corrosion control of copper in nitric acid solutions using

10
Corrosion control of copper in nitric acid solutions using some amino acids – A combined experimental and theoretical study K.F. Khaled * Electrochemistry Research Laboratory, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Roxy, Cairo 11711, Egypt Materials and Corrosion Laboratory, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Taif University, Taif 888, Saudi Arabia article info Article history: Received 10 April 2010 Accepted 29 May 2010 Available online 4 June 2010 Keywords: A. Copper A. Acid solutions B. EIS B. Modelling studies C. Acid corrosion abstract Inhibition performance of three amino acids, namely L-methionine (MIT), L-methionine sulfoxide (MITO) and L-methionine sulfone (MITO2), as corrosion-safe inhibitors for copper surface in 1.0 M nitric acid was investigated by weight loss, dc polarization and ac impedance techniques. A significant decrease in the corrosion rate of copper was observed in the presence of the investigated compounds. The reactivates of the compounds under investigation were analyzed through Fukui functions, to explain their inhibition performance. Simulation techniques incorporating molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics were used to simulate the adsorption of L-methionine derivatives, on copper (1 1 1) surface in nitric acid. Ó 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Copper and its alloys are very widely used materials for their excellent electrical and thermal conductivities in many applica- tions such as electronics and in the manufacture of integrated cir- cuits. Copper is a relatively noble metal, requiring strong oxidants for its corrosion or dissolution. The chemical dissolution and elec- trolytic plating are the main processes used in the fabrication of electronic devices. The most widely used corrosive solution con- tains nitric acid, so this medium has induced a great deal of re- search on copper corrosion [1]. One of the most important methods in the corrosion protection of copper is the use of organic inhibitors. Nitrogen and sulphur-containing organic heterocyclic compounds may act as inhibitors for copper dissolution due to the chelating action of heterocyclic molecules and the formation of a physical blocking barrier on the copper surface [2]. Among or- ganic heterocyclic compounds, benzotriazole (BTA) is well known as an effective inhibitor of copper corrosion in neutral/alkaline solutions [3,4]. It is generally accepted that its inhibition mecha- nism in neutral and alkaline solution is the adsorption of a single BTA molecules on the copper surface and the formation of a poly- meric film of a (Cu + BTA) complex [5]. However, in an acidic solu- tion, BTA exists predominantly as a protonated species, BTAH + . This protonated species is less strongly chemisorbed on the copper surface, as the metal is thought to be positively charged in acidic solution [6]. This is in turn leads to a decrease in the inhibition effi- ciency of BTA in acidic solution. Some other heterocyclic com- pounds have also been shown to be effective inhibitors for the corrosion of copper and its alloys. However, a very important dis- advantage of these heterocyclic compounds is their toxicity and most of them cannot be biodegraded [7]. This lack of biodegrad- ability leads to the emission of industrial waste water carrying a large amount of toxic material to public water ways. There is a need for new inhibitors for copper corrosion in acidic media. A possible solution to this problem is to find new ecologi- cally, friendly green corrosion inhibitors. Natural products ex- tracted from plant sources [8–12], as well as some non toxic organic compounds, which contain polar functions with nitrogen, oxygen and/or sulphur in conjugated systems in their molecules [8–20], have been effectively used as inhibitors in many corrosion systems. Amino acids are attractive as corrosion inhibitors because they are relatively easy to produce with high purity at low cost and are soluble in aqueous media. Methionine derivatives are sulphur- containing amino acids. Methionine itself is investigated as possi- ble corrosion inhibitor for mild steel [21–25] and for low carbon steel [26]. Ashassi-Sorkhabi et al. [27] reported the successful application of methionine as a corrosion inhibitor for aluminium in mixed acid solution and pointed out the role of S atom in increasing the interaction of the molecule with the metal surface. On continuation of our work on using L-methionine derivatives as possible green corrosion inhibitors for various metals in acid media [28], the aim of the present work is to study the influence of some se- lected sulphur-containing amino acids, namely L-methionine (MIT), 0010-938X/$ - see front matter Ó 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.corsci.2010.05.039 * Address: Electrochemistry Research Laboratory, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Roxy, Cairo 11711, Egypt. Tel./fax: +966 550460425. E-mail address: [email protected] Corrosion Science 52 (2010) 3225–3234 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Corrosion Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/corsci

Upload: others

Post on 04-Feb-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Corrosion Science 52 (2010) 3225–3234

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Corrosion Science

journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/ locate /corsc i

Corrosion control of copper in nitric acid solutions using some amino acids – Acombined experimental and theoretical study

K.F. Khaled *

Electrochemistry Research Laboratory, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Roxy, Cairo 11711, EgyptMaterials and Corrosion Laboratory, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Taif University, Taif 888, Saudi Arabia

a r t i c l e i n f o

Article history:Received 10 April 2010Accepted 29 May 2010Available online 4 June 2010

Keywords:A. CopperA. Acid solutionsB. EISB. Modelling studiesC. Acid corrosion

0010-938X/$ - see front matter � 2010 Elsevier Ltd. Adoi:10.1016/j.corsci.2010.05.039

* Address: Electrochemistry Research Laboratory, Chof Education, Ain Shams University, Roxy, Cairo 1550460425.

E-mail address: [email protected]

a b s t r a c t

Inhibition performance of three amino acids, namely L-methionine (MIT), L-methionine sulfoxide (MITO)and L-methionine sulfone (MITO2), as corrosion-safe inhibitors for copper surface in 1.0 M nitric acid wasinvestigated by weight loss, dc polarization and ac impedance techniques. A significant decrease in thecorrosion rate of copper was observed in the presence of the investigated compounds. The reactivatesof the compounds under investigation were analyzed through Fukui functions, to explain their inhibitionperformance. Simulation techniques incorporating molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics wereused to simulate the adsorption of L-methionine derivatives, on copper (1 1 1) surface in nitric acid.

� 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction

Copper and its alloys are very widely used materials for theirexcellent electrical and thermal conductivities in many applica-tions such as electronics and in the manufacture of integrated cir-cuits. Copper is a relatively noble metal, requiring strong oxidantsfor its corrosion or dissolution. The chemical dissolution and elec-trolytic plating are the main processes used in the fabrication ofelectronic devices. The most widely used corrosive solution con-tains nitric acid, so this medium has induced a great deal of re-search on copper corrosion [1]. One of the most importantmethods in the corrosion protection of copper is the use of organicinhibitors. Nitrogen and sulphur-containing organic heterocycliccompounds may act as inhibitors for copper dissolution due tothe chelating action of heterocyclic molecules and the formationof a physical blocking barrier on the copper surface [2]. Among or-ganic heterocyclic compounds, benzotriazole (BTA) is well knownas an effective inhibitor of copper corrosion in neutral/alkalinesolutions [3,4]. It is generally accepted that its inhibition mecha-nism in neutral and alkaline solution is the adsorption of a singleBTA molecules on the copper surface and the formation of a poly-meric film of a (Cu+BTA) complex [5]. However, in an acidic solu-tion, BTA exists predominantly as a protonated species, BTAH+.This protonated species is less strongly chemisorbed on the copper

ll rights reserved.

emistry Department, Faculty1711, Egypt. Tel./fax: +966

surface, as the metal is thought to be positively charged in acidicsolution [6]. This is in turn leads to a decrease in the inhibition effi-ciency of BTA in acidic solution. Some other heterocyclic com-pounds have also been shown to be effective inhibitors for thecorrosion of copper and its alloys. However, a very important dis-advantage of these heterocyclic compounds is their toxicity andmost of them cannot be biodegraded [7]. This lack of biodegrad-ability leads to the emission of industrial waste water carrying alarge amount of toxic material to public water ways.

There is a need for new inhibitors for copper corrosion in acidicmedia. A possible solution to this problem is to find new ecologi-cally, friendly green corrosion inhibitors. Natural products ex-tracted from plant sources [8–12], as well as some non toxicorganic compounds, which contain polar functions with nitrogen,oxygen and/or sulphur in conjugated systems in their molecules[8–20], have been effectively used as inhibitors in many corrosionsystems. Amino acids are attractive as corrosion inhibitors becausethey are relatively easy to produce with high purity at low cost andare soluble in aqueous media. Methionine derivatives are sulphur-containing amino acids. Methionine itself is investigated as possi-ble corrosion inhibitor for mild steel [21–25] and for low carbonsteel [26]. Ashassi-Sorkhabi et al. [27] reported the successfulapplication of methionine as a corrosion inhibitor for aluminiumin mixed acid solution and pointed out the role of S atom inincreasing the interaction of the molecule with the metal surface.

On continuation of our work on using L-methionine derivatives aspossible green corrosion inhibitors for various metals in acid media[28], the aim of the present work is to study the influence of some se-lected sulphur-containing amino acids, namely L-methionine (MIT),

3226 K.F. Khaled / Corrosion Science 52 (2010) 3225–3234

L-methionine sulphoxide (MITO) and L-methionine sulfone (MITO2),on the inhibition of copper corrosion in 1.0 M HNO3 solutions usingchemical (weight loss), electrochemical techniques (potentiody-namic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy)as well as explicit solvent simulations using molecular dynamicsand quantum chemical calculation to explore the adsorption mech-anism of these amino acids on copper surface (1 1 1). In addition, asthe electronic structure of these amino acids and their correlationwith inhibitor efficiencies will be sought.

2. Experimental

The weight loss measurements were carried out in a 250 mlcapacity glass beaker placed in a thermostat water bath. The solu-tion volume was 100 ml. The used copper coupons (Puratronic,99.999%, Johnson Matthey Chemicals) had a rectangular form(length = 2.5 cm, width = 2 cm, thickness = 0.05 cm). The couponswere weighed and suspended in 100 ml of an aerated 1.0 MHNO3 solution containing L-methionine derivatives at the desiredconcentrations for 36 h exposure period of time at 25 ± 1 �C.

At the end of the tests, the coupons were taken out, washedwith bi-distilled water, degreased with acetone, washed again withbi-distilled water, dried, and then weighed using an analytical bal-ance (precision: ±0.1 mg). Three measurements were performed ineach case and the mean value of the weight loss has been reported.The standard deviation of the observed weight loss was ±1%. Thecorrosion rate, w (expressed in mg cm�2 h�1) as well as the inhibi-tion efficiency (tw%) over the exposure time period were calculatedaccording to the following equation:

tw% ¼ 1� wwo

� �� 100 ð1Þ

where wo and w are the weight loss without and with L-methioninederivatives, respectively.

A cylindrical copper rod was welded with iron-wire for electri-cal connection and mounted in Teflon with an active flat discshaped surface of (0.28 cm2) geometric area, to contact the testsolution. Prior to each experiment, the copper electrode wasabraded using different grit sizes emery papers up to 4/0 grit sizeto remove the corrosion products if any, formed on the surface.The copper electrode was etched in 7 M HNO3 solution for 15 s,cleaned in 18 MX water in an ultrasonic bath for 5 min., and sub-sequently rinsed in acetone and bi-distilled water, and immedi-ately immersed in the test solution.

The L-methionine derivatives are presented in Fig. 1. All of thesecompounds were obtained from Aldrich chemical co. They wereput in the 1.0 M HNO3 (Fisher Scientific) without pre-treatmentat concentrations of 0.1, 0.5, 1.0 and 5.0 mM. The electrode was im-mersed in these solutions for 1 h before starting measurements,the time necessary to reach a quasi-stationary value for the opencircuit potential.

A conventional electrochemical cell of capacity 250 ml was usedcontaining three compartments for working, platinum mesh coun-ter and reference electrodes. A Luggin-capillary was also included

Fig. 1. Molecular structures of th

in the design, the tip of which was made very close to the surfaceof the copper electrode to minimize IR drop. The reference elec-trode was a saturated calomel (SCE) used directly in contact withthe test solution. The measurements were carried out in aeratedstagnant 1.0 M HNO3 solutions at 25 �C (using water thermostat±1 �C) without and with various concentrations (0.1–5 mM) of L-methionine derivatives, as possible corrosion inhibitors. All solu-tions were freshly prepared from analytical grade chemical re-agents using doubly distilled water and were used withoutfurther purification. For each run, freshly prepared solutions aswell as a cleaned set of electrodes were used.

Tafel polarization curves were obtained by changing the elec-trode potential automatically from �280 to +200 m VSCE with ascan rate of 1 mV s�1. Impedance measurements were carried outin a frequency range of 10 kHz to 20 mHz and with amplitude of5 mV peak-to-peak using ac signals at open circuit potential. Mea-surements were performed with a Gamry Instrument Potentiostat/Galvanostat/ZRA. This includes a Gamry framework system basedon the ESA400, Gamry applications that include DC105 for dc cor-rosion measurements, EIS300 for impedance measurements to cal-culate the corrosion current and the Tafel constants along with acomputer for collecting the data. Echem Analyst 5.58 softwarewas used for plotting, graphing and fitting data.

3. Theory and computational details

In order to support experimental data, theoretical calculationswere conducted in order to provide molecular-level understandingof the observed experimental behavior. The major driving force ofquantum chemical research is to understand and explain the func-tions of these L-methionine derivatives in molecular terms. Amongquantum chemical methods for evaluation of corrosion inhibitors,density function theory, DFT has shown significant promise [29]and appears to be adequate for pointing out the changes in elec-tronic structure responsible for inhibitory action. It is expected thatthe L-methionine derivatives molecules in solution behave differ-ently from that in vacuum. The solvent effect on molecular struc-ture of solute can be studied by a model which is known aspolarized continuum model (PCM) [30]. In this model, solvent istreated as an expanse of dielectric media and the solute as atrapped molecule in a cavity surrounded by solvent. All calcula-tions related to the inhibitor/Cu surface obtained by DFT studyare done in water solvent molecules.

There is no doubt that the recent progress in DFT has provided avery useful tool for understanding molecular properties and fordescribing the behavior of atoms in molecules. DFT methods havebecome very popular in the last decade due to their accuracy thatsimilar to other methods in less time and with a smaller invest-ment from the computational point of view. In agreement withthe DFT, the energy of the fundamental state of polyelectronic sys-tems can be expressed through the total electronic density, and infact the use of the electronic density instead of the wave function

e L-methionine derivatives.

Table 1Corrosion rate in (mg cm�2 h�1) and inhibition efficiency data obtained from weightloss measurements for copper in 1.0 M HNO3 solutions without and with variousconcentrations of L-methionine derivatives at 25 ± 1 �C.

Inhibitor Concentration (M) Corrosion rate (mg cm�2 h�1) tw (%)

Blank 0.34 –MIT 0.1 mM 0.13 61.8

0.5 mM 0.10 70.61.0 mM 0.07 79.45.0 mM 0.04 87.6

MITO 0.1 mM 0.12 64.80.5 mM 0.09 73.61.0 mM 0.05 85.35.0 mM 0.03 91.2

MITO2 0.1 mM 0.11 67.70.5 mM 0.06 82.41.0 mM 0.04 88.35.0 mM 0.02 94.1

K.F. Khaled / Corrosion Science 52 (2010) 3225–3234 3227

for the calculation of the energy constitutes the fundamental baseof DFT [31].

