copyright © 2010 pearson education, inc. publishing as prentice hall. chapter 5 network design in...
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Chapter 5Network
Design in the Supply Chain
5-1
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Outline
The Role of Network Design in the Supply Chain Factors Influencing Network Design Decisions Framework for Network Design Decisions Models for Facility Location and Capacity
Allocation The Role of IT in Network Design Making Network Design Decisions in Practice
5-2
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Network Design Decisions
Facility role Facility location Capacity allocation Market and supply allocation
5-3
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Factors InfluencingNetwork Design Decisions
Strategic Technological Macroeconomic Political Infrastructure Competitive Logistics and facility costs
5-5
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Strategic Factors
Firm’s competitive strategy– Cost– Responsiveness
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Factors InfluencingNetwork Design Decisions
Strategic Technological Macroeconomic Political Infrastructure Competitive Logistics and facility costs
5-7
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Factors InfluencingNetwork Design Decisions
Strategic Technological Macroeconomic Political Infrastructure Competitive Logistics and facility costs
5-8
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Factors InfluencingNetwork Design Decisions
Strategic Technological Macroeconomic Political Infrastructure Competitive Logistics and facility costs
5-9
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Factors InfluencingNetwork Design Decisions
Strategic Technological Macroeconomic Political Infrastructure Competitive Logistics and facility costs
5-10
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Factors InfluencingNetwork Design Decisions
Strategic Technological Macroeconomic Political Infrastructure Competitive Logistics and facility costs
5-11
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Competitor location
0 1A 1-B
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Competitor location
0 1A 1-B
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Competitor location
0 1A 1-B
D1 = A + (1 – B – A)/2D2 = (1+ B – A)/2
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Factors InfluencingNetwork Design Decisions
Strategic Technological Macroeconomic Political Infrastructure Competitive Logistics and facility costs
5-15
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Service and Number of Facilities
Number of Facilities
ResponseTime
5-16
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Costs and Number of Facilities
Costs
Number of facilities
Inventory
Transportation
Facility costs
5-17
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
TransportationTransportation
Cost Buildup as a Function of FacilitiesC
ost
of O
per
atio
ns
Cos
t of
Op
erat
ion
s
Number of FacilitiesNumber of Facilities
InventoryInventory
FacilitiesFacilities
Total CostsTotal Costs
LaborLabor
5-18
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Framework for Network Design Decisions
Phase I – Supply Chain Strategy Phase II – Regional Facility Configuration Phase III – Desirable Sites Phase IV – Location Choices
5-19
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
A Framework forNetwork Design Decisions
PHASE ISupply Chain
Strategy
PHASE IIRegional Facility
Configuration
PHASE IIIDesirable Sites
PHASE IVLocation Choices
Competitive STRATEGY
INTERNAL CONSTRAINTSCapital, growth strategy,existing network
PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIESCost, Scale/Scope impact, supportrequired, flexibility
COMPETITIVEENVIRONMENT
PRODUCTION METHODSSkill needs, response time
FACTOR COSTSLabor, materials, site specific
GLOBAL COMPETITION
TARIFFS AND TAXINCENTIVES
REGIONAL DEMANDSize, growth, homogeneity,local specifications
POLITICAL, EXCHANGERATE AND DEMAND RISK
AVAILABLEINFRASTRUCTURE
LOGISTICS COSTSTransport, inventory, coordination
5-20
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Linear programming (LP)
Optimization of linear objective functions
Normally formulated:– Maximize X– Subject to y < z
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
LP example (Joe’s chop shop)
Joe takes plain vans and converts them into custom vans and can produce either fine or fancy vans. Both types require a $25,000 plain van. Fancy vans sell for $37,000 and Joe uses $10,000 in parts to customize them yielding a profit margin of $2,000. Fine vans use $6,000 in parts and sell for $32,700 yielding profits of $1,700. Joe figures the shop can work on no more than 12 vans in a week. Joe hires 7 people including himself and operates 8 hours per day, 5 days a week and thus has at most 280 hours of labor available in a week. Joe also estimates that a fancy van will take 25 hours of labor, while a fine van will take 20 hours.
To maximize profit, how many of each van should Joe produce?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
LP Example (Joe’s chop shop)
Maximize Z = 2000 Xfancy + 1700 Xfine
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
LP example (Joe’s chop shop)
Joe takes plain vans and converts them into custom vans and can produce either fine or fancy vans. Both types require a $25,000 plain van. Fancy vans sell for $37,000 and Joe uses $10,000 in parts to customize them yielding a profit margin of $2,000. Fine vans use $6,000 in parts and sell for $32,700 yielding profits of $1,700. Joe figures the shop can work on no more than 12 vans in a week. Joe hires 7 people including himself and operates 8 hours per day, 5 days a week and thus has at most 280 hours of labor available in a week. Joe also estimates that a fancy van will take 25 hours of labor, while a fine van will take 20 hours.
To maximize profit, how many of each van should Joe produce?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
LP Example (Joe’s chop shop)
Maximize Z = 2000 Xfancy + 1700 Xfine
Subject to:Xfancy ≥ 0
Xfine ≥ 0
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
LP example (Joe’s chop shop)
Joe takes plain vans and converts them into custom vans and can produce either fine or fancy vans. Both types require a $25,000 plain van. Fancy vans sell for $37,000 and Joe uses $10,000 in parts to customize them yielding a profit margin of $2,000. Fine vans use $6,000 in parts and sell for $32,700 yielding profits of $1,700. Joe figures the shop can work on no more than 12 vans in a week. Joe hires 7 people including himself and operates 8 hours per day, 5 days a week and thus has at most 280 hours of labor available in a week. Joe also estimates that a fancy van will take 25 hours of labor, while a fine van will take 20 hours.
To maximize profit, how many of each van should Joe produce?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
LP Example (Joe’s chop shop)
Maximize Z = 2000 Xfancy + 1700 Xfine
Subject to:Xfancy ≥ 0
Xfine ≥ 0
Xfancy + Xfine ≤ 12
25 Xfancy + 20 Xfine ≤ 280
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
12
12
10
10
8
8
6
6
4
4
2
20
Xfancy + Xfine ≤ 12
Xfancy
Xfine
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
12
12
10
10
8
8
6
6
4
4
2
20
25 Xfancy + 20 Xfine ≤ 280
Xfancy
Xfine
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
12
12
10
10
8
8
6
6
4
4
2
20
Xfancy
Xfine
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
12
12
10
10
8
8
6
6
4
4
2
20
2000 Xfancy + 1700 Xfine
Xfancy
Xfine
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
12
12
10
10
8
8
6
6
4
4
2
20
Xfancy
Xfine
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Steps to add the Solver add-in in Excel 2007
1. Click the Microsoft Office Button , and then click Excel Options.2. Click Add-Ins, and then in the Manage box, select Excel Add-ins.3. Click Go.4. In the Add-Ins available box, select the Solver Add-in check box, and then click OK.
Tip: If Solver Add-in is not listed in the Add-Ins available box, click Browse to locate the add-in. If you get prompted that the Solver Add-in is not currently installed on your computer, click Yes to install it.After you load the Solver Add-in, the Solver command is available in the Analysis group on the Data tab
LP Example- Excel Solver
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
LP Example
Maximize Z = 2000 Xfancy + 1700 Xfine
# of Fancy produced
# of Fine produced
Subject to
Xfancy + Xfine <= 12 0
25 Xfancy + 20Xfine <= 280 0
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
LP Example
Maximize Z = 2000 Xfancy + 1700 Xfine 22800
# of Fancy produced 8
# of Fine produced 4
Subject toXfancy + Xfine <= 12 12
25 Xfancy + 20Xfine <= 280 280
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
LP example #2 (calculators)
A calculator company produces a scientific calculator and a graphing calculator. Long-term projections indicate an expected demand of at least 100 scientific and 80 graphing calculators each day. Because of limitations on production capacity, no more than 200 scientific and 170 graphing calculators can be made daily. To satisfy a shipping contract, a total of at least 200 calculators much be shipped each day.
If each scientific calculator sold results in a $2 loss, but each graphing calculator produces a $5 profit, how many of each type should be made daily to maximize net profits?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
LP Example #2 (Calculators)
Maximize Z = -2 Xscientific + 5 Xgraphing
Subject to:Xscientific ≥ 100
Xgraphing ≥ 80
Xscientific + Xgraphing ≤ 200
Xscientific ≤ 200
Xgraphing ≤ 170
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
LP Example #2 (Calculators)
Maximize Z = -2 Xsci + 5 Xgraph 650
# of Sci produced 100
# of Graph produced 170
Subject toXsci + Xgraph <= 200 270
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Network Optimization Models
Allocating demand to production facilities Locating facilities and allocating capacity
Which plants to establish? How to configure the network?
