Copyrighting Your Name 101 – IselfLawAmMaster.com

www.ISelfLawAmMaster.com

Copyright Your Name and

Use it to Ward Off Authorities

2

Copyrighting your name

The following information is provided for those who wish to copyright their own personal names to protect themselves from those who would use said name(s) for profit or gain without prior written consent by the owner.

Much of this information was Originally published by Better Books and Cassettes of America (BBCOA), the book Cracking the Code is now available from the authors at: www.jhdassociates.com and is highly recommended before you undertake asserting your rights and sovereignty with the Copyright Notice.

Statutory copyright law at the United States level does not allow for copyrighting private names, but a common law copyright may be obtained by following several easy steps. After all steps are complete, anyone who attempts to use your copyrighted trade-name for profit or gain (i.e.: police officer, judge, IRS, etc.) you will serve them with a Copyright Notice/Self Executing Security Agreement

To copyright your name as a trade-name, use the following steps and form:

1. Copy the following legal notice and change the generic "John H. Doe" and all variations to your name. Letters are case

sensitive,so if they appear ALL CAP, that is how your name should appear. If they are Upper/Lower case then make your name

show accordingly.

2. CAREFULLY READ the entire text of the legal notice. This is your notice to the world of your status. You may copyright

thenames of family members with you as the owner. Minor children (under 18) can not legally contract, so they can not copyright

their name. As a parent, you may copyright their name with you as the owner. When they turn 18 they may publish a legal notice

themselves stating the fact that they are the new owner (you should publish notice relinquishing ownership)

3. Have the completed Legal Notice published in any newspaper of general circulation. Your local hometown or State

newspaperwill do. Publish it for at least 4 consecutive weeks as a "Legal Notice." When you place the ad, tell the newspaper you

will need 3 notarized affidavits of publishing (normal procedure for newspapers) of the Legal Notice. After the 4 week period is up

you will file one of the affadavits and a copy of the ad with your County Clerk, keep one in a safe place, and use the third for general

reference.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------

LEGAL NOTICE

Copyright Notice: All rights reserved re common-law copyright of trade-name/trade-mark, JOHN HENRY DOE©-as well as any and all derivatives and variations in the spelling of said trade-name/trade-mark - Common Law Copyright © 1986 by John Henry Doe©. Said common-law trade-name/trade-mark, JOHN HENRY DOE©, may neither be used, nor reproduced, neither in whole nor in part, nor in any manner whatsoever, without the prior, express, written consent and acknowledgment of John Henry Doe© as signified by the red-ink signature of John Henry Doe©, hereinafter “Secured Party.” With the intent of being contractually bound, any juristic person, as well as the agent of said juristic person, consents and agrees by this Copyright Notice that neither said juristic person, nor the agent of said juristic person, shall display, nor otherwise use in

3

any manner, the common-law trade-name/trade-mark JOHN HENRY DOE©, nor the common-law copyright described herein, nor any derivative of, nor any variation in the spelling of JOHN HENRY DOE© without the prior, express, written consent and acknowledgment of Secured Party, as signified by Secured Party’s signature in red ink. Secured Party neither grants, nor implies, nor otherwise gives consent for any unauthorized use of JOHN HENRY DOE©, and all such unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. Secured Party is not now, nor has Secured Party ever been, an accommodation party, nor a surety, for the purported debtor, i.e. “JOHN HENRY DOE,” in Hold Harmless and Indemnity Agreement No. DRD-041886-HHIA dated the Eighteenth Day of the Fourth Month in the Year of Our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred Eighty-six. against any and all claims, legal actions, orders, warrants, judgments, demands, liabilities, losses, depositions, summonses, lawsuits, costs, fines, liens, levies, penalties, damages, interests, and expenses whatsoever, both absolute and contingent, as are due and as might become due, now existing and as might hereafter arise, and as might be suffered by, imposed on, and incurred by Debtor for any and every reason, purpose, and cause whatsoever. Self-executing Contract/Security Agreement in Event of Unauthorized Use: By this Copyright Notice, both the juristic person and the agent of said juristic person, hereinafter jointly and severally “User,” consent and agree that any use of JOHN HENRY DOE© other than authorized use as set forth above constitutes unauthorized use, counterfeiting, of Secured Party’s common-law copyrighted property, contractually binds User, renders this Copyright Notice a Security Agreement wherein User is debtor and John Henry Doe© is Secured Party, and signifies that User: (1) grants Secured Party a security interest in all of User’s assets, land, and personal property, and all of User’s interest in assets, land, and personal property, in the sum certain amount of $500,000.00 per each occurrence of use of the common-law-copyrighted trade-name/trademark JOHN HENRY DOE©, as well as for each and every occurrence of use of any and all derivatives of, and variations in the spelling of, JOHN HENRY DOE, plus costs, plus triple damages; (2) authenticates this Security Agreement wherein User is debtor and John Henry Doe© is Secured Party, and wherein User pledges all of User’s assets, land, consumer goods, farm products, inventory, equipment, money, investment property, commercial tort claims, letters of credit, letter-of-credit rights, chattel paper, instruments, deposit accounts, accounts, documents, and general intangibles, and all User’s interest in all such foregoing property, now owned and hereafter acquired, now existing and hereafter arising, and wherever located, as collateral for securing User’s contractual obligation in favor of Secured Party for User’s unauthorized use of Secured Party’s common-law-copyrighted property; (3) consents and agrees with Secured Party’s filing of a UCC Financing Statement in the UCC filing office, as well as in any county recorder’s office, wherein User is debtor and John Henry Doe© is Secured Party; (4) consents and agrees that said UCC Financing Statement described above in paragraph “(3)” is a continuing financing statement, and further consents and agrees with secured Party’s filing of any continuation statement necessary for maintaining Secured Party’s perfected security interest in all of User’s property and interest in property, pledged as collateral in this Security Agreement and described above in paragraph “(2)”, until User’s contractual obligation theretofore incurred has been fully satisfied; (5) consents and agrees with Secured Party’s filing of any UCC Financing Statement, as described above in paragraphs “(3)” and “(4),” as well as the filing of any Security Agreement, as described above in paragraph “(2),” in the UCC filing office, as well as in any county recorder’s office; (6) consents and agrees that any and all such filings described in paragraphs “(4)” and “(5)” above are not, and may not be considered, bogus, and that User will not claim that any such filing is bogus; (7) waives all defenses; and (8) appoints Secured Party as Authorized

Representative for User, effective upon User’s default re User’s contractual obligations in favor of Secured Party as set forth below under “Payment Terms” and “Default Terms,” granting Secured Party full authorization and power for engaging in any and all actions on behalf of User including,

4

but not limited by, authentication of a record on behalf of User, as Secured Party, in Secured Party’s sole discretion, deems appropriate, and User further consents and agrees that this appointment of Secured Party as Authorized Representative for User, effective upon User’s default is irrevocable and coupled with a security interest. User further consents and agrees with all of the following additional terms of Self-executing Contract/Security Agreement in Event of Unauthorized Use: Payment Terms: In accordance with fees for unauthorized use of JOHN HENRY DOE© as set forth above, User hereby consents and agrees that User shall pay Secured Party all unauthorized-use fees in full within ten (10) days of date Invoice is sent, User shall be deemed in default and: (a) all of User’s property and property pledged as collateral by

User, as set forth in above in paragraph “(2),” immediately becomes, i.e. is, property of Secured Party; (b) Secured Party is appointed User’s Authorized Representative as set forth above in paragraph “(8)”; and (c) User consents and agrees that Secured Party may take possession of, as well as otherwise dispose of in any manner that Secured Party, in Secured Party’s sole discretion, deems appropriate, including, but not limited by, sale at auction, at any time following User’s default, and without further notice, any and all of User’s property and interest, described above in paragraph “(2),” formerly pledged as collateral by User, no property of Secured Party, in respect of this “Self-executing Contract/Security Agreement in Event of Unauthorized Use,” that Secured Party, again in Secured Party’s sole discretion, deems appropriate. Terms for Curing Default: Upon event of default, as set forth above under “Default Terms,” irrespective of any and all of User’s former property and interest in property, described above in paragraph “(2).” in the possession of, as well as disposed of by, Secured Party, as authorized above under “Default Terms,” User may cure User’s default only re the remainder of User’s said former property and interest property, formerly pledged as collateral that is neither in the possession of, nor otherwise disposed of by, Secured Party within twenty (20) days of date of User’s default only by payment in full. Terms of Strict Foreclosure: User’s non-payment in full of all unauthorized-use fees itemized in Invoice within said twenty- (20) day period for curing default as set forth above under “Terms for Curing Default” authorizes Secured Party’s immediate non-judicial strict collateral by User, now property of Secured Party, which is not in the possession of, nor otherwise disposed of by, Secured Party upon expiration of said twenty- (20) day default-curing period. Ownership subject to common-law copyright and UCC Financing and Security agreement filed with the UCC filing office. Record Owner: John Henry Doe©, Autograph Common Law Copyright © 1986. Unauthorized use of “John Henry Doe” incurs same unauthorized-use fees as those associated with JOHN HENRY DOE©, as set forth above in paragraph “(1)” under “Self-executing Contract/Security Agreement in Event of Unauthorized Use.”

5

All rights reserved

What’s in the Use of the Name in America’s Justice System

#1) USING YOUR "true and proper name"

It might be extremely advantageous for you to purchase and register your property in

your "true and proper name."

It appears that your government will always try to register your property through the use

of your name written in "all upper-case letters" -- in the following way: "ALBERT J.

