conducting polymer
TRANSCRIPT
Special Topics on Materials Chemistry材 化 特 論
Part III Conducting polymers
國 立 清 華 大 學 化 學 系
韓 建 中 教 授 授課
1
2
2000 Nobel Prize : Conducting Polymers (Since 1977)
Profs. MacDiarmid / Shirakawa / Heeger (Chemist / Polymer Chemist / Physicist)
Conducting Polymers
Polyacetylene
NH( )n
( )n
Polyphenylene
CH CH( )n
Polyphenylene Vinylene
S( )n
Polythiophene
SCH CH( )n
Polythienylene Vinylene
N
R
( )n
Polypyrrole
N
R
CH CH( )n
Polypyrylene Vinylene
O( )nPolyfuran
OCH CH( )n
Polyfurylene Vinylene
Polyaniline( VersiconTM ) 3
Polyaromatics
Polyheteroaromatics
(aromatic + vinyl)
(aromatic + lone pair e)
Key Features of IntrinsicallyConductive Polymers
I. Highly Conjugated BackbonesII. Polymer Backbones need to be ionized (doped) to be conductive
Doping Reaction
n
- e, X
+ e n
X
ConductorInsulator
n
+ e, M
- e n
M
ConductorInsulator
p-type and n-type conductors
Doping by Chemical, Electrochemical, Photochemical meansDoping is Reversible ( 10-11 - 10+3 S/cm )
4
(Charge carriers)
Cations p-type
Anions n-type
(oxidation)
(reduction)
Oxidant : FeCl3, Fe(OTs)3, AsF5, I2, Br2, Cl2 Reductant : RLi, Naph-Li+
Anode : Oxidation Cathode : Reduction
SPECTRUM OF CONDUCTIVIESSPECTRUM OF CONDUCTIVIES
Copper
DopedSilicon
Water
QuartzTeflon
DiamondNylon
105 ohm-1 cm-1
100
10-10
10-15
10-20
10-5
conducting
polymers
5
(S/cm)
• With a very broad conductivity range• Tunable by the degree of doping
Undoped
Fully doped
Partially
doped
Conductivity Spectrum
Metals
ConductivePolymers
ConductiveCarbons
Ionic Salts
ConventionalPolymers
(Nylon, ABS, PC)
High Current
EMI Shielding(Low Current)
Antistats
Insulation
ElectrostaticDissipation
(ESD)
Conductive Materials Applications(electrical)
Conductivity(S/cm)
10+5
100
10-5
10-10
10-15
SurfaceResistance
(Ω/Sq)
(Ω/□)
106-109
109-1011
6
Electrical conduction
• Anti-static
• ESD
• EMI shielding
Electrical field protection
• Cable shielding
• Radar shielding
Chemical potential protection
• Anti-corrosion
Charge storage
• Capacitor
• Rechargeable battery
Semiconductor
• Lithography
• Via-hole electroplating
Sensors
• Chemical sensor
• Bio-sensor
Electronic devices
• Smart window
• Solar cell
• Light emitting diode
• Electrochromic display
• Field effect transistor
• NLO
Miscellaneous application
• Gas separation membrane
• Plastic welding
• Conductive adhesive
• Conductive gasket
Important Potential Applications of Conducting Polymers
7
Application/Property Relationships of Conducting Polymers
Conductivity (charge transport)EMI; ESD; Antistat
Charge storage capability (doping/dedoping)
Battery; Capacitor
Color change (doping/oxidation degree)Smart window; Electrochromic display.
Charge transfer bands (UV-vis-NIR)Solar energy control window; UV-vis stabilizer
Dimension change (doping/dedoping)Electromechanical actuator; Micro-mechanical device
High ionic characteristic (Doped)Exchange/Separation membrane; Virus cleaner
Redox/chemical activity (doping/dedoping/oxidation/reduction)Chemical sensor, Biosensor; Anti-corrosion
Hydrogen bonding (Doped/Some undoped)Microwave/Radar absorbing shield; Plastic welding
Strong intermolecular interactionsHigh strength fiber; Reinforcement materials
ConjugationNLO; Photoconductor; Photoswitch;LED; Thermochromic; Liquid Crystalline
8
Preparation of the First Polyacetylene (PA) Film
HC CH
Ti(OBu)4 / AlEt3 ( 1 : 3.3 )
Toluene / Anisole ( 1 : 3 ) , -78oCn
( 100 um )
Shirakawa and IkedaPolymer J. 1971, 2, 231
Natta, Mazzanti, and CorradiniAtti Accad. Naz. Lincei, Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Nat.,Rend. 1958, 25, 3
9
Preparation of PA powder (insoluble) had been reported as early as 1958.
Chlorination reaction of PA had been studied by Shirakawa Observing metallic shining in some cases But did not recognize the connection to its novel conducting behavior
PA film
Preparation of first PA film (insoluble) was reported only after 1971.
