compliance with the jjdp act core protections facjj washington, dc december 2, 2010 elissa rumsey...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Compliance with the JJDP Act Core ProtectionsFACJJ
Washington, DCDecember 2, 2010
Elissa Rumsey
Compliance Monitoring Coordinator
OJJDP
![Page 2: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
3 Topics of Discussion• OJJDP’s Compliance Program
• State Compliance Programs
• Anticipating Reauthorization of JJDPA
![Page 3: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
OJJDPs Compliance Program
• Implementing Core Protections @ State/local level – provision of Training/Technical Assistance
• Assessing 10 Elements of an “Adequate” CM System at State level
• Assessing State Compliance Monitoring Reports• Conducting Compliance Monitoring Audits
![Page 4: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Written Guidance • www.ojjdp.gov/compliance
– JJDP Act of 2002– JJDP Act Regulations (1996)– Federal Registers (1981,1982, 1988(2), 1994)– OJJDP Audit Manual (2000)– OJJDP Guidance Manual (2010)
![Page 5: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
JJDP Act• History
– Landmark legislation– Provides standards (core requirements) – Creates funding mechanism for participating States to
comply with core requirements– First passed in 1974, updated in 2002– Reauthorization is pending
![Page 6: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
JJDP Act
• Funding mechanism: annual grant to participating States - amount determined based on annual compliance with four core requirements– Deinstitutionalization of Status Offenders (DSO)– Sight and Sound Separation (Separation)– Jail Removal– Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC)
![Page 7: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
OJJDPs Compliance Program
• 55 States/territories participate in Act– Governor assigns a DSA– Governor appoints a SAG
• OJJDP is the federal oversight agency charged with providing implementing regulations for the JJDP Act and ensuring compliance with the JJDP Act core requirements.
• OJJDP administers the Formula Grants program
![Page 8: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Annual State Compliance Report
• States annually submit a compliance monitoring report detailing the number of violations under D.S.O., Separation and Jail Removal
• OJJDP’s assesses each State report annually & makes determination of compliance with core protections
![Page 9: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Definition of Terms
• In order to understand how to monitor the following terms are critical– Secure versus non-secure
– Jail and lockup
– Juvenile Detention Center
– Juvenile Correctional Facility
– Prison
![Page 10: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Definition of Terms• Status offender• Non-offender• Civil type offender• “Alien” • Delinquent• Accused• Adjudicated
![Page 11: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Definition of Terms• Collocated facility• Court holding facility• Direct file/waiver/transfer• Valid Court Order• Public authority• Residential
![Page 12: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Core Requirements
Facility Type D.S.O. Separation Jail Removal
Jail/Lockup Yes Yes Yes
JDC/JCF Yes Yes* No
Court Holding No Yes No
Group Home No No No
Collocated -Juvenile side -Adult side
YesYes
YesYes
NoYes
Prison Yes Yes No
![Page 13: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Topical Issue - Jail RemovalRural Exception
• If all statutory and regulatory conditions are met a juvenile awaiting an initial court appearance may be detained in an adult jail:– Up to 48 hours (excluding weekends and holidays)– Allows longer holds if distance or weather is a factor. – Only if sight and sound separated from adult inmates
![Page 14: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Topical Issue - DSOVCO
The VCO Exception (Statutory) to the DSO Core Protection
• State must have law allowing secure detention of status offenders who violate (federal) VCOs.
• The State must train court and facility staff to ensure that all VCO standards are met (e.g., due process is afforded, interviews occur within 24 hours, hearing within 48 hours).
![Page 15: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Topical Issue - Separation• Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) new policy eliminating
“Scared Straight” programs• “Scared Straight” type programs violate Separation core
requirement• Research evaluating these programs demonstrates negative
effect on youth, lack of positive evidence supporting rehabilitation
• Resurgence of adult inmate trustees utilized in juvenile detention and corrections facilities.
![Page 16: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Topical Issue -Court Holding
• See 1988 Federal Register noting Court Holding Facilities
• Must first qualify as a court holding facility:
– Used only for court – not as overflow;
– Can’t be used for overnight stays;
– Can’t be used for punitive purposes or purposes unrelated to a court appearance.
• Must only comply with Sight and Sound Separation.
![Page 17: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Topical Issue -Collocated Facilities
• To be monitored as a “Collocated” facility, must meet the following requirements:– Facility must ensure separation;
– Facility must have separate juvenile and adult programs;
– If using same staff must have a State policy on training staff to work with juveniles; and
– If applicable, facility must be licensed by the State.
![Page 18: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
10 Monitoring ElementsAn Adequate CM System includes:
1.Policies and Procedures
2. Monitoring Authority
3. Monitoring Timetable
4. Violation Procedures
5. Barriers and Strategies
![Page 19: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
10 Monitoring Elements
6. Definitions
7. Identification of the Universe
8. Classification of the Universe
9. Inspection of Facilities
10. Data Collection and Data Verification
![Page 20: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Why Monitor Facilities?
Section 223(a)(14) of the JJDP Act:
Participating States must, “provide for an adequate system of monitoring jails, detention facilities, correctional facilities, and nonsecure facilities to ensure that the requirements of paragraph (11), paragraph (12), and paragraph (13) are met, and for the annual reporting of the results of such monitoring to the [OJJDP] Administrator….”
![Page 21: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Data Collection/Verification
• Data collection is critical.• If OJJDP determines that a State is out of compliance
with Section 223(a)(14), then Formula Grants funds can be frozen.
• If you have a reluctant facility, stress AccountabilityFact that the requirements are now standards of
professional conduct
• Build relationships - Work as a team toward compliance.
![Page 22: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Compliance Monitors are your Eyes and Ears
• Ensure that children and youth are treated in accordance with the Act.
