comparison between tturbulent and … · spain. ()www cnh2 es (*)() ernesto amores@cnh2...
TRANSCRIPT
COMPARISON BETWEEN TCOMPARISON BETWEEN TCOMPARISON BETWEEN TBUBBLY FLOW FOR MODEBUBBLY-FLOW FOR MODEBUBBLY FLOW FOR MODE
(*)E Amores Vera(*) J Rodríguez RuizE. Amores Vera( ), J. Rodríguez Ruiz, gCentro Nacional del Hidrógeno Prolongación FernandoCentro Nacional del Hidrógeno. Prolongación Fernando13500 Puertollano (Ciudad Real) SPAIN www cnh2 es13500 Puertollano (Ciudad Real). SPAIN. www.cnh2.es( )
(*) @ h2 T l 34 926 420 682(*) ernesto amores@cnh2 es Tel: +34 926 420 682( ) [email protected], Tel: +34 926 420 682
INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION
Hydrogen production by water electrolysis combined with renewableHydrogen production by water electrolysis combined with renewablei i f h i ll f i dl h d denergies is one of the most environmentally ‐ friendly methods, comparedg y y , p
to traditional technologies based on fossil fuels since no CO emissions areto traditional technologies based on fossil fuels since no CO2 emissions aregeneratedgenerated.
O tl t H O tl t H2Outlet H2 Outlet H2
One of the most critical aspects onOne of the most critical aspects ont l t l i i th li idwater electrolysis is the gas‐liquid
H2
H2y g q
separation especially in systems + H
+ H
separation, especially in systems
et
ter
et
ter
with an electrolyte being nle
wat nle
watwith an electrolyte being
i l t d b (f d
I w I w
recirculated by a pump (forcedy p p (convection) [1] The main problem r +
H
2convection) [1]. The main problem
ter
ater d H
of this kind of circulation is that a wat wa
rsedof this kind of circulation is that a
f ti ld t t th
et w
let
per
gas fraction could return to the
Out
l
Out
Dis
pgelectrolysis circuit which may have
O O D
electrolysis circuit, which may haveundesiderable consequences, suchundesiderable consequences, such
th f ti f l ias the formation of explosive (a) (b)pmixtures and pump damages [2]
(a) Pump OFF
(b) Pump ONmixtures and pump damages [2] Pump OFF Pump ON
(Figure 1). Fi 1 G Li id t(Figure 1). Fig 1. Gas-Liquid separator
A suitable design of separator devices could be a solution in order to avoidA suitable design of separator devices could be a solution in order to avoidt t th l t l i i it I thi th f ta gas return to the electrolysis circuit. In this sense, the use of gas traps org y g p
deflectors might reduce hydrogen suction by pump action Howeverdeflectors might reduce hydrogen suction by pump action. However,introduction of traps or new bodies inside the separator could stronglyintroduction of traps or new bodies inside the separator could stronglyi fl th fl id d i f d li id d t b l hinfluence the fluid dynamic of gas and liquids, and turbulence phenomenay g q pcould be generated (Figure 2)could be generated (Figure 2).
The present work reports a comparison between laminar and turbulentThe present work reports a comparison between laminar and turbulentb bbl fl d l h l h d ff b b hbubbly‐flow modules. The aim is to evaluate the differences between bothymodules and whether the simplifications adopted for laminar regimemodules, and whether the simplifications adopted for laminar regimecorrectly describe the behavior of two‐phase flow within the separatorcorrectly describe the behavior of two phase flow within the separator.
GEOMETRY & SET UPGEOMETRY & SET‐UPG O & S U
The geometry of theliquid-gas interface The geometry of the(out for hydrogen, model (Figure 3)water level)
ode ( gu e 3)as designed in 2Dwas designed in 2D,
including the gasincluding the gasInlet traps, and consi‐t aps, a d co s
dering onl thedering only theGas domain occupied bytraps domain occupied by
S
the two‐phase flownt- t e t o p ase o
( ater h drogen)Poi
(water‐hydrogen).P
Outlet h i lifiAnother simplifica‐
(a) Standard (b) Separatorp
tions were made in(a) Standard separator
(b) Separator used in the model Wall
tions were made inseparator used in the model Wall
order to reduce theFi 3 G t i l t d
order to reduce thed l l iFig 2. Types of separators Fig 3. Geometry implemented model complexity.p y
COMPUTATIONAL METHODSCOMPUTATIONAL METHODSCOMPUTATIONAL METHODS
O (k d l)LAMINAR BUBBLY FLOW TURBULENT BUBBLY FLOW (k‐emodel)
Both laminar bubbly flow equations and the following ones:
