1

Constructivism

Summary: Constructivism as a paradigm or worldview posits that learning is an active,

constructive process. The learner is an information constructor. People actively construct or

create their own subjective representations of objective reality. New information is linked to to

prior knowledge, thus mental representations are subjective.

Originators and important contributors: Vygotsky, Piaget, Dewey, Vico, Rorty, Bruner

Keywords: Learning as experience, activity and dialogical process; Problem Based Learning

(PBL); Anchored instruction; Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD); cognitive

apprenticeship (scaffolding); inquiry and discovery learning.

What is constructivism?

Constructivism is basically a theory -- based on observation and scientific study -- about how

people learn. It says that people construct their own understanding and knowledge of the world,

through experiencing things and reflecting on those experiences. When we encounter something

new, we have to reconcile it with our previous ideas and experience, maybe changing what we

believe, or maybe discarding the new information as irrelevant. In any case, we are active

creators of our own knowledge. To do this, we must ask questions, explore, and assess what we

know. 

In the classroom, the constructivist view of learning can point towards a number of different

teaching practices. In the most general sense, it usually means encouraging students to use active

techniques (experiments, real-world problem solving) to create more knowledge and then to

reflect on and talk about what they are doing and how their understanding is changing. The

teacher makes sure she understands the students' preexisting conceptions, and guides the activity

to address them and then build on them. 

2

Constructivist teachers encourage students to constantly assess how the activity is helping them

gain understanding. By questioning themselves and their strategies, students in the constructivist

classroom ideally become "expert learners." This gives them ever-broadening tools to keep

learning. With a well-planned classroom environment, the students learn HOW TO LEARN.

You might look at it as a spiral. When they continuously reflect on their

experiences, students find their ideas gaining in complexity and power, and

they develop increasingly strong abilities to integrate new information.

One of the teacher's main roles becomes to encourage this learning and

reflection process.

For example: Groups of students in a science class are discussing a problem in physics. Though

the teacher knows the "answer" to the problem, she focuses on helping students restate their

questions in useful ways. She prompts each student to reflect on and examine his or her current

knowledge. When one of the students comes up with the relevant concept, the teacher seizes

upon it, and indicates to the group that this might be a fruitful avenue for them to explore. They

design and perform relevant experiments. Afterward, the students and teacher talk about what

they have learned, and how their observations and experiments helped (or did not help) them to

better understand the concept.

Contrary to criticisms by some (conservative/traditional) educators, constructivism does not

dismiss the active role of the teacher or the value of expert knowledge. Constructivism modifies

that role, so that teachers help students to construct knowledge rather than to reproduce a series

of facts. The constructivist teacher provides tools such as problem-solving and inquiry-based

learning activities with which students formulate and test their ideas, draw conclusions and

inferences, and pool and convey their knowledge in a collaborative learning environment.

Constructivism transforms the student from a passive recipient of information to an active

participant in the learning process. Always guided by the teacher, students construct their

knowledge actively rather than just mechanically ingesting knowledge from the teacher or the

textbook.

3

Constructivism is also often misconstrued as a learning theory that compels students to "reinvent

the wheel." In fact, constructivism taps into and triggers the student's innate curiosity about the

world and how things work. Students do not reinvent the wheel but, rather, attempt to understand

how it turns, how it functions. They become engaged by applying their existing knowledge and

real-world experience, learning to hypothesize, testing their theories, and ultimately drawing

conclusions from their findings. 

The best way for you to really understand what constructivism is and what it means in your

classroom is by seeing examples of it at work, speaking with others about it, and trying it

yourself. As you progress through each segment of this workshop, keep in mind questions or

ideas to share with your colleagues. 

Constructivism

A reaction to didactic approaches such as behaviorism and programmed instruction,

constructivism states that learning is an active, contextualized process of constructing knowledge

rather than acquiring it. Knowledge is constructed based on personal experiences and hypotheses

of the environment. Learners continuously test these hypotheses through social negotiation. Each

person has a different interpretation and construction of knowledge process. The learner is not a

blank slate (tabula rasa) but brings past experiences and cultural factors to a situation.

NOTE: A common misunderstanding regarding constructivism is that instructors should never

tell students anything directly but, instead, should always allow them to construct knowledge for

themselves. This is actually confusing a theory of pedagogy (teaching) with a theory of knowing.

Constructivism assumes that all knowledge is constructed from the learner’s previous

knowledge, regardless of how one is taught. Thus, even listening to a lecture involves active

attempts to construct new knowledge.

Vygotsky’s social development theory is one of the foundations for constructivism.

4

Cognitive Apprenticeship (Collins et al.)

Summary: Cognitive Apprenticeship is a theory that attempts to bring tacit processes out in the

open.  It assumes that people learn from one another, through observation, imitation and

modeling.

Originator: Collins, Brown and Newman

Key Terms: Modeling, coaching, scaffolding, articulation, reflection

Cognitive Apprenticeship

Around 1987, Collins, Brown, and Newman developed six teaching methods — modeling,

coaching, scaffolding, articulation, reflection and exploration. These methods enable students to

cognitive and metacognitive strategies for “using, managing, and discovering knowledge”

Modeling

Experts (usually teachers or mentors) demonstrate a task explicitly.  New students or novices

build a conceptual model of the task at hand. For example, a math teacher might write out

explicit steps and work through a problem aloud, demonstrating her heuristics and procedural

knowledge.

Coaching

During Coaching, the expert gives feedback and hints to the novice.

Scaffolding

Scaffolding the process of supporting students in their learning.  Support structures are put into

place.  In some instances, the expert may have to help with aspects of the task that the student

cannot do yet.

Articulation

McLellan describes articulation as (1) separating component knowledge and skills to learn them

more effectively and, (2) more common verbalizing or demonstrating knowledge and thinking

processes in order to expose and clarify them.

5

This process gets students to articulate their knowledge, reasoning, or problem-solving process in

a domain” (p. 482). This may include inquiry teaching (Collins & Stevens, 1982), in which

teachers ask students a series of questions that allows them to refine and restate their learned

knowledge and to form explicit conceptual models. Thinking aloud requires students to articulate

their thoughts while solving problems. Students assuming a critical role monitor others in

cooperative activities and draw conclusions based on the problem-solving activities.

Reflection

Reflection allows students to “compare their own problem-solving processes with those of an

expert, another student, and ultimately, an internal cognitive model of expertise” (p. 483). A

technique for reflection could be to examine the past performances of both expert and novice and

to highlight similarities and differences. The goal of reflection is for students to look back and

analyze their performances with a desire for understanding and improvement towards the

behavior of an expert.

Exploration

Exploration involves giving students room to problem solve on their own and teaching students

exploration strategies. The former requires the teacher to slowly withdraw the use of supports

and scaffolds not only in problem solving methods, but problem setting methods as well. The

latter requires the teacher to show students how to explore, research, and develop hypotheses.

Exploration allows the student to frame interesting problems within the domain for themselves

and then take the initiative to solve these problems.

For more information, see:

Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1987). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the

craft of reading, writing and mathematics (Technical Report No. 403). BBN Laboratories,

Cambridge, MA. Centre for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois. January, 1987.

Communities of Practice (Lave and Wenger)

Summary: Etienne Wenger summarizes Communities of Practice (CoP) as “groups of people

who share a concern or a passion for something they do and learn how to do it better as they

interact regularly.” This learning that takes place is not necessarily intentional. Three

6

components are required in order to be a CoP: (1) the domain, (2) the community, and (3) the

practice.

Originators: Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger in 1991 and further elaborated in 1998.

Key Terms: domain, community, practice, identity, learning

Communities of Practice

The term was first used in 1991 by theorists Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger who

discussed the notion of legitimate peripheral participation. In 1998, the theorist Etienne Wenger

extended the concept and applied it to other domains, such as organizations. With the flourishing

of online communities on the Internet, as well as the increasing need for improved knowledge

management, there has been much more interest as of late in communities of practice. People see

them as ways of promoting innovation, developing social capital, facilitating and spreading

knowledge within a group, spreading existing tacit knowledge, etc.

Communities of Practice can be defined, in part, as a process of social learning that occurs when

people who have a common interest in a subject or area collaborate over an extended period of

time, sharing ideas and strategies, determine solutions, and build innovations. Wenger gives a

simple definition: “Communities of practice are groups of people who share a concern or a

passion for something they do and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly.” Note that

this allows for, but does not require intentionality. Learning can be, and often is, an incidental

outcome that accompanies these social processes.