JOHNSON" [which creates a "legal fiction"] instead of using your "true and Proper"

name [which must be written in both "upper and lower case" letters] -- as follows: "Albert

J. Johnson".

For example, the following documents that you accepted from your government are all

"contracts" (Driver's License, Social Security Card, Voter's Registration Card, Credit

Cards, motor vehicle title, motor vehicle registration, Summons and Complaints, the

registration of your real estate for taxation, etc.).

Not surprisingly, your name on all of the above-mentioned contracts has been

"converted" into a "legal fiction."

Even your bank account is not in your "true and proper" name. Instead, it is in the name

of a "legal fiction" that is created when your name is written using all upper-case letters.

This is shown by an experiment that you can do regarding your own personal checking

account -- as follows:

Use a powerful magnifying glass (at least 8 power, as per a jeweler's loop) to

examine the "signature line" on one of your personal checks. You will find

that it is not a solid line at all. Instead, it consists of "words" that are

deceptively written so small that you can’t read them with your naked eye.

The words that you will find "intentionally hidden" in this signature line

involves the fact that your bank account is not in your "true and Proper

name" at all.

Instead, your bank account is in the name of the "legal fiction" -- and therefore,

"authorization" becomes an important issue as far as the bank is concerned.

Do you know what it means when you accept the "misuse" (it is not a mere

"missspelling") of your name written in all capital letters???

Because the above-described “legal fiction” is a “creation of government,” it appears that

the following “Maxim of Law” applies:

“The government has the right to ‘absolutely control’ [e.g. disregarding the

Constitution] anything that it creates.”

6

Have you ever wondered how the bureaucrats obtained jurisdiction over you regarding

such things as how big the front door of your home must be -- if the door opens "in" or

"out" -- the color and/or height of your fence – where your children go to school -- how

often you must mow your lawn (in some areas this is an important bureaucratic issue) --

etc.??

In my opinion, if you read the paragraphs contained below, you will be "on the way" to

knowing how they did it...

I have a lot more information on these topics if you are interested in knowing more about

the "law" – or if you are interested in using the law to obtain a greater amount of freedom

from the bureaucrats.

2

If you are concerned about protecting your freedom in America, then I strongly

recommend that you purchase an unabridged copy of "Black's Law Dictionary."

I would begin by looking up such things as:

1. Color of Authority

2. Color of Law

3. Color of Office

4. Legal fiction -- fiction of law -- etc.

5. Straw-man (in fact, I would do a lot of research this one)

6. Good faith/bad faith

7. Legal (e.g. in accordance with a legal "system")

8. Lawful (e.g. in accordance with our "Constitution"

#3) USING THE LAW TO PROTECT YOUR FREEDOM

Suppose that the following statements are true:

1. That your "true and proper" name MUST always be written in accordance with

the normal rules of English grammar -- using upper and lower case letters, as

follows: John Henry Doe.

Note: Genealogists have stated that it is also acceptable for a “colon” to be used

between the given names and the family name, as follows; John Henry: Doe.

Note: Genealogists have also stated that “common usage” allows for a name

to be correctly (but not nearly as definitively) written as follows: John H. Doe

– J. H. Doe – J. Doe -- Doe, John Henry – Doe, John H. – Doe, J. H. – Doe, J –

etc.

2. That the legal meaning of your name changes when it is written using all

uppercase (capital) letters, as follows: JOHN HENRY DOE.

7

3. That when your name is written in all upper-case (capital) letters, it means that you are

either "civilly dead” -- and/or a “corporation” – and/or a “fiction” – and/or a “legal fiction” -- and/or a ”fiction of law” – and/or a “fictitious entity” – and/or an “artificial

entity” -- and/or a "creation of government," etc. [If you are not familiar with these terms, it is highly recommended that you do some research about them -- perhaps starting with “Black’s Law Dictionary.”]

4. That on every “contract” the government has with you, it always intentionally writes

your name using all upper-case letters -- as follows; JOHN HENRY DOE -- JOHN H. DOE -- J. H. DOE -- DOE, JOHN HENRY -- DOE, JOHN H. – DOE, J. H.; AND

therefore the government intentionally changes the nature (and therefore the meaning) of your name.

3

5. That in America it is not possible for you to purchase “real” property (i.e. a home)

and then “record” said purchase with any county, and/or state, using your "true

and proper" name; AND that the government will always insist upon writing your

name using all “upper-case” letters; AND that this misuse of your name converts

your name (and “you”) into a “fiction” that the government created; AND this

gives the government absolute “control” and/or “jurisdiction” over you and your

property (without the benefit of Constitutional rights).

6. That in America it is not possible for you to purchase a motor vehicle and register

it in your true and Proper name.

7. That it is NOT possible for you to open a bank account, or obtain a credit card in

your true and Proper name.

8. That it is not possible for you to get ANY government contract (license, permit,

etc.) that bears your true and Proper name.

9. That you will never be presented with an Arrest Warrant, or a Search Warrant,

that bears your true and Proper name.

10. That you will never be served with a Notice, or a Summons and Complaint, or

any other "offer to contract" [all such documents are "offers to contract"], that

bears your "true and Proper name."

11. That it is not possible for you to give birth to a child in America and “register it”

via a so-called Birth Certificate that bears your child’s true and Proper name;

AND therefore all children born in America are considered to be “wards of the

state.” [If you do not believe this, then please prove it to your own satisfaction by

asking any attorney that specializes in “divorce law.”]

12. That the government (including the courts), does not have "standing at law" to

use your true and Proper name (as defined in paragraph #1, above) on any

document that constitutes a “contract” with you.

8

13. That an attorney can NOT represent you in court by using your true and Proper

name; AND that attorneys (including prosecutors, judges, etc.) therefore always

intentionally “misuse” your name on legal documents (i.e. Summons and

Complaints, Search Warrants, lawsuits, etc.) by writing your name using all

uppercase letters; AND that they intentionally misuse your name without

advising you of their reasons for doing so; AND that they do this without first

obtaining your consent; AND that their systematic failure to make a full

disclosure regarding said misuse of your name appears to constitute “constructive

fraud.”

14. That the government intentionally “defrauds” you (see “Constructive Fraud” in

Black’s Law Dictionary) whenever it writes your name using all capital letters; AND

4

that if you question the government’s fraudulent misuse of your name, the

government will respond by using “threats, duress, and coercion” to make you accept

the fraud (i.e. try registering a motor vehicle in your true and Proper name, and see

what happens); AND that if you accept the government’s misuse of your name (by

failing to object), then the misuse “converts” you (via your “all capital letter name”)

into being a mere “creation of government”.

15. That the government has the authority to “own,” and/or "control," and/or “have jurisdiction over” anything it creates – including the fictitious identity that it creates by writing your name using all capital letters.

16. That unless you "object in a proper manner" to the government's intentional

"misuse" (it would be a tactical mistake to refer to it as a mere "misspelling") of

your name, then the government assumes that you "accept" such a misuse; AND

your “acceptance” (via your failure to object) thereby grants the government

jurisdiction over you. [A maxim of law is; "Failure to object is fatal to your cause

at law."]

17. That your government did not make a “full disclosure of the facts” when it asked

(threatened? demanded? coerced?) you into becoming a party to any of the

above-mentioned contracts; AND that the government therefore committed

“constructive fraud” by purposefully and systematically failing to make a full

disclosure regarding such contracts; AND that the government “conspired” to

commit such constructive fraud (a “conspiracy” of this kind might constitute a

“felony” under the R.I.C.O. Act); AND that the government may have used the

U.S. Mail System to mail such documents to you (which might involve “mail

fraud”); AND that there might have been “second” conspiracy” (involving the

mail fraud) which might involve a “second” felony under the R.I.C.O. Act. [How

many "felonies" might we be talking about here???]

18. That your government [including the judges that are on its payroll, and that are

beneficiaries of the special “retirement program” for judges -- you would be amazed if

you did some research on this], intentionally and systematically uses the

abovementioned deception as a “tool” to obtain jurisdiction over you – to control you

-- and to convert your “rights” into “privileges.”

9

19. That your government (backed by judges that are on the government’s payroll)

converts your “rights” into “privileges” primarily in order to generate income for itself -- as a “for- profit “ business which is allegedly incorporated.

NOTE: Please see the questions listed at the end of this memo regarding the

fact that our government is not lawfully incorporated.

20. That because there is no statute of limitations regarding constructive fraud, it

would mean that all of the contracts that the government “alleges” to have with

you (including “adhesion contracts) are not valid; AND that this would mean the

5

government failed in its attempt to contractually control you and/or convert your

“rights” to “privileges.”.

21. That to clarify the point made directly above, the government does not have any valid contracts with you (including “adhesion contracts”) – because your “true and Proper name” does not appear anywhere on such contracts.

22, That any government employee who breaks the law in conjunction with his

employment does so in his own private capacity and therefore he loses his immunity

from suits at law.

23. That regarding the paragraph directly above, the following factors (which

you should immediately look up on Black’s Law Dictionary) might be involved:

#1) Color of Authority

#2) Color of Law

#3) Color of Office

24. That it is against the law for us to accept any mail that is not addressed to us

using out true and Proper names, and our true and proper mailing location; AND

that any mail that is delivered to us using “other” names and/or mailing locations

must be “returned for cause, without dishonor” with an Affidavit: such as the

following:

Affidavit to be added later...

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

#4) QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ABOVE ISSUES:

1. What would happen if we refused to accept [using the legal phrase, “refused

for cause without dishonor”] any of our government’s offers to contract with us, based

upon the fact that our “true and Proper name does not appear on the contract?

2. What would happen if we took the position that all previous contracts that

we entered into with our government are null and void because our true and Proper

names do not appear on them – and because the government was guilty of committing

constructive fraud against us regarding such contracts?