The local reactivity of the molecules was analyzed through anevaluation of the Fukui indices [32]. These are a measurement ofthe chemical reactivity, as well as an indicative of the reactive re-gions and the nucleophilic and electrophilic behavior of the mole-cule. The regions of a molecule where the Fukui function is largeare chemically softer than the regions where the Fukui functionis small, and by invoking the HSAB principle in a local sense, onemay establish the behavior of the different sites with respect tohard or soft reagents. The Fukui function f ð~rÞ is defined as thederivative of the electronic density qð~rÞwith respect to the numberof electrons N at a constant external potential rð~rÞ

f ð~rÞ ¼ @qð~rÞ@N

� �rð~rÞ

ð2Þ

If the effects of relaxation associated with the addition or re-moval of electronic charges are not considered, then

qþð~rÞ � qLUMOð~rÞ ð3Þ

q�ð~rÞ � qHOMOð~rÞ ð4Þ

where qLUMOð~rÞ is the density of the lowest unoccupied molecularorbital and qHOMOð~rÞ is density of the highest occupied molecularorbital [27].

The condensed Fukui functions [32] are found by taking the fi-nite difference approximations from Mulliken population analysisof atoms in L-methionine derivatives, depending on the directionof the electron transfer

fþk ¼ qkðN þ 1Þ � qkðNÞ ðfor nucleophilic attackÞ ð5Þ

f�k ¼ qkðNÞ � qkðN � 1Þ ðfor electrophilic attackÞ ð6Þ

f ok ¼

qkðN þ 1Þ � qkðN � 1Þ2

ðfor radial attackÞ ð7Þ

where qk is the gross charge of atom k in the molecule i.e. the elec-tron density at a point r in space around the molecule. The N corre-sponds to the number of electrons in the molecule. N + 1corresponds to an anion, with an electron added to the LUMO ofthe neutral molecule. N � 1 correspondingly is the cation with anelectron removed from the HOMO of the neutral molecule. All cal-culations are done at the ground-state geometry. These functionscan be condensed to the nuclei by using an atomic charge partition-ing scheme, such as Mulliken population analysis in Eqs. (5)–(7).

An easy graphical display technique can also be used based onthe Fukui functions. Instead of calculating the molecular orbitalsfor the neutral, cation, and anion, we can just add or subtract elec-trons from the molecular orbitals of the neutral molecule. This pro-cedure is not as good as described above, but it does give a quickgraphical display of the susceptibility of different kinds of attack.So rather than being a definitive calculation of a molecular prop-erty, freezing the molecular orbitals to those for the neutral mole-cule gives a useful graphical technique that can be rapidly applied.

The Fukui indices calculations were performed using MaterialsStudio DMol3 version 5 [33,34], a high quality quantum mechanicscomputer program (available from Accelrys, San Diego, CA). Thesecalculations employed an ab initio, local density functional (LDF)method with a double numeric polarization (DNP) basis set and aBecke–Perdew (BP) functional. Dmol3 use a Mulliken populationanalysis [35].

The Discover molecular dynamics module in Materials Studio5.0 software from Accelrys Inc. [36] allows selecting a thermody-namic ensemble and the associated parameters, defining simula-tion time, temperature and pressuring and initiating a dynamics

calculation. The molecular dynamics simulations procedures havebeen described elsewhere [28].

The interaction energy ECu–inhibitor of the Cu surface with the L-methionine derivatives was calculated according to the followingequation:

ECu�inhibitor ¼ Ecomplex � ðECu þ EinhibitorÞ ð8Þ

where Ecomplex is the total energy of the Cu crystal together with theadsorbed inhibitor molecule, ECu and Einhibitor are the total energy ofthe copper crystal and free inhibitor molecule, respectively. Thebinding energy of the inhibitor molecule is the negative value ofthe interaction energy [37],

Ebiniding ¼ �ECu�inhibition ½37�: ð9Þ

4. Results and discussions

4.1. Chemical measurements

4.1.1. Weight loss measurementsWeight loss measurements were carried out in a 1.0 M HNO3 in

the absence and presence of different concentrations of L-methio-nine derivatives. Corrosion rates of copper coupons w in(mg cm�2 h�1) and the inhibition efficiency (tw) were calculatedusing equation 1. The average corrosion rates, expressed in(mg cm�2 h�1), are shown in Table 1. The results show that all L-methionine derivatives used inhibit the corrosion of copper in1.0 M HNO3 solutions. The corrosion rate was found to dependon the concentration of the methionine derivatives. Increasingthe concentration of each L-methionine derivatives increases theinhibition efficiency tw% which reached its maximum value at con-centration of 5 mM. This indicates that the protective effect of L-methionine derivatives is not solely due to their reactivity withthe nitric acid. The inhibitory behavior of these compounds againstcopper corrosion can be attributed to the adsorption of L-methio-nine derivatives on the copper surface, which limits the dissolutionof the latter by blocking of its corrosion sites and hence decreasingthe corrosion rate, with increasing efficiency as their concentra-tions increase. These compounds can be adsorbed by the interac-tion between the lone pairs of electrons of the nitrogen, sulphurand oxygen atoms with the copper surface. This processes facili-tated by the presence of d vacant orbitals of low energy in the cop-per ions, as observed in transition group metals. Recently it wasfound that the formation of donor–acceptor surface complexesbetween free electrons of an inhibitor and a vacant d orbital of ametal is responsible for the inhibition of the corrosion process [38].

3228 K.F. Khaled / Corrosion Science 52 (2010) 3225–3234

4.2. Electrochemical measurements

4.2.1. Potentiodynamic polarization measurementsFig. 2 shows the anodic and cathodic polarization curves of cop-

per in 1.0 M HNO3 solution, without and with L-methionine deriv-atives at 25 ± 1 �C after immersion for 1 h. It is observed that boththe cathodic curves and anodic curves show lower current densityin the presence of the L-methionine derivatives than those re-

Fig. 2. Anodic and cathodic Tafel polarization curves for copper in 1.0 M HNO3 inthe absence and presence of various concentrations of L-methionine derivatives at25 ± 1 �C.

corded in the solution without L-methionine derivatives. This indi-cates that L-methionine inhibit the corrosion process. The results ofFig. 2 also clearly illustrate the fact that L-methionine, under thestudied conditions, brings down the corrosion current withoutcausing any considerable change in the corrosion mechanism, sug-gesting that the studied L-methionine derivatives are of mixed-type inhibitors.

According to corrosion theory [39], the rightward shift of thecathodic curves reveal that corrosion is mainly accelerated by cath-ode reactions. HNO3 is a strong copper oxidizer capable of rapidlyattacking copper. Additionally, the potentiodynamic polarizationcurves in Fig. 2 exhibit no steep slope in the anodic range, meaningthat no passive films are formed on the copper surface. Conse-quently, copper may directly dissolve in 1.0 M HNO3 solutions.The Pourbaix diagram for copper–water system is drawn onFig. 3 [40,41]. It indicates that copper is corroded to Cu2+ inHNO3 solutions, and no oxide film is formed to protect the surfacefrom corrosion. Copper dissolution is thus expected to be the dom-inant reaction in HNO3 solutions. The electrochemical reactions forcopper in HNO3 solution can be described as follow:

Anodic reaction:

Cu! Cu2þ þ 2e� ð10Þ

Cathodic reactions [42]:

NO�3 þ 3Hþ þ 2e� ! HNO2 þH2O ð11Þ

NO�3 þ 4Hþ þ 3e� ! NOþ 2H2O ð12Þ

O2 þ 4Hþ þ 4e� ! 2H2O ð13Þ

Fig. 2 shows that with increasing concentrations of L-methio-nine derivatives the corrosion current density icorr, decreased con-siderably. The maximum decrease in the corrosion current densitywas observed for MITO2 derivative.

