copyright © cengage learning. all rights reserved. logistic functions section 7.4

36
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

Upload: barrie-stafford

Post on 26-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Logistic FunctionsSECTION 7.4

Page 2: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

2

Learning Objectives

1 Graph logistic functions from equations and tables

2 Use logistic models to predict and interpret unknown results

Page 3: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

3

Logistic Growth

Page 4: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

4

Logistic Growth

Figure 7.23 represents the total number of people who have had the flu as a combination of very slow exponential growth (labeled a), rapid exponential growth (labeled b),followed by a slower increase (labeled c), and then a leveling off (labeled d).

Figure 7.23

Page 5: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

5

Logistic Growth

At the inflection point the rate at which the flu is spreading is the greatest.

The horizontal asymptote (red dashed horizontal line) represents the limiting value for the number of people who will contract the flu.

The mathematical model for such behavior is called a logistic function.

Page 6: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

6

Logistic Growth

Page 7: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

7

Example 1 – Exploring Logistic Functions in a Real-World Context

The Centers for Disease Control monitor flu infectionsannually, paying particular attention to flu-like symptoms in children from birth to 4 years old.

The cumulative number of children0–4 years old who visited the CDC’ssentinel providers with flu-likesymptoms during the 2006–2007flu season are displayed inFigure 7.24, together with alogistic model.

Figure 7.24

Children (0–4) with Flu-Like Symptoms

Page 8: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

8

Example 1 – Exploring Logistic Functions in a Real-World Context

a. Explain why a logistic function may better model the 2006–2007 flu infection rate than an exponential function.

cont’d

Children (0–4) with Flu-Like Symptoms

Figure 7.24

Page 9: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

9

Example 1(a) – Solution

A logistic function models the growth in the cumulative number of children with flu-like symptoms better than an exponential function because a logistic function grows slowly at first, then more quickly, and finally levels off at a limiting value.

An exponential function, on the other hand, may grow slowly at first but then will increase at an ever increasing rate, ultimately exceeding the available number of children who could conceivably become infected with flu-like illnesses.

Page 10: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

10

Example 1 – Exploring Logistic Functions in a Real-World Context

b. Using the language of rate of change, describe the behavior of the graph and relate this to what it tells about

the real-world context.

cont’d

Children (0–4) with Flu-Like Symptoms

Page 11: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

11

Example 1(b) – Solution

The graph of the function model is increasing throughout the interval; however, the rate at which the graph is increasing varies.

Initially, the graph is concave up, indicating that the cumulative number of reported cases is increasing at an ever increasing rate.

Around week 17, the graph changes to concave down, indicating that the cumulative number of reported cases are increasing at a lesser and lesser rate.

cont’d

Page 12: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

12

Example 1(b) – Solution

Around week 32, the graph is increasing at such a slow rate that it appears to level off.

This indicates that the number of newly reported cases in weeks 32 and beyond is so small that it has a negligible effect on the cumulative number of cases.

cont’d

Page 13: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

13

Example 1 – Exploring Logistic Functions in a Real-World Context

c. The formula for the logistic function that models the cumulative number of reported children with flu-like

symptoms is where w is the week

of the flu season.

What does the limiting value mean in the real-world context? How is the limiting value represented in the formula for the function H(w) and its graph?

cont’d

Page 14: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

14

Example 1(c) – Solution

The limiting value is approximately 75,700 children. It appears that no more than 75,700 children were reported to have flu-like symptoms during the season.

This value is represented in theformula for H(w) by the value 75,700found in the numerator and on thegraph by the horizontal asymptoteat 75,700.

cont’d

Figure 7.24

Children (0–4) with Flu-Like Symptoms

Page 15: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

15

Example 1 – Exploring Logistic Functions in a Real-World Context

d. Estimate the coordinates for the point of inflection and explain what each coordinate means in the real-world context.

cont’d

Children (0–4) with Flu-Like Symptoms

Page 16: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

16

Example 1(d) – Solution

From the graph of H(w), an estimate for the coordinates of the inflection point is approximately (17, 40,000).

This means at week 17 of the 2006–2007 flu season (late January), the number of children with flu-like symptoms was increasing most rapidly.

cont’d

Page 17: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

17

Example – Exploring Logistic Functions From a Table

Between what intervals is the inflection point? What is the meaning of the inflection point within the context of the problem?

