comparative study on rcc & steel building
DESCRIPTION
projectTRANSCRIPT
COMPARITIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY REINFORCED CEMENT CONCRETE AND STEEL BUILDING
A PROJECT REPORT ON
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY
REINFORCED CEMENT CONCRETE AND
STEEL BUILDING
A PROJECT REPORT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
IN
CIVIL ENGINEERING
BY
1. ABDULLAH 08E01A0102
2. MOHAMMED JAWAD HUSSAIN 08E01A0120
3. SUFIAN ASHER KHAN 08E01A0139
4. SYED AAMER HUSSAIN 08E01A0140
5. SYED ABDUL HANNAN 08E01A0141
6. SYED MUSHTAQ HUSSAIN SAJJAD 08E01A0152
7. MOHAMMADABDUL RAHEEM 09E05A0103
Under the Guidance of
MR. S. KHALID HASHMI MR. MIR AHMED ALI MUJAHID ASST VICE PRESIDENT-ENGG B.E (CIVIL); ME (STRUCT)
KIRBY BUILDING SYSTEM H.O.D CIVIL ENGG DEPT
HYDERABAD NIZAM INST OF ENGG AND TECH
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (Affiliated to JNTU Hyderabad)
Near Ramoji Film city, Deshmukhi (V) Nalgonda 508284
2008-2012
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Mr. Mir Mujahid Ali H.O.D of
Civil Engineering Department for having permitted us to carry out this project work.
Needless to mention that, Mr. S. Khalid Hashmi, Assistant vice-president of
Kirby Building India(P) Ltd, who had been a source of inspiration and for his
timely guidance in the conduct of our project work, I take this opportunity to thank for
his guidance toward us throughout the project period.
I take this opportunity to thank Mr. Syed Muneer Hussain, G.M Associates for
his esteem guidance and support throughout the project period during the program
would be nothing without the enthusiasm and imagination from you.
I acknowledge the untiring of Mr. S. Khalid Hashmi (External Guide) for his
excellent guidance without which the completion of this project would have been
impossible. His continuous encouragement and support has always been an
inspiration and a source of energy for us. We thank him for all of his valuable time,
effort and help. Without which the project could not have been completed.
The Materialization of ideas and views of the project work has been valuable
contributing of numerous friends and academics in the form of selfless criticism, well
wishes and above all words of inspiration. I am deeply indebted to all of them for
their support and guidance and sincerely thank each of them. Also my sincere thanks
to all other people who were directly or indirectly associated with the same in any
other way.
CONTENTS PAGE N0
INTRODUTION 1
MODULE I
1. INTRODUCTION TO DESIGN OF REINFORCED 5
CONCRETE STRUCTURE
2. INTRODUCTION TO LIMIT STATE DESIGN 25
3. ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED 31
CONCRETE STRUCTURE
4. DESIGN OF SLABS 80
5. DESIGN OF BEAMS 96
6. DESIGN OF COLUMNS 132
7. DESIGN OF FOOTINGS 152
8. DESIGN OF STAIRCASE 168
9. DETAILING AND DRAWINGS 178
MODULE II
10. INTRODUCTION TO STEEL STRUCTURES 179
11. LIMIT STATE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS 185
FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL MEMBERS
12. ANALYSIS OF STEEL STRUCTURE 189
13. DESIGN OF DECK SLABS 205
14. DESIGN OF STEEL BEAMS 215
15. DESIGN OF STEEL COLUMNS 238
16. DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS 252
17. DESIGN OF COLUMN BASES 267
18. DESIGN OF STAIRCASE 273
19. DETAILING AND DRAWING 275
MODULE III
20. ESTIMATION OF QUANTITIES OF R.C.C MEMBERS 276
21. ESTIMATION OF QUNTITIES OF 294
STRUCTURAL STEEL MEMBERS
22. CONCLUSION 297
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 0
If one does not reflect, one thinks oneself master of everything;
But when one does reflect, one realizes that one is a master of nothing.
-Voltaire
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 1
INTRODUCTION
Sociological changes, new technology in industry and commerce, new
building codes, other new laws and regulations, inflationary economics of nations,
and advances in building technology place an ever-increasing burden on building
designers and constructors. They need more and more knowledge and skill to cope
demands placed on them.
The public continually demands more complex buildings than in past. They
must serve more purposes, last longer and require less maintenance and repair. As in
past they must look more attractive. Yet, both building construction and operation
cost must be kept within acceptable limits or new construction will cease. To meet
this challenge successfully continual improvement in building design and construction
must be made.
One advance of note to building design is the adaption of operation research,
or system design and comparison of different type constructions. In the past, design of
a new building was mainly an imitation of the design of an existing building.
Innovations were often developed fortuitously and by intuition and were rare
occurrences. In contrast, systems design encourages innovation. It is a precise
procedure that guides creativity towards the best decisions. As a result, it can play
significant role in meeting the challenges posed by increasing building complexity
and costs.
I. PRINCIPLES OF ARCHITECTURE
A building is an assemblage that is firmly attached to the ground and the
ground that provides total or nearly total shelter for machines, processing equipment
performance of human activities, storage of human possessions, or any combination
of these.
Building design is the process of providing all information necessary for
construction of a building that will meet its owner’s requirements and also satisfy
public health, welfare, and safety requirements. Architecture is the art and science of
building design. Building design and construction is the process of assembling
members and materials to form a building.
Architects are persons legally permitted to practice architecture. Engineers
are experts in specific scientific disciplines and are legally permitted to design parts of
buildings; in some cases, complete buildings. Building construction is generally
performed by laborers and crafts people engaged for the purpose by an individual or
organization, called a contractor.
In the design of a building architect should be guided by following principles:
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 2
1. The building should be constructed to serve purposes specified by the client
2. The design should be constructed by known techniques and with available
labor and equipment, within an acceptable time.
3. The building should be capable of withstanding the elements and normal usage
for a period of time specified by client.
4. Both inside and outside, the building should be visually pleasing.
5. No part of the building should pose a hazard to the safety or health of its
occupants under normal usage, and the building should provide for safe
evacuation or refuge in emergencies.
6. The building should provide the degree of shelter from the elements and of
control of the interior environment-air, temperature, humidity, light and
acoustics-specified by the client and not less than the minimums required for
safety and health of the occupants.
7. The building should be constructed to minimum adverse impact on the
environment.
8. Operation of the building should consume a minimum of energy while
permitting the structure to serve its purposes.
9. The sum of costs of construction, operation, maintenance, repair, and
anticipated future alterations should be kept within the limit specified by the
client.
The ultimate observation objective of design is to provide all
the information necessary for the construction of a building. This objective is
achieved by the production of drawing, or plans, showing what are to be
constructed, specifications stating what materials and equipment are to be
incorporated in the building, and a construction contract between the client
and a contractor. Designer also should observe construction of the building
while it is in process. This should be done not only to assist the client in
ensuring that the building is being constructed in accordance with plans and
specifications but also to obtain information that will be useful in design of
future buildings.
II. SYSTEMS DESIGN AND ANALYSIS:
Systems design comprises a logical series of steps that leads to the best
decision for a given set of conditions. The procedure requires:
Analysis of a building system.
Synthesis, or selection of components, to form a system that meets
specific objectives while subject to constrains, or variables controlled by
designers.
Appraisal of system performance, including comparisons with
alternatives systems.
Feedback to analysis and synthesis of information obtained in system
evaluation, to improve the design.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 3
A system is an assemblage formed to satisfy specific objectives and
subject to constraints and restrictions and consisting of two or more
components that are interrelated and compatible, each component being
essential to the required performance of the system.
Building components, such as walls, floors, roofs, windows and doors,
are interrelated and compatible with each other. The existence of any of the
three components affects to some extent the performance of the others. And
the required performance of the building as a whole imposes restrictions on
the components. Consequently, a building has the basic characteristics of a
system, and system-design procedures should be applicable to it.
III. TRADITIONAL DESIGN PROCEDURES
System design of buildings requires a different approach to design and
construction than that used in traditional design. Because traditional design
and construction procedures are still widely used, however, it is desirable to
incorporate as much of those procedures in systems design as is feasible
without destroying its effectiveness. The basic traditional design procedure
usually starts when a client recognizes the need for and economic feasibility of
a building and engages an architect, a professional with a broad background in
building design. The architect, in turn, engages consulting engineers and other
consultants.
A Structural engineer is a specialist trained in the application of
scientific principles to the design of load-bearing walls, floors, roof,
foundations, and skeleton framing needed for the support of buildings and
building components.
A Mechanical engineer is a specialist trained in application of
scientific principles to the design of plumbing, elevators, escalators, horizontal
walkways, dumbwaiters, conveyors, installed machinery, and heating,
ventilation, and air conditioning.
An Electrical engineer is a specialist trained in the application of
scientific principles to the design of electric circuits, electric controls and
safety devices, electric motors and generators, electric lighting, and other
electric equipment.
STRUCTURAL SYSTEM, The portion of a building that extends
above the ground level outside it is called superstructure. The portion below
the outside ground level is called the substructure. The parts of the
substructure that distribute building loads to the ground are known as
foundation.
Foundations may take the form of walls. When the ground under the
building is excavated for a cellar, or basement, the foundation walls have the
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 4
additional task of retaining the earth along the outside of the building. The
superstructure in such cases is erected atop the foundation walls
Broadly multi-storey buildings have been classified into three types:
i. Load bearing construction
ii. Composite construction
iii. Frame construction which can be either with reinforced concrete or steel
The first method has got the limitation that will be economical only up to 2 to
3 storey's. With composite construction technique, the economy is achieved even if 6
storey's or more has to be necessarily dealt with framed type of construction.
ADVANTAGES OF FRAMED CONSTRUCTION OVER OTHER TYPES
1) Dead load on foundation will be less due to reduction in wall thickness.
2) Rate of construction is faster.
3) Floor area will be more due to reduction in thickness of wall
4) Greater feasibility with respect of:
a) Location and size of window b) Location of glazing area is obtained
5) Interior partition wall can be independent of doors on the floors above or below,
thus permitting their removal to suit varying requirement or change in the tenancy.
IV. CHOICE OF MATERIALS:
i. R.C.C. FRAMES: R.C.C frames are found to be economical up to 25 storey's.
Because of its resistance to corrosion, it is widely favored in cold climates too.
ii. STEEL FRAMES: If the number of floors exceeds twenty five, the
experience of designers, reveals that steel frames are more economical due to
the fact that these frames can be fabricated quickly in the workshop and can be
transported to work spot in convenient parts.
This project work consists of design of a four storied commercial cum
residential and both types of frames are used for the comparison of its choice which is
divided in different modules further.
MODULE I
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 5
1. INTRODUCTION TO DESIGN OF REINFORCED
CONCRETE
The design of reinforced concrete (RC) structures in India is governed by the
Indian Standard Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete IS: 456. The fourth
revision of this code IS: 456-2000 incorporates the Limit State Method of design
based on serviceability and safety requirements associated with the design loads and
design strengths of the materials. These design loads and design strengths are obtained
by applying partial safety factors for characteristic loads and strengths of the materials
concrete and steel.
Concrete structures have become very common in civil engineering
construction concrete has established as a universal building material because of its
high compressive strength, its adoptability to take any form and shape and resistant to
fire and carrion with negligible maintenance cost. Concrete is very strong in
compression but very weak in tension. Its low tensile strength is compensated by
introducing steel reinforcement in the tension zone. Thus, the concrete is strengthened
by steel and extensively in construction of buildings, bridges, tanks, dams etc. it is
therefore, necessary that every civil engineer should know the basic principles
involved in the design of Reinforced Concrete Structures.
1.1 CONCRETE:
Concrete is a composite material consisting of cement, aggregate and water in
suitable proportions. The chemical interaction between cement and water binds the
aggregates in to a solid mass. Fresh concrete will be plastic, so that it can be moulded
to any desired shape in the moulds and compacted to form a dense mass. Water has to
be applied for few days over the concrete surface soon after its setting because the
hydration reactions between cement and water continue for a longer period due to
which hardening of concrete takes place. This period when concrete is kept moist
during which concrete gains strength is called curing period. Hence, the strength of
concrete increases with age. The process of solidification of concrete from plastic
stage is called setting while gaining of strength after setting is called hardening.
Usually, setting completes within a maximum duration of 10 hours, while about 90%
of hardening is completed by 28 days.
The properties and quality of cement concrete are influenced by the
properties of its ingredients and quality control maintained during its making and
curing. Hence, it is necessary to study the ingredients of concrete.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 6
1.2 INGREDIENTS OF CONCRETE:
The main ingredient materials in concrete are:
(a) Cement
(b) Aggregates
(c) Water
a) Cement:
Cement is the building material which is obtained by burning
calcareous, siliceous and argillaceous materials together in definite proportions
at high temperatures and grinding the resultant clinker in to a fine powder.
Various types of cements have been developed for the use in different types of
structures under different situations. According to IS: 456-2000, the types of
cements and their suitability for specific situations are given Table below.
Table 1.1 TYPES OF CEMENTS AND THEIR SUITABILITY
S.NO. Types of Cement IS Code Where Used
1.
Ordinary Portland
Cement
33 Grade
43 Grade
53 Grade
(for OPC,
compressive strength
of cement at 28 days
in N/mm2 is called as
grade of cement)
IS: 269
IS: 8112
IS: 12269
All general concreting
works
Multi storey structures
Bridges, Tall structures,
Pre-stressed concrete work.
2. Rapid hardening
cement IS: 8041 Road work and repairs
3. Low heat Portland
cement IS: 12600 Mass concreting-Dams
4. Port land slag cement IS: 455 Marine structures
5. Portland pozzolana
cement IS: 1489
General building works,
Mass concrete,
Marine structures
6. Sulphate resisting
Portland cement IS: 12330
Marine structures
foundations in sulphate
bearing soils
7. Hydrophobic cement IS: 8043 Swimming pools, floors of
food processing plants
8. High alumina cement IS: 6452 Marine structures
9. Supersulphated
cement IS: 6909
Marine structures,
construction of sewers
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 7
b) Aggregates:
Around 75% volume of concrete is occupied by the aggregates. Hence, the
structural behavior of concrete is significantly influenced by the type of aggregates
used. The aggregates used for the concrete should be durable, strong, hard, chemically
inert and well graded.
Aggregates whose particle size varies from 0.075 mm to 4.75 mm are called as
fine aggregate. Aggregates with particle sizes more than 4.75 mm are called as
coarse aggregates. Usually sand is used as fine aggregate whereas crushed rock and
gravel is used as coarse aggregate.
Type of
aggregate Size of aggregate
Coarse aggregate Size bigger than 4.75 mm
Fine aggregate 4.75 mm and less
TABLE 1.2
The nominal maximum size of the coarse aggregate shall be as large as
possible but it should be limited to 1/4th
of the maximum thickness of the member.
The various properties of aggregates like specific gravity, strength, toughness,
hardness, soundness, particle size distribution and grading should comply with the IS
code IS: 383- 1979.
c) Water:
Water plays an active role in the chemical process of hydration of cement and
curing concrete. Hence, the water used for mixing and cutting of concrete should be
clean and free from injurious amount of oils, acids, alkalis, salts, organic matter etc.
that may be deleterious to concrete and steel.
Drinking water is generally considered satisfactory for mixing of concrete. Sea
water should not be used for mixing and curing because of presence of harmful salts
in it. The PH values of water should not be less than 6. The physical and chemical tests
for water should be done as per IS: 3025.
d) Admixtures:
Admixture is defined as a material, other than cement, water and aggregates.
Admixture is an ingredient of concrete and added to batch immediately before or
during mixing. Additive is a material which is added at the time of grinding cement
clinker at the factory. Admixture is used to modify the properties of ordinary concrete
so as to make it more suitable for any situation.
Admixtures are added to the concrete before or during mixing, to modify one
or more of the specific properties of concrete in the fresh or hardened states. IS: 9103-
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 8
1979 lays down the procedures for evolution of admixtures for concrete. The different
types of admixtures used are given below.
1. Accelerating Admixtures: These are added to concrete to increase the rate of
early strength development, which in turn facilitates earlier removal of
formwork. Common accelerators are calcium chloride, flu silicates and
trietanlamine.
2. Retarding Admixtures: These are added to slow down the rate of setting of
cement. They are useful in hot weather concreting. Common types of retarders
are starches and cellulose products, sugar and hydroxyl-carboxylic acids.
3. Water Reducing or Plasticizing Admixtures: The addition of plasticizer
allows greater workability for given water cement ratio or alternatively retains
the workability while reducing the water content. The basic ingredients of
water reducing agents are either lignosulphonate slats or polyhydroxy
compounds.
4. Air-Entraining Admixtures: These are used to incorporate air in the form of
minute bubbles in concrete usually to increase workability and resistance to
freezing and thawing. Commonly used air-entraining agents are animal and
vegetable oils, natural wood resin and their sodium salts of sulphated and
aulphonated organic compounds.
Action of plasticizers:
Fluidify the mix
Improve the workability of concrete
Reduction in the surface tension of water
Site problems in the use of plasticizers:
Slump of reference mix (i.e. concrete without plasticizer).
Sequence of addition of plasticizer.
Problem with crusher dust and crushed sand.
Compatibility with cement.
Slump loss.
Compaction at site.
Finishing.
Removal of formwork.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 9
GRADES OF CONCRETE
Group
Grade Designation
Specified Characteristic
Compressive Strength of
150 mm Cube at 28 Days
in
N/mm2
Ordinary
Concrete
M 10 10
M 15 15
M 20 20
Standard Concrete
M 25 25
M 30 30
M 35 35
M 40 40
M 45 45
M50 50
M 55 55
High
Strength
Concrete
M 60 60
M 65 65
M 70 70
M 75 75
M 80 80
TABLE 1.3
STRESS STRAIN CURVE FOR DIFFERENT MIXES
(1 : 1 : 2 MIX) (1 : 21/2 : 3 ½ MIX) (1 : 3 : 5 MIX)
Strain x 10-3
FIG1 Stress- Strain Relation
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 10
Formwork:
Formwork shall be designed and constructed so as to remain sufficiently rigid
during placing and compaction of concrete. The joints are plugged to prevent the loss
of slurry from concrete.
Stripping time of formwork:
TYPE OF FORMWORK MINIMUM PERIOD BEFORE
STRIKING FORMWORK a. Vertical formwork to columns
walls and beams 16 – 24 hours
b. Soffit formwork to slabs (props
to refixed immediately after
removal of formwork)
3 days
c. Soffit formwork to beams (props
to refixed immediately after
removal of formwork)
7 days
d. Props to slab
Spanning up to 4.5 m 7 days
Spanning over 4.5 m 14 days
e. Props to beam and arches
Spanning up to 6 m 14 days
Spanning over 6 m 21 days
TABLE 1.4
1.3 ADVANTAGES OF CONCRETE:
The following are the advantages of concrete due to which concrete is extensively
used in construction industry.
1. Compressive strength of concrete is very high.
2. Concrete can be moulded to any desired shape.
3. The materials for concrete are easily available.
4. It is easy to make.
5. It is durable.
6. By proper proportioning of mix, concrete can be made watertight.
7. It is fire resistant
8. Its maintenance cost is practically nil.
9. Strength of concrete increases with age.
10. Its monolithic character gives it more rigidity.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 11
1.4 DISADVANTAGES OF CONCRETE:
1. Tensile strength of concrete is very low and hence plain concrete cannot be
used in situations where tensile stresses are developed.
2. Strict quality control has to be maintained during production, placing and
compaction.
3. Curing has to be done far at least 14 days and hence time of construction
increases.
4. Once the members’ caste with concrete, it is very difficult to dismantle it.
1.5 DESIGN CATEGORIES:
It is emphasized that any structure to be constructed must satisfy the
need efficiently for which it is intended and shall be durable for its desired life. Thus,
the design of any structure is categorized into the following main types.
1. Functional design
2. Structural design
1. Functional design:
The structure to be constructed should primarily serve the basic purpose for
which it is to be used and must have a pleasing look.
The building should provide happy environment inside as well as outside.
Therefore, the functional planning of a building must take into account the proper
arrangements of rooms/halls to satisfy the need of the client, good ventilation,
lighting, acoustics, etc.
Bearing all these aspects in mind, the architect/engineer (i.e. Designer) has to
decide whether it should be a load bearing structure or R.C.C. framed structure or a
steel structure. He should also decide the system of covering the structure, whether the
roof shall consist of steel roof trusses and girders or R.C.C. folded plates or R.C. shell
or a beam-slab construction or a grid system or a pre-stressed concrete hanging roof or
combination of above.
After deciding the tentative form of the structure the designer should select
appropriate material for it construction. The properties of the available materials have
to be determined to decide their stability and suitability.
2. Structural Design:
Once the architectural planning task is completed further structural designing
task for all structural components of the building will be proceeded.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 12
‘’Structural design is an art and science of understanding the behavior of
structural members subjected to loads and designing them with economy and
elegance to give a safe, serviceable and durable structure’’.
The principal elements of a R.C. Building frame consists of:
i. Slabs to cover large area ,
ii. Beams to support slabs and walls
iii. Columns to support beams
iv. Footing to distribute concentrated column loads over large area of the
supporting soil such that the bearing capacity of soil is not exceeded.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 13
In a frame structure the load is transferred from slab to beam, from
beam to column and then to the foundation and soil below it
1.6 STAGES IN STRUCTURAL DESIGN:
Structural planning
Action of forces and computation of loads
Methods of analysis
Design of members
Detailing, drawing and preparation of schedules.
Structural planning:
After getting architectural plan of the building, the structural planning of the
building frame is done. This involves determination of the following:
a. Positioning and orientation of columns.
b. Positioning of beams.
c. Spanning of slabs.
d. Layout of stairs.
e. Selecting proper type of footing.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 14
A FLOWCHART ON
INVESTIGATION OF
BUILDING
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 15
As a Civil Engineering structures such as a house, worship Centre, Factories
etc. that has a foundation, wall, roof etc. that protect human being and their properties
from direct harsh effect of weather like rain, wind, sun etc.
1.6 BUILDING CONSISTS OF THREE PARTS:
(1) Foundation (Sub-structure)
(2) Plinth
(3) Superstructure
(1) Foundation: It is the lowest artificially prepared part, below the surface of the
surrounding ground, which is in direct contact with substrata and transmits all
the loads coming from super structure to the subsoil.
(2) Plinth: It is the middle part of the structure, above the surface of the
surrounding ground up to the surface at the floor (i.e. floor level), immediately
above the ground.
(3) Superstructure: The part of the structure constructed above the plinth level
(or ground floor level) is termed as superstructure.
Buildings are generally classified as residential, educational, institutional,
assembly, business, and mercantile industrial storage and hazardous.
1.7 BUILDING CLASSIFICATION:
According to National Building Code of India 1970, buildings on the basis of
occupancy are classified into following groups:.
1. Residential Buildings: All those building in which sleeping
accommodation is provided for residing permanently or temporarily
with or without cooking or dining or both facilities are termed as
residential buildings, for e.g. apartments, flats, bungalows, dormitories,
private houses, hostels, hotels etc.
2. Educational Buildings: These include any building used for school,
college or day- care purposes involving assembly for institution,
education or recreation and which is not covered by assembly buildings.
3. Institutional Buildings: These buildings are used for different purposes,
such as medical or other treatment or care of persons suffering from
physical or mental illness, disease or infirmity, care of infants,
convalescents or aged persons and for penal or correctional detention in
which the liberty of the inmates is restricted. Institutional buildings
ordinarily provide sleeping accommodation for the occupants. They
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 16
include hospitals, sanatoria, custodia institutions or penal institutions like
jails, prisons and mental asylums.
4. Assembly Buildings: These are the buildings where the groups of people
meet or gather for amusement, recreation, social, religious, political, civil
halls, marriage halls, town halls, auditoriums, exhibition halls, museums,
skating rinks, gymnasiums, restaurants (also used as assembly halls),
places of working, dance halls, club rooms, passenger stations and
terminals of air, surface and other public transportation services,
recreation places and stadia etc.
5. Business Buildings: These buildings are used for transaction of business
(other than that covered by mercantile buildings), for keeping of accounts
and records for similar purposes; offices, banks, professional
establishments, court houses and libraries. The principal function of these
buildings is transaction of public business and keeping of books and
records.
6. Mercantile Buildings: These buildings are used as shops, stores, market,
for display and sale of merchandise either wholesale or retail, office,
shops, storage service facilities incidental to the sale of merchandise and
located in the same building.
7. Industrial Buildings: These are buildings where products or materials of
all kinds and properties are fabricated, assembled, manufactured or
processed, as assembly plants, laboratories, dry cleaning plants, and
power plants, pumping stations, smoke houses, laundries, gas plants,
refineries, dairies and saw mills.
8. Storage Buildings: These buildings are used primarily for the storage or
sheltering (including servicing, processing or repairs incidental to
storage) of goods, wares or merchandise (except those that involve
highly combustible or explosive products or materials) vehicles and
animals, as warehouse, cold storage plants, freight depots, transit sheds,
store houses, truck and marine terminals, garages, hangers (other than
aircraft repair hangars), grain elevators, barns and stables.
9. Hazardous Buildings: These buildings are used for the storage,
handling, manufacture or processing of highly combustible or explosive
materials or products which are liable to burn with extreme rapidly
and/or which may produce poisonous elements or explosives; for storage
handling, manufacturing or processing of highly corrosive, toxic or
noxious alkalis, acids or other liquids or chemicals producing flame,
fumes and explosive, poisonous, irritant or corrosive gases; and for the
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 17
storage, handling or processing of any material producing explosive
mixtures of dust which result in the division of matter into fine particles
subjected to spontaneous ignition.
Residential building is one in which people reside permanently or for a
considerable time. It is the venues where all the members of a family live
together and have their various activities as eating, relaxing, sleeping, washing,
cleaning, bathing, easing and share their passions.
These shall include any building in which sleeping accommodation is
provided for normal residential purpose with or without cooking or dining
facility.
It includes one or more multi-family dwellings, apartment houses
(flats), lodging houses, restaurants, hostels, dormitories and residential hostels.
10. Dwelling: A dwelling is a house or a sub place of residence.
11. Detached House: A detached is the choice of every individual, pleasing
effect is achieved if the approach from the main road is kept open and
light and fresh air flow of uninterrupted by fences and walls. If proper
coordination with adjoining house were done, each house would present
aesthetic presentation.
12. Semi-detached House: This type of construction has the advantage of
separate unit as well as reduction in the cost of construction as two
dwelling units have a common entrance and staircase. And additional
advantage is the sense of security that is felt by dwellers.
13. Terrace Housing Unit: The main advantage of terrace is the in space.
This type of construction is an improvement over the semi-detached unit.
A terrace unit is the row of three or more dwelling units in continuity.
14. Flats: A dwelling is separated from another by horizontal division. In
case of conventional group vertical divisions or partitions achieve
housing the separation.
15. Duplex Apartments: These are living spaces at two or more levels.
They can be detached, semi-detached or in multi-storied buildings where
corridors can be provided in alternate floors.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 18
1.8 MULTI-STORIED COMPLEX HAVE BEEN CLASSIFIED
INTO THREE TYPES:
1. Load Bearing constructions
2. Composite constructions
3. Framed constructions, which can be with either Steel or Concrete.
1.9 ENGINEERING STRUCTURE AND STRUCTUTAL DESIGN:
An engineering structure is on assembly of members or elements transferring
the load or resisting external actions and providing a form to serve the desired
function.
The structural design is a science and art of designing with economy and
elegance. A durable structure, which can safely carry the forces and can serve the
desired function satisfactory during its expected service life span.
Object and basic requirements of structural design:-
Serviceability
Safety
Durability
Economy
Aesthetic beauty
1.10 PLANNING:
Once the site is chosen of accepted, the architect’s or engineer’s aim to fix the
direction of plan of building and finally to play the building keeping in view the local
bye-laws, principles of planning and requirements of owner.
Orientation is defined as a method of setting or fixing the direction of the plan
of the building in such a way that it devices maximum benefits from the elements of
nature. The knowledge of orientation is the first prerequisite of a good planning. It
should be noted that poor orientation of the buildings results in uncomfortable
conditions inside the building.
Bye-laws are certain rules and regulations laid down the by the municipalities
or town planning authorities in their jurisdiction. These have to be considered while
planning and designing the layout of buildings.
Building line, which is often known as set back refers to the line up to which
the plinth of a building adjoin a street may lawfully extend. Building line facilities
future widening of street and keeps away the noise and dust of the streets.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 19
Open space requirements should be left inside and around a building to meet
the lightening and ventilation requirements of the rooms. The open space left on front,
rear serve the purpose of future widening of streets.
1.11 DESIGNING:
Designing of structures is an art and science of designing a safe, durable and
elegant structure with economy. This not only requires imaginations but also good
knowledge of science of designing besides practical aspects, like the relevant codes
and local municipal bye-law with experience and judgment.
The architect whereas the requirement of safety, serviceability, durability and
economy are taken care of by the structural engineer looks after the design of structure
of planning of the structure and the aesthetics.
As mentioned earlier stages in structural design
Structural planning
Estimation of loads
Analysis of the structure
Design of the members
Drawings and preparation of schedules
Loading:
This stage involves determination of various types that are acting on the
structures. The values of types of loads are taken from relevant IS-codes.
Types of loads:
Various types of loads on a structure and requiring consideration in design
1. Dead load
2. Live load
3. Wind load
4. Seismic load
1. Dead loads:
Dead loads on structure comprise the self-weight of the member, weight of
finishes and partition walls. These are usually dependent upon the constructional
features and have to be assumed in order to design various structural concrete
members.
The unit weight of some of the commonly used building materials are
compiled in Table 1.1 based on IS: 875(PART I)-1987.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 20
2. Live loads or Imposed loads:
The imposed loads of different types of floors and roofs according to IS:
875(PART II) - 1987 in Table 1.2a and Table 1.2b respectively.
3. Wind loads:
The revised code IS: 875 (PART III) -1987 deals with wind loads that have to
be considered while designing while designing structures. The wind load acting on
structural member is expressed as
𝑭 = (𝑪𝒑𝒆 – 𝑪𝒑𝒊) 𝑨𝑷𝒅
F = wind load acting in a direction normal to the structural element
Cpe = external pressure coefficient
CPI= internal pressure coefficient
A = surface area of structural element or cladding unit
Pd = design wind pressure
The design wind pressure depends upon the design wind velocity which in turn
is insufficient by the type of terrain, height and class of structure.
The external pressure coefficient for different types of buildings and sloping
roofs are presented in IS: 875. The internal pressure coefficient depends upon degree
of permeability of cladding and may be positive or negative depending upon the
direction of air flow in relation to openings in the buildings. In the case of buildings
where claddings permit the flow of air through openings not more than 5% of the wall
area (without large openings) a positive and negative internal pressure coefficient of
0.2 is recommended in design.
4. Earthquake load or Seismic load:
Earthquake loads are horizontal loads caused by earthquake and shall be
computed in accordance with IS: 1893 for monolithic reinforced concrete structures
located in seismic zone ii, and iii with not more than 5 storey high, and importance
factor less than 1, the seismic forces are not critical ( see IS: 13920 sect. 1.1).
DESIGN:
Construction is an ultimate objective of design. An engineer is a key person of
successful completion of any kind of project undertaken. Hence, he should adopt all
means to reduce cost of project to minimum, without reducing serviceability aspect of
project.
An engineering structure is an assemble of members for elements transferring
the load and providing from a space, of enclosure and/or a cover to serve the desired,
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 21
function. The objective of structural design is to plan a structure that meets the basic
requirements such as serviceability, safety, durability, economy, aesthetic beauty,
feasibility and acceptability.
1.12 STRUCTURAL PLANNING:
Structural planning is first stage in any structural design. It involves the
determination of appropriate form of structure, material to be used, the structural
system, the layout of its components and the method of analysis.
As the success of any engineering project is measured in terms of safety and
economy, the emphasis today being more on economy. Structural planning is the first
step towards successful structural design.
Structural Planning of Reinforced Concrete Framed Building:
Structural planning of R.C framed building involves determination of
1. COLUMN POSITIONS
Positioning of columns
Orientation of columns
2. BEAMS LOCATIONS
3. SPANNING OF SLABS
4. LAYOUT AND PLANNING OF STAIRS
5. TYPE OF FOOTING
1. COLUMN POSITIONING:
Positioning of columns:
Following are some guidelines principles for positioning of columns
a) Columns should be preferably located at or near of the building and at
intersection of the walls, because the function of the columns is to support
beams which are normally placed under walls to support them. The columns,
which are near to property line, can be exception from above consideration as
the difficulties are encountered in providing footing for such columns.
b) When Centre to Centre distance between the intersection of the walls is large
or where there are no cross walls, the spacing between two columns is
governed by limitations on spans of supported beams because spacing of
columns beside the span of the beams. As the span of the beam increases in
total load is negligible in case of column due to increase in length. Therefore,
columns are generally cheaper compared to beams on basis of unit cost.
Therefore, large spans of beams should be avoided for economy reasons.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 22
Orientation of columns:
Columns normally provided in the building are rectangular, width of columns
not less than the width of support for effective load transfer. As far as possible, the
width of column shall not exceed the thickness of the walls to avoid the offsets.
Restrictions on the width of the column necessitate the other side (the depth) of the
column to be larger to get desired load carrying capacity. This leads to the
problems of orientation of columns.
2. BEAMS LOCATIONS:
Following are some of the guiding principles for the positioning of beams:
a. Beams shall, normally be provided under the walls and below a heavy
concentrated load to avoid these loads directly coming on slabs. Basic
principle in deciding the layout of a component member is that heavy loads
should be transferred to the foundation along the shortest path.
b. Since beams are primarily provided to support slabs, its spacing shall be
decided by the maximum spans of slabs. Slabs require the maximum
volume of concrete to carry a given load (i.e. its volume/load ratio is very
large compared to other components). Therefore the thickness of slab is
required to be kept minimum.
c. Avoid larger spacing of beams from deflection and cracking criteria.
Larger spans of beams shall also be avoided from the considerations of
controlling and cracking. This is because it is well known that the
deflection varies directly with the cube of the span and inversely with the
cube of the depth i.e. L3/D
3. Consequently, increase in D is less than
increase in span L which results in greater deflection for large span.
However, for large spans, normally higher L/D ratio is taken to restrict the
depth from considerations of headroom, aesthetics and psychological effect
( a long, heavy, deep beam creates a psychological feeling of crushing load
leading to a fear of collapse). Therefore, spans of beams which require the
depth of beam greater than one meter should as far as possible be avoided.
3. SPANNING OF SLABS:
Span of slabs is decided by the position of supporting beams of walls. The slab
can be made to span in one direction (one-way) or two directional (two-way),
depending on support conditions aspect ratio that is Lx/Ly, ratio of reinforcement
in the two directions. The designer is free to decide as to whether slab should be
designed as one-way or two-way.
The points to be considered in making a decision i.e. whether slab should be
designed as one-way or two-way.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 23
a. The slab acts as two way slab when (Lx/Ly) < 2, a slab acts as one-way
(Lx/Ly) > 2.
b. A two-way slab is economical compare to one-way slab, because steel
along with directions act as main steel and transfers loads to all the
supports, while in one-way slab, main steel is provided along short
span only and load is transferred to either of two supports.
c. Two-way is advantageous, essentially for large spans (greater than 3m)
and for live loads greater than 3 KN/Sq. m. For short spans and light
loads steel required for two-way slab does not appreciably differ as
compare to steel for one-way slab because of requirement of main
steel.
d. Spanning of slab is also decided by the necessity of continuity to
adjacent slab
e. Canopy or porch: while designing any slab as cantilever slab, it is of
utmost importance to see whether adequate anchorage to the same is
available or not.
f. Decide type of slab
While deciding the type of slab, whether a cantilever or a simply supported or a
continuous slab, loaded by udl it should be borne in mind that the maximum bending
moment in a cantilever (M=wL2/2) is four times that of a simply supported slab
(M=wL2/8), while it is five to six times that of a continuous or fixed slab
(M=wL2/12) for the same span length.
Similarly, deflection of a cantilever loaded by a uniformly distributed load is given
by:
δ = wL4/ 8EI = (48/5) x( 5wL
4/384EI)
Which is 9.6 times that of a simply supported slab ( = 5wL4/384EI) for the
same span and load ( besides, additional reduction in deflection is obtained in simply
supported slab due to partial fixity at supports).
In case of cantilevers, on the contrary, there is a probability of increase in
deflection due to probable rotation of the supporting beam due to lack of adequate end
restraint for the beam.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 24
4. FOOTING:
The type of footing depends upon the load carried by the column and
the bearing capacity of the supporting soil. Even under one small building the soil
may vary from soft clay to a hard morum. The nature and properties of soil may
change with season and weather, like swelling in wet weather. Increase in moisture
content results in substantial loss of bearing capacity in case of certain soils which
may lead to differential settlements. It is necessary to conduct the survey in the areas
for soil properties. For framed structure, isolated column footings are normally
preferred except in case of exists for great depths, pile foundations can be an
appropriate choice. If columns are very closely spaced and bearing capacity of the soil
is low, raft foundation can be an alternative solution. For a column on the boundary
line, a combined footing or a raft footing may be provided.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 25
2. INTRODUCTION TO LIMIT STATE DESIGN
2.1 STRUCTURAL DESIGNING:
The object of reinforced concrete design is to achieve a structure that will
result in a safe and economical solution. Structural designing for framed R.C.C
structures can be done by three methods.
1. WORKING STRESS METHOD.
2. ULTIMATE STRENGTH METHOD.
3. LIMIT STATE METHOD.
1. WORKING STRESS METHOD OF DESIGN:
It is the earliest modified method of R.C.C structures. In this method structural
element is so designed that the stress resulting from the action of service load as
computed in linear elastic theory using modular ratio concept does not exceed a pre-
designed allowable stress which is kept as some fraction of ultimate stress, to avail a
margin of safety. Since this method does not utilize full strength of the material it
results in heavy section, the economy aspect cannot be fully utilized in the method.
2. ULTIMATE STRENGTH METHOD OF DESIGN:
This method is primarily based on strength concept. In this method the
structural element is proportioned to with stand the ultimate load, which is obtained
by enhancing the service load of some factor referred to as load factor for giving
desired margin of safety. Since this method is based on actual stress, strain behavior
of the material, of the member as well as of the structure that too right up to failure,
the values calculated by this method agree well the experiments results.
3. LIMIT STATE METHOD OF DESIGN:
In the limit state method, the structural elements are designed for ultimate load
and checked for serviceability (deflections, cracking etc.) at working loads so that
structures is fit for use throughout its life period.
Philosophy of limit state design:
A structure may become unfit for use not only when it collapses but when it
violate the serviceability requirements such as deflections, cracking etc. The
philosophy of limit state method design is to see that the structure remains fit for use
throughout its life period by assuring safety against strength and serviceability
requirement before failure occurs is called limit state. All the relevant limit states
have to be considered in the design. The loads of strength of materials are to be
estimated by probabilistic approach (characteristic values). The design loads and
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 26
strengths are derived from the characteristic values through us e of partial safety
factors.
2.2 LIMIT STATES:
The various limit state to be considered in the design are
1. LIMIT STATE OF COLLAPSE
2. LIMIT STATE OF SERVICEABILITY
1. Limit State of Collapse:
It is the limit state at which the structure is likely to collapse. The structure
may collapse due to rupture of one or more critical sections or loss of overall stability
due to buckling or overturning. This limit state may correspond to
a. Flexure.
b. Compression.
c. Shear.
d. Torsion.
2. Limit State of Serviceability:
Limit state of serviceability relate to the performance of the structure at
working loads. It is the limit state at which the structure undergone excessive
deflection, which adversely affect the finishes causing discomfort to the users and
excessive cracking which effects the efficiency or appearance of structure. This limit
state may correspond to
a. Deflection
b. Cracking.
c. Other limit states (vibrations, fire resistance, and durability)
2.3 DESIGN PRINCIPLE, ASSUMPTION AND NOTATION
ASSUMED:
The notation adopted throughout the work is same as in IS-456-2000.
Materials: The design strength of materials is obtained by dividing the
characteristic strength by a factor known as partial safety factor. The partial safety
takes in to account variation of material strength, local weakness etc.
The design strength of the materials, 𝑓d is given by
𝐷𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡 = 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡 ÷ 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑠𝑎𝑓𝑒𝑡𝑦 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 27
𝑓d= f / γf
f- Characteristic strength of the material
γf Partial safety factor appropriate to the material and limit state being considered.
Material Limit state of Collapse Limit state of
Serviceability
Steel 1.15 1.0
Concrete 1.5 1.0
TABLE 2.1
2.4 ASSUMPTION IN DESIGN:
1. Using partial safety factors for loads in accordance with clause 36.4 of
IS:456-2000 as γf=1.5
2. Partial safety factor material in accordance with clause 36.4.2 of IS: 456-
2000 is taken as 1.5 for concrete and 1.15 for steel.
3. Using partial safety factor in accordance with clause 36.4 of IS: 456-2000
combination of load.
Load
combination Limit state of collapse Limit state of serviceability
D.L L.L W.L D.L L.L W.L
D.L+L.L 1.5 1.5 --- 1.0 1.0 ---
D.L+W.L 1.5 or
0.9 --- 1.5 1.0 --- 1.0
D.L+L.L+W.L 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.8
TABLE 2.2
* This value is to be used when stability against overturning or stress
reversal is critical
* While considering earthquake effects, substitute E.L for W.L.
2.5 DENSITY OF MATERIALS:
S.NO MATERIAL DENSITY
1. Plain concrete 24.0 KN/m3
2. Reinforced concrete 25.0 KN/m3
3. Flooring material 20.0 KN/m3
4. Brick masonry 19.0 KN/m3
5. Fly ash 5.0 KN/m3
TABLE 2.3
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 28
2.6 LIVE LOADS:
In accordance with IS: 875 (PART II)
i. Live load on slabs
Roof slab = 1.5 KN/m2
Typical floor slab = 2.0 KN/m2
ii. Live load on passage = 3.0 KN/m2
iii. Live load on stairs = 3.0 KN/m2
2.7 DESIGN CONSTANTS:
Using M20 and Fe415 grade of concrete and steel for beams, slabs, footings,
columns.
Therefore:-
fck = Characteristic strength for M20 Grade concrete – 20 N/mm2
fy = Characteristic strength of steel – 415 N/mm2
2.8 ASSUMPTION REGARDING DESIGN:
i. Slab is assumed to be continuous over interior support and partially fixed on
edges, due to monolithic construction and due to construction of walls over it.
ii. Beams are assumed to be continuous over interior support and they frame into
the column at ends.
2.9 PROPERTIES OF CONCRETE:
1. Grades of concrete:
Concrete is known by its grade which is designated as M15, M20 etc. in which
letter M refers to concrete mix and number 15, 20 denotes the specified compressive
strength (fck) of 150mm cube at 28 days, expressed in N/mm2. Thus, concrete is
known by its compressive strength. M20 and M25 are the most common grades of
concrete, and higher grades of concrete should be used for severe, very severe and
extreme environments.
2. Compressive strength:
Like load, the strength of the concrete is also a quality which varies
considerably for the same concrete mix. Therefore, a single representative value,
known as characteristic strength is used.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 29
3. Characteristic strength:
It is defined as the value of the strength below which not more than 5% of the
test results are expected to fall (i.e. there is 95% probability of achieving this value
only 5% of not achieving the same)
4. Characteristic strength of concrete in flexural member:
The characteristic strength of concrete in flexural member is taken as 0.67 times the strength of concrete cube
5. Design strength (fd) and partial safety factor for material strength:
The strength to be taken for the purpose of design is known is known as design strength and is given by Design strength (fd) = characteristic strength/ partial safety factor for material strength
The value of partial safety factor depends upon the type of material and upon the type of limit state. According to IS code,
Partial safety factor ( fs ) is taken as
1.5 for concrete 1.15 for steel
Design strength of concrete in member = 0.45 fck
6. Tensile strength:
The estimate of flexural tensile or the modulus of rupture or the cracking
strength of concrete from cube compressive strength is obtained by the relations.
fcr = 0.7 fck N/mm2
The tensile strength of concrete in direct tension is obtained experimental y by split cylinder. It varies between 1/8 to 1/12 of cube compressive strength..
7. Creep :
Creep is defined as the plastic deformation under sustain load. Creep strain depends primarily on the duration of sustained loading. According to the code, the value of the ultimate creep coefficient is taken as 1.6 at 28 days of loading..
8. Shrinkage:
The property of diminishing in volume during the process of drying and hardening is termed Shrinkage. It depends mainly on the duration of exposure. If this strain is prevented, it produces tensile stress in the concrete and hence concrete develops cracks.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 30
9. Modular ratio:
Short term modular ratio is the modulus of elasticity of steel to the modulus of
elasticity of concrete. Short term modular ratio = Es / Ec Es = modulus of elasticity of steel (2x10 5 N/mm2)
Ec = modulus of elasticity of concrete (5000 𝑓ck N/mm2)
As the modulus of elasticity of concrete changes with time, age at loading etc.
the modular ratio also changes accordingly. Taking into account the effects of creep
and shrinkage partially IS code gives the following expression for the long term
modular ratio.
Long term modular ratio (m) = 280/ (3fcbc)
Where, fcbc = permissible compressive stress due to bending in concrete in N/mn2
10. Poisson’s ratio:
Poisson’s ratio varies between 0.1 for high strength concrete and 0.2 for weak
mixes. It is normally taken as 0.15 for strength design and 0.2 for serviceability
criteria.
11. Durability:
Durability of concrete is its ability to resist its disintegration and decay. One of
the chief characteristics influencing durability of concrete is its permeability to
increase of water and other potential y deleterious materials. The desired low
permeability in concrete is achieved by having adequate cement, sufficient low
water/cement ratio, by ensuring full compaction of concrete and by adequate curing.
12. Unit weight of concrete:
The unit weight of concrete depends on percentage of reinforcement, type of
aggregate, amount of voids and varies from 23 to 26KN/m2. The unit weight of plain
and reinforced concrete as specified by IS: 456 are 24 and 25KN/m3 respectively.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 31
3 ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE
STRUCTURE
The intermediate structure can be analyzed by the following methods.
1. Moment Distribution Method.
2. Slope Deflection Method.
3. Kani’s Method or Rotation Contribution Method.
4. Column Analogy Method.
5. Strain Energy Method.
6. Matrix Method.
7. Finite Element Method (STAAD PRO)
Out of the above mentioned methods here Finite Element Method is adopted.
3.1 FINITE ELEMENT METHOD:
The finite element method analysis is a numerical technique. In this method all
the complexities of problem like varying shape, boundary conditions and loads are
maintained as they are but the solutions obtained approximately. Some of the popular
packages are STAAD-PRO, GT-SRTUDEL, NASTRAN, NISA, ETABS etc.
The finite element analysis originated as a method of stress analysis in the
design of air craft. Today this method is used not only for the analysis in solid
mechanics, but even in analysis of fluid flow, heat transfer, electric and magnetic field
and many others. Civil engineers use this method extensively for the analysis of
beams, space frames, plates, shells, floated plates, foundation, rock mechanic
problems and seepage analysis of fluid through porous media.
This is a time saving method of analysis, with consideration of shape,
boundary condition and loading.
FEM possess some definite advantages over other methods as follows:
a) In classical method exact equations are formed and exact solutions are
obtained where in FEM exact equations are formed but approximate
solutions are obtained.
b) Solutions have been obtained for few standard cases by classical
method whereas solution can be obtained for all problems by FEM.
c) Whenever the following complexities are faced, classical method
makes the drastic assumptions and looks for the solutions:
Shape
Boundary conditions
Loading
d) when material property is not isotropic the solution for the problem
become very difficult in classical method
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 32
e) If structure consists more than one material it is difficult to use
classical method but Fem can be used without difficulty.
f) Problems with materials and non-linearity cannot be handled by
classical method this is no difficulty in FEM.
3.2 ANALYSIS SOFTWARE - STAAD.PROV8i OVERVIEW
INTEGRATED SOFTWARE FOR STRUCTURAL
ANALYSIS & DESIGN:
STAAD.PROV8i is a stand-alone finite-element based structural
program for the analysis and design of civil structures. It offers an intuitive, yet
powerful user interface with many tools to aid in the quick and accurate construction
of models, along with the sophisticated analytical techniques needed to do the most
complex projects.
STAAD.PROV8i is controlled based, meaning that the models are
created with members that represent the physical reality. A beam with multiple
members framing into it is created as a single object; just as it exist in the real world,
and the sub-dividing needed to ensure that connectivity exists with the other members
is handled internally by the program. Results for analysis and design are reported for
the overall object, and not for each sub-element that makes up the object, providing
information that is both easier to interpret and more consistent with the physical
structure.
STAAD.PROV8i follows in the same tradition featuring a very
sophisticated, intuitive and versatile user interface powered by an unmatched analysis
engine and design tools for engineers working on transportation, industrial, public
works, sports, and other facilities.
From its 3D object based graphical modeling environment, to the wide
variety of analysis and design options completely integrated across one powerful user
interface, STAADPROV8i has proven to be the most integrated, productive and
practical general purpose structural program on market today.
The intuitive interface allows to create structural models rapidly and
intuitively without long learning curve delays. Complex models can be generated and
meshed with powerful templates built into the interface.
The advanced analytical techniques allow for step-by-step large
Deformation Analysis, Multiple P-Delta, Eigen and Ritz Analysis, Cable Analysis,
Tension or Compression only Analysis, Buckling Analysis, Blast Analysis, Fast
Nonlinear Analysis for Dampers, base Isolators and support Plasticity, Energy
Methods for Drift Control and Segmental Construction Analysis.
Bridge Designers can use STAADPROV8i bridge templates for
generating bridge models, Automated Bridge Live Load Analysis and Design, Bridge
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 33
Base Isolated, Bridge Construction Sequence Analysis, Large Deformation Cable
Supported Bridge Analysis and Pushover Analysis
STAADPROV8i enables users to easily apply loads or assign
restraints/supports in skewed directions from the global axis. Even if you don’t have
skewed restraints/supports, but have sloped beams or bracing, STAADPROV8i
analysis results are reported in local directions, making it easy to interpret the
direction of deflections or forces without having to do time consuming, error prone
transformations.
STAADPROV8i constraint options provide unique capabilities to
rigidly ‘link’ joints which are offset from one another. In addition to rigid
diaphragms, STAADPROV8i also provides additional constraint types which rigidly
transfer forces and moments from one joint to another in all degree of freedom, or in
selected degrees of freedom, while accounting for secondary moments that occur due
to the distance between the joint locations (lever arm effect). This ability to transfer
secondary moments differentiates these constraints from traditional master-slave/rigid
diaphragm type of constraints.
This is particularly important when connecting beams with plate
elements, modeling composite behavior, or joint connections offset from an element
centerline which can cause secondary moments. STAADPROV8i constraint options
become especially critical for accurate reactions in a dynamic analysis.
STAADPROV8i enables users to review analysis results graphically
by clicking on individually members or joints, or generate output reports. Output
reports can be limited by graphically selected areas, or by pre-defined groups, by load
case/combination. Results can be printed, exported to Excel or Access database, as
well as generation of DXF drawings.
3.3 GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC OF STAADPROV8i:
Fully integrated program that allows model creation, modification,
execution of analysis, design optimization, and results review
from within a single interface.
Powerful graphical 3D model generation using plan, elevation and
developed views.
A wide variety of automated templates allow a quick start for almost
any mode.
Object-based physical member modeling allows working with large
members that do not need to be broken up at each joint.
Powerful CAD-type editing features.
Compressive interactive spreadsheet editor.
Fully customized units that can be changed at any time.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 34
Fully integrated section Designer allows definition of complex
sections.
State-of-the-art static, dynamic, linear and nonlinear analysis.
Fully interactive steel, concrete and aluminum frame member deign
for many American, Indian, Canadian and European design codes.
Onscreen results display.
Animated display of deformed shapes, mode shapes, stress contours
and time history results.
User customizable tables that can be displayed on screen or output in
multiple formats.
Context sensitive online help, documentation, tutorials and AVI
movie demonstrations.
3.4 ANALYTICAL OPTIONS:
Static linear analysis
Static Non-linear analysis
Model analysis
Dynamic response spectrum analysis
Dynamic linear and Non-linear time history analysis
Bridge analysis (Moving load analysis)
Buckling analysis
3.5 DESIGN OPTIONS:
Fully interactive and graphical steel, concrete and aluminum frame
member design.
Design for static and dynamic load.
Ductile and non-ductile design.
Member grouping for design envelopes.
Automatic drift optimization for steel and aluminum members.
Compressive, color coded, graphical display of design results on the
model.
Detailed onscreen design information with aright button click.
Concrete column axial load – biaxial load moment interaction diagram.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 35
3.6 STEEL FRAME DESIGN THAT SUPPORTS THE
FOLLOWING:
DESIGN CODES:
AISC ASD 89
AISC LRFD 93
API RP2A WSD 2000
API RP2A LRFD 97
ASCE 10-97
BS59950-90
BSS5950-2000
CISC 95
Euro code 3-1993
Indian IS 800-1987
UBC 97 ASD
UBC 97 LRFD Etc.,
3.7 CONCRETE FRAME DESIGN THAT SUPPORTS THE
FOLLOWING:
DESIGN CODES:
ACI 318-99
BS 8110-89
BS 8110 97
CSA-A23 3-94
Euro code 2-1992
Indian IS 456-2000
Italian DM 14-2-92
Mexican RCDF 2001
NZS 3101-95
UBC 97 Etc.,
3.8 A MULTISTOREY RESIDENTIAL CUM COMMERCIAL
BUILDING:
This thesis portrays the design of an earthquake and wind resistant
structure. The structure taken for this thesis is a multistoried residential cum
commercial building located in the Hyderabad which comes under Zone II.
This building is taken as the reference for the design of against earthquake.
The building which has taken for the resident is prone to be most crowded area
in which Publics are likely to be gathered daily. Hence it is very important to
design building to resist against earthquake.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 36
Type of building Commercial cum residential
Number of storey's G+4 (+STAIR CAP)
Area of the Building 354.783 m2
Total Height of the building 19.2 m
Height of each storey 3.2 m
Number of flats in each floor 2
Number of commercial stores 2
Area of each flat 107.038 m2
Wall thickness External-0.300 m,
Internal- 0.150 m
Beam size 0.400m x 0.300m
Column sizes 0.3m x0.5m & 0.3m x 0.4m
Thickness of slab 0.120 & 0.14m
No. of Restraints/supports 32
TABLE 3.1
3.9 MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF MULTISTORIED
RESIDENTIAL CUM COMMERCIAL BUILDING:
STAADPROV8i is an effective software tool for the analysis and
design of structural members. Hence this software could be used to design a
structure against earthquake. The software follows the matrix stiffness
principle in analyzing the structure. The steps for analyzing a structure using
STAADPROV8i are given below.
1. GENERATION OF NODES.
2. MODELING OF THE STRUCTURE.
3. ASSIGNING OF THE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS.
4. RESTRAINTS.
5. APPLICATION OF LOADS.
6. RUN ANALYSIS.
1. Generation of nodes:
The nodes are generated based on the dimensions of the building. The
building is divided in to equal number of known grids. Then the grid spacing
is given on the STAADPROV8i window. The STAADPROV8i automatically
generates grids with specified spacing.
2. Modeling of the structure:
After the nodes are created they are joined with line elements. Based
on the dimension of the building the nodes are joined. Unwanted nodes could
be deleted.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 37
3. Assigning of the structural elements:
The STAADPROV8i has the facility to assign the structural elements.
The line elements have to be assigned as beams and columns and appropriate
dimensions are given.
4. Application of loads:
There are various loads acting on a structure. Current case study
constitute of the following loads:
a) Self-weight
b) Gravity Load
c) Wind Load
d) Seismic Load
The loads are applied on the structure as gravity loads (Dead & Live
Loads), Joint Loads (Seismic Load), Nodal Loads (Wind Load). After the
application of different load cases, combination of loads has to be specified as
mentioned in IS: 456 – 2000.
5. RUN ANALYSIS:
This is the last step in the analyzing of a structure using
STAADPROV8i software. When the run analysis is executed it shows
“ANALYSIS COMPLETE”, which indicated the termination of analysis
process.
3.10 INPUT COMMANDS IN STAAD PRO EDITER:
STAAD SPACE
START JOB INFORMATION
ENGINEER Students of Nizam Institute of Engineering and Technology
DATE 29-Feb-12
JOB NAME comparative study on multi-storey RCC & STEEL Building
END JOB INFORMATION
INPUT WIDTH 79
UNIT METER KN
JOINT COORDINATES
1 0 0 0; 2 3 0 0; 3 6.7 0 0; 4 10.25 0 0; 5 11.9 0 0; 6 13.8 0 0; 7 17.5 0 0; 8 20.5 0 0; 9
6.7 0 2; 10 11.9 0 2; 11 13.8 0 2; 12 0 0 3.65; 13 3 0 3.65; 14 6.7 0 3.65; 15 10.25 0
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 38
3.65; 16 13.8 0 3.65; 17 17.5 0 3.65; 18 20.5 0 3.65; 19 0 0 7.15; 20 3 0 7.15; 21 6.7 0
7.15; 22 10.25 0 7.15; 23 13.8 0 7.15; 24 17.5 0 7.15; 25 20.5 0 7.15; 26 0 0 11.3; 27
3 0 11.3; 28 6.7 0 11.3; 29 10.25 0 11.3; 30 13.8 0 11.3; 31 17.5 0 11.3; 32 20.5 0
11.3; 33 0 1.5 0; 34 3 1.5 0; 35 6.7 1.5 0; 36 10.25 1.5 0; 37 11.9 1.5 0; 38 13.8 1.5
0;39 17.5 1.5 0; 40 20.5 1.5 0; 41 6.7 1.5 2; 42 11.9 1.5 2; 43 13.8 1.5 2;44 0 1.5 3.65;
45 3 1.5 3.65; 46 6.7 1.5 3.65; 47 10.25 1.5 3.65; 48 13.8 1.5 3.65; 49 17.5 1.5 3.65;
50 20.5 1.5 3.65; 51 0 1.5 7.15; 52 3 1.5 7.15; 53 6.7 1.5 7.15; 54 10.25 1.5 7.15; 55
13.8 1.5 7.15; 56 17.5 1.5 7.15; 57 20.5 1.5 7.15; 58 0 1.5 11.3; 59 3 1.5 11.3; 60 6.7
1.5 11.3; 61 10.25 1.5 11.3; 62 13.8 1.5 11.3; 63 17.5 1.5 11.3; 64 20.5 1.5 11.3; 65
6.7 3.1 0; 66 6.7 3.1 2; 67 0 4.7 0; 68 3 4.7 0; 69 6.7 4.7 0; 70 10.25 4.7 0; 71 11.9 4.7
0; 72 13.8 4.7 0; 73 17.5 4.7 0; 74 20.5 4.7 0; 75 6.7 4.7 2; 76 11.9 4.7 2; 77 13.8 4.7
2; 78 0 4.7 3.65; 79 3 4.7 3.65; 80 6.7 4.7 3.65; 81 10.25 4.7 3.65; 82 13.8 4.7 3.65;
83 17.5 4.7 3.65; 84 20.5 4.7 3.65; 85 0 4.7 7.15; 86 3 4.7 7.15; 87 3.85 4.7 7.15; 88
6.7 4.7 7.15; 89 10.25 4.7 7.15; 90 13.8 4.7 7.15; 91 16.65 4.7 7.15; 92 17.5 4.7 7.15;
93 20.5 4.7 7.15; 94 0 4.7 11.3; 95 3 4.7 11.3; 96 3.85 4.7 11.3; 97 6.7 4.7 11.3; 98
10.25 4.7 11.3; 99 13.8 4.7 11.3; 100 16.65 4.7 11.3; 101 17.5 4.7 11.3; 102 20.5 4.7
11.3; 103 6.7 6.3 0; 104 6.7 6.3 2; 105 0 7.9 0; 106 3 7.9 0; 107 6.7 7.9 0; 108 10.25
7.9 0; 109 11.9 7.9 0; 110 13.8 7.9 0; 111 17.5 7.9 0; 112 20.5 7.9 0; 113 6.7 7.9 2;
114 11.9 7.9 2; 115 13.8 7.9 2; 116 0 7.9 3.65; 117 3 7.9 3.65; 118 6.7 7.9 3.65; 119
10.25 7.9 3.65; 120 13.8 7.9 3.65; 121 17.5 7.9 3.65; 122 20.5 7.9 3.65; 123 0 7.9
7.15; 124 3 7.9 7.15; 125 3.85 7.9 7.15; 126 6.7 7.9 7.15; 127 10.25 7.9 7.15; 128
13.8 7.9 7.15; 129 16.65 7.9 7.15; 130 17.5 7.9 7.15; 131 20.5 7.9 7.15; 132 0 7.9
11.3; 133 3 7.9 11.3; 134 3.85 7.9 11.3; 135 6.7 7.9 11.3; 136 10.25 7.9 11.3; 137
13.8 7.9 11.3; 138 16.65 7.9 11.3; 139 17.5 7.9 11.3; 140 20.5 7.9 11.3; 141 6.7 9.5 0;
142 6.7 9.5 2; 143 0 11.1 0; 144 3 11.1 0; 145 6.7 11.1 0; 146 10.25 11.1 0; 147 11.9
11.1 0; 148 13.8 11.1 0; 149 17.5 11.1 0; 150 20.5 11.1 0; 151 6.7 11.1 2; 152 11.9
11.1 2; 153 13.8 11.1 2; 154 0 11.1 3.65; 155 3 11.1 3.65; 156 6.7 11.1 3.65; 157
10.25 11.1 3.65; 158 13.8 11.1 3.65; 159 17.5 11.1 3.65; 160 20.5 11.1 3.65; 161 0
11.1 7.15; 162 3 11.1 7.15; 163 3.85 11.1 7.15; 164 6.7 11.1 7.15; 165 10.25 11.1
7.15; 166 13.8 11.1 7.15; 167 16.65 11.1 7.15; 168 17.5 11.1 7.15; 169 20.5 11.1
7.15; 170 0 11.1 11.3; 171 3 11.1 11.3; 172 3.85 11.1 11.3; 173 6.7 11.1 11.3; 174
10.25 11.1 11.3; 175 13.8 11.1 11.3; 176 16.65 11.1 11.3; 177 17.5 11.1 11.3; 178
20.5 11.1 11.3; 179 6.7 12.7 0; 180 6.7 12.7 2; 181 0 14.3 0; 182 3 14.3 0; 183 6.7
14.3 0; 184 10.25 14.3 0; 185 11.9 14.3 0; 186 13.8 14.3 0; 187 17.5 14.3 0; 188 20.5
14.3 0; 189 6.7 14.3 2; 190 11.9 14.3 2; 191 13.8 14.3 2; 192 0 14.3 3.65; 193 3 14.3
3.65; 194 6.7 14.3 3.65; 195 10.25 14.3 3.65; 196 13.8 14.3 3.65; 197 17.5 14.3 3.65;
198 20.5 14.3 3.65; 199 0 14.3 7.15; 200 3 14.3 7.15; 201 3.85 14.3 7.15; 202 6.7 14.3
7.15; 203 10.25 14.3 7.15; 204 13.8 14.3 7.15; 205 16.65 14.3 7.15; 206 17.5 14.3
7.15; 207 20.5 14.3 7.15; 208 0 14.3 11.3; 209 3 14.3 11.3; 210 3.85 14.3 11.3; 211
6.7 14.3 11.3; 212 10.25 14.3 11.3; 213 13.8 14.3 11.3; 214 16.65 14.3 11.3; 215 17.5
14.3 11.3; 216 20.5 14.3 11.3; 217 6.7 15.9 0; 218 6.7 15.9 2; 219 0 17.5 0; 220 3
17.5 0; 221 6.7 17.5 0; 222 10.25 17.5 0; 223 11.9 17.5 0; 224 13.8 17.5 0; 225 17.5
17.5 0; 226 20.5 17.5 0; 227 6.7 17.5 2; 228 11.9 17.5 2; 229 13.8 17.5 2; 230 0 17.5
3.65; 231 3 17.5 3.65; 232 6.7 17.5 3.65; 233 10.25 17.5 3.65; 234 13.8 17.5 3.65;
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 39
235 17.5 17.5 3.65; 236 20.5 17.5 3.65; 237 0 17.5 7.15; 238 3 17.5 7.15; 239 3.85
17.5 7.15; 240 6.7 17.5 7.15; 241 10.25 17.5 7.15; 242 13.8 17.5 7.15; 243 16.65 17.5
7.15; 244 17.5 17.5 7.15; 245 20.5 17.5 7.15; 246 0 17.5 11.3; 247 3 17.5 11.3; 248
3.85 17.5 11.3; 249 6.7 17.5 11.3; 250 10.25 17.5 11.3; 251 13.8 17.5 11.3; 252 16.65
17.5 11.3; 253 17.5 17.5 11.3; 254 20.5 17.5 11.3; 255 6.7 20.7 0; 256 10.25 20.7 0;
257 11.9 20.7 0; 258 13.8 20.7 0; 259 11.9 20.7 2; 260 13.8 20.7 2; 261 6.7 20.7 3.65;
262 10.25 20.7 3.65; 263 13.8 20.7 3.65;
MEMBER INCIDENCES
1 33 1; 2 34 2; 3 35 3; 4 36 4; 5 37 5; 6 38 6; 7 39 7; 8 40 8; 9 41 9; 10 42 10; 11 43
11; 12 44 12; 13 45 13; 14 46 14; 15 47 15; 16 48 16; 17 49 17; 18 50 18; 19 51 19;
20 52 20; 21 53 21; 22 54 22; 23 55 23; 24 56 24; 25 57 25; 26 58 26; 27 59 27; 28 60
28; 29 61 29; 30 62 30; 31 63 31; 32 64 32; 101 33 67; 102 34 68; 103 65 69; 104 35
65; 105 36 70; 106 37 71; 107 38 72; 108 39 73; 109 40 74; 110 66 75; 111 41 66;
112 42 76; 113 43 77; 114 44 78; 115 45 79; 116 46 80; 117 47 81; 118 48 82; 119 49
83; 120 50 84; 121 51 85; 122 52 86; 123 53 88; 124 54 89; 125 55 90; 126 56 92;
127 57 93; 128 58 94; 129 59 95; 130 60 97; 131 61 98; 132 62 99; 133 63 101; 134
64 102; 201 67 105; 202 68 106; 203 103 107; 204 69 103; 205 70 108; 206 71 109;
207 72 110; 208 73 111; 209 74 112; 210 104 113; 211 75 104; 212 76 114; 213 77
115; 214 78 116; 215 79 117; 216 80 118; 217 81 119; 218 82 120; 219 83 121; 220
84 122; 221 85 123; 222 86 124; 223 88 126; 224 89 127; 225 90 128; 226 92 130;
227 93 131; 228 94 132; 229 95 133; 230 97 135; 231 98 136; 232 99 137; 233 101
139; 234 102 140; 301 105 143; 302 106 144; 303 141 145; 304 107 141; 305 108
146; 306 109 147; 307 110 148; 308 111 149; 309 112 150; 310 142 151; 311 113
142; 312 114 152; 313 115 153; 314 116 154; 315 117 155; 316 118 156; 317 119
157; 318 120 158; 319 121 159; 320 122 160; 321 123 161; 322 124 162; 323 126
164; 324 127 165; 325 128 166; 326 130 168; 327 131 169; 328 132 170; 329 133
171; 330 135 173; 331 136 174; 332 137 175; 333 139 177; 334 140 178; 401 143
181; 402 144 182; 403 179 183; 404 145 179; 405 146 184; 406 147 185; 407 148
186; 408 149 187; 409 150 188; 410 180 189; 411 151 180; 412 152 190; 413 153
191; 414 154 192; 415 155 193; 416 156 194; 417 157 195; 418 158 196; 419 159
197; 420 160 198; 421 161 199; 422 162 200; 423 164 202; 424 165 203; 425 166
204; 426 168 206; 427 169 207; 428 170 208; 429 171 209; 430 173 211; 431 174
212; 432 175 213; 433 177 215; 434 178 216; 501 181 219;502 182 220; 503 217
221; 504 183 217; 505 184 222; 506 185 223; 507 186 224; 508 187 225; 509 188
226; 510 218 227; 511 189 218; 512 190 228; 513 191 229; 514 192 230; 515 193
231; 516 194 232; 517 195 233; 518 196 234; 519 197 235; 520 198 236; 521 199
237; 522 200 238; 523 202 240; 524 203 241; 525 204 242; 526 206 244; 527 207
245; 528 208 246; 529 209 247; 530 211 249; 531 212 250; 532 213 251; 533 215
253; 534 216 254; 601 255 221; 602 256 222; 603 257 223; 604 258 224; 605 259
228; 606 260 229; 607 261 232; 608 262 233; 609 263 234; 1001 33 34; 1002 34 35;
1003 35 36; 1004 36 37; 1005 37 38; 1006 38 39; 1007 39 40; 1008 42 43; 1009 44
45; 1010 45 46; 1011 46 47; 1012 47 48; 1013 48 49; 1014 49 50; 1015 51 52; 1016
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 40
52 53; 1017 53 54; 1018 54 55; 1019 55 56; 1020 56 57; 1021 58 59; 1022 59 60;
1023 60 61; 1024 61 62; 1025 62 63; 1026 63 64; 1027 35 41; 1028 37 42; 1029 38
43; 1030 33 44; 1031 34 45; 1032 36 47; 1033 39 49; 1034 40 50; 1035 41 46; 1036
43 48;1037 44 51; 1038 45 52; 1039 46 53; 1040 47 54; 1041 48 55; 1042 49 56;1043
50 57; 1044 51 58; 1045 52 59; 1046 53 60; 1047 54 61; 1048 55 62; 1049 56 63;
1050 57 64; 1051 65 66; 2001 67 68; 2002 68 69; 2003 69 70; 2004 70 71; 2005 71
72; 2006 72 73; 2007 73 74; 2008 76 77; 2009 78 79; 2010 79 80; 2011 80 81; 2012
81 82; 2013 82 83; 2014 83 84; 2015 85 86; 2016 86 87; 2017 87 88; 2018 88 89;
2019 89 90; 2020 90 91; 2021 91 92; 2022 92 93; 2023 94 95; 2024 95 96; 2025 96
97; 2026 97 98; 2027 98 99; 2028 99 100; 2029 100 101; 2030 101 102; 2031 67 78;
2032 68 79; 2033 69 75; 2034 75 80; 2035 70 81; 2036 71 76; 2037 72 77; 2038 77
82; 2039 73 83; 2040 74 84; 2041 78 85; 2042 81 89; 2043 84 93; 2044 85 94; 2045
87 96; 2046 88 97; 2047 89 98; 2048 90 99; 2049 91 100; 2050 93 102; 2051 103
104; 3001 105 106; 3002 106 107; 3003 107 108; 3004 108 109; 3005 109 110; 3006
110 111; 3007 111 112; 3008 114 115; 3009 116 117; 3010 117 118; 3011 118 119;
3012 119 120; 3013 120 121; 3014 121 122; 3015 123 124; 3016 124 125; 3017 125
126; 3018 126 127; 3019 127 128; 3020 128 129; 3021 129 130; 3022 130 131; 3023
132 133; 3024 133 134; 3025 134 135; 3026 135 136; 3027 136 137; 3028 137 138;
3029 138 139; 3030 139 140; 3031 105 116; 3032 106 117; 3033 107 113; 3034 113
118; 3035 108 119; 3036 109 114; 3037 110 115; 3038 115 120; 3039 111 121; 3040
112 122; 3041 116 123; 3042 119 127; 3043 122 131; 3044 123 132; 3045 125
134;3046 126 135; 3047 127 136; 3048 128 137; 3049 129 138; 3050 131 140; 3051
141 142; 4001 143 144; 4002 144 145; 4003 145 146; 4004 146 147; 4005 147 148;
4006 148 149; 4007 149 150; 4008 152 153; 4009 154 155; 4010 155 156; 4011 156
157; 4012 157 158; 4013 158 159; 4014 159 160; 4015 161 162; 4016 162 163; 4017
163 164; 4018 164 165; 4019 165 166; 4020 166 167; 4021 167 168; 4022 168 169;
4023 170 171; 4024 171 172; 4025 172 173; 4026 173 174; 4027 174 175; 4028 175
176; 4029 176 177; 4030 177 178; 4031 143 154; 4032 144 155; 4033 145 151; 4034
151 156; 4035 146 157; 4036 147 152; 4037 148 153; 4038 153 158; 4039 149
159;4040 150 160; 4041 154 161; 4042 157 165; 4043 160 169; 4044 161 170; 4045
163 172; 4046 164 173; 4047 165 174; 4048 166 175; 4049 167 176; 4050 169 178;
4051 179 180; 5001 181 182; 5002 182 183; 5003 183 184; 5004 184 185; 5005 185
186; 5006 186 187; 5007 187 188; 5008 190 191; 5009 192 193; 5010 193 194; 5011
194 195; 5012 195 196; 5013 196 197; 5014 197 198; 5015 199 200; 5016 200 201;
5017 201 202; 5018 202 203; 5019 203 204; 5020 204 205; 5021 205 206; 5022 206
207; 5023 208 209; 5024 209 210; 5025 210 211; 5026 211 212; 5027 212 213; 5028
213 214; 5029 214 215; 5030 215 216; 5031 181 192; 5032 182 193; 5033 183 189;
5034 189 194; 5035 184 195; 5036 185 190; 5037 186 191; 5038 191 196; 5039 187
197; 5040 188 198; 5041 192 199; 5042 195 203; 5043 198 207; 5044 199 208; 5045
201 210; 5046 202 211; 5047 203 212; 5048 204 213; 5049 205 214; 5050 207 216;
5051 217 218; 6001 219 220; 6002 220 221; 6003 221 222; 6004 222 223; 6005 223
224; 6006 224 225; 6007 225 226; 6008 228 229; 6009 230 231; 6010 231 232; 6011
232 233; 6012 233 234; 6013 234 235; 6014 235 236; 6015 237 238; 6016 238 239;
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 41
6017 239 240; 6018 240 241; 6019 241 242; 6020 242 243; 6021 243 244; 6022 244
245; 6023 246 247; 6024 247 248; 6025 248 249; 6026 249 250; 6027 250 251;6028
251 252; 6029 252 253; 6030 253 254; 6031 219 230; 6032 220 231; 6033 221 227;
6034 227 232; 6035 222 233; 6036 223 228; 6037 224 229; 6038 229 234; 6039 225
235; 6040 226 236; 6041 230 237; 6042 233 241; 6043 236 245; 6044 237 246; 6045
239 248; 6046 240 249; 6047 241 250; 6048 242 251; 6049 243 252; 6050 245 254;
7001 255 256; 7002 256 257; 7003 257 258; 7004 259 260; 7005 261 262; 7006 262
263; 7007 255 261; 7008 256 262; 7009 257 259; 7010 260 258; 7011 260 263;
DEFINE MATERIAL START
ISOTROPIC CONCRETE
E 2.17185e+007
POISSON 0.17
DENSITY 23.5616
ALPHA 1e-005
DAMP 0.05
END DEFINE MATERIAL
MEMBER PROPERTY INDIAN
3 4 6 14 16 20 21 23 24 27 28 30 31 103 TO 105 107 116 118 122 123 125 126 129
130 132 133 203 TO 205 207 216 218 222 223 225 226 229 230 232 233 303 304 TO
305 307 316 318 322 323 325 326 329 330 332 333 403 TO 405 407 416 418 422 423
425 426 429 430 432 433 503 TO 505 507 516 518 522 523 525 526 529 530 532
533 601 602 604 607 609 PRIS YD 0.5 ZD 0.3
1 2 7 8 12 13 15 17 TO 19 22 25 26 29 32 101 102 108 109 114 115 117 119 TO 121
124 127 128 131 134 201 202 208 209 214 215 217 219 TO 221 224 227 228 231
234 301 302 308 309 314 315 317 319 TO 321 324 327 328 331 334 401 402 408
409 414 415 417 419 TO 421 424 427 428 431 434 501 502 508 509 514 515 517
519 TO 521 524 527 528 531 534 608 PRIS YD 0.3 ZD 0.5
5 9 TO 11 106 110 TO 113 206 210 TO 213 306 310 TO 313 406 410 TO 413 506
510 TO 513 603 605 606 1001 TO 1051 2001 TO 2051 3001 TO 3051 4001 TO 4051
5001 TO 5051 6001 TO 6050 7001 TO 7011 PRIS YD 0.4 ZD 0.3
CONSTANTS
MATERIAL CONCRETE ALL
SUPPORTS
1 TO 32 FIXED
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 42
DEFINE 1893 LOAD
ZONE 0.1 RF 3 I 1 SS 2 ST 1 DM 5 DT 1.5
SELFWEIGHT 1
MEMBER WEIGHT
1001 TO 1050 2001 2002 2005 TO 2008 2011 2012 2023 2024 2026 TO 2028 2030
2031 2036 TO 2038 2040 2042 2044 2047 2050 3001 3002 3005 TO 3008 3011 3012
3023 3024 3026 TO 3028 3030 3031 3036 TO 3038 3040 3042 3044 3047 3050 4001
4002 4005 TO 4008 4011 4012 4023 4024 4026 TO 4028 4030 4031 4036 TO 4038
4040 4042 4044 4047 4050 5001 5002 5005 TO 5008 5011 5012 5023 5024 5026
5027 TO 5028 5030 5031 5036 TO 5038 5040 5042 5044 5047 5050 6003 TO 6005 -
6008 6011 6012 6033 6034 6036 TO 6038 UNI 16
2009 2010 2013 TO 2022 2032 TO 2035 2039 2045 2046 2048 2049 3009 3010 3013
3014 TO 3022 3032 TO 3035 3039 3045 3046 3048 3049 4009 4010 4013 TO 4022
4032 TO 4035 4039 4045 4046 4048 4049 5009 5010 5013 TO 5022 5032 TO 5035
5039 5045 5046 5048 5049 UNI 8
6001 6002 6006 6007 6023 TO 6031 6040 6041 6043 6044 6050 7001 TO 7003 7005
7006 TO 7007 7010 7011 UNI 2
1051 2051 3051 4051 5051 UNI 20
FLOOR WEIGHT
YRANGE 4.7 20.7 FLOAD -4.125 XRANGE 0 20.5 ZRANGE 0 3.65
YRANGE 4.7 20.7 FLOAD -4.125 XRANGE 0 20.5 ZRANGE 7.15 11.3
ONEWAY LOAD
YRANGE 4.7 20.7 ONE -4.125 XRANGE 0 20.5 ZRANGE 3.65 7.15
CHECK SOFT STOREY
DEFINE WIND LOAD
TYPE 1
INT 0.67 HEIG 19.2
EXP 1 JOINT 33 TO 263
LOAD 1 LOADTYPE None TITLE EQ XP
1893 LOAD X 1
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 43
LOAD 2 LOADTYPE None TITLE EQ XN
1893 LOAD X -1
LOAD 3 LOADTYPE None TITLE EQ ZP
1893 LOAD Z 1
LOAD 4 LOADTYPE None TITLE EQ ZN
1893 LOAD Z -1
LOAD 5 LOADTYPE None TITLE WL XP
WIND LOAD X 1 TYPE 1
LOAD 6 LOADTYPE None TITLE WL XN
WIND LOAD X -1 TYPE 1
LOAD 7 LOADTYPE None TITLE WL ZP
WIND LOAD Z 1 TYPE 1
LOAD 8 LOADTYPE None TITLE WL ZN
WIND LOAD Z -1 TYPE 1
LOAD 9 LOADTYPE None TITLE DEAD LOAD
SELFWEIGHT Y -1 LIST 1 TO 32 101 TO 134 201 TO 234 301 TO 334 401 TO
434 501 502 TO 534 601 TO 609 1001 TO 1037 1040 1043 TO 1051 2001 TO 2051
3001 TO 3051 4001 TO 4051 5001 TO 5051 6001 TO 6050 7001 TO 7011
FLOOR LOAD
YRANGE 4.7 20.7 FLOAD -4.125 XRANGE 0 20.5 ZRANGE 0 3.65 GY
YRANGE 4.7 20.7 FLOAD -4.125 XRANGE 0 20.5 ZRANGE 7.15 11.3 GY
ONEWAY LOAD
YRANGE 4.7 20.7 ONE -4.125 XRANGE 0 20.5 ZRANGE 3.65 7.15 GY
MEMBER LOAD
1001 TO 1026 1028 TO 1034 1036 TO 1050 2001 2002 2005 TO 2008 2011 2012
2023 2024 2026 TO 2028 2030 2031 2036 TO 2038 2040 2042 2044 2047 2050 3001
3002 3005 TO 3008 3011 3012 3023 3024 3026 TO 3028 3030 3031 3036 TO 3038
3040 3042 3044 3047 3050 4001 4002 4005 TO 4008 4011 4012 4023 4024 4026 TO
4028 4030 4031 4036 TO 4038 4040 4042 4044 4047 4050 5001 5002 5005 TO 5008
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 44
5011 5012 5023 5024 5026 TO 5028 5030 5031 5036 TO 5038 5040 5042 5044 5047
5050 6003 TO 6005 6008 6011 6012 6036 TO 6038 UNI GY -16
1027 1035 2009 2010 2013 TO 2022 2032 TO 2035 2039 2045 2046 2048 2049 3009
3010 3013 TO 3022 3032 TO 3035 3039 3045 3046 3048 3049 4009 4010 4013 TO
4022 4032 TO 4035 4039 4045 4046 4048 4049 5009 5010 5013 TO 5022 5032 TO
5035 5039 5045 5046 5048 5049 6033 6034 UNI GY -8
6001 6002 6006 6007 6023 TO 6031 6040 6041 6043 6044 6050 7001 TO 7003 7005
7006 TO 7007 7010 7011 UNI GY -2
1051 2051 3051 4051 5051 UNI GY -20
LOAD 10 LOADTYPE None TITLE LIVE LOAD
FLOOR LOAD
YRANGE 4.7 20.7 FLOAD -2 XRANGE 0 20.5 ZRANGE 0 3.65 GY
YRANGE 4.7 20.7 FLOAD -2 XRANGE 0 20.5 ZRANGE 7.15 11.3 GY
ONEWAY LOAD
YRANGE 4.7 20.7 ONE -2 XRANGE 0 20.5 ZRANGE 3.65 7.15 GY
LOAD COMB 11 SERVICE (DL+LL)
9 1.0 10 1.0
LOAD COMB 12 ULTIMATE 1.5 (DL+LL)
9 1.5 10 1.5
LOAD COMB 13 1.2 (DL+LL+WL XP)
9 1.2 10 1.2 5 1.2
LOAD COMB 14 1.2 (DL+LL+WL XN)
6 1.2 9 1.2 10 1.2
LOAD COMB 15 1.2 (DL+LL+WL ZP)
9 1.2 10 1.2 7 1.2
LOAD COMB 16 1.2 (DL+LL+WL ZN)
9 1.2 10 1.2 8 1.2
LOAD COMB 17 1.2 (DL+LL+EQ XP)
1 1.2 9 1.2 10 1.2
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 45
LOAD COMB 18 1.2 (DL+LL+EQ XN)
9 1.2 10 1.2 2 1.2
LOAD COMB 19 1.2 (DL+LL+EQ ZP)
3 1.2 9 1.2 10 1.2
LOAD COMB 20 1.2 (DL+LL+EQ ZN)
4 1.2 9 1.2 10 1.2
LOAD COMB 21 1.5(DL+EQ XP)
9 1.5 1 1.5
LOAD COMB 22 1.5(DL+EQ XN)
2 1.5 9 1.5
LOAD COMB 23 1.5(DL+EQ ZP)
3 1.5 9 1.5
LOAD COMB 24 1.5(DL+EQ ZN)
4 1.5 9 1.5
LOAD COMB 25 1.5(DL+WL XP)
5 1.5 9 1.5
LOAD COMB 26 1.5(DL+WL XN)
6 1.5 9 1.5
LOAD COMB 27 1.5(DL+WL ZP)
7 1.5 9 1.5
LOAD COMB 28 1.5(DL+WL ZN)
9 1.5 8 1.5
LOAD COMB 29 0.9DL+1.5 EQ XP
9 0.9 1 1.5
LOAD COMB 30 0.9DL+1.5 EQ XN
9 0.9 2 1.5
LOAD COMB 31 0.9DL+1.5 EQ ZP
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 46
3 1.5 9 0.9
LOAD COMB 32 0.9DL+1.5 EQ ZN
4 1.5 9 0.9
LOAD COMB 33 0.9DL+1.5 WL XP
9 0.9 5 1.5
LOAD COMB 34 0.9DL+1.5 WL XN
9 0.9 6 1.5
LOAD COMB 35 0.9DL+1.5 WL ZP
9 0.9 7 1.5
LOAD COMB 36 0.9DL+1.5 WL ZN
8 1.5 9 0.9
PERFORM ANALYSIS
LOAD LIST 11 TO 36
PERFORM ANALYSIS PRINT ALL
PRINT SUPPORT REACTION
FINISH
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 47
3.11 ANALYSIS OF THE MULTISTORIED RESIDENTIAL CUM
COMMERCIAL BUILDING FOR GRAVITY LOADS:
The structure is a residential building which comes under the category of
residential cum commercial building. Hence it has taken care of different types of
dead loads. The dead loads could be of its own self weight, furniture's, some
equipments, machineries, computers, store keeps, etc. Hence the building has to be
designed in such a way that it has to take care of all the loads imposed on it. The
easiest way to withstand these loads is by providing proper beams and columns. The
live load of the building could be taken from the standards.
FLOOR LOAD:
Floor load slab is distributed on the adjoining members as trapezoidal &
triangular loads depending on the length of the sides, as shown in figure. Internally
these loads are converted to multiple point loads. The loads are applied as area loads
over the building. These loads would be transferred to beams and columns.
FORMULAE FOR CALCULATING GRAVITY LOAD:
Area of triangle =1
2 𝑋 (𝑏 𝑋 ℎ)
Area of trapezoidal =A + B
2 𝑋 ℎ
Weight of ceiling plastering = area X 0.012 X 20
Weight of flooring = area X 0.02 X 20 + (area X 0.02 X 26.7)
Total dead load = weigth of ceiling plastering + weight of flooring
Live Load = 2.000 KN (As per IS code book)
Total load = Total Dead Load + Live Load
Factored load = 1.5 X Total load
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 48
FIG3.1. DISTRIBUTION OF LOAD FROM FLOOR/SLAB TO BEAMS
TABLE 3.2 FOR FINDING AREA OF SLAB
SLAB
No A B H B
Area of
triangle
Area of
trapezoidal
1. 0.65 3.65 1.5 3.0 2.25 3.225
2. 0.05 3.70 1.825 3.65 3.331 3.421
3. 0.1 3.65 1.775 3.55 3.151 3.328
4. 6.75 10.25 1.75 3.50 3.0625 14.875
5. 0.3 4.15 1.925 3.85 3.71 4.283
6. 0.45 4.15 1.85 3.70 3.422 4.578
7. 0.6 4.15 1.775 3.55 3.151 4.215
slab.No Wt. c.p
(tri)
Wt.
floor
(tri)
T.D.L
(tri)
L.L
(tri) T.L (tri) F.L (tri)
1. 0.54 2.10 2.64 2.00 4.64 6.96
2. 0.799 3.11 3.90 2.00 5.90 8.85
3. 0.756 2.94 3.696 2.00 5.696 8.544
4. 0.735 2.86 3.595 2.00 5.595 8.393
5. 0.890 3.465 4.355 2.00 6.355 9.533
6. 0.821 3.196 4.017 2.00 6.017 9.026
7. 0.756 2.943 3.699 2.00 5.699 8.548
TABLE 3.3 FINDING FACTORED LOAD FOR TRIANGULAR
AREA
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 49
TABLE 3.4 FOR FINDING FACTORED LOAD FOR
TRAPEZOIDAL AREA
Slab.
No
Wt. c.p Wt. floor T.D.L L.L T.L F.L
1. 0.774 3.012 3.786 2.00 5.786 8.679
2. 0.821 3.195 4.016 2.00 6.016 9.024
3. 0.798 3.108 3.906 2.00 5.906 8.859
4. 3.57 13.893 17.463 2.00 19.463 29.194
5. 1.027 4.00 5.027 2.00 7.027 10.541
6. 1.098 4.275 5.373 2.00 7.373 11.061
7. 1.012 3.936 4.948 2.00 6.948 10.423
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 50
FIG3.2 DEFORMED SHAPE OF THE BUILDING UNDER
GRAVITY LOADS
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 51
FIG3.3 BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAM FOR GRAVITY LOADS
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 52
FIG3.4 MAXIMUM BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAM FOR BEAM
NO 5021 UNDER GRAVITY LOAD
FIG3.5 MAXIMUM BENDING MOMENT VALUES FOR
GRAVITY LOAD
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 53
3.12 ANALYSIS OF THE MULTISTORIED RESIDENTIAL
CUM COMMERCIAL BUILDING FOR WIND LOADS:
WIND LOADS:
Buildings and their components are to be designed to withstand the
code-specified wind loads. Calculating wind loads is important in design of the wind
force-resisting system, including structural members, components, and cladding,
against shear, sliding, overturning, and uplift actions.
DESIGN WIND LOADS:
The wind pressure on a structure depends on the location of the
structure, height of structure above the ground level and also on the shape of the
structure.
The code gives the basic wind pressure for the structures in various
parts of the country. Both the wind pressure viz. including wind of short duration and
excluding wind of short duration have been given. All structures should be designed
for the short duration wind. For buildings up to 10 m in height, the intensity of wind
pressure, as specified in the code, may be reduced by 25% for stability calculations
and for the design of framework as well as cladding. For buildings over 10 m and up
to 30m height, this reduction can be made for stability calculations and for design of
columns only.
The total pressure on the walls or roof of an industrial building will
depend on the external wind pressure and also on internal wind pressure. The
internal wind pressure depends on the permeability; the internal air pressure may be
neglected. In the case of buildings with normal permeability the internal pressure
can be ± 0.2p. Here ‘+’ indicates pressure and ‘_’ suction, ‘p’ is the basic wind
pressure. If a building has openings larger than 20% of the wind pressure. If a
building has openings larger than 20% of the wall area, the internal air pressure will
be ±0.5 p.
WIND PRESSURE ON WALLS:
The wind pressure per unit area ‘p’ on the wall is taken as 0.5p
pressure on the windward surface and 0.5p suction on leeward surface. When the
walls form an enclosure, the windward wall will be subjected to a pressure of 0.5p
and leeward wall to a suction of 0.5p. The total pressure on the walls will depend on
the internal air pressure also.
For buildings with small permeability, design pressure on wall = 0.5p
For buildings with normal permeability, design pressure on wall = 0.7p
For buildings with large openings, design pressure on wall = p
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 54
If the wind blows parallel to the ridge of the roof, the average external wind
pressure of the roof may be taken as -0.6p on both slopes of the roof over a length
from the gable end equal to the mean height of the roof above the surrounding ground
level and as-0.4p over the remaining length of the roof on both slopes.
When the wind blows parallel to a surface, a wind force acts on the
surface in the direction of the wind. This force is called the ‘Wind Drag’. In the case
of industrial buildings, when wind blows normal to the ridges, the wind drag is equal
to 0.5p measured on plan area of roof and when the direction of wind parallel to the
ridge, wind drag is equal to 0.025p measured on plan area of roof.
Fig3.6 wind drag
In the multi-span roofs with spans, heights and slopes nearly equal, the
windward truss gives shelter to the other trusses. For general stability calculations and
for the design columns, the windward slope of wind-ward span and leeward slope of
leeward span are subjected to the full normal pressure of suction as given in table and
on all other roof slopes, only wind drag is considered (see fig. ). For the design of
roof trusses however, full normal pressure or suction is considered on both faces,
presuming that there was only one span.
The wind pressures given above are the average pressures on a roof slope. For
designing the roof sheeting or the fastenings of roof sheeting, we may take a larger
wind pressure because these pressures may considerably exceed the average value on
small areas. For designing roof sheeting and its fastenings, the values given in Table.
May be increased numerically by 0.3p. In a distance equal to 15% of the length of the
roof from the gable ends, fastenings should be capable of resisting a section of 2.0p
on the area of the roof sheeting them support.
THE WIND LOAD GENERATOR:
The STAAD Wind Load generator is capable of calculating wind loads on the
structure from user specified wind intensities and exposures factors. Different wind
intensities may be specified for different height zones of the structure. Openings in the
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 55
structure may be modeled using exposure factors. An exposure factor is associated
with each joint of the structure and is defined as the fraction of the influence area on
which the wind load acts. Built-in algorithms automatically calculate the wind load on
a SPACE structure and distribute the loads as lateral joint loads.
GENERATION OF WIND LOADS:
The built in wind load generation facility can be used to calculate the wind
loads based on the parameters defined. The following general format should be used
to perform the wind load generation. Note that areas bounded by beam members only
(and ground), and exposed to the wind, are used to define loaded areas(plates and
solids are ignored). The loads generated are applied only at the joints at vertices of the
bounded areas.
BASIC WIND PRESSURES FOR A CITY
S.NO HEIGHT IN METRES PRESSURE IN Kg/m2
1. UPTO 30 200
2. 40 209
3. 45 217
4. 50 222
5. 57 228
TABLE 3.5: BASIC WIND PRESSURES FOR A CITY
For intermediate heights, interpolated values may be adopted.
Calculation of wind loads:
The wind speed in atmospheric boundary layer increases with height
from zero at ground level and to a maximum at a height called gradient height.
Design wind speed:
From IS 875-(PART -III) the Design wind pressure at any height
above mean ground level shall be obtained from the following relationship between
wind pressure and wind velocity.
Pz = 0.6Vz2
Where,
Pz = Design wind pressure in N/m2
at a height of z, and
Vz = Design wind velocity in m/s at a height of z.
Design wind speed:
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 56
The Basic wind speed (Vb) for any site is obtained from Fig no 1 of IS 875-
(PART-III) and shall be modified to include the following effects to get a design
wind velocity at height.
Height of the building above ground level h= 19.2 m
Lateral dimensions of Building = 20.8m x 11.6 m
Design wind speed Vz = Vb.K1.K2.K3
Vb = Basic wind speed
For Hyderabad as per IS 875-(PART-III) is 44 m/sec
K1= Probability factor (Risk coefficient) (5.3.1 of IS 875-III)
= 1
K2= Terrain, Height and Structure size factor (5.3.2 of IS 875-III)
Category-4
Class -B
From Table no 2 of IS-875(PART-III) K2= 0.76
K3= Topographic factor (5.3.3 of IS 875-III)
= 1
Design wind speed Vz = 44x1x0.76x1
= 33.44 m/s
Design wind pressure (Pz) = 0.6Vz2
= 0.6 x 33.442
= 670 N/m2
= 0.670 KN/m2
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 57
FIG3.7 WIND LOAD ACTING ON THE BUILDING FROM X-
POSITIVE DIRECTION
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 58
FIG3.8 WIND LOAD ACTING ON THE BUILDING FROM Z-
POSITIVE DIRECTION
FIG3.9 MAXIMUM BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAM FOR COLUMN NO 117
WIND LOAD ACTING FROM Z +VE DIRECTION
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 59
TABLE 3.6
A TABLE FROM STAAD OUTPUT SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM BENDING
MOMENT FOR WIND LOAD
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 60
3.13 ANALYSIS OF MULITSTORIED RESIDENTIAL CUM
COMMERCIAL BUILDING FOR SEISMIC LOADS:
Reinforced concrete buildings have become more common in India. These
structures mainly consist of beam-column frames with slabs and walls and are
supported by foundation that rest on the ground. The RC frame participates in resting
the earthquake forces and the earthquake shaking generates inertia forces in the
building, which are proportional to the building mass. Since most of the building mass
is concentrated at floor levels. These forces travel downwards to reach the foundation
from where they are dispersed in to the ground. The structural elements, beams,
columns, slabs, and walls at lower storeys experience higher earthquake forces and
hence are designed to be stronger than those at higher levels.
Buildings are mostly provided with Shear walls in lower storey levels to resist
the earthquake loads.
Earthquake Design Consideration:
The building will be designed for horizontal seismic force only.
The structure in analyzed as an earthquake static approach employing the
use of a seismic coefficient Method.
