conceptualizing the maker - presentation

96
MAKER Empowering personal identity through creative appropriation Binaebi Akah Advised by Shaowen Bardzell April 20, 2010 HCI/d, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University Conceptualizing the

Upload: binaebi-akah

Post on 27-Jan-2015

117 views

Category:

Design


4 download

DESCRIPTION

This research thesis attempts to define an existing subset of end users as makers. These makers bridge the gaps between technological gadgets, creative appropriation, and identity through their bricolage of hacking, crafting, online tutorials, and the materials and knowledge ready at hand. Further, in studying makers this thesis refers to the exploding online and offline culture of Steampunk as a case study. What can the field of Human-computer Interaction learn from the Steampunk makers? What will you, as an interaction designer, do to empower and facilitate such personally identifiable creative acts? What will you do to make appropriation possible?

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

MAKEREmpower ing persona l ident i ty through creat ive appropr ia t ion

Binaebi AkahAdvised by Shaowen Bardzell

April 20, 2010HCI/d, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University

Conceptualizingthe

Page 2: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

2

“Products can be more than the sum of the functions they perform. Their real value can be in fulfilling people’s emotional needs, and one of the most important needs of all is to establish one’s self-image and one’s place in the world.”

Norman, D. 2005. Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York, NY.

Page 3: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

3

“Products can be more than the sum of the functions they perform. Their real value can be in fulfilling people’s emotional needs, and one of the most important needs of all is to establish one’s self-image and one’s place in the world.”

Norman, D. 2005. Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York, NY.

Page 4: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

4

“Products can be more than the sum of the functions they perform. Their real value can be in fulfilling people’s emotional needs, and one of the most important needs of all is to establish one’s self-image and one’s place in the world.”

Norman, D. 2005. Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York, NY.

Page 5: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

5

“Products can be more than the sum of the functions they perform. Their real value can be in fulfilling people’s emotional needs, and one of the most important needs of all is to establish one’s self-image and one’s place in the world.”

Norman, D. 2005. Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York, NY.

Page 6: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

6

“Products can be more than the sum of the functions they perform. Their real value can be in fulfilling people’s emotional needs, and one of the most important needs of all is to establish one’s self-image and one’s place in the world.”

Norman, D. 2005. Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York, NY.

Page 7: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

7

“Products can be more than the sum of the functions they perform. Their real value can be in fulfilling people’s emotional needs, and one of the most important needs of all is to establish one’s self-image and one’s place in the world.”

Norman, D. 2005. Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York, NY.

Page 8: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

8

Framework

Page 9: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation
Page 10: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation
Page 11: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

11

“Designers are seen as creative people, often indistinguishable from artists.”

Gross, M. D. and Do, E. Y. 2007. Design, art, craft, science: making and creativity. SoD '07, vol. 364. ACM, New York, NY, 9-11.

Page 12: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation
Page 13: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation
Page 14: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation
Page 15: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation
Page 16: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation
Page 17: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation
Page 18: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation
Page 19: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

19

Perfect designs = perfect users

Page 20: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation
Page 21: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation
Page 22: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation
Page 23: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation
Page 24: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

24

Who is this “Maker?”

Page 25: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

25

Personal Identity

Appropriation

Steampunk

Maker

Page 26: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

26

Personal Identity

Page 27: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

27

Leary, M. 2004. Editorial: what is the self? A plea for clarity. In Self and Identity 3, 1-3.

Self

“Person”

“Personality”

Self-as-subject

Self-as-object

Self-as-doer

Page 28: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

28

Leary, M. 2004. Editorial: what is the self? A plea for clarity. In Self and Identity 3, 1-3.

Self

“Person”

“Personality”

Self-as-subject

Self-as-object

Self-as-doer

Page 29: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

29

Self-as-

object

Experiences

Characteristics

Thoughts

Behaviors

Page 30: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

30

Identity The unique set of experiences, characteristics, thoughts, behaviors, etc, recognizably defining an individual or community, and the relationships between them.

