copyright 2008 pearson education canada individual decision making chapter 9 copyright 2008 pearson...
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
IndividualDecision Making
Chapter 9
Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
9-2Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Consumers as Problem Solvers
• Consumer purchase = response to problem
• Decision-making process– After realization that we want
to make a purchase, we go through a series of steps in order to make it
– Can seem automatic or like a full-time job
– Complicated by consumer hyperchoice
9-3Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Decision-making ProcessProblem Recognition
Information Search
Evaluation of Alternatives
Product Choice
Consumptions and Learning
Bill realizes that he dislikes his B&W TV
Bill talks to his friends to learn about TVs
Bill chooses a TV with an appealing feature
Bill compares models on reputation and features
Bill brings home and enjoys his TVFigure 9.1 (abridged)
9-4Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Decision-making Perspectives
• Rational perspective– Purchase momentum– Constructive processing
• Behavioural influence perspective
• Experiential perspective
9-5Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Types of Consumer Decisions• Continuum of Decision Making
9-6Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Extended Problem Solving
• Initiated by self-concept motive
• Eventual purchase decision is perceived as a risk
• Consumer collects extensive information– Internal and external search
• Careful evaluation of brand attributes (one at a time)
9-7Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Limited Problem Solving
• More straightforward/simple
• Simple decision rules to choose among alternatives– Cognitive shortcuts
9-8Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Habitual Decision Making
• Automaticity: choices made with little/no conscious effort– Efficient decisions: minimal time/energy
• Challenge for marketers…– Consumers must be convinced to “unfreeze”
their former habit and replace it with new one
9-9Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Problem Recognition• Occurs when consumer sees difference
between current state and ideal state• Need recognition: actual state moves
downward– Running out of a product, buying a deficient
product, or creating new needs
• Opportunity recognition: ideal state moves upward– Exposed to different/better quality products
(standard of comparison)
• Marketers: primary and secondary demand
9-10Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Individual Decision Making
9-11Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Information Search
• Consumers need information to solve problem– We survey our environment for appropriate
data to make decision
• Prepurchase search vs. ongoing search
9-12Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Internal vs. External Search
• Internal search– Scanning memory to assemble product
alternative information
• External search– Obtaining information from ads, retailers,
catalogs, friends, family, people-watching, Consumer Reports, etc.
9-13Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Deliberate vs. “Accidental” Search
• Directed learning: existing product knowledge obtained from previous information search or experience of alternatives
• Incidental learning: mere exposure over time to conditioned stimuli and observations of others
9-14Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
The Economics of Information
• Variety Seeking
• Consumers will gather as much data as needed to make informed decisions– We continue to search until costs exceed
utility of information search (as long as process is not too onerous/time-consuming)
– We will collect most valuable information first
9-15Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Do Consumers Always Search Rationally?
• Some consumers tend to avoid external search, especially with minimal time to do so and with durable goods (e.g., autos)
• Symbolic items = more external search– High perceived risk
9-16Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Do Consumers Always Search Rationally? (Cont’d)
• Brand switching– Variety seeking: unpredictability can be
rewarding to consumers• When in good mood or little stimulation elsewhere
(sensory-specific satiety)
– We select familiar brands, when decision situation is ambiguous or when there is little information about competing brands
9-17Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Biases in Decision-Making Process
• Mental accounting– Framing a problem in terms of gains/losses
influences our decisions
• Sunk-cost fallacy: We are reluctant to waste something we have paid for– Study: hockey ticket vs. storm
9-18Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Biases in Decision-Making Process (Cont’d)
• Loss aversion: We place more emphasis on loss than on gain– Prospect theory– Gambling study
• Extraneous characteristics of the choice situation can influence our selections– “Beer on the beach” study
9-19Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
How Much Search Occurs?
• Search activity is greater when…– Purchase is important– There is a need to learn more about purchase– Relevant info is easily obtained/utilized– One is younger, is better-educated, and
enjoys shopping/fact-finding– One is female (compared to male)– One places greater value on own style/image
9-20Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Consumer’s Prior Expertise• Moderately
knowledgeable consumers tend to search more than product experts and novices
• Experts: selective search
• Novices: others’ opinions, “nonfunctional” attributes, and “top down” processing
Figure 9-5
9-21Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Perceived Risk• Belief that product has negative
consequences– Expensive, complex, hard-to-understand
products– Product choice is visible to others (risk of
embarrassment for wrong choice)
• Risks can be objective (physical danger) and subjective (social embarrassment)
9-22Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Evaluation of Alternatives
• Choosing a brand/product among available alternatives requires much of the effort that goes into a purchase decision– Just think about how many brands or different
brand variations there are!– Discussion: Do you agree that having too
many choices is a bigger problem than not having enough choices? Is it possible to have too much of a good thing?
9-23Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Identifying Alternatives
• Extended problem solving = evaluation of several brands– Occurs when choice conflicts arouse negative
emotions (involving difficult trade-offs)
• Habitual decision = consider few/no brand alternatives
9-24Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Identifying Alternatives (Cont’d)
• Evoked set vs. consideration set– We usually don’t seriously consider every
brand we know about– In fact, we often include only a surprisingly
small number of alternatives in our evoked set
• Marketers must focus on getting their brands in consumers’ evoked set– We often do not give rejected brands a
second chance. Discussion: Why?
