constructing the future of energy - amazon s3 · con edison - a vertical landscape •we serve more...
TRANSCRIPT
Constructing the Future of Energy
Jamie Brennan
Director, Demonstration Projects
Distributed Resource Integration
2
Agenda
• Con Edison Overview
• Changes in New York Utility Regulation
• Reforming the Energy Vision (REV) Policy
• REV in Action
– BQDM
– REV Demonstration Projects
3
Business Model Focused on Energy Delivery &
Infrastructure Development
EPS $4.07* Consolidated Edison, Inc. Market Cap $20.6 billion
Con Edison Company of New York
(CECONY)
Orange and Rockland
(O&R)
Con Edison
Development
Con Edison
Energy
Con Edison
Solutions
Con Edison
Transmission
CET
Electric
CET
Gas
EPS $3.70
EPS $0.19
EPS $0.08EPS $0.03EPS $0.09
Regulated Businesses
Competitive Energy Businesses
*GAAP earnings include after-tax impairment of
assets held for sale of $(0.01)
Regulated
Transmission
Regulated Utility
Regulated Utility
4
Non-Utility Businesses Focus on Energy Infrastructure
Development
• $465 million in capital investment over
the next three years
• Electric & gas transmission– 45.7% ownership interest in NY Transco
– Additional $1 billion proposed NY Transco
project
– 12.5% ownership interest in proposed
Mountain Valley Pipeline
Con Edison Solutions (CES)
• 6th largest owner of solar generation in
North America (IHS EER as of year-end
2014)
• Growing renewable energy production• 1 GW in service or in various stages of
development
• $1.7 billion in capital investment over the
next three years
Renewables Transmission
Regulated Businesses Dominate Earnings and $11 Billion
Capital Investment Over the Next Three Years
($ millions)
5
$2,001 $1,889 $2,046
$2,270 $2,274
$2,595
$3,053 $3,184 $3,175
$28$114
$492
$378 $447
$823
$985
$360 $360
$115
$171 $179
CECONY & O&R Competitive Energy Businesses Con Edison Transmission
2015 Earnings per Share
CECONY & O&R 96%
Competitive Businesses 5%
Parent (<1%)
6
Constructive Regulatory Environment in New York
Where Reform is Underway
CECONY
• 3.4 million electric customers
• 1.1 million gas customers
• 1,700 steam customers
• 724 MW of regulated generation
O&R
• 0.3 million electric customers
• 0.1 million gas customers
• October 2015 agreement reached to sell Pike
County Light & Power to Corning Natural Gas
Features of NY regulation
• Reduced regulatory lag
– Forward-looking test years
– Timely recovery of most fuel and
commodity costs
– Revenue decoupling mechanism in NY
(electric and gas)
– Adjustment mechanisms for several major
uncontrollable expenses (e.g. pension)
• Ability to capture value in evolving industry for
customer & shareholder benefit
– Majority of investment is replacement and
upgrade of existing assets
– Accelerated gas main replacement
– Growth from natural-gas conversions
• Reforming the Energy Vision proceeding is at
the forefront of the evolving industry
NY
NJ
PA
Con Edison - A Vertical Landscape
• We serve more than 3 million electric customers
and 1.1 million gas customers
• The NYC metro area creates about 9% of the U.S.
GDP – home to 10% of the Fortune 500
• Peak demand of 13,320 MW – 215 MW per
square mile in Manhattan
• Average monthly residential electricity use in our
service territory is a third of the national average
(at 300 kWh/month)
• New York State spends less on energy and
generates fewer greenhouse gases per capita
than any state in the nation (EIA)
7
Electric Consumption by
Customer Class
United States
Con Edison
41%
34%
25%
Residential Commercial
Industrial
50%50%
<1%
Implications of Density
8
9
Reforming the Energy Vision (REV) Stated Objectives
• Enhanced customer knowledge and tools that will support
effective management of the total energy bill
• Market animation and leverage of customer contributions
• System wide efficiency
• Fuel and resource diversity
• System reliability and resiliency
• Reduction of carbon emissions
10
Reforming the Energy Vision (REV) Put in Practice
Generation
becomes
more flexible
Grid becomes smarter
all the way up to and
including the meter
Power Flow
Empowered
customers
become energy
producers
Loads become
more interactive
and dynamic
Greater
penetration of
distributed
energy resources
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Proj.
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Proj.
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
11
Distributed Generation
Adoption Trends in Service Area
Total Installations Total Installed Capacity
CHP
CHP
PV
PV
Source: Consolidated Edison Company of New York.
CECONY
11
Track One: Implementation
• Initial Order issued February 26, 2015; Utilities’ Distribution System
Provider Implementation Plans due June 30, 2016
• Key decisions made on structural issues such as distribution-level market
design, technical platform, integration system planning & operation
Track Two: Regulatory & Ratemaking
• Staff straw proposal issued July 28, 2015
• Rate design, rate plan duration, performance-based ratemaking
opportunities
Track Three: Large Scale Renewables
• NYSDPS Staff issued an white paper on January 25, 2016
• In concert with NYS CES Mandate of 50% renewables by 2030
REV Presents Opportunities as Industry Evolves
12
• Meets capacity shortfall through a $200
million program
– Non-traditional customer-sided 41 MW
($150 m)
– Utility-sided solutions 11 MW ($50 m)
• 78 responses to RFI
• Expenditures treated as 10 year capital
assets with regulated return
• Includes 100 basis points bonus incentive
for 3 performance metrics
13
Brooklyn-Queens Demand Management Program (BQDM)
Deferral of $1.2 billion in traditional network upgrades with distributed solutions
Targeted area
(4 networks)
Brooklyn-Queens Demand Management
14
750
760
770
780
790
800
810
820
830
840
850
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
MW
Hour
Sample network 2016 peak day load curve
1 Hour
12 Hour
8 Hour
1 Hour
6 Hour4 Hour
2 Hour
2 Hour4 Hour
1 Hour
1 Hour
1 Hour
• $1.2 billion substation deferral using portfolio of alternative
investments in Brownsville network
• Earn rate-of-return plus incentive based on implementation
Des
crip
tio
n
Sample Network Peak Day Load Curve
Virtual Power Plant Marketing Materials
Building Efficiency Marketplace
Customer
Portal
Marketing
Campaigns
Project
Marketplace
Customer friendly
Web portal with
specific opportunities
that drive action
Multi-channel
engagement with
messages that match
customer need
Marketplace to
facilitate transactions
between contractors
and businesses
Analytics-Enabled Software Program Delivery Process
Project
Identification
Holistic
Customer
Enablement
for DER
Project
Definition
Savings
Validation
Project
Connection
Customer
Portal
Customers will receive access to a portal containing building-specific insights
» These analytics-based
insights and
recommendations customized
for each customer can boost
engagement by 4X
» With the industry’s most
advanced scalable analytics
engine, the portal will provide
accurate savings estimates at
the first login, with no
additional information needed
from the customer
- Sign in
» In the Usage section of the
portal, customers can access
a unique and accurate
disaggregation of their
building's energy by end
use, such as lighting, plug
loads, HVAC and baseloads
Customer
Portal
Customers will understand how their building is using energy today
Customer
Portal
The portal will drive customers to specific recommendations and actions
» Personalized
recommendations for savings
are generated on the portal
automatically and can be
further refined by users if
needed
» Precise percent savings, cost
savings, payback period
guidance and other
information will motivate
customers to initiate action
plans for implementing
efficiency projects
MarketplaceCustomers and contractors will connect
through an online marketplace
» This model will reduce
transaction costs for
contractors and improve the
customer experience,
streamlining energy
efficiency projects between
customers and trade allies
CUSTOMER’S BID MANAGEMENT WORKFLOW
Build bid forms from scratch or use a template.
Invite vendors from within the platform.
Get email notifications when bids are submitted.
Communicate with everyone at once.
MARKET PARTNER WORKFLOW
Receives invitation to bid via email.
Accesses files, messages and project schedule from home page.
Completes bid form and submits documents online.
Can’t see other bidders or budgets.
Connected Homes: Program Overview
Personalized Energy Reports
(with Targeted Offerings)
High Bill Alert
Communications
Web Resources
(with Marketplace)
Available to 270k customers in Westchester and Brooklyn as a pilot program
New York State Clean Energy Standard
24
Clean Energy Standard’s 50% Renewable Goal by 2030
Requires Substantial Additional Resources
36k GWhs of Energy Efficiency
AND
27 GWs of Solar17 GWs of Wind
5 GWs of Hydro
Or some combination thereof
11 GWs Offshore WindOR
OR OR
Bundled PPAs are not a good solution
• Not a market solution – artificially shifts risk from private developers to utility customers
• Customers pay more• Residual value. NYS needs renewable energy for more than
20 years, but developer keeps value of asset years 21-30+ -with UOG, customers retain value. None of NYS’s analysis has incorporated this critical fact
• Utility credit impact. Raises borrowing costs because rating agencies impute debt from PPAs
Substantial ramp in energy efficiency is critical to
achieving the Clean Energy Standard
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
GW
hs
50x30 Targets
Energy Efficiency
Renewable Energy
GWhs incremental to CES base demand forecast
Source: CES whitepaper; Con Edison analysis
• Success of CES depends on achieving EE targets
• EE is a cost-effective mechanism to achieve carbon reduction but goals are significant:
• NYS 2015 performance estimated at only 1/3rd
what CES targets each year
• REV / CEF efforts are long-term investments -will take time to have impact
• Larger, more market-based utility programs can provide needed bridge
CES white paper EE targets translate into incremental savings of ~1.3% per year for 13 years