( ) ( ) FIu Tlrrrrrrrr
r⎤⎡⎟⎞
⎜⎛ ∇∇∇∇∇∇
∂ φφφφ 2Both laminar bubbly flow equations and the following ones:
⎤⎡ ⎞⎛( ) ( ) FgIuuupuut lll
TllTllllll
lll
rrrrrr+⋅⋅+⎥
⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛ ⋅∇⋅−∇+∇⋅+⋅⋅∇+−∇=∇⋅⋅⋅+
∂∂⋅⋅ ρφηηφρφρφ
3 ( ) klkT
lll SPkkuk+−+⎥
⎤⎢⎡
∇⎟⎟⎞
⎜⎜⎛
+∇=∇+∂ ερμμρρ ··r⎦⎣ ⎠⎝
( ) ( )∂
( ) klkk
lll SPkkut
++⎥⎦
⎢⎣
∇⎟⎟⎠
⎜⎜⎝
+∇∇+∂
ερσ
μρρ
( ) ( ) 0=⋅⋅+⋅⋅⋅∇+⋅+⋅∂∂
ggglllggll uut
rr ρφρφρφρφ( ) T ⎥
⎤⎢⎡
⎟⎞
⎜⎛∂ εεεμε 2r∂t
( )⋅∂ ρφ( ) ep
kSC
kCP
kCu
t klkT
lll =+−+⎥⎦
⎢⎣
∇⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛+∇=∇+
∂∂ εεερεε
σμμερερ εεεε
,·· 21r
( ) glggggg mu
t−=⋅⋅∇+
∂⋅∂ rρφρφ ⎦⎣ ⎠⎝ ε
( )( )[ ]Tk 2ggggt∂ ( )( )[ ] slipgkkT
lllkl upCSuuuPkCep rrrr · , : , , TT ∇−=∇+∇∇=== φμε
ρμε μ ε
TURBULENT AND LAMINARTURBULENT AND LAMINARTURBULENT AND LAMINAR LING H2 / H2O SEPARATIONLING H2 / H2O SEPARATIONLING H2 / H2O SEPARATION
o El Santo s/no El Santo s/n. ss
RESULTSRESULTS
Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the obtained results for laminar and turbulentgu e a d gu e 5 s o t e obta ed esu ts o a a a d tu bu e tb bbl flo fl id d namics sim lations of a gas liq id separator in thebubbly flow fluid dynamics simulations of a gas‐liquid separator in thesame operation conditions Evolution of gas distribution and speedsame operation conditions. Evolution of gas distribution and speedprofiles are shown. As can be seen, in both cases with increasing time gasp o es a e s o s ca be see , bot cases t c eas g t e gasgoes do n into the separator d e to effect of the p mp Ho e er stronggoes down into the separator, due to effect of the pump. However, strongfluctuations are observed in the case of laminar bubbly flow resultsfluctuations are observed in the case of laminar bubbly flow results.
0 040.04
0.03
0 020.02
0.01
0.00300s200s120s60s40s20s0s
Fig 4. Gas fraction (surface) and velocity profiles (arrows) obtained by laminar bubbly flowg ( ) y ( ) y y
0.016
0.0120.012
0 0080.008
0 0040.004
3002001206040200 0.00300s200s120s60s40s20s0s
Fig 5 Gas fraction (surface) and velocity profiles (arrows) obtained by turbulent bubbly flowFig 5. Gas fraction (surface) and velocity profiles (arrows) obtained by turbulent bubbly flow
I Fi 6 th0 003
In Figure 6 the evo‐0.003
lution of the gas
TO
(1)lution of the gas
0 0024RN
TIT
(fraction measured on 0.0024
UR
CUfraction measured on
i t S (Fi 3)Point-S
ET CIR
Cpoint‐S (Figure 3)0 0018N
R S C
with time is 0.0018
ON
YSISwith time is
CTI
OLYpresented. Laminar
0 0012RA
CTR
Opresented. Laminari l ti h 0.0012FR C
Tsimulations show
ME LEstrong fluctuations
0 0006LUM
E E TURBULENTstrong fluctuations,
0.0006
VOL
THE
LAMINARwhile a sweet curve V T LAMINARwhile a sweet curve
bt i d f 0.0was obtained for 0.040 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360turbulent bubbly
TIME (s)turbulent bubbly
TIME (s)flow simulation (k-e
Fig 6 Volume gas fraction measured in point So s u at o (d l) Fig 6. Volume gas fraction measured in point-Smodel).
CONCLUSIONSCONCLUSIONS
• Introduction of deflectors or gas‐traps increases turbulence phenomenaIntroduction of deflectors or gas traps increases turbulence phenomena
• Turbulence bubbly flow model allows a suitable analysis of turbulenceTurbulence bubbly flow model allows a suitable analysis of turbulenced i i lti h fldynamics in multiphase flowy p
F t d l t ill b i t d t th i f th t• Future development will be oriented to the comparison of the presentresults with other simulation modules which take into account the gas‐results with other simulation modules which take into account the gas‐liquid interface.liquid interface.
REFERENCESREFERENCESC S
[1] Takeuchi M., Furtua T., Efficiency and two‐phase flow of alkaline water electrolysis under[ ] , , ff y p f f yforced convection of electrolyte Annals of Assembly for Int Heat Transfer Conference 13 2006forced convection of electrolyte, Annals of Assembly for Int. Heat Transfer Conference 13, 2006
[2] Hug W Divisek J Mergel J Seeger W Steeb H Highly efficient advanced alkaline[2] Hug W., Divisek J., Mergel J., Seeger W., Steeb H., Highly efficient advanced alkalinel l f l i I J H d E 9 (1992) 699electrolyzer for solar operation, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 9 (1992) 699
Project EXSIVA was financed by: