copyright 2012 john wiley & sons, inc. part i project initiation

45
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

Upload: alyson-wilkins

Post on 12-Jan-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Part I

Project Initiation

Page 2: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-22

Project Management

Page 3: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Chapter 2

Strategic Management and Project Selection

Page 4: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

The PMBOK Five Process Groups

InitiatingPlanningExecutingMonitoring & ControllingClosing

Page 5: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

The PMBOK Nine Knowledge Areas (put Management after any)

Integration Scope Time Cost Quality Communications Human Resources Risk Procurement

Page 6: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

Definitions

Program: a group of related projects requiring coordinated management because of shared resources

Portfolio: a group of programs related by common strategic goals

the distinction may be blurry

2-2-66

Page 7: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-77

Problems With Multiple Projects

Delays in one project delays others Inefficient use of resources Bottlenecks in resource availability

Page 8: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-88

Project Management Maturity

Project management maturity refers to the mastery of skills required to manage projects competently

Number of ways to measureMost organizations do not do well

Page 9: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-99

Types of Companies

Companies considering projects fall into two broad categories:

– Companies whose core business is completing projects

– Companies whose core business is something else

They can also be broken down as:– Companies looking at projects to do for others– Companies looking at projects to do for themselves

Page 10: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-1010

Types of Nonnumeric Models

Sacred Cow– A project, often suggested by the top management,

that has taken on a life of its own

Operating Necessity– A project that is required in order to protect lives or

property or to keep the company in operation

Competitive Necessity– A project that is required in order to maintain the

company’s position in the marketplace

Page 11: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-1111

Numeric Models

Models that return a numeric value for a project that can be easily compared with other projects

Two major categories:– Profit/profitability– Scoring

Page 12: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-1212

Profit/Profitability Models

Models that look at costs and revenues– Payback period– Discounted cash flow (NPV)– Internal rate of return (IRR)– Profitability index

NPV and IRR are the more common methods

Page 13: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-1313

Payback Period

The length of time until the original investment has been recouped by the project

A shorter payback period is better

Page 14: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-1414

Payback Period Example

4000,25$

000,100$PeriodPayback

FlowCash Annual

CostProject PeriodPayback

Page 15: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-1515

Payback Period Drawbacks

Does not consider time value of money More difficult to use when cash flows

change over time Less meaningful for longer periods of

time (due to time value of money)

Page 16: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-1616

Discounted Cash Flow

The value of a stream of cash inflows and outflows in today’s dollars

Also known as Net Present Value or just discounting

Widely used to evaluate projects Includes the time value of money Includes all inflows and outflows, not just

the ones through payback point

Page 17: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-1717

Discounted Cash Flow Continued

Requires a percentage to use to reduce future cash flows– This is known as the discount rate

The discount rate may also be known as a hurdle rate or cutoff rate

There will usually be one overall discount rate for the company

Page 18: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-1818

NPV Formula

NPV (project) 0

1 1

nt

tt

FA

k

Page 19: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-1919

NPV Formula Terms

A0 Initial cash investment (usually < 0)

Ft Cash flow in time period t (negative foroutflows)

k The discount rate

t The number of years of lifeA higher NPV is betterHigher the discount rate lower the NPVExcel function NPV starts at Y1 not Y0

Page 20: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-2020

NPV Example

939,1$

03.015.01

000,25$000,100$ (project) NPV

8

1

t

t

Page 21: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-2121

Internal Rate of Return [IRR]

The discount rate (k) that causes the NPV to be equal to zero

The higher the IRR, the better– While it is technically possible for a series to

have multiple IRR’s, this is not a practical issue

Finding the IRR requires a financial calculator or computer

In Excel, use goal seek or IRR function.

