copyright dr jj, aserg, uitm, shah alam 1drjj.uitm.edu.my/drjj/obe fsg...
TRANSCRIPT
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 1
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 1
Howard
Gardner
email: [email protected], [email protected]; [email protected]: http://drjj.uitm.edu.my; HP#:+60193551621
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 2
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 2
11/05/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 3
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 4
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 3
64
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 6
1. Knowledge (K)
2. Practical Skills (S)
3. Thinking and scientific skills (K)
4.4. Communication skillsCommunication skills (A/S)
5. Social skills, teamworkteamwork and responsibility (A/S)
6. Values, ethics, moral and professionalism (A)
7. Information management and lifelong learning skills (A/S)
8. Managerial and entrepreneurial skills (A/S)
9.9. LeadershipLeadership skills (A/S)
MQF LOs DomainsMQF LOs Domains MOHE LOs, 2009MOHE LOs, 2009--KSAKSA
i. Knowledge (K)
ii. Practical skills (S)
iii. Social skills and responsibilities (S)
iv. Ethics, professionalism and
humanities (A)
v.v. CommunicationCommunication, leadershipleadership and
team skills (A)team skills (A)vi. Scientific methods, critical thinking
and problem solving skills (K)
vii. Lifelong learning and information
management (A)
viii. Entrepreneurship and managerial
skills (A)
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
24
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 4
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 7
1. Clarity of focus about outcomes
��Always have the significant, culminating exit outcomes as the Always have the significant, culminating exit outcomes as the
focusfocus.�Let the students know what they are aiming for.
2. Designing backwards
��Design curriculum backward by using the major outcomes as Design curriculum backward by using the major outcomes as
the focusthe focus and linking all planning, teaching and assessment
decisions directly to these outcomes
CMAP-S CMAP-ACMAP-EDU CMAP-M
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 8
3. Consistent, high expectations of success
�Set the expectation that OBE is for ALL learnersOBE is for ALL learners.
�Expect students to succeed by providing them encouragement to
engage deeply with the issues they are learning and to achieve the
high challenging standard set (Spady, 1994b).
4. Expanded opportunity
��Develop curriculum to give scope to every learner to learn in Develop curriculum to give scope to every learner to learn in
his/her own pace.his/her own pace.
��Cater for individual needs and differencesCater for individual needs and differences, for example,
expansion of available time and resources so that all students
succeed in reaching the exit outcomes.
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 5
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 9
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
“The greatest enemy of understanding is coverageThe greatest enemy of understanding is coverage – I can’t repeat
that often enough. If youIf you’’re determined to cover a lot of things, you re determined to cover a lot of things, you
are guaranteeing that most kids will not understandare guaranteeing that most kids will not understand, , because because
they haventhey haven’’t had time enough to go into things in depth, to figure t had time enough to go into things in depth, to figure
out what the requisite understanding is, and be able to perform out what the requisite understanding is, and be able to perform
that understanding in different situationsthat understanding in different situations.”
(Gardner 1993: 24)
Source: Biggs & Tang (2007). “Teaching for Quality Learning at University”. Third Edition. McGraw Hill Companies.
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 10
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 6
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 11
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 12
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 7
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 13
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Transformation Framework
Institutional Pillars
Critical Agenda
Source: National Higher Education Action Plan 2007-2010
Human Capital with First-class Mentality
Go
ve
rna
nce
Le
ade
rship
Aca
dem
ia
Teaching and
Learning
Re
se
arc
h a
nd
De
ve
lop
me
nt
Academic
Performance
Audit
ApexUniversities
LifelongLearning
MyBrain15Graduate TrainingScheme
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 14
�� Analytical intelligenceAnalytical intelligence, the ability to complete academic, problemproblem--
solving taskssolving tasks, such as those used in traditional intelligence tests. These types of tasks usually present welltasks usually present well--defined problems that have only a defined problems that have only a
single correct answersingle correct answer.
�� Creative or synthetic intelligence, the ability to successfully Creative or synthetic intelligence, the ability to successfully deal with deal with
new and unusual situations by drawing on new and unusual situations by drawing on
existingexisting knowledgeknowledge andand skillsskills. Individuals high in creative intelligence may give 'wrong' answers because they see things from a different perspective.