Leary, M. 2004. Editorial: what is the self? A plea for clarity. In Self and Identity 3, 1-3.

Markus, H., and Kitayama, S. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. In Psychological Review 98 (2), 224-253.

Oring, E. 1994. The arts, artifacts, and artifices of identity. In The Journal of American Folklore 107 (424), 211-233.

Page 31: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation
Page 32: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation
Page 33: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

33

Appropriation

Page 34: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

34

Buechley, L., Rosner, D. K., Paulos, E., and Williams, A. 2009. DIY for CHI: methods, communities, and values of reuse and customization. CHI EA '09. ACM, New York, NY.

Carroll, J., Howard, S., Vetere, F., Peck, J., and Murphy, J. 2001. Identity, power and fragmentation in cyberspace: technology appropriation by young people. In ACIS 2001 Proceedings. Paper 6.

Page 35: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

35

Buechley, L., Rosner, D. K., Paulos, E., and Williams, A. 2009. DIY for CHI: methods, communities, and values of reuse and customization. CHI EA '09. ACM, New York, NY.

Carroll, J., Howard, S., Vetere, F., Peck, J., and Murphy, J. 2001. Identity, power and fragmentation in cyberspace: technology appropriation by young people. In ACIS 2001 Proceedings. Paper 6.

Integration into one’s life

Creative customization

Page 36: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

36

Buechley, L., Rosner, D. K., Paulos, E., and Williams, A. 2009. DIY for CHI: methods, communities, and values of reuse and customization. CHI EA '09. ACM, New York, NY.

Carroll, J., Howard, S., Vetere, F., Peck, J., and Murphy, J. 2001. Identity, power and fragmentation in cyberspace: technology appropriation by young people. In ACIS 2001 Proceedings. Paper 6.

Integration into one’s life

Creative customization

Page 37: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

37

Buechley, L., Rosner, D. K., Paulos, E., and Williams, A. 2009. DIY for CHI: methods, communities, and values of reuse and customization. CHI EA '09. ACM, New York, NY.

Carroll, J., Howard, S., Vetere, F., Peck, J., and Murphy, J. 2001. Identity, power and fragmentation in cyberspace: technology appropriation by young people. In ACIS 2001 Proceedings. Paper 6.

Integration into one’s life

Creative customization

Page 38: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

38

Creative customization and/or appropriation makes an object a creation of one’s self rather than the creation of some “other.”Odom, W. and Pierce, J. 2009. Improving with age: designing enduring interactive products. CHI EA '09. ACM, New York, NY.

Rosner, D. and Ryokai, K. 2008. Weaving memories into handcrafted artifacts with Spyn. CHI EA ‘08. ACM, New York, NY

Page 39: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

39

“People show social relationships as well as their own history with the objects they own.”

Ahde, P. 2007. Appropriation by adornments: personalization makes the everyday life more pleasant. DPPI '07. ACM, New York, NY, 148-157.

Page 40: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

40

Appropriation The act of adapting an object to oneself in a way that not only redefines the object, but also relates the object to one’s sense of self. Ahde, P. 2007. Appropriation by adornments: personalization makes the everyday life more pleasant. DPPI ‘07. ACM, New York, NY, 148-157.

Dix, A. 2007. Designing for appropriation. BCS-CHI ‘07. BCS, Swinton, UK, 27-30.

March, W., Jacobs, M., and Salvador, T. 2005. Designing technology for community appropriation. CHI EA ‘05. ACM, New York, NY, 2126-2127.

McCarthy, J. and Wright, P. 2004. Technology as experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Salovaara, A. 2009. Studying appropriation of everyday technologies: a cognitive approach. CHI EA ‘09. ACM, New York, NY, 3141-3144.

Wakkary, R. and Maestri, L. 2007. The resourcefulness of everyday design. C&C ‘07. ACM, New York, NY, 163-172.