10

4. What would happen if we put the government "on notice" (with a supporting

Affidavit) that it must stop misusing our names?

5. What would happen if we put the government on notice (with a supporting

Affidavit) that it must correct all of its records regarding its previous misuse of our

names?

6

6. What would happen if we were prevented by law from accepting any mail

that was sent to us in “other” than our true and Proper names?

Regarding the “mail” issue, please note the following:

United States Code Title 18 Sec. 1342 (quoted in part): Anyone who, “for the purpose of conducting, promoting or carrying on by means of the Postal Service,

any scheme or device mentioned in section 1341 of this title or any other unlawful business, uses or assumes, or requests to be addressed by any fictitious false or assumed title, name or address, or name other than his own Proper name or takes

or receives from any post office or authorized depository of mail matter, any letter, postal card, package or other mail matter addressed to any such fictitious, false or

assumed title, name or address or name other than his own Proper name shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.”

7. What would happen if we were to immediately return (unopened) any and all

mail that does not bear our true and Proper name; AND if we were to send a cover

letter (with “their” letter that we return) explaining that their letter is being returned

“for cause, and without dishonor” because of the above-mentioned United States

Code Title 18 Sec 1342?

9. What would happen if a so-called “official” (corporate officer???) of our

government attempted to make a “claim” against you by improperly writing your

name in all capital letters on said claim, Summons and Complaint, etc. -- and if you

therefore returned said claim “for cause and without dishonor” based upon the fact

that your true and Proper name does not appear on it?

10. What would happen if the government made a claim against you “for which relief

could not be granted” (look up the phrase) because any such “relief” (look it up) would

wrongfully force you into the untenable position of having to “misuse” your true and Proper

name?

11. What would happen if the above-mentioned issues would eliminate the

government’s, and/or the court’s, alleged “jurisdiction” over you except under

Common Law (as guaranteed by the Constitution)???

12. What would happen if we responded to any of the government’s “offer to

contract” by putting the government on Notice – accompanied by the following

Affidavit:

11

Affidavit to be added later...

#5) HOW YOU LOST YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

7

The “Common Law” system that was guaranteed to us by the Constitution has been

replaced by a “Commercial Law” system, wherein we have no Constitutional rights.

Our government forced this new system upon us by unlawfully changing our

monetary system, thereby making us use unlawful (unconstitutional) Negotiable

Instruments called “Federal Reserve Notes” to discharge our debts with limited

liability instead of paying our debts at Common Law, with Constitutionally

mandated gold or silver coin.

In other words, the “Common Law” system upon which our nation was founded has

been replaced and/or changed by the present “Commercial Law” system.

The following paragraphs will explain how our government used Federal Reserve

Notes to convert us from being sovereigns "over" government, to being subjects

"under" government.

Our government's change from using “Public Law” (Common Law) to using

“Private Commercial Law” was recognized by the Supreme Court of the United

States in the Erie Railroad vs. Thompkins case of 1938, after which case, in the same

year, the procedures of Law were officially blended with the procedures of Equity.

Prior to 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court decisions were based upon public

law (which is controlled by Constitutional limitations).

However, since 1938 all U.S. Supreme Court decisions are based upon what

is termed public policy (where no Constitutional protection is afforded).

Public policy concerns commercial transactions made under the Negotiable

Instruments Law, which is a branch of the international Law Merchant. This has

been codified into what is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code, which

system of law was made uniform throughout the fifty States through the cunning

deception of the Congress of the united States (which "united States" has its origin

in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the constitution as distinguished from the

"United States", which is the Union of the fifty States).

When Congress gave grants of negotiable paper (Federal Reserve Notes) to the fifty

States of the Union -- for education, highways, health and other purposes --

Congress bound all the States of the Union into a commercial agreement with the

Federal United States (as distinguished from the continental United States).

When the fifty corporate States accepted the "benefits" offered by the Federal

United States, their acceptance became the “consideration” of a commercial

agreement between said States and the Federal United States.

12

8

Through the above-mentioned acceptance of benefits, the corporate States became

obligated to obey the Congress of the Federal United States; AND the corporate

States also became obligated to assume their portion of the equitable debts of the

Federal United States to the international banking houses, for the credit loaned.

The credit, which each State received, in the form of federal grants, was predicated

upon equitable paper.

This system of negotiable paper binds all corporate entities of government together

in a vast system of commercial agreements, which is what has altered our court

system from being under the Common Law to being under a Legislative Article I

court, or Tribunal system of Commercial Law.

Any person who is brought before this “new” type of court is held to the letter of

every statute of government on the federal, state, county, or municipal levels unless

they have exercised the REMEDY provided for them within the system of

Commercial Law.

The remedy is as follows: When a person is forced to use a so-called

"benefit" from government, they may reserve their former right (under the

Common Law Guarantee of said right), not to be bound by any contract, or

commercial agreement, that they did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily,

and intentionally.

This is exactly how the corporate entities of state, county, and municipal

governments got entangled with the Legislative Democracy, created by Article I,

Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution, and called here The Federal United States,

to distinguish it from the Continental united States, whose origin was in the Union of

the Sovereign States.

Our national Congress now rules the continental united States (pursuant to

Constitutional limits upon its authority), while it ALSO enjoys exclusive

rule (with no Constitutional limitation), as it legislates for the Federal

United States (in spite of the fact that most of us do not reside, work, or

have income from any territory that is subject to the direct jurisdiction of

the Federal United States (e.g. Washington D.C., federal forts, etc.

With the above information we may ask:

1) "How did we, the free Preamble citizenry of the Sovereign States,

lose our guaranteed unalienable rights and be forced into acceptance of the

equitable debt obligations of the Federal United States, and thereby become

subject to that entity of government?”

9

13

2) “How did we become divorced from our own respective sovereign

State (e.g. California, etc.) in the Republic -- which we will call here the

Continental United States?"

These above questions have troubled sincere, patriotic Americans for many years.

Our lack of knowledge concerning the cunning of our politicians (and the legal

profession) is the cause of that divorce.

However, when we learn the truth concerning this web of deceit, we can restore our

former status as free Preamble citizen of the Republic.

The answer is as follows:

Our national Congress works for two nations that are foreign to each other. Through the

use of legal cunning (with the obvious intent to deceive) both of these nations are called

The United States.

1) One is the Union of Sovereign states, under the Constitution,

termed in this article the Continental United States.

2) The other is a Legislative Democracy which has its origin in

Article I, section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution here termed Federal

United

States.

Very few people ask themselves "Which nation was congress working for when it

passed this or that so-called law?"

Almost no one asks, "Does this particular law apply to the Continental citizenry of

the Republic, or does this particular law apply only to residents of the District of

Columbia and other named enclaves, or territories, of the Democracy called the

Federal United States?"

Since the uninformed citizenry of the Republic seldom asks these questions, it was

an open invitation for our political leadership to seek more power and authority

over the entire citizenry of the Republic through the medium of "legalese" -- and by

failing to make a "full disclosure." [Failure to make a "full disclosure" in

contractual matters constitutes "constructive fraud":]

For example, Congress deliberately failed in its duty to provide a “lawful”

(Constitutional) medium of exchange for the citizenry of the Republic. Instead, it

created an abundance of commercial credit money (Federal Reserve Notes – which

are unconstitutional) for the Legislative Democracy, where it was not bound by

constitutional limitations.

10

14

Using the excuse of “an emergency situation,” and a “depression” in the Republic,

Congress used its emergency authority to remove the remaining substance (gold and

silver) from the medium of exchange belonging to the Republic, and made the

negotiable instrument paper (Federal Reserve Notes) of the Legislative Democracy

(Federal United States) a legal tender for continental United States citizenry to use

in the discharge of debts.

In other words, Congress granted the entire citizenry of the two nations the

"benefit" of limited liability in the discharge of all debts by telling the citizenry that

the gold and silver coins of the Republic were no longer needed to pay their debts,

that they were now "privileged" to discharge debt with this more "convenient"

currency, issued by the Federal United States.

Americans were all forced to turn in their gold. The entire news media complex

(through lack of understanding and perception) went along with the scam and

declared it to be a forward step for our democracy -- no longer referring to America

as a Republic.

From that time on, it was a falling light for the Republic of 1776, and a rising light

for Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal Democracy. The New Deal created an abundance

of so-called “paper money” in the form of interest bearing negotiable instrument

paper called Federal Reserve Notes, and other forms of credit instruments.

All contracts since Roosevelt's time have the colorable [look up this word in Black’s Law

Dictionary] consideration of Federal Reserve Notes, instead of genuine consideration of

silver and gold coin. Therefore, all contracts are now colorable contracts, and not

genuine contacts.

According to Black’s Law Dictionary (1990), colorable means: "That which

is in appearance only, and not in reality, what it purports to be, hence

counterfeit, feigned, having the appearance of truth."]

Consequently, a new colorable jurisdiction, called a statutory jurisdiction, had to be

created to enforce the contracts.

Soon the term colorable contract was changed to the term commercial agreement to

fit circumstances of the new statutory jurisdiction, which is legislative, rather than

judicial, in nature.

This jurisdiction enforces commercial agreements is based upon implied consent

to the enforcement -- rather than being based upon full knowledge (as per

enforcement of contracts under the Common Law).

