Copyright © 2007 Powerpoint Paradise. All Rights ReservedCopyright © 2007 Powerpoint Paradise. All Rights Reserved

Bells are tolling forBells are tolling for

Slightly Edited Condensation of Slightly Edited Condensation of Sister Teresa Forcades’ Sister Teresa Forcades’ Presentation @ SwinefluPresentation @ Swineflu

My name is Teresa Forcades i Villa.My name is Teresa Forcades i Villa.

I’m a Benedictine nun at Sant Benet I’m a Benedictine nun at Sant Benet of Montserrat’s monastery. Before of Montserrat’s monastery. Before joining the monastery I practiced joining the monastery I practiced medicine for several years. medicine for several years.

I’m a physician specialized in internal I’m a physician specialized in internal medicine, and I have a PHD in Public medicine, and I have a PHD in Public Health at Barcelona’s University. Health at Barcelona’s University.

I carried out the specialization in the I carried out the specialization in the USA, at the State University of NY. USA, at the State University of NY.

We have A, B and C types We have A, B and C types of known flu viruses affecting humans.of known flu viruses affecting humans.

• ““A”A” type viruses are part of the yearly type viruses are part of the yearly common flu... the seasonal flu. common flu... the seasonal flu.

• ““C”C” virus normally only affects a smaller virus normally only affects a smaller proportion of the population & is not used proportion of the population & is not used for yearly vaccines. for yearly vaccines.

• Therefore, every year, the seasonal flu Therefore, every year, the seasonal flu vaccine is a mixture of vaccine is a mixture of “A”“A” and and “B”“B” type type virus.virus.

• The so-called “new swine flu” is not new The so-called “new swine flu” is not new just because it’s an “A” type.just because it’s an “A” type.

• Nor because of the antigens of the A-Nor because of the antigens of the A-H1N1 virus... the hem agglutinin (H) and H1N1 virus... the hem agglutinin (H) and the neuraminidase (N).the neuraminidase (N).

A-H1N1 was the same flu virus group that in A-H1N1 was the same flu virus group that in 1918 caused the terrible pandemic 1918 caused the terrible pandemic

• It killed more than 20 million people It killed more than 20 million people worldwide. worldwide.

• It existed amongst the population until It existed amongst the population until around the mid 50s.around the mid 50s.

• In 1957 it seems to disappear from the In 1957 it seems to disappear from the known seasonal flu viruses.known seasonal flu viruses.

• But it reappeared in the year But it reappeared in the year 19771977

WHY? The A-H1N1 virus returned because WHY? The A-H1N1 virus returned because it had been re-synthesized in a LAB!it had been re-synthesized in a LAB!

• Re-synthesized, because in 1977 they went Re-synthesized, because in 1977 they went to exhume the body of an Inuit Eskimo to exhume the body of an Inuit Eskimo woman who died from this flu in 1918. woman who died from this flu in 1918.

• As her body remained under the ice it was As her body remained under the ice it was possible to recover from the tissues the possible to recover from the tissues the necessary elements to produce again, or to necessary elements to produce again, or to re-synthesize this virus. re-synthesize this virus.

• From 1977 A-H1N1 was part of the pool of From 1977 A-H1N1 was part of the pool of seasonal flu viruses again. seasonal flu viruses again.

• according to “The New England Journal of according to “The New England Journal of Medicine” this is an established fact.Medicine” this is an established fact.

Well, what is then new this year?Well, what is then new this year?

• The novelty is this year’s viral strain (S-The novelty is this year’s viral strain (S-OIV) unknown until now, first diagnosed OIV) unknown until now, first diagnosed April, 17th (2009)April, 17th (2009)

• First scientific factFirst scientific fact: Two first cases on : Two first cases on record were first diagnosed in California. record were first diagnosed in California.

• Second scientific factSecond scientific fact: From April until : From April until September 15th the statistics recorded September 15th the statistics recorded 137 deaths in Europe, and 3,559 deaths 137 deaths in Europe, and 3,559 deaths worldwide. (According to W.H.O!)worldwide. (According to W.H.O!)

• Can we trust them?—As they don’t Can we trust them?—As they don’t analyze each case anymore whether it is analyze each case anymore whether it is seasonal or swine flu! -- PPS Editorseasonal or swine flu! -- PPS Editor

Many declarations, but I’ll quote two…Many declarations, but I’ll quote two…• 1. J. Dupre’, member of the National 1. J. Dupre’, member of the National

Medical Ethics Committee of France, 2. Medical Ethics Committee of France, 2. Rodriquez Sendin, president of the Rodriquez Sendin, president of the General Spanish Medical Association. General Spanish Medical Association.

• Both prestigious doctors based on Both prestigious doctors based on scientific data confirmed that scientific data confirmed that this new this new virus has virus has a lower mortality ratea lower mortality rate than the than the common flucommon flu & seasonal viruses. & seasonal viruses.

• I end this scientific part with an important I end this scientific part with an important piece of data fully accredited in medical piece of data fully accredited in medical literature saying that it seems that people literature saying that it seems that people older that 60, have already older that 60, have already 33% immunity 33% immunity against this new virusagainst this new virus. .

• These are important objective facts to These are important objective facts to take into account before getting into an take into account before getting into an in-depth assessment. in-depth assessment.

Two irregularities have taken place in the way or Two irregularities have taken place in the way or consequences so far of the discovery of this consequences so far of the discovery of this

relatively new strain.relatively new strain.

• Two irregularities, to my understanding & of Two irregularities, to my understanding & of any objective observer, have remained un-any objective observer, have remained un-clarified, and are too serious to remain un-clarified, and are too serious to remain un-clarified.clarified.

• First: Investigative journalist Jane First: Investigative journalist Jane Burgermeister, born in Switzerland with Burgermeister, born in Switzerland with Austrian & Irish citizenship, heard about the Austrian & Irish citizenship, heard about the following, & made this information available. following, & made this information available.

• [TC: Jane pressed bioterrorism & mass [TC: Jane pressed bioterrorism & mass murder attempt charges against the WHO, murder attempt charges against the WHO, the UN, & some CEOs of companies, and the UN, & some CEOs of companies, and governments],governments],

• Anyone can verify that the information that Anyone can verify that the information that I'm going to disclose is accurate and I'm going to disclose is accurate and objective.objective.

www.theflucase.com

So What Happened?So What Happened?• In January 2009, before H1N1 was discovered, Baxter In January 2009, before H1N1 was discovered, Baxter

Pharmaceutical, a USA company from its Austrian subsidiary Pharmaceutical, a USA company from its Austrian subsidiary company proceeded to distribute via 4 neighboring European company proceeded to distribute via 4 neighboring European countries (Czech Republic, Slovenia and Germany), to 16 countries (Czech Republic, Slovenia and Germany), to 16 different laboratories, 72kg of different laboratories, 72kg of vaccination material for fluvaccination material for flu, to be , to be given in February & March to those countries, as seasonal flu given in February & March to those countries, as seasonal flu virus vaccine.virus vaccine.