�� Practical intelligence, the ability to adapt to everyday life byPractical intelligence, the ability to adapt to everyday life by drawing drawing
on existing knowledge and skills. Practical intelligence enableson existing knowledge and skills. Practical intelligence enables an an
individual to understand what needs to be done in a specific setindividual to understand what needs to be done in a specific setting ting
and then do itand then do it
Robert Sternberg, Yale Psychology Professor & President of the American Psychological Association
Triarchic Theory of Intelligence (2003)Triarchic Theory of Intelligence (2003)
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 8
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 15
"While your IQ, which is sort of language logic, will get you be"While your IQ, which is sort of language logic, will get you behind the hind the
desk, if you dondesk, if you don’’t know how to deal with people, if you don't know how to t know how to deal with people, if you don't know how to
read yourself read yourself (self(self--knowledge)knowledge), you, you’’re going to end up just staying at that re going to end up just staying at that
desk forever or eventually being asked to make room for somebodydesk forever or eventually being asked to make room for somebody who who
does have social or emotional intelligence."does have social or emotional intelligence."
Howard Gardner on his Multiple intelligences Theory
Intelligence is "the capacity to solve problems or to fashion prIntelligence is "the capacity to solve problems or to fashion products oducts
that are valued in one or more cultural setting"that are valued in one or more cultural setting" (Gardner & Hatch, 1989)
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2011 16
Traditional/Transitional OBETraditional/Transitional OBE emphasisesemphasises student mastery of student mastery of
traditional subjecttraditional subject--related academic outcomes (usually with a strong related academic outcomes (usually with a strong
focus on subjectfocus on subject--specific content) and some crossspecific content) and some cross--discipline discipline
outcomes (such as the ability to solve problems or to work cooutcomes (such as the ability to solve problems or to work co--
operatively). operatively).
Transformational OBETransformational OBE emphasisesemphasises longlong--term, crossterm, cross--curricular curricular
outcomes that are related directly to studentsoutcomes that are related directly to students’’ future life roles (such future life roles (such
as being a productive worker or a responsible citizen or a parenas being a productive worker or a responsible citizen or a parent). t).
SpadySpady (1994)(1994)
Source: Killen, Roy (2005). Programming and assessment for quality teaching and learning. Chapter 2. Thomson Social Science Press
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 9
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 17
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 18
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 10
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 19
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 20
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 11
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 21
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 22
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 12
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 23
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Evaluation
Synthesis
Analysis
Application
Comprehension
Knowledge
Level 1Level 1:
Recall or
recognition of
fact,
information or
concept
Level2Level2:
Basic application of skill/concept: Use
info, conceptual
knowledge, follow
procedures
Level 3Level 3:
Strategic thinking/reasoning:
Develop plan to solve probs;
require justification &
decision-making
Level 4Level 4:
Extended Thinking
Solving authentic real-
world problem requiring
time & research,
patience, perseverance..
WebbWebb’’s DOKs DOK
Cognitive DomainCognitive Domain
Set
Origination
Adaptation
Complete Overt Response
Mechanism
Guided Response
Perception
KrathwolKrathwol’’s Affective s Affective
DomainDomain
SimpsonSimpson’’s s
Psychomotor DomainPsychomotor Domain
Internalizing
Organisation
Valuing
Responding
Receiving
Inte
llec
tua
l
Sk
ills
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 24
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Set
Origination
Adaptation
Complete Overt Response
Mechanism
Guided Response
Perception
SimpsonSimpson’’s Taxonomys Taxonomy--SkillsSkills
Higher
order
Lower
order
PSYCHOMOTOR DOMAIN INCLUDES PHYSICAL
MOVEMENT, COORDINATION & USE OF THE
MOTOR SKILL AREAS
LO2, LO2, LO3, LO4,LO7,LO8
KrathwohlKrathwohl’’s Taxonomys Taxonomy--AffectiveAffective
Internalizing
Organisation
Valuing
Responding
Receiving
Higher
order
Lower
order
AFFECTIVE DOMAIN – INCLUDES MANNER WE DEAL
WITH THINGS EMOTIONALLY (e.g. FEELINGS,
INTERESTS, ATTITUDES, APPRECIATION,
ENTHUSIASMS, MOTIVATIONS) - THAT MIGHT RESULT
FROM INSTRUCTION): LO4,LO5,LO6,LO7, LO8,LO9LO4,LO5,LO6,LO7, LO8,LO9
6
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 13
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 25
Bloom Cognitive Action Verbs
Bloom
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 26
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 14
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 27
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 28
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 15
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 29
http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/coursedev/models/id/taxonomy/#table
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 30
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 16
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 31
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 32
84
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Source: Biggs &
Tang (2007). “Teaching
for Quality
Learning at
University”.