NOTICE: All of our courts today sit as legislative Tribunals, and the so-called "statutes"

of legislative bodies being enforced in these legislative Tribunals are not "statutes" passed

by the legislatives branch of our three-branch Republic, but as "commercial

11

obligations" to the Federal United States for anyone in the Federal United States or in the

Continental United States who has used the equitable currency of the Federal United

15

states and who has accepted the "benefit", "privilege", of discharging his debts with the

limited liability "benefit" offered to him by the Federal United States... EXCEPT those

who availed themselves of the remedy within the commercial system of law, which

remedy is today found in Book 1 of the Uniform Commercial Code at Section 207.

When written above one's signature, the words "WITHOUT PREJUDICE U.C.C. 1-207"

are sufficient to indicate to the magistrate of any of our present Legislative Tribunals

(called "courts") that the signer of the document has reserved his Common Law right to

not be bound to the statute, or commercial obligation, of any commercial agreement that

he did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally.

Furthermore, pursuant to U.C.C. 1-103, the statute, being enforced as a commercial

obligation of a commercial agreement, must now be construed in harmony with the

Common Law of America, where the tribunal/court must rule that the statute does

not apply to the individual who is wise enough and informed enough to exercise the

remedy.

Thus, an individual can retain his former status in the Republic and fully enjoy the

unalienable rights that are guaranteed to him by the Constitution of the Republic --

while those about him "curse the darkness" of the Commercial Law government,

and lack the knowledge that is needed to free themselves from their slave status

under the Federal United States.

#6) NOTES REGARDING THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE (UCC)

U.C.C. 1-207:3 Sufficiency of reservation. Any expression indicating any intention

to preserve rights is sufficient, such as "without prejudice", "under protest",

"under reservation", or "with reservation of all our rights."

The Code states an "explicit" reservation must be made. "Explicit" undoubtedly is

used in place of "express" to indicate that the reservation must not only be

"express" but it must also be "clear" that such a reservation was intended.

The term "explicit" as used in U.C.C. 1-207 means "that which is so clearly stated or

distinctly set forth that there is no doubt as to its meaning."

U.C.C. 1-207:7 Effect of reservation of rights. The making of a valid reservation of

rights preserves whatever rights the person then possesses and prevents the loss of such

right by application of concepts of waiver or estoppel...

U.C.C. 1-207:9 Failure to make reservation. When a waivable right or claim is involved,

the failure to make a reservation thereof causes a loss of the right and bars its assertion at

a later date...

12

[Does the failure to make reservation "really" cause a loss of the right (and

bar its assertion at a later date) if "Constructive Fraud" was involved;

AND if the fraud was just now discovered; AND if the fraud was

16

committed by the government when it failed to make a full disclosure to

you regarding its use of a legal fiction; AND if the government failed to

disclose the importance is said use ??? Personally, I do not think so. Isn't

it true that there is no "statute of limitations" regarding Constructive Fraud

???]

U.C.C. 1-203:6 Common law. The Code is "Complimentary" to the common law,

which remains in force except where displaced by the code...

A statute should be construed in harmony with the common law unless there is a clear

legislative intent to abrogate the common law..."The Code cannot be read to preclude a

Common law action."

Example:

“My use of ‘Without Prejudice UCC 1-207’ above my signature on

this document indicates that I have exercised the ‘Remedy’ provided

for me in the Uniform Commercial Code in Book 1 at Section 207,

whereby I may reserve my Common law right not to be compelled to

perform under any contract, or agreement, that I have not entered

into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally; And, that my

reservation serves notice upon all administrative agencies of

government - national, state and local - that I do not, and will not,

accept the liability associated with the ‘compelled’ benefit of any

unrevealed commercial agreement.”

#7) NAMES IN ALL UPPER-CASE LETTERS (CONTINUED)

Juristic Names Presume Government Employment-Agency

In the instant case, and in all litigation observed by the defendant in this and other

cases, cases have been originally styled, or attorneys, the court clerk, and judicial

officers have converted originals to, juristic, trade, or commercial names rather than

using proper names of the parties. For example, the living moral being John Doe will

be identified as the juristic JOHN DOE. In the instant case, John Doe has consistently

been misidentified as JOHN DOE or some variation thereof. The requirement of

proper names, and the mandate for correction when proper names are provided, is

set out clearly and simply relating to civil (sic) and criminal prosecution at Virginia

Code § 8.01-6:

- --cite--

§ 8.01-6 Amending pleading; relation back to original pleading A misnomer in any

pleading may, on the motion of any party, and on affidavit of the right name, be

amended by inserting the right name. An amendment changing the party against

13

whom a claim is asserted, whether to correct a misnomer or otherwise, relates back

to the date of the original pleading if (i) the claim asserted in the amended pleading

arose out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set forth in the original pleading

and (ii) within the limitations period for commencing the action against the party to

17

be brought in by the amendment, that party received such notice of the institution of

the action that he will not be prejudiced in maintaining a defense on the merits and

he knew or should have known that but for a mistake concerning the identity of the

proper party, the action would have been brought against him.

- --end--

In general, it is necessary to properly identify parties to actions or judgments are void,

as treated in Volume 46, American Jurisprudence 2d, "Judgments":

- --cite--

§ 100 Parties [46 Am Jur 2d JUDGMENTS]

A judgment should identify the parties for and against whom it is rendered, with such

certainty that it may be readily enforced, and a judgment which does not do so may

be regarded as void for uncertainty. Such identification may be achieved by naming

the persons for and against whom the judgment is rendered. Technical deficiencies

in the naming of the persons for and against whom judgment is rendered can be

corrected if the parties are not prejudiced. A reference in a judgment to a party

plainly liable, followed by an omission of that party's name from the language of the

decree, at least gives rise to an ambiguity and calling for an inquiry into the court's

real intention as reflected in the entire record and surrounding circumstances.

[Footnote numbers omitted; cites not reproduced] - --end--

The matter of proper names, spelled with capital first letters only, has repeatedly been

addressed to counsel for the defendant named in this action. However, the court clerk,

judicial officers, and attorneys have consistently ignored the matter, or when it has

been pressed in hearings, have skirted the issue by alleging that use of all capital

letters in case headings is simply a matter of style. However, this excuse is indicted by

consistent refusal to correct names in case headings in spite of proper name spelling,

i.e., John Doe instead of JOHN DOE, being provided to those responsible. If style

were the only issue, those responsible would correct form when given notice, or would

cite law-authorizing use of all capital letters for names.

The United States Government Printing Office Style Manual, March 1984 edition, provides

comprehensive standard grammar and usage for government publications, including casework. Chapter 3 , "Capitalization", at § 3.2, prescribes rules for proper names: "Proper

names are capitalized." Examples given are, "Rome, Brussels, John Macadam, Macadam family, Italy, Anglo-Saxon." Chapter 17, "Courtwork", preserves rules of capitalization prescribed in Chapter 3: 17.1. Courtwork differs in style from other work only as set forth

in this section; otherwise the style prescribed in the preceding sections will be followed.

14

At § 17.9, the Style Manual specifies, "In the titles of cases the first letter of all

principal words are capitalized, but not such terms as defendant and appellee."

Examples in § 17.12 are consistent with the § 17.9 specification, all proper names

being spelled with capital first letters only, the balance of each spelled with lowercase

letters.

18

By reviewing definitions and comments in The Oxford English Dictionary (1971 ed.),

which is possibly the most authoritative dictionary of the English language in the

world, proper capitalization and usage is made clear. In this dictionary, under the

term "Christian", the term "Christian name" is defined as follows:

"6. Christian name: the name given at christening; the personal name, as

distinguished from the family name or surname." All examples given are consistent

with standard rules of capitalization, the first letter only capitalized. Likewise, the

term "Surname" follows this same pattern; all are spelled with capital first letters

only, the surname generally being the family or last name. Together, the Christian

and surnames are the proper name or names of people. Under the term "Proper"

The Oxford English Dictionary prescribes capitalization rules: b. Gram. Applied to a

name or noun which is used to designate a particular individual object (e.g. a person,

a tame animal, a star, planet, country, town, river, house, ship, etc.). Opposed to

Common a. 17 a. A proper name is written with an initial capital letter. The same

proper name may be borne by many persons in different families or generations, or

by several places in different counties or localities; but it does not connote any

qualities common to and distinctive of the persons or things which it denotes. A proper

name may however receive a connotation from the qualities of an individual so named,

and be used as a common noun, as a Hercules...

Elements of Style by Strunk and White, an authoritative, concise book on English

grammar, and the Associated Press Style Manual, recognized as the grammar and

style bible for publishing writers, concur with and endorse capitalization of first

letters only for proper names.

Yet without authority of law or any other viable excuse, the court clerk, judicial

officers, and attorneys who practice in the Sixteenth Judicial District consistently,

habitually, and willfully displace proper names with juristic or trade names in case

headings, i.e., JOHN DOE instead of John Doe. Because the practice is consistent and

seemingly universal, it cannot be without purpose. Which is to say, there is some

reason for name perversion. The reason is explained by definitions found at 15 USC

§ 1127, reproduced below in relative part from the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access

[Laws in effect as of January 27, 1998]:

- --cite--

Sec. 1127. Construction and definitions; intent of chapter In the construction of this

chapter, unless the contrary is plainly apparent from the context

15

The United States includes and embraces all territory which is under its jurisdiction

and control.

The word ''commerce'' means all commerce which may lawfully be regulated by

Congress.

19

The term ''person'' and any other word or term used to designate the applicant or

other entitled to a benefit or privilege or rendered liable under the provisions of this

chapter includes a juristic person as well as a natural person.

The term ''juristic person'' includes a firm, corporation, union, association, or other

organization capable of suing and being sued in a court of law.

The term "person'' also includes any State, any instrumentality of a State, and any

officer or employee of a State or instrumentality of a State acting in his or her official

capacity. Any State, and any such instrumentality, officer, or employee, shall be

subject to the provisions of this chapter in the same manner and to the same extent as

any non governmental entity.

