conversion strategy (de)
TRANSCRIPT
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.comFRANKFURT - HAMBURG - MÜNCHEN
André Morys
Conversion OptimierungHardcore
Wer kennt den Unterschied?
HRS Booking
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com3
André Morys @morys
j.mp/convopt
© Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com
Wir beraten Top 100 Unternehmen für mehr Wachstum
4
© Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com
115 Conversion Experts in 15 Offices worldwide
5
Web Arts is founder of the worldwide alliance of leading
conversion optimization companies
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com13
„Welcher Header hat 22% mehr Leads gebracht?“
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com14
„Welches Kategorieseiten-Layout hat den Umsatz um 75,09% gesteigert?“
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.comFRANKFURT - HAMBURG - MÜNCHEN
„Welcher Add-to-Cart-Button hat den Umsatz um 159,95% gesteigert?“
Fehler 3: Das geht gar nicht.
Fehler 1: Woran lag es denn
genau?Fehler 2: Wo sind die Informationen über
Testlaufzeit und Stichprobe?
(99,9% Konfidenzlevel)
Bullshit.
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.comFRANKFURT - HAMBURG - MÜNCHEN
Which Test Won -> Which Test Was Stopped Zu FRÜH UM MEHR UPLIFT VORZUGAUKELN
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com17
Glaube keinen A/B-Test-
Case Studies.
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com
A/B Test Resultat
Realität
„Ich spüren keinen Uplift“
18
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com26
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com27
A/BTesting
70% wissen nicht, dass es ein Fragezeichen gibt 20% haben keine Antwort
10% haben eine Idee, wie Sie in Phase 3 kommen
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com28
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com
konversionskraft.de/tools
29
Gilt auch für Segmente und MVT!
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com
CRO: Improve Digital Value Chain
30
Site
Digital Value Chain
�Clicks
1-3%
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com31
Kosten für Entscheidungen
+
+- ValiditätConfirmation Bias
Der Begriff Bestätigungsfehler (confirmation bias) bezeichnet in der Kognitionspsychologie die Neigung, Informationen so auszuwählen, zu suchen und zu interpretieren, dass diese die eigenen Erwartungen erfüllen. Unbewusst ausgeblendet werden dabei Informationen, die eigene Erwartungen widerlegen (disconfirming evidence). Die betreffende Person unterliegt dann einer Selbsttäuschung oder einem Selbstbetrug.
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.comFRANKFURT - HAMBURG - MÜNCHEN
Was ist die Alternative?
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.comFRANKFURT - HAMBURG - MÜNCHEN
Stimulus
Reaktion
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com34
Traffic
Website
Web Analytics
Das Distanzhandels Paradoxon
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com35
Traffic
Website
Web Analytics
Click
Hand
Motor Control
prefrontal Cortex
Limbic System
Perception
Das Distanzhandels Paradoxon
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com36
Traffic
Website
Web Analytics
Click
Hand
Motor Control
prefrontal Cortex
Limbic System
Perception
99%
1%
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com
Test: facebook Acount Deaktivierung
37
fb cancellation seite beispiel
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com
Test: facebook Acount Deaktivierung
38
fb cancellation seite beispiel
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com
Test: facebook Acount Deaktivierung
39
„Warum sollte ich hier und jetzt kaufen?“
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com
Kernfragen für mehr Kontrast von Testhypothesen
‣ Wird es überhaupt wahrgenommen?
‣ Ist es relevant?
‣ Hat es einen Wert?
‣ Ist es alleinstellend?
‣ Folgt es psychologischen Prinzipien?
41
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com
Rauschen - kein signifikanter
Gewinner
Varianten laufen stabil besser - 2.800
Conversions pro Variante +7,4% Sales
Conversion Rate
48
14 Tage Testlaufzeit = 3 x Sales Cycles
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.comFRANKFURT - HAMBURG - MÜNCHEN
V0: Original
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.comFRANKFURT - HAMBURG - MÜNCHEN
V1: stimulantere Bühne + Portrait Einkäufer
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.comFRANKFURT - HAMBURG - MÜNCHEN
V2: zusätzlich mehr Fokus auf Value Propositions
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com52
Rauschen - kein signifikanter
Gewinner
Rauschen - kein signifikanter
Gewinner
159% Uplift
Woran erkennt man valide Resultate?
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com53
V2 erzeugt signifikant mehr Umsatz bei
weniger Bestellungen
Woran erkennt man valide Resultate?
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com54
Sind die Bilder der Einkäufer wirklich relevant für Kunden? War das Cross-Selling wichtiger?
Weiter optimieren und testen...
