comparison between tturbulent and … · spain. ()www cnh2 es (*)() ernesto amores@cnh2...

1
COMPARISON BETWEEN T COMPARISON BETWEEN T COMPARISON BETWEEN T BUBBLY FLOW FOR MODE BUBBLY -FLOW FOR MODE BUBBLY FLOW FOR MODE (*) E Amores Vera (*) J Rodríguez Ruiz E. Amores Vera () , J. Rodríguez Ruiz Centro Nacional del Hidrógeno Prolongación Fernando Centro Nacional del Hidrógeno. Prolongación Fernando 13500 Puertollano (Ciudad Real) SPAIN www cnh2 es 13500 Puertollano (Ciudad Real). SPAIN. www.cnh2.es (*) @ h2 Tl 34 926 420 682 (*) ernesto amores@cnh2 es Tel: +34 926 420 682 () [email protected] , Tel: +34 926 420 682 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Hydrogen production by water electrolysis combined with renewable Hydrogen production by water electrolysis combined with renewable i i f h i ll fi dl hd d energies is one of the most environmentally friendly methods, compared to traditional technologies based on fossil fuels since no CO emissions are to traditional technologies based on fossil fuels since no CO 2 emissions are generated generated. O tl tH O tl tH2 Outlet H2 Outlet H2 One of the most critical aspects on One of the most critical aspects on t l t l i i th li id water electrolysis is the gasliquid H2 H2 separation especially in systems + H + H separation, especially in systems et ter et ter with an electrolyte being nle wat nle wat with an electrolyte being i ltd b (f d I w I w recirculated by a pump (forced convection) [1] The main problem r + H2 convection) [1]. The main problem ter ater d H of this kind of circulation is that a wat wa rsed of this kind of circulation is that a f ti ld t t th et w let per gas fraction could return to the Outl Out Disp electrolysis circuit which may have O O D electrolysis circuit, which may have undesiderable consequences, such undesiderable consequences, such th f ti f l i as the formation of explosive (a) (b) mixtures and pump damages [2] (a) Pump OFF (b) Pump ON mixtures and pump damages [2] Pump OFF Pump ON (Figure 1). Fi 1 G Li id t (Figure 1). Fig 1. Gas-Liquid separator A suitable design of separator devices could be a solution in order to avoid A suitable design of separator devices could be a solution in order to avoid t t th l t l i i it I thi th f t a gas return to the electrolysis circuit. In this sense, the use of gas traps or deflectors might reduce hydrogen suction by pump action However deflectors might reduce hydrogen suction by pump action. However, introduction of traps or new bodies inside the separator could strongly introduction of traps or new bodies inside the separator could strongly i fl th fl id d i f d li id d t bl h influence the fluid dynamic of gas and liquids, and turbulence phenomena could be generated (Figure 2) could be generated (Figure 2). The present work reports a comparison between laminar and turbulent The present work reports a comparison between laminar and turbulent b bbl fl dl h l h d ff b b h bubblyflow modules. The aim is to evaluate the differences between both modules and whether the simplifications adopted for laminar regime modules, and whether the simplifications adopted for laminar regime correctly describe the behavior of twophase flow within the separator correctly describe the behavior of two phase flow within the separator . GEOMETRY & SET UP GEOMETRY & SETUP The geometry of the liquid-gas interface The geometry of the (out for hydrogen, model (Figure 3) water level) as designed in 2D was designed in 2D, including the gas including the gas Inlet traps, and considering onl the dering only the Gas domain occupied by traps domain occupied by S the twophase flow nt- ( ater h drogen) Poi (waterhydrogen). P Outlet h i lifi Another simplifica(a) Standard (b) Separator tions were made in (a) Standard separator (b) Separator used in the model Wall tions were made in separator used in the model Wall order to reduce the Fi 3 G t i l td order to reduce the dl l i Fig 2. Types of separators Fig 3. Geometry implemented model complexity . COMPUTATIONAL METHODS COMPUTATIONAL METHODS COMPUTATIONAL METHODS O (k d l) LAMINAR BUBBLY FLOW TURBULENT BUBBLY FLOW (ke model) Both laminar