The terms ''applicant'' and ''registrant'' embrace the legal representatives,

predecessors, successors and assigns of such applicant or registrant.

The terms ''trade name'' and ''commercial name'' mean any name used by a person

to identify his or her business or vocation.

The term ''trademark'' includes any word, name, symbol, or device, or any

combination thereof (1) used by a person, or (2) which a person has a bona fide

intention to use in commerce and applies to register on the principal register

established by this chapter, to identify and distinguish his or her goods, including a

unique product, from those manufactured or sold by others and to indicate the source

of the goods, even if that source is unknown.

The term "service mark'' means any word, name, symbol, or device, or any

combination thereof (1) used by a person, or (2) which a person has a bona fide

intention to use in commerce and applies to register on the principal register

established by this chapter, to identify and distinguish the services of one person,

including a unique service, from the services of others and to indicate the source of

the services, even if that source is unknown. Titles, character names, and other

distinctive features of radio or television programs may be registered as service marks

notwithstanding that they, or the programs, may advertise the goods of the sponsor.

The term "use in commerce'' means the bona fide use of a mark in the ordinary course

of trade, and not made merely to reserve a right in a mark. For purposes of this

chapter, a mark shall be deemed to be in use in commerce on goods when it is placed

in any manner on the goods or their containers or the displays associated

16

therewith or on the tags or labels affixed thereto, or if the nature of the goods makes

such placement impracticable, then on documents associated with the goods or their

sale, and the goods are sold or transported in commerce, and on services when it is

used or displayed in the sale or advertising of services and the services are rendered

in commerce, or the services are rendered in more than one State or in the United

States and a foreign country and the person rendering the services is engaged in

commerce in connection with the services.

- --end--

20

This section is referred to in 19 USC § 1526 & 1595a, which primarily involve

maritime drug trade. This is one of the primary purposes of the juristic or

commercial name, i.e., JOHN DOE instead of John Doe. The juristic or commercial

name, trade name, is predicated on maritime causes, i.e., private international law.

There is a clear distinction between law that is national in scope and that, which is merely

federal. One needs only to note that the definition of the term "United States", above, is limited in territorial jurisdiction to federal territory exclusive of the several states of the

Union. The General Assembly of Virginia must cede the territory in question to the United States, there must be an Act of Congress accepting it, and notice from the Secretary of State of the United States to the Secretary of the Commonwealth before the federal government

can assume that it is "territory which is under its jurisdiction and control".

Originally, the commonwealth of Virginia had no Maritime jurisdiction, as this was conferred to the federal government in the Constitution of 1787. Over the years, however,

Virginia and other states of the Union retained "concurrent jurisdiction" over territory, which had otherwise been properly ceded to the United States. Where both the

commonwealth and the federal government have enacted legislation over a particular subject matter, Virginia courts can take cognizance of the matter. This is done in a "viceadmiralty" capacity, and has given rise to the current "one form of action", which has

abrogated the state Citizens' access to due process in the course of the common law.

The second link to these juristic entities is due to the various types of citizenship in the United States. There is a clear difference between federal (U.S.) citizens, and state Citizens

(see U.S. v. Cruikshank --need cite--), and this difference lies mainly in their "privileges and immunities" (see Twining v. New Jersey --need cite--). State Citizens are guaranteed

due process in the course of the common law (U.S. Const. Amendments IV, V, and VI, and Va. Const. Art. I, §§ 8, 11, &c.). Federal (U.S.) citizens are entitled only to the due process

mentioned in the so-called 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which has come to mean due process in the course of the civil law.

Even though no state Citizen is required to participate in the federal socialist welfare

scheme known as Social Security, the vast majority of state Citizens have become

enrolled, either through the "enumeration at birth" plan, or by application by their

parents when they were a minor child. Making application to seek to obtain or retain

a benefit in federal funds, creates a juristic person, which the Social

17

Security Act calls an "individual" [see 42 USC 405(c) (2) (B) (i) (II)]. By this conduct,

state Citizens transform to a federal citizenship after making such an "oath of fealty"

to Congress in exchange for benefits payable in federal funds. However, this exchange

of citizenship has its commensurate costs. Whereas "natural persons" are generally

not regulated, this "individual", has come to be regulated extensively in both the state

and federal jurisdictions.

Also, we must take notice of 5 USC 5521(2)(a) which shows that people who were not

required to but were unwittingly enrolled into the federal welfare scheme are

government employees. This makes all people enrolled into the federal welfare

scheme linked into commerce at 15 USC § 1127 as, "The term 'person' also includes

21

any State, any instrumentality of a State, and any officer or employee of a State or

instrumentality of a State acting in his or her official capacity. Any State, and any

such instrumentality, officer, or employee, shall be subject to the provisions of this

chapter in the same manner and to the same extent as any non governmental entity."

The third and probably most important link is "public money", all of which is hypothecated on credit of the United States. Only departments and agencies of United States Government

and instrumentalities of the United States, including the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands, and officers

and employees of these governments, are entitled to receive and use "public money". This is the key link with the banking system: The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insures only deposits of "public money". Specification of who is entitled to receive and use public

money is clearly spelled out in regulations relating to Treasury tax and loan depositaries at 31 CFR § 202.1:

- --cite--

The regulations in this part govern the designation of Depositaries and Financial

Agents of the Government (hereinafter referred to as depositaries), and their

authorization to accept deposits of public money and to perform other services Public

money includes, without being limited to, revenue and funds of the United States, and

any funds the deposit of which is subject to the control or regulation of the United

States or any of its officers, agents, or employees [Underscore added for emphasis]

- --end--

People throughout the constitutionalist movement are concerned about the Federal

Reserve Note, which amounts to private-issue scrip. In reality, the Federal Reserve

Note is a minor issue compared to public money. Virtually all transaction accounts

such as checking and passbook savings accounts are colorable hypothecated on credit

of the United States even though financial institutions chartered and/or regulated by

federal government, FDIC, and/or the Federal Reserve System employ deceptive,

fraudulent, and unlawful means to issue private bills of credit. Credit of the United

States is public money.

18

Current credit and monetary systems where "credit" is used to defer payment rather

than actually pay debt are patently unconstitutional. Article I § 8 of the Constitution

of the United States empowers Congress to mint coin and regulate its value, and to

prescribe punishment for counterfeiting securities and current coin of the United

States, then Article I § 10 prohibits the several States from emitting bills of credit,

minting coin, or making anything but gold and silver coin a tender for payment of

debt. Yet Congress has ceased fulfilling the constitutional mandate to provide gold

and silver coin as the nation's lawful currency, and officers of the several States

brazenly ignore Article I § 10 prohibitions.

Of course, Virginia is an accommodation party in this scheme of cooperative

federalism, as the commonwealth receives federal funds in exchange for

administering federal mandates. Virginia's link to the "public money" is at § 2.1360

and § 2.1-195:

22

- --cite--

§ 2.1-360 Definitions

As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires: (a) The term "public deposit"

shall mean moneys of the Commonwealth or of any county, city, town or other political subdivision thereof, including moneys of any commission, institution, committee, board or

officer of the foregoing and any state, circuit, county or municipal court, which moneys are deposited in any qualified public depository in any of the following types of accounts: nonnegotiable or registered time deposits, demand deposits, savings deposits, and any other

transaction accounts, and security for such deposit is required by other provisions of law, or is required due to an election of the public depositor. (b) The term "qualified public

depository" shall mean any national banking association, federal savings and loan association or federal savings and located in Virginia and any bank, trust company or savings institution organized under Virginia law that receives or holds public deposits

which are secured pursuant to this chapter.

§ 2.1-195 General accounting and clearance through Comptroller In the Department

of Accounts the Comptroller shall maintain a complete system of general accounting

to comprehend the financial transactions of every state department, division, officer,

board, commission, institution or other agency owned or controlled by the

Commonwealth, whether at the seat of government or not. All transactions in public

funds shall clear through the Comptroller's office. - --end--

As shown above, the commonwealth is a prime trafficker in the hypothecated credit

of the United States.

The "United States of America", treated separately, is a confederation or compact of

insular possessions of the United States, the entity exclusive of and foreign to States

of the Union. The section above confirms links to the foreign "United States of

America" and "public funds", i.e., "public money", which is the object of the normal

tax and the exclusive medium federally chartered and/or regulated financial

19

institutions are authorized by law to traffic in. Since the Constitution of the United

States mandates that Congress mint gold and silver coin for a national currency, and

prohibits the several States from emitting bills of credit or making anything but gold

and silver coin a tender for payment of debt, the Federalism/Cooperative Federalism

scheme rests on the notion that all people throughout the nation are government

officers and employees engaged in "trade or business" entitled to use of "public

money" as deferred compensation.

Limits of application to the District of Columbia and insular possessions are clarified by the definition of "State" at 31 CFR § 215.2(m), which governs withholding by financial

institutions authorized as Treasury tax and loan depositaries: "State means a State of the United States or the District of Columbia, unless otherwise specified."

In and of itself, the juristic, trade or commercial name, i.e., JOHN DOE instead of

John Doe, might be insignificant except that it provides a colorable means for holding

real people accountable for the artificial entity that theoretically exists at the pleasure

23

of the State. In original capacity, federally chartered, licensed, or regulated financial

institutions are associations which can solicit and provide basic financial services such

as checking accounts only for qualified association members, those being officers and

employees of United States Government and instrumentalities of the United States.

They traffic exclusively in public money. Both State and Federal income tax systems

are privilege excise taxes where the "wage" is not the object, but the measure of the

tax. The government officer or employee is construed to be engaged in "trade or

business", and he functions in commerce under a juristic, trade or commercial name.