Page 41: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation
Page 42: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation
Page 43: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

43

Appropriation

Personal Identity

Page 44: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

44

Appropriation

Personal Identity

Case study: Steampunk

Page 45: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Artifacts

Interviews

Blogs

DeviantArt

Flickr

Etsy

45

Case Study:

Steampunk

Page 46: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

46

Artifacts

Interviews

Blogs

DeviantArt

Flickr

Etsy

Page 47: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Artifacts

Interviews

Blogs

DeviantArt

Flickr

Etsy

47

Fleming Model

Fleming, E. 1974. Artifact study: a proposed model. In Winterthur Portfolio 9 (1974), 153-173.

Page 48: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Artifacts

Interviews

Blogs

DeviantArt

Flickr

Etsy

48

Fleming ModelIdentificationEvaluationCultural AnalysisInterpretation

Fleming, E. 1974. Artifact study: a proposed model. In Winterthur Portfolio 9 (1974), 153-173.

Page 49: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Artifacts

Interviews

Blogs

DeviantArt

Flickr

Etsy

49

“Futuristic technological interpretation of the past.”

Steampunk costume player

Page 50: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

50

http://www.oldtimecomputer.com/oldtimecomputer/home.htmlFleming, E. 1974. Artifact study: a proposed model. In Winterthur Portfolio 9 (1974), 153-173.

Page 51: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Artifacts

Interviews

Blogs

DeviantArt

Flickr

Etsy

51

Insights

Affordability

Page 52: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Artifacts

Interviews

Blogs

DeviantArt

Flickr

Etsy

52

“Pull something out of the trash, experiment, rip out the parts until you know how to fix it.”

Steampunk inventor/artist

Page 53: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

53

http://www.nifnaks.com/chatterings-blog/rugged-femininity-my-new-work-corset-21.htmlFleming, E. 1974. Artifact study: a proposed model. In Winterthur Portfolio 9 (1974), 153-173.

Page 54: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Artifacts

Interviews

Blogs

DeviantArt

Flickr

Etsy

54

Insights

AffordabilityExperimentation

Page 55: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Artifacts

Interviews

Blogs

DeviantArt

Flickr

Etsy

55

“I can’t understand how a computer chip works. But I can conceptualize a watch, and it’s amazing.”

Steampunk digital artist

Page 56: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

56

http://www.instructables.com/id/steampunk-keyboard/Fleming, E. 1974. Artifact study: a proposed model. In Winterthur Portfolio 9 (1974), 153-173.

Page 57: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Artifacts

Interviews

Blogs

DeviantArt

Flickr

Etsy

57

Insights

AffordabilityExperimentationLearning

Page 58: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Artifacts

Interviews

Blogs

DeviantArt

Flickr

Etsy

58

“The Victorians made everyday objects beautiful.”

Steampunk seamstress

Page 59: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

59

http://steampunkworkshop.com/keyboard.shtmlFleming, E. 1974. Artifact study: a proposed model. In Winterthur Portfolio 9 (1974), 153-173.

Page 60: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Artifacts

Interviews

Blogs

DeviantArt

Flickr

Etsy

60

Insights

AffordabilityExperimentationLearningModification

Page 61: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Artifacts

Interviews

Blogs

DeviantArt

Flickr

Etsy

61

“The computer is this sad lump of beige plastic and metal. It should look like its importance.”

Steampunk inventor/artist

Page 62: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

62

http://steampunkworkshop.com/wooden-steampunk-keyboard-modFleming, E. 1974. Artifact study: a proposed model. In Winterthur Portfolio 9 (1974), 153-173.

Page 63: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Artifacts

Interviews

Blogs

DeviantArt

Flickr

Etsy

63

Insights

AffordabilityExperimentationLearningModificationSuggestion

Page 64: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Artifacts

Interviews

Blogs

DeviantArt

Flickr

Etsy

64

“Steampunk is growing to encapsulate the maker’s DIY creative grungy appreciation for tangible items.”

Steampunk costumer

Page 65: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

65

http://www.thebestcasescenario.com/forum/showthread.php?t=16924Fleming, E. 1974. Artifact study: a proposed model. In Winterthur Portfolio 9 (1974), 153-173.

Page 66: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Artifacts

Interviews

Blogs

DeviantArt

Flickr

Etsy

66

Insights

AffordabilityExperimentationLearningModificationSuggestionTransparency

Page 67: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Artifacts

Interviews

Blogs

DeviantArt

Flickr

Etsy

67

“The maker culture is bigger than and supersedes Steampunk.”

Steampunk inventor/artist

Page 68: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

68

Conceptualizing the Maker

Page 69: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

69

Makers see technological artifacts as “creative resources.”

Wakkary, R. and Maestri, L. 2007. The resourcefulness of everyday design. C&C '07. ACM, New York, NY, 163-172.

Page 70: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

70

ArtifactUtilize

Interpret

Alter

Adapt

Explore

Page 71: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

71

Gross, M. D. and Do, E. Y. 2007. Design, art, craft, science: making and creativity. SoD '07, vol. 364. ACM, New York, NY, 9-11.

ArtifactUtiliz

e

“Knowledge of materials is fundamental to making.”

Page 72: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

72

Janlert, L. and Stolterman, E. 1997. The character of things. In Design Studies 18, (1997), 297-314).

Artifact

Interpret

“Manipulate the [artifact] to

evoke emotions or induce beliefs.”

Page 73: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

73

Buechley, L., Rosner, D. K., Paulos, E., and Williams, A. 2009. DIY for CHI: methods, communities, and values of reuse and customization. CHI EA '09. ACM, New York, NY, 4823-4826.

Artifact

Alter

“Improve rather

than deteriorat

e with age.”

Page 74: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

74

Galloway, A., Brucker-Cohen, J., Gaye, L., Goodman, E., and Hill, D. 2004. Design for hackability. DIS '04. ACM, New York, NY, 363-366.

Artifact

Adapt

“Create spaces for play.”

Page 75: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

75

Carroll, J., Howard, S., Vetere, F., Peck, J., and Murphy, J. 2001. Identity, power and fragmentation in cyberspace: technology appropriation by young people. In ACIS 2001 Proceedings. Paper 6.

Artifact

Explore

“‘Unpack’ the parts or functions.”

Page 76: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

76

Summary

Page 77: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation
Page 78: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

78

Personal Identity

Appropriation Steampunk Maker

Page 79: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

79

Personal Identity

Appropriation Steampunk Maker

ExperiencesCharacteristicsThoughtsBehaviors

Page 80: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

80

Personal Identity

Appropriation Steampunk Maker

DeconstructsConstructsShapesConditions

Page 81: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

81

Personal Identity

Appropriation Steampunk Maker

Page 82: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

82

Personal Identity

Appropriation Steampunk Maker

Page 83: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

83

Personal Identity

Appropriation Steampunk Maker

Page 84: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

84

Personal Identity

Appropriation Steampunk Maker

Page 85: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

85

Personal Identity

Appropriation Steampunk Maker

Page 86: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

In short…

Page 87: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Designing for design empowers appropriation. Let’s create a dialogue with which makers can engage.

Page 88: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Designing for design empowers appropriation. Let’s create a dialogue with which makers can engage.

Page 89: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Designing for design empowers appropriation. Let’s create a dialogue with which makers can engage.

Page 90: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Designing for design empowers appropriation. Let’s create a dialogue with which makers can engage.

Page 91: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Acknowledgements

Page 92: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation
Page 93: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Thanks.

Page 94: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Questions?

Page 95: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Existing Examples in the Wild• Utilize• Interpret• Alter• Adapt• Explore

• Amazon.com• Twitter• Gmail, iGoogle• Adobe toolbars• Wikipedia

Page 96: Conceptualizing the Maker - Presentation

Limitation of the Study

• 9 interview subjects• Approximately 15 artifact analyses