confronto aerei regional

Comparison of the Medium-range Passenger AC

with 70-90 pax capacity (MTOW=40t)

UAK An-148, Embraer ERJ 170/175, Bombardier CRJ

700/900, MRJ 70/90/

Build. 6, the 1st km. of Rublevo-Uspenskoe highway,

Moscow region, Odintsovsky district, 143030, Russian Federation

Phone: +7(495) 710-99-63. Fax: +7(495) 710-99-60

E-mail: [email protected]

Web.: www.ifc-leasing.com

JSC «Ilyushin Finance Co.»

Confidential

32,8 m */35,9 m**

MRJ 70/90

Ilyushin Finance Co.

Aircraft dimensions comparison

31,68 m

ERJ 175

29,129 m

An-148

36,190m

CRJ 705

* MRJ 70

** MRJ 90


Aircraft dimensions comparison

ERJ 175 4 seats in row5 seats in row

CRJ 705

An-148-100

28,91 m 26,40 m

23,24 m

4 seats in rowMRJ 70/90 4 seats in row

30,9 m


Passenger Capacity

Comparison


Passenger capacity comparison (full economy class, 32’’, 2WC, 2 galleys)

95 pax

90 pax

85 pax

80 pax

75 pax

70 pax

Embraer Bombardier (31’’) Antonov-UAC

CRJ-900

CRJ-700/705

E-170-200 (175)

78 pax

E-170-100 (170)

An-148-100

92 paxAn-148-200

Mitsubishi Regional Jet

MRJ-70

MRJ-90


Passenger capacity comparison - Cross section characteristics

MRJ-70/90


Passenger capacity comparison - Passenger cabin layout AC with 70-75 pax

ERJ -170-100 standard 70 seat configuration at 32” - 2 lavatory & 2 galley

An-148-100 standard 75 seat configuration at 32” - 2 lavatory & 2 galley

L

L

G

G

G - galley L - lavatory

CRJ-700 standard 70 seat configuration at 31” - 1 lavatory & 1 galley

MRJ -70- standard 70 seat configuration at 32” - 2 lavatory & 2 galley


Passenger capacity comparison - Passenger cabin layout AC with 80-95 seats

CRJ-900 standard 90 seat configuration at 31” - 2 lavatory & 2 galley

ERJ -170-200 standard 78 seat configuration at 32” - 2 lavatory & 2 galley

An-148-200 standard 92 seat configuration at 32” - 2 lavatory & 2 galley

L L

GG

G - galley L - lavatory

MRJ -90- standard 80 seat configuration at 32” - 2 lavatory & 2 galley


Passenger Cabin Comраrison – Business Jets

Embraer Lineage 1000 Length 25.7 m / Width 2.68 m / Ceiling Height 1.97 m / Volume 115.7 m³

Antonov BJ E (Elite) Length 18.2 m / Width 3.15 m / Ceiling Height 2 m / Volume 125 m³

Challenger 850 Length 14.76 m / Width 2.49 m / Ceiling Height 1.85 m / Volume 53.35 m³

Bombardier Global 5000 Length 12.94 m / Width 2.49 m / Ceiling Height 1.91 m / Volume 53.29 m³

Dassault Falcon 900EX Length 10.11 m / Width 2.34 m / Ceiling Height 1.88 m / Volume 35.8 m³

Antonov Business Jet Elite

12 passengers

Configuration



An-148 Interior


ERJ-170 Interior


CRJ 700 Interior


MRJ 70/90 Interior


Baggage compartment comparison

Forward bag. compartment volume -12.4 m3

Aft bag. compartment volume 3.1 m3

CRJ-700 baggage compartment

Front bag. compartment volume - 8,7 m3 (306 ft3)

Rear bag. compartment volume - 5,8 m3 (204 ft3)

ERJ -170-100 baggage compartment


Baggage compartment comparison

MRJ-70/90 baggage compartment

An-148-100 baggage compartment


Political Risk

Comparison

Political Risk Comparison - Embraer ERJ 170/ 190 Partners


HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND (USA)

HONEYWELL / GRIMES (USA)

PARKER (USA)

C & D (USA)

LIEBHERR (GERMANY)

GEAE (USA)

KAISER (USA)

PPG (USA)

BFGOODRICH (USA)

VIBROMETER (SWITZERLAND)

PILKINGTON (USA)

GAMESA

(SPAIN)

LATECOERE

(FRANCE)

EMBRAER (LEADER)

KAWASAKI (JAPAN)

SONACA (BELGIUM)

GEAE (USA)

EMBRAER

EMBRAER

AKROS

(BRAZIL)

