core abstract
DESCRIPTION
CORE Abstract 2014 - SFAIRP vs ALARPTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Core abstract](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022020210/568c541b1a28ab4916bd7fb4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ABSTRACT OF PAPER
Authors:
Gaye Francis BE MIEAust and Richard Robinson BE BA FIEAust
Company of Affiliation
R2A Due Diligence Engineers
Presenting Author:
Richard Robinson
Title of Paper (limited to 15 words):
SFAIRP vs ALARP
Nominated Themes:
Enhancement in Safety and Efficiency -
Safety Management
___________________________________________________________
Abstract (max 350 words):
The Rail Safety National Law and the model Work Health and Safety Act both require safety risk to be eliminated or minimised so far as is reasonably practicable (SFAIRP). SFAIRP is a
legal concept and requires a positive demonstration of due diligence (another legal concept). Most technical safety work is done in the context of ensuring technical safety is ALARP (as low as reasonably practicable). There has been an on going attempt in many places to
equate the two. This paper will describe why this cannot be done and will explain why adopting the due diligence (SFAIRP) process is faster, better, safer, and forensically defensible.