comparison directive 2001/83/ec – proposal for...

222
Association Européenne des Spécialités Pharmaceutiques Grand Public Association of the European Self-Medication Industry _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________ COMPARISON BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMISSIONS PROPOSAL FOR A REGULATION ON MEDICAL DEVICES AND DIRECTIVE 93/42/EC PROPOSAL L 169/1 EN OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES 12.07.1993 COM(2012) 542 final 2012/0266 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on medical devices and amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices Chapter I Scope and definitions Article 1 Scope 1. This Regulation establishes rules to be complied with by medical devices and accessories to medical devices that are placed on the market or put into service in the Union for human use. Article 1 Definitions, scope 1. This Directive shall apply to medical devices and their accessories. For the purposes of this Directive, accessories 7, avenue de Tervuren B-1040 Brussels Belgium Tel.: + 32 (0)2 735 51 30 Fax: + 32 (0)2 735 52 22 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.aesgp.be

Upload: others

Post on 20-Aug-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

Association Européenne des Spécialités Pharmaceutiques Grand PublicAssociation of the European Self-Medication Industry

Europäischer Verband der Arzneimittel-Hersteller

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

COMPARISON BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S PROPOSAL FOR A

REGULATION ON MEDICAL DEVICES AND

DIRECTIVE 93/42/EC

PROPOSAL L 169/1 EN OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES 12.07.1993

COM(2012) 542 final 2012/0266 (COD)Proposal for aREGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on medical devices and amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009

Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices

Chapter I Scope and definitionsArticle 1Scope1. This Regulation establishes rules to be complied with by medical devices and accessories to medical devices that are placed on the market or put into service in the Union for human use.

For the purposes of this Regulation, medical devices and accessories to medical devices shall hereinafter be referred to as “devices”.

2. See below

3.Any device which, when placed on the market or used in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, incorporates as an integral part an in vitro diagnostic

Article 1Definitions, scope

1. This Directive shall apply to medical devices and their accessories.For the purposes of this Directive, accessories shall be treated as medical devices in their own right. Both medical devices and accessories shall hereinafter be termed devices.

7, avenue de Tervuren B-1040 Brussels Belgium Tel.: + 32 (0)2 735 51 30 Fax: + 32 (0)2 735 52 22E-mail: [email protected] http://www.aesgp.be

Page 2: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

medical device as defined in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) […] [on in vitro diagnostic medical devices] shall be governed by this Regulation, unless it is covered by Article 1(3) of that Regulation. The relevant general and safety performance requirements set out in Annex I of that Regulation shall apply as far as the safety and performance of the in vitro diagnostic medical device part are concerned.

4. See below

5. See below

6. See below

7. See below

8. See below

9. Reference to a Member State in this Regulation shall be understood as including any other country with which the Union has concluded as agreement which confers on that country the same status as a Member State for the purpose of application of this Regulation.Article 2Definitions

10. For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions shall apply:

Definitions related to devices:

(2) “medical device” means any instrument, apparatus, appliance, software, implant, reagent, material or other article, intended by the manufacturer to be used alone or in combination, for human beings for one or more of the specific medical purposes of: — diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment or alleviation of disease,

— diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, alleviation of or compensation for an injury or disability,

— investigation, replacement or modification of the anatomy or of a physiological

Article 1

2. For the purposes of this Directive, the following definitions shall apply:(a) ‘medical device’ means any instrument, apparatus, appliance, software, material or other article, whether used alone or in combination, including the software intended by its manufacturer to be used specifically for diagnostic and/or therapeutic purposes and necessary for its proper application, intended by the manufacturer to be used for human beings for the purpose of:

— diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment or alleviation of disease,

— diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, alleviation of or compensation for an injury or handicap,

— investigation, replacement or modification of the anatomy or of a physiological process,

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

2

Page 3: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

process or state,

— control or support of conception,

— disinfection or sterilization of any of the above-mentioned products,

and which does not achieve its principal intended action in by pharmacological, immunological or metabolic means, in or the human body, but which may be assisted in its function by such means;

The implantable or other invasive products, intended to be used for human beings, which are listed in Annex XV shall be considered medical devices, regardless of whether or not they are intended by the manufacturer to be used for a medical purpose.

(3) “accessory to a medical device” means an article which, whilst not being a medical device, is intended by its manufacturer to be used together with one or several particular devices to specifically enable or assist the device(s) to be used in accordance with its/their intended purposes(s).

(c) not in the scope of proposal for a regulation on medical device.

— control of conception, and which does not achieve its principal intended action in or on the human body by pharmacological, immunological or metabolic means, but which may be assisted in its function by such means;

(b) ‘accessory’ means an article which whilst not being a device is intended specifically by its manufacturer to be used together with a device to enable it to be used in accordance with the use of the device intended by the manufacturer of the device;

(c) ‘in vitro diagnostic medical device’ means any medical device which is a reagent, reagent product, calibrator, control material,kit, instrument, apparatus, equipment or system, whether used alone or in combination, intended by the manufacturer to be used in vitro for the examination of specimens, including blood and tissue donations,derived from the human body, solely or principally for the purpose of providing information:— concerning a physiological or pathological state, or— concerning a congenital abnormality, or— to determine the safety and compatibility with potential recipients, or— to monitor therapeutic measures.Specimen receptacles are considered to be in vitro diagnostic medical devices. ‘Specimen receptacles’ are those devices, whether vacuum-type or not, specifically intended by their manufacturers for the primary containment and preservation of specimens derived from the human body for the purpose of in vitro diagnostic examination.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

3

Page 4: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

(4) “custom-made device” means any device specifically made in accordance with a written prescription of a doctor of medicine, of a dental practitioner or of any other person authorised by national law by virtue of this person’s professional qualifications which gives, under his responsibility, specific design characteristics, and is intended for the sole use of a particular patient.

However, mass-produced devices which need to be adapted to meet the specific requirements of a doctor of medicine, a dental practitioner or any other professional user and devices which are mass-produced by means of industrial manufacturing processes in accordance with the written prescriptions of doctors of medicine, dental practitioners or any other authorised person shall not be considered to be custom made devices;

(5) “active device” means any device, the operation of which depends on a source of electrical energy or any source of power other than directly generated by gravity and which acts by changing the density of or converting this energy. Devices intended to transmit energy, substances or other elements between an active device and the patient, without any significant change, shall not be considered to be active devices.

Stand alone software is considered to be an active device;

(6) “implantable device” means any device, including those that are partially or wholly absorbed, which is intended

- to be totally introduced into the human body or,

- to replace an epithelial surface or the surface of the eye,

by clinical intervention and which is intended to remain in place after the procedure.

Any device intended to be partially introduced into the human body by clinical

Products for general laboratory use are not in vitro diagnostic medical devices unless such products, in view of their characteristics, are specifically intended by their manufacturer to be used for in vitro diagnostic examination;

(d) ‘custom-made device’ means any device specifically made in accordance with a duly qualified medical practitioner's written prescription which gives, under his responsibility, specific design characteristics and is intended for the sole use of a particular patient.The abovementioned prescription may also be made out by any other person authorized by virtue of his professional qualifications to do so.Mass-produced devices which need to be adapted to meet the specific requirements of the medical practitioner or any other professional user shall not be considered to be custom made devices;

(e) ‘device intended for clinical investigation’ means any device intended for use by a duly qualified medical practitioner when conducting investigations as referred to in Section 2.1 of Annex X in an adequate human clinical environment.For the purpose of conducting clinical investigation, any other person who, by virtue of his professional qualifications, is authorized to carry out such investigation shall be accepted as equivalent to a duly qualified medical practitioner;

(ii) “placing on the market” and (iii) “ putting into service”: See points (h) and (i)

(f) ‘manufacturer’ means the natural or legal person with responsibility for the design, manufacture, packaging and labelling of a device before it is placed on the market under his own name, regardless of whether these operations are carried out by that person himself or on his behalf by a third party.The obligations of this Directive to be met by manufacturers also apply to the natural or legal person who assembles, packages, processes, fully refurbishes and/or labels one or more ready-made products and/or assigns to them their intended purpose as a device with a view to their being placed on the market under his own name. This subparagraph does not

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

4

Page 5: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

intervention and intended to remain in place after the procedure for at least 30 days is also considered an implantable device;

(7) “invasive device” means any device which, in whole or in part, penetrates inside the body, either through a body orifice or through the surface of the body;

(8) “generic device group” means a set of devices having the same or similar intended purposes or commonality of technology allowing them to be classified in a generic manner not reflecting specific characteristics;

(9) “single-use device” means a device that is intended to be used on an individual patient during a single procedure;

The single procedure may involve several uses or prolonged use on the same patient.

(10) “single use device for critical use” means a single-use device intended to be used for surgically invasive medical procedures;

(11) “ intended purpose” means the use for which the device is intended according to the data supplied by the manufacturer on the label, in the instructions for use or in promotional or sales materials or statements;

(12) “label” means the written, printed, or graphic information appearing either on the device itself, or on the packaging of each unit or on the packaging of multiple devices;

(13) “instructions for use” means the information provided by the manufacturer to inform the user of the device’s intended purpose and proper use and of any precautions to be taken;

(14) “Unique Device Identification” (UDI) means a series of numeric or alphanumeric characters that is created through internationally accepted device identification and coding standards and that allows unambiguous identification of specific medical devices on the market;

(15) “non-viable” means having no potential for metabolism or multiplication.

(16) ‘nanomaterial’ means a natural, incidental or manufactured material

apply to the person who, while not a manufacturer within the meaning of the first subparagraph, assembles or adapts devices already on the market to their intended purpose for an individual patient;

(g) ‘intended purpose’ means the use for which the device is intended according to the data supplied by the manufacturer on the labelling, in the instructions and/or in promotional materials;

(h) ‘placing on the market’ means the first making available in return for

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

5

Page 6: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

containing particles, in an unbound state or as an aggregate or as an agglomerate and where, for 50 % or more of the particles in the number size distribution, one or more external dimensions is in the size range 1-100 nm.

Fullerenes, graphene flakes and single-wall carbon nanotubes with one or more external dimensions below 1 nm shall be considered as nanomaterials.For the purposes of the definition of nanomaterial, ‘particle’, ‘agglomerate’ and ‘aggregate’ are defined as follows:

– ‘particle’ means a minute piece of matter with defined physical boundaries;

– ‘agglomerate’ means a collection of weakly bound particles or aggregates where the resulting external surface area is similar to the sum of the surface areas of the individual components;

– ‘aggregate’ means a particle comprising of strongly bound or fused particles;

Definitions related to the making available of device:

(17) ‘making available on the market’ means any supply of a device, other than an investigational device, for distribution, consumption or use on the Union market in the course of a commercial activity, whether in return for payment or free of charge;

(18) ‘placing on the market’ means the first making available of a device, other than an investigational device, on the Union market;

(19)‘putting into service’ means the stage at which a device, other than an investigational device, has been made available to the final user as being ready for use on the Union market for the first time for its intended purposes.

Definitions related to economic operators, users and specific processes:

(20) ‘manufacturer’ means the natural or legal person who manufactures or fully refurbishes a device or has a device designed, manufactured or fully refurbished, and markets that device under his name or trademark.

payment or free of charge of a device other than a device intended for clinical investigation, with a view to distribution and/or use on the Community market, regardless of whether it is new or fully refurbished;

(i) ‘putting into service’ means the stage at which a device has been made available to the final user as being ready for use on the Community market for the first time for its intended purpose;

(j) ‘authorised representative’ means any natural or legal person established in the Community who, explicitly designated by the manufacturer, acts and may be addressed by authorities and bodies in the Community instead of the manufacturer with regard to the latter'sobligations under this Directive;

(k) ‘clinical data’ means the safety and/or performance information that is generated from the use of a device. Clinical data are sourced from:— clinical investigation(s) of the device concerned; or— clinical investigation(s) or other studies reported in the scientific literature, of a similar device for which equivalence to the device in question can be demonstrated; or— published and/or unpublished reports on other clinical experience of either the device in question or a similar device for which equivalence to the device in question can be demonstrated;

(l) ‘device subcategory’ means a set of devices having common areas of intended use or common technology;

(m) ‘generic device group’ means a set of devices having the same or similar intended uses or commonality of technology allowing them to be classified in a generic manner not reflecting specific characteristics;

(n) ‘single use device’ means a device intended to be used once only for a single patient.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

6

Page 7: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

For the purposes of the definition of manufacturer, fully refurbishing is defined as the complete rebuilding of a device already placed on the market or put into service, or the marking of a new device from used devices, to bring it in conformity with this Regulation, combined with the assignment of a new lifetime to the refurbished device;

(21) “authorised representative” means any natural or legal person established within the Union who has received and accepted a written mandate from a manufacturer to act on his behalf in relation to specified tasks with regard to the latter’s obligations under this regulation;

(22) ‘importer’ means any natural or legal person established within the Union who places a device from a third country on the Union market;

(23) ‘distributor’ means any natural or legal person in the supply chain, other than the manufacturer or the importer, who makes a device available on the market;

(24) ‘economic operators’ means the manufacturer, the authorised representative, the importer and the distributor;

(25) ‘health institution’ means an organisation whose primary purpose is the care or treatment of patients or the promotion of public health;

(26) ‘user’ means any healthcare professional or lay person who uses a device;

(27) ‘lay person’ means an individual who does not have formal education in a relevant field of healthcare or medical discipline;

(28) ‘reprocessing’ means the process carried out on a used device in order to allow its safe reuse including cleaning, disinfection and sterilisation, and related procedures, as well as testing and restoration of the technical and functional safety of the used device;

Definitions related to conformity assessment

(29) ‘conformity assessment’ means the process demonstrating whether the requirements of this Regulation relating to a device have been fulfilled;

(30) ‘conformity assessment body’ means a body that performs third-party conformity

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

7

Page 8: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

assessment activities including calibration, testing, certification and inspection;

(31) ‘notified body’ means a conformity assessment body designated in accordance with this Regulation;

(32) ‘CE marking of conformity’ or ‘CE marking’ means a marking by which the manufacturer indicates that the product is in conformity with the applicable requirements set out in this Regulation and other applicable Union harmonisation legislation providing for its affixing.

Definitions related to clinical evaluation and clinical investigations

(33) ‘clinical evaluation’ means the assessment and analysis of clinical data pertaining to a device in order to verify the safety and performance of the device when used as intended by the manufacturer;

(34) ‘clinical investigation’ means any systematic investigation in one or more human subjects, undertaken to assess the safety or performance of a device;

(35) ‘investigational device’ means any device being assessed for safety and/or performance in a clinical investigation;

(36) ‘clinical investigation plan’ means the document(s) setting out the rationale, objectives, design and proposed analysis, methodology, monitoring, conduct and record-keeping of the clinical investigation;

(37) ‘clinical data’ means the safety or performance information that is generated from the use of a device and that are sourced from the following:

– clinical investigation(s) of the device concerned;

– clinical investigation(s) or other studies reported in the scientific literature, of a similar device for which equivalence to the device in question can be demonstrated;

– published and/or unpublished reports on other clinical experience of either the device in question or a similar device for which equivalence to the device in question can be demonstrated;

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

8

Page 9: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

(38) ‘sponsor’ means any individual, company, institution or organisation which takes responsibility for the initiation and management of a clinical investigation;

(39) ‘adverse event’ means any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury or any untoward clinical signs, including an abnormal laboratory finding, in subjects, users or other persons, in the context of a clinical investigation, whether or not related to the investigational medical device;

(40) ‘serious adverse event’ means any adverse event that led to any of the following:

– death,

– serious deterioration in health of the subject, that resulted in any of the following:

(i) life-threatening illness or injury,

(ii) permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function,

(iii) hospitalisation or extending the duration of hospitalisation,

(iv) medical or surgical intervention to prevent a life-threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function,

– foetal distress, foetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect;

(41) ‘device deficiency’ means any inadequacy in the identity, quality, durability, reliability, safety or performance of an investigational device, including malfunction, use errors or inadequacy in the information supplied by the manufacturer.

Definitions related to vigilance and market surveillance:

(42) ‘recall’ means any measure aimed at achieving the return of a device that has already been made available to the end user;

(43) ‘withdrawal’ means any measure aimed at preventing a device in the supply chain from further being made available on the market;

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

9

Page 10: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

(44) ‘incident’ means any malfunction or deterioration in the characteristics and/or performance of a device made available on the market, any inadequacy in the information supplied by the manufacturer and any unexpected undesirable side-effect;

(45) ‘serious incident’ means any incident that directly or indirectly led, might have led or might lead to any of the following:

– death of a patient, user or other person,

– temporary or permanent serious deterioration of the patient's, user's or other person's state of health,

– serious public health threat;

(46) ‘corrective action’ means action taken to eliminate the cause of a potential or real non-conformity or other undesirable situation;

(47) ‘field safety corrective action’ means corrective action taken by the manufacturer for technical or medical reasons to prevent or reduce the risk of a serious incident in relation to a device made available on the market;

(48) ‘field safety notice’ means the communication sent by the manufacturer to users or customers in relation to a field safety corrective action;

(49) ‘market surveillance’ means the activities carried out and measures taken by public authorities to ensure that products comply with the requirements set out in the relevant Union harmonisation legislation and do not endanger health, safety or any other aspect of public interest protection;

Definitions related to standards and others technical specifications

(50) ‘harmonised standard’ means a European standard as defined in Article 2(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) No [../..];

(51) ‘common technical specifications’ means a document other that a standards that prescribes technical requirements that provide a means to comply with the legal

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

10

Page 11: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

obligation applicable to a device, process or system.

11. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 89 to amend the list in Annex XV referred to in the last subparagraph of number (1) of paragraph 1, in the light of technical progress and taking into account the similarity between a medical device and a product without a medical purpose in respect of their characteristics and risks.

12.Article 1Scope

5. Where a device is intended to administer a medicinal product as defined in Article 1(2) of Directive 2001/83/EC, that device shall be governed by this Regulation, without prejudice to the provisions of Directive 2001/83/EC with regard to the medicinal product.

However, if the device intended to administer a medicinal product and the medicinal product are placed on the market in such a way that they form a single integral product which is intended exclusively for use in the given combination and which is not reusable; the product shall be governed by Directive 2001/83/EC. In this case, the relevant general safety and performance requirements set out in Annex I of this Regulation shall apply as far as the safety and performance of the device part are concerned.

Article 1

3. Where a device is intended to administer a medicinal product within the meaning of Article 1 of Directive 2001/83/EC (1), that device shall be governed by this Directive, without prejudice to the provisions of Directive 2001/83/EC with regard to the medicinal product.If, however, such a device is placed on the market in such a way that the device and the medicinal product form a single integral product which is intended exclusively for use in the given combination and which is not reusable, that single product shall be governed by Directive 2001/83/EC. The relevant essential requirements of Annex I to this Directive shall apply as far as safety and performance-related device features are concerned.

4. Where a device, when placed on the market or used in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, incorporates, as an integral part, a substance which, if used separately, would be considered to be a medicinal product as defined in Article 1(2) of Directive 2001/83/EC, including a medicinal product derived from human blood or human plasma as defined in Article 1(10) of that Directive, with action ancillary to that of the device, that device shall be assessed and authorised in accordance with this Regulation.

However, of the action of the medicinal substance is not ancillary to that of the device, the product shall be governed by Directive 2001/83/EC. In this case, the relevant general safety and performance requirements set out in Annex I of this Regulation shall apply as far as the safety and performance of the device part are concerned.

Article 1

4. Where a device incorporates, as an integral part, a substance which, if used separately, may be considered to be a medicinal product within the meaning of Article 1 of Directive 2001/83/EC and which is liable to act upon the body with action ancillary to that of the device, that device shall be assessed and authorised in accordance with this Directive.

4 a. Where a device incorporates, as an integral part, a substance which, if used separately, may be considered to be a medicinal product constituent or a medicinal product derived from human blood or human plasma within the meaning of Article 1 of Directive 2001/83/EC and which is liable to act upon the human body with action ancillary to that of the device, hereinafter

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

11

Page 12: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

referred to as a ‘human blood derivative’, that device shall be assessed and authorised in accordance with this Directive.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

12

Page 13: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

Article 1Scope

2. This Regulation shall not apply to:

(a) in vitro diagnostic medical device covered by Regulation (EU) […/…];

(b) medicinal products covered by Directive 2001/83/EC and advanced therapy medicinal products covered by Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007. In deciding whether a product falls under Directive 2001/83/EC and/or Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007 or under this Regulation, particular account shall be taken of the principal mode of action of the product;

(c) human blood, blood products, plasma or blood cells of human origin or to devices which incorporate, when placed on the market, or used in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, such blood products, plasma or cells, except for devices referred to in paragraph 4;

(d) cosmetic products covered by Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009;

(e) transplants, tissues or cells of human or animal origin or their derivatives, or products containing or consisting of them, unless a device is manufactured utilising tissues or cells of human or animal origin, or their derivatives, which are non-viable or are rendered non-viable.

However, human tissues and cells that are non-viable or are rendered non-viable, that have undergone only non-substantial manipulation, in particular those listed in Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007, and products derived from such tissues and cells, shall not be considered devices manufactured utilising tissues or cells of human origin or their derivatives;

(f) products that contain or consist of biological substances or organisms other than those referred to in points (c) and (e) that are viable, such as living microorganisms, bacteria, fungi or virus;

(g) food covered by Regulation (EC) No 178/2002.

Article 1

5. This Directive shall not apply to:(a) in vitro diagnostic devices;

(b) active implantable devices covered by Directive 90/385/EEC;

(c) medicinal products covered by Directive 2001/83/EC. In deciding whether a product falls under that Directive or this Directive, particular account shall be taken of the principal mode of action of the product;

(d) cosmetic products covered by Directive 76/768/EEC (1);

(e) human blood, blood products, plasma or blood cells of human origin or to devices which incorporate at the time of placing on the market such blood products, plasma or cells, with the exception of devices referred to in paragraph 4a;

(f) transplants or tissues or cells of human origin nor to products incorporating or derived from tissues or cells of human origin, with the exception of devices referred to in paragraph 4a;

(g) transplants or tissues or cells of animal origin, unless a device is manufactured utilizing animal tissue which is rendered non-viable or non-viable products derived from animal tissue.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

13

Page 14: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

No correlation 6. Where a device is intended by the manufacturer to be used in accordance with both the provisions on personal protective equipment in Council Directive 89/686/EEC (1) and this Directive, the relevant basic health and safety requirements of Directive 89/686/EEC shall also be fulfilled.

Article 1Scope

6. This Regulation is specific Union legislation within the meaning of Article 1(4) of Directive 2004/108/EC and within the meaning of Article 3 of Directive 2006/42/EC.

7. This Directive is a specific Directive within the meaning of Article 1(4) of Directive 2004/108/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (2).

Article 1Scope

7. This Regulation shall not affect the application of Council Directive 96/29/Euratom nor of Council Directive 97/43/Euratom.

8. This Regulation shall not be affect national laws which require that certain devices may only be supplied on a medical prescription.

8. This Directive shall not affect the application of Council Directive 96/29/Euratom of 13 May 1996 laying down basic safety standards for the protection of the health of workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionising radiation (3), nor of Council Directive 97/43/Euratom of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionising radiation in relation to medical exposure (4).

Chapter II Making available of devices, obligations of economic operators, reprocessing, CE marking, free movement

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

14

Page 15: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

Article 4Placing on the market and putting into service

15. A device may be placed on the market or put into service only if it complies with this Regulation when duly supplied and properly installed, maintained and used in accordance with its intended purpose.

16. See below

17. Demonstration of conformity with the general safety and performance requirements shall include a clinical evaluation in accordance with Article 49.

18. Devices that are manufactured and used within a single health institution shall be considered as being put into service. The provisions regarding CE marking referred to in Article 18 and the obligations laid down in Article 23 to 27 shall not apply, provided that manufacture and use occur under the health institution's single quality management system

Article 2Placing on the market and putting into service

Member States shall take all necessary steps to ensure that devices may be placed on the market and/or put into service only if they comply with the requirements laid down in this Directive when duly supplied and properly installed, maintained and used in accordance with their intended purpose.

Article 4Placing on the market and putting into service

16. A device shall meet the essential safety and performance requirements which apply to it, taking into account its intended purpose. General safety and performance requirements are set out in Annex I.

Article 3Essential requirements

The devices must meet the essential requirements set out in Annex I which apply to them, taking account of the intended purpose of the devices concerned.

Where a relevant hazard exists, devices which are also machinery within the meaning of Article 2(a) of Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on machinery (5) shall also meet the essential health and safety requirements set out in Annex I to that Directive to the extent to which those essential health and safety requirements are more specific than the essential requirements set out in Annex I to this Directive.

Article 22Free movement

Member States shall not refuse, prohibit or restrict the making available or putting into service within the territory of devices which comply with the requirements of this Regulation.

Article 4Free movement, devices intended for special purposes

1. Member States shall not create any obstacle to the placing on the market or the putting into service within their territory of devices bearing the CE marking provided for in Article 17 which indicate that they have been the

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

15

Page 16: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

subject of an assessment of their conformity in accordance with the provisions of Article 11.

Article 19Devices for special purposes

1. Member States shall not create any obstacle to:

(a) investigational devices which are supplied to a doctor of medicine, a dental practitioner or an authorised person for the purpose of clinical investigation if they meet the conditions laid down in Articles 50 to 60 and in Annex XIV;

(b) custom-made devices which are made available on the market if they comply with Article 42(7) in combination with Annex XI.

Those devices shall not bear the CE marking, with the exception of the devices referred to in Article 54.

2. Custom-made shall be accompanied by the statement referred to in Annex XI which shall be made available to the particular patient or user identified by name, an acronym or a numerical code.

Member States may require that the manufacturer of a custom-made device submit to the competent authority a list of such devices which have been made available in their territory.

3. See below

Article 4Free movement, devices intended for special purposes

2. Member States shall not create any obstacle to:— devices intended for clinical investigation being made available to medical practitioners or authorized persons for that purpose if they meet the conditions laid down in Article 15 and in Annex VIII,— custom-made devices being placed on the market and put into service if they meet the conditions laid down in Article 11 in combination with Annex VIII; Class IIa, IIb and III devices shall be accompanied by the statement referred to in Annex VIII, which shall be available to the particular patient identified by name, an acronym or a numerical code.

These devices shall not bear the CE marking.

Article 19Devices for special purposes

3. At trade fairs, exhibitions, demonstrations or similar events, Member States shall not create any obstacle to the showing of devices which do not comply with this Regulation, provided a visible sign clearly indicates that such devices are intended for presentation or demonstration purposes only and cannot be made available until they have been made to comply with this Regulation.

Article 4Free movement, devices intended for special purposes

3. At trade fairs, exhibitions, demonstrations, etc. Member States shall not create any obstacle to the showing of devices which do not conform to this Directive, provided that a visible sign clearly indicates that such devices cannot be marketed or put into service until they have been made to comply.

28. Manufacturers shall draw up the technical documentation which shall allowassessment of the conformity of the device with the requirements of this

Article 4Free movement, devices intended for special purposes

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

16

Page 17: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

Regulation.The technical documentation shall include the elements set out in Annex II.The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 89 amending or supplementing, in the light of technical progress, the elements in the technical documentation set out in Annex II.

29. Where compliance of a device with the applicable requirements has been demonstrated following the applicable conformity assessment procedure, manufacturers of devices, other than custom-made or investigational devices, shall draw up an EU declaration of conformity in accordance with Article 17 and affix the CE marking of conformity in accordance with Article 18.

30. Manufacturers shall keep the technical documentation, the EU declaration of conformity and, if applicable, a copy of the relevant certificate including any supplement, issued in accordance with Article 45, available to the competent authorities for a period of at least five years after the last device covered by the declaration of conformity has been placed on the market. In the case of implantable devices, the period shall be at least 15 years after the last device has been placed on the market.Where the technical documentation is voluminous or held in different locations, the manufacturer shall provide, upon request by a competent authority, a summary technical documentation (STED) and grant access to the full technical documentation upon request.

31. Manufacturers shall ensure that procedures are in place to keep series production in conformity with the requirements of this Regulation. Changes in product design or characteristics and changes in the harmonised standards or CTS by reference to which conformity of a product is declared shall be adequately taken into account.Proportionate to the risk class and the type of device, manufacturers of devices, other than custom-made or investigational devices, shall institute and keep up to date a quality management system that shall address at least the following aspects:

4. Member States may require the information, which must be made available to the user and the patient in accordance with Annex I, point 13, to be in their national language(s) or in another Community language, when a device reaches the final user, regardless of whether it is for professional or other use.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

17

Page 18: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

(a) the responsibility of the management;

(b) resource management, including selection and control of suppliers and subcontractors;

(c) product realisation;

(d) processes for monitoring and measurement of output, data analysis and product improvement.

32. Proportionate to the risk class and the type of device, manufacturers of devices, other than custom-made devices, shall institute and keep up to date a systematic procedure to collect and review experience gained from their devices placed on the market or put into service and to apply any necessary corrective action, hereinafter referred to as ‘post-market surveillance plan’. The post-market surveillance plan shall set out the process for collecting, recording and investigating complaints and reports from healthcare professionals, patients or users on suspected incidents related to a device, keeping a register of non-conforming products and product recalls or withdrawals, and if deemed appropriate due to the nature of the device, sample testing of marketed devices. Part of the post-market surveillance plan shall be a plan for post-market clinical follow-up in accordance with Part B of Annex XIII. Where post-market clinical follow-up is not deemed necessary, this shall be duly justified and documented in the post-market surveillance plan.If in the course of the post-market surveillance a need for corrective action isidentified, the manufacturer shall implement the appropriate measures.

33. Manufacturers shall ensure that the device is accompanied by the information to be supplied in accordance with Section 19 of Annex I in an official Union language which can be easily understood by the intended user or patient. The language(s) of the information to be supplied by the manufacturer may be determined by the law of the Member State where the device is made available to the user or patient.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

18

Page 19: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

34. Manufacturers who consider or have reason to believe that a device which they have placed on the market is not in conformity with this Regulation shall immediately take the necessary corrective action to bring that product into conformity, withdraw it or recall it, as appropriate. They shall inform the distributors and, where applicable, the authorised representative accordingly.

35. Manufacturers shall, in response to a reasoned request from a competent authority, provide it with all the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the conformity of the device, in an official Union language which can be easily understood by that authority. They shall cooperate with that authority, at its request, on any corrective action taken to eliminate the risks posed by devices which they have placed on the market or put into service.

36. Where manufacturers have their devices designed and manufactured by another legal or natural person the information on the identity of that person shall be part of the information to be submitted in accordance with Article 25.

2. The CE marking shall be subject to the general principles set out in Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008.

3. The CE marking shall be affixed visibly, legibly and indelibly to the device or its sterile pack. Where that is not possible or not warranted on account of the nature of the device, it shall be affixed to the packaging. Where applicable, the CE marking shall also appear in the instructions for use and on the sales packaging where are provided.

4. The CE marking shall be affixed before the device is placed on the market. It may be followed by a pictogram or any other mark indicating a special risk or use.

5. Where applicable, the CE marking shall be followed by the identification number of the notified body responsible for the conformity assessment procedures set out in Article 42. The identification number shall also be indicated in any promotional material which mentions that a device fulfils the legal requirements for CE marking.

6. Where devices are subject to other Union legislation concerning other aspects which

Article 4Free movement, devices intended for special purposes

5. Where the devices are subject to other Directives concerning other aspects and which also provide for the affixing of the CE marking, the latter shall indicate that the devices also fulfil the provisions of the other Directives.However, should one or more of these directives allow the manufacturer, during a transitional period, to choose which arrangements to apply, the CE marking shall indicate that the devices fulfill the provisions only of those directives applied by the manufacturer. In this case, the particulars of these directives, as published in the Official Journal of the European Communities, must be given in the documents, notices or instructions required by the directives and accompanying such devices.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

19

Page 20: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

also provide for the affixing of the CE marking, the CE marking shall indicate that the devices also fulfil the provisions of the other legislation.Article 6Harmonised standards

22. Devices which are in conformity with the relevant harmonised standards, or parts thereof, the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union shall be presumed to be in conformity with the requirements of this Regulation covered by those standards or parts thereof.

The first subparagraph shall also apply to system or process requirements to be fulfilled by economic operators or sponsors in accordance with this Regulation, including those related to the quality management system, risk management, the post-market surveillance plan, clinical investigations, clinical evaluation, or post-market follow-up.

Article 5Reference to standards

1. Member States shall presume compliance with the essential requirements referred to in Article 3 in respect of devices which are in conformity with the relevant national standards adopted pursuant to the harmonized standards the references of which have been publishes in the Official Journal of the European Communities; Member States shall publish the references of such national standards.

Article 6Harmonised standards

23. Reference to harmonised standards also includes the monographs of the European Pharmacopoeia adopted in accordance with the Convention on the Elaboration of a European Pharmacopeia, notably on surgical sutures and on interaction between medicinal products and materials used in devices containing such medicinal products.

Article 5Reference to standards

2. For the purposes of this Directive, reference to harmonized standards also includes the monographs of the European Pharmacopoeia notably on surgical sutures and on interaction between medicinal products and materials used in devices containing such medicinal products, the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

No correlation Article 5Reference to standards

3. If a Member State or the Commission considers that the harmonized standards do not entirely meet the essential requirements referred to in Article 3, the measures to be taken by the Member States with regard to these standards and the publication referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be adopted by the procedure defined in Article 6 (2).

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

20

Page 21: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

Article 6Committee on Standards and Technical Regulations

1. The Commission shall be assisted by the Committee set up by Article 5 of Directive 98/34/EC (1), hereinafter referred to as ‘the Committee’.

2. Where reference is made to this Article, Articles 3 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC (2) shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.

3. The Committee shall adopt its rules of procedure.Article 88Committee procedure

1. The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee on Medical Devices. That Committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.

2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.

3. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.

4. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011, in conjunction with Article 4 or Article 5, as appropriate, shall apply.

Article 7

1. The Commission shall be assisted by the Committee set up by Article 6(2) of Directive 90/385/EEC, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Committee’.

2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 5 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.The period laid down in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at three months.

3. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5a(1) to (4) and Article 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.

4. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5a(1), (2), (4) and (6) and Article 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.

Article 69Evaluation regarding devices presenting a risk to health and safety at national level

Where the competent authorities of a Member State, based on vigilance data or other information, have sufficient reason to believe that a device presents a risk to the health or safety of patients, users or other persons, they shall carry out an evaluation in relation to the device concerned covering all the requirements laid down in this Regulation that are relevant to the risk presented by the device. The relevant economic

Article 8Safeguard clause

1. Where a Member State ascertains that the devices referred to in Article 4 (1) and (2) second indent, when correctly installed, maintained and used for their intended purpose, may compromise the health and/or safety of patients, users or, where applicable, other persons, it shall take all appropriate interim measures to withdraw such devices from the market or

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

21

Page 22: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

operators shall cooperate as necessary with the competent authorities.

Article 70Procedure for dealing with non-compliant devices presenting a risk to health and safety

1. Where, having performed an evaluation pursuant to Article 69, the competent authorities find that the device, which presents a risk to the health or safety of patients, users or other persons, does not comply with the requirements laid down in this Regulation, they shall without delay require the relevant economic operator to take all appropriate and duly justified corrective action to bring the device into compliance with those requirements, to prohibit or restrict the device on the market, to subject the making available of the device to specific requirements, to withdraw the device from the market, or to recall it within a reasonable period, proportionate to the nature of the risk.

2. Where the competent authorities consider that non-compliance is not restricted to their national territory, they shall inform the Commission and the other Member States of the results of the evaluation and of the actions which they have required the economic operators to take, by means of the electronic system set up in Article 68.

3. The economic operators shall ensure that all appropriate corrective action is taken in respect of all the devices concerned that they have made available on the market throughout the Union.

4. Where the relevant economic operator does not take adequate corrective action within the period referred to in paragraph 1, the competent authorities shall take all appropriate provisional measures to prohibit or restrict the device’s being made available on their national market, to withdraw the device from that market or to recall it.

They shall notify the Commission and the other Member States, without delay, of those measures, by means of the electronic system set up in Article 68.

5. The information referred to in paragraph 4 shall include all available details, in particular the data necessary for the identification of the non-compliant device, the origin of the device, the nature of the non-compliance alleged and the risk involved, the

prohibit or restrict their being placed on the market or put into service. The Member State shall immediately inform the Commission of any such measures, indicating the reasons for its decision and, in particular, whether non-compliance with this Directive is due to:(a) failure to meet the essential requirements referred to in Article 3;(b) incorrect application of the standards referred to in Article 5, in so far as it is claimed that the standards have been applied; (c) shortcomings in the standards themselves.

2. The Commission shall enter into consultation with the Parties concerned as soon as possible. Where, after such consultation, the Commission finds that:(a) the measures are justified:(i) it shall immediately so inform the Member State which took the measures and the other Member States. Where the decision referred to in paragraph 1 is attributed to shortcomings in the standards, the Commission shall, after consulting the Parties concerned, bring the matter before the Committee referred to in Article 6(1) within two months if the Member State which has taken the decision intends to maintain it and shall initiate the advisory procedure referred to in Article 6(2);(ii) when necessary in the interests of public health, appropriate measures designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive relating to withdrawal from the market of devices referred to in paragraph 1 or to prohibition or restriction of their placement on the market or being put into service or to introduction of particular requirements in order for such products to be put on the market, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 7(3). On imperative grounds of urgency, the Commission may use the urgency procedure referred to in Article 7(4);(b) the measures are unjustified, it shall immediately so inform the Member State which took the measures and the manufacturer or his authorised representative.

3. Where a non-complying device bears the CE marking, the competent Member State shall take appropriate action against whomsoever has affixed the mark and shall inform the Commission and the other Member States thereof.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

22

Page 23: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

nature and duration of the national measures taken and the arguments put forward by the relevant economic operator.

6. Member States other than the Member State initiating the procedure shall without delay inform the Commission and the other Member States of any measures adopted and of any additional information at their disposal relating to the non-compliance of the device concerned, and, in the event of disagreement with the notified national measure, of their objections, by means of the electronic system set up in Article 68.

7. Where, within two months of receipt of the information referred to in paragraph 4, no objection has been raised by either a Member State or the Commission in respect of a provisional measure taken by a Member State, that measure shall be deemed justified.

8. All Member States shall ensure that appropriate restrictive measures are taken without delay in respect of the device concerned.

Article 71Procedure at Union level

1. Where, within two months of receipt of the information referred to in Article 70(4), objections are raised by a Member State against a provisional measure taken by another Member State, or where the Commission considers the measure to be contrary to Union legislation, the Commission shall without delay enter into consultation with the Member States and the relevant economic operator or operators and shall evaluate the national measure. On the basis of the results of that evaluation, the Commission shall decide, by means of implementing acts, whether or not the national measure is justified. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 88(3).

2. If the national measure is considered justified, Article 70(8) shall apply. If the national measure is considered unjustified, the Member State concerned shall withdraw the measure. Where, in the situations referred to in Articles 70 and 72, a Member State or the Commission consider that the risk to health and safety emanating from a device cannot be contained satisfactorily by means of measures taken by the Member State(s) concerned, the Commission, at the request of a Member State or on its own initiative, may take, by implementing acts, the necessary and duly justified measures to ensure

4. The Commission shall ensure that the Member States are kept informed of the progress and outcome of this procedure.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

23

Page 24: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

the protection of health and safety, including measures restricting or prohibiting the placing on the market and/or putting into service of the device concerned. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 88(3).

3. On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the health and safety of humans, the Commission may adopt immediately applicable implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 88(4).

Article 72Procedure for dealing with compliant devices presenting a risk to health and safety

1. Where, having performed an evaluation pursuant to Article 69, a Member State finds that although a device has been legally placed on the market and/or put into service, it presents a risk to the health or safety of patients, users or other persons or to other aspects of the protection of public health, it shall require the relevant economic operator or operators to take all appropriate provisional measures to ensure that the device concerned, when placed on the market, no longer presents that risk, to withdraw the device from the market or to recall it within a reasonable period, commensurate with the nature of the risk.

2. The Member State shall immediately inform the Commission and the other Member States of the measures taken, by means of formal notification and the electronic system set up in Article 68. That information shall include all available details, in particular the data necessary for the identification of the device concerned, the origin and the supply chain of the device, the nature of the risk involved and the nature and duration of the national measures taken.

3. The Commission shall without delay enter into consultation with the Member States and the relevant economic operator or operators and shall evaluate the provisional national measures taken. On the basis of the results of that evaluation, the Commission shall decide, by means of implementing acts, whether or not the measure is justified. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 88(3). On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the health and safety of humans, the Commission may adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 88(4).

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

24

Page 25: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

4. Where the national measure is considered justified, Article 70(8) shall apply. If the national measure is considered unjustified, the Member State concerned shall withdraw the measure.Article 41Classification of medical devices

1. Devices shall be divided into classes I, IIa, IIb and III, taking into accound their intended purpose and inherent risks. Classification shall be carried out in accordance with the classification rules set out in Annex VII.

2. Any dispute between the manufacturer and the notified body concerned, arising from the application of the classification rules, shall be referred to the competent authority of the Member State where the manufacturer has his registered place of business for a decision. In cases where the manufacturer has no a registered place of business in the Union and has not yet designated an authorised representative, the matter shall be referred to the competent authority of the Member State where the authorised representative referred to in the last indent of point (b) of Section 3.2. of Annex VIII has his registered place of business.

At least 14 days prior to any decision, the competent authority shall notify the MDCG and the Commission of its envisaged decision.

3. The Commission may, at the request of a Member State or on its own initiative, by means of implementing acts, decide on the application of the classification criteria set out in Annex VII to a given device, or category or group of devices, with a view to determining their classification.

Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 89(3).

4. In the light of technical progress and any information which becomes available in the course of the vigilance and market surveillance activities described in Article 61 to 75, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 89 as regards the following:

(a) deciding that a given device, or category or group of devices, should, by way of

Article 9Classification

1. Devices shall be divided into Classes I, IIa, IIb and III. Classification shall be carried out in accordance with Annex IX.

2. In the event of a dispute between the manufacturer and the notified body concerned, resulting from the application of the classification rules, the matter shall be referred for decision to the competent authority to which the notified body is subject.

3. Where a Member State considers that the classification rules set out in Annex IX require adaptation in the light of technical progress and any information which becomes available under the information system provided for in Article 10, it may submit a duly substantiated request to the Commission and ask it to take the necessary measures for adaptation of classification rules. The measures designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive relating to adaptation of classification rules shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 7(3).

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

25

Page 26: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

derogation from the classification rules set out in Annex VII, be classified in another class,

(b) amending or supplementing the classification rules set out in Annex VII .Article 61Reporting of incidents and field safety corrective actions

1. Manufacturers of devices other than custom-made or investigational devices, shall report through the electronic system referred to in Article 62 the following:

(a) any serious incident in respect of devices made available on the Union market;

(b) any field safety corrective action in respect of devices made available on theUnion market, including any field safety corrective action undertaken in a thirdcountry in relation to a device which is also legally made available on the Union market if the reason for the field safety corrective action is not limited tothe device made available in the third country.

Manufacturers shall make the report referred to in the first subparagraph without delay, and no later than 15 days after they have become aware of the event and the causal relationship with their device or that such causal relationship is reasonably possible. The time period for reporting shall take account of the severity of the incident. Where necessary to ensure timely reporting, the manufacturer may submit an initial incomplete report followed up by a complete report.

2. For similar serious incidents occurring with the same device or device type and for which the root cause has been identified or the field safety corrective action implemented, manufacturers may provide periodic summary reports instead of individual incident reports, on condition that the competent authorities referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) of Article 62(5) have agreed with the manufacturer on the format, content and frequency of the periodic summary

Article 10Information on incidents occuring following placing of devices on the market

1. Member States shall take the necessary steps to ensure that any information brought to their knowledge, in accordance with the provisions of this Directive, regarding the incidents mentioned below involving a Class I, IIa, IIb or III device is recorded and evaluated centrally:

(a) any malfunction or deterioration in the characteristics and/or performance of a device, as well as any inadequacy in the labelling or the instructions for use which might lead to or might have led to the death of a patient or user or to a serious deterioration in his state of health;

(b) any technical or medical reason in relation to the characteristics or performance of a device for the reasons referred to in subparagraph (a), leading to systematic recall of devices of the same type by the manufacturer.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

26

Page 27: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

reporting.

3. See below

Article 62Electronic system on vigilance

1. The Commission shall, in collaboration with the Member States, set up and manage an electronic system to collate and process the following information:

(a) the reports by manufacturers on serious incidents and field safety correctiveactions referred to in Article 61(1);

(b) the periodic summary reports by manufacturers referred to in Article 61(2);

(c) the reports by competent authorities on serious incidents referred to in thesecond subparagraph of Article 63(1);

(d) the reports by manufacturers on trends referred to in Article 64;

(e) the field safety notices by manufacturers referred to in Article 63(5);

(f) the information to be exchanged between the competent authorities of the Member States and between them and the Commission in accordance with Article 63(4) and (7).

2. The information collated and processed by the electronic system shall be accessible to the competent authorities of the Member States, to the Commission and to the notified bodies.

3. The Commission shall ensure that healthcare professionals and the public have appropriate levels of access to the electronic system.

4. On the basis of arrangements between the Commission and competent

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

27

Page 28: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

authorities of third countries or international organisations, the Commission may grant those competent authorities or international organisations access to the database at the appropriate level. Those arrangements shall be based on reciprocity and make provision for confidentiality and data protection equivalent to those applicable in the Union.

5. The reports on serious incidents and field safety corrective actions referred to in points (a) and (b) of Article 61(1), the periodic summary reports referred to in Article 61(2), the reports on serious incidents referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 63(1) and the trend reports referred to in Article 64 shall be automatically transmitted upon receipt via the electronic system to the competent authorities of the following Member States:

(a) the Member State where the incident occurred;

(b) the Member State where the field safety corrective action is being or is to beundertaken;

(c) the Member State where the manufacturer has his registered place of business;

Article 63Analysis of serious incidents and field safety corrective actions

1. Member States shall take the necessary steps to ensure that any information regarding a serious incident that has occurred within their territory or a field safety corrective action that has been or is to be undertaken within their territory, and that is brought to their knowledge in accordance with Article 61 is, at national level, evaluated centrally by their competent authority, if possible together with the manufacturer.If in the case of reports received in accordance with Article 61(3) the competentauthority ascertains that the reports relate to a serious incident it shall notify without delay those reports to the electronic system referred to in Article 62,

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

28

Page 29: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

unless the same incident has already been reported by the manufacturer.

2. See below

Article 61Reporting of incidents and field safety corrective actions

3. The Member States shall take all appropriate measures to encourage healthcare professionals, users and patients to report to their competent authorities suspected serious incidents referred to in point (a) of paragraph 1. They shall record such reports centrally at national level. Where a competent authority of a Member State obtains reports referred to in the first sentence of this paragraph, it shall take the necessary steps to ensure that the manufacturer of the device concerned is also informed of the incident. The manufacturer shall ensure the appropriate follow-up.

The Member State shall coordinate between them the development of standard web-based structured forms for reporting of serious incidents by healthcare professionals, users and patients.

4. Manufacturers of custom-made devices shall report any serious incidents and field safety corrective actions referred to in paragraph 1 to the competent authority of the Member State in which the device in question has been made available.

Article 10Information on incidents occuring following placing of devices on the market

2. Where a Member State requires medical practitioners or the medical institutions to inform the competent authorities of any incidents referred to in paragraph 1, it shall take the necessary steps to ensure that the manufacturer of the device concerned, or his authorized representative, is also informed of the incident.

Article 63Analysis of serious incidents and field safety corrective actions

2. The national competent authorities shall carry out a risk assessment with regard to reported serious incidents or field safety corrective actions, taking into account criteria such as causality, detectability and probability of recurrence of the problem, frequency of use of the device, probability of occurrence of harm and severity of harm, clinical benefit of the device, intended and potential users, and population affected. They shall also evaluate the adequacy of the field safety corrective action envisaged or undertaken by the manufacturer and the need for and kind of any other corrective action. They shall monitor, and where necessary, oversee the manufacturer’s investigation of the incident.

Article 10Information on incidents occuring following placing of devices on the market

3. After carrying out an assessment, if possible together with the manufacturer or his authorised representative, Member States shall, without prejudice to Article 8, immediately inform the Commission and the other Member States of measures that have been taken or are contemplated to minimise the recurrence of the incidents referred to in paragraph 1, including information on the underlying incidents.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

29

Page 30: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

Article 65Implementing acts

The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, adopt the modalities and procedural aspects necessary for the implementation of Article 61 to 65 as regards the following:

(a) typology of serious incidents and field safety corrective action in relation to specific devices, or categories or groups of devices,

(b) types of corrective actions taken in relation to specific devices, or categories or groups of devices that are to be considered falling within the definition of field safety corrective actions laid down in Article 2(1), point (f), item (vi),

(c) harmonised forms for the reporting of incidents and field safety corrective actions, periodic summary reports and trend reports and for the exchange of information between competent authorities, and

(d) the timelines for the reporting of serious incidents and field safety corrective actions, periodic summary reports and trend reports, taking into account the seriousness of the event to be reported.Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 89(3).

Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure

Article 10Information on incidents occuring following placing of devices on the market

4. Any appropriate measures to adopt procedures to implement this Article shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 7(2).

Article 42Conformity assessment

2. Manufacturers of devices classified as class III, other than custom-made or investigational devices, shall be subject to a conformity assessment based on full quality assurance and design dossier examination as specified in Annex VIII.Alternatively, the manufacturer may choose to apply a conformity assessment based on type examination as specified in Annex IX coupled with a conformity assessment based on product conformity verification as specified in Annex X.

Article 11Conformity assessment procedures

1. In the case of devices falling within Class III, other than devices which are custom-made or intended for clinical investigations, the manufacturer shall, in order to affix the CE marking, either:(a) follow the procedure relating to the EC declaration of conformity set out in Annex II (full quality assurance); or(b) follow the procedure relating to the EC type-examination set out in Annex III, coupled with:(i) the procedure relating to the EC verification set out in Annex IV; or

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

30

Page 31: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

In the case of devices referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 1(4), the notified body shall follow the consultation procedure as specified in Section 6.1 of Chapter II of Annex VIII or Section 6 of Annex IX, as applicable.In the case of devices that are covered by this Regulation in accordance with point (e) of Article 1(2), the notified body shall follow the consultation procedure as specified in Section 6.2 of Chapter II of Annex VIII or Section 6 of Annex IX, as applicable.

(ii) the procedure relating to the EC declaration of conformity set out in Annex V (production quality assurance).

Article 42Conformity assessment

4. Manufacturers of devices classified as class IIa, other than custom-made or investigational devices, shall be subject to a conformity assessment based on full quality assurance as specified in Annex VIII, except for its Chapter II, withassessment of the design documentation within the technical documentation on a representative basis. Alternatively, the manufacturer may choose to draw up the technical documentation set out in Annex II coupled with a conformity assessment based on product conformity verification as specified in Section 7 of Part A or Section 8 of Part B of Annex X.

Article 11Conformity assessment procedures

2. In the case of devices falling within Class IIa, other than devices which are custom-made or intended for clinical investigations, the manufacturer shall, in order to affix the CE marking, follow the procedure relating to the EC declaration of conformity set out in Annex VII, coupled with either:

(a) the procedure relating to the EC verification set out in Annex IV; or

(b) the procedure relating to the EC declaration of conformity set out in Annex V (production quality assurance); or

(c) the procedure relating to the EC declaration of conformity set out in Annex VI (product quality assurance).Instead of applying these procedures, the manufacturer may also follow the procedure referred to in paragraph 3 (a).

Article 42Conformity assessment

3. Manufacturers of devices classified as class IIb, other than custom-made or investigational devices, shall be subject to a conformity assessment based on full quality assurance as specified in Annex VIII, except for its Chapter II, withassessment of the design documentation within the technical documentation on a representative basis. Alternatively, the manufacturer may choose to apply a conformity assessment based on type examination as specified in Annex IX coupled with a conformity assessment based on product conformity verification as specified in Annex X.

Article 11Conformity assessment procedures

3. In the case of devices falling within Class IIb, other than devices which are custom-made or intended for clinical investigations, the manufacturer shall, in order to affix the CE marking, either:

(a) follow the procedure relating to the EC declaration of conformity set out in Annex II (full quality assurance); in this case, point 4 of Annex II is not applicable; or

(b) follow the procedure relating to the EC type-examination set out in

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

31

Page 32: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

Annex III, coupled with:(i) the procedure relating to the EC verification set out in Annex IV; or(ii) the procedure relating to the EC declaration of conformity set out in Annex V (production quality assurance); or(iii) the procedure relating to the EC declaration of conformity set out in Annex VI (product quality assurance).

No correlation Article 11Conformity assessment procedures

4. The Commission shall, no later than five years from the date of implementation of this Directive, submit a report to the Council on the operation of the provisions referred to in Article 10 (1), Article 15 (1), in particular in respect of Class I and Class IIa devices, and on the operation of the provisions referred to in Annex II, Section 4.3 second and third subparagraphs and in Annex III, Section 5 second and third subparagraphs to this Directive, accompanied, if necessary, by appropriate proposals.

Article 42Conformity assessment

5. Manufacturers of devices classified as class I, other than custom-made or investigational devices, shall declare the conformity of their products by issuing the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 17 after drawing up the technical documentation set out in Annex II. If the devices are placed on the market in sterile condition or have a measuring function, the manufacturer shall apply the procedures set out in Annex VIII, except for its Chapter II, or in Part A of Annex X. However, involvement of the notified body shall be limited:

(a) in the case of devices placed on the market in sterile condition, to the aspects of manufacture concerned with securing and maintaining sterile conditions,

(b) in the case of devices with a measuring function, to the aspects of manufacture concerned with the conformity of the devices with the metrological requirements.

Article 11Conformity assessment procedures

5. In the case of devices falling within Class I, other than devices which are custom-made or intended for clinical investigations, the manufacturer shall, in order to affix the CE marking, follow the procedure referred to in Annex VII and draw up the EC declaration of conformity required before placing the device on the market.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

32

Page 33: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

Article 42Conformity assessment

7. Manufacturers of custom-made devices shall follow the procedure set out in Annex XI and draw up the statement set out in that Annex before placing the device on the market.

Article 11Conformity assessment procedures

6. In the case of custom-made devices, the manufacturer shall follow the procedure referred to in Annex VIII and draw up the statement set out in that Annex before placing each device on the market.Member States may require that the manufacturer shall submit to the competent authority a list of such devices which have been put into service in their territory.

No correlation Article 11Conformity assessment procedures

7. During the conformity assessment procedure for a device, the manufacturer and/or the notified body shall take account of the results of any assessment and verification operations which, where appropriate, have been carried out in accordance with this Directive at an intermediate stage of manufacture.

Article 9Authorised representative

39. The authorised representative shall perform the tasks specified in the mandate agreed between the manufacturer and the authorised representative. The mandate shall allow and require the authorised representative to perform at least the following tasks in relation to the devices that it covers:

(e) keep the technical documentation, the EU declaration of conformity and, if applicable, a copy of the relevant certificate including any supplement issued in accordance with Article 45 at the disposal of competent authorities for the period referred to in Article 8(4);

Article 11Conformity assessment procedures

8. The manufacturer may instruct his authorized representative to initiate the procedures provided for in Annexes III, IV, VII and VIII.

Article 43Involvement of notified bodies

1. Where the conformity assessment procedure requires the involvement of a notified body, the manufacturer may apply to a body of his choice within the limits of the conformity assessment activities, the conformity assessment procedures and the

Article 11Conformity assessment procedures

9. Where the conformity assessment procedure involves the intervention of a notified body, the manufacturer, or his authorized representative, may apply to a body of his choice within the framework of the tasks for which

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

33

Page 34: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

devices for which the body has been notified. An application may not be lodged in parallel with more than one notified body for the same conformity assessment activity.

the body has been notified.

Article 43Involvement of notified bodies

3. The notified body may require any information or data from the manufacturer which is necessary in order duly to conduct the chosen conformity assessment procedure.

Article 11Conformity assessment procedures

10. The notified body may require, where duly justified, any information or data, which is necessary for establishing and maintaining the attestation of conformity in view of the chosen procedure.

Article 45Certificates

1. The certificates issued by the notified bodies in accordance with Annexes VIII, IX and X shall be in an official Union language determined by the Member State in which the notified body is established or otherwise in an official Union language acceptable to the notified body. The minimum content of the certificates is set out in Annex XII.

Article 11Conformity assessment procedures

11. Decisions taken by the notified bodies in accordance with Annexes II, III, V and VI shall be valid for a maximum of five years and may be extended on application, made at a time agreed in the contract signed by both parties, for further periods of a maximum length of five years.

Article 42Conformity assessment

8. The Member State in which the notified body is established may determine that all or certain documents, including the technical documentation, audit, assessment and inspection reports, relating to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 1 to 6 shall be available in an official Union language. Otherwise they shall be available in an official Union language acceptable to the notified body.

Article 11Conformity assessment procedures

12. The records and correspondence relating to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 1 to 6 shall be in an official language of the Member State in which the procedures are carried out and/or in another Community language acceptable to the notified body.

Article 47Derogation from the conformity assessment procedures

1. By way of derogation from Article 42, any competent authority may authorise, on duly justified request, the placing on the market and/or putting into service within the territory of the Member State concerned, of a specific device for which the procedures referred to in Article 42 have not been carried out and use of which is in the interest of public health or patient safety.

Article 11Conformity assessment procedures

13. By derogation from paragraphs 1 to 6, the competent authorities may authorize, on duly justified request, the placing on the market and putting into service, within the territory of the Member State concerned, of individual devices for which the procedures referred to in paragraphs1 to 6 have not been carried out and the use of which is in the interest of protection of health.

Article 89Exercise of the delegation

Article 11Conformity assessment procedures

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

34

Page 35: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

1. The power to adopt the delegated acts referred to in Articles 2(2) and (3), 4(5), 8(2), 17(4), 24(7), 25(7), 29(2), 40(2), 41(4), 42(11), 45(5), 51(7), 53(3), 74(4) and 81(6) is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article.

2. The delegation of power referred to in Articles 2(2) and (3), 4(5), 8(2), 17(4), 24(7), 25(7), 29(2), 40(2), 41(4), 42(11), 45(5), 51(7), 53(3), 74(4) and 81(6) shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from the date of entry into force of this Regulation.

3. The delegation of power referred to in Articles 2(2) and (3), 4(5), 8(2), 17(4), 24(7), 25(7), 29(2), 40(2), 41(4), 42(11), 45(5), 51(7), 53(3), 74(4) and 81(6) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision of revocation shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force.

4. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council.

5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to any of the Articles listed in paragraph 1 shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period may be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council.

14. The measures designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive, by supplementing it, relating to the means by which, in the light of technical progress and considering the intended users of the devices concerned, the information laid down in Annex I Section 13.1 may be set out, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 7(3).

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

35

Page 36: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

Article 20Systems and procedure packs

1. Any natural or legal person shall draw up a statement referred to in paragraph 2 if he puts devices bearing the CE marking together with the following other devices or products, in accordance with the intended purpose of the devices or other products and within the limits of use specified by their manufacturers, in order to place themon the market as a system or procedure pack:– other devices bearing the CE marking;– in vitro diagnostic medical devices bearing the CE marking in conformity with Regulation (EU) […/…];– other products which are in conformity with the legislation applicable to thoseproducts.

2. In the statement, the person referred to in paragraph 1 shall declare the following:

(a) that he verified the mutual compatibility of the devices and, if applicable other products, in accordance with the manufacturers' instructions and has carried out his operations in accordance with those instructions;

(b) that he packaged the system or procedure pack and supplied relevant information to users incorporating the information to be supplied by the manufacturers of the devices or other products which have been put together;

(c) that the activity of putting devices and, if applicable, other products together as a system or procedure pack was subject to appropriate methods of internalmonitoring, verification and validation.

3. Any natural or legal person who sterilises systems or procedure packs referred to in paragraph 1 for the purpose of placing them on the market shall, at his choice, follow one of the procedures referred to in Annex VIII or in Part A of Annex X. The application of those Annexes and the involvement of the

Article 12Particular procedure for systems and procedure packs and procedure for sterilisation

1. By way of derogation from Article 11 this Article shall apply to systems and procedure packs.

2. Any natural or legal person who puts devices bearing the CE marking together within their intended purpose and within the limits of use specified by their manufacturers, in order to place them on the market as a system or procedure pack, shall draw up a declaration by which he states that:(a) he has verified the, mutual compatibility of the devices in accordance with the manufacturers' instructions and has carried out his operations in accordance with these instructions; and(b) he has packaged the system or procedure pack and supplied relevant information to users incorporating relevant instructions from the manufacturers; and(c) the whole activity is subjected to appropriate methods of internal control and inspection.Where the conditions above are not met, as in cases where the system or procedure pack incorporate devices which do not bear a CE marking or where the chosen combination of devices is not compatible in view of their original intended use, the system or procedure pack shall be treated as a device in its own right and as such be subjected to the relevant procedure pursuant to Article 11.

3. Any natural or legal person who sterilises, for the purpose of placing on the market, systems or procedure packs referred to in paragraph 2 or other CE-marked medical devices designed by their manufacturers to be sterilised before use, shall, at his choice, follow one of the procedures referred to in Annex II or V. The application of the abovementioned Annexes and the intervention of the notified body are limited to the aspects of the procedure relating to the obtaining of sterility until the sterile package is opened or damaged. The person shall draw up a declaration stating that sterilisation has been carried out in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

36

Page 37: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

notified body shall be limited to the aspects of the procedure relating to ensuring sterility until the sterile package is opened or damaged. The person shall draw up a statement declaring that sterilisation has been carried out in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

4. Where the system or procedure pack incorporate devices which do not bear the CE marking or where the chosen combination of devices is not compatible in view of their original intended purpose, the system or procedure pack shall be treated as advice in its own right and shall be subjected to the relevant conformity assessment procedure pursuant to Article 42.

5. The systems or procedure packs referred to in paragraph 1 shall not themselves bear an additional CE marking but they shall bear the name, registered trade name or registered trade mark of the person referred to in paragraph 1 as well as the address at which he can be contacted and his location can be established. Systems or procedure packs shall be accompanied by the information referred to in Section 19 of Annex I. The statement referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall be kept at the disposal of the competent authorities, after the system or procedure pack has been put together, for the period that is applicable to the devices put together in accordance with Article 8(4). Where these periods differ, the longest period shall apply.

4. The products referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 themselves shall not bear an additional CE marking. They shall be accompanied by the information referred to in point 13 of Annex I which includes, where appropriate, the information supplied by the manufacturers of the devices which have been put together. The declarations referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 shall be kept at the disposal of the competent authorities for a period of five years.

Article 15Single use devices and their reprocessing

1. Any natural or legal person who reprocesses a single-use device to make it suitable for further use within the Union shall be considered to be the manufacturer of the reprocessed device and shall assume the obligations incumbent on manufacturers laid down in this Regulation.

2. Only single-use devices that have been placed on the Union market in accordance with this Regulation, or prior to [date of application of this Regulation] in accordance with Directive 90/385/EEC or Directive 93/42/EEC may be reprocessed.

Article 12aReprocessing of medical devices

The Commission shall, no later than 5 September 2010, submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the issue of the reprocessing of medical devices in the Community.In the light of the findings of this report, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council any additional proposal it may deem appropriate in order to ensure a high level of health protection.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

37

Page 38: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

3. In the case of reprocessing of single-use devices for critical use, only reprocessing that is considered safe according to the latest scientific evidence may be carried out.

4. The Commission, by means of implementing acts, shall establish and regularly update a list of categories or groups of single-use devices for critical use which may be reprocessed in accordance with paragraph 3. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 88(3).

5. The name and address of the legal or natural person referred to in paragraph 1 and the other relevant information in accordance with Section 19 of Annex I shall be indicated on the label and, where applicable, in the instructions for use of the reprocessed device.

The name and address of the manufacturer of the original single-use device shall no longer appear on the label, but shall be mentioned in the instructions for use of the reprocessed device.

6. A Member State may maintain or introduce national provisions prohibiting, within its territory, on grounds of protection of public health specific to that Member State the following:

(a) the reprocessing of single-use devices and the transfer of single-use devices to another Member State or to a third country with a view to their reprocessing;

(b) the making available of reprocessed single-use devices.

Member States shall notify the Commission and the other Member States of thenational provisions and the grounds for introducing them. The Commission shall keep the information publicly available.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

38

Page 39: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

Article 41Classification of medical devices

3. By means of implementing acts, the Commission may, at the request of a Member State or on its own initiative, decide on application of the classification rules set out in Annex VII to a given device, or category or group of devices, with a view to determining their classification.Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 88(3).

Article 13Decisions with regard to classification and derogation clause

1. A Member State shall submit a duly substantiated request to the Commission and ask it to take the necessary measures in the following situations:(a) that Member State considers that the application of the classification rules set out in Annex IX requires a decision with regard to the classification of a given device or category of devices;

Article 41Classification of medical devices

4. In the light of technical progress and any information which becomes available in the course of the vigilance and market surveillance activities described in Articles 61 to 75, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 89 as regards the following:

(a) deciding that a device, or category or group of devices, should, by way of derogation from the classification criteria set out in Annex VII, be classified in another class;

(b) amending or supplementing the classification criteria set out in Annex VII.

Article 13Decisions with regard to classification and derogation clause

1. A Member State shall submit a duly substantiated request to the Commission and ask it to take the necessary measures in the following situations:(b) that Member State considers that a given device or family of devices should, by way of derogation from the provisions of Annex IX, be classified in another class;

Article 3Regulatory status of products

14. The Commission shall ensure the sharing of expertise in the fields of medical devices, in vitro diagnostic medical devices, medicinal products, human tissues and cells, cosmetics, biocides, food and, if necessary, other products in order to determine the appropriate regulatory status of a product, or category or group of products.

Article 13Decisions with regard to classification and derogation clause

1. A Member State shall submit a duly substantiated request to the Commission and ask it to take the necessary measures in the following situations:(c) that Member State considers that the conformity of a device or family of devices should, by way of derogation from Article 11, be established by applying solely one of the given procedures chosen from among those referred to in Article 11;

2. The Commission shall inform the Member States of the measures taken.Article 3Regulatory status of products

Article 13Decisions with regard to classification and derogation clause

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

39

Page 40: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

13. The Commission may, at the request of a Member State or on its own initiative, by means of implementing acts, determine whether or not a specific product, or category or group of products, falls within the definitions of 'medical device' or 'accessory to a medical device'. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 88(3).

(d) that Member State considers that a decision is required as to whether a particular product or product group falls within one of the definitions in Article 1(2)(a) to (e).The measures referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph shall, as appropriate, be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 7(2).

Article 25Electronic system on registration of devices and economic operators

1. The Commission, in collaboration with the Member States, shall set up and manage an electronic system to collate and process information that is necessary and proportionate to describe and identify the device and to identify the manufacturer and, where applicable, the authorised representative and the importer. The details regarding the information to be submitted by the economic operators are laid down in Part A of Annex V.

2. Before a device, other than a custom-made or investigational device, is placed on the market the manufacturer or his authorised representative shall submit to the electronic system the information referred to in paragraph 1.

3. Within one week after placing a device, other than a custom-made or investigational device, on the market, importers shall submit to the electronic system the information referred to in paragraph 1.

4. Within one week of any change occurring in relation to the information referred to in paragraph 1, the relevant economic operator shall update the data in the electronic system.

5. Not later than two years after submission of the information in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3, and then every second year, the relevant economic operator shall confirm the accuracy of the data. In the event of failure to confirm within six months of the due date, any Member State may take measures to suspend or otherwise restrict the making available of the device in

Article 14Registration of persons responsible for placing devices on the market

1. Any manufacturer who, under his own name, places devices on the market in accordance with the procedures referred to in Article 11(5) and (6) and any other natural or legal person engaged in the activities referred to in Article 12 shall inform the competent authorities of the Member State in which he has his registered place of business of the address of the registered place of business and the description of the devices concerned.

For all medical devices of classes IIa, IIb and III, Member States may request to be informed of all data allowing for identification of such devices together with the label and the instructions for use when such devices are put into service within their territory.

2. Where a manufacturer who places a device on the market under his own name does not have a registered place of business in a Member State, he shall designate a single authorised representative in the European Union. For devices referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1, the authorised representative shall inform the competent authority of the Member State in which he has his registered place of business of the details referred to in paragraph 1.

3. The Member States shall on request inform the other Member States and the Commission of the details referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 given by the manufacturer or authorised representative.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

40

Page 41: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

question within its territory until the obligation referred to in this paragraph is complied with.

6. The data contained in the electronic system shall be accessible to the public.

7. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 89 amending the list of information to be submitted as set out in Part A of Annex V in the light of technical progress.

Article 27European databank

1. The Commission shall develop and manage the European databank on medical devices (Eudamed) for the following purposes:

(a) to enable the public to be adequately informed about devices placed on themarket, about the corresponding certificates issued by notified bodies and about the relevant economic operators;

(b) to enable traceability of devices within the internal market;

(c) to enable the public to be adequately informed about clinical investigations and to enable sponsors of clinical investigations to be conducted in more than one Member State to comply with information obligations under Articles 50 to 60;

(d) to enable manufacturers to comply with information obligations under Articles 61 to 66;

(e) to enable the competent authorities of the Member States and the Commission to carry out their tasks relating to this Regulation on a well informed basis and to enhance the cooperation between them.

2. Eudamed shall include the following as integral parts:

Article 14aEuropean databank

1. Regulatory data in accordance with this Directive shall be stored in a European database accessible to the competent authorities to enable them to carry out their tasks relating to this Directive on a well-informed basis.The databank shall contain the following:

(a) data relating to registration of manufacturers and authorised representatives and devices in accordance with Article 14 excluding data related to custom-made devices;

(b) data relating to certificates issued, modified, supplemented, suspended, withdrawn or refused according to the procedures, as laid down in Annexes II to VII;

(c) data obtained in accordance with the vigilance procedure as defined in Article 10;

(d) data relating to clinical investigations referred to in Article 15.

2. Data shall be forwarded in a standardised format.

3. The measures necessary for the implementation of paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, in particular paragraph 1(d), shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 7(2).

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

41

Page 42: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

(a) the electronic system on UDI referred to in Article 24;

(b) the electronic system on registration of devices and economic operatorsreferred to in Article 25;

(c) the electronic system on information on certificates referred to in Article 45(4);

(d) the electronic system on clinical investigations referred to in Article 53,

(e) the electronic system on vigilance referred to in Article 62;

(f) the electronic system on market surveillance referred to in Article 68.

3. The data shall be entered into Eudamed by the Member States, notified bodies, economic operators and sponsors as specified in the provisions concerning the electronic systems referred to in paragraph 2.

4. All the information collated and processed by Eudamed shall be accessible to the Member States and to the Commission. The information shall be accessible to notified bodies, economic operators, sponsors and the public to the extent defined in the provisions referred to in paragraph 2.

5. Eudamed shall contain personal data only insofar as this is necessary for theelectronic systems referred to in paragraph 2 to collate and process the information in accordance with this Regulation. Personal data shall be kept in a form which permits identification of the data subjects for no longer than the periods referred to in Article 8(4).

6. The Commission and the Member States shall ensure that the data subjects may effectively exercise their rights to information, to access, to rectify and to object in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Directive 95/46/EC, respectively.

4. The provisions of this Article shall be implemented no later than 5 September 2012. The Commission shall, no later than 11 October 2012, evaluate the operational functioning and the added value of the databank. On the basis of this evaluation, the Commission shall, if appropriate, present proposals to the European Parliament and the Council or present draft measures in accordance with paragraph 3.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

42

Page 43: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

They shall ensure that the data subjects may effectively exercise the right of access to data relating to them, and the right to have inaccurate or incomplete data corrected and erased. Within their respective responsibilities, the Commission and the Member States shall ensure that inaccurate and unlawfully processed data is deleted, in accordance with the applicable legislation. Corrections and deletions shall be carried out as soon as possible, but no later than within 60 days after a request is made by a data subject.

7. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, lay down the modalities necessary for the development and management of Eudamed. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 88(3).

8. In relation to its responsibilities under this Article and the processing of personal data involved therein, the Commission shall be considered controller of Eudamed and its electronic systems.1. Where a Member State, after having performed an evaluation which indicates a potential risk related to a device or a specific category or group of devices considers that the making available on the market or putting into service of such device or specific category or group of devices should be prohibited, restricted or made subject to particular requirements or that such device or category or group of devices should be withdrawn from the market or recalled in order to protect the health and safety of patients, users or other persons or other aspects of public health, it may take any necessary and justified provisional measures.

2. The Member State shall immediately notify the Commission and all other Member States, giving the reasons for its decision, by means of the electronic system referred to in Article 68.

3. The Commission shall assess the provisional national measures taken. The Commission shall decide, by means of implementing acts, whether the nationalmeasures are justified or not. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 88(3).On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the health and

Article 14bParticular health monitoring measures

Where a Member State considers, in relation to a given product or group of products, that, in order to ensure protection of health and safety and/or to ensure that public health requirements are observed, such products should be withdrawn from the market, or their placing on the market and putting into service should be prohibited, restricted or subjected to particular requirements, it may take any necessary and justified transitional measures.The Member State shall then inform the Commission and all other Member States, giving the reasons for its decision.The Commission shall, whenever possible, consult the interested Parties and the Member States.The Commission shall adopt its opinion, indicating whether the national measures are justified or not. The Commission shall inform all the Member States and the consulted interested Parties thereof. When appropriate, the necessary measures designed to amend nonessential elements of this Directive, relating to withdrawal from the market, prohibition of placing

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

43

Page 44: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

safety of humans, the Commission may adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 88(4).

4. Where the assessment referred to in paragraph 3 demonstrates that the making available on the market or putting into service of a device, specific category or group of devices should be prohibited, restricted or made subject to particular requirements or that such device or category or group of devices should be withdrawn from the market or recalled in all Member States in order to protect the health and safety of patients, users or other persons or other aspects of public health, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 89 to take the necessary and duly justified measures.Where in this case imperative grounds of urgency so require, the procedure provided for in Article 90 shall apply to delegated acts adopted pursuant to this paragraph.

on the market and putting into service of a certain product or group of products or to restrictions or introduction of particular requirements in order for such products to be put on the market, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 7(3). On imperative grounds of urgency, the Commission may use the urgency procedure referred to in Article 7(4).

Chapter VIClinical evaluation and clinical investigationsArticle 50General requirements regarding clinical investigations

1. Clinical investigations shall be subject to Articles 50-60 and Annex XIV if they are conducted for one or more of the following purposes:

(a) to verify that, under normal conditions of use, devices are designed, manufactured and packaged in such a way that they are suitable for one or more of the purposes contained within the definition of a medical devicereferred to in Article 2(1), point (a), item (i), and achieve the performances intended as specified by the manufacturer,

(b) to verify that devices achieve the intended benefits to the patient as specified by the manufacturer, and

(c) to determine any undesirable side-effects, under normal conditions of use, and assess whether they constitute acceptable risks when weighed against the benefits to be achieved by the device.

Article 15

Clinical investigation

1. In the case of devices intended for clinical investigations, the manufacturer or the authorised representative, established in the Community, shall follow the procedure referred to in Annex VIII and notify the competent authorities of the Member States in which the investigations are to be conducted by means of the statement mentioned in Section 2.2 of Annex VIII.

2. In the case of devices falling within Class III and implantable and long-term invasive devices falling within Class IIa or IIb, the manufacturer may commence the relevant clinical investigation at the end of a period of 60 days after notification, unless the competent authorities have notified him within that period of a decision to the contrary based on considerations of public health or public policy.Member States may however authorise manufacturers to commence the relevant clinical investigations before the expiry of the period of 60 days,

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

44

Page 45: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

2. Where the sponsor is not established in the Union, he shall ensure that a contact person is established in the Union. That contact person shall be the addressee for all communications with the sponsor provided for in this Regulation. Any communication to that contact person shall be considered as communication to the sponsor.

3. Clinical investigations shall be designed and conducted in a way that the rights, safety and well-being of the subjects to the clinical investigation are protected and that the clinical data to be generated are reliable and robust.

4. Clinical investigations shall be designed, conducted, recorded and reported in accordance with the provisions of Articles 50 to 60 and of Annex XIV.

Article 51Application for clinical investigations

1. Before making the first application, the sponsor shall procure from the electronic system referred to in Article 53 a single identification number for a clinical investigation conducted in one site or multiple sites, in one or more than one Member State. The sponsor shall use this single identification number when registering theclinical investigation in accordance with Article 52.

2. The sponsor of a clinical investigation shall submit an application to the Member State(s) in which the investigation is to be conducted accompanied by the documentation mentioned in Chapter II of Annex XIV. Within one week after receipt of the application, the Member State concerned shall notify the sponsor whether the clinical investigation falls within the scope of this Regulation and whether the application is complete.

Where the Member State has not notified the sponsor within the time period referred to in the first subparagraph, the clinical investigation shall be considered as fallingwithin the scope of this Regulation and the application shall be considered complete.

3. Where the Member State finds that the clinical investigation applied for does

insofar as the relevant ethics committee has issued a favourable opinion on the programme of investigation in question, including its review of the clinical investigation plan.

3. In the case of devices other than those referred to in paragraph 2, Member States may authorise manufacturers to commence clinical investigations immediately after the date of notification, provided that the ethics committee concerned has issued a favourable opinion on the programme of investigation in question including its review of the clinical investigation plan.

4. The authorization referred to in paragraph 2 second subparagraph and paragraph 3, may be made subject to authorization from the competent authority.

5. The clinical investigations must be conducted in accordance with the provisions of Annex X. The measures designed to amend nonessential elements of this Directive, inter alia by supplementing it, relating to the provisions on clinical investigation in Annex X shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 7(3).

6. The Member States shall, if necessary, take the appropriate steps to ensure public health and public policy. Where a clinical investigation is refused or halted by a Member State, that Member State shall communicate its decision and the grounds therefor to all Member States and the Commission. Where a Member State has called for a significant modification or temporary interruption of a clinical investigation that Member State shall inform the Member States concerned about its actions and the grounds for the actions taken.

7. The manufacturer or his authorised representative shall notify the competent authorities of the Member States concerned of the end of the clinical investigation, with a justification in case of early termination. In the case of early termination of the clinical investigation on safety grounds this notification shall be communicated to all Member States and the Commission. The manufacturer or his authorised representative shall keep

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

45

Page 46: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

not fallwithin the scope of this Regulation or that the application is not complete, it shallinform the sponsor thereof and shall set a maximum of six days for the sponsor tocomment or to complete the application.Where the sponsor has not provided comments nor completed the application withinthe time-period referred to in the first subparagraph, the application shall beconsidered as withdrawn.Where the Member State has not notified the sponsor according to paragraph 2within three days following receipt of the comments or of the completed application,the clinical investigation shall be considered as falling within the scope of thisRegulation and the application shall be considered complete.

4. For the purposes of this Chapter, the date on which the sponsor is notified inaccordance with paragraph 2 shall be the validation date of the application. Wherethe sponsor is not notified, the validation date shall be the last day of the time periodsreferred to in paragraphs 2 and 3.

5. The sponsor may start the clinical investigation in the following circumstances:

(a) in the case of investigational devices classified as class III and implantable orlong-term invasive devices classified as class IIa or IIb, as soon as the MemberState concerned has notified the sponsor of its approval;

(b) in the case of investigational devices other than those referred to in point (a)immediately after the date of application provided that the Member Stateconcerned has so decided and that evidence is provided that the rights, safety

the report referred to in Section 2.3.7 of Annex X at the disposal of the competent authorities.

8. The provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 do not apply where the clinical investigations are conducted using devices which are authorized in accordance with Article 11 to bear the CE marking unless the aim of these investigations is to use the devices for a purpose other than that referred to in the relevant conformity assessment procedure. The relevant provisions of Annex X remain applicable.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

46

Page 47: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

and well-being of the subjects to the clinical investigation are protected;(c) after the expiry of 35 days after the validation date referred to in paragraph 4,unless the Member State concerned has notified the sponsor within that periodof its refusal based on considerations of public health, patient safety or publicpolicy.

6. Member States shall ensure that the persons assessing the application do not haveconflicts of interest and that they are independent of the sponsor, the institution of theinvestigation site(s) and the investigators involved, as well as free of any other undueinfluence.Member States shall ensure that the assessment is done jointly by a reasonablenumber of persons who collectively have the necessary qualifications andexperience. In the assessment, the view of at least one person whose primary area ofinterest is non-scientific shall be taken into account. The view of at least one patient shall be taken into account.

7. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 89 amending or supplementing, in the light of technical progress and global regulatory developments, the requirements for the documentation to be submitted with the application for the clinical investigation that is laid down in Chapter II of Annex XIV.

Article 52Registration of clinical investigations

1. Before commencing the clinical investigation, the sponsor shall enter in the electronic system referred to in Article 53 the following information regarding the clinical investigation:

(a) the single identification number of the clinical investigation,

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

47

Page 48: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

(b) the name and contact details of the sponsor and, if applicable, his contact person established in the Union,

(c) the name and contact details of the manufacturer, if different from the sponsor,

(d) the description of the investigational device,

(e) the description of the comparator(s), if applicable,

(f) the purpose of the clinical investigation, and

(g) the status of the clinical investigation.

2. Within one week of any change occurring in relation to the information referred to in paragraph 1, the sponsor shall update the relevant data in the electronic system referred to in Article 53.

3. The information shall be available to the public, through the electronic system referred to in Article 53, in accordance with the recognised ethical principles for medical research involving humans and the principles of good clinical practice in the field of clinical investigations of medical devices, unless confidentiality of the information is justified on any of the following grounds:

(a) protection of personal data in accordance with the rules laid down in Directive 95/46/EC and Regulation (EC) No 45/2001,

(b) protection of commercially sensitive information,

(c) effective supervision of the conduct of the clinical investigation by the Member State(s) concerned.

4. No personal data of subjects to the clinical investigation shall be publicly accessible.

Article 53Electronic system on clinical investigations

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

48

Page 49: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

1. The Commission shall, in collaboration with the Member States, set up and manage an electronic system to create the single identification numbers for clinical investigations referred to in Article 51(1) and to collate and process the following information:

(a) the registration of clinical investigations in accordance with Article 52;

(b) the exchange of information between the Member States and between them and the Commission in accordance with Article 56;

(c) the information related to clinical investigations conducted in more than oneMember State in case of a single application in accordance with Article 58;

(d) reports on serious adverse events and device deficiencies referred to in Article 59(2) in case of a single application in accordance with Article 58.

2. When setting up the electronic system referred in paragraph 1, the Commission shall ensure that it is interoperable with the EU database for clinical trials on medicinal products for human use set up in accordance with Article […] of Regulation (EU) No […/…]. With the exception of the information referred to in Article 52, the information collated and processed in the electronic system shall be accessible only to the Member States and to the Commission.

3. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 89 determining which other information regarding clinical investigations collated and processed in the electronic system shall be publicly accessible to allow interoperability with the EU database for clinical trials on medicinal products for human use set up by Regulation (EU) No […/…]. Article 52(3) and (4) shall apply.

Article 54Clinical investigations with devices authorised to bear the CE marking

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

49

Page 50: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

1. Where clinical investigations are to be conducted to further assess devices which are authorised in accordance with Article 42 to bear the CE marking and within the intended purpose referred to in the relevant conformity assessment procedure, hereafter referred to as 'post-market clinical follow-up investigations', the sponsor shall notify the Member States concerned at least 30 days prior to their commencement if the investigation would submit subjects to additionally invasive or burdensome procedures. Article 50(1) to (3), Article 52, Article 55, Article 56(1), Article 57(1), the last sentence of Article 57(2) and the relevant provisions of Annex XIV shall apply.

2. If the aim of the clinical investigations is to assess devices which are authorised in accordance with Article 42 to bear the CE marking for a purpose other than that referred to in the information supplied by the manufacturer in accordance with Section 19 of Annex I and in the relevant conformity assessment procedure, Articles 50 to 60 shall apply.

Article 55Substantial modifications to a clinical investigation

1. If the sponsor introduces amendments to a clinical investigation that are likely to have a substantial impact on the safety or rights of the subjects or on the robustness or reliability of the clinical data generated by the investigation, he shall notify the Member State(s) concerned of the reasons for and the content of those amendments. The notification shall be accompanied by an updated version of the relevant documentation referred to in Chapter II of Annex XIV.

2. The sponsor may implement the amendments referred to in paragraph 1 at the latest at the end of a period of four weeks after notification, unless the Member State concerned has notified the sponsor of any grounds for non-acceptance based on considerations of public health, patient safety or public policy.

Article 56Information exchange between Member States

1. Where a Member State has refused, suspended or terminated a clinical investigation, or has called for a substantial modification or temporary halt of a clinical investigation, that Member State shall communicate its decision and the grounds therefor to all

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

50

Page 51: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

Member States and the Commission by means of the electronic system referred to in Article 53.

2. Where an application is withdrawn by the sponsor prior to a decision by a Member State, that Member State shall inform all the other Member States and the Commission of that fact, by means of the electronic system referred to in Article 53.

Article 57Information by the sponsor in the event of suspension or termination of a clinical investigation

1. If the sponsor has temporarily halted a clinical investigation on safety grounds, he shall inform the Member States concerned within 15 days of the temporary halt.

2. The sponsor shall notify each Member State concerned of the end of a clinical investigation in relation to that Member State, providing a justification in the event of early termination. That notification shall be made within 15 days from the end of the clinical investigation in relation to that Member State.If the investigation is conducted in more than one Member State the sponsor shall notify all Member States concerned of the overall end of the clinical investigation. That notification shall be made within 15 days from the overall end of the clinical investigation.

3. Within one year from the end of the clinical investigation, the sponsor shall submit to the Member States concerned a summary of the results of the clinical investigation in form of a clinical investigation report referred to in Section 2.7 of Chapter I of Annex XIV. Where, for scientific reasons, it is not possible to submit the clinical investigation report within one year, it shall be submitted as soon as it is available. In this case, the clinical investigation plan referred to in Section 3 of Chapter II of Annex XIV shall specify when the results of the clinical investigation are going to be submitted, together with an explanation.

Article 58Clinical investigations conducted in more than one Member State

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

51

Page 52: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

1. By means of the electronic system referred to in Article 53, the sponsor of a clinical investigation to be conducted in more than one Member State may submit, for the purpose of Article 51, a single application that, upon receipt, is transmitted electronically to the Member States concerned.

2. In the single application, the sponsor shall propose one of the Member Statesconcerned as coordinating Member State. If that Member State does not wish to be the coordinating Member State, it shall agree, within six days of submission of the single application, with another Member State concerned that the latter shall be the coordinating Member State. If no other Member State accepts to be the coordinating Member State, the Member State proposed by the sponsor shall be the coordinating Member State. If another Member State than the one proposed by the sponsor becomes coordinating Member State, the deadline referred to in Article 51(2) shall start on the day following the acceptance.

3. Under the direction of the coordinating Member State referred to in paragraph 2, the Member States concerned shall coordinate their assessment of the application, in particular of the documentation submitted in accordance with Chapter II of Annex XIV, except for Sections 3.1.3, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 thereof which shall be assessed separately by each Member State concerned.

The coordinating Member State shall:

(a) within 6 days of receipt of the single application notify the sponsor whether the clinical investigation falls within the scope of this Regulation and whether the application is complete, except for the documentation submitted in accordance with Sections 3.1.3, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 of Chapter II of Annex XIV for which each Member State shall verify the completeness. Article 51(2) to (4) shall apply to the coordinating Member State in relation to the verification that the clinical investigation falls within the scope of this Regulation and that the application is complete, except for the documentation submitted in accordance with Sections 3.1.3, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 of Chapter II of Annex XIV. Article 51(2) to (4) shall apply to each Member State in relation to the verification that the

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

52

Page 53: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

documentation submitted in accordance with Sections 3.1.3, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 of Chapter II of Annex XIV is complete;

(b) establish the results of the coordinated assessment in a report to be taken into account by the other Member States concerned when deciding on the sponsor’s application in accordance with Article 51(5).

4. The substantial modifications referred to in Article 55 shall be notified to theMember States concerned by means of the electronic system referred to in Article 53.

Article 59Reporting of events occurring during clinical investigations

1. The sponsor shall fully record any of the following:

(a) an adverse event identified in the clinical investigation plan as critical to the evaluation of the results of the clinical investigation in view of the purposes referred to in Article 50(1);

(b) a serious adverse event;

(c) a device deficiency that might have led to a serious adverse event if suitable action had not been taken, intervention had not occurred, or circumstances had been less fortunate;

(d) new findings in relation to any event referred to in points (a) to (c).

2. The sponsor shall report to all Member States where a clinical investigation is conducted without delay any of the following:

(a) a serious adverse event that has a causal relationship with the investigationaldevice, the comparator or the investigation procedure or where such causal relationship is reasonably possible;

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

53

Page 54: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

(b) a device deficiency that might have led to a serious adverse event if suitable action had not been taken, intervention had not occurred, or circumstances had been less fortunate;

(c) new findings in relation to any event referred to in points (a) to (b).The time period for reporting shall take account of the severity of the event. Where necessary to ensure timely reporting, the sponsor may submit an initial incomplete report followed up by a complete report.

3. The sponsor shall also report to the Member States concerned any event referred to in paragraph 2 occurring in third countries in which a clinical investigation is performed under the same clinical investigation plan as the one applying to a clinical investigation covered by this Regulation.

4. In the case of a clinical investigation for which the sponsor has used the single application referred to in Article 58, the sponsor shall report any event as referred to in paragraph 2 by means of the electronic system referred to in Article 53. Upon receipt, this report shall be transmitted electronically to all Member States concerned.Under the direction of the coordinating Member State referred to in Article 58(2), the Member States shall coordinate their assessment of serious adverse events and device deficiencies to determine whether a clinical investigation needs to be terminated, suspended, temporarily halted or modified.This paragraph shall not affect the rights of the other Member States to perform their own evaluation and to adopt measures in accordance with this Regulation in order to ensure the protection of public health and patient safety. The coordinating Member State and the Commission shall be kept informed of the outcome of any such evaluation and the adoption of any such measures.

5. In the case of post-market clinical follow-up investigations referred to in Article 54(1), the provisions on vigilance contained in Articles 61 to 66 shall apply instead of this Article.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

54

Page 55: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

Article 60Implementing acts

The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, adopt the modalities and procedural aspects necessary for the implementation of this Chapter as regards the following:

(a) harmonised forms for the application for clinical investigations and their assessment as referred to in Articles 51 and 58, taking into account specific categories or groups of devices;

(b) the functioning of the electronic system referred to in Article 53;

(c) harmonised forms for the notification of post-market clinical follow-up investigations as referred to in Article 54(1), and of substantial modifications as referred to in Article 55;

(d) the exchange of information between Member States as referred to in Article 56;

(e) harmonised forms for the reporting of serious adverse events and device deficiencies as referred to in Article 59;

(f) the timelines for the reporting of serious adverse events and device deficiencies, taking into account the severity of the event to be reported as referred to in Article 59.Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 88(3).1. Member States shall notify the Commission and the other Member States of the conformity assessment bodies they intend to designate.

2. Member States may notify only conformity assessment bodies which satisfy the requirements set out in Annex VI.

3. Where a national authority is responsible for designation of notified bodies in the

Article 16Notified bodies

1. The Member States shall notify the Commission and other Member States of the bodies which they have designated for carrying out the tasks pertaining to the procedures referred to in Article 11 and the specific tasks for which the bodies have been designated. The Commission shall assign

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

55

Page 56: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

field of products other than medical devices, the competent authority for medical devices shall provide, prior to the notification, a positive opinion on the notification and its scope.

4. The notification shall clearly specify the scope of the designation indicating the conformity assessment activities, the conformity assessment procedures and the type of devices which the notified body is authorised to assess.

The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, set up a list of codes and the corresponding types of devices to define the scope of the designation of notified bodies which the Member States shall indicate in their notification. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 88(2).

5. The notification shall be accompanied by the final assessment report of the national authority responsible for notified bodies, the opinion of the joint assessment team and the recommendation of the MDCG. Where the notifying Member State does not follow the recommendation of the MDCG, it shall provide a duly substantiated justification.

6. The notifying Member State shall provide the Commission and the other Member States with documentary evidence regarding the arrangements in place to ensure that the notified body will be monitored regularly and will continue to satisfy the requirements set out in Annex VI. It shall furthermore submit evidence of the availability of competent personnel for monitoring the notified body in accordance with Article 28(6).

7. Within 28 days of a notification, a Member State or the Commission may raise written objections, setting out its arguments, with regard either to the notified body or to its monitoring by the national authority responsible for notified bodies.

8. When a Member State or the Commission raises objections in accordance with paragraph 7, the effect of the notification shall be suspended. In this case,

identification numbers to these bodies, hereinafter referred to as ‘notified bodies’.The Commission shall publish a list of the notified bodies, together with the identification numbers it has allocated to them and the tasks for which they have been notified, in the Official Journal of the European Communities. It shall ensure that the list is kept up to date.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

56

Page 57: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

the Commission shall bring the matter before the MDCG within 15 days after expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 7. After consulting the parties involved, the MDCG shall give its opinion at the latest within 28 days after the matter has been brought before it. If the notifying Member State does not agree with the opinion of the MDCG, it may request the Commission to give its opinion.

9. Where no objection is raised in accordance with paragraph 7 or where the MDCG or the Commission, after having been consulted in accordance with paragraph 8, is of the opinion that the notification may be accepted fully or partially, the Commission shall publish the notification accordingly.

10. The notification shall become valid the day after its publication in the database of notified bodies developed and managed by the Commission. The published notification shall determine the scope of lawful activity of the notified body.

Article 34Identification number and list of notified bodies

1. The Commission shall assign an identification number to each notified body for which the notification is accepted in accordance with Article 33. It shall assign a single such number even when the body is notified under several Union acts.

2. The Commission shall make publicly available the list of the bodies notified under this Regulation, including the identification numbers that have been assigned to them and the activities for which they have been notified. The Commission shall ensure that the list is kept up to date.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

57

Page 58: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

Article 29Requirements relating to notified bodies

1. Notified bodies shall satisfy the requirements that are necessary to fulfil their tasks for which they are designated in accordance with this Regulation. The minimum requirements to be met by notified bodies are set out in Annex VI.

2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 89 amending or supplementing the minimum requirements in Annex VI, in the light of technical progress and considering the minimum requirements needed for the assessment of specific devices, or categories or groups of devices.

Article 16Notified bodies

2. Member States shall apply the criteria set out in Annex XI for the designation of bodies. Bodies that meet the criteria laid down in the national standards which transpose the relevant harmonized standards shall be presumed to meet the relevant criteria.When appropriate in the light of technical progress, the detailed measures necessary to ensure a consistent application of the criteria set out in Annex XI for the designation of bodies by the Member States shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 7(2).

Article 36Changes to notifications

2. Where a national authority responsible for notified bodies has ascertained that a notified body no longer meets the requirements set out in Annex VI, or that it is failing to fulfil its obligations, the authority shall suspend, restrict, or fully or partially withdraw the notification, depending on the seriousness of the failure to meet those requirements or fulfil those obligations. A suspension shall not exceed a period of one year, renewable once for the same period. Where the notified body has ceased its activity, the national authority responsible for notified bodies shall withdraw the notification.

The national authority responsible for notified bodies shall immediately inform the Commission and the other Member States of any suspension, restriction or withdrawal of a notification.

Article 16Notified bodies

3. A Member State that has notified a body shall withdraw that notification if it finds that the body no longer meets the criteria referred to in paragraph 2. It shall immediately inform the other Member States and the Commission thereof.

No correlation Article 16Notified bodies

4. The notified body and the manufacturer, or his authorized representative, shall lay down, by common accord, the time limits for completion of the assessment and verification operations referred to in Annexes II to VI.

Article 45Certificates

Article 16Notified bodies

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

58

Page 59: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

4. The Commission, in collaboration with the Member States, shall set up and manage an electronic system to collate and process information on certificates issued by notified bodies. The notified body shall enter into this electronic system information regarding certificates issued, including amendments and supplements, and regarding suspended, reinstated, withdrawn or refused certificates and restrictions imposed on certificates. This information shall be accessible to the public.

5. The notified body shall inform its competent authority about all certificates issued, modified, supplemented, suspended, withdrawn or refused and the other notified bodies within the scope of this Directive about certificates suspended, withdrawn or refused and, on request, about certificates issued. The notified body shall also make available, on request, all additional relevant information.

Article 45Certificates

3. Where a notified body finds that requirements of this Regulation are no longer met by the manufacturer, it shall, taking account of the principle of proportionality, suspend or withdraw the certificate issued or impose any restrictions on it unless compliance with such requirements is ensured by appropriate corrective action taken by the manufacturer within an appropriate deadline set by the notified body. The notified body shall give the reasons for its decision.

Article 16Notified bodies

6. Where a notified body finds that pertinent requirements of this Directive have not been met or are no longer met by the manufacturer or where a certificate should not have been issued, it shall, taking account of the principle of proportionality, suspend or withdraw the certificate issued or place any restrictions on it unless compliance with such requirements is ensured by the implementation of appropriate corrective measures by the manufacturer. In the case of suspension or withdrawal of the certificate or of any restriction placed on it or in cases where an intervention of the competent authority may become necessary, the notified body shall inform its competent authority thereof. The Member State shall inform the other Member States and the Commission.

Article 31Application by a conformity assessment body for notification

2. The application shall specify the conformity assessment activities, the conformity assessment procedures and the devices for which the body claims to be competent, supported by documentation proving compliance with all the requirements set out in Annex VI.In respect of the organisational and general requirements and the quality management requirements set out in Sections 1 and 2 of Annex VI, the relevantdocumentation may be submitted in form of a valid certificate and the corresponding evaluation report delivered by a national accreditation body in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 765/2008. The conformity assessment body shall be presumed to be in conformity with the requirements covered by

Article 16Notified bodies

7. The notified body shall, on request, supply all relevant information and documents including budgetary documents, required to enable the Member State to verify compliance with Annex XI requirements.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

59

Page 60: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

the certificate delivered by such accreditation body.

Article 35Monitoring of notified bodies

1. The national authority responsible for notified bodies shall continuously monitor the notified bodies to ensure ongoing compliance with the requirements set out in Annex VI. The notified bodies shall, on request, supply all relevant information and documents, required to enable the authority to verify compliance with those criteria.Notified bodies shall, without delay, inform the national authority responsible for notified bodies of any changes, in particular regarding their personnel, facilities, subsidiaries or subcontractors, which may affect compliance with the requirements set out in Annex VI or their ability to conduct the conformity assessment proceduresrelating to the devices for which they have been designated.Article 18CE marking of conformity

1. Devices, other than custom-made or investigational devices, considered to be in conformity with the requirements of this Regulation shall bear the CE marking of conformity, as presented in Annex IV.

2. The CE marking shall be subject to the general principles set out in Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008.

3. The CE marking shall be affixed visibly, legibly and indelibly to the device or its sterile pack. Where that is not possible or not warranted on account of the nature of the device, it shall be affixed to the packaging. The CE marking shall also appear in the instructions for use and on the sales packaging where those are provided.

4. The CE marking shall be affixed before the device is placed on the market. It may be followed by a pictogram or any other mark indicating a special risk or

Article 17CE marking

1. Devices, other than devices which are custom-made or intended for clinical investigations, considered to meet the essential requirements referred to in Article 3 must bear the CE marking of conformity when they are placed on the market.

2. The CE marking of conformity, as shown in Annex XII, must appear in a visible, legible and indelible form on the device or its sterile pack, where practicable and appropriate, and on the instructions for use. Where applicable, the CE marking must also appear on the sales packaging. It shall be accompanied by the identification number of the notified body responsible for implementation of the procedures set out in Annexes II, IV, V and VI.

3. It is prohibited to affix marks or inscriptions which are likely to mislead third parties with regard to the meaning or the graphics of the CE marking. Any other mark may be affixed to the device, to the packaging or to the instruction leaflet accompanying the device provided that the visibility and

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

60

Page 61: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

use.

5. Where applicable, the CE marking shall be followed by the identification number of the notified body responsible for the conformity assessment procedures set out in Article 42. The identification number shall also be indicated in any promotional material which mentions that a device fulfils the legal requirements for CE marking.

6. Where devices are subject to other Union legislation concerning other aspects which also provide for the affixing of the CE marking, the CE marking shall indicate that the devices also fulfil the provisions of the other legislation.

legibility of the CE marking is not thereby reduced.

Article 73Formal non-compliance

1. Without prejudice to Article 70, a Member State shall require the relevant economic operator to put an end to the non-compliance concerned within a reasonable period that is proportionate to the non-compliance where it makes one of the following findings:

(a) that the CE marking has been affixed in violation of the formal requirementslaid down in Article 18;

(b) that the CE marking has not been affixed to a device contrary to Article 18;

(c) that the CE marking has been inappropriately affixed in accordance with procedures in this Regulation on a product that is not covered by this Regulation;

(d) that the EU declaration of conformity has not been drawn up or is not complete;

(e) that the information to be supplied by the manufacturer on the label or in theinstructions for use is not available, not complete or not provided in the language(s) required;

Article 18Wrongly affixed CE marking

Without prejudice to Article 8:

(a) where a Member State establishes that the CE marking has been affixed unduly or is missing in violation of the Directive, the manufacturer or his authorised representative shall be obliged to end the infringement under conditions imposed by the Member State;

(b) where non-compliance continues, the Member State must take all appropriate measures to restrict or prohibit the placing on the market of the product in question or to ensure that it is withdrawn from the market, in accordance with the procedure in Article 8.

Those provisions shall also apply where the CE marking has been affixed in accordance with the procedures in this Directive, but inappropriately, on products that are not covered by this Directive.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

61

Page 62: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

(f) that the technical documentation, including the clinical evaluation, is not available or not complete.

2. Where the economic operator does not put an end to the non-compliance within the period referred to in paragraph 1, the Member State concerned shall take all appropriate measures to restrict or prohibit the product being made available on the market or to ensure that it is recalled or withdrawn from the market. That Member State shall inform the Commission and the other Member States without delay of those measures, by means of the electronic system referred to in Article 68.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

62

Page 63: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

Article 75Good administrative practice

1. Any measure adopted by the competent authorities of the Member States pursuant to Articles 70 to 74 shall state the exact grounds on which it is based. Where it is addressed to a specific economic operator, it shall be notified without delay to the economic operator concerned, who shall at the same time be informed of the remedies available to him under the law of the Member State concerned and of the time limits to which such remedies are subject. Where the measure is of general scope, it shall be appropriately published.

2. Except in cases where immediate action is necessary for reasons of serious risk to human health or safety, the economic operator concerned shall be given the opportunity to make submissions to the competent authority within an appropriate period of time before any measure is adopted. If action has been taken without the economic operator’s being heard, he shall be given the opportunity to make submissions as soon as possible and the action taken shall be reviewed promptly thereafter.

3. Any measure adopted shall be immediately withdrawn or amended upon theeconomic operator’s demonstrating that he has taken effective corrective action.

4. Where a measure adopted pursuant to Articles 70 to 74 concerns a product for which a notified body has been involved in the conformity assessment, the competent authorities shall inform the relevant notified body of the measure taken.

Article 19Decision in respect of refusal or restriction

1. Any decision taken pursuant to this Directive:(a) to refuse or restrict the placing on the market or the putting into service of a device or the carrying out of clinical investigations; or(b) to withdraw devices from the market, shall state the exact grounds on which it is based. Such decisions shall be notified without delay to the party concerned, who shall at the same time be informed of the remedies available to him under the national law in force in the Member State in question and of the time limits to which such remedies are subject.

2. In the event of a decision as referred to in paragraph 1, the manufacturer, or his authorized representative, shall have an opportunity to put forward his viewpoint in advance, unless such consultation is not possible because of the urgency of the measure to be taken.

Article 84Confidentiality

1. Unless otherwise provided in this Regulation and without prejudice to existing national provisions and practices in the Member States on medical confidentiality, all parties involved in the application of this Regulation shall observe the confidentiality of information and data obtained in carrying out their tasks in order to protect:– personal data in compliance with Directive 95/46/EC and Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 [update to be introduced regarding the future General Data Protection

Article 20Confidentiality

1. Without prejudice to the existing national provisions and practices on medical confidentiality, Member States shall ensure that all the Parties involved in the application of this Directive are bound to observe confidentiality with regard to all information obtained in carrying out their tasks.This does not affect the obligation of Member States and notified bodies

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

63

Page 64: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

Regulation],– commercially sensitive information,– the effective implementation of this Regulation, among other things for the purpose of inspections, investigations or audits.

2. Without prejudice to paragraph 1, information exchanged between competentauthorities and between competent authorities and the Commission on condition of confidentiality shall remain confidential unless the originating authority has agreed to its disclosure.

3. Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not affect the rights and obligations of the Commission, Member States and notified bodies with regard to exchange of information and the dissemination of warnings, nor the obligations of the persons concerned to provide information under criminal law.

4. The Commission and Member States may exchange confidential information with regulatory authorities of third countries with which they have concluded bilateral or multilateral confidentiality arrangements.

with regard to mutual information and the dissemination of warnings, nor the obligations of the persons concerned to provide information under criminal law.

2. The following information shall not be treated as confidential:(a) information on the registration of persons responsible for placing devices on the market in accordance with Article 14;(b) information to users sent out by the manufacturer, authorised representative or distributor in relation to a measure according to Article 10(3);(c) information contained in certificates issued, modified, supplemented, suspended or withdrawn.

3. The measures designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive, inter alia by supplementing it, relating to determination of the conditions under which other information may be made publicly available, and in particular for Class IIb and Class III devices to any obligation for manufacturers to prepare and make available a summary of the information and data related to the device, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 7(3).

Article 83Device registers

The Commission and the Member States shall take all appropriate measures to encourage the establishment of registers for specific types of devices to gather post-market experience related to the use of such devices. Such registers shall contribute to the independent evaluation of the long-term safety and performance of devices.

Article 20aCooperation

Member States shall take appropriate measures to ensure that the competent authorities of the Member States cooperate with each other and with the Commission and transmit to each other the information necessary to enable this Directive to be applied uniformly.The Commission shall provide for the organisation of an exchange of experience between the competent authorities responsible for market surveillance in order to coordinate the uniform application of this Directive.Without prejudice to the provisions of this Directive, cooperation may be part of initiatives developed at an international level.

No correlation Article 21Repeal and amendment of Directives

1. Directive 76/764/EEC is hereby repealed with effect from 1 January

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

64

Page 65: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

1995.

2. In the title and Article 1 of Directive 84/539/EEC, ‘human or’ is deleted.In Article 2 of Directive 84/539/EEC, the following subparagraph is added to paragraph 1:‘If the appliance is at the same time a medical device within the meaning of Directive 93/42/EEC (*) and if it satisfies the essential requirements laid down therein for that device, the device shall be deemed to be in conformity with the requirements of this Directive.

3. Directive 90/385/EEC is hereby amended as follows:1. in Article 1 (2) the following two subparagraphs are added:‘(h) “placing on the market” means the first making available in return for payment or free of charge of a device other than a device intended for clinical investigation, with a view to distribution and/or use on the Community market, regardless of whether it is new or fully refurbished;(i) “manufacturer” means the natural or legal person with responsibility for the design, manufacture, packaging and labelling of a device before it is placed on the market under his own name, regardless of whether these operations are carried out by that person himself or on his behalf by a third party. The obligations of this Directive to be met by manufacturers also apply to the natural or legal person who assembles, packages, processes, fully refurbishes and/or labels one or more ready-made products and/or assigns to them their intended purpose as a device with a view to their being placed on the market under his own name. This subparagraph does not apply to the person who, while not a manufacturer within the meaning of the first subparagraph, assembles or adapts devices already on the market to their intended purpose for an individual patient;’

2. in Article 9 the following paragraphs are added:‘5. During the conformity assessment procedure for a device, the manufacturer and/or the notified body shall take account of the results of any assessment and verification operations which, where appropriate, have been carried out in accordance with this Directive at an intermediate stage of manufacture.6. Where the conformity assessment procedure involves the intervention of

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

65

Page 66: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

a notified body, the manufacturer, or his authorized representative established in the Community, may apply to a body of his choice within the framework of the tasks for which the body has been notified.7. The notified body may require, where duly justified, any information or data which is necessary for establishing and maintaining the attestation of conformity in view of the chosen procedure.8. Decisions taken by the notified bodies in accordance with Annexes II and III shall be valid for a maximum of five years and may be extended on application, made at a time agreed in the contract signed by both parties, for further periods of five years.9. By derogation from paragraphs 1 and 2 the competent authorities may authorize, on duly justified request, the placing on the market and putting into service, within the territory of the Member State concerned, of individual devices for which the procedures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 have not been carried out and the use of which is in the interest of protection of health.’;

3. the following Article 9a is inserted after Article 9:‘Article 9a1. Where a Member State considers that the conformity of a device or family of devices should be established, by way of derogation from the provisions of Article 9, by applying solely one ofthe given procedures chosen from among those referred to in Article 9, it shall submit a duly substantiated request to the Commission and ask it to take the necessary measures. These measures shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 7 (2) of Directive 93/42/EEC (*).2. The Commission shall inform the Member States of the measures taken and, where appropriate, publish the relevant parts of these measures in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

4. Article 10 shall be amended as follows:— the following subparagraph shall be added to paragraph 2: ‘Member States may however authorize manufacturers to start the clinical investigations in question before the expiry of the 60-day period, provided that the Ethical Committee concerned has delivered a favourable opinion with respect to the investigation programme in

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

66

Page 67: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

question.’,— the following paragraph shall be inserted: ‘2a. The authorization referred to in the second subparagraph of paragraph 2 may be subject to approval by the competent authority.’;▼B

5. the following is added to Article 14:‘In the event of a decision as referred to in the previous paragraph the manufacturer, or his authorized representative established in the Community, shall have an opportunity to put forward his viewpoint in advance, unless such consultation is not possible because of the urgency of the measures to be taken.’

No correlation Article 22Implementation, transitional provisions

1. Member States shall adopt and publish the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive not later than 1 July 1994. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.The Standing Committee referred to in Article 7 may assume its tasks from the date of notification (1) of this Directive. The Member States may take the measures referred to in Article 16 on notification of this Directive.When Member States adopt these provisions, these shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such a reference at the time of their official publication. The procedure for such reference shall be adopted by Member States. Member States shall apply these provisions with effect from 1 January 1995.

2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the texts of the provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.

3. Member States shall take the necessary action to ensure that the notified bodies which are responsible pursuant to Article 11 (1) to (5) for conformity assessment take account of any relevant information regarding the characteristics and performance of such devices, including in particular the results of any relevant tests and verification already carried out under pre-existing national law, regulations or administrative provisions in

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

67

Page 68: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

respect of such devices.

4. Member States shall accept:— devices which conform to the rules in force in their territory on 31 December 1994 being placed on the market during a period of five years following the adoption of this Directive, and— the aforementioned devices being put into service until 30 June 2001 at the latest.In the case of devices which have been subjected to EEC pattern approval in accordance with Directive 76/764/EEC, Member States shall accept their being placed on the market and put into service during the period up to 30 June 2004.

No correlation Article 23

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.ANNEX IESSENTIAL SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

I. General requirements

1. Devices shall achieve the performance intended by the manufacturer and be designed and manufactured in such a way that, during normal conditions of use, they are suitable for their intended purpose, taking into account the generally acknowledged state of the art. They shall not compromise the clinical condition or the safety ofpatients, or the safety and health of users or, where applicable, other persons, provided that any risks which may be associated with their use constitute acceptable risks when weighed against the benefits to the patient and are compatible with a high level of protection of health and safety.This shall include:– reducing as far as possible the risk of use error due to ergonomic features of the device and the environment in which the device is intended to be used (design for patient safety), and– consideration of the technical knowledge, experience, education and training, and the medical and physical conditions of intended users (design for lay, professional, disabled or other users).

2. The solutions adopted by the manufacturer for the design and manufacture of the

ANNEX IESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS

I. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

1. The devices must be designed and manufactured in such a way that, when used under the conditions and for the purposes intended, they will not compromise the clinical condition or the safety of patients, or the safety and health of users or, where applicable, other persons, provided that any risks which may be associated with their intended use constitute acceptable risks when weighed against the benefits to the patient and are compatible with a high level of protection of health and safety.This shall include:— reducing, as far as possible, the risk of use error due to the ergonomic features of the device and the environment in which the device is intended to be used (design for patient safety), and— consideration of the technical knowledge, experience, education and training and where applicable the medical and physical conditions of intended users (design for lay, professional, disabled or other users).

2. The solutions adopted by the manufacturer for the design and construction of the devices must conform to safety principles, taking

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

68

Page 69: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

devices shall conform to safety principles, taking account of the generally acknowledged state of the art. To reduce risks, the manufacturer shall manage the risks so that the residual risk associated with each hazard as well as the overall residual risk is judged acceptable. The manufacturer shall apply the following principles in the priority order listed:

(a) identify known or foreseeable hazards and estimate the associated risks arising from the intended use and foreseeable misuse;

(b) eliminate risks as far as possible through inherently safe design and manufacture;

(c) reduce as far as possible the remaining risks by taking adequate protection measures, including alarms; and

(d) provide training to users and/or inform users of any residual risks.

3. The characteristics and performances referred to in Sections 1 and 2 shall not be adversely affected to such a degree that the health or safety of the patient or the user and, where applicable, of other persons are compromised during the lifetime of the device, as indicated by the manufacturer, when the device is subjected to the stresses which can occur during normal conditions of use and has been properly maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. When no lifetime is stated, the same applies for the lifetime reasonably to be expected of a device of that kind, having regard to the intended purpose and the anticipated use of the device.

4. Devices shall be designed, manufactured and packaged in such a way that their characteristics and performances during their intended use will not be adversely affected by transport and storage conditions (for example, fluctuations of temperature and humidity) taking account of the instructions and information provided by the manufacturer.

5. All known and foreseeable risks, and any undesirable side-effects, shall be minimised and be acceptable when weighed against the benefits to the patient of the achieved performance of the device during normal conditions of use.

6. For devices listed in Annex XV for which the manufacturer does not claim a medical purpose, the general requirements set out in Sections 1 and 5 shall be understood that

account of the generally acknowledged state of the art.In selecting the most appropriate solutions, the manufacturer must apply the following principles in the following order:— eliminate or reduce risks as far as possible (inherently safe design and construction),— where appropriate take adequate protection measures including alarms if necessary, in relation to risks that cannot be eliminated,— inform users of the residual risks due to any shortcomings of the protection measures adopted.

3. The devices must achieve the performances intended by the manufacturer and be designed, manufactured and packaged in such a way that they are suitable for one or more of the functions referred to in Article 1 (2) (a), as specified by the manufacturer.

4. The characteristics and performances referred to in Sections 1, 2 and 3 must not be adversely affected to such a degree that the clinical conditions and safety of the patients and, where applicable, of other persons are compromised during the lifetime of the device as indicated by the manufacturer, when the device is subjected to the stresses which can occur during normal conditions of use.

5. The devices must be designed, manufactured and packed in such a way that their characteristics and performances during their intended use will not be adversely affected during transport and storage taking account of the instructions and information provided by the manufacturer.

6. Any undesirable side-effect must constitute an acceptable risk when weighed against the performances intended.

6a. Demonstration of conformity with the essential requirements must include a clinical evaluation in accordance with Annex X.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

69

Page 70: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

the device, when used under the conditions and for the purposes intended, shall not present any risk or only the minimum acceptable risks related to the product’s use which is consistent with a high level of protection for the safety and health of persons.

II Requirements regarding design and construction

7. Chemical, physical and biological properties

7.1. The devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to ensure the characteristics and performance referred to in Chapter I ‘General Requirements’.Particular attention shall be paid to:

(a) the choice of materials used, particularly as regards toxicity and, where appropriate, flammability,

(b) the compatibility between the materials used and biological tissues, cells, and body fluids taking account of the intended purpose of the device,

(c) where appropriate, the results of biophysical or modelling research whose validity has been demonstrated beforehand,

(d) the choice of materials used, reflecting, where appropriate, matters such as hardness, wear and fatigue strength.

7.2. The devices shall be designed, manufactured and packaged in such a way as to minimise the risk posed by contaminants and residues to the persons involved in the transport, storage and use of the devices and to patients, taking account of the intended purpose of the device. Particular attention shall be paid to tissues exposed and to the duration and frequency of exposure.

7.3. The devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way that they can be used safely with the materials and substances, including gases, with which they enter into contact during their normal use or during routine procedures; if the devices are intended to administer medicinal products they shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to be compatible with the medicinal products concerned according to the provisions and restrictions governing these medicinal products and that both the performance of the medicinal products and of the devices are maintained in accordance

II. REQUIREMENTS REGARDING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

7. Chemical, physical and biological properties

7.1. The devices must be designed and manufactured in such a way as to guarantee the characteristics and performances referred to in Section I on the ‘General requirements’. Particular attention must be paid to: — the choice of materials used, particularly as regards toxicity and,where appropriate, flammability,— the compatibility between the materials used and biological tissues, cells and body fluids, taking account of the intended purpose of the device,— where appropriate, the results of biophysical or modelling research whose validity has been demonstrated beforehand.

7.2. The devices must be designed, manufactured and packed in such a way as to minimize the risk posed by contaminants and residues to the persons involved in the transport, storage and use of the devices and to the patients, taking account of the intended purpose of the product.Particular attention must be paid to the tissues exposed and to the duration and frequency of exposure.

7.3. The devices must be designed and manufactured in such a way that they can be used safely with the materials, substances and gases with which they enter into contact during their normal use or during routine procedures; if the devices are intended to administer medicinal products they must be designed and manufactured in such a way as to be compatible with the medicinal products concerned according to the provisions and restrictions governing these products and that their performance is maintained in accordance with the intended

7.4. Where a device incorporates, as an integral part, a substance which, if used separately, may be considered to be a medicinal product as defined in Article 1 of Directive 2001/83/EC and which is liable to act upon the body with action ancillary to that of the device, the quality, safety and usefulness of the substance must be verified by analogy with the methods specified in

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

70

Page 71: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

with their respective indications and intended use.

7.4 The devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to reduce as far as possible and appropriate the risks posed by substances that may leach or leak from the device. Special attention shall be given to substances which are carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction, in accordance with Part 3 of Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/200657, and to substances having endocrine disrupting properties for which there is scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health and which are identified in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH).If devices, or parts thereof, that are intended– to be invasive devices and to come into contact with the body of the patient for short- or long-term, or– to (re)administer medicines, body liquids or other substances, including gases,to/from the body, or– to transport or store such medicines, body fluids or substances, including gases, to be (re)administered to the body contain, in a concentration of 0.1% by mass of the plasticised material or above, phthalates which are classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction of category 1A or 1B in accordance with Part 3 of Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, these devices shall be labelled on the device itself and/or on the packaging for each unit or, where appropriate, on the sales packaging as devices containing phthalates. If the intended use of such devices includes treatment of children or treatment of pregnant or nursing women, the manufacturer shall provide a specific justification for the use of these substances with regard to compliance with the general safety and performance requirements, in particular of this paragraph, within the technical documentation and, within the instructions for use, information on residual risks for these patient groups and, if applicable, on

Annex I to Directive 2001/83/EC.For the substances referred to in the first paragraph, the notified body shall, having verified the usefulness of the substance as part of the medical device and taking account of the intended purpose of the device, seek a scientific opinion from one of the competent authorities designated by the Member States or the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) acting particularly through its committee in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 (1) on the quality and safety of the substance including the clinical benefit/risk profile of the incorporation of the substance into the device. When issuing its opinion, the competent authority or the EMEA shall take into account the manufacturing process and the data related to the usefulness of incorporation of the substance into the device as determined by the notified body.Where a device incorporates, as an integral part, a human blood derivative, the notified body shall, having verified the usefulness of the substance as part of the medical device and taking into account the intended purpose of the device, seek a scientific opinion from the EMEA, acting particularly through its committee, on the quality and safety of the substance including the clinical benefit/risk profile of the incorporation of the human blood derivative into the device. When issuing its opinion, the EMEA shall take into account the manufacturing process and the data related to the usefulness of incorporation of the substance into the device as determined by the notified body.Where changes are made to an ancillary substance incorporated in a device, in particular related to its manufacturing process, the notified body shall be informed of the changes and shall consult the relevant medicines competent authority (i.e. the one involved in the initial consultation), in order to confirm that the quality and safety of the ancillary substance are maintained. The competent authority shall take into account the data related to the usefulness of incorporation of the substance into the device as determined by the notified body, in order to ensure that the changes have no negative impact on the established benefit/risk profile of the addition of the substance in the medical device.When the relevant medicines competent authority (i.e. the one involved in the initial consultation) has obtained information on the ancillary substance, which could have an impact on the established benefit/risk profile of the addition of the substance in the medical device, it shall

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

71

Page 72: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

appropriate precautionary measures.

7.5. Devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to reduce as far as possible and appropriate risks posed by the unintentional ingress or egress of substances into or from the device taking into account the device and the nature of the environment in which it is intended to be used.

7.6. The devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to reduce to a minimum the risks linked to the size and the properties of particles used. Special care shall be applied when devices contain or consist of nanomaterial that can be released into the patient’s or user’s body.

8. Infection and microbial contamination

8.1. The devices and manufacturing processes shall be designed in such a way as to eliminate or to reduce as far as possible the risk of infection to patients, users and, where applicable, other persons. The design shall:

(a) allow easy handling, and, where necessary:

(b) reduce as far as possible and appropriate any microbial leakage from the device and/or microbial exposure during use,

(c) prevent microbial contamination of the device or specimen.

8.2. Devices labelled as having a special microbiological state shall be designed, manufactured and packaged to ensure they remain so when placed on the market and remain so under the transport and storage conditions specified by the manufacturer.

8.3. Devices delivered in a sterile state shall be designed, manufactured and packaged in a non-reusable pack, and/or according to appropriate procedures, to ensure that they are sterile when placed on the market and remain sterile, under the transport and storage conditions indicated by the manufacturer, until the protective packaging isdamaged or opened.

8.4. Devices labelled either as sterile or as having a special microbiological state shall have been processed, manufactured and, if applicable, sterilised by appropriate,

provide the notified body with advice, whether this information has an impact on the established benefit/risk profile of the addition of the substance in the medical device or not. The notified body shall take the updated scientific opinion into account in reconsidering its assessment of the conformity assessment procedure.

7.5. The devices must be designed and manufactured in such a way as to reduce to a minimum the risks posed by substances leaking from the device. Special attention shall be given to substances which are carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction, in accordance with Annex I to Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances (1).If parts of a device (or a device itself) intended to administer and/or remove medicines, body liquids or other substances to or from the body, or devices intended for transport and storage of such body fluids or substances, contain phthalates which are classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction, of category 1 or 2, in accordance with Annex I to Directive 67/548/EEC, these devices must be labelled on the device itself and/or on the packaging for each unit or, where appropriate, on the sales packaging as a device containing phthalates.If the intended use of such devices includes treatment of children or treatment of pregnant or nursing women, the manufacturer must provide a specific justification for the use of these substances with regard to compliance with the essential requirements, in particular of this paragraph, within the technical documentation and, within the instructions for use, information on residual risks for these patient groups and, if applicable, on appropriate precautionary measures.

7.6. Devices must be designed and manufactured in such a way as to reduce, as much as possible, risks posed by the unintentional ingress of substances into the device taking into account the device and the nature of the environment in which it is intended to be used.

8. Infection and microbial contamination8.1. The devices and manufacturing processes must be designed in such a way as to eliminate or reduce as far as possible the risk of infection to the

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

72

Page 73: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

validated methods.

8.5. Devices intended to be sterilised shall be manufactured in appropriately controlled (e.g. environmental) conditions.

8.6. Packaging systems for non-sterile devices shall maintain the integrity and cleanliness of the product and, if the devices are to be sterilised prior to use, minimise the risk of microbial contamination; the packaging system shall be suitable taking account of the method of sterilisation indicated by the manufacturer.

8.7. The labelling of the device shall distinguish between identical or similar products placed on the market in both sterile and non-sterile condition.

9. Devices incorporating a substance considered to be a medicinal product and devices composed of substances or combination of substances intended to be ingested, inhaled or administered rectally or vaginally

9.1. In the case of devices referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 1(4), the quality, safety and usefulness of the substance which, if used separately, would be considered to be a medicinal product within the meaning of Article 1 of Directive 2001/83/EC, shall be verified by analogy with the methods specified in Annex I to Directive 2001/83/EC, as laid down in the applicable conformity assessment procedure in this Regulation.

9.2. Devices that are composed of substances or combination of substances intended to be ingested, inhaled or administered rectally or vaginally and that are absorbed by or dispersed in the human body shall comply, by analogy, with the relevant requirements laid down in Annex I to Directive 2001/83/EC.

10. Devices incorporating materials of biological origin

10.1. For devices manufactured utilising tissues or cells, or their derivatives, of human origin which are covered by this Regulation in accordance with point (d) of Article 1(2) the following applies:

(a)Donation, procurement and testing of tissues and cells of human origin used for the

patient, user and third parties. The design must allow easy handling and, where necessary, minimize contamination of the device by the patient or vice versa during use.

8.2. Tissues of animal origin must originate from animals that have been subjected to veterinary controls and surveillance adapted to the intended use of the tissues. Notified bodies shall retain information on the geographical origin of the animals.Processing, preservation, testing and handling of tissues, cells and substances of animal origin must be carried out so as to provide optimal security. In particular safety with regard to viruses and other transmissible agents must be addressed by implementation of validated methods of elimination or viral inactivation in the course of the manufacturing process.

8.3. Devices delivered in a sterile state must be designed, manufactured and packed in a non-reusable pack and/or according to appropriate procedures to ensure that they are sterile when placed on the market and remain sterile, under the storage and transport conditions laid down, until the protective packaging is damaged or opened.

8.4. Devices delivered in a sterile state must have been manufactured and sterilized by an appropriate, validated method.

8.5. Devices intended to be sterilized must be manufactured in appropriately controlled (e. g. environmental) conditions.

8.6. Packaging systems for non-sterile devices must keep the product without deterioration at the level of cleanliness stipulated and, if the devices are to be sterilized prior to use, minimize the risk of microbial contamination; the packaging system must be suitable taking account of the method of sterilization indicated by the manufacturer.

8.7. The packaging and/or label of the device must distinguish between identical or similar products sold in both sterile and non-sterile condition.

9. Construction and environmental properties

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

73

Page 74: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

manufacture of devices shall be made in accordance with Directive 2004/23/EC.

(b)The processing, preservation and any other handling of those tissues and cells shall be carried out so as to provide optimal safety for patients, users and, where applicable, other persons. In particular, safety with regard to viruses and other transmissible agents shall be addressed by implementation of validated methods of elimination or inactivation in the course of the manufacturing process.

(c) It shall be ensured that the traceability system for devices manufactured utilising those human tissues or cells is complementary and compatible with the traceability and data protection requirements laid down in Directive 2004/23/EC and in Directive 2002/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 setting standards of quality and safety for the collection, testing, processing, storage and distribution of human blood and blood components and amending Directive 2001/83/EC60.

10.2. For devices manufactured utilising tissues or cells, or their derivatives, of animal origin which are non-viable or rendered non-viable the following applies:

(a)Where feasible taking into account the animal species, tissues and cells of animal origin shall originate from animals that have been subjected to veterinary controls that are adapted to the intended use of the tissues. Information on the geographical origin of the animals shall be retained.

(b) Processing, preservation, testing and handling of tissues, cells and substances of animal origin shall be carried out so as to provide optimal safety for patients, users and, where applicable, other persons. In particular safety with regard to viruses and other transmissible agents shall be addressed by implementation of validated methods of elimination or viral inactivation in the course of the manufacturing process.

(c) In the case of devices manufactured utilising tissues or cells of animal origin as referred to in Commission Regulation […/…], the particular requirements laid down in that Regulation shall apply.

10.3. For devices manufactured utilising other non-viable biological substances the following applies:

9.1. If the device is intended for use in combination with other devices or equipment, the whole combination, including the connection system must be safe and must not impair the specified performances of the devices. Any restrictions on use must be indicated on the label or in the instructions for use.

9.2. Devices must be designed and manufactured in such a way as to remove or minimize as far as is possible:— the risk of injury, in connection with their physical features, including the volume/pressure ratio, dimensional and where appropriate ergonomic features,— risks connected with reasonably foreseeable environmental conditions, such as magnetic fields, external electrical influences, electrostatic discharge, pressure, temperature or variations in pressure and acceleration,— the risks of reciprocal interference with other devices normally used in the investigations or for the treatment given,— risks arising where maintenance or calibration are not possible (as with implants), from ageing of materials used or loss of accuracy of any measuring or control mechanism.

9.3. Devices must be designed and manufactured in such a way as to minimize the risks of fire or explosion during normal use and in single fault condition. Particular attention must be paid to devices whose intended use includes exposure to flammable substances or to substances which could cause combustion.

10. Devices with a measuring function

10.1. Devices with a measuring function must be designed and manufactured in such a way as to provide sufficient accuracy and stability within appropriate limits of accuracy and taking account of the intended purpose of the device. The limits of accuracy must be indicated by the manufacturer.

10.2. The measurement, monitoring and display scale must be designed in line with ergonomic principles, taking account of the intended purpose of

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

74

Page 75: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

In the case of biological substances other than those referred to in Sections 10.1. and 10.2., the processing, preservation, testing and handling of those substances shall be carried out so as to provide optimal safety for patients, users and, where applicable, other persons. In particular, safety with regard to viruses and other transmissible agents shall be addressed by implementation of validated methods of elimination or inactivation in the course of the manufacturing process.

11. Interaction of devices with their environment11.1. If the device is intended for use in combination with other devices or equipment the whole combination, including the connection system shall be safe and shall not impair the specified performance of the devices. Any restrictions on use applying to such combinations shall be indicated on the label and/or in the instructions for use.Connections which the user has to handle, such as fluid, gas transfer or mechanical coupling, shall be designed and constructed in such a way as to minimize all possible risks from incorrect connection.

11.2. Devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to remove or reduce as far as possible and appropriate:

(a) the risk of injury to the patient, user or other persons in connection with their physical and ergonomic features;

(b) the risk of use error due to the ergonomic features, human factors and the environment in which the device is intended to be used;

(c) risks connected with reasonably foreseeable external influences or environmental conditions, such as magnetic fields, external electrical and electromagnetic effects, electrostatic discharge, radiation associated with diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, pressure, humidity, temperature, variations in pressure and acceleration or radio signal interferences;

(d) the risks associated with the use of the device when it comes into contact with materials, liquids, and substances, including gases, to which it is exposed during normal conditions of use;

(e) the risk associated with the possible negative interaction between software and the environment within which it operates and interacts;

the device.

10.3. The measurements made by devices with a measuring function must be expressed in legal units conforming to the provisions of Council Directive 80/181/EEC (1).

11. Protection against radiation

11.1. General11.1.1. Devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way that exposure of patients, users and other persons to radiation shall be reduced as far as possible compatible with the intended purpose, whilst not restricting the application of appropriate specified levels for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes.

11.2. Intended radiation11.2.1. Where devices are designed to emit hazardous levels of radiation necessary for a specific medical purpose the benefit of which is considered to outweigh the risks inherent in the emission, it must be possible for the user to control the emissions. Such devices shall be designed and manufactured to ensure reproducibility and tolerance of relevant variable parameters.11.2.2. Where devices are intended to emit potentially hazardous, visible and/ or invisible radiation, they must be fitted, where practicable, with visual displays and/or audible warnings of such emissions.

11.3. Unintended radiation11.3.1. Devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way that exposure of patients, users and other persons to the emission of unintended, stray or scattered radiation is reduced as far as possible.

11.4. Instructions11.4.1. The operating instructions for devices emitting radiation must give detailed information as to the nature of the emitted radiation, means of protecting the patient and the user and on ways of avoiding misuse and of eliminating the risks inherent in installation.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

75

Page 76: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

(f)the risks of accidental ingress of substances into the device;

(g) the risks of reciprocal interference with other devices normally used in the investigations or for the treatment given;

(h) risks arising where maintenance or calibration are not possible (as with implants), from ageing of materials used or loss of accuracy of any measuring or control mechanism.

11.3. Devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to minimise the risks of fire or explosion during normal use and in single fault condition. Particular attention shall be paid to devices whose intended purpose includes exposure to or use in association with flammable substances or substances which could cause combustion.

11.4. Devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way that adjustment, calibration, and maintenance, where such is necessary to achieve the performances intended, can be done safely.

11.5. Devices that are intended to be operated together with other devices or products shall be designed and manufactured in such as way that the interoperability is reliable and safe.

11.6. Any measurement, monitoring or display scale shall be designed in line with ergonomic principles, taking account of the intended purpose of the device.

11.7. Devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to facilitate the safe disposal of the device and/or of any waste substances by the user, patient or other person.

12. Devices with a diagnostic or measuring function

12.1. Diagnostic devices and devices with a measuring function, shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to provide sufficient accuracy, precision and stability for their intended purpose, based on appropriate scientific and technical methods. The limits of accuracy shall be indicated by the manufacturer.

11.5. Ionizing radiation11.5.1. Devices intended to emit ionizing radiation must be designed and manufactured in such a way as to ensure that, where practicable, the quantity, geometry and quality of radiation emitted can be varied and controlled taking into account the intended use.

11.5.2. Devices emitting ionizing radiation intended for diagnostic radiology shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to achieve appropriate image and/or output quality for the intended medical purpose whilst minimizing radiation exposure of the patient and user.

11.5.3. Devices emitting ionizing radiation, intended for therapeutic radiology shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to enable reliable monitoring and control of the delivered dose, the beam type and energy and where appropriate the quality of radiation.

12. Requirements for medical devices connected to or equipped with an energy source

12.1. Devices incorporating electronic programmable systems must be designed to ensure the repeatability, reliability and performance of these systems according to the intended use. In the event of a single fault condition (in the system) appropriate means should be adopted to eliminate or reduce as far as possible consequent risks.

12.1a For devices which incorporate software or which are medical software in themselves, the software must be validated according to the state of the art taking into account the principles of development lifecycle, risk management, validation and verification.

12.2. Devices where the safety of the patients depends on an internal power supply must be equipped with a means of determining the state of the power supply.

12.3. Devices where the safety of the patients depends on an external power supply must include an alarm system to signal any power failure.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

76

Page 77: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

12.2. The measurements made by devices with a measuring function and expressed in legal units shall conform to the provisions of Council Directive 80/181/EEC61.

13. Protection against radiation

13.1. General

(a) Devices shall be designed and manufactured and packaged in such a way that exposure of patients, users and other persons to any emitted radiation shall be reduced as far as possible and appropriate, compatible with the intended purpose, whilst not restricting the application of appropriate specified levels for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes.

(b) The operating instructions for devices emitting radiation shall give detailed information as to the nature of the emitted radiation, means of protecting the patient and the user and on ways of avoiding misuse and of eliminating the risks inherent in installation.

13.2. Intended radiation

(a) Where devices are designed to emit hazardous, or potentially hazardous, levels of visible and/or invisible radiation necessary for a specific medical purpose the benefit of which is considered to outweigh the risks inherent in the emission, it shall be possible for the user to control the emissions. Such devices shall be designed and manufactured to ensure reproducibility of relevant variable parameters within an acceptable tolerance.

(b) Where devices are intended to emit potentially hazardous, visible and/or invisible radiation, they shall be fitted, where possible, with visual displays and/or audible warnings of such emissions.

13.3. Unintended radiation

Devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way that exposure of patients, users and other persons to the emission of unintended, stray or scattered radiation is reduced as far as possible and appropriate.

12.4. Devices intended to monitor one or more clinical parameters of a patient must be equipped with appropriate alarm systems to alert the user of situations which could lead to death or severe deterioration of the patient's state of health.

12.5. Devices must be designed and manufactured in such a way as to minimize the risks of creating electromagnetic fields which could impair the operation of other devices or equipment in the usual environment.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

77

Page 78: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

13.4. Ionising radiation

(a) Devices intended to emit ionising radiation shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to ensure that, where possible, the quantity, geometry and energy distribution (or quality) of radiation emitted can be varied and controlled taking into account the intended use.

(b) Devices emitting ionising radiation intended for diagnostic radiology shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to achieve appropriate image and/or output quality for the intended medical purpose whilst minimising radiation exposure of the patient and user.

(c) Devices emitting ionising radiation, intended for therapeutic radiology shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to enable reliable monitoring and control of the delivered dose, the beam characteristics in terms of type of radiations, energy and, where appropriate, energy distribution.

14. Software incorporated in devices and standalone software

14.1. Devices that incorporate electronic programmable systems, including software, or standalone software that are devices in themselves, shall be designed to ensure repeatability, reliability and performance according to the intended use. In the event of a single fault condition, appropriate means shall be adopted to eliminate or reduce as far as possible and appropriate consequent risks.

14.2. For devices that incorporate software or for standalone software that are devices in themselves, the software shall be developed and manufactured according to the state of the art taking into account the principles of development lifecycle, risk management, verification and validation.

14.3. Software referred to in this Section that are intended to be used in combination with mobile computing platforms shall be designed and manufactured taking into account the specific features of the mobile platform (e.g. size and contrast ratio of the screen) and the external factors related to their use (varying environment as regards to level of light or noise).

15. Active devices and devices connected to them

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

78

Page 79: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

15.1. For active devices, in the event of a single fault condition, appropriate means shall be adopted to eliminate or reduce as far as possible and appropriate consequent risks.

15.2. Devices where the safety of the patients depends on an internal power supply shall be equipped with a means of determining the state of the power supply.

15.3. Devices where the safety of the patients depends on an external power supply shall include an alarm system to signal any power failure.

15.4. Devices intended to monitor one or more clinical parameters of a patient shall be equipped with appropriate alarm systems to alert the user of situations which could lead to death or severe deterioration of the patient's state of health.

15.5. Devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to reduce as far as possible and appropriate the risks of creating electromagnetic interference which could impair the operation of this or other devices or equipment in the intended environment.

15.6. Devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to provide an adequate level of intrinsic immunity to electromagnetic disturbance to enable them to operate as intended.

15.7. Devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to avoid, as far as possible, the risk of accidental electric shocks to the patient, user or any other person, both during normal use of the device and in the event of a single fault condition in the device, provided the device is installed and maintained as indicated by the manufacturer.

16. Protection against mechanical and thermal risks

16.1. Devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to protect the patient and user against mechanical risks connected with, for example, resistance to movement, instability and moving parts.

16.2. Devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to reduce to the lowest possible level the risks arising from vibration generated by the devices, taking

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

79

Page 80: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

account of technical progress and of the means available for limiting vibrations, particularly at source, unless the vibrations are part of the specified performance.

16.3. Devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to reduce to the lowest possible level the risks arising from the noise emitted, taking account of technical progress and of the means available to reduce noise, particularly at source, unless the noise emitted is part of the specified performance.

16.4. Terminals and connectors to the electricity, gas or hydraulic and pneumatic energy supplies which the user or other person has to handle shall be designed and constructed in such a way as to minimise all possible risks.

16.5. Devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to reduce to the lowest possible level, the risk of error when certain parts within the device are intended to be connected or reconnected before or during use.

16.6. Accessible parts of the devices (excluding the parts or areas intended to supply heat or reach given temperatures) and their surroundings shall not attain potentially dangerous temperatures under normal conditions of use.

17. Protection against the risks posed to the patient or user by supplied energy or Substances.

17.1. Devices for supplying the patient with energy or substances shall be designed and constructed in such a way that the delivered amount can be set and maintained accurately enough to assure the safety of the patient and of the user.

17.2. Devices shall be fitted with the means of preventing and/or indicating any inadequacies in the delivered amount which could pose a danger. Devices shall incorporate suitable means to prevent, as far as possible, the accidental release of dangerous levels of energy or substances from an energy and/or substance source.

17.3. The function of the controls and indicators shall be clearly specified on the devices. Where a device bears instructions required for its operation or indicates operating or adjustment parameters by means of a visual system, such information shall be understandable to the user and, as appropriate, the patient.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

80

Page 81: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

18. Protection against the risks posed by medical devices intended by the manufacturer for use by lay persons

18.1. Devices for use by lay persons shall be designed and manufactured in such a way that they perform appropriately for their intended purpose taking into account the skills and the means available to lay persons and the influence resulting from variation that can reasonably be anticipated in the lay person’s technique and environment. The information and instructions provided by the manufacturer shall be easy for the lay person to understand and apply.

18.2. Devices for use by lay persons shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to– ensure that the device is easy to use by the intended user at all stages of the procedure, and– reduce as far as possible the risk of error by the intended user in the handling of the device and, if applicable, in the interpretation of the results.

18.3. Devices for use by lay persons shall, where reasonably possible, include a procedure by which the lay person– can verify that, at the time of use, the device will perform as intended by the manufacturer, and– if applicable, is warned if the device has failed to provide a valid result.

III. Requirements regarding the information supplied with the device

19. Label and instructions for use

19.1. General requirements regarding the information supplied by the manufacturerEach device shall be accompanied by the information needed to identify the device and its manufacturer, and communicate safety and performance related information to the user, professional or lay, or other person, as appropriate. Such information may appear on the device itself, on the packaging or in the instructions for use, taking into account the following:

(a) The medium, format, content, legibility, and location of the label and instructions for use shall be appropriate to the particular device, its intended purpose and the technical knowledge, experience, education or training of the intended user(s). In

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

81

Page 82: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

particular, instructions for use shall be written in terms readily understood by the intended user and, where appropriate, supplemented with drawings and diagrams. Some devices may include separate information for the professional user and the lay person.

(b) The information required on the label shall be provided on the device itself. If this is not practicable or appropriate, some or all of the information may appear on the packaging for each unit, and/or on the packaging of multiple devices.Where multiple devices are supplied to a single user and/or location, a single copy of the instructions for use may be provided if so agreed by the purchaser who in any case may request further copies to be provided.

(c) For devices of class I and IIa, instructions for use are not needed or may be abbreviated if the device can be used safely and as intended by the manufacturer without any such instructions for use.

(d) Labels shall be provided in a human-readable format but may be supplemented by machine-readable forms, such as radio-frequency identification (RFID) or bar codes.

(e) Instructions for use may be provided to the user in non-paper format (e.g. electronic) to the extent and under the conditions set out in Commission Regulation (EU) No 207/2012 on electronic instructions for use of medical devices.

(f) Residual risks which are required to be communicated to the user and/or other person shall be included as limitations, contraindications, precautions or warnings in the information supplied by the manufacturer.

(g) Where appropriate, this information should take the form of internationally recognised symbols. Any symbol or identification colour used shall conform to the harmonised standards. In areas for which no standards exist, the symbols and colours shall be described in the documentation supplied with the device.

19.2. Information on the labelThe label shall bear the following particulars:

(a) The name or trade name of the device.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

82

Page 83: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

(b) The details strictly necessary for a user to identify the device, the contents of the packaging and, where it is not obvious for the user, the intended purpose of the device.

(c) The name, registered trade name or registered trade mark of the manufacturer and the address of his registered place of business at which he can be contacted and his location be established.

(d) For imported devices, the name, registered trade name or registered trade mark of the authorised representative established within the Union and the address of his registered place of business at which he can be contacted and his location be established.

(e) Where applicable, an indication that the device contains or incorporates– a medicinal substance, including a human blood derivative, or– tissues or cells, or their derivatives, of human origin, or– tissues or cells, or their derivatives, of animal origin as referred to in Commission Regulation […/…].

(f) Where applicable, an indication that the device incorporates or consists of nanomaterial that fall within the definition contained in Commission Recommendation 2011/696/EU.

(g) The batch code/lot number or the serial number of the device preceded by the word LOT or SERIAL NUMBER or an equivalent symbol, as appropriate.

(h) Where applicable, the unique device identification (UDI).

(i) An unambiguous indication of the date until when the device may be used safely, expressed at least as the year and month, where this is relevant.

(j) Where there is no indication of the date until when it may be used safely, the year of manufacture. This year of manufacture may be included as part of the batch or serial number, provided the date is clearly identifiable.

(k) An indication of any special storage and/or handling condition that applies.

(l) If the device is supplied sterile, an indication of its sterile state and the sterilisation

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

83

Page 84: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

method.

(m) Warnings or precautions to be taken that need to be brought to the immediate attention of the user of the device as relevant, and to any other person where appropriate. This information may be kept to a minimum in which case more detailed information should appear in the instructions for use.

(n) If the device is intended for single use, an indication of that fact. A manufacturer's indication of single use shall be consistent across the Union.

(o) If the device is a single use device that has been reprocessed, an indication of that fact, the number of reprocessing cycles already performed, and any limitation as regards the number of reprocessing cycles.

(p) If the device is custom made, an indication of that fact.

(q) If the device is intended for clinical investigation only, an indication of that fact.

19.3. Information in the instructions for useThe instructions for use shall contain the following particulars:

(a) The particulars referred to in points 19.2. a), c), e), f), k), l) and n).

(b) The device’s intended purpose including the intended user (e.g. professional or lay person), as appropriate.

(c) The performance of the device intended by the manufacturer.

(d) Any residual risks, contraindications and any expected and foreseeable side effects, including information to be conveyed to the patient in this regard.

(e) Specifications the user requires to use the device appropriately, e.g. if the device has a measuring function, the degree of accuracy claimed for it.

(f) Details of any preparatory treatment or handling of the device before it is ready for use (e.g. sterilisation, final assembly, calibration, etc.).

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

84

Page 85: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

(g) Any requirements for special facilities, or special training, or particular qualifications of the device user and/or other persons.

(h) The information needed to verify whether the device is properly installed and is ready to perform safely and as intended by the manufacturer, together with, where relevant:– details of the nature, and frequency, of preventative and regular maintenance, and of any preparatory cleaning or disinfection;– identification of any consumable components and how to replace them;– information on any necessary calibration to ensure that the device operates properly and safely during its intended life span;– methods of eliminating the risks encountered by persons involved in installing, calibrating or servicing devices.

(i) If the device is supplied sterile, instructions in the event of the sterile packaging being damaged before use.

(j) If the device is supplied non-sterile with the intention that it is sterilised before use, the appropriate instructions for sterilisation.

(k) If the device is reusable, information on the appropriate processes to allow reuse, including cleaning, disinfection, decontamination, packaging and, where appropriate, the validated method of re-sterilisation. Information should be provided to identify when the device should no longer be reused, e.g. signs of material degradation or the maximum number of allowable reuses.

(l) If the device bears an indication that the device is for single use, information on known characteristics and technical factors known to the manufacturer that could pose a risk if the device were to be re-used. If in accordance with point c) of Section 19.1 no instructions for use are needed, the information shall be made available to the user upon request.

(m) For devices intended for use together with other devices and/or general purpose equipment:– information to identify such devices or equipment, in order to obtain a safe combination, and/or– information on any known restrictions to combinations of devices and equipment.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

85

Page 86: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

(n) If the device emits hazardous, or potentially hazardous levels of radiation for medical purposes:– detailed information as to the nature, type and where appropriate, the intensity and distribution of the emitted radiation;– the means of protecting the patient, user, or other person from unintended radiation during use of the device.

(o) Information that allows the user and/or patient to be informed of any warnings, precautions, measures to be taken and limitations of use regarding the device.This information should cover, where appropriate:

– warnings, precautions and/or measures to be taken in the event of malfunction of the device or changes in its performance that may affect safety;

– warnings, precautions and/or measures to be taken in regards to the exposure to reasonably foreseeable external influences or environmental conditions, such as magnetic fields, external electrical and electromagnetic effects, electrostatic discharge, radiation associated with diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, pressure, humidity, or temperature;

– warnings, precautions and/or measures to be taken in regards to the risks of interference posed by the reasonably foreseeable presence of the device during specific diagnostic investigations, evaluations, or therapeutic treatment or other procedures (e.g. electromagnetic interference emitted by the device affecting other equipment);

– if the device is intended to administer medicinal products, tissues or cells, or their derivatives, of human or animal origin or biological substances, any limitations or incompatibility in the choice of substances to be delivered;

– warnings, precautions and/or limitations related to the medicinal substance or biological material that is incorporated into the device as an integral part of the device;

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

86

Page 87: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

– precautions related to materials incorporated into the device that are carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic, or that have endocrine disrupting properties or that could result in sensitisation or allergic reaction of the patient or user.

(p) Warnings or precautions to be taken in order to facilitate the safe disposal ofthe device, its accessories and the consumables used with it, if any. This information should cover, where appropriate:

– infection or microbial hazards (e.g. explants, needles or surgical equipment contaminated with potentially infectious substances of human origin);

– physical hazards (e.g. from sharps).

(q) For devices intended for use by lay persons, the circumstances when the user should consult with a healthcare professional.

(r) For devices listed in Annex XV for which the manufacturer does not claim amedical purpose, information regarding the absence of a clinical benefit and the risks related to the use of the device.

(s) Date of issue of the instructions for use or, if they have been revised, date ofissue and identifier of the latest revision of the instructions for use.

7. References to the relevant harmonised standards used in relation to which conformity is declared;

8. Where applicable, name and identification number of the notified body, description of the conformity assessment procedure performed and identification of the certificate(s) issued;

9. Where applicable, additional information;

10. Place and date of issue, name and function of the person who signs as well as indication for and on behalf of whom he/she signs, signature.

ANNEX IIEC DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY(Full quality assurance system)

1. The manufacturer must ensure application of the quality system approved for the design, manufacture and final inspection of the products concerned, as specified in Section 3 and is subject to audit as laid down in Sections 3.3 and 4 and to Community surveillance as specified in Section 5.

2. The EC declaration of conformity is the procedure whereby the manufacturer who fulfils the obligations imposed by Section 1 ensures and

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

87

Page 88: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

declares that the products concerned meet the provisions of this Directive which apply to them.The manufacturer must affix the CE marking in accordance with Article 17 and draw up a written declaration of conformity. This declaration must cover one or more medical devices manufactured, clearly identified by means of product name, product code or other unambiguous reference and must be kept by the manufacturer.

3. Quality system3.1. The manufacturer must lodge an application for assessment of his quality system with a notified body.The application must include:— the name and address of the manufacturer and any additional manufacturing site covered by the quality system,— all the relevant information on the product or product category covered by the procedure,— a written declaration that no application has been lodged with any other notified body for the same product-related quality system,— the documentation on the quality system,— an undertaking by the manufacturer to fulfil the obligations imposed by the quality system approved,— an undertaking by the manufacturer to keep the approved quality system adequate and efficacious,— an undertaking by the manufacturer to institute and keep up to date a systematic procedure to review experience gained from devices in the post-production phase, including the provisions referred to in Annex X, and to implement appropriate means to apply any necessary corrective action. This undertaking must include an obligation for the manufacturer to notify the competent authorities of the following incidents immediately on learning of them:

(i) any malfunction or deterioration in the characteristics and/or performance of a device, as well as any inadequacy in the instructions for use which might lead to or might have led to thedeath of a patient or user or to a serious deterioration in his state of health;

(ii) any technical or medical reason connected with the characteristics or

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

88

Page 89: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

performance of a device leading for the reasons referred to in subparagraph (i) to systematic recall of devices of the same type by the manufacturer.

3.2. Application of the quality system must ensure that the products conform to the provisions of this Directive which apply to them at every stage, from design to final inspection. All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the manufacturer for his quality system must be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of written policies and procedures such as quality programmes, quality plans, quality manuals and quality records.

It shall include in particular the corresponding documentation, data and records arising from the procedures referred to in point (c).

It shall include in particular an adequate description of:

(a) the manufacturer's quality objectives;

(b) the organization of the business and in particular:— the organizational structures, the responsibilities of the managerial staff and their organizational authority where quality of design and manufacture of the products is concerned,— the methods of monitoring the efficient operation of the quality system and in particular its ability to achieve the desired quality of design and of product, including control of products which fail to conform,— where the design, manufacture and/or final inspection and testing of the products, or elements thereof, is carried out by a third party, the methods of monitoring the efficient operation of the quality system and in particular the type and extent of control applied to the third party;

(c) the procedures for monitoring and verifying the design of the products,including the corresponding documentation, and in particular:— a general description of the product, including any variants planned, and its intended use(s),— the design specifications, including the standards which will be applied and the results of the risk analysis, and also a description of the solutions adopted to fulfil the essential requirements which apply to the products if

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

89

Page 90: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

the standards referred to in Article 5 are not applied in full,— the techniques used to control and verify the design and the processes and systematic measures which will be used when the products are being designed,— if the device is to be connected to other device(s) in order to operate as intended, proof must be provided that it conforms to the essential requirements when connected to any such device(s)having the characteristics specified by the manufacturer,— a statement indicating whether or not the device incorporates, as an integral part, a substance or a human blood derivative referred to in section 7.4 of Annex I and the data on the tests conducted in this connection required to assess the safety, quality and usefulness of that substance or human blood derivative, taking account of the intended purpose of the device,— a statement indicating whether or not the device is manufactured utilising tissues of animal origin as referred to in Commission Directive 2003/32/EC (1),— the solutions adopted as referred to in Annex I, Chapter I, Section 2,— the pre-clinical evaluation,— the clinical evaluation referred to in Annex X,— the draft label and, where appropriate, instructions for use.

(d) the inspection and quality assurance techniques at the manufacturing stage and in particular:— the processes and procedures which will be used, particularly as regards sterilization, purchasing and the relevant documents,— the product identification procedures drawn up and kept up to date from drawings, specifications or other relevant documents at every stage of manufacture;(1) Commission Directive 2003/32/EC of 23 April 2003 introducing detailed specifications as regards the requirements laid down in Council Directive 93/42/EEC with respect to medical devices manufactured utilising tissues of animal origin (OJ L 105, 26.4.2003, p. 18).

(e) the appropriate tests and trials which will be carried out before, during and after manufacture, the frequency with which they will take place, and the test equipment used; it must be possible to trace back the calibration of

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

90

Page 91: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

the test equipment adequately.

3.3. The notified body must audit the quality system to determine whether it meets the requirements referred to in Section 3.2. It must presume that quality systems which implement the relevant harmonized standards conform to these requirements.The assessment team must include at least one member with past experience of assessments of the technology concerned. The assessment procedure must include an assessment, on a representative basis, of the documentation of the design of the product(s) concerned, an inspection on the manufacturer's premises and, in duly substantiated cases, on the premises of the manufacturer's suppliers and/or subcontractors to inspect the manufacturing processes.The decision is notified to the manufacturer. It must contain the conclusions of the inspection and a reasoned assessment.

3.4. The manufacturer must inform the notified body which approved the quality system of any plan for substantial changes to the quality system or the product-range covered. The notified body must assess the changes proposed and verify whether after these changes the quality system still meets the requirements referred to in Section 3.2. It must notify the manufacturer of its decision. This decision must contain the conclusions of the inspection and a reasoned assessment.

4. Examination of the design of the product

4.1. In addition to the obligations imposed by Section 3, the manufacturer must lodge with the notified body an application for examination of the design dossier relating to the product which he plans to manufacture and which falls into the category referred to in Section 3.1.

4.2. The application must describe the design, manufacture and performances of the product in question. It must include the documents needed to assess whether the product conforms to the requirements of this Directive, as referred to in Section 3.2 (c).

4.3. The notified body must examine the application and, if the product

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

91

Page 92: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

conforms to the relevant provisions of this Directive, issue the application with an EC design-examination certificate. The notified body may require the application to be completed by further tests or proof to allow assessment of conformity with the requirements of the Directive. The certificate must contain the conclusions of the examination, the conditions of validity, the data needed for identification of the approved design, where appropriate, a description of the intended purpose of the product.In the case of devices referred to in Annex I, Section 7.4, second paragraph, the notified body shall, as regards the aspects referred to in that section, consult one of the competent authorities designated by the Member States in accordance with Directive 2001/83/EC or the EMEA before taking a decision. The opinion of the competent national authority or the EMEA must be drawn up within 210 days after receipt of valid documentation. The scientific opinion of the competent national authority or the EMEA must be included in the documentation concerning the device. The notified body will give due consideration to the views expressed in this consultation when making its decision. It will convey its final decision to the competent body concerned.In the case of devices referred to in Annex I, Section 7.4, third paragraph, the scientific opinion of the EMEA must be included in the documentation concerning the device. The opinion of the EMEA must be drawn up within 210 days after receipt of valid documentation. The notified body will give due consideration to the opinion of the EMEA when making its decision.The notified body may not deliver the certificate if the EMEA's scientific opinion is unfavourable. It will convey its final decision to the EMEA.In the case of devices manufactured utilising tissues of animal origin as referred to in Directive 2003/32/EC, the notified body must follow the procedures referred to in that Directive.

4.4. Changes to the approved design must receive further approval from the notified body which issued the EC design-examination certificate wherever the changes could affect conformity with the essential requirements of the Directive or with the conditions prescribed for use of the product. The applicant shall inform the notified body which issued the EC design-examination certificate of any such changes made to the approved design. This additional approval must take the form of a supplement to the EC design examination certificate.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

92

Page 93: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

5. Surveillance

5.1. The aim of surveillance is to ensure that the manufacturer duly fulfils the obligations imposed by the approved quality system.

5.2. The manufacturer must authorize the notified body to carry out all the necessary inspections and supply it with all relevant information, in particular:— the documentation on the quality system,— the data stipulated in the part of the quality system relating to design, such as the results of analyses, calculations, tests, the solutions adopted as referred to in Annex I, Chapter I, Section 2, pre-clinical and clinical evaluation, post-market clinical follow-up plan and the results of thepost-market clinical follow-up, if applicable, etc.,— the data stipulated in the part of the quality system relating to manufacture, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports of the personnel concerned, etc.

5.3. The notified body must periodically carry out appropriate inspections and assessments to make sure that the manufacturer applies the approved quality system and must supply the manufacturer with an assessment report.

5.4. In addition, the notified body may pay unannounced visits to the manufacturer.At the time of such visits, the notified body may, where necessary, carry out or ask for tests in order to check that the quality system is working properly. It must provide the manufacturer with an inspection report and, if a test has been carried out, with a test report.

6. Administrative provisions

6.1. The manufacturer or his authorised representative must, for a period ending at least five years, and in the case of implantable devices at least 15 years, after the last product has been manufactured, keep at the disposal of the national authorities:

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

93

Page 94: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

— the declaration of conformity,— the documentation referred to in the fourth indent of Section 3.1 and in particular the documentation, data and records referred to in the second paragraph of Section 3.2,— the changes referred to in Section 3.4,— the documentation referred to in Section 4.2, and— the decisions and reports from the notified body as referred to in Sections 3.3, 4.3, 4.4, 5.3 and 5.4.

7. Application to devices in Classes IIa and IIb.

7.1. In line with Article 11(2) and (3), this Annex may apply to products in Classes IIa and IIb. Section 4, however, does not apply.

7.2. For devices in Class IIa the notified body shall assess, as part of the assessment in Section 3.3, the technical documentation as described in Section 3.2(c) for at least one representative sample for each device subcategory for compliance with the provisions of this Directive.

7.3. For devices in Class IIb the notified body shall assess, as part of the assessment in Section 3.3, the technical documentation as described in Section 3.2(c) for at least one representative sample for each generic device group for compliance with the provisions of this Directive.

7.4. In choosing representative sample(s) the notified body shall take into account the novelty of the technology, similarities in design, technology, manufacturing and sterilisation methods, the intended use and the results of any previous relevant assessments (e.g. with regard to physical, chemical or biological properties) that have been carried out in accordance with this Directive. The notified body shall document and keep available to the competent authority its rationale for the sample(s) taken.

7.5. Further samples shall be assessed by the notified body as part of the surveillance assessment referred to in Section 5.

8. Application to the devices referred to Article 1(4a)Upon completing the manufacture of each batch of devices referred to in

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

94

Page 95: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

Article 1(4a), the manufacturer shall inform the notified body of the release of the batch of devices and send to it the official certificate concerning the release of the batch of human blood derivative used in the device, issued by a State laboratory or a laboratory designated for that purpose by a MemberState in accordance with Article 114(2) of Directive 2001/83/EC.

ANNEX IXCONFORMITY ASSESSEMENT BASED ON TYPE EXAMINATION

1. EU type-examination is the procedure whereby a notified body ascertains and certifies that a representative sample of the production covered fulfils the relevant provisions of this Regulation.

2. Application

The application shall include:

– the name and address of the manufacturer and, if the application is lodged by the authorised representative, the name and address of the authorised representative,

– the technical documentation referred to in Annex II needed to assess the conformity of the representative sample of the production in question, hereinafter referred to as the ‘type’, with the requirements of this Regulation; where the technical documentation is voluminous and/or held in different locations, the manufacturer shall submit a summary technical documentation (STED) and grant access to the full technical documentation upon request. The applicant shall make a ‘type’ available to the notified body. The notified body may request other samples as necessary,

– a written declaration that no application has been lodged with any other notified body for the same type, or information about any previous application for the same type that has been refused by another notified body.

3. AssessmentThe notified body shall:

3.1. examine and assess the technical documentation and verify that the type has been manufactured in conformity with that documentation; it shall also record the items

ANNEX IIIEC TYPE-EXAMINATION

1. EC type-examination is the procedure whereby a notified body ascertains and certifies that a representative sample of the production covered fulfils the relevant provisions of this Directive.

2. The application includes:— the name and address of the manufacturer and the name and address of the authorized representative if the application is lodged by the representative,— the documentation described in Section 3 needed to assess the conformity of the representative sample of the production in question, hereinafter referred to as the ‘type’, with the requirements of this Directive. The applicant must make a ‘type’ available to the notified body. The notified body may request other samples as necessary,— a written declaration that no application has been lodged with any other notified body for the same type.

3. The documentation must allow an understanding of the design, the manufacture and the performances of the product and must contain the following items in particular:— a general description of the type, including any variants planned, and its intended use(s),— design drawings, methods of manufacture envisaged, in particular as regards sterilisation, and diagrams of components, sub-assemblies, circuits, etc.,— the descriptions and explanations necessary to understand the abovementioned drawings and diagrams and the operation of the product,— a list of the standards referred to in Article 5, applied in full or in part, and descriptions of the solutions adopted to meet the essential

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

95

Page 96: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

designed in conformity with the applicable provisions of the standards referred to in Article 5, as well as the items not designed on the basis of the relevant provisions of the abovementioned standards;

3.2. carry out or arrange for the appropriate assessments and the physical or laboratory tests necessary to verify whether the solutions adopted by the manufacturer meet the essential requirements of this Regulation if the standards referred to in Article 6 have not been applied; if the device is to be connected to other device(s) in order to operate as intended, proof shall be provided that it conforms to the essential requirements when connected to any such device(s) having the characteristics specified by the manufacturer;

3.3. carry out or arrange for the appropriate assessments and the physical or laboratory tests necessary to verify whether, if the manufacturer has chosen to apply the relevant standards, these have actually been applied;

3.4. agree with the applicant on the place where the necessary assessments and tests will be carried out.

4. CertificateIf the type conforms to the provisions of this Regulation, the notified body shall issue an EU type-examination certificate. The certificate shall contain the name and address of the manufacturer, the conclusions of the assessment, the conditions of validity and the data needed for identification of the type approved. The relevant parts of the documentation shall be annexed to the certificate and a copy kept by the notified body.

5. Changes to the type

5.1. The applicant shall inform the notified body which issued the EU type-examination certificate of any planned change to the approved type.

5.2. Changes to the approved product shall receive further approval from the notified body which issued the EU type-examination certificate wherever the changes may affect conformity with the essential requirements or with the conditions prescribed for use of the product. The notified body shall examine the planned changes, notify the manufacturer of its decision and provide him with a supplement to the EU type-examination report. The approval of any change to the approved type shall take the

requirements if the standards referred to in Article 5 have not been applied in full,— the results of the design calculations, risk analysis, investigations, technical tests, etc. carried out,— a statement indicating whether or not the device incorporates, as an integral part, a substance, or human blood derivative, referred to in Section 7.4 of Annex I, and the data on the tests conducted in this connection which are required to assess the safety, quality and usefulness of that substance, or human blood derivative, taking account of the intended purpose of the device,— a statement indicating whether or not the device is manufactured utilising tissues of animal origin as referred to in Directive 2003/32/EC,— the solutions adopted as referred to in Annex I, Chapter I, Section 2,— the pre-clinical evaluation,— the clinical evaluation referred to in Annex X,— the draft label and, where appropriate, instructions for use.

4. The notified body must:

4.1. examine and assess the documentation and verify that the type has been manufactured in conformity with that documentation; it must also record the items designed in conformity with the applicable provisions of the standards referred to in Article 5, as well as the items not designed on the basis of the relevant provisions of the abovementioned standards;

4.2. carry out or arrange for the appropriate inspections and the tests necessary to verify whether the solutions adopted by the manufacturer meet the essential requirements of this Directive if the standards referred to in Article 5 have not been applied; if the device is to be connected to otherdevice(s) in order to operate as intended, proof must be provided that it conforms to the essential requirements when connected to any such device(s) having the characteristics specified by the manufacturer;

4.3. carry out or arrange for the appropriate inspections and the tests necessary to verify whether, if the manufacturer has chosen to apply the relevant standards, these have actually been applied;

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

96

Page 97: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

form of a supplement to the initial EU type-examination certificate.

6. Specific procedures

The provisions regarding the specific procedures in the case of devices incorporating a medicinal substance, or devices manufactured utilising tissues or cells of human or animal origin, or their derivatives, that are non-viable or rendered non-viable set out in Annex VIII, Section 6, apply with the proviso that any reference to an EU design-examination certificate shall be understood as reference to an EU type-examination certificate.

7. Administrative provisions

The manufacturer or his authorised representative shall, for a period ending at least five years, and in the case of implantable devices at least 15 years, after the last device has been placed on the market, keep at the disposal of the competent authorities:

– the documentation referred to in the second indent of Section 2,

– the changes referred to in Section 5,

– copies of EU type-examination certificates and their additions.

Section 9 of Annex VIII shall apply.

4.4. agree with the applicant on the place where the necessary inspections and tests will be carried out.

5. If the type conforms to the provisions of this Directive, the notified body issues the applicant with an EC type-examination certificate. The certificate must contain the name and address of the manufacturer, the conclusions of the inspection, the conditions of validity and the data needed for identification of the type approved. The relevant parts of the documentation must be annexed to the certificate and a copy kept by the notified body. In the case of devices referred to in Annex I, Section 7.4, second paragraph, the notified body shall, as regards the aspects referred to in that section, consult one of the authorities designated by the Member States in accordance with Directive 2001/83/EC or the EMEA before taking a decision. The opinion of the competent national authority or the EMEA must be drawn up within 210 days after receipt of valid documentation. The scientific opinion of the competent national authority or the EMEA must be included in the documentation concerning the device. The notified body will give due consideration to the views expressed in this consultation when making its decision. It will convey its final decision to the competent body concerned. In the case of devices referred to in Annex I, Section 7.4, third paragraph, the scientific opinion of the EMEA must be included in the documentation concerning the device. The opinion of the EMEA must be drawn up within 210 days after receipt of valid documentation. The notified body will give due consideration to the opinion of the EMEA when making its decision. The notified body may not deliver the certificate if the EMEA's scientific opinion is unfavourable. It will convey its final decision to the EMEA. In the case of devices manufactured utilising tissues of animal origin as referred to in Directive 2003/32/EC, the notified body must follow the procedures referred to in that Directive.

6. The applicant must inform the notified body which issued the EC type examination certificate of any significant change made to the approved product.Changes to the approved product must receive further approval from the notified body which issued the EC type-examination certificate wherever the changes may affect conformity with the essential requirements or with

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

97

Page 98: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

the conditions prescribed for use of the product. This new approval must, where appropriate, take the form of a supplement to the initial EC type examination certificate.

7. Administrative provisions

7.1 No point

7.2. Other notified bodies may obtain a copy of the EC type-examination certificates and/or the supplements thereto. The Annexes to the certificates must be made available to other notified bodies on reasoned application, after the manufacturer has been informed.

7.3. The manufacturer or his authorised representative must keep with the technical documentation copies of EC type-examination certificates and their additions for a period ending at least five years after the last device has been manufactured. In the case of implantable devices, the period shall be at least 15 years after the last product has been manufactured.

ANNEX XCONFORMITY ASSESSEMENT BASED ON PRODUCT CONFORMITYVERIFICATION

PART B: PRODUCT VERIFICATION

1. Product verification is the procedure whereby after examination of every manufactured device the manufacturer, by issuing a EU declaration of conformity in accordance with Article 17 and Annex III, ensures and declares that the devices which have been subject to the procedure set out in Sections 4 and 5 conform to the type described in the EU type-examination certificate and meet the requirements of this Regulation which apply to them.

2. The manufacturer shall take all the measures necessary to ensure that the manufacturing process produces devices which conform to the type described in the EU type-examination certificate and to the requirements of the Regulation which apply to them. Before the start of manufacture, the manufacturer shall prepare documents defining the manufacturing process, in particular as regards sterilization where necessary, together with all the routine, pre-established provisions to be implemented

ANNEX IVEC VERIFICATION

1. EC verification is the procedure whereby the manufacturer or his authorized representative ensures and declares that the products which have been subject to the procedure set out in Section 4 conform to the type described in the EC type-examination certificate and meet the requirements of this Directive which apply to them.

2. The manufacturer must take all the measures necessary to ensure that the manufacturing process produces products which conform to the type described in the EC type-examination certificate and to the requirements of the Directive which apply to them. Before the start of manufacture, the manufacturer must prepare documents defining the manufacturing process, in particular as regards sterilization where necessary, together with all the routine, pre-established provisions to be implemented to ensure homogeneous production and, where appropriate, conformity of the products with the type described in the EC type-examination certificate and with the requirements of this Directive which apply to them. The

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

98

Page 99: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

to ensure homogeneous production and, where appropriate, conformity of the products with the type described in the EU type-examination certificate and with the requirements of this Regulation which apply to them.

In addition, for devices placed on the market in sterile condition, and only for those aspects of the manufacturing process designed to secure and maintain sterility, the manufacturer shall apply the provisions of Part A, Sections 3 and 4 of this Annex.

3. The manufacturer shall undertake to institute and keep up to date a post-market surveillance plan, including a post-market clinical follow-up, and the procedures ensuring compliance with the obligations emanating from the provisions on vigilance set out in Articles 61 to 66.

4. The notified body shall carry out the appropriate examinations and tests in order to verify the conformity of the device with the requirements of the Regulation by examining and testing every product as specified in Section 5.

The aforementioned checks do not apply to those aspects of the manufacturing process designed to secure sterility.

5. Verification by examination and testing of every product

5.1. Every device is examined individually and the appropriate physical or laboratory tests defined in the relevant standard(s) referred to in Article 6 or equivalent tests shall be carried out in order to verify, where appropriate, the conformity of the devices with the type described in the EU type-examination certificate and with the requirements of this Regulation which apply to them.

5.2. The notified body shall affix, or have affixed its identification number to each approved device and shall draw up an EU product verification certificate relating to the tests carried out.

6. Batch verification in the case of devices incorporating a medicinal substance which, if used separately, may be considered to be a medicinal product constituent or derived from human blood or human plasma referred to Article 1(4)

manufacturer must affix the CE marking in accordance with Article 17 and draw up a declaration of conformity. In addition, for products placed on the market in sterile condition, and only for those aspects of the manufacturing process designed to secure and maintain sterility, the manufacturer must apply the provisions of Annex V, Sections 3 and 4.

3. The manufacturer must undertake to institute and keep up to date a systematic procedure to review experience gained from devices in the post-production phase, including the provisions referred to in Annex X, and to implement appropriate means to apply any necessary corrective action. This undertaking must include an obligation for the manufacturer to notify the competent authorities of the following incidents immediately on learning of them:

(i) any malfunction or deterioration in the characteristics and/or performance of a device, as well as any inadequacy in the labelling or the instructions for use which might lead to or might have led to the death of a patient or user or to a serious deterioration in his state of health;

(ii) any technical or medical reason connected with the characteristics or performance of a device for the reasons referred to in subparagraph (i) leading to systematic recall of devices of the same type by the manufacturer.

4. The notified body must carry out the appropriate examinations and tests in order to verify the conformity of the product with the requirements of the Directive either by examining and testing every product as specified in Section 5 or by examining and testing products on a statistical basis as specified in Section 6, as the manufacturer decides. The aforementioned checks do not apply to those aspects of the manufacturing process designed to secure sterility.

5. Verification by examination and testing of every product

5.1. Every product is examined individually and the appropriate tests defined in the relevant standard(s) referred to in Article 5 or equivalent tests must be carried out in order to verify, where appropriate, the

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

99

Page 100: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

Upon completing the manufacture of each batch of devices that incorporate a medicinal substance which, if used separately, may be considered to be a medicinal product constituent or derived from human blood or human plasma referred to in Article 1(4), the manufacturer shall inform the notified body of the release of the batch of devices and send to it the official certificate concerning the release of the batch of human blood derivative used in the device, issued by a State laboratory or a laboratory designated for that purpose by a Member State in accordance with Article 114(2) of Directive 2001/83/EC.

7. Administrative provisionsThe manufacturer or his authorised representative shall, for a period ending at least five years, and in the case of implantable devices at least 15 years, after the last device has been placed on the market, keep at the disposal of the competent authorities:

– the declaration of conformity,

– the documentation referred to in Section 2,

– the certificate referred to in Section 5.2,

– the EU type-examination certificate referred to in Annex IX.

Section 9 of Annex VIII shall apply.

8. Application to devices falling within class IIa

8.1. By way of derogation from Section 1, by virtue of the EU declaration of conformity the manufacturer ensures and declares that the devices in class IIa are manufactured in conformity with the technical documentation referred to in Annex II and meet the requirements of this Regulation which apply to them.

8.2. The verification conducted by the notified body in accordance with Section 4 is intended to confirm the conformity of the devices in class IIa with the technical documentation referred to in Annex II and with the requirements of this Regulation which apply to them.

8.3. If the verification in accordance with Section 8.2. confirms that the devices in class

conformity of the products with the EC type described in the type-examination certificate and with the requirements of the Directive which apply to them.

5.2. The notified body must affix, or have affixed its identification number to each approved product and must draw up a written certificate of conformity relating to the tests carried out.

6. Statistical verification

6.1. The manufacturer must present the manufactured products in the form of homogeneous batches.

6.2. A random sample is taken from each batch. The products which make up the sample are examined individually and the appropriate tests defined in the relevant standard(s) referred to in Article 5 or equivalent tests must be carried out to verify, where appropriate, the conformity of the products with the type described in the EC type-examination certificate and with the requirements of the Directive which apply to them in order to determine whether to accept or reject the batch.

6.3. Statistical control of products will be based on attributes and/or variables, entailing sampling schemes with operational characteristics which ensure a high level of safety and performance according to the state of the art. The sampling schemes will be established by the harmonised standards referred to in Article 5, taking account of the specific nature of the product categories in question.

6.4. If the batch is accepted, the notified body affixes or has affixed its identification number to each product and draws up a written certificate of conformity relating to the tests carried out. All products in the batch may be put on the market except any in the sample which failed to conform. If a batch is rejected, the competent notified body must take appropriate measures to prevent the batch from being placed on the market. In the event of frequent rejection of batches, the notified body may suspend the statistical verification.The manufacturer may, on the responsibility of the notified body, affix the

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

100

Page 101: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

IIa conform to the technical documentation referred to in Annex II and meet the requirements of this Regulation which apply to them, the notified body shall issue a certificate pursuant to this section of this Annex.

8.4. By way of derogation from Section 7, the manufacturer or his authorised representative shall, for a period ending at least five years after the last device has been placed on the market, keep at the disposal of the competent authorities:

– the declaration of conformity,

– the technical documentation referred to in Annex II,

– the certificate referred to in Section 8.3.

Section 9 of Annex VIII shall apply.

notified body's identification number during the manufacturing process.

7. Administrative provisionsThe manufacturer or his authorised representative must, for a period ending at least five years, and in the case of implantable devices at least 15 years, after the last product has been manufactured, make available to the national authorities:— the declaration of conformity,— the documentation referred to in Section 2,— the certificates referred to in Sections 5.2 and 6.4,— where appropriate, the type-examination certificate referred to in Annex III.

8. Application to devices in Class IIaIn line with Article 11 (2), this Annex may apply to products in Class IIa, subject to the following:

8.1. in derogation from Sections 1 and 2, by virtue of the declaration of conformity the manufacturer ensures and declares that the products in Class IIa are manufactured in conformity with the technical documentation referred to in Section 3 of Annex VII and meet the requirements of this Directive which apply to them;

8.2. in derogation from Sections 1, 2, 5 and 6, the verifications conducted by the notified body are intended to confirm the conformity of the products in Class IIa with the technical documentation referred to in Section 3 of Annex VII.

9. Application to devices referred to in Article 1(4a)In the case of section 5, upon completing the manufacture of each batch of devices referred to in Article 1(4a), and in the case of verification under section 6, the manufacturer shall inform the notified body of the release of this batch of devices and send to it the official certificate concerning the release of the batch of human blood derivative used in the device issued by a State laboratory or a laboratory designated for that purpose by a Member State in accordance with Article 114(2) of Directive 2001/83/EC.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

101

Page 102: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

ANNEX XCONFORMITY ASSESSEMENT BASED ON PRODUCT CONFORMITYVERIFICATION

1. The objective of the conformity assessment based on product conformity verification is to ensure that devices conform to the type for which an EU type-examination certificate has been issued and meet the provisions of this Regulation which apply to them.

2. Where an EU type-examination certificate has been issued in accordance with Annex IX, the manufacturer can either apply the procedure set out in part A (production quality assurance) or the procedure set out in part B (product verification).

3. By way of derogation from Sections 1 and 2, this Annex can also be applied by manufacturers of devices falling within class IIa coupled with the drawing up of a technical documentation as set out in Annex II.

PART A: PRODUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE

1. The manufacturer shall ensure application of the quality management system approved for the manufacture of the devices concerned and carry out the final inspection, as specified in Section 3, and is subject to the surveillance referred to in Section 4.

2. The manufacturer who fulfils the obligations imposed by Section 1 shall draw up and keep a EU declaration of conformity in accordance with Article 17 and Annex III for the device model covered by the conformity assessment procedure. By issuing a declaration of conformity the manufacturer ensures and declares that the devices concerned conform to the type described in the EU type-examination certificate and meet the provisions of this Regulation which apply to them.

3. Quality management system

3.1. The manufacturer shall lodge an application for assessment of his quality management system with a notified body. The application shall include:

– all elements listed in Section 3.1 of Annex VIII,

ANNEX VEC DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY(Production quality assurance)

1. The manufacturer must ensure application of the quality system approved for the manufacture of the products concerned and carry out the final inspection, as specified in Section 3, and is subject to the Community surveillance referred to in Section 4.

2. The EC declaration of conformity is the part of the procedure whereby the manufacturer who fulfils the obligations imposed by Section 1 ensures and declares that the products concerned conform to the type described in the EC type-examination certificate and meet the provisions of this Directive which apply to them.The manufacturer must affix the CE marking in accordance with Article 17 and draw up a written declaration of conformity. This declaration must cover one or more medical devices manufactured, clearly identified by means of product name, product code or other unambiguous reference, and must be kept by the manufacturer.

3. Quality system

3.1. The manufacturer must lodge an application for assessment of his quality system with a notified body.The application must include:— the name and address of the manufacturer,— all the relevant information on the product or product category covered by the procedure,— a written declaration that no application has been lodged with any other notified body for the same products,— the documentation on the quality system,— an undertaking to fulfil the obligations imposed by the quality system is approved,— an undertaking to maintain the practicability and effectiveness of the approved quality system,— where appropriate, the technical documentation on the types approved and a copy of the EC type-examination certificates,

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

102

Page 103: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

– the technical documentation as referred to in Annex II for the types approved; where the technical documentation is voluminous and/or held in different locations, the manufacturer shall submit a summary technical documentation (STED) and grant access to the full technical documentation upon request;

– a copy of the EU-type examination certificates referred to in Section 4 of Annex IX; if the EU-type examination certificates have been issued by the same notified body with which the application is lodged, a reference to the technical documentation and the certificates issued is sufficient.

3.2. Application of the quality management system shall ensure that the devices conform to the type described in the EU type-examination certificate and to the provisions of this Regulation which apply to them at every stage. All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the manufacturer for his quality management system shall be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of written policies and procedures such as quality programmes, quality plans, quality manuals and quality records.

It shall, in particular, include an adequate description of all elements listed in points (a), (b), (d) and (e) of Section 3.2 of Annex VIII.

3.3. The provisions of points (a) and (b) of Section 3.3 of the Annex VIII apply.

If the quality management system ensures that the devices conform to the type described in the EU type-examination certificate and conforms to the relevant provisions of this Regulation, the notified body shall issue an EU quality assurance certificate. The decision shall be notified to the manufacturer. It shall contain the conclusions of the inspection and a reasoned assessment.

3.4. The provisions of Section 3.4. Annex VIII apply.

4. Surveillance

The provisions of Section 4.1., the first, second and fourth indents of Section 4.2, Section 4.3., Section 4.4., Section 4.6. and Section 4.7. of Annex VIII apply.

— an undertaking by the manufacturer to institute and keep up to date a systematic procedure to review experience gained from devices in the post-production phase, including the provisions referred to in Annex X, and to implement appropriate means to apply any necessary corrective action. This undertaking must include an obligation for the manufacturer to notify the competent authorities of the following incidents immediately on learning of them: (i) any malfunction or deterioration in the characteristics and/or performance of a device, as well as any inadequacy in the labelling or the instructions for use which might lead to or mighthave led to the death of a patient or user or to a serious deterioration in his state of health;(ii) any technical or medical reason connected with the characteristics or performance of a device for the reasons referred to in subparagraph(i) above leading to a systematic recall of devices of the same type by the manufacturer.

3.2. Application of the quality system must ensure that the products conform to the type described in the EC type-examination certificate.All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the manufacturer for his quality system must be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of written policy statements and procedures. This quality system documentation must permit uniform interpretation of the quality policy and procedures such as quality programmes, plans, manuals and records.It must include in particular an adequate description of:

(a) the manufacturer's quality objectives;

(b) the organization of the business and in particular:— the organizational structures, the responsibilities of the managerial staff and their organizational authority where manufacture of the products is concerned,— the methods of monitoring the efficient operation of the quality system and in particular its ability to achieve the desired quality of product, including control of products which fail to conform,— where the manufacture and/or final inspection and testing of the

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

103

Page 104: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

In the case of devices falling within class III, the surveillance shall also include a check of the coherence between the quantity of produced or purchased raw material or crucial components approved for the type and the quantity of finished products.

5. Batch verification in the case of devices incorporating a medicinal substance which, if used separately, may be considered to be a medicinal product constituent or derived from human blood or human plasma referred to Article 1(4)

Upon completing the manufacture of each batch of devices that incorporate a medicinal substance which, if used separately, may be considered to be a medicinal product constituent or derived from human blood or human plasma referred to in Article 1(4), the manufacturer shall inform the notified body of the release of the batch of devices and send to it the official certificate concerning the release of the batch of human blood derivative used in the device, issued by a State laboratory or a laboratory designated for that purpose by a Member State in accordance with Article 114(2) of Directive 2001/83/EC.

6. Administrative provisions

The manufacturer or his authorised representative shall, for a period ending at least five years, and in the case of implantable devices at least 15 years, after the last device has been placed on the market, keep at the disposal of the competent authorities:

– the declaration of conformity,

– the documentation referred to in the fourth indent of Annex VIII, Section 3.1.,

– the documentation referred to in the seventh indent of Annex VIII, Section 3.1., including the EU type-examination certificate referred to in Annex IX,

– the changes referred to in Annex VIII, Section 3.4., and

– the decisions and reports from the notified body as referred to in Annex VIII, Sections 3.3., 4.3. and 4.4.

Section 9 of Annex VIII shall apply.

products, or elements thereof, are carried out by a third party, the methods of monitoring the efficient operation of the quality system and in particular the type and extent of control applied to the third party;

(c) the inspection and quality assurance techniques at the manufacturing stage and in particular:— the processes and procedures which will be used, particularly as regards sterilization, purchasing and the relevant documents,— the product identification procedures drawn up and kept up to date from drawings, specifications or other relevant documents at every stage of manufacture;

(d) the appropriate tests and trials to be carried out before, during and after manufacture, the frequency with which they will take place, and the test equipment used; it must be possible adequately to trace back the calibration of the test equipment.

3.3. The notified body must audit the quality system to determine whether it meets the requirements referred to in Section 3.2. It must presume that quality systems which implement the relevant harmonized standards conform to these requirements.The assessment team must include at least one member with past experience of assessments of the technology concerned. The assessment procedure must include an inspection on the manufacturer's premises and, in duly substantiated cases, on the premises of the manufacturer's suppliers to inspect the manufacturing processes.The decision must be notified to the manufacturer after the final inspection and contain the conclusions of the inspection and a reasoned assessment.

3.4. The manufacturer must inform the notified body which approved the quality system of any plan for substantial changes to the quality system.The notified body must assess the changes proposed and verify whether after these changes the quality system still meets the requirements referred to in Section 3.2.After the abovementioned information has been received the decision is notified to the manufacturer. It must contain the conclusions of the inspection and a reasoned assessment.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

104

Page 105: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

7. Application to devices falling within class IIa

7.1. By way of derogation from Section 2, by virtue of the EU declaration of conformity the manufacturer ensures and declares that the devices in class IIa are manufactured in conformity with the technical documentation referred to in Annex II and meet the requirements of this Regulation which apply to them.

7.2. For devices in class IIa the notified body shall assess, as part of the assessment in Section 3.3, on a representative basis, the technical documentation as referred in Annex II for compliance with the provisions of this Regulation; where the technical documentation is voluminous and/or held in different locations, the manufacturer shall submit a summary technical documentation (STED) and grant access to the full technical documentation upon request.In choosing representative sample(s) the notified body shall take into account the novelty of the technology, similarities in design, technology, manufacturing and sterilisation methods, the intended use and the results of any previous relevant assessments (e.g. with regard to physical, chemical or biological properties) that havebeen carried out in accordance with this Regulation. The notified body shall document its rationale for the sample(s) taken.

7.3. If the assessment in accordance with Section 7.2. confirms that the devices in class IIa conform to the technical documentation referred to in Annex II and meet the requirements of this Regulation which apply to them, the notified body shall issue a certificate pursuant to this section of this Annex.

7.4. Further samples shall be assessed by the notified body as part of the surveillance assessment referred to in Section 4.

7.5. By way of derogation from Section 6, the manufacturer or his authorised representative shall, for a period ending at least five years after the last device has been placed on the market, keep at the disposal of the competent authorities:– the declaration of conformity,– the technical documentation referred to in Annex II,– the certificate referred to in Section 7.3. Annex VIII, Section 9 shall apply.

4. Surveillance

4.1. The aim of surveillance is to ensure that the manufacturer duly fulfils the obligations imposed by the approved quality system.

4.2. The manufacturer authorizes the notified body to carry out all the necessary inspections and must supply it with all relevant information, in particular:— the documentation on the quality system,— the technical documentation,— the data stipulated in the part of the quality system relating to manufacture, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports of the personnel concerned, etc.

4.3. The notified body must periodically carry out appropriate inspections and assessments to make sure that the manufacturer applies the approved quality system and supply the manufacturer with an assessment report.

4.4. In addition, the notified body may pay unannounced visits to the manufacturer. At the time of such visits, the notified body may, where necessary, carry out or ask for tests in order to check that the quality system is working properly. It must provide the manufacturer with an inspection report and, if a test has been carried out, with a test report.

5. Administrative provisions

5.1. The manufacturer or his authorised representative must, for a period ending at least five years, and in the case of implantable devices at least 15 years, after the last product has been manufactured, make available to the national authorities:— the declaration of conformity,— the documentation referred to in the fourth indent of Section 3.1,— the changes referred to in Section 3.4,— the documentation referred to in the seventh indent of Section 3.1,— the decisions and reports from the notified body as referred to in Sections 4.3 and 4.4,

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

105

Page 106: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

— where appropriate, the type-examination certificate referred to in Annex III.

6. Application to devices in Class IIaIn line with Article 11(2), this Annex may apply to products in Class IIa, subject to the following:

6.1. By way of derogation from Sections 2, 3.1 and 3.2, by virtue of the declaration of conformity the manufacturer ensures and declares that the products in Class IIa are manufactured in conformity with the technical documentation referred to in Section 3 of Annex VII and meet the requirements of this Directive which apply to them.

6.2. For devices in Class IIa the notified body shall assess, as part of the assessment in Section 3.3, the technical documentation as described in Section 3 of Annex VII for at least one representative sample for each device subcategory for compliance with the provisions of this Directive.

6.3. In choosing representative sample(s) the notified body shall take into account the novelty of the technology, similarities in design, technology, manufacturing and sterilisation methods, the intended use and the results of any previous relevant assessments (e.g. with regard to physical, chemical or biological properties) that have been carried out in accordance with this Directive. The notified body shall document and keep available to the competent authority its rationale for the sample(s) taken.

6.4. Further samples shall be assessed by the notified body as part of the surveillance assessment referred to in Section 4.3.

7. Application to devices referred to in Article 1(4a)Upon completing the manufacture of each batch of devices referred to in Article 1(4a), the manufacturer shall inform the notified body of the release of the batch of devices and send to it the official certificate concerning the release of the batch of human blood derivative used in the device issued by a State laboratory or a laboratory designated for that purpose by a MemberState in accordance with Article 114(2) of Directive 2001/83/EC.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

106

Page 107: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

ANNEX XCONFORMITY ASSESSEMENT BASED ON PRODUCT CONFORMITYVERIFICATIONSee above

ANNEX VIEC DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY(Product quality assurance)

1. The manufacturer must ensure application of the quality system approved for the final inspection and testing of the product, as specified in Section 3 and must be subject to the surveillance referred to in Section 4.In addition, for products placed on the market in sterile condition, and only for those aspects of the manufacturing process designed to secure and maintain sterility, the manufacturer must apply the provisions of Annex V, Sections 3 and 4.

2. The EC declaration of conformity is the part of the procedure whereby the manufacturer who fulfils the obligations imposed by Section 1 ensures and declares that the products concerned conform to the type described in the EC type-examination certificate and meet the provisions of this Directive which apply to them.The manufacturer affixes the CE marking in accordance with Article 17 and draws up a written declaration of conformity. This declaration must cover one or more medical devices manufactured, clearly identified by means of product name, product code or other unambiguous reference, and be kept by the manufacturer. The CE marking must be accompanied by the identification number of the notified body which performs the tasks referred to in this Annex.

3. Quality system

3.1. The manufacturer lodges an application for assessment of his quality system with a notified body.The application must include:— the name and address of the manufacturer,— all the relevant information on the product or product category covered by the procedure,— a written declaration specifying that no application has been lodged with any other notified body for the same products,— the documentation on the quality system,

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

107

Page 108: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

— an undertaking by the manufacturer to fulfil the obligations imposed by the quality system approved,— an undertaking by the manufacturer to keep the approved quality system adequate and efficacious,— where appropriate, the technical documentation on the types approved and a copy of the EC type-examination certificates,— an undertaking by the manufacturer to institute and keep up to date a systematic procedure to review experience gained from devices in the post-production phase, including the provisions referred to in Annex X, and to implement appropriate means to apply any necessary corrective action. This undertaking must include an obligation for the manufacturer to notify the competent authorities of the following incidents immediately on learning of them:(i) any malfunction or deterioration in the characteristics and/or performance of a device, as well as any inadequacy in the labelling or the instructions for use which might lead to or might have led to the death of a patient or user or to a serious deterioration in his state of health;(ii) any technical or medical reason connected with the characteristics or the performance of a device for the reasons referred to in subparagraph(i) leading to a systematic recall of devices of the same type by the manufacturer.

3.2. Under the quality system, each product or a representative sample of each batch is examined and the appropriate tests defined in the relevant standard(s) referred to in Article 5 or equivalent tests are carried out to ensure that the products conform to the type described in the EC type-examination certificate and fulfil the provisions of this Directive which apply to them.All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the manufacturer must be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of written measures, procedures and instructions. This quality system documentation must permit uniform interpretation of the quality programmes, quality plans, quality manuals and quality records.It must include in particular an adequate description of:— the quality objectives and the organizational structure, responsibilities and powers of the managerial staff with regard to product quality,— the examinations and tests that will be carried out after manufacture; it

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

108

Page 109: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

must be possible to trace back the calibration of the test equipment adequately,— the methods of monitoring the efficient operation of the quality system,— the quality records, such as reports concerning inspections, tests, calibration and the qualifications of the staff concerned, etc.,— where the final inspection and testing of the products, or elements thereof, are carried out by a third party, the methods of monitoring the efficient operation of the quality system and in particular the type and extent of control applied to the third party.The aforementioned checks do not apply to those aspects of the manufacturing process designed to secure sterility.

3.3. The notified body audits the quality system to determine whether it meets the requirements referred to in section 3.2. It must presume that quality systems which implement the relevant harmonized standards conform to these requirements.The assessment team must include at least one member with past experience of assessments of the technology concerned. The assessment procedure must include an inspection on the manufacturer's premises and, in duly substantiated cases, on the premises of the manufacturer's suppliers to inspect the manufacturing processes.The decision must be notified to the manufacturer. It must contain the conclusions of the inspection and a reasoned assessment.

3.4. The manufacturer must inform the notified body which approved the quality system of any plan for substantial changes to the quality system. The notified body must assess the changes proposed and verify whether after these changes the quality system will still meet the requirements referred to in Section 3.2. After receiving the abovementioned information it must notify the manufacturer of its decision. This decision must contain the conclusions of the inspection and a reasoned assessment.

4. Surveillance

4.1. The aim of surveillance is to ensure that the manufacturer duly fulfils the obligations imposed by the approved quality system.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

109

Page 110: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

4.2. The manufacturer must allow the notified body access for inspection purposes to the inspection, testing and storage locations and supply it with all relevant information, in particular:— the documentation on the quality system,— the technical documentation,— the quality records, such as inspection reports, test data, calibration data, qualification reports of the staff concerned, etc.

4.3. The notified body must periodically carry out appropriate inspections and assessments to make sure that the manufacturer applies the quality system and must supply the manufacturer with an assessment report.

4.4. In addition, the notified body may pay unannounced visits to the manufacturer.At the time of such visits, the notified body may, where necessary, carry out or ask for tests in order to check that the quality system is working properly and that the production conforms to the requirements of the Directive which apply to it. To this end, an adequate sample of the final products, taken on site by the notified body, must be examined and the appropriate tests defined in the relevant standard(s) referred to in Article 5 or equivalent tests must be carried out. Where one or more of the samples fails to conform, the notified body must take the appropriate measures. It must provide the manufacturer with an inspection report and, if a test has been carried out, with a test report.

5. Administrative provisions

5.1. The manufacturer or his authorised representative must, for a period ending at least five years, and in the case of implantable devices at least 15 years, after the last product has been manufactured, make available to the national authorities:— the declaration of conformity,— the documentation referred to in the seventh indent of Section 3.1,— the changes referred to in Section 3.4,— the decisions and reports from the notified body as referred to in the final indent of Section 3.4 and in Sections 4.3 and 4.4,— where appropriate, the certificate of conformity referred to in Annex III.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

110

Page 111: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

6. Application to devices in Class IIaIn line with Article 11(2), this Annex may apply to products in Class IIa, subject to the following:

6.1. By way of derogation from Sections 2, 3.1 and 3.2, by virtue of the declaration of conformity the manufacturer ensures and declares that the products in Class IIa are manufactured in conformity with the technical documentation referred to in Section 3 of Annex VII and meet the requirements of this Directive which apply to them.

6.2. For devices in Class IIa the notified body shall assess, as part of the assessment in Section 3.3, the technical documentation as described in Section 3 of Annex VII for at least one representative sample for each device subcategory for compliance with the provisions of this Directive.

6.3. In choosing representative sample(s) the notified body shall take into account the novelty of the technology, similarities in design, technology, manufacturing and sterilisation methods, the intended use and the results of any previous relevant assessments (e.g. with regard to physical, chemical or biological properties) that have been carried out in accordance with thisDirective. The notified body shall document and keep available to the competent authority its rationale for the sample(s) taken.

6.4. Further samples shall be assessed by the notified body as part of the surveillance assessment referred to in Section 4.3.— the descriptions and explanations necessary to understand the abovementioned drawings and diagrams and the operations of the product,— the results of the risk analysis and a list of the standards referred to in Article 5, applied in full or in part, and descriptions of the solutions adopted to meet the essential requirements of the Directive if the standards referred to in Article 5 have not been applied in full,— in the case of products placed on the market in a sterile condition, description of the methods used and the validation report,— the results of the design calculations and of the inspections carried out, etc.; if the device is to be connected to other device(s) in order to operate

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

111

Page 112: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

as intended, proof must be provided that it conforms to the essential requirements when connected to any such device(s) having the characteristics specified by the manufacturer,— the solutions adopted as referred to in Annex I, Chapter I, Section 2,— the pre-clinical evaluation,— the clinical evaluation in accordance with Annex X,— the label and instructions for use.

4. The manufacturer shall institute and keep up to date a systematic procedure to review experience gained from devices in the post-production phase, including the provisions referred to in Annex X, and to implement appropriate means to apply any necessary corrective actions, taking account of the nature and risks in relation to the product. He shall notify the competent authorities of the following incidents immediately on learning of them:

(i) any malfunction or deterioration in the characteristics and/or performance of a device, as well as any inadequacy in the labelling or the instructions for use which might lead to or might have led to the death of a patient or user or to a serious deterioration in his state of health;

(ii) any technical or medical reason connected with the characteristics on the performance of a device for the reasons referred to in subparagraph (i) leading to systematic recall of devices of the same type by the manufacturer.

5. With products placed on the market in sterile condition and Class I devices with a measuring function, the manufacturer must observe not only the provisions laid down in this Annex but also one of the procedures referred to in Annex II, IV, V or VI. Application of the abovementioned Annexes and the intervention by the notified body is limited to:— in the case of products placed on the market in sterile condition, only the aspects of manufacture concerned with securing and maintaining sterile conditions,— in the case of devices with a measuring function, only the aspects of manufacture concerned with the conformity of the products with the metrological requirements. Section 6.1. of this Annex is applicable.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

112

Page 113: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

6. Application to devices in Class IIaIn line with Article 11 (2), this Annex may apply to products in Class IIa, subject to the following derogation:

6.1. where this Annex is applied in conjunction with the procedure referred to in Annex IV, V or VI, the declaration of conformity referred to in the abovementioned Annexes forms a single declaration. As regards the declaration based on this Annex, the manufacturer must ensure and declare that the product design meets the provisions of this Directive which apply to it.

– data allowing identification of the device in question,

– a statement that the device is intended for exclusive use by a particular patient or user, identified by name, an acronym or a numerical code,

– the name of the medical practitioner or other authorised person who made out the prescription and, where applicable, the name of the health institution concerned,

– the specific characteristics of the product as indicated by the prescription,

– a statement that the device in question conforms to the essential requirements set out in Annex I and, where applicable, indicating which essential requirements have not been fully met, together with the grounds,

– where applicable, an indication that the device contains or incorporates a medicinal substance, including a human blood derivative, or tissues or cells of human origin, or of animal origin as referred to in Commission Regulation N°722/2012.

2. The manufacturer shall undertake to keep available for the competent national authorities the documentation, indicating manufacturing site(s) and allowing an understanding of the design, manufacture and performances of the product, including the expected performances, so as to allow assessment of conformity with the requirements of this Regulation.The manufacturer shall take all the measures necessary to ensure that the manufacturing process produces products which are manufactured in accordance with

ANNEX VIIISTATEMENT CONCERNING DEVICES FOR SPECIAL PURPOSES

1. For custom-made devices or for devices intended for clinical investigations the manufacturer or his authorized representative must draw up the statement containing the information stipulated in Section 2.

2. The statement must contain the following information:

2.1. for custom-made devices:— the name and address of the manufacturer,— data allowing identification of the device in question,— a statement that the device is intended for exclusive use by a particular patient, together with the name of the patient,— the name of the medical practitioner or other authorized person who made out the prescription and, where applicable, the name of the clinic concerned,— the specific characteristics of the product as indicated by the prescription,— a statement that the device in question conforms to the essential requirements set out in Annex I and, where applicable, indicating which essential requirements have not been fully met, together with the grounds;

2.2. for devices intended for the clinical investigations covered by Annex X:

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

113

Page 114: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

the documentation mentioned in the first paragraph;

3. The information contained in the declaration concerned by this Annex shall be kept for a period of time of at least five years after the device has been placed on the market. In the case of implantable devices the period shall be at least 15 years.

Section 9 of Annex VIII shall apply.

4. The manufacturer shall undertake to review and document experience gained in the post-production phase, including a PMCF referred to in Part B of Annex XIII, and to implement appropriate means to apply any necessary corrective action. This undertaking shall include an obligation for the manufacturer to notify, in accordance with Article 61(4) the competent authorities of any serious incidents and/or field safety corrective actions immediately on learning of them.

— data allowing identification of the device in question,— the clinical investigation plan,— the investigator's brochure,— the confirmation of insurance of subjects,— the documents used to obtain informed consent,— a statement indicating whether or not the device incorporates, as an integral part, a substance or human blood derivative referred to in Section 7.4 of Annex I,— a statement indicating whether or not the device is manufactured utilising tissues of animal origin as referred to in Directive 2003/32/EC,— the opinion of the ethics committee concerned and details of the aspects covered by its opinion,— the name of the medical practitioner or other authorized person and of the institution responsible for the investigations,— the place, starting date and scheduled duration for the investigations,— a statement that the device in question conforms to the essential requirements apart from the aspects covered by the investigations and that, with regard to these aspects, every precaution has been taken to protect the health and safety of the patient.

3. The manufacturer must also undertake to keep available for the competent national authorities:

3.1. For custom-made devices, documentation, indicating manufacturing site(s) and allowing an understanding of the design, manufacture and performances of the product, including the expected performances, so as to allow assessment of conformity with the requirements of this Directive.

The manufacturer must take all the measures necessary to ensure that the manufacturing process produces products which are manufactured in accordance with the documentation mentioned in the first paragraph;

3.2. For devices intended for clinical investigations, the documentation must contain:— a general description of the product and its intended use,— design drawings, methods of manufacture envisaged, in particular as regards sterilisation, and diagrams of components, sub-assemblies, circuits,

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

114

Page 115: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

etc.,— the descriptions and explanations necessary to understand the abovementioned drawings and diagrams and the operation of the product,— the results of the risk analysis and a list of the standards referred to in Article 5, applied in full or in part, and descriptions of the solutions adopted to meet the essential requirements of this Directive if the standards referred to in Article 5 have not been applied,— if the device incorporates, as an integral part, a substance or human blood derivative referred to in Section 7.4 of Annex I, the data on the tests conducted in this connection which are required to assess the safety, quality and usefulness of that substance or human blood derivative, taking account of the intended purpose of the device,— if the device is manufactured utilising tissues of animal origin as referred to in Directive 2003/32/EC, the risk management measures in this connection which have been applied to reduce the risk of infection,— the results of the design calculations, and of the inspections and technical tests carried out, etc.The manufacturer must take all the measures necessary to ensure that the manufacturing process produces products which are manufactured in accordance with the documentation referred to in the first paragraph of this Section.The manufacturer must authorise the assessment, or audit where necessary, of the effectiveness of these measures.

4. The information contained in the declarations concerned by this Annex shall be kept for a period of time of at least five years. In the case of implantable devices the period shall be at least 15 years.

5. For custom-made devices, the manufacturer must undertake to review and document experience gained in the post-production phase, including the provisions referred to in Annex X, and to implement appropriate means to apply any necessary corrective action. This undertaking must include an obligation for the manufacturer to notify the competent authorities of the following incidents immediately on learning of them and the relevant corrective actions:

(i) any malfunction or deterioration in the characteristics and/or

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

115

Page 116: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

performance of a device, as well as any inadequacy in the labelling or the instructions for use which might lead to or might have led to the death of a patient or user or to a serious deterioration in his state of health;

(ii) any technical or medical reason connected with the characteristics or performance of a device for the reasons referred to in subparagraph (i) leading to systematic recall of devices of the same type by the manufacturer.

ANNEX VIICLASSIFICATION CRITERIA

I. SPECIFIC DEFINITIONS FOR THE CLASSIFICATION RULES

1. DURATION OF USE

1.1. ‘Transient’ means normally intended for continuous use for less than 60 minutes.

1.2. ‘Short term’ means normally intended for continuous use for between 60 minutes and30 days.

1.3 ‘Long term’ means normally intended for continuous use for more than 30 days.

Annex IXCLASSIFICATION CRITERIA

I. DEFINITIONS1. Definitions for the classification rules1.1. Duration

TransientNormally intended for continuous use for less than 60 minutes.

Short termNormally intended for continuous use for not more than 30 days.

Long termNormally intended for continuous use for more than 30 days.

2. INVASIVE AND ACTIVE DEVICES

2.1. ‘Body orifice’ means any natural opening in the body, as well as the external surfaceof the eyeball, or any permanent artificial opening, such as a stoma or permanenttracheotomy.

2.2. ‘Surgically invasive device’ means(bbbbbbbbbb) an invasive device which penetrates inside the body through the surface of the body, with the aid or in the context of a surgical operation;

(cccccccccc) a device which produces penetration other than through a body orifice.

2.3. ‘Reusable surgical instrument’ means an instrument intended for surgical use by

1.2. Invasive devices

Invasive deviceA device which, in whole or in part, penetrates inside the body, either through a body orifice or through the surface of the body.

Body orificeAny natural opening in the body, as well as the external surface of the eyeball, or any permanent artificial opening, such as a stoma.

Surgically invasive deviceAn invasive device which penetrates inside the body through the surface of the body, with the aid or in the context of a surgical operation.For the purposes of this Directive devices other than those referred to in

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

116

Page 117: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

cutting, drilling, sawing, scratching, scraping, clamping, retracting, clipping or similar procedures, without connection to any active medical device and which are intended by the manufacturer to be reused after appropriate procedures for cleaning and/or sterilization have been carried out.

2.4. ‘Active therapeutic device’ means any active medical device, whether used alone or in combination with other medical devices, to support, modify, replace or restore biological functions or structures with a view to treatment or alleviation of an illness, injury or disability.

2.5.‘Active device intended for diagnosis’ means any active medical device, whether used alone or in combination with other medical devices, to supply information for detecting, diagnosing, monitoring or treating physiological conditions, states of health, illnesses or congenital deformities.

2.6. ‘Central circulatory system’ means the following blood vessels: arteriae pulmonales, aorta ascendens, arcus aorta, aorta descendens to the bifurcatio aortae, arteriae coronariae, arteria carotis communis, arteria carotis externa, arteria carotis interna, arteriae cerebrales, truncus brachiocephalicus, venae cordis, venae pulmonales, vena cava superior, vena cava inferior.

2.7. ‘Central nervous system’ means the brain, meninges and spinal cord.

the previous subparagraph and which produce penetration other than through an established body orifice, shall be treated as surgically invasive devices.

Implantable deviceAny device which is intended:— to be totally introduced into the human body or,— to replace an epithelial surface or the surface of the eye, by surgical intervention which is intended to remain in place after the procedure.Any device intended to be partially introduced into the human body through surgical intervention and intended to remain in place after the procedure for at least 30 days is also considered an implantable device.

1.3. Reusable surgical instrumentInstrument intended for surgical use by cutting, drilling, sawing, scratching, scraping, clamping, retracting, clipping or similar procedures, without connection to any active medical device and which can be reused after appropriate procedures have been carried out.

1.4. Active medical deviceAny medical device operation of which depends on a source of electrical energy or any source of power other than that directly generated by the human body or gravity and which acts by converting this energy. Medical devices intended to transmit energy, substances or other elements between an active medical device and the patient, without any significant change, are not considered to be active medical devices. Stand alone software is considered to be an active medical device.

1.5. Active therapeutical deviceAny active medical device, whether used alone or in combination with other medical devices, to support, modify, replace or restore biological functions or structures with a view to treatment or alleviation of an illness, injury or handicap.

1.6. Active device for diagnosisAny active medical device, whether used alone or in combination with other medical devices, to supply information for detecting, diagnosing,

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

117

Page 118: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

monitoring or treating physiological conditions, states of health, illnesses or congenital deformities.

1.7. Central circulatory systemFor the purposes of this Directive, ‘central circulatory system’ means the following vessels:arteriae pulmonales, aorta ascendens, arcus aorta, aorta descendens to the bifurcatio aortae, arteriae coronariae, arteria carotis communis, arteria carotis externa, arteria carotis interna, arteriae cerebrales, truncus brachiocephalicus, venae cordis, venae pulmonales, vena cava superior, vena cava inferior.

1.8. Central nervous systemFor the purposes of this Directive, ‘central nervous system’ means brain, meninges and spinal cord.

4. If the device is not intended to be used solely or principally in a specific part of the body, it shall be considered and classified on the basis of the most critical specified use.

5. If several rules, or within the same rule several sub-rules, apply to the same device based on the device’s intended purpose, the strictest rule and/or sub-rule resulting in the higher classification shall apply.

6. In calculating the duration referred to in Chapter I, Section 1 continuous use means:

(a) The entire duration of use of the same device without regard to temporary interruption of use during a procedure or, temporary removal for purposes such as cleaning or disinfection of the device. Whether the interruption of use or the removal is temporary shall be established in relation to the duration of the use prior and after the period when the use is interrupted or the device removed.

(b) The accumulated use of a device that is intended by the manufacturer to be replaced immediately with another of the same type.

7. A device is considered to allow direct diagnosis when it provides the diagnosis of the disease or condition by itself or when it provides decisive information for the

II. IMPLEMENTING RULES2. Implementing rules

2.1. Application of the classification rules shall be governed by the intended purpose of the devices.

2.2. If the device is intended to be used in combination with another device, the classification rules shall apply separately to each of the devices. Accessories are classified in their own right separately from the device with which they are used.

2.3. Software, which drives a device or influences the use of a device, falls automatically in the same class.

2.4. If the device is not intended to be used solely or principally in a specific part of the body, it must be considered and classified on the basis of the most critical specified use.

2.5. If several rules apply to the same device, based on the performance specified for the device by the manufacturer, the strictest rules resulting in the higher classification shall apply.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

118

Page 119: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

diagnosis.2.6. In calculating the duration referred to in Section 1.1 of Chapter I, continuous use means ‘an uninterrupted actual use of the device for the intended purpose’. However where usage of a device is discontinued in order for the device to be replaced immediately by the same or an identical device this shall be considered an extension of the continuous use of the device.

III. Classification rules3. NON-INVASIVE DEVICES

III. CLASSIFICATION1. Non-invasive devices

3.1 Rule 1

All non-invasive devices are in class I, unless one of the rules set out hereinafter applies.

1.1. Rule 1

All non-invasive devices are in Class I, unless one of the rules set out hereinafter applies.

3.2 Rule 2

All non-invasive devices intended for channelling or storing blood, body liquids or tissues, liquids or gases for the purpose of eventual infusion, administration or introduction into the body are in class IIa:– if they may be connected to an active medical device in class IIa or a higher class,– if they are intended for use for storing or channelling blood or other body liquids or for storing organs, parts of organs or body tissues.In all other cases they are in class I.

1.2. Rule 2

All non-invasive devices intended for channelling or storing blood, body liquids or tissues, liquids or gases for the purpose of eventual infusion, administration or introduction into the body are in Class IIa:— if they may be connected to an active medical device in Class IIa or a higher class,— if they are intended for use for storing or channelling blood or other body liquids or for storing organs, parts of organs or body tissues, in all other cases they are in Class I.

3.3. Rule 3

All non-invasive devices intended for modifying the biological or chemical composition of human tissues or cells, blood, other body liquids or other liquids intended for implantation or infusion into the body are in class IIb, unless the treatment consists of filtration, centrifugation or exchanges of gas, heat, in which case they are in class IIa.All non-invasive devices intended to be used for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or assisted reproduction technologies (ART) which are liable to act with close contact on the inner or outer cells during the IVF/ART, such as washing, separating, sperm immobilising, cryoprotecting solutions, are in class IIb.

1.3. Rule 3

All non-invasive devices intended for modifying the biological or chemical composition of blood, other body liquids or other liquids intended for infusion into the body are in Class IIb, unless the treatment consists of filtration, centrifugation or exchanges of gas, heat, in which case they are in Class IIa.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

119

Page 120: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

3.4. Rule 4

All non-invasive devices which come into contact with injured skin:– are in class I if they are intended to be used as a mechanical barrier, for compression or for absorption of exudates,– are in class IIb if they are intended to be used principally with wounds which have breached the dermis and can only heal by secondary intent,– are in class IIa in all other cases, including devices principally intended to manage the micro-environment of a wound.

1.4. Rule 4

All non-invasive devices which come into contact with injured skin:— are in Class I if they are intended to be used as a mechanical barrier, for compression or for absorption of exudates,— are in Class IIb if they are intended to be used principally with wounds which have breached the dermis and can only heal by secondary intent,— are in Class IIa in all other cases, including devices principally intended to manage the micro-environment of a wound.

4. INVASIVE DEVICES

4.1. Rule 5

All invasive devices with respect to body orifices, other than surgically invasive devices and which are not intended for connection to an active medical device or which are intended for connection to an active medical device falling within class I:– are in class I if they are intended for transient use,– are in class IIa if they are intended for short-term use, except if they are used in the oral cavity as far as the pharynx, in an ear canal up to the ear drum or in a nasal cavity, in which case they are in Class I,– are in class IIb if they are intended for long-term use, except if they are used in the oral cavity as far as the pharynx, in an ear canal up to the ear drum or in a nasal cavity and are not liable to be absorbed by the mucous membrane, in which case they are in class IIa.

All invasive devices with respect to body orifices, other than surgically invasive devices, intended for connection to an active medical device in class IIa or a higher class, are in class IIa.

2. Invasive devices

2.1. Rule 5

All invasive devices with respect to body orifices, other than surgically invasive devices and which are not intended for connection to an active medical device or which are intended for connection to an active medical device in Class I:— are in Class I if they are intended for transient use,— are in Class IIa if they are intended for short-term use, except if they are used in the oral cavity as far as the pharynx, in an ear canal up to the ear drum or in a nasal cavity, in which case they are in Class I,— are in Class IIb if they are intended for long-term use, except if they are used in the oral cavity as far as the pharynx, in an ear canal up to the ear drum or in a nasal cavity and are not liable to be absorbed by the mucous membrane, in which case they are in Class IIa.All invasive devices with respect to body orifices, other than surgically invasive devices, intended for connection to an active medical device in Class IIa or a higher class, are in Class IIa.

4.2. Rule 6

All surgically invasive devices intended for transient use are in class IIa unless they:– are intended to control, diagnose, monitor or correct a defect of the heart or of the central circulatory system through direct contact with these parts of the body, in which case they are in class III,– are reusable surgical instruments, in which case they are in class I,– are intended specifically for use in direct contact with the central nervous system, in

2.2. Rule 6

All surgically invasive devices intended for transient use are in Class IIa unless they are:— intended specifically to control, diagnose, monitor or correct a defect of the heart or of the central circulatory system through direct contact with these parts of the body, in which case they are in Class III,— reusable surgical instruments, in which case they are in Class I,

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

120

Page 121: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

which case they are in class III,– are intended to supply energy in the form of ionising radiation in which case they are in class IIb,– have a biological effect or are wholly or mainly absorbed in which case they are in class IIb,– are intended to administer medicines by means of a delivery system, if this is done in a manner that is potentially hazardous taking account of the mode of application, in which case they are in class IIb.

— intended specifically for use in direct contact with the central nervous system, in which case they are in Class III,— intended to supply energy in the form of ionising radiation in which case they are in Class IIb,— intended to have a biological effect or to be wholly or mainly absorbed in which case they are in Class IIb,— intended to administer medicines by means of a delivery system, if this is done in a manner that is potentially hazardous taking account of the mode of application, in which case they are in Class IIb.

4.3. Rule 7

All surgically invasive devices intended for short-term use are in class IIa unless they:– are intended specifically to control, diagnose, monitor or correct a defect of the heart or of the central circulatory system through direct contact with these parts of the body, in which case they are in class III,– are intended specifically for use in direct contact with the central nervous system, in which case they are in class III,– are intended to supply energy in the form of ionizing radiation in which case they are in class IIb,– have a biological effect or are wholly or mainly absorbed in which case they are in class III,– are intended to undergo chemical change in the body, except if the devices are placed in the teeth, or to administer medicines, in which case they are in class IIb.

4.4. Rule 8

All implantable devices and long-term surgically invasive devices are in class IIb unless they:– are intended to be placed in the teeth, in which case they are in class IIa,– are intended to be used in direct contact with the heart, the central circulatory system or the central nervous system, in which case they are in class III,– have a biological effect or are wholly or mainly absorbed, in which case they are in class III,– are intended to undergo chemical change in the body, except if the devices are placed in the teeth, or to administer medicines, in which case they are in class III,– are active implantable medical devices or implantable accessories to active

2.3. Rule 7

All surgically invasive devices intended for short-term use are in Class IIa unless they are intended:— either specifically to control, diagnose, monitor or correct a defect of the heart or of the central circulatory system through direct contact with these parts of the body, in which case they are in Class III, — or specifically for use in direct contact with the central nervous system, in which case they are in Class III,— or to supply energy in the form of ionizing radiation in which case they are in Class IIb,— or to have a biological effect or to be wholly or mainly absorbed in which case they are in Class III,— or to undergo chemical change in the body, except if the devices are placed in the teeth, or to administer medicines, in which case they are in Class IIb.

2.4. Rule 8

All implantable devices and long-term surgically invasive devices are in Class IIb unless they are intended:— to be placed in the teeth, in which case they are in Class IIa,— to be used in direct contact with the heart, the central circulatory system or the central nervous system, in which case they are in Class III,— to have a biological effect or to be wholly or mainly absorbed, in which case they are in Class III,— or to undergo chemical change in the body, except if the devices are

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

121

Page 122: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

implantable medical devices, in which case they are in class III,– are breast implants, in which case they are in class III,– are hip, knee or shoulder total and partial joint replacements, in which case they are in class III, with the exception of ancillary components such as screws, wedges, plates and instruments,– are spinal disc replacement implants and implantable devices that come into contact with the spinal column, in which case they are in class III.

5. ACTIVE DEVICES

5.1. Rule 9

All active therapeutic devices intended to administer or exchange energy are in class IIa unless their characteristics are such that they may administer or exchange energy to or from the human body in a potentially hazardous way, taking account of the nature, the density and site of application of the energy, in which case they are in class IIb.All active devices intended to control or monitor the performance of active therapeutic devices in class IIb, or intended directly to influence the performance of such devices are in class IIb.All active devices that are intended for controlling, monitoring or directly influencing the performance of active implantable medical devices are in class III.

5.2. Rule 10

Active devices intended for diagnosis are in class IIa:– if they are intended to supply energy which will be absorbed by the human body, except for devices used to illuminate the patient's body, in the visible spectrum,– if they are intended to image in vivo distribution of radiopharmaceuticals,– if they are intended to allow direct diagnosis or monitoring of vital physiological processes, unless they are specifically intended for monitoring of vital physiological parameters, where the nature of variations is such that it could result in immediate danger to the patient, for instance variations in cardiac performance, respiration, activity of central nervous system in which case they are in class IIb.Active devices intended to emit ionizing radiation and intended for diagnostic or therapeutic interventional radiology including devices which control or monitor such devices, or which directly influence their performance, are in class IIb.

placed in the teeth, or to administer medicines, in which case they are in Class III.

3. Additional rules applicable to active devices

3.1. Rule 9

All active therapeutic devices intended to administer or exchange energy are in Class IIa unless their characteristics are such that they may administer or exchange energy to or from the human body in a potentially hazardous way, taking account of the nature, the density and site of application of the energy, in which case they are in Class IIb.All active devices intended to control or monitor the performance of active therapeutic devices in Class IIb, or intended directly to influence the performance of such devices are in Class IIb.

3.2. Rule 10

Active devices intended for diagnosis are in Class IIa:— if they are intended to supply energy which will be absorbed by the human body, except for devices used to illuminate the patient's body, in the visible spectrum,— if they are intended to image in vivo distribution of radiopharmaceuticals,— if they are intended to allow direct diagnosis or monitoring of vital physiological processes, unless they are specifically intended for monitoring of vital physiological parameters, where the nature of variations is such that it could result in immediate danger to the patient, for instance variations in cardiac performance, respiration, activity of CNS in which case they are in Class IIb.Active devices intended to emit ionizing radiation and intended for diagnostic and therapeutic interventional radiology including devices

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

122

Page 123: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

5.3. Rule 11

All active devices intended to administer and/or remove medicines, body liquids or other substances to or from the body are in class IIa, unless this is done in a manner that is potentially hazardous, taking account of the nature of the substances involved, of the part of the body concerned and of the mode of application in which case they are in class IIb.

5.4. Rule 12

All other active devices are in class I.

6. SPECIAL RULES

6.1. Rule 13

All devices incorporating, as an integral part, a substance which, if used separately, can be considered to be a medicinal product, as defined in Article 1 of Directive 2001/83/EC, including a medicinal product constituent or derived from human blood or human plasma, with action ancillary to that of the devices, are in class III.

6.2 Rule 14

All devices used for contraception or the prevention of the transmission of sexually transmitted diseases are in class IIb, unless they are implantable or long term invasive devices, in which case they are in class III.

6.3. Rule 15

All devices intended specifically to be used for disinfecting, cleaning, rinsing or, when appropriate, hydrating contact lenses are in class IIb.All devices intended specifically to be used for disinfecting or sterilising medical devices are in class IIa, unless they are disinfecting solutions or washer-disinfectors

which control or monitor such devices, or which directly influence their performance, are in Class IIb.

Rule 11

All active devices intended to administer and/or remove medicines, body liquids or other substances to or from the body are in Class IIa, unless this is done in a manner:— that is potentially hazardous, taking account of the nature of the substances involved, of the part of the body concerned and of the mode of application in which case they are in Class IIb.

3.3. Rule 12

All other active devices are in Class I.

4. Special Rules

4.1. Rule 13

All devices incorporating, as an integral part, a substance which, if used separately, can be considered to be a medicinal product, as defined in Article 1 of Directive 2001/83/EC, and which is liable to act on the human body with action ancillary to that of the devices, are in Class III. All devices incorporating, as an integral part, a human blood derivative are in Class III.

4.2. Rule 14

All devices used for contraception or the prevention of the transmission of sexually transmitted diseases are in Class IIb, unless they are implantable or long term invasive devices, in which case they are in Class III.

4.3. Rule 15

All devices intended specifically to be used for disinfecting, cleaning, rinsing or, when appropriate, hydrating contact lenses are in Class IIb.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

123

Page 124: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

intended specifically to be used for disinfecting invasive devices, as the end point of processing, in which case they are in class IIb.This rule does not apply to devices that are intended to clean medical devices other than contact lenses by means of physical action only.

6.4. Rule 16

Devices specifically intended for recording of diagnostic images generated by X-ray, MRI, ultra-sound or other diagnostic devices are in class IIa.

6.5. Rule 17

All devices manufactured utilising tissues or cells of human or animal origin, or their derivatives, which are non-viable or rendered non-viable are in Class III, unless such devices are manufactured utilising tissues or cells of animal origin, or their derivatives, which are non-viable or rendered non-viable that are intended to comeinto contact with intact skin only.

6.6. Rule 18

By derogation from other rules, blood bags are in class IIb.

6.7. Rule 19

All devices incorporating or consisting of nanomaterial that fall under the definition contained in Commission Recommendation 2011/696/EU are in class III unless the nanomaterial is encapsulated or bound in such a manner that they cannot be released to the patient’s organs, tissues, cells or molecules.

6.8 Rule 20

All devices intended to be used for aphaeresis, such as aphaeresis machines, sets, connectors and solutions, are in class III.

6.9. Rule 21

Devices that are composed of substances or combination of substances intended to be

All devices intended specifically to be used for disinfecting medical devices are in Class IIa. Unless they are specifically to be used for disinfecting invasive devices in which case they are in Class IIb.This rule does not apply to products that are intended to clean medical devices other than contact lenses by means of physical action.

4.4. Rule 16

Devices specifically intended for recording of X-ray diagnostic images are in Class IIa.

4.5. Rule 17

All devices manufactured utilizing animal tissues or derivatives rendered non-viable are Class III except where such devices are intended to come into contact with intact skin only.

5. Rule 18

By derogation from other rules, blood bags are in Class IIb.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

124

Page 125: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

ingested, inhaled or administered rectally or vaginally and that are absorbed by or dispersed in the human body are in class III.ANNEX XIIICLINICAL EVALUATION AND POST-MARKET CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP

PART A: CLINICAL EVALUATION

1. To conduct a clinical evaluation, a manufacturer shall:

– identify the essential safety and performance requirements that require support from relevant clinical data;

– identify available clinical data relevant to the device and its intended use generated through scientific literature search, clinical experience and/or clinical investigations;

– appraise the clinical data sets by evaluating their suitability for establishing the safety and performance of the device;

– generate any new or additional clinical data needed to address outstanding issues;

– analyse all relevant clinical data to reach conclusions about the safety and performance of the device.

2. Confirmation of conformity with the requirements concerning the characteristics and performances referred to in Section 1 of Annex I, under the normal conditions of use of the device, and the evaluation of the undesirable side-effects and of the acceptability of the benefit/risk ratio referred to in Sections 1 and 5 of Annex I, shall be based on clinical data.

3. The clinical evaluation shall be thorough and objective, considering both favourable and unfavourable data. Its depth and extent shall be proportionate and appropriate to the nature, classification, intended use, manufacturer’s claims and risks of the device in question.

4. Clinical data relating to another device may be relevant where equivalence is demonstrated of the device subject to clinical evaluation to the device to which the data relates. Equivalence can only be demonstrated when the device that is subject to

ANNEX XCLINICAL EVALUATION1. General provisions

1.1. As a general rule, confirmation of conformity with the requirements concerning the characteristics and performances referred to in Sections 1 and 3 of Annex I, under the normal conditions of use of the device, and the evaluation of the side-effects and of the acceptability of the benefit/risk ratio referred to in Section 6 of Annex I, must be based on clinical data. The evaluation of this data, hereinafter referred to as ‘clinical evaluation’, where appropriate taking account of any relevant harmonised standards, must follow a defined and methodologically sound procedure based on:

1.1.1. Either a critical evaluation of the relevant scientific literature currently available relating to the safety, performance, design characteristics and intended purpose of the device, where:— there is demonstration of equivalence of the device to the device to which the data relates, and— the data adequately demonstrate compliance with the relevant essential requirements.

1.1.2. Or a critical evaluation of the results of all clinical investigations made.

1.1.3. Or a critical evaluation of the combined clinical data provided in 1.1.1 and 1.1.2.

1.1a In the case of implantable devices and devices in Class III clinical investigations shall be performed unless it is duly justified to rely on existing clinical data.

1.1b The clinical evaluation and its outcome shall be documented. This documentation shall be included and/or fully referenced in the technical documentation of the device.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

125

Page 126: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

clinical evaluation and the device to which the existing clinical data relates have thesame intended purpose and when the technical and biological characteristics of the devices and the medical procedures applied are similar to such an extent that there would be not a clinically significant difference in the safety and performance of the devices.

5. In the case of implantable devices and devices falling within class III, clinical investigations shall be performed unless it is duly justified to rely on existing clinical data alone. Demonstration of equivalence in accordance with the paragraph 4 shall generally not be considered as sufficient justification within the meaning of the first sentence of this paragraph.

6. The results of the clinical evaluation shall be documented in the clinical evaluation report which, together with the clinical data on which it is based, serves as the clinical evidence that supports the assessment of the conformity of the device.The clinical evidence together with non-clinical data generated from non-clinical testing methods and other relevant documentation shall allow the manufacturer to demonstrate conformity with the essential safety and performance requirements and shall be part of the technical documentation of the device in question.

PART B: POST-MARKET CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP

1. Post-market clinical follow-up, hereafter: PMCF, is a continuous process to update the clinical evaluation referred to in Article 49 and Part A of this Annex and shall be part of the manufacturer's post-market surveillance plan. To this end, the manufacturer shall proactively collect and evaluate clinical data from the use in or on humans of a device which is authorised to bear the CE marking, within its intended purpose as referred to in the relevant conformity assessment procedure, with the aim of confirming the safety and performance throughout the expected life-time of the device, the continued acceptability of identified risks and to detect emerging risks on the basis of factual evidence.

2. The PMCF shall be performed pursuant to a documented method laid down in a PMCF plan.

2.1. The PMCF plan shall specify the methods and procedures to proactively collect and evaluate clinical data with the aim of

1.1c The clinical evaluation and its documentation must be actively updated with data obtained from the post-market surveillance. Where post-market clinical follow-up as part of the post-market surveillance plan for the device is not deemed necessary, this must be duly justified and documented.

1.1d Where demonstration of conformity with essential requirements based on clinical data is not deemed appropriate, adequate justification for any such exclusion has to be given based on risk management output and under consideration of the specifics of the device/body interaction, the clinical performances intended and the claims of the manufacturer.Adequacy of demonstration of conformity with the essential requirements by performance evaluation, bench testing and pre-clinical evaluation alone has to be duly substantiated.

1.2. All the data must remain confidential, in accordance with the provisions of Article 20.

2. Clinical investigations

2.1. ObjectivesThe objectives of clinical investigation are:— to verify that, under normal conditions of use, the performance of the devices conform to those referred to in Section 3 of Annex I, and— to determine any undesirable side-effects, under normal conditions of use, and assess whether they constitute risks when weighed against the intended performance of the device.

2.2. Ethical considerationsClinical investigations must be carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly in Helsinki, Finland, in 1964, as last amended by the World Medical Assembly. It is mandatory that all measures relating to the protection of human subjects are carried out in the spirit of the Helsinki Declaration. This includes every step in the clinical investigation from first consideration of the need and justification of the study to publication of the results.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

126

Page 127: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

(a) confirming the safety and performance of the device throughout its expected lifetime,

(b) identifying previously unknown side-effects and monitoring the identified side-effects and contra-indications,

(c) identifying and analysing emergent risks on the basis of factual evidence,

(d) assuring the continued acceptability of the benefit/risk ratio referred to in Sections 1 and 5 of Annex I, and

(e) identifying possible systematic misuse or off-label use of the device with a view to verify the correctness of its intended purpose.

2.2. The PMCF plan shall lay down, in particular

(a) the general methods and procedures of the PMCF to be applied, such as gathering of clinical experience gained, feedback from users, screening of scientific literature and of other sources of clinical evidence;

(b) the specific methods and procedures of PMCF to be applied, such as evaluation of suitable registers or PMCF studies;

(c) a rationale for the appropriateness of the methods and procedures referred to in points (a) and (b);

(d) a reference to the relevant parts of the clinical evaluation report referred to in Section 6 of Part A of this Annex and to the risk management referred to in Section 2 of Annex I;

(e) the specific objectives to be addressed by the PMCF;

(f) an evaluation of the clinical data related to equivalent or similar devices,

(g) reference to relevant standards and guidance on PMCF.

2.3. Methods

2.3.1. Clinical investigations must be performed on the basis of an appropriate plan of investigation reflecting the latest scientific and technical knowledge and defined in such a way as to confirm or refute the manufacturer's claims for the device; these investigations must include an adequate number of observations to guarantee the scientific validity of the conclusions.

2.3.2. The procedures used to perform the investigations must be appropriate to the device under examination.

2.3.3. Clinical investigations must be performed in circumstances similar to the normal conditions of use of the device.

2.3.4. All the appropriate features, including those involving the safety and performances of the device, and its effect on patients must be examined.

2.3.5. All serious adverse events must be fully recorded and immediately notified to all competent authorities of the Member States in which the clinical investigation is being performed.

2.3.6. The investigations must be performed under the responsibility of a medical practitioner or another authorized qualified person in an appropriate environment.The medical practitioner or other authorized person must have access to the technical and clinical data regarding the device.

2.3.7. The written report, signed by the medical practitioner or other authorized person responsible, must contain a critical evaluation of all the data collected during the clinical investigation.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

127

Page 128: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

3. The manufacturer shall analyse the findings of the PMCF and document the results in a PMCF evaluation report that shall be part of the technical documentation.

4. The conclusions of the PMCF evaluation report shall be taken into account for the clinical evaluation referred to in Article 49 and Part A of this Annex and in the risk management referred to in Section 2 of Annex I. If through the PMCF the need for corrective measures has been identified, the manufacturer shall implement them.ANNEX VIMINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TO BEMET BY NOTIFIED BODIESORGANISATIONAL AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

1.ORGANISATIONAL AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

1.1 Legal status and organisational structure

1.1.1. A notified body shall be established under the national law of a Member State, or under the law of a third country with which the Union has concluded an agreement in this respect, and shall have full documentation of its legal personality and status.This shall include information about ownership and the legal or natural personsexercising control over the notified body.

1.1.2. If the notified body is a legal entity that is part of a larger organisation, the activities of this organisation as well as its organisational structure and governance, and the relationship with the notified body shall be clearly documented.

1.1.3. If the notified body wholly or partly owns legal entities established in a Member State or in a third country, the activities and responsibilities of those entities, as well as their legal and operational relationships with the notified body, shall be clearly defined and documented.

1.1.4. The organisational structure, distribution of responsibilities and operation of the notified body shall be such that it assures confidence in the performance and results of the conformity assessment activities conducted.

ANNEX XICRITERIA TO BE MET FOR THE DESIGNATION OF NOTIFIED BODIES

1. The notified body, its Director and the assessment and verification staff shall not be the designer, manufacturer, supplier, installer or user of the devices which they inspect, nor the authorized representative of any of these persons.They may not be directly involved in the design, construction, marketing or maintenance of the devices, nor represent the parties engaged in these activities. This in no way precludes the possibility of exchanges of technical information between the manufacturer and the body.

2. The notified body and its staff must carry out the assessment and verification operations with the highest degree of professional integrity and the requisite competence in the field of medical devices and must be free from all pressures and inducements, particularly financial, which might influence their judgment or the results of the inspection, especially from persons or groups of persons with an interest in the results of the verifications. Should the notified body subcontract specific tasks connected with the establishment and verification of the facts, it must first ensure that the subcontractor meets the provisions of the Directive and, in particular, of this Annex.The notified body shall keep at the disposal of the national authorities the relevant documents assessing the subcontractor's qualifications and the work carried out by the subcontractor under this Directive.

3. The notified body must be able to carry out all the tasks assigned to such bodies by one of Annexes II to VI and for which it has been notified, whether these tasks are carried out by the body itself or on its

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

128

Page 129: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

The organisational structure and the functions, responsibilities and authority of its top-level management and of other personnel with influence upon the performance and results of the conformity assessment activities shall be clearly documented.

1.2. Independence and impartiality

1.2.1. The notified body shall be a third-party body that is independent of the manufacturer of the product in relation to which it performs conformity assessment activities. The notified body shall also be independent of any other economic operator having an interest in the product as well as of any competitor of the manufacturer.

1.2.2. The notified body shall be organised and operated so as to safeguard theindependence, objectivity and impartiality of its activities. The notified body shall have procedures in place that effectively ensure identification, investigation and resolution of any case in which a conflict of interests may arise, including involvement in consultancy services in the field of medical devices prior to taking up employment with the notified body.

1.2.3. The notified body, its top-level management and the personnel responsible for carrying out the conformity assessment tasks shall not

– be the designer, manufacturer, supplier, installer, purchaser, owner, user or maintainer of the products, nor the authorised representative of any of those parties. This shall not preclude the purchase and use of assessed products that are necessary for the operations of the notified body (e.g. measuring equipment), the conduct of the conformity assessment or the use of such products for personal purposes;

– be directly involved in the design, manufacture or construction, the marketing, installation, use or maintenance of the products which they assess, or represent the parties engaged in those activities. They shall not engage in any activity that may conflict with their independence of judgement or integrity in

responsibility. In particular, it must have the necessary staff and possess the facilities needed to perform properly the technical and administrative tasks entailed in assessment and verification. This presupposes the availability of sufficient scientific staff within the organisation who possess experience and knowledge sufficient to assess the medical functionality and performance of devices for which it has been notified, having regard to the requirements of this Directive and, in particular, those set out in Annex I. It must also have access to the equipment necessary for the verifications required.

4. The notified body must have:— sound vocational training covering all the assessment and verification operations for which the body has been designated,— satisfactory knowledge of the rules on the inspections which they carry out and adequate experience of such inspections,— the ability required to draw up the certificates, records and reports to demonstrate that the inspections have been carried out.

5. The impartiality of the notified body must be guaranteed. Their remuneration must not depend on the number of inspections carried out, nor on the results of the inspections.

6. The body must take out civil liability insurance, unless liability is assumed by the State under domestic legislation or the Member State itself carries out the inspections directly.

7. The staff of the notified body are bound to observe professional secrecy with regard to all information gained in the course of their duties (except vis-à-vis the competent administrative authorities of the State in which their activities are carried out) pursuant to this Directive or any provision of national law putting it into effect.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

129

Page 130: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

relation to conformity assessment activities for which they are notified;

– offer or provide any service which may jeopardise the confidence in the irindependence, impartiality or objectivity. In particular, they shall not offer or provide consultancy services to the manufacturer, his authorised representative, a supplier or a commercial competitor as regards the design, construction, marketing or maintenance of the products or processes under assessment. This does not preclude general training activities relating to medical device regulations or related standards that are not client specific.

1.2.4. The impartiality of the notified bodies, of their top level management and of the assessment personnel shall be guaranteed. The remuneration of the top level management and assessment personnel of a notified body shall not depend on the results of the assessments.

1.2.5. If a notified body is owned by a public entity or institution, independence and absence of any conflict of interests must be ensured and documented between, on the one hand, the national authority responsible for notified bodies and/or competent authority and, on the other hand, the notified body.

1.2.6. The notified body shall ensure and document that the activities of its subsidiaries or subcontractors, or of any associated body, do not affect its independence, impartiality or objectivity of its conformity assessment activities.

1.2.7. The notified body shall operate in accordance with a set of consistent, fair and reasonable terms and conditions, taking into account the interests of small and medium-sized enterprises as defined by Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC.

1.2.8. The requirements of this section in no way preclude exchanges of technical information and regulatory guidance between a notified body and a manufacturer seeking their conformity assessment.

1.3. Confidentiality

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

130

Page 131: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

The personnel of a notified body shall observe professional secrecy with regard to all information obtained in carrying out their tasks under this Regulation, except in relation to the national authorities responsible for notified bodies, competent authorities or the Commission. Proprietary rights shall be protected. To this end, the notified body shall have documented procedures in place.

1.4. LiabilityThe notified body shall take out appropriate liability insurance that corresponds to the conformity assessment activities for which it is notified, including the possible suspension, restriction or withdrawal of certificates, and the geographic scope of its activities, unless liability is assumed by the State in accordance with national law, or the Member State itself is directly responsible for the conformity assessment.

1.5. Financial requirementsThe notified body shall have at its disposal the financial resources required toconduct its conformity assessment activities and related business operations. It shall document and provide evidence of its financial capacity and its sustainable economic viability, taking into account specific circumstances during an initial start-up phase.

1.6. Participation in coordination activities

1.6.1. The notified body shall participate in, or ensure that its assessment personnel is informed of the relevant standardisation activities and the activities of the notified body coordination group and that its assessment and decision making personnel are informed of all relevant legislation, guidance and best practice documents adopted in the framework of this Regulation.

1.6.2. The notified body shall adhere to a code of conduct, addressing among other things, ethical business practices for notified bodies in the field of medical devices that is accepted by the national authorities responsible for notified bodies. The code of conduct shall provide for a mechanism of monitoring and verification of its implementation by notified bodies.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

131

Page 132: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

2. QUALITY MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS

2.1. The notified body shall establish, document, implement, maintain and operate a quality management system that is appropriate to the nature, area and scale of its conformity assessment activities and capable of supporting and demonstrating the consistent achievement of the requirements of this Regulation.

2.2. The quality management system of the notified body shall at least address the following:– policies for assignment of personnel to activities and their responsibilities;– decision-making process in accordance with the tasks, responsibilities and roleof the top-level management and other notified body personnel;– control of documents;– control of records;– management review;– internal audits;– corrective and preventive actions;– complaints and appeals.

3. RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS

3.1. General

3.1.1. A notified body shall be capable of carrying out all the tasks assigned to it by this Regulation with the highest degree of professional integrity and the requisite technical competence in the specific field, whether those tasks are carried out by the notified body itself or on its behalf and under its responsibility.In particular, it shall have the necessary personnel and shall possess or have access to all equipment and facilities needed to perform properly the technical and administrative tasks entailed in the conformity assessment activities in

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

132

Page 133: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

relation to which it has been notified.This presupposes the availability within its organisation of sufficient scientific personnel who possess experience and knowledge sufficient to assess the medical functionality and performance of devices for which it has been notified, having regard to the requirements of this Regulation and, in particular, those set out in Annex I.

3.1.2. At all times and for each conformity assessment procedure and each kind or category of products in relation to which it has been notified, a notified body shall have within its organisation the necessary administrative, technical and scientific personnel with technical knowledge and sufficient and appropriate experience relating to medical devices and the corresponding technologies to perform the conformity assessment tasks, including the assessment of clinical data.

3.1.3. The notified body shall clearly document the extent and the limits of the duties, responsibilities and authorities in relation of the personnel involved in conformity assessment activities and inform the personnel concerned about it.

3.2. Qualification criteria in relation to personnel

3.2.1. The Notified Body shall establish and document qualification criteria andprocedures for selection and authorisation of persons involved in conformityassessment activities (knowledge, experience and other competence required) and the required training (initial and ongoing training). The qualification criteria shall address the various functions within the conformity assessment process (e.g. auditing, product evaluation/testing, design dossier/file review, decision-making) as well as the devices, technologies and areas (e.g. biocompatibility, sterilisation, tissues and cells of human and animal origin, clinical evaluation) covered by the scope of designation.

3.2.2. The qualification criteria shall refer to the scope of the notified body's designation in accordance with the scope description used by the Member State for the notification referred to in Article 33, providing sufficient level of detail

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

133

Page 134: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

for the required qualification within the subdivisions of the scope description.Specific qualification criteria shall be defined for the assessment of biocompatibility aspects, clinical evaluation and the different types of sterilisation processes.

3.2.3. The personnel responsible for authorising other personnel to perform specific conformity assessment activities and the personnel with overall responsibility for the final review and decision-making on certification shall be employed by the notified body itself and shall not be subcontracted. These personnel altogether shall have proven knowledge and experience in the following:– Union medical devices legislation and relevant guidance documents;

– the conformity assessment procedures in accordance with this Regulation;

– a broad base of medical device technologies, the medical device industry andthe design and manufacture of medical devices;

– the notified body’s quality management system and related procedures;

– the types of qualifications (knowledge, experience and other competence)required for carrying out conformity assessments in relation to medical devicesas well as the relevant qualification criteria;

– training relevant to personnel involved in conformity assessment activities inrelation to medical devices;

– the ability to draw up certificates, records and reports demonstrating that theconformity assessments have been appropriately carried out.

3.2.4. Notified bodies shall have available personnel with clinical expertise. This personnel shall be integrated in the notified body's decision-making process in a steady way in order to:

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

134

Page 135: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

– identify when specialist input is required for the assessment of the clinicalevaluation conducted by the manufacturer and identify appropriately qualifiedexperts;

– appropriately train external clinical experts in the relevant requirements of this Regulation, delegated and/or implementing acts, harmonised standards, CTS and guidance documents and ensure that the external clinical experts are fully aware of the context and implication of their assessment and advice provided;

– be able to discuss the clinical data contained within the manufacturer's clinicalevaluation with the manufacturer and with external clinical experts and toappropriately guide external clinical experts in the assessment of the clinicalevaluation;

– be able to scientifically challenge the clinical data presented, and the results of the external clinical experts' assessment of the manufacturer's clinicalevaluation;

– be able to ascertain the comparability and consistency of the clinical assessments conducted by clinical experts;

– be able to make an objective clinical judgement about the assessment of themanufacturer's clinical evaluation and make a recommendation to the notifiedbody's decision maker.

3.2.5. The personnel responsible for carrying out product related review (e.g. design dossier review, technical documentation review or type examination including aspects such as clinical evaluation, biological safety, sterilisation, software validation) shall have the following proven qualification:

– successful completion of a university or a technical college degree or equivalent qualification in relevant studies, e.g. medicine, natural science or engineering;

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

135

Page 136: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

– four years professional experience in the field of healthcare products or related sectors (e.g. industry, audit, healthcare, research experience) whilst two years of this experience shall be in the design, manufacture, testing or use of thedevice or technology to be assessed or related to the scientific aspects to beassessed;

– appropriate knowledge of the general safety and performance requirements laid down in Annex I as well as related delegated and/or implementing acts,harmonised standards, CTS and guidance documents;

– appropriate knowledge and experience of risk management and related medical device standards and guidance documents;

– appropriate knowledge and experience of the conformity assessment procedures laid down in Annexes VIII to X, in particular of those aspects for which they are authorised, and adequate authority to carry out those assessments.

3.2.6. The personnel responsible for carrying out audits of the manufacturer's quality management system shall have the following proven qualification:– successful completion of a university or a technical college degree or equivalent qualification in relevant studies, e.g. medicine, natural science or engineering;

– four years professional experience in the field of healthcare products or related sectors (e.g. industry, audit, healthcare, research experience) whilst two years of this experience shall be in the area of quality management;

– appropriate knowledge of the medical devices legislation as well as relateddelegated and/or implementing acts, harmonised standards, CTS and guidancedocuments;

– appropriate knowledge and experience of risk management and related

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

136

Page 137: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

medical device standards and guidance documents;

– appropriate knowledge of quality management systems and related standardsand guidance documents

– appropriate knowledge and experience of the conformity assessment procedures laid down in Annexes VIII to X, in particular of those aspects for which they are authorised, and adequate authority to carry out the audits;

– training in auditing techniques enabling them to challenge quality managementsystems.

3.3. Documentation of qualification, training and authorisation of personnel

3.3.1. The notified body shall have a process in place to fully document the qualification of each personnel involved in conformity assessment activities and the satisfaction of the qualification criteria referred to in Section 3.2. Where in exceptional circumstances the fulfilment of the qualification criteria set out in Section 3.2 cannot be fully demonstrated, the notified body shall appropriately justify the authorization of these personnel to carry out specific conformity assessment activities.

3.3.2. For its personnel referred to in Sections 3.2.3 to 3.2.6, the notified body shall establish and maintain up to date:– a matrix detailing the responsibilities of the personnel in respect of the conformity assessment activities;– records demonstrating the required knowledge and experience for the conformity assessment activity for which they are authorised.

3.4. Subcontractors and external experts

3.4.1. Without prejudice to the limitations emanating from Section 3.2., notified

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

137

Page 138: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

bodies may subcontract clearly defined parts of the conformity assessment activities. The subcontracting of the auditing of quality management systems or of product related reviews as a whole is not allowed.

3.4.2. Where a notified body subcontracts conformity assessment activities either to an organisation or an individual, it shall have a policy describing the conditions under which subcontracting may take place. Any subcontracting or consultation of external experts shall be properly documented and be subject to a written agreement covering, among others, confidentiality and conflict of interests.

3.4.3. Where subcontractors or external experts are used in the context of the conformity assessment, in particular regarding novel, invasive and implantable medical devices or technologies, the notified body shall have adequate own competence in each product area for which it is designated to lead the conformity assessment, to verify the appropriateness and validity of expert opinions and make the decision on the certification.

3.4.4. The notified body shall establish procedures for assessing and monitoring the competence of all subcontractors and external experts used.

3.5. Monitoring of competences and training

3.5.1. The notified body shall appropriately monitor the satisfactory performance of the conformity assessment activities by its personnel.

3.5.2. It shall review the competence of its personnel and identify training needs in order to maintain the required level of qualification and knowledge.

4. PROCESS REQUIREMENTS

4.1. The notified body's decision-making process shall be clearly documented, including the process for the issue, suspension, reinstatement, withdrawal or refusal of conformity assessment certificates, their

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

138

Page 139: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

modification or restriction and the issue of supplements.

4.2. The notified body shall have in place a documented process for the conduct of the conformity assessment procedures for which it is designated taking into account their respective specificities, including legally required consultations, in respect of the different categories of devices covered by the scope of notification, ensuring transparency and the ability of reproduction of those procedures.

4.3. The notified body shall have in place documented procedures covering at least:– the application for conformity assessment by a manufacturer or by an authorised representative,– the processing of the application, including the verification of the completeness of the documentation, the qualification of the product as device and its classification,– the language of the application, of the correspondence and of the documentation to be submitted,– the terms of the agreement with the manufacturer or authorised representative,– the fees to be charged for conformity assessment activities,– the assessment of relevant changes to be submitted for prior approval,– the planning of surveillance,– the renewal of certificates.ANNEX IVCE MARKING OF CONFORMITY

388. The CE marking shall consist of the initials ‘CE’ taking the following form:

389. If the CE marking is reduced or enlarged the proportions given in the above graduated drawing shall be respected.

390. The various components of the CE marking shall have substantially the same vertical dimension, which may not be less than 5 mm. This minimum dimension may be waived for small-scale devices.

ANNEX XIICE MARKING OF CONFORMITY

The CE conformity marking shall consist of the initials ‘CE’ taking the following form:— If the marking is reduced or enlarged the proportions given in the abovegraduated drawing must be respected.— The various components of the CE marking must have substantially the same vertical dimension, which may not be less than 5 mm.This minimum dimension may be waived for small-scale devices.

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

139

Page 140: COMPARISON DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC – PROPOSAL FOR …gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gps/images/stories/descargas/A…  · Web viewComparison between . the European Commission’s proposal

Brussels, 26 September 2012

This document is for documentation purposes only. AESGP does not assume any liability for its contents. For authenticity please refer to the original and official documents.

140