bubbly flow equations and the following ones: ( ) ( ) F I u T l r r r r r r r r r φ φ φ φ 2 Both laminar bubbly flow equations and the following ones: ( ) ( ) F g I u u u p u u t l l l T l l T l l l l l l l l l + + + + + −∇ = + ρ φ η η φ ρ φ ρ φ 3 ( ) k l k T l l l S P k k u k + + + = + ε ρ μ μ ρ ρ · · r ( ) ( ) ( ) k l k k l l l S P k k u t + + + + ε ρ σ μ ρ ρ ( ) ( ) 0 = + + + g g g l l l g g l l u u t r r ρ φ ρ φ ρ φ ρ φ ( ) T ε ε ε μ ε 2 r t ( ) ρ φ ( ) ep k S C k C P k C u t k l k T l l l = + + + = + ε ε ε ρ ε ε σ μ μ ε ρ ε ρ ε ε ε ε , · · 2 1 r ( ) gl g g g g g m u t = + r ρ φ ρ φ ε ( ) ( ) [ ] T k 2 t ( ) ( ) [ ] slip g k k T l l l k l u p C S u u u P k C ep r r r r · , : , , T T = + = = = φ μ ε ρ μ ε μ ε TURBULENT AND LAMINAR TURBULENT AND LAMINAR TURBULENT AND LAMINAR LING H2 / H2O SEPARATION LING H2 / H2O SEPARATION LING H2 / H2O SEPARATION o El Santo s/n o El Santo s/n. s s RESULTS RESULTS Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the obtained results for laminar and turbulent b bbl flo fl id d namics sim lations of a gas liq id separator in the bubbly flow fluid dynamics simulations of a gasliquid separator in the same operation conditions Evolution of gas distribution and speed same operation conditions. Evolution of gas distribution and speed profiles are shown. As can be seen, in both cases with increasing time gas goes do n into the separator de to effect of the p mp Ho e er strong goes down into the separator, due to effect of the pump. However, strong fluctuations are observed in the case of laminar bubbly flow results fluctuations are observed in the case of laminar bubbly flow results. 0 04 0.04 0.03 0 02 0.02 0.01 0.00 300s 200s 120s 60s 40s 20s 0s Fig 4. Gas fraction (surface) and velocity profiles (arrows) obtained by laminar bubbly flow 0.016 0.012 0.012 0 008 0.008 0 004 0.004 300 200 120 60 40 20 0 0.00 300s 200s 120s 60s 40s 20s 0s Fig 5 Gas fraction (surface) and velocity profiles (arrows) obtained by turbulent bubbly flow Fig 5. Gas fraction (surface) and velocity profiles (arrows) obtained by turbulent bubbly flow I Fi 6 th 0 003 In Figure 6 the evo0.003 lution of the gas TO (1) lution of the gas 0 0024 RN T IT ( fraction measured on 0.0024 UR CU fraction measured on it S (Fi 3) Point-S ET CIRC pointS (Figure 3) 0 0018 N R S C with time is 0.0018 ON YSIS with time is CTI OLY presented. Laminar 0 0012 RAC TRO presented. Laminar i l ti h 0.0012 FR CT simulations show ME LE strong fluctuations 0 0006 LUM E E TURBULENT strong fluctuations, 0.0006 VOL THE LAMINAR while a sweet curve V T LAMINAR while a sweet curve bt i d f 0.0 was obtained for 0.0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 turbulent bubbly TIME (s) turbulent bubbly TIME (s) flow simulation (k-e Fig 6 Volume gas fraction measured in point S d l) Fig 6. Volume gas fraction measured in point-S model). CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS Introduction of deflectors or gastraps increases turbulence phenomena Introduction of deflectors or gas traps increases turbulence phenomena Turbulence bubbly flow model allows a suitable analysis of turbulence Turbulence bubbly flow model allows a suitable analysis of turbulence d i i lti h fl dynamics in multiphase flow Ft d l t ill b i td t th i f th t Future development will be oriented to the comparison of the present results with other simulation modules which take into account the gasresults with other simulation modules which take into account the gasliquid interface. liquid interface. REFERENCES REFERENCES [1] Takeuchi M., Furtua T ., Efficiency and twophase flow of alkaline water electrolysis under forced convection of electrolyte Annals of Assembly for Int Heat Transfer Conference 13 2006 forced convection of electrolyte, Annals of Assembly for Int. Heat Transfer Conference 13, 2006 [2] Hug W Divisek J Mergel J Seeger W Steeb H Highly efficient advanced alkaline [2] Hug W ., Divisek J., Mergel J., Seeger W ., Steeb H., Highly efficient advanced alkaline l l f l i I J Hd E 9 (1992) 699 electrolyzer for solar operation, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 9 (1992) 699 Project EXSIVA was financed by:

