core components for program success -...
TRANSCRIPT
Core Components for Program SuccessFrank Federico, RPh
This presenter has nothing to disclose
March 4, 2017
Objectives
List the core components necessary to support the success of a program
Discuss how to use the core components as a foundation for improvement
work
Examine one of the programs you are leading in your organization to
determine which components may need further development
3
1) Goals
Aim Statement
2) Content Theory
Driver Diagram or Change
Package
3) Execution Theory
Logic Model
4) Data Measurement & Learning
Measurement Plan
5) Dissemination
Dissemination & Spread Plan
What are we trying to accomplish?
What changes will we make that
will result in improvement?
How will we know that a change is
an improvement?
Five Core Components:
The Model for Improvement
Kirkpatrick Framework
1) Experience What was the participants’ experience? Did the
participants have an excellent experience working on
the improvement project?
2) Learning What did participants learn? Did they learn
improvement methods and begin testing?
3) Process/Behavior Did participants modify their behavior? Did they work
differently and see change in their process
measures?
4) Outcomes Did the organization improve its performance (via
outcome measures)?
4
Goals: Aim Statement
How much, by when, for whom?
• An aim statement describes what we expect to
achieve in the timeframe of the project, taking the form
of “how much, by when, for whom”. The system or
bounds of the project are also defined.
• What is your aim statement?
What Is A Program Theory?
A conceptual explanation of how the program, as designed,
will theoretically result in the desired improvement.
Rapid Response Teams (RRTs)
RRTs aim to provide care to deteriorating patients, to reduce the likelihood of ICU
admission and mortality.
Rapid Response Team 1 Rapid Response Team 2
Monitor all patients in the acute care
setting using the Modified Early
Warning Score (MEWS).
When a patient scores 5 or more on
MEWS, this indicates the patient is
deteriorating.
Call for a Medical Emergency Team
(MET) consisting of two ICU nurses
and a physician to examine the
patient within 10 minutes.
Monitor all patients in the acute care
setting using the Modified Early
Warning Score (MEWS).
When a patient scores 4 or more on
MEWS, this indicates the patient is
deteriorating.
Call for a Medical Emergency Team
(MET) consisting of one ICU nurse
and a physician to examine the patient
within 20 minutes.
Core Concepts & Detailed Tasks
MEWS >=5Use a reliable
method to identify
deteriorating
patients in real
time.
When a patient is
deteriorating,
provide the most
appropriate
assessment and
care as soon as
possible
MEWS >=4
2 Nurses
1 Physician
1 Nurse
1 Physician
1 Physician
ActionTheory
Core Concepts Detailed Tasks
and Local
Adaptations
Program Theory
What is the theory of the program you are working on?
What evidence will you need to prove your theory?
Program Theory
Content theory
Execution theory
Content Theory (The What)
What changes will teams make that will result in improved
outcomes?
• Content theory describes the processes or behaviors that, if
adopted, we predict will improve patient outcomes.
• A driver diagram is a visualization of this shared theory,
depicting areas in the system that improvement teams can
modify to drive improvement.
Inputs
Resources
invested and
activities
performed by
each
improvement
agent/entity
Level 1
Participant
Experience
Level 2
Learning
Level 3
Process/
Behavior
Changes
Level 4
Clinical, personal,
organizational
outcomes
Content Theory:What changes will teams make that will result in improved outcomes?
Execution Theory:
What will the improvement initiative do that will lead teams to adopt the
process changes?
Parry et al. Recommendations for Evaluation of Health Care Improvement Initiatives, 2013,
Acad Peds.
Driver Diagram
• QI tool used to outline the system that underlies the process or
outcome you want to improve.
• This ‘map’ helps improvement teams identify change concepts
that are likely to impact the result of interest.
• Three components:
• Aim
• Primary Drivers
• Secondary Drivers
PRIMARY DRIVERS SECONDARY DRIVERSAIM
Increased use of tele-health services
Reduce death,
disability, or
other
preventable
harm among
newborns and
mothers across
six-district
service area
Staff clinical knowledge and skills
Adequate supply of necessary
materials
Use of data for decision making
Expand access
to pre-natal
care
Activate
community
members to
promote health
and connect
peers with
health services
Reliable
delivery of pre-
natal care
bundle
Supportive community structures
Attractiveness of Health Services
Communication & transportation
Remove cost barriers
Spread information to communities
Identify and train community leaders
Open lines of communication
Community-based education
Driver Diagram: Example
Execution Theory (The How)
What will the improvement initiative do that will lead teams to adopt
process changes?
• Execution theory describes the rationale for how the experience provided by
the improvement initiative, the improvement methods taught and other
activities delivered, and the learning applied leads to improvement in the
process or outcome measures
Why Describe Your Execution Theory?
Clarifies theory and strategy
Gets everyone on the same page
Increases intentionality and purpose, sets priorities
Identifies measures that matter to us
Helps identify standard work
Allows for comparison across programs
Many funders require this
Execution Theory
“.. explicit application of theory could shorten the time needed to develop
improvement interventions, optimise their design, identify conditions of
context necessary for their success, and enhance learning from those
efforts.”
