corporate governance in arms-length agencies (july 2009) · 2018-03-29 · on the other hand,...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
July 2009
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
Vision Statement
To be the preferred consulting partner for all government bureaux and departments and to advance
the delivery of world-class public services to the people of Hong Kong
Mission Statement
To provide strategic and implementable solutions to all our clients as they seek to deliver people-
based government services We do this by combining our extensive understanding of policies our
specialised knowledge and our broad contacts and linkages throughout the Government and the
private sector In doing this we join our clients in contributing to the advancement of the community
while also providing a fulfilling career for all members of our team
This brief was researched and authored by the Research Division Institute of Public Administration Ireland( wwwipaieresearch) The Research Division provides applied research services for policy
makers in a wide range of public service organisations drawing on an extensive network of contacts
and experience gained over more than thirty years
Other Efficiency Unit Documents
The Efficiency Unit has produced a number of guides on good practice on a wide range of areas
including outsourcing and contract management These may be found on the Efficiency Unit website
at wwweugovhk
i
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
ii
Foreword
Corporate governance means different things to different people Whilst it is an evolving concept in
the public sector as much as in the private sector it is not a strict science It is more than financial
accountability yet it is not the same as lsquoGovernancersquo the latter has a much broader scope
In Hong Kong unlike many other jurisdictions most government departments still follow the traditional
vote-funded model and are subject to a comprehensive regime of controls and accountability that
has been built up over many years
On the other hand concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies
We have therefore devoted this issue of our public sector reform series to an overview of the
challenges faced in other countries concerning corporate governance in arms-length agencies
We hope the overseas experiences related here will contribute to the debate on the most appropriate
way forward in Hong Kong
Head Efficiency Unit
July 2009
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Contents
Executive Summary 1
1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments 5
What does corporate governance mean
Why has corporate governance come to prominence
Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
What does corporate governance encompass
2 Standards of behaviour 13
Corporate governance codes of good practice
Codes of conduct
Leadership developments
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body 19
Board size
Board committees
Board appointments
Board tenure
Board development
Board performance
Board composition
Board remuneration
iii
4 Control 27
Risk management
Audit
5 External reporting 31
The need for transparency
Balancing transparency with confidentiality
6 Conclusions 33
References 34
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
1
Executive Summary
The importance of corporate governance lies in
its contribution to accountability The issue of
corporate governance has grown in prominence
in recent years largely in response to a number
of financial scandals in the private sector such as
the Enron collapse in the United States of America
(USA) More recently the collapse of Lehman
Brothers Holdings plc which has precipitated
and contributed to financial downturns globally
has drawn attention to the consequences of
weak controls
There has also been increased international public
concern over the governance and accountability
of public sector organisations arising from cases
of fraud or mismanagement or concerns over the
perceived absence of accountability of agencies
The public outrage at the abuse of the expenses
regime for parliamentarians at Westminister while
not a failure of corporate governance as such
highlights the issue of standards of behaviour which
is of central concern to corporate governance
Failure to adhere to good standards of behaviour
can lead to failures in corporate governance
such as misuse of public assets or resources
for personal or political purposes or failure to
exercise reasonable stewardship over public
assets or resources
A good definition of corporate governance in the
public sector states that
Broadly speaking corporate governance
generally refers to the processes by which
organisations are directed controlled and
held to account It encompasses authority
accountability stewardship leadership direction
and control exercised in the organisation
(Australian National Audit Office 1999)
Corporate governance can be more challenging
in a public sector environment than in the private
sector The challenges include policy is set by the
government board members may be selected by
ministers ministerial directions can countermand
the wishes of the board at any time and chief
executive officers may be formally employed by
the minister creating accountability problems
for the board
The focus of this report is on the corporate
governance of organisations at arms length
from government ie those bodies outside of
government departments or ministries such
as statutory agencies and publicly funded
non-governmental organisations (NGOs) In
particular the focus is on the functioning of the
governing board of the organisation Even where
a board may not exist there is usually a governing
body responsible for leadership and reporting on
stewardship
There are a number of common problems that
can lead to corporate governance failures
Figure 1 shows seven warning signs of service
failure Governing body members and relevant
staff in sponsoring departments need to give
particular attention to these signs
What does corporate governance cover
The International Federation of Accountantsrsquo
(IFAC) guidance that has been adopted in many
countries identifies four main dimensions of
the corporate governance of public sector
organisations (Figure 2)
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 1 The seven warning signs of service failure
2
Analysis of public inquiries shows these common problems contributed to serious service failures
Source Audit Commission of the United Kingdom
Figure 2 Dimensions of good corporate governance
Good Corporate Governance
Standards of Behaviour
bull codes of good practice
codes of conduct
leadership developments
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Organisational Structures and
Processes
bull board dynamics
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Control
risk management
audit
External Reporting
need for transparency balancing transparency with confidentiality
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
3
Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
operates the values that drive the organisation
and the culture that prevails As such standards of
behaviour deal largely with what has been termed
the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance
Governments internationally have adapted private
sector codes of practice and codes of conduct
to provide guidance for board members and
executives on these issues
Leadership is another crucial principle from a
corporate governance perspective There are two
key leadership roles that the governing bodies
of public organisations need to pay attention
to the establishment of sound governance
structures and processes and supporting good
governance through their own performance and
behaviours
Organisational structures and processes There are eight issues to be addressed by governing
bodies and their sponsoring departments if they
are to deliver good corporate governance in
terms of effective responsibility and accountability
(Table 1)
Control For public organisations other than financial
risk their work is also subject to a much
broader category of risks including policy risk
and reputational risk Risk management means
addressing these factors What is now required by
many codes of practice of corporate governance
is to ensure that risk is explicitly stated and a
consensus on addressing risks formulated
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk There is no prescriptive set
of rules specifying what constitutes ethical
behaviour Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and
service to the public which underpin most
corporate governance codes of practice
Audits and inspections become a normal
part of life in public organisations An issue of
concern for the governing body of many public
organisations is the choice of external auditors
and the need to ensure auditor independence In
that context auditor rotation is becoming more
common Another feature of good corporate
governance is the use of audit committees by
public organisations to provide an oversight of
audit arrangements
External reporting Transparency is a fundamental element of good
corporate governance Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence of
their stakeholders who in turn need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public bodies
with which they deal Transparency in relation to
matters such as procurement remuneration and
disclosure must be exemplary
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways
including public and timely production of plans
and reports Sponsoring departments need to
ensure that they have the skills and competencies
required to critically evaluate such plans and
reports
There are challenges in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information The need for codes and practices to
acknowledge the tension between confidentiality
and transparency and to strike a balance between
these competing tensions requires constant
scrutiny It is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Table 1 The eight key issues on board structures and processes
Board size Six to nine members is considered a reasonable size in the private
sector Up to twelve is not uncommon in the public sector to
meet representational and balance requirements
Board committees Commonly used for detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements in securing
effective boards Identifying competencies needed pro-active
search for candidates and attention to personal attributes are
amongst the items that must be given attention
Board tenure There is no set term limit for boards though three years is a
common time in a number of countries Appointments may be
renewed for a second term subject to satisfactory performance
Staggering of replacement appointments is important
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued review of
training needs and also to ensure that those involved in the
appointment of board members are fully trained
Board performance Best practice suggests that formal annual assessment of board
performance between the minister sponsoring department
and the chair of the board should take place to review board
performance
Board composition Best practice guidance suggests that the majority of board
members should be independent and that the chair and chief
executive positions should be separate There is a growing view
that departmental staff should not be members of the board
Board remuneration Practice varies significantly Many smaller public bodies tend
to pay only out-of-pocket expenses Others pay a set amount
based either on a daily rate or an estimated time commitment
per month or per year In general remuneration is relatively
modest
Source adapted from Uhrig (2003)
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
4
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
5
1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
What does corporate governance
mean Corporate governance is a concept that has been
very much to the fore in public sector reform in
recent years Understanding how to ensure and
achieve best practice in corporate governance
presents significant challenges for public sector
organisations internationally But what does the
term corporate governance mean
Corporate governance has its origins in the
marketplace and emerged to describe the way
in which suppliers of finance to corporations
could assure themselves of getting a return on
their investment In this sense it is about ensuring
that the management of private organisations
operate and run their businesses in a manner
consistent with the wishes of the shareholders
and that mechanisms for identifying and arresting
malpractice are in place and effective (Bovaird
and Loumlffler 2009 9)
Within the public sector when corporate
governance is discussed the main focus and
the focus of this report is often on the corporate
governance of organisations at arms length
from government ie those bodies outside of
government departments or ministries (which are
usually well regulated by specific rules and statutes)
such as statutory agencies and publicly funded
NGOs In this context corporate governance has
become associated not only with financial reporting
and controls but also with standards of behaviour
and organisational structures and processes In
this report we understand corporate governance
in the public sector by reference to the Australian
National Audit Office which states that
Broadly speaking corporate governanc e
generally refers to the processes by which
organisations are directed controlled and
held to account It encompasses authority
accountability stewardship leadership direction
and control exercised in the organisation
(Australian National Audit Office 1999 1
httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocuments
Corporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_
Authorities_and_Companiespdf)
Within private sector organisations corporate
governance is often viewed as being primarily
concerned with the functioning of the board of
the organisation In the different parts of the public
sector the equivalent of the group that fulfils the
role of the board of a company in the private
sector is at times not so easy to identify
But as the IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 019
httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoads
Study_13_Governancepdf) notes
In whatever way it is configured constituted
or described all bodies need to have at their
head a group which is responsible for giving
leadership and strategic direction defining
control mechanisms and supervising the overall
management of the entityrsquos activities and
reporting on stewardship and performance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
It is this leadership or government grouping
referred to in this report either as the governing
body or the board which is the main focus for
corporate governance in the public sector For
some public organisations the governing body
is relatively obvious as with the board of an
agency or a two-tier board structure where a
non-executive supervisory board oversees an
executive management board But for other
public sector organisations the role played by the
governing body in corporate governance may not
be clear as the case study of Canadarsquos National
Research Council governing council shows
Case study Role of governing council is unclear
As part of a review of the National Research Council Canada in 2003 the Office of the
Auditor General examined the role of the National Research Council governing council Its
findings revealed a lack of clarity among governing council members about the role of the
governing council whether it was simply advisory in nature to the president or whether it
included the obligation to direct and control the work of the corporation through the president
The governing council was found to be operating primarily as an advisory body The Auditor
General was concerned about this apparent lack of clarity and believed that it has led to the
absence of key governing council governance initiatives and structures
In a follow-up review in 2007 the Office of the Auditor General noted satisfactory progress on
this issue as the council had given itself a stronger role to meet the assigned responsibilities
under the National Research Council Act It had also established two new standing committees
the audit evaluation and risk management committee and the human resources committee
Source Office of the Auditor General of Canada 2007 httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglish att_20070203xe03_e_17507html
6
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
7
Why has corporate governance come
to prominence Interest in corporate governance has been driven
primarily by a growing list of corporate scandals
in the private sector such as the Enron collapse
in the USA The problems have to do with the
pursuit of private interests (excessive compensation
of top executives overly generous benefits)
duplicity (failure to observe accepted standards
of accounting the disguising of transactions)
conflict of interest (accounting firms too close
to client corporations) and corruption in various
other forms These issues have focused interest
on a number of corporate governance issues
such as the role of the board of directors the
independence of the boardrsquos membership
from management the responsibilities of the
board chair the chairrsquos relationship to the chief
executive and the transparency and accuracy
of financial reporting (Plumptre 2004 pp 2ndash3)
More recently the collapse of Lehman Brothers
Holdings plc in the USA which has precipitated
and contributed to financial downturns globally
has drawn attention to the consequences of weak
controls In a public sector setting the public
outrage at the abuse of the expenses regime for
parliamentarians at Westminister while not a failure
of corporate governance as such has highlighted
the issue of standards of behaviour which is of
central concern to corporate governance
Three sources for new practices and codes of
corporate governance are dominant internationally
in response to these scandals ndash the United
Kingdom (UK) Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the
USA In the UK following a number of private
sector corporate governance scandals the
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate
Governance (the Cadbury Committee) was formed
in 1991 to investigate The resultant Cadbury report
developed an innovative lsquoCode of Best Practicersquo
and identified three fundamental principles of
corporate governance ndash openness integrity and
accountability A lsquocombined codersquo was developed
in 1998 which harmonised the key issues from
Cadbury with a number of subsequent reports The
lsquocombined codersquo was binding on all companies
quoted on the London Stock Exchange It has
been revised on a number of occasions The most
recent version of the Code is available at http
wwwfrcorgukdocumentspagemanagerfrc
Combined20Code20June202006pdf
The OECD has also been active in relation to
promoting good corporate governance and
published a series of Principles of Corporate
Governance in 1999 Following a comprehensive
survey of how member countries addressed the
different corporate governance challenges they
faced the Principles were revised in 2004 see
httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724
In the USA following the widely reported
accounting scandals at energy company Enron
and telecommunications company WorldCom
the federal government sought to pass laws
which would prevent in future the fraudulent
reporting of accounts in private companies The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 extended boardsrsquo
financial oversight responsibilities and imposed
new financial disclosure requirements In particular
it requires that management prepare a report on
the internal control structures and procedures for
financial reporting in their organisation as well as
a report by external auditors on that assessment
see httpwwwsoxlawcom
While private sector examples of corporate
governance failure have been driving improvement
initiatives at an international level there have also
been an increasing number of such failures within
the public sphere which have prompted reviews of
corporate governance practices and procedures
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
in the public sector Public sector scandals
have been a driving force for the increasing
focus on corporate governance in the public
sector So too has the increasing complexity
of stakeholder relationships and expectations
regarding performance and transparency leading
to demands internationally for more effective
corporate governance arrangements in the public
sector to help agencies steer their way through
complex stakeholder demands Also changing
trends in the way the public sector conducts its
business and in particular regulatory and standard-
setting practices are increasingly requiring public
organisations to adopt best corporate governance
standards
The use and stewardship of public funds is an
essential feature of corporate governance in the
public sector As the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo case study
identifies boards of public sector bodies carry
considerable responsibilities for the management
of public funds and must ensure they have the
ability to fully pursue matters they deem to be of
concern Similarly the Royal United Hospital Bath
case study shows how boards can be misled
by executive management unless they have the
necessary competencies and skills to rigorously
scrutinise performance
Corporate governance failures can result in
wasted public money or poor service experience
and in some cases may even result in serious
tragedies The UK Audit Commission analysed
a number of inquiries into failures to see what
contribution governance arrangements made
to organisational failure as the case study on
page 11 identifies
Case study Royal United Hospital Bath corporate governance failures
Professor Robert Tinston was appointed by the trust in 2003 to hold an inquiry after two
external reviews identified concerns about deliberate manipulation of waiting lists and serious
deterioration in finances at the trust The Tinston report describes lsquoa trust in the grip of a powerful
self-delusion about its real performance and the desire to continue to support this leading to
a culture of misrepresentationrsquo
In particular the report noted major corporate governance failures The inquiry noted that the
former executive team appears to have adopted a policy of marginalising the trust board or
at the very least presenting important information at board meetings in an unduly optimistic
and favourable way The report says the trustrsquos weak control and accountability arrangements
combined to undermine fundamentally the performance of the hospital Boards must be in a
position to challenge constructively the financial and operational information they receive This
means they must understand the information presented to them and its implications for the
organisation They must also be able to identify risks to their corporate objectives recognise the
financial consequences and assess and monitor how effectively they are being addressed
Source httpwwwhsjcoukruh-bath-was-delude-claims-probe19369article
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
8
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board failure the example of the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo
In British Columbia (BC) the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo is an example of how the role of boards can
have major impacts on organisational performance The facts of the Fast Ferry Project are
fully documented in the BC Auditor Generalrsquos 1999 report A Review of the Fast Ferry Project
Governance and Risk Management
The government decided to purchase three high-speed aluminium catamaran car ferries at an
initial estimated cost of $210 million The initial board appointed to oversee the construction
included three independent directors from the private sector with relevant skills and experience
in marine construction Over the first ten months of its operations the board
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
asked repeatedly for a full budget
asked to receive regular reporting against an approved budget showing both forecast costs to complete and variances
asked for a construction schedule
pointed out that the original budget was for a different type of ferry and questioned both that budget and the latest changes to it
stressed the need for a risk analysis of the current scope of the project
noted that forecast costs continued to rise and that the scope of the programme had increased without an increase in budget
Its requests were consistently ignored or only partly met with the result that the board resigned
A new board was appointed The governance systems put in place to oversee the project were
inadequate Two years later it was determined that the project was significantly over budget
(the final cost was more than $450 million) and the ferries were not suitable for their intended
use Eventually the ferries were shrink-wrapped in plastic and stored under wraps for several
years until they were sold by auction for $18 million The net loss to the taxpayers of BC was
$430 million not including the cost of all of the reports and lost productivity in responding to
public outrage at the debacle The fiasco became a lightening rod for discussions on the lack
of appropriate governance
Source Watson 2004 pp 3ndash4 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
9
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
Particular challenges for corporate
governance in the public sector The Auditor General of Western Australia provides
a useful summary of the particular constraints
acting on public sector boards with regard to
corporate governance (Office of the Auditor
General Western Australia 1998) He notes that
in the private sector the board sets the strategic
direction management gives effect to that direction
and shareholders provide support through their
investment and operate as a general check on
the performance of the organisation While there
can be grey areas between the various roles
particularly between the board and management
the relationships are not as complex as in the
public sector
In the public sector the government is responsible
for the setting of policy and usually has wide
powers to intervene Management is responsible
for the day-to-day running to provide effective and
efficient services in the pursuit of government policy
The ultimate lsquoshareholdersrsquo are the electorate
who have infrequent opportunities to vote and
no direct authority over the affairs of any single
agency The public sector board often finds itself
balancing between managing an agency and
setting strategic direction Similarly management
finds itself balancing between a board that is
responsible for the agencyrsquos performance and
a minister responsible for the portfolio These all
make corporate governance more challenging
in a public sector environment The challenges
include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
policy is set by the government
board members may be selected by ministers
ministerial directions can countermand the wishes of the board at any time
chief executive officers may be formally employed by the minister which creates accountability problems for the board
the board as the accountable authority carries the legal responsibility for the performance of the agency
The remainder of this report looks at how such
challenges can be managed In brief a review of
good practice by Barker (2004) suggests that the
governing body and the sponsoring department
need to be clear about the organisationrsquos remit
and position and in particular that
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the organisation has a clear remit and set of
strategic priorities the organisationrsquos position within the delivery
network is clearly understood
changes in strategiespriorities are rapidly
communicated between the sponsor
department and the organisation
consultation between the organisation
sponsor department and key stakeholders
takes place as appropriate prior to any
significant policy change
effective communications between the
organisation sponsor department and key
stakeholders are in place
regular review of the organisation occurs to
ensure that governance is effective and that
remits and relationships evolve in line with
organisational and policy change
What does corporate governance encompass The IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 066 httpwwwifac orgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governance pdf) identifies four main dimensions of the corporate governance of public sector organisations
standards of behaviour ndash how the
management of the organisation exercises
leadership in determining the values and
standards of the organisation which define
the culture of the organisation and the
behaviour of everyone within it
organisational structures and processes ndash
how the board and top management within
organisations are appointed and organised
how their responsibilities are defined and
how they are held accountable
bull
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
10
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull control ndash the network of various controls
established by the top management of the
organisation to support it in achieving the
organisationrsquos objectives and compliance
with applicable laws and regulations and
internal policies
external reporting ndash how the top management
of the organisation demonstrates its financial
accountability for the stewardship of public
money and its performance in the use of
resources
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Elements of what is encompassed by these
aspects of corporate governance where there
have been notable developments in recent years
are outlined in more detail in Figure 3
These four dimensions of corporate governance
form the basis for the structuring of the rest of this
report Significant developments and examples
of international best practice in each of the four
areas are discussed further in the following
chapters
Case study Identifying corporate governance lessons from failures
Each of the national inquiry reports identified that poor governance arrangements set the framework
within which organisational systems and processes failed to detect or anticipate serious service
failures There was never a single failure or shortcoming in corporate governance that was solely
responsible for service failure Rather where there were serious and tragic outcomes it was
due to a combination of factors and an accumulation of governance failures
A number of common themes were brought to light by each inquiry
the poor quality or absence of leadership
poor decision-making and decision-making processes
inadequate systems and processes such as performance management
bull
lack of clarity in roles responsibilities and activities creating poor accountability
poor working relationships and dysfunctional behaviours
an insular organisational culture and poor focus on community and user needs
inadequate contingency plans or risk-management strategies to deal with
worst-case scenarios
Some combination of these factors was present at each failing organisation
Source Audit Commission 2003 p 28 httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPages improvementtrustpublicservicesaspx
11
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 3 Dimensions of corporate governance
Dimension Recommendations on governance
1 Standards of behaviour bull
bull
bull
Codes of good practice
Leadership
Codes of conduct
2 Organisational structures
and processes
bull
bull
Accountability for public money
Roles and responsibilities
bull Governing bodybull Chairpersonbull Executive managementbull Sponsoring department
3 Control bull
bull
bull I
Risk management including management of conflicts of interest
Audit
nternal control
4 External reporting bull
bull
Transparency
Confidentiality
Source adapted from IFAC 2001 p 14 httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
12
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
13
2 Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
of the organisation operates the values that drive
the organisation and the culture that prevails all
of which influence the behaviour of all staff As
such standards of behaviour deal largely with
the development of codes of practice and what
has been termed the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate
governance which have been receiving more
prominence in recent years drawing on best
practice in the private sector (see case study)
Corporate governance codes of good
practice As new corporate governance codes extended
throughout the private sector commercial
state-owned enterprises sought guidance from
governments about equivalent standards In
response governments internationally adapted
private sector codes to provide guidance for
board members and executives on commercial
and non-commercial state bodies and agencies
These codes set the parameters for standards of
behaviour required for good corporate governance
of public organisations
Case study Addressing the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance lessons from private sector practice
Research on corporate governance in the private sector has indicated that lsquohardrsquo attributes of
governance such as board independence are necessary but not sufficient There is a need
to pay attention to the lsquosoftrsquo side of governance focusing on behavioural dynamics Some
of the lsquosoftrsquo governance factors that appear to be important for performance in the private
sector include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
A clarity in roles responsibilities and relationships between chief executive officer (CEO)
and chair directors and management directors and shareholdersstakeholders
Healthy chairCEO interface
Directors working as a team
Culture trust and open dissent
Right skills competencies and characteristics including lsquoindustrybusiness knowledgersquo
A good induction process and ongoing access to training
Leadership skills of the chair
Information flows
Regular evaluation of board performance
Source Edwards and Clough 2005 p 12 httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
bull
For example in Australia the government
developed its Governance Arrangements
for Australian Government Bodies in 2005
httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-framework
governancedocsGovernance-Arrangementsshy
for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
Similarly in Canada the Treasury Board of
Canada Secretariat has produced guidelines for
lsquoCorporate Governance in Crown Corporations
and Other Public Enterprisesrsquo httpwwwtbs-sct
gccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-eng
asp
In Ireland the Department of Finance also
published in 2009 a revised and updated lsquoCode
of Practice for the Governance of State Bodiesrsquo
h t tp www f inance gov ie v iewdoc
aspDocID=5824
An example of the type of issue covered by codes
of good practice is given for building the relationship
between the board and chief executive in the case
study taken from the Canadian code
What all of these corporate governance codes
and guidelines have in common is a commitment
to ensuring there is
clarity over the roles and responsibilities of
government boards of state bodies CEOs
and external auditing bodies as well as the
relationship between them
clarity over the public policy objectives
expected of state bodies
adequate financial reporting and internal
controls
standards of behaviour that reflect values
of integrity honesty and probity and that all
actions taken within state bodies are in the
best interests of that organisation
Case study Canadian code of good practice guidance on building a relationship
In a Crown corporation the nature of the relationship between the CEO and the board is often
critical The board must work with the CEO to build a relationship of openness and trust
Position descriptions can assist greatly in the smooth functioning of these relations The board
of directors the chair and the CEO should develop position descriptions for the board the
chair and the CEO
Boards of directors in conjunction with the CEO should periodically review the allocation of
responsibilities between the board and management This review should focus on defining
and describing both the boardrsquos principal responsibilities and the limits to managementrsquos
authority
Source httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
14
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
15
Codes of conduct An important emerging feature of good corporate
governance practice internationally is the
development of written formal codes of conduct
by organisations that set out their obligations with
regard to corporate governance Like corporate
governance codes codes of conduct have
proliferated in recent years They identify the
behaviour expected of those to whom they
apply by articulating a coherent set of values
and a means of addressing maladministration
where it occurs (see Transport for London (TfL)
case study)
The Public Audit Forum (2001) sets out important
elements which it is expected most codes of
conduct will address
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
outlines of expected professional and
personal behaviour
defined restrictions on business and political
activities (where appropriate)
criteria and procedures for declarations of
interests both business and political
definitions of conflicts of interest
a statement of the aims and values of the
body
statements of the obligations of the body
towards its customers staff community and
other interested parties
information about the bodyrsquos approach to
openness and arrangements for acquiring
information about its activities
procedures for raising complaints with an
independent body
definition of the dividing line between the role
and responsibilities of the governing body
and those of the executive staff
Source Public Audit Forum (2001) httpwww
public-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Particularly with regard to standards of behaviour
such codes of conduct are expected to
reflect the practice of the highest standards in
public life In the UK the Nolan Committee
(httpwwwarchiveofficial-documentscouk
documentparlmentnolannolanhtm) inquired
into standards of public life and established seven
principles of public life that have been widely
adopted internationally
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Selflessness Holders of public office should
take decisions solely in terms of the public
interest They should not do so in order to
gain financial or other material benefits for
themselves their family or their friends
Integrity Holders of public office should
not place themselves under any financial
or other obligation to outside individuals or
organisations that might influence them in
the performance of their official duties
Objectivity In carrying out public business
including making public appointments
awarding contracts or recommending
individuals for rewards and benefits holders
of public office should make choices on
merit
Accountability Holders of public office are
accountable for their decisions and actions
to the public and must submit themselves
to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their
office
Openness Holders of public office should be
as open as possible about all the decisions
and actions that they take They should
give reasons for their decisions and restrict
information only when the wider public
interest clearly demands
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
Honesty Holders of public office have a duty
to declare any private interests relating to their
public duties and to take steps to resolve any
conflicts arising in a way that protects the
public interest
Leadership Holders of public office should
promote and support these principles by
leadership and example
Failure to adhere to such standards can lead to
the failures in corporate governance noted earlier
and in particular to
bull
bull
bull
failures of principles of fairness in the
treatment of staff suppliers or contractors
whether due to conflicts of interest or other
reason
misuse of public assets or resources for
personal or political purposes
failure to exercise reasonable stewardship
over public assets or resources
Case study Transport for London (TfL) code of conduct
TfLrsquos corporate governance code of conduct addresses the main principles of good corporate
governance by setting out a series of undertakings that TfL has committed itself to deliver
under five main headings
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Public focus
Structures and processes
Risk management and internal control
Service delivery arrangements
Standards of conduct
For example under risk management and internal control TfL amongst other things commits
that its annual report will contain an objective and understandable statement and assessment
of its risk-management system including systems of internal control and internal audit and
their effectiveness in practice
Source httpwwwtflgovukcorporateabout-tfl2876aspxPublicFocus
16
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
17
Leadership developments Leadership is a crucial principle from a corporate
governance perspective There are two key
leadership roles the governing body of public
organisations needs to pay attention to the
establishment of sound governance structures
and processes and supporting good governance
through its own performance and behaviours
A range of commentators such as Kalokerinos
(2007) note the central role of the chair of the
governing body in the leadership of public sector
organisations This includes the traditional duty
of ensuring the proper functioning of the board
and its meetings but also covers maintaining a
close relationship with the chief executive and
representing the authority to outside stakeholders
A study undertaken for the UK Public Services
Productivity Panel (Barker 2004) states that the
chair should
bull
bull
bull
bull
act as board team leader with an
understanding of what skills knowledge and
aptitudes the board needs
regularly carry out skills knowledge and
aptitude audits which may be relatively
low key and informal to help understand
the current board composition and provide
board members with further clarity about
their individual roles
act as board lsquoconductorrsquo fostering an
environment where dissenting voices can
be heard without damaging collective
responsibility
act as the interface between the board and
its executive team and the organisation and
its sponsor department
In terms of developing board membersrsquo leadership
skills knowledge and aptitude mentoring of board
members has been of growing prominence in
recent years (see case studies)
A particular leadership challenge for the chair is
managing the relationship with the chief executive
Chief executives are professionals with specific
training in their job Chairs often come to the
role with no or limited experience of chairing
The chair and chief executive may experience a
culture clash between a management approach
to a question and a laypersonrsquos approach They
may be talking about the same problem using
very different vocabularies and terms of reference
Chief executives and chairs may also have different
definitions of success and consequently may
end up working towards different goals The
development of a good working relationship with
an agreed common vision as to the organisationrsquos
purpose is the key to effective leadership of the
organisation
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 2: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
Vision Statement
To be the preferred consulting partner for all government bureaux and departments and to advance
the delivery of world-class public services to the people of Hong Kong
Mission Statement
To provide strategic and implementable solutions to all our clients as they seek to deliver people-
based government services We do this by combining our extensive understanding of policies our
specialised knowledge and our broad contacts and linkages throughout the Government and the
private sector In doing this we join our clients in contributing to the advancement of the community
while also providing a fulfilling career for all members of our team
This brief was researched and authored by the Research Division Institute of Public Administration Ireland( wwwipaieresearch) The Research Division provides applied research services for policy
makers in a wide range of public service organisations drawing on an extensive network of contacts
and experience gained over more than thirty years
Other Efficiency Unit Documents
The Efficiency Unit has produced a number of guides on good practice on a wide range of areas
including outsourcing and contract management These may be found on the Efficiency Unit website
at wwweugovhk
i
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
ii
Foreword
Corporate governance means different things to different people Whilst it is an evolving concept in
the public sector as much as in the private sector it is not a strict science It is more than financial
accountability yet it is not the same as lsquoGovernancersquo the latter has a much broader scope
In Hong Kong unlike many other jurisdictions most government departments still follow the traditional
vote-funded model and are subject to a comprehensive regime of controls and accountability that
has been built up over many years
On the other hand concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies
We have therefore devoted this issue of our public sector reform series to an overview of the
challenges faced in other countries concerning corporate governance in arms-length agencies
We hope the overseas experiences related here will contribute to the debate on the most appropriate
way forward in Hong Kong
Head Efficiency Unit
July 2009
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Contents
Executive Summary 1
1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments 5
What does corporate governance mean
Why has corporate governance come to prominence
Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
What does corporate governance encompass
2 Standards of behaviour 13
Corporate governance codes of good practice
Codes of conduct
Leadership developments
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body 19
Board size
Board committees
Board appointments
Board tenure
Board development
Board performance
Board composition
Board remuneration
iii
4 Control 27
Risk management
Audit
5 External reporting 31
The need for transparency
Balancing transparency with confidentiality
6 Conclusions 33
References 34
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
1
Executive Summary
The importance of corporate governance lies in
its contribution to accountability The issue of
corporate governance has grown in prominence
in recent years largely in response to a number
of financial scandals in the private sector such as
the Enron collapse in the United States of America
(USA) More recently the collapse of Lehman
Brothers Holdings plc which has precipitated
and contributed to financial downturns globally
has drawn attention to the consequences of
weak controls
There has also been increased international public
concern over the governance and accountability
of public sector organisations arising from cases
of fraud or mismanagement or concerns over the
perceived absence of accountability of agencies
The public outrage at the abuse of the expenses
regime for parliamentarians at Westminister while
not a failure of corporate governance as such
highlights the issue of standards of behaviour which
is of central concern to corporate governance
Failure to adhere to good standards of behaviour
can lead to failures in corporate governance
such as misuse of public assets or resources
for personal or political purposes or failure to
exercise reasonable stewardship over public
assets or resources
A good definition of corporate governance in the
public sector states that
Broadly speaking corporate governance
generally refers to the processes by which
organisations are directed controlled and
held to account It encompasses authority
accountability stewardship leadership direction
and control exercised in the organisation
(Australian National Audit Office 1999)
Corporate governance can be more challenging
in a public sector environment than in the private
sector The challenges include policy is set by the
government board members may be selected by
ministers ministerial directions can countermand
the wishes of the board at any time and chief
executive officers may be formally employed by
the minister creating accountability problems
for the board
The focus of this report is on the corporate
governance of organisations at arms length
from government ie those bodies outside of
government departments or ministries such
as statutory agencies and publicly funded
non-governmental organisations (NGOs) In
particular the focus is on the functioning of the
governing board of the organisation Even where
a board may not exist there is usually a governing
body responsible for leadership and reporting on
stewardship
There are a number of common problems that
can lead to corporate governance failures
Figure 1 shows seven warning signs of service
failure Governing body members and relevant
staff in sponsoring departments need to give
particular attention to these signs
What does corporate governance cover
The International Federation of Accountantsrsquo
(IFAC) guidance that has been adopted in many
countries identifies four main dimensions of
the corporate governance of public sector
organisations (Figure 2)
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 1 The seven warning signs of service failure
2
Analysis of public inquiries shows these common problems contributed to serious service failures
Source Audit Commission of the United Kingdom
Figure 2 Dimensions of good corporate governance
Good Corporate Governance
Standards of Behaviour
bull codes of good practice
codes of conduct
leadership developments
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Organisational Structures and
Processes
bull board dynamics
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Control
risk management
audit
External Reporting
need for transparency balancing transparency with confidentiality
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
3
Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
operates the values that drive the organisation
and the culture that prevails As such standards of
behaviour deal largely with what has been termed
the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance
Governments internationally have adapted private
sector codes of practice and codes of conduct
to provide guidance for board members and
executives on these issues
Leadership is another crucial principle from a
corporate governance perspective There are two
key leadership roles that the governing bodies
of public organisations need to pay attention
to the establishment of sound governance
structures and processes and supporting good
governance through their own performance and
behaviours
Organisational structures and processes There are eight issues to be addressed by governing
bodies and their sponsoring departments if they
are to deliver good corporate governance in
terms of effective responsibility and accountability
(Table 1)
Control For public organisations other than financial
risk their work is also subject to a much
broader category of risks including policy risk
and reputational risk Risk management means
addressing these factors What is now required by
many codes of practice of corporate governance
is to ensure that risk is explicitly stated and a
consensus on addressing risks formulated
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk There is no prescriptive set
of rules specifying what constitutes ethical
behaviour Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and
service to the public which underpin most
corporate governance codes of practice
Audits and inspections become a normal
part of life in public organisations An issue of
concern for the governing body of many public
organisations is the choice of external auditors
and the need to ensure auditor independence In
that context auditor rotation is becoming more
common Another feature of good corporate
governance is the use of audit committees by
public organisations to provide an oversight of
audit arrangements
External reporting Transparency is a fundamental element of good
corporate governance Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence of
their stakeholders who in turn need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public bodies
with which they deal Transparency in relation to
matters such as procurement remuneration and
disclosure must be exemplary
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways
including public and timely production of plans
and reports Sponsoring departments need to
ensure that they have the skills and competencies
required to critically evaluate such plans and
reports
There are challenges in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information The need for codes and practices to
acknowledge the tension between confidentiality
and transparency and to strike a balance between
these competing tensions requires constant
scrutiny It is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Table 1 The eight key issues on board structures and processes
Board size Six to nine members is considered a reasonable size in the private
sector Up to twelve is not uncommon in the public sector to
meet representational and balance requirements
Board committees Commonly used for detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements in securing
effective boards Identifying competencies needed pro-active
search for candidates and attention to personal attributes are
amongst the items that must be given attention
Board tenure There is no set term limit for boards though three years is a
common time in a number of countries Appointments may be
renewed for a second term subject to satisfactory performance
Staggering of replacement appointments is important
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued review of
training needs and also to ensure that those involved in the
appointment of board members are fully trained
Board performance Best practice suggests that formal annual assessment of board
performance between the minister sponsoring department
and the chair of the board should take place to review board
performance
Board composition Best practice guidance suggests that the majority of board
members should be independent and that the chair and chief
executive positions should be separate There is a growing view
that departmental staff should not be members of the board
Board remuneration Practice varies significantly Many smaller public bodies tend
to pay only out-of-pocket expenses Others pay a set amount
based either on a daily rate or an estimated time commitment
per month or per year In general remuneration is relatively
modest
Source adapted from Uhrig (2003)
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
4
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
5
1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
What does corporate governance
mean Corporate governance is a concept that has been
very much to the fore in public sector reform in
recent years Understanding how to ensure and
achieve best practice in corporate governance
presents significant challenges for public sector
organisations internationally But what does the
term corporate governance mean
Corporate governance has its origins in the
marketplace and emerged to describe the way
in which suppliers of finance to corporations
could assure themselves of getting a return on
their investment In this sense it is about ensuring
that the management of private organisations
operate and run their businesses in a manner
consistent with the wishes of the shareholders
and that mechanisms for identifying and arresting
malpractice are in place and effective (Bovaird
and Loumlffler 2009 9)
Within the public sector when corporate
governance is discussed the main focus and
the focus of this report is often on the corporate
governance of organisations at arms length
from government ie those bodies outside of
government departments or ministries (which are
usually well regulated by specific rules and statutes)
such as statutory agencies and publicly funded
NGOs In this context corporate governance has
become associated not only with financial reporting
and controls but also with standards of behaviour
and organisational structures and processes In
this report we understand corporate governance
in the public sector by reference to the Australian
National Audit Office which states that
Broadly speaking corporate governanc e
generally refers to the processes by which
organisations are directed controlled and
held to account It encompasses authority
accountability stewardship leadership direction
and control exercised in the organisation
(Australian National Audit Office 1999 1
httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocuments
Corporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_
Authorities_and_Companiespdf)
Within private sector organisations corporate
governance is often viewed as being primarily
concerned with the functioning of the board of
the organisation In the different parts of the public
sector the equivalent of the group that fulfils the
role of the board of a company in the private
sector is at times not so easy to identify
But as the IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 019
httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoads
Study_13_Governancepdf) notes
In whatever way it is configured constituted
or described all bodies need to have at their
head a group which is responsible for giving
leadership and strategic direction defining
control mechanisms and supervising the overall
management of the entityrsquos activities and
reporting on stewardship and performance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
It is this leadership or government grouping
referred to in this report either as the governing
body or the board which is the main focus for
corporate governance in the public sector For
some public organisations the governing body
is relatively obvious as with the board of an
agency or a two-tier board structure where a
non-executive supervisory board oversees an
executive management board But for other
public sector organisations the role played by the
governing body in corporate governance may not
be clear as the case study of Canadarsquos National
Research Council governing council shows
Case study Role of governing council is unclear
As part of a review of the National Research Council Canada in 2003 the Office of the
Auditor General examined the role of the National Research Council governing council Its
findings revealed a lack of clarity among governing council members about the role of the
governing council whether it was simply advisory in nature to the president or whether it
included the obligation to direct and control the work of the corporation through the president
The governing council was found to be operating primarily as an advisory body The Auditor
General was concerned about this apparent lack of clarity and believed that it has led to the
absence of key governing council governance initiatives and structures
In a follow-up review in 2007 the Office of the Auditor General noted satisfactory progress on
this issue as the council had given itself a stronger role to meet the assigned responsibilities
under the National Research Council Act It had also established two new standing committees
the audit evaluation and risk management committee and the human resources committee
Source Office of the Auditor General of Canada 2007 httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglish att_20070203xe03_e_17507html
6
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
7
Why has corporate governance come
to prominence Interest in corporate governance has been driven
primarily by a growing list of corporate scandals
in the private sector such as the Enron collapse
in the USA The problems have to do with the
pursuit of private interests (excessive compensation
of top executives overly generous benefits)
duplicity (failure to observe accepted standards
of accounting the disguising of transactions)
conflict of interest (accounting firms too close
to client corporations) and corruption in various
other forms These issues have focused interest
on a number of corporate governance issues
such as the role of the board of directors the
independence of the boardrsquos membership
from management the responsibilities of the
board chair the chairrsquos relationship to the chief
executive and the transparency and accuracy
of financial reporting (Plumptre 2004 pp 2ndash3)
More recently the collapse of Lehman Brothers
Holdings plc in the USA which has precipitated
and contributed to financial downturns globally
has drawn attention to the consequences of weak
controls In a public sector setting the public
outrage at the abuse of the expenses regime for
parliamentarians at Westminister while not a failure
of corporate governance as such has highlighted
the issue of standards of behaviour which is of
central concern to corporate governance
Three sources for new practices and codes of
corporate governance are dominant internationally
in response to these scandals ndash the United
Kingdom (UK) Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the
USA In the UK following a number of private
sector corporate governance scandals the
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate
Governance (the Cadbury Committee) was formed
in 1991 to investigate The resultant Cadbury report
developed an innovative lsquoCode of Best Practicersquo
and identified three fundamental principles of
corporate governance ndash openness integrity and
accountability A lsquocombined codersquo was developed
in 1998 which harmonised the key issues from
Cadbury with a number of subsequent reports The
lsquocombined codersquo was binding on all companies
quoted on the London Stock Exchange It has
been revised on a number of occasions The most
recent version of the Code is available at http
wwwfrcorgukdocumentspagemanagerfrc
Combined20Code20June202006pdf
The OECD has also been active in relation to
promoting good corporate governance and
published a series of Principles of Corporate
Governance in 1999 Following a comprehensive
survey of how member countries addressed the
different corporate governance challenges they
faced the Principles were revised in 2004 see
httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724
In the USA following the widely reported
accounting scandals at energy company Enron
and telecommunications company WorldCom
the federal government sought to pass laws
which would prevent in future the fraudulent
reporting of accounts in private companies The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 extended boardsrsquo
financial oversight responsibilities and imposed
new financial disclosure requirements In particular
it requires that management prepare a report on
the internal control structures and procedures for
financial reporting in their organisation as well as
a report by external auditors on that assessment
see httpwwwsoxlawcom
While private sector examples of corporate
governance failure have been driving improvement
initiatives at an international level there have also
been an increasing number of such failures within
the public sphere which have prompted reviews of
corporate governance practices and procedures
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
in the public sector Public sector scandals
have been a driving force for the increasing
focus on corporate governance in the public
sector So too has the increasing complexity
of stakeholder relationships and expectations
regarding performance and transparency leading
to demands internationally for more effective
corporate governance arrangements in the public
sector to help agencies steer their way through
complex stakeholder demands Also changing
trends in the way the public sector conducts its
business and in particular regulatory and standard-
setting practices are increasingly requiring public
organisations to adopt best corporate governance
standards
The use and stewardship of public funds is an
essential feature of corporate governance in the
public sector As the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo case study
identifies boards of public sector bodies carry
considerable responsibilities for the management
of public funds and must ensure they have the
ability to fully pursue matters they deem to be of
concern Similarly the Royal United Hospital Bath
case study shows how boards can be misled
by executive management unless they have the
necessary competencies and skills to rigorously
scrutinise performance
Corporate governance failures can result in
wasted public money or poor service experience
and in some cases may even result in serious
tragedies The UK Audit Commission analysed
a number of inquiries into failures to see what
contribution governance arrangements made
to organisational failure as the case study on
page 11 identifies
Case study Royal United Hospital Bath corporate governance failures
Professor Robert Tinston was appointed by the trust in 2003 to hold an inquiry after two
external reviews identified concerns about deliberate manipulation of waiting lists and serious
deterioration in finances at the trust The Tinston report describes lsquoa trust in the grip of a powerful
self-delusion about its real performance and the desire to continue to support this leading to
a culture of misrepresentationrsquo
In particular the report noted major corporate governance failures The inquiry noted that the
former executive team appears to have adopted a policy of marginalising the trust board or
at the very least presenting important information at board meetings in an unduly optimistic
and favourable way The report says the trustrsquos weak control and accountability arrangements
combined to undermine fundamentally the performance of the hospital Boards must be in a
position to challenge constructively the financial and operational information they receive This
means they must understand the information presented to them and its implications for the
organisation They must also be able to identify risks to their corporate objectives recognise the
financial consequences and assess and monitor how effectively they are being addressed
Source httpwwwhsjcoukruh-bath-was-delude-claims-probe19369article
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
8
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board failure the example of the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo
In British Columbia (BC) the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo is an example of how the role of boards can
have major impacts on organisational performance The facts of the Fast Ferry Project are
fully documented in the BC Auditor Generalrsquos 1999 report A Review of the Fast Ferry Project
Governance and Risk Management
The government decided to purchase three high-speed aluminium catamaran car ferries at an
initial estimated cost of $210 million The initial board appointed to oversee the construction
included three independent directors from the private sector with relevant skills and experience
in marine construction Over the first ten months of its operations the board
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
asked repeatedly for a full budget
asked to receive regular reporting against an approved budget showing both forecast costs to complete and variances
asked for a construction schedule
pointed out that the original budget was for a different type of ferry and questioned both that budget and the latest changes to it
stressed the need for a risk analysis of the current scope of the project
noted that forecast costs continued to rise and that the scope of the programme had increased without an increase in budget
Its requests were consistently ignored or only partly met with the result that the board resigned
A new board was appointed The governance systems put in place to oversee the project were
inadequate Two years later it was determined that the project was significantly over budget
(the final cost was more than $450 million) and the ferries were not suitable for their intended
use Eventually the ferries were shrink-wrapped in plastic and stored under wraps for several
years until they were sold by auction for $18 million The net loss to the taxpayers of BC was
$430 million not including the cost of all of the reports and lost productivity in responding to
public outrage at the debacle The fiasco became a lightening rod for discussions on the lack
of appropriate governance
Source Watson 2004 pp 3ndash4 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
9
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
Particular challenges for corporate
governance in the public sector The Auditor General of Western Australia provides
a useful summary of the particular constraints
acting on public sector boards with regard to
corporate governance (Office of the Auditor
General Western Australia 1998) He notes that
in the private sector the board sets the strategic
direction management gives effect to that direction
and shareholders provide support through their
investment and operate as a general check on
the performance of the organisation While there
can be grey areas between the various roles
particularly between the board and management
the relationships are not as complex as in the
public sector
In the public sector the government is responsible
for the setting of policy and usually has wide
powers to intervene Management is responsible
for the day-to-day running to provide effective and
efficient services in the pursuit of government policy
The ultimate lsquoshareholdersrsquo are the electorate
who have infrequent opportunities to vote and
no direct authority over the affairs of any single
agency The public sector board often finds itself
balancing between managing an agency and
setting strategic direction Similarly management
finds itself balancing between a board that is
responsible for the agencyrsquos performance and
a minister responsible for the portfolio These all
make corporate governance more challenging
in a public sector environment The challenges
include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
policy is set by the government
board members may be selected by ministers
ministerial directions can countermand the wishes of the board at any time
chief executive officers may be formally employed by the minister which creates accountability problems for the board
the board as the accountable authority carries the legal responsibility for the performance of the agency
The remainder of this report looks at how such
challenges can be managed In brief a review of
good practice by Barker (2004) suggests that the
governing body and the sponsoring department
need to be clear about the organisationrsquos remit
and position and in particular that
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the organisation has a clear remit and set of
strategic priorities the organisationrsquos position within the delivery
network is clearly understood
changes in strategiespriorities are rapidly
communicated between the sponsor
department and the organisation
consultation between the organisation
sponsor department and key stakeholders
takes place as appropriate prior to any
significant policy change
effective communications between the
organisation sponsor department and key
stakeholders are in place
regular review of the organisation occurs to
ensure that governance is effective and that
remits and relationships evolve in line with
organisational and policy change
What does corporate governance encompass The IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 066 httpwwwifac orgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governance pdf) identifies four main dimensions of the corporate governance of public sector organisations
standards of behaviour ndash how the
management of the organisation exercises
leadership in determining the values and
standards of the organisation which define