Third Edition.
McGraw Hill
Companies.
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 17
11/05/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 33
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Source: Biggs & Tang (2007). “Teaching for Quality Learning at University”. Third Edition. McGraw Hill Companies.
1. Explain in depth why a particular course topic is important to teaching.
TLATLAs: Plenary sessions with pre-readings and notes used for learning information, clarification and elaboration. Application to teaching by partners and small groups
2. Explain how the component course topics interrelate. TLATLAs: As for (1)3. Reflect on your teaching in terms of a working theory you have gained from
the course. TLATLAs: Keep reflective diary; discuss with group/learning partner4. Evaluate a situation that has gone wrong and apply a solution. TLATLAs: Use
workplace resources, group/learning partner comparing perspectives on evaluating and applying.
Intended learning outcomes (CLOs) for Biggs’ The Nature of Teaching and Learning Course and its aligned teaching/learning activities (TLAs)
11/05/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 34
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
1.1. Explain (in depth)Explain (in depth) the concepts, laws and theories in electrostatics, electricity and
magnetism using either or a combination of the qualitative, visual and quantitative
approach. (LO1-C2). TLATLAs: Pre-class activity: performing predictions and
simulation tasks from predetermined softwares followed by face-to-face group and
class discussion on outcomes of simulation.
2.2. Observe, predict, conduct and discussObserve, predict, conduct and discuss results of scientific investigations in
areas of electrostatics and electricity. (LO2-P3). TLATLAs: Pre-class activity on tasks
involving simulation, laboratory tasks in the lab and discussion of results during
class discussion.
3.3. CollaborateCollaborate with team members in team-related assessment tasks. (LO5-TS3).
TLATLAs: Group discussions and cooperation in labs & in class.
Intended learning outcomes (CLOs) for DrJJ’s Physics PHY407 class and its aligned teaching/learning activities (TLAs)
SYLL
LLOs
LabExam
Rubrics
7
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 18
11/05/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 35
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
1.1. Explain (in depth)Explain (in depth) the concepts, laws and theories in electrostatics, electricity and
magnetism using either or a combination of the qualitative, visual and quantitative
approach. (LO1-C2).
� Outcome Element: Explain.
� Knowledge Dimensions: Factual, Conceptual & Procedural.
� Assessment Methods: Paper & Pencil Tests (2 Tests & A final Exam), Oral
Interviews (Middle & End of Semester Oral Interviews), Assignments (Concept
Maps)
2.2. Observe, predict, conduct and discussObserve, predict, conduct and discuss results of scientific investigations in areas
of electrostatics and electricity. (LO2-P3). TLATLAs: Pre-class activity on tasks involving
simulation, laboratory tasks in the lab and discussion of results during class
discussion.
� Outcome Elements: Observe, predict, conduct & discuss
� Knowledge Dimensions: Procedural
� Assessment Methods: Journal Entries, Laboratories
Intended learning outcomes (CLOs) for DrJJ’s Physics PHY407 class and its aligned outcomes indicators
SYLL
LLOs
LabExam
Rubrics
7
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 36
Knowledge of terminologyKnowledge of terminology: technical vocabulary, musical symbols
Knowledge of specific details and elementsKnowledge of specific details and elements: Major natural resources, reliable sources of information
Factual (Declarative) KnowledgeFactual (Declarative) Knowledge: The basic elements students must know to be acquainted with a discipline or solve problems in it.
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 19
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 37
Knowledge of classifications and categoriesKnowledge of classifications and categories: periods of geologic time, areas of chemistry, types of energy
Knowledge of principles and generalizationsKnowledge of principles and generalizations: Energy Conservation, Pythagorean theorem, law of supply and demand, Newton’ Laws, Beer’s Laws, Faraday’s Law
Knowledge of theories, models and structuresKnowledge of theories, models and structures: theory of evolution, structure of congress, Atomic Models,
Conceptual KnowledgeConceptual Knowledge: The interrelationships among the basic elements within a larger structure that enable them to function together.