SAINT GOBAIN

(USA)

HAMILTON

SUNDSTRAND

(USA)WING, STUB,

CONTROL

SURFACES &

PYLON

FORWARD

FUSELAGEWING TO

FUSELAGE

FAIRING

CENTRAL

FUSELAGE I

& DOORS

CENTRAL

FUSELAGE II

ENGINE &

NACELLES

CENTER

FUSELAGE

III

EMPENNAGES

AND REAR

FUSELAGE

TAIL CONE &

APU

RADOME

LATECOERE

(FRANCE)

70 % of equipment produced by USA

Political Risk Comparison - Embraer ERJ170/190 Suppliers


Power Plant

GEAE - GE Aerospace

(USA)

Vertical/Horizontal Empennages

Gamesa

(Spain)

Control Surfaces

Kawasaki

(Japan)

Radome

Saint Gobain

(USA)

Fuel System

Parker

(USA)

APU/Tail Cone

Hamilton Sundstrand

(USA)

Center Fuselage II

Sonaca

(Belgium)

Pilot / Co-Pilot Seats

Sicma

(France)

Center Fuselage I & III

Latecoere

(France)

Doors

Latecoere

(France)

Landing Gear

Liebherr

(Germany)

Air Management System

Hamilton Sundstrand

(USA)

Interiors

C&D

(USA)

Wing Stub

Kawasaki

(Japan)

Avionics

Honeywell

(USA)

VOR/ILS Antenna

Sensor

(USA)

Rear Fuselage

Gamesa

(Spain)

EGPWS

Allied Signal

(USA)

SSCVR/FDR

Allied Signal

(USA)

TAT

BFGoodrich

(USA)

Pax Window Transparencies

Pilkington Aerospace

(USA)

Clock

Air Precision

(France)

Stick Shaker

BFGoodrich

(USA)

Slats

Sonaca

(Belgium)

Static Discharger

Chelton

(England)

Passenger Address

AVTECH

(France)

Flight Controls

Parker

(USA)

Fire Protection System

Pacific Scientific

(USA)Electric System

Hamilton Sundstrand

(USA)

Wing Skins

NMF

(USA)

Wires & Cables

NMF

(USA)

Push Bottons

Eaton

(USA)

Hydraulic System

Parker Hydraulics

(USA)EVM

Vibrometer

(Switzerland)

Smart Probe

BFGoodrich

(USA)

Composite Material

Hexcel

(USA)

Windshield Transparencies

PPG Industries, Inc.

(USA)

Exterior and Cockpit Lighting

Honeywell (Grimes)

(USA)

Throttle/Autothrottle

Kaiser

(USA)

Windshield Heater

Barber Colman

(USA)

Fixed Leading/Trailing Edge

Kawasaki

(Japan)

Windshield Wiper

BFGoodrich

(USA)

Center Fus. II/Wing to Fus. Fairing Project

AKAER

(Brazil)

Pylon

Kawasaki

(Japan)



Political Risk Comparison - Bombardier CRJ 700 suppliers/partners

Final Line/ Cockpit/Wing fairings

Bombardier Aerospace Montreal/Canada

Mid-Fuselage Bombardier Aerospace Belfast/Great Britain

Aft-Fuselage MHI Japan

Vert./Horz. Stabilizer Gamesa Spain

Nacelles Bombardier Aerospace Belfast/ Great Britain

Tailcone Westland Great Britain

Propulsion System General Electric USA

Avionics Rockwell Collins USA

Air System Liebherr Aerospace Toulouse/France

APU Honeywell Int’l USA

Stat/Flap&PowerGeneration

Sundstrand USA

Fuel System Intertechnique France

Hydraulics Parker/Abex USA

Landing Gear BF Goodrich USA

Pax Cabin, Bag. Bay, PSUs C&D USA

Fire Detection/Extinguishing Walter Kidde USA


Political Risk Comparison - UAC An-148 Partners


- Aircraft Manufacturing

Company (Voronezh, Russia)

-Kyiv Aviation Plant “Aviant” (Ukraine)

- PA Yuzhmash (Ukraine)

Political Risk Comparison - UAC An-148 suppliers


RussiaPassenger cabinPower jet and APU Life support systemsControl systemAvionicsLanding gear

UkraineAircraft general control equipmentFlight control equipment unitsHydraulic systemFire detectionWeather radarAltitude-speed parameters indicator

USAWater-vacuum systems (MONOGRAM)Optional: TCAS, EGPWS, PDP4B(Honeywell) – can be replaced by Russian and Ukrainian equipment