EARTHQUAKE: An earthquake is vibration of earth surface by waves emerging
from the source of disturbance in the earth by virtue of release of energy in the earth’s
crust. It is essentially a sudden and transient motion or series of motions of the earth
surface originating in a limited under ground motion due to disturbance of the elastic
equilibrium of the earth mass and spreading from there in all directions.
REASONS FOR HIGH CASUALITY:
1) Urbanization is rapidly increasing and due to increase in land cost,
many multi storied buildings are being constructed.
2) Code is not mandatory.
3) Construction as such is governed by municipal bye-laws.
4) Seismic provisions are not incorporated.
5) Non enforceation of elaborated checks proper ways.
6) No checks even for simple ordinary design.
GENERAL GUIDE LINES:
DRIFT: It is the maximum lateral displacement of the structure with respect to
total height or relative inter-storey displacement. The overall drifts index is the ratio
of maximum roof displacement to the height of the structure and inter-storey drift is
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 61
the ratio of maximum difference of lateral displacement at top and bottom of the
storey divided by the storey height.
Nonstructural elements and structural non seismic members
primarily get damaged due to drift. Higher the lateral stiffness lesser is the likely damage.
The storey drift in any storey due to minimum specified design lateral force with partial
safety factor of unity shall not exceed 0.004 times the storey height.
Separation between adjacent units or buildings:
Two adjacent buildings or two adjacent units of the same
building with separation joint in between shall be separated by distance equal to the
amount R times the sum of the calculated storey displacements as specified above of
each of them to avoid damaging contact when the two units deflect towards each
other.
Soft storey:
Soft storey or flexible storey is one in which the lateral stiffness is less than
70% of that in the storey above or less than 80% of the average lateral stiffness of the
three storey's above. In case of buildings with a flexible storey such as ground storey
consisting of open spaces for parking i.e. stilt buildings, special arrangements are
need to be made to increase the lateral strength and stiffness of the soft storey.
For such buildings, dynamic analysis is carried out including the
strength and stiffness effects of infill s and inelastic deformations in the members
particularly those in the soft storey and members designed accordingly. Alternatively,
the following design criteria are to be adopted after carrying the
earthquake analysis neglecting the effect of infill walls in other storey's. When the
floor levels of two similar adjacent buildings are at the same elevation levels, factor R
can be taken as R/2.
a) The columns and beams of the soft storey are to be designed for 2.5 times the
storey shear and moments calculated under seismic loads specified.
b) Besides the columns designed and detailed for calculated storey shears and
moments, shear walls placed symmetrically in both feasible to be designed
exclusively for 1.35 times the lateral storey shear calculated.
Foundation:
The use of foundations vulnerable to significant differential settlement due to
ground shaping shall be avoided for structures in seismic zones-III, IV & V.
individual spread footings or pile caps shall be interconnected with ties except when
individual spread footings are directly supported on rock. All ties shall be capable of
carrying in tension and in compression an axial force equal to Ah/A times the larger
of the column or pile cap load in addition to the otherwise computed forces where Ah
is the design horizontal spectrum value.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 62
Projections:
a) Vertical projections: Tanks, towers parapets, chimneys and other vertical
cantilever projections attached to buildings and projecting the
above roof shall be designed and checked for stability for 5 times the
design horizontal seismic co-efficient Ah. In the analysis of the building,
the weight of these projecting elements will be lumped with the roof
weight.
b) Horizontal projections: All horizontal projections like cornices and
balconies shall be designed and checked for stability for 5 times the
design vertical co-efficient equal to 10/3 Ah. These increased design
forces either for vertical projection or horizontal projection are only
for designing the projecting parts and their connection with the
main structures. This means that for the design of main structure such
increase need not to be considered.
Shape of the building:
Very slender buildings should be avoided. Large overhangs and projections
attract large earthquake forces. Heavy masses like water tanks, etc., at the top shall be
avoided. Small water tanks, if provided, should be properly connected with the
framing system. Building should be sufficiently be away from steep slopes. It should
be built on filled up soil.
Symmetry should be avoided as they undergo torsion and extreme corners are
subjected to very large earthquake forces.
Damping:
Damping is the removal of kinetic energy and potential energy from a
vibrating structure and by virtue of which the amplitude of vibration diminishes
steadily. Some vibrations are due to initial displacement or initial velocity. Due to
damping, these vibrations decay in amplitude.
1. When there are harmonic applied forces and its period is nearly equal to
the natural period of the structure. The vibration will grow from zero
displacement and velocity. Damping limits the vibration maximum
amplitude.
2. More damping less is the amplitude.
3. Negative damping arise while the vibration is small, followed by positive
damping at large amplitude vibrations. The code adopted for design of
multistoried buildings considering a seismic force is IS: 1893 (part I) –
2002. More than 60% area of India is earthquake prone. According to IS:
1893(part I) -2002, India is divided into several zones to their magnitude
of intensities.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 63
NEED FOR SEISMIC ZONATION:
a) There cannot be entirely scientific basis for zonation in view of the
scanty data available.
b) Though the magnitudes are known there is little instrumental evidence
for comparing damage.
c) Hence, magnitudes and epicenters are used.
REVISION OF PAST CODES:
It is very difficult to predict the occurrence time an exact location of
next earthquake. More than 60% area is earthquake prone. Various problems are
generated after an earthquake. The magnitudes of these problems are very severe.
In order to reduce this effective counter measures are to be taken. Enough steps
should be taken by the concerned authorities for code compliance so that the
structures being constructed are earthquake resistant. Especially during the past 15
years there were severe earthquake with a less time gap and high intensity. Based
on the technology advancement and knowledge gained after earthquake
occurrences, the seismic code is usually revised. The fifth revision of IS: 1893
with severe zone was done in 2002 after along gap of 18 years. According to the
present revision, the latest map has only 4 zones.
Fifth Revision in 2002:
Code has been split into 5 parts :-
Part 1: General provisions and buildings.
Part 2: Liquid retaining tanks-elevated and ground supported.
Part 3: Bridges and retaining walls.
Part 4: Industrial structures including stack like structures.
Part 5: Dams and embankment.
Part 1: General provisions and buildings:
Zone map is revised and zone factors changed
Response spectra for three types of founding strata
Empirical expression for fundamental natural period
Concept of response reduction factor
Lower bound for design base shear
Model combination rule is revised
Other clauses revised and redrafted
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 64
Design philosophy:
The design approach is IS: 1893 is
To ensure that the structure at least a minimum strength to with hand a
minor earthquake (<DBE) without damage.
To resist moderate earthquake (DBE) without significant structural
damage through some nonstructural damage may occur, and
To withstand a major earthquake (MCE) without Lapse.
3.14 CALCULATION OF SIESMIC BASE SHEAR:
Horizontal seismic co-efficient, Ah = zisa
2Rg
Where,
z- Zone factor
i- Importance factor
sa/ g – Spectral acceleration coefficient
R – Response reduction factor
From clause 6.4 of IS: 1893 – 2002
Time period, T = 0.075 h0.75
= 0.075 x 20.70.75
= 0.72785 sec
The soil is medium soil, hence 5% damping.
From staad pro analysis we have the base shear
TIME PERIOD FOR X 1893 LOADING = 0.72785 SEC
SA/G PER 1893 = 0.934, LOAD FACTOR= 1.000
FACTOR V PER 1893= 0.0152 X 19586.58 = 297.707 KN
TIME PERIOD FOR X 1893 LOADING = 0.72785 SEC
SA/G PER 1893= 0.934, LOAD FACTOR= -1.000
FACTOR V PER 1893= 0.0152 X 19586.58 = 297.707 KN
TIME PERIOD FOR Z 1893 LOADING = 0.72785 SEC
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 65
SA/G PER 1893= 0.934, LOAD FACTOR= 1.000
FACTOR V PER 1893= 0.0152 X 19586.58 = 297.707 KN
TIME PERIOD FOR Z 1893 LOADING = 0.72785 SEC
SA/G PER 1893= 0.934, LOAD FACTOR= -1.000
FACTOR V PER 1893= 0.0152 X 19586.58 = 297.707 KN
NOTE : NO SOFT STOREY IS DETECTED.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 66
FIG3.10 DISPLACEMENT OF BUILDING UNDER SEISMIC LOAD FROM
X+VE DIRECTION
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 67
FIG3.11 MAXIMUM BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAM FOR SEISMIC LOAD
FIG3.12 MAXIMUM BENDING MOMENT VALUES FOR SEISMIC LOAD.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 68
3.15 MAX BENDING MOMENTS FOR BEAMS:
BEAM
NO.
BEAM
CROSS-
SECTION(M)
BEAM
LENGTH
(M)
MAX MOMENT OF RESISTENCE (KN-m)
@ star support
(-ve)
@mid-span
(+ve)
@end support
(-ve)
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
3.00
3.70
3.55
1.65
1.90
3.70
3.00
1.90
3.00
3.70
3.55
3.55
3.70
3.00
3.00
3.70
3.55
3.55
3.70
3.00
3.00
3.70
32.633
42.931
47.176
35.415
27.417
46.584
38.217
32.145
32.499
43.873
48.911
40.323
47.889
38.558
34.200
48.839
46.786
41.262
48.336
40.932
33.292
48.087
12.755
18.381
17.581
18.726
14.725
19.181
15.495
15.876
15.690
18.733
16.683
16.603
18.800
15.561
15.375
17.834
16.887
16.823
17.897
15.246
15.252
17.954
38.451
49.323
46.029
26.626
34.632
43.995
33.055
28.055
38.837
43.340
40.533
48.598
44.362
32.823
41.380
48.759
41.569
47.103
49.281
34.624
41.749
48.228
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 69
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
3.55
3.55
3.70
3.00
3.65
3.65
2.00
1.65
3.65
2.00
2.00
1.65
3.65
3.65
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.50
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
46.685
42.012
47.744
41.037
47.496
49.395
26.778
24.985
47.104
27.293
29.104
24.795
46.528
48.458
47.051
38.479
33.676
49.624
33.749
39.300
47.974
58.106
52.402
56.028
59.694
55.994
52.929
15.548
16.975
17.867
15.181
19.257
19.338
12.837
15.658
19.794
16.304
17.433
12.282
19.588
19.562
16.230
14.152
14.710
16.748
14.566
14.441
16.487
23.535
25.886
25.938
23.878
25.911
26.020
41.293
45.438
48.969
33.763
51.048
49.154
24.410
26.386
49.502
27.534
25.351
25.963
50.348
52.575
47.764
40.940
43.132
51.377
42.512
41.661
49.310
54.393
44.739
48.960
58.167
47.463
45.073
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 70
1050
1051
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
4.15
2.00
3.00
3.70
3.55
1.65
1.90
3.70
3.00
1.90
3.00
3.70
3.55
3.55
3.70
3.00
3.00
0.85
2.85
3.55
3.55
2.85
0.85
3.00
3.00
0.85
2.85
58.937
44.458
44.777
57.491
42.468
39.687
37.754
64.115
47.533
46.531
43.859
55.686
80.267
60.548
65.963
47.208
45.403
88.301
9.783
65.875
49.543
72.414
9.774
60.260
44.992
69.573
9.440
23.701
30.724
21.253
27.412
22.840
25.887
22.386
27.015
21.009
22.873
21.023
26.349
30.346
28.923
26.551
20.694
19.854
18.140
32.812
23.159
23.055
33.136
18.160
19.559
20.696
18.609
31.847
55.853
45.315
48.630
63.879
41.874
35.022
48.304
57.696
45.748
32.731
47.790
67.464
61.970
78.189
57.008
44.612
60.963
9.784
72.969
50.008
68.584
9.775
89.713
46.144
58.999
9.438
51.178
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 71
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
2051
3001
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
3.55
3.55
2.85
0.85
3.00
3.65
3.65
2.00
1.65
3.65
2.00
2.00
1,65
3.65
3.65
3.50
3.50
3.50
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
2.00
3.00
62.004
53.822
70.429
9.448
60.467
70.180
65.620
35.945
46.035
63.504
36.505
42.999
42.703
68.375
71.746
38.700
60.319
40.166
76.690
36.152
61.352
91.337
63.880
37.463
78.020
44.511
46.268
23.731
22.783
31.324
29.151
19.998
27.990
26.092
29.585
22.382
27.080
27.069
28.258
38.899
27.096
28.999
27.031
23.991
29.430
34.407
52.264
40.680
44.480
40.679
55.264
34.553
32.654
20.177
53.353
63.285
9.447
86.157
45.328
66.314
64.743
36.845
33.786
55.150
37.662
37.525
35.313
68.005
68.925
40.014
72.120
42.655
80.259
39.547
66.587
94.345
66.183
39.314
82.853
45.356
45.654
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 72
3002
3003
3004
3005
3006
3007
3008
3009
3010
3011
3012
3013
3014
3015
3016
3017
3018
3019
3020
3021
3022
3023
3024
3025
3026
3027
3028
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
3.70
3.55
1.65
1.90
3.70
3.00
1.90
3.00
3.70
3.55
3.55
3.70
3.00
3.00
0.85
2.85
3.55
3.55
2.85
0.85
3.00
3.00
0.85
2.85
3.55
3.55
2.85
56.798
39.836
37.935
38.098
65.218
43.975
46.461
45.119
55.998
83.471
56.403
65.076
44.606
46.416
88.620
9.558
67.217
47.172
70.907
9.548
55.896
45.032
69.076
9.140
63.359
52.675
68.126
27.003
24.131
33.052
27.134
27.143
19.762
31.613
20.023
26.507
30.452
29.011
26.762
19.522
18.980
31.885
31.973
23.368
23.289
32.289
30.745
18.928
19.877
30.018
31.291
22.977
22.686
30.532
64.658
43.900
34.612
43.990
57.669
47.717
27.074
45.586
67.003
58.268
81.434
58.063
46.279
56.710
9.558
71.594
47.818
67.958
9.550
90.227
47.268
55.933
9.139
49.686
51.358
62.902
9.148
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 73
3029
3030
3031
3032
3033
3034
3035
3036
3037
3038
3039
3040
3041
3042
3043
3044
3045
3046
3047
3048
3049
3050
3051
4001
4002
4003
4004
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.85
3.00
3.65
3.65
2.00
1.65
3.65
2.00
2.00
1,65
3.65
3.65
3.50
3.50
3.50
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
2.00
3.00
3.70
3.55
1.65
9.150
56.452
70.383
65.577
32.698
48.503
68.220
34.009
43.586
43.444
68.309
71.730
39.278
59.195
40.585
77.232
36.012
61.819
89.968
64.652
37.334
78.414
39.013
44.051
54.284
35.363
31.181
27.788
19.114
27.566
25.428
27.174
40.553
28.692
25.656
26.820
37.758
26.399
28.594
28.086
25.121
30.414
33.865
55.884
39.257
43.670
39.257
54.882
34.048
27.093
18.662
26.384
21.481
27.346
86.956
45.950
67.030
64.582
35.342
32.134
50.237
36.889
36.930
33.029
67.938
69.708
39.610
74.234
42.382
80.927
40.115
69.348
97.419
68.250
39.933
83.601
41.106
41.045
61.740
41.824
30.938
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 74
4005
4006
4007
4008
4009
4010
4011
4012
4013
4014
4015
4016
4017
4018
4019
4020
4021
4022
4023
4024
4025
4026
4027
4028
4029
4030
4031
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
1.90
3.70
3.00
1.90
3.00
3.70
3.55
3.55
3.70
3.00
3.00
0.85
2.85
3.55
3.55
2.85
0.85
3.00
3.00
0.85
2.85
3.55
3.55
2.85
0.85
3.00
3.65
33.781
62.992
38.913
42.206
42.772
53.929
82.479
50.951
61.506
39.944
42.970
84.948
8.073
64.888
42.484
66.101
8.064
49.202
40.963
64.897
7.585
60.549
48.865
62.778
7.596
49.885
64.988
21.212
26.759
18.846
27.381
18.238
26.579
30.595
29.350
26.875
17.867
18.677
29.420
31.538
23.417
23.350
31.891
28.238
18.666
18.251
27.590
28.895
21.820
21.764
29.148
25.081
17.608
26.256
37.280
55.403
45.931
18.962
41.122
63.660
53.088
80.428
56.463
44.185
49.971
8.073
66.797
43.116
65.579
8.067
86.600
43.793
49.509
7.585
45.008
46.958
59.236
7.593
83.356
42.058
61.232
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 75
4032
4033
4034
4035
4036
4037
4038
4039
4040
4041
4042
4043
4044
4045
4046
4047
4048
4049
4050
4051
5001
5002
5003
5004
5005
5006
5007
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
3.65
2.00
1.65
3.65
2.00
2.00
1,65
3.65
3.65
3.50
3.50
3.50
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
2.00
3.00
3.70
3.55
1.65
1.90
3.70
3.00
59.346
25.547
46.892
67.440
27.892
39.300
40.712
61.348
65.816
34.604
53.594
35.453
72.047
33.986
57.503
84.811
60.353
35.170
72.815
30.265
38.112
50.657
29.423
19.307
25.689
57.571
33.188
25.553
21.860
37.667
28.555
20.797
21.659
33.635
25.583
26.749
23.221
24.493
24.879
33.940
54.961
39.556
33.780
39.556
54.958
33.914
19.115
17.132
26.463
14.537
19.073
11.592
26.471
16.956
58.989
32.463
26.458
42.537
32.450
33.220
27.283
61.747
63.550
34.237
72.348
36.684
76.186
38.069
65.534
94.726
63.857
37.752
78.527
33.648
36.016
54.747
35.869
24.840
28.653
51.657
40.486
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 76
5008
5009
5010
5011
5012
5013
5014
5015
5016
5017
5018
5019
5020
5021
5022
5023
5024
5025
5026
5027
5028
5029
5030
5031
5032
5033
5034
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
1.90
3.00
3.70
3.55
3.55
3.70
3.00
3.00
0.85
2.85
3.55
3.55
2.85
0.85
3.00
3.00
0.85
2.85
3.55
3.55
2.85
0.85
3.00
3.65
3.65
2.00
1.65
34.587
37.235
50.109
77.849
44.271
54.889
34.108
35.652
77.703
5.403
59.030
36.432
58.252
5.396
40.106
32.975
57.765
4.906
53.739
43.592
54.710
4.908
40.958
55.184
49.757
15.534
42.350
19.403
17.655
26.755
30.701
29.721
27.016
17.476
18.684
25.403
31.555
23.461
23.387
31.967
24.286
18.647
17.986
23.178
24.546
21.945
21.357
28.915
20.903
17.047
25.360
25.364
14.669
31.563
9.000
35.622
57.027
46.623
75.860
53.010
38.941
40.636
5.403
58.809
36.886
59.558
5.399
79.206
36.286
39.907
4.906
37.582
41.115
52.385
4.904
76.100
33.817
51.351
49.748
28.846
17.089
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 77
5035
5036
5037
5038
5039
5040
5041
5042
5043
5044
5045
5046
5047
5048
5049
5050
5051
6001
6002
6003
6004
6005
6006
6007
6008
6009
6010
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
3.65
2.00
2.00
1,65
3.65
3.65
3.50
3.50
3.50
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
2.00
3.00
3.70
3.55
1.65
1.90
3.70
3.00
1.90
3.00
3.70
61.350
18.787
31.786
34.862
50.777
55.462
26.622
44.420
26.968
63.158
30.355
49.977
76.977
52.281
31.285
63.475
18.228
16.864
18.660
40.641
19.806
18.701
29.414
7.964
26.206
19.038
29.858
27.431
14.796
13.822
25.084
25.369
25.383
14.426
21.296
15.345
34.172
54.860
39.168
43.601
39.168
54.855
3.150
12.216
8.389
12.199
23.416
6.237
6.304
13.671
8.484
13.521
13.946
19.652
32.453
25.745
27.277
18.961
51.608
53.005
25.750
66.045
27.578
67.198
34.149
57.224
86.958
55.153
33.619
68.891
25.151
9.912
30.269
54.548
21.137
14.139
20.523
18.330
3.436
20.892
39.189
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 78
6011
6012
6013
6014
6015
6016
6017
6018
6019
6020
6021
6022
6023
6024
6025
6026
6027
6028
6029
6030
6031
6032
6033
6034
6035
6036
6037
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
3.55
3.55
3.70
3.00
3.00
0.85
2.85
3. 55
3.55
2.85
0.85
3.00
3.00
0.85
2.85
3.55
3.55
2.85
0.85
3.00
3.65
3.65
2.00
1.65
3.65
2.00
2.00
70.503
39.441
37.182
20.250
18.221
49.153
2.597
40.408
22.633
37.860
2.593
24.976
12.185
34.914
2.285
27.475
14.746
22.254
2.279
16.619
22.963
27.416
6.758
34.073
44.125
7.557
21.499
31.136
30.108
20.325
13.656
14.848
114.921
22.457
17.448
17.531
22.483
14.535
14.841
8.056
13.850
16.439
9.754
10.961
15.709
12.294
8.114
12.394
19.730
9.806
20.634
20.295
11.811
10.437
42.801
71.122
32.218
19.975
25.236
2.598
38.337
22.966
40.576
2.595
49.828
18.452
17.665
2.264
25.753
12.706
22.266
2.277
38.417
13.044
21.781
27.079
26.053
11.753
12.262
19.413
21.095
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 79
6038
6039
6040
6041
6042
6043
6044
6045
6046
6047
6048
6049
6050
7001
7002
7003
7004
7005
7006
7007
7008
7009
7010
7011
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
0.300 x 0.400
1,65
3.65
3.65
3.50
3.50
3.50
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
4.15
3.55
1.65
1.90
1.90
3.55
3.55
3.65
3.65
2.00
2.00
1.65
26.767
27.520
22.940
17.6693
11.360
17.783
27.160
17.313
24.514
32.224
25.930
17.336
27.223
14.656
4.571
9.068
13.668
29.325
4.983
12.701
28.585
1.942
6.852
10.162
14.239
19.875
12.431
5.954
25.230
6.295
18.164
41.062
32.698
27.250
32.697
41.056
18.137
12.971
1.847
4.339
11.256
14.452
12.407
19.062
20.730
9.086
3.226
3.788
10.396
27.827
22.585
16.418
32.006
17.358
28.724
20.635
29.9411
42.507
28.414
20.624
29.659
27.847
12.022
3.742
2.290
6.797
31.235
16.717
17.301
9.953
7.671
3.788
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 80
4. DESIGN OF SLABS
4.1 GENERAL:
Slabs are usually supported on two parallel sides or an all the four sides.
Beams or walls are the common supports for slabs. If a slab is supported on two
opposite edges, it bends in only one direction. Hence it needs reinforcements in only
one direction. However distribution steel is to be provided at right angles to main
reinforcement so that load is distributed properly. Apart from this distribution steel
helps in distributing secondary stresses like temperature stresses. Hence slab
reinforcement is provided in both directions. Thus, Slabs supports mainly transverse
loads and transfer them to the supports by bending action in one or more directions.
Beams or walls are the common supports for the slab.
If the slab is supported on all the four sides, it bends in both directions and
needs reinforcement in both directions. In such case the reinforcements are to be
designed in for both directions. However, from the analysis of slabs by plate theory it
is found that if the ratio of larger span to smaller span (ly/lx) is more than 2, the
bending moment in the direction of larger span is very small. The main reinforcement
required works out to be less than that required as distribution steel for one-way slab.
The bending moment in shorter span is almost equal to bending moment in one way
slab and hence the slab may be designed as one-way slab if the ratio of larger span(ly)
to shorter span (lx) is more than 2.
The slabs in which main reinforcement is to be designed in only one direction
is called one-way slab. If main reinforcement is to be designed in both directions, the
slab is called two-way slab. Slabs may be a roof or a floor depending on its location in
the building, the design value of live load on slab panels as per IS: 875 part-II is as
follows:
1) Design L.L for roof slab : 1.5 KN/m
2) Design L.L for typical floor slab : 2.0 KN/m
A slab may be simply supported or continuous or may be cantilever. The
bending moments at critical sections are to be found and reinforcements designed.
Slab is usually designed as a beam of one meter width to carry moment over a strip of
1 meter. Instead of number of bars, spacing of bars is to be found. 8 mm or 10 mm are
commonly used.
A slab may be classified according to the method of support:
a) One-way slabs spanning in one direction.
b) Two-way slabs spanning in both directions.
c) Circular slabs.
d) Flat slabs resting directly on columns with no beams.
e) Grid floor & Ribbed slabs.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 81
Slabs are designed by using the same theories of bending and shear as they are
used for beams. The following methods of analysis are available:
a) Elastic Analysis – idealization into strips or beams.
b) Semi Empirical co-efficient as given in code.
c) Yield line Theory.
General Design Requirements for Slabs as per IS 456: 2000
1. Effective span:
The effective span of a simply supported slab shall be taken as clear
span plus effective depth of the slab or center to center distance between the
supports whichever is less.
The effective span of a cantilever slab shall be taken as its length to the face of
the support plus half the effective depth except where it forms the end of a
continuous slab where the length to the Centre of support shall be taken.
2. Limiting stiffness:
The stiffness of slab is governed by the span to depth ratio. As per
Clause 23.2 of IS: 456 for spans not exceeding 10 m, the span to depth ratio
(basic values) should not exceed the limits given below.
Cantilevers - 7
Simply supported - 20
Continuous - 26
Depending upon the type of steel and percentage of steel, the above
values have to be modified as per fig.4 of IS: 456 – 2000.For two-way slabs,
the shorter span should be used for calculating the span to effective depth
ratio.
3. Minimum Reinforcement:
The reinforcement in either direction of span shall not be less than
0.15% of gross cross-sectional area if mild steel is used. However, this value is
reduced to 0.12% where high strength deformed bars (HYSD) are welded by
fabrics are used. (Clause 26.5.2.1 of IS: 456 – 2000).
4. Maximum Diameter of Bars:
The diameter of bars shall not exceed one eighth of the total thickness
of slab (Clause 26.5.2.2 of IS: 456 – 2000)
5. Spacing of Main Reinforcement:
The spacing of main reinforcement in slabs shall not be more than
three times the effective depth of solid slab or 300 mm whichever is less.
(Clause 26.3.3 of IS: 456 – 2000)
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 82
6. Distribution Reinforcement:
The area of distribution reinforcement shall not be less than 0.15% of
gross cross-sectional area if plane bars are used and 0.12% if high yield
strength deformed bars are used. The spacing of distribution reinforcement in
slabs shall not be more than five times of the effective depth of slab or 450
mm whichever is less.
7. Cover to Reinforcement:
Reinforcement shall have concrete cover of thickness as follows:
a) At each end of reinforcement bar not less than 25 mm nor less than
twice the diameter of such bar.
b) The bottom cover for reinforcement shall not be less than 20 mm nor
less than the diameter of such bars.
4.2 DESIGN OF ONE WAY SLABS:
One way slab are those in which the length is more than twice the breadth. A
continuous one-way slab can be analyzed in a similar manner to that used for a
continuous beam. The general recommendation for curtailment of bars is given in
clause 26.2.3 of the code applies for slab also. As stated earlier, if the ratio of longer
span to the shorter span (ly/lx) is greater than 2, is called as one-way slab. One-way
slab bends only in one direction across the span, and acts like a wide beam.
Design Procedure for One-way Slab:
1) Assume the sustainable depth based on the stiffness consideration and
calculate the effective span.
Required effective depth = Span ÷ (Basic value x Modification
Factor).
(Span/depth) ratio safely be selected in range of 25 to 30 for simply
supported slabs.
2) Considering one meter width of slab, calculate the loads acting on the slab.
Find the factored Moment and Shear force. For simply supported slabs.
Mu = wul2/8 Bending Moment
Vu = wul/2 Shear Force
Where l = Length of Shorter span
3) Determine the minimum depth required to resist the bending moment by
equating
Mu = Mu, lim = k. fck.b. d2
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 83
b = 1000 mm,
k=0.138 for Fe415 steel & 0.148 for mild steel
Provided depth should be more than this value. Otherwise increase the depth.
4) Calculate the area of steel per meter width of slab by using
Mu = 0.87. Fy.Ast. d {1 – [(fy.Ast)/ (fck.b. d)]}
5) Find the spacing of bars using
S = (ast /Ast) x1000
Where
ast - area of bars used.
Ast - total area of steel required.
Spacing should be not more than 3d or 300 mm whichever is less.
6) Distribution Steel :
Provide distribution reinforcement at 0.12% (for HYSD bars) of gross
cross sectional area and find the spacing of these bars. If mild steel bars are
used, provide 0.15% of gross cross sectional area of distribution steel. Spacing
of distribution steel should not be more than 5d or 450 mm whichever is less.
7) Check for Deflection :
Calculate the Pt % corresponding maximum mid span moment, take
the modification factor (F1) from fig.4 of IS: 456 – 2000
(l/d) provided < (l/d) max = basic value x F1
8) Check for Shear :
Maximum shear force at the edges of one-way slab given by
Vu = wul/2 Shear Force
τv = Vu/ b. d Nominal Shear Stress
Calculate the percentage of main steel at supports
Pt = ast/ S. d
τc = ------- Shear Strength of Concrete
Which is calculated by referring table-19 of IS: 456, shear strength of
concrete for beams
τc = --------
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 84
For solid slabs, the shear strength of concrete shall be τc.k. Value of k should
be taken from clause 40.2.1.1 depending depth of slab, which is given below.
Overall
depth
300 or
more
275 250 225 200 175 150 or
less
K 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30
TABLE 4.1
Also note for slabs, nominal shear stress (τc) shall not exceed 0.5 τc max, where
τc max is as given as table-20 IS: 456. Shear reinforcements in slabs should be
avoided, since they work out cumbersome and expensive. Hence, if τv > τc,
increase the thickness of slab and redesign.
9) Check for Development Length :
Ld ≤ (M1 ÷ V) + Lo
The check for shear and check for development length are mostly
satisfied in all cases of slabs subjected to uniformly distributed loads and
therefore omitted in design calculations
4.3 DESIGN OF CONTINUOUS SLABS:
Continuous slabs are subjected to negative moments at supports and to
positive moments at mid span. Hence design is required for all critical sections.
However to avoid problems in construction, usually design is made for the maximum
bending moment and shear force and the reinforcement is provided.
IS: 456 (table-12 & 13) gives expressions for finding moments and shear
forces at critical sections. These are presented in table- 6.2 & 6.3 also. However it
may be noted that these coefficients are for beams/slabs of uniform cross sections
which supports substantially uniformly distributed loads over 3 or more spans which
do not differ by more than 15 % of the longest span. For all other cases, rigorous
structural analysis is required.
It may be noted that if all spans are equal maximum is at support next to end
support.
Mmax = (wdl2/12) + (wLl
2/9)
And Vmax is at outer of first interior support
Vmax = 0.6wd+0.6wL
Design Procedure:
I. Assume a depth of L/30th
of span.
II. Effective span shall be found as explained in Art. 6.3 (clause 222
IS:456)
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 85
III. Find design moment and shear force.
IV. Design for Moment.
V. Check for shear.
VI. Check for deflection.
VII. Design distribution steel.
VIII. Sketch reinforcement details.
4.4 DESIGN OF CANTILEVER SLABS:
Common example of cantilever slabs are chajjas and balcony slabs. These
slabs are free at one end and may be treated as fixed at other ends to lintel beams.
They may be overhanging portions of interior slabs. They need reinforcement to top
since in cantilevers subjected to vertical downward loads, tension in on top. Moment
is maximum at fixed/continuous end. Hence design is for the section at the end. We
know in cantilevers moment reduces to zero at free end. Hence the thickness of
cantilever slab may be reduced gradually towards free end. Hence minimum thickness
of 75 mm is maintained at free end.
In the design the following points are to be noted:
i. For uniformly distributed loads, the bending moment and shear force is
Mu = wul2/8 Bending Moment
Vu = wul Shear Force
ii. Basic value of span to depth ratio for cantilever = 7
To find the trial depth, l/d ratio may be taken as 10 taking the modification
factors in to consideration.
iii. Main bars are to be provided at top and distribution bars are to be provided in
the transverse direction.
iv. There should be check for anchorage length of main bars at the support.
4.5 DESIGN OF TWO WAY SLABS:
When slab is supported on all four sides and the ratio of long span (ly) to short
span (lx) is less than 2, the bending moment developed in both x & y directions is
predominant and hence design should be made for reinforcement in both directions.
For the analysis of such slab various theories have been developed and expressions
for bending moment Mx & My presented. Among all those theories plate theory is
quite precise.
The moment developed depends upon the edge conditions also. In buildings,
we come across the following boundary conditions.
1. All four edge continuous (interior panel)
2. One short edge discontinuous
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 86
3. One long edge discontinuous
4. Two adjacent edges discontinuous
5. Two short edges discontinuous
6. Two long edges discontinuous
7. Three edges discontinuous and one long edge continuous.
8. Three edges discontinuous and one short edge continuous.
9. Four edges discontinuous but corners held down by providing torsional
reinforcements.
10. Simply supported slab without torsion reinforcements.
Note: simply supported slabs have tendency to lift at corners due to torsion
moment in the slab. Lifting of corners may be prevented by providing torsion
reinforcement in the form of two mats. If such precaution is taken, the simply
supported slab falls under category 9 otherwise it falls under category 10.
FIG4.1
For uniformly distributed load on entire slab, maximum + ve moment (tension at
bottom) develops and at supports – ve moment developed in slabs with various edge
conditions. The maximum bending moment per unit width in slab are given by
Mx=αx w lx2
My=αy w lx
2 (Clause D.2.1 of IS: 456)
Where Mx & My are the design moments along short and long spans
w = uniformly distributed load on slab
lx & ly are the lengths of short and long spans.
αx & αy are the moment coefficients given in table – 26 of IS: 456.
4
2
3 3
1 4
4
7
5
2
6 6
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 87
Bending moment coefficients for rectangular panel supported on four sides with
provision of torsion at corners
(IS 456:2000 Clause D-1.1 and 24.4.1)
Ca
se
No
.
Type of Panel
and Moments
considered
Short Span Coefficients αx
(Values of ly/lx)
Long
span
coefficie
nts αy
for all
values
of ly/lx
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)
1
Interior Panels:
Negative
moment at
continuous edge.
Positive moment
at mid span
0.032
0.024
0.037
0.028
0.043
0.032
0.047
0.036
0.051
0.039
0.053
0.041
0.060
0.045
0.065
0.049
0.032
0.024
2
One short Edge
Discontinuous:
Negative
moment at
continuous edge.
Positive moment
at mid span
0.037
0.028
0.043
0.032
0.048
0.036
0.051
0.039
0.055
0.041
0.057
0.044
0.064
0.048
0.068
0.052
0.037
0.028
3
One Long Edge
Discontinuous:
Negative
moment at
continuous edge.
Positive moment
at mid span
0.037
0.028
0.044
0.033
0.052
0.039
0.057
0.044
0.063
0.047
0.067
0.051
0.077
0.059
0.085
0.065
0.037
0.028
4
Two Adjacent
Edges
Discontinuous:
Negative
moment at
continuous edge.
Positive moment
at mid span
0.047
0.035
0.053
0.040
0.060
0.045
0.065
0.049
0.071
0.053
0.075
0.056
0.084
0.063
0.091
0.069
0.047
0.035
5
Two Short
Edges
Discontinuous:
Negative
moment at
continuous edge.
0.045
0.035
0.049
0.037
0.052
0.040
0.056
0.043
0.059
0.044
0.060
0.045
0.065
0.049
0.069
0.052
--
0.035
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 88
Positive moment
at mid span
6
Two Long
Edges
Discontinuous:
Negative
moment at
continuous edge.
Positive moment
at mid span
--
0.035
--
0.043
--
0.051
--
0.057
--
0.063
--
0.068
--
0.080
--
0.088
0.045
0.035
7
Three Edges
Discontinuous
(One Long
Edge
Continuous):
Negative
moment at
continuous edge.
Positive moment
at mid span.
0.057
0.043
0.064
0.048
0.071
0.053
0.076
0.057
0.080
0.060
0.084
0.064
0.091
0.069
0.097
0.073
--
0.043
8
Three Edges
Discontinuous
(One Short
Edge
Continuous):
Negative
moment at
continuous edge.
Positive moment
at mid span
0.043
0.051
0.059
0.065
0.071
0.076
0.087
0.096
0.057
0.043
9
Four Edges
Discontinuous:
Positive moment
at mid span.
0.056
0.64
0.072
0.079
0.085
0.089
0.100
0.107
0.056
TABLE 4.2
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 89
Recommendation of IS: 456 for Design of Restrained Slabs:
1. The maximum bending moments per unit width in a slab are given by the
following equations.
Mx=αx w lx2
My=αy w lx
2
2. Slabs are considered as divided in each direction in to middle strips and edge
strips. The middle strip being ¾ of the width and edge strip of the 1/8 width
of the slab.
3. The maximum moment applies to only to middle strip.
4. Tension reinforcements provided at mid strip shall extend in the lower part of
the slab to within 0.25l of a continuous edge or 0.15l of discontinuous edge.
5. Over the continuous edges of a middle strip, the tension reinforcement shall
extend in the upper part of the slab a distance of 0.15l from the support and at
least 50% shall extend a distance of 0.3l.
6. Due to imperfection of boundary conditions, negative moment may occur at
discontinuous edges. To take care of such moments, tension reinforcement
equal to 50% of that provided at mid span extending to 0.1l in to the span will
be sufficient.
7. Reinforcement in edge strip, parallel to that edge, shall comply with the
minimum requirement.
8. Torsion Reinforcement:
Torsion reinforcement is to be provided at corners where two adjacent edges
are discontinuously/simply supported. It consists of two layers of
reinforcement mesh at top and other at bottom of slab with required cover. The
area of reinforcement in each of these four layers shall be ¾th
of the area
required for the maximum mid span in the slab and shall be of length 1/5th
of
the shorter span.
4.6 Design Procedure for Two way Slab:
1. Assume the depth of the slab based on the stiffness.
(a) For two way slabs with shorter span less than 3.5 m and L.L < 3
KN/m2, the allowable lx/d ratio is
Type Fe 250 Fe 415
Simply supported slabs 35 28
Fixed or Continuous
slabs
40 32
TABLE 4.3
(b) If lx > 3.5 m and L.L >3 3 KN/m2, the allowable lx/d ratio is same as
that of one-way slabs.
2. Find the effective spans lx and ly
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 90
3. Calculate the ultimate load considering 1 m width of the slab.
4. Obtain the design moment coefficients along short and long spans
depending on the boundary conditions given in table – 26 of IS: 456 as
applicable. Calculate the bending moments by multiplying the coefficients
by wlx2.
5. Calculate the minimum depth required to resist the absolute maximum
design moment (Mx and My) which should be less than the depth provided,
otherwise increase the depth.
6. Calculate the area of steel at the mid span (and at support if the slab is
continuous) in both the directions using
Mu = 0.87 FY Ast d {1 – [(FY Ast) ÷ (fck b d)]}
The short span bars are provided in the bottom layer and long span bars are
provided above the short span bars in the mid span regions.
Thus for
short span d = D – clear span – ϕ/2
Long span d1 = (D – clear span – ϕ/2) – ϕ = d – ϕ
The main reinforcement shall be provided in the middle strips of width
equal to ¾ of slab width.
7. Torsion steel:
(a) At corners where slab is discontinuous over both the edges At =
¾ Astx
(b) At corners where slab is discontinuous over one edge At = 3/8
Astx
(c) At corners where slab is continuous over both edges, At = 0,
i.e., no torsion steel is required.
Where Astx = Area of steel for maximum mid span moment.
This area of torsion reinforcement will be provide at corners in the
form of mesh, one at top and the other at bottom for a length of lx/5 in each
orthogonal direction, parallel to the sides of the slab.
8. Check for Deflection:
Calculate the Pt % corresponding maximum mid span moment
Take the modification factor (MF) from figure-4 IS: 456
(l/d) provided < (l/d) maximum = basic value x MF
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 91
9. Check For Shear:
Maximum shear force at the edges of two way slab is given by
Vux = wv [r4 ÷ (1 + r
4)] (lx/2), where r = (ly/lx)
τv < τc
10. Check for Development Length:
Ld ≤ (M1 ÷ V) + Lo
The check for shear and check for development length are mostly
satisfied in all cases slabs subjected to uniformly distributed loads and
therefore omitted in design calculations. The general arrangement of
reinforcement in two-way.
4.7 CALCULATIONS:
SLAB PANEL: S1
Length of longer span ( ly ): 3.65 m
Length of shorter span (lx ): 3.00 m
Now ratio of longer span to shorter span i.e.,
𝑙𝑦
lx =
3.65
3.00 = 1.217 < 2
Hence Two way slab should be considered.
Loads acting on the slab:
Live load = 2 KN/m2
Floor finish = 1.5 KN/m2
fck = 20 N/mm2
fy = 415 N/mm2
Thickness of slab:
Assume effective depth d = span
32 =
3000
32= 93.75 𝑚𝑚
Adopt d = 100 mm
Effective Cover = 20 mm
Overall depth D = 120 mm
Loads per unit area of slab
Self-weight of the slab = 0.12 x 25 = 3.0 kN/m2
Live load = 2 N/m2
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 92
Floor finish = 1.5 KN/m2
Total load = 6.5 KN/m2
Factor of safety = 1.5
Factored load (wu)= 1.5 x 6.0 = 9.75 KN/m2
Type of panel: Two adjacent edges discontinuous
Moment and Area of Steel calculations:
Mu = α.wu .lx
By using SP 16
Span Moment Mu Mu/bd² Pt Ast
reqd
Min
Ast Dia Spacing Ast pro
Coefficient kN.m N/mm
2 % mm² mm² mm mm mm²
shorter
αx
(-ve) 0.064 5.60 0.56 0.16% 157.04 120 8 200 251.33
αx
(+ve) 0.048 4.20 0.42 0.12% 116.77 120 8 200 251.33
longer
αy
(-ve) 0.045 3.98 0.40 0.11% 110.54 120 8 200 251.33
αy
(+ve) 0.034 2.98 0.30 0.08% 82.42 120 8 200 251.33
TABLE 4.4
Check for deflection:
Basic value of Lx/d ratio = 26
From figure 3 of I.S 456:1978 modification factor is 1.66
Maximum permitted l/d ratio = 1.66 × 26 = 43.16
Lx/d provided = 3000/100 = 30
Lx/d provided > Lx/d required
Hence deflection control is safe.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 93
Design of One way slab
SLAB PANEL: S4
Length of longer span ( l y ) = 10.25 m
Length of shorter span (l x ) = 3.50 m
Now ratio of longer span to shorter span i.e.
𝑙𝑦
lx =
10.25
3.50 = 2.92 > 2
Hence One way slab should be considered.
Loads acting on the slab:
Live load = 2 KN/m2
Floor load = 1 KN/m2
Characteristic strength of concrete ( fck ) = 20 N/mm2
Characteristic strength of steel (fy) = 415 N/mm2
Thickness of slab:
Assume effective depth d = span
28 =
3500
28= 125 𝑚𝑚
Adopt d = 125 mm
Cover = 20 mm
Overall depth = 145 mm
Loads: per unit area of slab
Self-weight of the slab = 0.145 x 25 = 3.3.625 kN/m2
Live load = 2 kN/m2
Floor finish = 1 kN/m2
Total load = 6.625 kN/m2
Load factor = 1.5
Factored load = 1.5 x 6.625 = 9.9735 kN/m2
Max B.M Mu= wl2/8 = 15.22 kN-m
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 94
By using SP 16
TABLE 4.5
Mu Mu/bd² Pt Ast
reqd
Min
Ast
Dia of
bar Spacing Ast pro
kN.m N/mm2 % mm² mm² mm mm mm²
15.22 0.97 0.28% 352.46 150 8 140 359.04
Distribution reinforcement:
Minimum percentage of steel as per IS 456 Is 0.12% of gross cross sectional area
Ast = 0.12 x 1000 x 145/100
= 174 mm2
Provide 8 mm dia bars @ 280 mm c/c
Check for deflection:
For simply supported slabs basic l/d ratio is 20
From figure 3 of I.S 456:1978 modification factor is 1.43
Maximum permitted l/d ratio = 1.43 × 20 = 28.6
Lx/d provided = 3500/125 = 28.6
Lx/d provided > Lx/d required
Hence deflection control is safe.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 95
Schedule of slabs (Typical & Roof):
slab Lx
(m)
Ly
(m)
Type of
slab
Reinforcement
Effecti
ve
depth
d (mm)
Along X-direction Along Y-direction
-ve +ve -ve +ve
S1 3.00 3.65 100 Two way
Continues 8 ϕ-200 c/c 8 ϕ-200 c/c 8 ϕ-200 c/c 8 ϕ-200 c/c
S2 3.65 3.70 100 Two way
Continues 8 ϕ-200 c/c 8 ϕ-250 c/c 8 ϕ-200 c/c 8 ϕ-250 c/c
S3 3.55 3.65 100 Two way
Continues 8 ϕ-200 c/c 8 ϕ-250 c/c 8 ϕ-200 c/c 8 ϕ-250 c/c
S4 3.50 10.25 125 One way ----- 8 ϕ-140 c/c ----- 8 ϕ-280 c/c
S5 3.85 4.15 100 Two way
Continues 8 ϕ-200 c/c 8 ϕ-250 c/c 8 ϕ-200 c/c 8 ϕ-250 c/c
S6 2.85 4.15 100 Two way
Continues 8 ϕ-250 c/c 8 ϕ-300 c/c 8 ϕ-250 c/c 8 ϕ-300 c/c
S7 3.55 4.15 100 Two way
Continues 8 ϕ-250 c/c 8 ϕ-300 c/c 8 ϕ-250 c/c 8 ϕ-300 c/c
TABLE 4.6
Note :
Effective cover for all slabs is 20 mm
Total depth for two way slabs is 120 mm
Total depth for one way slabs is 145 mm
Diameter of bar and spacing is in mm
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 96
5. DESIGN OF BEAMS
5.1 INTRODUCTION:
In a building frame at every floor level, there can be large number of
beams with different spans, end conditions, and loadings. It would not be
practicable to design all beams serially from first to last. It is quite likely
that some of the beams may have the same end conditions, spans, and/or
loadings. Under such circumstances, it is always advisable to categorize
them and group them to facilitate design, and reduce the computational
efforts.
Design of reinforced concrete beams involves sizing and finding
required quantity of steel based on the consideration of strength and
serviceability requirements. It also involves detailing. The major
consideration in the design of beams is bending moment. Hence first
beams are designed for bending moment and then the design for shear is
taken up. Checks are applied for deflection and crack width. If the
requirement for any limit state fails redesign is to be made. The detailing
of reinforcement is to be made with neat sketches/drawings taking into
account bond, cracking and durability considerations.
Concrete is fairly strong in compression but very weak in tension.
Hence plain concrete cannot be used in situations where considerable
tensile stresses develop. If flexural members like beams and slabs are
made of plain concrete their load carrying capacity is very low due to its
low tensile strength. Since steel is very strong in tension, steel bars are
provided to resist tensile stresses at a place where the maximum tensile
stresses are developed.
In case of simply supported beam, tensile stresses are induced in
bottom layers because of positive bending moment (sagging bending moment) and hence steel bars are provided near the bottom of the beam.
In cantilever beams steel bars are placed near the top of the beam to resist
the tensile stresses developed in top layers due to the negative bending moment (hogging bending moment). A
A
FIG 5.1 Reinforcement in simply supported beam
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -
- NA -
-- -- -
- -- -
- -- --
-- --
-- -- -
- -- -
- -- --
-- --
-- -- -
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 97
Positioning of beams:
Some of the guiding principles for the positioning of beams are as
follows:
(a) Beams are generally provided under walls or below heavy
concentrated loads to avoid these loads directly coming on slabs.
(b) The spacing of the beams is governed by the maximum spans of the
slabs.
(c) For larger spans and heavier loads the two-way action is advantageous,
as the steel required is minimum.
(d) For designing the cantilever slabs, availability adequate anchorage
should be checked.
Categorization of beams:
The categorization of beams may be done on the basis of design which
depends on the following factors:
(1) End conditions (EC = 1, 2, 3, 4)
(2) Span
(3) Load type (UDL, point load, triangular/trapezoidal load etc.)
(4) Section type (rectangular/flanged)
(5) Load magnitude.
Since categorization of beams would principally depend upon the end
conditions of beam it is necessary, in the beginning, to take certain
decisions or make suitable simplifying assumptions regarding the
following:
(i) Whether the multi-span continuous beams are to be analyzed and
designed as a whole or as made up of independent beams with
appropriate end conditions
(ii) What will be the end conditions of the beam?
The decision would depend upon the following:
(1) Whether detailed calculations are required by the client (as in
case of public buildings) for future/office record.
(2) Whether the client requires only result in the form of schedules
of members as in case of residential buildings constructed by
private owners or builders.
(3) What is the accuracy required? It depends upon the importance
of the building and magnitude and repetitious nature of work.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 98
For example, if it is to be used for a big residential complex with large number
of such units, then small excess of concrete and/or steel that may occur by using
simplifying assumption in design of one unit can lead to appreciable increase in
overall cost of materials in the entire big scheme.
The decisions regarding the assumptions made for the end conditions of the
beam materially affects the design procedure and designs itself.
Bearing the above points in mind, the decision has to be taken very carefully
whether to use the methods of structural analysis or simplifying assumptions and
approximations. A beam may be assumed as simply supported at discontinuous end
for simplicity on safer side, simultaneously taking care to provide steel at top at least
equal to 1/3rd
the mid-span steel to account for partial fixity developed.
For approximate method, the beams may be categorized on the basis of end
conditions as follows:
5.2 CATEGORY:
(1) Beam simply supported at both ends and carrying only UDL. (2) Beam simply supported at one end and continuous at the other end
and carrying UDL. (3) Beam continuous at both ends and carrying UDL only. (4) Miscellaneous beams such as overhanging beams, beams with any end
condition but carrying unusual loading like UDL over part of the length of beam, continuous beams with abnormally unequal spans etc.
The beams under each category may further be divided into different groups
on the basis of approximate equality of spans and loads. For beams with uniform
cross section and having the same end conditions the equality of spans may be
assumed when they do not differ more than 15% of the longest.
Types of Beams:
Designer has to decide whether the section of the beam is going to act as
rectangular or L or T-beam. A single span beam supported on masonry wall can be
considered as simply supported beam. It has zero moments at ends and sagging (+ve)
moment throughout. If slab is cast over it monolithically, the slab is on compression
side. Hence when beam bends part of slab acts as flange of the beam in resisting
bending moment. If the slab is on both sides, it becomes T-beam and if it is only on
one side it is L-beam.
If the beam is part of a framed structure or is continuous over a number of
supports, it will be having sagging (+ve) moment in mid-span and hogging (-ve)
moment near the supports. If as usual slab is on the top of the beam and is cast
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 99
monolithically with beam, the mid-span section of the beam becomes flanged section.
At interior supports, the flange is on tension side and hence will not assist in resisting
moment. In such cases the beam is to be designed as a rectangular section for negative
moment.
The designer has to decide whether the section is to be designed as Singly reinforced or Doubly reinforced. For this the depth of balanced section may be
found. If this depth cannot be permitted from the consideration of head room
requirement or from architectural consideration then the section is to be designed as
doubly reinforced. Otherwise it may be designed as singly reinforced.
Beam Section:
The cross-sectional dimensions of the beam consist of fixing breadth and
depth of the beam. The breadth of the beam is generally kept equal to the thickness of
the wall to avoid offset inside the room. It shall not exceed the width of the column
for effective transfer of load from beam to column. The minimum width of beam shall
be 200 mm to meet the requirements of fire resistance of 0.5 hours. (See fig.1 of IS:
456 – 2000).
FIG5.2
The depth of the beam is taken between L/10 to L/16. The types of beams
having different sections are kept minimum to facilitate reuse work. Even in some
cases, especially in residential buildings, the depth of the beam is provided equal to
the difference between the top of the floor and top of the door/ window. The
advantages are there is no need to provide lintel, the depth of the formwork remains
the same so that they can be reused and the top of the formwork being at the same
level there is considerable saving in labor.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 100
FIG 5.3 Stress - strain Diagrams
5.3 ASSUMPTIONS:
The analysis and design of a reinforced concrete section for flexure is based
on the following assumptions. (IS: 456 – 2000, Clause 38.1)
(i) Plane sections normal to the axis remains plane after bending.
(ii) The maximum strain in concrete at outermost compression fiber is taken as
0.0035 in bending regardless of strength of concrete.
(iii) The tensile strength of concrete is ignored.
(iv) The relationship between stress-strain distributions in concrete is assumed
to be parabolic as shown in fig below. Compressive strength of concrete in
the structure (size effect) is assumed to be 0.67 times the characteristic strength of concrete. The partial safety factor γm equal to 1.5 is applied
to the strength of concrete in addition to it. Therefore, the design
compressive strength of concrete is 0.67 fck/1.5 = 0.446 fck. (v) The stress in reinforcement is derived from the representative stress-strain
curve for the type of steel used as shown in fig. The partial safety factor γm
equal to 1.15 is applied to the strength of reinforcement. Therefore, the
design strength of steel is fy/1.15 = 0.87 FY.
(vi) The maximum strain in tension reinforcement in the section at failure
should not be less than the
(FY/ 1.15Es) + 0.002 Where FY = Characteristic strength of steel
Es = Modulus of elasticity of steel
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 101
Analysis of Singly Reinforced sections:
If the reinforcing bars are provided only on tension side in the beam section, it
is called as singly reinforced beams.
Consider a simply supported beam subjected to bending under factored loads.
Since plane sections are assumed to remain plane before and after bending, strain is
proportional to distance from the neutral axis. Above the neutral axis the entire cross
section is in compression and below the neutral axis, the cross section is in tension.
All the tensile stresses are assumed to be resisted by steel bars as the tensile strength
of concrete is ignored. The resultant tensile force, thus acts at the centroid of
reinforcing bars.
Effective Depth:
Effective depth of a beam is the distance between the centroid of tension
reinforcement and the maximum compression fibre, excluding thickness of finishing
material placed monolithically with the member.
Effective depth, d = D – clear cover – ϕ/2 Where D= Gross depth or overall depth.
Φ= Diameter of the bar.
Effective span:
For calculation of bending moment and shear force, effective span is to be
considered. IS: 456 Clause No.22.2 specifies effective span, various cases as given
below:
(i) Simply supported beams or slabs:
Effective span = clear span + effective depth
Or
Centre to centre distance between the supports, whichever is less.
(ii) Continuous beams or slabs:
(a) If width of support, w < 1/12th
of clear span, the effective span
is same as for simply supported case.
(b) For end span with one end simply supported and other end
continuous.
Effective span = clear span + d/2
Or
Clear span + (1/2) x width of simple support.
Whichever is less.
(iii) In case of roller supports:
Effective span = distance between the supports.
(iv) Cantilevers:
Effective span = clear span + d/2
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 102
(v) Overhanging portion of continuous beams:
Effective span = centre of support to free end.
(vi) Frames:
(vii) Effective span = centre to centre distance.
Depth of Neutral Axis (xu):
The depth of neutral axis can be obtained by considering the equilibrium of
internal forces of compression and tension.
Force of compression C = Average stress x area of beam in compression
= 0.36 fck b xu
Force of tension T = Design yield stress x area of steel
= 0.87 fy Ast
Force of compression should be equal to force of tension
Xu = (0.87 FY Ast) / (0.36 fck b xu)
Lever Arm (z):
The forces of compression and tension form a couple. The distance between
the lines of action of compression and tension forces is called as lever arm.
Lever arm, z = d – 0.42 xu
5.4 MODES FAILURES / TYPES OF SECTIONS:
A reinforced concrete member is considered to have failed when the strain in
concrete in extreme compression fiber reaches its ultimate value equal to 0.0035.
1. Balanced section: when the maximum strains in steel and concrete reach their
maximum values simultaneously, the section is known as a balanced section.
The percentage of steel provided for balanced section is called as limiting
percentage of steel.
xu = xu, max.
2. Under reinforced section (tension failure or ductile failure): when the amount
of steel in a section is less than that required for a balanced section, the section
is called as under reinforced section.
In under reinforced sections, the strain in concrete does not reach its maximum
value while the strain in steel reaches its maximum value. The position of
neutral axis will shift upwards to maintain equilibrium between force of
compression and tension.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 103
xu < xu, max
So failure of the section is initiated by steel reaching its yield value. Before
failure, beam undergoes substantial deflection excessive cracking of concrete
giving sufficient warning of impending failure. For this reason and from
economy point of view the under reinforced sections are designed. IS code
prefers design of under reinforced sections and at the most it can be a balanced
section (xu ≤ xu, max).
3. Over Reinforced section (compression Failure or brittle failure):
When the amount of steel is more than that required for balanced section, the
section is called over reinforced section.
In over reinforced sections, the strain in concrete reaches its ultimate value
before steel reaches its yield value. Neutral axis shift downwards to maintain
equilibrium
xu > xu, max
hence, in over reinforced sections sudden failure occurs by crushing of
concrete out giving any warning. So this type sections should be avoided. IS
code recommends avoid of over reinforced sections.
Maximum Depth of Neutral Axis ( xu, max):
The maximum depth of neutral axis is limited to ensure that tensile steel will
reach its yield stress before concrete fails in compression, thus brittle failure
(sudden failure with less alarming deflection) is avoided.
From strain diagram of IS: 456
𝑥𝑢 ,𝑚𝑎𝑥
0.0035=
𝑑 − 𝑥𝑢 ,𝑚𝑎𝑥
(087 𝑓𝑦/E𝑠) + 0.02
𝑥𝑢 ,𝑚𝑎𝑥
𝑑=
0.0035
087𝑓𝑦E𝑠
+ 0.0055
It may be noted that 𝑥𝑢 ,𝑚𝑎𝑥 is dependent on grade of steel only.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 104
fy (N/mm2) 𝐱𝐮,𝐦𝐚𝐱
𝐝
250
0.53
415
0.48
500
0.46
Table 5.1 Values of 𝒙𝒖,𝒎𝒂𝒙
𝒅 for different grades of steel
Grade of concrete
Fe 250 steel Fe 415 steel Fe 500 steel
General 0.148fckbd
2 0.138 fckbd
2 0.133 fckbd
2
M20 2.96 bd
2 3.45 bd2 3.33 bd
2
M25 3.7 bd
2 3.45 bd
2 3.33 bd
2
Table 5.2 Limiting Moment of Resistance for Singly Reinforced Rectangular Sections
Limiting Percentage of Steel:
The percentage of tensile reinforcement corresponding to the limiting
moment resistance is known as limiting percentage of steel. It can be
obtained by equating force of tension and compression.
0.87𝑓𝑦𝐴𝑠𝑡 ,𝑙𝑖𝑚 = 0.36𝑓𝑐𝑘𝑏𝑥𝑢 ,𝑚𝑎𝑥
𝐴𝑠𝑡 ,𝑙𝑖𝑚 = 0.36𝑓𝑐𝑘𝑏𝑥𝑢 ,𝑚𝑎𝑥 /0.87𝑓𝑦
Limiting percentage of steel 𝑃𝑡 ,𝑙𝑖𝑚 = 𝐴𝑠𝑡 ,𝑙𝑖𝑚
𝑏𝑑 𝑥100
=0.36𝑓𝑐𝑘0.87𝑓𝑦
𝑥𝑥𝑢 ,𝑚𝑎𝑥
𝑑𝑥100
The limiting values of tensile reinforcement percentage corresponding
to different grades of concrete and steel in a singly reinforced rectangular
beam are given below.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 105
Grade of concrete
Percentage of tensile steel
Fe 250 Fe 415 Fe 500
M15 1.32 0.72 0.57
M20 1.76 0.96 0.76
M25 2.20 1.19 0.94
Table 5.3 Limiting Percentage of steel for Singly Reinforced sections.
5.5 GENERAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR BEAMS:
1. Effective span: The effective span of a simply supported beam shall be taken as clear
span plus effective depth of the beam or center to center distance between
the supports whichever is less.
The effective span of a cantilever shall be taken as its length to the face
of the support plus half the effective depth except where it forms the end
of a continuous beam where the length to the centre of support shall be
taken.
2. Limiting stiffness: The stiffness of beams is governed by the span to depth ratio. As per
Clause 23.2 of IS: 456 for spans not exceeding 10 m, the span to effective
depth ratio should not exceed the limits (basic values) given below:
Cantilever – 7
Simply supported – 20
Continuous – 26
For spans above 10 m, the above values may be multiplied by 10/span
in m.
Depending on the amount and type of steel, the above values shall be
modified by multiplying with the modification factors obtained from fig.4
& 5 of IS: 456.
3. Minimum Reinforcement: The minimum area of tension reinforcement should not be less than the
following (Clause 26.51 of IS: 456) 𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝑏𝑑=
0.85
𝑓𝑦
This works out only 0.2% for Fe 415 steel and 0.34% for Fe 250 steel.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 106
4. Maximum Reinforcement: The maximum area of tension reinforcement should not exceed 4% of
the gross cross sectional area (Clause 26.51 of IS: 456) Ptmax < 0.04 bD
Where D = gross depth of the beam
5. Spacing of Bars: The horizontal distance between two parallel main reinforcing bars
shall usually be not less than the greatest of the following:
(a) Diameter of the bar if the diameters are equal.
(b) Diameter of the largest bar if the bars are unequal
(c) 5 mm more than the nominal maximum size of the aggregate
When there are two or more rows of bars, the bars shall be vertically in
line and the minimum vertical distance between the bars shall be 15 mm,
two-thirds of nominal maximum size of aggregate or the maximum size of
the bars whichever is greater.
The maximum spacing of bars in tension for beams is taken from
Table-15 of IS: 456 depending on the amount of redistribution carried
out in analysis and fy.
6. Cover to Reinforcement: Reinforcement shall have concrete cover of thickness as follows:
(a) At each end of reinforcement bar not less than 25 mm nor less
than twice the diameter of such bar.
(b) For longitudinal reinforcing bar in beam, not less than 25 mm
nor less than the diameter of such bar.
7. Side Face Reinforcement: Where the depth of the beam exceeds 750 mm, side face reinforcement
shall be provided along the two faces. The total area of such reinforcement
shall not be less than 0.1% of the beam area and shall be distributed
equally on two faces at a spacing not exceeding 300 mm or width of the
beam whichever is less.
Use of SP16 for Design and Analysis of Singly Reinforced Beams:
The Indian standards Institution’s special publication SP16, Design aids for
Reinforced concrete of IS: 456, contains a number of charts and tables for design of
reinforced concrete members.
The following are the data presented in SP16 for design and analysis singly
reinforced beams.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 107
(i) Tables 1 to 4 gives the percentage steel required for various values
of ( 𝑀𝑢
𝑏𝑑2) and fy for concrete grades fck = 15, 20, 25 and 30
(ii) Charts 1 to 18 gives the moment of resistance per meter width for
varying depths (5 to 80 cm) and varying percentage of steel, for
various values of
fck= 15 & 20 using steel grades of fy= 250,415 & 500.
Doubly Reinforced Beams:
Beams which are reinforced in both compression and tension asides are called
as doubly reinforced beam. These beams are generally provided when the dimensions
of the beam are restricted and it is required to resist moment higher than the limiting
moment of resistance of a singly reinforced section. The additional moment of
resistance required can be obtained by providing compression reinforcement and
additional tension reinforcement.
Situations under which doubly reinforced beams are used:
1. When the depth of the beam is restricted due to architectural or any
construction problems.
2. At the supports of a continuous beam where bending moment changes its
sign.
3. In precast members (during handling bending moment changes its sign).
4. In bracing members of a frame due to changes in the direction of wind
loads.
5. To improve the ductility of the beams in earth quake regions.
6. To reduce long term deflections or to increase stiffness of the beam.
Analysis of Doubly Reinforced Beams
Doubly Reinforced section can be considered to be composed of two sections
given below.
(a) A singly reinforced section with Mu,lim
(b) A section with compression steel and additional tension steel to resist
additional moment 𝑀𝑢2 = 𝑀𝑢 − 𝑀𝑢 ,𝑙𝑖𝑚 , i.e., a steel beam without
concrete.
Hence, moment of resistance of doubly reinforced beam.
𝑀𝑢 = 𝑀𝑢 ,𝑙𝑖𝑚 + 𝑀𝑢2
Where, 𝑀𝑢 ,𝑙𝑖𝑚 = Limiting moment of resistance of singly reinforced section.
𝑀𝑢2 = Additional moment of resistance to be resisted by compression steel and
additional tension steel.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 108
The lever arm for the additional moment of resistance 𝑀𝑢2 is equal to the
distance between the centroid of the tension and compression reinforcements,
i.e., d-d,. Hence the additional moment of resistance is given by
𝑀𝑢2 = 𝑓𝑠𝑐 𝐴𝑆𝐶 𝑑 − 𝑑′ = 0.87 𝑓𝑠𝑐 𝐴𝑠𝑡2 𝑑 − 𝑑′
Where,
fsc = stress in compression steel
d’ = Distance of centroid of compression reinforcement from the maximum
compression fiber (effective cover to compression reinforcement)
Asc= Area of compression reinforcement required to resist Mu2
Ast2 = Area of additional tensile reinforcement to balance compression steel
Ast1= Area of tensile reinforcement for a balanced singly reinforced section
1. Neutral Axis: The depth of neutral axis can be calculated by equating total force of
compression to total force of tension. Compression force of concrete 𝐶𝑐 = 0.36 𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝑏 𝑥𝑢
Compressive forces in compression steel 𝐶𝑠 = 𝑓𝑠𝑐 𝐴𝑠𝑐
Tensile force 𝑇 = 0.87 𝑓𝑦 𝐴𝑠𝑐
Equate force of Compression with Tension
𝐶𝑐 + 𝐶𝑠 = 𝑇
Therefore, 𝑥𝑢 = 0.87 𝑓𝑦 𝐴𝑠𝑐 − 𝑓𝑠𝑐 𝐴𝑠𝑐
0.36 𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝑏
2. Ultimate Moment of Resistance:
The ultimate Moment of resistance of doubly reinforced section is
given by:
𝑀𝑢 = 𝑀𝑢1 + 𝑀𝑢2
𝑀𝑢 = 0.36 𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝑏 𝑥𝑢 𝑑 − 0.42𝑥𝑢 + 𝑓𝑠𝑐 𝐴𝑠𝑐 𝑑 − 𝑑′
When xu > xu,max is limited to xu,max
𝑀𝑢 = 0.36 𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝑏 𝑥𝑢 ,𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑑 − 0.42𝑥𝑢 ,𝑚𝑎𝑥 + 𝑓𝑠𝑐 𝐴𝑠𝑐 𝑑 − 𝑑′
3. Area of Compression steel: Additional moment of resistance 𝑀𝑢2 = 𝑓𝑠𝑐 𝐴𝑠𝑐 𝑑 − 𝑑′
𝐴𝑠𝑐 = 𝑀𝑢2
𝑓𝑠𝑐 𝑑 − 𝑑′
The maximum area of compression reinforcement shall not exceed 0.04 bD
i.e., 4% of gross cross sectional area.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 109
4. Area of Tension steel: The limiting moment of resistance of singly reinforced section is given
by:
M𝑢 ,𝑙𝑖𝑚 = 0.87 𝑓𝑦A𝑠𝑡1(d − 0.42𝑥𝑢 ,𝑚𝑎𝑥 )
A𝑠𝑡1 =M𝑢 ,𝑙𝑖𝑚
0.87 𝑓𝑦(d − 0.42𝑥𝑢 ,𝑚𝑎𝑥 )
Additional area of tensile steel (Ast1) can be calculated by equating the
compressive force in compression steel and tensile force in additional tension
steel.
0.87 𝑓𝑦A𝑠𝑡2 = 𝑓𝑠𝑐A𝑠𝑐
A𝑠𝑡2 =𝑓𝑠𝑐A𝑠𝑐
0.87 𝑓𝑦
Ast2 can also be calculated by using
M𝑢2 = 0.87 𝑓𝑦A𝑠𝑡2(d − d′)
A𝑠𝑡2 =M𝑢2
0.87 𝑓𝑦(d − d′)
Total area of tension steel A𝑠𝑡 = A𝑠𝑡1 + A𝑠𝑡2
Stress in Compression Steel:
If εsc is the strain at the level of compression steel, from the strain diagram at
failure
𝜀𝑠𝑐x𝑢 − 𝑑′
=0.0035
x𝑢
Knowing the strain, the stress in compression steel can be obtained from
stress-strain curve of corresponding steel or from Table-A of SP-16 which is given
below
Stress level Fe415 Fe500
Strain Stress N/mm2 Strain Stress N/mm2
0.80fyd 0.00144 288.7 0.00174 347.8
0.85fyd 0.00163 306.7 0.00195 369.6
0.90fyd 0.00192 324.8 0.00226 391.3
0.95fyd 0.00241 342.8 0.00277 413.0
0.975fyd 0.00276 351.8 0.00312 423.9
1.0fyd 0.00380 360.9 0.00417 434.8
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 110
Table 5.4 Salient points on the design stress strain curve for cold worked bars (Table-A SP-16)
Note: Linear interpolation may be done for intermediate values
fyd = Design yield strength = 0.87fy
So fsc and xu are interrelated and cannot be found directly. Trial and error
procedure should be adopted.
For mild steel direct relation can be established between stress and strain since
the idealized stress strain curve is linear up to fy and then it is constant equal to fy
𝑓𝑠𝑐 = starin x E𝑠
Substituting the value of strain and E for steel = 2x105
N/mm2
= 0.0035 (1-d’/xu) 2x105
= 700(1-d’/xu), subjected to a maximum of 0.87fy
Stress in Compression Steel (fsc) based on d’/d :
As per SP-16, in designing doubly reinforced beam (by assuming xu= xu,max)
the following table gives the values of fsc for different values of d’/d.
Grade of Steel d'/d
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20
Fe415 355 353 342 329
Fe500 424 412 395 370
Table 5.5 Stress in Compression Steel (fsc) N/mm2 in Doubly Reinforced beams with cold worked bars (Table-F in SP-16) when d’/d < 0.2
For d’/d < 0.2, fsc for mild steel is 0.87fy
Use of Design Aids SP-16:
SP-16 design tables 45 to 56 gives the percentage of tension and compression
reinforcement (Pt and Pc) for different ratios of (d’/d) varying from 0.05 to 0.20 and
for various grades of concrete (fck= 15 to 30 N/mm2) and different grades of steel (fy=
250, 415 and 500 N/mm2) covering the moment of resistance factor (Mu/bd
2) varying
from 2.24 to 8.30
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 111
5.6 DESIGN OF BEAMS USING SP 16
Design of plinth beams:
Beam no's 1001, 1007, 1009,1014, 1015, 1020, 1021, and 1026
Length = 3000 mm
Cross section = 300x400 mm
Clear cover = 25 mm
Effective depth (d) = 375 mm
Max B.M @ Start support = 41.037 KN-m
Max B.M @ Mid span = 15.561 KN-m
Max B.M @End support = 41.749 KN-m
% of Ast @ Start support(-ve)
Mu
bd2 = 41.037 x 106
300x3752
= 0.97 KN/m2
Limiting moment of resistance
Mu,lim = 0.138x fckxbxd2
= 0.138 x20x300x3752 = 117 KN-m
Xu,max = 0.48 x d = 0.48 x 375 = 180 mm
Actual moment is less than the limiting moment.
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
From linear interpolation we get the actual %pt
𝑀𝑢
𝑏𝑑2 %pt
0.95 0.280
1.00 0.295
0.7822 0.287
Area of steel = pt xbxd
100=
0.287 x 300x 375
100
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 112
= 322 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
No of bars = 322
x1224π = 2.84 ~ 3 no’s
% of Ast @ mid span
𝑀𝑢
𝑏𝑑2 = 15.561 x 106
300x3752
= 0.37 KN/m2
Limiting moment of resistance
Mu,lim = 0.138x fckxbxd2
= 0.138 x20x300x3752 = 117 KN-m
Xu, max = 0.48 x d = 0.48 x 375 = 180 mm
Actual moment is less than the limiting moment.
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
%pt = 0.085
Area of steel = 𝑝𝑡 𝑥𝑏𝑥𝑑
100=
0.085 x 300x 375
100
= 95.625 mm2
Check for Area of steel
As per clause no 26.5.1.1 of IS 456-2000, min reinforcement is given by
𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝑏𝑑 =
0.85
𝑓𝑦
Ast = 230 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
No of bars = 230
x1224π = 2.03 ~ 3 no’s
% of Ast @End support
𝑀𝑢
𝑏𝑑2 = 41.749 x 106
300x3752
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 113
= 0.99 KN/m2
Limiting moment of resistance
Mu,lim = 0.138x fckxbxd2
= 0.138 x20x300x3752 = 117 KN-m
Xu,max = 0.48 x d = 0.48 x 375 = 180 mm
Actual moment is less than the limiting moment.
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
From linear interpolation we get the actual %pt
𝑀𝑢
𝑏𝑑2 %pt
0.95 0.280
1.00 0.295
0.92 0.292
Area of steel = 𝑝𝑡 𝑥𝑏𝑥𝑑
100=
0.292 𝑥 300𝑥 375
100
= 328 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
No of bars = 328
x1224π = 2.90 ~ 3 no’s
Beam no's 1002,1006, 1010, 1013, 1016, 1017, 1022, and 1025
Length = 3700 mm
Cross section = 300x400 mm
Clear cover = 25 mm
Effective depth (d) = 375 mm
Max B.M @ Start support = 48.839 KN-m
Max B.M @ Mid span = 19.181 KN-m
Max B.M @End support = 49.323 KN-m
% of Ast @ Start support(-ve)
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 114
Mu
bd2 = 48.839 x 106
300x3752
= 1.16 KN/m2
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
Percentage of steel = 0.384 %
Area of steel = pt xbxd
100=
0.384 x 300x 375
100
= 389 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
No of bars = 389
x1224π = 3.44 ~ 4 no's
% of Ast @ mid span
𝑀𝑢
𝑏𝑑2 = 19.181 x 106
300x3752
= 0.45 KN/m2
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
%pt = 0.128
Area of steel = 𝑝𝑡 𝑥𝑏𝑥𝑑
100=
0.128 x 300x 375
100
= 144 mm2
Check for Area of steel
As per clause no 26.5.1.1 of IS 456-2000, min reinforcement is given by
𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝑏𝑑 =
0.85
𝑓𝑦
Ast = 230 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
No of bars = 230
x1224π = 2.03 ~ 3 no's
% of Ast @End support
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 115
𝑀𝑢
𝑏𝑑2 = 49.323x 106
300x3752
= 1.17 KN/m2
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
percentage of reinforcement (%pt) = 0.349 %
Area of steel = 𝑝𝑡 𝑥𝑏𝑥𝑑
100=
0.349 𝑥 300𝑥 375
100
= 393 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
No of bars = 393
x1224π = 3.47 ~ 4 no’s
Beam no's 1003, 1011, 1012, 1017, 1018, 1023, 1024
Length = 3550 mm
Cross section = 300x400 mm
Clear cover = 25 mm
Effective depth (d) = 375 mm
Max B.M @ Start support = 48.911 KN-m
Max B.M @ Mid span = 17.581 KN-m
Max B.M @End support = 48.598 KN-m
% of Ast @ Start support(-ve)
Mu
bd2 = 48.911 x 106
300x3752
= 1.16 KN/m2
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
Percentage of steel = 0.346 %
Area of steel = pt xbxd
100=
0.346 x 300x 375
100
= 389 mm2
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 116
Using 12 mm dia bars
No of bars = 389
x1224π = 3.44 ~ 4 no's
% of Ast @ mid span
𝑀𝑢
𝑏𝑑2 = 17.581 x 106
300x3752
= 0.42 KN/m2
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
%pt = 0.118
Area of steel = 𝑝𝑡 𝑥𝑏𝑥𝑑
100=
0.118 x 300x 375
100
= 133 mm2
Check for Area of steel
As per clause no 26.5.1.1 of IS 456-2000, min reinforcement is given by
𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝑏𝑑 =
0.85
𝑓𝑦
Ast = 230 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
No of bars = 230
x1224π = 2.03 ~ 3 no's
% of Ast @End support
𝑀𝑢
𝑏𝑑2 = 48.598 x 106
300x3752
= 1.15 KN/m2
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
percentage of reinforcement (%pt) = 0.344 %
Area of steel = 𝑝𝑡 𝑥𝑏𝑥𝑑
100=
0.344 𝑥 300𝑥 375
100
= 387 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 117
No of bars = 387
x1224π = 3.42 ~ 4 no’s
Beam no's 1004, 1030, 1034
Length = 1650 mm
Cross section = 300x400 mm
Clear cover = 25 mm
Effective depth (d) = 375 mm
Max B.M @ Start support = 35.415 KN-m
Max B.M @ Mid span = 18.726 KN-m
Max B.M @End support = 26.626 KN-m
% of Ast @ Start support(-ve)
Mu
bd2 = 35.415 x 106
300x3752
= 0.84 KN/m2
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
Percentage of steel = 0.254 %
Area of steel = pt xbxd
100=
0.254 x 300x 375
100
= 276 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
No of bars = 276
x1224π = 2.44 ~ 3 no's
% of Ast @ mid span
𝑀𝑢
𝑏𝑑2 = 18.726 x 106
300x3752
= 0.45 KN/m2
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
%pt = 0.128
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 118
Area of steel = 𝑝𝑡 𝑥𝑏𝑥𝑑
100=
0.128 x 300x 375
100
= 142 mm2
Check for Area of steel
As per clause no 26.5.1.1 of IS 456-2000, min reinforcement is given by
𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝑏𝑑 =
0.85
𝑓𝑦
Ast = 230 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
No of bars = 230
x1224π = 2.03 ~ 3 no's
% of Ast @End support
𝑀𝑢
𝑏𝑑2 = 26.626 x 106
300x3752
= 0.63 KN/m2
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
percentage of reinforcement (%pt) = 0.182%
Area of steel = 𝑝𝑡 𝑥𝑏𝑥𝑑
100=
0.182 𝑥 300𝑥 375
100
= 204 mm2
As per clause no 26.5.1.1 of IS 456-2000, min reinforcement is given by
𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝑏𝑑 =
0.85
𝑓𝑦
Ast = 230 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
No of bars = 230
x1224π = 2.03 ~ 3 no’s
Beam no's 1005,1008
Length = 1900 mm
Cross section = 300x400 mm
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 119
Clear cover = 25 mm
Effective depth (d) = 375 mm
Max B.M @ Start support = 32.145 KN-m
Max B.M @ Mid span = 15.876 KN-m
Max B.M @End support = 34.632 KN-m
% of Ast @ Start support(-ve)
Mu
bd2 = 32.145 x 106
300x3752
= 0.76 KN/m2
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
Percentage of steel = 0.221 %
Area of steel = pt xbxd
100=
0.221 x 300x 375
100
= 249 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
No of bars = 249
x1224π = 2.20 ~ 3 no's
% of Ast @ mid span
𝑀𝑢
𝑏𝑑2 = 15.876 x 106
300x3752
= 0.38 KN/m2
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
%pt = 0.107
Area of steel = 𝑝𝑡 𝑥𝑏𝑥𝑑
100=
0.107 x 300x 375
100
= 120 mm2
Check for Area of steel
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 120
As per clause no 26.5.1.1 of IS 456-2000, min reinforcement is given by
𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝑏𝑑 =
0.85
𝑓𝑦
Ast = 230 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
No of bars = 230
x1224π = 2.03 ~ 3 no's
% of Ast @End support
𝑀𝑢
𝑏𝑑2 = 34.632 x 106
300x3752
= 0.82 KN/m2
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
percentage of reinforcement (%pt) = 0.239 %
Area of steel = 𝑝𝑡 𝑥𝑏𝑥𝑑
100=
0.239 𝑥 300𝑥 375
100
= 269 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
No of bars = 269
x1224π = 2.37 ~ 3 no’s
Beam no's 1027, 1028, 1031, 105, 1036
Length = 3650 mm
Cross section = 300x400 mm
Clear cover = 25 mm
Effective depth (d) = 375 mm
Max B.M @ Start support = 49.395 KN-m
Max B.M @ Mid span = 19.794 KN-m
Max B.M @End support = 52.575 KN-m
% of Ast @ Start support(-ve)
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 121
Mu
bd2 = 49.395 x 106
300x3752
= 1.17 KN/m2
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
Percentage of steel = 0.350 %
Area of steel = pt xbxd
100=
0.350 x 300x 375
100
= 394 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
No of bars = 394
x1224π = 3.38 ~ 4 no's
% of Ast @ mid span
𝑀𝑢
𝑏𝑑2 = 19.794 x 106
300x3752
= 0.47 KN/m2
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
%pt = 0.134
Area of steel = 𝑝𝑡 𝑥𝑏𝑥𝑑
100=
0.134 x 300x 375
100
= 150 mm2
Check for Area of steel
As per clause no 26.5.1.1 of IS 456-2000, min reinforcement is given by
𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝑏𝑑 =
0.85
𝑓𝑦
Ast = 230 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
No of bars = 230
x1224π = 2.03 ~ 3 no's
% of Ast @End support
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 122
𝑀𝑢
𝑏𝑑2 = 52.575 x 106
300x3752
= 1.25 KN/m2
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
percentage of reinforcement (%pt) = 0.374 %
Area of steel = 𝑝𝑡 𝑥𝑏𝑥𝑑
100=
0.374 𝑥 300𝑥 375
100
= 421 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
No of bars = 421
x1224π = .3.72 ~ 4 no’s
Beam no's 1044, 1045, 1046, 1047, 1048, 1049, 1050
Length = 4150 mm
Cross section = 300x400 mm
Clear cover = 25 mm
Effective depth (d) = 375 mm
Max B.M @ Start support = 59.694 KN-m
Max B.M @ Mid span = 19.794 KN-m
Max B.M @End support = 52.575 KN-m
% of Ast @ Start support(-ve)
Mu
bd2 = 59.694 x 106
300x3752
= 1.41 KN/m2
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
Percentage of steel = 0.431 %
Area of steel = pt xbxd
100=
0.431 x 300x 375
100
= 484 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 123
No of bars = 484
x1224π = 4.28 ~ 5 no's
% of Ast @ mid span
𝑀𝑢
𝑏𝑑2 = 19.794 x 106
300x3752
= 0.47 KN/m2
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
%pt = 0.134
Area of steel = 𝑝𝑡 𝑥𝑏𝑥𝑑
100=
0.134 x 300x 375
100
= 150 mm2
Check for Area of steel
As per clause no 26.5.1.1 of IS 456-2000, min reinforcement is given by
𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝑏𝑑 =
0.85
𝑓𝑦
Ast = 230 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
No of bars = 230
x1224π = 2.03 ~ 3 no's
% of Ast @End support
𝑀𝑢
𝑏𝑑2 = 52.575 x 106
300x3752
= 1.25 KN/m2
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
percentage of reinforcement (%pt) = 0.374 %
Area of steel = 𝑝𝑡 𝑥𝑏𝑥𝑑
100 =
0.431 𝑥 300𝑥 375
100
= 421 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 124
No of bars = 421
x1224π = 3.72~ 4 no’s
Beam no's 1029, 1032, 1051
Length = 2000 mm
Cross section = 300x400 mm
Clear cover = 25 mm
Effective depth (d) = 375 mm
Max B.M @ Start support = 44.458 KN-m
Max B.M @ Mid span = 30.724 KN-m
Max B.M @End support = 45.315 KN-m
% of Ast @ Start support(-ve)
Mu
bd2 = 44.458 x 106
300x3752
= 1.05 KN/m2
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
Percentage of steel = 0.312 %
Area of steel = pt xbxd
100=
0.312 x 300x 375
100
= 351 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
No of bars = 351
x1224π = 3.10 ~ 4 no's
% of Ast @ mid span
𝑀𝑢
𝑏𝑑2 = 30.724 x 106
300x3752
= 0.73 KN/m2
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
%pt = 0.211
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 125
Area of steel = 𝑝𝑡 𝑥𝑏𝑥𝑑
100=
0.211 x 300x 375
100
= 237 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
No of bars = 237
x1224π = 2.03 ~ 3 no's
% of Ast @End support45.315
𝑀𝑢
𝑏𝑑2 = 45.315 x 106
300x3752
= 1.07 KN/m2
Referring to Table no 2 of SP 16 for M20 and Fe415
percentage of reinforcement (%pt) = 0.319 %
Area of steel = 𝑝𝑡 𝑥𝑏𝑥𝑑
100 =
0.319 𝑥 300𝑥 375
100
= 359 mm2
Using 12 mm dia bars
No of bars = 359
x1224π = 3.17~ 4 no’s
Design of Beams (1st, 2nd, 3rd & 4th floors)
Beam no Length (m)
Position of Max B.M
Max B.M (KN-m) Reinforcement
2001, 2007, 2009, 2014,
2015, 2022, 2023, 2030,
3001, 3007, 3009, 3014,
3015, 3022, 3023,3030,
4001, 4007, 4009, 4014,
4015, 4022, 4023, 4030,
50001, 5007, 5009, 5014,
5015, 5022, 5023, 5030
3.00
@ Start
support(-ve) 60.47 #3-Φ16
@ Mid span
(+ve) 21.253 #3 -Φ12
@ End
support(-ve) 60.963 #3-Φ16
2002, 2006, 2010, 2013,
3002, 3006, 3010, 3013,
4002, 4006, 4010, 4012,
5002, 5006, 5010, 5013
3.70
@ Start
support(-ve) 65.963 #3-Φ16
@ Mid span
(+ve) 27.412 #3-Φ12
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 126
@ End
support(-ve) 67.464 #3-Φ16
2003, 2011, 2012, 2018,
2019, 2026, 2027, 3003,
3011, 3012, 3018, 3019,
3026, 3027, 4003, 4011,
4012, 4018, 4019, 4026,
4027, 5003, 5011, 5012,
5018, 5019, 5026, 5027
3.55
@ Start
support(-ve) 83.471 #4-Φ16
@ Mid span
(+ve) 30.701 #3-Φ12
@ End
support(-ve) 81.434
#4-Φ16
2004, 2034, 2038,3004,
3034, 3038,4004, 4034,
4038, 5004, 5034, 5038
1.65
@ Start
support(-ve) 48.503
#3-Φ16
@ Mid span
(+ve) 40.553 #4-Φ12
@ End
support(-ve) 35.313 #3-Φ12
2005, 2008, 3005, 3008,
4005, 4008, 5005, 5008
1.90
@ Start
support(-ve) 46.531
#4-Φ12
@ Mid span
(+ve) 31.613 #3-Φ12
@ End
support(-ve) 48.304 #4-Φ12
2016, 2021, 2024, 2029,
3016, 3021, 3024, 3029,
4016, 4021, 4024, 4029,
5016, 5021, 5024, 5029
0.85
@ Start
support(-ve) 88.620 #4-Φ16
@ Mid span
(+ve) 31.885 #3-Φ12
@ End
support(-ve) 90.227 #4-Φ16
2017, 2020, 2025, 2028,
3017, 3020, 3025, 3028,
4017, 4020, 4025, 4028,
5017, 5020, 5025, 5028
2.85
@ Start
support(-ve) 72.414
#3-Φ16
@ Mid span
(+ve) 33.136 #3-Φ12
@ End
support(-ve) 72.969 #3-Φ16
2031, 2032, 2035, 2039,
2040, 3031, 3032, 3035,
3039, 3040, 4031, 4032,
4035, 4039, 4040, 5031,
5032, 5035, 5039, 5040
3.65
@ Start
support(-ve) 71.746 #4-Φ16
@ Mid span
(+ve) 28.99 #3-Φ12
@ End
support(-ve) 67.938 #3-Φ16
2033, 2036, 2037, 2051,
3033, 3036, 3037, 3051,
2.00
@ Start
support(-ve) 44.511
#4-Φ12
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 127
4033, 4036, 4037, 4051,
5033, 5036, 5037, 5051 @ Mid span
(+ve) 32.654 #3-Φ12
@ End
support(-ve) 45.356 #4-Φ12
2041, 2042, 2043, 3041,
3042, 3043, 4041. 4042,
4043, 5041, 5042, 5043
3.50
@ Start
support(-ve) 60.319 #3-Φ16
@ Mid span
(+ve) 30.414 #3-Φ12
@ End
support(-ve) 74.234 #4-Φ16
2044,2045, 2046, 2047,
2048, 2049, 20503044,
3045, 3046, 3047, 3048,
3049, 3050, 4044, 4045,
4046, 4046, 4047, 4048,
4049, 4050, 5044, 5045,
5046, 5047, 5048, 5049,
5050
4.15
@ Start
support(-ve) 91.337 #4-Φ16
@ Mid span
(+ve) 55.884 #3-Φ16
@ End
support(-ve) 97.419 #3-Φ16
Design of Roof Beams
Beam no Length (m)
Position of Max B.M
Max B.M (KN-m) Reinforcement
6001, 6007, 6009, 6014,
6015, 6023, 6030 3.00
@ Start
support(-ve) 24.96 #3-Φ12
@ Mid span
(+ve) 14.848 #3-Φ12
@ End
support(-ve) 25.236 #3-Φ12
6002, 6006, 6010, 6013 3.70
@ Start
support(-ve) 37.182 #3-Φ12
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 128
@ Mid span
(+ve) 20.325 #3-Φ12
@ End
support(-ve) 39.189 #3-Φ12
6003, 6011, 6012, 6018,
6019, 6026, 6027, 7001,
7005, 7006
3.55
@ Start
support(-ve) 70.503 #3-Φ16
@ Mid span
(+ve) 31.136 #3-Φ12
@ End
support(-ve) 71.122 #3-Φ16
6004, 6034, 6038, 7002,
7011
1.65
@ Start
support(-ve) 34.073 #3-Φ12
@ Mid span
(+ve) 20.634 #3-Φ12
@ End
support(-ve) 21.137 #3-Φ12
6005, 6008, 7003, 7004
1.90
@ Start
support(-ve) 26.206 #3-Φ12
@ Mid span
(+ve) 13.521 #3-Φ12
@ End
support(-ve) 14.139 #3-Φ12
6016, 6021, 6024, 6029 0.85
@ Start
support(-ve) 49.153 #3-Φ12
@ Mid span
(+ve) 14.921 #3-Φ12
@ End
support(-ve) 49.828 #3-Φ12
6017, 6020, 6025, 6028 2.85
@ Start
support(-ve) 37.860 #3-Φ12
@ Mid span
(+ve) 22.483 #3-Φ12
@ End
support(-ve) 38.337 #3-Φ12
6031, 6032, 6035, 6039,
6040
3.65
@ Start
support(-ve) 44.125 #3-Φ12
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 129
@ Mid span
(+ve) 20.730 #3-Φ12
@ End
support(-ve) 27.827 #3-Φ12
6033, 6036, 6037, 7009,
7010
2.00
@ Start
support(-ve) 21.499 #3-Φ12
@ Mid span
(+ve) 11.811 #3-Φ12
@ End
support(-ve) 26.053 #3-Φ12
6041, 6042, 6043 3.50
@ Start
support(-ve) 17.783 #3-Φ12
@ Mid span
(+ve) 25.230 #3-Φ12
@ End
support(-ve) 32.006 #3-Φ12
6044, 6045, 6046, 6047,
6048, 6049, 6050 4.15
@ Start
support(-ve) 32.224 #3-Φ12
@ Mid span
(+ve) 41.062 #3-Φ12
@ End
support(-ve) 42.507 #3-Φ12
Design of shear reinforcement:
The Following table shows the summary of all loads under gravity, seismic
and wind forces. Shear force acting on the member along the direction of Global Y.
The maximum shear force is acting on member no 5016 is 130.305 KN under
Ultimate load combination(12) and minimum shear force is acting on beam no 5021 is
-130.764 KN under Ultimate load combination (12).
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 130
Table 5.6 Summary of Beam End Forces from staad
Max Shear force (Vu) = 130.305 KN
Nominal shear stress τv= ( Vu)/bd = 1.58 N/mm2
From table no 61 of SP 16
Design shear strength of concrete τc = 0.438
From table no J of SP 16
Max shear stress τc,max = 2.8 N/mm2
Min percentage of tension reinforcement is 0.402%
As τv > τc shear reinforcement has to be designed
Shear resistance of concrete Vuc= τc.bd = 49 KN
Shear to be resisted by shear reinforcement
Vus = Vu- Vuc
= 81 KN
Using 6 mm, 2 legged steel stirrups
Asv = 2 x 𝜋
4 x6
2 = 56.54 mm
2
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 131
Sv = 0.87fy .Asv .d
Vus
= 151.1 mm
Max allowed spacing = 0.75d = 281.25 mm
= 300 mm whichever is less
Hence provide 2 legged 6 mm stirrups @ 150 mm c/c at ends and 2 legged 6 mm
stirrups @ 200 mm c/c
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 132
6. DESIGN OF COLUMN
6.1 INTRODUCTION:
Concrete is strong in compression and steel is strong in tension. Longitudinal steel
rods are always provided to assist the direct loads. A minimum area of longitudinal
steel is provided in the column, to resist tensile stresses caused by some eccentricity
of the vertical loads. There is also an upper limit of amount of reinforcement in R.C.
columns, because higher percentage of steel may cause difficulties in placing and
compacting of concrete. Longitudinal reinforcing bars are tied laterally by ties or
stirrups at suitable interval, so that the bars do not buckle.
The design of column necessitates determination of loads transferred from
beam at different floors levels. Loads are transferred from slabs to beams and then to
columns. Hence, slabs and beams are normally designed prior to the design of
columns. This method is called as Exact method which enables one to assess the loads
on columns more accurately and thereby the design of columns becomes realistic and
economical.
However, in practice, many times situations arise which require the design of
columns and footings are required to be assessed using judgment based on past
experience and using approximate methods. The loads on the columns can be
determined approximately on the basis of floor area shared by each column. These
loads are normally calculated on higher side so that they are not less than the actual
loads transferred from slabs/beams. In such cases, the design of column is likely to be
uneconomical
The design procedure using both these approaches of column load calculation
has been explained.
6.2 DESIGN PROCEDURE:
Design of columns involves following steps:
(1) Categorization of columns:
(a) Category – I: Internal columns or Axially Loaded Columns.
(b) Category – II: Side columns or Columns subjected to Axial Load
and Uniaxial Bending.
(c) Category - III: Corner Column or Columns subjected to Axial Load
and Biaxial Bending.
(2) Computation of Loads on Columns
(3) Calculation of Moments in Columns
(4) Determination of Effective Length and Type of Column – Short or Long
(5) Grouping of Columns
(6) Design of Column Section
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 133
(1) Categorization of Columns:
Categorization of columns is extremely helpful because the procedure for
design of column in each of the three categories is different.
The columns shall be first divided into the following three categories:
(I) Category – I: Internal columns or Axially Loaded Columns.
Internal columns carrying beams either in all four directions or only in opposite
directions are predominantly subjected to axial compression because moments
due to loads on beams on opposite sides balance each other. Judgment should be
used to place a column under this category because if span and/ or loads on
beams on opposite sides vary appreciably the beam moments on opposite sides
may not balance each other and the column will be subjected to bending
moment, and it will be required to be placed under the second category.
Structurally, these columns can be termed as Axially Loaded Columns.
Therefore, they require practically very little or no allowance in axial load.
(II) Category – II: Side Columns or Columns subjected to Axial Compression and
uniaxial bending. Columns along the sides of a building, which carry beams
either in three orthogonal directions or a single beam in one direction, are
subjected predominantly to axial load and uniaxial bending due to unbalanced
opposite directions balance each other provided their spans and loads on them
are approximately equal. If such columns are to be designed as axially loaded
columns using approximate method, the axial load is required to be increased to
account for the effect of uniaxial bending in column. The load thus arrived is
called Equivalent axial load for the purpose of design of column section.
(III) Category – III: Corner Columns or Columns subjected to Axial Compression
and Biaxial Bending. Corner Columns or the columns which carry beams in two
perpendicular directions are subjected to biaxial bending due to beams in
orthogonal directions. They require large increase in axial load to account for
the effect of biaxial bending for obtaining an Equivalent axial load.
A column is an important component of R.C. structures. Columns are
compression member, the effective length of which exceeds three times the least
lateral dimension. A compression member with effective length less than three times
the least lateral dimension is called pedestal.
