copyright 2007 audience reception theory me1&2

11
Copyright 2007 www.englishteachi ng.co.uk Audience Reception Theory ME1&2

Upload: aubrey-garrison

Post on 17-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Copyright 2007  Audience Reception Theory ME1&2

Copyright 2007 www.englishteaching.co.uk

Audience Reception Theory

ME1&2

Page 2: Copyright 2007  Audience Reception Theory ME1&2

Copyright 2007 www.englishteaching.co.uk

The Effects Model

Also known as the hypodermic syringe model.

Theorises about what the media does to its audience.

Page 3: Copyright 2007  Audience Reception Theory ME1&2

Copyright 2007 www.englishteaching.co.uk

The Effects Model

Uses terminology such as ‘mass media’ and ‘mass communication’, this emphasises the size.

Page 4: Copyright 2007  Audience Reception Theory ME1&2

Copyright 2007 www.englishteaching.co.uk

The Effects Model

This theory implies that the media’s implied meaning is injected into a single mass audience.

This gives the potential for the audience to be duped or taken in.

Page 5: Copyright 2007  Audience Reception Theory ME1&2

Copyright 2007 www.englishteaching.co.uk

The Effects Model

Research Task:

Write 500 words detailing Bandura’s Bobo Doll experiment (1963) and critically examine its usefulness in explaining the effects theory.

Page 6: Copyright 2007  Audience Reception Theory ME1&2

Copyright 2007 www.englishteaching.co.uk

The Effects Model

Grebner and Gross (1976) Researched audience in the USAStated that the more tv watched, the

viewers had a more fearful attitude to the world outside home.

Blamed programmes such as America’s Most Wanted, real life crime dramas and media exaggeration of events and people such as terrorism.

Page 7: Copyright 2007  Audience Reception Theory ME1&2

Copyright 2007 www.englishteaching.co.uk

The Effects Model

Essay

Write a detailed analysis of The Effects Model. You should critically examine the theory using examples that you have researched from the media.

Page 8: Copyright 2007  Audience Reception Theory ME1&2

Copyright 2007 www.englishteaching.co.uk

Stuart Hall – Encoding/Decoding

Dominant Reading

Viewer recognises the preferred or offered meaning and broadly agrees with it.

Page 9: Copyright 2007  Audience Reception Theory ME1&2

Copyright 2007 www.englishteaching.co.uk

Stuart Hall – Encoding/Decoding

Oppositional Reading

The dominant reading is recognised but rejected for cultural, political or ideological reasons.

Page 10: Copyright 2007  Audience Reception Theory ME1&2

Copyright 2007 www.englishteaching.co.uk

Stuart Hall – Encoding/Decoding

Negotiated Reading

The reader accepts, rejects or refines elements of the programme in light of previously held views.

Page 11: Copyright 2007  Audience Reception Theory ME1&2

Copyright 2007 www.englishteaching.co.uk

Stuart Hall – Encoding/Decoding

Dominant – ‘flag waving patriot who responds to George Bush’s latest speech’.

Oppositional – ‘the pacifist who understands the speech but rejects it’.

Negotiated – ‘the viewer who agrees with the need for a response to Sept. 11th but doesn’t agree to the military means announced’.

Taken from ‘The Media Student’s Book’