Upload: others

Post on 10-Oct-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: COMPARISON BETWEEN TTURBULENT AND … · SPAIN. ()www cnh2 es (*)() ernesto amores@cnh2 esernesto.amores@cnh2.es@h2, Tel: +34 926 420 682T l 34 926 420 682Tel: +34 926 420 682 INTRODUCTION

COMPARISON BETWEEN TCOMPARISON BETWEEN TCOMPARISON BETWEEN TBUBBLY FLOW FOR MODEBUBBLY-FLOW FOR MODEBUBBLY FLOW FOR MODE

(*)E Amores Vera(*) J Rodríguez RuizE. Amores Vera( ), J. Rodríguez Ruiz, gCentro Nacional del Hidrógeno Prolongación FernandoCentro Nacional del Hidrógeno. Prolongación Fernando13500 Puertollano (Ciudad Real) SPAIN www cnh2 es13500 Puertollano (Ciudad Real). SPAIN. www.cnh2.es( )

(*) @ h2 T l 34 926 420 682(*) ernesto amores@cnh2 es Tel: +34 926 420 682( ) [email protected], Tel: +34 926 420 682

INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION

Hydrogen production by water electrolysis combined with renewableHydrogen production by water electrolysis combined with renewablei i f h i ll f i dl h d denergies is one of the most environmentally ‐ friendly methods, comparedg y y , p

to traditional technologies based on fossil fuels since no CO emissions areto traditional technologies based on fossil fuels since no CO2 emissions aregeneratedgenerated.

O tl t H O tl t H2Outlet H2 Outlet H2

One of the most critical aspects onOne of the most critical aspects ont l t l i i th li idwater electrolysis is the gas‐liquid

H2

H2y g q

separation especially in systems + H

+ H

separation, especially in systems

et

ter

et

ter

with an electrolyte being nle

wat nle

watwith an electrolyte being

i l t d b (f d

I w I w

recirculated by a pump (forcedy p p (convection) [1] The main problem r +

H

2convection) [1]. The main problem

ter

ater d H

of this kind of circulation is that a wat wa

rsedof this kind of circulation is that a

f ti ld t t th

et w

let

per

gas fraction could return to the

Out

l

Out

Dis

pgelectrolysis circuit which may have

O O D

electrolysis circuit, which may haveundesiderable consequences, suchundesiderable consequences, such

th f ti f l ias the formation of explosive (a) (b)pmixtures and pump damages [2]

(a) Pump OFF

(b) Pump ONmixtures and pump damages [2] Pump OFF Pump ON

(Figure 1). Fi 1 G Li id t(Figure 1). Fig 1. Gas-Liquid separator

A suitable design of separator devices could be a solution in order to avoidA suitable design of separator devices could be a solution in order to avoidt t th l t l i i it I thi th f ta gas return to the electrolysis circuit. In this sense, the use of gas traps org y g p

deflectors might reduce hydrogen suction by pump action Howeverdeflectors might reduce hydrogen suction by pump action. However,introduction of traps or new bodies inside the separator could stronglyintroduction of traps or new bodies inside the separator could stronglyi fl th fl id d i f d li id d t b l hinfluence the fluid dynamic of gas and liquids, and turbulence phenomenay g q pcould be generated (Figure 2)could be generated (Figure 2).

The present work reports a comparison between laminar and turbulentThe present work reports a comparison between laminar and turbulentb bbl fl d l h l h d ff b b hbubbly‐flow modules. The aim is to evaluate the differences between bothymodules and whether the simplifications adopted for laminar regimemodules, and whether the simplifications adopted for laminar regimecorrectly describe the behavior of two‐phase flow within the separatorcorrectly describe the behavior of two phase flow within the separator.

GEOMETRY & SET UPGEOMETRY & SET‐UPG O & S U

The geometry of theliquid-gas interface The geometry of the(out for hydrogen, model (Figure 3)water level)

ode ( gu e 3)as designed in 2Dwas designed in 2D,

including the gasincluding the gasInlet traps, and consi‐t aps, a d co s

dering onl thedering only theGas domain occupied bytraps domain occupied by

S

the two‐phase flownt- t e t o p ase o

( ater h drogen)Poi

(water‐hydrogen).P

Outlet h i lifiAnother simplifica‐

(a) Standard (b) Separatorp

tions were made in(a) Standard separator

(b) Separator used in the model Wall

tions were made inseparator used in the model Wall

order to reduce theFi 3 G t i l t d

order to reduce thed l l iFig 2. Types of separators Fig 3. Geometry implemented model complexity.p y

COMPUTATIONAL METHODSCOMPUTATIONAL METHODSCOMPUTATIONAL METHODS

O (k d l)LAMINAR BUBBLY FLOW TURBULENT BUBBLY FLOW (k‐emodel)

Both laminar bubbly flow equations and the following ones:

( ) ( ) FIu Tlrrrrrrrr

r⎤⎡⎟⎞

⎜⎛ ∇∇∇∇∇∇

∂ φφφφ 2Both laminar bubbly flow equations and the following ones:

⎤⎡ ⎞⎛( ) ( ) FgIuuupuut lll

TllTllllll

lll

rrrrrr+⋅⋅+⎥

⎤⎢⎣

⎡⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛ ⋅∇⋅−∇+∇⋅+⋅⋅∇+−∇=∇⋅⋅⋅+

∂∂⋅⋅ ρφηηφρφρφ

3 ( ) klkT

lll SPkkuk+−+⎥

⎤⎢⎡

∇⎟⎟⎞

⎜⎜⎛

+∇=∇+∂ ερμμρρ ··r⎦⎣ ⎠⎝

( ) ( )∂

( ) klkk

lll SPkkut

++⎥⎦

⎢⎣

∇⎟⎟⎠

⎜⎜⎝

+∇∇+∂

ερσ

μρρ

( ) ( ) 0=⋅⋅+⋅⋅⋅∇+⋅+⋅∂∂

ggglllggll uut

rr ρφρφρφρφ( ) T ⎥

⎤⎢⎡

⎟⎞

⎜⎛∂ εεεμε 2r∂t

( )⋅∂ ρφ( ) ep

kSC

kCP

kCu

t klkT

lll =+−+⎥⎦

⎢⎣

∇⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛+∇=∇+

∂∂ εεερεε

σμμερερ εεεε

,·· 21r

( ) glggggg mu

t−=⋅⋅∇+

∂⋅∂ rρφρφ ⎦⎣ ⎠⎝ ε

( )( )[ ]Tk 2ggggt∂ ( )( )[ ] slipgkkT

lllkl upCSuuuPkCep rrrr · , : , , TT ∇−=∇+∇∇=== φμε

ρμε μ ε

TURBULENT AND LAMINARTURBULENT AND LAMINARTURBULENT AND LAMINAR LING H2 / H2O SEPARATIONLING H2 / H2O SEPARATIONLING H2 / H2O SEPARATION