Key Costs:
• Fixed facility cost• Transportation cost• Production cost• Inventory cost• Coordination cost
5-39
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Plant Location with Multiple Sourcing
}1,0{;
,...,1,
,...,1,
..
1
1
1
1 11
yy
yKx
Dx
xcyf
i
m
ii
ii
n
jij
j
n
iij
n
i
m
jijiji
n
ii
k
ni
mj
ts
Min
5-40
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Figure 5-3
Inputs - Costs, Capacities, Demands
Demand Region
Production and Transportation Cost per 1,000,000 Units Fixed Low Fixed High
Supply Region N. America S. America Europe Asia Africa Cost ($) Capacity Cost ($) Capacity
N. America 81 92 101 130 115 6,000 10 9,000 20
S. America 117 77 108 98 100 4,500 10 6,750 20
Europe 102 105 95 119 111 6,500 10 9,750 20
Asia 115 125 90 59 74 4,100 10 6,150 20
Africa 142 100 103 105 71 4,000 10 6,000 20
Demand 12 8 14 16 7
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Figure 5-4
Decision Variables
Demand Region - Production Allocation (1000 Units) Plants Plants
Supply Region N. America S. America Europe Asia Africa (1=open) (1=open)
N. America 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
S. America 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Europe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Asia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Africa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Figure 5-5
Constraints
Supply Region Excess Capacity
N. America 0
S. America 0
Europe 0
Asia 0
Africa 0
N. America S. America Europe Asia Africa
Unmet Demand 12 8 14 16 7
Objective Function
Cost = $ -
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Figure 5-6
Constraints:All decision variables are ≥ 0
All excess capacity is ≥ 0
All unmet demand = 0
Plants are open or closed (0,1)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Figure 5-7Inputs - Costs, Capacities, Demands
Demand Region
Production and Transportation Cost per 1,000,000 Units Fixed Low Fixed High
Supply Region N. America S. America Europe Asia Africa Cost ($) Capacity Cost ($) CapacityN. America 81 92 101 130 115 6,000 10 9,000 20S. America 117 77 108 98 100 4,500 10 6,750 20Europe 102 105 95 119 111 6,500 10 9,750 20Asia 115 125 90 59 74 4,100 10 6,150 20Africa 142 100 103 105 71 4,000 10 6,000 20Demand 12 8 14 16 7 Decision Variables Demand Region - Production Allocation (1000 Units) Plants Plants
Supply Region N. America S. America Europe Asia Africa (1=open) (1=open)N. America 0 0 0 0 0 0 0S. America 12 8 0 0 0 0 1Europe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Asia 0 0 4 16 0 0 1Africa 0 0 10 0 7 0 1
ConstraintsSupply Region Excess Capacity N. America 0S. America 0Europe 0Asia 0Africa 3 N. America S. America Europe Asia AfricaUnmet Demand 0 0 0 0 0
Objective FunctionCost = $ 23,751
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Gravity Method
C
C
C
C
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
x = (60x5000) + (15x1000) + (80x3000)
5000+ 1000 + 3000
y = (15x5000) + (70x1000) + (110x3000)
5000+ 1000 + 3000
x = 555000/9000 ≈ 62
y = 475000/9000 ≈ 53
k
nn
k
nnny
k
nn
k
nnnx
V
Vdy
V
Vdx
1
1
1
1 ,
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Gravity Method
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
C
C
C
C
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Gravity Method
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
C
C
C
C
Customer x y demandIdaho 75 40 500Arizona 35 40 2000Texas 25 80 1200Ohio 65 105 600
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Gravity Method
Ton Mile-Center Solution– x : X coordinate center of gravity
– y : Y coordinate center of gravity
– dnx : X coordinate of the nth
location
– dny : Y coordinate of the nth
location
– Vn : Annual tonnage to delivery
location n
k
nn
k
nnny
k
nn
k
nnnx
V
Vdy
V
Vdx
1
1
1
1
5-50
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
x = (75x500) + (35x2000) + (25x1200) + (65x600)
500+ 2000 + 1200 + 600
y = (40x500) + (40x2000) + (80x1200) + (105x600)
500+ 2000 + 1200 + 600
x = 176500/4300 = 41
y = 259000/4300 = 60
k
nn
k
nnny
k
nn
k
nnnx
V
Vdy
V
Vdx
1
1
1
1 ,
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Gravity Method
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
C
C
C
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
k
nn
k
nnny
k
nn
k
nnnx
V
Vdy
V
Vdx
1
1
1
1 ,
Customer x y demand
California 60 15 5000
Texas 15 70 1000
New York 80 110 3000
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
QUESTION>>>
QUESTION…. What is the location 41/70 Oklahoma (62/53 Colorado)XX 55/71 Kansas 73/82 Iowa
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Gravity Method
C
C
C
C
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
x = (60x5000) + (15x1000) + (80x3000)
5000+ 1000 + 3000
y = (15x5000) + (70x1000) + (110x3000)
5000+ 1000 + 3000
x = 555000/9000 ≈ 62
y = 475000/9000 ≈ 53
k
nn
k
nnny
k
nn
k
nnnx
V
Vdy
V
Vdx
1
1
1
1 ,
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Exercise #2 DryIce, Inc., is a manufacturer of air conditioners that ha seen its demand
grow significantly. The company anticipates nationwide demand for the year 2010 to be 180,000 in the South, 120,000 units in the Midwest, 110,000 in the East, and 100,000 units in the West. Managers at DryIce are designing the manufacturing network and have selected four potential sites- New York, Atlanta, Chicago, and San Diego. Plants could have a capacity of either 200,000 or 400,000 units. The annual fixed costs are the four locations are shown in the table below, along with the cost of producing and shipping an air conditioner to each of the four markets. Where should DryIce build its factories and how large should they be?
New York Atlanta Chicago San Diego
Fixed Costs
200k 6,000,000 5,500,000 5,600,000 6,100,000
400k 10,000,000 9,200,000 9,300,000 10,200,000
Variable Costs
East 211 232 238 299
South 232 212 230 280
Midwest 240 230 215 270
West 300 280 270 225
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Exercise #2
Objective function:Minimize Z = fixed costs + Variable costs
Subject to :All shipments are positive integers (≥0)
All shipments are ≤ 400000
All shipment add up to the 2010 requirements.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Question
Question
Answer is: **265740 250150 231000 276090
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Exercise #2 New York
Shipped from NY Atlanta
Shipped from Atlanta Chicago
Shipped from
Chicago San Diego
Shipped from San
Diego Requirements Supply
Fixed Costs
200k 6,000,000 5,500,000 5,600,000 6,100,000
400k 10,000,000 9,200,000 9,300,000 10,200,000
Variable Costs
East 211
110,000
232
-
238
-
299
-
110,000 110,000
South 232
-
212
180,000
230
-
280
-
180,000 180,000
Midwest 240
-
230
-
215
120,000
270
-
120,000 120,000
West 300
-
280
-
270
-
225
100,000
100,000 100,000
23,210,000 110,000 38,160,000 180,000 25,800,000 120,000 22,500,000 100,000
Fixed 6,000,000 5,500,000 5,600,000 6,100,000
29,210,000 43,660,000 31,400,000 28,600,000 132,870,000
TOTAL SYSTEM COST
265,740,000
Cells that are changed
All non negative integers
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Exercise #2 New York
Shipped from NY Atlanta
Shipped from Atlanta Chicago
Shipped from
Chicago San Diego
Shipped from San
Diego Requirements Supply
Fixed Costs
200k 6,000,000 5,500,000 5,600,000 6,100,000
400k 10,000,000 9,200,000 9,300,000 10,200,000
Variable Costs
East 211
110,000
232
-
238
-
299
-
110,000 110,000
South 232
-
212
180,000
230
-
280
-
180,000 180,000
Midwest 240
-
230
-
215
120,000
270
-
120,000 120,000
West 300
-
280
-
270
-
225
100,000
100,000 100,000
23,210,000 110,000 38,160,000 180,000 25,800,000 120,000 22,500,000 100,000
Fixed 6,000,000 5,500,000 5,600,000 6,100,000
29,210,000 43,660,000 31,400,000 28,600,000 132,870,000
TOTAL SYSTEM COST
265,740,000
Cells that are changed
All non negative integers
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
The Role of IT in Network Design
IT systems help with network design by:1. Making the modeling of the network design
problems easier
2. Containing high-performance optimization technologies
3. Allowing for “what-if” scenarios
4. Interfacing with planning and operational software
5-62
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Making Network Design Decisions In Practice
Do not underestimate the life span of facilities Do not gloss over the cultural implications Do not ignore quality of life issues Focus on tariffs and tax incentives when
locating facilities
5-63
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Summary of Learning Objectives
What is the role of network design decisions in the supply chain?
What are the factors influencing supply chain network design decisions?
Describe a strategic framework for facility location.
How are the following optimization methods used for facility location and capacity allocation decisions?– Gravity methods for location– Network optimization models
5-64