A programme theory-driven evaluation approach was used to describe the
processes that might lead to the programme outcomes, and the conditions
under which these processes were believed to operate.
Davidoff et al, Demystifying theory and its use in improvement, BMJ Quality and Safety, http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/early/2015/01/23/bmjqs-2014-003627.full
What Is Not an Effective Execution Theory: the Audit
What’s wrong with junior doctor led audit?
A number of studies have shown that the traditional “clinical audit” as
expected in medical curriculums is an ineffective way of improving practice or
changing process—the very thing that it is intended to do.[2] [3] [4] In one
study only 27% of audits were considered to be complete, and only 22%
were reaudited. The steps studied in that paper may lead us to conclude that
only 5% of audits led to any change in the practice or process studied.[2]
This is a worrying finding as it implies that all the other audits were simply
data collection exercises.
Hillman and Roueche, BMJ Careers , 08 Apr 2011 http://careers.bmj.com/careers/advice/Quality_improvement
19
Marian Bihrle Johnson and Pedro Delgado IHI
Example of an Execution Theory
Execution Theory
What was/is your theory for the work you are leading?
Why did you select that method to execute on your theory?
Logic Models
1) What are they?
2) How do I develop one for my improvement project?
3) How can I use one to evaluate my work?
What Are They?
Diagram connection between what we want to accomplish and the
way we plan to do that
Teams use them to:
– Lay out plan
– Expose gaps
– Get multiple parties on the same page
– Increase intentionality
Long-Term Outcomes
Mid-Term Outcomes
Inputs Activities OutputsShort-Term Outcomes
What resources will
be used to support
the project?
What are the main
things the project will
do/provide?
How many and what
sort of observable/
tangible results will be
achieved?
What will occur as a
direct result of the
activities & outputs?
(typically, changes in
knowledge, skills,
attitudes—LEVEL 2)
• Enrollment fees
• Human resources
• Partnership contract
• Grant funding
• Industry partners
• In-kind contributions
• Monthly 1:1 calls
• Quarterly community
calls
• Develop how-to-
guides
• Build change
packages
• Learning sessions
• On-site coaching
• Use web
• Engage participants
(providers, partners,
stakeholders)
• Strengthen leadership
• Build shared vision
• Curriculum materials
developed
• Establish best practice
• Help implementation
• Participants improve
QI theory knowledge
• Running PDSA cycles
• Brainstorming tests of
change
What results should
follow from the initial
outcomes? (typically
changes in behavior,
policies, practice—
LEVEL 3)
• Improved retention
• More effective
classroom instruction
• Increased number of
job placements in
technical fields
• Increased employer
satisfaction
• Increased regional
economic vitality
• Increased diversity
in the technical
workforce
• A more highly skilled
and adaptable
workforce
What long-term
results should follow
from the mid-term
outcomes (typically,
changes in broader
conditions)
Logic Model Template (Created by Lori Wingate • www.evalu-ate.org)
For additional guidance on developing logic models, see:
University of Wisconsin-Extension’s Logic Model Resources: http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/evallogicmodel.html
W.K. Kellogg Foundation’s Logic Model Development Guide: http://www.wkkf.org/~/media/475A9C21974D416C90877A268DF38A15.ashx
Examples:
**NOTES HERE
Logic Model
Which of the components of the logic model did you include in
your work?
Which were missing?
Measurement Plan
How will we know that a change is an improvement?
A measurement plan outlines:
• What data we will collect
• How it will be collected
• How it will be analyzed
• Who will receive the feedback
Ideally, a measurement plan identifies one primary outcome metric and up to
four process measures aligned with your aim statement.
Small Multiples
Dig Deeper
We saw the data move in the right direction. Why?
• New hospital
We saw the process measures move in the right direction, but the
related outcomes haven’t moved. Why?
• Carrying out the processes, but want to look into the quality of the
processes
• Lag time between process changes and impact on outcomes
Qualitative Follow-up
“Our surgeons definitely see how this impacts their work. And they
definitely don’t have time for our hourly team meeting and the
webinars, I think, go a little too much outside of their work. So
they tried at first, but have kind of dropped off.” – surgical nurse
from rural hospital
“We could all the see the importance of doing this work, however,
the hospital had signed on to another program that took the
attention of senior leadership.” – senior nurse from small
community hospital
Measurement
What measures have you adopted?
Do you have qualitative measures to understand the impact of
your work on staff?
Dissemination Plan
How will we spread what we are learning?
• Central to our ability to spread our work is a set of outputs that
summarize what was done, where it was done, what impact it had and
how it was achieved.
• With these outputs, our partners, and others are better informed in how to
spread the work in their settings.
• The Dissemination Core Component is focused on developing a
resourced plan to increase the chances that learning from your project
can be spread widely.
Take a moment to reflect
on your own work.
What will you incorporate from
this session into your plans?