Inspection of polarization curves in Fig. 2 shows that, it was notpossible to evaluate the cathodic Tafel slope as there is no visiblelinear region that prevents linear extrapolation to Ecorr of thecathodic polarization curves.

It has been shown that in the Tafel extrapolation method, use ofboth the anodic and cathodic Tafel regions is undoubtedly pre-

Fig. 3. Potential–pH equilibrium diagram for the system, copper–water, at 25 ± 1 �C[40,41]. The dashed regions and the equilibrium components corresponding to thePourbaix diagram in HNO3.

K.F. Khaled / Corrosion Science 52 (2010) 3225–3234 3229

ferred over the use of only one Tafel region [43]. However, the cor-rosion rate can also be determined by Tafel extrapolation of eitherthe cathodic or anodic polarization curve alone. If only one polari-zation curve alone is used, it is generally the cathodic curve whichusually produces a longer and better defined Tafel region. Anodicpolarization may sometimes produce concentration effects, dueto passivation and dissolution, as noted above, as well as roughen-ing of the surface which can lead to deviations from Tafel behavior.

The situation is quite different here; the anodic dissolution ofcopper in aerated 1.0 M HNO3 solutions obeys Tafel’s law. The ano-dic curve is, therefore preferred over the cathodic one for the Tafelextrapolation method. However, the cathodic polarization curvedisplays a limiting diffusion current due to the reduction of dis-solved oxygen. Thus, the cathodic process is controlled, as will beseen latter, by concentration polarization rather than activationpolarization, which prevented linear extrapolation of the cathodiccurves. The reason why the corrosion current densities were ob-tained here by extrapolation of the anodic polarization curves toEcorr. Similar results were reported previously in our studies[42,44,45].

This irregularity was confirmed by other researchers and can beexplained as the superposition of at least two cathodic current con-tributions: one arises from oxygen reduction and the second oneconsequential of copper ion re-deposition [46–48]. It is commonpractice and it was possible in this case to evaluate icorr by extrap-olation of the anodic polarization curves only to Ecorr. At morecathodic potential with respect to Ecorr the characteristic horizontalline resulting from limiting current density for oxygen reductioncan be observed. There is, therefore an uncertainty and source oferror in the numerical values of the cathodic Tafel slope (bc) calcu-lated by the software; the reason why we did not introduce here bc

values recorded by the software.The electrochemical parameters of corrosion such as corrosion

current density icorr which calculated with the extrapolation ofthe linear parts of Tafel lines to Ecorr, corrosion potential Ecorr, ano-dic Tafel constants ba and inhibition efficiency pP% were calculatedfrom the polarization curves and presented in Table 2.

Inhibition efficiency pP% was calculated from the followingequation:

pP% ¼ 1� icorr

iocorr

� �� 100 ð14Þ

where iocorr and icorr are corrosion current densities in the absence

and presence of L-methionine derivatives, respectively.Table 2 shows that the addition of any of the studied L-methio-

nine derivatives in the concentration range 0.1–5 mM reduces sig-nificantly the dissolution rate of copper. The efficiency is increased

Table 2Electrochemical kinetic parameters, inhibition efficiencies (pP%) for copper in 1.0 MHNO3 solutions without and with various concentrations of L-methionine derivativesat 25 ± 1 �C.

Inhibitortype

Concentration(M)

ba

(mV dec�1)�Ecorr

(mV(SCE))icorr

(lA cm�2)pP

(%)

Blank 106 88.1 12MIT 0.1 mM 71.3 64.4 5.2 56.6

0.5 mM 66.7 54.0 4.2 65.01.0 mM 74.1 64.1 3.6 70.05.0 mM 70.2 50.6 2.2 81.6

MITO 0.1 mM 72.2 55.1 4.6 61.60.5 mM 66.7 56.0 3.6 70.01.0 mM 68.8 51.3 2.7 77.55.0 mM 72.1 57.2 1.5 87.5

MITO2 0.1 mM 64.4 74.3 4.4 63.30.5 mM 68.8 71.3 2.9 75.81.0 mM 75.8 71.7 2.1 82.55.0 mM 69.5 70.1 1.11 90.7

as the L-methionine concentration is increased. Anodic Tafel con-stants change with inhibitor concentration, which is an indicationof its effect on the copper dissolution reaction. No definite trendwas observed in the shift of Ecorr values, in the presence of variousconcentrations of L-methionine derivatives in 1.0 M HNO3 solu-tions. L-methionine derivatives may be classified as mixed-typeinhibitors.

4.2.2. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurementsFig. 4 shows impedance diagrams for copper in a 1.0 M HNO3

solution, with and without various concentrations of L-methioninederivatives, with an immersion time of 1 h. The experimental dataare represented by the symbols while fitted curves (solid lines) areplotted in terms of the equivalent circuit shown in Fig. 5, with theelements of the equivalent circuit as listed in Table 3. The experi-mental data are in acceptable match with the fitted ones. Obvi-ously, the corrosion behavior of Cu in 1.0 M HNO3 solution isinduced to some extent by mass transport since the Warburgimpedance is observed in all cases.

Measurements were conducted at the respective corrosionpotentials at 25 ± 1 �C. At high-frequency values, the Nyquist plotspresent a depressed semicircle, whose diameter is a function of theconcentration and the type of the introduced inhibitor. This high-frequency semicircle is attributed to the single time constant ofcharge-transfer resistance (Rct) and the double-layer capacitance(Cdl) [49,50]. In the high-frequency region, the electrode reactionis controlled by a charge-transfer process and the diameter of thesemicircle represents the charge-transfer resistance (Rct).

In general the impedance loops measured are often depressedsemicircles with their center below the real-axis. This kind of phe-nomenon is known as the dispersing effect [43,51]. Consideringthat the impedance of a double-layer does not behave as an idealcapacitor in the presence of the dispersing effect. A CPE which isused as a substitute for capacitor in Fig. 5 (equivalent circuit) tofit more accurately the impedance behavior of the electric dou-ble-layer. Constant phase elements, CPEs have been widely usedto account for deviations brought about by surface roughness.Rough electrodes in blocking conditions do not have a perfectcapacitive response.

The increase of capacitive loop size with the addition of L-methionine derivatives show that a barrier gradually forms onthe copper surface. The barrier is probably related to formationof the Cu(II) salt film. The equivalent circuit model employed forthis system is presented in Fig. 5. In Fig. 5, W stands for the War-burg impedance, R is a resistor (Rs = solution resistance, andRct = charge-transfer resistance), and CPE represents the constantphase element. Here, CPE is substituted for double-layer capaci-tance, Cdl to give a more accurate fit [52]. In most cases, the capac-itive loops are depressed semicircles rather than regularsemicircles, which are related to a phenomenon called the ‘‘disper-sion effect”. The admittance of CPE is described as:

YCPE ¼ YoðjxÞn ð15Þ

where j is the imaginary root, x the angular frequency, Yo the mag-nitude and n the exponential term [53]

A long Warburg diffusion tail was observed at low frequencyvalues. The tails are inclined at an angle of 45� to the real-axis atthe very low frequencies; A diffusion controlled process is there-fore exists. Studies reported in the literature [54] showed thatthe diffusion process is controlled by diffusion of dissolved oxygenfrom the bulk solution to the electrode surface and the Warburgimpedance, which is observed in the low frequency regions, is as-cribed to diffusion of oxygen to the copper surface. This diffusiontail still appears, even in presence of high concentrations of thetested inhibitors. This means that the corrosion behavior of copper

Fig. 4. Nyquist plots of a copper electrode in 1.0 M HNO3 in the absence andpresence of various concentrations of L-methionine derivatives at 25 ± 1 �C.