• 72 kg72 kg of this material makes thousands & thousands of doses. of this material makes thousands & thousands of doses.• Through one of life's coincidences, situations or plans are Through one of life's coincidences, situations or plans are

revealed which would have otherwise remained in the dark.revealed which would have otherwise remained in the dark.• One of the lab technicians of Czech Republic company One of the lab technicians of Czech Republic company

BioTest, recipient of this material, decided on his own initiative, BioTest, recipient of this material, decided on his own initiative, being qualified but not obliged to do, to carry out an extra being qualified but not obliged to do, to carry out an extra security test on the vaccination material before proceeding to security test on the vaccination material before proceeding to distribute. distribute.

• The technician inoculated this vaccine into The technician inoculated this vaccine into weasels/ferrets, small mammals used since 1918 to weasels/ferrets, small mammals used since 1918 to test flu vaccines, and all of them died. test flu vaccines, and all of them died.

• Observing that Observing that the vaccine shouldn't have caused the death of the vaccine shouldn't have caused the death of the weaselsthe weasels, he immediately raised the alarm and began , he immediately raised the alarm and began checks to establish what this Baxter material contained, checks to establish what this Baxter material contained, because being a vaccine, the death of the animals was because being a vaccine, the death of the animals was inexplicable... inexplicable...

On TVN24 in Poland Baxter has admitted they contaminated 72 KG of vaccine material with the live bird flu virus.

Test results showed that in the Baxter material for Test results showed that in the Baxter material for those 16 laboratories, those 16 laboratories, 2 live viruses2 live viruses coexisted. coexisted.

• The bird flu virus appeared in 2005, had a The bird flu virus appeared in 2005, had a high mortality ratehigh mortality rate, but , but infected just a few infected just a few people.people.

• The number of deaths Worldwide, was The number of deaths Worldwide, was around around 250250 but but around 60% of those infected around 60% of those infected dieddied! !

• The mortality rate of this virus is very high, The mortality rate of this virus is very high, while its infection rate is minimal.while its infection rate is minimal.

• BIRDFLUBIRDFLU was mixed with was mixed with seasonalseasonal fluflu that that has an extremely has an extremely low mortality ratelow mortality rate, less than , less than 0.01%, but a 0.01%, but a high degree of transmissionhigh degree of transmission/ a / a highly contagious infection rate.highly contagious infection rate.

One was the bird flu virus. One was the bird flu virus.

If you mix these two viruses and then If you mix these two viruses and then distribute it to thousands of people…distribute it to thousands of people…

• you’re maximizing the probabilities for you’re maximizing the probabilities for these two viruses to these two viruses to mergemerge, to , to recombinerecombine, , and for a and for a newnew virus to appear, very virus to appear, very lethallethal and very and very infectiousinfectious! !

• That the 72 Kg of the material contained a That the 72 Kg of the material contained a mix of live bird flu and seasonal flu virusesmix of live bird flu and seasonal flu viruses is a is a factfact! Admitted by Baxter. ! Admitted by Baxter.

• They didn’t say They didn’t say “No, this is not true... this “No, this is not true... this is just what by Jane Burgermeister says or is just what by Jane Burgermeister says or whoever, or this material wasn’t there...”whoever, or this material wasn’t there...”

• Baxter Baxter admittedadmitted that contamination took that contamination took place but place but notnot that the material was that the material was destined for human use. destined for human use.

• (Claiming protection behind confidentiality (Claiming protection behind confidentiality rights, they haven’t disclosed information rights, they haven’t disclosed information about its destination).about its destination).

72 Kg material contained a mix of 72 Kg material contained a mix of livelive bird flu & bird flu & seasonal flu! Could this have happened by seasonal flu! Could this have happened by

chance?chance?• IT IS EXTREMELY UNLIKELYIT IS EXTREMELY UNLIKELY, because in Science the , because in Science the

word impossible... is something we never say. word impossible... is something we never say. Extremely unlikely meansExtremely unlikely means that laboratories handling this that laboratories handling this kind of viruses have kind of viruses have Bio Security LevelsBio Security Levels in place. in place.

• Bio Security Bio Security LevelLevel 33 is the is the highesthighest & the one that & the one that mustmust be applied in this laboratory! Based on known facts the be applied in this laboratory! Based on known facts the Scientific probability that this may have happened by Scientific probability that this may have happened by chance, is extremely low!chance, is extremely low!

• Not only this, but also because, mixing two different live Not only this, but also because, mixing two different live viruses, flu vaccine is made with viruses, flu vaccine is made with attenuated virusesattenuated viruses. .

• So it’s perfectly normal for flu vaccine to contain live So it’s perfectly normal for flu vaccine to contain live virus. This is no exception. But virus. This is no exception. But attenuatedattenuated means that means that the virus the virus must go through a radiation proceduremust go through a radiation procedure. .

• These viruses These viruses in the whole Baxter material in the Czech in the whole Baxter material in the Czech Republic Republic hadn’thadn’t been been attenuatedattenuated. The odds of it . The odds of it happening by chance, scientifically or from a humanly happening by chance, scientifically or from a humanly prudent standpoint, we can’t say it’s 100% impossible prudent standpoint, we can’t say it’s 100% impossible but it’s important to let it be known how but it’s important to let it be known how unlikelyunlikely it is for it is for an an accidentaccident to occur under to occur under thesethese circumstances. circumstances.

• In any case, this has happened and it’s under In any case, this has happened and it’s under investigation. investigation.

• UPDATE: The case has now been dropped by Austria’s UPDATE: The case has now been dropped by Austria’s legal department. Huh?legal department. Huh?

Jane Burgermeister has pressed charges not Jane Burgermeister has pressed charges not just against Baxter, but also against the W.H.O…just against Baxter, but also against the W.H.O…

(World Heath Organization)(World Heath Organization)

• ……and governments of important countries, and governments of important countries, because it’s because it’s more likelymore likely to think in terms of to think in terms of malicious intentmalicious intent! !

• This is what Jane denounces rather than This is what Jane denounces rather than think that there have been a series of think that there have been a series of chancechance events almost events almost impossibleimpossible to to conceive.conceive.

• But it’s very important to separate But it’s very important to separate objectiveobjective facts from those which facts from those which haven’t been provenhaven’t been proven yetyet..

