conditional use - sf planningcommissions.sfplanning.org/cpcpackets/2015-006143cua.pdf · executive...
TRANSCRIPT
www.sfplanning.org
Executive Summary Conditional Use
HEARING DATE: JULY 7, 2016 Date: June 30, 2016 Case No.: 2015-006143CUA Project Address: 2755 McAllister Street Zoning: RH-3 (Residential, House, Three-Family) District 40-X Height and Bulk District Block/Lot: 1168/040 Project Sponsor: E.E. Weiss Architects, Inc. 21 Corte Madera, Suite 4 Mill Valley, CA 94941 Staff Contact: Alexandra Kirby – (415) 575-9133 [email protected]
PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant proposes to demolish a one-story–over-garage single-family house and construct a new three-story-over-garage, three-unit residential building on the subject lot. The new development would include one (2) three-bedroom units and one (1) four-bedroom unit. The proposed residential building would be approximately 8,000 gross square feet (GSF) and 40 feet in height. The proposal includes three off-street parking spaces. The proposal requires a Conditional Use Authorization pursuant to Planning Code Sections 303 and 317 to allow demolition of the two-story, single-family residence located in a RH-3 Zoning District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District. Pursuant to Planning Code 317 (c), “where an application for a permit that would result in the loss of one or more Residential Units is required to obtain Conditional Use Authorization by other sections of this Code, the application for a replacement building or alteration permit shall also be subject to Conditional Use requirements.” This report includes findings for Conditional Use Authorization in addition to Demolition Criteria established in Planning Code Section 317.
DEMOLITION APPLICATION
NEW BUILDING APPLICATION
Demolition Case Number
2015-006143CUA
New Building Case Number
2015-006143CUA
Recommendation Approve w/ Conditions Recommendation Approve w/ Conditions
Executive Summary CASE NO. 2015-006143CUA Hearing Date: July 7, 2016 2755 McAllister Street
2
Demolition Application Number
2015.04.23.4462
New Buildings Application Numbers 2015.04.23.4455
Number Of Existing Units
1
Number Of New Units
3
Existing Parking 1 New Parking 3 Number Of Existing Bedrooms
2
Number Of New Bedrooms
10
Existing Building Area
±2,768 Sq. Ft.
New Building Area ±7,992 Sq. Ft.
SITE DESCRIPTION AND PRESENT USE The project site is located on the south side of McAllister Street between Willard Street North and Arguello Boulevard, Lot 040 in Assessor’s Block 1168 in the Inner Richmond District. The project site is within an RH-3 (Residential, House, Three-Family) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk district. The project site currently contains a two-story single-family residence constructed circa 1909. The project site is approximately 24.5 feet wide and 137.5 feet deep, containing approximately 3,370 square feet.
The subject building was determined not to be an historic resource by the Planning Department on November 11, 2015 (Case No. 2015-006143ENV). SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND NEIGHBORHOOD
The project site is located in the middle of the block-face flanked by buildings on either side. The adjacent building to the east is a two-story-over-garage, six-unit apartment building constructed circa 1963. The adjacent building to the west is a three-story-over-garage, four-unit building constructed circa 1909. The subject block is characterized by two- to four-story buildings of mixed architectural styles and periods. The buildings on the subject block vary in density from single-family residences to small multi-unit buildings. Golden Gate Park is located one block directly to the south. The surrounding zoning is a mix of residential zoning districts, including RH-2, RM-2, RM-1 and RH-3.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) as a Class 3 categorical exemption.
HEARING NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
TYPE REQUIRED PERIOD
REQUIRED NOTICE DATE
ACTUAL NOTICE DATE
ACTUAL PERIOD
Classified News Ad Posted Notice
20 days 20 days
June 17, 2015 June 17, 2015
June 17, 2015 June 17, 2015
20 days 20 days
Mailed Notice 10 days June 27, 2015 June 27, 2015 10 days
Executive Summary CASE NO. 2015-006143CUA Hearing Date: July 7, 2016 2755 McAllister Street
3
The proposal requires a public notice per Planning Code Section 311, which was conducted from February 8th through March 9th, 2016.
PUBLIC COMMENT Section 311 notification for the Building Permit was completed on March 9, 2016, and a request for Discretionary Review was filed by the owner of the adjacent property to the west (2759 McAllister Street). The DR was later withdrawn following minor alterations to the rear façade to improve the privacy and security of 2759 McAllister.
The Department has received one letter in support of the proposed project; no further public comment in support of or opposition to the proposed project has been received.
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN TEAM REVIEW The request for demolition and new construction were reviewed by the Department’s Residential Design Team (RDT) on December 2, 2015, in accordance with the Residential Design Guidelines. The RDT requested modifications to the material selection and ratio of solids to voids on the front façade. The Project Sponsor modified the project accordingly and RDT supports the project as proposed.
REQUIRED COMMISSION ACTION
In order for the project to proceed, the Commission must grant Conditional Use Authorization as the project proposes to demolish a dwelling unit pursuant to Planning Code Sections 303 and 317.
BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION The Department recommends that the demolition of the existing single-family residence and the construction of a new three-story-over-garage, three-unit building be approved. The project is consistent with the Objectives and Policies of the General Plan and complies with the Planning Code. The project meets the criteria set forth in Planning Code Section 101.1 and 317 of the Planning Code in that:
Although the project would result in the loss of one two-bedroom residence, the existing building has been determined to be unsound per Section 317(d)(3)(B) of the Planning Code, as demonstrated by a soundness report prepared by a qualified structural engineer and reviewed by Department staff.
The replacement building would create three family-sized units, two with three bedrooms and one with four bedrooms, for a net gain of two dwelling units and eight bedrooms.
Per the Rent Board’s records, no tenant evictions have taken place at the subject property.
Given the scale of the project, it would have no significant effect on the existing capacity of the local street system or MUNI.
The proposed building would be consistent with the size and density of the immediate neighborhood and intent of the RH-3 zoning district. The project is therefore an appropriate in-fill development.
Executive Summary CASE NO. 2015-006143CUA Hearing Date: July 7, 2016 2755 McAllister Street
4
Although the existing structure proposed for demolition is more than 50 years old, the Historic Resource Evaluation resulted in a determination that the existing building is not a historic resource (Case No. 2015-006143ENV).
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with Conditions
Attachments: Block Book Map Sanborn Map Zoning Map Aerial Photograph Site Photograph
Exhibit Checklist
Executive Summary Project sponsor submittal
Draft Motion Drawings: Existing Conditions
Environmental Determination Check for legibility
Zoning District Map Drawings: Proposed Project
Height & Bulk Map Check for legibility
Block Book Map Health Dept. review of RF levels
Sanborn Map RF Report
Aerial Photos Community Meeting Notice
Context Photo Public Correspondence
Site Photo
Exhibits above marked with an “X” are included in this packet AK _______
Planner's Initials
AK: G:\Cases\CU\2755 McAllister_Executive Summary.doc
www.sfplanning.org
Subject to: (Select only if applicable)
Affordable Housing (Sec. 415)
Jobs Housing Linkage Program (Sec. 413)
Downtown Park Fee (Sec. 412)
First Source Hiring (Admin. Code)
Child Care Requirement (Sec. 414)
Other
Planning Commission Draft Motion
HEARING DATE: JULY 7, 2016
Date: June 30, 2016 Case No.: 2015-006143CUA Project Address: 2755 McAllister Street Zoning: RH-3 (Residential, House, Three-Family) District 40-X Height and Bulk District Block/Lot: 1168/040 Project Sponsor: E.E. Weiss Architects, Inc. 21 Corte Madera, Suite 4 Mill Valley, CA 94941 Staff Contact: Alexandra Kirby – (415) 575-9133 [email protected]
ADOPTING FINDINGS RELATING TO THE APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO PLANNING CODE SECTIONS 303 AND 317 REQUIRING CONDITIONAL USE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE REMOVAL OF A RESIDENTIAL UNIT. PREAMBLE On June 2, 2016, Earle Weiss (Project Sponsor) filed an application with the Planning Department (hereinafter “Department”) for Conditional Use Authorization under Planning Code Sections 303 and 317 to demolish one-story–over-garage single-family house at 2755 McAllister Street within an RH-3 (Residential, House, Three-Family) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District. On July 7, 2016, the San Francisco Planning Commission (hereinafter “Commission”) conducted a duly noticed public hearing at a regularly scheduled meeting on Conditional Use Application No. 2015-006143CUA. On November 23, 2015, the Project was determined by the Department to be categorically exempt from environmental review under Case No. 2015-006143ENV. The Commission has reviewed and concurs with said determination. The Commission has heard and considered the testimony presented to it at the public hearing and has further considered written materials and oral testimony presented on behalf of the applicant, Department staff, and other interested parties.
Draft Motion CASE NO 2015-006143CUA Hearing Date: July 7, 2016 2755 McAllister Street
2
MOVED, that the Commission hereby authorizes the Conditional Use requested in Application No. 2015-006143CUA, subject to the conditions contained in “EXHIBIT A” of this motion, based on the following findings: FINDINGS Having reviewed the materials identified in the preamble above, and having heard all testimony and arguments, this Commission finds, concludes, and determines as follows:
1. The above recitals are accurate and constitute findings of this Commission.
2. Project Description. The applicant proposes to demolish a one-story–over-garage single-family house and construct a new three-story-over-garage, three-unit residential building on the subject lot. The new development would include one (2) three-bedroom units and one (1) four-bedroom unit. The proposed residential building would be approximately 8,000 gross square feet (GSF) and 40 feet in height. The proposal includes three (3) off-street parking spaces. The exisitng residence was determined to be unsound by a qualified engineer and Planning Staff.
3. Site Description and Present Use. The project site is located on the south side of McAllister
Street between Willard Street North and Arguello Boulevard, Lot 040 in Assessor’s Block 1168 in the Inner Richmond District. The project site is within an RH-3 (Residential, House, Three-Family) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk district. The project site currently contains a two-story single-family residence constructed circa 1909. The project site is approximately 24.5 feet wide and 137.5 feet deep, containing approximately 3,370 square feet.
4. Surrounding Properties and Neighborhood. The project site is located in the middle of the
block-face flanked by buildings on either side. The adjacent building to the east is a two-story-over-garage, six-unit apartment building constructed circa 1963. The adjacent building to the west is a three-story-over-garage, four-unit building constructed circa 1909. The subject block is characterized by two- to four-story buildings of mixed architectural styles and periods. The buildings on the subject block vary in density from single-family residences to small multi-unit buildings. Golden Gate Park is located one block directly to the south. The surrounding zoning is a mix of residential zoning districts, including RH-2, RM-2, RM-1 and RH-3.
5. Public Comment. Section 311 notification for the Building Permit was completed on March 9,
2016, and a request for Discretionary Review was filed by the owner of the adjacent property to the west (2759 McAllister Street). The DR was later withdrawn following minor alterations to the rear façade to improve the privacy and security of 2759 McAllister. The Department has received no further public comment in support of or opposition to the proposed project.
6. Planning Code Compliance: The Commission finds that the Project is consistent with the relevant provisions of the Planning Code in the following manner:
A. Residential Demolition – Section 317: Pursuant to Planning Code Section 317, Conditional
Use Authorization is required for applications proposing to remove a residential unit in an
Draft Motion CASE NO 2015-006143CUA Hearing Date: July 7, 2016 2755 McAllister Street
3
RH-3 Zoning District. This Code Section establishes a checklist of criteria that delineate the relevant General Plan Policies and Objectives.
As the project requires Conditional Use Authorization per the requirements of the Section 317, the additional criteria specified under Section 317 have been incorporated as findings a part of this Motion. See Item 8, “Additional Findings pursuant to Section 317” below.
B. Residential Density (Section 209.1). The permitted ratio of dwelling units in the RH-3 Zoning District is three dwelling units, pursuant to Planning Code Section 209.1. The project proposes three (3) new dwelling units, maximizing to total number of allowable units.All units are to be three- to four-bedroom units.
C. Front Setback Requirement (Section 132). Planning Code Section 132 requires a front
setback equal to the average of the two adjacent front setbacks. The project proposes a front setback of 4’-8 ½”, equal to the average setback of the two adjacent properties.
D. Rear Yard Requirement (Section 134). Planning Code Section 134 requires a rear yard measuring 45 percent of the total depth in RH-3 Districts.
The Project proposes to employ the alternative method of averaging [Planning Code Section 134(c)(2)] to provide a rear yard depth of 55’-10” to the west for a width of 10 feet and 44’-4” to the east at a width of approximately 14 feet. The proposed design of the rear portion of the building would align approximately with both adjacent rear walls to allow the greatest access to light and air and maintain the existing mid-block open space.
E. Open Space (Section 135). Planning Code Section 135 requires 100 square feet of common
usable open space or 80 square feet of private usable open space per dwelling unit. The project proposes approximately 1,100 square feet of common open space at the rear yard, as well as private decks for each unit, two at the roof and one at the second floor, each approximately 200 square feet in area, providing adequate common and private open space for the three new units.
F. Dwelling Unit Exposure (Section 140). Planning Code Section 140 requires that at least one room of all dwelling units face directly onto a public street, public alley at least 20 feet in width, side yard at least 25 feet in width or Code-compliant rear yard. Each of the three units directly faces onto a Code-compliant rear yard or a public street. Therefore, the Project complies with Section 140.
G. Parking (Section 151). Planning Code Section 151 requires one parking space for each dwelling unit. The Project proposes a total of three parking spaces for the three replacement dwelling units.
Draft Motion CASE NO 2015-006143CUA Hearing Date: July 7, 2016 2755 McAllister Street
4
H. Bicycle Parking (Section 155.2). Planning Code Section 155.2 requires one Class 1 Bicycle Parking space for every dwelling unit, one Class 2 Bicycle Parking space for every 20 residential units. The project does not require any Class 1 bicycle parking spaces as the project proposes only three dwelling units; however, a secure, weather protected space meeting dimensions set in Zoning Administrator Bulletin No. 9 and easily accessible to residents is provided at the garage level. Therefore, the Project complies with Section 155.2.