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 38
Knowledge of subjectKnowledge of subject--specific skills and algorithmsspecific skills and algorithms: painting with watercolors, whole-number division
Knowledge of subjectKnowledge of subject--specific techniques and methodsspecific techniques and methods: interviewing techniques, scientific method
Knowledge of criteria for determining when to use appropriate Knowledge of criteria for determining when to use appropriate
proceduresprocedures: when to apply Newton's second law, when to use a particular method of estimation
Procedural KnowledgeProcedural Knowledge : How to do something, methods of inquiry, and criteria for using skills, algorithms, techniques, and methods
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 20
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 39
Strategic knowledgeStrategic knowledge: outlining as a means of capturing the structure of a unit of subject matter in a textbook
Cognitive tasksCognitive tasks: knowledge of the different types of tests, cognitive demands of different tasks
SelfSelf--knowledgeknowledge: knowledge that critiquing essays is a personal strength, whereas writing essays is a personal weakness; awareness of one's own knowledge level
Meta-Cognitive Knowledge: Knowledge of cognition in general as well as awareness and knowledge of one's own cognition.
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 40
RecognizingRecognizing: Recognize the dates of important events in US history.
RecallingRecalling: Recall the dates of important events in US history
RememberRemember: Retrieve relevant knowledge from long-term memory.
FC: Knowledge of terminologyFC: Knowledge of terminology: technical vocabulary, musical symbols
Knowledge of specific details and elementsKnowledge of specific details and elements: Major natural resources, reliable sources of information
CK: Knowledge of principles and generalizationsCK: Knowledge of principles and generalizations: Pythagorean theorem, law of supply and demand
CK: Knowledge of theories, models and structuresCK: Knowledge of theories, models and structures: theory of evolution, structure of congress
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 21
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 41
UnderstandUnderstand: Construct meaning from instructional messages, including oral, written,and graphic communication.
InterpretingInterpreting: Paraphrase important speeches and documents
ExemplifyingExemplifying: Give examples of various artistic painting styles
ClassifyingClassifying: Classify observed or described cases of mental disorders
SummarizingSummarizing: Write a short summary of the events portrayed on videotapes
InferringInferring: In learning a foreign language, infer grammatical principles from examples
Comparing: Compare historical events to contemporary situations
ExplainingExplaining: Explain the causes of important eighteenth-century events in France
CK: Knowledge of principles and generalizationsCK: Knowledge of principles and generalizations: Pythagorean theorem,
law of supply and demand
CK: Knowledge of theories, models and structuresCK: Knowledge of theories, models and structures: theory of evolution,
structure of congress
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 42
Apply: Carry out or use a procedure in a given situation
Executing: Divide one whole number by another whole number, both with multiple digits.Implementing: Determine in which situations Newton's second law is appropriate.
PK: Knowledge of subjectPK: Knowledge of subject--specific skills and algorithmsspecific skills and algorithms: painting with watercolors, whole-number division
PK: Knowledge of subjectPK: Knowledge of subject--specific techniques and methodsspecific techniques and methods: interviewing techniques, scientific method
PK: Knowledge of criteria for determining when to use appropriatPK: Knowledge of criteria for determining when to use appropriate e
proceduresprocedures: when to apply Newton's second law, when to use a particular method of estimation
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 22
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 43
AnalyzeAnalyze: Break material into constituent parts and determine how parts relate to one another and to an overall structure or purpose.
DifferentiatingDifferentiating: Distinguish between relevant and irrelevant numbers in a mathematical word problem)
OrganizingOrganizing: Structure evidence in a historical description into evidence foror against a particular historical explanation
AttributingAttributing: Determine the point of view of the author of an essay in terms of his or her political perspective
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 44
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 23
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 4545
The OutcomesThe Outcomes--Based approach to course design is intended to Based approach to course design is intended to
make the expectations of the designer/educator make the expectations of the designer/educator
more transparent to both the student and any more transparent to both the student and any
regulatory or accrediting bodyregulatory or accrediting body (KPT, MQA, EAC)(KPT, MQA, EAC). .
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Unlike the traditional model of course design in higher Unlike the traditional model of course design in higher
education (focus on coverage), where the lecturer would decide education (focus on coverage), where the lecturer would decide
what to include on a syllabus, based on his or her own what to include on a syllabus, based on his or her own
judgement of what was important for students to know; or on judgement of what was important for students to know; or on
personal research or other interests; personal research or other interests;
the outcomesthe outcomes--based approach starts with a specification of what based approach starts with a specification of what
the student will be expected to achieve by the end of the the student will be expected to achieve by the end of the
program/course/unitprogram/course/unit/lesson/lesson
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 46
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
1. Address 3-H (Head-Hand-Heart) as specified in the curriculum mapping.
2. Supports the achievement of PLOs (MOHE LOs) as specified in the Curriculum
Matrix (sheet 6 & sheet 8).