A column is generally defined as a member carrying direct axial load which
causes compressive stresses of such magnitude that these stresses largely control its
design. A column or strut is a compression member. Difference between columns and
strut is that column transfers the load to footing and strut transfers the load to some
other member as in case of compression members of trusses. A column is considered
as short, if its effective length to least lateral dimension is less than 12. If the ratio
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 134
exceeds 12, the column is considered is treated as long or slender. A member
carrying mainly axial load is vertical is termed as column. If the axial load is inclined
or horizontal, it is termed as strut.
Depending upon the structural or architectural requirements columns are
designed of various shapes. Columns positioning completely depends on the
architectural plan. In some cases floating columns are assigned for the architectural
requirements of the plan and to provide the necessary open space depending upon the
requirements of the architectural plan.
Types of columns shapes considered:
Circular
Rectangular
Square
Hexagonal
6.3 LENGTH OF COLUMNS:
The unsupported length of column is taken as clear distance between ends restrains.
1. Flat slab construction:
It is clear distance between the floor and the lower extremity of the capital,
the drop panel or slab whichever is less.
L
Fig6.1 Length in flat slab construction
2. Beam and slab construction:
In this case l is the clear distance between the floor and underside of the
shallow beam framing into the column in each direction at next higher level.
FLAT SLAB
FLAT SLAB FLAT SLAB
C
O
L
U
M
N
C
O
L
U
M
N
C
O
L
U
M
N
Column
capital
Drop
panel
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 135
lx ly
FIG6.2 Length in beam and slab construction
3. Columns restrained laterally by struts:
In these cases unsupported length (l) is clear distance between
consecutive struts in each vertical plane, provided that two struts meet column
approximately at the same level and the angle between the vertical planes shall
not vary more than 300 from a right angle.
STRUT Column
L
Strut
COLUMN
FIG 6.3 Elevation Plan
4. Columns restrained laterally by struts using brackets at junctions:
In this case unsupported length l shall be the clear distance between the
floor and lower edge of the bracket, provided that the bracket width equals that
of the beam or strut and at least half of the column.
BEAM BEAM
Strut
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 136
BRACKET
COLUMN
l
FIG 6.4 Length of columns restrained laterally using brackets
Functions of longitudinal and transverse reinforcements in a column:
a. Longitudinal reinforcement:
To share the vertical load, thereby reducing the overall size of the
column
To resist tensile stresses caused in the column due to
1. Eccentric load
2. Moment
3. Transverse load
To prevent sudden brittle failure of the column
To reduce the effects of creep and shrinkage due to sustained loading.
b. Transverse reinforcement:
To prevent longitudinal buckling of longitudinal reinforcement
To resist diagonal tension caused due to transverse, moment.
To hold the longitudinal reinforcement in position at the time of
concreting.
To impart ductility to the column.
6.4 TYPES OF COLUMNS:
1. Column with Longitudinal steel and lateral ties.
2. Column with Longitudinal steel and spirals. 3. Composite columns.
4. Based on type of loading. 5. Based on slenderness ratio
BEAM BEAM
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 137
a. Columns without ties b. square columns with
lateral ties FIG6.6
FIG6.5
c. Circular column with lateral ties d. Composite column
FIG6.7 FIG6.8
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 138
4. Based on type of loading
a. Axially loaded columns: when the line of action of the resultant compressive force
coincides with center of gravity of the cross section of the column, it is called axially
loaded column.
b. Eccentricity loaded columns (uniaxial or Biaxial ) : when the line of action of
the resultant compressive force doesn`t coincide with the center of gravity of the
cross-section of the column. Eccentricity loaded columns have to be designed for
combined axial force and bending moments.
5. Based on slenderness ratio
According to IS 456 clause 25.3 impose the following slenderness limits for columns:
i. The unsupported length ‘ l ’ shall not exceed 60 times the least lateral
dimension of the column ( l ≯ 60b ).
ii. If in any given plane , one end of the column is unrestrained 𝑙 ≯ 100 𝑏2/𝑑
6.5 EFFECTIVE LENGTH OF COLUMN
With the reference from strength of materials Euler`s buckling load for
column with different end conditions works out to be form
𝑃𝑐𝑟 = 𝛼𝜋2𝐸𝐼
𝑙2
Where l is the effective length of column. The buckling load 𝛼𝜋2𝐸𝐼
𝑙2 can be found for
idealized conditions. But when it comes to practice end conditions are never ideal.,
but in case of frame structures it is difficult to idealize ends as fixed, free or hinged.
IS 456 gives a method of determining the effective length for such cases in terms of
stiffness of members meeting at joint.
In normal usage idealized end conditions may be assumed and effective length
determined as shown from table 28 in IS 456.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 139
Degree of end
restraint of
compression
members
Symbol
Theoretical
value of
effective length
Recommended
value of effective
length
Effectively held in
position and
restrained against
rotation in both
ends
0.50 L
0.65 L
Effectively held in
position at both
ends, restrained
against rotation at
one end
0.70 L
0.80 L
Effectively held in
position at both
ends, but not
restrained against
rotation
1.00 L
1.00 L
Effectively held in
position and
restrained against
rotation at one end,
and at other
restrained against
rotation but not
held in position
1.00 L
1.20 L
Effectively held in
position and
restrained against
rotation at one end,
and at other
partially restrained
against rotation but
not held in position
1.50 L
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 140
Effectively held in
position at one end
but not restrained
against rotation,
and at other end
restrained against
rotation but not
held in position
2.00 L
2.00 L
Table 6.1 Effective length of compression member
Braced and unbraced columns
Columns are also subjected to horizontal loads like wind, earthquake
etc.
If the lateral supports are provided at the ends of the columns, the
lateral loads are borne entirely by the lateral supports. Such columns
are known as braced columns.
Where the lateral loads have to be resisted by them, in addition to
axial loads and end moments are considered as unbraced columns.
Bracing can be one direction or in more than one direction, depending
on the direction of the external loads.
A braced column is not subjected to side sway because the column is
braced in both the directions i.e. X and Y directions.
An unbraced column is subjected to side sway or lateral drift, i.e.
there is significant lateral displacement between top and bottom ends
of the column.
6.6 ASSUMPTIONS IN LIMIT STATE OF COLLAPSE IN AXIAL
COMPRESSION:
1. The plane section normal to the axis of column before deformation
remains plan after deformation. This means strain at any point is
proportional to its distance from the neutral axis.
2. The relationship between compressive stress distribution in concrete
and strain in concrete is represented by stress-strain curve.
3. For design purpose, the compressive strength of concrete is assumed
to be 0.67 times of the characteristic strength. The partial safety factor
is added γmc = 1.5 is added.
0.67𝑓𝑐𝑘
1.5= 0.446 𝑓ck
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 141
4. The stress in reinforcement is derived from representative stress-
strain curve for the type of steel used. Factor of safety 1.15 is applied
for steel
5. The maximum compressive strain in concrete in axial compression is
taken as 0.002, and is uniform in section. Hence maximum
compressive stress in concrete, assumed to be uniform across the
section is taken equal to 0.446*fck according to assumption.
Short column:
A compression member may be considered as short when both the slenderness
ratio lex/D and ley/D are less than 12, where
lex = effective length in bending with respect to major axis ( i.e. x- axis )
ley = effective length in bending with respect to major axis ( i.e. y- axis )
D = depth of the section in respect of major axis.
d = width of the section in respect of minor axis.
6.7 SHORT AXIALLY LOADED MEMBER IN AXIAL
COMPRESSION:
Experiments on columns show that load carrying capacity ( Pu ) of an
axially loaded R.C. member at collapse is made up of ultimate strength of concrete
member (Puc ) at collapse plus the ultimate strength of steel ( Pus ) in compression.
𝑃𝑢 = 𝑃𝑢𝑐 + 𝑃𝑢𝑠 = 𝛼𝑐 𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝐴𝑐 + 𝛼𝑠 𝑓𝑦 𝐴s
αc fck = fc = stress in concrete at failure, at uniform of 0.002
αs fy = fs = stress in steel at failure, at uniform of 0.002
Ac = area of concrete ; As = area of steel reinforcement
When a short column is axially loaded, the strain distribution across
the section will be rectangular. At failure, the strain in concrete will be uniform at a
value of 0.002. When concrete attains a limiting strain of 0.0002, the mild steel
reinforcement may develop full design stress ( fyd = 0.87 fy ) . In general therefore
stress fs in steel reinforcement at strain of 0.002, can be taken equal to αs fy, where
the value of αs will depend upon the type of reinforcement as given below ;
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 142
Type of reinforcement Value of (αs ) Stress in steel (fy)
Mild steel 0.87 0.87 fy
Fe 415 0.79 0.79 fy
Fe 500 0.75 0.75 fy
TABLE 6.2
Hence the load carrying capacity of a member, subjected to an axial load only, is
given by
𝑃𝑢 = 0.446 𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝐴𝑐 + 𝛼𝑠 𝑓𝑦 𝐴s
From IS CODE ( IS : 456-2000) adopts only the lowest value of αs ( = 0.75
), which is for steel Fe 500 grade . Also the code has redesigned Pu as Puz in section
39.6 of the code, and has given the following expression in design aids ( SP : 16 –
1980 ).
𝑷𝒖𝒛 = 𝟎. 𝟒𝟒𝟔 𝒇𝒄𝒌 𝑨𝒄 + 𝟎. 𝟕𝟓 𝒇𝒚 𝑨s = 𝟎. 𝟒𝟒𝟔 𝒇𝒄𝒌 𝑨𝒈 + 𝟎. 𝟕𝟓 𝒇𝒚 − 𝟎. 𝟒𝟒𝟔 𝑨𝒔
Ag = gross area of concrete
Ac = net area of concrete = Ag – As
6.8 SHORT AXIALLY LOADED COLUMN WITH MINIMUM
ECCENTRRICITY:
According to IS: 456-2000, compression members are to be designed
for the minimum eccentricity of the load in two principal directions. From the clause
25.4 of the code specifies the following minimum eccentricity emin for the design of
the columns :
𝑒 min =𝑙
500+
𝐷
30 , subject to minimum of 20 mm
Where l = unsupported length of the column in direction under consideration
D = lateral dimension of the column in direction under consideration
Here L is in both x and y direction i.e. lx and ly
If the value of minimum eccentricity is less than or equal to 0.05 D ,
from clause 39.3 of the code permits the design of short axially loaded compression
member by the equation :
𝑃𝑢 = 0.4 𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝐴𝑐 + 0.67 𝑓𝑦 𝐴s = 0.4 𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝐴𝑔 + 0.67 𝑓𝑦 − 0.4 𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝐴𝑠
This equation can be rearranged as
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 143
𝑷𝒖 = 𝟎. 𝟒 𝒇𝒄𝒌 𝑨𝒈 −𝒑𝑨𝒈
𝟏𝟎𝟎 + 𝟎. 𝟔𝟕 𝒇𝒚
𝒑𝑨𝒈
𝟏𝟎𝟎
Where,
Ag = gross area of cross section = b * D for rectangular section
= 𝜋
4𝐷2 for circular section
P = percentage of reinforcement = 𝐴𝑠/ 𝐴𝑔 ∗ 100
Compression members with helical reinforcement:
The code permits larger load in short compression members with
helical reinforcement because columns with helical reinforcement have greater
ductility or toughness when they are loaded concentrically or with small eccentricity.
As per code, the strength of the short compression members with helical
reinforcement shall be taken as 1.05 times the strength of similar members with lateral
ties.
Requirement:
The ratio of volume of helical reinforcement ( Vhs ) to the volume of core ( Vk )
shall not be less than 0.36 𝐴𝑔
𝐴𝑘− 1 𝑓𝑐𝑘 ÷ 𝑓𝑦
Where 𝐴𝑔 = gross area of the section
𝐴𝑘 = area of core of the helically reinforced column measured to the
outside diameter of the helix = 𝜋
4𝐷2𝑎𝑘 − 𝐴𝑠
𝐷𝑘 = diameter of concrete core, measured from outside of helix = D – 2 X clear
cover
𝑓𝑦 = characteristic strength of helical reinforcement but not exceeding
415 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
Load carrying capacity of axially loaded short columns:
1. Short column with lateral ties :
The ultimate load on the short column with lateral ties, when the minimum
eccentricity does not exceed 0.005 times the lateral dimensions,
𝑷𝒖 = 𝟎. 𝟒 𝒇𝒄𝒌𝑨𝒄 + 𝟎. 𝟔𝟕𝒇𝒚𝑨𝒔𝒄
Where,
Pu = factored axial load on column
Ac = area of concrete = gross area – area of steel = Ag - Asc
Asc = area of longitudinal reinforcement
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 144
𝑓𝑐𝑘 = characteristic compressive strength of concrete
𝑓𝑦 = characteristic strength of steel
2. Short column with helical reinforcement:
The strength of column with helical reinforcement shall be 1.05 times
the strength of similar columns with lateral tie, provided the ratio of volume of
helical reinforcement to the volume of the core shall not be less than
𝟎. 𝟑𝟔 𝑨𝒈
𝑨𝒌− 𝟏
𝒇𝒄𝒌
𝒇𝒚
Ag = gross area of section
Ak = area of the core of helically reinforced column measured to the out-side
diameter of the helix.
Long columns or slender columns:
If the ratio of effective length to its least lateral dimension is more than 12 the
columns are called long columns. A column under the action of axial loads deflects
laterally causing maximum lateral deflection at the center ( ∆ ). This makes the load
eccentric at the central section of the column by a distance∆, subjecting a bending
moment P * ∆
Pu Pu
∆ = DEFLECTION FIG6.11
CURVE. ∆ = 0 (NO DEFLECTION )
According to IS : 456-2000,the additional moments Max and May due to lateral
deflection shall be calculated by
Max = 𝑷𝒖 𝑫 𝒍𝒆𝒙
𝒍𝒆𝒙
𝑫
𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟎
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 145
May = 𝑷𝒖 𝒃 𝒍𝒆𝒚
𝒍𝒆𝒚
𝑫
𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟎
𝑃𝑢 = Axial load on member
𝑙𝑒𝑥 = effective length in respect of the major axis
𝑙𝑒𝑦 = effective length in respect of the major axis
D = depth of the cross section at right angles to the major axis
b = width of the cross section
The above values may be multiplied by reduction factor
𝑘 = 𝑃𝑢𝑧 − 𝑃𝑢
𝑃𝑢𝑧 − 𝑃𝑏 ≤ 1
Where
Pu = axial load on member
Puz = 0.45 fck Ac + 0.75 fy Asc
Pu = axial load corresponding to the condition of maximum compressive strain
0.0035 in concrete and tensile strain of 0.002 in outer most layer of tension steel.
6.9 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR COLUMNS (CLAUSE 26.5.3
OF IS 456):
1. Longitudinal reinforcement:
a. The cross sectional area of longitudinal reinforcement shall not be
less than 0.8 % and not more than 6 % of gross sectional area of
column.
b. In any column that has large cross sectional area that required to
support the load, the minimum percentage of steel shall be 0.8 % of
required area and not the area actually provided.
c. Minimum number of longitudinal bars to be provided is 4 for
rectangular columns and 6 for circular columns.
d. Minimum diameter of longitudinal bar is 12 mm.
e. Spacing of longitudinal bars measured along the periphery of the
column shall not exceed 300 mm.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 146
2. Transverse reinforcement :
A reinforced concrete compression member shall have transverse or helical
reinforcement so disposed that every longitudinal bar nearest to the compression face
has effective lateral support against buckling. The effective lateral support is given by
transverse reinforcement either in form of circular rings capable of taking up
circumferential tension or by polygonal links (lateral ties) with internal angles not
exceeding 1350. The ends of the transverse reinforcement shall be properly anchored.
i. Lateral ties:
a. The diameter of lateral ties shall not less than ¼ of the diameter of
largest longitudinal bar and in no case less than 6 mm.
b. The pitch of ties shall not exceed the following
Least Lateral dimension of the column
Sixteen times the smallest longitudinal bar
300 mm
ii. Helical reinforcement :
a. The diameter is same as that of lateral ties
b. The pitch of the helical reinforcement shall not be more the
following
75 mm
1/6 of core diameter of the column
c. And the pitch of helical reinforcement shall not be less than the
greatest of the following
25 mm
Three times the diameter of helical bar.
Cover:
For longitudinal reinforcing bars in a column nominal cover shall in any case
not be less than 40 mm, or less than the diameter of such bar. In case of columns
of minimum dimension of 200 mm or under, whose reinforcing bars do not exceed
12 mm, a nominal cover of 25 mm may be used. Ref (clause 26.4.2.1 of IS: 456-
200)
6.10 DESIGN OF COLUMNS USING SP 16:
SP 16 design charts 24 to 26 shall be used for designing of axially loaded short
columns. These charts cover different grades of steel ( fy =250, 415 and 500 ) and
concrete grades
fck = 15,20,25,30,35 and 40.
In lower section of these charts Pu /Ag has been plotted against percentage of steel
( p) for different grades of concrete. If the cross-section of column is known, Pu -
/Ag can be calculated and reinforcement percentage can be read from the chart.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 147
6.11 DESIGN OF COLUMNS:
Categorizations of Columns:
TABLE 6.3
Category – I(a): (13,14,15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24)
Axially loaded columns
Factored axial load = 1637 KN
Breadth (B) = 300 mm
Depth (D) = 500 mm
Length (L) = 3200 mm
Gross area (Ag) = 300 x 500 = 150000 mm2
Area of concrete (Ac) = 150000- Asc
For a axially loaded short columns
Pu = 0.4 fck.Ac+0.67.fy.Asc
1637 x 103 = 0.4x20x (150000- Asc) + 0.67x 415x Asc
Asc = 1618.21 mm2
Cate
gory Type Column No’s
Size of
column
Max Ultimate
load
I Internal Column or
Axially Loaded
13,14,15, 16, 17, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24 300 x 500 mm 1637.006 KN
9,10,11 300 x 400 mm 818.406 KN
II
Side Column or
Axially Loaded
with Uniaxial
Bending
2, 3, 4, 6, 7,12, 18, 19,
25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31
300 x 500 mm
1249.386 KN
5 300 x 400 mm 818.406 KN
III
Corner column or
Axially Loaded
Biaxial
1, 8, 26, 32 300 x 500 mm 790.593 KN
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 148
Min reinforcement = 0.8 % of gross area
= 0.008 x 300 x 500 = 1200 mm2
Max reinforcement = 6% of gross area
= 0.06 x300 x500 = 9000 mm2
Provide 10 bars of 16 mm dia.
Lateral ties
Diameter of lateral ties should not be less than
1. one fourth of longitudinal bar = 1
4x16 = 4 mm
2. 6 mm
Hence, adopt 6 mm diameter of bars
Pitch of the lateral ties shall be minimum of:
1. Least of the lateral dimension = 300 mm
2. 16 x dia of longitudinal bar 16 x 16 = 256 mm
3. 300 mm
Provide 6 mm lateral ties @ 250 mm c/c
Category – I(b): (9,10,11)
Axially loaded columns
Factored axial load = 818.406 KN
Breadth (B) = 300 mm
Depth (D) = 400 mm
Length (L) = 3200 mm
Gross area (Ag) = 300 x 400 = 120000 mm2
Area of concrete (Ac) = 120000- Asc
For a axially loaded short columns
Pu = 0.4 fck.Ac+0.67.fy.Asc
818.406 x 103 = 0.4x20x (120000- Asc) + 0.67x 415x Asc
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 149
Asc = 1172.67 mm2
Min reinforcement = 0.8 % of gross area
= 0.008 x 300 x 400 = 960 mm2
Max reinforcement = 6% of gross area
= 0.06 x300 x400 = 7200 mm2
Provide 10 bars of 12 mm dia.
Lateral ties
Diameter of lateral ties should not be less than
1. one fourth of longitudinal bar = 1
4x12 = 3 mm
2. 6 mm
Hence, adopt 6 mm diameter of bars
Pitch of the lateral ties shall be minimum of:
1. Least of the lateral dimension = 300 mm
2. 16 x dia of longitudinal bar 16 x 12 = 192 mm
3. 300 mm
Provide 6 mm lateral ties @ 250 mm c/c
Category – III:
Axial load (Pu) = 790.593 KN
Initial Moments
About X
KN-m
About Y
KN-m
15.79
7.12
Eccentric Moments
15.81
18.24
Total Design Moments
15.81
18.24
TABLE 6.4
Mx = 15.79 KN-m
My = 7.21 KN-m
Column size = 300 mm X 500 mm
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 150
M20 Fe415
Assume clear cover = 40 mm
Assume dia. Of main steel = 12 mm
Dia. Of link = 8 mm
Therefore effective cover = 40+8+ 12/2 = 54 mm
Assume % steel as p = 1.2 %
Emin.x = L/500 + d/30
= 3200 /500 + 500/30
= 23.066 mm
Emin.y= L/500 + d/30
= 3200/500 + 300/30
= 16.4 mm
P/fck = 1.2/20 = 0.06
P𝑢
𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝑏𝑑 = (790.593)/(20 x 300 x 500) = 0.263
From clause 39.6 from pg. 71 IS: 456
Pux = 0.45fckAc + 0.75 fyAsc
[Ac= Ag - Asc
= [(300 x 500) – (0.012 x 300 x 500)]
=148200 mm2]
= [(0.45 x 20 x 148200) + (0.75 x 415 x 1800)]
=1894.04 KN
P𝑢
P𝑢𝑥 =0.417
From pg. 71 clause no 39.6
αn= 1.36
For bending about X-axis
d' /d = 54/500 = 0.108
Selecting appropriate chart- 44 for d’/d = 0.1 from SP-16
Mu
fck bd 2 = 0.081
Mux1 = 121.5 KN-m
For bending about y-axis
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 151
d'/b = 54/300 = 0.18
Selecting appropriate chart from SP-16
Mu
fck db 2 = 0.075
Muy1 = 67.5 KN-m
Mux
Mux 1 ∝
+ Muy
Muy 1 ∝
= 0.11 < 1
Hence the assumed column size and % of steel are O.K.
Reinforcement
Asc = 1800 mm2
Assuming 16 mm bars,
Hence provide # 8-16 mm bars
Lateral ties
Provide lateral ties of dia 6 mm
Provide # 6 mm bars @ 250 mm c/c
Schedule of columns:
category Cross section Longitudinal
reinforcement
Lateral ties
(2 Legged)
I 300 x 500 mm 10-16 ϕ
6ϕ 250 C/C 300 x 400 mm 10-12 ϕ
II
300 x 500 mm 8-16 ϕ
6ϕ 250 C/C
300 x 400 mm 8-12 ϕ
III 300 x 500 mm 8-16 ϕ 6ϕ 250 C/C
TABLE 6.5
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 152
7. DESIGN OF FOOTINGS
A Building is generally composed of super structure above the
ground and sub-structure, which forms the foundation below ground. The safe bearing
capacity of the soil must not be exceeded; otherwise settlement may occur, resulting
in damage to building and its facility ex. gas mains, water etc
It is important to have an engineer survey made of soil under a
proposed structure so that variation in strata and soil properties can be determined.
The design of foundation ,the areas of bases in contact with ground should be such
that the safe bearing pressure will not be exceeded ,If these loads are to properly
transmitted ,footing must be designed to prevent excessive settlement or rotation, and
provide safety against sliding, overturning.
7.1 INTRODUCTION OF FOOTING:
Foundation or footing is an important part of the structure which transfer the
load of the super- structure to the foundation soil .It may be shallow or deep footing,
depending upon the load and type of foundation soil.
Example: if the soil with adequate bearing capacity at reasonable depth; then shallow
footing is provided.
If, 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 ≤ 𝑡𝑜 𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 Shallow foundation
If, 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 ≥ 𝑡𝑜 𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 Deep foundation
7.2 TYPES OF FOOTING:
Footings are classified as follows;
Isolated footing
Combined footing
Strap footing
Mat footing
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 153
1) Isolated footing:
Footing which are provided under each column independently is
called isolated footing. It may be square, rectangle, or circular in plan. Its
comprised of thick slab which may be flat or stepped or sloped as shown in
fig..
P P
P
FLAT Stepped Slopped
FIG7.1 Isolated Footing
2) Combined footing:
Footing that supports two or more columns is combined footing. These
may be rectangular or trapezoidal in shape, as shown in fig. This type of footing
is provided when isolated footing of adjacent columns overlap each other and
when exterior column close to boundary line.
P1 P2 P1 P2
FIG7.2 combined footing
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 154
3) Strap footing:
It is also one of the types of combines footing. It consists of an
isolated footing of two columns connected by beam called strap beam.
P1 P2
Connecting beam Cantilever slab
FIG7.3 Strap footing
4) Mat footing:
It is a solid re-in forced concrete slab covering entire area beneath the
structure and supporting all the columns. When the column loads are heavy or the safe
bearing capacity of soil is very low, the required footing area become very large and
the footing of adjacent column may overlap. In such case, for all the columns a
common footing may be provided.
FIG7.4 Mat Footing
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 155
7.3 DEPTH OF FOUNDATION:
Rankin’s formula is used to determine the min. depth of foundation which is
given below,
ℎ =𝑝
𝑤
(1−𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛼 )
(1+𝑠𝑖𝑛𝛼 )
2
Where,
h = Min depth
p = Safe bearing capacity
w = Unit weight of soil
α = Angle of friction of soil
Loads for foundation:
For,
a) Dead load + Imposed load case, 1.0 DL + 1.0 IL
b) Dead load + Wind load case, 1.0 DL +1.0 WL
c) Dead + Imposed + Wind load case, 1.0 DL + 0.8 DL + 0.8WL
10% of load from column may take as self-weight of footing for determining
the area of footing required.
In case of multi-storey Building, one should take advantage of allowable
reduction in the live load for residential and office buildings
General design requirements for footing (IS 456-2000):
I. Minimum thickness at edges:-
In reinforcement and plain concrete footing, the min. thickness at the edges shall be
taken as given below.
For footing on soil 150 mm
For footing on piles 300 mm
II. Moments and Forces:-
The bending moment at any section shall be determined by passing through
the section a vertical plane which extends completely across the footing, and
computing the moment of forces acting over entire area of footing on one side of said
plane. The critical section for determination of bending moment shall be as follows.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 156
i. At the face of the column, pedestal or wall, for footing supporting concrete
column, pedestal or wall
ii. Halfway b/w the center-line and edge of the wall, for footings under masonry
walls
iii. Halfway b/w the face of the column or pedestal and the edge of the gusseted
base, for footing under gusseted bases
III. Shear:
The shear strength of footing is governed by the more serve of the
following 2 conditions.
For one way or beam action, the critical section for shear shall be assumed as a
vertical section located from face of the column. i.e. {pedestal or wall at a
dist. Equal to effective depth for footing on soil and dist. equal to half effective
depth in case of footing on piles}.
For 2 way action of the footing, the critical section for shear shall be at a dist.
Of D/2 from the periphery of the column perpendicular to the plane of the
slab.{where d = effective depth of section}
IV. Bond:
The critical section for checking the development length in a footing shall
be assumed at the same planes as those prescribed for bending moment and also at
other planes where minimal changes of section occur.
V. Tensile reinforcement:-
Tension reinforcement should be provided to resist the bending moment
obtained in (II) above. The total tensile reinforcement shall be distributed across
the corresponding resisting section as given below;
a. In One way reinforced footing, the reinforcement shall be distributed
uniformly across the full width of footing.
b. In Two ways reinforced rectangular footing, the reinforcement in the long
direction is placed uniformly across the full width of the footing. For
reinforcement in short direction ,a central band equal to the width of footing
shall be marked along the length of the footing and portion of reinforcement
determined in accordance with the equation given below shall be uniformly
distributed across the central band.
𝑅𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑎𝑛𝑑
𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = (
2
𝛽+1)
Where, β = ratio of longer side to shorter side of footing.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 157
The remaining portion of reinforcement is provided uniformly in outer portion of
footing as shown in fig. L
ee
End Band B
Central band
(𝑙−𝑏
2) B (
𝑙−𝑏
2)
FIG7.5 End band
VI. Transfer of Load at the base of column:-
The compressive stress in concrete at the base of the column is
transferred by bearing to the top of the supporting footing. The bearing pressure
on the loaded area shall not exceed the permissible bearing stress in direct
compression multiplied by value equal to (𝐴1)/(𝐴2) but not greater than 2.
P
A1 = supporting area for bearing of footing
Column
A2 = loaded area at the column face.
Footing
A1= Max. Area of supporting surface 2d b
2d
A2
FIG7.6 Load distribution in Footing
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 158
VII. Min. reinforcement:-
The Min reinforcement and spacing shall be as per the requirements of
solid slab. Min. dia of bar to be used is 10 mm.
VIII. Nominal cover to reinforcement:-
For, footings Min. cover shall be 50 mm.
Column Bar
Development length of column bars Dowel
Bars
FIG7.7 Reinforcement of column – Footing interface
7.4 DESIGN PROCEDURE OF ISOLATED FOOTING:
The Footing for an axially loaded column is designed as an inverted
cantilever slab projecting from column and loaded with uniform upward soil pressure.
These are usually square or rectangular in shape. They may have uniform thickness
throughout or may have sloping surface.
1) Size of the Footing:
Size of the footing is determined based on service loads or working loads and not
the factored loads. Take 10% of the load as self-weight.
Area of the footing required;
𝐴 = 1.1 𝑃
𝑆𝐵𝐶 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑖𝑙
Where P = working load SBC = safe bearing capacity
2) Determine the upward soil Reaction for the factored load:
𝑄𝑢 = 𝑃𝑢
𝐴 =
1.5 𝑝
𝐴
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 159
3) Determine The Min Depth Required to Resist B.M:
Calculate the depth required for bending moment and check the depth
for single shear and double shear. The depth is kept uniform. If the footing size is
small and is made slopping, if the footing is large.
The maximum bending moment is calculate at the face of the column
by passing a section extends completely across the footing as shown in fig.
( 𝐵−𝑏
2)
L B-b / 2
aa
B
Qu
FIG7.8 CRITICAL SECTION OF BENDING MOMENT
Projection of the footing = (𝐵−𝑏)
2
The bending moment about x-x is (as a cantilever slab, 𝑤𝑙2
2 )
Mu = 𝑄𝑢 .𝐵(
𝐵−𝑏
2)2
2
≈ 𝑄𝑢 𝐵(𝐵−𝑏)2
8
Where, Qu = upward soil pressure; B= width of footing; b = width of column
4) Determine the area of reinforcement required in Width B using:
Mu = 0.87 ∗ 𝑓𝑦 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 (1 −𝑓𝑦 ∗𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝑓𝑐𝑘 ∗𝐵∗𝑑)
Using the bars of dia not less than 10 mm, find the spacing of bars.
Spacing = 𝐵∗𝑎𝑠𝑡
𝐴𝑠𝑡
Where, ast = area of bar used
b
b
b
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 160
Ast = total area of steel required
B = width of the footing
D = effective depth of footing
NOTE: - Provide same reinforcement in both directions.
5) Check for one way shear:
The check for one way shear is carried out similar to that of beams or
slabs. The critical section for one way shear is at a distance d from the column
extending the full width of the footing as shown in fig.
B
Vu = soil pressure from the shaded area
= Qu ∗ B B−b
2− d
τυ = Vu
bd< τc , permissible shear stress in concrete. B
FIG7.9
6) Check for Two way shear:
Two way shears is also known as “Punching shear”. if the footing
depth is less, the column may punch through the footing because of the shear
stresses in the footing around the perimeter of the column. As per IS 456-2000,the
critical section for two way shear is at a distance d/2 from the periphery of the
column as shown in the fig.
Perimeter of the punching area = 4(b+d)
Area of concrete resisting punching force = perimeter of punching x depth
A = 4 b + d d
Force of punching S = Qu ∗ shaded area
𝑆 = 𝑄𝑢 [𝐵2 - (𝑏 + 𝑑)2]
Punching shear stress,
τp = 𝑆
𝐴 < permissible value.
Permissible value of punching shear stress is τp =0.25 𝑓𝑐𝑘.
(B-b/2)-d
d b
b
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 161
B
B
FIG7.10 Critical section of two way shear
7) Check for bond length:
Since the footing is designed as a cantilever with reinforcement
subjected to deigned strength at the column face, sufficient bond length should be
available from the face of the column.
Ld = 0.87fy∅
4 ∗ τbd
8) Check for bearing stress:
The compressive stress in concrete at the base of the column is
transferred by bearing to the top of the supporting footing; the bearing pressure on
the loaded area shall not exceed the permissible bearing stress.
Actual bearing pressure = 𝑃𝑢
𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛< 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒
As per clause 34.4 of IS: 456-2000, the permissible bearing stress is
=0.45 𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝐴1
𝐴2 , in which
𝐴1
𝐴2 should not exceed 2
Where, 𝐴1= supporting area for bearing of column
𝐴2 = loaded area at the column face
b+d
b+d
` d/2
d/2 d/2
d/2
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 162
7.5 DESIGN OF RECTANGULAR FOOTING:
In case of rectangular footing, footing is provided when the
boundary line restricts one side of the footing. In such cases the projections of the
footing will be unequal. The dimensions of the footing are proportional in the same
ration of column dimensions. The depth of footing is to be calculated based on longer
projection. Reinforcement has to be designed for both the directions separately. The
reinforcement in the long direction is placed uniformly across the full width of the
footing. But in short direction, the reinforcement is distributed as explained in above
(5).the critical sections for bending and shear.
L L
B B
b
(b)
FIG7.11 critical section for one way shear; FIG7.12critical section for two way shear
Bending moment along longer direction = M1 = Qu B(L−a)2
8
Bending moment along shorter direction = 𝑀2 = 𝑄𝑢 𝐿(𝐵−𝑏)2
8
The maximum B.M shall be taken for calculating the depth of footing. The
depth calculated should be checked for one way shear and two way shear similar to
that of square/isolated footing.
7.6 DESIGN CALCULATION OF FOOTINGS:
The following are the reactions of nodes/columns obtained from
STAAD PRO. Footings of the columns having same sizes and variation of loads of
about 10% are grouped together and designed for the maximum load in that group.
Critical section
For bending B-b / 2
a
L - a / 2
(a)
a+d
d
b+d
d/2
b
a d/2
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 163
NODES Fx (KN) Fy (KN) Fz (KN) Mx (KN-
m)
My (KN-
m)
Mz (KN-m)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
16.254
16.191
16.392
15.314
20.698
28.706
12.083
5.696
2.826
16.323
10.261
16.470
16.524
15.173
13.614
17.264
11.970
5.750
17.832
21.037
17.198
13.826
17.147
17.231
6.348
739.600
1046.546
1146.586
834.852
681.782
960.644
1039.918
749.144
770.377
665.521
818.406
838.848
1178.568
1212.995
1637.006
1239.291
1180.815
842.925
903.807
1225.531
1361.846
1586.945
1367.383
1225.577
906.918
24.614
22.836
13.988
23.547
13.669
13.785
22.933
25.288
18.641
8.274
14.191
20.098
15.828
28.885
22.396
21.983
15.879
21.148
23.072
19.100
22.471
26.535
18.648
19.854
24.121
31.044
22.386
16.481
19.712
12.918
14.3
28.382
32.406
16.520
10.354
12.940
29.327
24.937
23.043
33.776
18.184
26.009
31.041
31.145
15.719
19.967
35.947
16.853
16.375
32.666
0.229
0.255
0.193
0.288
0.128
0.170
0.080
0.106
0.153
0.087
0.067
0.129
0.185
0.150
0.065
0.127
0.058
0.092
0.085
0.116
0.162
0.068
0.103
0.398
0.145
9.252
13.294
27.988
33.174
18.742
25.731
15.051
14.775
12.038
14.016
15.740
9.106
12.937
27.362
13.704
26.632
14.999
14.831
9.309
27.221
27.370
13.791
27.433
29.104
15.649
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 164
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
17.284
21.470
16.008
14.089
17.391
16.685
6.211
788.709
986.219
1056.792
1249.386
1201.954
1020.677
790.593
7.832
4.293
6.420
10.368
5.169
4.528
8.410
22.196
6.199
9.360
26.330
7.041
6.523
23.730
0.076
0.105
0.268
0.088
0.137
0.343
0.395
9.110
26.112
26.894
13.121
26.234
27.889
15.087
7.7 GROUPING OF FOOTINGS:
Group Column No’s Size of column Max Ultimate
load
I 1, 8, 26, 32 300 x500 mm 790.593 KN
II 2, 3, 4, 6, 7,12, 18, 19, 25,
27, 28, 29, 30, 31
300 x500 mm
1249.386 KN
III 13,14,15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22,
23, 24
300 x500 mm 1637.006 KN
IV 5,9,10,11 300 x 400 mm 818.406 KN
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 165
7.8 Design of footings
Step Design calculations Group I Group II Group III Group IV
1.
2.
3.
4.
General Data
Max column load Pu KN
Design working load (P)=Pu/1.5 KN
Column section (b x D) mm x mm
S.B.C of soil KN/m2
Proportioning of Base size
Area of footing required
Af =Pu/SBC m2
Area of footing provided m2
Length of footing Lf m
Breadth of footing Bf m
Projection from column face (Cx) m
Net upward soil pressure
wu=Pu/ Af KN/m2
Depth of footing required from
B.M consideration
MuL = w𝑢 B𝑓Cx 2
8 kN-m
MuB = w𝑢 L𝑓Cx 2
2 kN-m
Depth d = 𝑀𝑢
0.138.𝑓𝑐𝑘 .𝑏 mm
Assuming clear cover 50 mm
Effective depth d
mm
Total depth
mm
Reinforcement along:
(Ast )y= 0.5 fck
fy 1 −
1 −4.6𝑀𝑢
𝑓𝑐𝑘 .𝐵.𝑑2 xBxd mm2
Min %Pt of Ast as per IS 456-2000
(0.85 x100)/fy
Min Ast mm2
Diameter of bars mm
Spacing of bars, S= (astx B)/Ast
mm
c/c
in both directions
790.593
527.062
300 x 500
200
2.64
2.88
1.80
1.60
0.650
189
17.40
15.46
62.77
360
410
135
0.205
431
12
200
1249.386
832.924
300 x 500
200
4.16
4.83
2.30
2.10
0.90
172
40.16
36.67
121
470
520
242
0.205
557
12
180
1637.006
1091.133
300 x 500
200
5.46
5.75
2.50
2.30
1.00
190
59.31
54.57
147
470
520
361
0.205
554
16
180
818.406
545.604
300 x 400
200
2.64
3.06
1.80
1.70
0.70
178
19.66
18.57
84
360
410
155
0.205
425
12
200
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 166
5.
6.
Check for One-way shear: The
critical section for one way shear is
at a distance d from the face of the
column
Factored shear force
Vu = wuBf(Cx-d) KN
Nominal shear stress
τv = V𝑢
Bd N/mm
2
Percentage of steel,
Pt = ast x 100
S x d
Shear strength of concrete τc
τc >τv
Hence it is safe with respect to one
way shear.
Check for Two-way Shear: The
critical section is at a distance of
d/2 from the face of the column.
Perimeter of the critical section
=2{(b+d)+(D+d)}
Area of critical section
(A)=Perimeter x d
Two way shear Vu2= wu x area of
shaded portion= {(LxB-
(b+d)x(D+d)}
Two way shear stress = Vu2/A
Permissible punching shear stress
τp=0.25√𝑓𝑐𝑘
Two way shear is less than the
permissible punching shear stress,
hence, it is safe w.r.t two way shear.
85
0.148
0.157
0.260
safe
3040
1094.4x103
423
0.389
1.118
safe
183
0.162
0.157
0.260
safe
3480
1635.6 x
103
706
0.440
1.118
safe
235
0.221
0.237
0.332
safe
3480
1635.6 x
103
952
0.598
1.118
safe
105
0.174
0.157
0.260
Safe
2840
1022.4 x
103
458
0.459
1.118
safe
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 167
7.9 SCHEDULE OF FOOTINGS:
Group Length
Lf m
Breadth
Bf m D mm d mm
Astx Asty Clear
cover
(mm) Dia spacing Dia spacing
I 1.80 1.60 410 360 12 200 12 200 50
II 2.30 2.10 520 470 12 180 12 180 50
III 2.50 2.30 520 470 16 180 16 180 50
IV 1.80 1.70 410 360 12 200 12 200 50
C0MPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 168
8. DESIGN OF STAIRCASE
8.1 INTRODUCTION:
Stairs are provided in a building to afford a means of communication
between the various floors, they are called staircase. Since they have to
perform the very important function, the slab over which the steps rests should
be designed properly to provide maximum comfort, easy and safety.
Staircase provides access for the various floors of the building. The
stair consists of series of steps with landings at appropriate intervals. The
stretch between the two landings is called flight. The room or space where
stairs are provided is called stair case.
The width of stair depends up on the type of building in which it is
provided. Generally in residential buildings, the width of stair is kept as 1 m
and in case of public buildings it may be up to 2 m. to allow free flow of users,
the width of landings should be at least equal to the width of stairs.
Each step has one tread (going) and one rise. Rise and tread are
proportioned so as to provide convenient and easy access. The rise may vary
from 150 mm to 200 mm. the tread is in between 250 mm to 300 mm. as per
IS: 456, the slope or pitch of the stairs should be in between 250 to 40
0.
The most important aspect in providing staircase is its location. The
location of stair should be such as to provide as easy access so that in case of
any causality, e.g. fire break, earth, food etc. occupation should be placed in
the center or to the side of a building. The location depends upon the position
of the rooms’ ant type of approach needed. In residential buildings, it should
be placed centrally so as to:
1. Provide easy access from all rooms,
2. Maintain privacy.
3. In public building, the staircase should be located near the main entrance.
8.2 TYPES OF STAIR CASES:
Depending up on the geometry/shape:
The stair cases are classified into the following categories depending up on the
geometry.
C0MPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 169
1. Single Flight Stair Case:
This type of stair is used in cellars or where the height between the
floors is small and the frequency of its use is less.
2. Quarter Turn Stair Case:
In this stair case, flights run adjoining the walls and provide
uninterrupted space at the centre of the room. Generally, quarter turn stair
case is used in domestic houses where floor heights are limited to 3 m.
3. Doglegged Stair Case:
The most common type of stair arranged with two adjacent flights
running parallel with a mid-landing. Where space is less, dog legged stair
case is generally provided resulting in economical utilization of available
space
4. Open Well Stair Case:
In public buildings where large spaces are available, open well stair
case is generally preferred due to its better accessibility, comfort and
ventilation due to its smaller flights with an open well at the center.
5. Geometrical Stair Case:
It is aesthetically superior compared to other types and is generally
used in the entrance of cinema theatres and shopping malls.
6. Spiral Stair Case:
In congested locations, where space available is small, spiral stairs are
ideally suited. It comprises a central post with precast treads anchored to
the central column.
Based on Structural Behavior (support condition):
The stirs are classified into the following categories depending up on
the structural behavior.
1. Stairs Spanning Horizontally (with Side Supports):
When the stair slab (waist slab) is supported on sides by side
walls or by a stringer beam on one side and wall on other side, the stars
are said to be spanning horizontally. Hence, each step behaves as an
independent simply supported beam spanning horizontally
Sometimes cantilever steps are used which projects from inclined
beam (stringer beam). Steps may cantilever on only one side or may
both side of supporting inclined beam. In such stairs, design of steps is
done as a cantilever.
2. Stairs Spanning Longitudinally (with supports along sloping line):
C0MPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 170
In this type, the inclined stair slab together with the landings is
supported (on walls or beams along sloping line) at the top and bottom
of the flight without any support on the sides. Dog legged, open well and
quarter turn stair cases comes under this category.
8.3 REQUIREMENT OF A GOOD STAIR CASE:
A well planned and designed stair should provide an easy, quick and
safe mode of communication between the various floors. The general
requirements of a stair are given below:
1. Location:
It should be so located that sufficient light and ventilation is ensured
on the stair case. If possible it should be located centrally so as to be easy
accessible from the different corners of the building.
2. Width of Stair Case:
Width of stair case varies with the situation and the purpose for which
it is provided. Obviously in a building where there is a regular traffic of
people using the stair case its width should be sufficient while in a
residential building it may be the just minimum. The widths of stair case
for public building normally vary between 1.5 to 2.0 m. For residential
building a width of 900 mm to 1000 mm is considered adequate.
3. Length of Flight:
For the comfortable ascend of a stairway to stair the number of steps
in a flight should be restricted to a maximum of 12 and a minimum of 3.
4. Pitch of Stair:
The pitch of long stair should be made flatter by introducing landing to
make ascend less tiresome and less dangerous. In general the slope of stair
should never exceed 40 degrees and should not be flatter than 25 degrees.
5. Head Room:
The head room or clear distance between the tread and the off it of the
flight immediately above it should not be less than 2.13 m.
6. Materials:
The stair should preferably construct of materials, which possess fire
resisting qualities.
7. Balustrade:
The open well stairs should provide with balustrade so as to minimize
the danger of accidents.
C0MPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 171
8. Landing: The width of landing should not be less than width of stair.
9. Winders:
The introduction of winders in stairs should be provided as far
as possible. They are liable to be dangerous and involve extra expenses in
construction. They are difficult to carpet and are especially unsuitable for
public buildings. However, where the winders cannot be dispensed with, they
should preferably be provided near the lower end of flight. Thus instead of
quarter space landing three winders may be used and for a half/space landing 5
winders and four radiating risers may be adopted.
10. Step Proportions:
The rise and tread of each step in a stair should be uniform dimension
throughout. The ratio of going and the rise of a step should so proportioned as
to ensure a comfortable access of the stair way.
8.4 DESIGN OF STAIRS SPANNING LONGITUDINALLY:
1. Depth of the Section:
The depth of the section shall be taken as the minimum thickness
perpendicular to the soffit of the stairs.
2. Effective Span:
(a) If supported at top and bottom risers by beams spanning parallel
with risers, the effective span is the distance between the centre to
centre of beams
(b) If landing slab spans in the same directions as the stairs, they shall
be considered as acting together to form a single slab. The effective
span is the distance centre to centre of the supporting beams or
walls, the going being measured horizontally.
(c) When spanning on to the edge of a landing slab, which spans
parallel with the rises, the effective span of the stairs depend upon
the width x and y of landing.
C0MPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 172
TABLE 8.1
X Y Span
< 1 m < 1m G+X+Y
< 1 m > 1 m G+X+1
> 1m < 1 m G+Y+1
> 1 m > 1 m G+1+1
3. Loads on Stairs:
Live loads:
Stairs are prescribed in IS: 875 which is given per unit horizontal area.
Generally the following values of live loads on stairs may be taken.
(a) 5 KN/m2, if crowded.
(b) 3 KN/m2, if not crowded.
Dead loads:
These are to be calculated per unit horizontal area. If T, R and D are tread, rise
and thickness of waist slab in m, then the dead load can be calculated as given below.
(a) Weight of waist slab per unit horizontal area
𝑤1 = 𝐷 𝑅2 + 𝑇2
𝑇x25 = D 1 + [𝑅 𝑇 ]2 x25
(b) weight of steps per unit horizontal area
w2 = 1
2xRxTx 25
T=
1
2xRx25
Where R in meter
Providing load (0.5 to 1 KN/m2) may be added to the above values
4. Distribution of Loading on the Stairs:
In case of stairs with open wells, where spans cross at right angles, the load on
areas common to any two such spans may be taken as one half in each direction.
C0MPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 173
8.5 DESIGN PROCEDURE FOR STAIRS SPANNING
LONGITUDINALLY:
1. Determine the effective span of the stairs as explained before
2. Assume the thickness of waist slab based on stiffness. Span/thickness ratio can be
selected in the range of 20 to 25.
3. Determine the load wu per meter length on waist slab, which includes the weight of
waist slab, weight of step and live load.
Weight of waist slab per meter length D 1 + (R T )2 x 25
Weight of step per meter length = 1
2xRx25
4. Determine the maximum bending moment Mu = wu l2
8
5. Determine the minimum depth required to resist the bending moment by equating
Mu = Mu,lim = k fck bd2
b = 1000 mm, k = 0.138 for Fe415 steel & 0.148 for mild steel
Provided depth should be more than this value. Otherwise increase the depth.
6. Calculate the area of steel per meter width of slabs by using
Mu = 0.87 fyAst d[1 − fyAst
fck bd]
7. Finding the spacing of bars using
S = 1000xast
Ast
Where ast = area of bars used
Ast = total area of steel required
8. Providing distribution reinforcement perpendicular to the span direction at 0.12%
(for HYSD bars) of gross cross sectional area find the spacing of these bars. If mild
steel bars are used, provide 0.15% of gross cross sectional area as distribution steel.
C0MPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 174
8.6 DESIFN OF STAIRS SPANNING HORIZONTALLY:
For stairs spanning horizontally, the waist slab is supported on sides by side
walls or by a stringer beam on one side and wall on other side. Hence, each step
behaves as an independent simply supported beam spanning horizontally. For design
purpose each step is considered as a rectangular beam of width b and effective depth
D/2.
Where, b = R2 + T2
D = Thickness of waist slab + R cosθ = Thickness of waist slab + R.T
𝑏
Main reinforcement is provided along the span direction which generally
consists of one rod in each step and distribution reinforcement is provided
perpendicular to the direction of spanning.
8.7 DESIGN PROCEDURE FOR STAIRS SPANNING
LONGITUDINALLY:
1. Assume the thickness of waist slab based on stiffness.
Span/thickness ratio can be selected in the range of 20 to 25.
2. Determine the dimensions of equivalent beam as follows.
b = R2 + T2, R being rise T being tread.
D = Thickness of waist slab + R.T
𝑏
Effective depth d = D/2
3. Determine the load wu on each step per meter width (span direction), which
includes the weight of waist slab, weight of step and live load.
Weight of waist slab = t.b.25KN/m
Weight of step per meter width = 12 R. T. 25 KN/m
4. Determine the maximum bending moment M𝑢 = w𝑢 l2
8
5. Determine the minimum depth required to resist the bending moment by
equating
M𝑢 = M𝑢 ,𝑙𝑖𝑚 = k. 𝑓𝑐𝑘𝑏𝑑2
Where, k = 0.138 for Fe415 steel & 0.148 for mild steel
Provided depth should be more than this value. Otherwise increase depth.
6. Calculate the area of steel by using
M𝑢 = 0.87𝑓𝑦A𝑠𝑡𝑑[1 −𝑓𝑦A𝑠𝑡
𝑓𝑦𝑏. 𝑑]
C0MPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 175
7. Provide distribution reinforcement perpendicular to the span direction at 0.12
%( for HYSD bars) of gross cross sectional area and find the spacing of these
bars. If mild steel bars are used, provide 0.15% of gross area as distribution
steel.
8.8 DESIGN OF STAIR CASE:
Width of staircase = 1000 mm
Floor to Floor height (H) = 3200 mm
Live load = 3 KN/𝑚2
Let,
Riser (R) = 160 mm
Tread (T) = 250 mm
sec 𝜃 = 2502+1602
2502 = 1.1877
No. of risers required = 𝐻
𝑅 =
3200
160 = 20
No. of risers in each Flight = 10
No. of Treads per Flight = 10 – 1 = 9
Therefore,
Going = 250 x 9 = 2250 mm
Assuming, width of landing at end = 800 mm
Flight I is supported on beam
a) Mid-landing level
Total span L = 2250 + 800 + 300 = 3350 mm {Horizontally}
Design of Flight I:
Type one way single span simply supported inclined slab.
L = 3350 mm ~ 3.35 m
Trial depth of waist slab
Basic 𝐿
𝑑 ratio 𝑟𝑏 = 20 {for simply supported}
Assuming 𝑃𝑡 = 0.4%
C0MPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 176
Modification factor 𝛼1 = 1.32, for 𝑓𝑠 = 240 N/m𝑚2 {fig. No. 4 of IS
456:2000}
Required effective depth = d = 𝐿
𝛼1 ∗ 𝑟𝑏 =
3350
1.32 ×20 = 130 mm
Assuming, d = 20 mm for 𝐹𝑒415
D = 130 + 20 = 150 mm
Loads:
S/W = 25 x D x sec Φ = 25 x 0.15 x 1.1877 = 4.45 KN/𝑚2
Weight of steps = 25 R
2 = 25 x 0.16 / 2 = 2 KN/𝑚2
Live load = 5 KN/𝑚2
Floor finish = 1 KN/𝑚2
Total working load = 12.45 KN/𝑚2
Total design load, (𝑊𝑢 ) = 1.5 x 12.45 = 18.68 KN/𝑚2
Design Moments: Consider 1m width of slab
Mu = 𝑊
𝑢 ∗ 𝑙2
8 =
18.68 x 3.352
8 = 26.20 KN.m
Mu max = 0.138 fck . bd2 For Fe415
= 0.138 x 20 x 1000 x 1302
= 46.64 KN-m
Mu max > Mu Safe
Main Steel:
Required area of steel Ast = 0.5 x 20
4.5 1 −
4.6 x 26.20 x 106
20 x 1000 x 1302 x 1000 x 130
= 619.66 m𝑚2
C0MPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 177
Assuming, 10 mm ø Bars
ast = Π
4 x 102 = 78.57 m𝑚2
Spacing:
Ast
ast X 1000 =
78.57
619.66 x 1000 = 126 mm
Therefore,
Provide # 10 mm @ 120 mm c/c
Ast Provided = 654.762 m𝑚2
Distribution Steel:
For, Fe415 Pt = 0.12%
Ast = 0.12
100 x 1000 x 150 = 180 m𝑚2
Provide # 8 mm @ 275 mm c/c
Ast Provided = 182 m𝑚2
Design of Flight II:
Same as flight I
MODULE II
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 178
10. INTRODUCTION TO STEEL STRUCTURES
10.1 Introduction:
Structural steel has been used in the construction of structures for well over a
century. It is perhaps the most versatile of structural materials and has been used
extensively in the construction of multi-storeyed buildings, railways, bridges,
industrial structures, transmission towers, overhead tanks, chimneys, bunkers, silos,
etc.,
In many situations, lighter steel structures are invariably preferred to the
heavier alternatives such as reinforced concrete or pre-stressed concrete. The main
advantages of steel structures are its intrinsic strength, prefabrication and quicker
transportability to the work site and faster erection. Steel structures can be easily
dismantled without loss to the integrity of the original structure. Most structural steel
units are prefabricated in a workshop with superior quality control compared to in situ
construction.
Tolerances specified for steel structural components during fabrication and
erection are small compared to similar reinforced concrete structures. Steel also plays
an important role in composite construction in conjunction with reinforced and pre-
stressed concrete structures.
The advantages of steel members are as follows:
1. The steel members have high strength. Therefore, the steel members can resist
high loads with comparatively light weight and small size of members. The
steel members can be conveniently handled and transported because of their
small size.
2. The steel members are gas and water-tight, because of high density of steel.
3. The steel members have long service life. This is because of high and
homogeneous strength and density properties of steel.
4. The steel members can be used as pre-fabricated members, because of ease of
handling, fabrication and erection.
5. The steel members can be readily disassembled or replaced.
6. The existing steel structures and structural components may be strengthened
by connecting additional sections or planes.
7. The steel structures may be inspected quickly and conveniently.
The disadvantages of steel members are as follows:
1. The steel members are susceptible to corrosion. The corrosion necessitates
their painting or the use of other methods of their protection.
2. The steel members are costly.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 179
Structural Steel:
The structural steel is the steel used for the manufacture of rolled structural
steel sections, fastenings and other elements for use in structural steel works. This
material steel is an alloy of iron and carbon (small percentage) and other elements in
varying percentages. The strength, hardness and brittleness of steel increase and
ductility of steel decreases with the increase of percentage of carbon. Depending on
the chemical composition, the different type of steels are classified as mild steel,
medium carbon steel, high carbon steel, low alloy steel and high alloy steel. The mild
steel, medium carbon steel and low alloy steel are generally used for steel structures.
The copper bearing quality of steel contains small percentage of copper contents. The
corrosive resistance of such steel is increased.
1. Mild steel: The mild steel is used for the manufacture of rolled structural steel
sections, rivets and bolts. Following operations can be done easily on mild
steel :
1. Cutting
2. Punching
3. Drilling
4. Machining
5. Welding
6. Forging when heated
The mild steel cannot be used for manufacture of cutting tools.
All structural steels used in general construction, coming within the
preview of IS: 800-84 shall, before fabrication, comply with one of the
following Indian Standard Specifications.
1. IS: 226- 1975 structural steel (standard quality)
2. IS: 1977- 1975 structural steel (ordinary quality)
3. IS: 2062- 1984 weldable structural steel
4. IS: 961- 1975 structural steel ( high tensile)
5. IS: 8500- 1977 weldable structural steel (medium and high strength
qualities)
10.2 ROLLED STRUCTURAL STEEL SECTIONS:
The steel sections manufactured in rolling mills and used as structural
members are known as rolled structural steel sections. The steel sections are named
according to their cross- sectional shapes. Many steel structures are readily available
in the market and have frequent demand. Such sections are known as regular steel
sections. Some steel sections are rarely used. The special requisition and are known as
special sections.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 180
‘ISI’ Handbook for Structural Engineers ‘I’ gives nominal dimensions,
weight and geometrical properties of various rolled structural steel sections. This
handbook also gives other additional data required by the designers and architects.
The various types of rolled structural steel sections manufactured and used as
structural members are given below:
1. Rolled Steel I Sections
2. Rolled Steel Channel Sections
3. Rolled Steel Tee Sections
4. Rolled Steel Angle Sections
5. Rolled Steel Bars
6. Rolled Steel Tubes
7. Rolled Steel Flats
8. Rolled Steel Sheets and Strips
9. Rolled Steel Plates
10.2.1 ROLLED STEEL BEAM (I)SECTIONS
The rolled steel beams are classified into the following four series as per BIS:
(IS: 808- 1989)
a. Indian Standard Junior Beams-------------------------ISJB
b. Indian Standard Light Beams -------------------------ISlB
c. Indian Standard Medium Weight Beams-------------ISMB
d. Indian Standard Wide Flange Beams-----------------ISWB
The rolled steel columns/heavy weight beams are classified into the following
two series as per BIS (IS: 808-1989)
1. Indian Standard Column Sections--------------------ISSC
2. Indian Standard Heavy Weight Beams---------------ISHB
The cross-section of a rolled steel beam has been given below. The
beam section consists of web and two flanges. The junction between the flange and
the web is known as fillet. These hot rolled steel beam sections have sloping flanges.
The outer and inner faces are inclined to each other and they interest at an angle
varying from 𝟏𝟏
𝟐 to 8
0 depending on the section and rolling mill practice. The angle of
intersection of ISMB section is 80. Abbreviated reference symbols (JB, LB, MB, WB,
SC and HB) have been used in designating the Indian Standard Sections as per BIS
(IS: 808-1989)
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 181
FIG 10.1 INDIAN STANDARD I SECTION
10.2.2 ROLLED STEEL CHANNEL SECTIONS
The rolled steel channel sections are classified in the following four series as per
ISI:
1. Indian Standard Junior Channels----------------------------ISJC
2. Indian Standard Light Channels-----------------------------ISLC
3. Indian Standard Medium Weight Channels----------------ISMC
4. Indian Standard Medium Weight Parallel -----------------ISMCP
Flange Channels
The cross-section of rolled steel channel section been shown below. The
channel section consists of web and two flanges. The junction between the flange
and the web is known as fillet.
FIG 10.2 INDIAN STANDARD CHANNEL SECTION
Note: As per IS: 808-1989, following channel sections have also been additionally
adopted as Indian Standard Channel Sections
1. Indian Standard Light Channels with -------------------ISLC(P)
parallel flanges
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 182
2. Medium Weight Channels------------------------------ --ISMC
3. Medium weight channels with parallel flanges---------ISMCP
4. Indian Standard Gate Channels---------------------------ISPG
In MC and MCP channel sections, some heavier sections have been
developed for their intended use in wagon building industry. The method of
designating MC and MCP channels is also same as that for IS-channels described
above.
10.2.3 ROLLED STEEL TEE SECTIONS
The rolled steel tee sections are classified into the following five series as per
ISI:
1. Indian Standard Normal Tee Bars------------------ISNT
2. Indian Standard Wide flange Tee Bars-------------ISHT
3. Indian Standard Long Legged Tee Bars------------ISST
4. Indian Standard Light Tee Bars---------------------ISLT
5. Indian Standard Junior Tee Bars--------------------ISJT
FIG 10.3 INDIAN STANDARD TEE SECTION
The cross-section of a rolled steel tee section has been shown above. The tee
section consists of web and flange. The junction between the flange and the web is
known as fillet.
Note: As per IS: 808-1984, following T-sections have also been additionally
adopted as Indian Standard T-sections.
1. Indian Standard deep legged Tee bars---------------------ISDT
2. Indian Standard Slit medium weight Tee bars------------ISMT
3. Indian Standard Slit Tee bars from I-sections-------------ISNT
It is to note that as per IS: 808- 1978 (part II), H beam sections have been deleted.
10.2.4 ROLLED STEEL ANGLE SECTIONS
The rolled steel angle sections are classified into the following three series.
1. Indian Standard Equal Angles---------------ISA
2. Indian Standard Unequal Angles------------ISA
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 183
3. Indian Standard Bulb Angles----------------ISBA
FIG 10.4 INDIAN STANDARD ANGLE SECTION
The cross-section of a rolled equal angle section has been shown
above, unequal angle section and that of bulb angle section. The lengths of the legs
in case of equal sections are equal and in case of unequal section, length of one leg
is longer than the other. The thickness of legs of equal and unequal angle sections
are equal. The bulb angle shown in fig consists of web flange and a bulb projecting
from end of web. The thickness of web of bulb angle may or may not be equal tp
the thickness of flange.
Note: As per IS: 808- 1984, some supplementary angle sections have also
additionally adopted as Indian Standard angle sections. However prefix ISA has
been adopted. These sections are designated by the size of legs followed by
thickness.
10.2.5 ROLLED STEEL BARS
The rolled steel bars are classified into the following two series:
1. Indian Standard Round Bars------------ISRQ
2. Indian Standard Square Bars------------ISSQ
FIG 10.5 INDIAN STANDARD SQUARE AND ROUND BAR
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 184
10.2.6 ROLLED STEEL TUBES
The rolled steel tubes are used as columns and compression members
and tension members in tubular trusses. The rolled steel tubes are efficient
structural sections to be used as compression members. The steel tube sections
have equal radius of gyration in all directions.
FIG 10.6 INDIAN STANDARD TUBE SECTION
10.2.7 ROLLED STEEL FLATS
The rolled steel flats are used for lacing of elements in built-up
members, such as columns and are also used as ties.
FIG 10.7 INDIAN STANDARD STEEL FLAT SECTION
STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN INVOLVES THE FOLLWING STEPS:
1. Choice of materials such as the type and grade of structural steel.
2. Selection of the configuration of the structural system such as trusses, griders,
portal frames, stanchions, grid frames, cable structures, space frames, folded
plates, muti-storey framed structures, mill bents and foundation systems.
3. Computation of various types of loads acting on the structure.
4. Preliminary analysis of forces and moments developed in the structural
elements under the most unfavorable loading conditions using elementary
procedures, followed by rigorous analysis using computer software and other
design procedures.
5. Structural design of elements conforming to the latest national codes.
6. Final evaluation of strength, serviceability and safety of the structure as per the
code requirements.
7. Preparation of detailed structural and architectural drawings using AUTO
CAD programs with suitable specifications.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 185
11. LIMIT STATE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR
STRUCTURAL STEEL MEMBERS
The recently revised Indian Standard code IS: 800-2007 specifies that
in general structures and elements should be designed by the limit state
method. In case where the limit state method cannot be conveniently adopted,
the working stress method may be used.
Limit state design is a method of designing structures based on a
statistical concept of safety and the associated statistical probability of failure.
Structures designed by this method should satisfy the dual criterion of
(a) Limit state of strength and
(b) Limit state of serviceability.
The limit states of strength are those associated with failure (or
imminent failure), under the action of probable and most unfavorable
combination of loads on the structure using the appropriate partial safety
factors, which may endanger the safety of life and property. The limit sate of
strength includes:
(a) Loss of equilibrium of the structure as a whole or any of its parts or
components.
(b) Loss of stability of the structures (including the effect of sway
where appropriate and overturning) or any of its parts, including
supports and foundations.
(c) Failure by excessive deformation, rupture of the structure or any of
its parts or components.
(d) Fracture due to fatigue
(e) Brittle fracture
The limit state of serviceability comprises the following criteria:
(a) Any deformation and deflection which adversely affect the
appearance or effective use of the structure or may cause
improper functioning of equipment or services or may cause
damages to finishes and non-structural members.
(b) Vibrations in the structure or any of its components causing
discomfort to people, damage to the structures, its contents or
which may limit its functional effectiveness. Special consideration
shall be given to systems susceptible to vibration, such as large
open floor areas free of use and occupancy (Refer to Annex C of
the Code).
(c) Repairable damage or crack due to fatigue.
(d) Corrosion, durability.
(e) Fire.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 186
Use of Relevant IS Codes:
1. For steel:
(a) Structural steel as per
IS: 226, IS: 2062, IS: 3502, IS: 1977, IS: 961, IS: 8500
(b) Steel for reinforced concrete
IS: 432, IS: 1139, IS: 1786, IS: 2090.
(c) Steel for bars, rivets etc.
IS: 1148, 1149, 1570, 2073, 7383, 4431, and 5517.
(d) Steel for tubes and pipes.
IS: 1239, 1914 and 1978.
2. For code of practice for design of steel structures:
IS: 800- 1984, IS: 800-2007
3. For size of weld and stresses in weld
IS: 816- 1969
4. For code of practice for design loads:
IS: 875- 1987
Part I: Dead loads – unit weights of building materials and stored
materials
Part II: imposed loads
Part III: wind loads
Part IV: snow loads
Part V: special loads and load combinations
Permissible Stresses:
Structures shall be designed so that the calculated stresses in the members do
not exceed the corresponding permissible stresses specified by IS: 800-1984
1. Axial Tensile stress (αat) (clause 4.1 of IS: 800):
The permissible stress in axial tension, αat in MPa on the net effective area of
the sections shall not exceed
𝛼𝑎𝑡 = 0.6𝑓𝑦
Where fy = minimum yield stress of steel, in MPa.
2. Axial Compression Stress (αac) (clause 5.1 of IS: 800):
The direct stresses in compression on the gross cross sectional area of axially
loaded compression members shall not exceed 0.6 fy nor the permissible stress,
αac calculated using the formula
𝛼𝑎𝑡 = 0.6 𝑓𝑐𝑐𝑓𝑦
[ 𝑓𝑐𝑐 𝑛 + 𝑓𝑦
𝑛]
1𝑛
Where αac = permissible stress in axial compression, in MPa
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 187
fy = yield stress of steel in compression, in MPa.
fcc = elastic critical stress in compression = 𝜋2E
𝜆
E = modulus of elasticity of steel = 2 x 105 MPa
λ = 𝑙
𝑟 = slenderness ratio of the member.
m = a factor assumed as 1.4
3. Bending stress (αbc or αbt) (clause 6.2 of IS: 800):
The permissible compressive or tensile bending stress is given by
𝛼𝑏𝑐 𝑜𝑟 𝛼𝑏𝑡 = 0.66𝑓𝑦
If the compression flange is not restrained laterally against buckling, αbc or αbt
should not exceed the values given by the above equation nor the values given
in table 6.1 A to 6.1 F and 6.2 of IS: 800.
4. Bearing stress (αp) (clause 6.3 of IS: 800):
The bearing stress in any part of a beam when calculated on the net area of
contact shall not exceed the values determined by the formula.
𝛼𝑝 = 0.75𝑓𝑦
Where, αp = maximum yield stress of steel, in MPa
5. Maximum Shear Stress (τvm) (clause 6.4.1 of IS: 800):
The maximum shear stress in a member shall not exceed the value given by
the formula
τ𝑣𝑚 = 0.45𝑓𝑦
Where,
τvm = maximum permissible shear stress
fy = minimum yield stress of steel, in MPa
Average Shear Stress (τva):
The average shear stress in a member calculated on the cross section of the
web shall not exceed the value given by the formula
τ𝑣𝑎 = 0.4𝑓𝑦
Where,
τva = average shear stress
fy = minimum yield stress of steel, in MPa
Increase in Permissible Stresses (clause 3.10.2.1 IS: 800):
When the effect of wind or earthquake load is taken into account in the design
1. The permissible stresses in structural steel may be increased by 33% and
2. Permissible stress in rivets, bolts and tension maybe increased by 25%
Load combinations:
The following combinations of loads which ever produces maximum effect
maybe assumed for general design of most of the structures.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 188
1. Dead load alone
2. Dead load + partial or full live load which ever causes the most critical
condition in the structure
3. Dead load + wind or seismic load and
4. Dead load + part or full live load + wind or seismic load.
The partial safety factors for loads (γf) for the limit states of strength and
serviceability for different load combinations is shown in table below:
Combination
Limit state of strength Limit state of
serviceability
DL
LL
WL/E
L AL DL
LL
WL/E
L L
ead
ing
Acc
om
p
an
yin
g
Lea
din
g
Acc
om
p
an
yin
g
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
DL+LL+CL 1.5 1.5 1.05 --- --- 1.0 1.0 1.0 ---
DL+LL+CL+WL/
EL 1.2 1.2 1.05 0.6 --- 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.8
DL+LL+CL+WL/
EL 1.2 1.2 0.53 1.2
DL+WL/EL 1.5
(0.9) --- --- 1.5 --- 1.0 --- --- 1.0
DL+ER 1.2
(0.9) 1.2 --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
DL+LL+AL 1.0 0.3
5 0.35 --- 1.0 --- --- --- ---
(1) When action of different live loads is simultaneously considered, the leading live
load shall be considered to be the one causing the higher load effects in the
member/section.
(2) This value is to be considered when the dead load contributes to stability against
overturning is critical or the dead load causes reduction in stress due to other
loads.
Abbreviations:
DL= Dead Load, LL=Imposed Load (live load), WL= Wind Load, CL= Crane
Load (vertical/horizontal), AL= Accidental Load, ER= Election Load, EL=
Earthquake Load.
Note: The effects of actions (load) in terms of stresses resultant may be obtained
from an appropriate method of analysis.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 189
12. ANALYSIS OF STEEL BUILDING
Analysis of a steel structure is same as analysis of RCC structure by using
STAAD PRO v8i explained in chapter 3 of Module I.
12.1 INPUT COMMANDS IN STAAD PRO EDITOR
STAAD SPACE
START JOB INFORMATION
ENGINEER DATE 29-Feb-12
JOB NAME comparative study on multistorey R.C.C and STEEL Building
JOB CLIENT NIET
ENGINEER NAME NIET
END JOB INFORMATION
INPUT WIDTH 79
UNIT METER KN
JOINT COORDINATES
1 0 0 0; 2 3 0 0; 3 6.7 0 0; 4 10.25 0 0; 5 11.9 0 0; 6 13.8 0 0; 7 17.5 0 0; 8 20.5 0 0; 9
6.7 0 2; 10 11.9 0 2; 11 13.8 0 2; 12 0 0 3.65; 13 3 0 3.65; 14 6.7 0 3.65; 15 10.25 0
3.65; 16 13.8 0 3.65; 17 17.5 0 3.65; 18 20.5 0 3.65; 19 0 0 7.15; 20 3 0 7.15; 21 6.7 0
7.15; 22 10.25 0 7.15; 23 13.8 0 7.15; 24 17.5 0 7.15; 25 20.5 0 7.15; 26 0 0 11.3; 27
3 0 11.3; 28 6.7 0 11.3; 29 10.25 0 11.3; 30 13.8 0 11.3; 31 17.5 0 11.3; 32 20.5 0
11.3; 33 0 1.5 0; 34 3 1.5 0; 35 6.7 1.5 0; 36 10.25 1.5 0; 37 11.9 1.5 0; 38 13.8 1.5 0;
39 17.5 1.5 0; 40 20.5 1.5 0; 41 6.7 1.5 2; 42 11.9 1.5 2; 43 13.8 1.5 2; 44 0 1.5 3.65;
45 3 1.5 3.65; 46 6.7 1.5 3.65; 47 10.25 1.5 3.65; 48 13.8 1.5 3.65; 49 17.5 1.5 3.65;
50 20.5 1.5 3.65; 51 0 1.5 7.15; 52 3 1.5 7.15; 53 6.7 1.5 7.15; 54 10.25 1.5 7.15; 55
13.8 1.5 7.15; 56 17.5 1.5 7.15; 57 20.5 1.5 7.15; 58 0 1.5 11.3; 59 3 1.5 11.3; 60 6.7
1.5 11.3; 61 10.25 1.5 11.3; 62 13.8 1.5 11.3; 63 17.5 1.5 11.3; 64 20.5 1.5 11.3; 65
6.7 3.1 0; 66 6.7 3.1 2; 67 0 4.7 0; 68 3 4.7 0; 69 6.7 4.7 0; 70 10.25 4.7 0; 71 11.9 4.7
0; 72 13.8 4.7 0; 73 17.5 4.7 0; 74 20.5 4.7 0; 75 6.7 4.7 2; 76 11.9 4.7 2; 77 13.8 4.7
2; 78 0 4.7 3.65; 79 3 4.7 3.65; 80 6.7 4.7 3.65; 81 10.25 4.7 3.65; 82 13.8 4.7 3.65;
83 17.5 4.7 3.65; 84 20.5 4.7 3.65; 85 0 4.7 7.15; 86 3 4.7 7.15; 87 3.85 4.7 7.15; 88
6.7 4.7 7.15; 89 10.25 4.7 7.15; 90 13.8 4.7 7.15; 91 16.65 4.7 7.15; 92 17.5 4.7 7.15;
93 20.5 4.7 7.15; 94 0 4.7 11.3; 95 3 4.7 11.3; 96 3.85 4.7 11.3; 97 6.7 4.7 11.3; 98
10.25 4.7 11.3; 99 13.8 4.7 11.3; 100 16.65 4.7 11.3; 101 17.5 4.7 11.3; 102 20.5 4.7
11.3; 103 6.7 6.3 0; 104 6.7 6.3 2; 105 0 7.9 0; 106 3 7.9 0; 107 6.7 7.9 0; 108 10.25
7.9 0; 109 11.9 7.9 0; 110 13.8 7.9 0; 111 17.5 7.9 0;112 20.5 7.9 0; 113 6.7 7.9 2;
114 11.9 7.9 2; 115 13.8 7.9 2; 116 0 7.9 3.65; 117 3 7.9 3.65; 118 6.7 7.9 3.65; 119
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 190
10.25 7.9 3.65; 120 13.8 7.9 3.65; 121 17.5 7.9 3.65; 122 20.5 7.9 3.65; 123 0 7.9
7.15; 124 3 7.9 7.15; 125 3.85 7.9 7.15; 126 6.7 7.9 7.15; 127 10.25 7.9 7.15; 128
13.8 7.9 7.15; 129 16.65 7.9 7.15; 130 17.5 7.9 7.15; 131 20.5 7.9 7.15; 132 0 7.9
11.3; 133 3 7.9 11.3; 134 3.85 7.9 11.3; 135 6.7 7.9 11.3; 136 10.25 7.9 11.3; 137
13.8 7.9 11.3; 138 16.65 7.9 11.3; 139 17.5 7.9 11.3; 140 20.5 7.9 11.3; 141 6.7 9.5 0;
142 6.7 9.5 2; 143 0 11.1 0; 144 3 11.1 0; 145 6.7 11.1 0; 146 10.25 11.1 0; 147 11.9
11.1 0; 148 13.8 11.1 0; 149 17.5 11.1 0; 150 20.5 11.1 0; 151 6.7 11.1 2; 152 11.9
11.1 2; 153 13.8 11.1 2; 154 0 11.1 3.65; 155 3 11.1 3.65; 156 6.7 11.1 3.65; 157
10.25 11.1 3.65; 158 13.8 11.1 3.65; 159 17.5 11.1 3.65; 160 20.5 11.1 3.65; 161 0
11.1 7.15; 162 3 11.1 7.15; 163 3.85 11.1 7.15; 164 6.7 11.1 7.15; 165 10.25 11.1
7.15; 166 13.8 11.1 7.15; 167 16.65 11.1 7.15; 168 17.5 11.1 7.15; 169 20.5 11.1
7.15; 170 0 11.1 11.3; 171 3 11.1 11.3; 172 3.85 11.1 11.3; 173 6.7 11.1 11.3; 174
10.25 11.1 11.3; 175 13.8 11.1 11.3; 176 16.65 11.1 11.3; 177 17.5 11.1 11.3; 178
20.5 11.1 11.3; 179 6.7 12.7 0; 180 6.7 12.7 2; 181 0 14.3 0; 182 3 14.3 0; 183 6.7
14.3 0; 184 10.25 14.3 0; 185 11.9 14.3 0; 186 13.8 14.3 0; 187 17.5 14.3 0; 188 20.5
14.3 0; 189 6.7 14.3 2; 190 11.9 14.3 2; 191 13.8 14.3 2; 192 0 14.3 3.65; 193 3 14.3
3.65; 194 6.7 14.3 3.65; 195 10.25 14.3 3.65; 196 13.8 14.3 3.65; 197 17.5 14.3 3.65;
198 20.5 14.3 3.65; 199 0 14.3 7.15; 200 3 14.3 7.15; 201 3.85 14.3 7.15; 202 6.7 14.3
7.15; 203 10.25 14.3 7.15; 204 13.8 14.3 7.15; 205 16.65 14.3 7.15; 206 17.5 14.3
7.15; 207 20.5 14.3 7.15; 208 0 14.3 11.3; 209 3 14.3 11.3; 210 3.85 14.3 11.3; 211
6.7 14.3 11.3; 212 10.25 14.3 11.3; 213 13.8 14.3 11.3; 214 16.65 14.3 11.3; 215 17.5
14.3 11.3; 216 20.5 14.3 11.3; 217 6.7 15.9 0; 218 6.7 15.9 2; 219 0 17.5 0; 220 3
17.5 0; 221 6.7 17.5 0; 222 10.25 17.5 0; 223 11.9 17.5 0; 224 13.8 17.5 0; 225 17.5
17.5 0; 226 20.5 17.5 0; 227 6.7 17.5 2; 228 11.9 17.5 2; 229 13.8 17.5 2; 230 0 17.5
3.65; 231 3 17.5 3.65; 232 6.7 17.5 3.65; 233 10.25 17.5 3.65; 234 13.8 17.5 3.65;
235 17.5 17.5 3.65; 236 20.5 17.5 3.65; 237 0 17.5 7.15; 238 3 17.5 7.15; 239 3.85
17.5 7.15;240 6.7 17.5 7.15; 241 10.25 17.5 7.15; 242 13.8 17.5 7.15; 243 16.65 17.5
7.15; 244 17.5 17.5 7.15; 245 20.5 17.5 7.15; 246 0 17.5 11.3; 247 3 17.5 11.3; 248
3.85 17.5 11.3; 249 6.7 17.5 11.3; 250 10.25 17.5 11.3; 251 13.8 17.5 11.3; 252 16.65
17.5 11.3; 253 17.5 17.5 11.3; 254 20.5 17.5 11.3; 255 6.7 20.7 0; 256 10.25 20.7 0;
257 11.9 20.7 0; 258 13.8 20.7 0; 259 11.9 20.7 2; 260 13.8 20.7 2; 261 6.7 20.7
3.65;262 10.25 20.7 3.65; 263 13.8 20.7 3.65;
MEMBER INCIDENCES
1 33 1; 2 34 2; 3 35 3; 4 36 4; 5 37 5; 6 38 6; 7 39 7; 8 40 8; 9 41 9; 10 42 10; 11 43
11; 12 44 12; 13 45 13; 14 46 14; 15 47 15; 16 48 16; 17 49 17; 18 50 18; 19 51 19;
20 52 20; 21 53 21; 22 54 22; 23 55 23; 24 56 24; 25 57 25; 26 58 26; 27 59 27; 28 60
28; 29 61 29; 30 62 30; 31 63 31; 32 64 32; 101 33 67; 102 34 68; 103 65 69; 104 35
65; 105 36 70; 106 37 71; 107 38 72; 108 39 73; 109 40 74; 110 66 75; 111 41 66;
112 42 76; 113 43 77; 114 44 78; 115 45 79; 116 46 80; 117 47 81; 118 48 82; 119 49
83; 120 50 84; 121 51 85; 122 52 86; 123 53 88; 124 54 89; 125 55 90; 126 56 92;
127 57 93; 128 58 94; 129 59 95; 130 60 97; 131 61 98; 132 62 99; 133 63 101; 134
64 102; 201 67 105; 202 68 106; 203 103 107; 204 69 103; 205 70 108; 206 71 109;
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 191
207 72 110; 208 73 111; 209 74 112; 210 104 113; 211 75 104; 212 76 114; 213 77
115; 214 78 116; 215 79 117; 216 80 118; 217 81 119; 218 82 120; 219 83 121; 220
84 122; 221 85 123; 222 86 124; 223 88 126; 224 89 127; 225 90 128; 226 92 130;
227 93 131; 228 94 132; 229 95 133; 230 97 135; 231 98 136; 232 99 137; 233 101
139; 234 102 140; 301 105 143; 302 106 144; 303 141 145; 304 107 141; 305 108
146; 306 109 147; 307 110 148; 308 111 149; 309 112 150; 310 142 151; 311 113
142; 312 114 152; 313 115 153; 314 116 154; 315 117 155; 316 118 156; 317 119
157; 318 120 158; 319 121 159; 320 122 160; 321 123 161; 322 124 162; 323 126
164; 324 127 165; 325 128 166; 326 130 168; 327 131 169; 328 132 170; 329 133
171; 330 135 173; 331 136 174; 332 137 175; 333 139 177; 334 140 178; 401 143
181; 402 144 182; 403 179 183; 404 145 179; 405 146 184; 406 147 185; 407 148
186; 408 149 187; 409 150 188; 410 180 189; 411 151 180; 412 152 190; 413 153
191; 414 154 192; 415 155 193; 416 156 194; 417 157 195; 418 158 196; 419 159
197; 420 160 198; 421 161 199; 422 162 200; 423 164 202; 424 165 203; 425 166
204; 426 168 206; 427 169 207; 428 170 208; 429 171 209; 430 173 211; 431 174
212; 432 175 213; 433 177 215; 434 178 216; 501 181 219; 502 182 220; 503 217
221; 504 183 217; 505 184 222; 506 185 223; 507 186 224; 508 187 225; 509 188
226; 510 218 227; 511 189 218; 512 190 228; 513 191 229; 514 192 230; 515 193
231; 516 194 232; 517 195 233; 518 196 234; 519 197 235; 520 198 236; 521 199
237; 522 200 238; 523 202 240; 524 203 241; 525 204 242; 526 206 244; 527 207
245; 528 208 246; 529 209 247; 530 211 249; 531 212 250; 532 213 251; 533 215
253; 534 216 254; 601 255 221; 602 256 222; 603 257 223; 604 258 224; 605 259
228; 606 260 229; 607 261 232; 608 262 233; 609 263 234; 1001 33 34; 1002 34 35;
1003 35 36; 1004 36 37; 1005 37 38; 1006 38 39; 1007 39 40; 1008 42 43; 1009 44
45; 1010 45 46; 1011 46 47; 1012 47 48; 1013 48 49; 1014 49 50; 1015 51 52; 1016
52 53; 1017 53 54; 1018 54 55; 1019 55 56; 1020 56 57; 1021 58 59; 1022 59 60;
1023 60 61; 1024 61 62; 1025 62 63; 1026 63 64; 1027 35 41; 1028 37 42; 1029 38
43; 1030 33 44; 1031 34 45; 1032 36 47; 1033 39 49; 1034 40 50; 1035 41 46; 1036
43 48; 1037 44 51; 1038 45 52; 1039 46 53; 1040 47 54; 1041 48 55; 1042 49 56;
1043 50 57; 1044 51 58; 1045 52 59; 1046 53 60; 1047 54 61; 1048 55 62; 1049 56
63; 1050 57 64; 1051 65 66; 2001 67 68; 2002 68 69; 2003 69 70; 2004 70 71; 2005
71 72; 2006 72 73; 2007 73 74; 2008 76 77; 2009 78 79; 2010 79 80; 2011 80 81;
2012 81 82; 2013 82 83; 2014 83 84; 2015 85 86; 2016 86 87; 2017 87 88; 2018 88
89; 2019 89 90; 2020 90 91; 2021 91 92; 2022 92 93; 2023 94 95; 2024 95 96; 2025
96 97; 2026 97 98; 2027 98 99; 2028 99 100; 2029 100 101; 2030 101 102; 2031 67
78; 2032 68 79; 2033 69 75; 2034 75 80; 2035 70 81; 2036 71 76; 2037 72 77; 2038
77 82; 2039 73 83; 2040 74 84; 2041 78 85; 2042 81 89; 2043 84 93; 2044 85 94;
2045 87 96; 2046 88 97; 2047 89 98; 2048 90 99; 2049 91 100; 2050 93 102; 2051
103 104; 3001 105 106; 3002 106 107; 3003 107 108; 3004 108 109; 3005 109
110;3006 110 111; 3007 111 112; 3008 114 115; 3009 116 117; 3010 117 118; 3011
118 119; 3012 119 120; 3013 120 121; 3014 121 122; 3015 123 124; 3016 124 125;
3017 125 126; 3018 126 127; 3019 127 128; 3020 128 129; 3021 129 130; 3022 130
131; 3023 132 133; 3024 133 134; 3025 134 135; 3026 135 136; 3027 136 137; 3028
137 138; 3029 138 139; 3030 139 140; 3031 105 116; 3032 106 117; 3033 107 113;
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 192
3034 113 118; 3035 108 119; 3036 109 114; 3037 110 115; 3038 115 120; 3039 111
121; 3040 112 122; 3041 116 123; 3042 119 127; 3043 122 131; 3044 123 132; 3045
125 134; 3046 126 135; 3047 127 136; 3048 128 137; 3049 129 138; 3050 131 140;
3051 141 142; 4001 143 144; 4002 144 145; 4003 145 146; 4004 146 147; 4005 147
148; 4006 148 149; 4007 149 150; 4008 152 153; 4009 154 155; 4010 155 156; 4011
156 157; 4012 157 158; 4013 158 159; 4014 159 160; 4015 161 162; 4016 162 163;
4017 163 164; 4018 164 165; 4019 165 166; 4020 166 167; 4021 167 168; 4022 168
169; 4023 170 171; 4024 171 172; 4025 172 173; 4026 173 174; 4027 174 175; 4028
175 176; 4029 176 177; 4030 177 178; 4031 143 154; 4032 144 155; 4033 145 151;
4034 151 156; 4035 146 157; 4036 147 152; 4037 148 153; 4038 153 158; 4039 149
159; 4040 150 160; 4041 154 161; 4042 157 165; 4043 160 169; 4044 161 170; 4045
163 172; 4046 164 173; 4047 165 174; 4048 166 175; 4049 167 176; 4050 169 178;
4051 179 180; 5001 181 182; 5002 182 183; 5003 183 184; 5004 184 185; 5005 185
186; 5006 186 187; 5007 187 188; 5008 190 191; 5009 192 193; 5010 193 194; 5011
194 195; 5012 195 196; 5013 196 197; 5014 197 198; 5015 199 200; 5016 200 201;
5017 201 202; 5018 202 203; 5019 203 204; 5020 204 205; 5021 205 206; 5022 206
207; 5023 208 209; 5024 209 210; 5025 210 211; 5026 211 212; 5027 212 213; 5028
213 214; 5029 214 215; 5030 215 216; 5031 181 192; 5032 182 193; 5033 183 189;
5034 189 194; 5035 184 195; 5036 185 190; 5037 186 191; 5038 191 196; 5039 187
197; 5040 188 198; 5041 192 199; 5042 195 203; 5043 198 207; 5044 199 208; 5045
201 210; 5046 202 211; 5047 203 212; 5048 204 213; 5049 205 214; 5050 207 216;
5051 217 218; 6001 219 220; 6002 220 221; 6003 221 222; 6004 222 223; 6005 223
224; 6006 224 225; 6007 225 226; 6008 228 229; 6009 230 231; 6010 231 232; 6011
232 233; 6012 233 234; 6013 234 235; 6014 235 236; 6015 237 238; 6016 238 239;
6017 239 240; 6018 240 241; 6019 241 242; 6020 242 243; 6021 243 244; 6022 244
245; 6023 246 247; 6024 247 248; 6025 248 249; 6026 249 250; 6027 250 251; 6028
251 252; 6029 252 253; 6030 253 254; 6031 219 230; 6032 220 231; 6033 221 227;
6034 227 232; 6035 222 233; 6036 223 228; 6037 224 229; 6038 229 234; 6039 225
235; 6040 226 236; 6041 230 237; 6042 233 241; 6043 236 245; 6044 237 246; 6045
239 248; 6046 240 249; 6047 241 250; 6048 242 251; 6049 243 252; 6050 245 254;
7001 255 256; 7002 256 257; 7003 257 258; 7004 259 260; 7005 261 262; 7006 262
263; 7007 255 261; 7008 256 262; 7009 257 259; 7010 260 258; 7011 260 263;
DEFINE MATERIAL START
ISOTROPIC STEEL
E 2.05e+008
POISSON 0.3
DENSITY 76.8195
ALPHA 1.2e-005
DAMP 0.03
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 193
END DEFINE MATERIAL
MEMBER PROPERTY INDIAN
1044 1045 1047 1049 TO 1051 2009 TO 2022 2024 2029 2031 TO 2035 2037 TO
2040 2044 2050 2051 3009 TO 3022 3024 3031 TO 3035 3037 TO 3040 3051 4009
TO 4022 4024 4031 TO 4035 4037 TO 4040 4046 TO 4048 4051 5009 TO 5022
5024 5031 TO 5035 5037 TO 5040 5044 5046 TO 5048 5050 5051 6045 6049
TABLE ST ISHB250
1001 TO 1030 1032 1034 TO 1043 2001 TO 2008 2023 2025 TO 2028 2030 2036
2041 2042 TO 2043 3001 TO 3008 3023 3025 TO 3028 3030 3036 3041 TO 3043
4001 TO 4008 4023 4025 TO 4028 4030 4036 4041 TO 4043 5001 TO 5008 5023
5025 5026 TO 5028 5030 5036 5041 TO 5043 6001 6002 6004 TO 6010 6012 TO
6044 6046 6047 TO 6048 6050 7001 TO 7011 TABLE ST ISHB200
1 TO 32 101 TO 134 201 TO 234 301 TO 334 401 TO 434 501 TO 534 601 TO 608
609 TABLE ST ISWB600A
2045 2049 3045 3049 4045 4049 5045 5049 TABLE ST ISHB300
1031 1033 1046 1048 2046 TO 2048 3029 3044 3046 TO 3048 3050 4029 4044 4050
5029 6003 6011 TABLE ST ISHB400
CONSTANTS
MATERIAL STEEL ALL
SUPPORTS
1 TO 32 PINNED
DEFINE 1893 LOAD
ZONE 0.1 RF 5 I 1 SS 1 ST 1 DM 5 PX 0 DT 1.5
SELFWEIGHT 1
MEMBER WEIGHT
1001 TO 1050 2001 2002 2005 TO 2008 2011 2012 2023 2024 2026 TO 2028 2030
2031 2036 TO 2038 2040 2042 2044 2047 2050 3001 3002 3005 TO 3008 3011 3012
3023 3024 3026 TO 3028 3030 3031 3036 TO 3038 3040 3042 3044 3047 3050 4001
4002 4005 TO 4008 4011 4012 4023 4024 4026 TO 4028 4030 4031 4036 TO 4038
4040 4042 4044 4047 4050 5001 5002 5005 TO 5008 5011 5012 5023 5024 5026
5027 TO 5028 5030 5031 5036 TO 5038 5040 5042 5044 5047 5050 6003 TO 6005
6008 6011 6012 6033 6034 6036 TO 6038 UNI 16
2009 2010 2013 TO 2022 2032 TO 2035 2039 2045 2046 2048 2049 3009 3010 3013
3014 TO 3022 3032 TO 3035 3039 3045 3046 3048 3049 4009 4010 4013 TO 4022
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 194
4032 TO 4035 4039 4045 4046 4048 4049 5009 5010 5013 TO 5022 5032 TO 5035
5039 5045 5046 5048 5049 UNI 8
6001 6002 6006 6007 6023 TO 6031 6040 6041 6043 6044 6050 7001 TO 7003 7005
7006 TO 7007 7010 7011 UNI 2
1051 2051 3051 4051 5051 UNI 20
ONEWAY LOAD
YRANGE 4.7 20.7 ONE -3.6 XRANGE 0 20.5 ZRANGE 0 3.65 TOWARDS 7007
YRANGE 4.7 20.7 ONE -3.6 XRANGE 0 20.5 ZRANGE 7.15 11.3
ONEWAY LOAD
YRANGE 4.7 20.7 ONE -3.6 XRANGE 0 20.5 ZRANGE 3.65 7.15
CHECK SOFT STOREY
DEFINE WIND LOAD
TYPE 1
INT 0.67 HEIG 19.2
EXP 1 JOINT 33 TO 263
LOAD 1 LOADTYPE None TITLE EQ XP
1893 LOAD X 1
LOAD 2 LOADTYPE None TITLE EQ XN
1893 LOAD X -1
LOAD 3 LOADTYPE None TITLE EQ ZP
1893 LOAD Z 1
LOAD 4 LOADTYPE None TITLE EQ ZN
1893 LOAD Z -1
LOAD 5 LOADTYPE None TITLE WL XP
WIND LOAD X 1 TYPE 1
LOAD 6 LOADTYPE None TITLE WL XN
WIND LOAD X -1 TYPE 1
LOAD 7 LOADTYPE None TITLE WL ZP
WIND LOAD Z 1 TYPE 1
LOAD 8 LOADTYPE None TITLE WL ZN
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 195
WIND LOAD Z -1 TYPE 1
LOAD 9 LOADTYPE None TITLE DEAD LOAD
SELFWEIGHT Y -1 LIST 1 TO 32 101 TO 134 201 TO 234 301 TO 334 401 TO 434
501 502 TO 534 601 TO 609 1001 TO 1037 1040 1043 TO 1051 2001 TO 2051 3001
TO 3051 4001 TO 4051 5001 TO 5051 6001 TO 6050 7001 TO 7011
MEMBER LOAD
1001 TO 1026 1028 TO 1034 1036 TO 1050 2001 2002 2005 TO 2008 2011 2012
2023 2024 2026 TO 2028 2030 2031 2036 TO 2038 2040 2042 2044 2047 2050 3001
3002 3005 TO 3008 3011 3012 3023 3024 3026 TO 3028 3030 3031 3036 TO 3038
3040 3042 3044 3047 3050 4001 4002 4005 TO 4008 4011 4012 4023 4024 4026 TO
4028 4030 4031 4036 TO 4038 4040 4042 4044 4047 4050 5001 5002 5005 TO 5008
5011 5012 5023 5024 5026 TO 5028 5030 5031 5036 TO 5038 5040 5042 5044 5047
5050 6003 TO 6005 6008 6011 6012 6036 TO 6038 UNI GY -16
1027 1035 2009 2010 2013 TO 2022 2032 TO 2035 2039 2045 2046 2048 2049 3009
3010 3013 TO 3022 3032 TO 3035 3039 3045 3046 3048 3049 4009 4010 4013 TO
4022 4032 TO 4035 4039 4045 4046 4048 4049 5009 5010 5013 TO 5022 5032 TO
5035 5039 5045 5046 5048 5049 6033 6034 UNI GY -8
6001 6002 6006 6007 6023 TO 6031 6040 6041 6043 6044 6050 7001 TO 7003 7005
7006 TO 7007 7010 7011 UNI GY -2
1051 2051 3051 4051 5051 UNI GY -20
ONEWAY LOAD
YRANGE 4.7 20.7 ONE -3.6 XRANGE 0 20.5 ZRANGE 0 3.65 GY TOWARDS
7007
YRANGE 4.7 20.7 ONE -3.6 XRANGE 0 20.5 ZRANGE 7.15 11.3 GY
ONEWAY LOAD
YRANGE 4.7 20.7 ONE -3.6 XRANGE 0 20.5 ZRANGE 3.65 7.15 GY
LOAD 10 LOADTYPE None TITLE LIVE LOAD
ONEWAY LOAD
YRANGE 4.7 20.7 ONE -2 XRANGE 0 20.5 ZRANGE 0 3.65 GY TOWARDS 7007
YRANGE 4.7 20.7 ONE -2 XRANGE 0 20.5 ZRANGE 7.15 11.3 GY
ONEWAY LOAD
YRANGE 4.7 20.7 ONE -2 XRANGE 0 20.5 ZRANGE 3.65 7.15 GY
LOAD COMB 11 SERVICE (DL+LL)
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 196
9 1.0 10 1.0
LOAD COMB 12 ULTIMATE 1.5 (DL+LL)
9 1.5 10 1.5
LOAD COMB 13 1.2 (DL+LL+WL XP)
9 1.2 10 1.2 5 1.2
LOAD COMB 14 1.2 (DL+LL+WL XN)
6 1.2 9 1.2 10 1.2
LOAD COMB 15 1.2 (DL+LL+WL ZP)
9 1.2 10 1.2 7 1.2
LOAD COMB 16 1.2 (DL+LL+WL ZN)
9 1.2 10 1.2 8 1.2
LOAD COMB 17 1.2 (DL+LL+EQ XP)
1 1.2 9 1.2 10 1.2
LOAD COMB 18 1.2 (DL+LL+EQ XN)
9 1.2 10 1.2 2 1.2
LOAD COMB 19 1.2 (DL+LL+EQ ZP)
3 1.2 9 1.2 10 1.2
LOAD COMB 20 1.2 (DL+LL+EQ ZN)
4 1.2 9 1.2 10 1.2
LOAD COMB 21 1.5(DL+EQ XP)
9 1.5 1 1.5
LOAD COMB 22 1.5(DL+EQ XN)
2 1.5 9 1.5
LOAD COMB 23 1.5(DL+EQ ZP)
3 1.5 9 1.5
LOAD COMB 24 1.5(DL+EQ ZN)
4 1.5 9 1.5
LOAD COMB 25 1.5(DL+WL XP)
5 1.5 9 1.5
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 197
LOAD COMB 26 1.5(DL+WL XN)
6 1.5 9 1.5
LOAD COMB 27 1.5(DL+WL ZP)
7 1.5 9 1.5
LOAD COMB 28 1.5(DL+WL ZN)
9 1.5 8 1.5
LOAD COMB 29 0.9DL+1.5 EQ XP
9 0.9 1 1.5
LOAD COMB 30 0.9DL+1.5 EQ XN
9 0.9 2 1.5
LOAD COMB 31 0.9DL+1.5 EQ ZP
3 1.5 9 0.9
LOAD COMB 32 0.9DL+1.5 EQ ZN
4 1.5 9 0.9
LOAD COMB 33 0.9DL+1.5 WL XP
9 0.9 5 1.5
LOAD COMB 34 0.9DL+1.5 WL XN
9 0.9 6 1.5
LOAD COMB 35 0.9DL+1.5 WL ZP
9 0.9 7 1.5
LOAD COMB 36 0.9DL+1.5 WL ZN
8 1.5 9 0.9
PERFORM ANALYSIS
LOAD LIST 11 TO 36
PARAMETER 1
CODE INDIAN
STEEL TAKE OFF ALL
FINISH
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 198
12.2 ANALYSIS OF STEEL BUILDING FOR GRAVITY LOADS
The structure is a residential building which comes under the category of
residential cum commercial building. Hence it has taken care of different types of
dead loads. The dead loads could be of its own self weight, furniture’s, some
equipment, machineries, computers, store keeps, etc. Hence the building has to be
designed in such a way that it has to take care of all the loads imposed on it. The
easiest way to withstand these loads is by providing proper beams and columns. The
live load of the building could be taken from the standards.