the culture of the organisation and the
behaviour of everyone within it
organisational structures and processes ndash
how the board and top management within
organisations are appointed and organised
how their responsibilities are defined and
how they are held accountable
bull
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
10
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull control ndash the network of various controls
established by the top management of the
organisation to support it in achieving the
organisationrsquos objectives and compliance
with applicable laws and regulations and
internal policies
external reporting ndash how the top management
of the organisation demonstrates its financial
accountability for the stewardship of public
money and its performance in the use of
resources
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Elements of what is encompassed by these
aspects of corporate governance where there
have been notable developments in recent years
are outlined in more detail in Figure 3
These four dimensions of corporate governance
form the basis for the structuring of the rest of this
report Significant developments and examples
of international best practice in each of the four
areas are discussed further in the following
chapters
Case study Identifying corporate governance lessons from failures
Each of the national inquiry reports identified that poor governance arrangements set the framework
within which organisational systems and processes failed to detect or anticipate serious service
failures There was never a single failure or shortcoming in corporate governance that was solely
responsible for service failure Rather where there were serious and tragic outcomes it was
due to a combination of factors and an accumulation of governance failures
A number of common themes were brought to light by each inquiry
the poor quality or absence of leadership
poor decision-making and decision-making processes
inadequate systems and processes such as performance management
bull
lack of clarity in roles responsibilities and activities creating poor accountability
poor working relationships and dysfunctional behaviours
an insular organisational culture and poor focus on community and user needs
inadequate contingency plans or risk-management strategies to deal with
worst-case scenarios
Some combination of these factors was present at each failing organisation
Source Audit Commission 2003 p 28 httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPages improvementtrustpublicservicesaspx
11
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 3 Dimensions of corporate governance
Dimension Recommendations on governance
1 Standards of behaviour bull
bull
bull
Codes of good practice
Leadership
Codes of conduct
2 Organisational structures
and processes
bull
bull
Accountability for public money
Roles and responsibilities
bull Governing bodybull Chairpersonbull Executive managementbull Sponsoring department
3 Control bull
bull
bull I
Risk management including management of conflicts of interest
Audit
nternal control
4 External reporting bull
bull
Transparency
Confidentiality
Source adapted from IFAC 2001 p 14 httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
12
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
13
2 Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
of the organisation operates the values that drive
the organisation and the culture that prevails all
of which influence the behaviour of all staff As
such standards of behaviour deal largely with
the development of codes of practice and what
has been termed the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate
governance which have been receiving more
prominence in recent years drawing on best
practice in the private sector (see case study)
Corporate governance codes of good
practice As new corporate governance codes extended
throughout the private sector commercial
state-owned enterprises sought guidance from
governments about equivalent standards In
response governments internationally adapted
private sector codes to provide guidance for
board members and executives on commercial
and non-commercial state bodies and agencies
These codes set the parameters for standards of
behaviour required for good corporate governance
of public organisations
Case study Addressing the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance lessons from private sector practice
Research on corporate governance in the private sector has indicated that lsquohardrsquo attributes of
governance such as board independence are necessary but not sufficient There is a need
to pay attention to the lsquosoftrsquo side of governance focusing on behavioural dynamics Some
of the lsquosoftrsquo governance factors that appear to be important for performance in the private
sector include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
A clarity in roles responsibilities and relationships between chief executive officer (CEO)
and chair directors and management directors and shareholdersstakeholders
Healthy chairCEO interface
Directors working as a team
Culture trust and open dissent
Right skills competencies and characteristics including lsquoindustrybusiness knowledgersquo
A good induction process and ongoing access to training
Leadership skills of the chair
Information flows
Regular evaluation of board performance
Source Edwards and Clough 2005 p 12 httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
bull
For example in Australia the government
developed its Governance Arrangements
for Australian Government Bodies in 2005
httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-framework
governancedocsGovernance-Arrangementsshy
for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
Similarly in Canada the Treasury Board of
Canada Secretariat has produced guidelines for
lsquoCorporate Governance in Crown Corporations
and Other Public Enterprisesrsquo httpwwwtbs-sct
gccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-eng
asp
In Ireland the Department of Finance also
published in 2009 a revised and updated lsquoCode
of Practice for the Governance of State Bodiesrsquo
h t tp www f inance gov ie v iewdoc
aspDocID=5824
An example of the type of issue covered by codes
of good practice is given for building the relationship
between the board and chief executive in the case
study taken from the Canadian code
What all of these corporate governance codes
and guidelines have in common is a commitment
to ensuring there is
clarity over the roles and responsibilities of
government boards of state bodies CEOs
and external auditing bodies as well as the
relationship between them
clarity over the public policy objectives
expected of state bodies
adequate financial reporting and internal
controls
standards of behaviour that reflect values
of integrity honesty and probity and that all
actions taken within state bodies are in the
best interests of that organisation
Case study Canadian code of good practice guidance on building a relationship
In a Crown corporation the nature of the relationship between the CEO and the board is often
critical The board must work with the CEO to build a relationship of openness and trust
Position descriptions can assist greatly in the smooth functioning of these relations The board
of directors the chair and the CEO should develop position descriptions for the board the
chair and the CEO
Boards of directors in conjunction with the CEO should periodically review the allocation of
responsibilities between the board and management This review should focus on defining
and describing both the boardrsquos principal responsibilities and the limits to managementrsquos
authority
Source httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
14
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
15
Codes of conduct An important emerging feature of good corporate
governance practice internationally is the
development of written formal codes of conduct
by organisations that set out their obligations with
regard to corporate governance Like corporate
governance codes codes of conduct have
proliferated in recent years They identify the
behaviour expected of those to whom they
apply by articulating a coherent set of values
and a means of addressing maladministration
where it occurs (see Transport for London (TfL)
case study)
The Public Audit Forum (2001) sets out important
elements which it is expected most codes of
conduct will address
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
outlines of expected professional and
personal behaviour
defined restrictions on business and political
activities (where appropriate)
criteria and procedures for declarations of
interests both business and political
definitions of conflicts of interest
a statement of the aims and values of the
body
statements of the obligations of the body
towards its customers staff community and
other interested parties
information about the bodyrsquos approach to
openness and arrangements for acquiring
information about its activities
procedures for raising complaints with an
independent body
definition of the dividing line between the role
and responsibilities of the governing body
and those of the executive staff
Source Public Audit Forum (2001) httpwww
public-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Particularly with regard to standards of behaviour
such codes of conduct are expected to
reflect the practice of the highest standards in
public life In the UK the Nolan Committee
(httpwwwarchiveofficial-documentscouk
documentparlmentnolannolanhtm) inquired
into standards of public life and established seven
principles of public life that have been widely
adopted internationally
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Selflessness Holders of public office should
take decisions solely in terms of the public
interest They should not do so in order to
gain financial or other material benefits for
themselves their family or their friends
Integrity Holders of public office should
not place themselves under any financial
or other obligation to outside individuals or
organisations that might influence them in
the performance of their official duties
Objectivity In carrying out public business
including making public appointments
awarding contracts or recommending
individuals for rewards and benefits holders
of public office should make choices on
merit
Accountability Holders of public office are
accountable for their decisions and actions
to the public and must submit themselves
to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their
office
Openness Holders of public office should be
as open as possible about all the decisions
and actions that they take They should
give reasons for their decisions and restrict
information only when the wider public
interest clearly demands
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
Honesty Holders of public office have a duty
to declare any private interests relating to their
public duties and to take steps to resolve any
conflicts arising in a way that protects the
public interest
Leadership Holders of public office should
promote and support these principles by
leadership and example
Failure to adhere to such standards can lead to
the failures in corporate governance noted earlier
and in particular to
bull
bull
bull
failures of principles of fairness in the
treatment of staff suppliers or contractors
whether due to conflicts of interest or other
reason
misuse of public assets or resources for
personal or political purposes
failure to exercise reasonable stewardship
over public assets or resources
Case study Transport for London (TfL) code of conduct
TfLrsquos corporate governance code of conduct addresses the main principles of good corporate
governance by setting out a series of undertakings that TfL has committed itself to deliver
under five main headings
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Public focus
Structures and processes
Risk management and internal control
Service delivery arrangements
Standards of conduct
For example under risk management and internal control TfL amongst other things commits
that its annual report will contain an objective and understandable statement and assessment
of its risk-management system including systems of internal control and internal audit and
their effectiveness in practice
Source httpwwwtflgovukcorporateabout-tfl2876aspxPublicFocus
16
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
17
Leadership developments Leadership is a crucial principle from a corporate
governance perspective There are two key
leadership roles the governing body of public
organisations needs to pay attention to the
establishment of sound governance structures
and processes and supporting good governance
through its own performance and behaviours
A range of commentators such as Kalokerinos
(2007) note the central role of the chair of the
governing body in the leadership of public sector
organisations This includes the traditional duty
of ensuring the proper functioning of the board
and its meetings but also covers maintaining a
close relationship with the chief executive and
representing the authority to outside stakeholders
A study undertaken for the UK Public Services
Productivity Panel (Barker 2004) states that the
chair should
bull
bull
bull
bull
act as board team leader with an
understanding of what skills knowledge and
aptitudes the board needs
regularly carry out skills knowledge and
aptitude audits which may be relatively
low key and informal to help understand
the current board composition and provide
board members with further clarity about
their individual roles
act as board lsquoconductorrsquo fostering an
environment where dissenting voices can
be heard without damaging collective
responsibility
act as the interface between the board and
its executive team and the organisation and
its sponsor department
In terms of developing board membersrsquo leadership
skills knowledge and aptitude mentoring of board
members has been of growing prominence in
recent years (see case studies)
A particular leadership challenge for the chair is
managing the relationship with the chief executive
Chief executives are professionals with specific
training in their job Chairs often come to the
role with no or limited experience of chairing
The chair and chief executive may experience a
culture clash between a management approach
to a question and a laypersonrsquos approach They
may be talking about the same problem using
very different vocabularies and terms of reference
Chief executives and chairs may also have different
definitions of success and consequently may
end up working towards different goals The
development of a good working relationship with
an agreed common vision as to the organisationrsquos
purpose is the key to effective leadership of the
organisation
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 3: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
ii
Foreword
Corporate governance means different things to different people Whilst it is an evolving concept in
the public sector as much as in the private sector it is not a strict science It is more than financial
accountability yet it is not the same as lsquoGovernancersquo the latter has a much broader scope
In Hong Kong unlike many other jurisdictions most government departments still follow the traditional
vote-funded model and are subject to a comprehensive regime of controls and accountability that
has been built up over many years
On the other hand concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies
We have therefore devoted this issue of our public sector reform series to an overview of the
challenges faced in other countries concerning corporate governance in arms-length agencies
We hope the overseas experiences related here will contribute to the debate on the most appropriate
way forward in Hong Kong
Head Efficiency Unit
July 2009
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Contents
Executive Summary 1
1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments 5
What does corporate governance mean
Why has corporate governance come to prominence
Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
What does corporate governance encompass
2 Standards of behaviour 13
Corporate governance codes of good practice
Codes of conduct
Leadership developments
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body 19
Board size
Board committees
Board appointments
Board tenure
Board development
Board performance
Board composition
Board remuneration
iii
4 Control 27
Risk management
Audit
5 External reporting 31
The need for transparency
Balancing transparency with confidentiality
6 Conclusions 33
References 34
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
1
Executive Summary
The importance of corporate governance lies in
its contribution to accountability The issue of
corporate governance has grown in prominence
in recent years largely in response to a number
of financial scandals in the private sector such as
the Enron collapse in the United States of America
(USA) More recently the collapse of Lehman
Brothers Holdings plc which has precipitated
and contributed to financial downturns globally
has drawn attention to the consequences of
weak controls
There has also been increased international public
concern over the governance and accountability
of public sector organisations arising from cases
of fraud or mismanagement or concerns over the
perceived absence of accountability of agencies
The public outrage at the abuse of the expenses
regime for parliamentarians at Westminister while
not a failure of corporate governance as such
highlights the issue of standards of behaviour which
is of central concern to corporate governance
Failure to adhere to good standards of behaviour
can lead to failures in corporate governance
such as misuse of public assets or resources
for personal or political purposes or failure to
exercise reasonable stewardship over public
assets or resources
A good definition of corporate governance in the
public sector states that
Broadly speaking corporate governance
generally refers to the processes by which
organisations are directed controlled and
held to account It encompasses authority
accountability stewardship leadership direction
and control exercised in the organisation
(Australian National Audit Office 1999)
Corporate governance can be more challenging
in a public sector environment than in the private
sector The challenges include policy is set by the
government board members may be selected by
ministers ministerial directions can countermand
the wishes of the board at any time and chief
executive officers may be formally employed by
the minister creating accountability problems
for the board
The focus of this report is on the corporate
governance of organisations at arms length
from government ie those bodies outside of
government departments or ministries such
as statutory agencies and publicly funded
non-governmental organisations (NGOs) In
particular the focus is on the functioning of the
governing board of the organisation Even where
a board may not exist there is usually a governing
body responsible for leadership and reporting on
stewardship
There are a number of common problems that
can lead to corporate governance failures
Figure 1 shows seven warning signs of service
failure Governing body members and relevant
staff in sponsoring departments need to give
particular attention to these signs
What does corporate governance cover
The International Federation of Accountantsrsquo
(IFAC) guidance that has been adopted in many
countries identifies four main dimensions of
the corporate governance of public sector
organisations (Figure 2)
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 1 The seven warning signs of service failure
2
Analysis of public inquiries shows these common problems contributed to serious service failures
Source Audit Commission of the United Kingdom
Figure 2 Dimensions of good corporate governance
Good Corporate Governance
Standards of Behaviour
bull codes of good practice
codes of conduct
leadership developments
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Organisational Structures and
Processes
bull board dynamics
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Control
risk management
audit
External Reporting
need for transparency balancing transparency with confidentiality
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
3
Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
operates the values that drive the organisation
and the culture that prevails As such standards of
behaviour deal largely with what has been termed
the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance
Governments internationally have adapted private
sector codes of practice and codes of conduct
to provide guidance for board members and
executives on these issues
Leadership is another crucial principle from a
corporate governance perspective There are two
key leadership roles that the governing bodies
of public organisations need to pay attention
to the establishment of sound governance
structures and processes and supporting good
governance through their own performance and
behaviours
Organisational structures and processes There are eight issues to be addressed by governing
bodies and their sponsoring departments if they
are to deliver good corporate governance in
terms of effective responsibility and accountability
(Table 1)
Control For public organisations other than financial
risk their work is also subject to a much
broader category of risks including policy risk
and reputational risk Risk management means
addressing these factors What is now required by
many codes of practice of corporate governance
is to ensure that risk is explicitly stated and a
consensus on addressing risks formulated
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk There is no prescriptive set
of rules specifying what constitutes ethical
behaviour Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and
service to the public which underpin most
corporate governance codes of practice
Audits and inspections become a normal
part of life in public organisations An issue of
concern for the governing body of many public
organisations is the choice of external auditors
and the need to ensure auditor independence In
that context auditor rotation is becoming more
common Another feature of good corporate
governance is the use of audit committees by
public organisations to provide an oversight of
audit arrangements
External reporting Transparency is a fundamental element of good
corporate governance Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence of
their stakeholders who in turn need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public bodies
with which they deal Transparency in relation to
matters such as procurement remuneration and
disclosure must be exemplary
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways
including public and timely production of plans
and reports Sponsoring departments need to
ensure that they have the skills and competencies
required to critically evaluate such plans and
reports
There are challenges in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information The need for codes and practices to
acknowledge the tension between confidentiality
and transparency and to strike a balance between
these competing tensions requires constant
scrutiny It is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Table 1 The eight key issues on board structures and processes
Board size Six to nine members is considered a reasonable size in the private
sector Up to twelve is not uncommon in the public sector to
meet representational and balance requirements
Board committees Commonly used for detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements in securing
effective boards Identifying competencies needed pro-active
search for candidates and attention to personal attributes are
amongst the items that must be given attention
Board tenure There is no set term limit for boards though three years is a
common time in a number of countries Appointments may be
renewed for a second term subject to satisfactory performance
Staggering of replacement appointments is important
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued review of
training needs and also to ensure that those involved in the
appointment of board members are fully trained
Board performance Best practice suggests that formal annual assessment of board
performance between the minister sponsoring department
and the chair of the board should take place to review board
performance
Board composition Best practice guidance suggests that the majority of board
members should be independent and that the chair and chief
executive positions should be separate There is a growing view
that departmental staff should not be members of the board
Board remuneration Practice varies significantly Many smaller public bodies tend
to pay only out-of-pocket expenses Others pay a set amount
based either on a daily rate or an estimated time commitment
per month or per year In general remuneration is relatively
modest
Source adapted from Uhrig (2003)
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
4
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
5
1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
What does corporate governance
mean Corporate governance is a concept that has been
very much to the fore in public sector reform in
recent years Understanding how to ensure and
achieve best practice in corporate governance
presents significant challenges for public sector
organisations internationally But what does the
term corporate governance mean
Corporate governance has its origins in the
marketplace and emerged to describe the way
in which suppliers of finance to corporations
could assure themselves of getting a return on
their investment In this sense it is about ensuring
that the management of private organisations
operate and run their businesses in a manner
consistent with the wishes of the shareholders
and that mechanisms for identifying and arresting
malpractice are in place and effective (Bovaird
and Loumlffler 2009 9)
Within the public sector when corporate
governance is discussed the main focus and
the focus of this report is often on the corporate
governance of organisations at arms length
from government ie those bodies outside of
government departments or ministries (which are
usually well regulated by specific rules and statutes)
such as statutory agencies and publicly funded
NGOs In this context corporate governance has
become associated not only with financial reporting
and controls but also with standards of behaviour
and organisational structures and processes In
this report we understand corporate governance
in the public sector by reference to the Australian
National Audit Office which states that
Broadly speaking corporate governanc e
generally refers to the processes by which
organisations are directed controlled and
held to account It encompasses authority
accountability stewardship leadership direction
and control exercised in the organisation
(Australian National Audit Office 1999 1
httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocuments
Corporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_
Authorities_and_Companiespdf)
Within private sector organisations corporate
governance is often viewed as being primarily
concerned with the functioning of the board of
the organisation In the different parts of the public
sector the equivalent of the group that fulfils the
role of the board of a company in the private
sector is at times not so easy to identify
But as the IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 019
httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoads
Study_13_Governancepdf) notes
In whatever way it is configured constituted
or described all bodies need to have at their
head a group which is responsible for giving
leadership and strategic direction defining
control mechanisms and supervising the overall
management of the entityrsquos activities and
reporting on stewardship and performance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
It is this leadership or government grouping
referred to in this report either as the governing
body or the board which is the main focus for
corporate governance in the public sector For
some public organisations the governing body
is relatively obvious as with the board of an
agency or a two-tier board structure where a
non-executive supervisory board oversees an
executive management board But for other
public sector organisations the role played by the
governing body in corporate governance may not
be clear as the case study of Canadarsquos National
Research Council governing council shows
Case study Role of governing council is unclear
As part of a review of the National Research Council Canada in 2003 the Office of the
Auditor General examined the role of the National Research Council governing council Its
findings revealed a lack of clarity among governing council members about the role of the
governing council whether it was simply advisory in nature to the president or whether it
included the obligation to direct and control the work of the corporation through the president
The governing council was found to be operating primarily as an advisory body The Auditor
General was concerned about this apparent lack of clarity and believed that it has led to the
absence of key governing council governance initiatives and structures
In a follow-up review in 2007 the Office of the Auditor General noted satisfactory progress on
this issue as the council had given itself a stronger role to meet the assigned responsibilities
under the National Research Council Act It had also established two new standing committees
the audit evaluation and risk management committee and the human resources committee
Source Office of the Auditor General of Canada 2007 httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglish att_20070203xe03_e_17507html
6
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
7
Why has corporate governance come
to prominence Interest in corporate governance has been driven
primarily by a growing list of corporate scandals
in the private sector such as the Enron collapse
in the USA The problems have to do with the
pursuit of private interests (excessive compensation
of top executives overly generous benefits)
duplicity (failure to observe accepted standards
of accounting the disguising of transactions)
conflict of interest (accounting firms too close
to client corporations) and corruption in various
other forms These issues have focused interest
on a number of corporate governance issues
such as the role of the board of directors the
independence of the boardrsquos membership
from management the responsibilities of the
board chair the chairrsquos relationship to the chief
executive and the transparency and accuracy
of financial reporting (Plumptre 2004 pp 2ndash3)
More recently the collapse of Lehman Brothers
Holdings plc in the USA which has precipitated
and contributed to financial downturns globally
has drawn attention to the consequences of weak
controls In a public sector setting the public
outrage at the abuse of the expenses regime for
parliamentarians at Westminister while not a failure
of corporate governance as such has highlighted
the issue of standards of behaviour which is of
central concern to corporate governance
Three sources for new practices and codes of
corporate governance are dominant internationally
in response to these scandals ndash the United
Kingdom (UK) Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the
USA In the UK following a number of private
sector corporate governance scandals the
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate
Governance (the Cadbury Committee) was formed
in 1991 to investigate The resultant Cadbury report
developed an innovative lsquoCode of Best Practicersquo
and identified three fundamental principles of
corporate governance ndash openness integrity and
accountability A lsquocombined codersquo was developed
in 1998 which harmonised the key issues from
Cadbury with a number of subsequent reports The
lsquocombined codersquo was binding on all companies
quoted on the London Stock Exchange It has
been revised on a number of occasions The most
recent version of the Code is available at http
wwwfrcorgukdocumentspagemanagerfrc
Combined20Code20June202006pdf
The OECD has also been active in relation to
promoting good corporate governance and
published a series of Principles of Corporate
Governance in 1999 Following a comprehensive
survey of how member countries addressed the
different corporate governance challenges they
faced the Principles were revised in 2004 see
httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724
In the USA following the widely reported
accounting scandals at energy company Enron
and telecommunications company WorldCom
the federal government sought to pass laws
which would prevent in future the fraudulent
reporting of accounts in private companies The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 extended boardsrsquo
financial oversight responsibilities and imposed
new financial disclosure requirements In particular
it requires that management prepare a report on
the internal control structures and procedures for
financial reporting in their organisation as well as
a report by external auditors on that assessment
see httpwwwsoxlawcom
While private sector examples of corporate
governance failure have been driving improvement
initiatives at an international level there have also
been an increasing number of such failures within
the public sphere which have prompted reviews of
corporate governance practices and procedures
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
in the public sector Public sector scandals
have been a driving force for the increasing
focus on corporate governance in the public
sector So too has the increasing complexity
of stakeholder relationships and expectations
regarding performance and transparency leading
to demands internationally for more effective
corporate governance arrangements in the public
sector to help agencies steer their way through
complex stakeholder demands Also changing
trends in the way the public sector conducts its
business and in particular regulatory and standard-
setting practices are increasingly requiring public
organisations to adopt best corporate governance
standards
The use and stewardship of public funds is an
essential feature of corporate governance in the
public sector As the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo case study
identifies boards of public sector bodies carry
considerable responsibilities for the management
of public funds and must ensure they have the
ability to fully pursue matters they deem to be of
concern Similarly the Royal United Hospital Bath
case study shows how boards can be misled
by executive management unless they have the
necessary competencies and skills to rigorously
scrutinise performance
Corporate governance failures can result in
wasted public money or poor service experience
and in some cases may even result in serious
tragedies The UK Audit Commission analysed
a number of inquiries into failures to see what
contribution governance arrangements made
to organisational failure as the case study on
page 11 identifies
Case study Royal United Hospital Bath corporate governance failures
Professor Robert Tinston was appointed by the trust in 2003 to hold an inquiry after two
external reviews identified concerns about deliberate manipulation of waiting lists and serious
deterioration in finances at the trust The Tinston report describes lsquoa trust in the grip of a powerful
self-delusion about its real performance and the desire to continue to support this leading to
a culture of misrepresentationrsquo
In particular the report noted major corporate governance failures The inquiry noted that the
former executive team appears to have adopted a policy of marginalising the trust board or
at the very least presenting important information at board meetings in an unduly optimistic
and favourable way The report says the trustrsquos weak control and accountability arrangements
combined to undermine fundamentally the performance of the hospital Boards must be in a
position to challenge constructively the financial and operational information they receive This
means they must understand the information presented to them and its implications for the
organisation They must also be able to identify risks to their corporate objectives recognise the
financial consequences and assess and monitor how effectively they are being addressed
Source httpwwwhsjcoukruh-bath-was-delude-claims-probe19369article
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
8
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board failure the example of the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo
In British Columbia (BC) the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo is an example of how the role of boards can
have major impacts on organisational performance The facts of the Fast Ferry Project are
fully documented in the BC Auditor Generalrsquos 1999 report A Review of the Fast Ferry Project
Governance and Risk Management
The government decided to purchase three high-speed aluminium catamaran car ferries at an
initial estimated cost of $210 million The initial board appointed to oversee the construction
included three independent directors from the private sector with relevant skills and experience
in marine construction Over the first ten months of its operations the board
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
asked repeatedly for a full budget
asked to receive regular reporting against an approved budget showing both forecast costs to complete and variances
asked for a construction schedule
pointed out that the original budget was for a different type of ferry and questioned both that budget and the latest changes to it
stressed the need for a risk analysis of the current scope of the project
noted that forecast costs continued to rise and that the scope of the programme had increased without an increase in budget
Its requests were consistently ignored or only partly met with the result that the board resigned
A new board was appointed The governance systems put in place to oversee the project were
inadequate Two years later it was determined that the project was significantly over budget
(the final cost was more than $450 million) and the ferries were not suitable for their intended
use Eventually the ferries were shrink-wrapped in plastic and stored under wraps for several
years until they were sold by auction for $18 million The net loss to the taxpayers of BC was
$430 million not including the cost of all of the reports and lost productivity in responding to
public outrage at the debacle The fiasco became a lightening rod for discussions on the lack
of appropriate governance
Source Watson 2004 pp 3ndash4 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
9
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
Particular challenges for corporate
governance in the public sector The Auditor General of Western Australia provides
a useful summary of the particular constraints
acting on public sector boards with regard to
corporate governance (Office of the Auditor
General Western Australia 1998) He notes that
in the private sector the board sets the strategic
direction management gives effect to that direction
and shareholders provide support through their
investment and operate as a general check on
the performance of the organisation While there
can be grey areas between the various roles
particularly between the board and management
the relationships are not as complex as in the
public sector
In the public sector the government is responsible
for the setting of policy and usually has wide
powers to intervene Management is responsible
for the day-to-day running to provide effective and
efficient services in the pursuit of government policy
The ultimate lsquoshareholdersrsquo are the electorate
who have infrequent opportunities to vote and
no direct authority over the affairs of any single
agency The public sector board often finds itself
balancing between managing an agency and
setting strategic direction Similarly management
finds itself balancing between a board that is
responsible for the agencyrsquos performance and
a minister responsible for the portfolio These all
make corporate governance more challenging
in a public sector environment The challenges
include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
policy is set by the government
board members may be selected by ministers
ministerial directions can countermand the wishes of the board at any time
chief executive officers may be formally employed by the minister which creates accountability problems for the board
the board as the accountable authority carries the legal responsibility for the performance of the agency
The remainder of this report looks at how such
challenges can be managed In brief a review of
good practice by Barker (2004) suggests that the
governing body and the sponsoring department
need to be clear about the organisationrsquos remit
and position and in particular that
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the organisation has a clear remit and set of
strategic priorities the organisationrsquos position within the delivery
network is clearly understood
changes in strategiespriorities are rapidly
communicated between the sponsor
department and the organisation
consultation between the organisation
sponsor department and key stakeholders
takes place as appropriate prior to any
significant policy change
effective communications between the
organisation sponsor department and key
stakeholders are in place
regular review of the organisation occurs to
ensure that governance is effective and that
remits and relationships evolve in line with
organisational and policy change
What does corporate governance encompass The IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 066 httpwwwifac orgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governance pdf) identifies four main dimensions of the corporate governance of public sector organisations
standards of behaviour ndash how the
management of the organisation exercises
leadership in determining the values and
standards of the organisation which define
the culture of the organisation and the
behaviour of everyone within it
organisational structures and processes ndash
how the board and top management within
organisations are appointed and organised
how their responsibilities are defined and
how they are held accountable
bull
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
10
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull control ndash the network of various controls
established by the top management of the
organisation to support it in achieving the
organisationrsquos objectives and compliance
with applicable laws and regulations and
internal policies
external reporting ndash how the top management
of the organisation demonstrates its financial
accountability for the stewardship of public
money and its performance in the use of
resources
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Elements of what is encompassed by these
aspects of corporate governance where there
have been notable developments in recent years
are outlined in more detail in Figure 3
These four dimensions of corporate governance
form the basis for the structuring of the rest of this
report Significant developments and examples
of international best practice in each of the four
areas are discussed further in the following
chapters
Case study Identifying corporate governance lessons from failures
Each of the national inquiry reports identified that poor governance arrangements set the framework
within which organisational systems and processes failed to detect or anticipate serious service
failures There was never a single failure or shortcoming in corporate governance that was solely
responsible for service failure Rather where there were serious and tragic outcomes it was
due to a combination of factors and an accumulation of governance failures
A number of common themes were brought to light by each inquiry
the poor quality or absence of leadership
poor decision-making and decision-making processes
inadequate systems and processes such as performance management
bull
lack of clarity in roles responsibilities and activities creating poor accountability
poor working relationships and dysfunctional behaviours
an insular organisational culture and poor focus on community and user needs
inadequate contingency plans or risk-management strategies to deal with
worst-case scenarios
Some combination of these factors was present at each failing organisation
Source Audit Commission 2003 p 28 httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPages improvementtrustpublicservicesaspx
11
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 3 Dimensions of corporate governance
Dimension Recommendations on governance
1 Standards of behaviour bull
bull
bull
Codes of good practice
Leadership
Codes of conduct
2 Organisational structures
and processes
bull
bull
Accountability for public money
Roles and responsibilities
bull Governing bodybull Chairpersonbull Executive managementbull Sponsoring department
3 Control bull
bull
bull I
Risk management including management of conflicts of interest
Audit
nternal control
4 External reporting bull
bull
Transparency
Confidentiality
Source adapted from IFAC 2001 p 14 httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
12
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
13
2 Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
of the organisation operates the values that drive
the organisation and the culture that prevails all
of which influence the behaviour of all staff As
such standards of behaviour deal largely with
the development of codes of practice and what
has been termed the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate
governance which have been receiving more
prominence in recent years drawing on best
practice in the private sector (see case study)
Corporate governance codes of good
practice As new corporate governance codes extended
throughout the private sector commercial
state-owned enterprises sought guidance from
governments about equivalent standards In
response governments internationally adapted
private sector codes to provide guidance for
board members and executives on commercial
and non-commercial state bodies and agencies
These codes set the parameters for standards of
behaviour required for good corporate governance
of public organisations
Case study Addressing the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance lessons from private sector practice
Research on corporate governance in the private sector has indicated that lsquohardrsquo attributes of
governance such as board independence are necessary but not sufficient There is a need
to pay attention to the lsquosoftrsquo side of governance focusing on behavioural dynamics Some
of the lsquosoftrsquo governance factors that appear to be important for performance in the private
sector include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
A clarity in roles responsibilities and relationships between chief executive officer (CEO)
and chair directors and management directors and shareholdersstakeholders
Healthy chairCEO interface
Directors working as a team
Culture trust and open dissent
Right skills competencies and characteristics including lsquoindustrybusiness knowledgersquo
A good induction process and ongoing access to training
Leadership skills of the chair
Information flows
Regular evaluation of board performance
Source Edwards and Clough 2005 p 12 httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
bull
For example in Australia the government
developed its Governance Arrangements
for Australian Government Bodies in 2005
httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-framework
governancedocsGovernance-Arrangementsshy
for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
Similarly in Canada the Treasury Board of
Canada Secretariat has produced guidelines for
lsquoCorporate Governance in Crown Corporations
and Other Public Enterprisesrsquo httpwwwtbs-sct
gccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-eng
asp
In Ireland the Department of Finance also
published in 2009 a revised and updated lsquoCode
of Practice for the Governance of State Bodiesrsquo
h t tp www f inance gov ie v iewdoc
aspDocID=5824
An example of the type of issue covered by codes
of good practice is given for building the relationship
between the board and chief executive in the case
study taken from the Canadian code
What all of these corporate governance codes
and guidelines have in common is a commitment
to ensuring there is
clarity over the roles and responsibilities of
government boards of state bodies CEOs
and external auditing bodies as well as the
relationship between them
clarity over the public policy objectives
expected of state bodies
adequate financial reporting and internal
controls
standards of behaviour that reflect values
of integrity honesty and probity and that all
actions taken within state bodies are in the
best interests of that organisation
Case study Canadian code of good practice guidance on building a relationship
In a Crown corporation the nature of the relationship between the CEO and the board is often
critical The board must work with the CEO to build a relationship of openness and trust
Position descriptions can assist greatly in the smooth functioning of these relations The board
of directors the chair and the CEO should develop position descriptions for the board the
chair and the CEO
Boards of directors in conjunction with the CEO should periodically review the allocation of
responsibilities between the board and management This review should focus on defining
and describing both the boardrsquos principal responsibilities and the limits to managementrsquos
authority
Source httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
14
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
15
Codes of conduct An important emerging feature of good corporate
governance practice internationally is the
development of written formal codes of conduct
by organisations that set out their obligations with
regard to corporate governance Like corporate
governance codes codes of conduct have
proliferated in recent years They identify the
behaviour expected of those to whom they
apply by articulating a coherent set of values
and a means of addressing maladministration
where it occurs (see Transport for London (TfL)
case study)
The Public Audit Forum (2001) sets out important
elements which it is expected most codes of
conduct will address
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
outlines of expected professional and
personal behaviour
defined restrictions on business and political
activities (where appropriate)
criteria and procedures for declarations of
interests both business and political
definitions of conflicts of interest
a statement of the aims and values of the
body
statements of the obligations of the body
towards its customers staff community and
other interested parties
information about the bodyrsquos approach to
openness and arrangements for acquiring
information about its activities
procedures for raising complaints with an
independent body
definition of the dividing line between the role
and responsibilities of the governing body
and those of the executive staff
Source Public Audit Forum (2001) httpwww
public-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Particularly with regard to standards of behaviour
such codes of conduct are expected to
reflect the practice of the highest standards in
public life In the UK the Nolan Committee
(httpwwwarchiveofficial-documentscouk
documentparlmentnolannolanhtm) inquired
into standards of public life and established seven
principles of public life that have been widely
adopted internationally
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Selflessness Holders of public office should
take decisions solely in terms of the public
interest They should not do so in order to
gain financial or other material benefits for
themselves their family or their friends
Integrity Holders of public office should
not place themselves under any financial
or other obligation to outside individuals or
organisations that might influence them in
the performance of their official duties
Objectivity In carrying out public business
including making public appointments
awarding contracts or recommending
individuals for rewards and benefits holders
of public office should make choices on
merit
Accountability Holders of public office are
accountable for their decisions and actions
to the public and must submit themselves
to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their
office
Openness Holders of public office should be
as open as possible about all the decisions
and actions that they take They should
give reasons for their decisions and restrict
information only when the wider public
interest clearly demands
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
Honesty Holders of public office have a duty
to declare any private interests relating to their
public duties and to take steps to resolve any
conflicts arising in a way that protects the
public interest
Leadership Holders of public office should
promote and support these principles by
leadership and example
Failure to adhere to such standards can lead to
the failures in corporate governance noted earlier
and in particular to
bull
bull
bull
failures of principles of fairness in the
treatment of staff suppliers or contractors
whether due to conflicts of interest or other
reason
misuse of public assets or resources for
personal or political purposes
failure to exercise reasonable stewardship
over public assets or resources
Case study Transport for London (TfL) code of conduct
TfLrsquos corporate governance code of conduct addresses the main principles of good corporate
governance by setting out a series of undertakings that TfL has committed itself to deliver
under five main headings
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Public focus
Structures and processes
Risk management and internal control
Service delivery arrangements
Standards of conduct
For example under risk management and internal control TfL amongst other things commits
that its annual report will contain an objective and understandable statement and assessment
of its risk-management system including systems of internal control and internal audit and
their effectiveness in practice
Source httpwwwtflgovukcorporateabout-tfl2876aspxPublicFocus
16
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
17
Leadership developments Leadership is a crucial principle from a corporate
governance perspective There are two key
leadership roles the governing body of public
organisations needs to pay attention to the
establishment of sound governance structures
and processes and supporting good governance
through its own performance and behaviours
A range of commentators such as Kalokerinos
(2007) note the central role of the chair of the
governing body in the leadership of public sector
organisations This includes the traditional duty
of ensuring the proper functioning of the board
and its meetings but also covers maintaining a
close relationship with the chief executive and
representing the authority to outside stakeholders
A study undertaken for the UK Public Services
Productivity Panel (Barker 2004) states that the
chair should
bull
bull
bull
bull
act as board team leader with an
understanding of what skills knowledge and
aptitudes the board needs
regularly carry out skills knowledge and
aptitude audits which may be relatively
low key and informal to help understand
the current board composition and provide
board members with further clarity about
their individual roles
act as board lsquoconductorrsquo fostering an
environment where dissenting voices can
be heard without damaging collective
responsibility
act as the interface between the board and
its executive team and the organisation and
its sponsor department
In terms of developing board membersrsquo leadership
skills knowledge and aptitude mentoring of board
members has been of growing prominence in
recent years (see case studies)
A particular leadership challenge for the chair is
managing the relationship with the chief executive
Chief executives are professionals with specific
training in their job Chairs often come to the
role with no or limited experience of chairing
The chair and chief executive may experience a
culture clash between a management approach
to a question and a laypersonrsquos approach They
may be talking about the same problem using
very different vocabularies and terms of reference
Chief executives and chairs may also have different
definitions of success and consequently may
end up working towards different goals The
development of a good working relationship with
an agreed common vision as to the organisationrsquos
purpose is the key to effective leadership of the
organisation
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 4: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Contents
Executive Summary 1
1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments 5
What does corporate governance mean
Why has corporate governance come to prominence
Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
What does corporate governance encompass
2 Standards of behaviour 13
Corporate governance codes of good practice
Codes of conduct
Leadership developments
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body 19
Board size
Board committees
Board appointments
Board tenure
Board development
Board performance
Board composition
Board remuneration
iii
4 Control 27
Risk management
Audit
5 External reporting 31
The need for transparency
Balancing transparency with confidentiality
6 Conclusions 33
References 34
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
1
Executive Summary
The importance of corporate governance lies in
its contribution to accountability The issue of
corporate governance has grown in prominence
in recent years largely in response to a number
of financial scandals in the private sector such as
the Enron collapse in the United States of America
(USA) More recently the collapse of Lehman
Brothers Holdings plc which has precipitated
and contributed to financial downturns globally
has drawn attention to the consequences of
weak controls
There has also been increased international public
concern over the governance and accountability
of public sector organisations arising from cases
of fraud or mismanagement or concerns over the
perceived absence of accountability of agencies
The public outrage at the abuse of the expenses
regime for parliamentarians at Westminister while
not a failure of corporate governance as such
highlights the issue of standards of behaviour which
is of central concern to corporate governance
Failure to adhere to good standards of behaviour
can lead to failures in corporate governance
such as misuse of public assets or resources
for personal or political purposes or failure to
exercise reasonable stewardship over public
assets or resources
A good definition of corporate governance in the
public sector states that
Broadly speaking corporate governance
generally refers to the processes by which
organisations are directed controlled and
held to account It encompasses authority
accountability stewardship leadership direction
and control exercised in the organisation
(Australian National Audit Office 1999)
Corporate governance can be more challenging
in a public sector environment than in the private
sector The challenges include policy is set by the
government board members may be selected by
ministers ministerial directions can countermand
the wishes of the board at any time and chief
executive officers may be formally employed by
the minister creating accountability problems
for the board
The focus of this report is on the corporate
governance of organisations at arms length
from government ie those bodies outside of
government departments or ministries such
as statutory agencies and publicly funded
non-governmental organisations (NGOs) In
particular the focus is on the functioning of the
governing board of the organisation Even where
a board may not exist there is usually a governing
body responsible for leadership and reporting on
stewardship
There are a number of common problems that
can lead to corporate governance failures
Figure 1 shows seven warning signs of service
failure Governing body members and relevant
staff in sponsoring departments need to give
particular attention to these signs
What does corporate governance cover
The International Federation of Accountantsrsquo
(IFAC) guidance that has been adopted in many
countries identifies four main dimensions of
the corporate governance of public sector
organisations (Figure 2)
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 1 The seven warning signs of service failure
2
Analysis of public inquiries shows these common problems contributed to serious service failures
Source Audit Commission of the United Kingdom
Figure 2 Dimensions of good corporate governance
Good Corporate Governance
Standards of Behaviour
bull codes of good practice
codes of conduct
leadership developments
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Organisational Structures and
Processes
bull board dynamics
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Control
risk management
audit
External Reporting
need for transparency balancing transparency with confidentiality
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
3
Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
operates the values that drive the organisation
and the culture that prevails As such standards of
behaviour deal largely with what has been termed
the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance
Governments internationally have adapted private
sector codes of practice and codes of conduct
to provide guidance for board members and
executives on these issues
Leadership is another crucial principle from a
corporate governance perspective There are two
key leadership roles that the governing bodies
of public organisations need to pay attention
to the establishment of sound governance
structures and processes and supporting good
governance through their own performance and
behaviours
Organisational structures and processes There are eight issues to be addressed by governing
bodies and their sponsoring departments if they
are to deliver good corporate governance in
terms of effective responsibility and accountability
(Table 1)
Control For public organisations other than financial
risk their work is also subject to a much
broader category of risks including policy risk
and reputational risk Risk management means
addressing these factors What is now required by
many codes of practice of corporate governance
is to ensure that risk is explicitly stated and a
consensus on addressing risks formulated
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk There is no prescriptive set
of rules specifying what constitutes ethical
behaviour Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and
service to the public which underpin most
corporate governance codes of practice
Audits and inspections become a normal
part of life in public organisations An issue of
concern for the governing body of many public
organisations is the choice of external auditors
and the need to ensure auditor independence In
that context auditor rotation is becoming more
common Another feature of good corporate
governance is the use of audit committees by
public organisations to provide an oversight of
audit arrangements
External reporting Transparency is a fundamental element of good
corporate governance Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence of
their stakeholders who in turn need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public bodies
with which they deal Transparency in relation to
matters such as procurement remuneration and
disclosure must be exemplary
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways
including public and timely production of plans
and reports Sponsoring departments need to
ensure that they have the skills and competencies
required to critically evaluate such plans and
reports
There are challenges in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information The need for codes and practices to
acknowledge the tension between confidentiality
and transparency and to strike a balance between
these competing tensions requires constant
scrutiny It is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Table 1 The eight key issues on board structures and processes
Board size Six to nine members is considered a reasonable size in the private
sector Up to twelve is not uncommon in the public sector to
meet representational and balance requirements
Board committees Commonly used for detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements in securing
effective boards Identifying competencies needed pro-active
search for candidates and attention to personal attributes are
amongst the items that must be given attention
Board tenure There is no set term limit for boards though three years is a
common time in a number of countries Appointments may be
renewed for a second term subject to satisfactory performance
Staggering of replacement appointments is important
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued review of
training needs and also to ensure that those involved in the
appointment of board members are fully trained
Board performance Best practice suggests that formal annual assessment of board
performance between the minister sponsoring department
and the chair of the board should take place to review board
performance
Board composition Best practice guidance suggests that the majority of board
members should be independent and that the chair and chief
executive positions should be separate There is a growing view
that departmental staff should not be members of the board
Board remuneration Practice varies significantly Many smaller public bodies tend
to pay only out-of-pocket expenses Others pay a set amount
based either on a daily rate or an estimated time commitment
per month or per year In general remuneration is relatively
modest
Source adapted from Uhrig (2003)
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
4
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
5
1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
What does corporate governance
mean Corporate governance is a concept that has been
very much to the fore in public sector reform in
recent years Understanding how to ensure and
achieve best practice in corporate governance
presents significant challenges for public sector
organisations internationally But what does the
term corporate governance mean
Corporate governance has its origins in the
marketplace and emerged to describe the way
in which suppliers of finance to corporations
could assure themselves of getting a return on
their investment In this sense it is about ensuring
that the management of private organisations
operate and run their businesses in a manner
consistent with the wishes of the shareholders
and that mechanisms for identifying and arresting
malpractice are in place and effective (Bovaird
and Loumlffler 2009 9)
Within the public sector when corporate
governance is discussed the main focus and
the focus of this report is often on the corporate
governance of organisations at arms length
from government ie those bodies outside of
government departments or ministries (which are
usually well regulated by specific rules and statutes)
such as statutory agencies and publicly funded
NGOs In this context corporate governance has
become associated not only with financial reporting
and controls but also with standards of behaviour
and organisational structures and processes In
this report we understand corporate governance
in the public sector by reference to the Australian
National Audit Office which states that
Broadly speaking corporate governanc e
generally refers to the processes by which
organisations are directed controlled and
held to account It encompasses authority
accountability stewardship leadership direction
and control exercised in the organisation
(Australian National Audit Office 1999 1
httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocuments
Corporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_
Authorities_and_Companiespdf)
Within private sector organisations corporate
governance is often viewed as being primarily
concerned with the functioning of the board of
the organisation In the different parts of the public
sector the equivalent of the group that fulfils the
role of the board of a company in the private
sector is at times not so easy to identify
But as the IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 019
httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoads
Study_13_Governancepdf) notes
In whatever way it is configured constituted
or described all bodies need to have at their
head a group which is responsible for giving
leadership and strategic direction defining
control mechanisms and supervising the overall
management of the entityrsquos activities and
reporting on stewardship and performance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
It is this leadership or government grouping
referred to in this report either as the governing
body or the board which is the main focus for
corporate governance in the public sector For
some public organisations the governing body
is relatively obvious as with the board of an
agency or a two-tier board structure where a
non-executive supervisory board oversees an
executive management board But for other
public sector organisations the role played by the
governing body in corporate governance may not
be clear as the case study of Canadarsquos National
Research Council governing council shows
Case study Role of governing council is unclear
As part of a review of the National Research Council Canada in 2003 the Office of the
Auditor General examined the role of the National Research Council governing council Its
findings revealed a lack of clarity among governing council members about the role of the
governing council whether it was simply advisory in nature to the president or whether it
included the obligation to direct and control the work of the corporation through the president
The governing council was found to be operating primarily as an advisory body The Auditor
General was concerned about this apparent lack of clarity and believed that it has led to the
absence of key governing council governance initiatives and structures
In a follow-up review in 2007 the Office of the Auditor General noted satisfactory progress on
this issue as the council had given itself a stronger role to meet the assigned responsibilities
under the National Research Council Act It had also established two new standing committees
the audit evaluation and risk management committee and the human resources committee
Source Office of the Auditor General of Canada 2007 httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglish att_20070203xe03_e_17507html
6
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
7
Why has corporate governance come
to prominence Interest in corporate governance has been driven
primarily by a growing list of corporate scandals
in the private sector such as the Enron collapse
in the USA The problems have to do with the
pursuit of private interests (excessive compensation
of top executives overly generous benefits)
duplicity (failure to observe accepted standards
of accounting the disguising of transactions)
conflict of interest (accounting firms too close
to client corporations) and corruption in various
other forms These issues have focused interest
on a number of corporate governance issues
such as the role of the board of directors the
independence of the boardrsquos membership
from management the responsibilities of the
board chair the chairrsquos relationship to the chief
executive and the transparency and accuracy
of financial reporting (Plumptre 2004 pp 2ndash3)
More recently the collapse of Lehman Brothers
Holdings plc in the USA which has precipitated
and contributed to financial downturns globally
has drawn attention to the consequences of weak
controls In a public sector setting the public
outrage at the abuse of the expenses regime for
parliamentarians at Westminister while not a failure
of corporate governance as such has highlighted
