copyright and podcasting: the impact of regulation on new communication technologies edward l....
Post on 15-Jan-2016
215 views
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright and Podcasting:The Impact of Regulation on New
Communication Technologies
Edward L. Carter, J.D.
Scott Lunt, M.A. candidate
Brigham Young University
Setting the Scene
Streaming at BYU? Webcasting licenses convoluted Podcasting licensing non-existent
Copyright ClauseU.S. Constitution, art. I, sec. 8, cl. 8
Congress is authorized “[t]o promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.”
Copyright scholar Lawrence Lessig
“Unlike every other power-granting clause, this was the only power-granting clause that specified the means and purpose to which the power was devoted. Congress was not given the power simply to enact copyrights. Nor was it simply given the power to enact copyrights for limited times. Congress was given the power ‘to promote the Progress of Science’ by granting, not to publishers, but to authors, ‘exclusive Right[s]’ ‘for limited Times.’”
Threshold for copyright protection
Originality– “[W]ork was independently created by the author (as
opposed to copied from other works), and that it posses at least some minimum degree of creativity.” (U.S. Supreme Court)
Fixation– “[E]mbodiment in a copy or phonorecord … is
sufficiently permanent or stable to permit it to be perceived, reproduced or otherwise communicated for a period of more than transitory duration.” (U.S. Supreme Court)
Works of authorship
Literary works Musical works Dramatic works, including music Pantomimes and choreographic works Pictorial, graphic and sculptural works Motion pictures Sound recordings Architectural works
Exclusive rights of copyright owner
Reproduction Preparation of derivative works Public distribution Public performance Public display Public digital performance of a sound recording
How to obtain copyright protection
Permissive to register with Register of Copyrights and deposit with Lib. of Congress
Permissive to use © Copyright “subsists from creation” of a work But no suit for infringement until registration
(form, fee and 2 copies to Lib. of Congress)
Remedies for infringement
Injunctions Impounding Monetary damages Costs and attorney fees Criminal liability only if:
– Commercial advantage or private financial gain, or– Reproduce or distribute 1 or more copies of
phonorecords with total retail value of $1,000+
Sound recording copyrights
Sound recordings given no copyright protection until 1971
Even then, only reproduction and distribution (not public performance) protected
Even today, broadcasters can play recorded music without compensating copyright holders in sound recording (they do compensate composers for composition copyright)
Sound recording copyrights
In 1995 Congress created limited right to publicly perform digital audio sound recording
Concern was that electronic media facilitated copyright infringement (digital nature, ease of copying and distributing, quality of recording)
Copyright and podcasting
Today copyright law, especially in the recorded music arena, is more about compensating corporate record labels than promoting societal progress through providing an incentive for artistic expression
But podcasting poses an opportunity to get back to constitutional purpose of copyright
Copyright and podcasting
Result of regulation is that podcasts today are largely talk rather than music
There is “podsafe” music as well (not represented by performance rights agencies)
Streaming Radio (RealNetworks)
Podcast Listing (podcast alley)
iTunes podcast list
Do they want music?
“If people call it music and it has a purpose other than filling the pockets of the major labels we hope to share it with you.” (#20 - Music Nerve)
Rock n Roll Geek Show (podsafe) - 156,000 downloads in Jan 2005
Podsafe Music Network (PodShow)
Collection of artists and podcasters Curry - $8.9 m venture capital (2005) Offices in San Francisco (now hiring!)
Manufacturer or Service Provider?
Record companies need to see themselves more as a service provider. Providing entertainment in ways their customers want.
Negotiating copyright law
Music podcaster today would have to get licensing:– Harry Fox Agency (maybe) for reproduction and
distribution of compositions– BMI, ASCAP or SESAC for public performance of
compositions– SoundExchange for public performance of sound
recordings (but no statutory license is available here, according to SoundExchange)
Statutory license
For eligible nonsubscription transmission:– Noninteractive– Entertainment– Sound recording performance complement– No archived program less than 5 hours– No archives available more than 2 weeks– If continuous loop, no program less than 3 hours– Not induce making of phonorecord by recipient (this
a problem for podcasters)
Bottom line
Music industry not ready to embrace podcasting
Forces podcasters to make choice: no music, or unlicensed music?
Courts may have to address issue of when treating communications media differently based on technology is appropriate