complexity in neural and financial systems: from time

3
Editorial Complexity in Neural and Financial Systems: From Time-Series to Networks Tiziano Squartini , 1 Andrea Gabrielli, 2 Diego Garlaschelli, 1,3 Tommaso Gili , 1 Angelo Bifone, 4 and Fabio Caccioli 5 1 IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy 2 Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy 3 Instituut-Lorentz for eoretical Physics, Leiden Institute of Physics, Leiden, Netherlands 4 Center for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Rovereto, Italy 5 University College London, London, UK Correspondence should be addressed to Tiziano Squartini; [email protected] Received 2 February 2018; Accepted 5 February 2018; Published 24 April 2018 Copyright © 2018 Tiziano Squartini et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. When can a system be unambiguously defined as “complex”? Although many real-world systems are believed to bear the signature of complexity, the question above remains unan- swered. Our special issue aims at contributing to this ongoing discussion by collecting a number of studies tackling two aspects of complexity that have recently gained increasing attention: the temporal one and the structural one. e seven papers composing this special issue offer an articulated overview of these topics by proposing novel tech- niques for the analysis of systems described by multiple time- series (such as functional brain data, stock prices, and market indices) and networked interaction patterns. e choice of focusing on neural and financial systems is dictated by the importance that topics like the identification of precursors of stock market movements, the application of causality-testing techniques to brain data, and the definition of null models for the analysis of correlation matrices (only to mention a few) have gained in recent years. In what follows, a brief overview of the contributions is provided. H. Liao et al. contribute to the stream of research on “economic complexity,” focusing on the International Trade Network and addressing the problem of forecasting the eco- nomic evolution of a country using predictors that go beyond standard economic quantities (such as GDP). In order to identify the best method, the authors compare three different metrics across a dataset ranging from 1962 to 2000. As a result, the “Fitness and Complexity” approach seems to outperform the competing techniques. B. Podobnik et al. address another timely prediction prob- lem, that is, the rise of EU right-wing populism in response to unbalanced immigration. In particular, the authors ana- lyze the relationship between the percentage of right-wing (RW) populist voters in a given country, the prevalence of immigrants in the population of the same country, and the total immigration inflow into the entire EU over the last three years. ey find that the increase in the percentage of RW voters substantially overcomes the percentage of immigration inflow. is result questions the role of EU institutions and calls for a deeper understanding of the EU citizens perception of the “globalization” topic. A different, yet related, kind of prediction is the “link- prediction” problem, addressed by M.-Y. Zhou et al. e underlying hypothesis of any link prediction algorithm is that the likelihood of any two nodes to establish a connection depends on the number of “common” characteristics. e authors, however, propose a way of resorting link scores which enhances the precision of existing methods by penaliz- ing to a lesser extent nodes characterized by lower similarity scores. Hindawi Complexity Volume 2018, Article ID 3132940, 2 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3132940

Upload: others

Post on 24-Feb-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

EditorialComplexity in Neural and Financial Systems:From Time-Series to Networks

Tiziano Squartini ,1 Andrea Gabrielli,2 Diego Garlaschelli,1,3 Tommaso Gili ,1

Angelo Bifone,4 and Fabio Caccioli5

1 IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy2Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy3Instituut-Lorentz for Theoretical Physics, Leiden Institute of Physics, Leiden, Netherlands4Center for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Rovereto, Italy5University College London, London, UK

Correspondence should be addressed to Tiziano Squartini; [email protected]

Received 2 February 2018; Accepted 5 February 2018; Published 24 April 2018

Copyright © 2018 Tiziano Squartini et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons AttributionLicense, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properlycited.

When can a system be unambiguously defined as “complex”?Although many real-world systems are believed to bear thesignature of complexity, the question above remains unan-swered. Our special issue aims at contributing to this ongoingdiscussion by collecting a number of studies tackling twoaspects of complexity that have recently gained increasingattention: the temporal one and the structural one.

The seven papers composing this special issue offer anarticulated overview of these topics by proposing novel tech-niques for the analysis of systems described bymultiple time-series (such as functional brain data, stock prices, andmarketindices) and networked interaction patterns. The choice offocusing on neural and financial systems is dictated by theimportance that topics like the identification of precursors ofstock market movements, the application of causality-testingtechniques to brain data, and the definition of null models forthe analysis of correlation matrices (only to mention a few)have gained in recent years.

In what follows, a brief overview of the contributions isprovided.

H. Liao et al. contribute to the stream of research on“economic complexity,” focusing on the International TradeNetwork and addressing the problem of forecasting the eco-nomic evolution of a country using predictors that go beyondstandard economic quantities (such as GDP). In order to

identify the best method, the authors compare three differentmetrics across a dataset ranging from 1962 to 2000. Asa result, the “Fitness and Complexity” approach seems tooutperform the competing techniques.

B. Podobnik et al. address another timely prediction prob-lem, that is, the rise of EU right-wing populism in responseto unbalanced immigration. In particular, the authors ana-lyze the relationship between the percentage of right-wing(RW) populist voters in a given country, the prevalence ofimmigrants in the population of the same country, and thetotal immigration inflow into the entire EU over the last threeyears. They find that the increase in the percentage of RWvoters substantially overcomes the percentage of immigrationinflow. This result questions the role of EU institutions andcalls for a deeper understanding of the EU citizens perceptionof the “globalization” topic.

A different, yet related, kind of prediction is the “link-prediction” problem, addressed by M.-Y. Zhou et al. Theunderlying hypothesis of any link prediction algorithm is thatthe likelihood of any two nodes to establish a connectiondepends on the number of “common” characteristics. Theauthors, however, propose a way of resorting link scoreswhich enhances the precision of existingmethods by penaliz-ing to a lesser extent nodes characterized by lower similarityscores.

HindawiComplexityVolume 2018, Article ID 3132940, 2 pageshttps://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3132940

2 Complexity

Prediction problems are related to causality problems.Upon defining “causality” in an information-theoretic sense,T. Aste et al. investigate the performance of three methods(G-Lasso, Ridge, and LoGo) to detect causality links whenshort time-series are considered. A combination of filteringtechniques and graphical modelling provides the best perfor-mance.

The same kind of filtering techniques is applied to inves-tigate different types of dependency in financial multiplexnetworks. N. Musmeci et al. consider a four-layer multiplexdefined by linear, nonlinear, tail, and partial correlationsamong a set of financial time-series. The structural evolutionof this peculiar kind of network reveals changes associatedwith periods of financial stress, whose detection is enhancedby the multilayer character of the considered system.

Network techniques to analyze time-evolving, multiagentsystems are also employed by A. Lombardi et al. to studythe functional connectivity of the human brain. A novelframework is employed to quantify the synchronization ofpairs of signals by exploiting the so-called cross-recurrenceplots: community detection based on such a metric seems tooutperform the usual one, based on the Pearson correlationcoefficient.

Networks constitute also the support to explore “evolu-tionary” game theory. G. Cimini studies two different evo-lutionary dynamics in order to refine equilibria multiplicityof games of strategic substitutes and complements. Whenthe latter are embedded in complex topologies, differentbehaviors are found for different classes of games. In partic-ular, when coordination games on infinitely large scale-freenetworks are considered, equilibria arise for any value of theincentive to cooperate.

Tiziano SquartiniAndrea Gabrielli

Diego GarlaschelliTommaso GiliAngelo BifoneFabio Caccioli

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

MathematicsJournal of

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Applied MathematicsJournal of

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Probability and StatisticsHindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Journal of

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in

Complex AnalysisJournal of

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

OptimizationJournal of

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Engineering Mathematics

International Journal of

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Operations ResearchAdvances in

Journal of

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Function SpacesAbstract and Applied AnalysisHindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013Hindawiwww.hindawi.com

The Scientific World Journal

Volume 2018

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018Volume 2018

Numerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisNumerical AnalysisAdvances inAdvances in Discrete Dynamics in

Nature and SocietyHindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com

Di�erential EquationsInternational Journal of

Volume 2018

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Decision SciencesAdvances in

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

AnalysisInternational Journal of

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of

Submit your manuscripts atwww.hindawi.com