One needs to distinguish between what is a CoP and what is not. There are three required

components of CoPs:

1. There needs to be a domain. A CoP has an identity defined by a shared domain of interest

(e.g. radiologists, Star Trek fans, middle school history teachers, Seahawks football fans,

etc.); it’s not just a network of people or club of friends. Membership implies a

commitment to the domain.

2. There needs to be a community. A necessary component is that members of a specific

domain interact and engage in shared activities, help each other, and share information

with each other. They build relationships that enable them to learn from each other. In this

way, merely sharing the same job does not necessitate a CoP. A static website on hunting

7

in itself is not a community of practice. There needs to be people who interact and learn

together in order for a CoP to be formed. Note that members do not necessarily work

together daily, however. Wenger points to the example of Impressionist painters who

sometimes met in cafes to discuss their painting styles. He indicates that even though these

men normally painted alone, these kinds of interactions were essential to making them a

CoP.

3. There needs to be a practice: A CoP is not just people who have an interest in something

(e.g. sports or agriculture practices). The third requirement for a CoP is that the members

are practitioners. They develop a shared repertoire of resources which can include stories,

helpful tools, experiences, stories, ways of handling typical problems, etc. This kind of

interaction needs to be developed over time. A conversation with a random stranger who

happens to be an expert on a subject matter that interests you does not in itself make a

CoP. Informal conversations held by people of the same profession (e.g. office assistants

or graduate students) help people share and develop a set of cases and stories that can

become a shared repertoire for their practice, whether they realize it or not.

Communities develop their practice through a variety of methods, including: problem solving,

requests for information, seeking the experiences of others, reusing assets, coordination and

synergy, discussing developments, visiting other members, mapping knowledge and identifying

gaps.

For Etienne Wenger, learning is central to human identity. A primary focus is learning as social

participation – that is, an individual as an active participant in the practices of social

communities, and in the construction of his or her identity through these communities. People

continuously create their shared identity through engaging in and contributing to the practices of

their communities. The motivation to become a more central participant in a community of

practice can provide a powerful incentive for learning. Students will have a desire to develop

skills (e.g. literacy skills) if the people they admire have the same skills. That is, they want to

join the “literacy club” and will work towards becoming a a member.

For more information, see:

Etienne Wenger’s introduction to Communities of Practice.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity:

Cambridge University Press.

8

Discovery Learning (Bruner)

Summary: Discovery Learning is a method of inquiry-based instruction, discovery learning

believes that it is best for learners to discover facts and relationships for themselves.

Originator: Jerome Bruner (1915-)

Keywords: Inquiry-based learning, constructivism

Discovery Learning (Bruner)

Discovery learning is an inquiry-based, constructivist learning theory that takes place in problem

solving situations where the learner draws on his or her own past experience and existing

knowledge to discover facts and relationships and new truths to be learned. Students interact

with the world by exploring and manipulating objects, wrestling with questions and

controversies, or performing experiments. As a result, students may be more more likely to

remember concepts and knowledge discovered on their own (in contrast to a transmissionist

model). Models that are based upon discovery learning model include: guided discovery,

problem-based learning, simulation-based learning, case-based learning, incidental learning,

among others.

Proponents of this theory believe that discovery learning has many advantages, including:

encourages active engagement

promotes motivation

promotes autonomy, responsibility, independence

the development of creativity and problem solving skills.

a tailored learning experience

Critics have sometimes cited disadvantages including:

creation of cognitive overload

potential misconceptions

teachers may fail to detect problems and misconceptions

9

The theory is closely related to work by Jean Piaget and Seymour Papert.

For more information, see:

Bruner, J.S. (1967). On knowing: Essays for the left hand. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard

University Press.

Social Development Theory (Vygotsky)

Summary: Social Development Theory argues that social interaction precedes development;

consciousness and cognition are the end product of socialization and social behavior.

Originator: Lev Vygotsky (1896-1934).

Key terms: Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), More Knowledgeable Other (MKO

Vygotsky’s Social Development Theory

Vygotsky’s Social Development Theory is the work of Russian psychologist Lev

Vygotsky (1896-1934), who lived during Russian Revolution. Vygotsky’s work was largely

unkown to the West until it was published in 1962.