Fig. 5. Equivalent circuit model for the corrosion of copper displaying a Warburgimpedance.

3230 K.F. Khaled / Corrosion Science 52 (2010) 3225–3234

in the absence as well as in the presence of L-methionine deriva-tives is influenced by mass transport.

Values of elements fitted with equivalent circuit in Fig. 5 arelisted in Table 3.The percent inhibition efficiency ni%, is calculatedfrom the charge-transfer resistance values using Eq. (16):

ni% ¼ 1� Roct

Rct

� �� 100 ð16Þ

where Roct and Rct are the charge-transfer resistances in absence and

in presence of L-methionine derivatives, respectively. We remarkthat the value of inhibition efficiency increases with increase in L-methionine derivatives concentrations up to 5.0 mM reaching amaximum value of 93.5% in case of MITO2. These results suggestthat MITO2 is the best inhibitor among the tested inhibitors.

4.3. Theoretical study

4.3.1. Quantum chemical calculationsHighest occupied molecular orbital energy level (HOMO), as a

measure of electron donating ability of a molecule explains theadsorption on metallic surfaces by way of delocalized pair of pelectrons. A high EH value expresses intrinsic electron donatingtendency to an appropriate acceptor, i.e. any molecule with lowerHOMO energy and empty molecular orbital while, EL, the energy ofthe lowest unoccupied molecular orbital signifies the electronreceiving tendency of a molecule. Accordingly, the difference be-tween LUMO and HOMO energy levels, the dipole moment (l),the electron charge on hetero-atoms (N, S and O) and the total en-ergy of inhibitor molecule were determined. Based on these, thecalculated difference (EL � EH) demonstrates inherent electrondonating ability and measures the interaction of the inhibitor mol-ecule with the copper surface.

All these computational calculations have been performed inthe aqueous phase. The optimized geometries of the L-methioninederivatives as well as HOMO and LUMO molecular orbitals areshown in Fig. 6.

According to the frontier molecular orbital theory of chemicalreactivity, transition of electron is due to an interaction betweenthe frontier orbitals, highest occupied molecular orbital and lowestunoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of reacting species. The en-ergy of HOMO is directly related to the ionization potential andcharacterizes the susceptibility of the molecule toward attack byelectrophiles. The energy of LUMO is directly related to the elec-tron affinity and characterizes the susceptibility of the moleculetoward attack by nucleophiles. The lower the values of ELUMO are,the stronger the electron accepting abilities of the molecules.

In Table 4, certain quantum chemical parameters related to themolecular electronic structure are presented, such as: EH, EL, DEand l. The values of EH show the relation MITO2 > MITO > MITfor this property. In addition, the values of the gap energy DE showthe opposite trend. The results for the calculations of the ionizationpotential (I) and the electron affinity (A) by application of theKoopmans’ theorem [55] are shown in Table 4. According to theHartree–Fock theorem, the frontier orbital energies are given by:�EH = I, �EL = A.

This theorem establishes a relation between the energies of theHOMO and the LUMO and the ionization potential and the electronaffinity, respectively. Although no formal proof of this theorem ex-ists within DFT, its validity is generally accepted. For absolute elec-tronegativity, v and global hardness, g, their operational andapproximate definitions are �l = (I + A)/2 = v, g = (I � A)/2. Twosystems, copper and inhibitor, are brought together, electrons willflow from lower v (inhibitor) to higher v (Cu), until the chemicalpotentials become equal. As a first approximation, the fraction ofelectrons transferred [56], DN, will be given by:

Table 3Impedance parameters for copper in 1.0 M HNO3 in the absence and presence of various concentrations of L-methionine derivatives at 25 ± 1 �C derived using the equivalentcircuit in Fig. 5.

Concentration (M) Rs (X cm2) CPE (lX�1 cm�2 sn) n Wd (lX�1 cm�2 s1/2) Rct (X cm2) ni (%)

Blank 5 30.3 0.79 900 675 –MIT 0.1 mM 2.3 40 0.89 850 1824 63.0

0.5 mM 3.1 34 0.76 790 2410 72.001.0 mM 2.9 28 0.77 730 3970 82.95.0 mM 1.9 25 0.77 650 5625 88.0

MITO 0.1 mM 2.1 36 0.78 750 1850 63.50.5 mM 2.3 32 0.77 650 2766 75.61.0 mM 2.2 29 0.78 580 4821 86.05.0 mM 3.2 26 0.77 420 6887 90.2

MITO2 0.1 mM 1.6 25 0.78 600 2250 70.00.5 mM 2.4 19 0.80 520 3214 79.01.0 mM 2.5 16 0.76 430 6750 90.05.0 mM 2.7 10 0.78 290 10,384 93.5

Fig. 6. Optimized structures and molecular orbital plots for L-methionine derivatives.

Table 4Quantum chemical and molecular dynamics parameters derived for L-methionine derivatives calculated with DFT method.

Total energy (kJ mol�1) HOMO (kJ mol�1) LUMO (kJ mol�1) DE (kJ mol�1) l (debye) I = �EH A = �EL v = (I + A)/2 g = (I � A)/2 DN ¼ vCu�vinh2ðgCuþginhÞ

MITO2 �2090.1 �511.3 �147.1 364.3 5.2 511.3 147.1 329.2 182.2 0.455MITO �2130.2 �558.2 �150.6 407.5 7.7 558.2 150.6 354.4 203.7 0.360MIT �2211.3 �585.1 �159.2 425.8 8.1 585.1 159.2 372.1 212.9 0.285

K.F. Khaled / Corrosion Science 52 (2010) 3225–3234 3231

DN ¼ vCu � vinh

2ðgCu þ ginhÞð17Þ

where copper surface is the Lewis acid according to HSAB theory[57].

The difference in electronegativity drives the electron transfer,and the sum of the hardness parameters acts as a resistance [58].In order to calculate the fraction of electrons transferred, a theoret-ical value for the absolute electronegativity of copper according toPearson was used vCu = 463.1 kJ mol�1 [55], and a global hardnessof gCu = 0, by assuming that for a metallic bulk I = A [58] becausethey are softer than the neutral metallic atoms.

From Table 4, it is possible to observe that molecule MITO2 hasa lower value of global hardness. The fraction of transferred elec-trons is also the largest for molecule MITO2 and, in turn, is MITOthen MIT.

The values of the interaction energy and the binding energy ofthe three L-methionine derivatives on copper (1 1 1) surface arelisted in Table 4. It is clear from Table 4 that the binding energyhas a positive value. As the value of the binding energy increases,the more easily the inhibitor adsorbs on the metal surface, thehigher the inhibition efficiency [28].

MITO2 has the highest binding energy comparing to MITO andMIT to the copper surface that found during the molecular dynam-ics simulation process described elsewhere [28]. High values ofbinding energy obtained with MITO2 molecules explain its highestinhibition efficiency from the theoretical point of view. Therefore,according to a series of properties calculated for each moleculeshown in Table 4 the reactivity order, that is, the inhibitive effec-tiveness order for the molecules are: MITO2 > MITO > MIT. The cal-culated results are in agreement with experimental results.

Table 5 shows Mulliken atomic charges calculated for the stud-ied molecules. It is inferred that the more negative the atomic

3232 K.F. Khaled / Corrosion Science 52 (2010) 3225–3234

charges of the adsorbed center, the more easily the atom donatesits electrons to the unoccupied orbital of the metal/metal oxide.It is clear from Table 5, that nitrogen and sulphur atoms carryingnegative charges centers which could offer electrons to the coppersurface to form a coordinate-type of bond.