• Serve as the authority and resource for local law enforcement on federal, State and local custody rules.
• Monitor facilities that no other state or federal entity may ever monitor on behalf of youth.
![Page 23: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Compliance Audits
• What is a compliance audit, and why do we do them?
• The audit process: planning, execution, and follow-up.
• Common audit findings follow.
![Page 24: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Compliance Audits
Section 223 (a)(14)
• “Provide for an adequate system of monitoring jails, detention facilities, correctional facilities, and nonsecure facilities to ensure that the requirements of paragraph (11), paragraph (12), and paragraph (13) are met, and for annual reporting of the results of such monitoring to the [OJJDP] Administrator….”
![Page 25: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Compliance Audits
• Section 204 (b)(6)
(OJJDP shall) “Provide for the auditing of monitoring systems required under… this title to review the adequacy of such systems….”
![Page 26: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Compliance Audits
• The State is not performing onsite data verification prior to submission of Compliance Monitoring Reports to OJJDP.
![Page 27: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Compliance Audits
• The State has classified a facility (e.g., a lockup) as non-secure, yet during the OJJDP audit the onsite inspection reveals a cuffing bench or cuffing rail.
• The State is not inspecting facilities believed to be nonsecure (e.g., lockups, group homes) to verify their nonsecure classification.
![Page 28: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Compliance Audits• The State is not monitoring its juvenile correctional
facilities/training schools to ensure compliance with DSO and sight and sound separation requirements.
• Facilities are self-reporting violations and the DSA is not adequately verifying such self-reports for accuracy (e.g., comparing self-reported violations against admissions/booking logs).
![Page 29: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Compliance Audits
• The State does not provide adequate documentation that VCO process requirements have been met.
• The State has not included public law enforcement facilities that exist in airports, shopping malls, and sports stadiums in its monitoring universe.
![Page 30: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
State Compliance Programs• See www.ojjdp.gov/compliance for listing of state
compliance monitors• See www.ojjdp.gov. for States out of compliance• Innovations in State compliance efforts: Analysis of
DMC in the first 3 core protections
![Page 31: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
DMC in the 1st Three Core Requirements: An analysis of state compliance data to assess whether minority youth are
overrepresented in law enforcement facilities
Susan Davis (CO), Compliance Monitor
Shari Morris (MD), Compliance Monitor
Mike Pennington (PA), Director, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention,
Commission on Crime and Delinquency
Melissa Sickmund, Chief of Systems Research and Charles Puzzanchera, Senior Research Associate,
National Center for Juvenile Justice
![Page 32: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Why do this sort of analysis?• The intention of the JJDP Act is to protect youth
in custody and encourage fairness in justice systems
• Compliance violations in the first 3 core requirements have never been assessed from a DMC perspective
• This sort of analysis demonstrates what can be learned by applying the RRI strategy beyond what is currently undertaken
![Page 33: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Is there evidence of DMC in violations of DSO, Jail Removal, and Separation?
• Study of 3 States’ monitoring data• Voluntary study: States with effective compliance
monitoring systems + able report race information for violations invited to participate
• Analysis examined State RRI for core requirement violations — relative to populations and relative to arrests
![Page 34: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
State Compliance Programs• Pennsylvania
• Maryland
• Colorado
![Page 35: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Pennsylvania’s monitoring universe
• 69 Jails• 1,269Lockups• 32 Court holding facilities• 19 Juvenile detention facilities• 18 Juvenile correctional facilities
![Page 36: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Maryland’s monitoring universe
• 29 Jails• 215 Lockups• 49 Court holding facilities• 7 Juvenile detention facilities• 4 Juvenile correctional facilities
![Page 37: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Colorado’s monitoring universe
• 61 Jails• 272 Lockups• 17 Court holding facilities• 11 Juvenile detention facilities• 13 Juvenile correctional facilities
![Page 38: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Preliminary Findings
![Page 39: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Pennsylvania
![Page 40: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Maryland
![Page 41: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Maryland
![Page 42: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Colorado
![Page 43: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Colorado
![Page 44: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Before we infer racial bias what other information would we like?
– Why was the child contacted by police? • Why child X and not child Y?
– Are there certain offenses that lead to violations?• Is there an interaction between offense and race?
– Where do these kids come from? • From certain communities? From certain schools?
![Page 45: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Before we infer racial bias what other information would we like?
– Are there certain facilities that have more violations?• Are minorities a higher proportion of the youth population?• Are there admission criteria? Who approves admission?
– Are violations more likely to occur at certain times of day?• Are there issues with parents’ availability to collect youth that impact
minorities more than whites?
– Are there gender or age interactions?
![Page 46: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
What questions are raised?
• Should state DMC efforts include analyses of compliance violation data?
• Should state compliance monitoring data include other variables that would enable DMC analysis?
• Do the benefits of having more data outweigh the burden of collecting and using those data?
![Page 47: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
What have we learned?• Police are key to both DMC and core
requirement violations• Much can be gained from collaborations between
DMC Coordinators and Compliance Monitors • More study is needed to determine the
relationship among DSO, Jail Removal, Separation & DMC core protections
![Page 48: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Reauthorization
• S. 678
• VCO Phaseout
• TCW population
– “Adult inmate” definition
– Youth charged with felonies in adult jails
![Page 49: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Other Issues• JDAI
• PREA
• National Center for Youth in Custody
• Others?
![Page 50: Compliance with the JJDP Act Core Protections FACJJ Washington, DC December 2, 2010 Elissa Rumsey Compliance Monitoring Coordinator OJJDP](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110322/56649d0d5503460f949e2d62/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Thank you
• Elissa Rumsey, Compliance Monitoring Coordinator
• 202.616.9279