• It’s good that this information we are It’s good that this information we are facilitating, may reach the wider public, the facilitating, may reach the wider public, the more the better, and to reach those who more the better, and to reach those who hearing all this, about the existence of hearing all this, about the existence of plans from a World elite that wants part of plans from a World elite that wants part of the population to disappear—say, the population to disappear—say, “but... “but... where’s all this coming from? This is where’s all this coming from? This is science fiction, I’ve never heard about this”science fiction, I’ve never heard about this”..

I know there are people who have been studying I know there are people who have been studying this this (population control)(population control) for a while, but… for a while, but…

• I would that my message reached someone I would that my message reached someone who says... who says... “Look I don’t know anything “Look I don’t know anything about that stuff, but I’ve just heard that there about that stuff, but I’ve just heard that there was a was a laboratorylaboratory that delivered that delivered contaminatedcontaminated vaccine and that vaccine and that interestingly is one of the interestingly is one of the laboratories in charge of making flu vaccines laboratories in charge of making flu vaccines this year.”this year.”

• ThisThis factfact alonealone makes it justifiable to think makes it justifiable to think that that “Until such time as an explanation is “Until such time as an explanation is given about given about whywhy this contamination took this contamination took place place I I won’t wish it on me, on my child won’t wish it on me, on my child nor on anyone close to me”nor on anyone close to me”. .

• I don’t know if I’ve been clear enough I don’t know if I’ve been clear enough about this point. Because I think it’s about this point. Because I think it’s important to make it clear. important to make it clear.

A A SECONDSECOND irregularityirregularity, even , even moremore scandalous scandalous than the than the firstfirst one, happened as follows... one, happened as follows...

• What I’ve just said about Baxter What I’ve just said about Baxter happened in February, and on April happened in February, and on April 17 we had the first diagnosis of the 17 we had the first diagnosis of the new flu.new flu.

• Then on April 29, 12 days after those Then on April 29, 12 days after those 2 first cases were discovered, W.H.O 2 first cases were discovered, W.H.O Director-General, Dr. Margaret Chan Director-General, Dr. Margaret Chan (WHO is part of the United Nations), (WHO is part of the United Nations), made a public appearance and made a public appearance and announced a announced a Level 5 Worldwide Level 5 Worldwide state of alertstate of alert for the prevention of a for the prevention of a pandemicpandemic..

• What does this mean?What does this mean? Level 5 is Level 5 is quite a high level, after 5 there is only quite a high level, after 5 there is only Level Level 66 left. left. Level 6Level 6 means a means a pandemic is pandemic is already happeningalready happening. .

• What does a pandemic meanWhat does a pandemic mean??

How come Dr. M. Chan & the whole World How come Dr. M. Chan & the whole World Health Organization declare a Health Organization declare a pandemicpandemic??????

• On April 29 they say On April 29 they say Level 5Level 5, just after , just after the appearance of the the appearance of the firstfirst casescases on April on April 17th, and a month and a half later, on 17th, and a month and a half later, on June 11th... Dr. Chan announces LevelJune 11th... Dr. Chan announces Level 6, 6, thethe WHOWHO declared a declared a LevelLevel 66 PandemicPandemic, the , the maximummaximum level of level of health alert.health alert.

• Since then we have a global pandemic of Since then we have a global pandemic of the A-H1N1 virus. the A-H1N1 virus.

• HowHow could WHO declare a could WHO declare a pandemicpandemic, , taking into account that taking into account that this virus has a this virus has a mortality rate mortality rate lowerlower than the than the yearlyyearly virusvirus??

• Then how come there isn’t a pandemic Then how come there isn’t a pandemic everyevery year year, if the , if the yearlyyearly virus is worse virus is worse that this that this newnew virus? virus?How come we don’t declare a How come we don’t declare a pandemic pandemic every yearevery year??

•Well, it’s quite simple. The answer is Well, it’s quite simple. The answer is that in May 2009 the that in May 2009 the WHO changed WHO changed the the definitiondefinition of pandemic of pandemic from its then from its then current definition of “current definition of “an infection by an an infection by an infectious agent simultaneously infectious agent simultaneously present in different countries at the present in different countries at the same time and same time and withwith a a significant significant mortalitymortality ratio ratio to the proportion of to the proportion of infected populationinfected population”… ”… •……into into removing from the definition removing from the definition this this mortalitymortality characteristic characteristic. Therefore . Therefore the new definition went to describe a the new definition went to describe a pandemic as…pandemic as…•““a simultaneous infection present in a simultaneous infection present in various countries and carrying an various countries and carrying an infectious agent showing any novelty infectious agent showing any novelty characteristic thus leaving us unable to characteristic thus leaving us unable to know the type of immunity present know the type of immunity present within the population.”within the population.”

““Why don’t we declare a Why don’t we declare a pandemic every year?”pandemic every year?”

•So this So this amendedamended definitiondefinition is from is from May this year. IF the May this year. IF the mortalitymortality requirementrequirement disappearsdisappears from the from the definition of pandemic…then we definition of pandemic…then we should ask ourselves. Well…what should ask ourselves. Well…what prevents the prevents the annualannual commoncommon fluflu from from being declared a being declared a pandemicpandemic??

•And the answer is that... with this And the answer is that... with this definition in place, definition in place, nothingnothing prevents it. prevents it.

•With With thisthis definition... what we are definition... what we are seeing now, with this investment... and seeing now, with this investment... and I’ll get now into the political I’ll get now into the political consequences, which is in fact where I consequences, which is in fact where I wanted to get to. wanted to get to.

With this new definition, and it is a definition... With this new definition, and it is a definition... I’m quoting it from the “British Medical Journal” I’m quoting it from the “British Medical Journal”

I insist that all this information that I’m giving doesn’t come from the alternative press, for whom I have great I insist that all this information that I’m giving doesn’t come from the alternative press, for whom I have great respect, but I think it’s important to know that all this information comes from the most prestigious magazines and respect, but I think it’s important to know that all this information comes from the most prestigious magazines and

absolutely “mainstream” as they say in English, free from any possible suspicion of tendentiousness anyway.absolutely “mainstream” as they say in English, free from any possible suspicion of tendentiousness anyway.

All that’s happening now seems to be All that’s happening now seems to be justifiablejustifiable because because of its exceptional nature, of its exceptional nature, under the under the newnew definition definition,,

• It wouldn’t present anything exceptional It wouldn’t present anything exceptional about it. So this would be the situation about it. So this would be the situation year after yearyear after year, and this is just with the , and this is just with the fluflu, not to mention , not to mention otherother diseases with diseases with the the samesame characteristicscharacteristics... ...

• One may say... wait a minute... Isn’t it One may say... wait a minute... Isn’t it true that this virus is less lethal... that it true that this virus is less lethal... that it presents a lower mortality rate than the presents a lower mortality rate than the annual seasonal virus?annual seasonal virus?

