conflict resolution & student conduct services program review
DESCRIPTION
Conflict Resolution & Student Conduct Services Program Review. Evaluation Period 2007-2012. Key Contributors. External Reviewer. Self-Study Committee Members. Craig Chesson Paul Osincup Melissa Emerson Chris Bryson Darcy Ramirez Nakia Lilly Melissa Williams Elaine Green. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Conflict Resolution & Student Conduct Services Program Review
Evaluation Period2007-2012
Key ContributorsExternal Reviewer
• Dr. Jane Tuttle• University of Kansas• Assistant Vice Provost of
Student Affairs• Association of Student
Conduct Administration Board of Directors
• Extensive experience in student conduct, residence life, conflict management, and policy development
Self-Study Committee Members
• Craig Chesson• Paul Osincup• Melissa Emerson• Chris Bryson• Darcy Ramirez• Nakia Lilly• Melissa Williams• Elaine Green
Schedule of Campus Visit• Conflict Resolution & Student Conduct Services (CRSCS)
staff• Dean of Students• Residence Life• Associated Students of Colorado State University (ASCSU)• Fraternity/Sorority Life• Women and Gender Advocacy Center• Student Case Management• Colorado State University Police Department• Support & Safety Assessment
Evaluation Framework • CAS (Council for the Advancement of
Standards in Higher Education) Standards
• Association for Student Conduct Administration (ASCA) best practices and principles
• Conflict Resolution Theories and Concepts
2006 Program ReviewRecommendations
• Records Management • Academic Misconduct• Location (Safety
Concerns)• Hospitalization protocol
Accomplishments
• New database (Maxient)• Collaboration with TILT • Move to Aylesworth• Multiple exits, multiple
cameras, control traffic flow with hall divider, and meet with students in designated area
• Creation of Student Case Management
Highlights of Self-Study from 2012 Program Review
• Conflict Resolution Services• Educational Philosophy• Programs and Services• Consultation and Collaboration• CRSCS Staff• Integrated Student Conduct System
National RecognitionTrainings• Wilfred Laurier University
(Canada)• University of Northern
Colorado• Metro State• CSU-Pueblo• School of Mines• Academic Impressions
(National Webinar & Featured in Article)
Consultations• Missouri• Vermont• California• Michigan• North Dakota• Maryland• Kansas• New York• Alabama
Peer Institution ComparisonColorado State University
University of Colorado-Boulder
Oregon State University
North Carolina State University
Campus Wide Restorative Justice
YES YES NO NO
Conflict Resolution Services
YES NO NO NO
Educational Workshops
YES NO NO NO
Highlights from 2011-2012• Implemented Neighborhood Impact panel• New Responsible Action Exemption protocol• Supervised 6 practicum SAHE students • Invited to participate in a national conference to discuss
the impact of legalization of marijuana on college campuses in Washington D.C.
• Revised learning outcomes• Recipient of the 2013 Award of Excellence from ASCA
for Significant Institutional Contributions to the field of Student Conduct Administration
Looking At The Numbers(2011-2012)
• 2657 Student Conduct cases• 38 Student Conduct Appeal requests • 1947 Admission Application Review• 244 Conflict Resolution cases resulted in 1253 collateral
contacts with students, staff, and community members• 79 outreach programs and presentations throughout
campus, serving 3181 participants• Learning outcomes results reflect over 90 percent of
students agreed they understood the consequences of their personal actions
Areas of Growth• Title IX Compliance• Student Conduct Appeals Process• Communication (Colleagues and
Students)• Aylesworth Hall (Issues of access and
central air)• Website
Recommendations• Expand Conflict Resolution Services • Conduct a Title IX review• Review relevance of office mission• Review organizational structure• CRSCS location/Advertising
accommodations for users of its services• Institutional review of the pre-admission
process
Strategies to Address Recommendations
• Hire a Conflict Resolution Coordinator• General Counsel, Safety & Assessment,
OEO, and CRSCS met during over the academic year to address Title IX issues
• Scheduled planning meetings with campus partners to improve communication
• Work with General Counsel and VPSA on improving appeals board
Questions