The local reactivity are analyzed by means of the condensed Fu-kui function, the condensed Fukui functions allow us to distinguisheach part of the molecule on the basis of its distinct chemicalbehavior due to the different substituent functional groups. Thus,the site for nucleophilic attack will be the place where the valueof fþk is a maximum. In turn, the site for electrophilic attack is con-trolled by the value of f�k . The values of the Fukui functions for anucleophilic and electrophilic attack are given for the three inhib-itors in Tables 5 (only for the nitrogen, sulphur, oxygen and carbonatoms).

Inspection of the Fukui functions values presented in Table 5shows that MITO2 has propitious zones for nucleophilic attack lo-cated on (C1, S6, O8 AND O9) while MITO has only on (C1, N2, C3,S6 and O8). MIT has only nucleophilic centers on (C1 and S6). Datain Table 5 shows that MITO2 has more susceptible sites for adsorp-tion on the copper surface, which again reflects its highest inhibi-tion performance. The HOMO location on each system agrees withthe atoms that exhibit greatest values of indices of Fukui, bothindicate the zones by which the molecule would be adsorbed onthe copper surface.

4.3.2. Molecular dynamic simulations; adsorption energy calculationsThe adsorption structures of L-methionine derivatives on copper

surface were constructed using molecular dynamics simulation inan attempt for understanding the interactions between L-methio-nine derivatives and copper surface. Molecular structure of MITO2shows that it is likely to adsorb on copper surface by sharing theelectrons of nitrogen, sulphur and oxygen atoms with copper sur-

Table 5Calculated Mulliken atomic charges and Fukui functions for the three L-methioninederivatives.

Inhibitor Atom qN qN+1 qN�1 fþk f�k f ok

MITO2 C(1) 0.48 0.88 0.49 0.40 �0.01 0.152N(2) �0.62 �0.62 �0.62 0.01 0.01 0.004C(3) �0.13 �0.18 �0.13 �0.05 �0.01 �0.004C(4) �0.22 �0.25 �0.19 �0.03 �0.02 �0.027C(5) �0.16 �0.18 �0.21 �0.02 0.04 �0.029S(6) �0.38 �0.16 �1.01 0.22 0.62 0.32C(7) �0.26 �0.26 �0.28 0.00 0.02 �0.008O(8) �0.45 �0.13 �0.45 0.32 0.01 0.12O(9) �0.42 �0.09 �0.42 0.32 0.01 0.06

MITO C(1) 0.49 0.79 0.48 0.31 0.001 0.15N(2) �0.52 �0.42 �0.52 0.11 0.002 0.004C(3) �0.14 0.35 �0.13 0.49 �0.005 �0.03C(4) �0.22 �0.18 �0.18 0.03 �0.025 �0.03C(5) �0.21 �0.19 �0.19 0.02 �0.015 �0.02S(6) 0.13 0.24 �0.14 0.11 0.27 0.14C(7) �0.29 �0.29 �0.29 0.00 0.002 0.001O(8) �0.44 �0.22 �0.45 0.23 0.005 0.12O(9) �0.42 �0.31 �0.42 0.11 0.006 0.06O(10) �0.52 �0.42 �0.86 0.11 0.338 0.17

MIT C(1) 0.49 0.79 0.46 0.31 0.033 0.17N(2) �0.48 �0.47 �0.91 0.01 0.423 0.22C(3) �0.14 �0.09 �0.09 0.05 �0.042 �0.04C(4) �0.24 �0.21 �0.21 0.03 �0.032 �0.03C(5) �0.24 �0.22 �0.21 0.02 �0.023 �0.02S(6) 0.37 0.47 0.37 0.11 �0.001 0.001C(7) �0.31 �0.31 �0.31 0.003 �0.003 0.00O(8) �0.44 �0.22 �0.51 0.22 0.066 0.14O(9) �0.41 �0.30 �0.43 0.12 0.012 0.06O(10) �0.42 �0.42 �0.43 0.005 0.013 0.01O(11) �0.43 �0.42 �0.44 0.006 0.016 0.01

face. The adsorption progress of L-methionine derivatives on cop-per surface is investigated by performing molecular mechanics(MM) using MS modelling software. The periodic boundary condi-tions (PBC) were applied to the simulation cell and described else-where [59]. L-methionine derivatives were energy optimized,copper surface was constructed using the amorphous cell module,the whole system was energy optimized and the possibility of theiradsorption on the copper surface were simulated as in Fig. 7. Itcould be seen from Fig. 7 that L-methionine derivatives moleculesmove near to the copper surface and adsorbed on copper surface.Fig. 7 shows that the adsorption occurred through the nitrogen,sulphur and oxygen atoms which are found in L-methioninederivatives.

The adsorption density of L-methionine derivatives on the Cu(1 1 1) substrate has been presented in Fig. 8. The adsorption den-sity calculated by using Metropolis Monte Carlo method describedelsewhere [28], indicate that the adsorption density of MITO2 arehigher than MITO and MIT, respectively. Therefore, the studiedmolecules are likely to adsorb on the copper surface to form stablead layers and protect copper from corrosion. The binding energiesas well as the hydrogen bond length between the copper surfaceand the inhibitor molecules were calculated and presented inTable 6.

Also, the parameters presented in Table 6 include total energy,in kJ mol�1, of the substrate–adsorbate configuration. The total en-ergy is defined as the sum of the energies of the adsorbate compo-nents, the rigid adsorption energy and the deformation energy. Inthis study, the substrate energy (copper surface) is taken as zero.In addition, adsorption energy in kJ mol�1, reports energy released(or required) when the relaxed adsorbate components (L-methio-nine derivatives) are adsorbed on the substrate. The adsorption en-ergy is defined as the sum of the rigid adsorption energy and thedeformation energy for the adsorbate components. The rigidadsorption energy reports the energy, in kJ mol�1, released (or re-quired) when the unrelaxed adsorbate components (i.e. before thegeometry optimization step) are adsorbed on the substrate. Thedeformation energy reports the energy, in kJ mol�1, released whenthe adsorbed adsorbate components are relaxed on the substratesurface. Table 6 shows also (dEads/dNi), which reports the energy,in kJ mol�1, of substrate–adsorbate configurations where one ofthe adsorbate components has been removed. The binding energyintroduced in Table 6 calculated from Eq. (9).

5. Inhibition mechanism

It is generally accepted that the first step in the adsorption of anorganic inhibitor on a metal surface usually involves the replace-ment of one or more water molecules adsorbed at the metal sur-face [60]. The mixed-inhibition mechanism suggested bychemical and electrochemical investigations are consistent withOguzie et al., findings [61] and those of El Azhar et al. [62] onthe adsorption behavior of organic molecules containing both Nand S atoms. In acid solutions, organic inhibitors may interact withthe corroding metal and hence affect the corrosion reaction inmore than one way, sometimes simultaneously. It is therefore of-ten difficult to assign a single general inhibition mechanism, sincethe mechanism may change with experimental conditions. Thepresence of more than one functional group has been reported tooften lead to changes in the electron density of a molecule, whichcould influence its adsorption behavior [63].

In this study, L-methionine derivatives are studied computa-tionally in its neutral form. L-methionine derivatives can also bepresent as protonated species in molar nitric acid solutions. Bothmolecular and protonated species can adsorb on the metal surface.The adsorption of L-methionine derivatives through the lone pairs

Fig. 7. Mode of adsorption of the L-methionine derivatives on copper (1 1 1) surface.

Fig. 8. The adsorption density of the L-methionine derivatives on copper (1 1 1) surface.

Table 6Outputs and descriptors calculated by the Mont Carlo simulation for adsorption of L-methionine derivatives on Cu (1 1 1).

Inhibitor Total energy(kJ mol�1)

Adsorption energy(kJ mol�1)

Rigid adsorption/energy (kJ mol�1)

Deformation energy(kJ mol�1)

dEad/dNi

(kJ mol�1)Calculated bindingenergy (kJ mol�1)

Calculated hydrogenbond (nm)

MITO2 �152.4 �197.9 �208.6 10.7 �197.9 399 0.24MITO �144.1 �208.2 �209.3 1.1 �208.2 356 0.28MIT �129.8 �235.9 240.5 4.6 �235.9 311 0.36

K.F. Khaled / Corrosion Science 52 (2010) 3225–3234 3233

in the groups (–NH2, S–CH3, –S@O, –SO2) can occur on the positivecopper surface. Adsorption of the protonated L-methionine deriva-tives on the cathodic sites on copper surface will retard the oxygenevolution reaction. Adsorption on the anodic sites of copper surfacecan be occur via S atom in the aliphatic chain in case of MIT, S@Ogroup in case of MITO or –SO2 group in case of MITO2 to retardcopper dissolution process. Adsorption of L-methionine derivativeson copper surface are assisted by hydrogen bond formation be-tween methionine derivatives and the Cu2O and/or CuO formedon the copper surface. This type of adsorption should be more pre-valent for protonated inhibitors, because the positive charge on theN-atom is conductive to the formation of hydrogen bonds. Unprot-onated N-atoms may adsorb by direct chemisorption or by hydro-gen bonding [64]. L-methionine derivatives thus have the ability toinfluence both the cathodic and anodic partial reactions, giving riseto the mixed-inhibition mechanism observed.

6. Conclusions

L-methionine (MIT), L-methionine sulfoxide (MITO) and L-methionine sulfone (MITO2) were found to act as safe corrosioninhibitors for copper surface in 1.0 M nitric acid. Potentiodynamicpolarization studies have shown that L-mithionine derivatives actas mixed-type inhibitors and their inhibition mechanism is adsorp-tion assisted by hydrogen bond formation. Inhibition efficienciesare related to concentration and chemical structure of the threetested amino acids. The results of the investigation show that theinhibiting properties of the three amino acids depend on concen-tration and molecular structure of inhibitor. The theoretical studydemonstrated that the inhibition efficiency increases with increasein EHOMO and decrease in ELUMO, dipole moment l and energy gapDE. The quantum mechanical approach may well be able to foretellmolecule structures that are better for corrosion inhibition.

Acknowledgement

Author is grateful for the financial support provided by Taif Uni-versity, Project # 1-431-713 and The Center of Research Excellencein Corrosion (CoRE) located at King Fahd University, Project # CR-03-2010.

References

[1] A. Fiala, A. Chibani, A. Darchen, A. Boulkamh, K. Djebbar, Investigations of theinhibition of copper corrosion in nitric acid solutions by ketene dithioacetalderivatives, Applied Surface Science 253 (2007) 9347–9356.

[2] F. Zucchi, G. (Notoya and Poling 1976) Trabanelli, C. Monticelli, The inhibitionof copper corrosion in 0.1 M NaCl under heat exchange conditions, CorrosionScience 38 (1996) 147–154.

[3] T. Notoya, G.W. Poling, Topographies of thick cu-benzotriazolate films oncopper, Corrosion 32 (1976) 216–223.

[4] D. Chadwick, T. Hashemi, Adsorbed corrosion inhibitors studied by electronspectroscopy: benzotriazole on copper and copper alloys, Corrosion Science 18(1978) 39–51.

[5] F. El-Taib Heakal, S. Haruyama, Impedance studies of the inhibitive effect ofbenzotriazole on the corrosion of copper in sodium chloride medium,Corrosion Science 20 (1980) 887–898.

[6] Y.C. Wu, P. Zhang, H.W. Pickering, D.L. Allara, Effect of Kl on improving coppercorrosion inhibition efficiency of benzotriazole in sulfuric acid electrolytes,Journal of the Electrochemical Society 140 (1993) 2791–2800.

[7] E. Stupnis�ek-Lisac, A.L. Boz�ic, I. Cafuk, Low-toxicity copper corrosion inhibitors,Corrosion 54 (1998) 713–720.

[8] O.K. Abiolaa, A.O. Jamesb, The effects of Aloe vera extract on corrosion andkinetics of corrosion process of zinc in HCl solution, Corrosion Science 52(2010) 661–664.

[9] M.M. Solomon, S.A. Umoren, I.I. Udosoro, A.P. Udoh, Inhibitive and adsorptionbehaviour of carboxymethyl cellulose on mild steel corrosion in sulphuric acidsolution, Corrosion Science 52 (2010) 2848–2856.

[10] A.K. Satapathy, G. Gunasekaran, Kumar Amit, P.V. Rodrigues, Corrosioninhibition by Justicia gendarussa plant extract in hydrochloric acid solution,Corrosion Science 51 (2009) 1317–1325.

[11] O.K. Abiola, J.O.E. Otaigbe, The effects of Phyllanthus amarus extract oncorrosion and kinetics of corrosion process of aluminum in alkaline solution,51 (2009) 2790–2793.

3234 K.F. Khaled / Corrosion Science 52 (2010) 3225–3234

[12] E.E. Oguzie, Evaluation of the inhibitive effect of some plant extracts on theacid corrosion of mild steel, 50 (2008) 2993–2998.

[13] G. Moretti, F. Guidi, G. Grion, Tryptamine as a green iron corrosion inhibitor in0.5 M deaerated sulphuric acid, Corrosion Science 46 (2004) 387–403.

[14] O. Olivares, N.V. Likhanova, B. Gómez, J. Navarrete, M.E. Llanos-Serrano, E.Arce, J.M. Hallen, Electrochemical and XPS studies of decylamides of a-aminoacids adsorption on carbon steel in acidic environment, Applied SurfaceScience 252 (2006) 2894–2909.

[15] K.F. Khaled, New synthesized guanidine derivative as a green corrosioninhibitor for mild steel in acidic solutions, International Journal ofElectrochemical Science 3 (2008) 462.

[16] D.Q. Zhang, L.X. Gao, G.D. Zhou, Synergistic effect of 2-mercaptobenzimidazole and KI on copper corrosion inhibition in aerated sulfuric acidsolution, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 33 (2003) 361–366.

[17] E.E. Oguzie, C. Unaegbu, C.N. Ogukwe, B.N. Okolue, A.I. Onuchukwu, Inhibitionof mild steel corrosion in sulphuric acid using indigo dye and synergistichalide additives, Materials Chemistry and Physics 84 (2004) 363–368.

[18] S.M.A. Shibli, V.S. Saji, Co-inhibition characteristics of sodium tungstate withpotassium iodate on mild steel corrosion, Corrosion Science 47 (2005) 2213–2224.

[19] G. Mu, X. Li, Inhibition of cold rolled steel corrosion by Tween-20 in sulfuricacid: weight loss, electrochemical and AFM approaches, Journal of Colloid andInterface Science 289 (2005) 184–192.

[20] Y. Feng, K.S. Siow, W.K. Teo, A.K. Hsieh, The synergistic effects of propargylalcohol and potassium iodide on the inhibition of mild steel in 0.5 M sulfuricacid solution, Corrosion Science 41 (1999) 829–852.

[21] M.S. Morad, Effect of amino acids containing sulfur on the corrosion of mildsteel in phosphoric acid solutions containing Cl�, F� and Fe3+ ions: behaviorunder polarization conditions, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 35 (2005)889–895.

[22] M.A. Kiani, M.F. Mousavi, S. Ghasemi, M. Shamsipur, S.H. Kazemi, Inhibitoryeffect of some amino acids on corrosion of Pb–Ca–Sn alloy in sulfuric acidsolution, Corrosion Science 50 (2008) 1035–1045.

[23] O.K. Abiola, Adsorption of methionine on mild steel, Journal of the ChileanChemical Society 50 (2005) 685–690.

[24] O.K. Abiola, N.C. Oforka, E.E. Ebenso, A potential corrosion inhibitor for acidcorrosion of mild steel, Bulletin of Electrochemistry 20 (2004) 409–413.

[25] E.E. Oguzie, Y. Li, F.H. Wang, Corrosion inhibition and adsorption behavior ofmethionine on mild steel in sulfuric acid and synergistic effect of iodide ion,Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 310 (2007) 90–98.

[26] E.E. Oguzie, Y. Li, F.H. Wang, Effect of surface nanocrystallization on corrosionand corrosion inhibition of low carbon steel: synergistic effect of methionineand iodide ion, Electrochimica Acta 52 (2007) 6988–6996.

[27] H. Ashassi-Sorkhabi, Z. Ghasemi, D. Seifzadeh, The inhibition effect of someamino acids towards the corrosion of aluminum in 1 M HCl + 1 M H2SO4

solution, Applied Surface Science 249 (2005) 408–418.[28] K.F. Khaled, Monte Carlo simulations of corrosion inhibition of mild steel in

0.5 M sulphuric acid by some green corrosion inhibitors, Journal of Solid StateElectrochemistry 13 (2009) 1743–1756.

[29] N. Lopez, F. Illas, Journal of Physical Chemistry B 102 (1998) 1430.[30] E. Cancès, B. Mennucci, J. Tomasi, A new integral equation formalism for the

polarizable continuum model: theoretical background and applications toIsotropic and anisotropic dielectrics, Journal of Chemical Physics 107 (1997)3032–3041.

[31] J. Andrés, J. Beltran, Química Teórica y Computacional, Universitat Jaume I,Castellón de la Plana, España, 2000.

[32] W. Yang, W.J. Mortier, The use of global and local molecular parameters for theanalysis of the gas-phase basicity of amines, Journal of the American ChemicalSociety 108 (1986) 5708–5711.

[33] B. Delley, Journal of Chemical Physics 92 (1990) 508.[34] B. Delley, Journal of Chemical Physics 113 (2000) 7756.[35] R.S. Mulliken, Journal of Chemical Physics 23 (1995) 1833.[36] J. Barriga, B. Coto, B. Fernandez, Molecular dynamics study of optimal packing

structure of OTS self-assembled monolayers on SiO2 surfaces, TribologyInternational 40 (2007) 960–966.

[37] S. Xia, M. Qiu, L. Yu, F. Liu, H. Zhao, Molecular dynamics and density functionaltheory study on relationship between structure of imidazoline derivatives andinhibition performance, Corrosion Science 50 (2008) 2021–2029.

[38] D.Q. Zhang, Q.R. Cai, X.M. He, L.X. Gao, G.S. Kim, Corrosion inhibition andadsorption behavior of methionine on copper in HCl and synergistic effect ofzinc ions, Materials Chemistry and Physics 114 (2009) 612–617.

[39] D.A. Jones, Principles and Prevention of Corrosion, second ed., Prentice Hall,Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1983.

[40] M. Pourbaix, Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions, NACE,Houston, TX, 1975.

[41] H.E. Johnson, J. Leja, Journal of the Electrochemical Society 112 (1965) 638.[42] K.F. Khaled, S.A. Fadl-Allah, B. Hammouti, Some benzotriazole derivatives as

corrosion inhibitors for copper in acidic medium: experimental and quantumchemical molecular dynamics approach, Materials Chemistry and Physics 117(2009) 148–155.

[43] E. McCafferty, Validation of corrosion rates measured by the Tafelextrapolation method, Corrosion Science 47 (2005) 3202–3215.

[44] G. Quartarone, M. Battilana, L. Bonaldo, T. Tortato, Investigation of theinhibition effect of indole-3-carboxylic acid on the copper corrosion in 0.5 MH2SO4, Corrosion Science 50 (2008) 3467–3474.

[45] M.A. Amin, K.F. Khaled, Corrosion Science 52 (2010) 1194–1204.[46] G. Quartarone, T. Bellomi, A. Zingales, Inhibition of copper corrosion by isatin

in aerated 0.5 M H2SO4, Corrosion Science 45 (2003) 715–733.[47] J.W. Schultze, K. Wippermann, Inhibition of electrode processes on copper by

AHT in acid solutions, Electrochimica Acta 32 (1987) 823–831.[48] T.N. Andersen, M.H. Ghandehari, H. Eyring, Limitation to the mixed potential

concept of metal corrosion, Journal of the Electrochemical Society 122 (1975)1580–1585.

[49] O.E. Barcia, O.R. Mattos, N. Pebere, B. Tribollet, Journal of the ElectrochemicalSociety 140 (1993) 2825.

[50] Y. Feng, W.K. Teo, K.S. Siow, K.L. Tan, A.K. Hsieh, The corrosion behaviour ofcopper in neutral tap water. Part II: determination of corrosion rates, CorrosionScience 38 (1996) 387–395.

[51] F. Mansfield, Corrosion 37 (1981) 301.[52] X. Wu, H. Ma, S. Chen, Z. Xu, A. Sui, Studies on Electrochemical Behavior of

Copper in Aerated NaBr Solutions with Schiff Base, N, N0-o-phenylen-bis(3-methoxysalicylidenimine), Journal of the Electrochemical Society 148 (1999)B208–B216.

[53] A.V. Benedeti, P.T.A. Sumodjo, K. Nobe, P.L. Cabot, W.G. Proud, Electrochemicalstudies of copper, copper–aluminium and copper–aluminium–silver alloys:Impedance results in 0.5M NaCl, Electrochimica Acta 40 (1995) 2657–2668.

[54] H. Ma, S. Chen, L. Niu, S. Zhao, S. Li, D. Li, Inhibition of copper corrosion byseveral Schiff bases in aerated halide solutions, Journal of AppliedElectrochemistry 32 (2002) 65–72.

[55] V.S. Sastri, J.R. Perumareddi, Corrosion Science 53 (1997) 617–622.[56] He Wang, X. Wang, Ha Wang, L. Wang, A. Liu, Journal of Applied

Electrochemistry 13 (1983) 47.[57] R.G. Pearson, Inorgic Chemistry 27 (1988) 734–740.[58] R. Valdez, L.M. Martinez-Villafane, D. Glossman-Mitnik, Journal of Molecular

Structure: Thechem 716 (2005) 61.[59] K.F. Khaled, Molecular simulation, quantum chemical calculations and

electrochemical studies for inhibition of mild steel by triazoles,Electrochimica Acta 53 (2008) 3484–3492.

[60] J.O. Bockris, D.A.J. Swinkels, Journal of the Electrochemical Society 11 (1964)736.

[61] E.E. Oguzie, G.N. Onuoha, A.I. Onuchukwu, Inhibitory mechanism of mild steelcorrosion in 2 M sulphuric acid solution by methylene blue dye, MaterialsChemistry and Physics 89 (2005) 305–311.

[62] M. El Azhar, B. Mernari, M. Traisnel, F. Bentiss, M. Lagrenée, Corrosioninhibition of mild steel by the new class of inhibitors [2,5-bis(n-pyridyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazoles] in acidic media, Corrosion Science 43 (2001) 2229–2238.

[63] N. Hackerman, E.L. Cook, Journal of the Electrochemical Society 97 (1950) 2.[64] K.F. Khaled, M.A. Amin, Computational and electrochemical investigation for

corrosion inhibition of nickel in molar nitric acid by piperidines, Journal ofApplied Electrochemistry 38 (2008) 1609–1621.