FIG.12.1 DEFORMED SHAPE OF THE BUILDING UNDER GRAVITY
LOADS
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 199
FIG 12.2 MAXIMUM BENDIG MOMENT DIAGRAM FOR GRAVITY
LOADS
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 200
12.3 MAX BM ON BEAM NO 3029 DUE GRAVITY LOADS
12.4 SUMMARY OF BEAM END FORCES DUE TO GRAVITY LOADS
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 201
12.3 ANALYSIS OF STEEL BUILDING FOR WIND LOADS.
WIND LOADS:
Building and their components are to be designed to withstand the
code-specified wind loads. Calculating wind loads is important in design of the wind
force-resisting system, including structural members, components, and cladding
against shear, sliding, overturning, and uplift actions.
FIG 12.5 WIND LOAD ACTING FROM X-VE DIRECTION
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 202
FIG 12.6 MAXIMUM BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAM FOR COLUMN NO
125 WIND LOAD ACTING FROM Z -VE DIRECTION
FIG 12.7 SUMMARY OF BEAM END FORCES DUE TO WIND LOAD
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 203
12.4 ANALYSIS OF STEEL BUILDING FOR SIESMIC LOADS:
FIG 12.8 DISPLACEMENT OF BUILDING UNDER SIESMIC LOAD FROM
Z+VE DIRECTION
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 204
FIG 12.9 MAX BM ON COLUMN NO 21 DUE TO SEISMIC LOAD
FROM Z -VE DIRECTION
FIG 12.10 SUMMARY OF BEAM END FORCES DUE TO SEISMIC LOADS
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 205
13. DESIGN OF DECK SLAB
13.1 Introduction
The principal merit of steel-concrete composite construction lies in the
utilization of the compressive strength of concrete in conjunction with steel sheets 0r
beams, in order to enhance the strength and stiffness.
Composite floors with profiled decking consist of the following structural
elements in addition to in-situ concrete and steel beams:
Profiled decking
Shear connection
Reinforcement for shrinkage and temperature stresses
Composite floors using profiled sheet decking have are particularly
competitive where the concrete floor has to be completed quickly and where medium
level of fire protection to steel work is sufficient. However, composite slabs with
profiled decking are unsuitable when there is heavy concentrated loading or dynamic
loading in structures such as bridges. The alternative composite floor in such cases
consists of reinforced or pre-stressed slab over steel beams connected together using
shear connectors to act monolithically.
There is presently no Indian standard covering the design of composite floor
systems using profiled sheeting. The structural behaviour of Composite floors using
profiled decks is similar to a reinforced concrete slab, with the steel sheeting acting as
the tension reinforcement. The main structural and other benefits of using composite
floors with profiled steel decking are:
Savings in steel weight are typically 30% to 50% over non-composite
Construction
Greater stiffness of composite beams results in shallower depths for the same
span. Hence lower storey heights are adequate resulting in savings in cladding
costs, reduction in wind loading and savings in foundation costs.
Faster rate of construction
The steel deck is normally rolled into the desired profile from 0.9 mm to 1.5
mm galvanised sheets. It is profiled such that the profile heights are usually in the
range of 38-75 mm and the pitch of corrugations is between 150 mm and 350 mm.
Generally, spans of the order of 2.5 m to 3.5 m between the beams are chosen and the
beams are designed to span between 6 m to 12 m. Trapezoidal profile with web
indentations is commonly used.
The steel decking performs a number of roles, such as:
It supports loads during construction and acts as a working platform
It develops adequate composite action with concrete to resist the imposed
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 206
Loading
It transfers in-plane loading by diaphragm action to vertical bracing or shear
walls
It stabilizes the compression flanges of the beams against lateral buckling,
until concrete hardens.
It reduces the volume of concrete in tension zone
It distributes shrinkage strains, thus preventing serious cracking of concrete.
FIG 13.1: Steel beam bounded to concrete slab with shear
FIG 13.2: Composite floor system using profiled sheets
Profiled sheet decking as permanent form work
Construction stage: During construction, the profiled steel deck acts alone to
carry the weight of wet concrete, self weight, workmen and equipments. It must be
strong enough to carry this load and stiff enough to be serviceable under the weight of
wet concrete only. In addition to structural adequacy, the finished slab must be
capable of satisfying the requirements of fire resistance.
Design should make appropriate allowances for construction loads, which
include the weight of operatives, concreting plant and any impact or vibration that
may occur during construction. These loads should be arranged in such a way that
they cause maximum bending moment and shear. In any area of 3 m by 3 m (or the
span length, if less), in addition to weight of wet concrete, construction loads and
weight of surplus concrete should be provided for by assuming a load of 1.5 kN/m2.
Over the remaining area a load of 0.75 kN/m2 should be added to the weight of wet
concrete.
Composite Beam Stage: The composite beam formed by employing the
profiled steel sheeting is different from the one with a normal solid slab, as the
profiling would influence its strength and stiffness. This is termed ‘composite beam
stage’. In this case, the profiled deck, which is fixed transverse to the beam, results in
voids within the depth of the associated slab. Thus, the area of concrete used in
calculating the section properties can only be that depth of slab above the top flange
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 207
of the profile. In addition, any stud connector welded through the sheeting must lie
within the area of concrete in the trough of the profiling. Consequently, if the trough
is narrow, a reduction in strength must be made because of the reduction in area of
constraining concrete. In current design methods, the steel sheeting is ignored when
calculating shear resistance; this is probably too conservative.
Composite Slab Stage: The structural behaviour of the composite slab is
similar to that of a reinforced concrete beam with no shear reinforcement. The steel
sheeting provides adequate tensile capacity in order to act with the concrete in
bending. However, the shear between the steel and concrete must be carried by
friction and bond between the two materials. The mechanical keying action of the
indents is important. This is especially so in open trapezoidal profiles, where the
indents must also provide resistance to vertical separation. The predominant failure
mode is one of shear bond rupture that results in slip between the concrete and steel.
13.2 Design method As there is no Indian standard covering profiled decking, we refer to Euro
code 4 (EC4) for guidance. The design method defined in EC4 requires that the slab
be checked first for bending capacity, assuming full bond between concrete and steel,
then for shear bond capacity and, finally, for vertical shear. The analysis of the
bending capacity of the slab may be carried out as though the slab was of reinforced
concrete with the steel deck acting as reinforcement. However, no satisfactory
analytical method has been developed so far for estimating the value of shear bond
capacity. The loads at the construction stage often govern the allowable span rather
than at the composite slab stage.
The width of the slab ‘b’ shown in Figure is one typical wavelength of profiled
sheeting. But, for calculation purpose the width considered is 1.0 m. The overall
thickness is ht and the depth of concrete above main flat surface hc. Normally, ht is not
less than 80 mm and hc is not less than 40 mm from sound and fire insulation
considerations.
The neutral axis normally lies in the concrete in case of full shear connection.
For sheeting in tension, the width of indents should be neglected. Therefore, the
effective area 'Ap' per meter and height of centre of area above bottom 'e' are usually
based on tests. The plastic neutral axis ep is generally larger than e.
The simple plastic theory of flexure is used for analysis of these floors for
checking the design at Limit State of collapse load. IS 456:2000 assumes the
equivalent ultimate stress of concrete in compression as 0.36 (fck) where (fck) is
characteristic cube strength of concrete.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 208
FIG 13.3: Resistance of composite slab to sagging bending moment
Full shear connection is assumed. Hence, compressive force Ncf in concrete is
equal to steel yield force Npa.
𝑁𝑐𝑓 = 𝑁𝑝𝑎 =𝐴𝑝𝑓𝑝𝛾𝑎𝑝
𝑁𝑐𝑓 = 0.36 𝑓𝑐𝑘. 𝑏. 𝑥
Where
Ap = Effective area per meter length
Fy = yield strength of steel
ϒap = partial safety factor (1.15)
The natural axis depth is given by
𝑥 =𝑁𝑐𝑓
𝑏(0.36𝑓𝑐𝑘)
This is valid when x ≤ hc, i.e natural axis lies above steel decking.
Mp.Rd is the design resistance to sagging bending moment and is given by:
𝑝. 𝑅𝑑 = 𝑁𝑐𝑓 (𝑑𝑝 − 0.42𝑥)
The shear resistance of composite slab largely depends on connection
between profiled deck and concrete. The following three types of mechanisms
are mobilised:
(i) Natural bond between concrete and steel due to adhesion.
(ii) Mechanical interlock provided by dimples on sheet and shear connectors.
(iii) Provision of end anchorage by shot fired pins or by welding studs when
sheeting is made to rest on steel beams.
Natural bond is difficult to quantify and unreliable, unless separation at the
interface between the sheeting and concrete is prevented. Dimples or ribs are
incorporated in the sheets to ensure satisfactory mechanical interlock. These are
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 209
effective only if the embossments are sufficiently deep. Very strict control during
manufacture is needed to ensure that the depths of embossments are consistently
maintained at an acceptable level. End anchorage is provided by means of shot-fired
pins, when the ends of a sheet rest on a steel beam, or by welding studs through the
sheeting to the steel flange.
Quite obviously the longitudinal shear resistance is provided by the combined
effect of frictional interlock, mechanical interlock and end anchorage. No
mathematical model could be employed to evaluate these and the effectiveness of
the shear connection is studied by means of load tests on simply supported composite
slabs as described in the next section.
Serviceability criteria: The composite slab is checked for the following
serviceability criteria:
Cracking, Deflection and Fire endurance. The crack width is calculated
for the top surface in the negative moment region using standard methods prescribed
for reinforced concrete. Normally crack width should not exceed 3 mm. IS 456: 2000
gives a formula to calculate the width of crack. Provision of 0.4 % steel will normally
avoid cracking problems in propped construction and provision 0.2 % of steel is
normally sufficient in unpropped construction. If environment is corrosive it is
advisable to design the slab as continuous and take advantage of steel provided for
negative bending moment for resisting cracking during service loads.
The IS 456: 2000 gives a stringent deflection limitation of l/350 which may
be un- realistic for un-propped construction. The Euro code gives limitations of l/180
or 20 mm whichever is less. It may be worthwhile to limit span to depth ratio in the
range of 25 to 35 for the composite condition, the former being adopted for simply
supported slabs and the later for continuous slabs. The deflection of the composite
slabs is influenced by the slip-taking place between sheeting and concrete. Tests seem
to be the best method to estimate the actual deflection for the conditions adopted.
The fire endurance is assumed based on the following two criteria:
Thermal insulation criterion concerned with limiting the transmission of heat
by conduction
Integrity criterion concerned with preventing the flames and hot gases to
nearby compartments.
It is met by specifying adequate thickness of insulation to protect combustible
materials. R (time in minutes) denotes the fire resistance class of a member or
component. For instance, R60 means that failure time is more than 60 minutes. It is
generally assumed that fire rating is R60 for normal buildings.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 210
13.3 Metal Decking:
Metal decking are corrugated steel panels used as a working platform during
construction and eventually as formwork for site cast concrete slab. The decking
panels are secured with puddle-welds or shear welded through the decking to the
supporting steel joist or beams. The panels are fastened to each other along their sides
with screws, weld, or button punching standing seams. If the deck is to serve as a
structural diaphragm and transfer lateral loads to shear walls. Its entire perimeter is
welded to steel supports. In addition, more stringent requirements to support and side
lap fastening may apply. There are three major types of metal
FIG 13.4: Metal Decking
1. Form Decking:
Serves as a permanent formwork for a reinforced concrete slab until
the slab can support itself and its live load.
FIG 13.4: Form Decking
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 211
2. Composite Decking:
Serves as a tensile reinforcement for the concrete slab to which it is bonded
with embossed rib pattern. Composite action between the concrete slab and
the floor beams or joists can be achieve by welding shear studs through the
decking to the supporting beam below.
FIG 13.4: Composite Decking
3. Cellular Decking:
Is manufactured by welding a corrugated sheet to a flat steel sheet, forming a
series of spaces or raceways for electrical and communications wring; special
cutouts are available for floor outlets. The decking may serve as an acoustic
ceiling when the perforated cells are filled with glass fiber.
FIG 13.5: Cellular Decking
13.4 Design of deck slab
From KIRBY TECHNICAL HANDBOOK kirby decking (KD) section
properties and load tables page no 5.9
Assuming 0.7 mm thick Kirby Decking sheet
Weight of sheet = 6.99 kg/m2
= 0.06857 kN/ m2
Dead load on Deck slab
Self weight of deck slab= 0.1x25 = 2.5 kN/m2
Self weight of decking sheet =
Floor finish = 1 kN/m2
Live load on deck slab = 2 kN/m2
Total load on deck slab = 5.568kN/m2
Width of deck slab = 1.2 m
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 212
Allowable load on kirby decking = 6.82 kN/m2
Properties of decking sheet
For Panel nominal thickness of 0.7 mm,
Girth = 11.45 mm
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 213
Weight = 6.99 𝑘𝑔/𝑚2
Shear and web crippling
𝑉𝑎 𝐾𝑁 = 26.19 kN
𝑃𝑎 𝐾𝑁 = 17.54 kN
Top flat in compression:
Deflection 𝑙𝑥 in 𝑐𝑚4 = 12.55
Sx (top) in 𝑐𝑚3 = 10.01
Sx (bot) in 𝑐𝑚3: = 4.03
Ma (kN-m) = 0.83
Bottom flat in compression
Deflection 𝑙𝑥 in 𝑐𝑚4 = 12.58
Sx (top) in 𝑐𝑚3 = 11.28
Sx (bot) in 𝑐𝑚3 = 3.95
Ma (kN-m) = 0.81
Provide 0.7 mm thick Kirby decking sheet and 100 mm thick slab
Reinforcement in slab
Provide nominal reinforcement 8 mm dia @ 250 mm C/C in both directions
GIRTH CONNECTIONS
The decking sheet is connected to beams and columns with suitable nuts and
bolts. The typical drawing of connection of girth to column and beam is shown below.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 214
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 215
14.DESIGN OF BEAMS
14.1 INTRODUCTION:
A member subjected to bending moment and shear force due to transverse
loads is called a ‘Beam’ (or) the member carrying loads perpendicular to its axis is
called a Beam.
Classification of Beams:
The steel beams are generally classified as follows:
1. Simple Beams
2. Compound beam/ Built-up beam/ Plated beam.
3. Plate girders
1. Simple beam
When a single rolled section is provided to support the lateral load is called a
simple beam.
2. Compound Beam (or) Built up Beam:
When two or more rolled sections (or) rolled sections with plates are used as
flexural member is called a compound beam (or) built up beam. A rolled
section with one (or) more crown plates on its flange, when used as a beam is
called plated beam.
3. Plate griders:
When heavy loads are to be carried on large span, it may not be possible to
provide simple (or) compound beams. In such cases plate griders made up of
plates either riveted (or) welded together are used.
Laterally Restrained Beams:
A beam is said to be laterally restrained, when its compression flange is
supported laterally and it is not allowed to have moments in the lateral direction.
Because, the tendency of the compression flange to buckle under axial compressive
stresses is prevented, the safe allowable bending stress in compression may be taken
the same as that for tension.
Permissible Bending Stress:
If the compression flange of the beam is restrained laterally (or) ‘(flat)’ for
laterally restrained beam the bending stress in the compression may be taken same as
that of bending stress in tension.
i.e., 𝜎𝑏𝑡 = 0.66𝑓𝑦
where fy= minimum yield stress of steel in Mpa.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 216
if fy= 250 Mpa,
𝜎𝑏𝑡 = 0.66x250 = 165 𝑀𝑃𝑎.
Effective Span:
Effective span of beam shall be taken as the length of the beam between the
centres of the support (or) the length between assumed points of applications of
reactions. It is denoted by ‘l’.
14.2 Design Procedure:
A beam section is usually chosen which can resist maximum bending moment
occurring over its span. The shear stress and deflection for the chosen sections are
then checked to be with in the permissible limits. Check for web crippling and web
buckling are the secondary design requirements to be checked in some cases of beams
with heavy concentrated loads (or) reaction of supports.
(i) Design for Bending:
The bending stress 𝜎bc (or) bt at any point on a cross-section of a beam due
to bending moment ‘M’ is given by.
M
IxY = 𝜎𝑏𝑐 (or)𝜎𝑏𝑡
Where,
𝜎𝑏𝑐 (cal)(or)𝜎𝑏𝑡 (cal)= bending stress (compressive or tensile) calculated
at a point at a distance ‘y’ from the neutral axis.
M = bending moment
I = moment of inertia of the cross-section of beam.
The point of maximum bending stress occurs at the extreme fibre and the
corresponding I
Y ratio is called the sectional modulus designated by Z.
M
Z= 𝜎𝑏𝑐 (cal)(or)𝜎𝑏𝑡 (cal)
Since the calculated bending stress 𝜎𝑏𝑐 (cal)(or)𝜎𝑏𝑡 (cal) is lesser than the
permissible bending𝜎𝑏𝑐 (or)𝜎𝑏𝑡 .
M
Z ≤ 𝜎𝑏𝑐 or 𝜎𝑏𝑡
Z ≥ M
𝜎𝑏𝑐
Z ≥ M
𝜎𝑏𝑡
A suitable beam section is chosen which have the sectional modulus
slightly more than Z calculated from the equations.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 217
14.3Moment of Resistance:
It is the bending moment which a beam can resist.
Moment of resistance = Z x 𝜎𝑏𝑐 or 𝜎𝑏𝑡
The external loads should not cause a bending moment more than the moment of
resistance of the beam.
Load Carrying Capacity of the Beam:
1. From the strength consideration, the load carrying capacity of the beam
is calculated by the equation.
Moment of resistance = Zxx x 𝜎𝑏𝑐 or 𝜎𝑏𝑡
2. Calculate the max. Bending moment in the beam depending upon the
type of the beam and loading.
i. Simply supported carrying u.d.l max. Bending Moment = 𝑤𝑙2
8
ii. Simply supported carrying point load Max. B.M.= 𝑤𝑙
8
iii. Cantilever carrying u.d.l, Max. B.M. =𝑤𝑙2
2
iv. Cantilever carrying point load Max. B.M. = 𝑤. 𝑙
14.4 Shear:
1. Calculate maximum shear force in the beam depending upon the type of
loading .
i. Simply supported carrying u.d.l max. Shear force (𝑣) = 𝑤𝑙
2
ii. Simply supported carrying point load Max. S.F. 𝑣 = 𝑤
2
iii. Cantilever carrying u.d.l, Max. S.F. 𝑣 = 𝑤𝑙
iv. Cantilever carrying point load Max. S.F. 𝑣 = 𝑤
2. Calculate average shear stress 𝜏𝑣𝑎 ,𝑐𝑎𝑙
𝜏𝑣𝑎 ,𝑐𝑎𝑙 =V
x𝑡𝑤
3. 𝜏𝑣𝑎 ,𝑐𝑎𝑙 should be less than permissible avg. Shear stress.
𝜏𝑣𝑎 = 0.4𝑓𝑦
14.5 Maximum Deflection:
i. Simply supported carrying u.d.l over span 𝜕𝑚𝑎𝑥 =5
384 𝑤𝑙4
EI
ii. Simply supported carrying point load 𝜕𝑚𝑎𝑥 =1
48 𝑤𝑙3
EI
iii. Cantilever carrying u.d.l, 𝜕𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑤𝑙4
8EI
iv. Cantilever carrying point load. 𝜕𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑤𝑙3
3EI
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 218
Permissible Deflection (Allowable Deflection):
𝜕𝑚𝑎𝑥 = span
325
To satisfy the strength and stiffness requirements of the beam 𝜕𝑚𝑎𝑥 should not
be greater than 𝜕𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑤𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 of the beam.
Web Crippling and Web Buckling:
A beam may fail under a concentrated load or at end reaction due to crippling
of web or by buckling of web.
14.6 Web Crippling:
The depression of load is assumed to be at 300
The bearing stress in the web at the root of the fillet will be equal to
𝑤
𝑡𝑤 (𝑎+22 3) ≯ 𝜎𝑝 for inter mediate loads.
𝑅
𝑡𝑤 (𝑎+22 3) ≯ 𝜎𝑝 for end supports.
Where, w= concentrated loads on the beam (N)
R= end reaction at supports (N)
tw= thickness of web (mm)
a= bearing length (mm)
h2= depth of the root of the fillet from the top of the flange (mm).
𝜎p= maximum permissible bearing stress = 0.75𝑓𝑦
fy= yield stress of steel.
14.7 Web Buckling:
Load bearing stiffeners at all points of concentrated loads (including points of
support) should be provided where,
W or R > 𝜎𝑎𝑐 x 𝑡𝑤x B
Where W or R= concentrated load or reaction at support respectively.
𝜎ac= maximum permissible axial stress for columns in Table 5.1 of IS: 800 for
slenderness ratio = 1
𝑡𝑤 3
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 219
B= the length of the stiff portion of the bearing + additional length + thickness
of seating angle
h1= clear depth of the web between root fillets normally check for web
crippling and web buckling is not required for rolled steel sections under normal
loading.
14.8 Design of Tension Members:
Tension members subjected to axial forces may fail by rupture at a critical
section or it may become non-functional due to excessive elongation. Plates and other
rolled sections in tension may also fail by block shear of end bolted regions.
The factored design tension ’T’ in the member should comply with the
following criteria:
𝑇 < 𝑇𝑑
Where 𝑇𝑑= lowest design strength of the member due to yielding of gross section
under axial tension.
Design strength due to yielding of gross section: As per is 800-2007 the
design strength of the member under axial tension Tdg, as governed by yielding of
gross section, is expressed as
𝑇𝑑𝑔=
𝐴𝑔 𝑓𝑦𝛾𝑚𝑜
Where 𝑓𝑦 = yield stress of material
𝐴𝑔 = gross area of cross-section
Ὑ𝑚𝑜 = partial safety factor for failure in tension by yielding as compiled in the
following table.
Table 14.1: Partial safety factor for materials (γm)
Sl
No. Definitions Partial factor of safety
1 Resistance, governed by yielding 𝛾Ὑ𝑚𝑜 1.10
2 Resistance of member to buckling, Ὑ𝛾𝑚𝑜 1.10
3 Resistance, governed by ultimate stress,
γml 1.25
4 Resistance of connection Type of fabrications
Shop Field
a. Bolts: friction type, γmf 1.25 1.25
b. Bolts: bearing type, γmb 1.25 1.25
c. Rivets, γmr 1.25 1.25
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 220
d. Welds, γmw 1.25 1.50
Design strength due to rupture of critical section:
a. Plates: the design strength of a plate Tdn, as governed by rupture of the net
cross- sectional area. An at the hole is given by
𝑇𝑑𝑛=
0.9 𝐴𝑔 𝑓𝑦
𝛾𝑚 1
Where Ὑm1= partial safety factor for failure at ultimate stress as compile in the table
above
Fu= ultimate stress of the material
An= 𝑏 − 𝑛𝑑 + 𝑃𝑠𝑖
2
4𝑔𝑖 1
𝑖
Where b, t = width and thickness of the plate, respectively
dh = diameter of the bolt hole (2mm in addition to the diameter of the hole in
case of directly punched hole).
g = gauge length between the bolt holes as shown in the figure below
ps = staggered pitch length between line of the bolt holes as shown in the
figure below
n = number of bolt holes as shown in the figure below
I = subscript for summation of all the inclined legs.
b. Threaded rods : the design strength of threaded rods in tension, Tdn, as
governed by rupture is expressed as
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 221
𝑇𝑑𝑛=
0.9 𝐴𝑔 𝑓𝑦
Ὑ𝑚 1
Where An= net root area at the threaded section
c. Single Angles: the rupture strength of an angle connected through one leg is
affected by shear lag. The design strength Tdn as governed by the rupture at
net section is given by the relation
𝑇𝑑𝑛
0.9 𝐴𝑛𝑐 𝑓𝑢Ὑ𝑚 1
+ 𝛽 𝐴𝑔𝑜 𝑓𝑦
Ὑ𝑚 0
Where
Β= 1.4-0.076 𝑤
𝑡
𝑓𝑦
𝑓𝑢
𝑏𝑠
𝐿𝑐 ≤
𝑓𝑢Ὑ𝑚𝑜
𝑓𝑦Ὑ𝑚 1≥ 0.7
Where w= outstand leg width
bs = shear lag width, as shown in figure below
Lc = length of end connection, that is, the distance between the outermost bolts
in the end joint measured along with the load direction or length of the weld along the
load direction.
For preliminary sizing, the rupture strength of net section may be approximately taken
as :
𝑇𝑑𝑛 =𝛼𝐴𝑛𝑓𝑢Ὑ𝑚1
Where α = 0.6 for one or two bolts, 0.7 for three bolts and 0.8for four or more bolts
along the length in the end connection or equivalent weld length
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 222
An= net area of the total cross-section
Anc= net area of the connected leg
Ago= gross area of the outstanding leg
t= thickness of the leg
in the case of double angles, channels, I-sections and other rolled steel sections,
connected by one or more elements to an end gusset, the rupture strength is also
governed by tearing of net section may also be calculated using the above- mentioned
equation. However the value of β is calculated based on the shear leg distance bs taken
from the farthest edge of the outstanding leg to the nearest bolt/weld line in the
connected leg of the cross- section.
Design strength due to block shear: The design strength controlled by block shear
end connection of plates and angles is computed using the following equations:
a) Bolted connections : the block shear strength, Tdb of connection is taken as
the smaller value of
𝑇𝑑𝑏
𝐴𝑣𝑔𝑓𝑦
3Ὑ𝑚0
+0.9 𝐴𝑡𝑛𝑓𝑢
Ὑ𝑚0
Where, Avg= minimum gross and net area in shear along bolt line parallel to
external force respectively (1-2 and 3-4 as shown in the figure a. and 1-2 as
shown in the fig b)
Atn= minimum gross and net area in tension from the bolt hole to the
toe of the angle, end bolt line, perpendicular to the line of force, respectively
(2-3 as shown in the figure b.)
fu= ultimate and yield stress of the material, respectively
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 223
b) Welded connections: the block shear strength, Tdb shall be checked for
welded end connections by taking an approximate section in the member
around the end weld which can shear off as a block.
Design of flexural members:
1. General aspects
Flexural members such as beams should have adequate design strength to
resist the bending moments and shear forces resulting from imposed loads. In
addition, they should satisfy the serviceability criteria comprising the
deflection limits specified in table. given below for different types of
structural members. The maximum deflection under service loads should not
exceed the limits expressed as a function of the span given in the code. The
effective span of a beam is generally taken as the distance between the centre
of the supports.
Type of
building
(1)
Deflecti
on
(2)
Design
load
(3)
Member
(4)
Supporting
(5)
Maximu
m
deflection
(6)
Industrial
building Vertical
Live
load/
wind
load
Purlins and
girts
Elastic
cladding Span/150
Brittle
cladding Span/180
Live
load Simple span
Elastic
cladding Span/240
Brittle
cladding Span/300
Live
load
Cantilever
span
Elastic
cladding Span/120
Brittle
cladding Span/150
Live
load
Rafter
supporting
Profiled metal
sheeting Span/180
Plastered
sheeting Span/240
Crane
load
(manual
operatio
n up to
50 t)
Gantry Crane Span/500
Crane
load
(electric
operatio
n up to
50 t)
Gantry Crane Span/750
Crane Gantry Crane Span/100
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 224
load
(electric
operatio
n over
50 t)
Lateral
No
crane Column
Elastic
cladding
Height/15
0
Masonry/brittl
e cladding
Height/24
0
Crane +
wind
Gantry
(lateral)
Relative
displacement
between rails
supporting
crane
10 mm
Crane
(absolute) Span/400
Crane +
wind
Column/fram
e
Gantry (elastic
cladding;
pendent
operated)
Height/20
0
Gantry (brittle
cladding; cab
operated)
Height/40
0
Other
building
Vertical
Live
load
Floor and
roof
Elements not
susceptible to
cracking
Span/300
Elements
susceptible to
cracking
Span/360
Live
load Cantilever
Elements not
susceptible to
cracking
Span/150
Elements
susceptible to
cracking
Span/180
Lateral
Wind Building
Elastic
cladding
Height/30
0
Brittle
cladding
Height/50
0
Wind Inter storey
drift ----
Storey
height/300
2. Design strength in flexure
The following specifications govern the design of flexural members. Flexural
members adequately supported against lateral torsional buckling(laterally
supported beams) is governed by the yield stress. The factored design
moment, M at any section, in a beam due to external loads should satisfy the
relation
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 225
M ≤ Md
Where Md = design bending strength of the section
a) The design bending strength of a section which is not susceptible to web
buckling under shear before yielding and factored design shear force does
not exceed 0.6 Vd, where Vd is the design shear strength of the cross-
section, the bending strength Md is calculated by the relation
M𝑑 =𝛽𝑏𝑍𝑝𝑓𝑦𝛾𝑚0
Where 𝛽𝑏 = 1.0 for plastic and compact sections
= 𝑍𝑒
𝑍𝑝 for semi- compact sections
zp, ze = plastic and elastic section moduli of the cross-section,
respectively
𝑓𝑦 = yield stress of the material
𝛾𝑚0 = partial safety factor
To avoid irreversible deformation under serviceability loads, Md
should be less than [ 1.2𝑧𝑒 𝑓𝑦
𝛾𝑚0 ]in case of simply supported and
[1.5𝑧𝑒 𝑓𝑦
𝛾𝑚0 ] in cantilever beams.
b) In the case of laterally unsupported beams, the resistance to lateral
torsional buckling need not be checked separately in the following cases:
1) Bending is about the minor axis of the section,
2) Section is hollow (rectangular/tubular) or solid bars,
3) In case of bending about the major axis, the non-dimensional
slenderness ratio (λLT) is less than 0.4
The design bending strength of laterally unsupported beams as
governed by lateral torsional buckling is calculated by the relation
M𝑑 = 𝛽𝑏 𝑍𝑝 𝑓𝑏𝑑
Where 𝑓𝑏𝑑 = design bending compressive stress, computed as
= 𝑋𝐿𝑇 𝑓𝑦
𝛾𝑚 0
𝑋𝐿𝑇 = bending stress reduction factor to account for lateral
torsional buckling, given by the relation:
𝑋𝐿𝑇 = 1
∅𝐿𝑇 +[∅𝐿𝑇2 +𝜆𝐿𝑇
2 ]0.5 ≤ 1.0
∅𝐿𝑇 = 0.5[1 +∝𝐿𝑇 𝜆𝐿𝑇 − 0.2 + 𝜆𝐿𝑇2 ]
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 226
The imperfection parameter ∝𝐿𝑇 is given by
∝𝐿𝑇 = 0.21 for rolled steel section
∝𝐿𝑇 = 0.49 for welded steel section
The non-dimensional slenderness ratio, 𝜆𝐿𝑇 is given by the relation
𝜆𝐿𝑇 = 𝛽
𝑏𝑍𝑝𝑓𝑦
𝑀𝑐𝑟
≤ 1.2𝑍𝑝𝑓𝑦
𝑀𝑐𝑟
= 𝑓
𝑦
𝑓𝑐𝑟,𝑏
Where fcr,b = extreme fibre bending compressive stress
Mcr = elastic critical moment calculated by the expression,
𝑀𝑐𝑟 = { 𝜋2 𝐸𝐼𝑦 𝐿𝐿𝑇
2 𝐺𝐼𝑡 +
𝜋2 𝐸𝐼𝑤 𝐿𝐿𝑇
2 } = 𝛽𝑏𝑍𝑝𝑓𝑐𝑟 ,𝑏
The extreme fibre bending compressive stress fcr,b of non-slender rolled steel
sections in the above equation may be approximately calculated from the values
compiled in table in IS: 800 which has been prepared using the following equation:
𝑓𝑐𝑟 ,𝑏 =1.1𝜋2 𝐸
(𝐿𝐿𝑇𝑟𝑦
)2 [1 +
1
20
𝐿𝐿𝑇𝑟𝑦𝑓
𝑡𝑓
2
]0.5
A simplified equation has been suggested by the Indian standard code IS: 800-
2007 for computing the elastic lateral buckling moment of prismatic members made
of standard rolled I-sections and welded doubly symmetric I-sections given as
𝑀𝑐𝑟 =𝜋2 𝐸𝐼𝑦𝑓
2𝐿𝐿𝑇2 [1 +
1
20
𝐿𝐿𝑇𝑟𝑦𝑓
𝑡𝑓
2
]0.5
Where Iy = moment of inertia about the weaker axis
ry = radius of gyration about the weaker axis
It = torsional constant = 𝑏𝑖𝑡𝑖3/3 for open section
Iw = warping constant
LLT = effective length for lateral torsional buckling
hf = centre to centre distance between flange
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 227
tf = thickness of the flange
The Indian Standard Code IS: 800-2007 also recommends the use of a more
accurate method given in Annexure E of the code for computing the elastic critical
moment considering loading, support conditions and non-symmetric sections of the
member.
3. Effective length for lateral torsional buckling
In the case of simply supported beams and griders of span length, L,
where no lateral restraint to the compression flanges is provided, but where
each end of the beam is restrained against torsion, the effective length LLT to
be used for different types of restraint at supports and loading conditions are
compiled in table given below.
In the case of cantilever beams of projecting length L, the effective
length LLT to be used in table—for different support conditions.
4. Shear
The factored shear force V, in a beam due to external actions should
satisfy the relation,
V ≤ Vd
Where Vd = design strength = 𝑉𝑛𝛾𝑚0
The nominal shear strength of a cross-section, Vn may be governed by
plastic shear resistance or strength of the web influenced by shear buckling
outlined below;
Table on effective length for simply supported beams, LLT
SI
NO.
Conditions of restraint at
support Loading condition
(1)
Torsional
restraint
(2)
Warping
restraint
(3)
Normal
(4)
Destabilizing
(5)
(i) Fully
restrained
Both flanges
fully
restrained
0.70L 0.85L
(ii) Fully
restrained
Compression
flange fully
restrained
0.75L 0.90L
(iii) Fully
restrained
Both flanges
fully
restrained
0.80L 0.95L
(iv) Fully
restrained
Compression
flange
partially
restrained
0.85L 1.00L
(v) Fully
restrained
Warping not
restrained in
both flanges
0.00L 1.20L
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 228
(vi)
Partially
restrained by
bottom flange
support
connection
Warping not
restrained in
both flanges
1.0L+2D 1.2L+2D
(vii)
Partially
restrained by
bottom flange
bearing
support
Warping not
restrained in
both flanges
1.2L+2D 1.4L+2D
Notes:
1. Torsional restraint prevents rotation about the longitudinal axis
2. Warping restraint prevents rotation of the flange in its plane.
3. D is overall depth of the beam
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 229
1) Plastic shear resistance
The nominal plastic shear resistance under pure shear is expressed by the
relation,
Vn = Vp
Where 𝑉𝑛 = 𝐴𝑣𝑓𝑦𝑤
3
Av = shear area
fyw = yield strength of the web
the shear area for various sections
is computed using the following relations:
a) I and channel sections
Major axis bending. Minor axis bending
Hot-rolled: h.tw Hot-rolled or welded: 2b tf
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 230
b) Rectangular hollow sections of uniform thickness
Loaded parallel to depth (h): [Ah/(b+h)]
Loaded parallel to width (b): [Ab/(b+h)]
c) Circular hollow tubes of uniform thickness: [ 2 A/π]
d) Plates and solid bars: A
Where
A = cross-section of area
b= overall depth of tubular section, breadth of I-section flanges
d= clear depth of web between flanges
h= overall depth of the section
tf= thickness of the flange
tw= thickness of the web
2) Resistance to shear buckling
The resistance to shear buckling should be verified when
𝑑
𝑡𝑤 > 67𝜀 for a web without stiffeners
> 67𝜀 𝐾𝑣
5.35 for a web with stiffeners
Where Kv = shear buckling coefficient defined in the following paragraphs
𝜀 = 250
𝑓𝑦
The computations for shear buckling design are detailed as below:
The nominal shear strength, Vn of webs with or without intermediate
stiffeners as governed by buckling may be evaluated using one of the
following methods:
(a) Simple post-critical method
The simple post-critical method, based on shear buckling strength can
be used for webs of I-sections griders, with or without intermediate
transverse stiffeners, provided that the web has transverse stiffeners at
the supports.
The nominal shear strength is given by:
Vn = Vcr
Where
Vcr = shear force corresponding to web buckling
= (AvTb)
Tb = shear stress corresponding to web buckling determined as follows:
1) When λw ≤ 0.8
𝑇𝑏 = 𝑓𝑦𝑤
3
2) When 0.8 < λw < 1.2
𝑇𝑏 = [1 − 0.8 𝜆𝑤 − 0.8 ] 𝑓𝑦𝑤
3
3) When λw≥ 1.2
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 231
𝑇𝑏 = 𝑓𝑦𝑤
3𝜆𝑤2
Where λw = non-dimensional web slenderness ratio for shear
buckling stress, given by
𝜆𝑤 = 𝑓𝑦𝑤
3𝑇𝑐𝑟 ,𝑒
Tcr,e= the elastic shear stress of the web
= 𝐾𝑣𝜋
2𝐸
12(1−𝜇2) 𝑑
𝑡𝑤
2
Where
μ = Poisson’s ratio
Kw= 5.35 when transverse stiffeners are provided only at supports
= 4+ 5.35/ (c/d)2 for (c/d) < 1.0
= 5.35 +4.0 / (c/d)2 for (c/d) ≥ 1.0
Where c, d are the spacing of transverse stiffeners and depth of
web, respectively.
(b) Tension field method
This method is based on the post-shear buckling strength. It is
normally used for webs with intermediate transverse stiffeners. In the
tension field method, the nominal shear resistance, Vn, is given by
Vn= Vtf
Where
𝑉𝑡𝑓 = 𝐴𝑣𝑇𝑏 + 0.9𝑤𝑡𝑓 𝑡𝑤𝑓𝑣 sin ∅ ≤ 𝑉𝑝
Where Tb = buckling strength as computed from the simple post-
critical method.
fv = yield strength of the tension field computed as
= 𝑓𝑦𝑤2 − 3𝑇𝑏
2 + ∅2 0.5
− ∅
∅ = 1.5𝑇𝑏 sin 2∅
∅ = inclination of the tension field
= tan−1 𝑑
𝑐
wtf = width of the tension field given as
= 𝑑 cos ∅ + 𝑐 − 𝑠𝑐 − 𝑠𝑡 sin ∅
fyw = yield stress of the web
c = spacing of stiffeners in the web
Tb= shear stress corresponding
sc, st = anchorage lengths of the tension flange respectively, obtained
from the relation:
𝑠 = 2
sin ∅
𝑀𝑓𝑟
𝑓𝑦𝑤 𝑡𝑤
0.5
≤ 𝑐
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 232
Where Mfr = reduced plastic moment capacity of the respective flange
plate ( disregarding any edge stiffener) after accounting for the axial
force in the cross-section, and is calculated as:
𝑀𝑓𝑟 = 0.25𝑏𝑓𝑡𝑓2𝑓𝑦𝑓 1 −
𝑁𝑓
𝑏𝑓𝑡𝑓𝑓𝑦𝑓 /𝛾𝑚0
2
Where bf, tf = width and thickness of the relevant flange respectively
fyf = yield stress of the flange
CALCULATIONS:
Design:
The unit weight of reinforced concrete deck slab = 25 kN/m3
Live load on the floor = 2 kN/m2
3.00m
3.60m
(1) DESIGN OF SECONDARY BEAMS:
Each secondary beams supports load from strip 1.2 m wide. Uniformly
distributed load per meter length of the beam:
(a) Load Support:
Weight of reinforced concrete slab = 1.2 x 1x100
1000x25 = 3 kN
Live load on the floor = 1.2x1x2 = 2.4 kN
Assume self-weight of the beam = 0.50 kN
1.2 m 1.2 m 1.2 m
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 233
Total uniformly distributed load = 3 + 2.4 + 0.50 = 5.9 kN ≅ 6 kN
(b) Bending Moment and Shear Force:
The effective span of the beam is 3m the maximum bending moment, M
occurs at the centre.
M = 𝑤𝑙2
8 =
6x32
8 = 6.75 kN − m
The maximum shear force, F occurs at the support,
F = 𝑤𝑙
2 =
6x3
2 = 9 kN
(c) Permissible Bending Stress:
It is assumed that the value of yield stress fy for the structural steel is 250
N/mm2 (Mpa). The ratios’s
T
𝑡𝑤 &
𝑑1
𝑡𝑤 are less than 2.0 and 85
respectively. The maximum permissible stress in compression (or) tension
may be assumed below.
𝜎𝑏𝑐 = 𝜎𝑏𝑡 = 0.66x250 = 165 kN/mm2
(d) Section Modulus Required:
z = M
𝜎𝑏𝑐 =
6.75x1000x1000
165= 40909.09 mm3
The steel beam section shall have D
T &
𝑙
𝑟𝑦 ratios should be not more
than 8 and 40, respectively. The trial section of beam selected may have
more of section, Z x 1.5 times more than that needed.
The trial section modulus
= 1.5 x 40909.09 = 61363.635 mm3
(e) Check for Section Modulus:
D
T=
200
5.0 = 40
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 234
T
𝑡𝑤=
5.0
3.4 = 1.47 < 2.00
Also
𝑑1
𝑡𝑤=
179.5
3.4 = 52.79 < 85
The effective length of compression flange of beam may be assumed equal
to effective span,
𝑙
𝑟𝑦 =
0.7x3x1000
11.7 = 179.4
From Table 6.1(b), IS: 800-1984 maximum permissible bending stress.
𝑙
𝑟𝑦 = 170, 𝜎𝑏𝑐 = 75
𝑙
𝑟𝑦 = 180, 𝜎𝑏𝑐 = 71
𝑙
𝑟𝑦 = 179.4, 𝜎𝑏𝑐 =?
𝜎𝑏𝑐 = 75 − 75 − 71
180 − 170 179.4 − 170 = 71.24 N/𝑚𝑚2
Section Modulus required
z = 6.75x1000x1000
71.24 = 94.75 cm3
Provide sectional area 36.71 cm3 due to economical and architectural
purposes.
(f) Properties of Trial Sections:
From steel sections tables, ISJB 200 @ 0.99 kN/m
Section Modulus provided Zxx = 78.1 x 10 3 mm
3
Moment of Inertia, Ixx = 780.7 x 104 mm
4
Thickness of web tw = 3.4 mm
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 235
Depth of Section h= 300 mm
Mean Thickness of Flange, tf = 9.4 mm
(g) Check for Shear Force:
Average shear stress = F
h𝑡𝑤 =
9
200x3.4 = 13.23 N/𝑚𝑚2
Allowable shear stress
= 0.4x𝑓𝑦 = 0.4 x 250 = 100 > 𝐴𝑣𝑔. 𝑠𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠 13.23
(h) Check for Deflection:
𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 5
342 𝑤𝑙4
EI
= 5x6x34x(1000)4
342x2.047x105x780.7x104= 3.959 mm
Allowable deflection
= 𝑙
325=
3000
325= 9.23 mm
The maximum deflection is less than allowable deflection.
Hence, design is satisfactory.
(2) DESIGN OF MAIN BEAM:
(a) Load Supported:
The effective span is taken as distance c/c of bearings
Effective span = 3.60 m
Load transferred from each secondary beam = 6 x 1.2 = 7.2 kN
Assume self-weight of beam = 2 kN/m
(b) Bending moment:
The maximum bending moment occurs at centre due to UDL
𝑤1 = 16 + 2 = 18
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 236
M1 = 𝑤1𝑙
2
8 =
18x3.62
8 = 29.16 kN − m
End reaction due to concentrated load = 𝑤𝑙
2=
7.2 x 1.2
2= 4.32 kN
Total load w2 = 2x4.32 = 8.64 kN
M2 = moment due to secondary beam
No. of secondary beams = 2
M2 = 𝑤2𝑙
2
8 = 13.99 kN − m
M = M1 + M2 = 29.16 + 13.99 = 43.15 kN − m
The secondary beams are connected to the web at 1.2 m c/c. The
compression flange is assumed to the fully supported against lateral
deflection.
(c) Permissible Bending Stress:
It is assumed that the value of yield stress, fy for the structural steel is 250
N/mm2(Mpa). The ratios’s
T
𝑡𝑤 &
𝑑1
𝑡𝑤 are less than 2.0 and 85
respectively. The maximum permissible stress in compression or tension
may be assumed as under (for laterally supported beam)
𝜎𝑏𝑐 = 𝜎𝑏𝑡 = 0.66x250 = 165 kN/mm2
(d) Section Modulus Required:
z = M
𝜎𝑏𝑐 =
43.15x1000x1000
165= 261515.1515 mm3
From steel section tables try ISHB 250 @ 51.0 kN/m
Section modulus provided
𝑧𝑥𝑥 = 618.9 x 103 mm3
Moment of Inertia I𝑥𝑥 = 7736.5 x 104 mm4
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 237
Thickness of web, 𝑡𝑤 = 6.9 𝑚𝑚
Depth of section, h = 250 mm
Total load on griders inclusive of its own weight
= 6.75x1.2x1.2 + 0.51x3.60 = 11.556 kN
Maximum Shear Force
=11.556
2= 5.778 kN
(e) Check for Average Shear Stress:
Avg. shear stress
𝜏𝑣𝑎 ,𝑐𝑎𝑙 = 5.778x1000
250x6.9 = 3.349 N/mm2
Allowable shear stress
= 0.4x𝑓𝑦 = 0.4 x 250 = 100 > 𝐴𝑣𝑔. 𝑠𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠 3.349
Hence, safe.
