competency scorecard report

MEASURING PERFORMANCE FOR IMPROvEd SERvICE dELIvERY

CompetenCy SCoreCard report

CdLd policy Implementation Unit Local Government, Elections and Rural development departmentGovernment of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

The Competency Scorecard Report has been prepared and published by the CdLd Policy Implementation Unit of the Local Government, Elections and Rural development department (Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa) with the technical assistance of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Community-driven Local development (CdLd) Programme.

authored by:Shahzad Arif (Key Monitoring and Evaluation Expert, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa CdLd Programme)Abdul Saboor (Quality Assurance Specialist, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa CdLd Programme)

reviewed by:Brian Fawcett (Team Leader, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa CdLd Programme)

edited by:Tariq Afridi (Senior Strategic Communication Specialist, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa CdLd Programme)

designed by:Wasim Abbas (Ad.Sense Printing & Advertising, Peshawar)

publishing date and location:February 2016, Peshawar, Pakistan

The European Union supports the Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa to implement the Provincial Policy “Community-driven Local development (CdLd)” through financial resources, and technical assistance provided by Hulla & Co. Human Dynamics KG. The overall objective is to build responsiveness and effectiveness of the State to restore citizen trust, stimulate employment and livelihood opportunities, and ensure the delivery of basic services.

1. BaCKGroUnd to tHe CompetenCy SCoreCard

2. CapaCIty deVeLopment For tHe ImpLementatIon oF CdLd poLICy

3. a SCoreCard to meaSUre CapaCIty deVeLopment

4. metHodoLoGy oF tHe SUrVey

5. reSULtS oF tHe SCoreCard SUrVey

6. LImItatIonS oF tHe StUdy

7. Way ForWard on CapaCIty deVeLopment

ANNEx-A: COMPETENCY SCORECARd QUESTIONNAIRE

ANNEx-B: GOvERNMENT OFFICIALS SCORECARd dETAILS (BASELINE)

ANNEx-C: GOvERNMENT OFFICIALS SCORECARd dETAILS (FOLLOW-UP)

01

02

03

04

05

08

09

10

16

53

ContentS

aCronymS

ADO Assistant District Officer

CBNA Capacity Building Needs Assessment

CBO Community Based Organisation

CdLd Community-driven Local development

ddC district development Committee

DO (F&P) District Officer Finance and Planning

EDO Executive District Officer

GoKP Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

KP Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

LGE&Rdd Local Government, Elections and Rural development department

MIS Management Information System

O&M Operation and Maintenance

PCRC Policy Coordination and Review Committee

PFC Provincial Finance Commission

RMU Reforms Monitoring Unit

SDO Sub Divisional Officer

SRSP Sarhad Rural Support Programme

TA Technical Assistance

TEC Technical Evaluation Committee

The Community-driven Local development (CdLd) Policy lays down the local governance vision of the Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (GoKP). In order to link up key local governance aspects with local development practices, the GoKP envisaged the CdLd Policy, which provides for the active participation of citizens in addressing their foremost development needs. With the conduct of the local government elections in KP and the implementation of the CdLd Policy, citizens of the six pilot districts in Malakand division (Chitral, dir Lower, Malakand, Shangla, Swat, and Dir Upper) are bracing for a major shift in the way their governance and development efforts were managed in the past. Both of these frameworks have embedded the essentials of good governance as key characteristics, such as, participation, transparency, responsiveness, equity, effectiveness, efficiency, subsidiarity, and accountability to improve the quality and reach of frontline public services.

The CDLD Policy document refers to the following goal and objectives:

GoalThe overall goal of the KP CdLd Policy is to achieve a sustainable improvement in the coverage and quality of frontline public service delivery through the active involvement of local communities.

Objectives1. Put in place a fiscal and regulatory framework for CDLD where local communities

are in charge of executing local development/service delivery initiatives;

2. Build the capacity of the relevant public sector entities and functionaries at the district level to operationalise CdLd; and

3. Provide an enabling environment for Community Based Organisations (CBOs) to access public funds earmarked for CdLd initiatives.

01CompetenCy SCoreCard reportCommunity-driven Local development

BaCKGroUnd to tHe CompetenCy SCoreCard1

CapaCIty deVeLopment For tHe ImpLementatIon oF CdLd poLICy

A capacity assessment is an analysis of existing capacities against desired capacities which generates an understanding of capacity assets and needs that can serve as inputs to formulate a capacity development response. This serves as baseline for continuous monitoring and evaluation of progress against relevant indicators and helps to create a solid foundation for long-term planning, implementation and sustainable results.

There is broad agreement that capacity refers to the ability of people and organisations as a whole to manage their affairs successfully. At the individual level, capacity development refers to the process of improving skill sets towards CdLd Policy implementation, most frequently through imparting knowledge and developing abilities through training. However, it also involves learning by doing, participation, ownership, and processes associated with increasing performance through changes in management, motivation, morale, and by improving accountability and responsibility. The competency scorecard is designed at the level of individuals given the performance indicators defined as part of the performance matrix.

The Technical Assistance (TA) team conducted a Capacity Building Needs Assessment (CBNA) survey. This baseline survey covered all the six districts of Malakand division, including Chitral, dir Lower, Malakand, Shangla, Swat, and dir Upper. Through a detailed questionnaire, information related to existing capacities and future requirements was collected from all line department officials who made themselves available during survey exercise. Baseline questionnaire provided the opportunity to the TA team to collect information through direct and indirect questions. Survey team collected all data by directly meeting with all concerned line department officials at their workplaces. A CBNA exercise was initiated in the month of April 2015 that included questions contributing to the competency scorecard. The CBNA was helpful to find out the existing capacities as well as identify the capacity gaps within the programme design.

It was planned that all relevant public sector officials would be trained and oriented between the month of April and June 2015 on the CdLd Policy and its regulatory framework. The capacity enhancement was also mandatory since government initiated implementation of the call for proposals process and roles of district officials were needed to be clarified for use of mechanisms and tools to carry out their tasks effectively. With a view to implement CdLd Policy, capacity development is one of the pivotal components. There are two modalities of interventions for capacity building (one complementing the other), which are formal trainings and on-the-job technical assistance.

CompetenCy SCoreCard reportCommunity-driven Local development02

2

a SCoreCard to meaSUre CapaCIty deVeLopment

One of the objectives of CDLD Policy specifically focuses on developing capacity of the district functionaries in the implementation of CdLd Policy. Given that before the inception of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa CdLd Programme, phase-zero (CdLd design phase) ran for around two years that involved trainings of the district officials, so the baseline of CDLD competency was not assumed as zero.

The competency scorecard for CdLd is a customised tool that attempts to provide a balance by quantifying a qualitative process of capacity change through the use of appropriate indicators and their corresponding ratings. The scorecard presents descriptive questions for each capacity development area with numerical ratings (0, 1, 2) keeping in view the direct response by the respondent (no, partial and yes). Where, ‘yes’ means appropriate knowledge about a particular question, ‘partial’ means knowledge to some extent and ‘no’ refers to complete unawareness. during analysis of the data gathered, the Yes, Partial and No responses were converted to actual ratings. Furthermore, weights were assigned to capacity development areas and associated indicators according to the importance of that specific area.

Considering the limited time to gauge improvement in capacity (3 months) during fiscal year 2015-16, maximum level of competency score was set as 60% for an individual. It was targeted that a total of 30% staff would achieve the 60% competency level.


3


The methodology for the survey was based on structured interviews and questions. A detailed questionnaire was developed and shared with the Reforms Monitoring Unit (RMU, then Coordination Unit for CdLd Policy implementation) for feedback and approval. RMU sent a formal request to all concerned district line departments for supporting the study. Capacity building team was given a day long orientation on the methodology of the study and briefing of questionnaire. As per the decision, all available and relevant district officials were interviewed and their capacities were assessed.

The frequency of use of this scorecard is, at a minimum, on an annual basis. The set capacity benchmark under each of the capacity building areas allowed for establishment of a capacity baseline, through a set of questions correlated with the indicators and its possible responses, at the beginning of CdLd Policy implementation. These benchmarks were compared against a baseline in order to assess progress made during the programme lifecycle. A rating system permits the quantification of change achieved and provides the information needed for reporting. The following are weights that have been assigned to each major area of capacity in terms of its importance and relevance during the initial phase of programme implementation.

A total of 524 government line department staff were interviewed for CBNA, which was taken as baseline data for the scorecard. However, after continuous training and on-the-job techincal assistance, a follow-up activity of competency scorecard was carried out in the month of July 2015 soon after the completion of financial year. During the follow-up activity, a total of 453 staff were interviewed. Given the fact that there are frequent postings and transfers, staff going on vacations and engagement of district staff in other priority tasks, not all the district staff covered in the earlier CBNA could be assessed.

areaS WItH aSSIGned WeIGHtS

S.no. Quantifiable areas about CDLD competency level percentage of assigned weight

1 Understanding of the CdLd policy 50%

2 Understanding of the regulatory framework of theCdLd policy implementation 30%

3 Self-assessment about the role of CdLd 20%

total 100%

metHodoLoGy oF tHe SUrVey4


Of the total 453 government officials, a total of 233 government staff were those who were interviewed during the baseline and follow-up activities both.

This competency scorecard measured the actual change in those particular staff who were interviewed twice during the interval of 3 months. The data on the rest of 291 government officials covered under the baseline (out of 524) and 220 officials interviewed during follow-up will be dealt separately for the next year's assessment, subject to their availability in the target districts.

As mentioned above, government officials were engaged during CDLD phase-zero in various trainings, therefore, it was expected that baseline on CdLd competency may already exist in the districts. The following chart indicates that 13% of the district officials possessed the required CDLD competency at the time of baseline. However, as a result of TA interventions, the percentage of officials increased from 13% to 31%.

BaSeLIne and FoLLoW-Up (nUmBer oF reSpondentS)

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

524

453

233

Government Officials Interviewed (baseline)

Government Officials Interviewed (follow-up)

Government Officials Interviewed (baseline and follow-up)

reSULtS oF tHe SCoreCard SUrVey5


Out of 233 respondents, 73 district officials possessed CDLD competency compared to 31 at the time of baseline. In general, there has been an improvement in the overall capacity among the staff but not at the desired level. The capacity building initiative that involves training and on-the-job technical assistance is yielding the expected results. The government officials with the required capacity includes a major group from the finance and planning office. This office is fully responsible to execute the Policy at the district level. The TA team also focused on Finance and Planning Office in the context of their leading role in the call for proposal cycles under different rounds of applications.

Though only 31% of the district officials possessed the required competency, the TA interventions also resulted into an improvement in the knowledge and skills regarding CdLd Policy and regulatory framework among all district officials. The following graph illustrates that there has been a significant improvement in the overall score compared to the baseline. It should be noted that change in the competency was a result of only 3 months of TA activities in the districts.

nUmBer oF dIStrICt oFFICIaLS WItH tHe reQUIred CdLd CompetenCy

100

80

60

40

20

0

73

31

Follow-upBaseline

perCentaGe oF dIStrICt oFFICIaLS WItH tHe reQUIred CdLd CompenteCy

100%

80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

31%

13%

Follow-upBaseline


The district wise analysis shows significant improvement in CDLD competency in all the target districts in proportion to the baseline status. The following graphs are illustrating changes in the capacity. It is very obvious that district Chitral, dir Lower and dir Upper will require more intensive technical assistance in the near future compared to the other 3 districts.

Detailed scoring on each indicator and each government official is attached as Annex-B (for baseline) and Annex-C (for follow-up).

SCoreCard SCaLe - BaSeLIne VS FoLLoW-Up

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

73

31

60% and above

177

50% to 59%

Follow-upBaseline

25

10

40% to 49%

2816

30% to 39%

23

11

23

10

20% to 29% 10% to 19%

44

148

Less than 10%

nUmBer oF oFFICIaLS WItHCdLd CompetenCy (BaSeLIne)

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0 0

3 4

18

39

19

Chitral Malakand Shangla dir Upper

dir Lower

Swat

nUmBer oF oFFICIaLS WItHCdLd CompetenCy (FoLLoW-Up)

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

28

2326

68

40

8

Chitral Malakand Shangla dir Upper

dir Lower

Swat


Like every other study, this scorecard was also constrained by certain limitations. The indicator considers government officials as the unit of measure. Each government official has a specific role in the implementation of the CDLD Policy and therefore, it is not justified that each individual is scored against a standardised set of indicators. The focus of the scorecard remained on the knowledge rather than application of the gained knowledge in the implementation since it required designing instrument vis-a-vis responsibilities.

The follow-up of baseline was required to be carried out after 3 months’ interventions. Capacity building is a long-term process and should include knowledge, attitude, performance and ownership. Bringing all these changes in a very short span of time was not practically possible. Therefore, the scorecard was only limited to the knowledge aspect. Turnover and responsiveness of the district officials remained a constraint to re-interview after short period of time. Therefore, only the officials who responded in both baseline and follow-up survey were treated as the population for this study.