3. Specifies the competency level consistent with the Taxonomy identified in
Curriculum Mapping (sheet 10 in the Excel template)
4. Specifies the competency level for the Generic Student Attributes identified in
Curriculum Mapping (Sheet 9 in the Excel Template).
5. Identifies the learning areas or themes and the competency level attainment for
each theme. Content & standards are developed to ensure attainment of the CLOs.
6. Best to just have 3 CLOs, one each for KSA as specified in the Curr Mapping.
7. Alternatively, you could have 5 CLOs: 3 CLO for each theme in the combined
cognitive domain (LOTS-LO1 and HOTS-LO3) and the other 2 CLOs as specified in
the curriculum mapping. Note that the 3 CLOs for each theme may not necessarily
be addressing the same attainment level but the deepest attainment is as specified
in the Taxonomy of your curriculum mapping (sheet 10).
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 24
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 47
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
“The greatest enemy of understanding is coverageThe greatest enemy of understanding is coverage – I can’t repeat
that often enough. If youIf you’’re determined to cover a lot of things, you re determined to cover a lot of things, you
are guaranteeing that most kids will not understandare guaranteeing that most kids will not understand, , because because
they haventhey haven’’t had time enough to go into things in depth, to figure t had time enough to go into things in depth, to figure
out what the requisite understanding is, and be able to perform out what the requisite understanding is, and be able to perform
that understanding in different situationsthat understanding in different situations.”
(Gardner 1993: 24)
Source: Biggs & Tang (2007). “Teaching for Quality Learning at University”. Third Edition. McGraw Hill Companies.
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 48
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
1.1. Explain (in depth)Explain (in depth) the concepts, laws and theories in electrostatics, electricity and
magnetism using either or a combination of the qualitative, visual and quantitative
approach. (LO1-C2). TLATLAs: Pre-class activity: performing predictions and
simulation tasks from predetermined softwares followed by face-to-face group and
class discussion on outcomes of simulation.
2.2. Observe, predict, conduct and discussObserve, predict, conduct and discuss results of scientific investigations in
areas of electrostatics and electricity. (LO2-P3). TLATLAs: Pre-class activity on tasks
involving simulation, laboratory tasks in the lab and discussion of results during
class discussion.
3.3. CollaborateCollaborate with team members in team-related assessment tasks. (LO5-TS3).
TLATLAs: Group discussions and cooperation in labs & in class.
Course learning outcomes (CLOs) for DrJJ’s Physics PHY407 class and its aligned teaching/learning activities (TLAs)
SYLL
LLOs
LabExam
Rubrics
7
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 25
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 49
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
1.1. Explain (in depth)Explain (in depth) the concepts, laws and theories in electrostatics, electricity and
magnetism using either or a combination of the qualitative, visual and quantitative
approach. (LO1-C2).
� Outcome Element: Explain.
� Knowledge Dimensions: Factual, Conceptual & Procedural.
� Assessment Methods: Paper & Pencil Tests (2 Tests & A final Exam), Oral
Interviews (Middle & End of Semester Oral Interviews), Assignments (Concept
Maps)
2.2. Observe, predict, conduct and discussObserve, predict, conduct and discuss results of scientific investigations in areas
of electrostatics and electricity. (LO2-P3). TLATLAs: Pre-class activity on tasks involving
simulation, laboratory tasks in the lab and discussion of results during class
discussion.
� Outcome Elements: Observe, predict, conduct & discuss
� Knowledge Dimensions: Procedural
� Assessment Methods: Journal Entries, Laboratories
Intended learning outcomes (CLOs) for DrJJ’s Physics PHY407 class and its aligned outcomes indicators
SYLL
LLOs
LabExam
Rubrics
7
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 50
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 26
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 51
Work with your learning CommunityWork with your learning Community
�� Select a course that you are currently teaching or you will Select a course that you are currently teaching or you will
be teachingbe teaching
�� Generate the Table of Knowledge Dimension & Knowledge Generate the Table of Knowledge Dimension & Knowledge
ComplexityComplexity
�� Write the proposed CLOs based on the Table aboveWrite the proposed CLOs based on the Table above
�� Propose the Learning Themes/Learning Areas and the Propose the Learning Themes/Learning Areas and the
content that will support attainment of the CLOs. content that will support attainment of the CLOs.
�� Present it to the facilitator.Present it to the facilitator.
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Be practical. You only have 14 weeksBe practical. You only have 14 weeks..