+15,57% Sales-Conversion Rate
-1,8% Sales-Conversion-Rate
+4% Sales-Conversion-Rate
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.comFRANKFURT - HAMBURG - MÜNCHEN
Wie viele solcher Entscheidungen werden in Redesign-Projekten falsch getroffen?
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com
4 Wochen Testlaufzeit
Gewinner läuft > 3 Wochen parallel
58
Woran erkennt man valide Resultate?
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com
Goal =
Die gleiche Variante erzeugt ebenfalls signifikant mehr Brutto-Nachfrage
59
Woran erkennt man valide Resultate?
Persuasion = Growth Factor
HRS = Traditional hotel booker since 1972 Booking.com = Young Challenger, fueled with persuasion principles
© Web Arts AG www.web-arts.comFRANKFURT - HAMBURG - MÜNCHEN
Behavior PatternsCompetitive Advantage through psychological knowledge
How do I perceive things?
What is fun for me?How do I build relations? What is most convenient for me?
Perception
Gamification SimplificationRelation
What is the influence of other people?
How do I make decisions?
SocialDecision
bit.ly/conversiontraining
© Web Arts AG www.web-arts.comFRANKFURT - HAMBURG - MÜNCHEN
Decision Social Perception
Relation Gamification Simplification
How do I perceive things?
What is fun for me?How do I build relations? What is most convenient for me?
What is the influence of other people?
How do I make decisions?
Behavior PatternsCompetitive Advantage through psychological knowledge
bit.ly/conversiontraining
© Web Arts AG www.web-arts.comFRANKFURT - HAMBURG - MÜNCHEN
Cognitive Biases (139)
Actor-observer bias Affective forecasting Ambiguity effect Attentional Attribute substitution Attribution theory Availability cascade Backfire effect Bandwagon effect Base rate fallacy Belief Bias Bias Blind Spot Bizarreness effect Change bias Choice Supportive Bias Clustering Illusion Cognitive bias mitigation Cognitive distortion Confirmation bias Congruence bias Conjunction fallacy Conservatism Consistency bias Context effect Cross-race effect Cryptomnesia Denomination effect Disqualifying the positive Distinction bias Dunning-kruger effect Duration neglect Egocentric bias Emotional reasoning Empathy gap Essentialism Exaggerated expectation
Expectation bias Extrinsic incentives bias False consensus effect False memory Focusing Effect Forer effect Functional fixedness Fundamental attribution error Gamblers fallacy Generation effect Google Effekt Hard-easy effect Heuristics in judgement and decision making Hostile media effect Hot-hand fallacy Humor effect Illusion of control Illusion of external agency Illusion of transparency Illusion of validity Illusory correlation Illusory superiority Impact Bias impression management Inference-observation confusion Information Bias Ingroup bias Innumeracy Insensitivity to sample size Introspection illusion Jumping to conclusion bias Just-world hypothesis Less is better effect Leveling and sharpening List-length effect
Ludic fallacy Magical thinking Magnification and minimization Mental filter Mere-exposure effekt Misattribution Misinformation effect Misinterpretations Modality effect Price illusion Mood-congruent memory bias Moral credential effect Moral luck Naive cynicsm Naive realism Negativity bias Neglect of probability Next-in-line effect Normalcy bias Omission bias Opimism bias Osborn effect Ostrich effect Outcome bias Outgroup homogenity Overconfidence effect Pareidolia Part-list cueing effect Peak End Rule persistence Pessimism bias Picture superiority effect Planning fallacy Positivity bias Post-purchase rationalization Pro-innovation bias
Projection bias Pseudocertainty effect Reactive devaluation Recency bias Reminiscence bump Risk compensation Rosy retrospection Salience Selective perception Self-relevance effect Semmelweis reflex Social comparison bias Social desirability bias Somatic markers hypothesis Source confustion Stereotyping Subaddivity effect Subject validation Suggestibility Survivorship bias System Justification Telescoping effect Texas sharpshooter fallacy Time-saving bias Tip of the tongue phenomen Ultimate attribution error Unit bias Verbatim effect Von restorff effekt Zeigarnik effekt Zero-risk bias Zero-sum heuristic
bit.ly/conversiontraining
© Web Arts AG www.web-arts.comFRANKFURT - HAMBURG - MÜNCHEN
