converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

23
Converging evidence: linguistic Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics typology and corpus linguistics Holger Diessel & Kasten Schmidtke Holger Diessel & Kasten Schmidtke University of Jena University of Jena holger.diessel holger.diessel @uni @uni - - jena.de jena.de http://www.holger http://www.holger - - diessel.de diessel.de

Upload: others

Post on 12-Sep-2021

12 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

Converging evidence: linguisticConverging evidence: linguistictypology and corpus linguisticstypology and corpus linguistics

Holger Diessel & Kasten SchmidtkeHolger Diessel & Kasten SchmidtkeUniversity of JenaUniversity of Jena

holger.diesselholger.diessel@[email protected]://www.holgerhttp://www.holger--diessel.dediessel.de

Page 2: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

Language SystemLanguage System

Phonology

Syntax

Morphology

Semantic

In order to study the language system you have toabstract away from aspects of language use.

Page 3: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

Competence Performance

Language system Language use

Page 4: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

UsageUsage--based linguisticsbased linguistics

Linguistic structure emerges from language use.

Grammar is a dynamic system that is shaped by thepsychological mechanisms involved in language use.

The linguistic system is grounded in language use.

Page 5: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

Theoretical vs. empirical linguisticsTheoretical vs. empirical linguistics

�� TheoryTheory--building is grounded in empirical researchbuilding is grounded in empirical research

�� Empirical research involves quantitative dataEmpirical research involves quantitative data

�� Methods of quantitative data analysisMethods of quantitative data analysis

Page 6: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

Synchronic vs. diachronic linguisticsSynchronic vs. diachronic linguistics

�� If grammar is a dynamic system we need to know how itIf grammar is a dynamic system we need to know how itemerged and develops.emerged and develops.

�� Historical linguistics (e.g. grammaticalization) and L1Historical linguistics (e.g. grammaticalization) and L1acquisition have become cornerstones of usageacquisition have become cornerstones of usage--basedbasedlinguistics.linguistics.

Page 7: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

Linguistic subfieldsLinguistic subfields

�� The usageThe usage--based approach takes a more holisticbased approach takes a more holisticperspective on linguistic phenomena.perspective on linguistic phenomena.

�� It often combines evidence from different subfieldsIt often combines evidence from different subfields -->>converging evidence.converging evidence.

� The study of grammar involves the study of language use.

Page 8: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

Converging evidence from LT and CLConverging evidence from LT and CL

Linguistic typology is mainly concerned with grammaticalconventions, whereas corpus linguistics is concerned withusage data.

If grammar is grounded in usage, we would expect to find thesame underlying tendencies/principles in linguistic typologyand corpus linguistics.

Page 9: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

Class scheduleClass schedule

�� The usageThe usage--based model / converging evidencebased model / converging evidence�� The linear structuring of complex sentences in crossThe linear structuring of complex sentences in cross--

linguistic perspectivelinguistic perspective�� The positional patterns of causal, conditional and temporalThe positional patterns of causal, conditional and temporal

clauses: Converging evidence from linguistic typology andclauses: Converging evidence from linguistic typology andcorpus linguisticscorpus linguistics

�� Purpose clauses: Converging evidence from linguisticPurpose clauses: Converging evidence from linguistictypology and corpus linguisticstypology and corpus linguistics

Page 10: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

What are the psychological mechanisms that affect grammar?

Page 11: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

How does frequency affect the emergence of grammar?

Page 12: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

EntrenchmentEntrenchment

Page 13: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

EntrenchmentEntrenchment

exemplar-basedcategory

Page 14: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

Exemplar theory/viewExemplar theory/view

attractor

Page 15: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

Exemplar theory/viewExemplar theory/view

attractor

Page 16: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

Exemplar theory/viewExemplar theory/view

attractor

Page 17: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

AutomatizationAutomatization

Automatization involves:1. emergence of chunks of prefabricated structure2. loss of linguistic boundaries3. reduction

w1 w2 w3 w4 w5 ….

Page 18: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

AnalogyAnalogy

Old English Modern English

climb clomb climb climbedstep stope step steppedlaugh low laugh laughed

Analogy is a cognitive process of transferring informationfrom a particular subject, the source, to another particularsubject, the target. (Gentner 2004)

Page 19: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

AnalogyAnalogy

buy → buyedhit → hittedbring → bringed

foot → foots (feets)child(ren) → childrens

Page 20: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

AnalogyAnalogy

Why are there are still irregular verbs in English?

Competition between entrenchment and analogy

Page 21: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

Information processingInformation processing

Page 22: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

ParsingParsing

�� The human parser prefers linguistic structures with a shortThe human parser prefers linguistic structures with a shortDependency Domain.Dependency Domain.

�� The dependency domain is defined as the string of linguisticThe dependency domain is defined as the string of linguisticelements that must be parsed (and kept in working memory)elements that must be parsed (and kept in working memory)in order to access the Mother Node Constructing Categoriesin order to access the Mother Node Constructing Categories(MNCCs) of a phrase once the first MNCC has been(MNCCs) of a phrase once the first MNCC has beenaccessed.accessed.

�� A MNCC is a linguistic element that allows the parser toA MNCC is a linguistic element that allows the parser touniquely identify the mother node of a phrase.uniquely identify the mother node of a phrase.

Minimize domains (Hawkins 2004):

Page 23: Converging evidence: linguistic typology and corpus linguistics

Minimize domains (Hawkins)Minimize domains (Hawkins)

(1) Mary [gave]VP [the book that she dad been searching forsince Christmas]NP [to Bill]PP.

(2) Mary [gave]VP [to Bill]PP [the book that she dad beensearching for since Christmas]NP.