contracting for laboratory services ann mullin cleveland us geological survey presented to the...
TRANSCRIPT
Contracting for Laboratory Services
Ann Mullin ClevelandUS Geological Survey
Presented to the Environmental Protection Agency
Science Advisory BoardApril 23, 2002
Examples of Procurement Options
Purchase order
Sole source solicitation
Request for Quotation (RFQ)
Request for Proposal (RFP)
Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA)
Performance-based Contracting
QA acceptance criteria
Market research
Appropriate incentives, if applicable
Past performance
Contract Process (for RFP)
Planning
Request for proposal
Laboratory selection – technical criteria
Price comparison
Debriefing of unsuccessful vendors
Award
Contract Process (for RFP)
Planning
Request for proposal
Laboratory selection – technical criteria
Price comparison
Debriefing of unsuccessful vendors
Award
Planning
Determine needs and
requirements
Establish Data Quality Objectives (DQOs)
Establish Measurement Quality
Objectives (MQOs)
Planning
Specify technical requirements – Statement of Work (SOW)
AnalytesMatricesMeasurement Quality Objectives (MQOs)QC and PT samplesRadiological holding and turnaround timesNumber of samples and schedules
Planning
Specify contractual requirementsLicenses and certifications
Data reporting and communications
Sample re-analysis requirements
Sample management
Subcontract allowances
Liquidated damages
Contract Process (for RFP)
Planning
Request for proposal
Laboratory selection – technical criteria
Price comparison
Debriefing of unsuccessful vendors
Award
Request for Proposal
Prepare contractual document
Technical requirements
Generic requirements
Scoring criteria
Advertise in Commerce Business
Daily
Schedule pre-proposal conference
Proposals
Copy of Quality ManualMethods and supporting documentationPersonnelInstrumentationLaboratory facilitiesLicenses and AccreditationsExperience – including contacts
Contract Process (for RFP)
PlanningRequest for proposal
Laboratory selection – technical criteriaPrice comparison
Debriefing of unsuccessful vendors
Award
Laboratory SelectionTechnical Criteria
Establish Technical Evaluation
Committee (TEC)
Evaluate proposals
Submit pre-award proficiency samples
Perform on-site audit
Proposal Evaluation
Past performanceTechnical meritUnderstanding of the requirementsAdequacy and suitability of laboratory equipment and resourcesAcademic qualifications and experience of personnelRelated experience with similar contracts
Pre-Award Proficiency Samples
Samples Site-specific matrixWell characterized materialsMethod validation reference materials
CostSpecified in RFP
ScoringPass/FailSliding scale
Pre-Award Audit
To determine if the laboratory’s
representation (proposal) is realistic
when compared to the actual facilities.
Pre-Award Audit
Sample securityChain of Custody (COC)
MethodsSOPs available to every analyst
Method validation documentationVerification of documentation included in proposalsQA/QC issues
Pre-Award Audit
Internal QCCheck files and records
TrainingTraining logs
InstrumentationCalibration recordsNumber and age (condition)Maintenance contracts
PersonnelSample tracking
Contract Process (for RFP)
PlanningRequest for proposalLaboratory selection – technical criteria
Price comparisonDebriefing of unsuccessful vendorsAward
Price comparison
Price of analyses reviewed
Labs in final stage of selection can
rebid with “best and final offer”
Contract Process (for RFP)
PlanningRequest for proposalLaboratory selection – technical criteriaPrice comparison
Debriefing of unsuccessful vendorsAward
Debriefing of Unsuccessful Vendors
Letters sent to unsuccessful bidders
Individual debriefing arranged
between TEC and contractor reps.
Formal protest requires legal council
for both sides
Contract Process (for RFP)
Planning
Request for proposal
Laboratory selection – technical criteria
Price comparison
Debriefing of unsuccessful vendors
Award
Contract Management
“Communication is key to the
successful management and
execution of the contract.”
Laboratory Assessment Ongoing Evaluation of
Performance
Quantitative monitoring of laboratory’s performance
Internal QC sample resultsExternal QA sample resultsPE sample results
Operational aspectsDesk auditsOn-site audits
End of Contract
All data received
All invoices paid
All records requested and received
Summary report on performance of
vendor
MARLAP recommends
“Technical specifications be prepared in writing in a single document designated as a SOW for all radioanalytical laboratory services, regardless of whether the services are to be contracted out or performed by an Agency’s laboratory.”
MARLAP recommends
“All members of the TEC have a
complete technical
understanding of the subject
matter related to the proposed
work.”