I. Height. Planning Code Section 260 requires that all structures be no taller than the height prescribed in the subject height and bulk district. The proposed Project is located in a 40-X Height and Bulk District, with a 40-foot height limit.
The proposed replacement building will stand 40 feet in height with a reduction to a height of 30 feet at the rear 10 feet of the proposed building, per Section 134(c) (1).
J. Child Care Requirement for Residential Projects. Planning Code Section 414A requires payment of a child care impact fee for a project that results in one net new dwelling unit. The Project proposes three new dwelling units and will be required to pay a fee of $0.91 for each net new gross square foot of residential development.
7. Planning Code Section 303 establishes criteria for the Planning Commission to consider when
reviewing applications for Conditional Use approval. On balance, the project does comply with said criteria in that:
A. The proposed new use and building, at the size and intensity contemplated and at the
proposed location, will provide a development that is necessary or desirable, and compatible with, the neighborhood or the community.
The use and size of the proposed project is compatible with the immediate neighborhood. While the project proposes demolition of existing housing, the existing housing is unsound according to a soundness report submitted to the Planning Department. The replacement building will increase number of units at the project site as well as add additional bedrooms and improved interior layouts. The replacement building is designed to be in keeping with the existing development pattern and the neighborhood character.
B. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, convenience or general
welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity. There are no features of the project that could be detrimental to the health, safety or convenience of those residing or working the area, in that:
i. Nature of proposed site, including its size and shape, and the proposed size, shape and
arrangement of structures;
Draft Motion CASE NO 2015-006143CUA Hearing Date: July 7, 2016 2755 McAllister Street
5
The Project is designed to be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and adjacent buildings. The replacement building would provide a minimum rear yard of 44’-4”, thus contributing landscaped area to the mid-block open space.
ii. The accessibility and traffic patterns for persons and vehicles, the type and volume of
such traffic, and the adequacy of proposed off-street parking and loading;
The Planning Code requires three parking spaces for the replacement building. Three spaces are proposed. Further, adequate space for three bicycles is provided within the garage in accordance with the Zoning Administrator Bulletin No. 9.
iii. The safeguards afforded to prevent noxious or offensive emissions such as noise, glare,
dust and odor;
The proposed project is residential in nature. Unlike commercial or industrial uses, the proposed residential use is not considered to have the potential to produce noxious or offensive emissions.
iv. Treatment given, as appropriate, to such aspects as landscaping, screening, open spaces,
parking and loading areas, service areas, lighting and signs;
Although designed in a contemporary aesthetic, the façade treatment and materials of the replacement building have been appropriately selected to be harmonious with the existing surrounding neighborhood.
C. That the use as proposed will comply with the applicable provisions of the Planning Code
and will not adversely affect the General Plan.
The Project complies with all relevant requirements and standards of the Planning Code and is consistent with objectives and policies of the General Plan as detailed below.
D. That the use as proposed would provide development that is in conformity with the purpose
of the applicable RH-3 District.
The proposed project is consistent with the stated purpose of the RH-3 Districts.
8. Additional Findings pursuant to Section 317 establishes criteria for the Planning Commission to consider when reviewing applications to demolish or convert Residential Buildings. On balance, the Project does comply with said criteria in that:
i. Whether the Project Sponsor has demonstrated that the residential structure is unsound, where soundness is an economic measure of the feasibility of upgrading a residence that is deficient with respect to habitability and Housing Code requirements, due to its original construction. The soundness factor for a structure shall be the ratio of a construction upgrade to the replacement cost, expressed as a percent. A building is unsound if its soundness factor exceeds 50-percent. A residential building that is unsound may be approved for demolition.
Draft Motion CASE NO 2015-006143CUA Hearing Date: July 7, 2016 2755 McAllister Street
6
The Project Sponsor has submitted a soundness report, which demonstrates that the repair cost exceeds 50-percent of the replacement cost for the building proposed to be demolished.
ii. Whether the property is free of a history of serious, continuing code violations;
A review of the Department of Building Inspection and the Planning Department databases showed no enforcement cases or notices of violation for the subject property.
iii. Whether the housing has been maintained in a decent, safe, and sanitary condition;
Per the submitted soundness report, construction deficiencies are evident.
iv. Whether the property is an “historic resource” under CEQA;
Although the existing structures are more than 50 years old, a review of the supplemental information resulted in a determination that neither structure is an historical resource, as reflected in the Categorical Exemption dated November 23, 2015.
v. Whether the removal of the resource will have a substantial adverse impact under
CEQA;
Not applicable. The structure was determined not to be an historical resource.
vi. Whether the Project converts rental housing to other forms of tenure or occupancy;
The Project does not convert rental housing to other forms of tenure or occupancy, as the existing building is authorized as a single-family residence.
vii. Whether the Project removes rental units subject to the Rent Stabilization and Arbitration
Ordinance;
No rent controlled units will be removed. The project site has historically been owner-occupied and there is no history of evictions at the property.
viii. Whether the Project conserves existing housing to preserve cultural and economic
neighborhood diversity;
Although the Project proposes demolition of a two-bedroom unit, the number of units at the property will see a net increase of two family-sized units at the project site.
ix. Whether the Project conserves neighborhood character to preserve neighborhood cultural and economic diversity;
The replacement building will conserve neighborhood character with appropriate scale, design, and materials, and improve cultural and economic diversity by appropriately increasing the
Draft Motion CASE NO 2015-006143CUA Hearing Date: July 7, 2016 2755 McAllister Street
7
number of bedrooms on the site to provide family-sized housing. The project would increase the existing number of dwelling units by two, while providing a net gain of eight bedrooms to the City’s housing stock.
x. Whether the Project protects the relative affordability of existing housing;
The Project does not protect the relative affordability of existing housing, as the project proposes demolition of the existing building and construction of a new residential building with three dwelling units. However, it should be taken into consideration that the existing building is an unsound structure, and that the proposed structure will provide three family-sized units.
xi. Whether the Project increases the number of permanently affordable units as governed
by Section 315;
The Project is not subject to the provisions of Planning Code Section 315, as the project proposes fewer than five units.
xii. Whether the Project locates in-fill housing on appropriate sites in established
neighborhoods;
The Project has been designed to be consistent with the scale and development pattern of the established neighborhood character.
xiii. Whether the Project creates quality, new family housing;
The Project proposes three opportunities for new family-sized housing. One four-bedroom dwelling unit and two three-bedroom dwellings are proposed.
xiv. Whether the Project creates new supportive housing;
The Project does not create supportive housing.
xv. Whether the Project promotes construction of well-designed housing to enhance existing
neighborhood character;
The overall scale, design, and materials of the proposed building are consistent with the block-face and compliment the neighborhood character with a contemporary design.
xvi. Whether the Project increases the number of on-site dwelling units;
The Project would increase the number of on-site units by two family-sized units.
xvii. Whether the Project increases the number of on-site bedrooms.
The project proposes ten bedrooms, eight bedrooms more that the existing building.
Draft Motion CASE NO 2015-006143CUA Hearing Date: July 7, 2016 2755 McAllister Street
8
9. General Plan Compliance. The Project is, on balance, consistent with the following Objectives and Policies of the General Plan:
HOUSING ELEMENT OBJECTIVE 2: RETAIN EXISTING HOUSING UNITS, AND PROMOTE SAFETY AND MAINTENANCE STANDARDS, WITHOUT JEOPARDIZING AFFORDABILITY.
Policy 2.1: Discourage the demolition of sound existing housing, unless the demolition results in a net increase in affordable housing. The project proposes demolition of an unsound residential structure and replacement with a three-unit building. The proposed new units will not be required to meet affordability standards. URBAN DESIGN OBJECTIVE 1: EMPHASIS OF THE CHARACTERISTIC PATTERN WHICH GIVES TO THE CITY AND ITS NEIGHBORHOODS AN IMAGE, A SENSE OF PURPOSE, AND A MEANS OF ORIENTATION. Policy 1.2: Recognize, protect and reinforce the existing street pattern, especially as it is related to topography. The project proposes demolition of an existing two-story building. Similar to other existing structures on the block-face, the proposed building would contain a garage at the ground floor that is to be constructed 4’-8” from the front lot line standing 40 feet in height. Policy 1.3: Recognize that buildings, when seen together, produce a total effect that characterizes the city and its districts. The proposed replacement building reflects the existing neighborhood character and development pattern, particularly by proposing a building of similar mass, width and height as the existing structures along the block-face. OBJECTIVE 2: CONSERVATION OF RESOURCES WHICH PROVIDE A SENSE OF NATURE, CONTINUITY WITH THE PAST, AND FREEDOM FROM OVERCROWDING.
Policy 2.6: Respect the character of older development nearby in the design of new buildings.
Draft Motion CASE NO 2015-006143CUA Hearing Date: July 7, 2016 2755 McAllister Street
9
The massing of the replacement building’s front façade has been designed to be compatible with the prevailing street wall height, particularly the height and proportions of the adjacent buildings. Although interpreted in a contemporary architectural style, the proposed building proportions and exterior materials and ratios have been selected to be compatible with the adjacent buildings and the immediate neighborhood character.
10. Planning Code Section 101.1(b) establishes eight priority-planning policies and requires review
of permits for consistency with said policies. On balance, the project does comply with said policies in that:
A. That existing neighborhood-serving retail uses be preserved and enhanced and future
opportunities for resident employment in and ownership of such businesses be enhanced.
Existing neighborhood-serving retail uses would not be displaced or otherwise adversely affected by the proposal, as the existing building does not contain commercial uses/spaces. The additional bedrooms in the replacement building would house more individuals to patronize the existing neighborhood-serving retail uses.
B. That existing housing and neighborhood character be conserved and protected in order to
preserve the cultural and economic diversity of our neighborhoods.
While the existing residence is proposed to be demolished, the new replacement building would increase the number of dwelling units and bedrooms, providing a net gain of two family-sized units and eight bedrooms.
C. That the City's supply of affordable housing be preserved and enhanced,
While the affordability of the existing unit is not preserved since it is proposed to be demolished, the existing residence is unsound and the replacement building will provide dwelling units that are well-designed and contain additional bedrooms.
D. That commuter traffic not impede MUNI transit service or overburden our streets or neighborhood parking.
The Project would not have a significant adverse effect on automobile traffic congestion or create parking problems in the neighborhood. The Project would maintain neighborhood parking by providing two new off-street parking spaces for the proposed new units.
E. That a diverse economic base be maintained by protecting our industrial and service sectors from displacement due to commercial office development, and that future opportunities for resident employment and ownership in these sectors be enhanced.
The Project is a residential project in an RH-3 District; therefore the Project would not affect industrial or service sector uses or related employment opportunities. Ownership of industrial or service sector businesses would not be affected by the Project.
Draft Motion CASE NO 2015-006143CUA Hearing Date: July 7, 2016 2755 McAllister Street
10
F. That the City achieve the greatest possible preparedness to protect against injury and loss of life in an earthquake.
The replacement structure would be built in compliance with San Francisco’s current Building Code Standards and would meet all earthquake safety requirements.
G. That landmarks and historic buildings be preserved.
No landmark or historic buildings occupy the Project site.
H. That our parks and open space and their access to sunlight and vistas be protected from
development. The project will have no negative effect on existing parks and open spaces. The project does not exceed the 40-foot height limit, and is thus not subject to the requirements of Planning Code Section 295 – Height Restrictions on Structures Shadowing Property Under the Jurisdiction of the Recreation and Park Commission. The height of the proposed structures is compatible with the established neighborhood development.
11. The Project is consistent with and would promote the general and specific purposes of the Code
provided under Section 101.1(b) in that, as designed, the Project would contribute to the character and stability of the neighborhood and would constitute a beneficial development.
12. The Commission hereby finds that approval of the Conditional Use authorization would promote
the health, safety and welfare of the City.
