conservation funding trends and implications

16
Conservation Funding Trends and Implications Presented by Directors Humphries, Irwin and Chester February 7, 2007

Upload: shadi

Post on 11-Feb-2016

23 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Conservation Funding Trends and Implications. Presented by Directors Humphries, Irwin and Chester February 7, 2007. Department Missions. Department of Natural Resources - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Conservation Funding Trends  and Implications

Conservation Funding Trends and Implications

Presented by Directors Humphries, Irwin and ChesterFebruary 7, 2007

Page 2: Conservation Funding Trends  and Implications

2

Department MissionsDepartment of Natural ResourcesThe Department of Natural Resources is committed to the conservation, protection, management, use and enjoyment of the State's natural resources for current and future generations.

Department of Environmental QualityThe Department of Environmental Quality protects and enhances Michigan’s environment and public health on behalf of the people of the Great Lakes State for an improved quality of life and a sustainable future.

Department of AgricultureThe Department of Agricultures serves, promotes and protects the food, agricultural, environmental and economic interests of the people of Michigan.

Page 3: Conservation Funding Trends  and Implications

3

What we do… Improve habitat Protect air and water

quality Preserve farmland Monitor and research

diseases Promote agricultural

products Regulate hazardous

materials Stock fish Ensure food safety

Regulate solid waste disposal

Maintain public recreation land

Protect the Great Lakes Administer consumer quality

measures Provide recreation trails Provide camping Enforce laws Manage timber

Page 4: Conservation Funding Trends  and Implications

4

How much for DEQ, DNR, MDA?

State Budget98.2%

DEQ, DNR, MDA 1.8%

Page 5: Conservation Funding Trends  and Implications

5

Economic impacts $4.5 billion hunting, fish, non-consumptive users Agri-food system $60.1 billion and 1 million jobs Parks visitors contributed $500 million Air quality (fine particles standard) saves

between $9 billion and $76 billion in health benefits nationwide

Air quality (Clean Air Interstate Rule) saves between $85 and $100 billion in health care savings nationwide

$3 billion in boating and snowmobiling

Page 6: Conservation Funding Trends  and Implications

6

Economic impacts (cont.)State forest products and recreation contribute $12 billion and 200,000 jobs

$3 billion in boating and snowmobiling

Agri-food infrastructure investments total $6.8 billion over last five years

$19 million in Brownfield grants leveraging $500 million in private investments and 3,400 jobs

$500 million in cleanup of state sites and infrastructure improvements and 3,800 jobs

Page 7: Conservation Funding Trends  and Implications

7

Return on investment

For every $1 invested in conservation, $116 is

returned.

Page 8: Conservation Funding Trends  and Implications

8

How much General Fund?

MDA, DEQ, and DNR receive only

1%

Page 9: Conservation Funding Trends  and Implications

9

How much for DEQ, DNR, MDA?

State Budget98.2%

DEQ, DNR, MDA 1.8% DNR $288,313.2

Page 10: Conservation Funding Trends  and Implications

10

FY 2006-2007 Budget

General Fund8.8%

Federal Funds 14.9%

Restricted Funds 76.3%

Total Appropriation $288,313.2

Page 11: Conservation Funding Trends  and Implications

11

DNR challengesProliferation of disease and non-native

species

Conflicting uses of public lands

Infrastructure deterioration

Recruitment and retention of hunters and anglers

Page 12: Conservation Funding Trends  and Implications

12

How much for DEQ, DNR, MDA?

State Budget98.2%

DEQ, DNR, MDA 1.8% DEQ $373,800.0

Page 13: Conservation Funding Trends  and Implications

13

DEQ challenges Pollution of air, water, and land resources Adverse health impacts Significant ecological consequences More wetland loss Less pollution prevention Few polluted sites cleaned and less

brownfield redevelopment Less service to the public (complaint

response, permit processing)

Page 14: Conservation Funding Trends  and Implications

14

How much for DEQ, DNR, MDA?

State Budget98.2%

DEQ, DNR, MDA 1.8% MDA $113,628.8

Page 15: Conservation Funding Trends  and Implications

15

MDA challengesGlobalization driving invasive species, new and re-emerging diseases

New demands on resources

Fragmentation of landscape

Page 16: Conservation Funding Trends  and Implications

Thank You

www.michigan.gov/dnr

Great Lakes, Great Times, Great Outdoors