All "credit" colorable extended via federally chartered and/or regulated financial

institutions is hypothecated on credit of the United States, with said "credit" not

paying, but deferring payment of debt (15 USC § 1602).

Use of the fictional or juristic name, JOHN DOE, is fraud of the first order. It’s simply one more device employed as a transparent, insulating barrier over lawful government to defeat

and thereby render constitutions of the United States and the de jure commonwealth of Virginia ineffective. The Circuit Court in the city of Charlottesville accommodate the

scheme via civil law process, thus depriving the people of due process in the course of the common law secured by Article I § 11 of the Constitution of the State of Virginia. Motive is self-enrichment and accommodation of entrenched de facto powers. Effect undermines

sovereignty, solvency and basic liberties of the People of Charlottesville and the Sixteenth Judicial District of the commonwealth of Virginia. Object is reduction of the People to

third-world economic status and general servitude.

Although the Federalism scheme has not progressed to the same point Nazi law did

after 1935, principles articulated in support and prosecution of the Nuremberg Trials

following World War II are as much at issue: Judicial officers and other public

servants are obligated to uphold principles that stand above arbitrary statutory

mandate and executive whim. They can and should be held accountable when they

suppress and abridge basic human dignities.

20

In the American system, usurpation of power not delegated by applicable

constitutions, whether as a perpetrator or by accommodation, is betrayal of public

trust. Depriving the people of constitutionally secured due process in the course of the

common law abridges an indispensable constitutionally secured right.

By proper notice and pleading, interested parties may rebut or correct any matter of law

or fact set forth herein.

#8) PROPERTY RIGHTS ARE "STATE" RIGHTS

You should look for the requirement for "just weights and measures" in the state statutes.

Look at the history of how Congress defined a "dollar." Look for the statute that

authorizes the Susan B Anthony dollar -- which only refers to it as being "$1."

I kid you not.

24

Your own research will show that the Executive Order by Franklin Delano Roosevelt

"outlawing" gold, is effective only within the federal areas.

This is evidenced by the absence of a reference to his Executive Order in the parallel

tables of authorities and rules in the index volume of the code of federal regulations.

Note that an Executive Order by Reagan "allowed" for the making of contracts in gold --

and I think we should start doing so.

This appears to be the only way that we can regain our access to a Common Law Court -- where

we have Constitutional rights.

#10) PAYING WITH "LAWFUL" (CONSTITUTIONAL) MONEY

At this time, many people are including the following wording (approximately) in their

real estate contracts:

" As a down-payment, the purchaser has hereby paid the seller

$___________ in Federal Reserve Notes; AND in addition to the Federal

Reserve notes, the purchaser has also hereby paid the seller twenty

American dollars in the form of one "twenty dollar American gold coin."

[A twenty-dollar American gold piece is "lawful" money, according to the

Constitution. It is reported that the same approach will work if one pays

twenty American silver dollars that were minted prior to 1964 -- which

also constitutes "lawful" money."]

[In order to understand the importance of the above-mentioned wording, it is

necessary to read what the Constitution says about the number of "dollars" that

21

must be involved in a transaction before one can gain access to a Common Law

Court. Then it is necessary for you to determine if Federal Reserve Notes

constitute "lawful dollars and/or lawful money."]

The theory is as follows: If you ever have a "legal controversy" with your government

regarding your property (law suits -- seizures -- liens -- claims -- infringements --

encroachments -- eminent domain -- etc.), the above-mentioned wording might be

necessary if you want to gain access to the Common Law Courts that are guaranteed to

you by the Constitution (AND WHERE YOU STILL HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL

RIGHTS), instead of the Admiralty/Equity Courts that are generally the only types that

we now have access to -- as indicated by the gold fringe around the flags that hang in

every courtroom.

#11) CAN YOUR ATTORNEY HELP YOU???

It appears that attorneys cannot use the above-mentioned arguments for the following

reasons:

25

1. Under the present court system, every American attorney is an "officer of the

court."

2. As an officer of the court, your attorney's primary obligation/responsibility is not

to "you" -- but to the court he serves (as an officer).

3. When your attorney acts within the current legal system, he can only represent

(as in "re-present") your "legal fiction" -- which grants jurisdiction to the court. 4.

You will never see a Summons and Complaint (regarding a lawsuit, etc.) that is

filed "for" or "against" anything but your "legal fiction" name -- which has

nothing to do with the "real" you (unless you fail to properly object).

5. All suits that are filed in the current system of law will be filed "for" or

"against" a name that is written ("spelled" would not be the correct word to

use regarding this phenomenon) using all upper-case letters.

6. A maxim of law is as follows: "Your failure to properly object is fatal to your cause at law." 7. Etc.

#10) THE NON-CONSTITUTIONAL (NOT UN-CONSTITUTIONAL) ASPECTS OF

OUR MONEY

The creation of the Federal Reserve was perfectly constitutional because it is only the

central banking system of (for) the United States -- and therefore it is ONLY a system

for the District of Columbia, and the territories, and possessions.

In those locations, under I:8:17 and IV:3:2, Congress can do

ANYTHING IT WANTS TO DO -- and it has done so.

Go thru the Parallel Tables for Titles 12 and 31 again. Pull up the regulations cited

22

therein and understand that the VENUE in which the fed operates is outside of the states

of the Union party to the Constitution.

In other words, the following statements are true:

1.) The banking system is perfectly constitutional, IF IT IS LIMITED to the

territories outside of the states.

2.) Its presence in the states is not UN-constitutional, it is NON-constitutional.

3.) It is imposition of a law outside its legal venue.

Arguing anything else is not only incorrect, it is totally the wrong argument.

Can the state courts enforce a law that operates ONLY in the District and the territories

here in the states of the Union?

If you make the wrong argument, yes it can -- and yes it will.

They do it all the time.

26

A judge is almost totally immune from prosecution. The black wall of the judiciary has

made it impossible to attack a judge. The only way that anyone can successfully sue a

judge is by seeking a declaratory judgment or to seek injunctive relief from what is

perceived to be a judge acting outside of his authority. After the declaratory judgment

shows that he is acting outside of this authority, then and only then does he become

personally liable.

#11) AVOIDING JURISDICTION:

We just found the following document in our file cabinet. I can’t remember where it

came from -- who sent it to us – or whatever...

It obviously pertains to how the courts, hearing examiners, etc. “attempt” to obtain

jurisdiction over you.

Here is the document in its entirety:

BEGINNING OF DOCUMENT:

STANDARD SCREENING QUESTIONS

These questions were administered by Mr. Alberto Gutier, Deputy Administrator,

Arizona Department of Transportation, at approximately two o’clock p.m. on

August 24, 1989, after confirming that Mr. Cooper had met with Mr. Carl Davis, the

Governor’s Special Assistant Over State Agencies:

23

Mr. Gutier: “Before we go any further, I need to ask you our standard Screening

Questions.”

#1.) Mr. Guthier: “Are you a citizen of the United States ?”

Mr Cooper’s answer: “No, I am not.”

#2.) Mr. Gutier: “Are you a resident of Arizona ?”

Mr Cooper’s answer: “No, I am not. I was born in Phoenix, and

I have lived in Maricopa County, Arizona, all my life, but I am

not a resident. I do not ‘reside’ in Arizona.”

#3.) Mr. Gutier: “Are you registered to vote ?”

Mr. Cooper’s answer: “No, I am not.”

#4.) Mr. Gutier: “Do you have a driver’s license ?”

Mr. Cooper’s answer: No, I do not.”

#5.) Mr. Gutier: “Do you have any motor vehicles registered in

Arizona ?”

Mr. Cooper’s answer: “No, I do not.”

27

#6.) Mr. Gutier: “Are you employed ?”

Mr. Cooper’s answer: “No, I am not. I am not employed. I am

self-employed. I am not gainfully employed. In fact, I am not

employable. But, I work. Besides, Arizona is a ‘Right to Work’

State.”

#7.) Mr. Gutier: “Do you pay state and federal resident income

taxes ?”

Mr. Cooper’s answer: “No, I do not.”

#8.) Mr. Gutier: “Do you pay property taxes in Arizona ?”

Mr Cooper’s answer: “No, I do not.”

#9.) Mr Gutier: “Do you have a marriage license ?“

Mr Cooper’s answer: “No, I do not.”

#10.) Mr. Gutier: “Do you have children enrolled in public school ?” Mr. Cooper’s answer: “No, I do not. My children are home

taught.”

Mr Gutier then said, “You’ve really done your homework.”

END OF DOCUMENT ---------

24

Concerning the above-mentioned list of questions (and answers), I suggest that you

reflect upon the following comments:

Regarding question #1: “Are you a citizen of the United States ? In

order for you to understand Mr. Cooper’s answer to

this question, it is first necessary for you to learn the

definitions of the following terms:

citizen (with a small “c”) Citizen

(with a capital “C”)

the United States (with a capital "U")

the united States (with a lower-case "u")

the United States of America (capital

"U")

the united States of America (lower case

"u")

the U.S.

the continental united States

28

the District of Columbia (its territories, possessions,

etc.)

etc.

Regarding question #2: In order for you to understand what Mr. Cooper meant by

his answer to this question, you would first need to learn what it means if you

“reside” somewhere. After you learn what this term means, you will probably

always take the position that you “live” in various places – or “stay” in various

places – but you do not “reside” anywhere.

Regarding question #3: In order for you to understand Mr. Cooper's answer to this

question, you would first need to recognize that his true and Proper name does not

appear on any Voter’s Registration Card.