• And this fact can be read everywhere, And this fact can be read everywhere, everybody says so...even our minister everybody says so...even our minister (Health MP) here... They admit this is (Health MP) here... They admit this is the case. the case.

• Well if Well if thisthis is the case...how can it be is the case...how can it be that a that a pandemicpandemic has been declared has been declared bearing in mind the bearing in mind the serious political serious political consequencesconsequences??

So this is perhaps the new piece of information that I’m So this is perhaps the new piece of information that I’m giving that...and I insist it’s from the “British Medical giving that...and I insist it’s from the “British Medical Journal”: that the definition of pandemic has changed, Journal”: that the definition of pandemic has changed, but this can be seen by anyone by asking WHO to send but this can be seen by anyone by asking WHO to send you the pandemic definition from 2008 and 2009, and you the pandemic definition from 2008 and 2009, and there you can see that this change exists. It can also be there you can see that this change exists. It can also be read on their web site, etc.read on their web site, etc.

Due to the 11th June pandemic declaration because of the new Due to the 11th June pandemic declaration because of the new virus, the US declared Public Health National Emergencyvirus, the US declared Public Health National Emergency

• This emergency declaration also carries This emergency declaration also carries politicalpolitical consequencesconsequences. It was possible in the US having . It was possible in the US having in April in April 2020 cases of infection and cases of infection and 0 0 deaths. deaths.

• With 20 cases of people infected, With 20 cases of people infected, allall of them of them documenteddocumented, it’s important to know that the , it’s important to know that the documentation is not so reliable, and not being documentation is not so reliable, and not being carried out now, because carried out now, because WHO said to WHO said to stopstop verifying with lab tests who had swine flu or not.verifying with lab tests who had swine flu or not.

• In the UK it’s done by In the UK it’s done by phonephone consultation where consultation where a person reports the flu symptoms, then they a person reports the flu symptoms, then they note down swine flu. note down swine flu. ThisThis is how it’s done now! is how it’s done now!

• So when they So when they saysay there are 12,000... 13,000 there are 12,000... 13,000 cases... it’s important to know the way in which cases... it’s important to know the way in which these figures are worked out. These objective these figures are worked out. These objective facts can be verified on the official web site. facts can be verified on the official web site.

• Therefore we’re Therefore we’re assumingassuming that that everyevery flu case is flu case is a a casecase. In some countries they make surveys... . In some countries they make surveys... based on... based on... “we had 100 and 50 were swine flu “we had 100 and 50 were swine flu cases, so cases, so wewe assume the rest is also that wayassume the rest is also that way””

• But this survey or generalization lacks sufficient But this survey or generalization lacks sufficient data at least on the ones I’ve seen in the books.data at least on the ones I’ve seen in the books.

• [Thus far the irregularities.][Thus far the irregularities.]

• In the document that I’m disseminating I also quote In the document that I’m disseminating I also quote an article from an American journal, where they an article from an American journal, where they explain that after visiting the WHO website they explain that after visiting the WHO website they commented “Listen, here it says that high mortality is commented “Listen, here it says that high mortality is a pre-requisite for a pandemic and here nobody a pre-requisite for a pandemic and here nobody dies...” They told them, wait a minute... and they dies...” They told them, wait a minute... and they changed the definition on the web... this article has changed the definition on the web... this article has been quoted and it’s from been quoted and it’s from CNN which is not a source which is not a source under suspicion in this sense. Therefore the WHO under suspicion in this sense. Therefore the WHO irregularity seems even more serious to me, because irregularity seems even more serious to me, because it’s equally objective, clear and easy to verity, and it it’s equally objective, clear and easy to verity, and it brings us closer to the possible real consequences so brings us closer to the possible real consequences so it’s not just about elaborating on possible intentions or it’s not just about elaborating on possible intentions or who did what. As you’ve seen I’ve stopped there, who did what. As you’ve seen I’ve stopped there, because I like to distinguish between what I can prove because I like to distinguish between what I can prove from what I cannot but about what is already from what I cannot but about what is already happening now because of this definition.happening now because of this definition.

PART 3:PART 3: Focus on The Focus on The Political ConsequencesPolitical Consequences of a Pandemic Declaration.of a Pandemic Declaration.

• WHO is an international organization that WHO is an international organization that normally issues normally issues recommendationsrecommendations... “... “WHO’s WHO’s recommendations are...recommendations are...” ”

• ThenThen each sovereign country applies or not the each sovereign country applies or not the recommendations following its own criteria, its recommendations following its own criteria, its own circumstances, and its own internal research.own circumstances, and its own internal research.

• In 2005 this In 2005 this changedchanged allowing an exception allowing an exception preciselyprecisely in case of a pandemicin case of a pandemic, ,

• This means that in case of a This means that in case of a pandemicpandemic WHO WHO doesn’tdoesn’t make make recommendationsrecommendations, it gives , it gives ordersorders. .

• This means that countries—this is a verifiable & This means that countries—this is a verifiable & objective fact—in case of a pandemic... and a objective fact—in case of a pandemic... and a pandemic is something pandemic is something veryvery seriousserious, as in the , as in the oldold definition, definition, a real serious threat to the health of the a real serious threat to the health of the whole populationwhole population, that justifies this medical , that justifies this medical emergencyemergency. It does within the context of the . It does within the context of the oldold definition, but definition, but notnot in the new one we have now! in the new one we have now!

• Therefore with the Therefore with the presentpresent definition, the definition, the titletitle has has remained the same, remained the same, global pandemicglobal pandemic, but its , but its contentscontents have have totally changedtotally changed, because the , because the significant mortality rate doesn’t exist. significant mortality rate doesn’t exist.

• But the But the political consequencespolitical consequences remain because of remain because of the heading! There the law says, “the heading! There the law says, “in case of a in case of a pandemicpandemic” ... or the internal rules, or WHO’s ” ... or the internal rules, or WHO’s regulations within their treaties and agreements regulations within their treaties and agreements with the member countries. with the member countries.

Since 2005 when faced with a pandemic W.H.O Since 2005 when faced with a pandemic W.H.O DOESN’TDOESN’T recommend but recommend but ORDERSORDERS member countries which actions to member countries which actions to

take.take.• That’s why we hear from the authorities in That’s why we hear from the authorities in

Spain, Spain, “Were awaiting WHO’s “Were awaiting WHO’s recommendationsrecommendations...”...”

• Perhaps that’s a manner of speech... but Perhaps that’s a manner of speech... but it’s not just that they are waiting for them it’s not just that they are waiting for them because they think it’s the right thing to because they think it’s the right thing to do, but because they do, but because they havehave to to abideabide by by themthem, , notnot as recommendation but as as recommendation but as orderorder from the moment that it’s issued. from the moment that it’s issued.