the issue of standards of behaviour which is of
central concern to corporate governance
Three sources for new practices and codes of
corporate governance are dominant internationally
in response to these scandals ndash the United
Kingdom (UK) Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the
USA In the UK following a number of private
sector corporate governance scandals the
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate
Governance (the Cadbury Committee) was formed
in 1991 to investigate The resultant Cadbury report
developed an innovative lsquoCode of Best Practicersquo
and identified three fundamental principles of
corporate governance ndash openness integrity and
accountability A lsquocombined codersquo was developed
in 1998 which harmonised the key issues from
Cadbury with a number of subsequent reports The
lsquocombined codersquo was binding on all companies
quoted on the London Stock Exchange It has
been revised on a number of occasions The most
recent version of the Code is available at http
wwwfrcorgukdocumentspagemanagerfrc
Combined20Code20June202006pdf
The OECD has also been active in relation to
promoting good corporate governance and
published a series of Principles of Corporate
Governance in 1999 Following a comprehensive
survey of how member countries addressed the
different corporate governance challenges they
faced the Principles were revised in 2004 see
httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724
In the USA following the widely reported
accounting scandals at energy company Enron
and telecommunications company WorldCom
the federal government sought to pass laws
which would prevent in future the fraudulent
reporting of accounts in private companies The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 extended boardsrsquo
financial oversight responsibilities and imposed
new financial disclosure requirements In particular
it requires that management prepare a report on
the internal control structures and procedures for
financial reporting in their organisation as well as
a report by external auditors on that assessment
see httpwwwsoxlawcom
While private sector examples of corporate
governance failure have been driving improvement
initiatives at an international level there have also
been an increasing number of such failures within
the public sphere which have prompted reviews of
corporate governance practices and procedures
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
in the public sector Public sector scandals
have been a driving force for the increasing
focus on corporate governance in the public
sector So too has the increasing complexity
of stakeholder relationships and expectations
regarding performance and transparency leading
to demands internationally for more effective
corporate governance arrangements in the public
sector to help agencies steer their way through
complex stakeholder demands Also changing
trends in the way the public sector conducts its
business and in particular regulatory and standard-
setting practices are increasingly requiring public
organisations to adopt best corporate governance
standards
The use and stewardship of public funds is an
essential feature of corporate governance in the
public sector As the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo case study
identifies boards of public sector bodies carry
considerable responsibilities for the management
of public funds and must ensure they have the
ability to fully pursue matters they deem to be of
concern Similarly the Royal United Hospital Bath
case study shows how boards can be misled
by executive management unless they have the
necessary competencies and skills to rigorously
scrutinise performance
Corporate governance failures can result in
wasted public money or poor service experience
and in some cases may even result in serious
tragedies The UK Audit Commission analysed
a number of inquiries into failures to see what
contribution governance arrangements made
to organisational failure as the case study on
page 11 identifies
Case study Royal United Hospital Bath corporate governance failures
Professor Robert Tinston was appointed by the trust in 2003 to hold an inquiry after two
external reviews identified concerns about deliberate manipulation of waiting lists and serious
deterioration in finances at the trust The Tinston report describes lsquoa trust in the grip of a powerful
self-delusion about its real performance and the desire to continue to support this leading to
a culture of misrepresentationrsquo
In particular the report noted major corporate governance failures The inquiry noted that the
former executive team appears to have adopted a policy of marginalising the trust board or
at the very least presenting important information at board meetings in an unduly optimistic
and favourable way The report says the trustrsquos weak control and accountability arrangements
combined to undermine fundamentally the performance of the hospital Boards must be in a
position to challenge constructively the financial and operational information they receive This
means they must understand the information presented to them and its implications for the
organisation They must also be able to identify risks to their corporate objectives recognise the
financial consequences and assess and monitor how effectively they are being addressed
Source httpwwwhsjcoukruh-bath-was-delude-claims-probe19369article
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
8
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board failure the example of the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo
In British Columbia (BC) the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo is an example of how the role of boards can
have major impacts on organisational performance The facts of the Fast Ferry Project are
fully documented in the BC Auditor Generalrsquos 1999 report A Review of the Fast Ferry Project
Governance and Risk Management
The government decided to purchase three high-speed aluminium catamaran car ferries at an
initial estimated cost of $210 million The initial board appointed to oversee the construction
included three independent directors from the private sector with relevant skills and experience
in marine construction Over the first ten months of its operations the board
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
asked repeatedly for a full budget
asked to receive regular reporting against an approved budget showing both forecast costs to complete and variances
asked for a construction schedule
pointed out that the original budget was for a different type of ferry and questioned both that budget and the latest changes to it
stressed the need for a risk analysis of the current scope of the project
noted that forecast costs continued to rise and that the scope of the programme had increased without an increase in budget
Its requests were consistently ignored or only partly met with the result that the board resigned
A new board was appointed The governance systems put in place to oversee the project were
inadequate Two years later it was determined that the project was significantly over budget
(the final cost was more than $450 million) and the ferries were not suitable for their intended
use Eventually the ferries were shrink-wrapped in plastic and stored under wraps for several
years until they were sold by auction for $18 million The net loss to the taxpayers of BC was
$430 million not including the cost of all of the reports and lost productivity in responding to
public outrage at the debacle The fiasco became a lightening rod for discussions on the lack
of appropriate governance
Source Watson 2004 pp 3ndash4 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
9
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
Particular challenges for corporate
governance in the public sector The Auditor General of Western Australia provides
a useful summary of the particular constraints
acting on public sector boards with regard to
corporate governance (Office of the Auditor
General Western Australia 1998) He notes that
in the private sector the board sets the strategic
direction management gives effect to that direction
and shareholders provide support through their
investment and operate as a general check on
the performance of the organisation While there
can be grey areas between the various roles
particularly between the board and management
the relationships are not as complex as in the
public sector
In the public sector the government is responsible
for the setting of policy and usually has wide
powers to intervene Management is responsible
for the day-to-day running to provide effective and
efficient services in the pursuit of government policy
The ultimate lsquoshareholdersrsquo are the electorate
who have infrequent opportunities to vote and
no direct authority over the affairs of any single
agency The public sector board often finds itself
balancing between managing an agency and
setting strategic direction Similarly management
finds itself balancing between a board that is
responsible for the agencyrsquos performance and
a minister responsible for the portfolio These all
make corporate governance more challenging
in a public sector environment The challenges
include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
policy is set by the government
board members may be selected by ministers
ministerial directions can countermand the wishes of the board at any time
chief executive officers may be formally employed by the minister which creates accountability problems for the board
the board as the accountable authority carries the legal responsibility for the performance of the agency
The remainder of this report looks at how such
challenges can be managed In brief a review of
good practice by Barker (2004) suggests that the
governing body and the sponsoring department
need to be clear about the organisationrsquos remit
and position and in particular that
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the organisation has a clear remit and set of
strategic priorities the organisationrsquos position within the delivery
network is clearly understood
changes in strategiespriorities are rapidly
communicated between the sponsor
department and the organisation
consultation between the organisation
sponsor department and key stakeholders
takes place as appropriate prior to any
significant policy change
effective communications between the
organisation sponsor department and key
stakeholders are in place
regular review of the organisation occurs to
ensure that governance is effective and that
remits and relationships evolve in line with
organisational and policy change
What does corporate governance encompass The IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 066 httpwwwifac orgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governance pdf) identifies four main dimensions of the corporate governance of public sector organisations
standards of behaviour ndash how the
management of the organisation exercises
leadership in determining the values and
standards of the organisation which define
the culture of the organisation and the
behaviour of everyone within it
organisational structures and processes ndash
how the board and top management within
organisations are appointed and organised
how their responsibilities are defined and
how they are held accountable
bull
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
10
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull control ndash the network of various controls
established by the top management of the
organisation to support it in achieving the
organisationrsquos objectives and compliance
with applicable laws and regulations and
internal policies
external reporting ndash how the top management
of the organisation demonstrates its financial
accountability for the stewardship of public
money and its performance in the use of
resources
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Elements of what is encompassed by these
aspects of corporate governance where there
have been notable developments in recent years
are outlined in more detail in Figure 3
These four dimensions of corporate governance
form the basis for the structuring of the rest of this
report Significant developments and examples
of international best practice in each of the four
areas are discussed further in the following
chapters
Case study Identifying corporate governance lessons from failures
Each of the national inquiry reports identified that poor governance arrangements set the framework
within which organisational systems and processes failed to detect or anticipate serious service
failures There was never a single failure or shortcoming in corporate governance that was solely
responsible for service failure Rather where there were serious and tragic outcomes it was
due to a combination of factors and an accumulation of governance failures
A number of common themes were brought to light by each inquiry
the poor quality or absence of leadership
poor decision-making and decision-making processes
inadequate systems and processes such as performance management
bull
lack of clarity in roles responsibilities and activities creating poor accountability
poor working relationships and dysfunctional behaviours
an insular organisational culture and poor focus on community and user needs
inadequate contingency plans or risk-management strategies to deal with
worst-case scenarios
Some combination of these factors was present at each failing organisation
Source Audit Commission 2003 p 28 httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPages improvementtrustpublicservicesaspx
11
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 3 Dimensions of corporate governance
Dimension Recommendations on governance
1 Standards of behaviour bull
bull
bull
Codes of good practice
Leadership
Codes of conduct
2 Organisational structures
and processes
bull
bull
Accountability for public money
Roles and responsibilities
bull Governing bodybull Chairpersonbull Executive managementbull Sponsoring department
3 Control bull
bull
bull I
Risk management including management of conflicts of interest
Audit
nternal control
4 External reporting bull
bull
Transparency
Confidentiality
Source adapted from IFAC 2001 p 14 httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
12
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
13
2 Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
of the organisation operates the values that drive
the organisation and the culture that prevails all
of which influence the behaviour of all staff As
such standards of behaviour deal largely with
the development of codes of practice and what
has been termed the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate
governance which have been receiving more
prominence in recent years drawing on best
practice in the private sector (see case study)
Corporate governance codes of good
practice As new corporate governance codes extended
throughout the private sector commercial
state-owned enterprises sought guidance from
governments about equivalent standards In
response governments internationally adapted
private sector codes to provide guidance for
board members and executives on commercial
and non-commercial state bodies and agencies
These codes set the parameters for standards of
behaviour required for good corporate governance
of public organisations
Case study Addressing the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance lessons from private sector practice
Research on corporate governance in the private sector has indicated that lsquohardrsquo attributes of
governance such as board independence are necessary but not sufficient There is a need
to pay attention to the lsquosoftrsquo side of governance focusing on behavioural dynamics Some
of the lsquosoftrsquo governance factors that appear to be important for performance in the private
sector include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
A clarity in roles responsibilities and relationships between chief executive officer (CEO)
and chair directors and management directors and shareholdersstakeholders
Healthy chairCEO interface
Directors working as a team
Culture trust and open dissent
Right skills competencies and characteristics including lsquoindustrybusiness knowledgersquo
A good induction process and ongoing access to training
Leadership skills of the chair
Information flows
Regular evaluation of board performance
Source Edwards and Clough 2005 p 12 httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
bull
For example in Australia the government
developed its Governance Arrangements
for Australian Government Bodies in 2005
httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-framework
governancedocsGovernance-Arrangementsshy
for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
Similarly in Canada the Treasury Board of
Canada Secretariat has produced guidelines for
lsquoCorporate Governance in Crown Corporations
and Other Public Enterprisesrsquo httpwwwtbs-sct
gccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-eng
asp
In Ireland the Department of Finance also
published in 2009 a revised and updated lsquoCode
of Practice for the Governance of State Bodiesrsquo
h t tp www f inance gov ie v iewdoc
aspDocID=5824
An example of the type of issue covered by codes
of good practice is given for building the relationship
between the board and chief executive in the case
study taken from the Canadian code
What all of these corporate governance codes
and guidelines have in common is a commitment
to ensuring there is
clarity over the roles and responsibilities of
government boards of state bodies CEOs
and external auditing bodies as well as the
relationship between them
clarity over the public policy objectives
expected of state bodies
adequate financial reporting and internal
controls
standards of behaviour that reflect values
of integrity honesty and probity and that all
actions taken within state bodies are in the
best interests of that organisation
Case study Canadian code of good practice guidance on building a relationship
In a Crown corporation the nature of the relationship between the CEO and the board is often
critical The board must work with the CEO to build a relationship of openness and trust
Position descriptions can assist greatly in the smooth functioning of these relations The board
of directors the chair and the CEO should develop position descriptions for the board the
chair and the CEO
Boards of directors in conjunction with the CEO should periodically review the allocation of
responsibilities between the board and management This review should focus on defining
and describing both the boardrsquos principal responsibilities and the limits to managementrsquos
authority
Source httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
14
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
15
Codes of conduct An important emerging feature of good corporate
governance practice internationally is the
development of written formal codes of conduct
by organisations that set out their obligations with
regard to corporate governance Like corporate
governance codes codes of conduct have
proliferated in recent years They identify the
behaviour expected of those to whom they
apply by articulating a coherent set of values
and a means of addressing maladministration
where it occurs (see Transport for London (TfL)
case study)
The Public Audit Forum (2001) sets out important
elements which it is expected most codes of
conduct will address
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
outlines of expected professional and
personal behaviour
defined restrictions on business and political
activities (where appropriate)
criteria and procedures for declarations of
interests both business and political
definitions of conflicts of interest
a statement of the aims and values of the
body
statements of the obligations of the body
towards its customers staff community and
other interested parties
information about the bodyrsquos approach to
openness and arrangements for acquiring
information about its activities
procedures for raising complaints with an
independent body
definition of the dividing line between the role
and responsibilities of the governing body
and those of the executive staff
Source Public Audit Forum (2001) httpwww
public-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Particularly with regard to standards of behaviour
such codes of conduct are expected to
reflect the practice of the highest standards in
public life In the UK the Nolan Committee
(httpwwwarchiveofficial-documentscouk
documentparlmentnolannolanhtm) inquired
into standards of public life and established seven
principles of public life that have been widely
adopted internationally
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Selflessness Holders of public office should
take decisions solely in terms of the public
interest They should not do so in order to
gain financial or other material benefits for
themselves their family or their friends
Integrity Holders of public office should
not place themselves under any financial
or other obligation to outside individuals or
organisations that might influence them in
the performance of their official duties
Objectivity In carrying out public business
including making public appointments
awarding contracts or recommending
individuals for rewards and benefits holders
of public office should make choices on
merit
Accountability Holders of public office are
accountable for their decisions and actions
to the public and must submit themselves
to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their
office
Openness Holders of public office should be
as open as possible about all the decisions
and actions that they take They should
give reasons for their decisions and restrict
information only when the wider public
interest clearly demands
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
Honesty Holders of public office have a duty
to declare any private interests relating to their
public duties and to take steps to resolve any
conflicts arising in a way that protects the
public interest
Leadership Holders of public office should
promote and support these principles by
leadership and example
Failure to adhere to such standards can lead to
the failures in corporate governance noted earlier
and in particular to
bull
bull
bull
failures of principles of fairness in the
treatment of staff suppliers or contractors
whether due to conflicts of interest or other
reason
misuse of public assets or resources for
personal or political purposes
failure to exercise reasonable stewardship
over public assets or resources
Case study Transport for London (TfL) code of conduct
TfLrsquos corporate governance code of conduct addresses the main principles of good corporate
governance by setting out a series of undertakings that TfL has committed itself to deliver
under five main headings
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Public focus
Structures and processes
Risk management and internal control
Service delivery arrangements
Standards of conduct
For example under risk management and internal control TfL amongst other things commits
that its annual report will contain an objective and understandable statement and assessment
of its risk-management system including systems of internal control and internal audit and
their effectiveness in practice
Source httpwwwtflgovukcorporateabout-tfl2876aspxPublicFocus
16
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
17
Leadership developments Leadership is a crucial principle from a corporate
governance perspective There are two key
leadership roles the governing body of public
organisations needs to pay attention to the
establishment of sound governance structures
and processes and supporting good governance
through its own performance and behaviours
A range of commentators such as Kalokerinos
(2007) note the central role of the chair of the
governing body in the leadership of public sector
organisations This includes the traditional duty
of ensuring the proper functioning of the board
and its meetings but also covers maintaining a
close relationship with the chief executive and
representing the authority to outside stakeholders
A study undertaken for the UK Public Services
Productivity Panel (Barker 2004) states that the
chair should
bull
bull
bull
bull
act as board team leader with an
understanding of what skills knowledge and
aptitudes the board needs
regularly carry out skills knowledge and
aptitude audits which may be relatively
low key and informal to help understand
the current board composition and provide
board members with further clarity about
their individual roles
act as board lsquoconductorrsquo fostering an
environment where dissenting voices can
be heard without damaging collective
responsibility
act as the interface between the board and
its executive team and the organisation and
its sponsor department
In terms of developing board membersrsquo leadership
skills knowledge and aptitude mentoring of board
members has been of growing prominence in
recent years (see case studies)
A particular leadership challenge for the chair is
managing the relationship with the chief executive
Chief executives are professionals with specific
training in their job Chairs often come to the
role with no or limited experience of chairing
The chair and chief executive may experience a
culture clash between a management approach
to a question and a laypersonrsquos approach They
may be talking about the same problem using
very different vocabularies and terms of reference
Chief executives and chairs may also have different
definitions of success and consequently may
end up working towards different goals The
development of a good working relationship with
an agreed common vision as to the organisationrsquos
purpose is the key to effective leadership of the
organisation
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 5: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
1
Executive Summary
The importance of corporate governance lies in
its contribution to accountability The issue of
corporate governance has grown in prominence
in recent years largely in response to a number
of financial scandals in the private sector such as
the Enron collapse in the United States of America
(USA) More recently the collapse of Lehman
Brothers Holdings plc which has precipitated
and contributed to financial downturns globally
has drawn attention to the consequences of
weak controls
There has also been increased international public
concern over the governance and accountability
of public sector organisations arising from cases
of fraud or mismanagement or concerns over the
perceived absence of accountability of agencies
The public outrage at the abuse of the expenses
regime for parliamentarians at Westminister while
not a failure of corporate governance as such
highlights the issue of standards of behaviour which
is of central concern to corporate governance
Failure to adhere to good standards of behaviour
can lead to failures in corporate governance
such as misuse of public assets or resources
for personal or political purposes or failure to
exercise reasonable stewardship over public
assets or resources
A good definition of corporate governance in the
public sector states that
Broadly speaking corporate governance
generally refers to the processes by which
organisations are directed controlled and
held to account It encompasses authority
accountability stewardship leadership direction
and control exercised in the organisation
(Australian National Audit Office 1999)
Corporate governance can be more challenging
in a public sector environment than in the private
sector The challenges include policy is set by the
government board members may be selected by
ministers ministerial directions can countermand
the wishes of the board at any time and chief
executive officers may be formally employed by
the minister creating accountability problems
for the board
The focus of this report is on the corporate
governance of organisations at arms length
from government ie those bodies outside of
government departments or ministries such
as statutory agencies and publicly funded
non-governmental organisations (NGOs) In
particular the focus is on the functioning of the
governing board of the organisation Even where
a board may not exist there is usually a governing
body responsible for leadership and reporting on
stewardship
There are a number of common problems that
can lead to corporate governance failures
Figure 1 shows seven warning signs of service
failure Governing body members and relevant
staff in sponsoring departments need to give
particular attention to these signs
What does corporate governance cover
The International Federation of Accountantsrsquo
(IFAC) guidance that has been adopted in many
countries identifies four main dimensions of
the corporate governance of public sector
organisations (Figure 2)
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 1 The seven warning signs of service failure
2
Analysis of public inquiries shows these common problems contributed to serious service failures
Source Audit Commission of the United Kingdom
Figure 2 Dimensions of good corporate governance
Good Corporate Governance
Standards of Behaviour
bull codes of good practice
codes of conduct
leadership developments
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Organisational Structures and
Processes
bull board dynamics
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Control
risk management
audit
External Reporting
need for transparency balancing transparency with confidentiality
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
3
Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
operates the values that drive the organisation
and the culture that prevails As such standards of
behaviour deal largely with what has been termed
the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance
Governments internationally have adapted private
sector codes of practice and codes of conduct
to provide guidance for board members and
executives on these issues
Leadership is another crucial principle from a
corporate governance perspective There are two
key leadership roles that the governing bodies
of public organisations need to pay attention
to the establishment of sound governance
structures and processes and supporting good
governance through their own performance and
behaviours
Organisational structures and processes There are eight issues to be addressed by governing
bodies and their sponsoring departments if they
are to deliver good corporate governance in
terms of effective responsibility and accountability
(Table 1)
Control For public organisations other than financial
risk their work is also subject to a much
broader category of risks including policy risk
and reputational risk Risk management means
addressing these factors What is now required by
many codes of practice of corporate governance
is to ensure that risk is explicitly stated and a
consensus on addressing risks formulated
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk There is no prescriptive set
of rules specifying what constitutes ethical
behaviour Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and
service to the public which underpin most
corporate governance codes of practice
Audits and inspections become a normal
part of life in public organisations An issue of
concern for the governing body of many public
organisations is the choice of external auditors
and the need to ensure auditor independence In
that context auditor rotation is becoming more
common Another feature of good corporate
governance is the use of audit committees by
public organisations to provide an oversight of
audit arrangements
External reporting Transparency is a fundamental element of good
corporate governance Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence of
their stakeholders who in turn need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public bodies
with which they deal Transparency in relation to
matters such as procurement remuneration and
disclosure must be exemplary
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways
including public and timely production of plans
and reports Sponsoring departments need to
ensure that they have the skills and competencies
required to critically evaluate such plans and
reports
There are challenges in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information The need for codes and practices to
acknowledge the tension between confidentiality
and transparency and to strike a balance between
these competing tensions requires constant
scrutiny It is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Table 1 The eight key issues on board structures and processes
Board size Six to nine members is considered a reasonable size in the private
sector Up to twelve is not uncommon in the public sector to
meet representational and balance requirements
Board committees Commonly used for detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements in securing
effective boards Identifying competencies needed pro-active
search for candidates and attention to personal attributes are
amongst the items that must be given attention
Board tenure There is no set term limit for boards though three years is a
common time in a number of countries Appointments may be
renewed for a second term subject to satisfactory performance
Staggering of replacement appointments is important
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued review of
training needs and also to ensure that those involved in the
appointment of board members are fully trained
Board performance Best practice suggests that formal annual assessment of board
performance between the minister sponsoring department
and the chair of the board should take place to review board
performance
Board composition Best practice guidance suggests that the majority of board
members should be independent and that the chair and chief
executive positions should be separate There is a growing view
that departmental staff should not be members of the board
Board remuneration Practice varies significantly Many smaller public bodies tend
to pay only out-of-pocket expenses Others pay a set amount
based either on a daily rate or an estimated time commitment
per month or per year In general remuneration is relatively
modest
Source adapted from Uhrig (2003)
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
4
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
5
1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
What does corporate governance
mean Corporate governance is a concept that has been
very much to the fore in public sector reform in
recent years Understanding how to ensure and
achieve best practice in corporate governance
presents significant challenges for public sector
organisations internationally But what does the
term corporate governance mean
Corporate governance has its origins in the
marketplace and emerged to describe the way
in which suppliers of finance to corporations
could assure themselves of getting a return on
their investment In this sense it is about ensuring
that the management of private organisations
operate and run their businesses in a manner
consistent with the wishes of the shareholders
and that mechanisms for identifying and arresting
malpractice are in place and effective (Bovaird
and Loumlffler 2009 9)
Within the public sector when corporate
governance is discussed the main focus and
the focus of this report is often on the corporate
governance of organisations at arms length
from government ie those bodies outside of
government departments or ministries (which are
usually well regulated by specific rules and statutes)
such as statutory agencies and publicly funded
NGOs In this context corporate governance has
become associated not only with financial reporting
and controls but also with standards of behaviour
and organisational structures and processes In
this report we understand corporate governance
in the public sector by reference to the Australian
National Audit Office which states that
Broadly speaking corporate governanc e
generally refers to the processes by which
organisations are directed controlled and
held to account It encompasses authority
accountability stewardship leadership direction
and control exercised in the organisation
(Australian National Audit Office 1999 1
httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocuments
Corporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_
Authorities_and_Companiespdf)
Within private sector organisations corporate
governance is often viewed as being primarily
concerned with the functioning of the board of
the organisation In the different parts of the public
sector the equivalent of the group that fulfils the
role of the board of a company in the private
sector is at times not so easy to identify
But as the IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 019
httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoads
Study_13_Governancepdf) notes
In whatever way it is configured constituted
or described all bodies need to have at their
head a group which is responsible for giving
leadership and strategic direction defining
control mechanisms and supervising the overall
management of the entityrsquos activities and
reporting on stewardship and performance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
It is this leadership or government grouping
referred to in this report either as the governing
body or the board which is the main focus for
corporate governance in the public sector For
some public organisations the governing body
is relatively obvious as with the board of an
agency or a two-tier board structure where a
non-executive supervisory board oversees an
executive management board But for other
public sector organisations the role played by the
governing body in corporate governance may not
be clear as the case study of Canadarsquos National
Research Council governing council shows
Case study Role of governing council is unclear
As part of a review of the National Research Council Canada in 2003 the Office of the
Auditor General examined the role of the National Research Council governing council Its
findings revealed a lack of clarity among governing council members about the role of the
governing council whether it was simply advisory in nature to the president or whether it
included the obligation to direct and control the work of the corporation through the president
The governing council was found to be operating primarily as an advisory body The Auditor
General was concerned about this apparent lack of clarity and believed that it has led to the
absence of key governing council governance initiatives and structures
In a follow-up review in 2007 the Office of the Auditor General noted satisfactory progress on
this issue as the council had given itself a stronger role to meet the assigned responsibilities
under the National Research Council Act It had also established two new standing committees
the audit evaluation and risk management committee and the human resources committee
Source Office of the Auditor General of Canada 2007 httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglish att_20070203xe03_e_17507html
6
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
7
Why has corporate governance come
to prominence Interest in corporate governance has been driven
primarily by a growing list of corporate scandals
in the private sector such as the Enron collapse
in the USA The problems have to do with the
pursuit of private interests (excessive compensation
of top executives overly generous benefits)
duplicity (failure to observe accepted standards
of accounting the disguising of transactions)
conflict of interest (accounting firms too close
to client corporations) and corruption in various
other forms These issues have focused interest
on a number of corporate governance issues
such as the role of the board of directors the
independence of the boardrsquos membership
from management the responsibilities of the
board chair the chairrsquos relationship to the chief
executive and the transparency and accuracy
of financial reporting (Plumptre 2004 pp 2ndash3)
More recently the collapse of Lehman Brothers
Holdings plc in the USA which has precipitated
and contributed to financial downturns globally
has drawn attention to the consequences of weak
controls In a public sector setting the public
outrage at the abuse of the expenses regime for
parliamentarians at Westminister while not a failure
of corporate governance as such has highlighted
the issue of standards of behaviour which is of
central concern to corporate governance
Three sources for new practices and codes of
corporate governance are dominant internationally
in response to these scandals ndash the United
Kingdom (UK) Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the
USA In the UK following a number of private
sector corporate governance scandals the
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate
Governance (the Cadbury Committee) was formed
in 1991 to investigate The resultant Cadbury report
developed an innovative lsquoCode of Best Practicersquo
and identified three fundamental principles of
corporate governance ndash openness integrity and
accountability A lsquocombined codersquo was developed
in 1998 which harmonised the key issues from
Cadbury with a number of subsequent reports The
lsquocombined codersquo was binding on all companies
quoted on the London Stock Exchange It has
been revised on a number of occasions The most
recent version of the Code is available at http
wwwfrcorgukdocumentspagemanagerfrc
Combined20Code20June202006pdf
The OECD has also been active in relation to
promoting good corporate governance and
published a series of Principles of Corporate
Governance in 1999 Following a comprehensive
survey of how member countries addressed the
different corporate governance challenges they
faced the Principles were revised in 2004 see
httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724
In the USA following the widely reported
accounting scandals at energy company Enron
and telecommunications company WorldCom
the federal government sought to pass laws
which would prevent in future the fraudulent
reporting of accounts in private companies The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 extended boardsrsquo
financial oversight responsibilities and imposed
new financial disclosure requirements In particular
it requires that management prepare a report on
the internal control structures and procedures for
financial reporting in their organisation as well as
a report by external auditors on that assessment
see httpwwwsoxlawcom
While private sector examples of corporate
governance failure have been driving improvement
initiatives at an international level there have also
been an increasing number of such failures within
the public sphere which have prompted reviews of
corporate governance practices and procedures
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
in the public sector Public sector scandals
have been a driving force for the increasing
focus on corporate governance in the public
sector So too has the increasing complexity
of stakeholder relationships and expectations
regarding performance and transparency leading
to demands internationally for more effective
corporate governance arrangements in the public
sector to help agencies steer their way through
complex stakeholder demands Also changing
trends in the way the public sector conducts its
business and in particular regulatory and standard-
setting practices are increasingly requiring public
organisations to adopt best corporate governance
standards
The use and stewardship of public funds is an
essential feature of corporate governance in the
public sector As the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo case study
identifies boards of public sector bodies carry
considerable responsibilities for the management
of public funds and must ensure they have the
ability to fully pursue matters they deem to be of
concern Similarly the Royal United Hospital Bath
case study shows how boards can be misled
by executive management unless they have the
necessary competencies and skills to rigorously
scrutinise performance
Corporate governance failures can result in
wasted public money or poor service experience
and in some cases may even result in serious
tragedies The UK Audit Commission analysed
a number of inquiries into failures to see what
contribution governance arrangements made
to organisational failure as the case study on
page 11 identifies
Case study Royal United Hospital Bath corporate governance failures
Professor Robert Tinston was appointed by the trust in 2003 to hold an inquiry after two
external reviews identified concerns about deliberate manipulation of waiting lists and serious
deterioration in finances at the trust The Tinston report describes lsquoa trust in the grip of a powerful
self-delusion about its real performance and the desire to continue to support this leading to
a culture of misrepresentationrsquo
In particular the report noted major corporate governance failures The inquiry noted that the
former executive team appears to have adopted a policy of marginalising the trust board or
at the very least presenting important information at board meetings in an unduly optimistic
and favourable way The report says the trustrsquos weak control and accountability arrangements
combined to undermine fundamentally the performance of the hospital Boards must be in a
position to challenge constructively the financial and operational information they receive This
means they must understand the information presented to them and its implications for the
organisation They must also be able to identify risks to their corporate objectives recognise the
financial consequences and assess and monitor how effectively they are being addressed
Source httpwwwhsjcoukruh-bath-was-delude-claims-probe19369article
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
8
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board failure the example of the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo
In British Columbia (BC) the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo is an example of how the role of boards can
have major impacts on organisational performance The facts of the Fast Ferry Project are
fully documented in the BC Auditor Generalrsquos 1999 report A Review of the Fast Ferry Project
Governance and Risk Management
The government decided to purchase three high-speed aluminium catamaran car ferries at an
initial estimated cost of $210 million The initial board appointed to oversee the construction
included three independent directors from the private sector with relevant skills and experience
in marine construction Over the first ten months of its operations the board
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
asked repeatedly for a full budget
asked to receive regular reporting against an approved budget showing both forecast costs to complete and variances
asked for a construction schedule
pointed out that the original budget was for a different type of ferry and questioned both that budget and the latest changes to it
stressed the need for a risk analysis of the current scope of the project
noted that forecast costs continued to rise and that the scope of the programme had increased without an increase in budget
Its requests were consistently ignored or only partly met with the result that the board resigned
A new board was appointed The governance systems put in place to oversee the project were
inadequate Two years later it was determined that the project was significantly over budget
(the final cost was more than $450 million) and the ferries were not suitable for their intended
use Eventually the ferries were shrink-wrapped in plastic and stored under wraps for several
years until they were sold by auction for $18 million The net loss to the taxpayers of BC was
$430 million not including the cost of all of the reports and lost productivity in responding to
public outrage at the debacle The fiasco became a lightening rod for discussions on the lack
of appropriate governance
Source Watson 2004 pp 3ndash4 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
9
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
Particular challenges for corporate
governance in the public sector The Auditor General of Western Australia provides
a useful summary of the particular constraints
acting on public sector boards with regard to
corporate governance (Office of the Auditor
General Western Australia 1998) He notes that
in the private sector the board sets the strategic
direction management gives effect to that direction
and shareholders provide support through their
investment and operate as a general check on
the performance of the organisation While there
can be grey areas between the various roles
particularly between the board and management
the relationships are not as complex as in the
public sector
In the public sector the government is responsible
for the setting of policy and usually has wide
powers to intervene Management is responsible
for the day-to-day running to provide effective and
efficient services in the pursuit of government policy
The ultimate lsquoshareholdersrsquo are the electorate
who have infrequent opportunities to vote and
no direct authority over the affairs of any single
agency The public sector board often finds itself
balancing between managing an agency and
setting strategic direction Similarly management
finds itself balancing between a board that is
responsible for the agencyrsquos performance and
a minister responsible for the portfolio These all
make corporate governance more challenging
in a public sector environment The challenges
include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
policy is set by the government
board members may be selected by ministers
ministerial directions can countermand the wishes of the board at any time
chief executive officers may be formally employed by the minister which creates accountability problems for the board
the board as the accountable authority carries the legal responsibility for the performance of the agency
The remainder of this report looks at how such
challenges can be managed In brief a review of
good practice by Barker (2004) suggests that the
governing body and the sponsoring department
need to be clear about the organisationrsquos remit
and position and in particular that
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the organisation has a clear remit and set of
strategic priorities the organisationrsquos position within the delivery
network is clearly understood
changes in strategiespriorities are rapidly
communicated between the sponsor
department and the organisation
consultation between the organisation
sponsor department and key stakeholders
takes place as appropriate prior to any
significant policy change
effective communications between the
organisation sponsor department and key
stakeholders are in place
regular review of the organisation occurs to
ensure that governance is effective and that
remits and relationships evolve in line with
organisational and policy change
What does corporate governance encompass The IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 066 httpwwwifac orgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governance pdf) identifies four main dimensions of the corporate governance of public sector organisations
standards of behaviour ndash how the
management of the organisation exercises
leadership in determining the values and
standards of the organisation which define
the culture of the organisation and the
behaviour of everyone within it
organisational structures and processes ndash
how the board and top management within
organisations are appointed and organised
how their responsibilities are defined and
how they are held accountable
bull
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
10
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull control ndash the network of various controls
established by the top management of the
organisation to support it in achieving the
organisationrsquos objectives and compliance
with applicable laws and regulations and
internal policies
external reporting ndash how the top management
of the organisation demonstrates its financial
accountability for the stewardship of public
money and its performance in the use of
resources
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Elements of what is encompassed by these
aspects of corporate governance where there
have been notable developments in recent years
are outlined in more detail in Figure 3
These four dimensions of corporate governance
form the basis for the structuring of the rest of this
report Significant developments and examples
of international best practice in each of the four
areas are discussed further in the following
chapters
Case study Identifying corporate governance lessons from failures
Each of the national inquiry reports identified that poor governance arrangements set the framework
within which organisational systems and processes failed to detect or anticipate serious service
failures There was never a single failure or shortcoming in corporate governance that was solely
responsible for service failure Rather where there were serious and tragic outcomes it was
due to a combination of factors and an accumulation of governance failures
A number of common themes were brought to light by each inquiry
the poor quality or absence of leadership
poor decision-making and decision-making processes
inadequate systems and processes such as performance management
bull
lack of clarity in roles responsibilities and activities creating poor accountability
poor working relationships and dysfunctional behaviours
an insular organisational culture and poor focus on community and user needs
inadequate contingency plans or risk-management strategies to deal with
worst-case scenarios
Some combination of these factors was present at each failing organisation
Source Audit Commission 2003 p 28 httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPages improvementtrustpublicservicesaspx
11
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 3 Dimensions of corporate governance
Dimension Recommendations on governance
1 Standards of behaviour bull
bull
bull
Codes of good practice
Leadership
Codes of conduct
2 Organisational structures
and processes
bull
bull
Accountability for public money
Roles and responsibilities
bull Governing bodybull Chairpersonbull Executive managementbull Sponsoring department
3 Control bull
bull
bull I
Risk management including management of conflicts of interest
Audit
nternal control
4 External reporting bull
bull
Transparency
Confidentiality
Source adapted from IFAC 2001 p 14 httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
12
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
13
2 Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
of the organisation operates the values that drive
the organisation and the culture that prevails all
of which influence the behaviour of all staff As
such standards of behaviour deal largely with
the development of codes of practice and what
has been termed the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate
governance which have been receiving more
prominence in recent years drawing on best
practice in the private sector (see case study)
Corporate governance codes of good
practice As new corporate governance codes extended
throughout the private sector commercial
state-owned enterprises sought guidance from
governments about equivalent standards In
response governments internationally adapted
private sector codes to provide guidance for
board members and executives on commercial
and non-commercial state bodies and agencies
These codes set the parameters for standards of
behaviour required for good corporate governance
of public organisations
Case study Addressing the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance lessons from private sector practice
Research on corporate governance in the private sector has indicated that lsquohardrsquo attributes of
governance such as board independence are necessary but not sufficient There is a need
to pay attention to the lsquosoftrsquo side of governance focusing on behavioural dynamics Some
of the lsquosoftrsquo governance factors that appear to be important for performance in the private
sector include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
A clarity in roles responsibilities and relationships between chief executive officer (CEO)
and chair directors and management directors and shareholdersstakeholders
Healthy chairCEO interface
Directors working as a team
Culture trust and open dissent
Right skills competencies and characteristics including lsquoindustrybusiness knowledgersquo
A good induction process and ongoing access to training
Leadership skills of the chair
Information flows
Regular evaluation of board performance
Source Edwards and Clough 2005 p 12 httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
bull
For example in Australia the government
developed its Governance Arrangements
for Australian Government Bodies in 2005
httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-framework
governancedocsGovernance-Arrangementsshy
for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
Similarly in Canada the Treasury Board of
Canada Secretariat has produced guidelines for
lsquoCorporate Governance in Crown Corporations
and Other Public Enterprisesrsquo httpwwwtbs-sct
gccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-eng
asp
In Ireland the Department of Finance also
published in 2009 a revised and updated lsquoCode
of Practice for the Governance of State Bodiesrsquo
h t tp www f inance gov ie v iewdoc
aspDocID=5824
An example of the type of issue covered by codes
of good practice is given for building the relationship
between the board and chief executive in the case
study taken from the Canadian code
What all of these corporate governance codes
and guidelines have in common is a commitment
to ensuring there is
clarity over the roles and responsibilities of
government boards of state bodies CEOs
and external auditing bodies as well as the
relationship between them
clarity over the public policy objectives
expected of state bodies
adequate financial reporting and internal
controls
standards of behaviour that reflect values
of integrity honesty and probity and that all
actions taken within state bodies are in the
best interests of that organisation
Case study Canadian code of good practice guidance on building a relationship
In a Crown corporation the nature of the relationship between the CEO and the board is often
critical The board must work with the CEO to build a relationship of openness and trust
Position descriptions can assist greatly in the smooth functioning of these relations The board
of directors the chair and the CEO should develop position descriptions for the board the
chair and the CEO
Boards of directors in conjunction with the CEO should periodically review the allocation of
responsibilities between the board and management This review should focus on defining
and describing both the boardrsquos principal responsibilities and the limits to managementrsquos
authority
Source httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
14
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
15
Codes of conduct An important emerging feature of good corporate
governance practice internationally is the
development of written formal codes of conduct
by organisations that set out their obligations with
regard to corporate governance Like corporate
governance codes codes of conduct have
proliferated in recent years They identify the
behaviour expected of those to whom they
apply by articulating a coherent set of values
and a means of addressing maladministration
where it occurs (see Transport for London (TfL)
case study)
The Public Audit Forum (2001) sets out important
elements which it is expected most codes of
conduct will address
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
outlines of expected professional and
personal behaviour
defined restrictions on business and political
activities (where appropriate)
criteria and procedures for declarations of
interests both business and political
definitions of conflicts of interest
a statement of the aims and values of the
body
statements of the obligations of the body
towards its customers staff community and
other interested parties
information about the bodyrsquos approach to
openness and arrangements for acquiring
information about its activities
procedures for raising complaints with an
independent body
definition of the dividing line between the role
and responsibilities of the governing body
and those of the executive staff
Source Public Audit Forum (2001) httpwww
public-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Particularly with regard to standards of behaviour
such codes of conduct are expected to
reflect the practice of the highest standards in
public life In the UK the Nolan Committee
(httpwwwarchiveofficial-documentscouk
documentparlmentnolannolanhtm) inquired
into standards of public life and established seven
principles of public life that have been widely
adopted internationally
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Selflessness Holders of public office should
take decisions solely in terms of the public
interest They should not do so in order to
gain financial or other material benefits for
themselves their family or their friends
Integrity Holders of public office should
not place themselves under any financial
or other obligation to outside individuals or
organisations that might influence them in
the performance of their official duties
Objectivity In carrying out public business
including making public appointments
awarding contracts or recommending
individuals for rewards and benefits holders
of public office should make choices on
merit
Accountability Holders of public office are
accountable for their decisions and actions
to the public and must submit themselves
to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their
office
Openness Holders of public office should be
as open as possible about all the decisions
and actions that they take They should
give reasons for their decisions and restrict
information only when the wider public
interest clearly demands
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
Honesty Holders of public office have a duty
to declare any private interests relating to their
public duties and to take steps to resolve any
conflicts arising in a way that protects the
public interest
Leadership Holders of public office should
promote and support these principles by
leadership and example
Failure to adhere to such standards can lead to
the failures in corporate governance noted earlier
and in particular to
bull
bull
bull
failures of principles of fairness in the
treatment of staff suppliers or contractors
whether due to conflicts of interest or other
reason
misuse of public assets or resources for
personal or political purposes
failure to exercise reasonable stewardship
over public assets or resources
Case study Transport for London (TfL) code of conduct
TfLrsquos corporate governance code of conduct addresses the main principles of good corporate
governance by setting out a series of undertakings that TfL has committed itself to deliver
under five main headings
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Public focus
Structures and processes
Risk management and internal control
Service delivery arrangements
Standards of conduct
For example under risk management and internal control TfL amongst other things commits
that its annual report will contain an objective and understandable statement and assessment
of its risk-management system including systems of internal control and internal audit and
their effectiveness in practice
Source httpwwwtflgovukcorporateabout-tfl2876aspxPublicFocus
16
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
17
Leadership developments Leadership is a crucial principle from a corporate
governance perspective There are two key
leadership roles the governing body of public
organisations needs to pay attention to the
establishment of sound governance structures
and processes and supporting good governance
through its own performance and behaviours
A range of commentators such as Kalokerinos
(2007) note the central role of the chair of the
governing body in the leadership of public sector
organisations This includes the traditional duty
of ensuring the proper functioning of the board
and its meetings but also covers maintaining a
close relationship with the chief executive and
representing the authority to outside stakeholders
A study undertaken for the UK Public Services
Productivity Panel (Barker 2004) states that the
chair should
bull
bull
bull
bull
act as board team leader with an
understanding of what skills knowledge and
aptitudes the board needs
regularly carry out skills knowledge and
aptitude audits which may be relatively
low key and informal to help understand
the current board composition and provide
board members with further clarity about
their individual roles
act as board lsquoconductorrsquo fostering an
environment where dissenting voices can
be heard without damaging collective
responsibility
act as the interface between the board and
its executive team and the organisation and
its sponsor department
In terms of developing board membersrsquo leadership
skills knowledge and aptitude mentoring of board
members has been of growing prominence in
recent years (see case studies)
A particular leadership challenge for the chair is
managing the relationship with the chief executive
Chief executives are professionals with specific
training in their job Chairs often come to the
role with no or limited experience of chairing
The chair and chief executive may experience a
culture clash between a management approach
to a question and a laypersonrsquos approach They
may be talking about the same problem using
very different vocabularies and terms of reference
Chief executives and chairs may also have different
definitions of success and consequently may
end up working towards different goals The
development of a good working relationship with
an agreed common vision as to the organisationrsquos
purpose is the key to effective leadership of the
organisation
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 6: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 1 The seven warning signs of service failure
2
Analysis of public inquiries shows these common problems contributed to serious service failures
Source Audit Commission of the United Kingdom
Figure 2 Dimensions of good corporate governance
Good Corporate Governance
Standards of Behaviour
bull codes of good practice
codes of conduct
leadership developments
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Organisational Structures and
Processes
bull board dynamics
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Control
risk management
audit
External Reporting
need for transparency balancing transparency with confidentiality
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
3
Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
operates the values that drive the organisation
and the culture that prevails As such standards of
behaviour deal largely with what has been termed
the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance
Governments internationally have adapted private
sector codes of practice and codes of conduct
to provide guidance for board members and
executives on these issues
Leadership is another crucial principle from a
corporate governance perspective There are two
key leadership roles that the governing bodies
of public organisations need to pay attention
to the establishment of sound governance
structures and processes and supporting good
governance through their own performance and
behaviours
Organisational structures and processes There are eight issues to be addressed by governing
bodies and their sponsoring departments if they
are to deliver good corporate governance in
terms of effective responsibility and accountability
(Table 1)
Control For public organisations other than financial
risk their work is also subject to a much
broader category of risks including policy risk
and reputational risk Risk management means
addressing these factors What is now required by
many codes of practice of corporate governance
is to ensure that risk is explicitly stated and a
consensus on addressing risks formulated
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk There is no prescriptive set
of rules specifying what constitutes ethical
behaviour Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and
service to the public which underpin most
corporate governance codes of practice
Audits and inspections become a normal
part of life in public organisations An issue of
concern for the governing body of many public
organisations is the choice of external auditors
and the need to ensure auditor independence In
that context auditor rotation is becoming more
common Another feature of good corporate
governance is the use of audit committees by
public organisations to provide an oversight of
audit arrangements
External reporting Transparency is a fundamental element of good
corporate governance Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence of
their stakeholders who in turn need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public bodies
with which they deal Transparency in relation to
matters such as procurement remuneration and
disclosure must be exemplary
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways
including public and timely production of plans
and reports Sponsoring departments need to
ensure that they have the skills and competencies
required to critically evaluate such plans and
reports
There are challenges in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information The need for codes and practices to
acknowledge the tension between confidentiality
and transparency and to strike a balance between
these competing tensions requires constant
scrutiny It is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Table 1 The eight key issues on board structures and processes
Board size Six to nine members is considered a reasonable size in the private
sector Up to twelve is not uncommon in the public sector to
meet representational and balance requirements
Board committees Commonly used for detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements in securing
effective boards Identifying competencies needed pro-active
search for candidates and attention to personal attributes are
amongst the items that must be given attention
Board tenure There is no set term limit for boards though three years is a
common time in a number of countries Appointments may be
renewed for a second term subject to satisfactory performance
Staggering of replacement appointments is important
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued review of
training needs and also to ensure that those involved in the
appointment of board members are fully trained
Board performance Best practice suggests that formal annual assessment of board
performance between the minister sponsoring department
and the chair of the board should take place to review board
performance
Board composition Best practice guidance suggests that the majority of board
members should be independent and that the chair and chief
executive positions should be separate There is a growing view
that departmental staff should not be members of the board
Board remuneration Practice varies significantly Many smaller public bodies tend
to pay only out-of-pocket expenses Others pay a set amount
based either on a daily rate or an estimated time commitment
per month or per year In general remuneration is relatively
modest
Source adapted from Uhrig (2003)
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
4
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
5
1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
What does corporate governance
mean Corporate governance is a concept that has been
very much to the fore in public sector reform in
recent years Understanding how to ensure and
achieve best practice in corporate governance
presents significant challenges for public sector
organisations internationally But what does the
term corporate governance mean
Corporate governance has its origins in the
marketplace and emerged to describe the way
in which suppliers of finance to corporations
could assure themselves of getting a return on
their investment In this sense it is about ensuring
that the management of private organisations
operate and run their businesses in a manner
consistent with the wishes of the shareholders
and that mechanisms for identifying and arresting
malpractice are in place and effective (Bovaird
and Loumlffler 2009 9)
Within the public sector when corporate
governance is discussed the main focus and
the focus of this report is often on the corporate
governance of organisations at arms length
from government ie those bodies outside of
government departments or ministries (which are
usually well regulated by specific rules and statutes)
such as statutory agencies and publicly funded
NGOs In this context corporate governance has
become associated not only with financial reporting
and controls but also with standards of behaviour
and organisational structures and processes In
this report we understand corporate governance
in the public sector by reference to the Australian
National Audit Office which states that
Broadly speaking corporate governanc e
generally refers to the processes by which
organisations are directed controlled and
held to account It encompasses authority
accountability stewardship leadership direction
and control exercised in the organisation
(Australian National Audit Office 1999 1
httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocuments
Corporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_
Authorities_and_Companiespdf)
Within private sector organisations corporate
governance is often viewed as being primarily
concerned with the functioning of the board of
the organisation In the different parts of the public
sector the equivalent of the group that fulfils the
role of the board of a company in the private
sector is at times not so easy to identify
But as the IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 019
httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoads
Study_13_Governancepdf) notes
In whatever way it is configured constituted
or described all bodies need to have at their
head a group which is responsible for giving
leadership and strategic direction defining
control mechanisms and supervising the overall
management of the entityrsquos activities and
reporting on stewardship and performance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
It is this leadership or government grouping
referred to in this report either as the governing
body or the board which is the main focus for
corporate governance in the public sector For
some public organisations the governing body
is relatively obvious as with the board of an
agency or a two-tier board structure where a
non-executive supervisory board oversees an
executive management board But for other
public sector organisations the role played by the
governing body in corporate governance may not
be clear as the case study of Canadarsquos National
Research Council governing council shows
Case study Role of governing council is unclear
As part of a review of the National Research Council Canada in 2003 the Office of the
Auditor General examined the role of the National Research Council governing council Its
findings revealed a lack of clarity among governing council members about the role of the
governing council whether it was simply advisory in nature to the president or whether it
included the obligation to direct and control the work of the corporation through the president
The governing council was found to be operating primarily as an advisory body The Auditor
General was concerned about this apparent lack of clarity and believed that it has led to the
absence of key governing council governance initiatives and structures
In a follow-up review in 2007 the Office of the Auditor General noted satisfactory progress on
this issue as the council had given itself a stronger role to meet the assigned responsibilities
under the National Research Council Act It had also established two new standing committees
the audit evaluation and risk management committee and the human resources committee
Source Office of the Auditor General of Canada 2007 httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglish att_20070203xe03_e_17507html
6
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
7
Why has corporate governance come
to prominence Interest in corporate governance has been driven
primarily by a growing list of corporate scandals
in the private sector such as the Enron collapse
in the USA The problems have to do with the
pursuit of private interests (excessive compensation
of top executives overly generous benefits)
duplicity (failure to observe accepted standards
of accounting the disguising of transactions)
conflict of interest (accounting firms too close
to client corporations) and corruption in various
other forms These issues have focused interest
on a number of corporate governance issues
such as the role of the board of directors the
independence of the boardrsquos membership
from management the responsibilities of the
board chair the chairrsquos relationship to the chief
executive and the transparency and accuracy
of financial reporting (Plumptre 2004 pp 2ndash3)
More recently the collapse of Lehman Brothers
Holdings plc in the USA which has precipitated
and contributed to financial downturns globally
has drawn attention to the consequences of weak
controls In a public sector setting the public
outrage at the abuse of the expenses regime for
parliamentarians at Westminister while not a failure
of corporate governance as such has highlighted
the issue of standards of behaviour which is of
central concern to corporate governance
Three sources for new practices and codes of
corporate governance are dominant internationally
in response to these scandals ndash the United
Kingdom (UK) Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the
USA In the UK following a number of private
sector corporate governance scandals the
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate
Governance (the Cadbury Committee) was formed
in 1991 to investigate The resultant Cadbury report
developed an innovative lsquoCode of Best Practicersquo
and identified three fundamental principles of
corporate governance ndash openness integrity and
accountability A lsquocombined codersquo was developed
in 1998 which harmonised the key issues from
Cadbury with a number of subsequent reports The
lsquocombined codersquo was binding on all companies
quoted on the London Stock Exchange It has
been revised on a number of occasions The most
recent version of the Code is available at http
wwwfrcorgukdocumentspagemanagerfrc
Combined20Code20June202006pdf
The OECD has also been active in relation to
promoting good corporate governance and
published a series of Principles of Corporate
Governance in 1999 Following a comprehensive
survey of how member countries addressed the
different corporate governance challenges they
faced the Principles were revised in 2004 see
httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724
In the USA following the widely reported
accounting scandals at energy company Enron
and telecommunications company WorldCom
the federal government sought to pass laws
which would prevent in future the fraudulent
reporting of accounts in private companies The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 extended boardsrsquo
financial oversight responsibilities and imposed
new financial disclosure requirements In particular
it requires that management prepare a report on
the internal control structures and procedures for
financial reporting in their organisation as well as
a report by external auditors on that assessment
see httpwwwsoxlawcom
While private sector examples of corporate
governance failure have been driving improvement
initiatives at an international level there have also
been an increasing number of such failures within
the public sphere which have prompted reviews of
corporate governance practices and procedures
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
in the public sector Public sector scandals
have been a driving force for the increasing
focus on corporate governance in the public
sector So too has the increasing complexity
of stakeholder relationships and expectations
regarding performance and transparency leading
to demands internationally for more effective
corporate governance arrangements in the public
sector to help agencies steer their way through
complex stakeholder demands Also changing
trends in the way the public sector conducts its
business and in particular regulatory and standard-
setting practices are increasingly requiring public
organisations to adopt best corporate governance
standards
The use and stewardship of public funds is an
essential feature of corporate governance in the
public sector As the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo case study
identifies boards of public sector bodies carry
considerable responsibilities for the management
of public funds and must ensure they have the
ability to fully pursue matters they deem to be of
concern Similarly the Royal United Hospital Bath
case study shows how boards can be misled
by executive management unless they have the
necessary competencies and skills to rigorously
scrutinise performance
Corporate governance failures can result in
wasted public money or poor service experience
and in some cases may even result in serious
tragedies The UK Audit Commission analysed
a number of inquiries into failures to see what
contribution governance arrangements made
to organisational failure as the case study on
page 11 identifies
Case study Royal United Hospital Bath corporate governance failures
Professor Robert Tinston was appointed by the trust in 2003 to hold an inquiry after two
external reviews identified concerns about deliberate manipulation of waiting lists and serious
deterioration in finances at the trust The Tinston report describes lsquoa trust in the grip of a powerful
self-delusion about its real performance and the desire to continue to support this leading to
a culture of misrepresentationrsquo
In particular the report noted major corporate governance failures The inquiry noted that the
former executive team appears to have adopted a policy of marginalising the trust board or
at the very least presenting important information at board meetings in an unduly optimistic
and favourable way The report says the trustrsquos weak control and accountability arrangements
combined to undermine fundamentally the performance of the hospital Boards must be in a
position to challenge constructively the financial and operational information they receive This
means they must understand the information presented to them and its implications for the
organisation They must also be able to identify risks to their corporate objectives recognise the
financial consequences and assess and monitor how effectively they are being addressed
Source httpwwwhsjcoukruh-bath-was-delude-claims-probe19369article
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
8
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board failure the example of the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo
In British Columbia (BC) the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo is an example of how the role of boards can
have major impacts on organisational performance The facts of the Fast Ferry Project are
fully documented in the BC Auditor Generalrsquos 1999 report A Review of the Fast Ferry Project
Governance and Risk Management
The government decided to purchase three high-speed aluminium catamaran car ferries at an
initial estimated cost of $210 million The initial board appointed to oversee the construction
included three independent directors from the private sector with relevant skills and experience
in marine construction Over the first ten months of its operations the board
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
asked repeatedly for a full budget
asked to receive regular reporting against an approved budget showing both forecast costs to complete and variances
asked for a construction schedule
pointed out that the original budget was for a different type of ferry and questioned both that budget and the latest changes to it
stressed the need for a risk analysis of the current scope of the project
noted that forecast costs continued to rise and that the scope of the programme had increased without an increase in budget
Its requests were consistently ignored or only partly met with the result that the board resigned
A new board was appointed The governance systems put in place to oversee the project were
inadequate Two years later it was determined that the project was significantly over budget
(the final cost was more than $450 million) and the ferries were not suitable for their intended
use Eventually the ferries were shrink-wrapped in plastic and stored under wraps for several
years until they were sold by auction for $18 million The net loss to the taxpayers of BC was
$430 million not including the cost of all of the reports and lost productivity in responding to
public outrage at the debacle The fiasco became a lightening rod for discussions on the lack
of appropriate governance
Source Watson 2004 pp 3ndash4 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
9
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
Particular challenges for corporate
governance in the public sector The Auditor General of Western Australia provides
a useful summary of the particular constraints
acting on public sector boards with regard to
corporate governance (Office of the Auditor
General Western Australia 1998) He notes that
in the private sector the board sets the strategic
direction management gives effect to that direction
and shareholders provide support through their
investment and operate as a general check on
the performance of the organisation While there
can be grey areas between the various roles
particularly between the board and management
the relationships are not as complex as in the
public sector
In the public sector the government is responsible
for the setting of policy and usually has wide
powers to intervene Management is responsible
for the day-to-day running to provide effective and
efficient services in the pursuit of government policy
The ultimate lsquoshareholdersrsquo are the electorate
who have infrequent opportunities to vote and
no direct authority over the affairs of any single
agency The public sector board often finds itself
balancing between managing an agency and
setting strategic direction Similarly management
finds itself balancing between a board that is
responsible for the agencyrsquos performance and
a minister responsible for the portfolio These all
make corporate governance more challenging
in a public sector environment The challenges
include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
policy is set by the government
board members may be selected by ministers
ministerial directions can countermand the wishes of the board at any time
chief executive officers may be formally employed by the minister which creates accountability problems for the board
the board as the accountable authority carries the legal responsibility for the performance of the agency
The remainder of this report looks at how such
challenges can be managed In brief a review of
good practice by Barker (2004) suggests that the
governing body and the sponsoring department
need to be clear about the organisationrsquos remit
and position and in particular that
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the organisation has a clear remit and set of
strategic priorities the organisationrsquos position within the delivery
network is clearly understood
changes in strategiespriorities are rapidly
communicated between the sponsor
department and the organisation
consultation between the organisation
sponsor department and key stakeholders
takes place as appropriate prior to any
significant policy change
effective communications between the
organisation sponsor department and key
stakeholders are in place
regular review of the organisation occurs to
ensure that governance is effective and that
remits and relationships evolve in line with
organisational and policy change
What does corporate governance encompass The IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 066 httpwwwifac orgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governance pdf) identifies four main dimensions of the corporate governance of public sector organisations
standards of behaviour ndash how the
management of the organisation exercises
leadership in determining the values and
standards of the organisation which define
the culture of the organisation and the
behaviour of everyone within it
organisational structures and processes ndash
how the board and top management within
organisations are appointed and organised
how their responsibilities are defined and
how they are held accountable
bull
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
10
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull control ndash the network of various controls
established by the top management of the
organisation to support it in achieving the
organisationrsquos objectives and compliance
with applicable laws and regulations and
internal policies
external reporting ndash how the top management
of the organisation demonstrates its financial
accountability for the stewardship of public
money and its performance in the use of
resources
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Elements of what is encompassed by these
aspects of corporate governance where there
have been notable developments in recent years
are outlined in more detail in Figure 3
These four dimensions of corporate governance
form the basis for the structuring of the rest of this
report Significant developments and examples
of international best practice in each of the four
areas are discussed further in the following
chapters
Case study Identifying corporate governance lessons from failures
Each of the national inquiry reports identified that poor governance arrangements set the framework
within which organisational systems and processes failed to detect or anticipate serious service
failures There was never a single failure or shortcoming in corporate governance that was solely
responsible for service failure Rather where there were serious and tragic outcomes it was
due to a combination of factors and an accumulation of governance failures
A number of common themes were brought to light by each inquiry
the poor quality or absence of leadership
poor decision-making and decision-making processes
inadequate systems and processes such as performance management
bull
lack of clarity in roles responsibilities and activities creating poor accountability
poor working relationships and dysfunctional behaviours
an insular organisational culture and poor focus on community and user needs
inadequate contingency plans or risk-management strategies to deal with
worst-case scenarios
Some combination of these factors was present at each failing organisation
Source Audit Commission 2003 p 28 httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPages improvementtrustpublicservicesaspx
11
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 3 Dimensions of corporate governance
Dimension Recommendations on governance
1 Standards of behaviour bull
bull
bull
Codes of good practice
Leadership
Codes of conduct
2 Organisational structures
and processes
bull
bull
Accountability for public money
Roles and responsibilities
bull Governing bodybull Chairpersonbull Executive managementbull Sponsoring department
3 Control bull
bull
bull I
Risk management including management of conflicts of interest
Audit
nternal control
4 External reporting bull
bull
Transparency
Confidentiality
Source adapted from IFAC 2001 p 14 httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
12
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
13
2 Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
of the organisation operates the values that drive
the organisation and the culture that prevails all
of which influence the behaviour of all staff As
such standards of behaviour deal largely with
the development of codes of practice and what
has been termed the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate
governance which have been receiving more
prominence in recent years drawing on best
practice in the private sector (see case study)
Corporate governance codes of good
practice As new corporate governance codes extended
throughout the private sector commercial
state-owned enterprises sought guidance from
governments about equivalent standards In
response governments internationally adapted
private sector codes to provide guidance for
board members and executives on commercial
and non-commercial state bodies and agencies
These codes set the parameters for standards of
behaviour required for good corporate governance
of public organisations
Case study Addressing the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance lessons from private sector practice
Research on corporate governance in the private sector has indicated that lsquohardrsquo attributes of
governance such as board independence are necessary but not sufficient There is a need
to pay attention to the lsquosoftrsquo side of governance focusing on behavioural dynamics Some
of the lsquosoftrsquo governance factors that appear to be important for performance in the private
sector include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
A clarity in roles responsibilities and relationships between chief executive officer (CEO)
and chair directors and management directors and shareholdersstakeholders
Healthy chairCEO interface
Directors working as a team
Culture trust and open dissent
Right skills competencies and characteristics including lsquoindustrybusiness knowledgersquo
A good induction process and ongoing access to training
Leadership skills of the chair
Information flows
Regular evaluation of board performance
Source Edwards and Clough 2005 p 12 httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
bull
For example in Australia the government
developed its Governance Arrangements
for Australian Government Bodies in 2005
httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-framework
governancedocsGovernance-Arrangementsshy
for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
Similarly in Canada the Treasury Board of
Canada Secretariat has produced guidelines for
lsquoCorporate Governance in Crown Corporations
and Other Public Enterprisesrsquo httpwwwtbs-sct
gccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-eng
asp
In Ireland the Department of Finance also
published in 2009 a revised and updated lsquoCode
of Practice for the Governance of State Bodiesrsquo
h t tp www f inance gov ie v iewdoc
aspDocID=5824
An example of the type of issue covered by codes
of good practice is given for building the relationship
between the board and chief executive in the case
study taken from the Canadian code
What all of these corporate governance codes
and guidelines have in common is a commitment
to ensuring there is
clarity over the roles and responsibilities of
government boards of state bodies CEOs
and external auditing bodies as well as the
relationship between them
clarity over the public policy objectives
expected of state bodies
adequate financial reporting and internal
controls
standards of behaviour that reflect values
of integrity honesty and probity and that all
actions taken within state bodies are in the
best interests of that organisation
Case study Canadian code of good practice guidance on building a relationship
In a Crown corporation the nature of the relationship between the CEO and the board is often
critical The board must work with the CEO to build a relationship of openness and trust
Position descriptions can assist greatly in the smooth functioning of these relations The board
of directors the chair and the CEO should develop position descriptions for the board the
chair and the CEO
Boards of directors in conjunction with the CEO should periodically review the allocation of
responsibilities between the board and management This review should focus on defining
and describing both the boardrsquos principal responsibilities and the limits to managementrsquos
authority
Source httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
14
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
15
Codes of conduct An important emerging feature of good corporate
governance practice internationally is the
development of written formal codes of conduct
by organisations that set out their obligations with
regard to corporate governance Like corporate
governance codes codes of conduct have
proliferated in recent years They identify the
behaviour expected of those to whom they
apply by articulating a coherent set of values
and a means of addressing maladministration
where it occurs (see Transport for London (TfL)
case study)
The Public Audit Forum (2001) sets out important
elements which it is expected most codes of
conduct will address
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
outlines of expected professional and
personal behaviour
defined restrictions on business and political
activities (where appropriate)
criteria and procedures for declarations of
interests both business and political
definitions of conflicts of interest
a statement of the aims and values of the
body
statements of the obligations of the body
towards its customers staff community and
other interested parties
information about the bodyrsquos approach to
openness and arrangements for acquiring
information about its activities
procedures for raising complaints with an
independent body
definition of the dividing line between the role
and responsibilities of the governing body
and those of the executive staff
Source Public Audit Forum (2001) httpwww
public-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Particularly with regard to standards of behaviour
such codes of conduct are expected to
reflect the practice of the highest standards in
public life In the UK the Nolan Committee
(httpwwwarchiveofficial-documentscouk
documentparlmentnolannolanhtm) inquired
into standards of public life and established seven
principles of public life that have been widely
adopted internationally
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Selflessness Holders of public office should
take decisions solely in terms of the public
interest They should not do so in order to
gain financial or other material benefits for
themselves their family or their friends
Integrity Holders of public office should
not place themselves under any financial
or other obligation to outside individuals or
organisations that might influence them in
the performance of their official duties
Objectivity In carrying out public business
including making public appointments
awarding contracts or recommending
individuals for rewards and benefits holders
of public office should make choices on
merit
Accountability Holders of public office are
accountable for their decisions and actions
to the public and must submit themselves
to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their
office
Openness Holders of public office should be
as open as possible about all the decisions
and actions that they take They should
give reasons for their decisions and restrict
information only when the wider public
interest clearly demands
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
Honesty Holders of public office have a duty
to declare any private interests relating to their
public duties and to take steps to resolve any
conflicts arising in a way that protects the
public interest
Leadership Holders of public office should
promote and support these principles by
leadership and example
Failure to adhere to such standards can lead to
the failures in corporate governance noted earlier
and in particular to
bull
bull
bull
failures of principles of fairness in the
treatment of staff suppliers or contractors
whether due to conflicts of interest or other
reason
misuse of public assets or resources for
personal or political purposes
failure to exercise reasonable stewardship
over public assets or resources
Case study Transport for London (TfL) code of conduct
TfLrsquos corporate governance code of conduct addresses the main principles of good corporate
governance by setting out a series of undertakings that TfL has committed itself to deliver
under five main headings
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Public focus
Structures and processes
Risk management and internal control
Service delivery arrangements
Standards of conduct
For example under risk management and internal control TfL amongst other things commits
that its annual report will contain an objective and understandable statement and assessment
of its risk-management system including systems of internal control and internal audit and
their effectiveness in practice
Source httpwwwtflgovukcorporateabout-tfl2876aspxPublicFocus
16
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
17
Leadership developments Leadership is a crucial principle from a corporate
governance perspective There are two key
leadership roles the governing body of public
organisations needs to pay attention to the
establishment of sound governance structures
and processes and supporting good governance
through its own performance and behaviours
A range of commentators such as Kalokerinos
(2007) note the central role of the chair of the
governing body in the leadership of public sector
organisations This includes the traditional duty
of ensuring the proper functioning of the board
and its meetings but also covers maintaining a
close relationship with the chief executive and
representing the authority to outside stakeholders
A study undertaken for the UK Public Services
Productivity Panel (Barker 2004) states that the
chair should
bull
bull
bull
bull
act as board team leader with an
understanding of what skills knowledge and
aptitudes the board needs
regularly carry out skills knowledge and
aptitude audits which may be relatively
low key and informal to help understand
the current board composition and provide
board members with further clarity about
their individual roles
act as board lsquoconductorrsquo fostering an
environment where dissenting voices can
be heard without damaging collective
responsibility
act as the interface between the board and
its executive team and the organisation and
its sponsor department
In terms of developing board membersrsquo leadership
skills knowledge and aptitude mentoring of board
members has been of growing prominence in
recent years (see case studies)
A particular leadership challenge for the chair is
managing the relationship with the chief executive
Chief executives are professionals with specific
training in their job Chairs often come to the
role with no or limited experience of chairing
The chair and chief executive may experience a
culture clash between a management approach
to a question and a laypersonrsquos approach They
may be talking about the same problem using
very different vocabularies and terms of reference
Chief executives and chairs may also have different
definitions of success and consequently may
end up working towards different goals The
development of a good working relationship with
an agreed common vision as to the organisationrsquos
purpose is the key to effective leadership of the
organisation
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 7: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
3
Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
operates the values that drive the organisation
and the culture that prevails As such standards of
behaviour deal largely with what has been termed
the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance
Governments internationally have adapted private
sector codes of practice and codes of conduct
to provide guidance for board members and
executives on these issues
Leadership is another crucial principle from a
corporate governance perspective There are two
key leadership roles that the governing bodies
of public organisations need to pay attention
to the establishment of sound governance
structures and processes and supporting good
governance through their own performance and
behaviours
Organisational structures and processes There are eight issues to be addressed by governing
bodies and their sponsoring departments if they
are to deliver good corporate governance in
terms of effective responsibility and accountability
(Table 1)
Control For public organisations other than financial
risk their work is also subject to a much
broader category of risks including policy risk
and reputational risk Risk management means
addressing these factors What is now required by
many codes of practice of corporate governance
is to ensure that risk is explicitly stated and a
consensus on addressing risks formulated
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk There is no prescriptive set
of rules specifying what constitutes ethical
behaviour Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and
service to the public which underpin most
corporate governance codes of practice
Audits and inspections become a normal
part of life in public organisations An issue of
concern for the governing body of many public
organisations is the choice of external auditors
and the need to ensure auditor independence In
that context auditor rotation is becoming more
common Another feature of good corporate
governance is the use of audit committees by
public organisations to provide an oversight of
audit arrangements
External reporting Transparency is a fundamental element of good
corporate governance Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence of
their stakeholders who in turn need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public bodies
with which they deal Transparency in relation to
matters such as procurement remuneration and
disclosure must be exemplary
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways
including public and timely production of plans
and reports Sponsoring departments need to
ensure that they have the skills and competencies
required to critically evaluate such plans and
reports
There are challenges in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information The need for codes and practices to
acknowledge the tension between confidentiality
and transparency and to strike a balance between
these competing tensions requires constant
scrutiny It is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Table 1 The eight key issues on board structures and processes
Board size Six to nine members is considered a reasonable size in the private
sector Up to twelve is not uncommon in the public sector to
meet representational and balance requirements
Board committees Commonly used for detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements in securing
effective boards Identifying competencies needed pro-active
search for candidates and attention to personal attributes are
amongst the items that must be given attention
Board tenure There is no set term limit for boards though three years is a
common time in a number of countries Appointments may be
renewed for a second term subject to satisfactory performance
Staggering of replacement appointments is important
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued review of
training needs and also to ensure that those involved in the
appointment of board members are fully trained
Board performance Best practice suggests that formal annual assessment of board
performance between the minister sponsoring department
and the chair of the board should take place to review board
performance
Board composition Best practice guidance suggests that the majority of board
members should be independent and that the chair and chief
executive positions should be separate There is a growing view
that departmental staff should not be members of the board
Board remuneration Practice varies significantly Many smaller public bodies tend
to pay only out-of-pocket expenses Others pay a set amount
based either on a daily rate or an estimated time commitment
per month or per year In general remuneration is relatively
modest
Source adapted from Uhrig (2003)
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
4
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
5
1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
What does corporate governance
mean Corporate governance is a concept that has been
very much to the fore in public sector reform in
recent years Understanding how to ensure and
achieve best practice in corporate governance
presents significant challenges for public sector
organisations internationally But what does the
term corporate governance mean
Corporate governance has its origins in the
marketplace and emerged to describe the way
in which suppliers of finance to corporations
could assure themselves of getting a return on
their investment In this sense it is about ensuring
that the management of private organisations
operate and run their businesses in a manner
consistent with the wishes of the shareholders
and that mechanisms for identifying and arresting
malpractice are in place and effective (Bovaird
and Loumlffler 2009 9)
Within the public sector when corporate
governance is discussed the main focus and
the focus of this report is often on the corporate
governance of organisations at arms length
from government ie those bodies outside of
government departments or ministries (which are
usually well regulated by specific rules and statutes)
such as statutory agencies and publicly funded
NGOs In this context corporate governance has
become associated not only with financial reporting
and controls but also with standards of behaviour
and organisational structures and processes In
this report we understand corporate governance
in the public sector by reference to the Australian
National Audit Office which states that
Broadly speaking corporate governanc e
generally refers to the processes by which
organisations are directed controlled and
held to account It encompasses authority
accountability stewardship leadership direction
and control exercised in the organisation
(Australian National Audit Office 1999 1
httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocuments
Corporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_
Authorities_and_Companiespdf)
Within private sector organisations corporate
governance is often viewed as being primarily
concerned with the functioning of the board of
the organisation In the different parts of the public
sector the equivalent of the group that fulfils the
role of the board of a company in the private
sector is at times not so easy to identify
But as the IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 019
httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoads
Study_13_Governancepdf) notes
In whatever way it is configured constituted
or described all bodies need to have at their
head a group which is responsible for giving
leadership and strategic direction defining
control mechanisms and supervising the overall
management of the entityrsquos activities and
reporting on stewardship and performance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
It is this leadership or government grouping
referred to in this report either as the governing
body or the board which is the main focus for
corporate governance in the public sector For
some public organisations the governing body
is relatively obvious as with the board of an
agency or a two-tier board structure where a
non-executive supervisory board oversees an
executive management board But for other
public sector organisations the role played by the
governing body in corporate governance may not
be clear as the case study of Canadarsquos National
Research Council governing council shows
Case study Role of governing council is unclear
As part of a review of the National Research Council Canada in 2003 the Office of the
Auditor General examined the role of the National Research Council governing council Its
findings revealed a lack of clarity among governing council members about the role of the
governing council whether it was simply advisory in nature to the president or whether it
included the obligation to direct and control the work of the corporation through the president
The governing council was found to be operating primarily as an advisory body The Auditor
General was concerned about this apparent lack of clarity and believed that it has led to the
absence of key governing council governance initiatives and structures
In a follow-up review in 2007 the Office of the Auditor General noted satisfactory progress on
this issue as the council had given itself a stronger role to meet the assigned responsibilities
under the National Research Council Act It had also established two new standing committees
the audit evaluation and risk management committee and the human resources committee
Source Office of the Auditor General of Canada 2007 httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglish att_20070203xe03_e_17507html
6
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
7
Why has corporate governance come
to prominence Interest in corporate governance has been driven
primarily by a growing list of corporate scandals
in the private sector such as the Enron collapse
in the USA The problems have to do with the
pursuit of private interests (excessive compensation
of top executives overly generous benefits)
duplicity (failure to observe accepted standards
of accounting the disguising of transactions)
conflict of interest (accounting firms too close
to client corporations) and corruption in various
other forms These issues have focused interest
on a number of corporate governance issues
such as the role of the board of directors the
independence of the boardrsquos membership
from management the responsibilities of the
board chair the chairrsquos relationship to the chief
executive and the transparency and accuracy
of financial reporting (Plumptre 2004 pp 2ndash3)
More recently the collapse of Lehman Brothers
Holdings plc in the USA which has precipitated
and contributed to financial downturns globally
has drawn attention to the consequences of weak
controls In a public sector setting the public
outrage at the abuse of the expenses regime for
parliamentarians at Westminister while not a failure
of corporate governance as such has highlighted
the issue of standards of behaviour which is of
central concern to corporate governance
Three sources for new practices and codes of
corporate governance are dominant internationally
in response to these scandals ndash the United
Kingdom (UK) Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the
USA In the UK following a number of private
sector corporate governance scandals the
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate
Governance (the Cadbury Committee) was formed
in 1991 to investigate The resultant Cadbury report
developed an innovative lsquoCode of Best Practicersquo
and identified three fundamental principles of
corporate governance ndash openness integrity and
accountability A lsquocombined codersquo was developed
in 1998 which harmonised the key issues from
Cadbury with a number of subsequent reports The
lsquocombined codersquo was binding on all companies
quoted on the London Stock Exchange It has
been revised on a number of occasions The most
recent version of the Code is available at http
wwwfrcorgukdocumentspagemanagerfrc
Combined20Code20June202006pdf
The OECD has also been active in relation to
promoting good corporate governance and
published a series of Principles of Corporate
Governance in 1999 Following a comprehensive
survey of how member countries addressed the
different corporate governance challenges they
faced the Principles were revised in 2004 see
httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724
In the USA following the widely reported
accounting scandals at energy company Enron
and telecommunications company WorldCom
the federal government sought to pass laws
which would prevent in future the fraudulent
reporting of accounts in private companies The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 extended boardsrsquo
financial oversight responsibilities and imposed
new financial disclosure requirements In particular
it requires that management prepare a report on
the internal control structures and procedures for
financial reporting in their organisation as well as
a report by external auditors on that assessment
see httpwwwsoxlawcom
While private sector examples of corporate
governance failure have been driving improvement
initiatives at an international level there have also
been an increasing number of such failures within
the public sphere which have prompted reviews of
corporate governance practices and procedures
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
in the public sector Public sector scandals
have been a driving force for the increasing
focus on corporate governance in the public
sector So too has the increasing complexity
of stakeholder relationships and expectations
regarding performance and transparency leading
to demands internationally for more effective
corporate governance arrangements in the public
sector to help agencies steer their way through
complex stakeholder demands Also changing
trends in the way the public sector conducts its
business and in particular regulatory and standard-
setting practices are increasingly requiring public
organisations to adopt best corporate governance
standards
The use and stewardship of public funds is an
essential feature of corporate governance in the
public sector As the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo case study
identifies boards of public sector bodies carry
considerable responsibilities for the management
of public funds and must ensure they have the
ability to fully pursue matters they deem to be of
concern Similarly the Royal United Hospital Bath
case study shows how boards can be misled
by executive management unless they have the
necessary competencies and skills to rigorously
scrutinise performance
Corporate governance failures can result in
wasted public money or poor service experience
and in some cases may even result in serious
tragedies The UK Audit Commission analysed
a number of inquiries into failures to see what
contribution governance arrangements made
to organisational failure as the case study on
page 11 identifies
Case study Royal United Hospital Bath corporate governance failures
Professor Robert Tinston was appointed by the trust in 2003 to hold an inquiry after two
external reviews identified concerns about deliberate manipulation of waiting lists and serious
deterioration in finances at the trust The Tinston report describes lsquoa trust in the grip of a powerful
self-delusion about its real performance and the desire to continue to support this leading to
a culture of misrepresentationrsquo
In particular the report noted major corporate governance failures The inquiry noted that the
former executive team appears to have adopted a policy of marginalising the trust board or
at the very least presenting important information at board meetings in an unduly optimistic
and favourable way The report says the trustrsquos weak control and accountability arrangements
combined to undermine fundamentally the performance of the hospital Boards must be in a
position to challenge constructively the financial and operational information they receive This
means they must understand the information presented to them and its implications for the
organisation They must also be able to identify risks to their corporate objectives recognise the
financial consequences and assess and monitor how effectively they are being addressed
Source httpwwwhsjcoukruh-bath-was-delude-claims-probe19369article
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
8
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board failure the example of the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo
In British Columbia (BC) the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo is an example of how the role of boards can
have major impacts on organisational performance The facts of the Fast Ferry Project are
fully documented in the BC Auditor Generalrsquos 1999 report A Review of the Fast Ferry Project
Governance and Risk Management
The government decided to purchase three high-speed aluminium catamaran car ferries at an
initial estimated cost of $210 million The initial board appointed to oversee the construction
included three independent directors from the private sector with relevant skills and experience
in marine construction Over the first ten months of its operations the board
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
asked repeatedly for a full budget
asked to receive regular reporting against an approved budget showing both forecast costs to complete and variances
asked for a construction schedule
pointed out that the original budget was for a different type of ferry and questioned both that budget and the latest changes to it
stressed the need for a risk analysis of the current scope of the project
noted that forecast costs continued to rise and that the scope of the programme had increased without an increase in budget
Its requests were consistently ignored or only partly met with the result that the board resigned
A new board was appointed The governance systems put in place to oversee the project were
inadequate Two years later it was determined that the project was significantly over budget
(the final cost was more than $450 million) and the ferries were not suitable for their intended
use Eventually the ferries were shrink-wrapped in plastic and stored under wraps for several
years until they were sold by auction for $18 million The net loss to the taxpayers of BC was
$430 million not including the cost of all of the reports and lost productivity in responding to
public outrage at the debacle The fiasco became a lightening rod for discussions on the lack
of appropriate governance
Source Watson 2004 pp 3ndash4 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
9
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
Particular challenges for corporate
governance in the public sector The Auditor General of Western Australia provides
a useful summary of the particular constraints
acting on public sector boards with regard to
corporate governance (Office of the Auditor
General Western Australia 1998) He notes that
in the private sector the board sets the strategic
direction management gives effect to that direction
and shareholders provide support through their
investment and operate as a general check on
the performance of the organisation While there
can be grey areas between the various roles
particularly between the board and management
the relationships are not as complex as in the
public sector
In the public sector the government is responsible
for the setting of policy and usually has wide
powers to intervene Management is responsible
for the day-to-day running to provide effective and
efficient services in the pursuit of government policy
The ultimate lsquoshareholdersrsquo are the electorate
who have infrequent opportunities to vote and
no direct authority over the affairs of any single
agency The public sector board often finds itself
balancing between managing an agency and
setting strategic direction Similarly management
finds itself balancing between a board that is
responsible for the agencyrsquos performance and
a minister responsible for the portfolio These all
make corporate governance more challenging
in a public sector environment The challenges
include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
policy is set by the government
board members may be selected by ministers
ministerial directions can countermand the wishes of the board at any time
chief executive officers may be formally employed by the minister which creates accountability problems for the board
the board as the accountable authority carries the legal responsibility for the performance of the agency
The remainder of this report looks at how such
challenges can be managed In brief a review of
good practice by Barker (2004) suggests that the
governing body and the sponsoring department
need to be clear about the organisationrsquos remit
and position and in particular that
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the organisation has a clear remit and set of
strategic priorities the organisationrsquos position within the delivery
network is clearly understood
changes in strategiespriorities are rapidly
communicated between the sponsor
department and the organisation
consultation between the organisation
sponsor department and key stakeholders
takes place as appropriate prior to any
significant policy change
effective communications between the
organisation sponsor department and key
stakeholders are in place
regular review of the organisation occurs to
ensure that governance is effective and that
remits and relationships evolve in line with
organisational and policy change
What does corporate governance encompass The IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 066 httpwwwifac orgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governance pdf) identifies four main dimensions of the corporate governance of public sector organisations
standards of behaviour ndash how the
management of the organisation exercises
leadership in determining the values and
standards of the organisation which define
the culture of the organisation and the
behaviour of everyone within it
organisational structures and processes ndash
how the board and top management within
organisations are appointed and organised
how their responsibilities are defined and
how they are held accountable
bull
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
10
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull control ndash the network of various controls
established by the top management of the
organisation to support it in achieving the
organisationrsquos objectives and compliance
with applicable laws and regulations and
internal policies
external reporting ndash how the top management
of the organisation demonstrates its financial
accountability for the stewardship of public
money and its performance in the use of
resources
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Elements of what is encompassed by these
aspects of corporate governance where there
have been notable developments in recent years
are outlined in more detail in Figure 3
These four dimensions of corporate governance
form the basis for the structuring of the rest of this
report Significant developments and examples
of international best practice in each of the four
areas are discussed further in the following
chapters
Case study Identifying corporate governance lessons from failures
Each of the national inquiry reports identified that poor governance arrangements set the framework
within which organisational systems and processes failed to detect or anticipate serious service
failures There was never a single failure or shortcoming in corporate governance that was solely
responsible for service failure Rather where there were serious and tragic outcomes it was
due to a combination of factors and an accumulation of governance failures
A number of common themes were brought to light by each inquiry
the poor quality or absence of leadership
poor decision-making and decision-making processes
inadequate systems and processes such as performance management
bull
lack of clarity in roles responsibilities and activities creating poor accountability
poor working relationships and dysfunctional behaviours
an insular organisational culture and poor focus on community and user needs
inadequate contingency plans or risk-management strategies to deal with
worst-case scenarios
Some combination of these factors was present at each failing organisation
Source Audit Commission 2003 p 28 httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPages improvementtrustpublicservicesaspx
11
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 3 Dimensions of corporate governance
Dimension Recommendations on governance
1 Standards of behaviour bull
bull
bull
Codes of good practice
Leadership
Codes of conduct
2 Organisational structures
and processes
bull
bull
Accountability for public money
Roles and responsibilities
bull Governing bodybull Chairpersonbull Executive managementbull Sponsoring department
3 Control bull
bull
bull I
Risk management including management of conflicts of interest
Audit
nternal control
4 External reporting bull
bull
Transparency
Confidentiality
Source adapted from IFAC 2001 p 14 httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
12
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
13
2 Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
of the organisation operates the values that drive
the organisation and the culture that prevails all
of which influence the behaviour of all staff As
such standards of behaviour deal largely with
the development of codes of practice and what
has been termed the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate
governance which have been receiving more
prominence in recent years drawing on best
practice in the private sector (see case study)
Corporate governance codes of good
practice As new corporate governance codes extended
throughout the private sector commercial
state-owned enterprises sought guidance from
governments about equivalent standards In
response governments internationally adapted
private sector codes to provide guidance for
board members and executives on commercial
and non-commercial state bodies and agencies
These codes set the parameters for standards of
behaviour required for good corporate governance
of public organisations
Case study Addressing the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance lessons from private sector practice
Research on corporate governance in the private sector has indicated that lsquohardrsquo attributes of
governance such as board independence are necessary but not sufficient There is a need
to pay attention to the lsquosoftrsquo side of governance focusing on behavioural dynamics Some
of the lsquosoftrsquo governance factors that appear to be important for performance in the private
sector include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
A clarity in roles responsibilities and relationships between chief executive officer (CEO)
and chair directors and management directors and shareholdersstakeholders
Healthy chairCEO interface
Directors working as a team
Culture trust and open dissent
Right skills competencies and characteristics including lsquoindustrybusiness knowledgersquo
A good induction process and ongoing access to training
Leadership skills of the chair
Information flows
Regular evaluation of board performance
Source Edwards and Clough 2005 p 12 httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
bull
For example in Australia the government
developed its Governance Arrangements
for Australian Government Bodies in 2005
httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-framework
governancedocsGovernance-Arrangementsshy
for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
Similarly in Canada the Treasury Board of
Canada Secretariat has produced guidelines for
lsquoCorporate Governance in Crown Corporations
and Other Public Enterprisesrsquo httpwwwtbs-sct
gccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-eng
asp
In Ireland the Department of Finance also
published in 2009 a revised and updated lsquoCode
of Practice for the Governance of State Bodiesrsquo
h t tp www f inance gov ie v iewdoc
aspDocID=5824
An example of the type of issue covered by codes
of good practice is given for building the relationship
between the board and chief executive in the case
study taken from the Canadian code
What all of these corporate governance codes
and guidelines have in common is a commitment
to ensuring there is
clarity over the roles and responsibilities of
government boards of state bodies CEOs
and external auditing bodies as well as the
relationship between them
clarity over the public policy objectives
expected of state bodies
adequate financial reporting and internal
controls
standards of behaviour that reflect values
of integrity honesty and probity and that all
actions taken within state bodies are in the
best interests of that organisation
Case study Canadian code of good practice guidance on building a relationship
In a Crown corporation the nature of the relationship between the CEO and the board is often
critical The board must work with the CEO to build a relationship of openness and trust
Position descriptions can assist greatly in the smooth functioning of these relations The board
of directors the chair and the CEO should develop position descriptions for the board the
chair and the CEO
Boards of directors in conjunction with the CEO should periodically review the allocation of
responsibilities between the board and management This review should focus on defining
and describing both the boardrsquos principal responsibilities and the limits to managementrsquos
authority
Source httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
14
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
15
Codes of conduct An important emerging feature of good corporate
governance practice internationally is the
development of written formal codes of conduct
by organisations that set out their obligations with
regard to corporate governance Like corporate
governance codes codes of conduct have
proliferated in recent years They identify the
behaviour expected of those to whom they
apply by articulating a coherent set of values
and a means of addressing maladministration
where it occurs (see Transport for London (TfL)
case study)
The Public Audit Forum (2001) sets out important
elements which it is expected most codes of
conduct will address
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
outlines of expected professional and
personal behaviour
defined restrictions on business and political
activities (where appropriate)
criteria and procedures for declarations of
interests both business and political
definitions of conflicts of interest
a statement of the aims and values of the
body
statements of the obligations of the body
towards its customers staff community and
other interested parties
information about the bodyrsquos approach to
openness and arrangements for acquiring
information about its activities
procedures for raising complaints with an
independent body
definition of the dividing line between the role
and responsibilities of the governing body
and those of the executive staff
Source Public Audit Forum (2001) httpwww
public-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Particularly with regard to standards of behaviour
such codes of conduct are expected to
reflect the practice of the highest standards in
public life In the UK the Nolan Committee
(httpwwwarchiveofficial-documentscouk
documentparlmentnolannolanhtm) inquired
into standards of public life and established seven
principles of public life that have been widely
adopted internationally
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Selflessness Holders of public office should
take decisions solely in terms of the public
interest They should not do so in order to
gain financial or other material benefits for
themselves their family or their friends
Integrity Holders of public office should
not place themselves under any financial
or other obligation to outside individuals or
organisations that might influence them in
the performance of their official duties
Objectivity In carrying out public business
including making public appointments
awarding contracts or recommending
individuals for rewards and benefits holders
of public office should make choices on
merit
Accountability Holders of public office are
accountable for their decisions and actions
to the public and must submit themselves
to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their
office
Openness Holders of public office should be
as open as possible about all the decisions
and actions that they take They should
give reasons for their decisions and restrict
information only when the wider public
interest clearly demands
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
Honesty Holders of public office have a duty
to declare any private interests relating to their
public duties and to take steps to resolve any
conflicts arising in a way that protects the
public interest
Leadership Holders of public office should
promote and support these principles by
leadership and example
Failure to adhere to such standards can lead to
the failures in corporate governance noted earlier
and in particular to
bull
bull
bull
failures of principles of fairness in the
treatment of staff suppliers or contractors
whether due to conflicts of interest or other
reason
misuse of public assets or resources for
personal or political purposes
failure to exercise reasonable stewardship
over public assets or resources
Case study Transport for London (TfL) code of conduct
TfLrsquos corporate governance code of conduct addresses the main principles of good corporate
governance by setting out a series of undertakings that TfL has committed itself to deliver
under five main headings
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Public focus
Structures and processes
Risk management and internal control
Service delivery arrangements
Standards of conduct
For example under risk management and internal control TfL amongst other things commits
that its annual report will contain an objective and understandable statement and assessment
of its risk-management system including systems of internal control and internal audit and
their effectiveness in practice
Source httpwwwtflgovukcorporateabout-tfl2876aspxPublicFocus
16
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
17
Leadership developments Leadership is a crucial principle from a corporate
governance perspective There are two key
leadership roles the governing body of public
organisations needs to pay attention to the
establishment of sound governance structures
and processes and supporting good governance
through its own performance and behaviours
A range of commentators such as Kalokerinos
(2007) note the central role of the chair of the
governing body in the leadership of public sector
organisations This includes the traditional duty
of ensuring the proper functioning of the board
and its meetings but also covers maintaining a
close relationship with the chief executive and
representing the authority to outside stakeholders
A study undertaken for the UK Public Services
Productivity Panel (Barker 2004) states that the
chair should
bull
bull
bull
bull
act as board team leader with an
understanding of what skills knowledge and
aptitudes the board needs
regularly carry out skills knowledge and
aptitude audits which may be relatively
low key and informal to help understand
the current board composition and provide
board members with further clarity about
their individual roles
act as board lsquoconductorrsquo fostering an
environment where dissenting voices can
be heard without damaging collective
responsibility
act as the interface between the board and
its executive team and the organisation and
its sponsor department
In terms of developing board membersrsquo leadership
skills knowledge and aptitude mentoring of board
members has been of growing prominence in
recent years (see case studies)
A particular leadership challenge for the chair is
managing the relationship with the chief executive
Chief executives are professionals with specific
training in their job Chairs often come to the
role with no or limited experience of chairing
The chair and chief executive may experience a
culture clash between a management approach
to a question and a laypersonrsquos approach They
may be talking about the same problem using
very different vocabularies and terms of reference
Chief executives and chairs may also have different
definitions of success and consequently may
end up working towards different goals The
development of a good working relationship with
an agreed common vision as to the organisationrsquos
purpose is the key to effective leadership of the
organisation
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 8: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Table 1 The eight key issues on board structures and processes
Board size Six to nine members is considered a reasonable size in the private
sector Up to twelve is not uncommon in the public sector to
meet representational and balance requirements
Board committees Commonly used for detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements in securing
effective boards Identifying competencies needed pro-active
search for candidates and attention to personal attributes are
amongst the items that must be given attention
Board tenure There is no set term limit for boards though three years is a
common time in a number of countries Appointments may be
renewed for a second term subject to satisfactory performance
Staggering of replacement appointments is important
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued review of
training needs and also to ensure that those involved in the
appointment of board members are fully trained
Board performance Best practice suggests that formal annual assessment of board
performance between the minister sponsoring department
and the chair of the board should take place to review board
performance
Board composition Best practice guidance suggests that the majority of board
members should be independent and that the chair and chief
executive positions should be separate There is a growing view
that departmental staff should not be members of the board
Board remuneration Practice varies significantly Many smaller public bodies tend
to pay only out-of-pocket expenses Others pay a set amount
based either on a daily rate or an estimated time commitment
per month or per year In general remuneration is relatively
modest
Source adapted from Uhrig (2003)
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
4
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
5
1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
What does corporate governance
mean Corporate governance is a concept that has been
very much to the fore in public sector reform in
recent years Understanding how to ensure and
achieve best practice in corporate governance
presents significant challenges for public sector
organisations internationally But what does the
term corporate governance mean
Corporate governance has its origins in the
marketplace and emerged to describe the way
in which suppliers of finance to corporations
could assure themselves of getting a return on
their investment In this sense it is about ensuring
that the management of private organisations
operate and run their businesses in a manner
consistent with the wishes of the shareholders
and that mechanisms for identifying and arresting
malpractice are in place and effective (Bovaird
and Loumlffler 2009 9)
Within the public sector when corporate
governance is discussed the main focus and
the focus of this report is often on the corporate
governance of organisations at arms length
from government ie those bodies outside of
government departments or ministries (which are
usually well regulated by specific rules and statutes)
such as statutory agencies and publicly funded
NGOs In this context corporate governance has
become associated not only with financial reporting
and controls but also with standards of behaviour
and organisational structures and processes In
this report we understand corporate governance
in the public sector by reference to the Australian
National Audit Office which states that
Broadly speaking corporate governanc e
generally refers to the processes by which
organisations are directed controlled and
held to account It encompasses authority
accountability stewardship leadership direction
and control exercised in the organisation
(Australian National Audit Office 1999 1
httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocuments
Corporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_
Authorities_and_Companiespdf)
Within private sector organisations corporate
governance is often viewed as being primarily
concerned with the functioning of the board of
the organisation In the different parts of the public
sector the equivalent of the group that fulfils the
role of the board of a company in the private
sector is at times not so easy to identify
But as the IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 019
httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoads
Study_13_Governancepdf) notes
In whatever way it is configured constituted
or described all bodies need to have at their
head a group which is responsible for giving
leadership and strategic direction defining
control mechanisms and supervising the overall
management of the entityrsquos activities and
reporting on stewardship and performance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
It is this leadership or government grouping
referred to in this report either as the governing
body or the board which is the main focus for
corporate governance in the public sector For
some public organisations the governing body
is relatively obvious as with the board of an
agency or a two-tier board structure where a
non-executive supervisory board oversees an
executive management board But for other
public sector organisations the role played by the
governing body in corporate governance may not
be clear as the case study of Canadarsquos National
Research Council governing council shows
Case study Role of governing council is unclear
As part of a review of the National Research Council Canada in 2003 the Office of the
Auditor General examined the role of the National Research Council governing council Its
findings revealed a lack of clarity among governing council members about the role of the
governing council whether it was simply advisory in nature to the president or whether it
included the obligation to direct and control the work of the corporation through the president
The governing council was found to be operating primarily as an advisory body The Auditor
General was concerned about this apparent lack of clarity and believed that it has led to the
absence of key governing council governance initiatives and structures
In a follow-up review in 2007 the Office of the Auditor General noted satisfactory progress on
this issue as the council had given itself a stronger role to meet the assigned responsibilities
under the National Research Council Act It had also established two new standing committees
the audit evaluation and risk management committee and the human resources committee
Source Office of the Auditor General of Canada 2007 httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglish att_20070203xe03_e_17507html
6
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
7
Why has corporate governance come
to prominence Interest in corporate governance has been driven
primarily by a growing list of corporate scandals
in the private sector such as the Enron collapse
in the USA The problems have to do with the
pursuit of private interests (excessive compensation
of top executives overly generous benefits)
duplicity (failure to observe accepted standards
of accounting the disguising of transactions)
conflict of interest (accounting firms too close
to client corporations) and corruption in various
other forms These issues have focused interest
on a number of corporate governance issues
such as the role of the board of directors the
independence of the boardrsquos membership
from management the responsibilities of the
board chair the chairrsquos relationship to the chief
executive and the transparency and accuracy
of financial reporting (Plumptre 2004 pp 2ndash3)
More recently the collapse of Lehman Brothers
Holdings plc in the USA which has precipitated
and contributed to financial downturns globally
has drawn attention to the consequences of weak
controls In a public sector setting the public
outrage at the abuse of the expenses regime for
parliamentarians at Westminister while not a failure
of corporate governance as such has highlighted
the issue of standards of behaviour which is of
central concern to corporate governance
Three sources for new practices and codes of
corporate governance are dominant internationally
in response to these scandals ndash the United
Kingdom (UK) Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the
USA In the UK following a number of private
sector corporate governance scandals the
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate
Governance (the Cadbury Committee) was formed
in 1991 to investigate The resultant Cadbury report
developed an innovative lsquoCode of Best Practicersquo
and identified three fundamental principles of
corporate governance ndash openness integrity and
accountability A lsquocombined codersquo was developed
in 1998 which harmonised the key issues from
Cadbury with a number of subsequent reports The
lsquocombined codersquo was binding on all companies
quoted on the London Stock Exchange It has
been revised on a number of occasions The most
recent version of the Code is available at http
wwwfrcorgukdocumentspagemanagerfrc
Combined20Code20June202006pdf
The OECD has also been active in relation to
promoting good corporate governance and
published a series of Principles of Corporate
Governance in 1999 Following a comprehensive
survey of how member countries addressed the
different corporate governance challenges they
faced the Principles were revised in 2004 see
httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724
In the USA following the widely reported
accounting scandals at energy company Enron
and telecommunications company WorldCom
the federal government sought to pass laws
which would prevent in future the fraudulent
reporting of accounts in private companies The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 extended boardsrsquo
financial oversight responsibilities and imposed
new financial disclosure requirements In particular
it requires that management prepare a report on
the internal control structures and procedures for
financial reporting in their organisation as well as
a report by external auditors on that assessment
see httpwwwsoxlawcom
While private sector examples of corporate
governance failure have been driving improvement
initiatives at an international level there have also
been an increasing number of such failures within
the public sphere which have prompted reviews of
corporate governance practices and procedures
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
in the public sector Public sector scandals
have been a driving force for the increasing
focus on corporate governance in the public
sector So too has the increasing complexity
of stakeholder relationships and expectations
regarding performance and transparency leading
to demands internationally for more effective
corporate governance arrangements in the public
sector to help agencies steer their way through
complex stakeholder demands Also changing
trends in the way the public sector conducts its
business and in particular regulatory and standard-
setting practices are increasingly requiring public
organisations to adopt best corporate governance
standards
The use and stewardship of public funds is an
essential feature of corporate governance in the
public sector As the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo case study
identifies boards of public sector bodies carry
considerable responsibilities for the management
of public funds and must ensure they have the
ability to fully pursue matters they deem to be of
concern Similarly the Royal United Hospital Bath
case study shows how boards can be misled
by executive management unless they have the
necessary competencies and skills to rigorously
scrutinise performance
Corporate governance failures can result in
wasted public money or poor service experience
and in some cases may even result in serious
tragedies The UK Audit Commission analysed
a number of inquiries into failures to see what
contribution governance arrangements made
to organisational failure as the case study on
page 11 identifies
Case study Royal United Hospital Bath corporate governance failures
Professor Robert Tinston was appointed by the trust in 2003 to hold an inquiry after two
external reviews identified concerns about deliberate manipulation of waiting lists and serious
deterioration in finances at the trust The Tinston report describes lsquoa trust in the grip of a powerful
self-delusion about its real performance and the desire to continue to support this leading to
a culture of misrepresentationrsquo
In particular the report noted major corporate governance failures The inquiry noted that the
former executive team appears to have adopted a policy of marginalising the trust board or
at the very least presenting important information at board meetings in an unduly optimistic
and favourable way The report says the trustrsquos weak control and accountability arrangements
combined to undermine fundamentally the performance of the hospital Boards must be in a
position to challenge constructively the financial and operational information they receive This
means they must understand the information presented to them and its implications for the
organisation They must also be able to identify risks to their corporate objectives recognise the
financial consequences and assess and monitor how effectively they are being addressed
Source httpwwwhsjcoukruh-bath-was-delude-claims-probe19369article
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
8
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board failure the example of the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo
In British Columbia (BC) the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo is an example of how the role of boards can
have major impacts on organisational performance The facts of the Fast Ferry Project are
fully documented in the BC Auditor Generalrsquos 1999 report A Review of the Fast Ferry Project
Governance and Risk Management
The government decided to purchase three high-speed aluminium catamaran car ferries at an
initial estimated cost of $210 million The initial board appointed to oversee the construction
included three independent directors from the private sector with relevant skills and experience
in marine construction Over the first ten months of its operations the board
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
asked repeatedly for a full budget
asked to receive regular reporting against an approved budget showing both forecast costs to complete and variances
asked for a construction schedule
pointed out that the original budget was for a different type of ferry and questioned both that budget and the latest changes to it
stressed the need for a risk analysis of the current scope of the project
noted that forecast costs continued to rise and that the scope of the programme had increased without an increase in budget
Its requests were consistently ignored or only partly met with the result that the board resigned
A new board was appointed The governance systems put in place to oversee the project were
inadequate Two years later it was determined that the project was significantly over budget
(the final cost was more than $450 million) and the ferries were not suitable for their intended
use Eventually the ferries were shrink-wrapped in plastic and stored under wraps for several
years until they were sold by auction for $18 million The net loss to the taxpayers of BC was
$430 million not including the cost of all of the reports and lost productivity in responding to
public outrage at the debacle The fiasco became a lightening rod for discussions on the lack
of appropriate governance
Source Watson 2004 pp 3ndash4 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
9
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
Particular challenges for corporate
governance in the public sector The Auditor General of Western Australia provides
a useful summary of the particular constraints
acting on public sector boards with regard to
corporate governance (Office of the Auditor
General Western Australia 1998) He notes that
in the private sector the board sets the strategic
direction management gives effect to that direction
and shareholders provide support through their
investment and operate as a general check on
the performance of the organisation While there
can be grey areas between the various roles
particularly between the board and management
the relationships are not as complex as in the
public sector
In the public sector the government is responsible
for the setting of policy and usually has wide
powers to intervene Management is responsible
for the day-to-day running to provide effective and
efficient services in the pursuit of government policy
The ultimate lsquoshareholdersrsquo are the electorate
who have infrequent opportunities to vote and
no direct authority over the affairs of any single
agency The public sector board often finds itself
balancing between managing an agency and
setting strategic direction Similarly management
finds itself balancing between a board that is
responsible for the agencyrsquos performance and
a minister responsible for the portfolio These all
make corporate governance more challenging
in a public sector environment The challenges
include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
policy is set by the government
board members may be selected by ministers
ministerial directions can countermand the wishes of the board at any time
chief executive officers may be formally employed by the minister which creates accountability problems for the board
the board as the accountable authority carries the legal responsibility for the performance of the agency
The remainder of this report looks at how such
challenges can be managed In brief a review of
good practice by Barker (2004) suggests that the
governing body and the sponsoring department
need to be clear about the organisationrsquos remit
and position and in particular that
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the organisation has a clear remit and set of
strategic priorities the organisationrsquos position within the delivery
network is clearly understood
changes in strategiespriorities are rapidly
communicated between the sponsor
department and the organisation
consultation between the organisation
sponsor department and key stakeholders
takes place as appropriate prior to any
significant policy change
effective communications between the
organisation sponsor department and key
stakeholders are in place
regular review of the organisation occurs to
ensure that governance is effective and that
remits and relationships evolve in line with
organisational and policy change
What does corporate governance encompass The IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 066 httpwwwifac orgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governance pdf) identifies four main dimensions of the corporate governance of public sector organisations
standards of behaviour ndash how the
management of the organisation exercises
leadership in determining the values and
standards of the organisation which define
the culture of the organisation and the
behaviour of everyone within it
organisational structures and processes ndash
how the board and top management within
organisations are appointed and organised
how their responsibilities are defined and
how they are held accountable
bull
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
10
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull control ndash the network of various controls
established by the top management of the
organisation to support it in achieving the
organisationrsquos objectives and compliance
with applicable laws and regulations and
internal policies
external reporting ndash how the top management
of the organisation demonstrates its financial
accountability for the stewardship of public
money and its performance in the use of
resources
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Elements of what is encompassed by these
aspects of corporate governance where there
have been notable developments in recent years
are outlined in more detail in Figure 3
These four dimensions of corporate governance
form the basis for the structuring of the rest of this
report Significant developments and examples
of international best practice in each of the four
areas are discussed further in the following
chapters
Case study Identifying corporate governance lessons from failures
Each of the national inquiry reports identified that poor governance arrangements set the framework
within which organisational systems and processes failed to detect or anticipate serious service
failures There was never a single failure or shortcoming in corporate governance that was solely
responsible for service failure Rather where there were serious and tragic outcomes it was
due to a combination of factors and an accumulation of governance failures
A number of common themes were brought to light by each inquiry
the poor quality or absence of leadership
poor decision-making and decision-making processes
inadequate systems and processes such as performance management
bull
lack of clarity in roles responsibilities and activities creating poor accountability
poor working relationships and dysfunctional behaviours
an insular organisational culture and poor focus on community and user needs
inadequate contingency plans or risk-management strategies to deal with
worst-case scenarios
Some combination of these factors was present at each failing organisation
Source Audit Commission 2003 p 28 httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPages improvementtrustpublicservicesaspx
11
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 3 Dimensions of corporate governance
Dimension Recommendations on governance
1 Standards of behaviour bull
bull
bull
Codes of good practice
Leadership
Codes of conduct
2 Organisational structures
and processes
bull
bull
Accountability for public money
Roles and responsibilities
bull Governing bodybull Chairpersonbull Executive managementbull Sponsoring department
3 Control bull
bull
bull I
Risk management including management of conflicts of interest
Audit
nternal control
4 External reporting bull
bull
Transparency
Confidentiality
Source adapted from IFAC 2001 p 14 httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
12
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
13
2 Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
of the organisation operates the values that drive
the organisation and the culture that prevails all
of which influence the behaviour of all staff As
such standards of behaviour deal largely with
the development of codes of practice and what
has been termed the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate
governance which have been receiving more
prominence in recent years drawing on best
practice in the private sector (see case study)
Corporate governance codes of good
practice As new corporate governance codes extended
throughout the private sector commercial
state-owned enterprises sought guidance from
governments about equivalent standards In
response governments internationally adapted
private sector codes to provide guidance for
board members and executives on commercial
and non-commercial state bodies and agencies
These codes set the parameters for standards of
behaviour required for good corporate governance
of public organisations
Case study Addressing the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance lessons from private sector practice
Research on corporate governance in the private sector has indicated that lsquohardrsquo attributes of
governance such as board independence are necessary but not sufficient There is a need
to pay attention to the lsquosoftrsquo side of governance focusing on behavioural dynamics Some
of the lsquosoftrsquo governance factors that appear to be important for performance in the private
sector include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
A clarity in roles responsibilities and relationships between chief executive officer (CEO)
and chair directors and management directors and shareholdersstakeholders
Healthy chairCEO interface
Directors working as a team
Culture trust and open dissent
Right skills competencies and characteristics including lsquoindustrybusiness knowledgersquo
A good induction process and ongoing access to training
Leadership skills of the chair
Information flows
Regular evaluation of board performance
Source Edwards and Clough 2005 p 12 httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
bull
For example in Australia the government
developed its Governance Arrangements
for Australian Government Bodies in 2005
httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-framework
governancedocsGovernance-Arrangementsshy
for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
Similarly in Canada the Treasury Board of
Canada Secretariat has produced guidelines for
lsquoCorporate Governance in Crown Corporations
and Other Public Enterprisesrsquo httpwwwtbs-sct
gccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-eng
asp
In Ireland the Department of Finance also
published in 2009 a revised and updated lsquoCode
of Practice for the Governance of State Bodiesrsquo
h t tp www f inance gov ie v iewdoc
aspDocID=5824
An example of the type of issue covered by codes
of good practice is given for building the relationship
between the board and chief executive in the case
study taken from the Canadian code
What all of these corporate governance codes
and guidelines have in common is a commitment
to ensuring there is
clarity over the roles and responsibilities of
government boards of state bodies CEOs
and external auditing bodies as well as the
relationship between them
clarity over the public policy objectives
expected of state bodies
adequate financial reporting and internal
controls
standards of behaviour that reflect values
of integrity honesty and probity and that all
actions taken within state bodies are in the
best interests of that organisation
Case study Canadian code of good practice guidance on building a relationship
In a Crown corporation the nature of the relationship between the CEO and the board is often
critical The board must work with the CEO to build a relationship of openness and trust
Position descriptions can assist greatly in the smooth functioning of these relations The board
of directors the chair and the CEO should develop position descriptions for the board the
chair and the CEO
Boards of directors in conjunction with the CEO should periodically review the allocation of
responsibilities between the board and management This review should focus on defining
and describing both the boardrsquos principal responsibilities and the limits to managementrsquos
authority
Source httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
14
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
15
Codes of conduct An important emerging feature of good corporate
governance practice internationally is the
development of written formal codes of conduct
by organisations that set out their obligations with
regard to corporate governance Like corporate
governance codes codes of conduct have
proliferated in recent years They identify the
behaviour expected of those to whom they
apply by articulating a coherent set of values
and a means of addressing maladministration
where it occurs (see Transport for London (TfL)
case study)
The Public Audit Forum (2001) sets out important
elements which it is expected most codes of
conduct will address
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
outlines of expected professional and
personal behaviour
defined restrictions on business and political
activities (where appropriate)
criteria and procedures for declarations of
interests both business and political
definitions of conflicts of interest
a statement of the aims and values of the
body
statements of the obligations of the body
towards its customers staff community and
other interested parties
information about the bodyrsquos approach to
openness and arrangements for acquiring
information about its activities
procedures for raising complaints with an
independent body
definition of the dividing line between the role
and responsibilities of the governing body
and those of the executive staff
Source Public Audit Forum (2001) httpwww
public-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Particularly with regard to standards of behaviour
such codes of conduct are expected to
reflect the practice of the highest standards in
public life In the UK the Nolan Committee
(httpwwwarchiveofficial-documentscouk
documentparlmentnolannolanhtm) inquired
into standards of public life and established seven
principles of public life that have been widely
adopted internationally
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Selflessness Holders of public office should
take decisions solely in terms of the public
interest They should not do so in order to
gain financial or other material benefits for
themselves their family or their friends
Integrity Holders of public office should
not place themselves under any financial
or other obligation to outside individuals or
organisations that might influence them in
the performance of their official duties
Objectivity In carrying out public business
including making public appointments
awarding contracts or recommending
individuals for rewards and benefits holders
of public office should make choices on
merit
Accountability Holders of public office are
accountable for their decisions and actions
to the public and must submit themselves
to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their
office
Openness Holders of public office should be
as open as possible about all the decisions
and actions that they take They should
give reasons for their decisions and restrict
information only when the wider public
interest clearly demands
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
Honesty Holders of public office have a duty
to declare any private interests relating to their
public duties and to take steps to resolve any
conflicts arising in a way that protects the
public interest
Leadership Holders of public office should
promote and support these principles by
leadership and example
Failure to adhere to such standards can lead to
the failures in corporate governance noted earlier
and in particular to
bull
bull
bull
failures of principles of fairness in the
treatment of staff suppliers or contractors
whether due to conflicts of interest or other
reason
misuse of public assets or resources for
personal or political purposes
failure to exercise reasonable stewardship
over public assets or resources
Case study Transport for London (TfL) code of conduct
TfLrsquos corporate governance code of conduct addresses the main principles of good corporate
governance by setting out a series of undertakings that TfL has committed itself to deliver
under five main headings
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Public focus
Structures and processes
Risk management and internal control
Service delivery arrangements
Standards of conduct
For example under risk management and internal control TfL amongst other things commits
that its annual report will contain an objective and understandable statement and assessment
of its risk-management system including systems of internal control and internal audit and
their effectiveness in practice
Source httpwwwtflgovukcorporateabout-tfl2876aspxPublicFocus
16
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
17
Leadership developments Leadership is a crucial principle from a corporate
governance perspective There are two key
leadership roles the governing body of public
organisations needs to pay attention to the
establishment of sound governance structures
and processes and supporting good governance
through its own performance and behaviours
A range of commentators such as Kalokerinos
(2007) note the central role of the chair of the
governing body in the leadership of public sector
organisations This includes the traditional duty
of ensuring the proper functioning of the board
and its meetings but also covers maintaining a
close relationship with the chief executive and
representing the authority to outside stakeholders
A study undertaken for the UK Public Services
Productivity Panel (Barker 2004) states that the
chair should
bull
bull
bull
bull
act as board team leader with an
understanding of what skills knowledge and
aptitudes the board needs
regularly carry out skills knowledge and
aptitude audits which may be relatively
low key and informal to help understand
the current board composition and provide
board members with further clarity about
their individual roles
act as board lsquoconductorrsquo fostering an
environment where dissenting voices can
be heard without damaging collective
responsibility
act as the interface between the board and
its executive team and the organisation and
its sponsor department
In terms of developing board membersrsquo leadership
skills knowledge and aptitude mentoring of board
members has been of growing prominence in
recent years (see case studies)
A particular leadership challenge for the chair is
managing the relationship with the chief executive
Chief executives are professionals with specific
training in their job Chairs often come to the
role with no or limited experience of chairing
The chair and chief executive may experience a
culture clash between a management approach
to a question and a laypersonrsquos approach They
may be talking about the same problem using
very different vocabularies and terms of reference
Chief executives and chairs may also have different
definitions of success and consequently may
end up working towards different goals The
development of a good working relationship with
an agreed common vision as to the organisationrsquos
purpose is the key to effective leadership of the
organisation
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 9: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
5
1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
What does corporate governance
mean Corporate governance is a concept that has been
very much to the fore in public sector reform in
recent years Understanding how to ensure and
achieve best practice in corporate governance
presents significant challenges for public sector
organisations internationally But what does the
term corporate governance mean
Corporate governance has its origins in the
marketplace and emerged to describe the way
in which suppliers of finance to corporations
could assure themselves of getting a return on
their investment In this sense it is about ensuring
that the management of private organisations
operate and run their businesses in a manner
consistent with the wishes of the shareholders
and that mechanisms for identifying and arresting
malpractice are in place and effective (Bovaird
and Loumlffler 2009 9)
Within the public sector when corporate
governance is discussed the main focus and
the focus of this report is often on the corporate
governance of organisations at arms length
from government ie those bodies outside of
government departments or ministries (which are
usually well regulated by specific rules and statutes)
such as statutory agencies and publicly funded
NGOs In this context corporate governance has
become associated not only with financial reporting
and controls but also with standards of behaviour
and organisational structures and processes In
this report we understand corporate governance
in the public sector by reference to the Australian
National Audit Office which states that
Broadly speaking corporate governanc e
generally refers to the processes by which
organisations are directed controlled and
held to account It encompasses authority
accountability stewardship leadership direction
and control exercised in the organisation
(Australian National Audit Office 1999 1
httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocuments
Corporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_
Authorities_and_Companiespdf)
Within private sector organisations corporate
governance is often viewed as being primarily
concerned with the functioning of the board of
the organisation In the different parts of the public
sector the equivalent of the group that fulfils the
role of the board of a company in the private
sector is at times not so easy to identify
But as the IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 019
httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoads
Study_13_Governancepdf) notes
In whatever way it is configured constituted
or described all bodies need to have at their
head a group which is responsible for giving
leadership and strategic direction defining
control mechanisms and supervising the overall
management of the entityrsquos activities and
reporting on stewardship and performance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
It is this leadership or government grouping
referred to in this report either as the governing
body or the board which is the main focus for
corporate governance in the public sector For
some public organisations the governing body
is relatively obvious as with the board of an
agency or a two-tier board structure where a
non-executive supervisory board oversees an
executive management board But for other
public sector organisations the role played by the
governing body in corporate governance may not
be clear as the case study of Canadarsquos National
Research Council governing council shows
Case study Role of governing council is unclear
As part of a review of the National Research Council Canada in 2003 the Office of the
Auditor General examined the role of the National Research Council governing council Its
findings revealed a lack of clarity among governing council members about the role of the
governing council whether it was simply advisory in nature to the president or whether it
included the obligation to direct and control the work of the corporation through the president
The governing council was found to be operating primarily as an advisory body The Auditor
General was concerned about this apparent lack of clarity and believed that it has led to the
absence of key governing council governance initiatives and structures
In a follow-up review in 2007 the Office of the Auditor General noted satisfactory progress on
this issue as the council had given itself a stronger role to meet the assigned responsibilities
under the National Research Council Act It had also established two new standing committees
the audit evaluation and risk management committee and the human resources committee
Source Office of the Auditor General of Canada 2007 httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglish att_20070203xe03_e_17507html
6
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
7
Why has corporate governance come
to prominence Interest in corporate governance has been driven
primarily by a growing list of corporate scandals
in the private sector such as the Enron collapse
in the USA The problems have to do with the
pursuit of private interests (excessive compensation
of top executives overly generous benefits)
duplicity (failure to observe accepted standards
of accounting the disguising of transactions)
conflict of interest (accounting firms too close
to client corporations) and corruption in various
other forms These issues have focused interest
on a number of corporate governance issues
such as the role of the board of directors the
independence of the boardrsquos membership
from management the responsibilities of the
board chair the chairrsquos relationship to the chief
executive and the transparency and accuracy
of financial reporting (Plumptre 2004 pp 2ndash3)
More recently the collapse of Lehman Brothers
Holdings plc in the USA which has precipitated
and contributed to financial downturns globally
has drawn attention to the consequences of weak
controls In a public sector setting the public
outrage at the abuse of the expenses regime for
parliamentarians at Westminister while not a failure
of corporate governance as such has highlighted
the issue of standards of behaviour which is of
central concern to corporate governance
Three sources for new practices and codes of
corporate governance are dominant internationally
in response to these scandals ndash the United
Kingdom (UK) Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the
USA In the UK following a number of private
sector corporate governance scandals the
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate
Governance (the Cadbury Committee) was formed
in 1991 to investigate The resultant Cadbury report
developed an innovative lsquoCode of Best Practicersquo
and identified three fundamental principles of
corporate governance ndash openness integrity and
accountability A lsquocombined codersquo was developed
in 1998 which harmonised the key issues from
Cadbury with a number of subsequent reports The
lsquocombined codersquo was binding on all companies
quoted on the London Stock Exchange It has
been revised on a number of occasions The most
recent version of the Code is available at http
wwwfrcorgukdocumentspagemanagerfrc
Combined20Code20June202006pdf
The OECD has also been active in relation to
promoting good corporate governance and
published a series of Principles of Corporate
Governance in 1999 Following a comprehensive
survey of how member countries addressed the
different corporate governance challenges they
faced the Principles were revised in 2004 see
httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724
In the USA following the widely reported
accounting scandals at energy company Enron
and telecommunications company WorldCom
the federal government sought to pass laws
which would prevent in future the fraudulent
reporting of accounts in private companies The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 extended boardsrsquo
financial oversight responsibilities and imposed
new financial disclosure requirements In particular
it requires that management prepare a report on
the internal control structures and procedures for
financial reporting in their organisation as well as
a report by external auditors on that assessment
see httpwwwsoxlawcom
While private sector examples of corporate
governance failure have been driving improvement
initiatives at an international level there have also
been an increasing number of such failures within
the public sphere which have prompted reviews of
corporate governance practices and procedures
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
in the public sector Public sector scandals
have been a driving force for the increasing
focus on corporate governance in the public
sector So too has the increasing complexity
of stakeholder relationships and expectations
regarding performance and transparency leading
to demands internationally for more effective
corporate governance arrangements in the public
sector to help agencies steer their way through
complex stakeholder demands Also changing
trends in the way the public sector conducts its
business and in particular regulatory and standard-
setting practices are increasingly requiring public
organisations to adopt best corporate governance
standards
The use and stewardship of public funds is an
essential feature of corporate governance in the
public sector As the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo case study
identifies boards of public sector bodies carry
considerable responsibilities for the management
of public funds and must ensure they have the
ability to fully pursue matters they deem to be of
concern Similarly the Royal United Hospital Bath
case study shows how boards can be misled
by executive management unless they have the
necessary competencies and skills to rigorously
scrutinise performance
Corporate governance failures can result in
wasted public money or poor service experience
and in some cases may even result in serious
tragedies The UK Audit Commission analysed
a number of inquiries into failures to see what
contribution governance arrangements made
to organisational failure as the case study on
page 11 identifies
Case study Royal United Hospital Bath corporate governance failures
Professor Robert Tinston was appointed by the trust in 2003 to hold an inquiry after two
external reviews identified concerns about deliberate manipulation of waiting lists and serious
deterioration in finances at the trust The Tinston report describes lsquoa trust in the grip of a powerful
self-delusion about its real performance and the desire to continue to support this leading to
a culture of misrepresentationrsquo
In particular the report noted major corporate governance failures The inquiry noted that the
former executive team appears to have adopted a policy of marginalising the trust board or
at the very least presenting important information at board meetings in an unduly optimistic
and favourable way The report says the trustrsquos weak control and accountability arrangements
combined to undermine fundamentally the performance of the hospital Boards must be in a
position to challenge constructively the financial and operational information they receive This
means they must understand the information presented to them and its implications for the
organisation They must also be able to identify risks to their corporate objectives recognise the
financial consequences and assess and monitor how effectively they are being addressed
Source httpwwwhsjcoukruh-bath-was-delude-claims-probe19369article
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
8
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board failure the example of the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo
In British Columbia (BC) the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo is an example of how the role of boards can
have major impacts on organisational performance The facts of the Fast Ferry Project are
fully documented in the BC Auditor Generalrsquos 1999 report A Review of the Fast Ferry Project
Governance and Risk Management
The government decided to purchase three high-speed aluminium catamaran car ferries at an
initial estimated cost of $210 million The initial board appointed to oversee the construction
included three independent directors from the private sector with relevant skills and experience
in marine construction Over the first ten months of its operations the board
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
asked repeatedly for a full budget
asked to receive regular reporting against an approved budget showing both forecast costs to complete and variances
asked for a construction schedule
pointed out that the original budget was for a different type of ferry and questioned both that budget and the latest changes to it
stressed the need for a risk analysis of the current scope of the project
noted that forecast costs continued to rise and that the scope of the programme had increased without an increase in budget
Its requests were consistently ignored or only partly met with the result that the board resigned
A new board was appointed The governance systems put in place to oversee the project were
inadequate Two years later it was determined that the project was significantly over budget
(the final cost was more than $450 million) and the ferries were not suitable for their intended
use Eventually the ferries were shrink-wrapped in plastic and stored under wraps for several
years until they were sold by auction for $18 million The net loss to the taxpayers of BC was
$430 million not including the cost of all of the reports and lost productivity in responding to
public outrage at the debacle The fiasco became a lightening rod for discussions on the lack
of appropriate governance
Source Watson 2004 pp 3ndash4 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
9
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
Particular challenges for corporate
governance in the public sector The Auditor General of Western Australia provides
a useful summary of the particular constraints
acting on public sector boards with regard to
corporate governance (Office of the Auditor
General Western Australia 1998) He notes that
in the private sector the board sets the strategic
direction management gives effect to that direction
and shareholders provide support through their
investment and operate as a general check on
the performance of the organisation While there
can be grey areas between the various roles
particularly between the board and management
the relationships are not as complex as in the
public sector
In the public sector the government is responsible
for the setting of policy and usually has wide
powers to intervene Management is responsible
for the day-to-day running to provide effective and
efficient services in the pursuit of government policy
The ultimate lsquoshareholdersrsquo are the electorate
who have infrequent opportunities to vote and
no direct authority over the affairs of any single
agency The public sector board often finds itself
balancing between managing an agency and
setting strategic direction Similarly management
finds itself balancing between a board that is
responsible for the agencyrsquos performance and
a minister responsible for the portfolio These all
make corporate governance more challenging
in a public sector environment The challenges
include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
policy is set by the government
board members may be selected by ministers
ministerial directions can countermand the wishes of the board at any time
chief executive officers may be formally employed by the minister which creates accountability problems for the board
the board as the accountable authority carries the legal responsibility for the performance of the agency
The remainder of this report looks at how such
challenges can be managed In brief a review of
good practice by Barker (2004) suggests that the
governing body and the sponsoring department
need to be clear about the organisationrsquos remit
and position and in particular that
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the organisation has a clear remit and set of
strategic priorities the organisationrsquos position within the delivery
network is clearly understood
changes in strategiespriorities are rapidly
communicated between the sponsor
department and the organisation
consultation between the organisation
sponsor department and key stakeholders
takes place as appropriate prior to any
significant policy change
effective communications between the
organisation sponsor department and key
stakeholders are in place
regular review of the organisation occurs to
ensure that governance is effective and that
remits and relationships evolve in line with
organisational and policy change
What does corporate governance encompass The IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 066 httpwwwifac orgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governance pdf) identifies four main dimensions of the corporate governance of public sector organisations
standards of behaviour ndash how the
management of the organisation exercises
leadership in determining the values and
standards of the organisation which define
the culture of the organisation and the
behaviour of everyone within it
organisational structures and processes ndash
how the board and top management within
organisations are appointed and organised
how their responsibilities are defined and
how they are held accountable
bull
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
10
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull control ndash the network of various controls
established by the top management of the
organisation to support it in achieving the
organisationrsquos objectives and compliance
with applicable laws and regulations and
internal policies
external reporting ndash how the top management
of the organisation demonstrates its financial
accountability for the stewardship of public
money and its performance in the use of
resources
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Elements of what is encompassed by these
aspects of corporate governance where there
have been notable developments in recent years
are outlined in more detail in Figure 3
These four dimensions of corporate governance
form the basis for the structuring of the rest of this
report Significant developments and examples
of international best practice in each of the four
areas are discussed further in the following
chapters
Case study Identifying corporate governance lessons from failures
Each of the national inquiry reports identified that poor governance arrangements set the framework
within which organisational systems and processes failed to detect or anticipate serious service
failures There was never a single failure or shortcoming in corporate governance that was solely
responsible for service failure Rather where there were serious and tragic outcomes it was
due to a combination of factors and an accumulation of governance failures
A number of common themes were brought to light by each inquiry
the poor quality or absence of leadership
poor decision-making and decision-making processes
inadequate systems and processes such as performance management
bull
lack of clarity in roles responsibilities and activities creating poor accountability
poor working relationships and dysfunctional behaviours
an insular organisational culture and poor focus on community and user needs
inadequate contingency plans or risk-management strategies to deal with
worst-case scenarios
Some combination of these factors was present at each failing organisation
Source Audit Commission 2003 p 28 httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPages improvementtrustpublicservicesaspx
11
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 3 Dimensions of corporate governance
Dimension Recommendations on governance
1 Standards of behaviour bull
bull
bull
Codes of good practice
Leadership
Codes of conduct
2 Organisational structures
and processes
bull
bull
Accountability for public money
Roles and responsibilities
bull Governing bodybull Chairpersonbull Executive managementbull Sponsoring department
3 Control bull
bull
bull I
Risk management including management of conflicts of interest
Audit
nternal control
4 External reporting bull
bull
Transparency
Confidentiality
Source adapted from IFAC 2001 p 14 httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
12
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
13
2 Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
of the organisation operates the values that drive
the organisation and the culture that prevails all
of which influence the behaviour of all staff As
such standards of behaviour deal largely with
the development of codes of practice and what
has been termed the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate
governance which have been receiving more
prominence in recent years drawing on best
practice in the private sector (see case study)
Corporate governance codes of good
practice As new corporate governance codes extended
throughout the private sector commercial
state-owned enterprises sought guidance from
governments about equivalent standards In
response governments internationally adapted
private sector codes to provide guidance for
board members and executives on commercial
and non-commercial state bodies and agencies
These codes set the parameters for standards of
behaviour required for good corporate governance
of public organisations
Case study Addressing the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance lessons from private sector practice
Research on corporate governance in the private sector has indicated that lsquohardrsquo attributes of
governance such as board independence are necessary but not sufficient There is a need
to pay attention to the lsquosoftrsquo side of governance focusing on behavioural dynamics Some
of the lsquosoftrsquo governance factors that appear to be important for performance in the private
sector include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
A clarity in roles responsibilities and relationships between chief executive officer (CEO)
and chair directors and management directors and shareholdersstakeholders
Healthy chairCEO interface
Directors working as a team
Culture trust and open dissent
Right skills competencies and characteristics including lsquoindustrybusiness knowledgersquo
A good induction process and ongoing access to training
Leadership skills of the chair
Information flows
Regular evaluation of board performance
Source Edwards and Clough 2005 p 12 httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
bull
For example in Australia the government
developed its Governance Arrangements
for Australian Government Bodies in 2005
httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-framework
governancedocsGovernance-Arrangementsshy
for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
Similarly in Canada the Treasury Board of
Canada Secretariat has produced guidelines for
lsquoCorporate Governance in Crown Corporations
and Other Public Enterprisesrsquo httpwwwtbs-sct
gccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-eng
asp
In Ireland the Department of Finance also
published in 2009 a revised and updated lsquoCode
of Practice for the Governance of State Bodiesrsquo
h t tp www f inance gov ie v iewdoc
aspDocID=5824
An example of the type of issue covered by codes
of good practice is given for building the relationship
between the board and chief executive in the case
study taken from the Canadian code
What all of these corporate governance codes
and guidelines have in common is a commitment
to ensuring there is
clarity over the roles and responsibilities of
government boards of state bodies CEOs
and external auditing bodies as well as the
relationship between them
clarity over the public policy objectives
expected of state bodies
adequate financial reporting and internal
controls
standards of behaviour that reflect values
of integrity honesty and probity and that all
actions taken within state bodies are in the
best interests of that organisation
Case study Canadian code of good practice guidance on building a relationship
In a Crown corporation the nature of the relationship between the CEO and the board is often
critical The board must work with the CEO to build a relationship of openness and trust
Position descriptions can assist greatly in the smooth functioning of these relations The board
of directors the chair and the CEO should develop position descriptions for the board the
chair and the CEO
Boards of directors in conjunction with the CEO should periodically review the allocation of
responsibilities between the board and management This review should focus on defining
and describing both the boardrsquos principal responsibilities and the limits to managementrsquos
authority
Source httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
14
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
15
Codes of conduct An important emerging feature of good corporate
governance practice internationally is the
development of written formal codes of conduct
by organisations that set out their obligations with
regard to corporate governance Like corporate
governance codes codes of conduct have
proliferated in recent years They identify the
behaviour expected of those to whom they
apply by articulating a coherent set of values
and a means of addressing maladministration
where it occurs (see Transport for London (TfL)
case study)
The Public Audit Forum (2001) sets out important
elements which it is expected most codes of
conduct will address
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
outlines of expected professional and
personal behaviour
defined restrictions on business and political
activities (where appropriate)
criteria and procedures for declarations of
interests both business and political
definitions of conflicts of interest
a statement of the aims and values of the
body
statements of the obligations of the body
towards its customers staff community and
other interested parties
information about the bodyrsquos approach to
openness and arrangements for acquiring
information about its activities
procedures for raising complaints with an
independent body
definition of the dividing line between the role
and responsibilities of the governing body
and those of the executive staff
Source Public Audit Forum (2001) httpwww
public-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Particularly with regard to standards of behaviour
such codes of conduct are expected to
reflect the practice of the highest standards in
public life In the UK the Nolan Committee
(httpwwwarchiveofficial-documentscouk
documentparlmentnolannolanhtm) inquired
into standards of public life and established seven
principles of public life that have been widely
adopted internationally
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Selflessness Holders of public office should
take decisions solely in terms of the public
interest They should not do so in order to
gain financial or other material benefits for
themselves their family or their friends
Integrity Holders of public office should
not place themselves under any financial
or other obligation to outside individuals or
organisations that might influence them in
the performance of their official duties
Objectivity In carrying out public business
including making public appointments
awarding contracts or recommending
individuals for rewards and benefits holders
of public office should make choices on
merit
Accountability Holders of public office are
accountable for their decisions and actions
to the public and must submit themselves
to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their
office
Openness Holders of public office should be
as open as possible about all the decisions
and actions that they take They should
give reasons for their decisions and restrict
information only when the wider public
interest clearly demands
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
Honesty Holders of public office have a duty
to declare any private interests relating to their
public duties and to take steps to resolve any
conflicts arising in a way that protects the
public interest
Leadership Holders of public office should
promote and support these principles by
leadership and example
Failure to adhere to such standards can lead to
the failures in corporate governance noted earlier
and in particular to
bull
bull
bull
failures of principles of fairness in the
treatment of staff suppliers or contractors
whether due to conflicts of interest or other
reason
misuse of public assets or resources for
personal or political purposes
failure to exercise reasonable stewardship
over public assets or resources
Case study Transport for London (TfL) code of conduct
TfLrsquos corporate governance code of conduct addresses the main principles of good corporate
governance by setting out a series of undertakings that TfL has committed itself to deliver
under five main headings
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Public focus
Structures and processes
Risk management and internal control
Service delivery arrangements
Standards of conduct
For example under risk management and internal control TfL amongst other things commits
that its annual report will contain an objective and understandable statement and assessment
of its risk-management system including systems of internal control and internal audit and
their effectiveness in practice
Source httpwwwtflgovukcorporateabout-tfl2876aspxPublicFocus
16
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
17
Leadership developments Leadership is a crucial principle from a corporate
governance perspective There are two key
leadership roles the governing body of public
organisations needs to pay attention to the
establishment of sound governance structures
and processes and supporting good governance
through its own performance and behaviours
A range of commentators such as Kalokerinos
(2007) note the central role of the chair of the
governing body in the leadership of public sector
organisations This includes the traditional duty
of ensuring the proper functioning of the board
and its meetings but also covers maintaining a
close relationship with the chief executive and
representing the authority to outside stakeholders
A study undertaken for the UK Public Services
Productivity Panel (Barker 2004) states that the
chair should
bull
bull
bull
bull
act as board team leader with an
understanding of what skills knowledge and
aptitudes the board needs
regularly carry out skills knowledge and
aptitude audits which may be relatively
low key and informal to help understand
the current board composition and provide
board members with further clarity about
their individual roles
act as board lsquoconductorrsquo fostering an
environment where dissenting voices can
be heard without damaging collective
responsibility
act as the interface between the board and
its executive team and the organisation and
its sponsor department
In terms of developing board membersrsquo leadership
skills knowledge and aptitude mentoring of board
members has been of growing prominence in
recent years (see case studies)
A particular leadership challenge for the chair is
managing the relationship with the chief executive
Chief executives are professionals with specific
training in their job Chairs often come to the
role with no or limited experience of chairing
The chair and chief executive may experience a
culture clash between a management approach
to a question and a laypersonrsquos approach They
may be talking about the same problem using
very different vocabularies and terms of reference
Chief executives and chairs may also have different
definitions of success and consequently may
end up working towards different goals The
development of a good working relationship with
an agreed common vision as to the organisationrsquos
purpose is the key to effective leadership of the
organisation
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 10: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
It is this leadership or government grouping
referred to in this report either as the governing
body or the board which is the main focus for
corporate governance in the public sector For
some public organisations the governing body
is relatively obvious as with the board of an
agency or a two-tier board structure where a
non-executive supervisory board oversees an
executive management board But for other
public sector organisations the role played by the
governing body in corporate governance may not
be clear as the case study of Canadarsquos National
Research Council governing council shows
Case study Role of governing council is unclear
As part of a review of the National Research Council Canada in 2003 the Office of the
Auditor General examined the role of the National Research Council governing council Its
findings revealed a lack of clarity among governing council members about the role of the
governing council whether it was simply advisory in nature to the president or whether it
included the obligation to direct and control the work of the corporation through the president
The governing council was found to be operating primarily as an advisory body The Auditor
General was concerned about this apparent lack of clarity and believed that it has led to the
absence of key governing council governance initiatives and structures
In a follow-up review in 2007 the Office of the Auditor General noted satisfactory progress on
this issue as the council had given itself a stronger role to meet the assigned responsibilities
under the National Research Council Act It had also established two new standing committees
the audit evaluation and risk management committee and the human resources committee
Source Office of the Auditor General of Canada 2007 httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglish att_20070203xe03_e_17507html
6
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
7
Why has corporate governance come
to prominence Interest in corporate governance has been driven
primarily by a growing list of corporate scandals
in the private sector such as the Enron collapse
in the USA The problems have to do with the
pursuit of private interests (excessive compensation
of top executives overly generous benefits)
duplicity (failure to observe accepted standards
of accounting the disguising of transactions)
conflict of interest (accounting firms too close
to client corporations) and corruption in various
other forms These issues have focused interest
on a number of corporate governance issues
such as the role of the board of directors the
independence of the boardrsquos membership
from management the responsibilities of the
board chair the chairrsquos relationship to the chief
executive and the transparency and accuracy
of financial reporting (Plumptre 2004 pp 2ndash3)
More recently the collapse of Lehman Brothers
Holdings plc in the USA which has precipitated
and contributed to financial downturns globally
has drawn attention to the consequences of weak
controls In a public sector setting the public
outrage at the abuse of the expenses regime for
parliamentarians at Westminister while not a failure
of corporate governance as such has highlighted
the issue of standards of behaviour which is of
central concern to corporate governance
Three sources for new practices and codes of
corporate governance are dominant internationally
in response to these scandals ndash the United
Kingdom (UK) Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the
USA In the UK following a number of private
sector corporate governance scandals the
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate
Governance (the Cadbury Committee) was formed
in 1991 to investigate The resultant Cadbury report
developed an innovative lsquoCode of Best Practicersquo
and identified three fundamental principles of
corporate governance ndash openness integrity and
accountability A lsquocombined codersquo was developed
in 1998 which harmonised the key issues from
Cadbury with a number of subsequent reports The
lsquocombined codersquo was binding on all companies
quoted on the London Stock Exchange It has
been revised on a number of occasions The most
recent version of the Code is available at http
wwwfrcorgukdocumentspagemanagerfrc
Combined20Code20June202006pdf
The OECD has also been active in relation to
promoting good corporate governance and
published a series of Principles of Corporate
Governance in 1999 Following a comprehensive
survey of how member countries addressed the
different corporate governance challenges they
faced the Principles were revised in 2004 see
httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724
In the USA following the widely reported
accounting scandals at energy company Enron
and telecommunications company WorldCom
the federal government sought to pass laws
which would prevent in future the fraudulent
reporting of accounts in private companies The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 extended boardsrsquo
financial oversight responsibilities and imposed
new financial disclosure requirements In particular
it requires that management prepare a report on
the internal control structures and procedures for
financial reporting in their organisation as well as
a report by external auditors on that assessment
see httpwwwsoxlawcom
While private sector examples of corporate
governance failure have been driving improvement
initiatives at an international level there have also
been an increasing number of such failures within
the public sphere which have prompted reviews of
corporate governance practices and procedures
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
in the public sector Public sector scandals
have been a driving force for the increasing
focus on corporate governance in the public
sector So too has the increasing complexity
of stakeholder relationships and expectations
regarding performance and transparency leading
to demands internationally for more effective
corporate governance arrangements in the public
sector to help agencies steer their way through
complex stakeholder demands Also changing
trends in the way the public sector conducts its
business and in particular regulatory and standard-
setting practices are increasingly requiring public
organisations to adopt best corporate governance
standards
The use and stewardship of public funds is an
essential feature of corporate governance in the
public sector As the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo case study
identifies boards of public sector bodies carry
considerable responsibilities for the management
of public funds and must ensure they have the
ability to fully pursue matters they deem to be of
concern Similarly the Royal United Hospital Bath
case study shows how boards can be misled
by executive management unless they have the
necessary competencies and skills to rigorously
scrutinise performance
Corporate governance failures can result in
wasted public money or poor service experience
and in some cases may even result in serious
tragedies The UK Audit Commission analysed
a number of inquiries into failures to see what
contribution governance arrangements made
to organisational failure as the case study on
page 11 identifies
Case study Royal United Hospital Bath corporate governance failures
Professor Robert Tinston was appointed by the trust in 2003 to hold an inquiry after two
external reviews identified concerns about deliberate manipulation of waiting lists and serious
deterioration in finances at the trust The Tinston report describes lsquoa trust in the grip of a powerful
self-delusion about its real performance and the desire to continue to support this leading to
a culture of misrepresentationrsquo
In particular the report noted major corporate governance failures The inquiry noted that the
former executive team appears to have adopted a policy of marginalising the trust board or
at the very least presenting important information at board meetings in an unduly optimistic
and favourable way The report says the trustrsquos weak control and accountability arrangements
combined to undermine fundamentally the performance of the hospital Boards must be in a
position to challenge constructively the financial and operational information they receive This
means they must understand the information presented to them and its implications for the
organisation They must also be able to identify risks to their corporate objectives recognise the
financial consequences and assess and monitor how effectively they are being addressed
Source httpwwwhsjcoukruh-bath-was-delude-claims-probe19369article
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
8
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board failure the example of the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo
In British Columbia (BC) the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo is an example of how the role of boards can
have major impacts on organisational performance The facts of the Fast Ferry Project are
fully documented in the BC Auditor Generalrsquos 1999 report A Review of the Fast Ferry Project
Governance and Risk Management
The government decided to purchase three high-speed aluminium catamaran car ferries at an
initial estimated cost of $210 million The initial board appointed to oversee the construction
included three independent directors from the private sector with relevant skills and experience
in marine construction Over the first ten months of its operations the board
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
asked repeatedly for a full budget
asked to receive regular reporting against an approved budget showing both forecast costs to complete and variances
asked for a construction schedule
pointed out that the original budget was for a different type of ferry and questioned both that budget and the latest changes to it
stressed the need for a risk analysis of the current scope of the project
noted that forecast costs continued to rise and that the scope of the programme had increased without an increase in budget
Its requests were consistently ignored or only partly met with the result that the board resigned
A new board was appointed The governance systems put in place to oversee the project were
inadequate Two years later it was determined that the project was significantly over budget
(the final cost was more than $450 million) and the ferries were not suitable for their intended
use Eventually the ferries were shrink-wrapped in plastic and stored under wraps for several
years until they were sold by auction for $18 million The net loss to the taxpayers of BC was
$430 million not including the cost of all of the reports and lost productivity in responding to
public outrage at the debacle The fiasco became a lightening rod for discussions on the lack
of appropriate governance
Source Watson 2004 pp 3ndash4 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
9
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
Particular challenges for corporate
governance in the public sector The Auditor General of Western Australia provides
a useful summary of the particular constraints
acting on public sector boards with regard to
corporate governance (Office of the Auditor
General Western Australia 1998) He notes that
in the private sector the board sets the strategic
direction management gives effect to that direction
and shareholders provide support through their
investment and operate as a general check on
the performance of the organisation While there
can be grey areas between the various roles
particularly between the board and management
the relationships are not as complex as in the
public sector
In the public sector the government is responsible
for the setting of policy and usually has wide
powers to intervene Management is responsible
for the day-to-day running to provide effective and
efficient services in the pursuit of government policy
The ultimate lsquoshareholdersrsquo are the electorate
who have infrequent opportunities to vote and
no direct authority over the affairs of any single
agency The public sector board often finds itself
balancing between managing an agency and
setting strategic direction Similarly management
finds itself balancing between a board that is
responsible for the agencyrsquos performance and
a minister responsible for the portfolio These all
make corporate governance more challenging
in a public sector environment The challenges
include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
policy is set by the government
board members may be selected by ministers
ministerial directions can countermand the wishes of the board at any time
chief executive officers may be formally employed by the minister which creates accountability problems for the board
the board as the accountable authority carries the legal responsibility for the performance of the agency
The remainder of this report looks at how such
challenges can be managed In brief a review of
good practice by Barker (2004) suggests that the
governing body and the sponsoring department
need to be clear about the organisationrsquos remit
and position and in particular that
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the organisation has a clear remit and set of
strategic priorities the organisationrsquos position within the delivery
network is clearly understood
changes in strategiespriorities are rapidly
communicated between the sponsor
department and the organisation
consultation between the organisation
sponsor department and key stakeholders
takes place as appropriate prior to any
significant policy change
effective communications between the
organisation sponsor department and key
stakeholders are in place
regular review of the organisation occurs to
ensure that governance is effective and that
remits and relationships evolve in line with
organisational and policy change
What does corporate governance encompass The IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 066 httpwwwifac orgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governance pdf) identifies four main dimensions of the corporate governance of public sector organisations
standards of behaviour ndash how the
management of the organisation exercises
leadership in determining the values and
standards of the organisation which define
the culture of the organisation and the
behaviour of everyone within it
organisational structures and processes ndash
how the board and top management within
organisations are appointed and organised
how their responsibilities are defined and
how they are held accountable
bull
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
10
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull control ndash the network of various controls
established by the top management of the
organisation to support it in achieving the
organisationrsquos objectives and compliance
with applicable laws and regulations and
internal policies
external reporting ndash how the top management
of the organisation demonstrates its financial
accountability for the stewardship of public
money and its performance in the use of
resources
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Elements of what is encompassed by these
aspects of corporate governance where there
have been notable developments in recent years
are outlined in more detail in Figure 3
These four dimensions of corporate governance
form the basis for the structuring of the rest of this
report Significant developments and examples
of international best practice in each of the four
areas are discussed further in the following
chapters
Case study Identifying corporate governance lessons from failures
Each of the national inquiry reports identified that poor governance arrangements set the framework
within which organisational systems and processes failed to detect or anticipate serious service
failures There was never a single failure or shortcoming in corporate governance that was solely
responsible for service failure Rather where there were serious and tragic outcomes it was
due to a combination of factors and an accumulation of governance failures
A number of common themes were brought to light by each inquiry
the poor quality or absence of leadership
poor decision-making and decision-making processes
inadequate systems and processes such as performance management
bull
lack of clarity in roles responsibilities and activities creating poor accountability
poor working relationships and dysfunctional behaviours
an insular organisational culture and poor focus on community and user needs
inadequate contingency plans or risk-management strategies to deal with
worst-case scenarios
Some combination of these factors was present at each failing organisation
Source Audit Commission 2003 p 28 httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPages improvementtrustpublicservicesaspx
11
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 3 Dimensions of corporate governance
Dimension Recommendations on governance
1 Standards of behaviour bull
bull
bull
Codes of good practice
Leadership
Codes of conduct
2 Organisational structures
and processes
bull
bull
Accountability for public money
Roles and responsibilities
bull Governing bodybull Chairpersonbull Executive managementbull Sponsoring department
3 Control bull
bull
bull I
Risk management including management of conflicts of interest
Audit
nternal control
4 External reporting bull
bull
Transparency
Confidentiality
Source adapted from IFAC 2001 p 14 httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
12
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
13
2 Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
of the organisation operates the values that drive
the organisation and the culture that prevails all
of which influence the behaviour of all staff As
such standards of behaviour deal largely with
the development of codes of practice and what
has been termed the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate
governance which have been receiving more
prominence in recent years drawing on best
practice in the private sector (see case study)
Corporate governance codes of good
practice As new corporate governance codes extended
throughout the private sector commercial
state-owned enterprises sought guidance from
governments about equivalent standards In
response governments internationally adapted
private sector codes to provide guidance for
board members and executives on commercial
and non-commercial state bodies and agencies
These codes set the parameters for standards of
behaviour required for good corporate governance
of public organisations
Case study Addressing the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance lessons from private sector practice
Research on corporate governance in the private sector has indicated that lsquohardrsquo attributes of
governance such as board independence are necessary but not sufficient There is a need
to pay attention to the lsquosoftrsquo side of governance focusing on behavioural dynamics Some
of the lsquosoftrsquo governance factors that appear to be important for performance in the private
sector include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
A clarity in roles responsibilities and relationships between chief executive officer (CEO)
and chair directors and management directors and shareholdersstakeholders
Healthy chairCEO interface
Directors working as a team
Culture trust and open dissent
Right skills competencies and characteristics including lsquoindustrybusiness knowledgersquo
A good induction process and ongoing access to training
Leadership skills of the chair
Information flows
Regular evaluation of board performance
Source Edwards and Clough 2005 p 12 httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
bull
For example in Australia the government
developed its Governance Arrangements
for Australian Government Bodies in 2005
httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-framework
governancedocsGovernance-Arrangementsshy
for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
Similarly in Canada the Treasury Board of
Canada Secretariat has produced guidelines for
lsquoCorporate Governance in Crown Corporations
and Other Public Enterprisesrsquo httpwwwtbs-sct
gccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-eng
asp
In Ireland the Department of Finance also
published in 2009 a revised and updated lsquoCode
of Practice for the Governance of State Bodiesrsquo
h t tp www f inance gov ie v iewdoc
aspDocID=5824
An example of the type of issue covered by codes
of good practice is given for building the relationship
between the board and chief executive in the case
study taken from the Canadian code
What all of these corporate governance codes
and guidelines have in common is a commitment
to ensuring there is
clarity over the roles and responsibilities of
government boards of state bodies CEOs
and external auditing bodies as well as the
relationship between them
clarity over the public policy objectives
expected of state bodies
adequate financial reporting and internal
controls
standards of behaviour that reflect values
of integrity honesty and probity and that all
actions taken within state bodies are in the
best interests of that organisation
Case study Canadian code of good practice guidance on building a relationship
In a Crown corporation the nature of the relationship between the CEO and the board is often
critical The board must work with the CEO to build a relationship of openness and trust
Position descriptions can assist greatly in the smooth functioning of these relations The board
of directors the chair and the CEO should develop position descriptions for the board the
chair and the CEO
Boards of directors in conjunction with the CEO should periodically review the allocation of
responsibilities between the board and management This review should focus on defining
and describing both the boardrsquos principal responsibilities and the limits to managementrsquos
authority
Source httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
14
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
15
Codes of conduct An important emerging feature of good corporate
governance practice internationally is the
development of written formal codes of conduct
by organisations that set out their obligations with
regard to corporate governance Like corporate
governance codes codes of conduct have
proliferated in recent years They identify the
behaviour expected of those to whom they
apply by articulating a coherent set of values
and a means of addressing maladministration
where it occurs (see Transport for London (TfL)
case study)
The Public Audit Forum (2001) sets out important
elements which it is expected most codes of
conduct will address
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
outlines of expected professional and
personal behaviour
defined restrictions on business and political
activities (where appropriate)
criteria and procedures for declarations of
interests both business and political
definitions of conflicts of interest
a statement of the aims and values of the
body
statements of the obligations of the body
towards its customers staff community and
other interested parties
information about the bodyrsquos approach to
openness and arrangements for acquiring
information about its activities
procedures for raising complaints with an
independent body
definition of the dividing line between the role
and responsibilities of the governing body
and those of the executive staff
Source Public Audit Forum (2001) httpwww
public-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Particularly with regard to standards of behaviour
such codes of conduct are expected to
reflect the practice of the highest standards in
public life In the UK the Nolan Committee
(httpwwwarchiveofficial-documentscouk
documentparlmentnolannolanhtm) inquired
into standards of public life and established seven
principles of public life that have been widely
adopted internationally
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Selflessness Holders of public office should
take decisions solely in terms of the public
interest They should not do so in order to
gain financial or other material benefits for
themselves their family or their friends
Integrity Holders of public office should
not place themselves under any financial
or other obligation to outside individuals or
organisations that might influence them in
the performance of their official duties
Objectivity In carrying out public business
including making public appointments
awarding contracts or recommending
individuals for rewards and benefits holders
of public office should make choices on
merit
Accountability Holders of public office are
accountable for their decisions and actions
to the public and must submit themselves
to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their
office
Openness Holders of public office should be
as open as possible about all the decisions
and actions that they take They should
give reasons for their decisions and restrict
information only when the wider public
interest clearly demands
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
Honesty Holders of public office have a duty
to declare any private interests relating to their
public duties and to take steps to resolve any
conflicts arising in a way that protects the
public interest
Leadership Holders of public office should
promote and support these principles by
leadership and example
Failure to adhere to such standards can lead to
the failures in corporate governance noted earlier
and in particular to
bull
bull
bull
failures of principles of fairness in the
treatment of staff suppliers or contractors
whether due to conflicts of interest or other
reason
misuse of public assets or resources for
personal or political purposes
failure to exercise reasonable stewardship
over public assets or resources
Case study Transport for London (TfL) code of conduct
TfLrsquos corporate governance code of conduct addresses the main principles of good corporate
governance by setting out a series of undertakings that TfL has committed itself to deliver
under five main headings
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Public focus
Structures and processes
Risk management and internal control
Service delivery arrangements
Standards of conduct
For example under risk management and internal control TfL amongst other things commits
that its annual report will contain an objective and understandable statement and assessment
of its risk-management system including systems of internal control and internal audit and
their effectiveness in practice
Source httpwwwtflgovukcorporateabout-tfl2876aspxPublicFocus
16
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
17
Leadership developments Leadership is a crucial principle from a corporate
governance perspective There are two key
leadership roles the governing body of public
organisations needs to pay attention to the
establishment of sound governance structures
and processes and supporting good governance
through its own performance and behaviours
A range of commentators such as Kalokerinos
(2007) note the central role of the chair of the
governing body in the leadership of public sector
organisations This includes the traditional duty
of ensuring the proper functioning of the board
and its meetings but also covers maintaining a
close relationship with the chief executive and
representing the authority to outside stakeholders
A study undertaken for the UK Public Services
Productivity Panel (Barker 2004) states that the
chair should
bull
bull
bull
bull
act as board team leader with an
understanding of what skills knowledge and
aptitudes the board needs
regularly carry out skills knowledge and
aptitude audits which may be relatively
low key and informal to help understand
the current board composition and provide
board members with further clarity about
their individual roles
act as board lsquoconductorrsquo fostering an
environment where dissenting voices can
be heard without damaging collective
responsibility
act as the interface between the board and
its executive team and the organisation and
its sponsor department
In terms of developing board membersrsquo leadership
skills knowledge and aptitude mentoring of board
members has been of growing prominence in
recent years (see case studies)
A particular leadership challenge for the chair is
managing the relationship with the chief executive
Chief executives are professionals with specific
training in their job Chairs often come to the
role with no or limited experience of chairing
The chair and chief executive may experience a
culture clash between a management approach
to a question and a laypersonrsquos approach They
may be talking about the same problem using
very different vocabularies and terms of reference
Chief executives and chairs may also have different
definitions of success and consequently may
end up working towards different goals The
development of a good working relationship with
an agreed common vision as to the organisationrsquos
purpose is the key to effective leadership of the
organisation
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 11: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
7
Why has corporate governance come
to prominence Interest in corporate governance has been driven
primarily by a growing list of corporate scandals
in the private sector such as the Enron collapse
in the USA The problems have to do with the
pursuit of private interests (excessive compensation
of top executives overly generous benefits)
duplicity (failure to observe accepted standards
of accounting the disguising of transactions)
conflict of interest (accounting firms too close
to client corporations) and corruption in various
other forms These issues have focused interest
on a number of corporate governance issues
such as the role of the board of directors the
independence of the boardrsquos membership
from management the responsibilities of the
board chair the chairrsquos relationship to the chief
executive and the transparency and accuracy
of financial reporting (Plumptre 2004 pp 2ndash3)
More recently the collapse of Lehman Brothers
Holdings plc in the USA which has precipitated
and contributed to financial downturns globally
has drawn attention to the consequences of weak
controls In a public sector setting the public
outrage at the abuse of the expenses regime for
parliamentarians at Westminister while not a failure
of corporate governance as such has highlighted
the issue of standards of behaviour which is of
central concern to corporate governance
Three sources for new practices and codes of
corporate governance are dominant internationally
in response to these scandals ndash the United
Kingdom (UK) Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the
USA In the UK following a number of private
sector corporate governance scandals the
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate
Governance (the Cadbury Committee) was formed
in 1991 to investigate The resultant Cadbury report
developed an innovative lsquoCode of Best Practicersquo
and identified three fundamental principles of
corporate governance ndash openness integrity and
accountability A lsquocombined codersquo was developed
in 1998 which harmonised the key issues from
Cadbury with a number of subsequent reports The
lsquocombined codersquo was binding on all companies
quoted on the London Stock Exchange It has
been revised on a number of occasions The most
recent version of the Code is available at http
wwwfrcorgukdocumentspagemanagerfrc
Combined20Code20June202006pdf
The OECD has also been active in relation to
promoting good corporate governance and
published a series of Principles of Corporate
Governance in 1999 Following a comprehensive
survey of how member countries addressed the
different corporate governance challenges they
faced the Principles were revised in 2004 see
httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724
In the USA following the widely reported
accounting scandals at energy company Enron
and telecommunications company WorldCom
the federal government sought to pass laws
which would prevent in future the fraudulent
reporting of accounts in private companies The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 extended boardsrsquo
financial oversight responsibilities and imposed
new financial disclosure requirements In particular
it requires that management prepare a report on
the internal control structures and procedures for
financial reporting in their organisation as well as
a report by external auditors on that assessment
see httpwwwsoxlawcom
While private sector examples of corporate
governance failure have been driving improvement
initiatives at an international level there have also
been an increasing number of such failures within
the public sphere which have prompted reviews of
corporate governance practices and procedures
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
in the public sector Public sector scandals
have been a driving force for the increasing
focus on corporate governance in the public
sector So too has the increasing complexity
of stakeholder relationships and expectations
regarding performance and transparency leading
to demands internationally for more effective
corporate governance arrangements in the public
sector to help agencies steer their way through
complex stakeholder demands Also changing
trends in the way the public sector conducts its
business and in particular regulatory and standard-
setting practices are increasingly requiring public
organisations to adopt best corporate governance
standards
The use and stewardship of public funds is an
essential feature of corporate governance in the
public sector As the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo case study
identifies boards of public sector bodies carry
considerable responsibilities for the management
of public funds and must ensure they have the
ability to fully pursue matters they deem to be of
concern Similarly the Royal United Hospital Bath
case study shows how boards can be misled
by executive management unless they have the
necessary competencies and skills to rigorously
scrutinise performance
Corporate governance failures can result in
wasted public money or poor service experience
and in some cases may even result in serious
tragedies The UK Audit Commission analysed
a number of inquiries into failures to see what
contribution governance arrangements made
to organisational failure as the case study on
page 11 identifies
Case study Royal United Hospital Bath corporate governance failures
Professor Robert Tinston was appointed by the trust in 2003 to hold an inquiry after two
external reviews identified concerns about deliberate manipulation of waiting lists and serious
deterioration in finances at the trust The Tinston report describes lsquoa trust in the grip of a powerful
self-delusion about its real performance and the desire to continue to support this leading to
a culture of misrepresentationrsquo
In particular the report noted major corporate governance failures The inquiry noted that the
former executive team appears to have adopted a policy of marginalising the trust board or
at the very least presenting important information at board meetings in an unduly optimistic
and favourable way The report says the trustrsquos weak control and accountability arrangements
combined to undermine fundamentally the performance of the hospital Boards must be in a
position to challenge constructively the financial and operational information they receive This
means they must understand the information presented to them and its implications for the
organisation They must also be able to identify risks to their corporate objectives recognise the
financial consequences and assess and monitor how effectively they are being addressed
Source httpwwwhsjcoukruh-bath-was-delude-claims-probe19369article
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
8
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board failure the example of the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo
In British Columbia (BC) the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo is an example of how the role of boards can
have major impacts on organisational performance The facts of the Fast Ferry Project are
fully documented in the BC Auditor Generalrsquos 1999 report A Review of the Fast Ferry Project
Governance and Risk Management
The government decided to purchase three high-speed aluminium catamaran car ferries at an
initial estimated cost of $210 million The initial board appointed to oversee the construction
included three independent directors from the private sector with relevant skills and experience
in marine construction Over the first ten months of its operations the board
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
asked repeatedly for a full budget
asked to receive regular reporting against an approved budget showing both forecast costs to complete and variances
asked for a construction schedule
pointed out that the original budget was for a different type of ferry and questioned both that budget and the latest changes to it
stressed the need for a risk analysis of the current scope of the project
noted that forecast costs continued to rise and that the scope of the programme had increased without an increase in budget
Its requests were consistently ignored or only partly met with the result that the board resigned
A new board was appointed The governance systems put in place to oversee the project were
inadequate Two years later it was determined that the project was significantly over budget
(the final cost was more than $450 million) and the ferries were not suitable for their intended
use Eventually the ferries were shrink-wrapped in plastic and stored under wraps for several
years until they were sold by auction for $18 million The net loss to the taxpayers of BC was
$430 million not including the cost of all of the reports and lost productivity in responding to
public outrage at the debacle The fiasco became a lightening rod for discussions on the lack
of appropriate governance
Source Watson 2004 pp 3ndash4 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
9
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
Particular challenges for corporate
governance in the public sector The Auditor General of Western Australia provides
a useful summary of the particular constraints
acting on public sector boards with regard to
corporate governance (Office of the Auditor
General Western Australia 1998) He notes that
in the private sector the board sets the strategic
direction management gives effect to that direction
and shareholders provide support through their
investment and operate as a general check on
the performance of the organisation While there
can be grey areas between the various roles
particularly between the board and management
the relationships are not as complex as in the
public sector
In the public sector the government is responsible
for the setting of policy and usually has wide
powers to intervene Management is responsible
for the day-to-day running to provide effective and
efficient services in the pursuit of government policy
The ultimate lsquoshareholdersrsquo are the electorate
who have infrequent opportunities to vote and
no direct authority over the affairs of any single
agency The public sector board often finds itself
balancing between managing an agency and
setting strategic direction Similarly management
finds itself balancing between a board that is
responsible for the agencyrsquos performance and
a minister responsible for the portfolio These all
make corporate governance more challenging
in a public sector environment The challenges
include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
policy is set by the government
board members may be selected by ministers
ministerial directions can countermand the wishes of the board at any time
chief executive officers may be formally employed by the minister which creates accountability problems for the board
the board as the accountable authority carries the legal responsibility for the performance of the agency
The remainder of this report looks at how such
challenges can be managed In brief a review of
good practice by Barker (2004) suggests that the
governing body and the sponsoring department
need to be clear about the organisationrsquos remit
and position and in particular that
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the organisation has a clear remit and set of
strategic priorities the organisationrsquos position within the delivery
network is clearly understood
changes in strategiespriorities are rapidly
communicated between the sponsor
department and the organisation
consultation between the organisation
sponsor department and key stakeholders
takes place as appropriate prior to any
significant policy change
effective communications between the
organisation sponsor department and key
stakeholders are in place
regular review of the organisation occurs to
ensure that governance is effective and that
remits and relationships evolve in line with
organisational and policy change
What does corporate governance encompass The IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 066 httpwwwifac orgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governance pdf) identifies four main dimensions of the corporate governance of public sector organisations
standards of behaviour ndash how the
management of the organisation exercises
leadership in determining the values and
standards of the organisation which define
the culture of the organisation and the
behaviour of everyone within it
organisational structures and processes ndash
how the board and top management within
organisations are appointed and organised
how their responsibilities are defined and
how they are held accountable
bull
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
10
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull control ndash the network of various controls
established by the top management of the
organisation to support it in achieving the
organisationrsquos objectives and compliance
with applicable laws and regulations and
internal policies
external reporting ndash how the top management
of the organisation demonstrates its financial
accountability for the stewardship of public
money and its performance in the use of
resources
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Elements of what is encompassed by these
aspects of corporate governance where there
have been notable developments in recent years
are outlined in more detail in Figure 3
These four dimensions of corporate governance
form the basis for the structuring of the rest of this
report Significant developments and examples
of international best practice in each of the four
areas are discussed further in the following
chapters
Case study Identifying corporate governance lessons from failures
Each of the national inquiry reports identified that poor governance arrangements set the framework
within which organisational systems and processes failed to detect or anticipate serious service
failures There was never a single failure or shortcoming in corporate governance that was solely
responsible for service failure Rather where there were serious and tragic outcomes it was
due to a combination of factors and an accumulation of governance failures
A number of common themes were brought to light by each inquiry
the poor quality or absence of leadership
poor decision-making and decision-making processes
inadequate systems and processes such as performance management
bull
lack of clarity in roles responsibilities and activities creating poor accountability
poor working relationships and dysfunctional behaviours
an insular organisational culture and poor focus on community and user needs
inadequate contingency plans or risk-management strategies to deal with
worst-case scenarios
Some combination of these factors was present at each failing organisation
Source Audit Commission 2003 p 28 httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPages improvementtrustpublicservicesaspx
11
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 3 Dimensions of corporate governance
Dimension Recommendations on governance
1 Standards of behaviour bull
bull
bull
Codes of good practice
Leadership
Codes of conduct
2 Organisational structures
and processes
bull
bull
Accountability for public money
Roles and responsibilities
bull Governing bodybull Chairpersonbull Executive managementbull Sponsoring department
3 Control bull
bull
bull I
Risk management including management of conflicts of interest
Audit
nternal control
4 External reporting bull
bull
Transparency
Confidentiality
Source adapted from IFAC 2001 p 14 httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
12
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
13
2 Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
of the organisation operates the values that drive
the organisation and the culture that prevails all
of which influence the behaviour of all staff As
such standards of behaviour deal largely with
the development of codes of practice and what
has been termed the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate
governance which have been receiving more
prominence in recent years drawing on best
practice in the private sector (see case study)
Corporate governance codes of good
practice As new corporate governance codes extended
throughout the private sector commercial
state-owned enterprises sought guidance from
governments about equivalent standards In
response governments internationally adapted
private sector codes to provide guidance for
board members and executives on commercial
and non-commercial state bodies and agencies
These codes set the parameters for standards of
behaviour required for good corporate governance
of public organisations
Case study Addressing the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance lessons from private sector practice
Research on corporate governance in the private sector has indicated that lsquohardrsquo attributes of
governance such as board independence are necessary but not sufficient There is a need
to pay attention to the lsquosoftrsquo side of governance focusing on behavioural dynamics Some
of the lsquosoftrsquo governance factors that appear to be important for performance in the private
sector include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
A clarity in roles responsibilities and relationships between chief executive officer (CEO)
and chair directors and management directors and shareholdersstakeholders
Healthy chairCEO interface
Directors working as a team
Culture trust and open dissent
Right skills competencies and characteristics including lsquoindustrybusiness knowledgersquo
A good induction process and ongoing access to training
Leadership skills of the chair
Information flows
Regular evaluation of board performance
Source Edwards and Clough 2005 p 12 httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
bull
For example in Australia the government
developed its Governance Arrangements
for Australian Government Bodies in 2005
httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-framework
governancedocsGovernance-Arrangementsshy
for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
Similarly in Canada the Treasury Board of
Canada Secretariat has produced guidelines for
lsquoCorporate Governance in Crown Corporations
and Other Public Enterprisesrsquo httpwwwtbs-sct
gccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-eng
asp
In Ireland the Department of Finance also
published in 2009 a revised and updated lsquoCode
of Practice for the Governance of State Bodiesrsquo
h t tp www f inance gov ie v iewdoc
aspDocID=5824
An example of the type of issue covered by codes
of good practice is given for building the relationship
between the board and chief executive in the case
study taken from the Canadian code
What all of these corporate governance codes
and guidelines have in common is a commitment
to ensuring there is
clarity over the roles and responsibilities of
government boards of state bodies CEOs
and external auditing bodies as well as the
relationship between them
clarity over the public policy objectives
expected of state bodies
adequate financial reporting and internal
controls
standards of behaviour that reflect values
of integrity honesty and probity and that all
actions taken within state bodies are in the
best interests of that organisation
Case study Canadian code of good practice guidance on building a relationship
In a Crown corporation the nature of the relationship between the CEO and the board is often
critical The board must work with the CEO to build a relationship of openness and trust
Position descriptions can assist greatly in the smooth functioning of these relations The board
of directors the chair and the CEO should develop position descriptions for the board the
chair and the CEO
Boards of directors in conjunction with the CEO should periodically review the allocation of
responsibilities between the board and management This review should focus on defining
and describing both the boardrsquos principal responsibilities and the limits to managementrsquos
authority
Source httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
14
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
15
Codes of conduct An important emerging feature of good corporate
governance practice internationally is the
development of written formal codes of conduct
by organisations that set out their obligations with
regard to corporate governance Like corporate
governance codes codes of conduct have
proliferated in recent years They identify the
behaviour expected of those to whom they
apply by articulating a coherent set of values
and a means of addressing maladministration
where it occurs (see Transport for London (TfL)
case study)
The Public Audit Forum (2001) sets out important
elements which it is expected most codes of
conduct will address
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
outlines of expected professional and
personal behaviour
defined restrictions on business and political
activities (where appropriate)
criteria and procedures for declarations of
interests both business and political
definitions of conflicts of interest
a statement of the aims and values of the
body
statements of the obligations of the body
towards its customers staff community and
other interested parties
information about the bodyrsquos approach to
openness and arrangements for acquiring
information about its activities
procedures for raising complaints with an
independent body
definition of the dividing line between the role
and responsibilities of the governing body
and those of the executive staff
Source Public Audit Forum (2001) httpwww
public-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Particularly with regard to standards of behaviour
such codes of conduct are expected to
reflect the practice of the highest standards in
public life In the UK the Nolan Committee
(httpwwwarchiveofficial-documentscouk
documentparlmentnolannolanhtm) inquired
into standards of public life and established seven
principles of public life that have been widely
adopted internationally
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Selflessness Holders of public office should
take decisions solely in terms of the public
interest They should not do so in order to
gain financial or other material benefits for
themselves their family or their friends
Integrity Holders of public office should
not place themselves under any financial
or other obligation to outside individuals or
organisations that might influence them in
the performance of their official duties
Objectivity In carrying out public business
including making public appointments
awarding contracts or recommending
individuals for rewards and benefits holders
of public office should make choices on
merit
Accountability Holders of public office are
accountable for their decisions and actions
to the public and must submit themselves
to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their
office
Openness Holders of public office should be
as open as possible about all the decisions
and actions that they take They should
give reasons for their decisions and restrict
information only when the wider public
interest clearly demands
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
Honesty Holders of public office have a duty
to declare any private interests relating to their
public duties and to take steps to resolve any
conflicts arising in a way that protects the
public interest
Leadership Holders of public office should
promote and support these principles by
leadership and example
Failure to adhere to such standards can lead to
the failures in corporate governance noted earlier
and in particular to
bull
bull
bull
failures of principles of fairness in the
treatment of staff suppliers or contractors
whether due to conflicts of interest or other
reason
misuse of public assets or resources for
personal or political purposes
failure to exercise reasonable stewardship
over public assets or resources
Case study Transport for London (TfL) code of conduct
TfLrsquos corporate governance code of conduct addresses the main principles of good corporate
governance by setting out a series of undertakings that TfL has committed itself to deliver
under five main headings
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Public focus
Structures and processes
Risk management and internal control
Service delivery arrangements
Standards of conduct
For example under risk management and internal control TfL amongst other things commits
that its annual report will contain an objective and understandable statement and assessment
of its risk-management system including systems of internal control and internal audit and
their effectiveness in practice
Source httpwwwtflgovukcorporateabout-tfl2876aspxPublicFocus
16
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
17
Leadership developments Leadership is a crucial principle from a corporate
governance perspective There are two key
leadership roles the governing body of public
organisations needs to pay attention to the
establishment of sound governance structures
and processes and supporting good governance
through its own performance and behaviours
A range of commentators such as Kalokerinos
(2007) note the central role of the chair of the
governing body in the leadership of public sector
organisations This includes the traditional duty
of ensuring the proper functioning of the board
and its meetings but also covers maintaining a
close relationship with the chief executive and
representing the authority to outside stakeholders
A study undertaken for the UK Public Services
Productivity Panel (Barker 2004) states that the
chair should
bull
bull
bull
bull
act as board team leader with an
understanding of what skills knowledge and
aptitudes the board needs
regularly carry out skills knowledge and
aptitude audits which may be relatively
low key and informal to help understand
the current board composition and provide
board members with further clarity about
their individual roles
act as board lsquoconductorrsquo fostering an
environment where dissenting voices can
be heard without damaging collective
responsibility
act as the interface between the board and
its executive team and the organisation and
its sponsor department
In terms of developing board membersrsquo leadership
skills knowledge and aptitude mentoring of board
members has been of growing prominence in
recent years (see case studies)
A particular leadership challenge for the chair is
managing the relationship with the chief executive
Chief executives are professionals with specific
training in their job Chairs often come to the
role with no or limited experience of chairing
The chair and chief executive may experience a
culture clash between a management approach
to a question and a laypersonrsquos approach They
may be talking about the same problem using
very different vocabularies and terms of reference
Chief executives and chairs may also have different
definitions of success and consequently may
end up working towards different goals The
development of a good working relationship with
an agreed common vision as to the organisationrsquos
purpose is the key to effective leadership of the
organisation
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 12: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
in the public sector Public sector scandals
have been a driving force for the increasing
focus on corporate governance in the public
sector So too has the increasing complexity
of stakeholder relationships and expectations
regarding performance and transparency leading
to demands internationally for more effective
corporate governance arrangements in the public
sector to help agencies steer their way through
complex stakeholder demands Also changing
trends in the way the public sector conducts its
business and in particular regulatory and standard-
setting practices are increasingly requiring public
organisations to adopt best corporate governance
standards
The use and stewardship of public funds is an
essential feature of corporate governance in the
public sector As the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo case study
identifies boards of public sector bodies carry
considerable responsibilities for the management
of public funds and must ensure they have the
ability to fully pursue matters they deem to be of
concern Similarly the Royal United Hospital Bath
case study shows how boards can be misled
by executive management unless they have the
necessary competencies and skills to rigorously
scrutinise performance
Corporate governance failures can result in
wasted public money or poor service experience
and in some cases may even result in serious
tragedies The UK Audit Commission analysed
a number of inquiries into failures to see what
contribution governance arrangements made
to organisational failure as the case study on
page 11 identifies
Case study Royal United Hospital Bath corporate governance failures
Professor Robert Tinston was appointed by the trust in 2003 to hold an inquiry after two
external reviews identified concerns about deliberate manipulation of waiting lists and serious
deterioration in finances at the trust The Tinston report describes lsquoa trust in the grip of a powerful
self-delusion about its real performance and the desire to continue to support this leading to
a culture of misrepresentationrsquo
In particular the report noted major corporate governance failures The inquiry noted that the
former executive team appears to have adopted a policy of marginalising the trust board or
at the very least presenting important information at board meetings in an unduly optimistic
and favourable way The report says the trustrsquos weak control and accountability arrangements
combined to undermine fundamentally the performance of the hospital Boards must be in a
position to challenge constructively the financial and operational information they receive This
means they must understand the information presented to them and its implications for the
organisation They must also be able to identify risks to their corporate objectives recognise the
financial consequences and assess and monitor how effectively they are being addressed
Source httpwwwhsjcoukruh-bath-was-delude-claims-probe19369article
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
8
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board failure the example of the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo
In British Columbia (BC) the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo is an example of how the role of boards can
have major impacts on organisational performance The facts of the Fast Ferry Project are
fully documented in the BC Auditor Generalrsquos 1999 report A Review of the Fast Ferry Project
Governance and Risk Management
The government decided to purchase three high-speed aluminium catamaran car ferries at an
initial estimated cost of $210 million The initial board appointed to oversee the construction
included three independent directors from the private sector with relevant skills and experience
in marine construction Over the first ten months of its operations the board
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
asked repeatedly for a full budget
asked to receive regular reporting against an approved budget showing both forecast costs to complete and variances
asked for a construction schedule
pointed out that the original budget was for a different type of ferry and questioned both that budget and the latest changes to it
stressed the need for a risk analysis of the current scope of the project
noted that forecast costs continued to rise and that the scope of the programme had increased without an increase in budget
Its requests were consistently ignored or only partly met with the result that the board resigned
A new board was appointed The governance systems put in place to oversee the project were
inadequate Two years later it was determined that the project was significantly over budget
(the final cost was more than $450 million) and the ferries were not suitable for their intended
use Eventually the ferries were shrink-wrapped in plastic and stored under wraps for several
years until they were sold by auction for $18 million The net loss to the taxpayers of BC was
$430 million not including the cost of all of the reports and lost productivity in responding to
public outrage at the debacle The fiasco became a lightening rod for discussions on the lack
of appropriate governance
Source Watson 2004 pp 3ndash4 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
9
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
Particular challenges for corporate
governance in the public sector The Auditor General of Western Australia provides
a useful summary of the particular constraints
acting on public sector boards with regard to
corporate governance (Office of the Auditor
General Western Australia 1998) He notes that
in the private sector the board sets the strategic
direction management gives effect to that direction
and shareholders provide support through their
investment and operate as a general check on
the performance of the organisation While there
can be grey areas between the various roles
particularly between the board and management
the relationships are not as complex as in the
public sector
In the public sector the government is responsible
for the setting of policy and usually has wide
powers to intervene Management is responsible
for the day-to-day running to provide effective and
efficient services in the pursuit of government policy
The ultimate lsquoshareholdersrsquo are the electorate
who have infrequent opportunities to vote and
no direct authority over the affairs of any single
agency The public sector board often finds itself
balancing between managing an agency and
setting strategic direction Similarly management
finds itself balancing between a board that is
responsible for the agencyrsquos performance and
a minister responsible for the portfolio These all
make corporate governance more challenging
in a public sector environment The challenges
include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
policy is set by the government
board members may be selected by ministers
ministerial directions can countermand the wishes of the board at any time
chief executive officers may be formally employed by the minister which creates accountability problems for the board
the board as the accountable authority carries the legal responsibility for the performance of the agency
The remainder of this report looks at how such
challenges can be managed In brief a review of
good practice by Barker (2004) suggests that the
governing body and the sponsoring department
need to be clear about the organisationrsquos remit
and position and in particular that
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the organisation has a clear remit and set of
strategic priorities the organisationrsquos position within the delivery
network is clearly understood
changes in strategiespriorities are rapidly
communicated between the sponsor
department and the organisation
consultation between the organisation
sponsor department and key stakeholders
takes place as appropriate prior to any
significant policy change
effective communications between the
organisation sponsor department and key
stakeholders are in place
regular review of the organisation occurs to
ensure that governance is effective and that
remits and relationships evolve in line with
organisational and policy change
What does corporate governance encompass The IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 066 httpwwwifac orgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governance pdf) identifies four main dimensions of the corporate governance of public sector organisations
standards of behaviour ndash how the
management of the organisation exercises
leadership in determining the values and
standards of the organisation which define
the culture of the organisation and the
behaviour of everyone within it
organisational structures and processes ndash
how the board and top management within
organisations are appointed and organised
how their responsibilities are defined and
how they are held accountable
bull
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
10
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull control ndash the network of various controls
established by the top management of the
organisation to support it in achieving the
organisationrsquos objectives and compliance
with applicable laws and regulations and
internal policies
external reporting ndash how the top management
of the organisation demonstrates its financial
accountability for the stewardship of public
money and its performance in the use of
resources
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Elements of what is encompassed by these
aspects of corporate governance where there
have been notable developments in recent years
are outlined in more detail in Figure 3
These four dimensions of corporate governance
form the basis for the structuring of the rest of this
report Significant developments and examples
of international best practice in each of the four
areas are discussed further in the following
chapters
Case study Identifying corporate governance lessons from failures
Each of the national inquiry reports identified that poor governance arrangements set the framework
within which organisational systems and processes failed to detect or anticipate serious service
failures There was never a single failure or shortcoming in corporate governance that was solely
responsible for service failure Rather where there were serious and tragic outcomes it was
due to a combination of factors and an accumulation of governance failures
A number of common themes were brought to light by each inquiry
the poor quality or absence of leadership
poor decision-making and decision-making processes
inadequate systems and processes such as performance management
bull
lack of clarity in roles responsibilities and activities creating poor accountability
poor working relationships and dysfunctional behaviours
an insular organisational culture and poor focus on community and user needs
inadequate contingency plans or risk-management strategies to deal with
worst-case scenarios
Some combination of these factors was present at each failing organisation
Source Audit Commission 2003 p 28 httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPages improvementtrustpublicservicesaspx
11
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 3 Dimensions of corporate governance
Dimension Recommendations on governance
1 Standards of behaviour bull
bull
bull
Codes of good practice
Leadership
Codes of conduct
2 Organisational structures
and processes
bull
bull
Accountability for public money
Roles and responsibilities
bull Governing bodybull Chairpersonbull Executive managementbull Sponsoring department
3 Control bull
bull
bull I
Risk management including management of conflicts of interest
Audit
nternal control
4 External reporting bull
bull
Transparency
Confidentiality
Source adapted from IFAC 2001 p 14 httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
12
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
13
2 Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
of the organisation operates the values that drive
the organisation and the culture that prevails all
of which influence the behaviour of all staff As
such standards of behaviour deal largely with
the development of codes of practice and what
has been termed the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate
governance which have been receiving more
prominence in recent years drawing on best
practice in the private sector (see case study)
Corporate governance codes of good
practice As new corporate governance codes extended
throughout the private sector commercial
state-owned enterprises sought guidance from
governments about equivalent standards In
response governments internationally adapted
private sector codes to provide guidance for
board members and executives on commercial
and non-commercial state bodies and agencies
These codes set the parameters for standards of
behaviour required for good corporate governance
of public organisations
Case study Addressing the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance lessons from private sector practice
Research on corporate governance in the private sector has indicated that lsquohardrsquo attributes of
governance such as board independence are necessary but not sufficient There is a need
to pay attention to the lsquosoftrsquo side of governance focusing on behavioural dynamics Some
of the lsquosoftrsquo governance factors that appear to be important for performance in the private
sector include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
A clarity in roles responsibilities and relationships between chief executive officer (CEO)
and chair directors and management directors and shareholdersstakeholders
Healthy chairCEO interface
Directors working as a team
Culture trust and open dissent
Right skills competencies and characteristics including lsquoindustrybusiness knowledgersquo
A good induction process and ongoing access to training
Leadership skills of the chair
Information flows
Regular evaluation of board performance
Source Edwards and Clough 2005 p 12 httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
bull
For example in Australia the government
developed its Governance Arrangements
for Australian Government Bodies in 2005
httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-framework
governancedocsGovernance-Arrangementsshy
for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
Similarly in Canada the Treasury Board of
Canada Secretariat has produced guidelines for
lsquoCorporate Governance in Crown Corporations
and Other Public Enterprisesrsquo httpwwwtbs-sct
gccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-eng
asp
In Ireland the Department of Finance also
published in 2009 a revised and updated lsquoCode
of Practice for the Governance of State Bodiesrsquo
h t tp www f inance gov ie v iewdoc
aspDocID=5824
An example of the type of issue covered by codes
of good practice is given for building the relationship
between the board and chief executive in the case
study taken from the Canadian code
What all of these corporate governance codes
and guidelines have in common is a commitment
to ensuring there is
clarity over the roles and responsibilities of
government boards of state bodies CEOs
and external auditing bodies as well as the
relationship between them
clarity over the public policy objectives
expected of state bodies
adequate financial reporting and internal
controls
standards of behaviour that reflect values
of integrity honesty and probity and that all
actions taken within state bodies are in the
best interests of that organisation
Case study Canadian code of good practice guidance on building a relationship
In a Crown corporation the nature of the relationship between the CEO and the board is often
critical The board must work with the CEO to build a relationship of openness and trust
Position descriptions can assist greatly in the smooth functioning of these relations The board
of directors the chair and the CEO should develop position descriptions for the board the
chair and the CEO
Boards of directors in conjunction with the CEO should periodically review the allocation of
responsibilities between the board and management This review should focus on defining
and describing both the boardrsquos principal responsibilities and the limits to managementrsquos
authority
Source httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
14
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
15
Codes of conduct An important emerging feature of good corporate
governance practice internationally is the
development of written formal codes of conduct
by organisations that set out their obligations with
regard to corporate governance Like corporate
governance codes codes of conduct have
proliferated in recent years They identify the
behaviour expected of those to whom they
apply by articulating a coherent set of values
and a means of addressing maladministration
where it occurs (see Transport for London (TfL)
case study)
The Public Audit Forum (2001) sets out important
elements which it is expected most codes of
conduct will address
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
outlines of expected professional and
personal behaviour
defined restrictions on business and political
activities (where appropriate)
criteria and procedures for declarations of
interests both business and political
definitions of conflicts of interest
a statement of the aims and values of the
body
statements of the obligations of the body
towards its customers staff community and
other interested parties
information about the bodyrsquos approach to
openness and arrangements for acquiring
information about its activities
procedures for raising complaints with an
independent body
definition of the dividing line between the role
and responsibilities of the governing body
and those of the executive staff
Source Public Audit Forum (2001) httpwww
public-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Particularly with regard to standards of behaviour
such codes of conduct are expected to
reflect the practice of the highest standards in
public life In the UK the Nolan Committee
(httpwwwarchiveofficial-documentscouk
documentparlmentnolannolanhtm) inquired
into standards of public life and established seven
principles of public life that have been widely
adopted internationally
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Selflessness Holders of public office should
take decisions solely in terms of the public
interest They should not do so in order to
gain financial or other material benefits for
themselves their family or their friends
Integrity Holders of public office should
not place themselves under any financial
or other obligation to outside individuals or
organisations that might influence them in
the performance of their official duties
Objectivity In carrying out public business
including making public appointments
awarding contracts or recommending
individuals for rewards and benefits holders
of public office should make choices on
merit
Accountability Holders of public office are
accountable for their decisions and actions
to the public and must submit themselves
to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their
office
Openness Holders of public office should be
as open as possible about all the decisions
and actions that they take They should
give reasons for their decisions and restrict
information only when the wider public
interest clearly demands
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
Honesty Holders of public office have a duty
to declare any private interests relating to their
public duties and to take steps to resolve any
conflicts arising in a way that protects the
public interest
Leadership Holders of public office should
promote and support these principles by
leadership and example
Failure to adhere to such standards can lead to
the failures in corporate governance noted earlier
and in particular to
bull
bull
bull
failures of principles of fairness in the
treatment of staff suppliers or contractors
whether due to conflicts of interest or other
reason
misuse of public assets or resources for
personal or political purposes
failure to exercise reasonable stewardship
over public assets or resources
Case study Transport for London (TfL) code of conduct
TfLrsquos corporate governance code of conduct addresses the main principles of good corporate
governance by setting out a series of undertakings that TfL has committed itself to deliver
under five main headings
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Public focus
Structures and processes
Risk management and internal control
Service delivery arrangements
Standards of conduct
For example under risk management and internal control TfL amongst other things commits
that its annual report will contain an objective and understandable statement and assessment
of its risk-management system including systems of internal control and internal audit and
their effectiveness in practice
Source httpwwwtflgovukcorporateabout-tfl2876aspxPublicFocus
16
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
17
Leadership developments Leadership is a crucial principle from a corporate
governance perspective There are two key
leadership roles the governing body of public
organisations needs to pay attention to the
establishment of sound governance structures
and processes and supporting good governance
through its own performance and behaviours
A range of commentators such as Kalokerinos
(2007) note the central role of the chair of the
governing body in the leadership of public sector
organisations This includes the traditional duty
of ensuring the proper functioning of the board
and its meetings but also covers maintaining a
close relationship with the chief executive and
representing the authority to outside stakeholders
A study undertaken for the UK Public Services
Productivity Panel (Barker 2004) states that the
chair should
bull
bull
bull
bull
act as board team leader with an
understanding of what skills knowledge and
aptitudes the board needs
regularly carry out skills knowledge and
aptitude audits which may be relatively
low key and informal to help understand
the current board composition and provide
board members with further clarity about
their individual roles
act as board lsquoconductorrsquo fostering an
environment where dissenting voices can
be heard without damaging collective
responsibility
act as the interface between the board and
its executive team and the organisation and
its sponsor department
In terms of developing board membersrsquo leadership
skills knowledge and aptitude mentoring of board
members has been of growing prominence in
recent years (see case studies)
A particular leadership challenge for the chair is
managing the relationship with the chief executive
Chief executives are professionals with specific
training in their job Chairs often come to the
role with no or limited experience of chairing
The chair and chief executive may experience a
culture clash between a management approach
to a question and a laypersonrsquos approach They
may be talking about the same problem using
very different vocabularies and terms of reference
Chief executives and chairs may also have different
definitions of success and consequently may
end up working towards different goals The
development of a good working relationship with
an agreed common vision as to the organisationrsquos
purpose is the key to effective leadership of the
organisation
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 13: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board failure the example of the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo
In British Columbia (BC) the lsquoFast Ferry Fiascorsquo is an example of how the role of boards can
have major impacts on organisational performance The facts of the Fast Ferry Project are
fully documented in the BC Auditor Generalrsquos 1999 report A Review of the Fast Ferry Project
Governance and Risk Management
The government decided to purchase three high-speed aluminium catamaran car ferries at an
initial estimated cost of $210 million The initial board appointed to oversee the construction
included three independent directors from the private sector with relevant skills and experience
in marine construction Over the first ten months of its operations the board
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
asked repeatedly for a full budget
asked to receive regular reporting against an approved budget showing both forecast costs to complete and variances
asked for a construction schedule
pointed out that the original budget was for a different type of ferry and questioned both that budget and the latest changes to it
stressed the need for a risk analysis of the current scope of the project
noted that forecast costs continued to rise and that the scope of the programme had increased without an increase in budget
Its requests were consistently ignored or only partly met with the result that the board resigned
A new board was appointed The governance systems put in place to oversee the project were
inadequate Two years later it was determined that the project was significantly over budget
(the final cost was more than $450 million) and the ferries were not suitable for their intended
use Eventually the ferries were shrink-wrapped in plastic and stored under wraps for several
years until they were sold by auction for $18 million The net loss to the taxpayers of BC was
$430 million not including the cost of all of the reports and lost productivity in responding to
public outrage at the debacle The fiasco became a lightening rod for discussions on the lack
of appropriate governance
Source Watson 2004 pp 3ndash4 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
9
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
Particular challenges for corporate
governance in the public sector The Auditor General of Western Australia provides
a useful summary of the particular constraints
acting on public sector boards with regard to
corporate governance (Office of the Auditor
General Western Australia 1998) He notes that
in the private sector the board sets the strategic
direction management gives effect to that direction
and shareholders provide support through their
investment and operate as a general check on
the performance of the organisation While there
can be grey areas between the various roles
particularly between the board and management
the relationships are not as complex as in the
public sector
In the public sector the government is responsible
for the setting of policy and usually has wide
powers to intervene Management is responsible
for the day-to-day running to provide effective and
efficient services in the pursuit of government policy
The ultimate lsquoshareholdersrsquo are the electorate
who have infrequent opportunities to vote and
no direct authority over the affairs of any single
agency The public sector board often finds itself
balancing between managing an agency and
setting strategic direction Similarly management
finds itself balancing between a board that is
responsible for the agencyrsquos performance and
a minister responsible for the portfolio These all
make corporate governance more challenging
in a public sector environment The challenges
include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
policy is set by the government
board members may be selected by ministers
ministerial directions can countermand the wishes of the board at any time
chief executive officers may be formally employed by the minister which creates accountability problems for the board
the board as the accountable authority carries the legal responsibility for the performance of the agency
The remainder of this report looks at how such
challenges can be managed In brief a review of
good practice by Barker (2004) suggests that the
governing body and the sponsoring department
need to be clear about the organisationrsquos remit
and position and in particular that
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the organisation has a clear remit and set of
strategic priorities the organisationrsquos position within the delivery
network is clearly understood
changes in strategiespriorities are rapidly
communicated between the sponsor
department and the organisation
consultation between the organisation
sponsor department and key stakeholders
takes place as appropriate prior to any
significant policy change
effective communications between the
organisation sponsor department and key
stakeholders are in place
regular review of the organisation occurs to
ensure that governance is effective and that
remits and relationships evolve in line with
organisational and policy change
What does corporate governance encompass The IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 066 httpwwwifac orgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governance pdf) identifies four main dimensions of the corporate governance of public sector organisations
standards of behaviour ndash how the
management of the organisation exercises
leadership in determining the values and
standards of the organisation which define
the culture of the organisation and the
behaviour of everyone within it
organisational structures and processes ndash
how the board and top management within
organisations are appointed and organised
how their responsibilities are defined and
how they are held accountable
bull
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
10
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull control ndash the network of various controls
established by the top management of the
organisation to support it in achieving the
organisationrsquos objectives and compliance
with applicable laws and regulations and
internal policies
external reporting ndash how the top management
of the organisation demonstrates its financial
accountability for the stewardship of public
money and its performance in the use of
resources
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Elements of what is encompassed by these
aspects of corporate governance where there
have been notable developments in recent years
are outlined in more detail in Figure 3
These four dimensions of corporate governance
form the basis for the structuring of the rest of this
report Significant developments and examples
of international best practice in each of the four
areas are discussed further in the following
chapters
Case study Identifying corporate governance lessons from failures
Each of the national inquiry reports identified that poor governance arrangements set the framework
within which organisational systems and processes failed to detect or anticipate serious service
failures There was never a single failure or shortcoming in corporate governance that was solely
responsible for service failure Rather where there were serious and tragic outcomes it was
due to a combination of factors and an accumulation of governance failures
A number of common themes were brought to light by each inquiry
the poor quality or absence of leadership
poor decision-making and decision-making processes
inadequate systems and processes such as performance management
bull
lack of clarity in roles responsibilities and activities creating poor accountability
poor working relationships and dysfunctional behaviours
an insular organisational culture and poor focus on community and user needs
inadequate contingency plans or risk-management strategies to deal with
worst-case scenarios
Some combination of these factors was present at each failing organisation
Source Audit Commission 2003 p 28 httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPages improvementtrustpublicservicesaspx
11
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 3 Dimensions of corporate governance
Dimension Recommendations on governance
1 Standards of behaviour bull
bull
bull
Codes of good practice
Leadership
Codes of conduct
2 Organisational structures
and processes
bull
bull
Accountability for public money
Roles and responsibilities
bull Governing bodybull Chairpersonbull Executive managementbull Sponsoring department
3 Control bull
bull
bull I
Risk management including management of conflicts of interest
Audit
nternal control
4 External reporting bull
bull
Transparency
Confidentiality
Source adapted from IFAC 2001 p 14 httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
12
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
13
2 Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
of the organisation operates the values that drive
the organisation and the culture that prevails all
of which influence the behaviour of all staff As
such standards of behaviour deal largely with
the development of codes of practice and what
has been termed the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate
governance which have been receiving more
prominence in recent years drawing on best
practice in the private sector (see case study)
Corporate governance codes of good
practice As new corporate governance codes extended
throughout the private sector commercial
state-owned enterprises sought guidance from
governments about equivalent standards In
response governments internationally adapted
private sector codes to provide guidance for
board members and executives on commercial
and non-commercial state bodies and agencies
These codes set the parameters for standards of
behaviour required for good corporate governance
of public organisations
Case study Addressing the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance lessons from private sector practice
Research on corporate governance in the private sector has indicated that lsquohardrsquo attributes of
governance such as board independence are necessary but not sufficient There is a need
to pay attention to the lsquosoftrsquo side of governance focusing on behavioural dynamics Some
of the lsquosoftrsquo governance factors that appear to be important for performance in the private
sector include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
A clarity in roles responsibilities and relationships between chief executive officer (CEO)
and chair directors and management directors and shareholdersstakeholders
Healthy chairCEO interface
Directors working as a team
Culture trust and open dissent
Right skills competencies and characteristics including lsquoindustrybusiness knowledgersquo
A good induction process and ongoing access to training
Leadership skills of the chair
Information flows
Regular evaluation of board performance
Source Edwards and Clough 2005 p 12 httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
bull
For example in Australia the government
developed its Governance Arrangements
for Australian Government Bodies in 2005
httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-framework
governancedocsGovernance-Arrangementsshy
for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
Similarly in Canada the Treasury Board of
Canada Secretariat has produced guidelines for
lsquoCorporate Governance in Crown Corporations
and Other Public Enterprisesrsquo httpwwwtbs-sct
gccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-eng
asp
In Ireland the Department of Finance also
published in 2009 a revised and updated lsquoCode
of Practice for the Governance of State Bodiesrsquo
h t tp www f inance gov ie v iewdoc
aspDocID=5824
An example of the type of issue covered by codes
of good practice is given for building the relationship
between the board and chief executive in the case
study taken from the Canadian code
What all of these corporate governance codes
and guidelines have in common is a commitment
to ensuring there is
clarity over the roles and responsibilities of
government boards of state bodies CEOs
and external auditing bodies as well as the
relationship between them
clarity over the public policy objectives
expected of state bodies
adequate financial reporting and internal
controls
standards of behaviour that reflect values
of integrity honesty and probity and that all
actions taken within state bodies are in the
best interests of that organisation
Case study Canadian code of good practice guidance on building a relationship
In a Crown corporation the nature of the relationship between the CEO and the board is often
critical The board must work with the CEO to build a relationship of openness and trust
Position descriptions can assist greatly in the smooth functioning of these relations The board
of directors the chair and the CEO should develop position descriptions for the board the
chair and the CEO
Boards of directors in conjunction with the CEO should periodically review the allocation of
responsibilities between the board and management This review should focus on defining
and describing both the boardrsquos principal responsibilities and the limits to managementrsquos
authority
Source httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
14
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
15
Codes of conduct An important emerging feature of good corporate
governance practice internationally is the
development of written formal codes of conduct
by organisations that set out their obligations with
regard to corporate governance Like corporate
governance codes codes of conduct have
proliferated in recent years They identify the
behaviour expected of those to whom they
apply by articulating a coherent set of values
and a means of addressing maladministration
where it occurs (see Transport for London (TfL)
case study)
The Public Audit Forum (2001) sets out important
elements which it is expected most codes of
conduct will address
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
outlines of expected professional and
personal behaviour
defined restrictions on business and political
activities (where appropriate)
criteria and procedures for declarations of
interests both business and political
definitions of conflicts of interest
a statement of the aims and values of the
body
statements of the obligations of the body
towards its customers staff community and
other interested parties
information about the bodyrsquos approach to
openness and arrangements for acquiring
information about its activities
procedures for raising complaints with an
independent body
definition of the dividing line between the role
and responsibilities of the governing body
and those of the executive staff
Source Public Audit Forum (2001) httpwww
public-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Particularly with regard to standards of behaviour
such codes of conduct are expected to
reflect the practice of the highest standards in
public life In the UK the Nolan Committee
(httpwwwarchiveofficial-documentscouk
documentparlmentnolannolanhtm) inquired
into standards of public life and established seven
principles of public life that have been widely
adopted internationally
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Selflessness Holders of public office should
take decisions solely in terms of the public
interest They should not do so in order to
gain financial or other material benefits for
themselves their family or their friends
Integrity Holders of public office should
not place themselves under any financial
or other obligation to outside individuals or
organisations that might influence them in
the performance of their official duties
Objectivity In carrying out public business
including making public appointments
awarding contracts or recommending
individuals for rewards and benefits holders
of public office should make choices on
merit
Accountability Holders of public office are
accountable for their decisions and actions
to the public and must submit themselves
to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their
office
Openness Holders of public office should be
as open as possible about all the decisions
and actions that they take They should
give reasons for their decisions and restrict
information only when the wider public
interest clearly demands
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
Honesty Holders of public office have a duty
to declare any private interests relating to their
public duties and to take steps to resolve any
conflicts arising in a way that protects the
public interest
Leadership Holders of public office should
promote and support these principles by
leadership and example
Failure to adhere to such standards can lead to
the failures in corporate governance noted earlier
and in particular to
bull
bull
bull
failures of principles of fairness in the
treatment of staff suppliers or contractors
whether due to conflicts of interest or other
reason
misuse of public assets or resources for
personal or political purposes
failure to exercise reasonable stewardship
over public assets or resources
Case study Transport for London (TfL) code of conduct
TfLrsquos corporate governance code of conduct addresses the main principles of good corporate
governance by setting out a series of undertakings that TfL has committed itself to deliver
under five main headings
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Public focus
Structures and processes
Risk management and internal control
Service delivery arrangements
Standards of conduct
For example under risk management and internal control TfL amongst other things commits
that its annual report will contain an objective and understandable statement and assessment
of its risk-management system including systems of internal control and internal audit and
their effectiveness in practice
Source httpwwwtflgovukcorporateabout-tfl2876aspxPublicFocus
16
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
17
Leadership developments Leadership is a crucial principle from a corporate
governance perspective There are two key
leadership roles the governing body of public
organisations needs to pay attention to the
establishment of sound governance structures
and processes and supporting good governance
through its own performance and behaviours
A range of commentators such as Kalokerinos
(2007) note the central role of the chair of the
governing body in the leadership of public sector
organisations This includes the traditional duty
of ensuring the proper functioning of the board
and its meetings but also covers maintaining a
close relationship with the chief executive and
representing the authority to outside stakeholders
A study undertaken for the UK Public Services
Productivity Panel (Barker 2004) states that the
chair should
bull
bull
bull
bull
act as board team leader with an
understanding of what skills knowledge and
aptitudes the board needs
regularly carry out skills knowledge and
aptitude audits which may be relatively
low key and informal to help understand
the current board composition and provide
board members with further clarity about
their individual roles
act as board lsquoconductorrsquo fostering an
environment where dissenting voices can
be heard without damaging collective
responsibility
act as the interface between the board and
its executive team and the organisation and
its sponsor department
In terms of developing board membersrsquo leadership
skills knowledge and aptitude mentoring of board
members has been of growing prominence in
recent years (see case studies)
A particular leadership challenge for the chair is
managing the relationship with the chief executive
Chief executives are professionals with specific
training in their job Chairs often come to the
role with no or limited experience of chairing
The chair and chief executive may experience a
culture clash between a management approach
to a question and a laypersonrsquos approach They
may be talking about the same problem using
very different vocabularies and terms of reference
Chief executives and chairs may also have different
definitions of success and consequently may
end up working towards different goals The
development of a good working relationship with
an agreed common vision as to the organisationrsquos
purpose is the key to effective leadership of the
organisation
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 14: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
Particular challenges for corporate
governance in the public sector The Auditor General of Western Australia provides
a useful summary of the particular constraints
acting on public sector boards with regard to
corporate governance (Office of the Auditor
General Western Australia 1998) He notes that
in the private sector the board sets the strategic
direction management gives effect to that direction
and shareholders provide support through their
investment and operate as a general check on
the performance of the organisation While there
can be grey areas between the various roles
particularly between the board and management
the relationships are not as complex as in the
public sector
In the public sector the government is responsible
for the setting of policy and usually has wide
powers to intervene Management is responsible
for the day-to-day running to provide effective and
efficient services in the pursuit of government policy
The ultimate lsquoshareholdersrsquo are the electorate
who have infrequent opportunities to vote and
no direct authority over the affairs of any single
agency The public sector board often finds itself
balancing between managing an agency and
setting strategic direction Similarly management
finds itself balancing between a board that is
responsible for the agencyrsquos performance and
a minister responsible for the portfolio These all
make corporate governance more challenging
in a public sector environment The challenges
include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
policy is set by the government
board members may be selected by ministers
ministerial directions can countermand the wishes of the board at any time
chief executive officers may be formally employed by the minister which creates accountability problems for the board
the board as the accountable authority carries the legal responsibility for the performance of the agency
The remainder of this report looks at how such
challenges can be managed In brief a review of
good practice by Barker (2004) suggests that the
governing body and the sponsoring department
need to be clear about the organisationrsquos remit
and position and in particular that
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the organisation has a clear remit and set of
strategic priorities the organisationrsquos position within the delivery
network is clearly understood
changes in strategiespriorities are rapidly
communicated between the sponsor
department and the organisation
consultation between the organisation
sponsor department and key stakeholders
takes place as appropriate prior to any
significant policy change
effective communications between the
organisation sponsor department and key
stakeholders are in place
regular review of the organisation occurs to
ensure that governance is effective and that
remits and relationships evolve in line with
organisational and policy change
What does corporate governance encompass The IFAC (IFAC 2001 para 066 httpwwwifac orgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governance pdf) identifies four main dimensions of the corporate governance of public sector organisations
standards of behaviour ndash how the
management of the organisation exercises
leadership in determining the values and
standards of the organisation which define
the culture of the organisation and the
behaviour of everyone within it
organisational structures and processes ndash
how the board and top management within
organisations are appointed and organised
how their responsibilities are defined and
how they are held accountable
bull
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
10
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull control ndash the network of various controls
established by the top management of the
organisation to support it in achieving the
organisationrsquos objectives and compliance
with applicable laws and regulations and
internal policies
external reporting ndash how the top management
of the organisation demonstrates its financial
accountability for the stewardship of public
money and its performance in the use of
resources
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Elements of what is encompassed by these
aspects of corporate governance where there
have been notable developments in recent years
are outlined in more detail in Figure 3
These four dimensions of corporate governance
form the basis for the structuring of the rest of this
report Significant developments and examples
of international best practice in each of the four
areas are discussed further in the following
chapters
Case study Identifying corporate governance lessons from failures
Each of the national inquiry reports identified that poor governance arrangements set the framework
within which organisational systems and processes failed to detect or anticipate serious service
failures There was never a single failure or shortcoming in corporate governance that was solely
responsible for service failure Rather where there were serious and tragic outcomes it was
due to a combination of factors and an accumulation of governance failures
A number of common themes were brought to light by each inquiry
the poor quality or absence of leadership
poor decision-making and decision-making processes
inadequate systems and processes such as performance management
bull
lack of clarity in roles responsibilities and activities creating poor accountability
poor working relationships and dysfunctional behaviours
an insular organisational culture and poor focus on community and user needs
inadequate contingency plans or risk-management strategies to deal with
worst-case scenarios
Some combination of these factors was present at each failing organisation
Source Audit Commission 2003 p 28 httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPages improvementtrustpublicservicesaspx
11
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 3 Dimensions of corporate governance
Dimension Recommendations on governance
1 Standards of behaviour bull
bull
bull
Codes of good practice
Leadership
Codes of conduct
2 Organisational structures
and processes
bull
bull
Accountability for public money
Roles and responsibilities
bull Governing bodybull Chairpersonbull Executive managementbull Sponsoring department
3 Control bull
bull
bull I
Risk management including management of conflicts of interest
Audit
nternal control
4 External reporting bull
bull
Transparency
Confidentiality
Source adapted from IFAC 2001 p 14 httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
12
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
13
2 Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
of the organisation operates the values that drive
the organisation and the culture that prevails all
of which influence the behaviour of all staff As
such standards of behaviour deal largely with
the development of codes of practice and what
has been termed the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate
governance which have been receiving more
prominence in recent years drawing on best
practice in the private sector (see case study)
Corporate governance codes of good
practice As new corporate governance codes extended
throughout the private sector commercial
state-owned enterprises sought guidance from
governments about equivalent standards In
response governments internationally adapted
private sector codes to provide guidance for
board members and executives on commercial
and non-commercial state bodies and agencies
These codes set the parameters for standards of
behaviour required for good corporate governance
of public organisations
Case study Addressing the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance lessons from private sector practice
Research on corporate governance in the private sector has indicated that lsquohardrsquo attributes of
governance such as board independence are necessary but not sufficient There is a need
to pay attention to the lsquosoftrsquo side of governance focusing on behavioural dynamics Some
of the lsquosoftrsquo governance factors that appear to be important for performance in the private
sector include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
A clarity in roles responsibilities and relationships between chief executive officer (CEO)
and chair directors and management directors and shareholdersstakeholders
Healthy chairCEO interface
Directors working as a team
Culture trust and open dissent
Right skills competencies and characteristics including lsquoindustrybusiness knowledgersquo
A good induction process and ongoing access to training
Leadership skills of the chair
Information flows
Regular evaluation of board performance
Source Edwards and Clough 2005 p 12 httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
bull
For example in Australia the government
developed its Governance Arrangements
for Australian Government Bodies in 2005
httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-framework
governancedocsGovernance-Arrangementsshy
for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
Similarly in Canada the Treasury Board of
Canada Secretariat has produced guidelines for
lsquoCorporate Governance in Crown Corporations
and Other Public Enterprisesrsquo httpwwwtbs-sct
gccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-eng
asp
In Ireland the Department of Finance also
published in 2009 a revised and updated lsquoCode
of Practice for the Governance of State Bodiesrsquo
h t tp www f inance gov ie v iewdoc
aspDocID=5824
An example of the type of issue covered by codes
of good practice is given for building the relationship
between the board and chief executive in the case
study taken from the Canadian code
What all of these corporate governance codes
and guidelines have in common is a commitment
to ensuring there is
clarity over the roles and responsibilities of
government boards of state bodies CEOs
and external auditing bodies as well as the
relationship between them
clarity over the public policy objectives
expected of state bodies
adequate financial reporting and internal
controls
standards of behaviour that reflect values
of integrity honesty and probity and that all
actions taken within state bodies are in the
best interests of that organisation
Case study Canadian code of good practice guidance on building a relationship
In a Crown corporation the nature of the relationship between the CEO and the board is often
critical The board must work with the CEO to build a relationship of openness and trust
Position descriptions can assist greatly in the smooth functioning of these relations The board
of directors the chair and the CEO should develop position descriptions for the board the
chair and the CEO
Boards of directors in conjunction with the CEO should periodically review the allocation of
responsibilities between the board and management This review should focus on defining
and describing both the boardrsquos principal responsibilities and the limits to managementrsquos
authority
Source httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
14
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
15
Codes of conduct An important emerging feature of good corporate
governance practice internationally is the
development of written formal codes of conduct
by organisations that set out their obligations with
regard to corporate governance Like corporate
governance codes codes of conduct have
proliferated in recent years They identify the
behaviour expected of those to whom they
apply by articulating a coherent set of values
and a means of addressing maladministration
where it occurs (see Transport for London (TfL)
case study)
The Public Audit Forum (2001) sets out important
elements which it is expected most codes of
conduct will address
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
outlines of expected professional and
personal behaviour
defined restrictions on business and political
activities (where appropriate)
criteria and procedures for declarations of
interests both business and political
definitions of conflicts of interest
a statement of the aims and values of the
body
statements of the obligations of the body
towards its customers staff community and
other interested parties
information about the bodyrsquos approach to
openness and arrangements for acquiring
information about its activities
procedures for raising complaints with an
independent body
definition of the dividing line between the role
and responsibilities of the governing body
and those of the executive staff
Source Public Audit Forum (2001) httpwww
public-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Particularly with regard to standards of behaviour
such codes of conduct are expected to
reflect the practice of the highest standards in
public life In the UK the Nolan Committee
(httpwwwarchiveofficial-documentscouk
documentparlmentnolannolanhtm) inquired
into standards of public life and established seven
principles of public life that have been widely
adopted internationally
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Selflessness Holders of public office should
take decisions solely in terms of the public
interest They should not do so in order to
gain financial or other material benefits for
themselves their family or their friends
Integrity Holders of public office should
not place themselves under any financial
or other obligation to outside individuals or
organisations that might influence them in
the performance of their official duties
Objectivity In carrying out public business
including making public appointments
awarding contracts or recommending
individuals for rewards and benefits holders
of public office should make choices on
merit
Accountability Holders of public office are
accountable for their decisions and actions
to the public and must submit themselves
to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their
office
Openness Holders of public office should be
as open as possible about all the decisions
and actions that they take They should
give reasons for their decisions and restrict
information only when the wider public
interest clearly demands
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
Honesty Holders of public office have a duty
to declare any private interests relating to their
public duties and to take steps to resolve any
conflicts arising in a way that protects the
public interest
Leadership Holders of public office should
promote and support these principles by
leadership and example
Failure to adhere to such standards can lead to
the failures in corporate governance noted earlier
and in particular to
bull
bull
bull
failures of principles of fairness in the
treatment of staff suppliers or contractors
whether due to conflicts of interest or other
reason
misuse of public assets or resources for
personal or political purposes
failure to exercise reasonable stewardship
over public assets or resources
Case study Transport for London (TfL) code of conduct
TfLrsquos corporate governance code of conduct addresses the main principles of good corporate
governance by setting out a series of undertakings that TfL has committed itself to deliver
under five main headings
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Public focus
Structures and processes
Risk management and internal control
Service delivery arrangements
Standards of conduct
For example under risk management and internal control TfL amongst other things commits
that its annual report will contain an objective and understandable statement and assessment
of its risk-management system including systems of internal control and internal audit and
their effectiveness in practice
Source httpwwwtflgovukcorporateabout-tfl2876aspxPublicFocus
16
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
17
Leadership developments Leadership is a crucial principle from a corporate
governance perspective There are two key
leadership roles the governing body of public
organisations needs to pay attention to the
establishment of sound governance structures
and processes and supporting good governance
through its own performance and behaviours
A range of commentators such as Kalokerinos
(2007) note the central role of the chair of the
governing body in the leadership of public sector
organisations This includes the traditional duty
of ensuring the proper functioning of the board
and its meetings but also covers maintaining a
close relationship with the chief executive and
representing the authority to outside stakeholders
A study undertaken for the UK Public Services
Productivity Panel (Barker 2004) states that the
chair should
bull
bull
bull
bull
act as board team leader with an
understanding of what skills knowledge and
aptitudes the board needs
regularly carry out skills knowledge and
aptitude audits which may be relatively
low key and informal to help understand
the current board composition and provide
board members with further clarity about
their individual roles
act as board lsquoconductorrsquo fostering an
environment where dissenting voices can
be heard without damaging collective
responsibility
act as the interface between the board and
its executive team and the organisation and
its sponsor department
In terms of developing board membersrsquo leadership
skills knowledge and aptitude mentoring of board
members has been of growing prominence in
recent years (see case studies)
A particular leadership challenge for the chair is
managing the relationship with the chief executive
Chief executives are professionals with specific
training in their job Chairs often come to the
role with no or limited experience of chairing
The chair and chief executive may experience a
culture clash between a management approach
to a question and a laypersonrsquos approach They
may be talking about the same problem using
very different vocabularies and terms of reference
Chief executives and chairs may also have different
definitions of success and consequently may
end up working towards different goals The
development of a good working relationship with
an agreed common vision as to the organisationrsquos
purpose is the key to effective leadership of the
organisation
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 15: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull control ndash the network of various controls
established by the top management of the
organisation to support it in achieving the
organisationrsquos objectives and compliance
with applicable laws and regulations and
internal policies
external reporting ndash how the top management
of the organisation demonstrates its financial
accountability for the stewardship of public
money and its performance in the use of
resources
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Elements of what is encompassed by these
aspects of corporate governance where there
have been notable developments in recent years
are outlined in more detail in Figure 3
These four dimensions of corporate governance
form the basis for the structuring of the rest of this
report Significant developments and examples
of international best practice in each of the four
areas are discussed further in the following
chapters
Case study Identifying corporate governance lessons from failures
Each of the national inquiry reports identified that poor governance arrangements set the framework
within which organisational systems and processes failed to detect or anticipate serious service
failures There was never a single failure or shortcoming in corporate governance that was solely
responsible for service failure Rather where there were serious and tragic outcomes it was
due to a combination of factors and an accumulation of governance failures
A number of common themes were brought to light by each inquiry
the poor quality or absence of leadership
poor decision-making and decision-making processes
inadequate systems and processes such as performance management
bull
lack of clarity in roles responsibilities and activities creating poor accountability
poor working relationships and dysfunctional behaviours
an insular organisational culture and poor focus on community and user needs
inadequate contingency plans or risk-management strategies to deal with
worst-case scenarios
Some combination of these factors was present at each failing organisation
Source Audit Commission 2003 p 28 httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPages improvementtrustpublicservicesaspx
11
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 3 Dimensions of corporate governance
Dimension Recommendations on governance
1 Standards of behaviour bull
bull
bull
Codes of good practice
Leadership
Codes of conduct
2 Organisational structures
and processes
bull
bull
Accountability for public money
Roles and responsibilities
bull Governing bodybull Chairpersonbull Executive managementbull Sponsoring department
3 Control bull
bull
bull I
Risk management including management of conflicts of interest
Audit
nternal control
4 External reporting bull
bull
Transparency
Confidentiality
Source adapted from IFAC 2001 p 14 httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
12
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
13
2 Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
of the organisation operates the values that drive
the organisation and the culture that prevails all
of which influence the behaviour of all staff As
such standards of behaviour deal largely with
the development of codes of practice and what
has been termed the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate
governance which have been receiving more
prominence in recent years drawing on best
practice in the private sector (see case study)
Corporate governance codes of good
practice As new corporate governance codes extended
throughout the private sector commercial
state-owned enterprises sought guidance from
governments about equivalent standards In
response governments internationally adapted
private sector codes to provide guidance for
board members and executives on commercial
and non-commercial state bodies and agencies
These codes set the parameters for standards of
behaviour required for good corporate governance
of public organisations
Case study Addressing the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance lessons from private sector practice
Research on corporate governance in the private sector has indicated that lsquohardrsquo attributes of
governance such as board independence are necessary but not sufficient There is a need
to pay attention to the lsquosoftrsquo side of governance focusing on behavioural dynamics Some
of the lsquosoftrsquo governance factors that appear to be important for performance in the private
sector include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
A clarity in roles responsibilities and relationships between chief executive officer (CEO)
and chair directors and management directors and shareholdersstakeholders
Healthy chairCEO interface
Directors working as a team
Culture trust and open dissent
Right skills competencies and characteristics including lsquoindustrybusiness knowledgersquo
A good induction process and ongoing access to training
Leadership skills of the chair
Information flows
Regular evaluation of board performance
Source Edwards and Clough 2005 p 12 httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
bull
For example in Australia the government
developed its Governance Arrangements
for Australian Government Bodies in 2005
httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-framework
governancedocsGovernance-Arrangementsshy
for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
Similarly in Canada the Treasury Board of
Canada Secretariat has produced guidelines for
lsquoCorporate Governance in Crown Corporations
and Other Public Enterprisesrsquo httpwwwtbs-sct
gccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-eng
asp
In Ireland the Department of Finance also
published in 2009 a revised and updated lsquoCode
of Practice for the Governance of State Bodiesrsquo
h t tp www f inance gov ie v iewdoc
aspDocID=5824
An example of the type of issue covered by codes
of good practice is given for building the relationship
between the board and chief executive in the case
study taken from the Canadian code
What all of these corporate governance codes
and guidelines have in common is a commitment
to ensuring there is
clarity over the roles and responsibilities of
government boards of state bodies CEOs
and external auditing bodies as well as the
relationship between them
clarity over the public policy objectives
expected of state bodies
adequate financial reporting and internal
controls
standards of behaviour that reflect values
of integrity honesty and probity and that all
actions taken within state bodies are in the
best interests of that organisation
Case study Canadian code of good practice guidance on building a relationship
In a Crown corporation the nature of the relationship between the CEO and the board is often
critical The board must work with the CEO to build a relationship of openness and trust
Position descriptions can assist greatly in the smooth functioning of these relations The board
of directors the chair and the CEO should develop position descriptions for the board the
chair and the CEO
Boards of directors in conjunction with the CEO should periodically review the allocation of
responsibilities between the board and management This review should focus on defining
and describing both the boardrsquos principal responsibilities and the limits to managementrsquos
authority
Source httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
14
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
15
Codes of conduct An important emerging feature of good corporate
governance practice internationally is the
development of written formal codes of conduct
by organisations that set out their obligations with
regard to corporate governance Like corporate
governance codes codes of conduct have
proliferated in recent years They identify the
behaviour expected of those to whom they
apply by articulating a coherent set of values
and a means of addressing maladministration
where it occurs (see Transport for London (TfL)
case study)
The Public Audit Forum (2001) sets out important
elements which it is expected most codes of
conduct will address
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
outlines of expected professional and
personal behaviour
defined restrictions on business and political
activities (where appropriate)
criteria and procedures for declarations of
interests both business and political
definitions of conflicts of interest
a statement of the aims and values of the
body
statements of the obligations of the body
towards its customers staff community and
other interested parties
information about the bodyrsquos approach to
openness and arrangements for acquiring
information about its activities
procedures for raising complaints with an
independent body
definition of the dividing line between the role
and responsibilities of the governing body
and those of the executive staff
Source Public Audit Forum (2001) httpwww
public-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Particularly with regard to standards of behaviour
such codes of conduct are expected to
reflect the practice of the highest standards in
public life In the UK the Nolan Committee
(httpwwwarchiveofficial-documentscouk
documentparlmentnolannolanhtm) inquired
into standards of public life and established seven
principles of public life that have been widely
adopted internationally
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Selflessness Holders of public office should
take decisions solely in terms of the public
interest They should not do so in order to
gain financial or other material benefits for
themselves their family or their friends
Integrity Holders of public office should
not place themselves under any financial
or other obligation to outside individuals or
organisations that might influence them in
the performance of their official duties
Objectivity In carrying out public business
including making public appointments
awarding contracts or recommending
individuals for rewards and benefits holders
of public office should make choices on
merit
Accountability Holders of public office are
accountable for their decisions and actions
to the public and must submit themselves
to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their
office
Openness Holders of public office should be
as open as possible about all the decisions
and actions that they take They should
give reasons for their decisions and restrict
information only when the wider public
interest clearly demands
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
Honesty Holders of public office have a duty
to declare any private interests relating to their
public duties and to take steps to resolve any
conflicts arising in a way that protects the
public interest
Leadership Holders of public office should
promote and support these principles by
leadership and example
Failure to adhere to such standards can lead to
the failures in corporate governance noted earlier
and in particular to
bull
bull
bull
failures of principles of fairness in the
treatment of staff suppliers or contractors
whether due to conflicts of interest or other
reason
misuse of public assets or resources for
personal or political purposes
failure to exercise reasonable stewardship
over public assets or resources
Case study Transport for London (TfL) code of conduct
TfLrsquos corporate governance code of conduct addresses the main principles of good corporate
governance by setting out a series of undertakings that TfL has committed itself to deliver
under five main headings
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Public focus
Structures and processes
Risk management and internal control
Service delivery arrangements
Standards of conduct
For example under risk management and internal control TfL amongst other things commits
that its annual report will contain an objective and understandable statement and assessment
of its risk-management system including systems of internal control and internal audit and
their effectiveness in practice
Source httpwwwtflgovukcorporateabout-tfl2876aspxPublicFocus
16
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
17
Leadership developments Leadership is a crucial principle from a corporate
governance perspective There are two key
leadership roles the governing body of public
organisations needs to pay attention to the
establishment of sound governance structures
and processes and supporting good governance
through its own performance and behaviours
A range of commentators such as Kalokerinos
(2007) note the central role of the chair of the
governing body in the leadership of public sector
organisations This includes the traditional duty
of ensuring the proper functioning of the board
and its meetings but also covers maintaining a
close relationship with the chief executive and
representing the authority to outside stakeholders
A study undertaken for the UK Public Services
Productivity Panel (Barker 2004) states that the
chair should
bull
bull
bull
bull
act as board team leader with an
understanding of what skills knowledge and
aptitudes the board needs
regularly carry out skills knowledge and
aptitude audits which may be relatively
low key and informal to help understand
the current board composition and provide
board members with further clarity about
their individual roles
act as board lsquoconductorrsquo fostering an
environment where dissenting voices can
be heard without damaging collective
responsibility
act as the interface between the board and
its executive team and the organisation and
its sponsor department
In terms of developing board membersrsquo leadership
skills knowledge and aptitude mentoring of board
members has been of growing prominence in
recent years (see case studies)
A particular leadership challenge for the chair is
managing the relationship with the chief executive
Chief executives are professionals with specific
training in their job Chairs often come to the
role with no or limited experience of chairing
The chair and chief executive may experience a
culture clash between a management approach
to a question and a laypersonrsquos approach They
may be talking about the same problem using
very different vocabularies and terms of reference
Chief executives and chairs may also have different
definitions of success and consequently may
end up working towards different goals The
development of a good working relationship with
an agreed common vision as to the organisationrsquos
purpose is the key to effective leadership of the
organisation
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 16: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Figure 3 Dimensions of corporate governance
Dimension Recommendations on governance
1 Standards of behaviour bull
bull
bull
Codes of good practice
Leadership
Codes of conduct
2 Organisational structures
and processes
bull
bull
Accountability for public money
Roles and responsibilities
bull Governing bodybull Chairpersonbull Executive managementbull Sponsoring department
3 Control bull
bull
bull I
Risk management including management of conflicts of interest
Audit
nternal control
4 External reporting bull
bull
Transparency
Confidentiality
Source adapted from IFAC 2001 p 14 httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
12
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
13
2 Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
of the organisation operates the values that drive
the organisation and the culture that prevails all
of which influence the behaviour of all staff As
such standards of behaviour deal largely with
the development of codes of practice and what
has been termed the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate
governance which have been receiving more
prominence in recent years drawing on best
practice in the private sector (see case study)
Corporate governance codes of good
practice As new corporate governance codes extended
throughout the private sector commercial
state-owned enterprises sought guidance from
governments about equivalent standards In
response governments internationally adapted
private sector codes to provide guidance for
board members and executives on commercial
and non-commercial state bodies and agencies
These codes set the parameters for standards of
behaviour required for good corporate governance
of public organisations
Case study Addressing the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance lessons from private sector practice
Research on corporate governance in the private sector has indicated that lsquohardrsquo attributes of
governance such as board independence are necessary but not sufficient There is a need
to pay attention to the lsquosoftrsquo side of governance focusing on behavioural dynamics Some
of the lsquosoftrsquo governance factors that appear to be important for performance in the private
sector include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
A clarity in roles responsibilities and relationships between chief executive officer (CEO)
and chair directors and management directors and shareholdersstakeholders
Healthy chairCEO interface
Directors working as a team
Culture trust and open dissent
Right skills competencies and characteristics including lsquoindustrybusiness knowledgersquo
A good induction process and ongoing access to training
Leadership skills of the chair
Information flows
Regular evaluation of board performance
Source Edwards and Clough 2005 p 12 httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
bull
For example in Australia the government
developed its Governance Arrangements
for Australian Government Bodies in 2005
httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-framework
governancedocsGovernance-Arrangementsshy
for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
Similarly in Canada the Treasury Board of
Canada Secretariat has produced guidelines for
lsquoCorporate Governance in Crown Corporations
and Other Public Enterprisesrsquo httpwwwtbs-sct
gccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-eng
asp
In Ireland the Department of Finance also
published in 2009 a revised and updated lsquoCode
of Practice for the Governance of State Bodiesrsquo
h t tp www f inance gov ie v iewdoc
aspDocID=5824
An example of the type of issue covered by codes
of good practice is given for building the relationship
between the board and chief executive in the case
study taken from the Canadian code
What all of these corporate governance codes
and guidelines have in common is a commitment
to ensuring there is
clarity over the roles and responsibilities of
government boards of state bodies CEOs
and external auditing bodies as well as the
relationship between them
clarity over the public policy objectives
expected of state bodies
adequate financial reporting and internal
controls
standards of behaviour that reflect values
of integrity honesty and probity and that all
actions taken within state bodies are in the
best interests of that organisation
Case study Canadian code of good practice guidance on building a relationship
In a Crown corporation the nature of the relationship between the CEO and the board is often
critical The board must work with the CEO to build a relationship of openness and trust
Position descriptions can assist greatly in the smooth functioning of these relations The board
of directors the chair and the CEO should develop position descriptions for the board the
chair and the CEO
Boards of directors in conjunction with the CEO should periodically review the allocation of
responsibilities between the board and management This review should focus on defining
and describing both the boardrsquos principal responsibilities and the limits to managementrsquos
authority
Source httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
14
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
15
Codes of conduct An important emerging feature of good corporate
governance practice internationally is the
development of written formal codes of conduct
by organisations that set out their obligations with
regard to corporate governance Like corporate
governance codes codes of conduct have
proliferated in recent years They identify the
behaviour expected of those to whom they
apply by articulating a coherent set of values
and a means of addressing maladministration
where it occurs (see Transport for London (TfL)
case study)
The Public Audit Forum (2001) sets out important
elements which it is expected most codes of
conduct will address
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
outlines of expected professional and
personal behaviour
defined restrictions on business and political
activities (where appropriate)
criteria and procedures for declarations of
interests both business and political
definitions of conflicts of interest
a statement of the aims and values of the
body
statements of the obligations of the body
towards its customers staff community and
other interested parties
information about the bodyrsquos approach to
openness and arrangements for acquiring
information about its activities
procedures for raising complaints with an
independent body
definition of the dividing line between the role
and responsibilities of the governing body
and those of the executive staff
Source Public Audit Forum (2001) httpwww
public-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Particularly with regard to standards of behaviour
such codes of conduct are expected to
reflect the practice of the highest standards in
public life In the UK the Nolan Committee
(httpwwwarchiveofficial-documentscouk
documentparlmentnolannolanhtm) inquired
into standards of public life and established seven
principles of public life that have been widely
adopted internationally
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Selflessness Holders of public office should
take decisions solely in terms of the public
interest They should not do so in order to
gain financial or other material benefits for
themselves their family or their friends
Integrity Holders of public office should
not place themselves under any financial
or other obligation to outside individuals or
organisations that might influence them in
the performance of their official duties
Objectivity In carrying out public business
including making public appointments
awarding contracts or recommending
individuals for rewards and benefits holders
of public office should make choices on
merit
Accountability Holders of public office are
accountable for their decisions and actions
to the public and must submit themselves
to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their
office
Openness Holders of public office should be
as open as possible about all the decisions
and actions that they take They should
give reasons for their decisions and restrict
information only when the wider public
interest clearly demands
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
Honesty Holders of public office have a duty
to declare any private interests relating to their
public duties and to take steps to resolve any
conflicts arising in a way that protects the
public interest
Leadership Holders of public office should
promote and support these principles by
leadership and example
Failure to adhere to such standards can lead to
the failures in corporate governance noted earlier
and in particular to
bull
bull
bull
failures of principles of fairness in the
treatment of staff suppliers or contractors
whether due to conflicts of interest or other
reason
misuse of public assets or resources for
personal or political purposes
failure to exercise reasonable stewardship
over public assets or resources
Case study Transport for London (TfL) code of conduct
TfLrsquos corporate governance code of conduct addresses the main principles of good corporate
governance by setting out a series of undertakings that TfL has committed itself to deliver
under five main headings
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Public focus
Structures and processes
Risk management and internal control
Service delivery arrangements
Standards of conduct
For example under risk management and internal control TfL amongst other things commits
that its annual report will contain an objective and understandable statement and assessment
of its risk-management system including systems of internal control and internal audit and
their effectiveness in practice
Source httpwwwtflgovukcorporateabout-tfl2876aspxPublicFocus
16
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
17
Leadership developments Leadership is a crucial principle from a corporate
governance perspective There are two key
leadership roles the governing body of public
organisations needs to pay attention to the
establishment of sound governance structures
and processes and supporting good governance
through its own performance and behaviours
A range of commentators such as Kalokerinos
(2007) note the central role of the chair of the
governing body in the leadership of public sector
organisations This includes the traditional duty
of ensuring the proper functioning of the board
and its meetings but also covers maintaining a
close relationship with the chief executive and
representing the authority to outside stakeholders
A study undertaken for the UK Public Services
Productivity Panel (Barker 2004) states that the
chair should
bull
bull
bull
bull
act as board team leader with an
understanding of what skills knowledge and
aptitudes the board needs
regularly carry out skills knowledge and
aptitude audits which may be relatively
low key and informal to help understand
the current board composition and provide
board members with further clarity about
their individual roles
act as board lsquoconductorrsquo fostering an
environment where dissenting voices can
be heard without damaging collective
responsibility
act as the interface between the board and
its executive team and the organisation and
its sponsor department
In terms of developing board membersrsquo leadership
skills knowledge and aptitude mentoring of board
members has been of growing prominence in
recent years (see case studies)
A particular leadership challenge for the chair is
managing the relationship with the chief executive
Chief executives are professionals with specific
training in their job Chairs often come to the
role with no or limited experience of chairing
The chair and chief executive may experience a
culture clash between a management approach
to a question and a laypersonrsquos approach They
may be talking about the same problem using
very different vocabularies and terms of reference
Chief executives and chairs may also have different
definitions of success and consequently may
end up working towards different goals The
development of a good working relationship with
an agreed common vision as to the organisationrsquos
purpose is the key to effective leadership of the
organisation
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 17: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
13
2 Standards of behaviour Standards of behaviour are important to corporate
governance as they establish how the leadership
of the organisation operates the values that drive
the organisation and the culture that prevails all
of which influence the behaviour of all staff As
such standards of behaviour deal largely with
the development of codes of practice and what
has been termed the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate
governance which have been receiving more
prominence in recent years drawing on best
practice in the private sector (see case study)
Corporate governance codes of good
practice As new corporate governance codes extended
throughout the private sector commercial
state-owned enterprises sought guidance from
governments about equivalent standards In
response governments internationally adapted
private sector codes to provide guidance for
board members and executives on commercial
and non-commercial state bodies and agencies
These codes set the parameters for standards of
behaviour required for good corporate governance
of public organisations
Case study Addressing the lsquosoftrsquo attributes of corporate governance lessons from private sector practice
Research on corporate governance in the private sector has indicated that lsquohardrsquo attributes of
governance such as board independence are necessary but not sufficient There is a need
to pay attention to the lsquosoftrsquo side of governance focusing on behavioural dynamics Some
of the lsquosoftrsquo governance factors that appear to be important for performance in the private
sector include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
A clarity in roles responsibilities and relationships between chief executive officer (CEO)
and chair directors and management directors and shareholdersstakeholders
Healthy chairCEO interface
Directors working as a team
Culture trust and open dissent
Right skills competencies and characteristics including lsquoindustrybusiness knowledgersquo
A good induction process and ongoing access to training
Leadership skills of the chair
Information flows
Regular evaluation of board performance
Source Edwards and Clough 2005 p 12 httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
bull
For example in Australia the government
developed its Governance Arrangements
for Australian Government Bodies in 2005
httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-framework
governancedocsGovernance-Arrangementsshy
for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
Similarly in Canada the Treasury Board of
Canada Secretariat has produced guidelines for
lsquoCorporate Governance in Crown Corporations
and Other Public Enterprisesrsquo httpwwwtbs-sct
gccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-eng
asp
In Ireland the Department of Finance also
published in 2009 a revised and updated lsquoCode
of Practice for the Governance of State Bodiesrsquo
h t tp www f inance gov ie v iewdoc
aspDocID=5824
An example of the type of issue covered by codes
of good practice is given for building the relationship
between the board and chief executive in the case
study taken from the Canadian code
What all of these corporate governance codes
and guidelines have in common is a commitment
to ensuring there is
clarity over the roles and responsibilities of
government boards of state bodies CEOs
and external auditing bodies as well as the
relationship between them
clarity over the public policy objectives
expected of state bodies
adequate financial reporting and internal
controls
standards of behaviour that reflect values
of integrity honesty and probity and that all
actions taken within state bodies are in the
best interests of that organisation
Case study Canadian code of good practice guidance on building a relationship
In a Crown corporation the nature of the relationship between the CEO and the board is often
critical The board must work with the CEO to build a relationship of openness and trust
Position descriptions can assist greatly in the smooth functioning of these relations The board
of directors the chair and the CEO should develop position descriptions for the board the
chair and the CEO
Boards of directors in conjunction with the CEO should periodically review the allocation of
responsibilities between the board and management This review should focus on defining
and describing both the boardrsquos principal responsibilities and the limits to managementrsquos
authority
Source httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
14
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
15
Codes of conduct An important emerging feature of good corporate
governance practice internationally is the
development of written formal codes of conduct
by organisations that set out their obligations with
regard to corporate governance Like corporate
governance codes codes of conduct have
proliferated in recent years They identify the
behaviour expected of those to whom they
apply by articulating a coherent set of values
and a means of addressing maladministration
where it occurs (see Transport for London (TfL)
case study)
The Public Audit Forum (2001) sets out important
elements which it is expected most codes of
conduct will address
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
outlines of expected professional and
personal behaviour
defined restrictions on business and political
activities (where appropriate)
criteria and procedures for declarations of
interests both business and political
definitions of conflicts of interest
a statement of the aims and values of the
body
statements of the obligations of the body
towards its customers staff community and
other interested parties
information about the bodyrsquos approach to
openness and arrangements for acquiring
information about its activities
procedures for raising complaints with an
independent body
definition of the dividing line between the role
and responsibilities of the governing body
and those of the executive staff
Source Public Audit Forum (2001) httpwww
public-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Particularly with regard to standards of behaviour
such codes of conduct are expected to
reflect the practice of the highest standards in
public life In the UK the Nolan Committee
(httpwwwarchiveofficial-documentscouk
documentparlmentnolannolanhtm) inquired
into standards of public life and established seven
principles of public life that have been widely
adopted internationally
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Selflessness Holders of public office should
take decisions solely in terms of the public
interest They should not do so in order to
gain financial or other material benefits for
themselves their family or their friends
Integrity Holders of public office should
not place themselves under any financial
or other obligation to outside individuals or
organisations that might influence them in
the performance of their official duties
Objectivity In carrying out public business
including making public appointments
awarding contracts or recommending
individuals for rewards and benefits holders
of public office should make choices on
merit
Accountability Holders of public office are
accountable for their decisions and actions
to the public and must submit themselves
to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their
office
Openness Holders of public office should be
as open as possible about all the decisions
and actions that they take They should
give reasons for their decisions and restrict
information only when the wider public
interest clearly demands
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
Honesty Holders of public office have a duty
to declare any private interests relating to their
public duties and to take steps to resolve any
conflicts arising in a way that protects the
public interest
Leadership Holders of public office should
promote and support these principles by
leadership and example
Failure to adhere to such standards can lead to
the failures in corporate governance noted earlier
and in particular to
bull
bull
bull
failures of principles of fairness in the
treatment of staff suppliers or contractors
whether due to conflicts of interest or other
reason
misuse of public assets or resources for
personal or political purposes
failure to exercise reasonable stewardship
over public assets or resources
Case study Transport for London (TfL) code of conduct
TfLrsquos corporate governance code of conduct addresses the main principles of good corporate
governance by setting out a series of undertakings that TfL has committed itself to deliver
under five main headings
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Public focus
Structures and processes
Risk management and internal control
Service delivery arrangements
Standards of conduct
For example under risk management and internal control TfL amongst other things commits
that its annual report will contain an objective and understandable statement and assessment
of its risk-management system including systems of internal control and internal audit and
their effectiveness in practice
Source httpwwwtflgovukcorporateabout-tfl2876aspxPublicFocus
16
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
17
Leadership developments Leadership is a crucial principle from a corporate
governance perspective There are two key
leadership roles the governing body of public
organisations needs to pay attention to the
establishment of sound governance structures
and processes and supporting good governance
through its own performance and behaviours
A range of commentators such as Kalokerinos
(2007) note the central role of the chair of the
governing body in the leadership of public sector
organisations This includes the traditional duty
of ensuring the proper functioning of the board
and its meetings but also covers maintaining a
close relationship with the chief executive and
representing the authority to outside stakeholders
A study undertaken for the UK Public Services
Productivity Panel (Barker 2004) states that the
chair should
bull
bull
bull
bull
act as board team leader with an
understanding of what skills knowledge and
aptitudes the board needs
regularly carry out skills knowledge and
aptitude audits which may be relatively
low key and informal to help understand
the current board composition and provide
board members with further clarity about
their individual roles
act as board lsquoconductorrsquo fostering an
environment where dissenting voices can
be heard without damaging collective
responsibility
act as the interface between the board and
its executive team and the organisation and
its sponsor department
In terms of developing board membersrsquo leadership
skills knowledge and aptitude mentoring of board
members has been of growing prominence in
recent years (see case studies)
A particular leadership challenge for the chair is
managing the relationship with the chief executive
Chief executives are professionals with specific
training in their job Chairs often come to the
role with no or limited experience of chairing
The chair and chief executive may experience a
culture clash between a management approach
to a question and a laypersonrsquos approach They
may be talking about the same problem using
very different vocabularies and terms of reference
Chief executives and chairs may also have different
definitions of success and consequently may
end up working towards different goals The
development of a good working relationship with
an agreed common vision as to the organisationrsquos
purpose is the key to effective leadership of the
organisation
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 18: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
bull
For example in Australia the government
developed its Governance Arrangements
for Australian Government Bodies in 2005
httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-framework
governancedocsGovernance-Arrangementsshy
for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
Similarly in Canada the Treasury Board of
Canada Secretariat has produced guidelines for
lsquoCorporate Governance in Crown Corporations
and Other Public Enterprisesrsquo httpwwwtbs-sct
gccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-eng
asp
In Ireland the Department of Finance also
published in 2009 a revised and updated lsquoCode
of Practice for the Governance of State Bodiesrsquo
h t tp www f inance gov ie v iewdoc
aspDocID=5824
An example of the type of issue covered by codes
of good practice is given for building the relationship
between the board and chief executive in the case
study taken from the Canadian code
What all of these corporate governance codes
and guidelines have in common is a commitment
to ensuring there is
clarity over the roles and responsibilities of
government boards of state bodies CEOs
and external auditing bodies as well as the
relationship between them
clarity over the public policy objectives
expected of state bodies
adequate financial reporting and internal
controls
standards of behaviour that reflect values
of integrity honesty and probity and that all
actions taken within state bodies are in the
best interests of that organisation
Case study Canadian code of good practice guidance on building a relationship
In a Crown corporation the nature of the relationship between the CEO and the board is often
critical The board must work with the CEO to build a relationship of openness and trust
Position descriptions can assist greatly in the smooth functioning of these relations The board
of directors the chair and the CEO should develop position descriptions for the board the
chair and the CEO
Boards of directors in conjunction with the CEO should periodically review the allocation of
responsibilities between the board and management This review should focus on defining
and describing both the boardrsquos principal responsibilities and the limits to managementrsquos
authority
Source httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
14
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
15
Codes of conduct An important emerging feature of good corporate
governance practice internationally is the
development of written formal codes of conduct
by organisations that set out their obligations with
regard to corporate governance Like corporate
governance codes codes of conduct have
proliferated in recent years They identify the
behaviour expected of those to whom they
apply by articulating a coherent set of values
and a means of addressing maladministration
where it occurs (see Transport for London (TfL)
case study)
The Public Audit Forum (2001) sets out important
elements which it is expected most codes of
conduct will address
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
outlines of expected professional and
personal behaviour
defined restrictions on business and political
activities (where appropriate)
criteria and procedures for declarations of
interests both business and political
definitions of conflicts of interest
a statement of the aims and values of the
body
statements of the obligations of the body
towards its customers staff community and
other interested parties
information about the bodyrsquos approach to
openness and arrangements for acquiring
information about its activities
procedures for raising complaints with an
independent body
definition of the dividing line between the role
and responsibilities of the governing body
and those of the executive staff
Source Public Audit Forum (2001) httpwww
public-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Particularly with regard to standards of behaviour
such codes of conduct are expected to
reflect the practice of the highest standards in
public life In the UK the Nolan Committee
(httpwwwarchiveofficial-documentscouk
documentparlmentnolannolanhtm) inquired
into standards of public life and established seven
principles of public life that have been widely
adopted internationally
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Selflessness Holders of public office should
take decisions solely in terms of the public
interest They should not do so in order to
gain financial or other material benefits for
themselves their family or their friends
Integrity Holders of public office should
not place themselves under any financial
or other obligation to outside individuals or
organisations that might influence them in
the performance of their official duties
Objectivity In carrying out public business
including making public appointments
awarding contracts or recommending
individuals for rewards and benefits holders
of public office should make choices on
merit
Accountability Holders of public office are
accountable for their decisions and actions
to the public and must submit themselves
to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their
office
Openness Holders of public office should be
as open as possible about all the decisions
and actions that they take They should
give reasons for their decisions and restrict
information only when the wider public
interest clearly demands
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
Honesty Holders of public office have a duty
to declare any private interests relating to their
public duties and to take steps to resolve any
conflicts arising in a way that protects the
public interest
Leadership Holders of public office should
promote and support these principles by
leadership and example
Failure to adhere to such standards can lead to
the failures in corporate governance noted earlier
and in particular to
bull
bull
bull
failures of principles of fairness in the
treatment of staff suppliers or contractors
whether due to conflicts of interest or other
reason
misuse of public assets or resources for
personal or political purposes
failure to exercise reasonable stewardship
over public assets or resources
Case study Transport for London (TfL) code of conduct
TfLrsquos corporate governance code of conduct addresses the main principles of good corporate
governance by setting out a series of undertakings that TfL has committed itself to deliver
under five main headings
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Public focus
Structures and processes
Risk management and internal control
Service delivery arrangements
Standards of conduct
For example under risk management and internal control TfL amongst other things commits
that its annual report will contain an objective and understandable statement and assessment
of its risk-management system including systems of internal control and internal audit and
their effectiveness in practice
Source httpwwwtflgovukcorporateabout-tfl2876aspxPublicFocus
16
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
17
Leadership developments Leadership is a crucial principle from a corporate
governance perspective There are two key
leadership roles the governing body of public
organisations needs to pay attention to the
establishment of sound governance structures
and processes and supporting good governance
through its own performance and behaviours
A range of commentators such as Kalokerinos
(2007) note the central role of the chair of the
governing body in the leadership of public sector
organisations This includes the traditional duty
of ensuring the proper functioning of the board
and its meetings but also covers maintaining a
close relationship with the chief executive and
representing the authority to outside stakeholders
A study undertaken for the UK Public Services
Productivity Panel (Barker 2004) states that the
chair should
bull
bull
bull
bull
act as board team leader with an
understanding of what skills knowledge and
aptitudes the board needs
regularly carry out skills knowledge and
aptitude audits which may be relatively
low key and informal to help understand
the current board composition and provide
board members with further clarity about
their individual roles
act as board lsquoconductorrsquo fostering an
environment where dissenting voices can
be heard without damaging collective
responsibility
act as the interface between the board and
its executive team and the organisation and
its sponsor department
In terms of developing board membersrsquo leadership
skills knowledge and aptitude mentoring of board
members has been of growing prominence in
recent years (see case studies)
A particular leadership challenge for the chair is
managing the relationship with the chief executive
Chief executives are professionals with specific
training in their job Chairs often come to the
role with no or limited experience of chairing
The chair and chief executive may experience a
culture clash between a management approach
to a question and a laypersonrsquos approach They
may be talking about the same problem using
very different vocabularies and terms of reference
Chief executives and chairs may also have different
definitions of success and consequently may
end up working towards different goals The
development of a good working relationship with
an agreed common vision as to the organisationrsquos
purpose is the key to effective leadership of the
organisation
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 19: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
15
Codes of conduct An important emerging feature of good corporate
governance practice internationally is the
development of written formal codes of conduct
by organisations that set out their obligations with
regard to corporate governance Like corporate
governance codes codes of conduct have
proliferated in recent years They identify the
behaviour expected of those to whom they
apply by articulating a coherent set of values
and a means of addressing maladministration
where it occurs (see Transport for London (TfL)
case study)
The Public Audit Forum (2001) sets out important
elements which it is expected most codes of
conduct will address
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
outlines of expected professional and
personal behaviour
defined restrictions on business and political
activities (where appropriate)
criteria and procedures for declarations of
interests both business and political
definitions of conflicts of interest
a statement of the aims and values of the
body
statements of the obligations of the body
towards its customers staff community and
other interested parties
information about the bodyrsquos approach to
openness and arrangements for acquiring
information about its activities
procedures for raising complaints with an
independent body
definition of the dividing line between the role
and responsibilities of the governing body
and those of the executive staff
Source Public Audit Forum (2001) httpwww
public-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Particularly with regard to standards of behaviour
such codes of conduct are expected to
reflect the practice of the highest standards in
public life In the UK the Nolan Committee
(httpwwwarchiveofficial-documentscouk
documentparlmentnolannolanhtm) inquired
into standards of public life and established seven
principles of public life that have been widely
adopted internationally
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Selflessness Holders of public office should
take decisions solely in terms of the public
interest They should not do so in order to
gain financial or other material benefits for
themselves their family or their friends
Integrity Holders of public office should
not place themselves under any financial
or other obligation to outside individuals or
organisations that might influence them in
the performance of their official duties
Objectivity In carrying out public business
including making public appointments
awarding contracts or recommending
individuals for rewards and benefits holders
of public office should make choices on
merit
Accountability Holders of public office are
accountable for their decisions and actions
to the public and must submit themselves
to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their
office
Openness Holders of public office should be
as open as possible about all the decisions
and actions that they take They should
give reasons for their decisions and restrict
information only when the wider public
interest clearly demands
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
Honesty Holders of public office have a duty
to declare any private interests relating to their
public duties and to take steps to resolve any
conflicts arising in a way that protects the
public interest
Leadership Holders of public office should
promote and support these principles by
leadership and example
Failure to adhere to such standards can lead to
the failures in corporate governance noted earlier
and in particular to
bull
bull
bull
failures of principles of fairness in the
treatment of staff suppliers or contractors
whether due to conflicts of interest or other
reason
misuse of public assets or resources for
personal or political purposes
failure to exercise reasonable stewardship
over public assets or resources
Case study Transport for London (TfL) code of conduct
TfLrsquos corporate governance code of conduct addresses the main principles of good corporate
governance by setting out a series of undertakings that TfL has committed itself to deliver
under five main headings
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Public focus
Structures and processes
Risk management and internal control
Service delivery arrangements
Standards of conduct
For example under risk management and internal control TfL amongst other things commits
that its annual report will contain an objective and understandable statement and assessment
of its risk-management system including systems of internal control and internal audit and
their effectiveness in practice
Source httpwwwtflgovukcorporateabout-tfl2876aspxPublicFocus
16
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
17
Leadership developments Leadership is a crucial principle from a corporate
governance perspective There are two key
leadership roles the governing body of public
organisations needs to pay attention to the
establishment of sound governance structures
and processes and supporting good governance
through its own performance and behaviours
A range of commentators such as Kalokerinos
(2007) note the central role of the chair of the
governing body in the leadership of public sector
organisations This includes the traditional duty
of ensuring the proper functioning of the board
and its meetings but also covers maintaining a
close relationship with the chief executive and
representing the authority to outside stakeholders
A study undertaken for the UK Public Services
Productivity Panel (Barker 2004) states that the
chair should
bull
bull
bull
bull
act as board team leader with an
understanding of what skills knowledge and
aptitudes the board needs
regularly carry out skills knowledge and
aptitude audits which may be relatively
low key and informal to help understand
the current board composition and provide
board members with further clarity about
their individual roles
act as board lsquoconductorrsquo fostering an
environment where dissenting voices can
be heard without damaging collective
responsibility
act as the interface between the board and
its executive team and the organisation and
its sponsor department
In terms of developing board membersrsquo leadership
skills knowledge and aptitude mentoring of board
members has been of growing prominence in
recent years (see case studies)
A particular leadership challenge for the chair is
managing the relationship with the chief executive
Chief executives are professionals with specific
training in their job Chairs often come to the
role with no or limited experience of chairing
The chair and chief executive may experience a
culture clash between a management approach
to a question and a laypersonrsquos approach They
may be talking about the same problem using
very different vocabularies and terms of reference
Chief executives and chairs may also have different
definitions of success and consequently may
end up working towards different goals The
development of a good working relationship with
an agreed common vision as to the organisationrsquos
purpose is the key to effective leadership of the
organisation
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 20: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
Honesty Holders of public office have a duty
to declare any private interests relating to their
public duties and to take steps to resolve any
conflicts arising in a way that protects the
public interest
Leadership Holders of public office should
promote and support these principles by
leadership and example
Failure to adhere to such standards can lead to
the failures in corporate governance noted earlier
and in particular to
bull
bull
bull
failures of principles of fairness in the
treatment of staff suppliers or contractors
whether due to conflicts of interest or other
reason
misuse of public assets or resources for
personal or political purposes
failure to exercise reasonable stewardship
over public assets or resources
Case study Transport for London (TfL) code of conduct
TfLrsquos corporate governance code of conduct addresses the main principles of good corporate
governance by setting out a series of undertakings that TfL has committed itself to deliver
under five main headings
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Public focus
Structures and processes
Risk management and internal control
Service delivery arrangements
Standards of conduct
For example under risk management and internal control TfL amongst other things commits
that its annual report will contain an objective and understandable statement and assessment
of its risk-management system including systems of internal control and internal audit and
their effectiveness in practice
Source httpwwwtflgovukcorporateabout-tfl2876aspxPublicFocus
16
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
17
Leadership developments Leadership is a crucial principle from a corporate
governance perspective There are two key
leadership roles the governing body of public
organisations needs to pay attention to the
establishment of sound governance structures
and processes and supporting good governance
through its own performance and behaviours
A range of commentators such as Kalokerinos
(2007) note the central role of the chair of the
governing body in the leadership of public sector
organisations This includes the traditional duty
of ensuring the proper functioning of the board
and its meetings but also covers maintaining a
close relationship with the chief executive and
representing the authority to outside stakeholders
A study undertaken for the UK Public Services
Productivity Panel (Barker 2004) states that the
chair should
bull
bull
bull
bull
act as board team leader with an
understanding of what skills knowledge and
aptitudes the board needs
regularly carry out skills knowledge and
aptitude audits which may be relatively
low key and informal to help understand
the current board composition and provide
board members with further clarity about
their individual roles
act as board lsquoconductorrsquo fostering an
environment where dissenting voices can
be heard without damaging collective
responsibility
act as the interface between the board and
its executive team and the organisation and
its sponsor department
In terms of developing board membersrsquo leadership
skills knowledge and aptitude mentoring of board
members has been of growing prominence in
recent years (see case studies)
A particular leadership challenge for the chair is
managing the relationship with the chief executive
Chief executives are professionals with specific
training in their job Chairs often come to the
role with no or limited experience of chairing
The chair and chief executive may experience a
culture clash between a management approach
to a question and a laypersonrsquos approach They
may be talking about the same problem using
very different vocabularies and terms of reference
Chief executives and chairs may also have different
definitions of success and consequently may
end up working towards different goals The
development of a good working relationship with
an agreed common vision as to the organisationrsquos
purpose is the key to effective leadership of the
organisation
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 21: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
17
Leadership developments Leadership is a crucial principle from a corporate
governance perspective There are two key
leadership roles the governing body of public
organisations needs to pay attention to the
establishment of sound governance structures
and processes and supporting good governance
through its own performance and behaviours
A range of commentators such as Kalokerinos
(2007) note the central role of the chair of the
governing body in the leadership of public sector
organisations This includes the traditional duty
of ensuring the proper functioning of the board
and its meetings but also covers maintaining a
close relationship with the chief executive and
representing the authority to outside stakeholders
A study undertaken for the UK Public Services
Productivity Panel (Barker 2004) states that the
chair should
bull
bull
bull
bull
act as board team leader with an
understanding of what skills knowledge and
aptitudes the board needs
regularly carry out skills knowledge and
aptitude audits which may be relatively
low key and informal to help understand
the current board composition and provide
board members with further clarity about
their individual roles
act as board lsquoconductorrsquo fostering an
environment where dissenting voices can
be heard without damaging collective
responsibility
act as the interface between the board and
its executive team and the organisation and
its sponsor department
In terms of developing board membersrsquo leadership
skills knowledge and aptitude mentoring of board
members has been of growing prominence in
recent years (see case studies)
A particular leadership challenge for the chair is
managing the relationship with the chief executive
Chief executives are professionals with specific
training in their job Chairs often come to the
role with no or limited experience of chairing
The chair and chief executive may experience a
culture clash between a management approach
to a question and a laypersonrsquos approach They
may be talking about the same problem using
very different vocabularies and terms of reference
Chief executives and chairs may also have different
definitions of success and consequently may
end up working towards different goals The
development of a good working relationship with
an agreed common vision as to the organisationrsquos
purpose is the key to effective leadership of the
organisation
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 22: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Mentoring support for a young chair
Jamie Dear became chair of newly established charity Jacari in the UK in 2005 at the age
of twenty-three He availed of the opportunity provided by government-funded support for
mentoring of chairs to provide him with guidance on his new role He met with his mentor
three times over a couple of months lsquoOf all the development opportunities Irsquove experienced
this has made the most impact on mersquo said Jamie lsquoI couldnrsquot recommend it highly enoughrsquo
The mentoring provided reassurance that the issues facing Jamie and the board were faced by
others The mentor also provided invaluable technical input on governance and management
issues It helped clarify roles and functions
Source httpwwwncvo-volorgukgovernanceandleadershipid=9474ampterms=chairing
Case study Mentoring and board development
In a national development agency in the USA every new board member is assigned two
mentors ndash a veteran board mentor and a staff mentor Mentoring partners meet in person and
or virtually before and after each board meeting for the first year of board service The board
mentor introduces the new member to the issues and workings of the board The staff mentor
introduces the new board member to the organisational issues around current and future
operations The mentoring programme enables new board members to familiarise themselves
with standards of behaviour and practice in the organisation
Source httpwwwcommunitydevelopmentworksorgPortals12word_docsBoard20Articles Mentor20Your20Way20to20Board20Developmentpdf
18
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 23: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
19
3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
With regard to corporate governance issues around
organisational structures and processes the main
issues focus on the roles and responsibilities
of governing bodies and their accountability
processes A government-commissioned review
of corporate governance of statutory authorities
and office holders in Australia (Uhrig 2003)
identified six issues to be addressed in governing
bodies if they are to deliver in terms of effective
responsibility and accountability board size
committees appointments tenure development
and performance To these can be added board
composition and board remuneration
Board size Public sector boards tend to be large in size The
Uhrig report (Uhrig 2003) suggests that based
on current thinking on best practice in the private
sector a board of between six and nine members
(including a managing director if there is one)
represents a reasonable size Boards with less
than six members may have difficulty in meeting
their statutory responsibilities due to workload
pressures and the potential lack of breadth of
views This situation is likely to be exacerbated
in periods where vacancies exist There is also
the risk that smaller boards may find it easier to
become involved in management decisions rather
than overseeing them
Uhrig also notes however that there are
circumstances where a larger board may be
warranted For example when management of
the risks of the organisation is such that a number
of board committees are required larger board
membership may be appropriate Particularly in
the public sector where boards act in the interests
of the owners or members of the corporation
essentially as their proxies and representatives
board size can be somewhat larger often up to
twelve to meet representational and balance
requirements (httpwwwbrowngovernance
comasktheexperts4htm)
Board committees Board committees are a commonly used mechanism
for boards to enhance their effectiveness through
further detailed oversight and supervision of areas
of special risk critical to success Uhrig (2003) notes
that to assist in the efficiency of operations and
for reasons of accountability committees should
operate with a clear written mandate from the full
board The operations of committees should also
be agreed including how committees will report
to the board and how committees will interact with
management and other relevant parties This will
clarify whether a committee has the power to make
decisions and approve management proposals
or report to and make recommendations to the
board A director should be appointed to chair
each committee and should be responsible for
its operations reporting back to the full board
It is considered good practice that the chairman
of the full board should not be the chairman of
all committees
Board appointments Board selection and composition are vital elements
in securing effective boards that can deliver on
their accountability requirements The case study
from BC addresses the issue of best international
practice with regard to board selection
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 24: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Best practice in board selection
In Canada the premier of BC in 2001 established the Board Resourcing and Development Office
(BRDO) (httpwwwfingovbccabrdo) After reviewing best practices in director recruitment
and selection in the private and public sectors around the world the BRDO put in place the
following key elements of board selection
Competency matrix All corporations are required to think strategically about the issues facing
the corporation and from that to identify a matrix of competencies that sets out the required
skill set for the board of directors as a whole
Personal attributes In the recruitment process close attention is paid to the behaviour and
personal attributes of potential directors Importance is also placed on a candidatersquos commitment
to corporate governance and his or her understanding of the responsibilities of directors today
As part of due diligence directors of crown corporations are asked to commit to a Charter of
Expectations
Work with the chairboard If a new board is being created the chair is identified first The
BRDO then works with that chair to establish the competency matrix and to recruit and evaluate
potential board members If the recruitment is for a vacancy on a board the BRDO works with
the chair andor governance committee to identify and evaluate potential candidates
Pro-active search for candidates Candidates are identified from a variety of sources and
any person who is interested in serving on a board may make his or her interest known by
submitting a reacutesumeacute and expression of interest to the BRDO For specific vacancies boards are
encouraged to identify potential candidates In addition the BRDO retains a national executive
search consultant to provide ongoing search and referencing services
Due diligence The due diligence process for each candidate includes a review of the candidatersquos
probity identification of potential conflicts of interest and a declaration by the candidate
accepting his or her fiduciary and other responsibilities to the corporation All candidates who
wish to be considered for a position on a public sector corporation must complete a written
Candidate Profile and Declaration The formal due diligence process has been particularly
helpful in identifying potential conflicts of interest
Diversity There is a feeling that the membership of public sector boards should reflect the
cultural and geographical makeup of the population The challenge is to make sure that token
or unqualified appointments are not made The BRDO undertakes a search process including
searching in non-traditional places to ensure that qualified candidates are identified from many
diverse communities
20
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 25: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Building the talent pool Boards are normally structured with a mixture of seasoned board
directors and others who are very senior and skilled in their professions but may not have had
extensive board experience The intention is to build the talent pool for the next generation of
private and public sector directors for BC and elsewhere
Transparency The BRDO publishes the names terms and full biographies of all appointees
to all public sector boards on the BRDO website Members of the public and other interested
parties can review and assess whether the board members appear to have the requisite skills
and experience for the positions they hold
Quality control During the recruitment and evaluation process the BRDO works with ministers
and boards to identify and recruit candidates Because the BRDO has expertise in the area of
corporate governance and board building it is able to bring this expertise to the process and
to provide advice in this area regardless of the ministry involved Also after the recruitment
and evaluation process is complete the BRDO is required to endorse the appropriateness
of every candidate before the appointment instrument is presented to the appointing body
for final approval
Commitment to best practices In addition to appointments the BRDO encourages and
supports public sector organisations to adopt best practices in corporate governance These
include things such as position descriptions for the board chair individual directors and
committees and written documents that outline the boardrsquos process and structure board
composition and succession plans appropriate orientation and ongoing director education
board chair committee and individual director evaluation processes separation of the chair and
CEO except in exceptional circumstances and a board plan for evaluating and compensating
the CEO and for CEO succession
21
Source Watson 2004 httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Board tenure The length of tenure on a board and the associated
issue of staggering of replacement of board
members are important issues to be addressed
as the case study from Canada suggests
There is no set term limit for boards though three
years is a common time in a number of countries
The experience of the Scottish government
regarding length of board appointments would
not be untypical
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Terms of appointment can be for any period
between one and five years Appointments may be renewed for a second term subject
to satisfactory performance Members may
be re-appointed to the same position only
once without open competition A member
who has served an initial term and has been re-appointed may however choose to apply for
a third re-appointment or subsequent term with
the same public body He or she must apply in
open competition for each new term (http
wwwscotlandgovukTopicsGovernment
public-bodiesfaq-paa14)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 26: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Board appointments and staggering of terms
A review carried out by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) found that in 2004
over one-third of directors of the fifteen largest Crown corporations were still sitting on boards
after their term had expired in several cases for over six months It also found that appointments
were not staggered evenly with one Crown corporation being in the process of replacing eight
of its twelve directors during 2004 This increased the risk that continuity of expertise and
corporate memory will be lost
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf paras 730ndash732
Board development There is a need for board induction and continued
review of training needs and also to ensure
that those involved in the appointment of board
members are fully trained Many board members
come from the private sector and may be unfamiliar
with the challenges and opportunities associated
with working in a public sector environment
Induction is important in these circumstances
to enable board members to settle into their
roles The Auditor General of Western Australia
(1998) has further identified several areas where
individual and collective training needs of board
members should be regularly reviewed
bull
bull
bull
bull
specific skills such as the ability to understand
financial statements and non-financial
performance information
changes to legislation that will affect the
agencyrsquos operations or obligations
significant public sector trends
emerging issues of general significance such
as electronic commerce and the potential
uses and impacts of new technology
With regard to the continuing development needs
of board members board mentoring has been
discussed in Chapter 2 Board self-evaluation
(see section on board performance below) can
also be used to identify competency and skills
limitations where development is needed
The case study of training provided by Canadarsquos
Privy Council Office and the Cabinet Office in
the UK shows examples of training for board
members and for public servants involved in
board appointments
22
Board performance As the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) notes
There is a tendency to equate the performance
of a governing board with the performance of the
agency thus excusing the board from separate
scrutiny However boards have numerous
choices on all aspects of how they conduct
themselves A poorly run board may waste
time spend disproportionate effort on minor
matters fail to provide strategic leadership
and have inadequate methods for monitoring
agency performance All boards should make
appraisals of how they conduct themselves
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 27: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
23
Case study Training provision
A 2000 review of practice by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that while new
directors of Crown corporations were given orientation training they were not briefed adequately
on their duties and responsibilities the corporationrsquos relationship to government policies on the
compensation of Crown corporation executives and boardroom procedures In response the
Privy Council Office established a new orientation course specifically addressing these issues
Most Crown corporations have participated in the training programme
In the UK following recommendations from the Public Administration Select Committee that
senior officials should receive training in public appointments the Cabinet Office worked in
partnership with the National Health Service Appointments Commission to develop a short
briefing event for members of the senior civil service The aims of the event were to provide
an overview of the public appointment process and the role of senior officials in that process
and to enable participants to undertake a fair appointments process that is fully compliant with
both the Code of Practice and equality legislation
Sources httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmediacabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreportspublic_ bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf
However it is not that common for board
performance to be assessed Best practice
suggests that formal annual assessment of
board performance between the minister and the
chair of the board should take place to review
board performance (Uhrig 2003) Barker (2004)
suggests that a comprehensive board evaluation
in a UK setting for non-departmental public bodies
should include
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
subjecting the board collectively to annual
evaluation against performance plan or
overarching list of objectives which may be
externally facilitated
senior responsible officers in the sponsor
department appraising the chairrsquos
performance annually
board members being assessed individually
for their performance against personal
objectives
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
using frameworks for board member appraisal
based on the Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments Code of Practice and
Cabinet Office guidance
using evaluations and appraisals to identify
areas for future development to drive through
performance improvements
For this process to be effective the board members
themselves must evaluate their own performance
alongside a departmental assessment Barker
(2004) suggests a performance evaluation
framework that board members its executive
team and members of the sponsoring department
can use to collaboratively assess performance
(see case study)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 28: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
bull
bull
bull
Case study Illustrative example of board performance rating
Rating Description Headline action
Highly performing The board and sponsor
department are clear about
the organisationrsquos aim and its
position within the departmentrsquos
strategy
Produce timeline for future
reviews
Ensure that processes
for two-way strategy
communication continue to
be as effective as possible
Performing Both the board and the department
are quite clear about what they
want from the organisation but this
is not communicated effectively
between them
Ensure that the department
and the board meet regularly
so that both understand the
agreed strategies and their
implications
Developing The board understands aspects of
the sponsor departmentrsquos strategy
but does not see how it can be
married with the current direction
of the organisation
Arrange high-level meetings
of the chair and the senior
responsible officer in the
department or the minister
Ensure agreed alignment of
priorities is sustainable and
able to be implemented
Under performing The board does not see how the
organisation fits into the role of the
department and the department
feels that the organisationrsquos
objectives are at odds with the
departmentrsquos priorities
Carry out review of the
organisation to agree its
position within the departmentrsquos
landscape
Clarify the independent nature
and needs of the body
Clarify the requirements of the
department
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
Source Barker (2004) p 9 httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
24
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 29: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
25
Board composition Guidance from the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada (2005) draws on international best
practice to suggest that the majority of board
members should be independent that the
independent members hold regular meetings
without management in attendance and that the
board chair be an independent director (that is
the chair and chief executive positions should be
separate) The Auditor General notes that these
best practices are not always adopted in Crown
corporations in Canada where the practice of
holding board meetings without management in
attendance is uneven Further in a few Crown
corporations the same individual acts as chair
and chief executive
A further issue of debate is whether departmental
staff should represent government departments
on boards for which they have responsibility While
practice here varies the trend internationally is
tending towards the position that departmental
staff should not serve on boards The Office
of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) has
raised concerns about the role played by senior
public servants appointed to the boards of some
Crown corporations In their view departmental
representatives can too easily be viewed as
having a lsquosuper voicersquo and thereby unduly affect
the direction of the board For departmental
representatives themselves having the fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the
corporation and owing loyalty to their minister can
place them in difficult situations At times boards
require access to public sector decision-makers
but not necessarily as members of the board
Uhrig (2003) similarly notes that care should be
exercised when appointing public servants to
boards He states
In circumstances where a departmental staff
member is appointed on the basis of representing
the governmentrsquos interests or having a lsquoquasirsquo
supervision approach conflicts of interest may
arise and poor governance is likely Through
participation in decision-making either directly
or implied the departmental representative may
become an advocate for the organisation rather
than contributing critical comment This also has
the potential to create an incentive for the other
members of the board to meet to discuss and
agree on important issues separately from formal
meetings without involving the departmental
representative thereby removing the formal
board meeting as the main decision-making
forum of governance Membership of the board
by the related departmental representative is
unwise unless there are specific circumstances
which require it The above points do not
mean that departmental representatives should
not attend board meetings as agreed by the
chairman No objections are raised to either staff
of the entity or other public servants attending
specific parts of a meeting to discuss or clarify
issues with the board
The selective attendance of government
representatives at board meetings as outlined
above is one of the ways in which sponsoring
departments may exercise effective control over
public bodies in the absence of a board member
from a sponsoring department Also regular formal
and informal communications with the board
primarily the chair are vital to control So too is
the effective scrutiny and use of performance
plans and reports
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 30: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Board remuneration Practice with regard to governing body
remuneration varies from country to country
and within countries across different types of
organisation Many of the smaller public bodies
tend to pay only out-of-pocket expenses such as
travel overnight accommodation and childcare
Others pay a set amount based either on a daily
rate or an estimated time commitment per month
or per year In general however remuneration is
relatively modest and lower than for non-executive
members of private sector boards Research
undertaken by the Auditor General Western
Australia (1998) suggests that total fees for a
board of seven to ten members are likely to be
about the same as the salary of a single middle
to senior manager
Practice varies as to whether there is centrally
imposed guidance andor control on remuneration
levels In South Australia for example the chief
executive of the Department of the Premier and
Cabinet has the delegated authority of cabinet
to assess and recommend fees for the members
of government appointed part-time to boards
and committees The determination of fees is
undertaken in accordance with a cabinet-approved
classification structure which the chief executive
may review from time to time (httpwwwpremcab
sagovaupdfcircularsremunerationpdf) In
the UK by way of contrast in 2005 the Cabinet
Office undertook a remuneration review of its
own public appointments The review concluded
that individual sponsor teams should retain
responsibility for setting and reviewing rates of
remuneration due to the diverse nature and work
of the departmentrsquos non-departmental public
bodies It was also decided that remuneration
rates must be reviewed by the sponsor team
every one to three years at the sponsor teamrsquos
discretion Any review conducted should take
into account any changes to the duties or
time commitment required of appointees any
recruitment or retention issues rates paid by
other Cabinet Office bodies and any increase in
the retail price index since the previous review
(httpwwwcabinetofficegovukmedia
cabinetofficecorpassetspublicationsreports
public_bodies2006co_pa_plan_2006pdf)
26
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 31: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
27
4 Control Two areas of control where there have been
particular developments in recent years are risk
management and audit With regard to good
corporate governance practice the governing
bodies of public organisations are expected to
ensure that their organisations have effective
risk-management practices in place and to
ensure effective internal and external audit of
financial and performance information regarding
the organisation
Risk management In considering risks and controls the obvious
area frequently highlighted is financial exposure or
financial risk However there is also a much broader
category of risks relevant to public organisations
including policy risk (the appropriateness and
quality of policy decisions) and reputational risk
(the public reputation of the organisation and
consequent effects) Risk management means
addressing this wide range of organisational factors
and not focusing solely on financial exposure
Of course public organisations are subject to
rapidly changing economic social and political
environments and planning for risk management
is difficult to implement in reality Nonetheless
some lessons can be derived from international
experiences
Public organisations have for many years
incorporated risk management albeit informally
into their management and decision-making
processes What is now required by many codes of
practice is that corporate governance procedures
and practice ensure that risk is explicitly stated and
a consensus on addressing risks formulated For
an example of how to develop a risk-management
framework see the approach adopted by the
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (2006)
httpwwwhefcwacukInternalPolicies_Docs
Risk_Management_Policy_and_Guidelinesdoc
A risk-management policy can help clarify
accountability and responsibility for risk
management and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation
A particular dimension of risk management directly
applicable to the governing bodies of public
organisations is the management of conflicts
of interest which can significantly impact on
reputational risk Managing conflicts of interest
can be a particular challenge where departmental
representatives are also board members (but
see also the section on board composition
in Chapter 3) as the hypothetical case study
from Western Australia illustrates There is no
prescriptive set of rules specifying what constitutes
ethical behaviour for all situations or all public
organisations Decision-making should be guided
by the principles of integrity honesty transparency
openness independence good faith and service
to the public which underpin most corporate
governance codes of practice The additional
hypothetical case study from New Zealand further
illustrates this point where a board member
may face potentially competing duties to two
organisations
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 32: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Hypothetical case study Conflict of interest challenges for a departmental board member
Juanita is the director general of a state government department with responsibility for developing
and delivering cultural tourism in Western Australia The director general is responsible for
allocation of funds to the statutory authorities comprising the cultural tourism portfolio As a
voting member of several boards within the portfolio Juanita is well aware of the competing
demands for funding During a board meeting one of the members proposes a motion to cease
a key regional programme if funding cannot be guaranteed for the next three years
As the public officer responsible for allocation of government funds across the portfolio Juanita
has competing interests between her role as director general and as a board member This
makes it difficult for Juanita to always be seen to be impartial and acting in the best interests
of the agency with regard to decisions about allocation of funds for cultural tourism If it is not
possible for Juanita as director general to resign from the board it may be necessary to restrict
her involvement in certain board discussions such as that surrounding budget strategy For
example the director general could offer the board information on the overall cultural tourism
portfolio budget and advise members on matters of government policy but remove herself
from participating in any budget decisions made by the board Given the potential for conflict
it would be wise for the board in conjunction with the director general to develop specific
protocols in a code of conduct for how such competing situations will be handled 28
Source httpwwwopsscwagovauicgdocumentscoiscenario3pdf
Audit A particular feature of corporate governance
developments in recent years has been the
growing use of audits and inspections by external
bodies One issue of concern for the governing
body of many public organisations is the choice of
external auditors and the need to ensure auditor
independence rather than lsquocapturersquo of the auditors
by the organisation In that context auditor rotation
has been discussed as a possible mechanism The
case study on this topic suggests that striking a
balance between rotation and too quick a turnover
of external auditors is important
Another audit issue of growing prominence in the
public sector corporate governance literature is the
use of audit committees by public organisations to
provide an oversight of audit arrangements Audit
committees are becoming an increasingly important
part of the corporate governance framework in the
public sector for many organisations (though they
are not necessarily required for all organisations
for example in small or less complex organisations
there may not be a need for an audit committee)
Audit committees regularly review the plans and
reports of internal audit and quality assure the
work of internal audit
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 33: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Good practice principles for audit committees
The Controller and Auditor General in New Zealand on the basis of a review of best international practice issued guidance on the formation and operation of audit committees in the public sector Among the items addressed was the identification of good practice principles for audit committees
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
bull
the governing body or departmental chief executive should appoint an audit committee in which most of the members are independent of the management team
the chairperson of the audit committee should be someone other than the chairperson of the governing body or the chief executive
people appointed as audit committee members should have skills and experience adequate for the role of the committee
the audit committee needs to be clear about its mandate purpose and role in the organisation and within the governance structure as a whole
the roles and responsibilities of the audit committee should be documented and clearly defined in the context of the overall governance framework
the activities of the audit committee should be linked to risk-management disciplines
the chairperson of the audit committee should ensure that the audit committee has open and effective relationships with other governance committees the chief executive senior management and internal and external auditors
Source Controller and Auditor General (2008) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Hypothetical case study Duties to two different organisations
29
Jean-Paul is a member of the governing body of a tertiary education institution (TEI) The TEI has some contracting arrangements with private organisations to help to deliver some educational courses One of those arrangements is with a charitable trust under which the trust is funded by the TEI to prepare administer and teach the course on behalf of the TEI However the TEI is now about to decide whether to discontinue this arrangement Jean-Paul is also a trustee of the charitable trust
Jean-Paul has a conflict of interest in this decision He may not be affected personally by the decision but the trust he is a trustee of will be As a member of the governing body of the TEI Jean-Paul has a duty to act in the best interests of the TEI but as a trustee he also has a duty to act in the best interests of the trust In this case the best outcome for one entity may not be the best outcome for the other and so it may be impossible for Jean-Paul to faithfully give effect to his obligations to both organisations
Jean-Paul should declare a conflict of interest at relevant meetings of the TEIrsquos council and refrain from discussing or voting on the TEIrsquos decision It might be wise for him not to be provided with confidential information about the matter Jean-Paul may also need to consider whether he has a conflict of interest in the matter at meetings of the trust
Source httpwwwoaggovtnz2007conflicts-public-entitiesdocsoag-conflicts-public-entitiespdf pp 42ndash43
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 34: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study The impact of independent auditors and auditor rotation
Corporate auditors are assigned to review financial statements and evaluate the accuracy of the information provided The lack of auditor independence is one of the major issues in the recent history of corporate governance Calls have been made for the introduction of provisions requiring the auditor to be appointed independent of management and for mandatory auditor rotation which compels organisations to change the audit firm at regular predetermined intervals
An empirical investigation by Schelker focuses on USA state level government where state auditors are often elected or appointed for a fixed term Auditors are elected or appointed for a different term length or sometimes face term limits The study estimates the impact of such differences on Moodyrsquos state credit ratings for USA long-term state bonds The evidence shows a U-shape relationship indicating that auditor performance is weak for very short and very long terms This is consistent with theories pointing towards audit failure due to a lack of expertise in the beginning of a mandate as well as with theories suggesting problems associated with diminishing independence with extended auditorndashclient relationships Furthermore the results indicate beneficial effects of term limits which can be interpreted as being in favour of mandatory rotation requirements Schelker proposes that auditors should be elected or appointed by either the board of directors for a fixed term with the possibility of re-electing or reappointing the auditor He advocates a term limit restricting the auditor from serving too long Such a design is related to auditor rotation requirements but is more flexible and preserves auditor expertise for an extended period of time 30
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Source Schelker 2008 httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 35: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
31
5 External reporting The need for transparency As well as accountability transparency is a
fundamental element in the promotion of good
corporate governance The pivotal role of the
governing body in issues of transparency and
accountability is as relevant to the public sector as it
is to the private sector Public sector organisations
rely on the continuing support and confidence
of their stakeholders (eg ministers customers
employees lenders suppliers and business
partners) These stakeholders need to be assured
of the quality and ethical standards of public
bodies with which they deal and governing
bodies are expected to set an example in terms
of transparency in relation to matters such as
procurement remuneration and disclosure
policies
In practical terms transparency in relation to
reporting on performance and on future intentions
and plans is achieved in a number of ways including
managing the relationship between government
departments and organisational governing bodies
Performance dialogues between managers in
central government authorities and governing
body members and executive management of
public organisations are increasingly common
Performance dialogue refers to regular structured
face-to-face meetings between managers and
managed which draw on performance data to
review performance and agree prioritised action
plans
Public and timely production of reports as
illustrated in the case study on the ex-ante
reporting of business and corporate plans are
another means of enhancing transparency
Case study Ex-ante reporting of business and corporate plans
The preparation of corporate planning documents that cover short medium and long-term
periods is a feature of corporate governance arrangements for public sector agencies The
arrangements requiring the preparation of such plans are typically part of an agencyrsquos establishing
legislation or legislative or administrative elements of a financial management framework
In New Zealand the responsible minister of a Crown corporation is required to table the
organisationrsquos statement of corporate intent (a detailed plan covering a three-year period) in
parliament within twelve sitting days of the statement being delivered to the minister In New
South Wales a copy of a completed statement of corporate intent (a three-year plan reviewed
annually that contains the agencyrsquos objectives and performance targets and measures to judge
its performance) for state-owned companies is required to be tabled within fourteen sitting days
of the date on which the responsible ministers received the statement (However in 2004 for
the fourteen government business enterprises covered by the Act the reports were delivered
more than eight months after the start of the reporting period)
Source Public Accounts and Estimates Committee 2005 pp 89ndash90 httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 36: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
Case study Weaknesses in departmental review of public bodiesrsquo corporate plans
A review by the Office of the Auditor General in Canada found that government departments
had limited knowledge and expertise to challenge the corporate plans of Crown corporations
and that in effect the government was approving many deficient corporate plans They found
that neither the Treasury Board Secretariat nor the applicable departments have clearly defined
their respective roles in the process for reviewing and approving corporate plans or assessed
the capacity and skills needed to fulfil their roles
Source httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
The public production of reports such as
corporate plans by the governing bodies of
public organisations also puts an onus on staff in
parent departments to assess and validate these
reports The case study from Canada shows that
there may be weaknesses at departmental level
that needs to be addressed if transparency is to
be fully effective
Balancing transparency with confidentiality Studies show that there may be difficulties
for individuals and organisations in relation to
discharging governing body duties in a transparent
manner whilst simultaneously protecting sensitive
business or organisation information The need for
codes and practices to acknowledge the tension
between confidentiality and transparency and
to strike a balance between these competing
tensions requires constant scrutiny
32
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 37: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
33
6 Conclusions Understanding how to ensure and achieve best
practice in corporate governance is a significant
challenge for public sector organisations There
has been much cross-fertilisation of corporate
governance standards and codes in recent
years particularly those from the UK USA and
OECD which have provided many of the basic
frameworks Many developments in public sector
corporate governance have borrowed from practice
in the private sector though public authorities
operate within unique statutory regulatory and
managerial environments
The principal dimensions of corporate governance
are standards of behaviour organisational
structures and processes control and external
reporting Standards of behaviour are important
to corporate governance as they establish how
the leadership of the organisation operates
the values that drive the organisation and the
culture that prevails in the organisation all of
which influence the behaviour of all staff Formal
codes of conduct are an important emerging
feature of good corporate governance practice
internationally to ensure good standards of
behaviour Leadership is a crucial principle from
a corporate governance perspective
Organisational structures and processes should
be designed to achieve and successfully manage
different accountability demands The boards of
public organisations as the governing bodies
with responsibility for the organisation require
particular attention to be paid to their operation
and performance This demands action both on
the part of the board and also of staff within the
sponsoring government department
Control involves both risk management and
regular audit A risk-management policy and the
active management of conflicts of interest can
help address risks and thereby further support
the adoption of good practice governance
arrangements within the organisation Audits
and inspections by external bodies are now a
normal part of life in public service organisations
Issues of concern for the governing body of
many public organisations include the choice of
external auditors auditor rotation and the use of
audit committees
External reporting is one means of demonstrating
a commitment to transparency However public
servants and public organisations routinely
face difficulties in terms of discharging duties
in a transparent manner whilst simultaneously
protecting business or organisation sensitive
information As well as developing guidance on
such issues it is important that governing bodies
periodically scrutinise their organisationrsquos guidance
and practice with regard to striking a balance
between transparency and confidentiality
While there are particular challenges regarding
the application of corporate governance in the
public sector the examples of good practice
here (and the lessons to be learned from the
failures outlined) show that good governance
is possible for arms-length agencies Effective
corporate governance can contribute to a better
functioning public service Scandals and waste
of public money can be avoided if corporate
governance issues are clearly addressed by the
governing bodies of arms-length agencies and
officials from their sponsoring departments
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 38: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
References Audit Commission (2003) Corporate Governance Improvement and trust in local public services (London Audit Commission) httpwwwaudit-commissiongovuknationalstudieslocalgovPagesimprovementtrust publicservicesaspx
Auditor General Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards Perth Auditor General Western Australia httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Australian National Audit Office (1999) Principles and Better Practices Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Discussion Paper (Canberra ANAO) httpwwwanaogovauuploadsdocumentsCorporate_Governance_in_Commonwealth_Authorities_and_ Companiespdf
Barker L (2004) Building Effective Boards (London HM Treasury) httpwwwhm-treasurygovukpspp_buliding_effective_boardshtm
Bovaird T and Loumlffler E (2009) lsquoUnderstanding public management and governancersquo in Bovaird T and Loumlffler E Public Management and Governance (eds) (2nd ed) (Oxford Routledge) pp 3ndash13
Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the Cadbury Committee) (1992) The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London Burgess Science Press) httpwwwecgiorgcodesdocumentscadburypdf
Controller and Auditor General (2008) Audit Committees in the Public Sector Good Practice Guide (Wellington Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwoaggovtnz2008audit-committeesdocsaudit-committees-public-sectorpdf
Department of Finance (2009) Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (Dublin Department of Finance) httpwwwfinancegovieviewdocaspDocID=5824
Edwards M and R Clough (2005) Corporate Governance and Performance An Exploration of the Connection in a Public Sector Context Issue Paper No 1 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo1_GovernancePerformanceIssuespdf
Government of Australia (2005) Governance Arrangements for Australian Government Bodies (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsGovernance-Arrangements-for-Australian-Government-Bodiespdf
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2001) Governance in the Public Sector A Governing Body Perspective (New York International Federation of Accountants) httpwwwifacorgMembersDownLoadsStudy_13_Governancepdf
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
34
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 39: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
35
Kalokerinos J (2007) Developments in the Role of the Chair in the Private and Public Sectors Issue Paper Series No 4 (Canberra University of Canberra) httpwwwcanberraeduaucorpgov-apspubIssuesPaperNo4_ DevelopmentsInTheRoleOfTheChair_Final_March07pdf
OECD (2004) OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (revised) (Paris OECD) httpwwwoecdorgdataoecd321831557724pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2005) Governance of Crown Corporations (Ottawa Office of the Auditor General of Canada) httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetdocs20050207cepdf
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2007) 2007 February Status Report of the Auditor General of Canada httpwwwoag-bvggccainternetEnglishatt_20070203xe03_e_17507html
Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia (1998) Public Sector Boards (Perth Office of the Auditor General) httpwwwauditwagovaureportsreport98_9html
Plumptre T (2004) The New Rules of the Board Game (Ottawa Institute On Governance) httpwwwiogcapublicationsboard_gamepdf
Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (2005) Report on the Inquiry into Corporate Governance in the Victorian Public Sector (Melbourne Government Printer for the State of Victoria) httpwwwparliamentvicgovaupaecinquiriespublicgovernance
Public Audit Forum (2001) Propriety and Audit in the Public Sector httpwwwpublic-audit-forumgovukproprietypdf
Schelker M (2008) Auditors and Corporate Governance Evidence from the Public Sector httppapersssrncomsol3paperscfmabstract_id=959392
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2002) Corporate Governance in Crown Corporations and Other Public Enterprises ndash Guidelines (Ottawa Treasury Board) httpwwwtbs-sctgccagov-gouventrepriseentreprise02-engasp
Uhrig J (2003) Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Canberra Commonwealth of Australia) httpwwwfinancegovaufinancial-frameworkgovernancedocsUhrig-Reportpdf Watson E (2004) lsquoPublic sector corporate governance British Columbiarsquos best-practices reformsrsquo Ivey Business Journal MarchApril httpwwwiveybusinessjournalcomview_articleaspintArticle_ID=473
Corporate Governance in Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 40: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Full Version Simplified Version Options of Red
0c 100m 100y 0k
EfficiEncy unit 13f West Wing central Government Offices 11 ice House Street central Hong Kong
Email euwmeugovhk tel 2165 7255 fax 2524 7267 Website wwweugovhk
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-
![Page 41: Corporate Governance in arms-length agencies (July 2009) · 2018-03-29 · On the other hand, concerns have arisen over the corporate governance of non-government bodies. We have,](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022042418/5f341cf376dd1f03c5413d32/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 政 府 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- Corporate Governance In Arms-Length Agencies ndash An International Overview
-
- EFFICIENCY UNIT VISION AND MISSION
- Foreword
- Contents
-
- Executive Summary
- 1 Corporate governance in the public sector definitions and developments
-
- What does corporate governance mean
- Why has corporate governance come to prominence
- Particular challenges for corporate governance in the public sector
- What does corporate governance encompass
-
- 2 Standards of behaviour
-
- Corporate governance codes of good practice
- Codes of conduct
- Leadership developments
-
- 3 Organisational structures and processes governing body
-
- Board size
- Board committees
- Board appointments
- Board tenure
- Board development
- Board performance
- Board composition
- Board remuneration
-
- 4 Control
-
- Risk management
- Audit
-
- 5 External reporting
-
- The need for transparency
- Balancing transparency with confidentiality
-
- 6 Conclusions
- References
-