copy of foundations group behavior
TRANSCRIPT
Foundations of Group Behavior
What is Group?A group is defined as two or more individuals, interacting and interdependent, who have come together to achieve particular objectives.• Formal groups• Informal groups• Command group• Task groups• Interest group• Friendship groups
Stages of Group Development
The Five-Stage Model•Stage I: Forming
– Characterized by much uncertainty•Stage II: Storming
– Characterized by intra-group conflict•Stage III: Norming
– Characterized by close relationships and cohesiveness•Stage IV: Performing
– The stage when the group is fully functional•Stage V: Adjourning
– The final stage in group development for temporary groups, characterized by concern with wrapping up activities rather than task performance
But in Reality…
• Groups do not necessarily progress clearly through the stages one at a time.
• Groups can sometimes go back to an earlier stage.
• Conflict can sometimes be helpful to the group.
• Context can matter: airline pilots can immediately reach performing stage.
The Punctuated-Equil ibrium Model
• Phase 1– The first meeting sets the group’s direction.– The first phase of group activity is one of inertia.
• Transition– A transition takes place at the end of the first phase, which
occurs exactly when the group has used up half its allotted time.
– The transition initiates major changes.• Phase 2
– A second phase of inertia follows the transition.• Last meeting is characterized by markedly accelerated activity.
Completion
Transition
First
Meeting
Phase 1
Phase 2
(High)
(Low)
A (A+B)/2
Time
B
Per
form
ance
The Punctuated-Equil ibrium Model
Group Structure
• Roles• Norms• Status• Group Size• Degree of group cohesiveness
Teams
How groups and teams are different?
So, what are the differences between group and team?
Share Information
Neutral (sometimes negative)
Individual
Random and varied
Share Information
Neutral (sometimes negative)
Individual
Random and varied
Collective performance
Positive
Individual and mutual
Complementary
Collective performance
Positive
Individual and mutual
Complementary
Goal
Synergy
Accountability
Skills
Work Groups Work Teams
Types of Teamsa.Problem-Solving Teams
• From same department, who met to discuss ways of improving quality, efficiency and the work environment. They only suggest ideas, do not have authority to implement
a.Self-Managed Work Teams• Group of employees who perform highly related or interdependent jobs and take on many responsibilities of their former supervisors
a.Cross-Functional Teamsa.Made up of employees from about the same hierarchical level, but from different work areas
Team EffectivenessTeam Effectiveness
Context-Adequate Resources-Leadership and Structure-Climate of Trust-Performance Evaluation and reward systems
Context-Adequate Resources-Leadership and Structure-Climate of Trust-Performance Evaluation and reward systems
Composition-Abilities of members-Personality-Allocating roles-Diversity-Size of teams-Member flexibility-Member preferences
Composition-Abilities of members-Personality-Allocating roles-Diversity-Size of teams-Member flexibility-Member preferences
Process-Common purpose-Specific goals-Team efficacy-Conflict levels-Social loafing
Process-Common purpose-Specific goals-Team efficacy-Conflict levels-Social loafing
Work Design-Autonomy-Skill variety-Task identity-Task significance
Work Design-Autonomy-Skill variety-Task identity-Task significance
Creating Effective Teams – Process
• Common Purpose• Specific Goals• Team Efficacy• Managed Level of Conflict• Accountability
Creating a Team Charter• What are team members’ names and contact
information (e.g., phone, email)?• How will communication among team members take
place (e.g., phone, email)?• What will the team ground rules be (e.g., where and
when to meet, attendance expectations, workload expectations)?
• How will decisions be made (e.g., consensus, majority vote, leader rules)?
• What potential confl icts may arise in the team? Among team members?
• How will confl icts be resolved by the group?
Increasing Socio-emotional Cohesiveness• Keep the group relatively small.• Strive for a favorable public image to increase the
status and prestige of belonging.• Encourage interaction and cooperation.• Emphasize members’ common characterist ics and
interests.• Point out environmental threats (e.g., competitors’
achievements) to rally the group.
Increasing Instrumental Cohesiveness
• Regularly update and clarify the group’s goal(s) .• Give every group member a vital “piece of the
action.”• Channel each group member’s special talents toward the
common goal(s).• Recognize and equitably reinforce every member’s
contributions.• Frequently remind group members they need each
other to get the job done.