Page 18: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

18

Example – Exploring Logistic Functions From a Table

The percentage of households with a telephone increase throughout the table; however, the rate of increase between 10 and 15 years since 1935 begins to decrease indicating an inflection point. So between 1945 and 1950 the percentage of households with telephones

increased at it’s highest rate.

Page 19: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

19

Logistic Decay

Page 20: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

20

Many real-world data sets are modeled with decreasing rather than increasing logistic functions.

As was the case with logistic growth functions, logistic decay functions have an upper limiting value, L, and a lower limiting value of y = 0.

Logistic Decay

Page 21: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

21

Example 2 – Recognizing a Logistic Decay Function

As shown in Table 7.19, the infant mortality rate in the United States has been falling since 1950. (An infant is a child under 1 year of age.)

Table 7.19

Page 22: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

22

Example 2 – Recognizing a Logistic Decay Function

a. Using Table 7.19, show how the rate of change records the decline in the infant death mortality rate and discuss why this suggests that a logistic model may fit the data.

cont’d

Page 23: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

23

Example 2(a) – Solution

If we calculate the decrease in the infant mortality rate (M) and the yearly rate of change of the infant mortality rate over each interval of time given in Table 7.20, we can determine the behavior of the function M(y).

Table 7.20

Page 24: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

24

Example 2(a) – Solution

Note: We must exercise caution because the intervals between the years provided are not the same.

From the rate of change, we can see that the decline in the infant mortality rate tends to drop slowly at first, then more dramatically, and then levels off.

The change in the infant mortality rate suggests a logistic model.

cont’d

Page 25: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

25

Example 2 – Recognizing a Logistic Decay Function

b. From the table, predict the future lower limiting value and explain what the numerical value means in the real-world context. Does this value seem reasonable?

cont’d

Page 26: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

26

Example 2(b) – Solution

We estimate the lower limiting value to be approximately6.0 deaths per 1000 live births because we expect thevalues to level off near 6.0.

cont’d

Page 27: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

27

Example 2 – Recognizing a Logistic Decay Function

c. Create a scatter plot of the data and estimate the upper and lower limiting values.

cont’d

Page 28: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

28

Example 2(c) – Solution

The scatter plot is shown in Figure 7.25.

From the scatter plot, we predict the upper limiting value will be around 35 and the lower limiting value will be around 6.

cont’d

Figure 7.25

Page 29: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

29

We said earlier that all logistic functions have a lower limiting value at y = 0.

We can use logistic regression to model data sets with this lower limiting value.

But when a data set appears to be logistic but has a different lower limiting value, as in Example 2, we need to align the data before using logistic regression to model the function.

Logistic Decay

Page 30: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

30

a.) Use logistic regression to find the logistic model for the data. (Remember to align your data for the lower limiting value.)

Example: Lower Limiting Value Alignment

Page 31: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

31

a.) Use logistic regression to find the logistic model for the data. (Remember to align your data for the lower limiting value.)

Example: Lower Limiting Value Alignment

Page 32: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

32

Example 4 – Extrapolating Exponential and Logistic Growth

The sales of DVD hardware from 1997 to 2006 are given inTable 7.22.

Table 7.22

cont’d

Page 33: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

33

Example 4 – Extrapolating Exponential and Logistic Growth

a. Use logistic regression to determine the function, D(y), of

the form that best models the growth in

DVD sales from 1997 to 2004. Determine the value of L and explain what this number means in the real-world context.

b. Based on the data from 2005 and 2006, does it appear the model can be used to accurately forecast future sales? Explain why or why not.

cont’d

Page 34: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

34

Example 4(a) – Solution

Using the Technology Tip and logistic regression on the

data from 1997 to 2004, we find

million dollars is the best-fit logistic function for DVD sales(see Figure 7.29).

The limiting value, L, is 40.69, which means DVD sales will level off at $40,690,000 per year.

Figure 7.29

Page 35: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

35

Example 4(b) – Solution

For the years 2005 and 2006, we evaluate the function at t = 8 and t = 9.

The model forecasts 39.3 million dollars in sales in 2005 and 40.1 million dollars in sales in 2006. In actuality, there were 36.7 and 32.7 million dollars in sales, respectively.

cont’d

Page 36: Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Logistic Functions SECTION 7.4

36

Example 4(b) – Solution

The model predicts a leveling off of sales whereas the actual data shows a decline in sales in 2005 and 2006

Consequently, the model does not appear to accurately model future sales.

cont’d