o El Santo s/no El Santo s/n. ss

RESULTSRESULTS

Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the obtained results for laminar and turbulentgu e a d gu e 5 s o t e obta ed esu ts o a a a d tu bu e tb bbl flo fl id d namics sim lations of a gas liq id separator in thebubbly flow fluid dynamics simulations of a gas‐liquid separator in thesame operation conditions Evolution of gas distribution and speedsame operation conditions. Evolution of gas distribution and speedprofiles are shown. As can be seen, in both cases with increasing time gasp o es a e s o s ca be see , bot cases t c eas g t e gasgoes do n into the separator d e to effect of the p mp Ho e er stronggoes down into the separator, due to effect of the pump. However, strongfluctuations are observed in the case of laminar bubbly flow resultsfluctuations are observed in the case of laminar bubbly flow results.

0 040.04

0.03

0 020.02

0.01

0.00300s200s120s60s40s20s0s

Fig 4. Gas fraction (surface) and velocity profiles (arrows) obtained by laminar bubbly flowg ( ) y ( ) y y

0.016

0.0120.012

0 0080.008

0 0040.004

3002001206040200 0.00300s200s120s60s40s20s0s

Fig 5 Gas fraction (surface) and velocity profiles (arrows) obtained by turbulent bubbly flowFig 5. Gas fraction (surface) and velocity profiles (arrows) obtained by turbulent bubbly flow

I Fi 6 th0 003

In Figure 6 the evo‐0.003

lution of the gas

TO

(1)lution of the gas

0 0024RN

TIT

(fraction measured on 0.0024

UR

CUfraction measured on

i t S (Fi 3)Point-S

ET CIR

Cpoint‐S (Figure 3)0 0018N

R S C

with time is 0.0018

ON

YSISwith time is

CTI

OLYpresented. Laminar

0 0012RA

CTR

Opresented. Laminari l ti h 0.0012FR C

Tsimulations show

ME LEstrong fluctuations

0 0006LUM

E E TURBULENTstrong fluctuations,

0.0006

VOL

THE

LAMINARwhile a sweet curve V T LAMINARwhile a sweet curve

bt i d f 0.0was obtained for 0.040 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360turbulent bubbly

TIME (s)turbulent bubbly

TIME (s)flow simulation (k-e

Fig 6 Volume gas fraction measured in point So s u at o (d l) Fig 6. Volume gas fraction measured in point-Smodel).

CONCLUSIONSCONCLUSIONS

• Introduction of deflectors or gas‐traps increases turbulence phenomenaIntroduction of deflectors or gas traps increases turbulence phenomena

• Turbulence bubbly flow model allows a suitable analysis of turbulenceTurbulence bubbly flow model allows a suitable analysis of turbulenced i i lti h fldynamics in multiphase flowy p

F t d l t ill b i t d t th i f th t• Future development will be oriented to the comparison of the presentresults with other simulation modules which take into account the gas‐results with other simulation modules which take into account the gas‐liquid interface.liquid interface.

REFERENCESREFERENCESC S

[1] Takeuchi M., Furtua T., Efficiency and two‐phase flow of alkaline water electrolysis under[ ] , , ff y p f f yforced convection of electrolyte Annals of Assembly for Int Heat Transfer Conference 13 2006forced convection of electrolyte, Annals of Assembly for Int. Heat Transfer Conference 13, 2006

[2] Hug W Divisek J Mergel J Seeger W Steeb H Highly efficient advanced alkaline[2] Hug W., Divisek J., Mergel J., Seeger W., Steeb H., Highly efficient advanced alkalinel l f l i I J H d E 9 (1992) 699electrolyzer for solar operation, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 9 (1992) 699

Project EXSIVA was financed by: