connecting radiation to dynamics through simulations with omer blaes, shigenobu hirose, jiming shi...

28
CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Post on 21-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH

SIMULATIONS

with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Page 2: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Dynamics vs. Thermodynamics

Angular momentum transport is the primary driver of accretion—Does thermodynamics matter?

Yes—

It determines the equation of state

Radiation forces can determine the vertical profile of disk material

Both issues can affect the magnetic saturation level

Page 3: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

How to Include Thermodynamics

Requirements:

Good energy conservation

Radiation transfer solution

Include radiation in momentum, energy conservation

Page 4: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Specifics of Implementation(Hirose, K. & Stone 2006)

Shearing box approximation

Finite difference MHD (Zeus)

Total and internal energy equations

Internal energy acquires gridscale losses at every operator-split update

Thermally-averaged opacity

Time-implicit flux-limited diffusion approximation (multi-grid solver)

Page 5: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Program Overview:Disk Vertical Structure as Function of pr/pg

What are the vertical profiles of density, stress, dissipation rate, pressure?

What determines the magnetic saturation level? Is it numerically well-defined?

What are the characteristics of the fluctuations, both in time and in position?

Is the structure stable: dynamically, thermally, or in terms of inflow?

Page 6: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Simplest Example: A Gas-Dominated Disk

Page 7: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Time-Averaged Density and Dissipation Profiles

Q=½/ § ¡ 1=2

Page 8: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Time-Averaged Pressure Profiles

Page 9: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Saturated Parker Modes in the Upper Layers

Page 10: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Does Pressure Control Magnetic Stress?Or Does Magnetic Stress Control Pressure?

Magnetic leads Pressure leads

Page 11: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Is the Stress Numerically Well-Defined?

Page 12: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

standard resolution

2 x

2 x r

2 x z

2 x (r,,z)

independent of resolution

See also Davis, Stone & Pessah (2009) for the same conclusion

Box = (2Hx8Hx8H) Standard = (32x64x256)

Page 13: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Buoyancy Creates Vertical Coherence

black curve = standard resolution

red curve = 2 x (r,,z)

Page 14: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Thermodynamic Convergence Requires Better Resolution

Page 15: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

When Radiation Forces Matter

Page 16: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Radiation-Dominance Is Generic(Shakura & Sunyaev 1973)

r=rg < 170(L=LE )16=21(M=M ¯ )2=21

Radiation pressure exceeds gas pressure for

That is, for the most interesting parts of all bright accretion disks around black holes

Page 17: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

– Model Predicts Thermal Instability When pr > pg

$\int dz Q \propto p_r h$$

Shakura & Sunyaev 1976

In the model,

ZdzQ » ­

ZdzTrÁ » ®prh

When radiation pressure dominates, h / F =

ZdzQ

And pr » Qtcool » Q(h=c)¿ » (¿=c)ZdzQ

Thermal Instability

Page 18: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

But Even When pr ~ 10pg , No Runaway!

Hirose, K. & Blaes (2009)

tcool = 15 orbits

Page 19: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Trends with pr/pg: Density Profile

pr=pg » 10pr=pg » 0:015

Page 20: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Trends with pr/pg: Pressure Profiles

pr=pg » 0:015 pr=pg » 10

Page 21: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Trends with pr/pg: Dissipation Profile

pr=pg » 0:015 pr=pg » 10

Page 22: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Trends with pr/pg: Dissipation Profile

»´ F(2=3)c(aT 4

0 )=¿

Page 23: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Trends with pr/pg: Stress vs. Pressure

Magnetic leads Pressure leads

Page 24: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

A New Dimensional Analysis

Two quantities with dimensions stress:

p (Shakura & Sunyaev 1973)

c (Shakura & Sunyaev 1976) ;

Q = c2/required for radiation-supported hydrostatic balance

Fluctuation analysis reveals (weak) role of p; c does not fluctuate

Both enter through hydrostatic balance.

Page 25: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Averaging over T >> tcool Restores

Page 26: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Is the Radiation-Dominated Branch Inflow Unstable? (Lightman & Eardley 1974)

Mass conservation + angular momentum conservation give diffusion equation for surface density:

@§@t

+1R@@R

½1¼­

@@R

hr2­ _M (§ )

=0

Linearizing gives a negative effective diffusion coefficient when the accretion rate varies inversely with the surface density.

Page 27: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Linear Analysis of Inflow in Shearing Boxes Incomplete

Growth rate ~ k2; what about horizontal heat flow?

Shearing box can show bunching, but no net inflow

There is a maximum permitting thermal balance;

what happens if max ?

Page 28: CONNECTING RADIATION TO DYNAMICS THROUGH SIMULATIONS with Omer Blaes, Shigenobu Hirose, Jiming Shi and Jim Stone

Summary

Thermodynamics dynamics• Hydrostatic balance/magnetic buoyancy determines

vertical structure, influences magnetic saturation (two characteristic stresses)

• MHD dynamics/hydrostatic balance drives thermodynamics, stabilizing radiation-dominated disks

• MHD dynamics control surface density=optical depth, influence thermal state, which influences magnetic saturation: is radiation-dominated inflow stable?