Discovery of the First Conducting Polymer
Dopant Conductivity (S/cm)
Cl2
Br2
I2
< 0.05
0.4 - 0.5
30 - 38
Shirakawa, MacDiarmid, Heeger, et. al.J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 578 (1977)
Polyacetylene
ect.etc.HC CH
Ti(OBu)4 + AlEt3 Doped PolyacetyleneX2
10
Important Historical Aspects and Developments of Conducting Polymers
• Processibility Improvement(New synthetic routes; New processing concepts)
• Conducting Mechanism (Intrachain transport vs Interchain hoping)
• Doping Mechanism (Redox reaction / Non-oxidative protonic acid doping)
• New Functional Dopants (Dopant moiety provides the means for color and solubility modifications)
• Lower Bandgap Polymers (RO-substituted poly(thienylene vinylene); became transparent after doping) • New Properties New Applications
(PLED / FET / Solar Cells)
• Superconducting Polymers? 11
Polyacetylene Polyethylene
*
*
*
etc.
Why π-Conjugated Polymer is a Better Conductor
12
Smaller E
Low energy bondresonanceprocess
Larger E
High energy bond-breakingprocess
-bonding frame keepthe resonance orbitals
to remain within the effective chemical bonding distance
The escape of the vinyl fragments make the reversetransport process impossible
PossiblePolymerization Mechanism of Acetylene(via the metal-carbene intermediate)
13
HC CHWCl6 / Bu4Sn
polyacetyleneacetylene
WCl6 CH3CH2CH2CH2 WCl5
Bu4Sn Bu3SnCl
Bu4Sn
Bu3SnCl
CH3CH2CH2 C
WCl4
H
H
H3CH2CH2CH2C
CH3CH2CH2CH3
"Metal carbene"
C WCl4CH3CH2CH2
H
HC CH
C WLn
H7C3
H
HC CH HC
CH
CH
WLn
H7C3
HC CH
C WLn
C3H7
H
HC CH
C
C
H C3H7
H CH
WLnC
C
H
HHC C
CH
C3H7
WLn
C
H
CH C3H7
H
CC
C
C3H7
H
H
HHC
HC WLn
HC CH
etc.WLn
H
termination
Polyacetylene
InsolubleInfusibleIntractable
metallocyclemetal-carbene
Solubility Improvement of Polyacetylenes (via incorporation of substituents)
RC CHWCl6 etc. etc.
R R R R R
T. Masuda et. al. with improved solubility
WCl6 + C6H5C CH + etc.
PhPhPh
etc.
1 x 200
C. C. Han & T. J. KatzOrganometallics 1982, 1, 1093Organometallics 1985, 4, 2186
Olefin Metathesisring-opening polymerization
WCl6 + PhC CH etc. WLx
PhPhPh
etc.LxW
PhPhPh
PhPh Ph
W
etc.
PhPhPh
WLx
etc.
PhPhPh
WLx
H
14
Coplanarity is the key for gaining high conductivity
Substituent Effects: Solubility Conductivity
15
full overlaping
Coplanarity gives best overlapingbetween orbitals
Distortion from coplanarityreduces the electron mobility
partial overlaping
no overlaping
90o distortion lead to conjugation defects
doped with I2
R R R R R
R = Me, Br, Cl ......... etc.doped with I2; < 0.001 S/cm> 10 S/cm
Steric hindrance effect of substituent is very important
Because,R group destroy the coplanarity of the conjugation system
Reduce electron mobility of intrachain and interchain
16
A Molecular Orbital Description of Stability
• Bonding MO: constructive (in-phase) overlap• Antibonding MO: destructive (out-of-phase) overlap
17
Consider the molecular orbitals of 1,4-pentadiene:
This compound has 4 e, which forming 2 bondsthat are completely separated from one another
4 x 2p
2 x *
2 x
18
The Molecular Orbitals of 1,3-Butadiene
CH2 CH CH CH2 CH2 CH CH CH2 CH2 CH CH CH2
resonance contributors
CH2 CH CH CH2
resonance hybrid
HOMO
LUMOHOMO = the highest occupied MO
LUMO = the lowest unoccupied MO
4 x 2p
19
The Molecular Orbitals of 1,3,5-HexatrieneCH2 CH CH CH CH CH2 CH2 CH CH CH CH CH2
1,3,5-hexatriene resonance hybrid of 1,3,5-hexatriene
20
Summary of Energy Diagram
h h h
Conjugation / Wavelength / Molar Absorptivity
21
1 1 2 2 n's n's
Interaction betweentwo orbitals that havethe same symmetry andenergy level
Formation of anorbital band
£k*
£k
Conducting band(empty orbitals)
Valence band(filled orbitals)
¡µEg Conductivity highersmaller
¡µEg
band gap
Metal (No bandgap)
Semiconductor(Narrow bandgap)
Insulator(Wide bandgap )
,
Metal
Semiconductor/Insulator
22
Bands and Bandgaps
Element SolidsC : insulator (5.5 eV)Si : semiconductive (1.1 eV)Ge : semiconductive (0.7 eV)Sn : metal (0.1 eV)Pb : metal
23
increased attraction(nucleus e cloud)
• Bond dissociation energy (bond strength) : energy required to break a bond or energy released to form a bond
increased repulsion(nucleus nucleus)
Energy diagram for a H-H bond formation
24
Bonding in Hydrogen Halides
Typical Charge Carriers (via doping)
25
soliton
antisoliton
positive soliton
negative soliton
trans-polyacetylene
hole polaron cis-polyacetylene
NN
NH
NN
NNH
Nhole polaron polypyrrole
electron polaron polyphenylene
R
RR
R
R
R
R
RR
R
polydiacetylenehole polaron
SS
SS
SS
SS polythiophenepositive bipolaron
Energy diagramsof charge carriers
26
neutralsoliton
S0
positivesoliton
S+
negativesoliton
S-
neutralpolaron
P0
positivepolaron
P+
negativepolaron
P-
hv1
hv2hv3
positivebipolaron
B++
negativebipolaron
B - -
hv1
hv1
No. of charge carrier absorption bands:
Soliton: 1Polaron: 3
Bipolaron: 2
π band
π* band
Alternative Methods for Making Polyacetylenes
27
Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl - HCl
¡µ
pyrolytic eliminationPVC
poly(vinylchloride) C. S. Marvel et. al. JACS, 61, 3241 ( 1939 )
Cl2Cl
Cl
Cl
Clpoly(1,4-butadiene)
- HCl
KNH2 / NH3 (liq)
East German patent 50, 954 ( 1966 )CA 66 : 86117 r
Cl Cl Cl Cl ClCl
conjugation defects
Both approaches yield poorly conductive polyacetylenes
Dehydrochlorination
Durham Route (via a processable precursor)
28
X XRing-openingolefin metahesispolymerization
X X
n
retro-cyclization
X X
n
I2doping
10 S/cm
+
Cyclization
t1/2 ¡Ü 20 h at 20 oC
very unstabledifficult in handling
10-7 S/cm
¡î too much " stability gain "both products form conjugated systems
(X = -CF3, -COOMe)
Cyclooctatetraene
XC CX
Feast et. al.1. Polymer, 21, 595 ( 1980 )2. J. Phys. Colloq. C3, Suppl. 6, 44 : C3 -148 ( 1983 )3. Polymer, 25, 395 ( 1984 )
X
X
X
X
29
The Diels–Alder Reaction(1,4-addition reaction; concerted reaction)
8.8
7-45.ppt
+
new bond
new bonddiene dienophiletransition
state
a pericyclic reaction; a [4+2] cycloaddition reaction
3 2σ+ 1
30
ROMP
nn
£G
70 oC
stable at RTeasier in handling " less stability gain "
Resonance Energy (Kcal/mol)
3660
Strategy : Stabilize the prepolymer by reducing the stability gain in the conversion step
X X
n
retro-cyclization
X X
nt1/2 20 h at 20 oC)
unstable at RT
For the 2nd ring:24 kcal/mol
Syntheses of Poly(p-phenylene) (PPP)
31
Cl Cl + Nan
+ NaCl Wurtz -Fittig Reaction
G. Gold finger et. al. J. Polym. Sci., 4, 93 ( 1949 )J. Polym. Sci.,16, 589 ( 1955 )
I I
R
+ Cu
R
n
Ullmann reaction
S. Ozasa et. al. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 53, 2610 ( 1980 )
• Had very low molecular weights or irregular structures
Cl Cl + Na Cl Cl + Na
ClCl Cl + NaCl
NaCl
Cl Cl
or
Cl
Cl Cl
Cl
Reductive polymerization (step-reaction)
32
I I
R
+ Cu I CuI
ROxidativeaddition
I CuI
R
I Cu
R
I
R
+ CuI2
Reductiveelimination
I
R
I
R
etc.
R R
etc.
R RR
33
+ CuCl2 / AlCl3n
P. Kovacic et. al. JACS 85, 454 ( 1963 )
Most successful and economicalOxidizing agent : CuCl2, MnO2, MoCl5, FeCl3Lewis acid catalyst : AlCl3, AlBr3
CuCl2
AlCl3
Cl Al
Cl
ClCl + CuCl
Radicalcation
H
HAlCl4
AlCl3CuCl2
- 2H+2 HAlCl4+CuCl
Use of AlCl3 help reduce the following side-reaction
+ Cl ClH
+ CuCl + Cl- H
CuCl2Cl
Oxidative polymerization (step-reaction)
33
34
n n
Ziegler catalyst
MW = 5000 - 10,000poly(1,3-cyclohexadiene)
450- H2
£G
¢J
chloranilxylene
C. S. Marvel et. al.JACS 81, 448 ( 1959 )J. Polym. Sci. A3,1553 ( 1965 )
aromatization
OCl
ClO
Cl
Cl
p-chloranil
( tetrachloro-1,4-benzoquinone )
Oxidant
n n n( Cl2, Br2 )
300 - 380
- 2 HX- H2
n
- H2
X2 ¢J
£G
X X
-2 HX
Catalyzed Chain polymerization
n n
450 ℃
chloranilxylene aromatization
- H2
n n
300 - 380
- 2 HX- H2
℃X X
35
HO OH HO OHpseudomonas putida
Base
C
O
Cl R
O O CC R
OO
R
R = OCH3, CH3, Ph
( for improving solubility )
O O CC RROO
n radical chainpolymerization
highly soluble ; easily processible
DP = 600-1000 ( degree of polymerization )
220 ℃
n
( t1/2 = 30 sec for R = OMe)
Ballard et. al. JCS, CC 954 ( 1983 )
Lower the aromatization temperature via the decarboxylation
36
Free Radical Chain Reaction
OR
OCORROCO
ROOR
Initiation step
OCORROCOOCORROCO
RO
Propagation steps
RO
R' R' R' R'
( R' = OCOR)
TerminationR' R' R' R'
RO
R' R'n
(X = radical terminator)
X
Radical Chain Polymerization
Mechanism
37
Initiation
Propagation
RO OR 2 RO
RO +X
RO
X
RO
X
+
XRO
X X
ROX X +
XRO
X X X
ROX X X
n
Termination ROX X X
n
+ RO ROX X X
nOR
ROX X X
n
+X X OR
n
XRO
X X X
n
X X X OR
n
Chain transfer ROX X X
n
+ ZR' ROX X X
nZ
+
( Z = H, I, Br, Cl )
ROX X X
n
ROX X X
n
H+
R'
Radical Initiators
38
ROOR 2 RO
H3C C
CH3
CH3
O O C
CH3
CH3
CH3 2 H3C C
CH3
CH3
O100 - 120oC
t-Butyl peroxide
CO
O O C
O 60 - 80oCCO
O2 CO
Omore stable
radicalBenzoyl peroxide
CO
O O C
O
OO CC
CH3
CH3
HH3C
H3CH
Diisopropyl peroxydicarbonate
C
CH3
CH3
O OH
Cumyl hydroperoxide
H2O2 (Hydrogen peroxide)
(H3C)2C N
CN
N C(CH3)2
CN
2 C(CH3)2
CN
+ N N
AIBNAzo bis(isobutyronitrile)
K2S2O8 (Potassium persulfate)
Chain Transfer
TABLE 2.2 Chain Transfer Constants for Selected Solvents at 60oC with Respect
to Polystyrene and Poly(vinyl acetate)
Cs X 104
Solvet Polystyrene Poly(vinyl acetate)
Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Isopropylbenzene n-Heptane Acetone Butanone Ethyl acetate Ethyl butyrate Phenol Anilin n-Butyl chloride n-Butyl bromide n-Butyl iodide Methylene chloride Chloroform Carbon tetrachloride Carbon tetrabromide
0.181.256.78.20.424.1 (80 )5.0 (80 )
0.040.061.850.150.5
92
13,600
2.2 21 55 90 17 11 65 2.3 17 (50 )220 (40 )210 10 50800 4140920
39,000
oC
oC
oCoC
Radical stability : 3o > 2o > 1o > methyl
Otheractivated - H ROOH, R S H, R C H,
O
R CH,OR
R
R' CH2
NR2
Allylic
Benzylic
39
HC CH2 CH2 CHa
CH
Styrenepolystyrene chain
stablized by
O C
O
CH3
CH2 CH CH2
OC
O
H3C
CH
OC
O
H3C
a destablized by OAc(more reactive)
CH2
Syntheses of Polyphenylene Vinylene (PPV)
H3C CO
HCH CH
n
(CH3)3C O K
DMF
G. Kossmehl et. al.Makromol. Chem. 182,3419 ( 1981 )
H2C CO
HH
B
H2C CO
H
H
C C
OH
HH
H n
- H2O
CH CHn
C COH
HH
H
Nu
C COH
HH
HC C
OH
HH
H
Nu C C
OH
HH
H
etc.
C COH
HH
HC C
OH
HH
HC C
OH
HH
H
C C
OH
HH
H
C
H
H
etc. etc.
or
40
Witting Condensation
Ph3P CH CH PPh3 + C C
O
HO
HCH CH
n
R. N. McDonald et. al. JACS 82,4669 ( 1960 )G. E. Wnek et. al. Polymer 20,1441 ( 1979 )
Ph3P CH CH PPh3 Ph3P CH C
PPh3
H
C CO
HO
H
Ph3P CH C
PPh3
H
C CO
H
H
OH
Ph3P CH C
Ph3P
H
C CO
H
H
O
Ph3P CH C
H
C CO
H
Hetc. CH C
HCH C
HCH C
Hetc.
Ph3P BrH2C CH2Br
triphenyl phosphine
Ph3P H2C CH2 PPh3
Br Br
Base (like LiBu)
Ph3P HC CH PPh3Ph3P CH CH PPh3Phosphorus ylide (phosphorus-stabilized carbanion)41
Dehalogenation
Cl
Cl3C CCl3
ClCl
Cl- Cl2
Cl
CCl
ClCl
Cl
CCln
M. Ballester et. al. JACS 88, 957 ( 1966 )
McMurry Condensation (TiCl3/LiAlH4)
OHC CHO- "O2"
CH CHn
L. Rajaraman et. al. Curr. Sci. 49 (3), 101 ( 1980 )
C
O
C
O - "O2"C C
n
Feast et. al. Polymer Commum. 24,102 ( 1983 )
42
ClH2C
R
R
CH2ClNaH/DMF
-HClCH CH
n
R
R
( R = H, CH3, OCH3)
H. H. Horhold et. al. Makromol. Chem. 131, 165 ( 1970 )
C C
H
H
C CH
H
H
Cl
H
Cl
H
H
Cl
etc. CH2
HC CH2
Cl
HC
Cl
CH2
HC
Cl
CH CHn
C C
PhPh
N2 N2- N2 C C
Ph Ph
n
Dehydrohalogenation of Benzyl Halides
From Bis(diazobenzylic) Compounds
43
C C
PhPh
carbene intermediate
-HCl
ClH2C CH2Cl + SMe2 H2C CH2Me2S SMe2
ClClbissulfonium salt
NaOH
CH CHn
CH2
HC
nSMe2
Cl
£G
Casting
sulfonium polyelectrolyte
£G
Casting dialysis
-NaCl- low MW molecules
+ NaCl
R. A. Wessling et.al.J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Symp.,72, 55( 1986 )U. S. Patent 3,706, 677 ( 1972 )U. S. Patent 3,401, 152 ( 1968 )
Via Sulfonium Polyeletrolyte Precursor
44
- SMe2
- HCl
C CMe2S SMe2
ClCl
H
H
H
H
NaOH
C CMe2S SMe2
H
H
H
C CSMe2
H
H
H
Cl
quinone dimethane
C CSMe2
H
H
H
Cl
diradical
Initiates the polymerization of quinone dimethane
45
C CSMe2
H
H
H
Cl
Other possible mechanism :
NuC C
SMe2
H
H
H
Nu
C CSMe2
H
H
H
Cl
CH2
HC
nSMe2Cl
H2C CH2 SMe2
ClClCH2
HC
nSMe2
NaOH dialysis
(25 - 35 % yield)Acid titration : > 90 - 95 % NaOH has been consumed.
Why ?
Cl
Me2S
May be :
CH2 S
ClCl
NaOH
Me
Me
a
ba
b
H2C CH S
Me
Me
H2C CH2 S
Cl
Me
MeOH+
non-productive pathway
sulfonium polyelectrolyte
H2CMe2S
Me2SMe2S
Cl
10.9
A good nucleophile is required Does not require a good nucleophile
A good leaving group is required A good leaving group is required
Polar solvent is not required Polar ionizing solvent is usually required
46
47
A possible solution :
H2C CH2Et2S S
ClCl CH2CH3
CH2CH3
2o C is more hindered, whichreduce the SN2 side reaction
SMe2 SEt2
But a new problem was created ,
CH2 S
ClCl C
Et
NaOH
a
b
ab
CH S
Cl
Et
Et
CH2 S
Cl
Et
H2C+
non-productive pathway
C
H
H
H
H
H
CH2
sulfonium polyelectrolyte
H2CEt2S
H2CEt2S
H2CEt2S
Relative stabilities of carbanions
carbanion carbanion carbanion anion
: : : : most stable
least stable
Relative stabilities of carbocations
C
R
R
R
> C
R
R
H
C
H
R
H
> C
H
H
H
>
tertiarycarbocation
secondarycarbocation
primarycarbocation
methylcarbocation
least stable
most stable
Relative stabilities of radicals
48
49
S
C
C
S
C
C
even worse !
H
HH
H
HH
HH
HH
C
C
H
H
H
HH
H
S
C
C
HH
HH
C
C
H
C
H
H HC
H
HH
H
H
H
< <Nucleophilicity :
New problems appeared,
CH2ClClH2C + SR2
CH2H2CR2S SR2
ClCl
priceSR2 yield
SMe2 80 %
SEt2 60 %
SPr2 30 %increasedramatically
Why ? and How ?
A possible solution :
H2C CH2Pr2S S
ClCl CH2CH2CH3
Pr
2o C, disfavor-H abstraction
2o C, disfavor SN2
SEt2 SPr2
50
S
A possible solution :
S
also a stronger Nu
contains only 2o C, which willdisfavor all possible side reactions
1
1'
2 3'
3 2'
CH2ClClH2C + S CH2H2C SS
Cl
> 80% yd
NaOH
CH2
HC
nS
Cl
> 80% yd
cheap !
CH CHn
best quality
C. C. Han et. al. Polymer Communications 28, 261 ( 1987 )J. of Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. 26, 3241 ( 1988 )
Cl
S works equally well
C. C. Han et. al. J. of Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. 26, 3241 ( 1988 )
CH2
HC
nSMe2
Cl
CH CHn£G
+ +SMe2 HCl
CH2 CH
SMex
CH CHn-x
doped with AsF510 S/cm
a conjugation defect
CH2
HC
nS
Cl
CH CHn£G
+ + HClS
with less conjugation defect
50 S/cmall 2o C, disfavor SN2
doped with AsF5
CH2
HC
nS
Cl
CH CHn£G
even better
180 S/cm
C. C. Han et. al. J. of Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. 26, 3241 ( 1988 )
doped with AsF5
51
Material-P38.cdx01/05/38
yield of 1
ClH2C CH2Cl R2SH2C CH2SR2
Cl Cl
NaOHCH2
Cl
HC
SR2
n
-SR2
-HCl
£G
CH CHn
1 2 3
yield of 2
Conductivity of 3
SMe2 ~
S
S ~ S > SEt2 >> SPr2
SMe2 < SEt2 S<
SMe2 SEt2 S< < <
7 15 44 180 S/cm(doped with AsF5)
R.W. Lenz, C.C. Han, J. Stenger-Smith, F.E. KaraszJ. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. (1988), 26, 3241-3249
52
Effects of Sulfides on the Synthesis of PPV
“nucleophilicity” “side reactions” “defects”
yield yield
53
Conjugation Length Effectson ionization potential
54
Conjugation Length Effectson ionization / oxidation potentials
55
Conjugation Length Effectson ionization potential and electron affinity
Oxidation Potential
Reduction Potential
4.4 eV
HOMOlevel
LUMOlevel
56
Conjugation Length Effectson band gap
57
Conjugation Length Effectson absorption wavelength
Substituent Effects on the Ionization Potential (eV) (Small Molecules)
Me F F
F F
F6
8.80 9.25 9.30 9.64 10.12
Me F
F5
9.38 9.71 9.74 10.45
CN CN CN CN
PhC CPh < PhC CMe < PhC CH
6.97
8.00 (+0.05) 8.42 8.82
58
59
Substituent Effects on the Ionization Potential (eV)
Material-P35.cdx01/05/28
CF3F3CWCl6 / Me4Sn
CF3F3C
n
n+
CF3F3C
£G
WCl6 / R4Sn
nMetathesis
Ballard
ROCO OCOR ROCO OCOR
n n+ 2RCO2H
£G
Durham
60
Precursor routes for conducting polymers
Ring opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP)(Olefin metathesis polymerization)
Radical chain polymerization
Poly(phenylene vinylene)
ClH2C CH2Cl R2SH2C CH2SR2
Cl Cl
Materia-P36.cdx01/05/28
R2SH2C CHSR2
Cl
NaOH
NaOH
CHH2C
SR2
Cl
CH2
Cl
HC
SR2
n£G
-SR2
-HClCH CH
n
AsF5, FeCl3 (unstable), 10 S cm-1
Orientable, 103 S cm-1Stable Solution
61
PPV via Wessling Route
require strong oxidant
(Dow Chemical route)
Anionic chain polymerization
bissulfonium salt
sulfonium polyeletrolyte
Material-P37.cdx01/05/28
Poly(dialkoxyphenylene vinylene)
OR
RO
OR
RO
ClH2C CH2Cl
OR
RO
R2SH2C CH2SR2
Cl Cl
OH
HO
(OR = OMe, OEt, OBu)
NaOH
SR2 = SMe2 , SEt2
SS
CH2
Cl
HC
SR2
n£G
-SR2
-HClCH CH
n
I2, 50 S cm-1 (Stable)Unorientable Unstable Solution
Gel, Precipitation
OR
RO
OR
RO200 - 250oC
,
62
mild oxidant work fine
Substituent effects: 1. solubility: procesibility, quality of film/coating, application potentials 2. e-effect (donating/withdrawing): HOMO/LUMO, bandgap, coloring, redox, e-density, e-polarizability 3. steric hindrance: chain conformation, packing morphology, e-transport
bissulfonium salt
sulfonium polyeletrolyte
RXNaOH
CH2OHCl SR2
Material-P39.cdx01/05/28
Processible Copolymers
H2C CH2 SS
ClCl
+ r
OR
RO
H2C CH2 SS
ClCl
(1+r) NaOH/H2O
0oC, N2
CH2 CH
S
OR
RO
CH2 CH
S
ClCl
1-x x n
Stable Solution
1.Dialysis
2.Casting3. £G
I2 DopableOrientableStable
CH CH
OR
RO
CH CH1-x x
n
Polymer Communciations 261, 28 (1987)C.C. Han, R.W. Lenz, and F.E. Karasz
good electroluminescent materials
63
++ +
Orientable Copolymers
CH CH
R
R
CH CH1-x x
n
Polymer XDraw Ratio (L/Lo)
Conductivity (Scm-1)
(Doped with I2)
Homopolymers
PPV
PDMPV
Copolymers
(R = OMe)
(R = OEt)
0%
100%
13%
12%
13%
1
14
110
113
1
< 10-5
51
27428
12500
8.3694
Polymer Communciations 261, 28 (1987)C.C. Han, R.W. Lenz, and F.E. Karasz 64
Polymer, 30, 1041 (1989)R. W. Lenz, C. C. Han and M. Lux
CH CH
R
R
CH CH1-x x
n
65
++ +
C
Material-P42.cdx01/05/28
Scheme 1
Fig A
OO
R'
R'OO
R'
R'
O
R'
OH
R'
HO
R'
HO
R'
Fig B
CC
C
H
HC H
HC
Fig C66
e
eElectron transport:Interchain hopping
vsIntrachain moving
CH CH
R
R
CH CH1-x x
n
Polymer X
Conductivity (Scm-1)
(Doped with I2)
PPV
PDMPV
Copolymers
0
1
< 10-5
< 10-5
0.1 0.3
(R = Me)
(R = Me)
67
CH2
HC
S
Cl
n
Gel or Precipitate
3 - 6 Months
CH2
HC
S
Cl
n
OMe
MeO
1 -3 Days
CH2
HC
S
Cl
n
OBu
BuO
1 - 5 Hours
CH2
HC
S
Cl
nS1 - 5 Hours
CH2
HC
S
Cl
nO1 - 5 Hours
68
Electron Donating Groups Promote Elimination
CH
Cl
CH2
SR2RO
OR
CH CH2
RO
OR Cl
SR2+
OR
RO
CH CH SR2+ + HCl
CHnS
SR2
Cl
CH2 CHnO
SR2
Cl
CH2
69
Proposed Mechanism For Precipitation
CH2
Cl
CH
SR2
OMe
MeO
CH CH
OMe
MeO
SR2HCl+ +
CH2 CH
OMe
MeO Cl
Crossing LinkingAggregationLow Aqueous Solubility
Low Aqueous Solubility
¡ì¡ì ¡ì¡ì ¡ì¡ì ¡ì¡ì
70
Stabilization of Polyelectrolyte
CH2
Cl
CH
SR2
OMe
MeOn
H2O
H2O
Py
Precipitates in 1 - 3 Days
Stable Solutionfor 14 + Months
PDMPV
Conductivity (S cm-1)
I2-Doped FeCl3-Doped
Pyridine-Stabilized
Unstabilized
500
50
300
30
C. C. Han, R. L. ElsenbaumerSynth. Met. 1991, 41-43, 849
71
Relative Stabilizing Ability of Amines
N> ~NMe3
N
N>>
N> ~NEt3
OH
OH N
NH3C CH3
N>
N ~
Me Me
>NMe Me
>N
N~
~N Br N
~ ~N
> ~N
N
OH
HONN
OH
OH
>N
N
OH~
N
N
OH
OH
72
73
Stabilization of Polyelectrolyte
CH2
OBu
BuO
CH
S
Cl
n
CH3CN/H2O
BuOH
CH3CN/H2O/Py
BuOH/Py
Precipitates
in 5 hours
Stable solution
for + 14 months
CH2 CH
S
Cl
n
H2O/PyPrecipitates
in 5 hours
Stable solution
for + 14 monthsS
H2O
74
Stabilization of Polyelectrolyte
CH2
Cl
CH
SR2
OMe
MeO
n
Py/H2OCH2
Cl
CH
SR2
OMe
MeO
n
Stable SolutionUnstable Film (insoluble)
Py/H2OCH2
Cl
CH
SR2
OMe
MeOx
CH2
Cl
CH
N
OMe
MeOy
Stable Solution
Stable FilmSoluble (H2O, DMF, DMSO, MeOH, EtOH)1HNMR, TGA
75
larger amount
small amount
Non-Ionic Precursor Polymer
76
CH2
OBu
BuO
CH
S
Cl
nCH2
OBu
BuO
CH
OBun
BuOH/Pyridine
Room Temperature
Soluble, StableElastomer, Tg = 2.6oC1HNMR, TGA, GPCC. C. Han, R. L. Elsenbaumer
Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1990, 189, 183
Thermal Elimination
CH2
OBu
BuO
CH
OBun
CH
OBu
BuO
CHn
£G
250 - 300oC
I2, 1 Scm-1 Insoluble
77
Non-Thermal Elimination
CH2
OBu
BuO
CH
OBun
CH
OBu
BuO
CH
Soluble
I2, 14 Scm-1
H+ BuOH + H
Butanol Scavengers
CH
OBu
BuO
CH + Butanol Adducts
Butanol Scavengers
Me3SiClMe3SiBrMe3SiIMe2SiCl2(CH3CO)2O(CF3CO)2O
¡ì¡ì ¡ì¡ì ¡ì¡ì ¡ì¡ì
¡ì¡ì ¡ì¡ì
C. C. Han, R. L. ElsenbaumerMol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1990, 189, 183
78
Simultaneous Elimination and Doping
CH2
OBu
BuO
CH
OBun
CH
OBu
BuO
CHn
H+, Solvent
Weak Acid
H+, Solvent
Strong Acid
Neutral Polymer Solution
Doped Polymer Solution
C. C. Han, R. L. ElsenbaumerMol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1990, 189, 183
79
Simultaneous Elimination and Doping
CH2
OMe
MeO
CH
OMen
CH2 CH
OMenS
Weak Acid
Strong AcidNeutral Polymer
Doped Polymer
Weak Acid
Strong AcidNeutral Polymer
Doped Polymer
80
Protonic Acid-Doping of Various Conducting PolymersConductong Polymers Dopants Conditions Conductivity Dopong Level
S/cm mol %
Poly(thienylene vinylene) CH3SO3H in CH3NO2, 20h 2.4 8.7 %
_< 10-4neat, 1 day
31.2 %5.3in CH3NO2, 20h¡E
19.7 %44.1 in CH3NO3, 2hCH3SO3HPoly(phenylene vinylene- co-dimethoxyphenylenevinylene) (90:10) _< 10-7neat
19.7 %31.5in CH3NO2, 50h¡E
10.9 %10.7 in CH3NO2, 3 h 15 minCH3SO3HPoly(phenylene vinylene)
_< 10-7neat
_< 10-7 in CH3NO2¡E
C. C. Han, R. L. ElsenbaumerSynth. Met. 1989, 30, 123
CF3COOH
FeCl3 6H2O
CF3COOH
FeCl3 6H2O
CF3COOH
FeCl3 6H2O
81
Protonic Acid-Doping of Poly(dimethoxyphenylene vinylene)
Acids Conditions Conductivity Doping Level
CH3SO3H in CH3NO2, 15 min
S/cm
36.8
mol %
46.1
in CH3NO2, 1 hr 40 min 42 54.0
CF3SO3H
C6H5SO3H
in CH3NO2, 28 min 24
in CH3NO2, 16 hr 25 min 69.4
Neat & in vacuo, 1.5 hr 46 9.3
in CH3NO2, 23 hr
HBF4
CF3COOH
CF3CF2COOH 32
CF3(CF2)2COOH in CH3NO2, 23.5 hr 42
CF3(CF2)6COOH in CH3NO2, 26 hr 71
CH3COOH in CH3NO2 < 10-7
< 10-3CH2ClCOOH in CH3NO2, > 100 hr
CHCl2COOH in CH3NO2, 23 hr 12.1 20.7
CCl3COOH in CH3NO2, 8 hr 18.8 13.1
¡E in CH3NO2, 36 min 105 4.4
C. C. Han, R. L. ElsenbaumerSynth. Met. 1989, 30, 123 82
83
Proposed Doping Mechanism
OMe
MeO
OMe
MeO
OMe
MeO
OMe
MeO
H
OMe
MeO
OMe
MeO
OMe
MeO
OMe
MeO
HH
HH
Disproportionation
OMe
MeO
OMe
MeO
HH
H H
OMe
MeO
OMe
MeO
Bipolaron13C NMR
Two PolaronsESRUV-vis-NIR
C. C. Han, R. L. ElsenbaumerSynth. Met. 1989, 30, 123
84
Non-thermal Elimination
CH2
OBu
BuO
CH
OBun Partial
Elimination
CH
OBu
BuO
CHm
CH2
OBu
BuO
CH
OBun-m
Soluble, OrientableLiquid Crystalline
C. C. Han, R. L. ElsenbaumerMol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1990, 189, 183
85
1. Conventional Liquid Crystalline Polymers
etc. etc.
etc. etc.
RigidPlanar
FlexibleNon-Planar
2. Partially Eliminated Precursor Polymers
CH2
OR
RO
CH
ORj
CH
OR
RO
CHi
86
CH
OR
RO
CHn
+ HXCH
OR
ROn
CH
HX
Doping is very time-consuming, and sometimes almost impossible.
87
Potential Approach for a Doping Free Process
CH
Cl
CH2
SR2RO
OR
+ Latent Dopant
Processing
Non-conductive Articles
Processing
Conductive Articles
Criterions :
¡E High aqueous solubility
¡E No chemical reactivity
¡E Similar solubility
¡E Remains homogeneous distribution
¡E Maintains mechanical strength
88
Concurrent Elimination and Doping
CH2
B
CH
SR2
n
R
R
CH
R
Rn
CH
H
B
CH2
Cl
CH
SR2
n
R
R
Precursor polymer Intermediate Conductive Polymer
Protonic Acid-Doped
B = Halogen, BF4 , PF6 , SbF6 , RSO3 , etc.Ion Exchange
C.C. Han and R.L. ElsenbaumerSynthetic Metals, 30, 123-131 (1989)
HB + R2S
£G
R
R n
- R2S
CH2
Cl
CH
SR2
n
R
R£G
R
R n
- R2S, - HCl
89
Interconversion between Various Redox Forms of Polyaniline
Leucoemeraldine Base
Emeraldine Base
Pernigraniline
HN
HN
HN
HN
n
HN
HN N N
n
N N N Nn
[ Ox ] ( -2e ; -2H+ )(+2e ; +2H+ ) [ Red ]
( +2e ; +2H+ ) [ Red ] [ Ox ] ( -2e ; -2H+ )
Fully Reduced
Fully Oxidized
Half Oxidized
90
91
N NHN
HN
N NHN
HN
H H
N NHN
HN
H H
N NHN
HN
H H
HX
X X
X X
XX
N NHN
HN
H H
N NHN
HN
H H
Protonic Acid Doping of Pani