LImItatIonS oF tHe StUdy6


The competency scorecard should be used at the institutional level while taking into account compliance to the CdLd regulatory framework, timeliness of the task completion, ensuring transparency, and effectiveness of the processes involved. Besides knowledge, change in attitude, behaviour, and commitment to the CdLd Policy implementation are also required. Moving forward, the institutional capacity should measure and assess how CdLd mechanism has been embedded at the district level at a time when the devolved governments are being established.

Way ForWard on CapaCIty deVeLopment7

ann

ex-a

: Com

pete

ncy

Scor

ecar

d Q

uest

ionn

aire

S.N

o.In

dica

tor

des

crip

tion

Met

hodo

logy

Que

stio

nsR

espo

nses

Mar

k (Y

/N/P

)1

Und

erst

andi

ng o

f th

e C

dLd

Pol

icy

This

indi

cato

r mea

sure

s th

e un

ders

tand

ing

of C

dLd

Pol

icy

obje

ctiv

es a

nd p

rinci

ples

Wha

t is

Cd

Ld g

oal?

E

xpla

in in

you

r ow

n w

ords

.

Impr

ovem

ent o

f lin

e de

partm

ents

' per

form

ance

Act

ive

invo

lvem

ent o

f com

mun

ity th

roug

h C

BO

s

Wha

t are

Cd

Ld

obje

ctiv

es?

Exp

lain

in

your

ow

n w

ords

.

Fund

ing,

fina

ncin

g an

d fis

cal p

roce

sses

to a

lloca

te fu

nds

for C

dLd

Pol

icy

esta

blis

hed

Impl

emen

tatio

n pr

oces

s or

regu

lato

ry fr

amew

ork

exis

ts fo

r di

sbur

sem

ent o

f Cd

Ld fu

nds

Trai

ning

and

on-

the-

job

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

of a

ll go

vern

men

t offi

cial

s to

per

form

thei

r res

pect

ive

role

s un

der t

he C

dLd

Pol

icy

Cap

acity

of c

omm

uniti

es e

nhan

ced

to fo

rm C

BO

s an

d su

bmit

prop

osal

s as

per

Cd

Ld c

riter

ia

2U

nder

stan

ding

of

the

regu

lato

ry

fram

ewor

k of

th

e C

dLd

Pol

icy

impl

emen

tatio

n

This

indi

cato

r mea

sure

s th

e un

ders

tand

ing

of th

e pr

oces

s an

d ro

les

of d

iffer

ent

stak

ehol

ders

invo

lved

in th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e P

olic

y re

gula

tory

fram

ewor

k

Are

you

aw

are

of

the

Cd

Ld re

gula

tory

fra

mew

ork?

Hea

rd a

bout

the

CD

LD n

otifi

catio

n

Rea

d th

e re

gula

tory

Cd

Ld fr

amew

ork

Awar

e of

the

stak

ehol

ders

invo

lved

i.e.

GoK

P, T

A (c

apac

ity

build

ing)

, and

Soc

ial M

obili

satio

n P

artn

er (S

RS

P)

do

you

unde

rsta

nd

the

spec

ific

role

of

each

offi

ce/p

artn

er

unde

r the

regu

lato

ry

fram

ewor

k?

prov

inci

al F

inan

ce d

epar

tmen

tIn

stru

ctio

ns a

nd o

ther

rele

vant

not

ifica

tions

issu

ed b

y th

e Fi

nanc

e d

epar

tmen

t

Pro

gres

s, re

gula

r fee

dbac

k, a

nd in

form

atio

n to

be

shar

ed

with

the

Fina

nce

dep

artm

ent



Com

mis

sion

er O

ffice

Com

plai

nt re

gist

ratio

n an

d re

dres

sal m

echa

nism

Pro

gram

me

inte

rnal

mon

itorin

g

Pro

gres

s re

view

Dep

uty

Com

mis

sion

er O

ffice

Cha

ir of

the

dis

trict

dev

elop

men

t Com

mitt

ee (d

dC

)

Con

tract

neg

otia

tions

and

sig

ning

Hel

plin

e to

pro

vide

cus

tom

er s

uppo

rt to

the

com

mun

ities

dis

tric

t Fin

ance

dep

artm

ent

Pla

nnin

g O

ffice

r und

er th

e Fi

nanc

e D

epar

tmen

t re

spon

sibl

e fo

r rec

eivi

ng a

pplic

atio

ns, s

harin

g w

ith li

ne

depa

rtmen

ts fo

r rev

iew

, and

cal

ling

Tech

nica

l Eva

luat

ion

Com

mitt

ee (T

EC

) mee

tings

Line

dep

artm

ents

Full

prop

osal

app

licat

ions

are

rece

ived

by

the

foca

l pe

rson

s in

the

conc

erne

d de

partm

ents

The

foca

l per

son

of th

e co

ncer

ned

depa

rtmen

ts c

heck

s th

e pr

opos

al a

pplic

atio

ns fo

r the

ir te

chni

cal s

ound

ness

and

re

turn

s it

with

com

men

tspo

ol o

f eng

inee

rsTe

chni

cal s

uper

visi

on a

nd in

spec

tion

afte

r des

ign

phas

eSo

cial

mob

ilisa

tion

part

ner

Con

tact

app

lican

ts

Org

anis

e an

d es

tabl

ish

CB

Os

Ass

ist i

n th

e de

velo

pmen

t of d

etai

led

prop

osal

s

S.N

o.In

dica

tor

des

crip

tion

Met

hodo

logy

Que

stio

nsR

espo

nses

Mar

k (Y

/N/P

)


tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

team

Pro

vide

trai

ning

s, o

n-th

e-jo

b te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e an

d M

IS

supp

ort

do

you

unde

rsta

nd

your

spe

cific

role

as

part

of c

omm

ittee

s un

der t

he re

gula

tory

fra

mew

ork?

proj

ect C

oord

inat

ion

and

rev

iew

Com

mitt

ee

Act

as

a st

eerin

g co

mm

ittee

for C

dLd

Pol

icy

revi

ew a

nd

impl

emen

tatio

n r

efor

ms

mon

itorin

g U

nit

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

ann

ual a

ctio

n pl

an

Ove

rall

Cd

Ld c

oord

inat

ion

Cd

Ld C

oord

inat

ion

Uni

tS

ecre

taria

t to

the

PC

RC

Mon

itor a

nd c

oord

inat

e C

dLd

Pol

icy

dis

tric

t dev

elop

men

t Com

mitt

eeR

espo

nsib

le fo

r im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e C

dLd

Pol

icy

at th

e di

stric

t lev

elte

chni

cal e

valu

atio

n C

omm

ittee

TEC

is a

sub

-com

mitt

ee u

nder

dd

C th

at a

utho

rises

to

app

rais

e, te

chni

cally

eva

luat

e an

d pr

ovid

e fo

r co

nsid

erat

ion

of th

e D

DC

reco

mm

enda

tions

on

the

proj

ect

appl

icat

ions

sub

mitt

ed u

nder

Cd

Ld P

olic

yte

hsil

Leve

l Com

mitt

eeR

esol

ve th

e di

sput

e by

giv

ing

a m

ajor

ity d

ecis

ion

dis

tric

t Lev

el C

omm

ittee

Res

olve

the

disp

ute

if un

reso

lved

at t

he te

hsil

leve

l co

mm

ittee

or i

ncas

e ei

ther

of t

he d

ispu

ting

party

is n

ot

satis

fied

with

the

deci

sion

of t

he te

hsil

leve

l com

mitt

ee

S.N

o.In

dica

tor

des

crip

tion

Met

hodo

logy

Que

stio

nsR

espo

nses

Mar

k (Y

/N/P

)


CB

o p

roje

ct C

omm

ittee

Impl

emen

t pro

ject

, mon

itor p

rogr

ess

and

keep

reco

rdC

Bo

aud

it C

omm

ittee

Rev

iew

reco

rd a

nd fi

nanc

ials

vis

-à-v

is p

rogr

ess

CB

o o

&m

Com

mitt

eeR

espo

nsib

le fo

r the

ope

ratio

n an

d m

aint

enan

ce a

fter t

he

com

plet

ion

of th

e pr

ojec

td

o yo

u un

ders

tand

th

e C

DLD

pro

ject

cy

cle

proc

ess

unde

r th

e re

gula

tory

fra

mew

ork?

A de

taile

d an

d ro

bust

wor

k pl

an is

dev

elop

ed jo

intly

by

the

dist

rict t

eam

of s

ocia

l mob

ilisa

tion

partn

er a

nd th

e di

stric

t go

vern

men

t tea

m h

eade

d by

dep

uty

Com

mis

sion

er

dep

uty

Com

mis

sion

er a

dver

tises

for c

all f

or p

ropo

sals

TEC

eva

luat

es th

e fir

st a

pplic

atio

ns a

gain

st th

e cr

iteria

The

appl

ican

ts fu

lfilli

ng th

e cr

iteria

are

ask

ed b

y th

e P

lann

ing

Offi

cer t

o su

bmit

full

prop

osal

s th

roug

h S

RS

P

Soc

ial m

obili

satio

n pa

rtner

sta

rts th

e so

cial

mob

ilisa

tion

proc

ess

CB

Os

subm

its th

e fu

ll pr

ojec

t pro

posa

ls

S.N

o.In

dica

tor

des

crip

tion

Met

hodo

logy

Que

stio

nsR

espo

nses

Mar

k (Y

/N/P

)


Pla

nnin

g O

ffice

r sen

ds th

e fu

ll pr

opos

al a

pplic

atio

ns to

the

foca

l per

sons

not

ified

in th

e co

ncer

ned

line

depa

rtmen

ts

for c

omm

ents

on

the

tech

nica

l sou

ndne

ss o

f the

pro

pose

d pr

ojec

tsFo

cal P

erso

ns o

f the

con

cern

ed d

epar

tmen

ts c

heck

the

prop

osal

app

licat

ions

for t

heir

tech

nica

l sou

ndne

ss a

nd

resp

ond

with

com

men

ts

Pla

nnin

g O

ffice

r con

vene

s a

mee

ting

of th

e TE

C to

ap

prov

e an

d di

sapp

rove

app

licat

ions

All

such

eva

luat

ed p

ropo

sal a

pplic

atio

ns, w

ith

reco

mm

enda

tions

of t

he T

EC

, are

sub

mitt

ed to

the

dd

C

for r

evie

w a

nd a

ppro

val i

n a

mee

ting

to b

e co

nven

ed b

y th

e d

eput

y C

omm

issi

oner

List

of a

ppro

ved

proj

ects

is s

ent t

o th

e C

DLD

Coo

rdin

atio

n U

nit i

n Fi

nanc

e d

epar

tmen

t and

the

dep

uty

Com

mis

sion

er

shal

l inv

ite s

ucce

ssfu

l CB

Os

for c

ontra

ct n

egot

iatio

n

dep

uty

Com

mis

sion

er is

sues

ord

er fo

r com

men

cem

ent o

f w

ork

and

rele

ase

the

first

inst

alm

ent

Rel

ease

of s

econ

d an

d th

ird in

stal

men

ts in

to th

e C

BO

ac

coun

t is

cont

inge

nt u

pon

subm

issi

on o

f sta

tem

ent o

f ex

pend

iture

and

phy

sica

l pro

gres

s ac

cord

ing

to th

e ag

reed

m

ilest

ones

S.N

o.In

dica

tor

des

crip

tion

Met

hodo

logy

Que

stio

nsR

espo

nses

Mar

k (Y

/N/P

)


Sel

f-ass

essm

ent

abou

t com

pete

ncy

scor

ecar

d

Do

you

have

suf

ficie

nt

capa

city

to p

erfo

rm

your

role

und

er C

dLd

P

olic

y?

I do

not u

nder

stan

d m

y ro

le u

nder

Cd

Ld

I was

nev

er p

art o

f Cd

Ld tr

aini

ngs

and

tech

nica

l as

sist

ance

bef

ore

I par

ticip

ated

in C

dLd

trai

ning

s an

d te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e,

but I

nee

d a

refre

sher

cou

rse(

s)

I par

ticip

ated

in C

dLd

trai

ning

s an

d te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e,

but t

hey

wer

e no

t use

ful

I nee

d fu

rther

trai

ning

s an

d on

-the-

job

tech

nica

l ass

ista

nce

to p

erfo

rm m

y ro

le e

ffect

ivel

y

S.N

o.In

dica

tor

des

crip

tion

Met

hodo

logy

Que

stio

nsR

espo

nses

Mar

k (Y

/N/P

)


CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation

Understanding of CdLd Policy (50% weight)

Understanding of the regulatory framework of the CdLd Policy

implementation (30% weight)

Self-assessment about competency scorecard

(20% weight)

Total Possible Score

Baseline Score

Baseline Percentage Score

Q1.What is CdLd’s goal? (23% weight)

Q2. What are CdLd’s objectives?(8% weight)

Q3. Are you aware of the CdLd regulatory

framework? (23% weight)

Q4. do you know about stakeholders and partners

of CdLd framework? do you understand their specific role under the

regulatory framework? (8% weight)

Q5. do you know about committees and

sub-committees for implementation of CdLd

framework? do you understand your specific

role? (8% weight)

Q6. do you understand the CDLD project cycle process

under the regulatory framework?(23% weight)

Q7. Do you have sufficient capacity to perform your role under CdLd? (8%

weight)

Abd

ul A

ziz

Sha

heen

Sw

atB

aboz

aiE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

Abd

ul

Gha

ffar

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Add

ition

al

dep

uty

Com

mis

sion

er0.

230.

150.

350.

250.

230.

000.

044.

381.

4132

.21

Abd

ul K

abir

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Hea

lthA

ccou

ntan

t0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

54

Abd

ul L

atif

Sw

atB

aboz

aiE

duca

tion

Juni

or C

lerk

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.04

4.38

0.04

0.81

Abd

ul M

alik

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Edu

catio

nA

ssis

tant

P

rogr

amm

er0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

54

Abd

ul

Wah

idM

alak

and

dar

gai

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksS

ub d

ivis

iona

l A

ccou

ntan

t0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

40

Ann

ex-B

: Gov

ernm

ent O

ffici

als

Scor

ecar

d D

etai

ls


Afz

al K

han

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksS

ub E

ngin

eer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

Ahm

ed

Zaib

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Soi

l C

onse

rvat

ion

Soi

l C

onse

rvat

ion

Offi

cer/

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.46

0.19

0.21

0.12

0.18

1.52

0.02

4.38

3.03

69.1

4

Akb

ar A

liS

wat

Bab

ozai

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Pla

nnin

g O

ffice

r0.

460.

310.

420.

320.

601.

660.

024.

384.

2597

.03

Akh

tar

Hus

sain

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

40

Akh

tar

Nae

emS

hang

laA

lpur

iE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

0.46

0.15

0.21

0.12

0.28

0.55

0.01

4.38

2.17

49.5

7

Ala

m K

han

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

Soc

ial W

elfa

reA

ssis

tant

W

arde

n0.

120.

040.

000.

000.

000.

000.

044.

380.

204.

45

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Ala

mgi

r K

han

Sw

atB

aboz

aid

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Ass

ista

nt

Fina

nce

and

Pla

nnin

g0.

230.

150.

210.

140.

000.

830.

024.

381.

4533

.00

Ali

Abb

asM

alak

and

Bat

khel

ad

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

dep

uty

Com

mis

sion

er0.

460.

310.

420.

320.

601.

660.

014.

384.

2496

.76

Ali

Hai

der

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

Edu

catio

nA

ssis

tant

D

istri

ct O

ffice

r0.

230.

040.

070.

070.

000.

000.

044.

380.

378.

53

Ali

Mur

adC

hitra

lM

astu

jE

duca

tion

Juni

or C

lerk

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.01

0.27

Am

eer

Ham

zaM

alak

and

Bat

khel

ad

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Priv

ate

Sec

reta

ry0.

460.

270.

280.

180.

301.

590.

014.

383.

6082

.20

Am

in J

anU

pper

dir

dir

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Ass

ista

nt

Pro

gram

mer

0.46

0.08

0.28

0.18

0.28

0.83

0.02

4.38

2.32

52.8

2

Am

in K

han

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

Pub

lic H

ealth

E

ngin

eerin

gS

ub d

ivis

iona

l O

ffice

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

004.

380.

000.

00

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Anj

um

Kha

nLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

raA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Bud

get a

nd

Acc

ount

s O

ffice

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

014.

380.

010.

27

Asa

d U

llah

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Agr

icul

ture

, Li

vest

ock

and

Fish

erie

sA

ssis

tant

0.46

0.08

0.00

0.05

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.78

17.8

1

Asi

f Iqb

alS

hang

laA

lpur

iA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Ass

ista

nt0.

460.

270.

350.

250.

601.

660.

024.

384.

1594

.57

Asi

f Kha

nM

alak

and

dar

gai

Irrig

atio

nS

ub d

ivis

iona

l O

ffice

r0.

460.

230.

350.

250.

301.

180.

024.

383.

2373

.56

Asl

am

Kha

nC

hitra

lC

hitra

lA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Offi

ce A

ssis

tant

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.01

0.27

Ayat

Ulla

hU

pper

dir

dir

On-

Farm

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

014.

380.

010.

27

Ayub

Kha

nS

wat

Bab

ozai

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Mun

icip

al

Fina

nce

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.05

4.38

0.05

1.08

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Ayub

Kha

nM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

Azi

z U

r R

ehm

anLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

raP

ublic

Hea

lth

Eng

inee

ring

div

isio

nal

Acc

ount

s O

ffice

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

54

Bak

ht S

hah

Zeb

Upp

er d

ird

irE

duca

tion

Bud

get a

nd

Acc

ount

s O

ffice

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

54

Bak

ht S

her

Kha

nM

alak

and

Bat

khel

a

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Acc

ount

ant

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.03

4.38

0.03

0.67

Bak

htia

r K

han

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Chi

ef M

unic

ipal

O

ffice

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

54

Bas

hir

Ahm

edLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

raP

ublic

Hea

lth

Eng

inee

ring

Sub

div

isio

nal

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Dr.

Ajm

al

Kha

nU

pper

dir

dir

Agr

icul

ture

, Li

vest

ock

and

Fish

erie

s

dis

trict

dire

ctor

Li

vest

ock

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

dr.

Ibra

him

K

han

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Hea

lthC

oord

inat

or

Prim

ary

Hea

lth

Car

e0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

014.

380.

010.

27

dr.

Iftik

har

ud d

inU

pper

dir

dir

Hea

lthD

istri

ct H

ealth

O

ffice

r0.

230.

040.

140.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

439.

84

dr.

Isra

r U

llah

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Hea

lthD

istri

ct H

ealth

O

ffice

r0.

120.

150.

210.

180.

140.

000.

024.

380.

7817

.73

dr.

Naz

ar

Muh

amm

adU

pper

dir

dir

Hea

lthN

atio

nal

Pro

gram

me

Coo

rdin

ator

0.46

0.15

0.28

0.18

0.23

0.97

0.02

4.38

2.49

56.6

8

Fahe

em

Akh

tar

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Agr

icul

ture

, Li

vest

ock

and

Fish

erie

s

Ass

ista

nt

dire

ctor

0.23

0.15

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.40

9.04

Faiz

Ur

Reh

man

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Com

pute

r P

rogr

amm

er0.

350.

150.

280.

250.

140.

480.

044.

381.

8141

.30

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Faqi

r M

uham

mad

Upp

er d

ird

irC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sen

ior C

lerk

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.01

0.27

Farz

ana

Kha

nS

wat

Bab

ozai

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

Faza

l A

dnan

Upp

er d

ird

irH

ealth

Dis

trict

Hea

lth

Man

agem

ent

Info

rmat

ion

Sys

tem

A

ssis

tant

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.01

0.27

Faza

l e

Sub

han

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.46

0.23

0.28

0.18

0.25

0.90

0.01

4.38

2.75

62.7

7

Faza

l Hab

ibS

hang

laA

lpur

iS

ocia

l Wel

fare

Juni

or C

lerk

0.00

0.00

0.07

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.08

1.71

Faza

l Had

iS

wat

Bab

ozai

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Ass

ista

nt

Acc

ount

ant

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.04

4.38

0.04

0.81

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Faza

l K

haliq

Sw

atB

aboz

aiE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.46

0.31

0.28

0.18

0.37

0.83

0.04

4.38

2.70

61.5

1

Faza

l M

aboo

dS

hang

laA

lpur

iS

oil

Con

serv

atio

nJu

nior

Cle

rk0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

014.

380.

010.

27

Faza

l Raz

aLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

raIrr

igat

ion

Sub

div

isio

nal

Acc

ount

ant

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

Faza

l R

ehm

anLo

wer

dir

Bal

amba

tC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

044.

380.

040.

81

Faza

l R

ehm

anS

wat

Bab

ozai

Agr

icul

ture

, Li

vest

ock

and

Fish

erie

s

Acc

ount

s O

ffice

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

034.

380.

030.

67

Faza

l S

atta

rU

pper

dir

dir

On-

Farm

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

Faza

l S

ubha

nLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

raE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt

Pro

gram

mer

0.23

0.04

0.07

0.12

0.21

0.00

0.05

4.38

0.80

18.2

7

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Fazl

e K

huda

B

acha

Low

er d

irA

denz

aiIrr

igat

ion

Sub

div

isio

nal

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

Gha

zala

A

njum

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Edu

catio

nS

ub d

ivis

iona

l E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.01

0.27

Ghu

lam

R

ahim

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksS

ub d

ivis

iona

l O

ffice

r0.

230.

230.

000.

050.

601.

660.

024.

383.

5380

.40

Ghu

lam

R

asoo

lLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

ra

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

120.

040.

140.

120.

320.

830.

044.

381.

7139

.06

Ghu

lam

S

adiq

Sw

atB

aboz

aiE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.05

4.38

0.05

1.08

Goh

ar A

liM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aIrr

igat

ion

div

isio

nal

Acc

ount

s O

ffice

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

034.

380.

030.

67

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Gul

B

adsh

ahLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

rad

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Ass

ista

nt

Pla

nnin

g an

d d

evel

opm

ent

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.04

4.38

0.04

0.81

Gul

B

ahad

erC

hitra

lC

hitra

l

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Mun

icip

al

Fina

nce

Offi

cer

0.23

0.08

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.32

7.29

Hab

ib U

llah

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Soc

ial W

elfa

reA

ssis

tant

0.46

0.23

0.42

0.32

0.46

0.76

0.01

4.38

2.94

66.9

8

Ham

id

Isla

mM

alak

and

Bat

khel

a

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Chi

ef M

unic

ipal

O

ffice

r0.

460.

150.

280.

180.

180.

900.

024.

382.

5758

.65

Ham

id

Ulla

h K

han

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

On-

Farm

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

0.46

0.27

0.21

0.12

0.25

1.18

0.01

4.38

2.91

66.4

1

Hay

at u

d d

inM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aIrr

igat

ion

Exe

cutiv

e E

ngin

eer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

Haz

rat

Wah

abU

pper

dir

dir

Edu

catio

nA

ccou

nts

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Hid

ayat

U

llah

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Uni

on C

ounc

il S

ecre

tary

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

His

sam

ud

din

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ceJu

nior

Cle

rk0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

014.

380.

010.

27

Ibra

r A

hmed

Upp

er d

ird

irA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Ass

ista

nt

dire

ctor

Fi

sher

ies

0.46

0.08

0.14

0.05

0.09

0.14

0.01

4.38

1.06

24.1

3

Iftik

har

Ahm

adM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aP

ublic

Hea

lth

Eng

inee

ring

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

54

Ihsa

n A

hmad

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Soc

ial W

elfa

reA

ssis

tant

0.23

0.12

0.28

0.18

0.23

0.62

0.01

4.38

1.93

43.9

5

Ihsa

n U

llah

Low

er d

irB

alam

bat

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Ass

ista

nt

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Ihte

sham

ul

Haq

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

Ijaz

Ali

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksS

ub E

ngin

eer

0.12

0.12

0.21

0.18

0.12

0.62

0.02

4.38

1.63

37.2

5

Imda

d U

llah

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

Imra

n K

han

Low

er d

irB

alam

bat

On-

Farm

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent

Ass

ista

nt

Bud

get a

nd

Acc

ount

s0.

230.

080.

280.

180.

210.

480.

044.

381.

7539

.93

Imtia

z A

hmad

Chi

tral

Mas

tuj

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Mun

icip

al

Eng

inee

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

014.

380.

010.

27

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Imtia

z A

liS

wat

Khw

azak

hela

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

Inay

at U

llah

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

On-

Farm

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent

Ass

ista

nt0.

460.

000.

000.

050.

000.

690.

024.

381.

6437

.38

Inay

at U

r R

ehm

anLo

wer

dir

Bal

amba

tC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

230.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

044.

380.

276.

07

Inay

at U

llah

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Chi

ef M

unic

ipal

O

ffice

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

014.

380.

010.

27

Irfan

Ulla

hLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

raP

ublic

Hea

lth

Eng

inee

ring

Ass

ista

nt S

ocia

l O

rgan

iser

0.12

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.04

4.38

0.15

3.44

Isht

iaq

Ahm

edM

alak

and

Bat

khel

a

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

230.

120.

210.

120.

280.

760.

024.

382.

1047

.91

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Isra

r Kha

nS

hang

laA

lpur

iH

ealth

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.04

4.38

0.04

0.81

Jala

l ud

din

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksA

ccou

nts

Cle

rk0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

014.

380.

010.

27

Jam

il K

han

Low

er d

irB

alam

bat

Agr

icul

ture

, Li

vest

ock

and

Fish

erie

sD

istri

ct O

ffice

r0.

460.

120.

070.

070.

230.

000.

044.

381.

2428

.18

Jan

Mal

ikM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aIrr

igat

ion

Acc

ount

ant

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

Jan

Muh

amm

adC

hitra

lC

hitra

lA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

dis

trict

dire

ctor

A

gric

ultu

re0.

230.

150.

000.

000.

250.

000.

014.

381.

0223

.25

Jeha

n M

uham

mad

Upp

er d

ird

irE

duca

tion

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.23

0.04

0.21

0.12

0.18

0.28

0.01

4.38

1.34

30.6

2

Jeha

n Ze

bU

pper

dir

dir

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

54

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Jum

a K

han

Sw

atB

aboz

aid

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

Fina

nce

and

Pla

nnin

g0.

460.

310.

420.

320.

601.

660.

014.

384.

2496

.76

Kar

im K

han

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Agr

icul

ture

, Li

vest

ock

and

Fish

erie

s

dis

trict

dire

ctor

A

gric

ultu

re0.

460.

310.

420.

320.

461.

660.

024.

384.

0792

.82

Kar

im U

llah

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Chi

ef M

unic

ipal

O

ffice

r0.

230.

040.

350.

250.

300.

550.

014.

381.

9243

.78

Kas

hif

Qay

um

Kha

nM

alak

and

dar

gai

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Add

ition

al

Ass

ista

nt

Com

mis

sion

er0.

460.

310.

420.

320.

511.

660.

004.

384.

1494

.39

Kha

lid

Bab

arU

pper

dir

dir

Edu

catio

nC

ompu

ter

Pro

gram

mer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.01

0.27

Kha

n B

adsh

ahM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Offi

ce A

ssis

tant

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.03

4.38

0.03

0.67

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Kha

yal

Muh

amm

adU

pper

dir

dir

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.12

0.04

0.28

0.18

0.35

1.04

0.04

4.38

2.24

51.1

6

Khu

rshi

d Je

han

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.40

Khu

sh

Bah

arC

hitra

lC

hitra

lE

duca

tion

Juni

or C

lerk

0.35

0.15

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.55

0.01

4.38

1.07

24.3

0

Kifa

yat

Ulla

hS

hang

laA

lpur

iC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Exe

cutiv

e E

ngin

eer

0.46

0.19

0.42

0.32

0.32

0.83

0.01

4.38

2.71

61.8

9

Kifa

yat

Ulla

h K

han

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.03

4.38

0.03

0.67

Lagh

al

Aza

mC

hitra

lC

hitra

lE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

014.

380.

010.

27

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Laiq

Sha

hS

hang

laA

lpur

i

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Wor

k S

uper

viso

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

54

Lal

Bad

shah

Mal

akan

dd

arga

iC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

40

Muh

amm

ad

Kha

liqS

wat

Mat

tad

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Chi

ef M

unic

ipal

O

ffice

r0.

460.

310.

420.

320.

021.

660.

034.

383.

6884

.01

Muh

amm

ad

Gul

Sw

atB

aboz

aiE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.04

4.38

0.04

0.81

Maq

bool

A

min

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Edu

catio

nC

ompu

ter

Pro

gram

mer

0.00

0.00

0.14

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.15

3.43

Maq

bool

A

zam

Upp

er d

ird

irC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

div

isio

nal

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Mas

aud

Kha

nM

alak

and

Bat

khel

a

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Mun

icip

al

Fina

nce

Offi

cer

0.46

0.31

0.28

0.18

0.44

1.52

0.02

4.38

3.74

85.3

2

Meh

boob

E

lahi

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.01

0.27

Mia

n G

hula

m

Hus

sain

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

On-

Farm

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

0.46

0.31

0.42

0.32

0.51

1.04

0.01

4.38

3.34

76.1

0

Mia

n H

azra

t S

hah

Sw

atB

aboz

aiS

ocia

l Wel

fare

Hea

d D

arul

K

afal

a0.

460.

310.

210.

120.

320.

000.

044.

381.

7640

.07

Mid

rar

Ulla

hM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aE

duca

tion

dep

uty

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.40

Mift

ah u

d d

inU

pper

dir

dir

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksA

ccou

ntan

t0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

014.

380.

010.

27

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Mis

bah

ud

din

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Ass

ista

nt

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

Reg

ulat

ion

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

Mis

bah

ud

din

Chi

tral

Mas

tuj

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Mun

icip

al

Offi

cer

Reg

ulat

ion

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.01

0.27

Moh

amm

ad

Ash

faq

Low

er d

irA

denz

aiIrr

igat

ion

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

230.

000.

070.

120.

140.

000.

054.

380.

6915

.82

Moh

amm

ad

Hay

atM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Ass

ista

nt0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

40

Moh

amm

ad

Ilyas

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Agr

icul

ture

, Li

vest

ock

and

Fish

erie

s

Ass

ista

nt

dire

ctor

Fi

sher

ies

0.23

0.00

0.21

0.07

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.53

11.9

8

Moh

amm

ad

Jave

dM

alak

and

Bat

khel

a

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

Fina

nce

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.40

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Moh

amm

ad

Qas

imM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aS

ocia

l Wel

fare

Ass

ista

nt0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

034.

380.

030.

67

Moh

amm

ad

Ras

ool

Kha

nLo

wer

dir

Ade

nzai

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksS

ub E

ngin

eer

0.23

0.08

0.07

0.07

0.00

0.00

0.04

4.38

0.41

9.41

Moh

amm

ad

Ria

zM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aP

ublic

Hea

lth

Eng

inee

ring

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

40

Moh

amm

ad

Ria

zM

alak

and

Bat

khel

ad

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Juni

or C

lerk

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.03

4.38

0.03

0.67

Moh

amm

ad

Saj

jad

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Irrig

atio

nS

ub d

ivis

iona

l O

ffice

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

034.

380.

030.

67

Mub

arak

Ze

bLo

wer

dir

Jand

olC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

044.

380.

040.

81

Muh

amm

ad

Ali

Sw

atB

aboz

aiA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Ass

ista

nt

dire

ctor

Fi

sher

ies

0.23

0.15

0.35

0.25

0.51

1.66

0.02

4.38

3.71

84.5

7

Muh

amm

ad

Ilyas

Upp

er d

ird

irP

ublic

Hea

lth

Eng

inee

ring

Sub

div

isio

nal

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.01

0.27

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Muh

amm

ad

Am

inS

hang

laA

lpur

iE

duca

tion

dep

uty

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

4.38

0.00

0.00

Muh

amm

ad

Arif

Low

er d

irB

alam

bat

On-

Farm

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

230.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

255.

80

Muh

amm

ad

Ars

had

Low

er d

irB

alam

bat

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

044.

380.

040.

81

Muh

amm

ad

Ayaz

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Ass

ista

nt

Com

mis

sion

er0.

460.

000.

070.

070.

000.

000.

024.

380.

5512

.65

Muh

amm

ad

Ibra

rLo

wer

dir

Bal

amba

tH

ealth

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

Muh

amm

ad

Ilyas

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Pub

lic H

ealth

E

ngin

eerin

gS

ub d

ivis

iona

l O

ffice

r0.

230.

150.

280.

180.

120.

480.

014.

381.

6737

.99

Muh

amm

ad

Iqba

lU

pper

dir

dir

Edu

catio

nA

ssis

tant

d

irect

or

Edu

catio

n0.

230.

040.

210.

120.

210.

480.

044.

381.

4132

.21

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Muh

amm

ad

Isha

qM

alak

and

dar

gai

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.40

Muh

amm

ad

Isra

rLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

rad

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Juni

or C

lerk

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.04

4.38

0.04

0.81

Muh

amm

ad

Reh

man

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

Hea

lthD

istri

ct H

ealth

O

ffice

r0.

230.

080.

350.

320.

281.

180.

044.

382.

6760

.99

Muh

amm

ad

Ria

zLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

raE

duca

tion

dep

uty

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.46

0.23

0.07

0.07

0.00

0.00

0.03

4.38

0.79

18.0

4

Muh

amm

ad

Tahi

rU

pper

dir

dir

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.23

0.04

0.14

0.05

0.28

0.48

0.02

4.38

1.52

34.5

7

Muh

amm

ad

Zeb

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

Soc

ial W

elfa

reD

istri

ct O

ffice

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

54

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Muk

htia

r Ali

Sha

hU

pper

dir

dir

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ceO

ffice

Ass

ista

nt0.

120.

000.

280.

180.

090.

830.

024.

381.

6437

.38

Muq

arab

K

han

Sw

atB

aboz

ai

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Tehs

il O

ffice

r In

frast

ruct

ure

0.46

0.31

0.42

0.32

0.60

1.66

0.02

4.38

4.25

97.0

3

Mur

ad A

liLo

wer

dir

Bal

amba

tA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

dep

uty

dire

ctor

A

gric

ultu

re0.

000.

000.

070.

120.

301.

590.

024.

382.

5658

.30

Mur

ad

Ulla

hM

alak

and

Bat

khel

ad

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Ass

ista

nt

Pro

gram

mer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.03

4.38

0.03

0.67

Mus

htaq

Ali

Sw

atB

aboz

aid

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Com

pute

r P

rogr

amm

er0.

460.

310.

420.

320.

601.

660.

044.

384.

2797

.30

Mus

sara

t Ja

mal

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Nad

ar S

hah

Low

er d

irS

amar

bagh

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Chi

ef M

unic

ipal

O

ffice

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

54

Nae

em u

d d

inC

hitra

lC

hitra

l

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Uni

on C

ounc

il S

ecre

tary

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.01

0.27

Nah

eed

Akh

tar

Sw

atB

aboz

aiE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.04

4.38

0.04

0.81

Nai

k A

mal

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Edu

catio

nC

ompu

ter

Ope

rato

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

40

Nav

eed

Ala

mM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aH

ealth

Dis

trict

Hea

lth

Man

agem

ent

Info

rmat

ion

Sys

tem

A

ssis

tant

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Naz

iat

Kha

nM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

Naz

ir U

llah

Upp

er d

ird

ir

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.01

0.27

Nia

z M

oham

mad

Low

er d

irA

denz

aiC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

54

Nia

z M

uham

mad

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Hea

lthS

enio

r Cle

rk0.

000.

080.

000.

000.

000.

000.

044.

380.

112.

56

Nija

t B

egam

Mal

akan

dd

arga

iE

duca

tion

Sub

div

isio

nal

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.40

Noo

r Ala

mM

alak

and

Bat

khel

ad

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.03

4.38

0.03

0.67

Noo

r Ali

Jan

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Acc

ount

s O

ffice

r0.

230.

080.

140.

140.

000.

550.

024.

381.

0223

.35

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Noo

r M

uham

mad

Mal

akan

dd

arga

iIrr

igat

ion

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

54

Noo

r ul

Bas

har

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

40

Nus

rat

Kha

nM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.23

0.19

0.21

0.12

0.21

0.55

0.04

4.38

2.03

46.3

8

Nus

rat

Jabe

enC

hitra

lC

hitra

lS

ocia

l Wel

fare

Soc

ial W

elfa

re

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.01

0.27

Oba

id U

llah

Upp

er d

ird

irA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Ass

ista

nt

dire

ctor

A

gric

ultu

re0.

230.

150.

140.

050.

140.

830.

024.

381.

7539

.84

Qad

ir N

asir

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Chi

ef

Coo

rdin

atio

n O

ffice

r0.

230.

150.

280.

180.

180.

000.

014.

381.

4332

.73

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Qai

sar A

liS

wat

Bab

ozai

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Ass

ista

nt

Pro

gram

mer

0.46

0.31

0.28

0.18

0.60

1.66

0.03

4.38

4.08

92.9

6

Qam

ar

Zam

anM

alak

and

Bat

khel

a

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

460.

230.

280.

180.

251.

520.

034.

383.

2874

.89

Qaz

i M

uham

mad

R

asoo

l S

hah

Upp

er d

ird

ird

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

Fina

nce

0.46

0.19

0.42

0.32

0.55

1.45

0.02

4.38

3.84

87.5

6

Rafi

ud

Din

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ceS

ub E

ngin

eer

0.23

0.12

0.07

0.07

0.02

0.69

0.01

4.38

1.14

26.0

6

Rah

man

U

llah

Upp

er d

ird

irH

ealth

Ass

isan

t D

istri

ct O

ffice

r0.

230.

040.

280.

180.

000.

970.

044.

381.

8341

.69

Rah

mat

H

akim

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksE

xecu

tive

Eng

inee

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

54

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Rah

mat

S

yed

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksS

ub d

ivis

iona

l A

ccou

ntan

t0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

54

Ras

hid

Afz

alS

hang

laA

lpur

iE

duca

tion

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.23

0.12

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.83

0.01

4.38

1.19

27.1

1

Ria

z W

ali

Sha

hM

alak

and

dar

gai

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksS

ub d

ivis

iona

l O

ffice

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

40

Riz

wan

U

llah

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Pub

lic H

ealth

E

ngin

eerin

gS

ub d

ivis

iona

l O

ffice

r0.

460.

190.

420.

320.

420.

480.

014.

382.

6059

.39

Sad

iq U

llah

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Edu

catio

nA

ccou

nts

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.01

0.27

Sad

iq U

llah

Upp

er d

ird

irA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Fiel

d A

ssis

tant

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.01

0.27

Sae

ed

Gha

niS

wat

Bab

ozai

Edu

catio

nC

ompu

ter

Ope

rato

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

044.

380.

040.

81

Sae

ed

Kha

nS

hang

laA

lpur

iE

duca

tion

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.46

0.23

0.42

0.32

0.00

0.14

0.01

4.38

1.49

33.9

5

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Saf

dar A

liM

alak

and

Bat

khel

ad

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Pla

nnin

g O

ffice

r0.

460.

310.

420.

320.

601.

660.

004.

384.

2396

.49

Safi

a K

han

Mal

akan

dd

arga

iE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

Sah

ib Z

arin

Low

er d

irS

amar

bagh

Pub

lic H

ealth

E

ngin

eerin

gS

ub E

ngin

eer

0.12

0.04

0.07

0.07

0.00

0.00

0.04

4.38

0.26

5.90

Sai

d A

li S

hah

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ceA

ssis

tant

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.40

Sai

ma

Bib

iS

wat

Bab

ozai

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

Sal

ih d

arLo

wer

dir

Bal

amba

tC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

div

isio

nal

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Sal

ma

Bib

iM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.03

4.38

0.03

0.67

Sam

i Ulla

hS

wat

Bab

ozai

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ceS

teno

grap

her

0.46

0.31

0.28

0.32

0.42

1.59

0.02

4.38

3.86

87.9

5

Sam

iulla

h K

undi

Low

er d

irJa

ndol

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksS

ub d

ivis

iona

l O

ffice

r0.

230.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

044.

380.

276.

21

San

a U

llah

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.03

4.38

0.03

0.67

Sar

ver

Par

veen

Upp

er d

ird

irE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.01

0.27

Sha

fi U

llah

Kha

nLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

raS

oil

Con

serv

atio

nA

ccou

nts

Cle

rk0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

54

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Sha

h Fe

roz

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ceA

ssis

tant

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.40

Sha

h K

halid

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.35

0.27

0.28

0.18

0.32

0.83

0.01

4.38

2.54

57.9

9

Sha

h N

awaz

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

On-

Farm

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

40

Sha

h N

awaz

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Pub

lic H

ealth

E

ngin

eerin

gS

ub d

ivis

iona

l O

ffice

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

034.

380.

030.

67

Sha

heen

B

egum

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

Edu

catio

nS

ub d

ivis

iona

l E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

Sha

hzad

N

adee

mC

hitra

lC

hitra

lE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.46

0.08

0.00

0.05

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

1.27

28.8

7

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Sha

keel

A

hmad

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Ass

ista

nt0.

230.

040.

210.

070.

000.

000.

014.

380.

4911

.15

Sha

keel

H

ayat

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Mun

icip

al

Offi

cer

Reg

ulat

ion

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

Sha

zia

Kha

nM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.03

4.38

0.03

0.67

She

r Mal

ikS

hang

laA

lpur

iE

duca

tion

Sup

erin

tend

ent

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.01

0.13

She

r Mur

adC

hitra

lC

hitra

lE

duca

tion

Com

pute

r P

rogr

amm

er0.

120.

190.

000.

000.

120.

280.

014.

380.

7116

.23

She

r Zad

aS

wat

Bab

ozai

Agr

icul

ture

, Li

vest

ock

and

Fish

erie

sd

istri

ct d

irect

or0.

000.

000.

140.

120.

320.

830.

044.

381.

7439

.76

Sho

aib

Ulla

hLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

raC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

div

isio

nal

Acc

ount

ant

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.04

4.38

0.04

0.81

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)

Sho

ukat

Ali

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Pla

nnin

g O

ffice

r0.

460.

310.

350.

250.

301.

450.

044.

383.

6783

.62

Shu

ja U

llah

Low

er d

irB

alam

bat

Irrig

atio

nd

ivis

iona

l A

ccou

nts

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

4.38

0.00

0.00

Siy

ab A

liM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

460.

190.

210.

120.

281.

040.

024.

382.

7562

.82

Sul

tan

Rom

eM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aP

ublic

Hea

lth

Eng

inee

ring

Sub

div

isio

nal

Acc

ount

ant

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.54

Sye

d A

jmal

A

li S

hah

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksS

ub E

ngin

eer

0.46

0.27

0.00

0.00

0.30

0.69

0.01

4.38

2.10

47.9

9

Sye

d A

min

Low

er d

irB

alam

bat

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksS

ub d

ivis

iona

l A

ccou

ntan

t0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

044.

380.

040.

81

Sye

d A

nwar

A

li S

hah

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Edu

catio

nS

enio

r Cle

rk0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

014.

380.

010.

13

Sye

d M

uham

mad

Ta

riqS

hang

laA

lpur

iC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

div

isio

nal

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.03

4.38

0.03

0.67

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Sye

d Q

amar

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.01

0.27

Sye

d S

alah

ud

din

S

hah

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Edu

catio

nS

enio

r Cle

rk0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

014.

380.

010.

27

Sye

d Za

min

S

hah

Mal

akan

dd

arga

iE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.40

Taif

Kha

nS

hang

laA

lpur

iE

duca

tion

Sen

ior C

lerk

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.01

0.13

Taj u

d D

inC

hitra

lM

astu

jS

ocia

l Wel

fare

Soc

ial W

elfa

re

Offi

cer

0.23

0.04

0.21

0.18

0.14

0.14

0.01

4.38

0.97

22.2

0

Taqw

eem

U

l Haq

Low

er d

irB

alam

bat

Soc

ial W

elfa

reA

ccou

ntan

t0.

350.

040.

070.

120.

090.

000.

044.

380.

9722

.21

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Tariq

A

hmad

Low

er d

irB

alam

bat

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.01

0.27

Uba

id U

llah

Jan

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ks

div

isio

nal

Acc

ount

s O

ffice

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

54

Usm

an u

d d

inC

hitra

lC

hitra

lA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Ass

ista

nt0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

014.

380.

010.

27

Waj

id A

liM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aO

n-Fa

rm W

ater

M

anag

emen

tC

ompu

ter

Ope

rato

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

014.

380.

010.

13

Was

eem

M

alik

Sw

atB

aboz

aiIrr

igat

ion

Exe

cutiv

e E

ngin

eer

0.23

0.15

0.35

0.25

0.60

1.66

0.04

4.38

3.77

85.9

0

Yous

af

Kha

nS

wat

Bab

ozai

Pub

lic H

ealth

E

ngin

eerin

gE

xecu

tive

Eng

inee

r0.

460.

150.

350.

250.

551.

660.

044.

383.

9690

.24

Zafa

r Ali

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksC

ompu

ter

Ope

rato

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

034.

380.

030.

67

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Zafa

r Ali

Sw

atB

aboz

aiC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

div

isio

nal

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.04

4.38

0.04

0.81

Zahi

d U

llah

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Edu

catio

nC

ompu

ter

Ope

rato

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

014.

380.

010.

13

Zahi

r Sha

hC

hitra

lC

hitra

ld

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

dev

elop

men

t A

ssis

tant

0.23

0.23

0.21

0.18

0.30

0.62

0.00

4.38

1.87

42.6

3

Zaki

a R

aza

Sw

atB

aboz

aiE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.04

4.38

0.04

0.81

Zaki

r Ulla

hU

pper

dir

dir

Soi

l C

onse

rvat

ion

dis

tict

Offi

cer S

oil

Con

serv

atio

n0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

024.

380.

020.

54

Zakr

ia

Kha

nLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

raH

ealth

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.23

0.00

0.07

0.12

0.25

0.69

0.05

4.38

1.62

36.8

7

Zehr

a Ja

lal

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Edu

catio

nE

xecu

tive

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

0.12

0.12

0.21

0.18

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.50

11.3

2

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Zia

ud d

inU

pper

dir

dir

On-

Farm

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.14

0.05

0.09

0.69

0.02

4.38

1.22

27.9

1

Zuha

ib

Has

san

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.00

0.00

0.07

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

0.08

1.85

CB

na

Ba

SeLI

ne

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Abd

ul A

ziz

Sha

heen

Sw

atB

aboz

aiE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.46

0.15

0.28

0.05

0.00

1.66

0.09

4.38

2.69

61.4

0

Abd

ul

Gha

ffar

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Add

ition

al

dep

uty

Com

mis

sion

er0.

460.

310.

420.

780.

481.

520.

034.

384.

0191

.40

Abd

ul K

abir

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Hea

lthA

ccou

ntan

t0.

460.

230.

280.

650.

180.

830.

024.

382.

6560

.35

Abd

ul L

atif

Sw

atB

aboz

aiE

duca

tion

Juni

or C

lerk

0.46

0.31

0.42

0.78

0.60

1.66

0.15

4.38

4.38

100.

00

Abd

ul M

alik

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Edu

catio

nA

ssis

tant

P

rogr

amm

er0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

004.

380.

000.

00

Abd

ul

Wah

idM

alak

and

dar

gai

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksS

ub d

ivis

iona

l A

ccou

ntan

t0.

230.

120.

070.

180.

090.

280.

054.

381.

0223

.16

Afz

al K

han

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksS

ub E

ngin

eer

0.23

0.31

0.28

0.42

0.44

1.66

0.11

4.38

3.44

78.4

2

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Ann

ex-C

: Gov

ernm

ent O

ffici

als

Scor

ecar

d D

etai

ls


Ahm

ed

Zaib

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Soi

l C

onse

rvat

ion

Soi

l C

onse

rvat

ion

Offi

cer/

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.46

0.31

0.35

0.58

0.25

1.45

0.02

4.38

3.42

77.8

9

Akb

ar A

liS

wat

Bab

ozai

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Pla

nnin

g O

ffice

r0.

460.

310.

420.

780.

601.

660.

114.

384.

3498

.95

Akh

tar

Hus

sain

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

120.

040.

070.

230.

140.

420.

084.

381.

0824

.74

Akh

tar

Nae

emS

hang

laA

lpur

iE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

0.35

0.15

0.28

0.67

0.46

0.62

0.03

4.38

2.56

58.4

2

Ala

m K

han

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

Soc

ial W

elfa

reA

ssis

tant

W

arde

n0.

350.

230.

210.

000.

001.

110.

124.

382.

0245

.96

Ala

mgi

r K

han

Sw

atB

aboz

aid

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Ass

ista

nt

Fina

nce

and

Pla

nnin

g0.

230.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

094.

380.

327.

37

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Ali

Abb

asM

alak

and

Bat

khel

ad

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

dep

uty

Com

mis

sion

er0.

460.

230.

420.

780.

601.

660.

034.

384.

1895

.44

Ali

Hai

der

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

Edu

catio

nA

ssis

tant

D

istri

ct O

ffice

r0.

460.

270.

140.

510.

481.

520.

064.

383.

4578

.60

Ali

Mur

adC

hitra

lM

astu

jE

duca

tion

Juni

or C

lerk

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.06

4.38

0.06

1.40

Am

eer

Ham

zaM

alak

and

Bat

khel

ad

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Priv

ate

Sec

reta

ry0.

460.

310.

280.

780.

301.

590.

034.

383.

7585

.61

Am

in J

anU

pper

dir

dir

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Ass

ista

nt

Pro

gram

mer

0.46

0.31

0.42

0.74

0.48

1.59

0.06

4.38

4.06

92.6

3

Am

in K

han

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

Pub

lic H

ealth

E

ngin

eerin

gS

ub d

ivis

iona

l O

ffice

r0.

120.

080.

070.

000.

000.

000.

084.

380.

347.

72

Anj

um

Kha

nLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

raA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Bud

get a

nd

Acc

ount

s O

ffice

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

034.

380.

030.

70

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Asa

d U

llah

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Agr

icul

ture

, Li

vest

ock

and

Fish

erie

sA

ssis

tant

0.23

0.08

0.00

0.23

0.00

0.00

0.06

4.38

0.60

13.6

8

Asi

f Iqb

alS

hang

laA

lpur

iA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Ass

ista

nt0.

350.

080.

140.

460.

140.

550.

034.

381.

7539

.82

Asi

f Kha

nM

alak

and

dar

gai

Irrig

atio

nS

ub d

ivis

iona

l O

ffice

r0.

460.

190.

280.

690.

231.

250.

034.

383.

1371

.40

Asl

am

Kha

nC

hitra

lC

hitra

lA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Offi

ce A

ssis

tant

0.12

0.00

0.21

0.00

0.00

0.48

0.06

4.38

0.87

19.8

2

Ayat

Ulla

hU

pper

dir

dir

On-

Farm

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

230.

080.

210.

320.

320.

690.

094.

381.

9544

.39

Ayub

Kha

nS

wat

Bab

ozai

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Mun

icip

al

Fina

nce

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.06

4.38

0.06

1.40

Ayub

Kha

nM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.35

0.15

0.14

0.44

0.00

0.76

0.06

4.38

1.90

43.3

3

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Azi

z U

r R

ehm

anLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

raP

ublic

Hea

lth

Eng

inee

ring

div

isio

nal

Acc

ount

s O

ffice

r0.

120.

040.

070.

000.

000.

000.

064.

380.

286.

49

Bak

ht S

hah

Zeb

Upp

er d

ird

irE

duca

tion

Bud

get a

nd

Acc

ount

s O

ffice

r0.

350.

080.

140.

250.

180.

550.

094.

381.

6537

.54

Bak

ht S

her

Kha

nM

alak

and

Bat

khel

a

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Acc

ount

ant

0.46

0.31

0.28

0.69

0.25

1.59

0.06

4.38

3.65

83.1

6

Bak

htia

r K

han

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Chi

ef M

unic

ipal

O

ffice

r0.

120.

040.

070.

000.

000.

000.

064.

380.

286.

49

Bas

hir

Ahm

edLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

raP

ublic

Hea

lth

Eng

inee

ring

Sub

div

isio

nal

Offi

cer

0.12

0.08

0.07

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.06

4.38

0.32

7.37

Dr.

Ajm

al

Kha

nU

pper

dir

dir

Agr

icul

ture

, Li

vest

ock

and

Fish

erie

s

dis

trict

dire

ctor

Li

vest

ock

0.23

0.04

0.07

0.30

0.18

0.97

0.06

4.38

1.85

42.2

8

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


dr.

Ibra

him

K

han

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Hea

lthC

oord

inat

or

Prim

ary

Hea

lth

Car

e0.

230.

150.

210.

050.

000.

420.

064.

381.

1225

.44

dr.

Iftik

har

ud d

inU

pper

dir

dir

Hea

lthD

istri

ct H

ealth

O

ffice

r0.

230.

080.

210.

250.

211.

180.

034.

382.

1849

.82

dr.

Isra

r U

llah

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Hea

lthD

istri

ct H

ealth

O

ffice

r0.

230.

190.

280.

300.

320.

830.

064.

382.

2250

.53

dr.

Naz

ar

Muh

amm

adU

pper

dir

dir

Hea

lthN

atio

nal

Pro

gram

me

Coo

rdin

ator

0.35

0.08

0.14

0.32

0.25

1.04

0.09

4.38

2.27

51.7

5

Fahe

em

Akh

tar

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Agr

icul

ture

, Li

vest

ock

and

Fish

erie

s

Ass

ista

nt

dire

ctor

0.00

0.08

0.21

0.32

0.25

1.11

0.06

4.38

2.03

46.3

2

Faiz

Ur

Reh

man

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Com

pute

r P

rogr

amm

er0.

460.

310.

420.

760.

371.

660.

094.

384.

0792

.81

Faqi

r M

uham

mad

Upp

er d

ird

irC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sen

ior C

lerk

0.12

0.00

0.07

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.03

4.38

0.22

4.91

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Farz

ana

Kha

nS

wat

Bab

ozai

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.23

0.15

0.21

0.00

0.00

0.76

0.09

4.38

1.45

32.9

8

Faza

l A

dnan

Upp

er d

ird

irH

ealth

Dis

trict

Hea

lth

Man

agem

ent

Info

rmat

ion

Sys

tem

A

ssis

tant

0.23

0.04

0.07

0.14

0.12

0.42

0.00

4.38

1.01

22.9

8

Faza

l e

Sub

han

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.46

0.31

0.35

0.74

0.23

1.59

0.00

4.38

3.68

83.8

6

Faza

l Hab

ibS

hang

laA

lpur

iS

ocia

l Wel

fare

Juni

or C

lerk

0.12

0.00

0.14

0.00

0.00

0.07

0.03

4.38

0.35

8.07

Faza

l Had

iS

wat

Bab

ozai

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Ass

ista

nt

Acc

ount

ant

0.23

0.15

0.07

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.09

4.38

0.55

12.4

6

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Faza

l K

haliq

Sw

atB

aboz

aiE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.46

0.31

0.42

0.05

0.05

1.66

0.12

4.38

3.06

69.8

2

Faza

l M

aboo

dS

hang

laA

lpur

iS

oil

Con

serv

atio

nJu

nior

Cle

rk0.

120.

040.

210.

160.

090.

000.

034.

380.

6514

.74

Faza

l Raz

aLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

raIrr

igat

ion

Sub

div

isio

nal

Acc

ount

ant

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.06

4.38

0.06

1.40

Faza

l R

ehm

anLo

wer

dir

Bal

amba

tC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

120.

040.

070.

000.

000.

000.

094.

380.

327.

19

Faza

l R

ehm

anS

wat

Bab

ozai

Agr

icul

ture

, Li

vest

ock

and

Fish

erie

s

Acc

ount

s O

ffice

r0.

230.

080.

210.

280.

250.

620.

004.

381.

6738

.07

Faza

l S

atta

rU

pper

dir

dir

On-

Farm

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent

Offi

cer

0.46

0.15

0.42

0.46

0.23

1.11

0.03

4.38

2.86

65.2

6

Faza

l S

ubha

nLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

raE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt

Pro

gram

mer

0.46

0.31

0.28

0.39

0.28

1.52

0.03

4.38

3.27

74.5

6

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Fazl

e K

huda

B

acha

Low

er d

irA

denz

aiIrr

igat

ion

Sub

div

isio

nal

Offi

cer

0.12

0.08

0.07

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.06

4.38

0.32

7.37

Gha

zala

A

njum

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Edu

catio

nS

ub d

ivis

iona

l E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.14

0.00

0.00

0.14

0.09

4.38

0.37

8.42

Ghu

lam

R

ahim

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksS

ub d

ivis

iona

l O

ffice

r0.

350.

270.

280.

480.

180.

550.

034.

382.

1548

.95

Ghu

lam

R

asoo

lLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

ra

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

460.

310.

420.

780.

511.

660.

094.

384.

2396

.49

Ghu

lam

S

adiq

Sw

atB

aboz

aiE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.46

0.31

0.28

0.05

0.05

1.66

0.11

4.38

2.91

66.3

2

Goh

ar A

liM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aIrr

igat

ion

div

isio

nal

Acc

ount

s O

ffice

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

064.

380.

061.

40

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Gul

B

adsh

ahLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

rad

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Ass

ista

nt

Pla

nnin

g an

d d

evel

opm

ent

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.07

0.06

4.38

0.13

2.98

Gul

B

ahad

erC

hitra

lC

hitra

l

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Mun

icip

al

Fina

nce

Offi

cer

0.00

0.08

0.14

0.02

0.05

0.21

0.06

4.38

0.55

12.6

3

Hab

ib U

llah

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Soc

ial W

elfa

reA

ssis

tant

0.46

0.31

0.42

0.78

0.44

0.55

0.03

4.38

2.99

68.2

5

Ham

id

Isla

mM

alak

and

Bat

khel

a

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Chi

ef M

unic

ipal

O

ffice

r0.

460.

150.

350.

760.

300.

900.

004.

382.

9266

.67

Ham

id

Ulla

h K

han

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

On-

Farm

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

0.46

0.31

0.35

0.74

0.25

1.59

0.00

4.38

3.70

84.3

9

Hay

at u

d d

inM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aIrr

igat

ion

Exe

cutiv

e E

ngin

eer

0.46

0.23

0.35

0.69

0.23

1.52

0.03

4.38

3.52

80.1

8

Haz

rat

Wah

abU

pper

dir

dir

Edu

catio

nA

ccou

nts

Offi

cer

0.12

0.00

0.14

0.28

0.14

0.76

0.03

4.38

1.46

33.3

3

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Hid

ayat

U

llah

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Uni

on C

ounc

il S

ecre

tary

0.00

0.00

0.07

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.06

4.38

0.13

2.98

His

sam

ud

din

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ceJu

nior

Cle

rk0.

000.

080.

210.

180.

230.

760.

064.

381.

5234

.74

Ibra

r A

hmed

Upp

er d

ird

irA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Ass

ista

nt

dire

ctor

Fi

sher

ies

0.46

0.15

0.28

0.28

0.21

1.11

0.06

4.38

2.55

58.0

7

Iftik

har

Ahm

adM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aP

ublic

Hea

lth

Eng

inee

ring

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

460.

310.

140.

370.

140.

900.

024.

382.

3353

.16

Ihsa

n A

hmad

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Soc

ial W

elfa

reA

ssis

tant

0.46

0.23

0.35

0.74

0.39

0.55

0.03

4.38

2.75

62.8

1

Ihsa

n U

llah

Low

er d

irB

alam

bat

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Ass

ista

nt

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.14

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.06

4.38

0.20

4.56

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Ihte

sham

ul

Haq

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

4.38

0.00

0.00

Ijaz

Ali

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksS

ub E

ngin

eer

0.23

0.15

0.35

0.78

0.18

0.42

0.03

4.38

2.15

48.9

5

Imda

d U

llah

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

0.12

0.00

0.07

0.18

0.09

0.21

0.00

4.38

0.67

15.2

6

Imra

n K

han

Low

er d

irB

alam

bat

On-

Farm

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent

Ass

ista

nt

Bud

get a

nd

Acc

ount

s0.

460.

310.

210.

650.

441.

520.

034.

383.

6282

.46

Imtia

z A

hmad

Chi

tral

Mas

tuj

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Mun

icip

al

Eng

inee

r0.

000.

000.

140.

020.

070.

140.

064.

380.

439.

82

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Imtia

z A

liS

wat

Khw

azak

hela

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.46

0.31

0.42

0.05

0.12

1.45

0.09

4.38

2.89

65.9

6

Inay

at U

llah

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

On-

Farm

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent

Ass

ista

nt0.

120.

040.

000.

350.

180.

690.

034.

381.

4132

.11

Inay

at U

r R

ehm

anLo

wer

dir

Bal

amba

tC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

230.

080.

070.

120.

120.

000.

114.

380.

7216

.32

Inay

at U

llah

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Chi

ef M

unic

ipal

O

ffice

r0.

000.

080.

140.

000.

000.

690.

094.

381.

0022

.81

Irfan

Ulla

hLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

raP

ublic

Hea

lth

Eng

inee

ring

Ass

ista

nt S

ocia

l O

rgan

iser

0.35

0.08

0.14

0.25

0.14

0.62

0.06

4.38

1.64

37.3

7

Isht

iaq

Ahm

edM

alak

and

Bat

khel

a

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

460.

150.

280.

390.

280.

620.

004.

382.

1849

.82

Isra

r Kha

nS

hang

laA

lpur

iH

ealth

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.35

0.04

0.07

0.00

0.00

0.07

0.03

4.38

0.55

12.6

3

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Jala

l ud

din

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksA

ccou

nts

Cle

rk0.

000.

040.

140.

000.

000.

140.

064.

380.

388.

60

Jam

il K

han

Low

er d

irB

alam

bat

Agr

icul

ture

, Li

vest

ock

and

Fish

erie

sD

istri

ct O

ffice

r0.

350.

150.

420.

650.

391.

520.

064.

383.

5480

.70

Jan

Mal

ikM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aIrr

igat

ion

Acc

ount

ant

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.08

4.38

0.08

1.75

Jan

Muh

amm

adC

hitra

lC

hitra

lA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

dis

trict

dire

ctor

A

gric

ultu

re0.

460.

190.

210.

280.

250.

760.

064.

382.

2250

.53

Jeha

n M

uham

mad

Upp

er d

ird

irE

duca

tion

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.46

0.15

0.28

0.37

0.25

1.38

0.06

4.38

2.96

67.5

4

Jeha

n Ze

bU

pper

dir

dir

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

120.

040.

210.

180.

180.

690.

004.

381.

4232

.46

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Jum

a K

han

Sw

atB

aboz

aid

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

Fina

nce

and

Pla

nnin

g0.

460.

310.

420.

780.

601.

660.

064.

384.

2997

.89

Kar

im K

han

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Agr

icul

ture

, Li

vest

ock

and

Fish

erie

s

dis

trict

dire

ctor

A

gric

ultu

re0.

460.

270.

420.

740.

461.

660.

064.

384.

0792

.81

Kar

im U

llah

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Chi

ef M

unic

ipal

O

ffice

r0.

460.

190.

350.

370.

351.

110.

064.

382.

8865

.79

Kas

hif

Qay

um

Kha

nM

alak

and

dar

gai

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Add

ition

al

Ass

ista

nt

Com

mis

sion

er0.

460.

310.

420.

780.

511.

660.

004.

384.

1494

.39

Kha

lid

Bab

arU

pper

dir

dir

Edu

catio

nC

ompu

ter

Pro

gram

mer

0.23

0.04

0.21

0.21

0.18

0.69

0.03

4.38

1.59

36.3

2

Kha

n B

adsh

ahM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Offi

ce A

ssis

tant

0.46

0.15

0.14

0.42

0.16

1.32

0.06

4.38

2.71

61.7

5

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Kha

yal

Muh

amm

adU

pper

dir

dir

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.23

0.08

0.28

0.62

0.44

1.45

0.03

4.38

3.13

71.4

0

Khu

rshi

d Je

han

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.46

0.04

0.07

0.37

0.14

0.55

0.02

4.38

1.65

37.5

4

Khu

sh

Bah

arC

hitra

lC

hitra

lE

duca

tion

Juni

or C

lerk

0.12

0.08

0.28

0.37

0.23

0.83

0.05

4.38

1.95

44.3

9

Kifa

yat

Ulla

hS

hang

laA

lpur

iC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Exe

cutiv

e E

ngin

eer

0.35

0.19

0.35

0.37

0.23

0.48

0.03

4.38

2.00

45.6

1

Kifa

yat

Ulla

h K

han

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.46

0.15

0.07

0.37

0.12

0.69

0.03

4.38

1.89

43.1

6

Lagh

al

Aza

mC

hitra

lC

hitra

lE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt0.

000.

000.

070.

000.

000.

140.

064.

380.

276.

14

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Laiq

Sha

hS

hang

laA

lpur

i

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Wor

k S

uper

viso

r0.

120.

000.

000.

510.

140.

280.

034.

381.

0724

.39

Lal

Bad

shah

Mal

akan

dd

arga

iC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

230.

040.

070.

390.

120.

420.

054.

381.

3129

.82

Muh

amm

ad

Kha

liqS

wat

Mat

tad

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Chi

ef M

unic

ipal

O

ffice

r0.

460.

310.

420.

780.

601.

660.

094.

384.

3298

.60

Muh

amm

ad

Gul

Sw

atB

aboz

aiE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.46

0.31

0.21

0.05

0.05

1.66

0.15

4.38

2.88

65.7

9

Maq

bool

A

min

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Edu

catio

nC

ompu

ter

Pro

gram

mer

0.00

0.00

0.14

0.00

0.00

0.21

0.06

4.38

0.41

9.30

Maq

bool

A

zam

Upp

er d

ird

irC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

div

isio

nal

Offi

cer

0.46

0.08

0.28

0.37

0.37

1.25

0.03

4.38

2.83

64.5

6

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Mas

aud

Kha

nM

alak

and

Bat

khel

a

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Mun

icip

al

Fina

nce

Offi

cer

0.46

0.31

0.21

0.65

0.35

1.52

0.00

4.38

3.49

79.6

5

Meh

boob

E

lahi

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.00

0.08

0.14

0.05

0.00

0.21

0.06

4.38

0.53

12.1

1

Mia

n G

hula

m

Hus

sain

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

On-

Farm

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

0.23

0.27

0.35

0.58

0.32

0.69

0.03

4.38

2.47

56.3

2

Mia

n H

azra

t S

hah

Sw

atB

aboz

aiS

ocia

l Wel

fare

Hea

d D

arul

K

afal

a0.

460.

310.

350.

780.

601.

660.

084.

384.

2496

.67

Mid

rar

Ulla

hM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aE

duca

tion

dep

uty

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.46

0.19

0.21

0.58

0.16

1.25

0.05

4.38

2.89

65.9

6

Mift

ah u

d d

inU

pper

dir

dir

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksA

ccou

ntan

t0.

230.

080.

210.

210.

140.

480.

034.

381.

3831

.40

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Mis

bah

ud

din

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Ass

ista

nt

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

Reg

ulat

ion

0.35

0.04

0.21

0.65

0.23

0.55

0.06

4.38

2.08

47.5

4

Mis

bah

ud

din

Chi

tral

Mas

tuj

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Mun

icip

al

Offi

cer

Reg

ulat

ion

0.00

0.04

0.14

0.00

0.00

0.42

0.06

4.38

0.65

14.9

1

Moh

amm

ad

Ash

faq

Low

er d

irA

denz

aiIrr

igat

ion

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

230.

120.

070.

230.

140.

000.

124.

380.

9120

.70

Moh

amm

ad

Hay

atM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Ass

ista

nt0.

230.

080.

070.

210.

140.

000.

114.

380.

8318

.95

Moh

amm

ad

Ilyas

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Agr

icul

ture

, Li

vest

ock

and

Fish

erie

s

Ass

ista

nt

dire

ctor

Fi

sher

ies

0.46

0.31

0.28

0.65

0.25

1.45

0.06

4.38

3.46

78.9

5

Moh

amm

ad

Jave

dM

alak

and

Bat

khel

a

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

Fina

nce

0.23

0.08

0.07

0.16

0.05

0.35

0.02

4.38

0.95

21.5

8

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Moh

amm

ad

Qas

imM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aS

ocia

l Wel

fare

Ass

ista

nt0.

460.

190.

280.

740.

141.

110.

054.

382.

9667

.54

Moh

amm

ad

Ras

ool

Kha

nLo

wer

dir

Ade

nzai

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksS

ub E

ngin

eer

0.23

0.08

0.07

0.14

0.12

0.00

0.11

4.38

0.74

16.8

4

Moh

amm

ad

Ria

zM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aP

ublic

Hea

lth

Eng

inee

ring

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

460.

150.

070.

230.

160.

280.

084.

381.

4332

.63

Moh

amm

ad

Ria

zM

alak

and

Bat

khel

ad

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Juni

or C

lerk

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.03

4.38

0.03

0.70

Moh

amm

ad

Saj

jad

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Irrig

atio

nS

ub d

ivis

iona

l O

ffice

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

084.

380.

081.

75

Mub

arak

Ze

bLo

wer

dir

Jand

olC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

350.

040.

070.

140.

070.

000.

114.

380.

7717

.54

Muh

amm

ad

Ali

Sw

atB

aboz

aiA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Ass

ista

nt

dire

ctor

Fi

sher

ies

0.46

0.31

0.42

0.78

0.60

1.66

0.12

4.38

4.35

99.3

0

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Muh

amm

ad

Ilyas

Upp

er d

ird

irP

ublic

Hea

lth

Eng

inee

ring

Sub

div

isio

nal

Offi

cer

0.12

0.04

0.14

0.30

0.16

0.76

0.06

4.38

1.58

35.9

6

Muh

amm

ad

Am

inS

hang

laA

lpur

iE

duca

tion

dep

uty

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.46

0.15

0.42

0.74

0.46

1.59

0.06

4.38

3.88

88.6

0

Muh

amm

ad

Arif

Low

er d

irB

alam

bat

On-

Farm

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

460.

150.

140.

280.

000.

000.

034.

381.

0624

.21

Muh

amm

ad

Ars

had

Low

er d

irB

alam

bat

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

460.

150.

140.

000.

000.

000.

124.

380.

8820

.00

Muh

amm

ad

Ayaz

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Ass

ista

nt

Com

mis

sion

er0.

460.

120.

070.

420.

140.

000.

094.

381.

2929

.47

Muh

amm

ad

Ibra

rLo

wer

dir

Bal

amba

tH

ealth

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.46

0.31

0.14

0.00

0.00

0.97

0.06

4.38

1.94

44.2

1

Muh

amm

ad

Ilyas

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Pub

lic H

ealth

E

ngin

eerin

gS

ub d

ivis

iona

l O

ffice

r0.

460.

150.

280.

780.

250.

690.

034.

382.

6560

.53

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Muh

amm

ad

Iqba

lU

pper

dir

dir

Edu

catio

nA

ssis

tant

d

irect

or

Edu

catio

n0.

350.

150.

210.

580.

301.

040.

064.

382.

6861

.23

Muh

amm

ad

Isha

qM

alak

and

dar

gai

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.46

0.23

0.21

0.48

0.14

0.90

0.06

4.38

2.48

56.6

7

Muh

amm

ad

Isra

rLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

rad

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Juni

or C

lerk

0.46

0.31

0.42

0.78

0.60

1.52

0.06

4.38

4.15

94.7

4

Muh

amm

ad

Reh

man

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

Hea

lthD

istri

ct H

ealth

O

ffice

r0.

460.

310.

420.

600.

281.

660.

064.

383.

7886

.32

Muh

amm

ad

Ria

zLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

raE

duca

tion

dep

uty

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.23

0.31

0.21

0.39

0.00

1.04

0.05

4.38

2.22

50.7

0

Muh

amm

ad

Tahi

rU

pper

dir

dir

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.46

0.15

0.21

0.37

0.28

1.11

0.03

4.38

2.61

59.4

7

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Muh

amm

ad

Zeb

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

Soc

ial W

elfa

reD

istri

ct O

ffice

r0.

460.

080.

280.

690.

000.

000.

114.

381.

6236

.84

Muk

htia

r Ali

Sha

hU

pper

dir

dir

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ceO

ffice

Ass

ista

nt0.

230.

080.

280.

350.

321.

380.

064.

382.

7061

.58

Muq

arab

K

han

Sw

atB

aboz

ai

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Tehs

il O

ffice

r In

frast

ruct

ure

0.46

0.31

0.42

0.78

0.60

1.66

0.08

4.38

4.31

98.2

5

Mur

ad A

liLo

wer

dir

Bal

amba

tA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

dep

uty

dire

ctor

A

gric

ultu

re0.

460.

310.

280.

390.

421.

520.

034.

383.

4177

.72

Mur

ad

Ulla

hM

alak

and

Bat

khel

ad

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Ass

ista

nt

Pro

gram

mer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.05

4.38

0.05

1.05

Mus

htaq

Ali

Sw

atB

aboz

aid

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Com

pute

r P

rogr

amm

er0.

460.

310.

420.

780.

601.

660.

124.

384.

3599

.30

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Mus

sara

t Ja

mal

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.12

0.04

0.07

0.00

0.00

0.21

0.06

4.38

0.49

11.2

3

Nad

ar S

hah

Low

er d

irS

amar

bagh

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Chi

ef M

unic

ipal

O

ffice

r0.

230.

230.

000.

180.

000.

000.

094.

380.

7416

.84

Nae

em u

d d

inC

hitra

lC

hitra

l

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Uni

on C

ounc

il S

ecre

tary

0.00

0.00

0.14

0.00

0.00

0.14

0.06

4.38

0.34

7.72

Nah

eed

Akh

tar

Sw

atB

aboz

aiE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.46

0.23

0.21

0.00

0.00

1.04

0.11

4.38

2.05

46.6

7

Nai

k A

mal

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Edu

catio

nC

ompu

ter

Ope

rato

r0.

460.

190.

140.

320.

141.

180.

064.

382.

4956

.84

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Nav

eed

Ala

mM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aH

ealth

Dis

trict

Hea

lth

Man

agem

ent

Info

rmat

ion

Sys

tem

A

ssis

tant

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.02

4.38

0.02

0.35

Naz

iat

Kha

nM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

0.46

0.15

0.14

0.51

0.14

0.55

0.06

4.38

2.02

45.9

6

Naz

ir U

llah

Upp

er d

ird

ir

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.12

0.04

0.07

0.09

0.12

0.28

0.06

4.38

0.77

17.5

4

Nia

z M

oham

mad

Low

er d

irA

denz

aiC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

460.

080.

140.

350.

210.

350.

084.

381.

6537

.72

Nia

z M

uham

mad

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Hea

lthS

enio

r Cle

rk0.

000.

150.

140.

000.

140.

210.

064.

380.

7015

.96

Nija

t B

egam

Mal

akan

dd

arga

iE

duca

tion

Sub

div

isio

nal

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.06

4.38

0.06

1.40

Noo

r Ala

mM

alak

and

Bat

khel

ad

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.23

0.00

0.07

0.28

0.12

0.14

0.08

4.38

0.91

20.7

0

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Noo

r Ali

Jan

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Acc

ount

s O

ffice

r0.

460.

310.

420.

780.

601.

660.

064.

384.

2997

.89

Noo

r M

uham

mad

Mal

akan

dd

arga

iIrr

igat

ion

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

460.

150.

210.

670.

180.

620.

024.

382.

3252

.81

Noo

r ul

Bas

har

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

230.

040.

070.

370.

230.

690.

024.

381.

6537

.54

Nus

rat

Kha

nM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.46

0.23

0.28

0.69

0.25

1.11

0.09

4.38

3.12

71.0

5

Nus

rat

Jabe

enC

hitra

lC

hitra

lS

ocia

l Wel

fare

Soc

ial W

elfa

re

Offi

cer

0.35

0.04

0.21

0.00

0.05

0.28

0.06

4.38

0.98

22.2

8

Oba

id U

llah

Upp

er d

ird

irA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Ass

ista

nt

dire

ctor

A

gric

ultu

re0.

000.

040.

140.

140.

120.

350.

064.

380.

8419

.12

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Qad

ir N

asir

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Chi

ef

Coo

rdin

atio

n O

ffice

r0.

230.

080.

280.

230.

230.

620.

064.

381.

7339

.47

Qai

sar A

liS

wat

Bab

ozai

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Ass

ista

nt

Pro

gram

mer

0.46

0.31

0.42

0.78

0.60

1.66

0.12

4.38

4.35

99.3

0

Qam

ar

Zam

anM

alak

and

Bat

khel

a

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

460.

150.

210.

530.

231.

450.

024.

383.

0569

.65

Qaz

i M

uham

mad

R

asoo

l S

hah

Upp

er d

ird

ird

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

Fina

nce

0.46

0.31

0.42

0.78

0.60

1.59

0.06

4.38

4.22

96.3

2

Rafi

ud

Din

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ceS

ub E

ngin

eer

0.12

0.08

0.21

0.30

0.28

0.97

0.03

4.38

1.98

45.0

9

Rah

man

U

llah

Upp

er d

ird

irH

ealth

Ass

isan

t D

istri

ct O

ffice

r0.

230.

040.

210.

250.

230.

760.

064.

381.

7840

.70

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Rah

mat

H

akim

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksE

xecu

tive

Eng

inee

r0.

460.

230.

140.

250.

140.

690.

084.

381.

9945

.44

Rah

mat

S

yed

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksS

ub d

ivis

iona

l A

ccou

ntan

t0.

120.

040.

070.

000.

000.

000.

064.

380.

286.

49

Ras

hid

Afz

alS

hang

laA

lpur

iE

duca

tion

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.23

0.08

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

4.38

0.31

7.02

Ria

z W

ali

Sha

hM

alak

and

dar

gai

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksS

ub d

ivis

iona

l O

ffice

r0.

350.

120.

140.

250.

090.

000.

024.

380.

9621

.93

Riz

wan

U

llah

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Pub

lic H

ealth

E

ngin

eerin

gS

ub d

ivis

iona

l O

ffice

r0.

460.

120.

420.

780.

510.

480.

034.

382.

8063

.86

Sad

iq U

llah

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Edu

catio

nA

ccou

nts

Offi

cer

0.00

0.08

0.07

0.00

0.16

0.21

0.06

4.38

0.58

13.1

6

Sad

iq U

llah

Upp

er d

ird

irA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Fiel

d A

ssis

tant

0.12

0.04

0.07

0.18

0.21

0.83

0.06

4.38

1.51

34.3

9

Sae

ed

Gha

niS

wat

Bab

ozai

Edu

catio

nC

ompu

ter

Ope

rato

r0.

350.

310.

210.

050.

051.

660.

094.

382.

7161

.75

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Sae

ed

Kha

nS

hang

laA

lpur

iE

duca

tion

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.46

0.23

0.42

0.69

0.23

1.52

0.00

4.38

3.55

81.0

5

Saf

dar A

liM

alak

and

Bat

khel

ad

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

Pla

nnin

g O

ffice

r0.

460.

310.

420.

780.

601.

660.

004.

384.

2396

.49

Safi

a K

han

Mal

akan

dd

arga

iE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.46

0.15

0.21

0.44

0.16

0.83

0.06

4.38

2.32

52.8

1

Sah

ib Z

arin

Low

er d

irS

amar

bagh

Pub

lic H

ealth

E

ngin

eerin

gS

ub E

ngin

eer

0.23

0.08

0.07

0.18

0.14

0.00

0.09

4.38

0.79

18.0

7

Sai

d A

li S

hah

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ceA

ssis

tant

0.23

0.08

0.28

0.44

0.23

0.48

0.06

4.38

1.80

41.0

5

Sai

ma

Bib

iS

wat

Bab

ozai

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.46

0.23

0.42

0.05

0.00

0.00

0.12

4.38

1.28

29.1

2

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Sal

ih d

arLo

wer

dir

Bal

amba

tC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

div

isio

nal

Offi

cer

0.46

0.19

0.07

0.32

0.16

0.83

0.09

4.38

2.13

48.6

0

Sal

ma

Bib

iM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.03

4.38

0.03

0.70

Sam

i Ulla

hS

wat

Bab

ozai

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ceS

teno

grap

her

0.46

0.31

0.42

0.78

0.60

1.66

0.09

4.38

4.32

98.6

0

Sam

iulla

h K

undi

Low

er d

irJa

ndol

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksS

ub d

ivis

iona

l O

ffice

r0.

460.

150.

140.

160.

140.

000.

094.

381.

1526

.14

San

a U

llah

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.46

0.15

0.07

0.48

0.18

0.62

0.09

4.38

2.07

47.1

9

Sar

ver

Par

veen

Upp

er d

ird

irE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.35

0.08

0.21

0.30

0.28

1.11

0.09

4.38

2.41

54.9

1

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Sha

fi U

llah

Kha

nLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

raS

oil

Con

serv

atio

nA

ccou

nts

Cle

rk0.

460.

150.

210.

550.

280.

000.

084.

381.

7339

.47

Sha

h Fe

roz

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ceA

ssis

tant

0.23

0.12

0.28

0.32

0.21

0.42

0.06

4.38

1.63

37.1

9

Sha

h K

halid

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.46

0.31

0.28

0.78

0.46

0.83

0.03

4.38

3.15

71.9

3

Sha

h N

awaz

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

On-

Farm

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

460.

230.

350.

720.

321.

250.

024.

383.

3476

.14

Sha

h N

awaz

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Pub

lic H

ealth

E

ngin

eerin

gS

ub d

ivis

iona

l O

ffice

r0.

460.

310.

420.

530.

181.

250.

004.

383.

1571

.75

Sha

heen

B

egum

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

Edu

catio

nS

ub d

ivis

iona

l E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.00

0.00

0.07

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.09

4.38

0.16

3.68

Sha

hzad

N

adee

mC

hitra

lC

hitra

lE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.00

0.15

0.14

0.23

0.18

0.55

0.06

4.38

1.32

30.1

8

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Sha

keel

A

hmad

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Ass

ista

nt0.

460.

120.

350.

230.

140.

280.

034.

381.

6036

.49

Sha

keel

H

ayat

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Loca

l G

over

nmen

t an

d R

ural

d

evel

opm

ent

Mun

icip

al

Offi

cer

Reg

ulat

ion

0.23

0.19

0.07

0.30

0.12

0.35

0.08

4.38

1.33

30.3

5

Sha

zia

Kha

nM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

0.35

0.19

0.21

0.35

0.16

0.42

0.08

4.38

1.75

39.8

2

She

r Mal

ikS

hang

laA

lpur

iE

duca

tion

Sup

erin

tend

ent

0.12

0.08

0.07

0.44

0.00

1.04

0.03

4.38

1.77

40.3

5

She

r Mur

adC

hitra

lC

hitra

lE

duca

tion

Com

pute

r P

rogr

amm

er0.

350.

120.

140.

050.

000.

280.

064.

380.

9822

.46

She

r Zad

aS

wat

Bab

ozai

Agr

icul

ture

, Li

vest

ock

and

Fish

erie

sd

istri

ct d

irect

or0.

230.

150.

210.

780.

601.

660.

064.

383.

7084

.39

Sho

aib

Ulla

hLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

raC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

div

isio

nal

Acc

ount

ant

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.06

4.38

0.06

1.40

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Sho

ukat

Ali

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Pla

nnin

g O

ffice

r0.

460.

310.

420.

780.

511.

660.

094.

384.

2396

.49

Shu

ja U

llah

Low

er d

irB

alam

bat

Irrig

atio

nd

ivis

iona

l A

ccou

nts

Offi

cer

0.46

0.23

0.07

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.09

4.38

0.85

19.4

7

Siy

ab A

liM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

Eng

inee

r0.

460.

150.

210.

550.

250.

970.

034.

382.

6360

.00

Sul

tan

Rom

eM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aP

ublic

Hea

lth

Eng

inee

ring

Sub

div

isio

nal

Acc

ount

ant

0.23

0.15

0.07

0.35

0.18

0.62

0.08

4.38

1.68

38.4

2

Sye

d A

jmal

A

li S

hah

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksS

ub E

ngin

eer

0.00

0.08

0.21

0.25

0.25

0.48

0.06

4.38

1.34

30.5

3

Sye

d A

min

Low

er d

irB

alam

bat

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksS

ub d

ivis

iona

l A

ccou

ntan

t0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

064.

380.

061.

40

Sye

d A

nwar

A

li S

hah

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Edu

catio

nS

enio

r Cle

rk0.

120.

040.

000.

460.

180.

420.

004.

381.

2227

.72

Sye

d M

uham

mad

Ta

riqS

hang

laA

lpur

iC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

div

isio

nal

Offi

cer

0.00

0.04

0.07

0.28

0.09

0.14

0.03

4.38

0.65

14.7

4

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Sye

d Q

amar

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.12

0.04

0.14

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.06

4.38

0.35

8.07

Sye

d S

alah

ud

din

S

hah

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Edu

catio

nS

enio

r Cle

rk0.

000.

040.

070.

000.

000.

280.

064.

380.

4510

.18

Sye

d Za

min

S

hah

Mal

akan

dd

arga

iE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt S

ub

div

isio

nal

Edu

catio

n O

ffice

r

0.46

0.19

0.14

0.44

0.16

0.83

0.08

4.38

2.30

52.4

6

Taif

Kha

nS

hang

laA

lpur

iE

duca

tion

Sen

ior C

lerk

0.12

0.04

0.00

0.00

0.07

0.14

0.06

4.38

0.42

9.65

Taj u

d D

inC

hitra

lM

astu

jS

ocia

l Wel

fare

Soc

ial W

elfa

re

Offi

cer

0.00

0.08

0.07

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.06

4.38

0.21

4.74

Taqw

eem

U

l Haq

Low

er d

irB

alam

bat

Soc

ial W

elfa

reA

ccou

ntan

t0.

460.

310.

140.

000.

000.

000.

094.

381.

0022

.81

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Tariq

A

hmad

Low

er d

irB

alam

bat

Edu

catio

n

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.00

0.04

0.07

0.00

0.07

0.00

0.09

4.38

0.27

6.14

Uba

id U

llah

Jan

Low

er d

irTi

mer

gara

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ks

div

isio

nal

Acc

ount

s O

ffice

r0.

120.

040.

070.

000.

000.

000.

064.

380.

286.

49

Usm

an u

d d

inC

hitra

lC

hitra

lA

gric

ultu

re,

Live

stoc

k an

d Fi

sher

ies

Ass

ista

nt0.

000.

000.

070.

000.

000.

280.

064.

380.

419.

30

Waj

id A

liM

alak

and

Bat

khel

aO

n-Fa

rm W

ater

M

anag

emen

tC

ompu

ter

Ope

rato

r0.

350.

190.

280.

460.

181.

380.

064.

382.

9166

.32

Was

eem

M

alik

Sw

atB

aboz

aiIrr

igat

ion

Exe

cutiv

e E

ngin

eer

0.46

0.23

0.42

0.05

0.05

1.66

0.09

4.38

2.95

67.3

7

Yous

af

Kha

nS

wat

Bab

ozai

Pub

lic H

ealth

E

ngin

eerin

gE

xecu

tive

Eng

inee

r0.

460.

230.

420.

580.

050.

830.

094.

382.

6560

.53

Zafa

r Ali

Mal

akan

dB

atkh

ela

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Wor

ksC

ompu

ter

Ope

rato

r0.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

064.

380.

061.

40

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Zafa

r Ali

Sw

atB

aboz

aiC

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

orks

Sub

div

isio

nal

Offi

cer

0.23

0.15

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.83

0.11

4.38

1.32

30.1

8

Zahi

d U

llah

Sha

ngla

Alp

uri

Edu

catio

nC

ompu

ter

Ope

rato

r0.

230.

080.

210.

280.

090.

140.

034.

381.

0524

.04

Zahi

r Sha

hC

hitra

lC

hitra

ld

istri

ct

Adm

inis

tratio

n O

ffice

dev

elop

men

t A

ssis

tant

0.46

0.31

0.42

0.78

0.60

1.59

0.03

4.38

4.19

95.6

1

Zaki

a R

aza

Sw

atB

aboz

aiE

duca

tion

Ass

ista

nt

dis

trict

E

duca

tion

Offi

cer

0.46

0.23

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.52

0.12

4.38

2.34

53.3

3

Zaki

r Ulla

hU

pper

dir

dir

Soi

l C

onse

rvat

ion

dis

tict

Offi

cer S

oil

Con

serv

atio

n0.

230.

080.

210.

250.

211.

110.

064.

382.

1548

.95

Zakr

ia

Kha

nLo

wer

dir

Tim

erga

raH

ealth

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.23

0.31

0.21

0.05

0.00

1.18

0.08

4.38

2.05

46.6

7

Zehr

a Ja

lal

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

Edu

catio

nE

xecu

tive

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

0.23

0.15

0.21

0.14

0.09

0.35

0.08

4.38

1.25

28.4

2

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

aRespondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)


Zia

ud d

inU

pper

dir

dir

On-

Farm

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent

Dis

trict

Offi

cer

0.23

0.00

0.21

0.37

0.37

0.97

0.09

4.38

2.24

51.0

5

Zuha

ib

Has

san

Chi

tral

Chi

tral

dis

trict

A

dmin

istra

tion

Offi

ce

Com

pute

r O

pera

tor

0.12

0.00

0.21

0.07

0.05

0.48

0.06

4.38

0.98

22.4

6

CB

na

FoLL

oW

Up

dat

a

Respondent Name

district

Tehsil

department

designation





(20% weight)


Baseline Score












role? (8% weight)




weight)

CdLd policy Implementation Unit Local Government, Elections and Rural development departmentGovernment of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

091 9210528 I www.cdldta.pk I www.facebook.com/kpcdld

competency scorecard report

Documents