FranceElectronic devicesIndicatorsAir-conditioning system

KazakhstanElectric heaterFire extinguisher

AzerbaijanOxygen equipment

GermanyElectronic devicesLightning equipmentAltitude-and0heading reference systemAccumulator battery

NetherlandsService & galley equipment

EnglandTires

Less then 2 % of equipment

produced by USA

Political Risk Comparison - MRJ 70/90 suppliers


Political Risk Comparison


ERJ 170/190 - 70 % of equipment produced by USA

CRJ 700 - 63 % of equipment produced by USA

Strong dependence on the export policy

of the US Department of State

An-148 - less then 2 % of equipment produced by USA

Purchase and operation of An-148 aircraft do not depend

on export policy of the US Department of State

MRJ 70/90 - 65 % of equipment produced by USA


Operational Risk

Comparison


Operational Risk Comparison - Main performance data

70

-78

pax

airc

raft

:

An-148-100 CRJ-705 E-170-100 (E-170) MRJ-70

100-A 100-B 100-E 705 705ER 705LR STD LR STD ER LR

Max. pax75 pax (32") 70 pax 70 pax (32")

70 pax(32")

Max. cargo V 16 m 3 14,39 m 3

Уточняется

MTOW 38.550 kg 41.550 kg 43.700 kg 36.515 kg 37.421 kg 38.328 kg 35.990 kg 37.200 kg 36.850 kg 38.995 kg 40.200 kg

OEW 25.380 kg 21.432 kg 21.800 kg 21.700 kg

W for pax+fuel 18.320 kg 16.896 kg 16.400 kg Уточняется

Max.payload 9.000 kg 10.387 kg 10.591 kg 9.640 kg Уточняется

usable fuel 12.100 kg 8,823 kg 9.428 kg Уточняется

80

-92

pax

air

craf

t

An-148-200 CRJ-900 E-170-200 (E-175) MRJ-90

STD 900 900ER 900LR STD LR STD ER LR

Max. pax 92 pax (32") 90 pax 78 pax (32")

80 pax(32")

Max. cargo V 17,1 m 3

MTOW 43.700 kg 36.514 kg 37.421 kg 38.329 kg 37.500 kg 38.950 kg 39.600 kg 40.995 kg 42.800 kg

OEW 26.160 kg 21.432 kg 21.500 kg 22.600 kg

W for pax+Fuel 17.540 kg 16.897 kg 17.450 kg


Max.payload 9.800 kg 10.319 kg 10.591 kg 10.200 kg Уточняется

usable fuel 12.100 kg 8.823 kg 9.428 kg


Operational Risk Comparison – Airfield performances


Wight of sucked up

particle, grams

(concrete)

An-148 is certified for operation on the unpaved airfields.

An-148-100 passenger aircraft is designed in accordance with AP-25 and EASA CS-25 requirements.26 February 2007 Type Certificate № СТ 264-АН-148 was issued by Interstate Aviation Committee (MAK).

Operational Risk Comparison


F

An-148-100 E 1800 m

ERJ 170-100 LR 1750 m

CRJ-700 LR 1 726 m


Take-Off Field Length at MTOW

An-148-200 1800 m

ERJ 170-200 LR 1900 m

MRJ-90LR 1690 m

CRJ-900 LR 1 970 m

MRJ-70 LR 1 750 m

An-148-100 2 475 nm 70 pax

ERJ 170-100 LR 2 100 nm 70 pax

CRJ-700 LR 1 980 nm 70 pax


Range Comparison

An-148-200 2 029 nm 78 pax

ERJ 170-200 LR 1 580 nm 78 pax

CRJ-900 LR 1 580 nm 78 pax

MRJ-70 LR 1 780 m 78 pax

MRJ-70 LR 1 840 m 70 pax


74%

20%

2%

2% 1% 1%

0%

CRJ-700/900

USA + Canada

Europe

Middle East

Asia

Africa

South America

Central America

63%19%

10%

4% 1%

3%

0%

E-170/175

USA + Canada

Europe

Middle East

CRL and Embraer – low weight aircraft designed for operation in Europe and North America on airports with developed infrastructure


An-148 robust aircraft structure allows to operate within hard

environmentSuites for Africa, Asia and Latin

America airfields

An-148-100


- The biggest passenger capacity- The longest range - Minimum political risks- Robust AC structure + high-wing design solution

- The most suitable for operation in Latin America, Africa and Asia

An-148 advantages:

confronto aerei regional

Documents

interiorilyushin finance

galleyilyushin finance

partnersilyushin finance

milyushin finance

jsc ilyushin finance

seat configuration

compartment volume

ceiling height