Vygotsky’s theory is one of the foundations of constructivism. It asserts three major themes:

Major themes:

1. Social interaction plays a fundamental role in the process of cognitive development. In

contrast to Jean Piaget’s understanding of child development (in which development

necessarily precedes learning), Vygotsky felt social learning precedes development. He

states: “Every function in the child’s cultural development appears twice: first, on the

social level, and later, on the individual level; first, between people (interpsychological)

and then inside the child (intrapsychological).” (Vygotsky, 1978).

2. The More Knowledgeable Other (MKO). The MKO refers to anyone who has a better

understanding or a higher ability level than the learner, with respect to a particular task,

process, or concept. The MKO is normally thought of as being a teacher, coach, or older

adult, but the MKO could also be peers, a younger person, or even computers.

10

3. The Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). The ZPD is the distance between a student’s

ability to perform a task under adult guidance and/or with peer collaboration and the

student’s ability solving the problem independently. According to Vygotsky, learning

occurred in this zone.

Vygotsky focused on the connections between people and the sociocultural context in which they

act and interact in shared experiences (Crawford, 1996). According to Vygotsky, humans use

tools that develop from a culture, such as speech and writing, to mediate their social

environments. Initially children develop these tools to serve solely as social functions, ways to

communicate needs. Vygotsky believed that the internalization of these tools led to higher

thinking skills.

Applications of the Vygotsky’s Social Development Theory

Many schools have traditionally held a transmissionist or instructionist model in which a teacher

or lecturer ‘transmits’ information to students. In contrast, Vygotsky’s theory promotes learning

contexts in which students play an active role in learning. Roles of the teacher and student are

therefore shifted, as a teacher should collaborate with his or her students in order to help

facilitate meaning construction in students. Learning therefore becomes a reciprocal experience

for the students and teacher.

For more information, see:

Driscoll, M. P. (1994). Psychology of Learning for Instruction. Needham, MA: Allyn &

Bacon.

Crawford, K. (1996) Vygotskian approaches to human development in the information era.

Educational Studies in Mathematics. (31) 43-62.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes.

Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wertsch, James V. Sohmer, Richard. (1995). Vygotsky on learning and development.

Human Development. (38 ) 332-37.

Problem-Based Learning (PBL)

11

Summary: Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is an instructional method of hands-on, active

learning centered on the investigation and resolution of messy, real-world problems.

Originators: Late 1960s at the medical school at McMaster University in Canada.

Key Terms: open-ended problems, self-directed learners, teacher as facilitator, student as

problem solver

Problem-Based Learning (PBL)

Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is a pedagogical approach and curriculum design

methodology often used in higher education and K-12 settings.

The following are some of the defining characteristics of PBL:

Learning is driven by challenging, open-ended problems with no one “right” answer

Problems/cases are context specific

Students work as self-directed, active investigators and problem-solvers in small

collaborative groups (typically of about five students)

A key problem is identified and a solution is agreed upon and implemented

Teachers adopt the role as facilitators of learning, guiding the learning process and

promoting an environment of inquiry

Rather than having a teacher provide facts and then testing students ability to recall these facts

via memorization, PBL attempts to get students to apply knowledge to new situations. Students

are faced with contextualized, ill-structured problems and are asked to investigate and discover

meaningful solutions.

Proponents of PBL believe that, as a strategy, it:

develops critical thinking and creative skills

improves problem-solving skills

increases motivation

helps students learn to transfer knowledge to new situations

History

12

PBL’s more recent influence can be traced to the late 1960s at the medical school at McMaster

University in Canada. Shortly thereafter, three other medical schools — the University of

Limburg at Maastricht (the Netherlands), the University of Newcastle (Australia), and the

University of New Mexico (United States) took on the McMaster model of problem-based

learning. Various adaptations were made and the model soon found its way to various other

disciplines — business, dentistry, health sciences, law, engineering, education, and so on.

Criticisms

One common criticism of PBL is that students cannot really know what might be important for

them to learn, especially in areas which they have no prior experience. Therefore teachers, as

faciliators, must be careful to assess and account for the prior knowledge that students bring to

the classroom.

Another criticism is that a teacher adopting a PBL approach may not be able to cover as much

material as a conventional lecture-based course. PBL can be very challenging to implement, as it

requires a lot of planning and hard work for the teacher. It can be difficult at first for the teacher

to “relinquish control” and become a facilitator, encouraging the students to ask the right

questions rather than handing them solutions.

For more information, see:

Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem Based Learning

Barrows, H. S. & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to

medical education. New York: Springer.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?

Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235-266.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based

learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1. 21-39.

Savery, J. R., and Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model

and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35, 31-38.

Schmidt HG: Foundations of problem-based learning: some explanatory notes. Medical

Education 27:422-432, 1993.

Situated Learning Theory (Lave)

13

Summary: Situated Learning Theory posits that learning is unintentional and situated within

authentic activity, context, and culture.

Originator: Jean Lave

Key Terms: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (LPP), Cognitive Apprenticeship

Situated Learning Theory (Lave)

In contrast with most classroom learning activities that involve abstract knowledge

which is and out of context, Lave argues that learning is situated; that is, as it normally occurs,

learning is embedded within activity, context and culture. It is also usually unintentional rather

than deliberate. Lave and Wenger (1991) call this a process of “legitimate peripheral

participation.”

Knowledge needs to be presented in authentic contexts — settings and situations that would

normally involve that knowledge. Social interaction and collaboration are essential components

of situated learning — learners become involved in a “community of practice” which embodies

certain beliefs and behaviors to be acquired. As the beginner or novice moves from the periphery

of a community to its center, he or she becomes more active and engaged within the culture and

eventually assumes the role of an expert.

Other researchers have further developed Situated Learning theory. Brown, Collins & Duguid

(1989) emphasize the idea of cognitive apprenticeship: “Cognitive apprenticeship supports

learning in a domain by enabling students to acquire, develop and use cognitive tools in authentic

domain activity. Learning, both outside and inside school, advances through collaborative social

interaction and the social construction of knowledge.”

Situated learning is related to Vygotsky’s notion of learning through social development.

For more information, see:

Brown, J.S., Collins, A. & Duguid, S. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of

learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.

14

Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life.

Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1990). Situated Learning: Legitimate Periperal Participation.

Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Teaching with the Constructivist Learning Theory

What is the best method of teaching to use?

One of the first things a teacher must do when considering how to teach students is to

acknowledge that each student does not learn in the same way. This means that if the teacher

chooses just one style of teaching (direct instruction, collaborative learning, inquiry learning,

etc.), the students will not be maximizing their learning potential. Obviously, a teacher can not

reach every student on the same level during one lesson, but implementing a variety of learning

styles throughout the course allows all the students will have the chance to learn in at least one

way that matches their learning style.

Much of the material used to educate students at grade levels beyond primary school is largely

text and lecture based, which have significant limitations. While reading is a very important

learning mode, not all students learn effectively from reading. Some students respond better to

visual and audio stimuli of lecture but often get lost in the material or lose interest in the

presentation. In this type of a learning environment, students have limited opportunity to ask

questions or may be uncomfortable asking a question in front of the class. It is well known that

many questions go unasked.

How do students learn best?

Before we answer this question, ask yourself, "How do I learn best?" For example, do you learn

better when someone tells you exactly how to do something, or do you learn better by doing it

yourself? Many people are right in the middle of those two scenarios. This has led many

educators to believe that the best way to learn is by having students construct their own

15

knowledge instead of having someone construct it for them. This belief is explained by the

Constructivist Learning Theory. This theory states that learning is an active process of creating

meaning from different experiences. In other words, students will learn best by by trying to make

sense of something on their own with the teacher as a guide to help them along the way.

Since all sensory input is organized by the person receiving the stimuli, it cannot always be

directly transferred from the teacher to the student. This means that a teacher cannot "pour"

information into a student's brain and always expect them to process it and apply it correctly

later. For example, think of a time when you were taught something in a lecture-type class. Then

contrast that against a time when you had to prepare to teach someone else something. You will

probably agree that you learned the material better when you were preparing to teach the

material. This is because you constructed the knowledge for yourself.

Below is a list of different methods of learning. The percentages listed represent the average

amount of information that is retained through that particular learning method. Note what

method produces the highest retention rate.

