coordinating care among stakeholders to raise healthy …the first 1000 days •rapid change in...
TRANSCRIPT
Coordinating Care Among Stakeholders
to Raise Healthy Families
Dr. Jennifer S. Savage, Assistant Professor of Nutritional Sciences
Interim Director, Center for Childhood Obesity Research
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Annual Meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine
April 2 2016
Symposium Objectives
• Discuss community and clinical care
stakeholders’ beliefs regarding roles and
responsibilities for care domains and their
attitudes toward electronic data coordination
solutions
• Highlight key lessons learned on developing
systems to coordinate coordinating care
between clinical and community providers
• Discuss the importance of mental health
screening in community and clinical settings
and how coordinating care will improve health
services
1 of 3 children in the United States
are overweight or obese before age 5
The Problem
1Pan, et al., JAMA, 2012; 2012;308:2563-25652Finkelstein, et al., Am J Prev Med, 2012
1 of every 7 low-income preschool aged
children in the US is obese1
In less than 2 decades
42% of today’s kids will be obese2
The first 1000 days
• Rapid change in diet, metabolic, and behavioral
systems are opportunities
• Early onset obesity comorbidities are more serious
• Infants and toddlers don’t tend to “grow out of it”
• Dietary patterns are established early in life
• Experimental studies suggest promising strategies for
early obesity prevention (T1 and T2)
*Summerbell et al Cochrane review, 2005 ;Harris et al, 2009; Haynos & O’Donohue, 2012
The Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing
on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT) Study
• Ongoing Randomized Controlled Trial
• Recruit first time mothers from labor
and delivery
• Nurse home visits, videos, mailings
Study protocol: Paul et al. 2014 BMC Pediatrics
Primary Aim: To test the efficacy of an intervention designed to prevent
rapid weight gain in infancy and overweight at 3 y by providing guidance
on responsive feeding and healthy dietary choices.
INSIGHT Intervention Components
Responsive Parenting
Sleep
Feeding
Fussing and
Soothing
Active
Social Play
Lower weight-for-length percentile at 1y
in parenting intervention group
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
< 5 5-10 10-25 25-50 50-75 75-90 90-95 ≥ 95
Pe
rce
nt
Weight-for-length percentile at 1 year
Parenting
Contol
5.5% in parenting
infants
12.7% of control
infants were
overweight
Overweight =
weight/length ≥95th
percentile
*Kolmogorov Smirnov Two-Sample Test p<0.01;
Savage et al. presented at PAS meeting, 2015; In Preparation, 2015
Next step: translation to broader population
• Large trials like INSIGHT demonstrate program efficacy,
but....
• Expensive, not feasible on large scale
• Home delivery intervention
• Homogenous population – highly educated, high income,
low depression
• Inclusion criteria: first time mothers
• May not translate well to other populations
• How do we translate to broader populations?
1Redsell et al. 2015 Mat Child Nutr; 2Paul et al. 2011 Obesity; 3Wen et al. 2012 BMJ
Goal of R40
Develop an individually-tailored behavioral
intervention designed to prevent overweight
among low-income infants by providing
coordinated, personalized care on responsive
parenting across multiple settings.
Mom and Infant
GeisingerPediatrician
WIC Nutritionist
Goal of R40
Coordination of care is definition:
• Deliver the same, consistent messages
• Providers will communicate preventive care plans
and education with each other
3-5 day 1 mo 2 mo 6 mo 9 mo 12 mo
WCV X X X X X X
WIC X X X X X
Research Project Overview
• Phase 1
• Focus groups
• Data sharing, integration, display
• Training
Y1Phase 2
Recruitment Observational
then RCT
Y2• Data
analysis
• Manuscripts
• Next GrantY3
Phase 1 Lessons Learned: Formative Research
1. Establishing an interdisciplinary team that includes
community partners takes TIME and requires administrative
leadership
Establishing an Interdisciplinary Team
that includes Community Partners
• Center for Childhood Obesity Research
• Geisinger Health Systems Obesity Institute
• Maternal and Pediatric Obesity Research
• Department of Pediatrics
• Center for Clinical Innovations
• EPIC programmers
Interdisciplinary Team Members
• Center for Childhood Obesity Research
• Geisinger Health Systems Obesity Institute
• American Academy of Pediatrics
• Sandra Hassink, President, American Academy of Pediatrics
• Janice Liebhart: Evaluation Manager, Institute for Healthy Childhood
Weight
• Alison Baker: Institute for Healthy Childhood Weight
• Jeanne Lindros, Manager, Institute for Healthy Childhood Weight
Sandra Hassink, MD
Interdisciplinary Team Members
• Center for Childhood Obesity Research
• Geisinger Health Systems Obesity Institute
• American Academy of Pediatrics
• Women, Infants, and Children
• Shirley Sword: Chief, Nutrition Services Section
• William Cramer: Director, WIC
• Greg Johnson: IT, WIC
• Local agency
Shirley Sword, MS, RD
Interdisciplinary Team Members
• Center for Childhood Obesity Research
• Geisinger Health Systems Obesity Institute
• American Academy of Pediatrics
• Women, Infants, and Children
• INSIGHT intervention PIs
Ian Paul, MD, MScProfessor of Pediatrics and Public
Health Sciences
Chief, Division of Academic
General Pediatrics
Leann BirchProfessor of Nutrition
University of Georgia
Phase 1: Formative Research
1. Establishing an interdisciplinary team that includes community
partners
2. Stakeholders we have spoken with:
• Focus groups: WIC nutritionists (n = 35)
• Interviews: Primary care providers (n = 15)
• Interviews: GHS patients/WIC parents: (n = 28)
• Interviews were transcribed and grounded-theory approach was
used to independently open-code transcripts. Categories were
identified and emerging themes reported.