"The" only Voter's Registration Card [It would be a tactical mistake to call it

"his" card.] that has ever come into Mr. Cooper's possession, contains only a

“legal fiction” name that is written in all “upper-case” letters.

Regarding question #4: Your so-called “driver’s license” does not contain your true

and Proper name. It only contains the name of a “legal fiction” that was created by

government through the use of a name spelled in all upper-case letters.

25

Regarding questions #5 through #10: None of the records, and/or legal documents,

and/or legal contracts, that pertain to any of these questions will ever bear Mr.

Cooper's true and Proper name.

#12) A "NOTICE" THAT MIGHT BE IMPORTANT TO YOU:

The following NOTICE should perhaps be posted next to the "Constitutional

Keep Out" sign -- see appropriate page of this Website.

NOTICE

THIS “NOTICE” IS ADDRESSED TO ALL FEDERAL AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES

OF THE I.R.S., H.E.W., H.U.D., O.E.O., E.P.A., E.A.A., C.I.A., REGIONAL

COUNCILS, SIMILAR STATE EMPLOYEES, SIMILAR COUNTY EMPLOYEES,

AND ALL OTHER UNCONSTITUTIONAL AGENCIES; AND THIS NOTICE

PERTAINS TO THE FOLLOWING FEDERAL CRIMINAL LAW – U.S.C., TITLE 18,

Sec. 241:

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate

any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of a right or privilege secured

to him by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, or because of

his having so exercised the same; or

29

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises

of another, with the intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or

enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured –

They shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten

years, or both; and if death results, they shall be subject to imprisonment

for any term of years or for life.”

# 13) MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL (?)

Disclaimer:

The above comments about the law are included here only for your amusement; AND

you should not use any of this information without first checking with your attorney --

your medical doctor -- your psychoanalyst -- your neighbors -- and your mother.

Remember: Do not try any of this stuff at home unless you are ready to accept total

responsibility for your own actions -- and unless you first educate yourself regarding

these issues.

Remember: When dealing with the "law" there are always two sides (e.g. "yours" and

"theirs") to every issue -- which is why "courts" were invented.

26

Remember: The law is like chess. Any attorney can be taught how to play chess -- but

no attorney can be taught how to "win" every time he plays the game. [e.g. In every court

case, one attorney wins -- and the other one loses.]

Remember: It appears that the safest course of action is to use your "legal knowledge" to

avoid the courts altogether -- by making bureaucrats obey the law.

Remember: Only the bravest and most patriotic American has courage enough to "make"

the government's bureaucrats obey the law.

Important Litigated Cases in the District Courts in the United States

In regards to my case in the Southern District of Ohio case number C2-03-1133, in July

2004, the clerk of court’s office had no trace of the file on record with them. I have a time

stamped copy of the case that was filed on February 9, 2004. There was no response or

reply to the briefs I filed during the time the file was there and during the time the file

disappeared. My case raises many of the same issues that the one filed below in the

Northern District of California does with some differences.

First, the party in California uses an attorney to argue his case, in which he lost to the

government and I didn’t use an attorney and had the whole file jacket disappear into thin

air.

30

Second, the California suit currently sits in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals under a closed

disclosure to the general public. This US Attorney’s Motion to Close the Hearings to the

General Public was granted by the judges on July 15, 2004. The URL for the web site is

http://freetotravel.org/legal.html

I was not able to obtain copies of the opinion the District Court Judge. He gave his

opinion for the government in some action the US Attorney filed as a Motion to Dismiss

for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction earlier this year.

Lastly, the Southern District of Ohio in my case I litigated earlier this year already settles

the matter as a matter of law. The government has conciliated to issues I raised when they

failed to answer me in the correct commerce, jurisdiction, and venue pursuant to FCRP

15©(3) and 15(d). Since I couldn’t get a Declaratory Judgment in District Court, I would

have to give a notice of remove the case from the Southern District of Ohio to the

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court in Cleveland, Ohio pursuant to 28 USC 2201,

FRCP 44 and 44.1. I would have to re-file the case under ORCP 8 a common law

complaint in the crookest county in the State of Ohio. I was looking forward to having a

little bit of fun in that courtroom setting. Even if I lost there, I would still have opinions

available to me.

My prediction is that this lawsuit below isn’t going anywhere if this party doesn’t stop

using attorney(s) in this process and the opinion will be for the government when the 9th

Circuit makes their decision later this year or early next year.

27

With all there is on the internet and my web site expose on radio advertising in Cleveland,

I can only wonder how people in the tax movement don’t take more stock in what I tell

people is the truth is in matters that address these issues

As always, have an income tax-free day and life,

EDITORIAL: A Blow Against the Secrecy State

Federal government didn't even want to produce its photo ID law

Judges today are often former prosecutors, political creatures who got where they are by

putting their finger to the wind, all too often more interested in enforcing the state's

"prerogatives" than defending the inconvenient rights of the little guy.

In such an environment, heroes can be in short supply. So anyone who stands up for an

individual's rights -- especially in the face the war on terror -- needs to be celebrated.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has drawn its share of criticism over the years for its

creative readings of the Constitution. But on Sept. 10, that court struck a solid first blow against

the burgeoning secret police state.

31

John Gilmore is an Oakland resident who made millions as a founding employee of Sun

Microsystems Inc.

On July 4, 2002, Southwest Airlines employees at Oakland International Airport barred Mr.

Gilmore from boarding a flight to Baltimore after he refused to produce a government-issued

photo ID. He also refused to allow security personnel -- who had no warrant based on probable

cause -- to pat him down and search through his luggage.

Mr. Gilmore went through a similar experience with United Airlines employees at San Francisco

International Airport later that same day. Both airlines said they were following federal directives.

28

Mr. Gilmore, who hasn't flown since, proceeded to sue the government and the airlines in federal

court, alleging among other things that the identification requirement violates his right to freely

assemble because he can't travel by air.

The U.S. Department of Justice has refused to even confirm or deny the existence of the rule the

airline employees said they were following. The department has argued that national security

requires directives dealing with transportation must be kept secret.

Though Mr. Gilmore's lawsuit was thrown out by a lower court judge, the 9th Circuit agreed to take

up the matter on appeal. Thereupon the Department of Justice said it needed to file its reply --

detailing why the appeals court should throw out Mr. Gilmore's challenge -- under seal.

This nonsense is laughable.

On Sept. 10, the 9th Circuit ruled against the government in Mr. Gilmore's case, stating federal

officials must argue their case in public.

Thank heavens.

Imagine if the other default setting should prevail. What could be a more basic premise and

foundation of a free society than the public's ability to find out what laws are proposed, to debate

them in the light of day, and -- at the very least -- promptly be told which laws have been enacted,

and what they stipulate?

How is a law to be challenged if no one knows what it is? How could its provisions be tested for

constitutionality in a court if those seeking to mount the challenge were not allowed to read its

clear and concrete language?

Are we even to be arrested for violating "secret" laws, which we couldn't possibly know existed?

To assert that any government officials should be able to say, "I'm now going to arrest you but I

don't have to tell you what law you broke, or how you can comply with it in future" takes us back

not merely before the establishment of the U.S. Constitution, but back to the days before the

32

Magna Carta, when a king could imprison or execute one of his subjects on nothing more than a

passing whim.

All rights reserved

29

Let's start with this: Money has two factors that define it. It

is a thing of beauty if you're mathematically or even

poetically inclined, because it's not one and it's not three.

There are two specific factors that indicate anything is

money and they are: #1: It has to have intrinsic value; and

#2: It can't vary in quality.

That's it. Everything in creation that has these two

conditions, is money. Everything that doesn't, isn't.

Gold and silver have always been considered money in the

history of mankind in all cultures because they meet the two

conditions, plus they're handy. Actually, every element in

the chemistry table of elements other than carbon is money.

Water is money. The only reason you don't see people

carrying gallons of water to the store to pay for things is

because it's not handy.

Diamonds aren't money because, though they have intrinsic

value, they vary in quality.

Federal Reserve Notes are not money because they don't

have any intrinsic value. They cost two cents to make

regardless of denomination. That's an obvious shocker to a

lot of people - the fact that someone actually makes a 98

cent profit on every dollar bill; a $99.98 profit on every $100

bill.

33

Presuming it is the government that does this (actually it's

not - the Federal Reserve is no more federal than Federal

Express - more on that at another time), one might wonder

why it (the government) needs so much money in taxes,

license & permit fees, citations, fines & penalties and

confiscations, and all the other perhaps subtler methods it

uses to remove us from our property.

Federal Reserve Notes are negotiable instruments that

discharge debt, but they are not money. They are not

backed by silver anymore like they were in the days of the

silver certificates, nor are they backed by any other

commodity that meets the definition of money. The collateral

for Federal Reserve Notes is the future labor of the people of

the United States as evidenced by the birth certificates.

That's a very loaded sentence that we will go into more in a

minute, but one of the keywords is future. In other words it

doesn't exist now, it may exist later. So Federal Reserve

notes are in that category of negotiable instruments called

"promises to pay" or promissory notes. They are debt

instruments.

In reality, we can't actually pay any debts anymore because

all of the real money has been extracted from society. All we

can do now is discharge debts. All we have to do it with is

fake money or counterfeit money. Federal Reserve Notes

are counterfeit money.

You may have noticed that there are so many other

examples of real things that have pretty much been replaced

by their fake counterparts in the past few generations. Prior

to this century, for instance, the only kind of food that existed

was real - now it is quite a challenge to go into a regular

grocery store and buy any food that has not been polluted by

chemicals, insecticides, genetic engineering or

overprocessing to an incredible extent. Some people don't

even know that real maple syrup comes from a tree. The

34

brown sugar water with chemicals in it that you are served in

the House of Pancakes may look like syrup, but it isn't.