9-25Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Identifying Alternative (Cont’d)
9-26Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Product Categorization
• We evaluate products in terms of what we already know about a (similar) product
• Evoked-set products usually share similar features– When faced with a new product, we refer to existing
product category knowledge to form new knowledge
• Marketers want to ensure that their products are correctly grouped in knowledge structures– Jell-O gelatin flavours for salads
9-27Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Levels of Categorization
9-28Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Strategic Implications of Product Categorization
• Product positioning– Convincing consumers that product should be
considered within a given category• Orange juice: “It’s not just for breakfast anymore”• Pepsi A.M.
• Identifying competitors– Products/services different on the surface can
actually compete on superordinate level for consumer dollars
• “Entertainment” (bowling vs. ballet)
9-29Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Strategic Implications of Product Categorization (Cont’d)
• Exemplar products– Brands strongly associated with a category get to
“call the shots” by defining evaluative criteria– But “moderately unusual” products may stimulate
more information processing and positive evaluations
• Locating products– Products that do not fit clearly into categories
confuse consumers (e.g., frozen dog food)
9-30Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Product Choice
• Selecting among alternatives– Once we assemble and evaluate relevant
options from a category, we must choose among them
– Decision rules for product choice can be very simple or very complicated
• Prior experience with (similar) product• Present information at time of purchase• Beliefs about brands (from advertising)
9-31Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Evaluative Criteria
• Dimensions used to judge merits of competing options
• Determinant attributes: features we use to differentiate among our choices– Criteria on which products differ carry more
weight– Marketers educate consumers about (or even
invent) determinant attributes• Pepsi’s freshness date stamps on cans
9-32Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Evaluative Criteria (Cont’d)
• Procedural learning: cognitive steps before making choice– Marketers often point out significant
differences among brands on relevant attribute…
• Then supply consumers with decision-making rule (“if, then”) that has helped them make previous decisions
• Should convey a rule that can be easily integrated with the way the person has made this decision in the past
9-33Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Cybermediaries
• The Web delivers enormous amounts of product information in seconds– Problem is narrowing down our choices!
• Cybermediary: helps filter and organize online market information– Consumers can identify/evaluate alternatives
more efficiently
SHOPPING.COM
9-34Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Electronic Recommendation Agents
• Intelligent agents and collaborative filtering– Learn from past user behaviour to recommend new
purchases– “Shopping robots” filtering
• Discussion: Will “bots” make our lives too predictable? If so, is this a problem?
• Electronic recommendation agents– Asks user to communicate preferences– Recommends list of sorted alternatives– Findings associated with such agents
9-35Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Heuristics: Mental Shortcuts
• Mental rules-of-thumb that lead to a speedy decision– Examples: higher price = higher quality,
buying the same brand your mother bought
• Can lead to bad decisions due to flawed assumptions (especially with unusually named brands)
9-36Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Relying on a Product Signal
• Observable product attributes that communicate underlying qualities– Clean and shiny car = good mechanical
condition
• Covariation: perceived associations among events– Product type/quality and country of origin– Consumers are poor estimators of covariation
(self-fulfilling prophecy: we see what we are looking for)
9-37Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Market Beliefs
• Consumer assumptions about companies, products, and stores that become shortcuts for decisions– Price-quality relationship: we tend to get what we pay
for– Other common marketing beliefs (see Table 9.3 for
full list):• All brands are basically the same• Larger stores offer better prices than smaller stores• Items tied to “giveaways” are not a good value
9-38Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Country-of-Origin
• Overall, we tend to rate our own country’s products more favourably than do people who live elsewhere
• Industrialized countries make better products than developing countries do
• Attachment to own vs. other cultures– Nationalists– Internationalists– Disengaged
9-39Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Country-of-Origin (Cont’d)
• We strongly associate certain items with specific countries (stereotyping)
• Country-of-origin effects stimulate consumer interest in the product
• Expertise with product minimizes country-of-origin effects
• Ethnocentrism (“buy Canadian”)– ‘The Rant’ – Molson Canadian
9-40Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Choosing Familiar Brand Names: Loyalty or Habit?
• Branding = heuristic for loyal consumers– Fierce loyalty to a brand = dominant market
share– Marketers try to cultivate loyalty
• Rock band fan packages
9-41Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Inertia: The Fickle Customer
• Many buy the same brand every time– We buy out of habit because it requires less
effort– Little/no underlying commitment here
• Brand switching frequently occurs (cheaper price, original brand out-of-stock, point-of-purchase displays)
9-42Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Brand Loyalty• Repeat purchase behaviour reflecting a
conscious decision to continue buying the same brand– Repeat purchase + positive attitude toward brand– Emotional attachment and commitment often result
over time (via self-image and prior experiences)
• Information overload and too many alternatives strengthen reliance on brands for quality
• We are often less picky about where we buy our favourite brands– Discussion: How can retailer compete if we believe
we can get the same brands everywhere?
9-43Copyright 2008 Pearson Education Canada
Decision Rules
• Noncompensatory: shortcuts via basic standards– Lexicographic rule– Elimination-by-aspects rule– Conjunctive rule
• Compensatory– Simple additive rule– Weighted additive rule