Phase 1: Lessons learned from parents
• Dislike the rigidity of the nutrition education provided by the
WIC program
• Receive conflicting information from WIC, health care providers
and their own families
• Think “every baby is different” and “I know best, instincts” when
making decisions about feeding and caring for infant or toddler
• Want more individualized messages on feeding and caring for
their child.
Savage et al. (under review) Maternal and Child Nutrition
Phase 1: Lessons learned from Community
Nutrition and PCP
Data sharing: WIC nutritionists and pediatricians were enthusiastic about sharing and having access to data (e.g., progress note, immunizations, anthropometrics, formula)
Coordination of care
WIC:
• Conflict in messaging is prevalent (not clear the source: mother reporting bias or actual doctor reports… “grapevine effect”)
• Concerns: time management/work flow, and technology access (i.e., web access)
GHS Primary Care Providers:
• Value feeding guidance provided by WIC, but disagree with some WIC policies/guidance (e.g., juice)
• Conflict in anthropometric measures between PCP and WIC
• Have little concern about time to review WIC information
Phase 1: Lessons learned from Community
Nutrition and PCP
Who is the expert?
• WIC nutritionists reported trivializing their training as the
expert by deferring to the physicians (“ask your
physician”).
• Mothers/caregivers trust advice based on relationship;
less dependent on credentials
• Both WIC and Pediatricians express that “it takes an army
to parent a child” and that responsive parenting guidance
is a shared responsibility.
Phase 1: Lessons learned from Community
Nutrition and PCP
Depression
• WIC (half willingly) expands practice to screening for
depression. Concerns about not being trained and lack of
resources/referral procedures. Need for formal training
• Doctors report being unprepared to handle mental health
referrals
• Scope of practice: parent chart is hard to get
Maternal psychosocial factors (e.g., depression)
may also influence feeding behavior and child weight
• Depression rates are high among low-income mothers (40-59%)
• Some evidence shows that depressed mothers are:
• Less sensitive and more negating to their children (Murray et al. 1996)
• More likely to endorse a non-responsive feeding style (Hurley et al.,
2008) and tend to have heavier children (Gross et al. 2013)
X
Savage. 2015. Pediatric Obesity
Research Project Overview
• Phase 1
• Focus groups
• Data sharing, integration, display
• Training
Y1Phase 2
Recruitment Observational
then RCT
Y2• Data
analysis
• Manuscripts
• Next GrantY3
Phase 2: Randomized Controlled Trial
| 25
Mom and Infant
PCPWIC
Mom and Infant
PCPWIC
Treatment (n=145):
Responsive Parenting Curriculum
Personalized Messaging
Data Sharing
Care Plan Coordination
Standard of Care Control
(n=145)
Intervention components: Responsive Parenting
•Name (child/parent)
•Date of birth
•Child’s health insurance
•WIC participant
•Brand and product name of formula
•Breastfeeding status
•Hemoglobin/Hematocrit
•Length/Weight
•Food allergies
•Special pediatric conditions
•Neurological and psychiatric disorders
•Gastrointestinal disorders
•Hepatic, pancreatic, and
biliary disorders
•Endocrine disorders
•Nutrition disorders
•Musculoskeletal disorders
•Cancer
•Renal disorders
•Cardiovascular disorders
•Immunizations
•Well child visit date
•WIC visit date
Intervention Components: Data Sharing
Intervention Components: Early Healthy Living (EHL)
Screening Tool to provide clinical decision support to
personalize messaging
• Examples of Care Coordination Topics
Intervention Components: Coordinated Care
Conceptual view of Epic (PCP View)
EHL Topic Patient-Reported Data (Report
Date: 11/01/15)
Topic
Discussed
during WCV
Beverages in past
week
Formula; 100% Juice
WIC Discussion (Report Date:
10/07/2015): Beverages
Child put to sleep
(start/end)
8:00 PM/12:00 AM
WIC Discussion (Report Date:
10/07/2015): Sleep Routine
WIC Note: Reoccurring topic. Co-
sleeping. Family stressor.
| 29
Intervention Components: Coordinated Care
Conceptual view of Quick WIC (Nutritionist View)
| 30
Intervention Components: Coordinated Care
Conceptual view of Quick WIC (Nutritionist View)
| 31
Intervention Components: Coordinated Care
Conceptual view of Quick WIC (Nutritionist View)
| 32
Summary of Lessons Learned
• Conflict in messaging was commonly reported by all stakeholders, but the majority were enthusiastic about sharing and having access to data
• A challenge has been establishing a health information exchange platform (i.e., data management system) and data sharing agreements
• Data sharing agreements among state/federal agencies, health care systems, and academics take months to execute
• IT support is critical for data sharing: Epic and Quik WIC Systems
• Need for mental health screening, referral/treatment operating procedures, and provider training
• Stay tuned for efficacy results…
Questions?