• You may ask, You may ask, “Well, what terrible thing “Well, what terrible thing may happen?”may happen?”

• Well... Well... the the mandatorymandatory vaccination vaccination. . ThisThis is the most important point to is the most important point to meme! !

• It’s so important to It’s so important to spreadspread this information this information so that even so that even ifif vaccination is offered on a vaccination is offered on a voluntaryvoluntary basis, the more people know basis, the more people know about the circumstances surrounding this about the circumstances surrounding this vaccine and all the facts the better, so vaccine and all the facts the better, so that each one of us can make an that each one of us can make an informedinformed decision.decision.

Next point:Next point: About the About the realreal possibility that this possibility that this vaccine was issued, or distributed, or announced vaccine was issued, or distributed, or announced

as a as a mandatorymandatory vaccinevaccine..• How can it be possible that I’m How can it be possible that I’m forcedforced to to

accept a vaccine that I don’t accept a vaccine that I don’t wishwish to have? to have?• Well the reasoning is quite clear... Well the reasoning is quite clear... IFIF we are we are

in a global in a global pandemicpandemic situation, although I situation, although I insist even if in the present case it doesn’t insist even if in the present case it doesn’t qualify..., qualify..., it seems that there’s a risk that if a it seems that there’s a risk that if a person doesn’t take the shot this may put person doesn’t take the shot this may put other people’s health at riskother people’s health at risk

• Therefore the member countries are under Therefore the member countries are under obligation to obligation to ensureensure that the law is obeyed. that the law is obeyed.

• If this is the law, what would this mean?If this is the law, what would this mean?• Well, the same as usual: Well, the same as usual: FineFine or or prisonprison!!• Talking about fines. It seems that in Talking about fines. It seems that in

Massachusetts, a , a document has already has already been made public in preparation for a been made public in preparation for a possible mandatory vaccination, possible mandatory vaccination,

• If this was the case, If this was the case, the fine would be the fine would be or or could reach could reach up to 1,000 Dollars a dayup to 1,000 Dollars a day..

• So it works this way, You say: So it works this way, You say: “No I don’t “No I don’t want to get vaccinated” “Oh, ok. Then look, want to get vaccinated” “Oh, ok. Then look, 1,000 dollars daily from civil service for every 1,000 dollars daily from civil service for every day you don’t take the vaccine.”day you don’t take the vaccine.”

You say: You say: “No I don’t want to get vaccinated” “No I don’t want to get vaccinated” “Oh, ok. Then look, 1,000 dollars fine, for every “Oh, ok. Then look, 1,000 dollars fine, for every

day you don’t get the vaccine!”day you don’t get the vaccine!”• Other ways are happening already now, but Other ways are happening already now, but

without a law of compulsory nature! There are without a law of compulsory nature! There are companiescompanies that say to their workers, that say to their workers, “if you “if you don’t take the shot, I fire you.” don’t take the shot, I fire you.”

• There are There are openopen lawsuitslawsuits in different countries, in different countries, in the US, UK, France, because there are in the US, UK, France, because there are people that have already faced this dilemma, people that have already faced this dilemma, and have tried to refuse, and in some cases and have tried to refuse, and in some cases in private companies, where there’s no in private companies, where there’s no collective labour agreement, in US for collective labour agreement, in US for instance! instance!

• This has This has alreadyalready made people made people lose their joblose their job for for refusingrefusing to to acceptaccept this this vaccinevaccine. And you . And you may say: “but there’s no vaccine yet.” may say: “but there’s no vaccine yet.”

• Not yet, but the one already in distribution, Not yet, but the one already in distribution, we already have, the we already have, the seasonalseasonal flu. This has flu. This has been delivered sooner. Because WHO has been delivered sooner. Because WHO has recommended to give, the seasonal one and recommended to give, the seasonal one and then, in most of the cases, in two doses, the then, in most of the cases, in two doses, the new flu one. new flu one.

Then, what might Then, what might happenhappen to a person who to a person who refusesrefuses to get this vaccine? to get this vaccine?

• If the vaccine is not mandatory, as it isn’t in any country now, then nothing will If the vaccine is not mandatory, as it isn’t in any country now, then nothing will happen! You say ‘no’, and sign a document if necessary, and the same for your happen! You say ‘no’, and sign a document if necessary, and the same for your children, they don’t get it and no problem.children, they don’t get it and no problem.

• In case the vaccine is mandatory, a fine or prison sentence must be applied in In case the vaccine is mandatory, a fine or prison sentence must be applied in a country. a country. If there’s a law, it must be obeyedIf there’s a law, it must be obeyed, otherwise it’d be a joke., otherwise it’d be a joke.

• Let’s see, facing this, this daily 1,000 Dollars fine, or the possibility of a prison Let’s see, facing this, this daily 1,000 Dollars fine, or the possibility of a prison sentence, one would say, sentence, one would say, “OK, let’s not exaggerate, I got the vaccine every “OK, let’s not exaggerate, I got the vaccine every year! year! Or:Or: Not me but my father has, or I know people who get it, so we simply Not me but my father has, or I know people who get it, so we simply get it this year, and it’s alright. Look a disaster, they’re making money, as get it this year, and it’s alright. Look a disaster, they’re making money, as always, as happened with the papilloma, but what can I say, I’m not paying a always, as happened with the papilloma, but what can I say, I’m not paying a 1,000 Dollars a day, or I’m not risking going to prison”.1,000 Dollars a day, or I’m not risking going to prison”.

• Facing this possible answer, Facing this possible answer, it is important to know THREE FACTORS that it is important to know THREE FACTORS that make the vaccine of swine flu, of this year’s flu, DIFFERENT from EVERY make the vaccine of swine flu, of this year’s flu, DIFFERENT from EVERY year’s vaccine!year’s vaccine! I mean, this argument of it I mean, this argument of it “being the same as every year’s “being the same as every year’s vaccine, vaccine, but this time it’s for the swine virusbut this time it’s for the swine virus. Well then we’ll take it, we’ve been . Well then we’ll take it, we’ve been fooled once again, politicians or whoever”fooled once again, politicians or whoever”,…,…

• BUT IT’S NOT GOING TO BE THE LAST TIMEBUT IT’S NOT GOING TO BE THE LAST TIME! !

ThreeThree noveltiesnovelties, that this vaccine has, in , that this vaccine has, in contrast with the yearly vaccine.contrast with the yearly vaccine.

• WHY IS THIS VACCINE NOT GOING TO BE THE SAME AS EVERY YEAR?WHY IS THIS VACCINE NOT GOING TO BE THE SAME AS EVERY YEAR?• The first noveltyThe first novelty is, I have already said it, because WHO recommends, most of the is, I have already said it, because WHO recommends, most of the

pharmaceuticals that are producing this vaccine, recommend it to be given pharmaceuticals that are producing this vaccine, recommend it to be given IN IN TWOTWO DOSES.DOSES. That’sThat’s the novelty! the novelty!

• Nobody Nobody has has everever heardheard beforebefore that flu vaccines come in that flu vaccines come in twotwo dosesdoses. Normally it’s given . Normally it’s given onceonce and that’s all... next year you take it again, but it’s and that’s all... next year you take it again, but it’s nevernever given in given in twotwo doses. This doses. This year it comes in two doses, and also as I said, WHO has already recommended, in fact, year it comes in two doses, and also as I said, WHO has already recommended, in fact, the vaccine delivery has already arrived at senior care homes, monasteries and other the vaccine delivery has already arrived at senior care homes, monasteries and other places, so that everybody takes the vaccine for the seasonal virus. places, so that everybody takes the vaccine for the seasonal virus.

• IFIF the WHO’s recommendations are followed the WHO’s recommendations are followed thisthis year, those who year, those who followfollow them, will end up them, will end up receiving receiving THREETHREE FLUFLU VACCINATIONSVACCINATIONS, the , the seasonalseasonal one, the one, the firstfirst dose for dose for swineswine flu...and the flu...and the 22ndnd one! I’ve also heard that some laboratories produce it just in one, but one! I’ve also heard that some laboratories produce it just in one, but most of them have announced it will be a vaccine in two doses... most of them have announced it will be a vaccine in two doses...

• Therefore, the seasonal one, that is already available this month, the first dose for the Therefore, the seasonal one, that is already available this month, the first dose for the swine flu, and the second dose. swine flu, and the second dose.

• That way, the possibility of secondary effects is multiplied by three, theoretically it’s That way, the possibility of secondary effects is multiplied by three, theoretically it’s multiplied by three, and these vaccines do have secondary effect. multiplied by three, and these vaccines do have secondary effect.

• But this is only theoretical, in practice, nobody knows what could happen, because it’s But this is only theoretical, in practice, nobody knows what could happen, because it’s never been done before. Because no one has ever before received three doses of the never been done before. Because no one has ever before received three doses of the virus, three shots with alive viruses of the flu, and from different types... one after the virus, three shots with alive viruses of the flu, and from different types... one after the other, in the middle of a supposed pandemic or flu season. other, in the middle of a supposed pandemic or flu season.

• THIS IS THE FIRST NOVELTY, THIS IS NEW! THIS IS THE FIRST NOVELTY, THIS IS NEW!

2nd novelty: the untested co-adjuvants.2nd novelty: the untested co-adjuvants.• The National Nurse Labour Union of France has The National Nurse Labour Union of France has

published a document that you can also check where published a document that you can also check where they talk about the company Glaxo Smith Kline, one of they talk about the company Glaxo Smith Kline, one of the Pharmaceuticals that produce the vaccine, in fact is the Pharmaceuticals that produce the vaccine, in fact is responsible for the research with children that it’s done in responsible for the research with children that it’s done in Spain, the pioneer country of the world that has accepted Spain, the pioneer country of the world that has accepted that children from 6 months to 17 years old, try an that children from 6 months to 17 years old, try an experimental vaccineexperimental vaccine, and thus see what the secondary , and thus see what the secondary effects may be, or what point they reach!effects may be, or what point they reach!

• GSK is the company that promotes this research. This GSK is the company that promotes this research. This company is using a co-adjuvant in those flu vaccines, company is using a co-adjuvant in those flu vaccines, that’s never been used beforethat’s never been used before. And this, in different . And this, in different ways, all companies that produce swine flu vaccines ways, all companies that produce swine flu vaccines have announced that they use these kinds of have announced that they use these kinds of strongerstronger co-adjuvants than the kinds that are normally used every co-adjuvants than the kinds that are normally used every year for flu vaccines.year for flu vaccines.

• What is a co-adjuvant? A co-adjuvant is a substance What is a co-adjuvant? A co-adjuvant is a substance that’s generally added to the flu vaccine. The objective of that’s generally added to the flu vaccine. The objective of the co-adjuvant being added, is to stimulate and excite the co-adjuvant being added, is to stimulate and excite the immune system to the immune system to produce a higher immune produce a higher immune system responsesystem response. This is mainly done for the vaccine to . This is mainly done for the vaccine to be more effective. But in this case, French nurses have be more effective. But in this case, French nurses have denounced that this co-adjuvant will be multiplied ten denounced that this co-adjuvant will be multiplied ten times. This is the intention in the first studies, to multiply times. This is the intention in the first studies, to multiply ten times the immune system response! Excite the ten times the immune system response! Excite the immune system of the person so much that it produces a immune system of the person so much that it produces a response ten times higher than the normal common one. response ten times higher than the normal common one.

2nd novelty: The Anthrax Co-adjuvants.2nd novelty: The Anthrax Co-adjuvants.• This co-adjuvant seems to mix polysorbate This co-adjuvant seems to mix polysorbate

with the excipient, or the co-adjuvant with the excipient, or the co-adjuvant squalene, which is the same one used squalene, which is the same one used against against AnthraxAnthrax, and was given to the , and was given to the soldiers in the Gulf Warsoldiers in the Gulf War. .

• There are many studies that prove that There are many studies that prove that they had serious secondary effectsthey had serious secondary effects, in , in terms of central terms of central neurologicalneurological system, system, paralysisparalysis and and arthritisarthritis! !

• That’s squalene! This new co-adjuvant That’s squalene! This new co-adjuvant is, therefore, the second novelty. is, therefore, the second novelty.

• These are co-adjuvants still untested, and These are co-adjuvants still untested, and pharmaceutical companies justify that pharmaceutical companies justify that precisely because they’ve asked to precisely because they’ve asked to produce millions and millions, in fact produce millions and millions, in fact billions, billions, 4.6 billion doses of this vaccine4.6 billion doses of this vaccine! ! It’s what has been set up, to vaccinate the It’s what has been set up, to vaccinate the whole population. whole population.

• Rich countries and those pharmaceuticals Rich countries and those pharmaceuticals have already announced that they are have already announced that they are making donations of millions of doses to making donations of millions of doses to third world countries that couldn’t afford it. third world countries that couldn’t afford it.

• SO THE PLAN IS TO VACCINATE THE SO THE PLAN IS TO VACCINATE THE WHOLE WORLD POPULATION. WHOLE WORLD POPULATION.

2nd novelty: Co-adjuvants are dangerous!2nd novelty: Co-adjuvants are dangerous!• These production conditions, some pharmaceutical companies justify using still untested These production conditions, some pharmaceutical companies justify using still untested

co-adjuvants, so that they can add fewer antigens. -They save. They can save antigen co-adjuvants, so that they can add fewer antigens. -They save. They can save antigen and in each injected dose of vaccine fewer antigens and more co-adjuvant. Which and in each injected dose of vaccine fewer antigens and more co-adjuvant. Which means, less means, less naturalnatural immune system excitation, and more immune system excitation, and more artificialartificial excitation to excitation to compensate for the lack of antigen to produce vaccines. compensate for the lack of antigen to produce vaccines.

• This is the official explanation. This is the second novelty; The co-adjuvant is not the This is the official explanation. This is the second novelty; The co-adjuvant is not the same as every year. same as every year. Therefore nobody knows to what degree this artificial Therefore nobody knows to what degree this artificial excitation of the immune system is going to cause autoimmune diseases.excitation of the immune system is going to cause autoimmune diseases.

• In fact there’s one, the ascending paralysis of In fact there’s one, the ascending paralysis of Guillain-BarreGuillain-Barre’. This is known from or ’. This is known from or associated with the administering of associated with the administering of Swine flu vaccinesSwine flu vaccines in in 19761976. At that time it just . At that time it just affected the US, in a affected the US, in a similarsimilar campaign we’re living through now, also via the campaign we’re living through now, also via the mass mass media and politiciansmedia and politicians. .

• In In thatthat campaign they ended up vaccinating 48 million US citizens. Among those campaign they ended up vaccinating 48 million US citizens. Among those 4848 millionmillion there were around there were around 3,000 complaints of paralysis3,000 complaints of paralysis with the Guillain-Barre’ with the Guillain-Barre’ syndrome. And this is accepted as a consequence. syndrome. And this is accepted as a consequence.

• In fact the CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of the United States (In fact the CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of the United States (www.cdc.gov), have already announced that ), have already announced that it is inevitableit is inevitable that there will be that there will be paralysisparalysis cases if the whole of the population gets the vaccine, but, despite this, they’re going cases if the whole of the population gets the vaccine, but, despite this, they’re going ahead with it.ahead with it.

• While I insist we must always While I insist we must always keep in mindkeep in mind that that this swine flu virus is more benign than this swine flu virus is more benign than the usual virusthe usual virus, therefore considering all pros and cons as the French nurses did in their , therefore considering all pros and cons as the French nurses did in their document, the option of spending a few days at home with flu, like every year, in fact document, the option of spending a few days at home with flu, like every year, in fact less than every year, less than every year, OROR the the possibility of suffering a creeping paralysispossibility of suffering a creeping paralysis, which in , which in somesome cases people recover from but in many cases cases people recover from but in many cases don’tdon’t, that can even lead to , that can even lead to deathdeath, , thenthen... ... at least THIS INFORMATION MUST REACH EVERYBODY SO EVERYONE at least THIS INFORMATION MUST REACH EVERYBODY SO EVERYONE TAKES RESPONSIBILITYTAKES RESPONSIBILITY. .

And the last, And the last, THIRDTHIRD novelty regarding this year’s novelty regarding this year’s vaccines: Non-Liability Agreements!!!vaccines: Non-Liability Agreements!!!

• Third novelty is that pharmaceutical companies, Third novelty is that pharmaceutical companies, because they’ve been asked, supposedly, to make because they’ve been asked, supposedly, to make this extraordinary effort to produce such a vast this extraordinary effort to produce such a vast amount of doses in record time, they are forcing amount of doses in record time, they are forcing agreements, and in the US it’s official that this agreements, and in the US it’s official that this agreement has been signed, agreement has been signed, AGREEMENTS TO AGREEMENTS TO ABSOLVE THEM OF ANY LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY IN ABSOLVE THEM OF ANY LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY IN CASE THAT THIS VACCINE HAS ADVERSE CASE THAT THIS VACCINE HAS ADVERSE SECONDARY EFFECTS OR EVEN IF IT CAUSES DEATHSECONDARY EFFECTS OR EVEN IF IT CAUSES DEATH. .

• In the US, the Secretary of Health, Sibelius, In the US, the Secretary of Health, Sibelius, signed a a document that gives immunity, political immunity. document that gives immunity, political immunity.

• It won’t be possible to ask for responsibilities nor It won’t be possible to ask for responsibilities nor compensation, nor from the involved politicians nor compensation, nor from the involved politicians nor from the pharmaceutical companies.from the pharmaceutical companies.

• This is a the novelty that I think is This is a the novelty that I think is very significantvery significant, , for money can’t buy health or life, but if the for money can’t buy health or life, but if the pharmaceutical company or the responsible person pharmaceutical company or the responsible person is not willing to financially compensate... we can take is not willing to financially compensate... we can take it as guarantee that it is not unforeseen to have an it as guarantee that it is not unforeseen to have an avalanche of complaints.avalanche of complaints.

• If the responsible person makes sure, with objective, If the responsible person makes sure, with objective, clear, and verifiable public documents, that it won’t clear, and verifiable public documents, that it won’t be possible to bring a lawsuit against them, be possible to bring a lawsuit against them, he is he is taking from us a guarantee that this vaccine is taking from us a guarantee that this vaccine is not going to have adverse secondary effects. not going to have adverse secondary effects.

To Sum Things Up!To Sum Things Up!•What happened with What happened with BaxterBaxter and those vaccines proven to and those vaccines proven to be be contaminatedcontaminated, we don’t , we don’t know why or how, but that know why or how, but that they they werewere contaminated we contaminated we DODO know for sure,… know for sure,… •IFIF this contamination this contamination hadn’thadn’t been been discovereddiscovered by by chancechance in in February 2009, February 2009, todaytoday we we would have would have hadhad this this terrible terrible pandemic!pandemic! But But they’rethey’re talking talking about this pandemic about this pandemic without a without a real or objective basisreal or objective basis..•If it hadn’t been discovered If it hadn’t been discovered by chance by this Czech by chance by this Czech researcher or lab technician researcher or lab technician who carried that test, which who carried that test, which he didn’t have to, he didn’t have to, today we today we would have would have hadhad this this pandemic that is being pandemic that is being announced. announced.

WhyWhy Did the Media Did the Media BlackBlack OutOut The Baxter Affaire? The Baxter Affaire?

Knowing this, and keeping in mind the current WHO Knowing this, and keeping in mind the current WHO legislation, and the irregularities for instance, legislation, and the irregularities for instance, howhow is it is it possible that, what happened in February, has not been possible that, what happened in February, has not been discusseddiscussed in the international in the international presspress?? HowHow is it is it possiblepossible that that politicianspoliticians haven’t talked about it? haven’t talked about it? THIS HASN’T HAD THIS HASN’T HAD ANYANY POLITICAL OR MEDIA IMPACT. POLITICAL OR MEDIA IMPACT.

