conversations with policy makers
DESCRIPTION
Colorado Community College Summit October 24, 2011. Conversations with Policy makers. Matt Gianneschi, Ph.D. Deputy Executive Director Colorado Department of Higher Education. Legislators. Tom Massey, Chair, House Education Committee Bob Bacon, Chair, Senate Education Committee - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Conversations with Policy makers](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/5681658a550346895dd84e04/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
CONVERSATIONS WITH POLICY MAKERS
Colorado Community College Summit October 24, 2011
Matt Gianneschi, Ph.D.Deputy Executive Director
Colorado Department of Higher Education
![Page 2: Conversations with Policy makers](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/5681658a550346895dd84e04/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Legislators Tom Massey, Chair, House Education Committee
Bob Bacon, Chair, Senate Education Committee
Keith King, Member, Senate Education Committee
Mike Johnston, Member, Senate Education Committee
![Page 3: Conversations with Policy makers](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/5681658a550346895dd84e04/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Concurrent Enrollment Summary, Fall 2010 (Source: CDHE)
![Page 4: Conversations with Policy makers](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/5681658a550346895dd84e04/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
High School to College Matriculation, 2010 (Source: CDHE)
![Page 5: Conversations with Policy makers](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/5681658a550346895dd84e04/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Remediation in Colorado, Fall 2010 (Source: CDHE)
![Page 6: Conversations with Policy makers](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/5681658a550346895dd84e04/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
43.2%
64.0%
56.8%
36.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
1987-88 (Gallagher '82) 2011-12
K-12 Local Share vs. State Share
Local Share
State Share
![Page 7: Conversations with Policy makers](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/5681658a550346895dd84e04/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Medicaid Enrollment Growth
![Page 8: Conversations with Policy makers](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/5681658a550346895dd84e04/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
HIED Finance: Mix of Public Funds & Tuition, 2000 - 2012
68%
34%
32%
66%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2000-01 2011-12
College Funding splitStudent vs. State
Student Share (Resident Tuition)
State Share (General Fund)
![Page 9: Conversations with Policy makers](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/5681658a550346895dd84e04/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Are college costs out of control?
$3,128
$8,370
$2,063
$4,462
$1,707
$3,613
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
Amou
nt P
er R
esid
ent S
tude
nt
* FY 2011-12 is understated as it is based Long Bill data at 9%. College governing boards increased tuition anywhere between 9% and 20% in FY 2011-12 not captured here.
Average Tuition Cost Per Resident Student over time
Research Colleges -Ave. Tuition Per Resident Student
State Colleges -Ave. Tuition Per Resident Student
Community Colleges -Ave. Tuition Per Resident Student
![Page 10: Conversations with Policy makers](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/5681658a550346895dd84e04/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Total Revenue per FTE, Adjusted for Inflation
![Page 11: Conversations with Policy makers](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/5681658a550346895dd84e04/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Affordability: Tuition’s Share of Household Income
![Page 12: Conversations with Policy makers](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062410/5681658a550346895dd84e04/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Preliminary CCHE Master Plan GoalsGoal 1: Increase degree attainment across Colorado in order to meet future workforce demands. Goal 2: Close gaps in degree attainment among students from traditionally underserved communities, in particular, Latinos, students from rural communities, and students from lower socioeconomic households. Goal 3: Improve outcomes in remedial education by successfully aligning the state’s postsecondary admission and remedial policies with the state’s K-12 system, by assisting the state’s school districts in identifying and addressing students’ developmental needs before graduating from high school, and by scaling up successful innovations in developmental placement and instruction.
Goal 4: Pursue public funding that will allow public institutions of higher education to meet projected enrollment demands while maintaining current productivity efficiencies. In addition, pursue public funding to lower the burden on students by achieving a mix of revenues that equals 50 percent state funds and 50 percent tuition and fees.