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 52
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Source: Biggs & Tang (2007). “Teaching for Quality Learning at University”. Third Edition. McGraw Hill Companies.
Guidelines to write your constructively aligned CLOs Guidelines to write your constructively aligned CLOs (Use EXCEL to (Use EXCEL to
construct this table) construct this table) –– Refer to Refer to Brief Guide to LOKI Brief Guide to LOKI for the depth/complexityfor the depth/complexity
Level or
complexity of understanding / Performance (Outcome verb-Bloom taxonomy)
MOHE LOs or
PLOs (from Curr Map)
Topics/learning
Areas to be learned / Content
Kind of Knowledge
(Declarative [Factual], Conceptual, Procedural or Metacognition)
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 27
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 53
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Source: Biggs & Tang (2007). “Teaching for Quality Learning at University”. Third Edition. McGraw Hill Companies.
LO1Explain, C2ElectrostaticsF, C, P
LO1Explain, C2ElectricityF, C
LO2Science Method: Predict, Design,
Experiment, Conclude
ElectricityP
LO1Explain, C2MagnetismF, C
LO1Explain, C2Electro-
magnetism
F, C
Level or complexity of
understanding / Performance (Outcome verb-Bloom taxonomy)
MOHE LOs or
PLOs (from Curr Map)
Learning
Areas/Topics to be learned / Content
Kind of Knowledge
(Declarative [Factual], Conceptual, Procedural or Metacognition)
Guidelines to write your constructively aligned CLOs Guidelines to write your constructively aligned CLOs (Use EXCEL to (Use EXCEL to
construct this table) construct this table) –– Refer to Refer to Brief Guide to LOKI Brief Guide to LOKI for the depth/complexityfor the depth/complexity
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 54
Functional Knowledge (what you do with what you know & understand)
Higher order thinking skills (HOTS)
Lower order thinking skills (LOTS)
Complexity increase going from left to right – deeper understandingCourse: PHY407
Meta-
cognition
Procedural
Conceptual
Factual
EvaluateSynthesisAnalyzeApplyUnderstandRememberKnowledge Dimensions
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 28
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 55
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 56
Complexity increase going from left to right Complexity increase going from left to right –– deeper deeper
understandingunderstandingCourse: Course:
PHY407PHY407
MetaMeta--
cognitioncognition
ProceduralProcedural
ExperimentExplainConceptualConceptual
√√√√FactualFactual
EvaluateEvaluateSynthesisSynthesisAnalyzeAnalyzeApplyApplyUnderUnder--
standstandReRe--
membermemberKnowledge Knowledge
DimensionsDimensions
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 29
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 57
http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/coursedev/models/id/taxonomy/#table
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 58
Bloom Cognitive Action Verbs
Bloom
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 30
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 59
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 60
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 31
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 61
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 62
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
1. Note that LLOs are Direct measures of attainment.
2. Courses are offered as evidence towards attainment of PLOs (MOHE LOs) and the
evidence is gathered through attainment of CLOs but are direct measurement is
made by attainment of LLOs.
3. Best to have not more than 5 LLOs (a practical, achievable & measurable numbers
range between 3-5 LLOs, for each 1-hour Face-2-Face Lesson.
4. Have LLOs for all the CLOs to be able to gather direct evidence for the CLO
attainment.
(Don(Don’’ just focus on the cognitive attainment but attainment of just focus on the cognitive attainment but attainment of
ALL the CLOsALL the CLOs……))
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 32
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 63
Work with your learning CommunityWork with your learning Community
�� For each CLO, propose samples of the For each CLO, propose samples of the LLOsLLOs you will be you will be
directly measuring for at least 4 Facedirectly measuring for at least 4 Face--22--Face oneFace one--hour hour
lesson lesson
�� Present it to the facilitator.Present it to the facilitator.
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Be practical. You only have 14 weeksBe practical. You only have 14 weeks..
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 64
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
1.1. Explain (in depth)Explain (in depth) the concepts, laws and theories in electrostatics, electricity and
magnetism using either or a combination of the qualitative, visual and quantitative
approach. (LO1-C2). TLATLAs: Pre-class activity: performing predictions and
simulation tasks from predetermined softwares followed by face-to-face group and
class discussion on outcomes of simulation.
2.2. Observe, predict, conduct and discussObserve, predict, conduct and discuss results of scientific investigations in
areas of electrostatics and electricity. (LO2-P3). TLATLAs: Pre-class activity on tasks
involving simulation, laboratory tasks in the lab and discussion of results during
class discussion.