1. Lecture = 5%

2. Reading = 10%

3. Audiovisual = 20%

4. Demonstration = 30%

5. Discussion Group = 50%

6. Practice by doing = 75%

7. Teach others / immediate use of learning = 90%

It should also be recognized that a person's prior knowledge may help or hurt the construction of

meaning. People's prior knowledge comes from their past experiences, culture, and their

environment. Generally prior knowledge is good, but sometimes misconceptions and wrong

information can be a hindrance. Sometimes time must be spent correcting prior knowledge

before new learning can occur.

Suggestions for Teaching with the Constructivist Learning Theory

16

Encourage and accept student autonomy and initiative.

Try to use raw data and primary sources, in addition to manipulative, interactive, and

physical materials.

When assigning tasks to the students, use cognitive terminology such as "classify,"

"analyze," "predict," and "create."

Build off and use student responses when making "on-the-spot" decisions about teacher

behaviors, instructional strategies, activities, and content to be taught.

Search out students' understanding and prior experiences about a concept before teaching

it to them.

Encourage communication between the teacher and the students and also between the

students.

Encourage student critical thinking and inquiry by asking them thoughtful, open-ended

questions, and encourage them to ask questions to each other.

Ask follow up questions and seek elaboration after a student's initial response.

Put students in situations that might challenge their previous conceptions and that will

create contradictions that will encourage discussion.

Make sure to wait long enough after posing a question so that the students have time to

think about their answers and be able to respond thoughtfully.

Provide enough time for students to construct their own meaning when learning

something new.

(Ref: Brooks, J. and Brooks, M. (1993). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist

Classrooms, ASCD)

CONSTRUCTIVISM

(J. Bruner)

Overview:

A major theme in the theoretical framework of Bruner is that learning is an active process in

which learners construct new ideas or concepts based upon their current/past knowledge. The

learner selects and transforms information, constructs hypotheses, and makes decisions, relying

17

on a cognitive structure to do so. Cognitive structure (i.e., schema, mental models) provides

meaning and organization to experiences and allows the individual to "go beyond the

information given".

As far as instruction is concerned, the instructor should try and encourage students to discover

principles by themselves. The instructor and student should engage in an active dialog (i.e.,

socratic learning). The task of the instructor is to translate information to be learned into a format

appropriate to the learner's current state of understanding. Curriculum should be organized in a

spiral manner so that the student continually builds upon what they have already learned.

Bruner (1966) states that a theory of instruction should address four major aspects: (1)

predisposition towards learning, (2) the ways in which a body of knowledge can be structured so

that it can be most readily grasped by the learner, (3) the most effective sequences in which to

present material, and (4) the nature and pacing of rewards and punishments. Good methods for

structuring knowledge should result in simplifying, generating new propositions, and increasing

the manipulation of information.

In his more recent work, Bruner (1986, 1990, 1996) has expanded his theoretical framework to

encompass the social and cultural aspects of learning as well as the practice of law.

Scope/Application:

Bruner's constructivist theory is a general framework for instruction based upon the study of

cognition. Much of the theory is linked to child development research (especially Piaget   ). The

ideas outlined in Bruner (1960) originated from a conference focused on science and math

learning. Bruner illustrated his theory in the context of mathematics and social science programs

for young children (see Bruner, 1973). The original development of the framework for reasoning

processes is described in Bruner, Goodnow & Austin (1951). Bruner (1983) focuses on language

learning in young children.

Note that Constructivism is a very broad conceptual framework in philosophy and science and

Bruner's theory represents one particular perspective. For an overview of other Constructivist

frameworks, seehttp://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/itc_data/constructivism.html.

Example:

18

This example is taken from Bruner (1973):

"The concept of prime numbers appears to be more readily grasped when the child, through

construction, discovers that certain handfuls of beans cannot be laid out in completed rows and

columns. Such quantities have either to be laid out in a single file or in an incomplete row-

column design in which there is always one extra or one too few to fill the pattern. These

patterns, the child learns, happen to be called prime. It is easy for the child to go from this step to

the recognition that a multiple table , so called, is a record sheet of quantities in completed

mutiple rows and columns. Here is factoring, multiplication and primes in a construction that can

be visualized."

Principles:

1. Instruction must be concerned with the experiences and contexts that make the student willing

and able to learn (readiness).

2. Instruction must be structured so that it can be easily grasped by the student (spiral

organization).

3. Instruction should be designed to facilitate extrapolation and or fill in the gaps (going beyond

the information given).