comparison between tillage transect and supplementary data

9
Comparison between tillage transect and supplementary data GLPF Grant- Team meeting #5 July 23-24, 2013

Upload: makani

Post on 23-Feb-2016

54 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Comparison between tillage transect and supplementary data. GLPF Grant- Team meeting #5 July 23-24, 2013. Tillage transects. Developed by NRCS and CTIC Record crop, tillage, and estimate residue cover along a road transect throughout the Sandusky River Watershed - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comparison between tillage transect and supplementary data

Comparison between tillage transect and supplementary data

GLPF Grant- Team meeting #5July 23-24, 2013

Page 2: Comparison between tillage transect and supplementary data

Tillage transects• Developed by NRCS and CTIC

• Record crop, tillage, and estimate residue cover along a road transect throughout the Sandusky River Watershed Seneca, Sandusky, Crawford,

and Wyandot Counties Also used throughout the

Maumee Watershed

• Transects conducted 2x a year (spring and fall) since 2009

• Each transect revisits the exact same GPS coordinates

Page 3: Comparison between tillage transect and supplementary data

Dominant crops

Corn Soybean Wheat Hay Other CRP

Across years Corn Soybean Wheat Hay Other CRP

Transect 35% 45% 14% 2.6% 1.5% 1.4%

P strat 36% 39% 22% 1.8% 1.5% n/a

Spring Fall P strat.

2009 2010 2011 2012

% o

f tra

nsec

t

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2009 2010 2011 20120

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

previous planned0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Page 4: Comparison between tillage transect and supplementary data

2009 2010 2011 20120

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Corn

• Note: cover and vertical till was not recorded until 2011, zeroes in 2009-2010 doesn’t mean it wasn’t there

No Till Cover Vertical Mulch (>30% residue)Strip (>30% residue) Reduced (15-30% residue) Conventional (plow or <15% residue)

2009 2010 2011 2012

% o

f tra

nsec

t

0

20

40

60

80

100

2009 2010 2011 2012

51%

31%

79%

9%

37% 39%

74% 64% 52% 78%

36%

10%

24%

31%

Spring Fall

25%18%

16%

Corn Soybean Wheat Hay Other

Crop planted next

Page 5: Comparison between tillage transect and supplementary data

2009 2010 2011 2012

% o

f tra

nsec

t

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Soybean

• Note: cover and vertical till was not recorded until 2011, zeroes in 2009-2010 doesn’t mean it wasn’t there

No Till Cover Vertical Mulch (>30% residue)Strip (>30% residue) Reduced (15-30% residue) Conventional (plow or <15% residue)

Corn Soybean Wheat Hay Other

Crop planted next2009 2010 2011 2012

% o

f tra

nsec

t

0

20

40

60

80

100

2009 2010 2011 2012

20%

53%

13%

58%

14%19%

60% 64% 59% 75%51%

26%

28%

Spring Fall

34%26%

19%11%

21%17%

14%11%10%

11%23%

Page 6: Comparison between tillage transect and supplementary data

2009 2010 2011 2012

% o

f tra

nsec

t

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Wheat

• Note: cover and vertical till was not recorded until 2011, zeroes in 2009-2010 doesn’t mean it wasn’t there

No Till Cover Vertical Mulch (>30% residue)Strip (>30% residue) Reduced (15-30% residue) Conventional (plow or <15% residue)

Corn Soybean Wheat Hay Other

Crop planted next2009 2010 2011 2012

% o

f tra

nsec

t

0

20

40

60

80

100

2009 2010 2011 2012

15%

72%

31%

87%

75%

27% 14% 21% 78%99% 92%

Spring Fall8%

51%

8%

33%

7%12% 10% 12% 13%

Page 7: Comparison between tillage transect and supplementary data

Crop rotation compared with Supplementary data

2009 2010 2011 2012

% o

f tra

nsec

t

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2009 2010 2011 20120

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2009 2010 2011 20120

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

P strat

% o

f tra

nsec

t

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

P strat

% o

f tra

nsec

t

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

P strat%

of t

rans

ect

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Corn Soybean Wheat Hay Other

After corn: After soybean: After wheat:

Page 8: Comparison between tillage transect and supplementary data

P strat Spring Fall

% o

f tra

nsec

t

0

20

40

60

80

100

P strat Spring Fall0

20

40

60

80

100

P strat Spring Fall0

20

40

60

80

100

Tillage practices compared with supplementary data

• Results are very similar for the tillage transect and supplementary data

No Till/Strip Mulch/Vertical Reduced/Plow

Corn Soybean Wheat

67%

77% 70%

14% 14% 32% 20%

68% 47% 69%83% 86% 34%

41%

Page 9: Comparison between tillage transect and supplementary data

Questions?