concept of "teknopolitan"
Post on 20-Oct-2014
690 views
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
CompanyLOGO
Tommy MonoarfaPPKDT-BPPT
LOGO
It is not what fields a state competes in that determines its prosperity, but howproductively it competes (Michael Porter)
Agenda
� Introduction
� Concept and Development Stages : lesson and learn
- Definition
- Types of Development : science park, technopolis, innovation cluster
� Analysis Framework
2www.themeart.com
� Analysis Framework
- Functions and elements of science park development
- Analysis Framework
� Case Study: Daedeok Innopolis
� Teknopolitan: The Proposed concept of Development
� Financing Teknopolitan activities (next presentation)
Tommy Monoarfa
Introduction
Why need science park, technopolis(teknopolitan),And innovation clusters?
Andrew Dearing, “Enabling Europe to innovate”, SCIENCE, 19 January 2007
3www.themeart.com
Competitiveness depends on the created assets such as a highly skilled/educated and flexible workforce and appropriate supporting infrastructure (SW/HW) like STPs, Technopolises, and Innovation Clusters, and States or regions compete to offer the most productive environment for business
Tommy Monoarfa
Introduction
� Technopark originated in 1950 with the wishes ofentrepreneurial minded university academicians inthe U.S.A. who wanted to convert their knowledgeand R&D findings into economical values namelyproduction and marketing.
4www.themeart.com
production and marketing.
� The first technopark was founded with the leadership of Stanford University in California. Today it’sfamously known as Silicon Valley which employed about 200,000 highly qualified people earninghigh salaries work in designing and producing highadded value products
Tommy Monoarfa
Introduction
� "Business Week" August 18-25, 1997 there are 7,000electronics and software companies and thousands ofstartups, with 11 companies being created every weekall in 80 km long technology corridor.
� on average, a Valley company went public every 5 days
5www.themeart.com
� on average, a Valley company went public every 5 days, making 62 millionaires every day.
� Creating new knowledge that will lead to newinventions and innovations which attracting investors’sattention and accumulate their support in order to addeconomical value.
Tommy Monoarfa
Introduction
� A technology park brings together the government, the academic community, the business and financial sector (triple helix) in a well planned development which integrates all necessary facilities such as commercial buildings, research facilities, resi
6www.themeart.com
ch as commercial buildings, research facilities, residences, recreational areas, hotels and conference centers.
Tommy Monoarfa
Introduction
� In later state, it also called as High-tech clusters ,innovation clusters . These type of clusters arehigh technology oriented business environment,
7www.themeart.com
high technology oriented business environment,well suited to the knowledge economy, and typically have a core renowned university and researchcenters like in silicon valley .
Tommy Monoarfa
Introduction
� Science Park/ Technopolis / Innovation Cluster
Regional and national competitiveness is often decided by these Science park / Technopolis
8www.themeart.com
decided by these Science park / Technopolis / Innovation clusters which will be provided with an applicability for development policy and insight to regional and national competitiveness
Tommy Monoarfa
Introduction
� Important issues: dynamics of their creation andsupport mechanisms how effective it can be asan instrument of regional innovation policy andfor stimulating technology-led economic deve
9www.themeart.com
for stimulating technology-led economic development
� Science parks are mainly local initiatives, backed by the management of towns, cities and economic regions. This “bottom-up” approach makes defining national policy in this area more difficult.
Tommy Monoarfa
Introduction
According to the management paradigm (Regis Cabral 1990),a science park must;
� Have access to qualified research and development personnel inthe areas of knowledge in which the park has its identity.
� Be able to market its high valued products and services.� Have the capability to provide marketing expertise and managerial
10www.themeart.com
� Have the capability to provide marketing expertise and managerialskills to firms, particularly SME which lacking such a resource.
� Be inserted in a society that allows for the protection of productor process secrets, via patents, security or any other means.
� Be able to select or reject which firms enter the park. The firm'sbusiness plan is expected to be coherent with the science parkidentity.
� Have a clear identity, quite often expressed symbolically, as thepark's name choice, its logo or the management discourse.
Introduction
� Have a management with established or recognized expertise in financial matters, and which has presented longterm economic development plans.
� Have the backing of powerful, dynamic and stable economic actors, such as a funding agency, political institution orlocal university
11www.themeart.com
local university� Include in its management an active person of vision, with
power of decision and with high and visible profile, who isperceived by relevant actors in society as embodying theinterface between academia and industry, long-term plansand good management.
� Include a prominent percentage of consultancy firms, aswell as technical service firms, including laboratories andquality control firms
12www.themeart.com
Tommy Monoarfa
Definition of Technopark
� is on an appealing land and contains beautiful architectural buildings scattered spatially where carefully selected science and technology or R&D companies function, for new or applied research,
� conducts joint R&D with renowned close-by universities profiting extensively from their technological resources,
13www.themeart.com
profiting extensively from their technological resources, � realizes strong technology transfer among universities,
research laboratories and industry, � systematically draws support from the technopark's ma-
nagement in order to develop its management skills, finds solutions to financing at all levels of the innovation process, and makes extensive use of all modern office facilities and consulting services.
Tommy Monoarfa
Definition
� The concept of "Science Park", "Technopark", “Business Park", "Technopole", "Technopolis or Teknopolitan", “Science City" "Technology Zone", "Silicon Valley", "Technology Corridor
14www.themeart.com
Zone", "Silicon Valley", "Technology Corridor“ represents different meanings for the organizing committees, managers and the size and needs of the countries.
Tommy Monoarfa
Definition
� While definitions on the subject vary widely, the definition we would focus on in this study describes a "technology park" as one that at generally provides:
15www.themeart.com
1. linked with educational or research institutions
2. infrastructure and support services for businesses, particularly real estate and office space, etc
3. performs a technology transfer function
4. performs an economic development function
Definition
� Note, however, that not all technology parks will meet all of these characteristics and some may contain additional functions. As the British Councils explains in their definition, “The term 'Science Park' can encompass a range of initiatives which can vary greatly, even within any one country. There is thus no question of a rigid definition or of a single transferable model being appropriate throughout the world."
16www.themeart.com
rable model being appropriate throughout the world."
For example, in 1993 in the United States, the average technology park has 200 acres, over 200,000 square feet of buildings, 12 tenant companies, 300 employees and a $250,000 operating budget. Parks outside the United States often are smaller in size and can be found in a variety of settings, from sprawling green spaces in rural areas to "vertical parks" in high rise buildings in larger cities. To date, there are 212 technology parks that are members of the International Association of Science Parks and 295 members of the Association of University Research Parks.
Science Park : Concept & Development Stages
Types Physical characteristics
Focus Examples
Science/Techno Park
Creation of new settlement (research centers, new town)
Basic R&D Tsukuba Japan,
Daedeok science Town, Korea (‘80-’90)
Key Features of Technopolis Development
17www.themeart.com
-’90)
Technopolis Creation of new settlement including production activity
High-tech Production
Kumonoto – Japan, Sophia Antipolis, France, Daedeok scince Town Korea (98-2005)
Innovation cluster
Cluster development of Technopolis and science park in the region
Innovative and entreprenurial cluster in the region
Daedeok Innopolis,Korea (2005-), silicon valey, USA
� formal links with a university or other
higher educational and research institution
• encourage the formation and growth of
knowledge-based businesses on high value added firms, and other organizations normally residents on site
Science Park : Property-based Initiative
Research core
R&D University
18www.themeart.com
sidents on site
• management function which is
actively engaged in the transfer of technology
and business skills to the organizations on site
R&Dcenter
UniversityHEI’s
At the heart of the park, there is a combination of physical facilities and a well-balanced portfolio of service providers to support the creation of a collaborative environment in which the three major components can generate new value.
Cambridge science park, UK
Science Parks
19www.themeart.com
Surrey research Park, UK Dortmund Technology Park, Germany
Technopolis / Science City : Urban development
• emphasizes the need for a balanced approach
• Instead of focusing only on technology it involves
the creation of new settlement, completed
with research park, new universities,
technology centers, housing and
cultural/social facilities (Tatsuno, 1986)
20www.themeart.com
cultural/social facilities (Tatsuno, 1986)
• larger in scale and often linked
to the development of infrastructure and facilities
on the new town model
�whereas science parks are more limited in scope (Masser, 1991 ; Oh, 1997)
• more production oriented than science parks
• have both national and regional objectives
Tommy Monoarfa
Tsukuba science city, Japan Hsinchu science park, Taiwan
Technopolis
21www.themeart.com
Tsukuba science city, Japan Hsinchu science park, Taiwan
Research Triangle Park, USA Sophia Antipolis, France
Innovation Cluster
Key word : Innovation NetworkInnovation networking within clusters aims to increase innovative capacity and fostering industries for regional and national competitiveness.
� An Integrated approach to create the necessary institutional capacity for inno
22www.themeart.com
� An Integrated approach to create the necessary institutional capacity for innovation cluster development is required, it covers the followings:- The promotion of new technology areas.- The setting up of science parks and agencies, software centers, transportation/logistic infrastructure, ICT or data highways infrastructure- The establishment of technology transfer centers- Technology centers (TBI) to support business start-ups (PPBT)- Financial and Technology aid schemes to support SME’s- Joint research project between SMEs, technology transfer centers, and other firms.
Tommy Monoarfa
Innovation Cluster Institutional framework
23www.themeart.com
Innovation Cluster: Another Example
24www.themeart.com
25www.themeart.com
Function and Elements of Science Park
Main Function Elements
R & D HEI, Public R&D, Private R&D, Collaborative R&D, Technology Commercialization
Business & Networked Entrepreneurship, Incubating, Venture
26www.themeart.com
Business & Networked Entrepreneurship
Entrepreneurship, Incubating, Venture Capital, Networking
Management & Globalization
Training Program, Financial Aid, Marke-ting, Property for rent, Globalization
Infrastructure Land-use, R&D facilities, Business facilities, Mgt facilities, Housing & settlement
27www.themeart.com
28www.themeart.com
Benchmarking
29www.themeart.com
30www.themeart.com
ZONING : Daedeok Innopolis
54
31www.themeart.com
4
Daedeok : R & D Facilities in DST
32www.themeart.com
33www.themeart.com
Daedeok Techno Valley
34www.themeart.com
Daedeok Innopolis: Integrated development
35www.themeart.com
Daedeok : From DST to DI
36www.themeart.com
Daedeok : From DST to DI
37www.themeart.com
Daedeok : strategic milestone
38www.themeart.com
Daedeok : strategic milistone
39www.themeart.com
40www.themeart.com
Stages of Development
� 1st Stage: initial - Science park model
By using Daedeok Innopolis as selected benchmark,The proposed stage of development for Teknopolitanwould be as followings:
41www.themeart.com
� 1st Stage: initial - Science park model
� 2nd Stage: growing - Technopolis model
� 3rd Stage: mature - Innovation Cluster model
1st stage of development - initial
R & D
Public R&DInstitutes
HEI’s
Basic and Applied Research
TechnologyBusinessIncubator
Starup firms
Spin off
42www.themeart.com
Infrastructure/Management
Land Allocation/Housing and Settlement:Physical planning of Teknopolitan: Zoning, Land-use etc
Teknopolitan Adminstrative Office:Limited management, Adminstration and maintenance
� 1st stage contains three main functions: R&D, Business and Infrastructure. Management is only limited to infrastructure-related service
� Research & Development
- HEIs and public R&D centers: the main role of development.
1st stage of development
43www.themeart.com
- HEIs and public R&D centers: the main role of development.
- Public research institutes focused on conducting national R&D projects. Private R&D institutes formed a hierarchical relationship with their mother firms and concentrated on R&D
� Business & networked Teknopreneurship
- Business incubation is limited to start-ups in labs of HEIs or R&D institutes (the Daedeok Science Town focused on non-industrial basic science activities in the initial stage)
1st stage of developmentFunctional Features
Function Main Features Key Role
R&D -- HEI’s: a leading role of basic/applied research
-- Public Institutes: Govt. Research Institute, to increase national capacity in science and technology, major R&D projects supported by national government
HEI’s national R&D ce
nter
Business - Technology transfer and commercialization Spin-offs
44www.themeart.com
Business
Activities
&
Networked
Entrepreneurship
- Technology transfer and commercialization
- Venture firms (PPBT) that orginated from labs in HEI’s
Spin-offs
From
R&D labs
Infrastructure - TAO: a limited management office
Formed by Government, managing and operating the teknopolitan
- Zoning ordinance for R&D (RUTR)
- Housing and settlement
Mngt
Office
1st stage of development
� Main objectives in the 1st stage of the Teknopolitan devp. are:
- Constructing infrastructure
- Managing and operating the Science Park
- Constructing institutional infrastructure
45www.themeart.com
2nd stage of development
46www.themeart.com
Technopreneurship
2nd stage of development
teknopolitan
47www.themeart.com
Collaborative R&D scheme
48www.themeart.com
Business technopreneurship/One stop service mechanism
Management & Globalization- Technology Commercialization: the core topic of sustainable growth ofhigh-tech venture firms: service activity,technology marketing,technology management,technology commercialization,advertisement of products,
49www.themeart.com
advertisement of products,- financial aid for venture firms,marketing services,institutional support,various equipments,facilities
One stop service mechanism: technopreneurship
(Teknopolitan)
Functional features
50www.themeart.com
Teknopolitan
Teknopolitan
Infrastructure/Management
Infrastructure- Industrial complex for venture firms and R&D facilities to cover the request fromR&D centers for technology commercialization.- Accessibility to the service facilities of quality of life (housing and community facilities)- The integration of cultural society(emphasized to make best use of
51www.themeart.com
(emphasized to make best use ofmother town’s infrastructure)
3rd stage of development - mature
52www.themeart.com
Teknopolitan
Link with MP3EI
Teknopolitan
53www.themeart.com
54www.themeart.com
55www.themeart.com
References
� Asheim, B. & Herstad, S., J. (2005) “Regional innovation systems, varieties of capitalism and non-local relations: challenges from the globalising economy” in R.A. Boschma & R.C. Kloosterman (eds) Learning from clusters: a critical assessment from an economic-geographical perspective, Dordrecht: Springer.
� Dahlstrand, A. L. and Jacobsson, S. (2003) “Universities and technology-based entrepreneurship in the Gothenburg region” Local Economy
� SHARING OF KOREA'S STP EXPERIENCE: Daedeok Innopolis- STP program brochure
56www.themeart.com
� SHARING OF KOREA'S STP EXPERIENCE: Daedeok Innopolis- STP program brochure
� Science parks in China: a cautionary exploration: Stuart Macdonald, Yunfeng Deng
� Regional Reasearch Intensive Clusters and science parks- European Commissio, Directorat Generale for Reaseach,2008
� Kyungbuk Technopark, Yeungnam University (Korea) http://www.yeungnam.ac.kr/english/research-3.html
� United Kingdom Science Park Association, http://www.ukspa.org.uk/
� Jennifer Hillner, “Skunk works, startups, and hungry VCs are making these 46 hubs the hot spots of the global high tech network,” kolom Venture Capital dari majalah Wired, edisi 8.07, July 2000. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.07/silicon.html
57www.themeart.com