comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

31
Comparing with redshif t surveys of galaxies

Upload: delora

Post on 22-Jan-2016

72 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies. Redshift surveys –brief review. CFA -----2000 galaxies (1983) Las Campanas ----25000 galaxies (1996) 2dF----250,000 galaxies (2003) SDSS----900,000 galaxies (2008?). The role of different observations. Clustering and environment analysis. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

Page 2: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

Redshift surveys –brief review

• CFA -----2000 galaxies (1983)

• Las Campanas ----25000 galaxies (1996)

• 2dF----250,000 galaxies (2003)

• SDSS----900,000 galaxies (2008?)

Page 3: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

The role of different observations

Page 4: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies
Page 5: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies
Page 6: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies
Page 7: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

Clustering and environment analysis

• The key is to account for the incompleteness correctly

• For example, two-point correlation function is measured very simply with DD(r)/RR(r)-1, where DD and RR are the number of pairs of galaxies in the observed sample and in the random sample respectively;

• The key is to construct the random sample correctly

Page 8: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

Incompleteness or selection effects

• Magnitude limited sample----radial selection effect;

• Limiting magnitude variation (0.1 typically) across the survey region;

• Survey boundary;• Redshift measurement completeness;

– Sampling rate;– Magnitude dependent redshift incompleteness– Fiber collision

Page 9: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies
Page 10: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies
Page 11: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies
Page 12: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

Random sample

• A sample of the points randomly distributed spatially but with the same observational selection effects

Page 13: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

• 光度函数:– 单位体积、单位光度间隔内的星系平均数目

– Schechter function:

• 两点相关函数:– 与均匀随机场相比,在距离某个星系 r处发现另一个星系的额外几率

• 相对速度弥散:

**** exp)(

L

Ld

L

L

L

LdLL

背 景 介 绍 统计量

212

12 )](1[ dVdVrndP

212

21212 )( vvr

Page 14: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

• 红移空间畸变:本征运动使星系看起来偏离膨胀背景• 红移空间 2PCF:沿视向,大尺度压扁,小尺度拉伸

背 景 介 绍 测量方法

Page 15: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

背 景 介 绍 测量方法

Page 16: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

Redshift two-point correlation functions for DR2 (Li, C. et al. astroph/0509874; 0509873; see also Zeh

avi et al. 2005)

红移空间的星系两点

相关函数

Page 17: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

Dependence of CF on physical properties (Li et al. 2005a,b)

星系的成团性随颜色、光谱特

征(恒星形成的历史)和密集

参量、恒星质量面密度(星系

结构和形态)的变化

Page 18: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

• Luminosity dependence of the bias (r_p=2.7 Mpc/h; Zehavi et al. 2005)

• Stellar mass dependence (Li, et al 2005a,b)

• 星系成团的幅度,即偏袒因子 b,随光度(上图)和恒星质量(下图)的变化。

Page 19: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

Velocity dispersion vs. physical properties (Li, C. et al. 2005b)

星系的速度弥散随颜色、光

谱特征(恒星形成的历史)

和密集参量、恒星质量面密

度(星系结构和形态)的变

Page 20: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

Velocity vs luminosity (Li, et al. 2005a,b)

星系相对运动的速

度弥散随光度的变

化,反映不同光度

的星系的暗物质结

构环境

Page 21: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

Bimodal distribution in the color-magnitude diagram (SDSS)

Page 22: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

Three ways of interpreting

• Halo Occupation Distribution (HOD) model (e.g. Jing et al. 1998; Yang et al 2003)

• Using galaxy formation models – Hydro/N-body simulations with star formation

(physical processes; id of galaxies? e.g. V. Springel et al. 2005)

– Semi-analytical models of galaxy formation + N-body simulations (e.g. Kauffmann et al. 1999)

Page 23: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies
Page 24: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

Physical processes of galaxy formation

• Formation of dark halos; gas shock heated;• Gas cooled radiatively;• Stars formed from cold gas;• Massive stars short lived; form neutron stars and

supernova explosions• Explosions inject energy and metals into interstel

lar medium (hot+cold); heating and enrich---feedback effects

• Mergers of galaxies after their host halos merge;• Black hole formation and its AGN feedback

Page 25: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies
Page 26: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies
Page 27: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

Dark matter

Galaxies: red for E; blue for spirals

Page 28: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

理 论 比 较 构建 SDSS的模拟样本

SDSS DR4

L500 L100+L300

Page 29: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

Agreement after the reduction of faint satellites

Page 30: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

Subhalo resolved: the bimodal color-mag distribution is much better reproduced

Page 31: Comparing with redshift surveys of galaxies

Summary

• Main features of galaxies can be explained in current galaxy formation models;

• High precision modeling for galaxy formation is still challenging, for very complicated physical process