copyright © 2004 by thomson southwestern all rights reserved. 4-1 depository institution...
Post on 20-Dec-2015
217 views
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-1
Depository Institution Performance and Risk
Analysis Chapter 4
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-2
Why Financial Analysis Is Important?
Financial services industry is becoming more competitive
Achieving financial goals is critical to survival and is aided by• An affective planning process• Establishing performance criteria• Measuring progress towards those criteria
It is required by the disclosures laws for publicly held firms
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-3
Sources of Industry Information
Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) Website
Uniform Bank Performance Report ( UBPRs)National Information Center (NIC) Call ReportsFDIC Bank Data & Statistics WebsiteNational Credit Union Administration WebsiteOther Federal Reserve Bank WebsiteBank Rating Services Other Sources of Financial InformationEnforcement Actions and Orders
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-4
Commercial Bank Report of Income
Interest incomeLess Interest expense = Net Interest income (NII)Less Provision for loan losses (PLL)Less Burden (non-interest expenses –
noninterest income)Equals Traditional Operating Profit, orTraditional Operating Profit = NII – PLL –
Burden
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-5Types of Assets and Liabilities
Held by All FDIC - Insured Banks on Average
PANEL A: ASSETS ON AVERAGE FOR FDIC-INSURED BANKS
All Other Assets 7.59%
Trading Account Assets 5.51%
Fixed Assets & OREO 1.16%
Cash and Due 5.10%
Securities 23.00%
Net Loans and Leases 57.20%
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-6
Types of Assets and Liabilities Held by All FDIC - Insured Banks
on AveragePANEL B: LIABILITIES ON AVERAGE FOR FDIC - INSURED BANKS
Subdordinated Debt, 1.31%
Other Borrowed Funds and Trading Liabilities 12.60%
Federal Funds Purchased and
Repurchase Agreements 7.50%
Equity Capital 9.12%
Total Deposits 65.78%
All Other Liabilities 3.69%
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-7Trends in Balance Sheet Composition: 1950 to
2003Over this period
• Percent of assets held as loans has increased• Percent of assets financed by deposits has
decreased• Banks lost deposits to money market funds
and mutual funds• Banks equity-to-asset ratio increased
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-8
Types of Bank Assets
Cash and dueInvestment securitiesFed funds sold & reverse repo agreementsAssets in Trading AccountsLoans (as a percentage of assets) 58.28%
• Individuals 09.36%• Commercial & Industrial 11.76%• Real Estate 30.41%• Farm 00.62%• Other 06.11%
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-9
Types of Liabilities & Equity
Bank Liabilities• Deposits 66%• Other liabilities 25%◦ Short term◦ Long term
Equity Capital 9%• Common stock• Surplus• Undivided profits• Other equity & reserves
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-10
Layout of the Income Statement
Interest revenueInterest expenseNet interest income (NII)Provision for loan losses (PLL)Noninterest revenue (NIR)Noninterest expense (NIE)Burden (BUR = NIE – NIR)Pretax net operating income (NII – PLL – BUR)Gains (Losses) on Securities and Net
Extraordinary ItemsNet Income
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-11
ROA & ROE
Effect on ROA of NIM, Provision for Loan Losses, and Burden• NI=(NII – PLL – Burden) (1-t)
• ROA = (NIM – PLL% - Burden%) (1-t)
• ROE = ROA * EM
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-12
Figure 4.6
Page 145
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-13Figure 4.7
Page 146
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-14
Forecasting NIM Based on a Target ROA
Target ROA = (NIM – PLL% - Burden%)(1 – t)
Pretax ROA = after-tax ROA/(1 – t)
Pretax ROA = (NIM – PPL% - Burden%)
Target NIM = [ROA/(1 – t)] + PPL% + Burden%
NIM = IR% - IE% Given any two, you can solve for the remaining
one.
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-15
Forecasting NIM Based on a Desired Target of ROE
ROE = ROA * EM
Target NIM = {[ROE/(1 – t)]/EM} + PPL% + Burden%
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-16
Analyzing Trends over Time
Table 4.4 (page 148)• NPM * AU = ROA• ROA * EM = ROE
Trends in ROA, EM, and ROE over time• Components of ROA and ROE reveal◦ Sources of change in performance
measures◦ Areas which need improvement
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-17Table 4.4
Page 148
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-18
Overview of a Depository Institution’s Performance
using a UBPR A More Detailed Analysis of a Depository Institution
using UBPRS
I. Overall Profitability Ratios
II. Earnings and Profitability Analysis
III. (NIM) Margin Analysis
IV. Yield or Cost of Analysis
V. Balance Sheet % Composition of Assets and Liabilities
VI. Analysis of Noninterest Expenses as a Percent of Average Assets
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-19
UPBR Risk Ratios
Credit Risk• Composition of asset portfolio• Net loan rates, net charge-offs, noncurrent
loan rates• Loan loss provision, earnings coverage, loan
loss allowance
Liquidity riskCapital riskInterest rate risk
See Table 4.6
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-20
A Performance and Risk Evaluation Illustrated for
Wells FargoWells Fargo Peer Comparison for 2002 and 2003:
DuPont Analysis See Table 4.7Earnings and Profitability Analysis: Peer Comparison
2002 and 2003NIM Overview
• Yields to Assets• Cost of (Interest Paid on) Liability Rates
Asset and Liability Mix Analysis• Asset Mix• Liability Mix Analysis• Burden
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-21
A Performance and Risk Evaluation Illustrated for
Wells FargoRisk Comparison with Peers See Table 4.8
• Credit Risk• Liquidity Risk• Capital Risk• Interest Rate Risk• Off-balance-Sheet Activities That Reduce Interest Rate
and Liquidity Risk• Interest Rate Derivative Off-Balance-Sheet (OBS) Items• State Peer Bank Comparison
Summary of Analysis of Wells Fargo’s Performance and Risk Relative to the Peer Average
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved.
4-22
Trend Analysis for Wells Fargo in 2002 and 2003
Explaining the Low ROA
The Decline in the NIM
Trends in Risk Ratios
Summary of Trends