Page 22: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-2222

Profitability Index

a k a Benefit cost ratioNPV divided by initial cash investmentRatios greater than 1.0 are goodEasy to use and understandBased on accounting data and forecastsFamiliar and well understoodGives a go/no-go indication

Page 23: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-2323

Scoring Models

Unweighted 0–1 factor modelUnweighted factor modelWeighted factor model

Page 24: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-2424

Unweighted 0-1 Factor Model

Factors selected– Listed on a preprinted form

Raters score the project on each factorEach project gets a total scoreMain advantage is that the model uses

multiple criteriaMajor disadvantages are that it assumes

all criteria are of equal importance

Page 25: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-2525

Unweighted 0-1 Factor Model Example

Figure 2-2

Page 26: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-2626

Unweighted Factor Scoring Model

Replaces X’s with factor score– Typically a 1-5 scale

Column of scores is summedProjects with high scores are selected

Page 27: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-2727

Unweighted Weighted Factor Model

Each factor is weighted the sameLess important factors are weighted the

same as important onesEasy to computeJust total or average the scores

Page 28: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-2828

Weighted Factor Model

Each factor is weighted relative to its importance– Weighting allows important factors to stand out

A good way to include nonnumeric data in the analysis

Factors need to sum to one All weights must be set up, so higher values

mean more desirable Small differences in totals are not meaningful

Page 29: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-2929

Weighted Factor Model Example

Figure B Page 60

Page 30: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-3030

Advantages of Scoring Models

Allow multiple criteria Structurally simple Direct reflection of managerial policy Easily altered Allow for more important factors Allow easy sensitivity analysis

Page 31: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-3131

Disadvantages of Scoring Models

Relative measure Linear in form Can have large number of criteria Unweighted models assume equal

importance

Page 32: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-3232

The Project Portfolio Process (PPP)

Links projects directly to the goals and strategy of the organization

Means for monitoring and controlling projects

Page 33: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-3333

Purpose of Project Portfolio Process

Identify nonprojectsPrioritize list of projectsLimit number of projects Identify the real options for each project Identify projects with good fit Identify co-dependent projects

Page 34: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-3434

Purpose of Project Portfolio Process Continued

Eliminate risky projectsEliminate projects that skip the formal

selection processKeep from overloading the organizationTo balance the resources with needsTo balance returnsTo balance short-, medium-, and long-

term returns

Page 35: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-3535

Project Portfolio Process Steps

1. Establish a project council2. Identify project categories and criteria3. Collect project data4. Assess resource availability5. Reduce the project and criteria set6. Prioritize the projects within categories7. Select the projects to be funded and held in

reserve8. Implement the process

Page 36: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-3636

Step 1: Establish a Project Council

Senior managementThe project managers of major projectsThe head of the Project Management

OfficeParticularly relevant general managersThose who can identify key opportunities

and risks facing the organizationAnyone who can derail the PPP later on

Page 37: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-3737

Step 2: Identify Project Categories and Criteria

Derivative projects– Projects that are only incrementally different from previous

efforts.

Platform projects– Projects that impact organization outputs or the processes

that create them.

Breakthrough projects– Projects that involve implementing new, sometimes

“disruptive” technology.

R&D projects– Projects used to acquire new knowledge or create new

technology.

Page 38: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-3838

Step 3: Collect Project Data

Assemble the dataDocument assumptionsScreen out weaker projectsThe fewer projects that need to be

compared and analyzed, the easier the work of the council

Page 39: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-3939

Step 4: Assess Resource Availability

Assess both internal and external resources

Assess labor conservativelyTiming is particularly important

Page 40: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-4040

Step 5: Reduce the Project and Criteria Set

Organization’s goals Have competence Market for offering How risky the project is Potential partner Right resources Good fit

Use strengths Synergistic Dominated by

another Has slipped in

desirability

Page 41: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-4141

Step 6: Prioritize the Projects Within Categories

Apply the scores and criterion weightsConsider in terms of benefits first and

resource costs secondSummarize the returns from the projects

Page 42: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-4242

Step 7: Select the Projects to be Funded and Held in Reserve

Determine the mix of projects across the categories

Leave some resources free for new opportunities

Allocate the categorized projects in rank order

Page 43: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-4343

Step 8: Implement the Process

Communicate resultsRepeat regularly Improve process

Page 44: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-4444

Project Proposals

The project proposal is essentially a project bid

Putting together a project proposal requires a detailed analysis of the project

Project proposals can take weeks or months to complete

A more detailed analysis may result in not bidding on the project

Page 45: Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Part I Project Initiation

2-2-4545

Project Proposal Contents

Cover letterExecutive summaryThe technical approachThe implementation planThe plan for logistic support and

administrationPast experience