Draft Motion CASE NO 2015-006143CUA Hearing Date: July 7, 2016 2755 McAllister Street
11
DECISION That based upon the Record, the submissions by the Applicant, the staff of the Department and other interested parties, the oral testimony presented to this Commission at the public hearings, and all other written materials submitted by all parties, the Commission hereby APPROVES Conditional Use Application No. 2015-06143CUA subject to the following conditions attached hereto as “EXHIBIT A” which is incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth. APPEAL AND EFFECTIVE DATE OF MOTION: Any aggrieved person may appeal this Conditional Use Authorization to the Board of Supervisors within thirty (30) days after the date of this Motion No. 17820. The effective date of this Motion shall be the date of this Motion if not appealed (After the 30-day period has expired) OR the date of the decision of the Board of Supervisors if appealed to the Board of Supervisors. For further information, please contact the Board of Supervisors at (415) 554-5184, City Hall, Room 244, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, San Francisco, CA 94012. Protest of Fee or Exaction: You may protest any fee or exaction subject to Government Code Section 66000 that is imposed as a condition of approval by following the procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020. The protest must satisfy the requirements of Government Code Section 66020(a) and must be filed within 90 days of the date of the first approval or conditional approval of the development referencing the challenged fee or exaction. For purposes of Government Code Section 66020, the date of imposition of the fee shall be the date of the earliest discretionary approval by the City of the subject development. If the City has not previously given Notice of an earlier discretionary approval of the project, the Planning Commission’s adoption of this Motion, Resolution, Discretionary Review Action or the Zoning Administrator’s Variance Decision Letter constitutes the approval or conditional approval of the development and the City hereby gives NOTICE that the 90-day protest period under Government Code Section 66020 has begun. If the City has already given Notice that the 90-day approval period has begun for the subject development, then this document does not re-commence the 90-day approval period. I hereby certify that the Planning Commission ADOPTED the foregoing Motion on July 7, 2016. Jonas P. Ionin Commission Secretary AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: RECUSED: ADOPTED:
Draft Motion CASE NO 2015-006143CUA Hearing Date: July 7, 2016 2755 McAllister Street
12
EXHIBIT A AUTHORIZATION This authorization is for a conditional use to allow demolition of an existing single-family residence located at 2755 McAllister Street, Block 040 of Assessor’s Lot 1168 pursuant to Planning Code Section(s) 303 and 317 within the RH-3 District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District; in general conformance with plans, dated April 11, 2016, and stamped “EXHIBIT B” included in the docket for Case No. 2015-006143CUA and subject to conditions of approval reviewed and approved by the Commission on July 7, 2016 under Motion No XXXXXX. This authorization and the conditions contained herein run with the property and not with a particular Project Sponsor, business, or operator. RECORDATION OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Prior to the issuance of the building permit or commencement of use for the Project the Zoning Administrator shall approve and order the recordation of a Notice in the Official Records of the Recorder of the City and County of San Francisco for the subject property. This Notice shall state that the project is subject to the conditions of approval contained herein and reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on July 7, 2016 under Motion No XXXXXX. PRINTING OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ON PLANS The conditions of approval under the 'Exhibit A' of this Planning Commission Motion No. XXXXXX shall be reproduced on the Index Sheet of construction plans submitted with the Site or Building permit application for the Project. The Index Sheet of the construction plans shall reference to the Conditional Use authorization and any subsequent amendments or modifications. SEVERABILITY The Project shall comply with all applicable City codes and requirements. If any clause, sentence, section or any part of these conditions of approval is for any reason held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect or impair other remaining clauses, sentences, or sections of these conditions. This decision conveys no right to construct, or to receive a building permit. “Project Sponsor” shall include any subsequent responsible party. CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS Changes to the approved plans may be approved administratively by the Zoning Administrator. Significant changes and modifications of conditions shall require Planning Commission approval of a new Conditional Use authorization.
Draft Motion CASE NO 2015-006143CUA Hearing Date: July 7, 2016 2755 McAllister Street
13
Conditions of Approval, Compliance, Monitoring, and Reporting PERFORMANCE
1. Validity and Expiration. The authorization and right vested by virtue of this action is valid for three years from the effective date of the Motion. A building permit from the Department of Building Inspection to construct the project and/or commence the approved use must be issued as this Conditional Use authorization is only an approval of the proposed project and conveys no independent right to construct the project or to commence the approved use. The Planning Commission may, in a public hearing, consider the revocation of the approvals granted if a site or building permit has not been obtained within three (3) years of the date of the Motion approving the Project. Once a site or building permit has been issued, construction must commence within the timeframe required by the Department of Building Inspection and be continued diligently to completion. The Commission may also consider revoking the approvals if a permit for the Project has been issued but is allowed to expire and more than three (3) years have passed since the Motion was approved. For information about compliance, contact Code Enforcement, Planning Department at 415-575-6863, www.sf-planning.org.
DESIGN
2. Garbage, composting and recycling storage. Space for the collection and storage of garbage, composting, and recycling shall be provided within enclosed areas on the property and clearly labeled and illustrated on the architectural addenda. Space for the collection and storage of recyclable and compostable materials that meets the size, location, accessibility and other standards specified by the San Francisco Recycling Program shall be provided at the ground level of the buildings. For information about compliance, contact the Case Planner, Planning Department at 415-558-6378, www.sf-planning.org .
MONITORING
3. Enforcement. Violation of any of the Planning Department conditions of approval contained in this Motion or of any other provisions of Planning Code applicable to this Project shall be subject to the enforcement procedures and administrative penalties set forth under Planning Code Section 176 or Section 176.1. The Planning Department may also refer the violation complaints to other city departments and agencies for appropriate enforcement action under their jurisdiction.
4. For information about compliance, contact Code Enforcement, Planning Department at 415-575-6863, www.sf-planning.org
OPERATION
5. Sidewalk Maintenance. The Project Sponsor shall maintain the main entrance to the building and all sidewalks abutting the subject property in a clean and sanitary condition in compliance with the Department of Public Works Streets and Sidewalk Maintenance Standards. For information about compliance, contact Bureau of Street Use and Mapping, Department of Public Works, 415-695-2017, http://sfdpw.org
~a courv~,r
~~P~` "~~x SAN FRANCISCO~m PLANNING DEPARTMENT
o~b~& o'~~~'
CEQA Categorical Exemption DeterminationPROPERTY INFORMATIONIPROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project Address Block/Lot(s)
2755 McAllister Street 1168/040Case No. Permit No. Plans Dated
2015-006143EN V 4/21 /2015
Addition/
Alteration
~/ Demolition
(requires HRER if over 45 years old)
~/ ew Project
Construction
Modification
(GO TO STEP 7)
Project description for Planning Department approval.
Demolish single-family home and construct three-residential-unit, four-story building with parkingfor three vehicles.
STEP 1: EXEMPTION CLASSTO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT PLANNER
Note: If neither Class 1 or 3 a lies, an Environmental Evaluation A lication is re uired.
Class 1—Existing Facilities. Interior and exterior alterations; additions under 10,000 sq. ft.
❑Class
✓
3 —New Construction/ Conversion of Small Structures. Up to three (3) new single-familyresidences or six (6) dwelling units in one building; commercial/office structures; utility extensions;change of use under 10,000 sq. ft. if principally permitted or with a CU.
Class_
STEP 2: CEQA IMPACTSTO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT PLANNER
If any box is checked below, an Environmental Evaluation Application is required.
Air Quality: Would the project add new sensitive receptors (specifically, schools, day care facilities,hospitals, residential dwellings, and senior-care facilities) within an Air Pollution Exposure Zone?Does the project have the potential to emit substantial pollutant concentrations (e.g., backup dieselgenerators, heavy industry, diesel trucks)? Exceptions: do not check box if the applicant presentsdocumentation of enrollment in the San Francisco Department of Public Health (DPH) Article 38 program andthe project would not have the potential to emit substantial pollutant concentrations. (refer to EP ArcMap >CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Air Pollutant Exposure Zone)
Hazardous Materials: If the project site is located on the Maher map or is suspected of containinghazardous materials (based on a previous use such as gas station, auto repair, dry cleaners, or heavymanufacturing, or a site with underground storage tanks): Would the project involve 50 cubic yardsar more of soil disturbance - or a change of use from industrial to residential? If yes, this box must bechecked and the ro'ect a licant must submit an Environmental A lication with a Phase I
SAN FRANCISCOPLANNING DEPARTMENT)'I,iig
Environmental Site Assessment. Exceptions: do not check box if the applicant presents documentation of
enrollment in the San Francisco Department of Public Health (DPH) Maher program, a DPH waiver from the
Maher program, or other documentation from Environmental Planning sta~f'that hazardous material effects
would be less than significant (refer to EP ArcMap > Maher layer).
Transportation: Does the project create six (6) or more net new parking spaces or residential units?
Does the project have the potential to adversely affect transit, pedestrian and/or bicycle safety
(hazards) or the adequacy of nearby transit, pedestrian and/or bicycle facilities?
Archeological Resources: Would the project result in soil disturbance/modification greater than two
(2) feet below grade in an archeological sensitive area or eight (8) feet in anon-archeological sensitive
area? (refer to EP_ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Archeological Sensitive Area)
Noise: Does the project include new noise-sensitive receptors (schools, day care facilities, hospitals,
residential dwellings, and senior-care faalities) fronting roadways located in the noise mitigation
area? (refer to EP_ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Noise Mitigation Area)
Subdivision/Lot Line Adjustment: Does the project site involve a subdivision or lot line adjustment
on a lot with a slope average of 20% or more? (refer to EP_ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers >
Topography)
Slope = or > 20%: Does the project involve excavation of 50 cubic yards of soil or more, new
❑ construction, or square footage expansion greater than 1,000 sq. ft. outside of the existing building
footprint? (refer to EP_ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Topography) If box is checked, a
geotechnical report is required.
Seismic: Landslide Zone: Does the project involve excavation of 50 cubic yards of soil or more, new
❑ construction, or square footage expansion greater than 1,000 sq. ft. outside of the existing building
footprint? (refer to EP_ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Seismic Hazard Zones) If box is checked, a
geotechnical report is required.
Seismic: Liquefaction Zone: Does the project involve excavation of 50 cubic yards of soil or more,
❑ new construction, or square footage expansion greater than 1,000 sq. ft. outside of the existing
building footprint? (refer to EP ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Seismic Hazard Zones) If box is
checked, a geotechnical report will likely be required.
If no boxes are checked above, GO TO STEP 3. If one or more boxes are checked above, an Environmental
Evaluation Application is required unless reviewed by an Environmental Planner.
Project can proceed with categorical exemption review. The project does not trigger any of the
CEQA impacts listed above.
Comments and Planner Signature (optional): Jean Poling ~.A„a,.w_ma,~ ~~--
STEP 3: PROPERTY STATUS -HISTORIC RESOURCETO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT PLANNER
PROPERTY IS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: (re er to Parcel In ormation Ma )
❑ Catego A: Known Historical Resource. GO TO STEP 5.
✓ Cate o B: Potential Historical Resource (over 45 ears of a e). GO TO STEP 4.
Category C: Not a Historical Resource or Not Age Eligible (under 45 years of age). GO TO STEP 6.
saN FRnNciscoPLANNING DEPARTMENT L;~;.afi't
STEP 4: PROPOSED WORK CHECKLISTTO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT PLANNER
Check all that apply to the project.
❑ 1. Change of use and new construction. Tenant improvements not included.
2. Regular maintenance or repair to correct or repair deterioration, decay, or damage to building.
❑ 3. Window replacement that meets the Department's Window Replacement Standards. Does not includestorefront window alterations.
❑ 4. Garage work. A new opening that meets the Guidelines for Adding Garages and Curb Cuts, and/arreplacement of a garage door in an existing opening that meets the Residential Design Guidelines.
5. Deck, terrace construction, or fences not visible from any immediately adjacent public right-of-way.
❑ 6. Mechanical equipment installation that is not visible from any immediately adjacent public right-of-way.
❑ 7. Dormer installation that meets the requirements for exemption from public notification under ZoningAdministrator Bulletin No. 3: Dormer Windows.
❑
8. Additions) that are not visible from any immediately adjacent public right-of-way for 150 feet in eachdirection; does not extend vertically beyond the floor level of the top story of the structure or is only asingle story in height; does not have a footprint that is more than 50%larger than that of the originalbuilding; and does not cause the removal of architectural significant roofing features.
Note: Project Planner must check box below before proceeding.
Project is not listed. GO TO STEP 5.
Project does not conform to the scopes of work. GO TO STEP 5.
Project involves four or more work descriptions. GO TO STEP 5.
Project involves less than four work descriptions. GO TO STEP 6.
STEP 5: CEQA IMPACTS -ADVANCED HISTORICAL REVIEWTO BE COMPLETED BY PRESERVATION PLANNER
Check all that apply to the project.
❑ 1. Project involves a known historical resource (CEQA Category A) as determined by Step 3 andconforms entirely to proposed work checklist in Step 4:
2. Interior alterations to publicly accessible spaces.
❑ 3. Window replacement of original/historic windows that are not "in-kind" but are consistent withexisting historic character.
4. Facade/storefront alterations that do not remove, alter, or obscure character-defining features.
5. Raising the building in a manner that does not remove, alter, or obscure character-definingfeatures.
6. Restoration based upon documented evidence of a building's historic condition, such as historicphotographs, plans, physical evidence, or similar buildings.
❑ 7. Addition(s), including mechanical equipment that are minimally visible from a public right-of-wayand meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation.
SAN FRANCISCOPLANNING DEPARTMENT 2;1 s~" i
8. Other work consistent with the Secretary of the Interior Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties
(specify or add comments):
9. Other work that would not materially impair a historic district (specify or add comments):
(Requires approval by Senior Preservation Planner/Preservation Coordinator)
10. Reclassification of property status to Category C. (Requires approval by Senior Preservation
Planner/Preservation Coordinator)
a. Per HRER dated: (attach HRER)
b. Other (specify): Per PTR dated 11 /18/2015
Note: If ANY box in STEP 5 above is checked, a Preservation Planner MUST check one box below.
❑ Further environmental review required. Based on the information provided, the project requires an
Environmental Evaluation Application to be submitted. GO TO STEP 6.
Project can proceed with categorical exemption review. The project has been reviewed by the
Preservation Planner and can proceed with categorical exemption review. GO TO STEP 6.
Comments (optional):
Preservation Planner Signature: Alexandra Kirby ~ ~°-'a„~ =----~~.
STEP 6: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DETERMINATIONT(7 BE CnMPLETED BY PROTECT PLANNER
❑ Further environmental review required. Proposed project does not meet scopes of work in either (check all that
apply):
Step 2 — CEQA Impacts
Step 5 —Advanced Historical Review
STOP! Must file an Environmental Evaluation Application.
a llo further environmental review is required. The project is categorically exempt under CEQA.
Planner Name: /q. KI rbySignature:
Alexandra Kirby- Digitally signetl by
exa n d ra Kirby DN: do=org, dc=sfgov, dr-ciryplanning,
o~=~~a,P~a~~~~9,a~=c~Ra~~P~a~~~~9,~~=A~xa~d~ -Klrtiy; [email protected] Approval Action•
Building Permit°8'a:Z°,5.,,.2"5:'°:55_°8~°°~
It 17iscretionary Keview betore the Planning Commission is requested,
the Discretionary Review hearing is the Approval Action for the
project.
Once signed or stamped and dated, this document constitutes a categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines and Chapter 31 of the
Administrative Code.
In accordance with Chapter 31 of the San Francisco Administrative Code, an appeal of an exemption determination can only be filed within 30
days of the project receiving the first approval action.
SAN FRANCISCOPLANNING DEPARTMENT ~~ 1:.31? C;
~4A~o cooNr~,o
~z
x ~_ ,
r̀0?68S ~ ~0~~'~
~
SAN FRANCISCOPLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRESERVATION TEAM REVIEW FORM
Preservation Team Meeting Date: 11/18/2015 Date of Form Completion 11/18/2015
PR07ECT INFORMATION:
Planner: Address:
Alexandra Kirby 2755 McAllister Street
Block/Lot: Cross Streets:
1 168/040 Arguello Boulevard and Willard Street North
CEQA Category: Art. 10/11: BPA/Case No.:
B N/A 2015-006143ENV
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
{: CEQA (~ Article 10/11 (~` Preliminary/PIC (: Alteration ('=Demo/New Construction
DATE OF PLANS UNDER REVIEW: 4/21/2015
PROJECT ISSUES:
~ Is the subject Property an eligible historic resource?
If so, are the proposed changes a significant impact?
Additional Notes:
Submitted: Historic Resource Evaluation submitted by Tim Kelley, March 2015.
The proposal is to demolish the existing one-story over garage residence and construct anew four-story, three-unit building.
PRESERVATION TEAM REVIEW:
Historic Resource Present ('Yes C~No ~ (' N/A
Individual Historic District/Context
Property is individually eligible for inclusion in a Property is in an eligible California RegisterCalifornia Register under one or more of the Historic District/Context under one or more offollowing Criteria: the following Criteria:
Criterion 1 -Event: (` Yes (, No Criterion 1 -Event: C' Yes (: No
Criterion 2 -Persons: [` Yes (: No Criterion 2 -Persons: C~ Yes ( No
Criterion 3 -Architecture: C" Yes (, No Criterion 3 -Architecture: C` Yes ( No
Criterion 4 -Info. Potential• C` Yes (No Criterion 4 -Info. Potential: C` Yes (No
Period of Significance: Period of Significance:
C' Contributor ~ Non-Contributor
1650 Mission St.Suite 400San Francisco,CA 94103-2479
Reception:415.558.6378
Fax:415.558.6409
PlanningInformation:415.558.6377
Complies with the Secretary's Standards/Art 10/Art 1 1: C` Yes (~` No (' N/A
CEQA Material Impairment: ~ Yes ( No
Needs More Information: C~` Yes (i No
Requires Design Revisions: C" Yes { No
Defer to Residential Design Team: (+` Yes (` No
If No is selected for Historic Resource per CEQA, a signature from Senior Preservation Planner or
Preservation Coordinator is required.
PRESERVATION TEAM COMMENTS:
22755 McAllister is aone-story-over-garage, wood frame, vernacular single-familyresidence located on the south side of McAllister Street in the Inner Richmondneighborhood. The building features a hipped roof, horizontal wood siding, and double-hungwood sash windows with ogee lugs at all three sides of the two angled bay windows.
j The main entrance is recessed at the ground floor with access via a security gate. Nohistoric photos of the property were found; overall the property appears to have amoderate degree of integrity.
22755 McAllister Street was constructed in 1910 by the Segurson Brothers contractingcompany for owner Henry Schuster, a local baker of German origins. The property wastransferred to Martin and Augusta Berkovatz, a brewer and his wife, in 1932, and theproperty remained in the family until 1968. The known owners and occupants of theproperty do not appear to be of regional or local historic significance.
Based on historic research conducted by Tim Kelley consulting and preservation planningstaff, 22755 McAllister Street does not appear to be individually eligible for the CaliforniaRegister under Criteria 1 (Events), 2 (Persons), or 3 (Architecture). 22755 McAllister Street isnot associated with any historic trends or events in the area or at the subject property; theowners and occupants do not appear to have been significant to our local, regional ornational past; and the subject property is not the work of a master architect or builder, nordoes its architecture possess high artistic value or integrity.
The immediate context is a mixture ofsingle-family homes and multi-family flats,constructed between 1900 and 1988, with a concentration of building constructedbetween 1900 and 1910. Many buildings have undergone alterations that impact thearchitectural integrity of the immediate vicinity, and the visual continuity is mixed in termsof style, massing, and materials along the immediate block. The neighborhood is not adesignated historic district, nor does it appear to qualify as a potential district based onpreliminary research.
Signature of a Senior Rreservation Planner /Preservation Coordinator: Date
~Cv ~v~ ~ ~ ~ ~ q „ 2fJ ~~'~'
i~~Nr~u¢~ ~~P~~r~'r'
Parcel Map
SUBJECT PROPERTY
Conditional Use Hearing Case Number 2015-006413CUA 2755 McAllister Street Block 1168 Lot 040
*The Sanborn Maps in San Francisco have not been updated since 1998, and this map may not accurately reflect existing conditions.
Sanborn Map*
SUBJECT PROPERTY
Conditional Use Hearing Case Number 2015-006413CUA 2755 McAllister Street Block 1168 Lot 040
Zoning Map
Conditional Use Hearing Case Number 2015-006413CUA 2755 McAllister Street Block 1168 Lot 040
Aerial Photo
SUBJECT PROPERTY
(looking south)
Conditional Use Hearing Case Number 2015-006413CUA 2755 McAllister Street Block 1168 Lot 040
Aerial Photo
SUBJECT PROPERTY
(looking south)
Conditional Use Hearing Case Number 2015-006413CUA 2755 McAllister Street Block 1168 Lot 040
Site Photo
Conditional Use Hearing Case Number 2015-006413CUA 2755 McAllister Street Block 1168 Lot 040
SUBJECT PROPERTY
NEW
TH
REE
UN
IT :
2755
McA
LLIS
TER
1 N
EW 4
STO
RY
BUIL
DIN
G: 3
Sto
ry R
-2, T
ype
V-A
cons
truct
ion
OVE
R 1
Sto
ry U
, Typ
e V-
A co
nstru
ctio
n. E
NTI
RE
BUIL
DIN
G S
PRIN
KLER
ED
2 3
RES
IDEN
TIAL
CO
ND
O U
NIT
S O
VER
PAR
KIN
G: (
2) 2
Sto
ry (f
ront
to b
ack)
Tow
nhou
ses
(3rd
and
4th
Fl)
OVE
R (1
) 1 T
ownh
ouse
(ent
ire 2
nd
floor
OVE
R G
ARAG
E, w
ith p
artia
l firs
t flo
or b
ehin
d ga
rage
)
4 R
oof P
itch:
4:1
2 pi
tch;
NO
Fire
Dep
artm
ent A
cces
s
3 P
hoto
volti
c &
Mec
hani
cal e
quip
men
t per
roof
pla
n
A0.0
TITLE SHEET
SAN
FR
ANC
ISC
O, C
ALIF
OR
NIA
, 941
18
PLAN
NIN
G N
OTE
S1
24.5
' x 1
37.5
' LO
T; A
PN 1
168/
040
2N
EW 3
UN
IT IN
RH
-3 Z
ON
ING
DIS
TRIC
T
3O
NE
OFF
-SIT
E PA
RKI
NG
SPA
CE
PER
UN
IT
445
% R
EAR
YAR
D S
ETBA
CK
536
" PR
OJE
CTI
ON
BAY
WIN
DO
WS
AT F
RO
NT
636
" PR
OJE
CTI
ON
BAY
WIN
DO
WS
AT R
EAR
7M
AXIM
UM
HEI
GH
T =4
0'-0
", PR
OPO
SED
HEI
GH
T 40
'-0"
(4 S
TOR
Y BU
ILD
ING
)
PAR
TIC
IPA
NT
OW
NER
2755
MC
ALLI
STER
, LP
601
VAN
NES
S AV
E #E
3606
SAN
FR
ANC
ISC
O, C
A 94
102
ARC
HIT
ECT
EE W
EISS
AR
CH
ITEC
TS21
CO
RTE
MAD
ERA
AVE,
SU
ITE
4M
ILL
VALL
EY, C
A 94
941
[415
] 381
-878
8 FA
X[4
15] 3
81-8
700
TEL
GEN
ERAL
CO
NTR
ACTO
RU
NKN
OW
N
STR
UC
TUR
ALH
arre
ll Ka
ne S
truct
ural
Eng
inee
rsEN
GIN
EER
237
Kear
ny S
t #18
0Sa
n Fr
anci
sco,
CA
9410
8Te
l: 41
5.50
1.90
00 x
100
dkan
e@hk
-se.
com
GEO
TEC
HN
ICAL
Earth
Mec
hani
cs C
onsu
lting
360
Gra
nd A
ve, S
uite
262
Oak
land
, CA
946
1051
0-83
9-07
65ea
rthm
ech1
@ao
l.com
SUR
VEYO
RG
L&A
ENG
INEE
RS
944
MAR
KET
STR
EET
SUIT
E 61
2SA
N F
RAN
CIS
CO
, CA
9410
2[4
15] 8
60-3
010
PRO
JEC
T TE
AMLO
CAT
ION
MAP
BUIL
DIN
G P
RO
GR
AMIN
DEX
A0.
0TI
TLE
C1
SITE
SU
RVE
Y
A1.
1PL
AN: S
ITE
A2.
0PL
AN: E
XIST
ING
A2.
1PL
AN: F
IRST
& S
ECO
ND
FLO
OR
A2.
2PL
AN: T
HIR
D &
FO
UR
TH F
LOO
R
A2.
3PL
AN: R
OO
F, A
SSEM
BLY
DET
AILS
A3.
1EL
EVAT
ION
S: F
RO
NT
& R
EAR
A3.
2EL
EVAT
ION
S: S
IDE
A4.
1SE
CTI
ON
: LO
NG
ITU
DIN
AL
A5.
1D
ETAI
LS
A6.
0FI
RE
FLO
W, G
REE
N, A
B FO
RM
S
A6.
1.1
TITL
E-24
EN
ERG
Y C
F-1R
A6.
1.2
TITL
E-24
EN
ERG
Y M
F-1R
A6.
2W
IND
OW
SC
HED
ULE
E0.1
ELEC
TRIC
AL &
MEC
H: L
EGEN
D, N
OTE
S, S
PEC
E1.1
ELEC
TRIC
AL &
MEC
H: F
IRST
- SE
CO
ND
PLA
N
E2.1
ELEC
TRIC
AL &
MEC
H: T
HIR
D -
FOU
RTH
PLA
N
S0.1
Gen
eral
Not
es
S1.1
Foun
datio
n Pl
an &
2nd
Flo
or F
ram
ing
Plan
S1.2
3rd
& 4t
h Fl
oor F
ram
ing
Plan
s
S1.3
Roo
f & P
enth
ouse
Fra
min
g Pl
ans
S2.1
Sect
ions
& D
etai
ls
S2.2
Sect
ions
& D
etai
ls
S2.3
Sect
ions
& D
etai
ls
S2.4
Sect
ions
& D
etai
ls
S2.5
Sect
ions
& D
etai
ls
S3.1
Stee
l Fra
me
Det
ails
Gen
eral
Not
es
1. C
odes
: The
des
ign
and
cons
truct
ion
of a
ll si
te a
ltera
tions
sha
ll co
mpl
y w
ith th
e 20
13 C
alifo
rnia
Bui
ldin
g C
ode,
201
3 Pl
umbi
ng C
ode,
201
3 El
ectri
cal C
ode,
20
13 C
alifo
rnia
Mec
hani
cal C
ode,
201
3 C
alifo
rnia
Fire
Cod
e, a
nd 2
013
Title
24
Cal
iforn
ia E
nerg
y Ef
ficie
ncy
Stan
dard
s, in
clud
ing
Loca
l Am
endm
ents
2. T
wo-
Hou
r sep
arat
ion
asse
mbl
ies
betw
een
all U
nits
, Uni
ts a
nd G
arag
e, a
nd E
leva
tor S
hafts
. 90
Min
ute
Rat
ed d
oors
at T
wo-
Hou
r Wal
ls3.
One
-Hou
r Ass
embl
ies
with
in 6
0" o
f (si
de, r
ear)
prop
erty
line
s al
l por
tions
of t
he B
uild
ing
4. A
ll pe
netr
atio
ns in
fire
ass
embl
ies
to c
ompl
y w
ith th
e Fi
re R
atin
g in
whi
ch th
ey b
reec
h. F
ire c
aulk
all
pipe
s, d
ucts
, etc
. to
seal
com
plet
ely
5. S
epar
ate
Perm
its re
quire
d fo
r: Sp
rinkl
ers,
Fire
Con
trols
, Tru
sses
, Sid
ewal
k &
Driv
eway
, Util
ity la
tera
ls,
6. S
prin
kler
Sys
tem
per
NFP
A 13
and
CBC
903
.3.1
.1
2755 McALLISTERSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94118
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL: 1168/040
E.E.
WEI
SSAr
chite
cts,
Inc
.21
Cor
te M
ader
a Av
e.M
ill Va
lley,
CA
9494
1
adm
in@
eew
eis
s.c
om
Tel
4
15.3
81.8
700
HIS
TOR
YBY
10 J
UN
E 05
SITE PERMIT SET
PLAN
NIN
G P
ERM
IT
16 J
AN 1
6
2015
.042
3.44
55
Dat
e: 6
/22/
16Ti
me:
3:4
5:23
PM
SKYL
IGH
T N
OTE
ANO
DIZ
ED A
LUM
INU
M. 5
.5" C
UR
B W
ITH
INTE
GR
AL C
UR
B BA
SE F
LASH
ING
KIT
BY
MAN
UFA
CTU
RE.
ISO
LATE
D
ISSI
MIL
AR
MET
ALS
, TYP
ICA
L LO
W-E
SQ
UAR
ED O
R
SIM
ILAR
TIN
T O
VER
STA
IRS,
OBS
CU
RE
GLA
ZIN
G A
T BA
THR
OO
MS.
ALL
UN
ITS
TO H
AVE
DO
UBL
E G
LAZI
NG
, TY
PIC
AL
A1.1
SITE & ROOF PLAN
WO
RK
AT
PR
OPE
RTY
LIN
E:1)
AR
CH
ITEC
TUR
AL P
LAN
S AR
E SC
HEM
ATIC
IN
NAT
UR
E; A
LL W
OR
K TO
BE
PER
FOR
MED
WIT
HIN
TH
E SU
BJEC
T PR
OPE
RTY
2) A
LL W
OR
K IN
CLU
DIN
G R
ETAI
NIN
G W
ALLS
; PI
ERS;
D
RAI
N L
INES
; WAT
ERPR
OO
FIN
G;
BAC
K FI
LLIN
G; E
TC.
SHAL
L BE
CO
NTA
INED
WIT
HIN
TH
E PR
OPE
RTY
LIN
ES.
THE
SUBJ
ECT
PRO
PER
TY
3) N
O E
QU
IPM
ENT,
PER
SON
NEL
, OR
MAT
ERIA
L AR
E AL
LOW
ED O
N T
HE
NEI
GH
BOR
ING
PR
OPE
RTY
WIT
HO
UT
PRIO
R W
RIT
TEN
CO
NSE
NT.
GEN
ERA
L SI
TE N
OTE
S:1)
EN
GIN
EER
TO
REV
IEW
AN
D A
PPR
OVE
ALL
ASP
ECTS
OF
GR
ADIN
G, D
RAI
NAG
E, F
OU
ND
ATIO
NS,
AN
D A
LL
ASSO
CIA
TED
UN
DER
GR
OU
ND
IMPR
OVE
MEN
TS A
ND
C
ON
DIT
ION
S. E
NG
INEE
R T
O T
EST
AND
INSP
ECT
ALL
SYST
EMS
AS R
EQU
IRED
, TYP
.
2) E
RO
SIO
N A
ND
SU
RFA
CE
RU
N-O
FF S
HAL
L BE
C
ON
TAIN
ED A
ND
CO
NTR
OLL
ED W
ITH
IN T
HE
SITE
.
3) 2
:1 M
AX. S
LOPE
OF
UN
RES
TRAI
NED
EAR
TH.
NO
G
RAD
ING
AT
PRO
PER
TY L
INE
4) A
LL W
OR
K SH
ALL
CO
NFO
RM
TO
CO
UN
TY A
ND
CIT
Y ST
AND
ARD
SPE
CIF
ICAT
ION
S AN
D U
NIF
OR
M
CO
NST
RU
CTI
ON
STA
ND
ARD
S.
MAI
NTA
IN 2
-HO
UR
ASS
EMB
LY, T
WO
LAY
ERS
5/8"
TY
PE 'X
' AT
CEI
LIN
G, 1
1/8
" PLY
WO
OD
RO
OF.
2x
CU
RB
TO C
ON
TRO
L R
AIN
WAT
ER W
ITH
IN 6
0" O
F PR
OPE
RTY
LIN
E (S
HO
WN
HAT
CH
ED)
5'-9
"5'
-9"
12'-0
" EXT
ENSI
ON
PER
Sec
136
(c)(2
5)
REA
R Y
ARD
:G
RAD
E TO
+/-
240.
92
5'-0"
REA
R Y
ARD
PLA
NSc
ale:
1/4
" = 1
'-0"
2A1
.1
+/- 8
'-0"
WAL
L
PRO
POSE
D B
ULI
DIN
G:
SEE
PLAN
SH
EETS
AVERAGESETBACK
25% REARYARD
NEW
PAT
IOBE
LOW
GR
ADE +/- 2'-6"
PLAN
TER
(BEL
OW
GR
ADE)
45% REAR YARD
SAU
NA
(BEL
OW
GR
ADE)
UP (PVT)13r @7.4"12t @ 12"
AD
TW 2
42.0
6 +
14'-0
"
+ 23
8.75
SITE
+ R
OO
F PL
ANSc
ale:
1/8
" = 1
'-0"
1A1
.1
N
24.34'
24.34'
137.
50'
137.
50'
248.50
252.74
258.42
240.29
243.28
237.99
243.19
237.44
238.04
237.79
243.19
237.06
237.89
243.20
238.10
239.00
239.04
240.20
239.54
240.17
243.37
240.43
240.37
240.26
238.95
238.00
237.62
237.34
237.07
237.15
237.00
236.85
236.26
236.04
242.21
240.24
240.11
240.19
240.51
242.47
242.01
242.12
242.28
242.25
245.15
242.26
242.43
242.56
242.11
242.06
239.85
230.4
9BW
231.2
7BW
231.7
4BW
232.2
5BW
232.6
9BW
233.1
0BW
234.0
6BW
234.5
3BW BW
TW242.06BOW239.88
239.8
0FENCE
3-ST
OR
Y BL
DG
. WIT
H A
TTIC
LOT
3927
59-2
761
McA
LLIS
TER
STR
EET,
SF
F.F.
EL.
=±23
9.34
(@ 2
ND
FLO
OR
)G
.F.F
. EL.
=±23
0.69
PEAK
EL.
=±27
3.79
(RID
GE)
LOT
4127
49 M
cALL
ISTE
R S
TREE
T, S
FFL
AT R
OO
F EL
.=±2
63.5
8F.
F. E
L.=±
234.
41
2-ST
OR
Y BL
DG
.
4-STORY BLDG.LOT 17
2450 FULTON STREET, SF (NO ACCESS)
L/W
L/W
EAVE EL.
=±261.33
STAIRG.F.F. EL.
=±233.86
BL23
1.06 BC
231.8
2
BC23
4.97
BL23
4.46
BL23
4.86
BC23
6.85
BL23
6.04
230.6
6BC
233.2
2 BC
236.5
6 BC
234.3
9BL
4"'
1"'
1 3/4"'
ON LINE**
1"'
1/4"'
±0.0
7' C
LR.*
±0.15'
CLR.*
WOODENPOLE
1 1/2"'
27'-4
3/4
"'17
'-0"'
5'-1
0 3/
4"'
34'-8
"'
ROOF EL.=±245.85
2-ST
OR
Y BL
DG
.LO
T 40
2755
McA
LLIS
TER
STR
EET,
SF
9'-5
"
4'-8
1/2
"4'
-8 1
/2"
GV
WBX
VEN
TWBXPPD/W D/W
TREE-WELL
GV
VENTWBX
TREE-WELL
D/W
230.2
5TC
230.8
8TC
231.4
2TC
232.2
0TC
232.7
0TC
233.0
7TC
233.6
3TC
234.0
5TC
231.6
6TC
05
1015
2025
FT
11'-6
"
5'-9
"5'
-9"
FACE OF NEIGHBORING BUILDING
FACE OF NEIGHBORING BUILDING
25%
REA
R Y
ARD
: 34
'-4 1
/2"
AVER
AGE
SETB
ACK
AVER
AGE
SETB
ACK
10'-0"
3'-0
"
REL
OC
ATE
(E) C
UR
B C
UT;
NEW
STA
ND
ARD
(10'
M
AXIM
UM
)
REL
OC
ATE
(E) U
TILI
TIES
NEW
STR
EET
TREE
AN
D B
ASIN
FRO
NT
LAN
DSC
APIN
G: S
EE S
HEE
T A2
.1
FIR
E D
EPAR
TMEN
T C
ON
NEC
TIO
N; A
LSO
SEE
SH
EET
A2.1
45% REAR YARD
10'-0
"
30' A
BOVE
GR
ADE
(MAX
IMU
M)
40' A
BOVE
GR
ADE
(MAX
IMU
M)
000000000000.. 0000
59sf
(HAT
CH
ED) A
REA
O
FF-S
ET; A
LSO
SEE
A2.
1
120"
PR
IVAC
Y FE
NC
EAT
PR
OPE
RTY
LIN
E, T
YP
ALL
ELEV
ATIO
N A
ND
SIT
E N
OTE
S PE
RTA
IN T
O
EXIS
TIN
G C
ON
DIT
ION
S;
SEE
2/A1
.1 F
OR
FIN
ISH
EL
EVAT
ION
S
+ 23
2.9
+ 23
6.85
+ 23
2.25
+ 23
3.25
UP 12" 15'-0
"
DO
WN
BAR
REL
VAU
LT
MEC
H
MEC
H
5'-0" MIN
DOWN
LOW
PIT
CH
RO
OF
OVE
R S
TAIR
BEL
OW
DO
WNN
RO
OF
HAT
CH
18
2755 McALLISTERSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94118
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL: 1168/040
E.E.
WEI
SSAr
chite
cts,
Inc
.21
Cor
te M
ader
a Av
e.M
ill Va
lley,
CA
9494
1
adm
in@
eew
eis
s.c
om
Tel
4
15.3
81.8
700
HIS
TOR
YBY
10 J
UN
E 05
SITE PERMIT SET
PLAN
NIN
G P
ERM
IT
16 J
AN 1
6
2015
.042
3.44
55
Dat
e: 6
/22/
16Ti
me:
3:4
5:23
PM
A2.0
EXISTING FLOOR PLANS
62'-6
"8'
-4"
14'-6
"8'
-5"
23'-9
"
62'-6
"8'
-4"
14'-6
"8'
-5"
23'-9
"
GAR
AGE
STO
RAG
E
STO
RAG
E
KITC
HEN
BED
RO
OM
LIVI
NG
DIN
ING
BED
RO
OM
WC
BATH
DEC
K
EXIS
TIN
G F
IRST
FLO
OR
Scal
e: 1
/4" =
1'-0
"1
A2.1
NEI
GH
BOR
ING
BU
ILD
ING
SH
OW
N H
ATC
HED
NEI
GH
BOR
ING
BU
ILD
ING
SH
OW
N H
ATC
HED
EXIS
TIN
G S
ECO
ND
FLO
OR
Scal
e: 1
/4" =
1'-0
"2
A2.1
NEI
GH
BOR
ING
BU
ILD
ING
SH
OW
N H
ATC
HED
NEI
GH
BOR
ING
BU
ILD
ING
SH
OW
N H
ATC
HED
2755 McALLISTERSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94118
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL: 1168/040
E.E.
WEI
SSAr
chite
cts,
Inc
.21
Cor
te M
ader
a Av
e.M
ill Va
lley,
CA
9494
1
adm
in@
eew
eis
s.c
om
Tel
4
15.3
81.8
700
HIS
TOR
YBY
10 J
UN
E 05
SITE PERMIT SET
PLAN
NIN
G P
ERM
IT
16 J
AN 1
6
2015
.042
3.44
55
Dat
e: 6
/22/
16Ti
me:
3:4
5:23
PM
1A3.2
2A3.2
2A3.1
1
A3.1
2x6
ON
E-H
OU
R E
XTER
IOR
WAL
L: 5
/8" T
YPE
X G
WB
ON
INTE
RIO
R.
5/8"
GYP
SH
EATH
ING
O
VER
STU
DS.
BU
ILD
ING
PAP
ER O
VER
GYP
SH
EATH
ING
. EX
T T&
G P
.T. P
LYW
OO
D P
ER
STR
UC
TUR
AL.
'Z' F
LASH
ING
AT
HO
RIZ
ON
TAL
JOIN
TS.
ADD
ITIO
NAL
FIN
ISH
OVE
R P
LYW
OO
D
WH
ERE
PLYW
OO
D IS
VIS
IBLE
.
2x6
TWO
-HO
UR
WAL
LS: T
WO
LAY
ERS
5/8"
TYP
E X
EAC
H S
IDE
OF
WO
OD
STU
DS;
STA
GG
ER
SEAM
S
2x6
TWO
-HO
UR
SO
UN
D W
ALLS
: STA
GG
ER 2
x4
STU
DS
ON
2x6
PLA
TES.
SO
UN
D IN
SULA
TIO
N IN
AL
L VO
IDS.
TW
O L
AYER
S 5/
8" T
YPE
X EA
CH
SI
DE
OF
WO
OD
STU
DS;
STA
GG
ER S
EAM
S. S
EE
DET
AIL
2x6
ON
E-H
OU
R W
ALLS
: ON
E LA
YER
5/8
" TYP
E X
EAC
H S
IDE
OF
WO
OD
STU
DS
2x4
TWO
-HO
UR
WAL
LS: T
WO
LAY
ERS
5/8"
TYP
E X
EAC
H S
IDE
OF
WO
OD
STU
DS;
STA
GG
ER
SEAM
S
2x4
ON
E-H
OU
R W
ALLS
: ON
E LA
YER
5/8
" TYP
E X
EAC
H S
IDE
OF
WO
OD
STU
DS
2x4
ON
E-H
OU
R P
ARAP
ET: 3
0" M
IN. W
ALL
AT
RO
OFS
, 42"
AT
DEC
KS, W
ITH
IN 6
0" O
F PR
OPE
RTY
LIN
E. O
NE
LAYE
R 5
/8" T
YPE
X SH
EATH
ING
EAC
H S
IDE
OF
WO
OD
STU
DS,
BU
ILD
ING
PAP
ER, P
.T. P
LYW
OO
D P
ER
STR
UC
TUR
AL, E
XTER
IOR
FIN
ISH
ES W
HER
E PL
Y IS
EXP
OSE
D, N
ON
-CO
MBU
STIB
LE F
INIS
H
TOP
18")
,
WA
LL S
CH
EDU
LE
FIR
E D
EPA
RTM
ENT
NO
TES:
- FIR
E AL
ARM
SYS
TEM
PER
CBC
310
.10
AND
NFP
A 72
, 199
9 ED
ITIO
N- S
TAN
DPI
PE S
YSTE
M P
ER N
FPA
13, 1
999
EDIT
ION
- SM
OKE
DET
ECTO
RS
IN IN
CO
MM
ON
CO
RR
IDO
RS
AND
LO
BBIE
S PE
R C
FC 1
006.
2.9.
1.3
- PR
OVI
DE
STAI
RW
ELL
IDEN
TIFI
CAT
ION
SIG
NS
PER
C
BC 1
003.
3.3.
13- P
RO
VID
E LO
CKB
OX
AT B
UIL
DIN
G E
NTR
Y ;
ARR
ANG
E M
EETI
NG
WIT
H F
IRE
OFF
ICIA
L BE
FOR
E IN
STAL
LATI
ON
TO
DET
ERM
INE
LOC
ATIO
N P
ER C
FC
904.
4- E
LEVA
TOR
S TO
HAV
E R
ECAL
L AS
PAR
T O
F FI
RE
ALAR
M S
YSTE
M- P
ITC
HED
RO
OF;
NO
FIR
E D
EPAR
TMEN
T AC
CES
S
05
1015
2025
FT
GA
S FI
REP
LAC
E U
NIT
- N
OT
WO
OD
BU
RN
ING
.-
RO
UTE
FLU
E TO
TER
MIN
ATIO
N N
OT
WIT
HIN
48"
OF
PRO
PER
TY L
INE.
-M
ETAL
DR
AFT-
STO
PS A
T AL
L FL
OO
RS
AND
R
OO
FS.
1" M
INIM
UM
CLE
ARAN
CE
TO
CO
MBU
STIB
LES.
MAI
NTA
IN F
IRE
RAT
ING
FO
RTH
E AS
SEM
BLY
WH
ICH
A F
LUE
PEN
ETR
ATES
-AC
CES
SIBL
E G
AS S
HU
T-O
FF V
ALVE
.-
INST
ALL
PER
MAN
UFA
CTU
RE'
SR
ECO
MM
END
ATIO
N.
-VE
RIF
Y U
NIT
CO
MPL
IES
WIT
H T
ITLE
-24
REP
OR
TPR
IOR
TO
OR
DER
ING
OR
INST
ALLI
NG
UN
IT
BA
THR
OO
M N
OTE
S
-BA
TH L
IGH
TIN
G T
O B
E N
ON
SC
REW
-IN F
LOR
ESC
ENT
OR
O
CC
UPA
NC
Y SE
NSO
R S
WIT
CH
- TI
LE O
VER
W.P
. MEM
BRAN
E AT
ALL
BAT
HR
OO
M
FLO
OR
S, T
YPIC
AL-
FAN
W/ D
AMPE
R T
O P
RO
VID
E (5
) AIR
CH
ANG
ES /
MIN
UTE
, TYP
. -
TILE
BAC
KER
BO
ARD
OR
FLO
ATED
MO
RTA
R (O
R
ENC
LOSU
RE
ASS
EMBL
Y) O
VER
15l
b BU
ILD
ING
PAP
ER
OVE
R W
ATER
RES
ISTA
NT
GW
B IN
TU
B &
SHO
WER
S,
TYPI
CAL
. R
UN
TIL
E TO
CEI
LIN
G U
NLE
SS O
THER
WIS
E N
OTE
D.
USE
SAN
DED
CAU
LK T
O M
ATC
H G
RO
UT
CO
LOR
AT
90
DEG
REE
CO
RN
ERS.
SEA
L AL
LSU
RFA
CES
, TYP
ICAL
GLA
ZIN
G N
OTE
:
TEM
PER
ED O
R S
AFET
Y G
LAZI
NG
AT
THE
FOLL
OW
ING
:-
IN A
LL D
OO
RS
WH
ERE
GLA
ZIN
G IS
PR
ESEN
T-
WIT
HIN
A 2
4" A
RC
OF
EITH
ER V
ERTI
CAL
ED
GE
OF
DO
OR
-AL
L TU
B AN
D S
HO
WER
EN
CLO
SUR
ES W
ITH
IN 6
0"
ABO
VE F
INIS
H F
LOO
R-
WIT
HIN
60"
ABO
VE A
STA
IR-
EXPO
SED
BO
TTO
M E
DG
ES L
ESS
THAN
18"
ABO
VE
FIN
ISH
ED F
LOO
R
STA
IR N
OTE
S
HA
ND
RA
ILS
TO
BE
36" A
BOVE
NO
SIN
G, B
RAC
KETS
IN
TO F
RAM
ING
OR
BLO
CKI
NG
; EXT
END
6" T
OP
& BO
TTO
M. 1
1/2
" DIA
MET
ER C
RO
SS-S
ECTI
ON
. RAI
L TO
W
ITH
STAN
D 2
00 P
OU
ND
S AP
PLIE
D IN
AN
Y D
IREC
TIO
N
AT A
NY
POIN
T O
N R
AIL,
TYPI
CAL
7" R
ISER
AN
D 1
1" T
REA
D. 7
.75"
MAX
IMU
M R
ISER
AN
D
10.5
" MIN
IMAL
TR
EAD
AT
PRIV
ATE
STAI
RS,
MAX
. C
ON
FIR
M W
ITH
AR
CH
ITEC
T PR
IOR
TO
INST
ALLA
TIO
N.
5/8"
TYP
E 'X
' GW
B AT
WA
LLS
AND
SO
FFIT
S O
FEN
CLO
SED
USA
BLE
SPAC
E U
ND
ER S
TAIR
S.
DR
AFT
STO
P BL
OC
KS A
T ST
RIN
GER
S W
HER
E G
WB
IS N
OT
CO
NTI
NU
OU
S BE
HIN
D S
TRIN
GER
, TYP
.
WO
OD
STA
IRS
TO B
E 1
1/8"
PLY
WO
OD
SC
REW
ED 3
" ON
C
ENTE
R A
ND
GLU
ED A
T AL
L JO
INTS
WIT
H U
ND
ERLA
YMEN
T AD
HES
IVE
A4.11
A4.11
A4.11
A4.11
45%REARYARD
STANDPIPE
1'-2"
BATH
1U
NIT
1
AVER
AGE
REA
R Y
ARD
LIN
E; R
EAR
BU
ILD
ING
WAL
L IS
O
FF S
ET (5
3sf O
VER
/UN
DER
) TO
MAT
CH
PR
EDO
MIN
ANT
REA
R Y
ARD
PAT
TER
N
A2.1
EXTE
RIO
R D
OO
R N
OTE
S:EN
TRY
DO
OR
: PR
E-H
UN
G W
ITH
INTE
GR
AL
WEA
THER
-STR
IPPI
NG
AN
D T
HR
ESH
OLD
S.
CO
MM
ERC
IAL
CLO
SER
. M
ASTE
R K
EY T
O F
IRE
LOC
K BO
X. T
YP
FIR
ST F
LOO
R P
LAN
Scal
e: 1
/4" =
1'-0
"1
A2.1
FIRST & SECOND FLOOR PLANS
9'-1
1"
BUIL
DIN
GEN
TRY
4'-8
1/2
"
82'-1
0 5/
8"
UP
(PU
BLIC
)17
r @ 6
.88"
15t @
11"
BED
3U
NIT
1
BIKE
STO
RAG
E
DEC
K
9'-5
"
4'-8
1/2
"4'
-8 1
/2"
5'-9
"5'
-9"
12'-0
" EXT
ENSI
ON
PER
Sec
136
(c)(2
5)
SEC
ON
D F
LOO
R P
LAN
Scal
e: 1
/4" =
1'-0
"2
A2.1
CLO
SET
82'-1
0 5/
8"
5'-9
"
4'-3 1/2"
DEC
K
5'-1
0 3/
4"
5'-1
0 3/
4"
17'-0
" LIG
HTW
ELL
= 12
'-9" M
INIM
UM
13'-4
"
3'-2"14
'-6 1
/8"
10'-0 7/8"
12'-1
0 3/
8"
15'-0
"12
'-3 1
/2"
14'-0"
27'-4
1/8
"
16'-1
0"12
'-0 1
/8"
5'-3"2'-4 3/4" 9'-6"
UN
IT 2
PRIV
ATE
ELEV
ATO
R
UN
IT 2
PRIV
ATE
ELEV
ATO
R
2'-2 1/2"
10'-7
3/8
"
2'-8
"
14'-10 1/8"9'-6 1/4"
9'-10" 5'-0"
4'-8
1/2
"
AVG SETBACK
OPE
N
BED
3U
NIT
1
BATH
4U
NIT
1
KITC
HEN
LIVI
NG
DIN
ING
GAR
AGE
PLAN
TER
PLAN
TER
ENTR
YU
NIT
1
BED
1U
NIT
1
6'-11 3/4"
STANDPIPE
UP
(2nd
)18
r @ 7
"17
t @ 1
1"
DOWN
DO
WN
UP
(2nd
)17
r @ 7
.0"
15t @
11"
UP
(PVT
)12
r @ 7
.30"
11t @
11"
3'-9 1/2"
CLO
SET
7'-7"4'-1 3/8"
2'-0
"
24'-4
1/8
"
2'-0"
PATI
OBE
LOW
GR
ADE
SEE
A1.1
DO
WN
10'-0 7/8"
CLO
SET
5'-9
"
87'-0
1/2
"
UN
IT 3
PRIV
ATE
ELEV
ATO
R
UNIT 3PRIVATEELEVATOR
5'-8
5/8
"5'
-8"
13'-1
1/4
"
UP
(PVT
)16
r @ 7
.25"
14t @
10.
5"
14'-6
1/8
"8'
-9"BE
D 2
UN
IT 1
BATH
2U
NIT
1
CLOSET
7'-5
1/8
"3'
-10
1/8" 7'-6 3/4"
ENTR
YBU
ILT-
IN
10'-0
"
PAN
TRY
7'-1
1 7/
8"
17
GAS
PLAT
FOR
MAT
+/-
28" A
FF
EXIT
TH
RO
UG
H G
AR
AG
E PE
R A
B02
0:
1. T
HE
ENTI
RE
GAR
AGE
AREA
AN
D A
NY
CO
VER
ED
DR
IVEW
AY A
REA
SH
ALL
BE P
RO
VID
ED W
ITH
O
RD
INAR
Y-TE
MPE
RAT
UR
E, Q
UIC
K-R
ESPO
NSE
FIR
E SP
RIN
KLE
RS
2. T
HE
PATH
OF
EXIT
TR
AVEL
TH
RO
UG
H T
HE
GAR
AGE
SHAL
L BE
3 F
EET
AND
SEP
AR
ATE
D F
RO
M T
HE
PAR
KIN
G A
REA
BY
PER
MA
NEN
T N
ON
CO
MB
UST
IBLE
R
AIL
ING
S AT
LEA
ST 3
FEE
T H
IGH
. SU
CH
RAI
LIN
GS
OR
BU
ILD
ING
WAL
LS S
HAL
L EX
TEN
D T
HE
FULL
LEN
GTH
OF
THE
PATH
WAY
ON
EAC
H S
IDE,
AN
D A
NY
RAI
LIN
GS
SHAL
L BE
SET
IN A
CO
NC
RET
E C
UR
B AT
LEA
ST 1
2 IN
CH
ES H
IGH
AN
D 8
INC
HES
TH
ICK;
AN
D3.
TH
E PA
TH O
F EX
IT T
RAV
EL T
HR
OU
GH
TH
E G
ARAG
E SH
ALL
BE P
OST
ED W
ITH
A P
ERM
ANEN
T, P
RO
MIN
ENTL
Y D
ISPL
AYE
D S
IGN
IN B
LOC
K LE
TTER
S N
OT
LESS
TH
AN 3
IN
CH
ES IN
HEI
GH
T R
EAD
ING
: "EX
IT P
ATH
. DO
NO
T O
BSTR
UC
T"; A
ND
4. A
LL D
OO
RW
AYS
OR
OPE
NIN
GS
IN T
HE
PATH
OF
EXIT
TR
AVEL
SH
ALL
BE A
MIN
IMU
M O
F TH
REE
FEE
T W
IDE.
AN
Y D
OO
R IN
STAL
LED
IN T
HE
PATH
OF
EXIT
TR
AVEL
SH
ALL
MEE
T TH
E R
EQU
IREM
ENTS
OF
SFBC
SEC
TIO
N
1008
.1; A
ND
5. T
HE
PATH
OF
EXIT
TR
AVE
L SH
ALL
BE
ILLU
MIN
ATE
D
IN A
CC
OR
DAN
CE
WIT
H S
FBC
SEC
TIO
N 1
006
SAU
NA
(BEL
OW
GR
ADE)
+233
.0
+233
.0
+ 24
2.67
+233
.03
+ 24
2.67
+240
.3
UP
(PVT
)4r
@ 7
.11"
3t @
11.
0"
UP
(PU
PLIC
)18
r @ 7
.0"
17t @
11.
0"
+ 243.17
+ 233.23
OUTDOORGAS FP
+ 24
2.67
STANDPIPE
+ 23
2.25
+ 23
3.25
6"
36"
+233
.0
+237
.0
9'-0
"
1'-6
"
PLAN
TER
6'-1
0"
CLOSETBUILT-IN
LAU
ND
RY
UN
IT 1
W/D 1W/D 2FOLDING
6'-4
1/2
"
3'-5 5/8"
2'-3
1/2
"
BATH
3U
NIT
1
OFF
ICE
UN
IT 1
4'-6"
5'-8 1/4"
10'-7
1/4
"
CLOSET
CLO
SET
CLO
SET
6'-1
1"
POW
DER
UN
IT 1
2755 McALLISTERSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94118
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL: 1168/040
E.E.
WEI
SSAr
chite
cts,
Inc
.21
Cor
te M
ader
a Av
e.M
ill Va
lley,
CA
9494
1
adm
in@
eew
eis
s.c
om
Tel
4
15.3
81.8
700
HIS
TOR
YBY
10 J
UN
E 05
SITE PERMIT SET
PLAN
NIN
G P
ERM
IT
16 J
AN 1
6
2015
.042
3.44
55
Dat
e: 6
/22/
16Ti
me:
3:4
5:23
PM
1A3.2
2A3.2
2A3.1
1
A3.1
2x6
ON
E-H
OU
R E
XTER
IOR
WAL
L: 5
/8" T
YPE
X G
WB
ON
INTE
RIO
R.
5/8"
GYP
SH
EATH
ING
O
VER
STU
DS.
BU
ILD
ING
PAP
ER O
VER
GYP
SH
EATH
ING
. EX
T T&
G P
.T. P
LYW
OO
D P
ER
STR
UC
TUR
AL.
'Z' F
LASH
ING
AT
HO
RIZ
ON
TAL
JOIN
TS.
ADD
ITIO
NAL
FIN
ISH
OVE
R P
LYW
OO
D
WH
ERE
PLYW
OO
D IS
VIS
IBLE
.
2x6
TWO
-HO
UR
WAL
LS: T
WO
LAY
ERS
5/8"
TYP
E X
EAC
H S
IDE
OF
WO
OD
STU
DS;
STA
GG
ER
SEAM
S
2x6
TWO
-HO
UR
SO
UN
D W
ALLS
: STA
GG
ER 2
x4
STU
DS
ON
2x6
PLA
TES.
SO
UN
D IN
SULA
TIO
N IN
AL
L VO
IDS.
TW
O L
AYER
S 5/
8" T
YPE
X EA
CH
SI
DE
OF
WO
OD
STU
DS;
STA
GG
ER S
EAM
S. S
EE
DET
AIL
2x6
ON
E-H
OU
R W
ALLS
: ON
E LA
YER
5/8
" TYP
E X
EAC
H S
IDE
OF
WO
OD
STU
DS
2x4
TWO
-HO
UR
WAL
LS: T
WO
LAY
ERS
5/8"
TYP
E X
EAC
H S
IDE
OF
WO
OD
STU
DS;
STA
GG
ER
SEAM
S
2x4
ON
E-H
OU
R W
ALLS
: ON
E LA
YER
5/8
" TYP
E X
EAC
H S
IDE
OF
WO
OD
STU
DS
2x4
ON
E-H
OU
R P
ARAP
ET: 3
0" M
IN. W
ALL
AT
RO
OFS
, 42"
AT
DEC
KS, W
ITH
IN 6
0" O
F PR
OPE
RTY
LIN
E. O
NE
LAYE
R 5
/8" T
YPE
X SH
EATH
ING
EAC
H S
IDE
OF
WO
OD
STU
DS,
BU
ILD
ING
PAP
ER, P
.T. P
LYW
OO
D P
ER
STR
UC
TUR
AL, E
XTER
IOR
FIN
ISH
ES W
HER
E PL
Y IS
EXP
OSE
D, N
ON
-CO
MBU
STIB
LE F
INIS
H
TOP
18")
,
WA
LL S
CH
EDU
LE
FIR
E D
EPA
RTM
ENT
NO
TES:
- FIR
E AL
ARM
SYS
TEM
PER
CBC
310
.10
AND
NFP
A 72
, 199
9 ED
ITIO
N- S
TAN
DPI
PE S
YSTE
M P
ER N
FPA
13, 1
999
EDIT
ION
- SM
OKE
DET
ECTO
RS
IN IN
CO
MM
ON
CO
RR
IDO
RS
AND
LO
BBIE
S PE
R C
FC 1
006.
2.9.
1.3
- PR
OVI
DE
STAI
RW
ELL
IDEN
TIFI
CAT
ION
SIG
NS
PER
C
BC 1
003.
3.3.
13- P
RO
VID
E LO
CKB
OX
AT B
UIL
DIN
G E
NTR
Y ;
ARR
ANG
E M
EETI
NG
WIT
H F
IRE
OFF
ICIA
L BE
FOR
E IN
STAL
LATI
ON
TO
DET
ERM
INE
LOC
ATIO
N P
ER C
FC
904.
4- E
LEVA
TOR
S TO
HAV
E R
ECAL
L AS
PAR
T O
F FI
RE
ALAR
M S
YSTE
M- P
ITC
HED
RO
OF;
NO
FIR
E D
EPAR
TMEN
T AC
CES
S
05
1015
2025
FT
GA
S FI
REP
LAC
E U
NIT
- N
OT
WO
OD
BU
RN
ING
.-
RO
UTE
FLU
E TO
TER
MIN
ATIO
N N
OT
WIT
HIN
48"
OF
PRO
PER
TY L
INE.
-M
ETAL
DR
AFT-
STO
PS A
T AL
L FL
OO
RS
AND
R
OO
FS.
1" M
INIM
UM
CLE
ARAN
CE
TO
CO
MBU
STIB
LES.
MAI
NTA
IN F
IRE
RAT
ING
FO
RTH
E AS
SEM
BLY
WH
ICH
A F
LUE
PEN
ETR
ATES
-AC
CES
SIBL
E G
AS S
HU
T-O
FF V
ALVE
.-
INST
ALL
PER
MAN
UFA
CTU
RE'
SR
ECO
MM
END
ATIO
N.
-VE
RIF
Y U
NIT
CO
MPL
IES
WIT
H T
ITLE
-24
REP
OR
TPR
IOR
TO
OR
DER
ING
OR
INST
ALLI
NG
UN
IT
BA
THR
OO
M N
OTE
S
-BA
TH L
IGH
TIN
G T
O B
E N
ON
SC
REW
-IN F
LOR
ESC
ENT
OR
O
CC
UPA
NC
Y SE
NSO
R S
WIT
CH
- TI
LE O
VER
W.P
. MEM
BRAN
E AT
ALL
BAT
HR
OO
M
FLO
OR
S, T
YPIC
AL-
FAN
W/ D
AMPE
R T
O P
RO
VID
E (5
) AIR
CH
ANG
ES /
MIN
UTE
, TYP
. -
TILE
BAC
KER
BO
ARD
OR
FLO
ATED
MO
RTA
R (O
R
ENC
LOSU
RE
ASS
EMBL
Y) O
VER
15l
b BU
ILD
ING
PAP
ER
OVE
R W
ATER
RES
ISTA
NT
GW
B IN
TU
B &
SHO
WER
S,
TYPI
CAL
. R
UN
TIL
E TO
CEI
LIN
G U
NLE
SS O
THER
WIS
E N
OTE
D.
USE
SAN
DED
CAU
LK T
O M
ATC
H G
RO
UT
CO
LOR
AT
90
DEG
REE
CO
RN
ERS.
SEA
L AL
LSU
RFA
CES
, TYP
ICAL
GLA
ZIN
G N
OTE
:
TEM
PER
ED O
R S
AFET
Y G
LAZI
NG
AT
THE
FOLL
OW
ING
:-
IN A
LL D
OO
RS
WH
ERE
GLA
ZIN
G IS
PR
ESEN
T-
WIT
HIN
A 2
4" A
RC
OF
EITH
ER V
ERTI
CAL
ED
GE
OF
DO
OR
-AL
L TU
B AN
D S
HO
WER
EN
CLO
SUR
ES W
ITH
IN 6
0"
ABO
VE F
INIS
H F
LOO
R-
WIT
HIN
60"
ABO
VE A
STA
IR-
EXPO
SED
BO
TTO
M E
DG
ES L
ESS
THAN
18"
ABO
VE
FIN
ISH
ED F
LOO
R
STA
IR N
OTE
S
HA
ND
RA
ILS
TO
BE
36" A
BOVE
NO
SIN
G, B
RAC
KETS
IN
TO F
RAM
ING
OR
BLO
CKI
NG
; EXT
END
6" T
OP
& BO
TTO
M. 1
1/2
" DIA
MET
ER C
RO
SS-S
ECTI
ON
. RAI
L TO
W
ITH
STAN
D 2
00 P
OU
ND
S AP
PLIE
D IN
AN
Y D
IREC
TIO
N
AT A
NY
POIN
T O
N R
AIL,
TYPI
CAL
7" R
ISER
AN
D 1
1" T
REA
D. 7
.75"
MAX
IMU
M R
ISER
AN
D
10.5
" MIN
IMAL
TR
EAD
AT
PRIV
ATE
STAI
RS,
MAX
. C
ON
FIR
M W
ITH
AR
CH
ITEC
T PR
IOR
TO
INST
ALLA
TIO
N.
5/8"
TYP
E 'X
' GW
B AT
WA
LLS
AND
SO
FFIT
S O
FEN
CLO
SED
USA
BLE
SPAC
E U
ND
ER S
TAIR
S.
DR
AFT
STO
P BL
OC
KS A
T ST
RIN
GER
S W
HER
E G
WB
IS N
OT
CO
NTI
NU
OU
S BE
HIN
D S
TRIN
GER
, TYP
.
WO
OD
STA
IRS
TO B
E 1
1/8"
PLY
WO
OD
SC
REW
ED 3
" ON
C
ENTE
R A
ND
GLU
ED A
T AL
L JO
INTS
WIT
H U
ND
ERLA
YMEN
T AD
HES
IVE
A4.11
A4.11
A4.11
A4.11
45%REARYARD
10'-0
"
A2.2
THIRD & FOURTH FLOOR PLANS
TIG
HT
FITT
ING
90
MIN
UTE
RAT
ED D
OO
R (W
ITH
U
L 45
0 D
EGR
EE L
ABEL
) WIT
H C
OM
MER
CIA
L AU
TOM
ATIC
CLO
SER
AN
D S
MO
KE S
EALS
AT
ALL
2-H
OU
R W
ALLS
, TYP
ICAL
DEC
K
THIR
D F
LOO
R P
LAN
Scal
e: 1
/4" =
1'-0
"1
A2.2
FOU
RTH
FLO
OR
PLA
NSc
ale:
1/4
" = 1
'-0"
2A2
.2
UNIT 3PRIVATEELEVATOR
UNIT 3PRIVATEELEVATOR
13'-1
0 5/
8"10
'-6"
16'-7
3/4
"
13'-2
3/8
"
14'-9
3/4
"
13'-4
"10
'-3"
10'-8
7/8
"
2'-8
"13
'-9 1
/4"
2'-3
1/2
"11
'-3 3
/8"
3'-6" 9'-6"
13'-0"
3'-11 1/8"
6'-1
3/8
"16
'-6"
13'-4
"
5'-8
5/8
"17
'-4 1
/8"
14'-0"10'-1 1/8"
2'-8
"
14'-10 1/8"9'-6 1/4"
9'-10" 5'-0"
4'-8
1/2
"
5'-5
1/2
"2'
-3 1
/2"
10'-3 1/2"
DN
(2nd
)
UN
IT 2
PRIV
ATE
ELEV
ATO
R
UN
IT 2
PRIV
ATE
ELEV
ATO
R
7'-4
3/4
"
7'-0
3/4
"
9'-7
1/4
"
14'-10 1/8"9'-6 1/4"
9'-10" 5'-0"
4'-8
1/2
"
3rd
FL E
XIT
SEP:
16'
-7"
EXIT
: 37'
-10"
TOTA
L EX
IT U
NIT
2:
24'
-8" +
41'
-0"=
65'
-8"
EXIT
: 46'
-3"
EXIT: 24'-8"
EXIT
: 16'
-11"
TOTA
L EX
IT U
NIT
3:
46'
-3" +
16'
-11"
= 63
'-2"
UP
15r @
7.7
4"13
t @ 1
0.5"
UP
16r @
7.2
5"12
t @ 1
0.5"
DO
WN
(PU
BLIC
)
KITC
HEN
LIVI
NG
DIN
ING
BED
1U
NIT
3
BATH
1U
NIT
3
BED
3U
NIT
3
STU
DY
UN
IT 3
BED
2U
NIT
2
ENTR
YU
NIT
3
ENTR
YU
NIT
2BE
D 1
UN
IT 2
BATH
1U
NIT
2
STANDPIPE
2'-0" 2'-0"
DO
WN
UP
17r @
7.5
8"13
t @ 1
0.5"
10'-0" BAY WINDOW
CLOSET
CLOSET
STU
DY
UN
IT 2
LIVI
NG
DIN
ING
CLO
SET
BATH
2U
NIT
2
CLO
SET
10'-1
"
2'-8
"
5'-1
0 3/
4"
3'-2"
5'-8
5/8
"5'
-10
3/4"
3'-2"
5'-8
"13
'-1 1
/4"
7'-1
"5'
-8"
13'-1
1/4
"
SOLI
D R
AIL
SOLI
D R
AIL
GLASS RAIL
TRAN
SOM
WIN
DO
W:
68" S
ILL
HEI
GH
T M
IN
BATH
2U
NIT
3W
/D
KITC
HEN
10'-3 1/2"
5'-7
"
MAX
EXI
T: 4
7'-3
"1/
3 O
F M
AX =
15'
-9"
LAU
ND
RY
+ 25
3.09
+ 26
2.76
+ 26
2.76
RO
OF
STANDPIPE
36"
CLO
SET
POW
DER
UN
IT 3
5'-4 3/4"
UP
17r @
7.5
8"13
t @ 1
0.5"
DOWN
CLO
SET
UP
17r @
7.0
"15
t @ 1
1.0"
6'-1
5/8
"10
'-6 7
/8"
17
STANDPIPE
DOWN
3'-6
1/4
"8'
-7 1
/2"
CLO
SET
CLO
SET
CLO
SET
PAR
APET
MAX
EXI
TIN
G: 4
1'-0
"1/
3 O
F M
AX =
13'
-8"
PAN
TRY
2755 McALLISTERSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94118
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL: 1168/040
E.E.
WEI
SSAr
chite
cts,
Inc
.21
Cor
te M
ader
a Av
e.M
ill Va
lley,
CA
9494
1
adm
in@
eew
eis
s.c
om
Tel
4
15.3
81.8
700
HIS
TOR
YBY
10 J
UN
E 05
SITE PERMIT SET
PLAN
NIN
G P
ERM
IT
16 J
AN 1
6
2015
.042
3.44
55
Dat
e: 6
/22/
16Ti
me:
3:4
5:23
PM
ROOF PLAN, DETAILS A2.3
RO
OF
PLAN
Scal
e: 1
/4" =
1'-0
"1
A2.3
DEC
KBE
LOW
RO
OF
DEC
K19
4 sf
RO
OF
DEC
K16
6 sf
A4.11
A4.11
DO
WN
MEC
H
MEC
H
5'-0" MIN
DOWN
LOW
PIT
CH
RO
OF
OVE
R S
TAIR
BEL
OW
+ 27
3.0
RO
OF
+ 27
3.5
DEC
K
+ 273.0 ROOF+ 273.5 DECK
DDOO
WWNN
DDOO
WWNN
RO
OF
HAT
CH
+/- 42"WALL
BUILT-INGRILL
18
STANDPIPE
8'-1
" EXI
T SE
PAR
ATIO
N
MAX
EXI
TIN
G: 2
2'-6
"1/
3 O
F M
AX =
7'-6
"
11'-1
" EXI
T SE
PAR
ATIO
N
77'-2
3/4
"
16'-5
7/8
"18
'-8 1
/8"
13'-1
1/2
"6'
-2 1
/4"
35'-2
"
48'-3
1/4
"5'
-8 1
/4"
7'-6
3/8
"
4'-7
3/4
"8'
-2"
5'-2
1/8
"
BUILT-INGRILL
MAX
EXI
TIN
G: 1
9'-6
"1/
3 O
F M
AX =
6'-6
"
BAR
REL
VAU
LT
PRO
PER
TYLI
NE
60" MIN
BAR
REL
VAU
LT
BAR
REL
VAU
LT
RO
OF
OVE
R S
TAIR
S
SKYL
IGH
TSK
YLIG
HT
SKYL
IGH
TSK
YLIG
HT
SKYL
IGH
T
SKYLIGHTSKYLIGHT
2755 McALLISTERSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94118
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL: 1168/040
E.E.
WEI
SSAr
chite
cts,
Inc
.21
Cor
te M
ader
a Av
e.M
ill Va
lley,
CA
9494
1
adm
in@
eew
eis
s.c
om
Tel
4
15.3
81.8
700
HIS
TOR
YBY
10 J
UN
E 05
SITE PERMIT SET
PLAN
NIN
G P
ERM
IT
16 J
AN 1
6
2015
.042
3.44
55
Dat
e: 6
/22/
16Ti
me:
3:4
5:23
PM
EXISTING ELEVATIONS A3.0
A3.0
EXISTING ELEVATIONS
EXIS
TIN
G S
OU
TH (Y
ARD
) ELE
VATI
ON
2A3
.0EX
ISTI
NG
NO
RTH
(STR
EET)
ELE
VATI
ON
1A3
.0
EXIS
TIN
G E
AST
ELEV
ATIO
N4
A3.0
EXIS
TIN
G W
EST
ELEV
ATIO
N3
A3.0
2755 McALLISTERSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94118
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL: 1168/040
E.E.
WEI
SSAr
chite
cts,
Inc
.21
Cor
te M
ader
a Av
e.M
ill Va
lley,
CA
9494
1
adm
in@
eew
eis
s.c
om
Tel
4
15.3
81.8
700
HIS
TOR
YBY
10 J
UN
E 05
SITE PERMIT SET
PLAN
NIN
G P
ERM
IT
16 J
AN 1
6
2015
.042
3.44
55
Dat
e: 6
/22/
16Ti
me:
3:4
5:23
PM
8'-6"1'-2"9'-3"1'-2"8'-6"1'-2"9'-3"1'-0"
40'-0"
233.
0
242.
67
253.
09
262.
76
273.
0
SOU
TH E
LEVA
TIO
NSc
ale:
1/4
" = 1
'-0"
2A2
.3A3
.1
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
SOU
TH E
LEVA
TIO
NSc
ale:
1/4
" = 1
'-0"
2A2
.3
ILLU
MIN
ATED
HO
USE
NU
MBE
R
AIPH
ON
E O
R S
IM. V
IDEO
EN
TRY
SYST
EM
FRONT & REAR ELEVATIONS
GU
AR
DR
AIL
NO
TES:
42" M
IN. H
EIG
HT
ABO
VE H
IGH
EST
FLO
OR
/DEC
K LE
VEL;
SPA
CE
ALL
INTE
RM
EDIA
TE R
AILS
TO
PR
EVEN
T A
4" S
PHER
E FR
OM
PAS
SIN
G
THR
OU
GH
RAI
L.
NO
TE: A
LL E
XPO
SED
WO
OD
TO
BE
RED
WO
OD
OR
PR
ESSU
RE
TREA
TED
LU
MBE
R, T
YPIC
AL
NO
RTH
(STR
EET)
ELE
VATI
ON
Scal
e: 1
/4" =
1'-0
"1
A3.1
EXTE
RIO
R F
ENES
TRAT
ION
AN
D
FIN
ISH
ES T
O M
EET
U-F
ACTO
R IN
TI
TLE
-24
ENER
GY
REP
OR
T,
TYPI
CAL
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
ELEVATION STEPS BACK 10' ELEVATION STEPS FORWARD 12'
21 22 23 25 26 27 28 29
STO
NE
TILE
- LI
MES
TON
E O
R S
IMIL
AR
STEE
L TR
OW
EL IN
TEG
RAL
CO
LOR
STU
CC
O (L
A H
ABR
A O
R S
IMIL
AR)
PAIN
TED
GAL
VAN
IZED
FLA
SHIN
G
WO
OD
T&G
SID
ING
WIN
DO
WS
AND
DO
OR
S, B
RO
NZE
ALU
MIN
UM
SOLI
D R
AIL
- FIN
ISH
TO
MAT
CH
AD
JAC
ENT
GLA
SS R
AIL
- PAN
EL N
O L
ARG
ER T
HAN
24s
f FO
R B
IRD
SAFE
CO
MPL
IAN
CE
OVE
RH
ANG
- PO
WD
ER C
OAT
ED M
ETAL
WIT
H S
TAIN
LESS
STE
EL A
DD
RES
S LE
TTER
S
PRO
PER
TY L
INE
BLIN
D W
ALL:
PR
ESSU
RE
TREA
TED
PLY
WO
OD
BAR
REL
VAU
LT R
OO
F BE
HIN
D P
ARAP
ET
22
FIN
ISH
SC
HED
ULE
40'-0"
3'-7 1/2"
5'-8"
22
24
GLA
SS R
AIL
PAN
ELS
NO
LA
RG
ER T
HAN
25s
f FO
R B
IRD
SA
FE R
EGU
LATI
ON
, TYP
ICAL
25
NAT
UR
AL G
RAD
E
27
2127
55BL
IND
DO
OR
24
8'-0"
2755 McALLISTERSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94118
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL: 1168/040
E.E.
WEI
SSAr
chite
cts,
Inc
.21
Cor
te M
ader
a Av
e.M
ill Va
lley,
CA
9494
1
adm
in@
eew
eis
s.c
om
Tel
4
15.3
81.8
700
HIS
TOR
YBY
10 J
UN
E 05
SITE PERMIT SET
PLAN
NIN
G P
ERM
IT
16 J
AN 1
6
2015
.042
3.44
55
Dat
e: 6
/22/
16Ti
me:
3:4
5:23
PM
PRO
PER
TY L
INE
WAL
L N
OTE
S1
ALL
WAL
LS W
ITH
IN 3
6" O
F PR
OPE
RTY
LIN
E TO
BE
ON
E-H
OU
R; C
ON
TIN
UO
US
5/8"
GW
B BO
TH S
IDE
OF
WAL
LS.
FIR
E TA
PE W
HER
E T
ON
GU
E AN
D G
RO
VE N
OT
USE
D.
2D
ECAY
RES
ISTA
NT
FIN
ISH
ES; R
EDW
OO
D, C
EDAR
PR
ESSU
RE
TREA
TED
PLY
WO
OD
, TYP
. AC
CES
SIBL
E SI
DES
M
AY H
AVE
AN A
DD
ITIO
NAL
LAY
ER O
F SI
DIN
G.
3'Z
' BAR
FLA
SHIN
G A
T AL
L H
OR
IZO
NTA
L N
ON
-LAP
PED
SE
AMS.
4EX
POSE
D W
ALLS
TO
BE
FIN
ISH
ED; M
ETAL
OR
C
EMEN
TIO
US
SID
ING
WIT
H M
AIN
TEN
ANC
E FR
EE F
INIS
H
SIDE ELEVATIONS A3.2
EAST
ELE
VATI
ON
Scal
e: 1
/8" =
1'-0
"2
A3.2
WES
T EL
EVAT
ION
Scal
e: 1
/8" =
1'-0
"1
A3.2
EXTE
RIO
R F
ENES
TRAT
ION
AN
D F
INIS
HES
TO
M
EET
U-F
ACTO
R IN
TIT
LE -2
4 EN
ERG
Y R
EPO
RT,
TYP
ICAL
HIG
H P
RO
FILE
WIN
DO
W S
ECTI
ON
3A3
.2
OU
TLIN
E O
F N
EIG
HBO
RIN
G
BUIL
DIN
G S
HO
WN
DAS
HED
8'-6"1'-2"9'-3"1'-2"8'-6"1'-2"9'-3"1'-0"
40'-0"
10'-0
"
40'-0"
30'-0"
8'-6"1'-2"9'-3"1'-2"8'-6"1'-2"9'-3"1'-0"
40'-0"
10'-0
"
40'-0"
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29FIN
ISH
SC
HED
ULE
29
29
24
24
STO
NE
TILE
- LI
MES
TON
E O
R S
IMIL
AR
STEE
L TR
OW
EL IN
TEG
RAL
CO
LOR
STU
CC
O (L
A H
ABR
A O
R S
IMIL
AR)
PAIN
TED
GAL
VAN
IZED
FLA
SHIN
G
WO
OD
T&G
SID
ING
WIN
DO
WS
AND
DO
OR
S, B
RO
NZE
ALU
MIN
UM
SOLI
D R
AIL
- FIN
ISH
TO
MAT
CH
AD
JAC
ENT
GLA
SS R
AIL
- PAN
EL N
O L
ARG
ER T
HAN
24s
f FO
R B
IRD
SAFE
CO
MPL
IAN
CE
OVE
RH
ANG
- PO
WD
ER C
OAT
ED M
ETAL
WIT
H S
TAIN
LESS
STE
EL A
DD
RES
S LE
TTER
S
PRO
PER
TY L
INE
BLIN
D W
ALL:
PR
ESSU
RE
TREA
TED
PLY
WO
OD
2755 McALLISTERSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94118
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL: 1168/040
E.E.
WEI
SSAr
chite
cts,
Inc
.21
Cor
te M
ader
a Av
e.M
ill Va
lley,
CA
9494
1
adm
in@
eew
eis
s.c
om
Tel
4
15.3
81.8
700
HIS
TOR
YBY
10 J
UN
E 05
SITE PERMIT SET
PLAN
NIN
G P
ERM
IT
16 J
AN 1
6
2015
.042
3.44
55
Dat
e: 6
/22/
16Ti
me:
3:4
5:23
PM
8'-6"1'-2"9'-3"1'-2"8'-6"1'-2"9'-3"1'-0"
40'-0"
233.
0
242.
67
253.
09
262.
76
273.
0
A4.1
LONGITUDINAL SECTION
LON
GIT
UD
INAL
SEC
TIO
NSc
ale:
1/4
" = 1
'-0"
1A4
.1
FIR
E R
ATI
NG
AN
D C
ON
STR
UC
TIO
N T
YPE
KEY
TYPE
V: 1
-HO
UR
(MIN
IMU
M R
ATIN
G) W
ALL
& C
EILI
NG
TYPE
V: 2
-HO
UR
WAL
LS A
ND
CEI
LIN
G
1009
.16
Stai
rway
to ro
of.
In b
uild
ings
four
or m
ore
stor
ies
abov
e gr
ade
plan
e, o
ne s
tairw
ay s
hall
exte
nd to
the
roof
sur
-fa
ce, u
nles
s th
e ro
of h
as a
slo
pest
eepe
r tha
n fo
ur u
nits
ver
ti-ca
l in
12 u
nits
hor
izon
tal (
33-p
erce
nt s
lope
). In
bui
ldin
gsw
ithou
t an
occu
pied
roof
, acc
ess
to th
e ro
of fr
om th
e to
pst
ory
shal
l be
perm
itted
to b
e by
an
alte
rnat
ing
tread
dev
ice. 40'-0"
UN
IT 3
UN
IT 1
4:12
PIT
CH
ED R
OO
F
2'-10"2'-10"
GAR
AGE
40' H
EIG
HT
LIM
IT
UN
IT 2
CO
MM
ON
LOBB
Y
30'-0"
40'-0"
10'-0
"
2755 McALLISTERSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94118
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL: 1168/040
E.E.
WEI
SSAr
chite
cts,
Inc
.21
Cor
te M
ader
a Av
e.M
ill Va
lley,
CA
9494
1
adm
in@
eew
eis
s.c
om
Tel
4
15.3
81.8
700
HIS
TOR
YBY
10 J
UN
E 05
SITE PERMIT SET
PLAN
NIN
G P
ERM
IT
16 J
AN 1
6
2015
.042
3.44
55
Dat
e: 6
/22/
16Ti
me:
3:4
5:23
PM
Public Comment