Adaptive Bias Affect Heuristic All-or-nothing thinking Anchoring Anxiety Aesthetic = Good Arousal Authenticity Authority Autonomy Availability Heuristics Banner Blindness Black swan theory Bonding Breaking Rules Caring Challenge Cognitive Dissonance Commitment & Consistency Comparability Completion Context Contrast effect Curiosity Curse of knowledge Decoy Effekt Default Defensive attribution hypothesis Endowment Effect Exclusivity Faces/Views Feedback Flow Framing
Free Funneling Grouping Halo Effect Herding Hide/Remove Hope Hyperbolic discounting Identification Illusion of asymmetric insight Illusion of truth effect Innerer Dialog Irrational Escalation Island Joy/Fun Known Kognitive Leichtigkeit Leaderboard Liking Logic Loss Aversion Mastery Mental accounting Mental Models Mirror Nonsense math effect Order Order/Harmony Overgeneralization Paradox of choice Patterns/Principles Preview Primacy-Recency-Effekt Priming
Proof Purpose Reactance/Censoring Reason why Reciprocity Remove Represantativeness heuristic Reputation Restraint bias Reward Rhyme-as-reason effect Rules Scarcity Schuld Self expression Self fulfilling prophecy Self serving bias Self-perception theory Sensation Skim/Scan/Read Social Proof Sofortiges Erfolgserlebnis Spurring Status quo Story-telling Sympathie Tension/Closure Testimonial Testing effect Threat Trait ascription bias Trust Try out Tunneling
Unlocking Value/UVP Well travelled road effect Worse-than-average effect Zugehörigkeit
Competitive Advantage through psychological knowledge
Behavior Patterns
bit.ly/conversiontraining
© Web Arts AG www.web-arts.comFRANKFURT - HAMBURG - MÜNCHEN
Adaptive Bias Affect Heuristic All-or-nothing thinking Anchoring Anxiety Aesthetic = Good Arousal Authenticity Authority Autonomy Availability Heuristics Banner Blindness Black swan theory Bonding Breaking Rules Caring Challenge Cognitive Dissonance Commitment & Consistency Comparability Completion Context Contrast effect Curiosity Curse of knowledge Decoy Effekt Default Defensive attribution hypothesis Endowment Effect Exclusivity Faces/Views Feedback Flow Framing
Free Funneling Grouping Halo Effect
Herding Hide/Remove Hope Hyperbolic discounting Identification Illusion of asymmetric insight Illusion of truth effect Innerer Dialog Irrational Escalation Island Joy/Fun Known Kognitive Leichtigkeit Leaderboard Liking Logic Loss Aversion Mastery Mental accounting Mental Models Mirror Nonsense math effect Order Order/Harmony Overgeneralization Paradox of choice Patterns/Principles Preview
Primacy-Recency-Effekt Priming Proof Purpose Reactance/Censoring Reason why Reciprocity Remove Represantativeness heuristic Reputation Restraint bias Reward Rhyme-as-reason effect Rules Scarcity Schuld Self expression Self fulfilling prophecy Self serving bias Self-perception theory Sensation Skim/Scan/Read Social Proof Sofortiges Erfolgserlebnis Spurring Status quo Story-telling Sympathie Tension/Closure Testimonial Testing effect Threat Trait ascription bias Trust
Try out Tunneling Unlocking Value/UVP Well travelled road effect Worse-than-average effect Zugehörigkeit
Competitive Advantage through psychological knowledge
Behavior Patterns
bit.ly/conversiontraining
© Web Arts AG 2013 www.web-arts.com
Or even like this?
71
Kacke. Das wird eng.
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com75
Hype Disillusionment Enlightenment Productivity
159% Beispiel Inhouse-Test
Frontlineshop
Booking.com
Was kann ich tun?
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com76
159% Beispiel Inhouse-Test
Frontlineshop
Booking.com
1) Validität der Resultate erhöhen:
‣ Testlaufzeit verlängern ‣ A/A‘/B/B‘ testen um Artefakte zu erkennen ‣ nicht in Segmenten nach Pseudo-Uplifts suchen ‣ Alpha-Fehler-Kumulierung verstehen
bit.ly/cro-statistik
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com77
159% Beispiel Inhouse-Test
Frontlineshop
Booking.com
2) Effektivere Hypothesen generieren
‣ Kein Trial&Error ‣ Verhaltensökonomik verstehen
(„booking.com“) ‣ Qualitative Methoden einsetzen ‣ Hypothesen priorisieren
bit.ly/conversiontraining
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com78
159% Beispiel Inhouse-Test
Frontlineshop
Booking.com
3) Fokus verändern
‣ Prozesseffizienz messen ‣ Erfolgsquote in Prozent ‣ ROI p.a. ‣ Durchschnittlicher Uplift
‣ Optimierungsprozess optimieren ‣ Woher kommen die besten
Hypothesen? ‣ Wie wird die Organisation agiler?
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.comFRANKFURT - HAMBURG - MÜNCHEN
Growth Engineering
Playbook
konversionsKRAFT.de/playbook
© Andre Morys, Web Arts AG www.web-arts.com80
André Morys CEO
Web Arts AG [email protected] Tel. +49.6172.68097-15
www.web-arts.com
Danke!
Folge mir auf Twitter: @morys