In a similar fashion, and just like we used to have real money

rather than fake money, we used to have real laws

(implementing regulations), rather than fake laws like Codes

(color of law) that are only applicable to corporate fictions.

We also used to have real titles to property rather than fake

titles like deeds (color of title). If you really own your land

and have an allodial title to it, you are not subject to building

codes or property taxes. If you only have a deed, the

STATE really owns your land, and it you don't pay the rent

(property taxes), they will take it away from you. You can be

assured that Mr. Rockefeller has real title to his property.

There are two of so many things these days - one that is real

and one that is fake.

There are two "states" of whatever state you live in. There is

one that has hills and valleys and rocks and trees and dogs

and cats and people in it. There is another one that is a

government entity, a corporate fiction. When you fill out a

government form that asks you "Are you a resident of the

State of California?", you may presume you know what is

meant by the word "resident" and the phrase "State of

California", but you should be sure before you sign that thing

under penalty of perjury.

In the same way, there are in a way two of you. The real you

was created by your mother and father and God, and if

somebody pinches, you will feel it. There is another "you",

believe it or not, that was created by the STATE and is a

corporate fiction.

Have you ever noticed that whenever you receive a letter

from a creditor or debt collector or IRS, it's always addressed

to your name in all capital letters? Well, that's because that

letter is not addressed to you but to your STRAWMAN. On

35

your personal checks issued to you by your bank, your name

and address are imprinted in all capital letters for the same

reason.

You may decide you want to have the best mailbox on your

block, so you design and construct and paint this fabulous

mailbox and you take it out in front of your mansion and you

pound it in to the ground on your property. Who owns that

mailbox? If one of your neighbors puts a letter in that

mailbox that does not have a stamp on it, they can be fined

or imprisoned for trespassing on government property.

In the same way, you may have a birth certificate in your

possession - it has your name on it - you've had it for

decades - you value it - you keep it in your box of important

documents. Guess who owns that birth certificate. Of

course, it is the STATE who own that birth certificate. At the

very best, you may get a certified copy. The original is

always kept in the Bureau of Vital Records in the State you

were born, in the Department of Commerce. Do you know

why in the Department of Commerce? Because your birth

certificate, along with all the other birth certificates, is the

collateral for Federal Reserve Notes.

Effectively, your birth certificate is the STATE's certificate of

title over you.

Now, how did you become chattel property of the STATE

(being as the Constitution supposedly forbids slavery)? The

short answer is by deceit and trickery. The STATE created a

corporate fiction, your STRAWMAN with that birth certificate,

and as long as you don't know the difference between that

STRAWMAN and you the real, live human being, the least

common denominator is the STRAWMAN.

When you're driving on the street, perhaps at a higher speed

than the posted so-called speed limit, but you haven't done

any personal or property damage, the reason a cop can stop

36

you, hand you a bill at gun point, and deny your rights to

travel and due process in one fell swoop, is because the cop

is not dealing with you the real, live human being, but only

with the STRAWMAN.

Remember we were taught back in the 8th Grade that there

are three branches of government - the Executive, the

Judicial and the Legislative? Well, where does the DMV or

the IRS fit into that? They don't. They're in what some

people have come to call the quasi-Fourth branch of

government - the Administrative agencies. The

Administrative agencies would like you to believe they have

legislative authority over you. They don't. The only authority

or jurisdiction they can claim to have is in commerce, by

contract, over corporate fictions.

The real you has God-given rights. It doesn't matter whether

you live in a country with a Constitution that supposedly

protects those rights or not. You have God-given rights just

by being here. The fake "you", the corporate fiction or

STRAWMAN, doesn't have any God-given rights, only

benefits and obligations under contract, and maybe "civil

rights", a poor substitute (fake) for real rights.

Civil rights may be politically correct, but they are counter to

nature and real rights. For instance it may be a civil right not

to be discriminated against because you have a pointy nose,

but the deeper (real, God-given) right is the right to associate

with anyone you want to and not to have to associate in any

way with anyone you don't want to. If you don't want to hire

pointy nosed people just because you don't like pointy nosed

people, that is your God-given right.

God-given rights include the rights to livelihood, property,

travel, due process, sovereignty, happiness and health.

These are not STATE privileges.

37

Knowledge really is power. It is important to know the

difference between what is real and what is fake, and it is

also good to know the rules. There are Constitutional

experts in jail because they didn't understand how they had

contracted away their God-given rights in exchange for

STATE privileges. It's important to be familiar with the

Uniform Commercial Code, because this is the real rules on

planet Earth.

One of the ten basic maxims of Commercial law is this: "An

unrebutted Affidavit is presumed to be true". What this

means is that whenever you get a bill, a fine, a penalty,

assessment, or demand or presentment in commerce of any

sort, it behooves you to respond to it timely, because if you

don't - if you ignore it, you acquiesce to the truth of it. You

loose your due process, and it may not have been true at all

in the first place.

The better way to play the commerce game is to respond

timely and request that your adversary respond timely to you

as well. Oftentimes it is ridiculously easy to pull the rug out

from under an IRS agent or a debt collector simply by

making a righteous formal request that they cannot or will not

respond to.

Did you know that there is no law that makes it mandatory

for any real, live human being to pay income taxes, have

income taxes withheld from one's pay, or even file tax

returns? How could there be? It is an obvious fact, and the

Supreme Court has ruled very clearly that when you file an

income tax return, you are waiving your 5th Amendment

Right to not testify against yourself. Certainly there can be

no law that makes it mandatory that anyone waive and

rights.

When many people get an inquiry from IRS asking them

where their tax return is, they panic and ignore it, and six

weeks later they get an unsigned assessment that contains

38

added in fines and penalties - they on the way to being

liened or levied. [Actually, the IRS never sends out real liens

- only "Notices" of liens, but they usually get the County

Recorders to treat them as real liens anyway.]

When you get a letter from IRS asking you where your tax

return is, you might write back very humbly, simply and

immediately and give them Power of Attorney to complete

your tax return for you as long as they sign it under penalty

of perjury - you may never hear from them again.

Another way to illustrate using the maxim "An unrebutted

Affidavit is presumed to be true" is also an easy way to

explain one approach to terminating unsecured debt.

Did you know that banks do not issue loans? This is a

shocker to many people, because we are taught to believe

that if we want a loan, we go to a bank. But banks don't

issue loans and there is no asterisk on that sentence. Banks

are prohibited from loaning their customer's assets because

that would violate General Accounting principles. They are

prohibited from loaning their own assets because that would

violate Federal Reserve Regulations. What's left? Nothing.

Banks don't issue loans.

What happens is when you leave the bank with a credit card

application or another type of co-called loan application, you

are actually giving the bank your promise to pay them with

your signature on it. It could be on a piece of toilet paper. It

is a promissory note that the bank cashes, and in a simple

example, gives you a check of equal value in return. They

don't disclose that there wasn't really any loan or any risk or

collateral on their part and that they merely paid a clerk $12

an hour or so to make an entry in a computer. [This is what

causes inflation because the so-called money is created out

of thin air.] Then they (the banks) violate usury and

racketeering laws all day every day by charging you principle

and interest on the fictitious "loan".

39

One way to terminate this unsecured debt, without

bankruptcy, is: when your STRAWMAN gets the bill, send in

a minimum payment with a cover letter that says at the top

"Notice of Final Payment". In this half a page cover letter,

make a formal request in commerce, that they (the so-called

creditor) answer your question, and your question is where

was the risk or the collateral for that so-called loan.

Well, again, there was no loan; there was no risk, and there

was no collateral. They can't answer that question, and you

end up creating a new contract in which your STRAWMAN

doesn't owe them anything anymore that replaces the old

contract in which your STRAWMAN might have owed them

thousands of dollars. This new contract is called a novation.

Evading responsibility is not being advocated by these prior

statements. Certainly if you have made a mess, it is up to

you to clean it up. But if the mess you've made is a merely a

mirage, it is appropriate to handle it by mirage means.

Step by step over the last few decades, the substance of our

money, our laws, our rights and our freedoms have been

overlayed by something resembling but counter to these

precious things.

Our society has become a tyrannical police state. Still

however, it is our ability to be truly free human beings

because it is our birthright - it just takes more knowledge

then ever, and action, to step out of the negative spell that

has been cast by the conspiratorial powers that be.

The laying of the groundwork to one's freedom and

sovereignty requires dotting all of the "i"s and crossing all of

the "t"s and at least three steps:

1. Properly filing a UCC-1 form to establish a public

record that you are not the STRAWMAN and in fact are the

holderin-due-course of it. This is the single most important

40

tool in your toolbag because this alone changes the

presumption of law from the side of the STATE to your side;

2. Making yourself the Power of Attorney over the

corporate fiction; and

3. Copyrighting the STRAWMAN's name. This doesn't

just give you another defensive strategy - it gives you a very

important offensive weapon, because from this point on,

anyone who is coming after your STRAWMAN for anything

without your permission is trespassing on your commercial

property.

You've possibly heard of the term "judicial immunity" a judge

has, or so-called "unlimited immunity" a clerk or a cop or an

IRS agent has protected by his or her agency. Well, it hardly

exists at all. The only immunity any agent has is when they

are within their jurisdiction, and they have no jurisdiction over

you the real live person.

When you know the difference between who you are and

who you've been led to believe you are (a corporate fiction)

and how to effectively assert this difference, the scales of

justice are unlocked and the balance of power tilts back to

your favor.

Peace.