control of estrus in cows - applied reproductive strategies in beef

6
1 Control of Estrus in Cows Cliff Lamb University of Florida

Upload: others

Post on 20-Feb-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

Control of Estrus in Cows

Cliff Lamb

University of Florida

2

Estrous Synchronization and AI in Beef Cattle

Definitions

Synchronization Rate: % of females detected in estrus compared to total number synchronized.

Conception Rate: % of females pregnant compared to number of females inseminated.

Pregnancy Rate: % of females pregnant compared to total number synchronized.

Effect of synchronization rate on pregnancy rates

Effect of synchronization rate on pregnancy rates Location Effects

(Larson et al., 2006)

3

Focus on Fixed-Time AI (TAI) in Cows

PGF GnRH TAI & GnRH

-7 d 0 60-66 h

CIDR

7-day CO-Synch + CIDR

PGF GnRH TAI & GnRH

-5 d 0 8 ± 2h 72 h

CIDR

5-day CO-Synch + CIDR

PGF

PGF GnRH TAI & GnRH

-7 d 0 60-66h

CIDR

7-day CO-Synch + CIDR

PGF GnRH TAI & GnRH

-5 d 0 8±2h 72h

CIDR

5-day CO-Synch + CIDR

PGF

Pregnancy rates

58 61

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

7-day CO-Synch + CIDR 5-day CO-Synch + CIDR

%

Treatments

n = 17,779 n = 8,245

4

Are 2 Injections of PGF Necessary in the 5-day CO-

Synch + CIDR Protocol?

PGF GnRH TAI & GnRH

-5 d 0 8h 72h

CIDR

Interval to 2nd PGF Injection

PGF

PGF x 2 GnRH TAI & GnRH

-5 d 0 72h

CIDR

PGF GnRH TAI & GnRH

-5 d 0 72h

CIDR

(Bridges et al., 2012)

1 x PGF

Co-PGF

8h-PGF

Pregnancy rates

48.0 51.0

55.0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1xPGF Co-PGF 8h-PGF

%

Treatments

(Bridges et al., 2012)

b a,b b

n = 2,465

a,b Percentages differ (P < 0.05)

Answers to field results from a SD herd

438 suckled cows were estrous synchronized using the 7-day CO-Synch + CIDR Protocol.

PGF GnRH TAI & GnRH

CIDR

57

8

18

7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

TAI First 21 d 21-42 d 42-63 d

Perc

ent

Calving group

n=275

n=85

n=37 n=34

90% Overall pregnancy rate

??

Pregnancy Rates

2.5 5.0

7.5

20.0

37.5

10.0 7.5

5.0 2.5

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Perc

ent

Days after GnRH

97.5% return to estrus rate!!

Estrus response of cows following the 7-day CO-Synch+CIDR protocol

Average Interval to estrus = 20.9 days

5

(Rodgers et al., 2011)

Control

CIDR Natural mating GnRH PGF

TAI + GnRH

TAI

Natural mating

Impact of FTAI on Calving and Weaning

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

Cum

ulat

ive

perc

enta

ge o

f co

ws

calv

ing

Days of calving season

TAI Control

(Rodgers et al., 2011)

Impact of FTAI on Calving and Weaning

18

22

20

15

7 7

3 3

1

4 6

16

25

21

10 9

4 2 1

7

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81+ NC

% o

f pre

gnan

t cow

s ca

lvin

g

Days of calving season

TAI Control

* *

*

**

**

Impact of FTAI on Calving and Weaning

(Rodgers et al., 2011)

Treatment

Item Control TAI

No. of cows 615 582

Weaning rate, % 78 84

Weaning weight, lb 387 ± 8a 425 ± 8b

ab Means within row differ (P < 0.01)

Impact of Fixed-Time AI on Calving and Weaning

(Rodgers et al., 2011)

38 lbs

$55

$19

$72

$139

-$6

$36 $30

$47 $49

-$20

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

$140

$160

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Overall

Net

gai

n or

loss

Location (Rodgers et al., 2012)

Net Gain or Loss Associated with Estrous Synchronization and AI – Location Effects

$25

$47

$57

$64

$0

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

1:20 1:30 1:40 1:50

Net

gai

n or

loss

Bull:Cow Ratio (Rodgers et al., 2012)

Net Gain or Loss Associated with Estrous Synchronization and AI – Bull to Cow Ratio

6

  Bull price $3,250

  Salvage bull price $75/cwt.

  Bull grazing, feed, maintenance $365/year

  Interest 7%

  Steer calf selling price 550 lb $121/cwt.

  Semen $13.00

  Reduction in bull/cow ratio 1/17 to 1/34

Model Assumptions

Increased returns $47.09

Decreased Costs $35.23

Decreased Returns $ 0.00

Increased Costs $33.18

Gain $49.14

Summary of Outputs

Change in value based on herd sire costs Bull Value

Item $2,500 $3,500 $4,500

Increased returns (increased value of AI calves)

$58.33 $58.33 $58.33

Decreased costs decreased costs of clean-up bulls)

$29.55 $39.29 $49.04

Decreased returns (Attributed to fewer clean-up bulls included in decreased costs calculation)

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Increased costs (additional labor, semen, AI supplies, etc.)

$46.10 $46.10 $46.10

Gain per cow exposed to AI $41.78 $51.52 $61.27

Acknowledgements

People Dr. Carl Dahlen

Dr. Alfredo DiCostanzo Dr. Nicolas DiLorenzo

Dr. Jamie Larson Ms. Kalyn Bischoff

Mrs. Tera Black Mr. Guilherme Marquezini

Mr. Vitor Mercadante Technical staff Support staff Collaborators

Co-authors Beef cattle producers

Funding and Product Support

ABS Global, Inc. Intervet Animal Health IVX/Teva Animal Health

Merial Animal Health Pfizer Animal Health

Select Sires, Inc. Univ. of FL

Univ. of MN USDA-CSREES USDA-TSTAR

Thank You!

Contact Information: Cliff Lamb

University of Florida 3925 HWY 71

Marianna, FL 32446 Tel: 850-394-9124

Email: [email protected]