3.3. CollaborateCollaborate with team members in team-related assessment tasks. (LO5-TS3).
TLATLAs: Group discussions and cooperation in labs & in class.
Intended learning outcomes (CLOs) for DrJJ’s Physics PHY407 class and its aligned teaching/learning activities (TLAs)
SYLL
LLOs
LabExam
Rubrics
7
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 33
Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 65
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
1.1. Explain (in depth)Explain (in depth) the concepts, laws and theories in electrostatics, electricity and
magnetism using either or a combination of the qualitative, visual and quantitative
approach. (LO1-C2).
� Outcome Element: Explain.
� Knowledge Dimensions: Factual, Conceptual & Procedural.
� Assessment Methods: Paper & Pencil Tests (2 Tests & A final Exam), Oral
Interviews (Middle & End of Semester Oral Interviews), Assignments (Concept
Maps)
2.2. Observe, predict, conduct and discussObserve, predict, conduct and discuss results of scientific investigations in areas
of electrostatics and electricity. (LO2-P3). TLATLAs: Pre-class activity on tasks involving
simulation, laboratory tasks in the lab and discussion of results during class
discussion.
� Outcome Elements: Observe, predict, conduct & discuss
� Knowledge Dimensions: Procedural
� Assessment Methods: Journal Entries, Laboratories
Intended learning outcomes (CLOs) for DrJJ’s Physics PHY407 class and its aligned outcomes indicators
SYLL
LLOs
LabExam
Rubrics
7
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 66
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
5
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 34
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 67
MQF.Roz.Roadshow
How Does MQF Affect TeachingHow Does MQF Affect TeachingHow Does MQF Affect TeachingHow Does MQF Affect Teaching----Learning?Learning?Learning?Learning?
Teacher - centered Student - centered
Contact hours Reflects Credit
value
Student Independent
LearningNot Calculated
Total SLT reflects
Credit value
Student
independent
Learning Time
Calculated
No mapping of learning outcomes
Course Objective is
the Learning
Target
Learning
Outcomes is
the Learning
Target
Mapping of
learning
outcomes
necessary
MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 68
MQF.Roz.Roadshow
LecturerLecturerLecturerLecturer----CentredCentredCentredCentred to Studentto Studentto Studentto Student----CentredCentredCentredCentred(incorporating SLT)Academic Activity
(some examples)
Face 2 Face
Student Self-Learning*
Total
1 Lecture 1 2 3
2 Tutorial 1 2 3
3 Laboratory/Practical 3 2 5
4 Assignment - 2000 words 0 20 20
5 Presentation 1 4 5
Total 6 30 36Unaccounted for
in the present system
* Using the Proposed student independent learning in relation (Slide 17)
MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 35
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 69
MQF.Roz.Roadshow
Credit =
Student Learning Time (SLT)
A credit is the agreed-upon value used to measure a student
workload in terms of learning time required to complete
course units, resulting in learning outcomes’ (UNESCO, 2004)
the measurement of students’
academic load
the measurement of students’
academic load
Total SLT 40 Credit
e.g. 4 800 notional SLT = 120 credits
Teaching/Learning + Assessment
Achievement of Learning Outcomes
Teaching Learning
Activities
MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 70
MQF.Roz.Roadshow
Factors In Calculating CreditFactors In Calculating CreditFactors In Calculating CreditFactors In Calculating Credit
Face to Face / Guided Learning Time
+
Student Self Learning Time
+
Total Assessment Time
MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 36
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 71
MQF.Roz.Roadshow
Student Categories &130 credit BachelorsStudent Categories &130 credit BachelorsStudent Categories &130 credit BachelorsStudent Categories &130 credit Bachelors
MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 72
MQF.Roz.Roadshow
Proposed student independent learning timeProposed student independent learning timeProposed student independent learning timeProposed student independent learning timeItem Duration (hours) or
requirementsProposed Student Self Learning Time (hours)
Lecture 1 1-2
Tutorial 1 1-2
Tutorial (involving case studies) 1 3
Laboratory (including report writing) 3 2-3
Undergraduate Final Year Project/ Dissertation
6 - 10 credits 200 - 400
Studio Work 2 2
Presentation 1 3-4
Coursework/Assignment 2000 words 10 - 12
Creative Writing (or a project that last a whole semester)
100 – 150 pages 8-10
Examination 3 10 – 20*Source: Bengkel Kebangsaan Pemantapan Sistem Kredit MQF, 31 Jan. – 2 Feb. 2005 by Quality Assurance
Division, Ministry of Higher Education (Malaysia). * Proposed by MQA, depending on the field of study and the intensity of the examination.
MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 37
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 73
MQF.Roz.Roadshow
Learning Outcomes and Student Learning Time Learning Outcomes and Student Learning Time Learning Outcomes and Student Learning Time Learning Outcomes and Student Learning Time (A subject with 6 learning outcomes and 1.5 credit hours)
Learning Outcomes Lecture Tute Self -learning
Total SLT
1 explain the types of contracts; 2 1 3 6
2 distinguish between offer, acceptance and an invitation to treat;
3 2 5 10
3 differentiate the types considerations; 2 1 3 6
4 describe the principles concerning termination and breach of contract;
4 2 4 10
5 Summarise principles of damages; 2 1 3 6
6 Examine, analyse, compile, apply and justify the principles of contract in given scenario.
0 3 6 9
- Assessment (1 coursework and one 3-hour examinations)
0 4 12 16
Total 63
MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 74
MQF.Roz.Roadshow
Module Academic Load & Credits Module Academic Load & Credits Module Academic Load & Credits Module Academic Load & Credits
Learning Activities SLT
(in hours)
1 Lectures (54)
a Attending Lectures 24
b Pre and Post preparation* 30
2 Tutorial (18)
a Attending tutorial 9
b Preparation for tutorial* 9
3 Laboratory (36)
a Practical 24
b Prepreparation and Report writing*
12
* See Proposed student independent learning in relation (Slide 17)
Learning Activities SLT
(in hours)
4 Assessments (23)
a.
1 continuos assessement (1 hour + 3 hours preparation*)
4
b.
1 presentation (1 hour + 5 hours preparation*)
6
c.
1 Final Examination (3 hour + 10 hours preparation*)
13
Total 131
Subject Credit (131 ÷ 40 = 3.27) 3
MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 38
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 75
MQF.Roz.Roadshow
Credits per semesterCredits per semesterCredits per semesterCredits per semester
MQF in Programmes.Roz.Roadshow
PHY407 FSG500
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 76
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
Outcome Based Education 11/05/2011
Copyright DR JJ, ASERG, UiTM, Shah Alam 39
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 77
Work with your learning CommunityWork with your learning Community
�� Using the course you selected earlier, formulate the Using the course you selected earlier, formulate the SLTsSLTs
for the course.for the course.
�� Present it to the facilitator.Present it to the facilitator.
http://drjj.uitm.edu.my
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 78
ReflectionReflectionReflectionReflection
““““““““The goal of intellectual education The goal of intellectual education The goal of intellectual education The goal of intellectual education The goal of intellectual education The goal of intellectual education The goal of intellectual education The goal of intellectual education is not how to repeat or is not how to repeat or is not how to repeat or is not how to repeat or is not how to repeat or is not how to repeat or is not how to repeat or is not how to repeat or
retain readyretain readyretain readyretain readyretain readyretain readyretain readyretain ready--------made truthsmade truthsmade truthsmade truthsmade truthsmade truthsmade truthsmade truths…………………… . It is in learning to master . It is in learning to master . It is in learning to master . It is in learning to master . It is in learning to master . It is in learning to master . It is in learning to master . It is in learning to master
the truth by oneself at the risk of losing a lot of time and the truth by oneself at the risk of losing a lot of time and the truth by oneself at the risk of losing a lot of time and the truth by oneself at the risk of losing a lot of time and the truth by oneself at the risk of losing a lot of time and the truth by oneself at the risk of losing a lot of time and the truth by oneself at the risk of losing a lot of time and the truth by oneself at the risk of losing a lot of time and
going thru all the roundabout waysgoing thru all the roundabout waysgoing thru all the roundabout waysgoing thru all the roundabout waysgoing thru all the roundabout waysgoing thru all the roundabout waysgoing thru all the roundabout waysgoing thru all the roundabout ways that are inherent in that are inherent in that are inherent in that are inherent in that are inherent in that are inherent in that are inherent in that are inherent in
real activity.real activity.real activity.real activity.real activity.real activity.real activity.real activity.””””””””
(Jean Piaget, Swiss cognitive psychologist, 1896-1980)
5/11/2011 Copyright DrJJ, ASERG, FSG, UiTM. March 2010 57
http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/coursedev/models/id/taxonomy/#table