THEY MUCH THEY MUCH PREFER TO PREFER TO PRINT PRINT THISTHIS KIND OF KIND OF SCARE SCARE PROPA-PROPA-GANDA.GANDA.The Irish The Irish “Sunday S**t “Sunday S**t Rag!”Rag!”

A A RealReal RiskRisk That Vaccines May be That Vaccines May be ContaminatedContaminated• How is all this possible? Keeping in mind that How is all this possible? Keeping in mind that

the pandemic would have happened if this the pandemic would have happened if this hadn’t been discovered by chance, I think it’s hadn’t been discovered by chance, I think it’s very important to state that very important to state that the the realreal threat threat, that , that those vaccinesthose vaccines, which will arrive very soon, , which will arrive very soon, areare or or maymay be be contaminatedcontaminated! !

• And that And that despitedespite the fact they may be the fact they may be contaminated, a contaminated, a coercive legislationcoercive legislation could be could be imposedimposed that could that could forceforce allall of the population of the population to take this vaccine by to take this vaccine by lawlaw, I think this is a , I think this is a riskrisk that that cannotcannot be and be and mustmust not be not be minimizedminimized. .

• But promoting, spreading & sharing But promoting, spreading & sharing information like I’m doing, may be important information like I’m doing, may be important as we still have time for a reaction! as we still have time for a reaction!

• That’s why I think That’s why I think thisthis initiativeinitiative is so is so importantimportant.. Therefore don’t Therefore don’t minimize itminimize it. .

• This is just a This is just a riskrisk! I can’t say for ! I can’t say for suresure that that vaccines will be contaminated, I haven’t made vaccines will be contaminated, I haven’t made nor analyzed them! I don’t think it’s going to be nor analyzed them! I don’t think it’s going to be easy either, to get access to this vaccine in easy either, to get access to this vaccine in order to analyze it independently. If possible order to analyze it independently. If possible we’ll try have help to do it. But I don’t know we’ll try have help to do it. But I don’t know anybody who is able to do it. anybody who is able to do it.

Don’t panic! But what happens, when more Don’t panic! But what happens, when more people start dying?! Or if there’s a mutation?!people start dying?! Or if there’s a mutation?!

• What What happenshappens if if moremore people start people start dyingdying now? now? Or like was Or like was announced, that announced, that a second wavea second wave is coming and a is coming and a mutationmutation is coming? It’s very important to know that is coming? It’s very important to know that swine flu virusswine flu virus has has not mutated in 70 yearsnot mutated in 70 years! !

• Then how is it possible to announce a mutation this year Then how is it possible to announce a mutation this year when this virus is not known to have ever mutated during a when this virus is not known to have ever mutated during a period of 70 years? period of 70 years?

• What we What we didn’tdidn’t have for 70 years is a flu coming in have for 70 years is a flu coming in two two waveswaves with with differentdifferent virusesviruses. . This is also an irregularityThis is also an irregularity. .

• But let’s assume that many people start dying now, because But let’s assume that many people start dying now, because of the flu or with compatible symptoms, then of the flu or with compatible symptoms, then it will be even it will be even more important to refuse this vaccinationmore important to refuse this vaccination, for , for TWO TWO REASONSREASONS::First because First because if this virus starts giving an increased if this virus starts giving an increased mortality, it’s mortality, it’s because it’s not the samebecause it’s not the same. That is, . That is, it will it will have have mutatedmutated although it’s something that doesn’t agree although it’s something that doesn’t agree with up-to-date data. with up-to-date data.

• IFIF it has mutated, it has mutated, the vaccine that’s been produced now, the vaccine that’s been produced now, is is notnot of of USEUSE anymore! anymore! This is why This is why every yearevery year a a differentdifferent vaccinevaccine is produced, because there are is produced, because there are mutationsmutations, we , we have to produce a vaccine have to produce a vaccine adaptedadapted to the new mutation. to the new mutation.

• So if an important amount of population So if an important amount of population doesn’tdoesn’t die, it is die, it is notnot necessarynecessary to take the to take the vaccinevaccine, because the risk is very high, , because the risk is very high, the risk may be higher than the benefit. the risk may be higher than the benefit.

Only 2 Possible Reasons For a High Only 2 Possible Reasons For a High Rate of Mortality!Rate of Mortality!

• If we If we startstart seeingseeing a a highhigh raterate of of mortalitymortality caused by this flu, or because of caused by this flu, or because of compatible symptoms, then, this surprise compatible symptoms, then, this surprise could only be due to could only be due to two reasonstwo reasons. .

• The The firstfirst is that the virus has is that the virus has mutatedmutated, , therefore the vaccine is not good. therefore the vaccine is not good.

• Or Or secondsecond, It is , It is anotheranother virusvirus or or other other virusesviruses, and , and thereforetherefore, the , the vaccine is not vaccine is not good eithergood either, ,

• And it could even be the vaccine itself And it could even be the vaccine itself the means of transmission of those the means of transmission of those new virusesnew viruses, according to what , according to what happened with Baxter in February. This is happened with Baxter in February. This is where my thoughts lead me. where my thoughts lead me.

• My proposal is very clear. Stay calm, take My proposal is very clear. Stay calm, take your usual precautions to not get infected, your usual precautions to not get infected, common sense precautions, and common sense precautions, and do not do not get the vaccination get the vaccination this year because this year because there are all those circumstances. there are all those circumstances.

• This is my recommendation, but is also This is my recommendation, but is also the recommendation of common sense...the recommendation of common sense...

I appeal from this document & visual platform, to I appeal from this document & visual platform, to activate urgently all civil citizenship and legal activate urgently all civil citizenship and legal resourcesresources, to avoid , to avoid two thingstwo things in our country. in our country.FirstFirst. That no one can force anybody in this country . That no one can force anybody in this country to get a vaccine they do not want to get. And to get a vaccine they do not want to get. And SecondSecond, that those who of their own will desire to , that those who of their own will desire to get the vaccination, won’t be deprived of their right get the vaccination, won’t be deprived of their right to ask for responsibilities of financial compensation to ask for responsibilities of financial compensation in case the vaccine causes them serious disease or in case the vaccine causes them serious disease or death! So….death! So….

Rise Up & Rise Up & Take Action!Take Action!

And visit the And visit the www.theflucase.com/www.theflucase.com/ TODAY! TODAY!

'Be Still and Know that I AM GOD‘'Be Still and Know that I AM GOD‘Psalm 46:19Psalm 46:19

And And PrayPray & & trusttrust in the in the greatest doctor in the greatest doctor in the

Universe!Universe!

www.powerpointparadise.com/