corporate law syllabus

4
SCHEDULE OF CASES CORPORATION LAW CHAPTERS I AND II Union Glass v. SEC Abejo v. dela Cruz Magalad v. Premiere Financing Corporation (209 SCRA 261) CIR v. Club Filipino Manuel R. Dulay Ent. v. CA (225 S 678) NDC v. Philippine Veterans Bank (192 SCRA 257) Pioneer Insurance v. CA (175 SCRA 668) CHAPTER III - FORMATION/ ORGANIZATION Philips Export BV. v. CA (206 S 457) Lyceum of the Phils v. CA (219 S 610) P.C. Javier &. Sons, Inc., et al. v. CA, et al. (462 SCRA 36) Malabang v. Benito Harr-,,I v. Davis Hall v. Piccio ABC v. Standard Products Cranson v. Intl Bus. Machines Salvatierra v. Garhtos, et al. Chiang Kai Shek School v. CA (172 S 389) LBC Express, inc. v. CA (236 S 602) Lozano v. delos Santos (274 S 452) Lim Tor , g Lim v. Phil. Fishing Gear Industries, Inc. (317 S 728) Intl Express Travel v. CP- , '•(343 S Stockholders of T. Guanzon v. RD Carann v. CA Panay, Inc. v. Clave J.G. Summit Holdings, Inc. v. CA (450 SCRA 169) Iramat Mercantile, In,-. v. CA (238 SCR,- , 14) Marvel B l dg. v. David N1 ags aysay- Labrador v. CA (180 SCRA 266) Indo Phil Textile Mills v. Cauca (205 SCRA 698) Jacinto v. CA (198 SCRA 211) Concept Builders, Inc. v. NLRC (257 SCRA 149) Claparols v. CIR, Villa Rey Transit v. Ferrer Secosa, et al. v. Heirs of ErwinSuarez Francisco (433 SCRA 273) Yu v. NLRC (245 S 134) Cease v. CA Delpher Trade v. CA Garnett v. Southern Railway Jardine Davies, Inc. v. JRB Realty, Inc. (463 SCRA 555) Keppel v. Yatco

Upload: jene-ramos

Post on 08-Apr-2015

860 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Corporate Law Syllabus

SCHEDULE OF CASES CORPORATION LAW

CHAPTERS I AND II

Union Glass v. SECAbejo v. dela CruzMagalad v. Premiere Financing Corporation (209 SCRA 261) CIR v. Club FilipinoManuel R. Dulay Ent. v. CA (225 S 678)NDC v. Philippine Veterans Bank (192 SCRA 257)Pioneer Insurance v. CA (175 SCRA 668)

CHAPTER III - FORMATION/ ORGANIZATION

Philips Export BV. v. CA (206 S 457) Lyceum of the Phils v. CA (219 S 610)P.C. Javier &. Sons, Inc., et al. v. CA, et al. (462 SCRA 36) Malabang v. BenitoHarr-,,I v. DavisHall v. PiccioABC v. Standard ProductsCranson v. Intl Bus. MachinesSalvatierra v. Garhtos, et al.Chiang Kai Shek School v. CA (172 S 389) LBC Express, inc. v. CA (236 S 602) Lozano v. delos Santos (274 S 452)Lim Tor, g Lim v. Phil. Fishing Gear Industries, Inc. (317 S 728) Intl Express Travel v. CP- ,'•(343 S 674) Loyola Grand Villas Homeov. ,ners v. CA (276 S 681) Fleischer v. BoLica NolascoGovernment of the Philippines v. El Hogar

CHAPTER rV - THE CORPORATE ENTITY

Stockholders of T. Guanzon v. RDCarann v. CAPanay, Inc. v. ClaveJ.G. Summit Holdings, Inc. v. CA (450 SCRA 169) Iramat Mercantile, In,-. v. CA (238 SCR,-, 14) Marvel Bldg. v. DavidN1 ags aysay- Labrador v. CA (180 SCRA 266) Indo Phil Textile Mills v. Cauca (205 SCRA 698) Jacinto v. CA (198 SCRA 211)Concept Builders, Inc. v. NLRC (257 SCRA 149) Claparols v. CIR,Villa Rey Transit v. FerrerSecosa, et al. v. Heirs of ErwinSuarez Francisco (433 SCRA 273) Yu v. NLRC (245 S 134)Cease v. CADelpher Trade v. CAGarnett v. Southern RailwayJardine Davies, Inc. v. JRB Realty, Inc. (463 SCRA 555) Keppel v. YatcoLiddel v. CIRLa Campana Coffee Factory v. Kaisahan

Page 2: Corporate Law Syllabus

CHAPTER V - PROMOTER'S CONTRACTS

McArthur v. Times PrintingCagayan Fishing v. SandikoBuilders Duntile v. DunnRiz~d Light v. PSC and Morong ElectricQuaker Hill v. ParrOld Dominion Copper Mining and Smelting Co. v. Bigelow

CHAPTER VI - CORPORATE POWERS

RP v. Acoje MiningNat'l Power Corp. v. Vera (170 S 721) Madrigal & Co. v. Zamora (151 S 355) Government of the Philippines v. El Hogar Pirovano v. Delarama

Harden v. Benguet

CHAPTER VII - CONTROL/tIANAGEMENT

Ramirez v. Orientalist Co. & FernandezLopez v. ErictaExpert Travel & Tours, Inc. v. CA (459 SCRA 147)Citibank NA v. Chua (220 SCRA 75)Prime White Cement v. IAC (220 SCRA 103)Boyer-Roxas v. CA (211 SCRA 470)EPG Construction v. CA (210 SCRA 210)Benguet Electric Cooperative v. NLRC (209 SCI;,Ir, 55)Woodchild Holdings, Inc. v. Roxas Electric and Construction Company,

Inc. (436 SCRA 235) Yu Chuk v. Kong Li PoLapulapu Foundation, Inc. v. CA (421 SCRA 329)Board of Liquidators v. Heirs of KalavZamboanga Transportation v. Bachrach MotorBoard of SMB Workers v. TanJ o h n s t o n v . J o h n s t o n Ponce, et al. v. EncarnacionDetective & Protective Bureau v. CloribelRoxas v. dela RosaAngeles v. SantosCampbell v. Leow, Inc.Dela Rama, et al. v. Ma-ao SugarGokongwei v. SECIn Re: Giant Portland CementState ex. rel Everett Trust v. Pacific WaxAlejandrino v. de Leon Campbell v. Leow, Inc. Abercrombie v. Davis Everett v. Asia Banking Mackin v. Nicollet Hotel NIDC v. Aquino

Ringling v. Ringling Bros.E.K. Buck Retail Store v. HarketClark v. DodgeGottschalk v. Avalon Realty -Sherman & Ellis v. Indiana Mutual,Benintendi v. Kenton Hotel

2

Page 3: Corporate Law Syllabus

PTER VIII - DUTIES OF DIRECTORS/ CONTROLLING

STOCKHOLDERS

Otis & Co. v. Pennsylvania & Co. Montelibano v. Bacolod Murcia Litwin v. AllenWalker v. ManSteinberg v. VelascoBarnes v. AndrewsBates v. DresserPatting v. San Jose Petroleum Mead v. McCulloughGovernment v. El Hogan Barreto v. La Previsora Kerbs v. California Eastern Strong v. RepideTaylor v. WrightSinger, et al. v.CarlisleIrving Trust v. Deutsch, et al. Litwin v. AllenGlobe Woolen v. Utica Gas

ER IX - INSPECTION

Pardo v. Hercules Lumber Gonzales v. PNBVeraguth v. Isabela Sugar Co. Gokongwei v. SEC

CHAPTER X - DERIVATIVE SUITS

Evangelista, et al. v. Santos Republic Bank v. Cuadernc SMC v. Kahn

CHAPTER XI - FINANCING THE-CORPORATION

Ellingwood v. Wolfs Head Oil Refining Hay v. HayAugusta Trust v. Augusta, et al.Garcia v. Lim. Chu SingWallace v. Eclipse Pocahontas Coal Co. Bayla, et al., v. Silang Traffic Co., 'Inc. Benito v. SECStokes v. Continental TrustThorn v. Paltimore TrustRoss Transport v. CrothersMeritt Chapman v. New York Trust Jordan Co. v. AllenAlladin Hotel v. Bloom

CHAPTER XII - CONSIDERATION FOR SHARES

Triplex Shoe Co. v. Rice & Hatchins, Inc.McCarty v. Langdeau Rode v. Dock-hop Co. V e l a s c o v . P o i z a t Lingayen Gulf v. BaltazarDe Silva v. AboitizNational Exchange v. IB DexterLumanlan v. Cura

Page 4: Corporate Law Syllabus

Fua Cun v. Summers Baltazar v. Lingayen Gulf Nava v. Peers

CHAPTER XIII - DIVIDENDS / PURCHASE BY CORPORATIONS OF SHARES

Nielson & Co. v. Lepanto Consolidated Berks Broadcasting v. CraurnerLich v. US RubberKeough v. St. Paul Milk Co.Dodge v. Ford Motor Co.Burk v. Otawa Gas &, Electric Co. McLaran v. Crescent Planning

CHAPTER Xrv y - AMENDMENTS TO CHARTER

M a r c u s v . R H M a c y Philippine Trust Co. v. Rivera

CHAPTER XV - TRANFER OF SHARES

Uson v. DiosomotoNautica Canning Corp. v. Yumul (473 SCRA 4151, Razon v. IAC (207 SCRA, 235)Rural Bank of Salinas v. CA (210 SCRA 511) Sta. Maria v. HKSBDelos Santos v. Atty. GenChua Guan v. Samahang Magsasaka, Inc.

CHAPTER XVI - DISSOLUTION

Financing Corporation v. TeodoroRP v. Bisaya Land Transpo.Gonzales v. Sugar Regulatory Adm. (174 S 377)Pepsi-Cola Products Philippines, Inc. v. CA (443 SCRA 580) National Abaca v. PoreChina Banking v. Michelin & CieRP v. Marsman Dev. Co.Tan Tiong Bio v. CIR

C I I-APT E !--, XVII - CORPORA r E COMBINATIONS

-,yes v. BlouseEdward J. Nell v. Pacific F---ms

CHAPT ERXVIII - FOREIGN CORPORATIONS

Marshall Wells v. ElserColumbia Pictures v. CA (261 SCRA 144)General Garments v. Dir. Of PatentsLe Chemise Lacoste v. FernandezLitton Mills v. CA (256 SCRA 696)Mentholatum v. MangilirnanAgilent Technologies Singapore (Pte) Ltd. v. integrated Silicon

Technology Philippines Corporation (427 SCR-A, 593) Merryll Lynch -Futures v. CA (211 SCRA 824)

Top Weld Manufacturing, Inc. v. ECEDAritam v. CA

U PLAW4 / corpo- ached -cases5 June '06-'07

4