(f) Check for Moment:
z = M
𝜎𝑏𝑐
M = 𝑧. 𝜎𝑏𝑐 = 165x618.9x1000
1000x1000 = 102.1185 > 43.15 kN − m Hence, safe.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 238
15. DESIGN OF COLUMN
15.1 INTRODUCTION:
An element or a member subjected to primary compression is called a
compression member.
There are two main types of such members
1. Column and
2. Struts
1. Column: The vertical compression member in a building is called column
or stanchion.
2. Strut: The structural member carrying compressive load in a truss is
called strut.
15.2STEEL COLUMNS:
Steel columns are of the following types:
a. Struts of one or two angles:
These are used for compression members in roof trusses, light towers, and
lattice griders. The two angles of double struts are riveted together by
rivets driven through washers placed between the two angles at intervals of
4 to 6ft.
b. Starred angles:
Starred angles of two or four connected by batten plate spaced at intervals
of 3 to 4ft. these are used to support the light loads.
c. Latticed columns:
These are made up of channels or angles connected by lattice bars are
often used where light loads are to be supported on long columns.
d. Rolled H-columns:
These are obtainable with depths ranging from 6’’ to 16’’ and are now
commonly used instead of built-up columns in steel skeleton construction.
e. Built-up columns:
These are usually H-shaped section formed by a combination of plates and
angles although box-columns with two or more webs are not uncommonly
used in heavy building frames.
f. Top chord sections:
These are made up of heavy trusses are usually unsymmetrical and are
made of two rolled or built-up channel sections and cover plate. The
open(bottom) side of the section is latticed.
g. Columns for bents:
These are sometimes made up of a pair of channels and a I-beam with
batten plates at intervals of 3 to 4ft. connecting the flanges of the channels.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 239
Columns made of four angles and a web-plate are commonly used in mill
buildings bents.
h. Battened columns:
Battened columns are those in which two component parts of the column
are connected only by battened plates. They are decidedly inferior to
latticed columns and should be avoided if a continuous plate or latticing
can be used instead.
15.3 Effective Length:
Effective length is defined as that length of column for which it acts as if both
the ends are hinged. At these points, the flexure changes its sign or in other words it is
the distance between two points of zero moments.
Effective length for different end conditions are enlisted in Table-5.2 of IS: 800-
1984
Radius of Gyration:
Radius of gyration of a section is given by
𝑟 = I
𝐴
Where I= moment of inertia
A= area of cross-section
Slenderness Ratio:
Slenderness ratio is the ratio of effective length to the least radius of gyration.
It is denoted by λ
𝜆 = 𝑙
𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛
The maximum slenderness ratio of a strut should not exceed the values given in table-
3.1 of IS: 800-1984.
Table 15.1: Maximum slenderness ratio
S.No. Member Maximum slenderness
1. A member carrying
compressive loads
resulting from dead and
imposed loads
180
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 240
2. A member subjected to
compressive forces
resulting from wind/
earthquake forces provided
the deformation of such
member does not
adversely affect the stress
in any part of the structure
250
3. A member normally
carrying tension but
subjected to reversal of
stresses due to wind or
earthquake forces
350
15.4 Permissible Stress in axial Compression (𝜎ac):
The direct stress in compression on the cross-sectional area of axially loaded
compression members shall not exceed 0.6fy nor calculated using the formula.
𝜎𝑎𝑐 =𝑓𝑐𝑐𝑓𝑦
𝑓𝑐𝑐 𝑛 + 𝑓𝑦
𝑛
1𝑛
Where 𝜎ac= permissible stress in axial compression
fy= yield stress of steel, in Mpa.
fcc= elastic critical stress in compression =𝜋2E
𝜆2
n = a factor assumed as 1.4 the values of 𝜎ac for steel with various yield stress
are given in Table-4.3 of IS: 800-1984
15.5 Strength of Axially Loaded Compression Member (column &
strut):
The maximum axial compressive load ‘P’ which can be permitted on a
compression member is given by
P = 𝜎𝑎𝑐 x A
Where P= axial compressive load (N)
𝜎ac= permissible stress in axial compression (Mpa)
A= effective cross-sectional area of the member (mm2)
Note: The axial compressive load (or) load carrying capacity of a column (or)
compression member depends on the following parameters
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 241
(i) Slenderness rtatio, 𝜆 = 𝑙
𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛
(ii) Yield stress of steel (fy)
(iii) Permissible stress in axial compression (𝜎ac)
(iv) Effective cross-sectional area of the member (A)
15.6 Design of Compression Members
In design of steel columns the following should be taken into consideration:
No part of steel column should be less than ¼’’ thick
No material whether in a body of the column or used as a lattice bar or
stay plate, shall be of less thickness than 1/32 of its unsupported width,
measured between centers of rivets transversely, or 1/6 of the distance
between center of rivets in the direction of stress.
Tie-plates are to have not less than 4 rivets and are to be spaced so that
the ratio of length to the least radius of gyration of the parts connected
does not exceed 40, the distance between nearest rivets of two stay
plates in this case being considered as length
In built-up columns the thickness of any outstanding member (for
example, the outstanding legs of angles) shall not be less than 1/12 of
the width of the outstanding portion.
Base plates for steel column are usually made of steel plates and
shapes.
Cast-iron bases are sometimes used for very heavy columns. Ribbed
cases may also be used instead of plates and when bolted to the
columns, add greatly to the stability of the supporting members
because of their greater width.
Lally columns:
These are columns made up of a cylindrical steel pipe shell filled with
1: 11
2: 3 portland cement concrete. The standard type of lally column is
reinforced with only the steel pipe shell. Special types of columns are
obtainable with additional reinforcement consisting of steel pipe,
reinforcing bars or structural steel shapes. The light weight column of
0.134”, while the heavy- weight columns are from 31
2 to 12
3
4 inches in
outside diameter with shell thickness of 0.216 to 0.375 inches.
Composite columns:
These are columns in which a concrete core is further reinforced with a
steel or cast-iron core designed to support a part of the load. Steel cores
may be structural H-sections or four angles, latticed or battened; cast-iron
cores are usually either solid shafts or hollow pipe sections. The column
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 242
may be further reinforced by vertical rods or bars placed at the
circumference and enclosed by spirals.
1. Design strength: steel structural members carrying usually fail by flexural
buckling. The buckling strength is affected by the residual stresses, initial
curvature and accidental eccentricities if the load. These factors are considered
while computing the strength of structural steel members subjected to axial
compression by introducing an imperfection factor α and categorizing the
columns under buckling class a, b, c or d as shown in the table no.1
Table 1:
Buckling class a b C D
Α 0.21 0.34 0.49 0.76
The design compressive strength Pd of a compression member is given by the relation:
𝑃 < 𝑃𝑑
Where
𝑃𝑑 = 𝐴𝑒𝑓𝑐𝑑
Where 𝐴𝑐 = effective cross-sectional area of the member
𝑓 𝑐𝑑=design compressive stress computed by using the following equation:
𝑓𝑐𝑑 =
𝑓𝑦𝛾𝑚0
𝛷2 − 𝜆2 0.5=
𝑓𝑦𝜒
𝛾𝑚0≤
𝑓𝑦
𝛾𝑚0
Where ф = 0.5 1 + 𝛼 𝜆 − 0 + 𝜆2
𝜆 = non- dimensional effective slenderness ratio
= 𝑓𝑦
𝑓𝑐𝑐=
𝑓𝑦 𝐾𝐿
𝑟
2
𝜋2𝐸
𝑓𝑐𝑐= Euler buckling stress = 𝜋2𝐸
𝐾𝐿
𝑟
2
Where 𝐾𝐿
𝑟 = effective slenderness ratio or ratio of effective length, KL to
approximate radius of gyration, r
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 243
Table 15.2
α = imperfection factor compiled in table
χ = stress reduction factor as shown in the table for different buckling classes,
slenderness ratios and yield stresses.
1
ф + Φ2 − λ2 0.5
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 244
𝜆 𝑚0= partial factor of safety for material strength.
The calculated values of the design compressive stress, fcd for different
buckling classes a, b, c or d are compiled in table no.2 for different types rolled steel
cross-section such as I, channel, angle, tee, solid and built –up sections. The stress
reduction factor χ and design compressive stress fcd for different buckling classes,
yield stresses and effective slenderness ratios is compiled in the code book and these
are useful in design computations. In addition, the curves corresponding to different
buckling classes are shown in non- dimensional form in the figure below.
2. Effective length of compression members: the effective length of
compression members depends upon the end support conditions influencing
the rotation and translation of the member. The end conditions are either
restrained or free depending upon the type construction at supports. The actual
length is generally taken from centre to centre of its intersections with a free
end, the free end standing length from the centre of the intersecting member at
the supported end is considered as the actual length.
If L is the actual length of the compression member, the effective length varies
from 0.65L to 2L depending upon the type of support and boundary conditions.
The effective length KL can be calculated using table no.3 for different types of
boundary conditions encountered in practice.
In case of bolted, riveted or welded trusses and braces frames, the effective
length, KL of the compression members should be taken as 0.7 to 1.0 times the
distance between centre's of connections, depending on the degree of end restraint
provided by the connection. In the case of members of trusses, effective length,
KL is taken as the distance between the centre's of intersection.
3. Column bases:column bases should be designed to have sufficient strength
and stiffness to transmit the axial force, bending moments and shear forces
developed at the base of the columns without exceeding the load carrying
capacity of the supports. Suitable anchor bolts and shear keys are designed
whenever necessary.
The nominal bearing pressure between the base plate and the support may be
determined on the basis of linearly varying distribution of pressure. The maximum
bearing pressure should not exceed the bearing strength should exceed the bearing
strength which is limited to 0.6fck, where
fck = smaller of the characteristic cube strength of concrete or bedding material
In case where the base plate is larger than the required to limit the bearing
pressure, an equal projection c of the base plate beyond the face of the column and
gusset may be taken as effective in transferring the column load as shown in the
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 245
table no.2, such that the bearing pressure on the effective area does not exceed the
bearing capacity of the concrete base.
When a column is provided with a slab base, the minimum thickness, ts of the
rectangular slab base supporting the column under axial compression is calculated
by the relation
𝑡𝑠 = (2.5𝑤(𝑎^2 − 0.3𝑏^2 ) 𝛾𝑚0 )
𝑓𝑦 > 𝑡𝑓
Table 15.3
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 246
FIG : Effective area of base plate
Where w = uniform pressure from below, on th slab base under the factored load axial
compression.
𝑎, 𝑏 = larger and smaller projection, respectively of the slab base beyond the
rectangle circumscribing the column
𝑡𝑓 = flange thickness of compression member.
When only the effective area of the base plate is used, 𝑐2 may be used in the above
equation instead of 𝑎2 − 0.3𝑏2 .
4. Design of lacings: columns comprising two main components are generally
Tied together by lacings and battens for composite action. Typical examples of
different types of lacings used in columns are shown in the figure given below
The following specifications are applicable for design of laced columns:
a) The lacing is proportioned to resist a total transverse shear Vt at at any
point in the member equal to at least 2.5 percent of the axial force in the
member and shall be divided equality among all transverse lacing systems
in parallel planes.
b) The slenderness ratio (KL/r) of the lacing bars should not exceed 145. The
effective length of the lacing bars should be taken as he length between the
inner end fasteners of the bars for single lacing and 0.7 times the distance
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 247
between the inner ends of welds connecting the lacing bars to the member.
The effective slenderness ratio (KL/r)e, of laced columns should be taken
as 1.05 times the (KL/r)0 , the actual maximum slenderness ratio, in order
to account for shear deformation effects.
c) The minimum width of lacing bars in bolted/riveted connections should be
three times the nominal diameter of the end bolt or rivet.
d) The thickness of the lacing bars should be less not than one-fortieth of its
effective length for double lacings. The inclination of the lacings and one-
sixtieth of the effective length for double lacings. The inclination of the
lacing bars should lie in the range of 40 to 70 degrees to the axis of the
member.
The maximum spacing of lacing bars should be such that maximum
slenderness ratio of the components of the main member between consecutive
lacing connections is not greater than 50 to 0.7 times the most unfavorable
slenderness ratio of the member as a whole, whichever is less.
5. Design of battens: compression members built up of two components
connected by battens should preferably have the same cross-section
symmetrically arranged about their major axis.
The code also recommends that the compression member should have
a radius of gyration about the axis perpendicular to the plane of the batten not
less than the radius of gyration about the axis parallel to the plane of the batten
as shown in the figure
The following specifications are applicable for the design of battens:
(a.) Battens are designed to resist the bending moment and transverse shear
force Vt equal to 2.5 per cent of the total axial force on the whole
compression member. They are also designed to resist simultaneously a
shear force and a moment computed by the equations
𝑉𝑏 = 𝑉𝑡 𝑐
𝑁𝑆 And 𝑀 =
𝑉𝑡 𝐶
2𝑁
Where Vt = transverse shear force as defined above
C = distance between centre- to-centre of battens in the longitudinal
direction
N = number of parallel planes of battens
S = minimum transverse distance between the centroid of the rivet/bolt
group/ welding connecting the batten to the main member.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 248
(b.) The thickness of the plates used as battens should be not less than one-
fortieth of the distance between the inner-most connecting line of rivets,
bolts or welds, the end battens should have an effective depth,
longitudinally not less than the perpendicular distance between the
centroids of the main members.
The intermediate battens should have an effective depth of not more
than three quarters of this distance, but in no case should the effective depth of
any batten be less than twice the width of one member, in the plane of the
battens. The effective depth of the batten is taken as the longitudinal distance
between the outer-most bolts, rivets or welds at the ends.
(c.) The spacing of the battens, centre-to-centre of its end fastenings, should be
such that the slenderness ratio (KL/r) of any component over that distance
should not exceed a value of 50, nor be greater than 0.7 times the
slenderness ratio of the member as a whole about its axis parallel to the
battens (z – z).
(d.) Tie plates, members provided at the ends of battened or laced members,
should also be designed in the same method as battens.
Design of flexural member:
General aspects: flexural members such as beams should have adequate design
strength to resist the bending moments and shear forces resulting from impose loads.
In addition, they should satisfy the serviceability criteria comprising the deflection
limits specified in the table no.4 for different types of structural members. The
maximum deflection under service loads should not exceed the limits expressed as a
function of the span given in the code. The effective span of the beam is generally
taken as the distance the centre of the supports.
Design strength in flexure: the following specifications govern the design of flexural
members. Flexural members adequately supported against lateral torsion buckling
(laterally supported beams) are governed by the yield stress. The factored design
moment, M at any section, in a beam due to external loads should satisfy the relation
𝑀 ≤ 𝑀𝑑
Where 𝑀𝑑= design bending strength of the section
a.) The design bending strength of a section which is not susceptible to web
buckling under shear before yielding and factored design shear force does
not exceed 0.6 Vd, where Vd is the design shear strength of the cross-
section, bending strength Md is calculated by the relation
𝑀𝑑 =𝛽𝑏𝑍𝑝𝑓𝑦
𝛾𝑚0
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 249
Where 𝛽𝑏 = 1.0 for plastic and compact sections
= 𝑍𝑒
𝑍𝑝 for semi-compact sections
𝑍𝑝 = plastic and elastic section modulii of the cross- section,
respectively
𝑓𝑦 = yield stress of the material
𝛾𝑚0= partial safety factor
To avoid irreversible deformation under serviceability loads Md should b less
than [1.2𝑍_𝑒 𝑓_𝑦 ]
𝛾𝑚 0 in case of simply supported and
[1.5𝑍_𝑒 𝑓_𝑦 ]
𝛾𝑚 0 in cantilever beams.
b.) In the case of laterally supported beams, the resistance to lateral torsional
buckling need not be checked separately in the following cases:
1) Bending is about the minor axis of the section
2) Section is hollow (rectangular/tubular) or solid bars,
3) In case of bending about the axis, the non-dimensional slenderness
ratio (γLT) is less than 0.4.
The design loading strength of laterally unsupported bemas as governed by
lateral torsional buckling is calculated by the relation
𝑀𝑑 = 𝛽𝑝 𝑍𝑝 𝑓𝑏𝑑
Where 𝑓𝑏𝑑 = design bending compressive stress, computed as
= 𝜒𝐿𝑇 𝑓𝑦
𝛾𝑚 0
𝜒𝐿𝑇= bending stress reduction factor to account for lateral torsional
buckling, given by the relation:
𝜒𝐿𝑇 = 1
ф𝐿𝑇 + ф𝐿𝑇2 − 𝜆𝐿𝑇
2 0.5 ≤ 1.0
ф𝐿𝑇 = 0.5 1 + 𝛼𝐿𝑇 𝜆𝐿𝑇 − 0.2 + 𝜆𝐿𝑇2
The imperfection parameter 𝛼𝐿𝑇 is given by
𝛼𝐿𝑇 = 0.21 for rolled steel section
𝛼𝐿𝑇 = 0.49 for welded steel section
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 250
The non-dimensional slenderness ratio, 𝜆𝐿𝑇 is given by the relation
𝜆𝐿𝑇 = 𝛽𝑏 𝑍𝑝 𝑓𝑦
𝑀𝑐𝑟≤
1.2𝑍𝑒𝑓𝑦
𝑀𝑐𝑟=
𝑓𝑦
𝑓𝑐𝑟 ,𝑏
Where 𝑓𝑐𝑟 ,𝑏 = extreme fiber bending compressive stress
𝑀𝑐𝑟 = elastic critical moment calculated by the expression
𝑀𝑐𝑟 = 𝜋2𝐸𝐼𝑤
𝐿𝐿𝑇 2 𝐺𝐼𝑡 + 𝜋2𝐸𝐼𝑤
𝐿𝐿𝑇 2 = 𝛽𝑏 𝑍𝑟 𝑓𝑐𝑟 ,𝑏
The extreme fiber bending compressive stress 𝑓𝑐𝑟 ,𝑏 of non-slender rolled steel
sections in the above equation may be approximately calculated from the
values from steel tables which have been prepared using the following
equation:
𝑓𝑐𝑟 ,𝑏 = 1.1𝜋2𝐸
𝐿𝐿𝑇𝑇𝑦
2
1 +1
20
𝐿𝐿𝑇𝑇𝑦ℎℎ𝑡𝑓
2
0.5
CALCULATIONS:
1. Selection of Trial Section:
Length of the column = 3.2 m
Effective length of column
Load = 574.253 kN
𝒍 = 𝟎. 𝟖𝟓𝐋 = 𝟎. 𝟖𝟓𝐱𝟑. 𝟐𝐱𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎 = 𝟐𝟕𝟐𝟎 𝐦𝐦
In order to support load, the slenderness ratio of the rolled steel column
and the value of yield stress for the steel may be taken 60 and 250 N/mm2
respectively.
Allowable working stress from IS: 800-1984
𝜎𝑎𝑐 = 122 N/mm2
Effective sectional area required = 574.253x100
122= 4706.99 mm2
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 251
2. Properties of Trial Section:
From steel table try ISWB600A @ 1.451 kN/m section.
Sectional area A = 18486 mm2
Radius of gyration 𝑟𝑥𝑥 = 250.1 𝑚𝑚
𝑟𝑦𝑦 = 53.5 𝑚𝑚
3. Slenderness Ratio:
𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 53.5 𝑚𝑚
Slenderness ratio 𝑙
𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛=
2720
53.5= 50.84
4. Check for Safe Load:
From IS: 800-1984, allowable axial stress in compression for having yield stress
250 N/mm2
𝑓𝑦 = 250 N/mm2
𝜆 = 50 𝜎𝑎𝑐 = 132
𝜆 = 60 𝜎𝑎𝑐 = 122
𝜆 = 50.84 𝜎𝑎𝑐 = ?
𝜎𝑎𝑐 = 122 − 132 − 122
60 − 50 60 − 50.84 = 112.84 N/mm2
Safe load carrying capacity
p = 112.84x18486
1000 = 2085.96 kN
Hence, safe.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 252
16. DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS
Design of connections and splices is a critical aspect of the design process.
Because each fabricator has unique equipment and methods, the detailed
configuration of connections plays an important part in determining the cost of the
fabricated product. Consequently, the detailed design of these elements is a part of the
work performed by the fabricator. In the industry, this work is known as detailing.
Usually, the structural engineer indicates the type of connections and type and
size of fasteners required; for example, “framed connections with 7/8 inches in A325
bolts in bearing-type joints,” or the type of connection with reference to IS:800
requirements. For beams, the design drawings should specify the reactions. If, how –
ever, the reactions are not noted, the detailer will determine the reactions from the
uniform load capacity (tabulated in IS steel manual), giving due considerations to the
effect of large concentrated loads near the connection. For connections resisting
lateral loads, live, wind, or seismic, the design drawing should stipulate the forces and
moments to be carried. Generally, the design should also include a sketch showing the
type of moment connection desired.
The various types of connections used for connecting the structural members
are given below:
1. Riveted connections.
2. Bolted connections.
3. Welded connections.
These connections are named after the type of fastening (viz., rivets, bolts and
nuts, pins and welds) used for connecting the structural members.
1. Rivets :
A piece of round steel forged in place to connect two or more than two steel members
together is known as rivet. The rivet for structural purposes are manufactured from
mild steel and high tensile rivet bars. A rivet consists of a head and a body. The body
of rivet is termed as shank. The rivets are manufactured in different lengths to suit
different purposes. The sizes of rivets is expressed by the diameter of the shank.
For driving the rivets, they are heated till they become red hot and are then
placed in the hole. Keeping the rivets pressed from one side, a number of blows are
applied and a head at other end is formed. The hot-driven rivets are divided into
following three types, according to the method of rivet-driving.
1. Power driven rivets.
2. Hand driven rivets.
3. Field rivets.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 253
i) Rivet heads:
The proportions of various shapes of rivet heads have been expressed in terms
of diameter „D‟ of shank of rivet. The snap head is also termed as round head and
button head. The snap heads are used for rivets connecting structural members. The
countersunk heads are used to provide a flush surface.
ii) Rivet holes:
The rivet holes are made in the plates or structural members by one of the following
methods:
1. Punching
2. Drilling.
When the rivet holes are made by punching , the holes are not perfect, but
taper. A punch damages the material around the hole. The operation known as
reaming is done in the hole made by punching.
When the rivet holes are made by drilling, the holes are perfect and provide
good alignment for driving the rivets.
The diameter of a rivet hole is made larger than the nominal diameter of the
rivet by 1.5 mm of rivets less than or equal to 25 mm diameter and by 2 mm for
diameters exceeding 25 mm.
Riveted joint:
The riveted joints are of two types:
1. Lap joint
a. Single riveted lap joint
i. Chain riveted lap joint
b. Double riveted lap joint
i. Zigzag riveted lap joint
2. Butt joint
a. Single cover butt joint
b. Double cover butt joint
16.1 Transmission of load in riveted joint:
There are two modes of transmission of load in riveted joints. When the load is
transmitted by bearing between plates and shanks of rivets, the rivets are subjected to
shear. When the shear of rivets is only across one cross section of the rivet, it is
known as single shear. When the shear of rivet is across two cross-section of the
rivet, it is known as double shear.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 254
16.2 Failure of Riveted Joint:
The failure of a riveted joint may take place in any of the following ways:
1. Shear failure of rivets
2. Shear failure of plates
3. Tearing failure of plates
4. Bearing failure of plates
5. Splitting failure of plates at the edges.
6. Bearing failure of rivets
16.3 Arrangements of Rivets
The rivets in a riveted joint are arranged into two forms:
1. Chain riveting
2. Diamond riveting
16.4 Specifications for design of riveted joints:
1. Members meeting at joint.
The centroidal axes of the members meeting at a joint should intersect at one
point, and if there is any eccentricity. Adequate resistance should be provided in the
connection.
2. The centre of gravity of group of rivets should be on the line of action of load
whenever practicable.
3. Pitch:
Minimum pitch: The distance between centres of adjacent rivets should not be
less than 2.5 times the gross diameter of the rivet.
Maximum pitch
(i) The maximum pitch should not exceed 12t or 200 mm whichever is less in
compression member, and 16t or 200 mm whichever is less in case of tension
member, when the line of rivets lies in the direction of stress. In the case of
compression members in which the forces are transferred through the butting faces,
this distance shall not exceed 4.5 times the diameter of the rivets for a distance from
the abutting faces equal to 1.5 times the width of the member.
(ii) The distance between centers of any two consecutive rivets in a line adjacent and
parallel to an edge of an outside plate shall not exceed (100mm + 4t) or 200 mm,
whichever is less in compression or tension members.
(iii)When the rivets are staggered at equal intervals and the gauges does not exceed 75
mm, the distances specified in Para i and ii between centres of rivets may be
increased by 50 percent.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 255
(iv) If the line of rivets (including tacking rivets) does lie in the direction of stress,
the maximum pitch should not exceed 32 t or 300 mm whichever is less where t is the
thickness of the thinner outside plate.
4. Edge distance:
A minimum edge distance of approximately 1.5 times the gross diameter of
the rivet measured from the centre of the rivet hole is provided in the riveted joint
Table 16.1
Edge distance of holes
Gross diameter of rivet
mm
Edge Distance of Hole
distance to sheared or
hand flame cut edge
mm
Distance to rolled
machine flame cut or
planed edge
Mm
13.5 & below 19 17
15.5 25 22
17.5 29 25
19.5 32 29
21.5 32 29
23.5 38 32
25.5 44 38
29.0 51 44
32.0 57 51
35.0 57 51
5. Rivets through packing’s:
The rivets carrying calculated shear stress through a packing greater than 6
mm thick shall be increased above number required by normal calculations by 2.5
percent for each 2 mm thickness of packing. For double shear connections packed
on both sides, the number of additional rivets required shall be determined from the
thickness of the thicker packing. The additional rivets should preferably be placed in
an extension of the packing. When the properly fitted packing are subjected to direct
compression, then, the above mentioned specifications shall not apply.
6. Long grip rivets
When the grip of rivets carrying calculated loads exceeds 6 times the diameter
of the holes, then, the rivets are subjected to bending in addition to shear and bearing.
The number of rivets required by normal calculations shall be increased by not less
than one percent for each additional 1.6 mm of grip, but the grip shall not exceed 8
times the diameter of the holes.
7. Rivet line distance
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 256
When two or more parts are connected together, a line of rivet shall be
provided at a distance of not more than 37 mm + 4t from the nearest edge where t is
the thickness in mm of thinner outside plate. In case steel work is not exposed to
weather, this may be increased to 12t
8. Tacking rivets:
When the maximum distance between centres of two adjacent rivets
connecting the members subjected to either compression or tension exceeds the
maximum pitch, then, the tacking rivets not subjected to calculated stresses shall be
used
The tacking rivets shall have a pitch in line not exceeding 32 times the
thickness of the outside plate or 300 mm whichever is less. Wherever the plates are
exposed to the weather, the pitch in line not exceed 16 times the thickness of the
outside plate or 200 mm , whichever is less. In both cases, the lines of rivets shall not
be apart at a distance greater than these pitches.
For the design and construction composed of two flats, angles, channels or tees in
contact back or separated back to back by a distance not exceeding the aggregate
thickness of the connected parts, tacking rivets with solid distance pieces where the
parts are separated, shall be provided at a pitch in line not exceeding 1000 mm.
16.5 Design procedure for riveted joint:
For the design of a lap joint or butt joint the thickness of plates to be joined are
known and the joint is designed for the full strength of the plate. For the design of a
structural steel work, force (pull or push) to be transmitted by the joint is known and
riveted joint can be designed. Following are the usual steps for the design of a riveted
joint:
Step1: The size of the rivet is determined for the unwin‟s formula i.e.,
𝑑 = 6.04 (𝑡)1
2
Where t = thickness of plate in mm
d = nominal diameter of rivet
The diameter of the rivet computed is rounded off to available size of rivets.
The rivets are manufactured in nominal diameters of 12, 14, 16 .18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 33,
36, 39, 42 and 48mm.
In structural steel work, rivets of nominal diameter of 16, 18, 20 and 22 mm are used.
The nominal diameter of rivets to be used in a joint is assumed.
Step 2: The strength of rivets in shearing and bearing are computed. The working
stress in rivets and plates are adopted as per BIS. The rivet value R is found. For
designing lap joint or butt joint tearing strength of plate is determined as under:
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 257
𝑃𝑡 = 𝑔 − 𝑑 . 𝑡. 𝜎𝑡𝑓
Where g = gauge of rivets to be adopted
t = thickness of plate
𝜎𝑡𝑓 = working stress in direct tension for plate
The tearing strength of plate should not exceed the rivet value R( Ps or Pb which ever
is less) or
𝑔 − 𝑑 . 𝑡. 𝜎𝑡𝑓 ≤ 𝑅
From this relation gauge of the rivets is determined.
In structural steel work, force to be transmitted by the riveted joint and the
rivet value are known. Hence number of rivets requested to be provided in the joint
can be computed, as follows:
No. of rivets required in the joint = force
rivet value
The number of rivets thus obtained is provided on one side of the joint and an
equal number of rivets is provided on the other side of joint also.
For the design of joint in a tie member consisting of a flat, width/thickness of
the flat is known. The section is assumed to be reduced by rivet holes, depending
upon the arrangement of rivets to be provided. The strength of flat at weakest section
is equated to the pull transmitted at the joint.
𝑏 − 𝑑 . 𝑡. 𝜎𝑡𝑓 = P
16.6 Bolted Connections:
Introduction
Structural steel members are usually assembled using different types of
elements such as plates, angles, channels, tee and I-sections. Connections are made
using rivets or bolts to transfer the forces and moments from one member to another.
They are also required to extend the length of the members. The connections should
be designed to avoid the failure of the fasteners before the failure of the principal
member.
Design principals of connections
16.6.1 Design strength
The evaluation of design strength of connection should be evaluated using the
partial safety factors compiled in table of load combinations. In general, connection
failure may be avoided by adopting a higher safety for the joints than the members.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 258
16.6.2 Spacing of fasteners
The minimum spacing between the centre of a fastener should be not less than
2.5 times the diameter of the fastener. The maximum spacing between the centre of
any two adjacent fasteners should not exceed 32 t or 300 mm, whichever is less,
where f is the thickness of the thinner plate.
Also the distance between the centres of two adjacent fasteners (pitch ) in a
line lying in the direction of stress, should not exceed 16t or 200 mm, whichever less,
in tension members; and 12t or 200mm , whichever is less in compression members,
where f is the thickness of the thinner plate.
16.6.3 Edge and end distance
The minimum and end distances from the centre of any hole to the nearest
edge of a plate should be not less than 1.7 times the hole diameter in case of sheared
or hand-flame cut edge; 1.5 times the hole diameter in case of rolled, machine-flame
cut, sawn and plane edges.
The maximum edge distance to the nearest line of fasteners from an edge of
any un-stiffened part should not exceed 12tε, where ε=(250/fy)0.5
and t is the
thickness of the thinner outer plate. This clause is not applicable to fasteners
interconnecting the components of back-to-back tension members. Where the
members are exposed to corrosive influences, the maximum edge distance should not
exceed 40 mm plus 4t, where t is the thickness of the thinner connected plate.
The bolt diameter, pitch edge distances as per IS: 800-2007 are compiled in
table given below.
Table :16.2 Bolt diameter, pitch and edge distances
Nominal diameter of bolt(mm) 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 27 30 Above
36
Diameter of hole(mm)
13
15
18
20
22
24
26
30
33
Bolt dia.
+ 3 mm
Minimum edge distance(mm)
For sheared or rough edge 20 26 30 34 37 40 44 51 56 1.7 x
hole
diameter
For rolled, sawn, or planed edge 19 23 27 30 33 36 39 45 50 1.5 x
hole
diameter
Maximum edge distance = 12tε, where ε=(250/fy)0.5
Maximum pitch = 2.5 x nominal diameter of bolt
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 259
Maximum pitch = 32 t or 300 mm
(a) Parts in tension = 16 t or 200 mm whichever is less
(b) Parts in compression = 12 t or 200 mm whichever is less
16.6.4 Bearing type bolts in shear
The design strength of the bolt Vdsb based on shear strength is given by the relation:
𝑉𝑑𝑠𝑏 = 𝑉𝑛𝑠𝑏
𝛾𝑚𝑏
Where Vnsb = nominal shear capacity of a bolt, computed as
𝑉𝑛𝑠𝑏 = 𝑓𝑢
3 𝑛𝑛𝐴𝑛𝑏 + 𝑛𝑠𝐴𝑠𝑏 𝛽𝑖𝑗 𝛽𝑙𝑔𝛽𝑝𝑘
Where fu = ultimate tensile strength of bolt
nn = number of shear planes with threads intercepting the shear plane
ns = number of shear planes without threads intercepting the shear plane
Asb = nominal plain shank area of the bolt
Anb = net shear area of the bolt at threads, may be taken as the area corresponding to
root diameter at the thread
βij = reduction factor for the overloading of end bolts
βlg = reduction factor for the effect of large grip length
βpk = reduction factor for packing plates in excess of 6mm
The reduction factors are computed using the following relations:
𝛽𝑖𝑗 = 1.075 − 𝑙𝑗
(200𝑑) but 0.75 ≤ βij ≤ 1.0
= 1.075 − 0.005 𝑙
𝑑
Where d = nominal diameter of the fastener.
When the grip length, lg (equal to the total thickness of the connected plates) exceeds
5 times the diameter, d of the bolts, the design shear capacity should be reduced by a
factor βlg, given by
𝛽𝑙𝑔 = 8𝑑
3𝑑 + 𝑙𝑔=
8
(3 + 𝑙𝑔 𝑑)
Also 𝛽𝑙𝑔 should not exceed 𝛽𝑖𝑗 and the grip length, lg should in no case be greater
than 8d. the design shear capacity of bolts carrying shear through a packing plate in
excess of 6 mm should be decreased by a factor of 𝛽𝑝𝑘 given by a relation,
𝛽𝑝𝑘 = (1 − 0.0125𝑡𝑝𝑘 )
Where tpk = thickness of the thicker packing expressed in mm.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 260
16.6.5 Bolts in Tension
The nominal strength capacity of bolt Tnb depends on the ultimate tensile strength of
the bolt and the net tensile stress area. The factored tensile force, Tb should satisfy the
relation:
𝑇𝑏 ≤ 𝑇𝑑𝑏
Where
𝑇𝑑𝑏 = 𝑇𝑛𝑏
𝛾𝑚𝑏
Tnb = nominal tensile capacity of the bolt, calculated as:
(0.90𝑓𝑢𝑏𝐴𝑛) < 𝑓𝑢𝑏𝐴𝑛 𝛾𝑚𝑏
𝛾𝑚0
Where fub = ultimate tensile stress of the bolt
fyb = yield stress of the bolt
An = net tensile stress area at the bottom of the thread of the bolt
Asb = shank area of the bolt
γmb = partial safety factor for ultimate stress = 1.25
γm0 = partial safety factor yield stress = 1.10
The design capacity of ordinary bolts (Grade 4.6) based on the net cross-sectional
area in tension and single shear are compiled in Table
Table : 16.3 design capacity of ordinary bolts ( Grade 4.6)
Bolt size
diameter
d(mm)
Tensile
stress area
(Anb)(mm2)
Tension
capacity Tb
(KN) tnb =
272 Mpa
Single
shear
capacity,
Vsb(kN)
vnsb = 185
Mpa
Minimum
thickness of
ply for bolt
bearing vnpb
= 800 Mpa
tbb = tc, mm
(12) 84.3 22.9 15.6 1.6
16 157.0 42.7 29.0 2.3
20 245.0 66.6 45.3 2.8
(22) 303.0 82.4 56.0 3.2
24 353.0 96.0 65.3 3.4
(27) 469.0 124.8 84.9 3.9
30 561.0 152.5 103.8 4.3
36 817.0 222.2 151.1 5.2
𝑻𝒃
= 𝑨𝒏𝒃𝒕𝒏𝒃
𝑽𝒔𝒃
= 𝑨𝒏𝒃𝒗𝒏𝒔𝒃 𝒕𝒃𝒃 = 𝑽𝒏𝒑𝒃
𝒅𝒗𝒏𝒑𝒃
Sizes in
brackets not
preferred
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 261
16.7 Welded Connections:
General features
Welded connections result in considerable savings in material. It has the added
advantage of rapidity of construction of complicated steel structures involving the
assembly of several individual steel components into an integrated steel structure.
Welding obviates the formation of holes in the member and permit design based on
continuity at supports resulting in economy of material. Welding offers airtight and
watertight jointing of structural elements and hence is employed in the construction of
water/oil storage tanks, ships etc. Welded connections are usually aesthetic in
appearance and appear less clustered in comparison with bolted connections.
In addition, welded connections improve the rigidity of the complete structure
resulting in superior structural behavior at various limit states. Proper workmanship is
essential to produce structurally sound and effective welds connecting structural, steel
components. In the case of normal steel structures arc welding is adopted and the
design of welds should conform to the Indian Standard Codes IS: 816 and IS: 9595.
16.7.1 Types of welds
The most common types of welds used in steel structures are
(a) Fillet welds
(b) Butt welds
(c) Plug welds
(d) Slot welds
Fillet welds are the most commonly used type to connect structural
components meeting at an angle (generally between 60 and 120 degrees), while butt
or groove welds are used to connect horizontal members.
(a) Fillet weld
The size of fillet weld should be not less than 3 mm. The size of the fillet
weld is generally taken as the minimum leg length and is related to the thickness of
the connected member as detailed in Table given below:
Table :16.4 minimum size of the fillet weld (Table 21 of IS: 800-2007)
SI
No.
Thickness of
thicker part
(mm)
Minimum size
of weld
(mm)
Over Up to and
including
(1) (2) (3) (4)
i) - 10 3
ii) 10 20 5
iii) 20 32 6
iv) 32 50 10
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 262
For purposes of stress calculation in fillet welds joining faces inclined to each other,
the effective throat thickness should be taken as K times the fillet size, where K is a
constant, depending upon the angle between the fusion faces. As compiled in Table
given below.
Table:16.4 values of K for different angles between fusion faces.
Angle
between
Fusion
Faces
600
910 101
0 107
0 114
0
to to to to to
910
1000
1060
1130
1200
Constant
K
0.70 0.65 0.60 0.55 0.50
The effective length of fillet weld is taken as the length of specified size and
required throat thickness, with minimum length not less than four times the size of the
weld.
Design strength of a fillet weld, fwd is based on the throat area and is compute
as
𝐹𝑤𝑑 = 𝑓𝑤𝑛
𝛾𝑚𝑤
Where 𝑓𝑤𝑛 = 𝑓𝑢
3
fu = smaller of the ultimate stress of the weld or of the parent metal
𝛾𝑚𝑤 = partial safety factor
(b) Butt welds
When the joining plates are of equal thickness, the butt weld size is defined by
the throat thickness, taken as the thickness of the plate. If the joining plates are of
unequal thickness, the size of the weld corresponds to the thickness of the thinner
plate. The design strength of butt welds depends upon the throat thickness and the
stresses are limited to those permitted in the parent metal. However for site welds, the
partial safety factor 𝛾𝑚𝑤 = 1.5.
(c) Plug and Slot welds
Plug and slot weld s are not used exclusively in steel construction. When it is
not possible to use fillet welds or when the length of the fillet weld is limited, plug
and slot welds are used to supplement fillet welds. Plug welds are occasionally used
to fill up holes in construction, such as beam-to-column seat angles where temporary
erection bolts have been placed to align members prior to welding. The penetration of
these welds into base metal is difficult to ascertain. Moreover the inspection of these
welds is difficult. Hence, they are normally not used to connect members subjected to
tensile forces. Slot and plug welds are useful in preventing overlapping parts from
buckling.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 263
16.8 Design of beam column connection
Beam ISHB 200
D=250 mm; b=250 mm;
tf =9.7 mm; tw =6.9 mm;
Column ISWB 600A
D=600 mm; b=250 mm;
tf =23.6 mm; tw =11.8 mm;
yield stress = 245 N/mm2
Moment M = 52 kN-m
Axial A = 71.80 kN
Shear R = 4 kN
Bolt Design
Flange force = M
D−tw -
R
2
= 52x1000
250−6.9 -
4
2
= 237.4 kN
Assuming 4 No's 16 mm diameter bolts
Tension on each bolts = 237.4/4
= 59.35 kN
From AISC Manual 89
Allowable tension in SI units
= 44 x πxd 2
4 x 25.42 x 4.448
= 61 kN
Allowable tension is greater than actual tension
Hence safe
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 264
Flange to end plate weld
= force on flange
(1.024 𝑥 2𝑥 𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 )
= 237.4 x10
(1.024 𝑥 2𝑥 250)
= 4.64 mm weld
Effective end plate width (pb) = bf+50
= 250+50
= 300 mm
Centre of bolt to centre of
Flange distance (pf) = 40 mm
Effective bolt distance (Pe) = (𝑝𝑓 −𝑡𝑓
2) -(
𝑑𝑖𝑎
4)-0.707x thickness of
weld
= (40-9.7/2)-16/4-0.707x4.64
= 27.8719 mm
Thickness of plate required
Partial safety factor (Ca) = 1.13
Ratio of area of flange to area of web
(Af/Aw) = (250x9.7)/(250x6.9) = 1.41
Ratio of effective bolt distance to diameter of bolt
(Pe)/(d) = 27.8719/16 = 1.74
Ratio of width of flange to width of base plate
(Cb) = 250/300 = 0.83
∝ = 𝐶𝑎. 𝐶𝑏 𝐴𝑓
𝐴𝑤
13
(𝑝𝑒
𝑑𝑖𝑎)1/4
∝ = 1.212
Moment in plate Mp= ∝ x flange force x eff bolt distance/4
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 265
= 2002686.87 Nmm
Required plate thickness = 6Mp
o.75fypb
= 6x2004686 .87
o.75x365x300
=12.45 mm
Beam to end plate weld size
Min weld size = 5 mm
Required weld to develop max web tension stress (0.6fy) in web near flanges
= 0.6fy .tw
2x10.24
= 0.6x245
2x10.24x10
= 4.952 mm
Provide 5 mm weld
Provide 300 mm wide and 12.45 mm connection plate.
Use 4 No's 16 mm dia bolts each side
Welds
Flange to end plate = 4.64 mm
Web to end plate = 5.00 mm
16.9 Design of Main beam-Joist connection
Secondary beam ISJB [email protected] kN/m
Main Beam ISHB [email protected] kN/m
Shear force on Main beam from joist = 17 kN
Assuming 8.8 Grade 12 mm diameter bolts and
No of bolts on main beam (Nm) = 3
No of bolts on secondary beam (Ns) = 3
Yield strength of bolts fy = 345 N/mm2
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 266
Allowable shear = 0.25πd2Nm x0.4fy
1000
= 0.25πd1223 x0.4x345
1000
= 46.80 kN
Allowable shear > Actual shear, hence safe
Using ISA 90x90x6 as cleat angle
Shear stress in cleat angle = 1.5 x F
2xdxt
= 1.5 x 17 𝑥103
2𝑥90𝑥8
= 17.7 N/mm2
Max shear stress = 0.45fy = 0.45x250
= 112.5 N/mm2 safe
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 267
17. COLUMN BASES
Beams transfer the load to the column and the column transfer their loads to
the soil through column bases resting over concrete or masonry blocks. A column
base distributes the load over a greater area so that the pressure on the concrete block
does not exceed the permissible bearing stress
Column base should be designed to have sufficient strength and stiffness to
transmit the axial force, bending moments and shear forces developed at the base of
the columns without exceeding the load carrying capacity of the supports. Suitable
anchor bolts and shear keys are designed wherever necessary.
The nominal bearing pressure between the base plate and the support may be
determined on the basis of linearly varying distribution of pressure. The maximum
bearing pressure should not exceed the bearing strength which is limited to 0.6fck,
where.
fck= smaller of the characteristic cube strength of concrete
In cases where the base plate is larger than that required to limit the bearing
pressure, an equal projection c of the base plate beyond the face of the column and
gusset may be taken as effective in transferring the column load given in fig. below
such that the bearing pressure on the effective area does not exceed the bearing
capacity of the concrete base.
When a column is provided with a slab base, the minimum thickness, ts of the
rectangular slab base supporting the column under axial compression is calculated by
the relation
𝑡𝑠 = 2.5𝑤(𝑎2 − 0.3𝑏2)𝛾𝑚0
𝑓𝑦 > 𝑡𝑓
There are three types of column bases which are generally used
1. Slab base
2. Gusseted base
3. Grillage foundation
17.1 Slab Base:
The consists of a base plate underneath a column end which is machined so as
to have a complete bearing on the plate. The column is properly secured to the base
plate by means of fastenings as shown.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 268
Fastenings are simply used to secure it with the base plate and secondly to
resist all moments and forces due to transit, unloading and erection. Those are not
designed to resist the direct compression in the column.\
Design of a Slab Base and Concrete block:
The following steps are to be followed when axial load to which the column is
subjected is known
1. Calculating the bearing area (A) of the base plate
Bearing Area = Axial load in the column
permissible compressive stress in concrete ,𝐴 =
P
𝜎𝑐
2. Assuming the shape of base plate to be square calculating the size of one side.
If it is rectangular calculate the length and breadth of the base plate. Arrange
the section of the column centrally on the base plate
3. Calculate the thickness of base plate as per
IS: 800-1984 (5.4.3).
𝑡 = 3𝑤
𝜎𝑏𝑠 𝑎2 −
𝑏2
4
Where t = slab thickness, (mm)
w= the pressure or loading on the underside of base (Mpa)
a= the greater projection of the plate beyond column
b= the lesser projection of the plate beyond column
𝜎bs= the permissible bending stress in slab bases = 185 Mpa for all
steels.
If a square base plate is used for solid round steel column, the
thickness of the plate will be taken as.
𝑡 = 10 90𝑤
16𝜎𝑏𝑠x
B
B − d0
Where, t= thickness of plate (mm)
w= the total axial load, (kN)
B= the length of side of cape or base (mm)
𝜎bs = permissible bending stress in slab base = 185 Mpa for all
steels
d0= diameter of the reduced end (if any) of the column (mm)
The cap or base plate should not be less than 1.5 (d0 + 75) mm in
length or diameter.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 269
17.2cGusseted Base:
A gusseted base consists of base plate connected to the column through gusset
plates. The thickness of base plate in this case will be less than the thickness of the
slab base for the same axial load as the bearing area of the column on the base plate
increases by the gusset plate.
As per IS: 800-1984 for the columns with gusseted base; gusset plates, angle
cleats, stiffeners, fastening, etc. In combination with the bearing area of the shaft
should be sufficient to take the loads, bending moment and reaction to the base plate
without exceeding the specified stresses. All bearing surfaces are machined to ensure
perfect contact. Where the ends of the column shaft and the gusset plate are not faced
for complete bearing, the fastening shall be sufficient to transmit all the forces to
which the base is subjected.
Design of Gusseted Base and Concrete Block:
Following design steps are to be followed:
1. Calculate the area (A) of base plate
𝐀 = 𝐀𝐱𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐥𝐨𝐚𝐝 𝐨𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐦𝐧
𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐞
2. Assume the materials used in gusseted base. Generally the thickness of
gusseted plate is assumed as 12 to 16 mm. The size of angle used generally is
ISA 150x115x12 mm or ISA 150x100x12 mm in rivet design and no gusset
angle is used in welds. The depth of column section, thickness of gusset plate
and length of leg of angle being known the width of gusset plate for these
distances can be calculated. Then calculate the length of gusset plate by
dividing area by width of gusset plate.
3. Provide suitable rounded size of gusset plate and calculate actual upward
concrete pressure.
4. See fig. let ‘w’ be the upward reaction of concrete and ‘l’ be the projection of
base plate beyond column face xx. Calculate the hogging bending moment at
column face as per mm width plate.
Mxx = 𝑤𝑙2
2
Calculate the moment of resistance per mm width of section xx.
Mxx = 𝑧.𝜎𝑏𝑐
Equating B.M to M.R., find the thickness ‘t’.
5. Consider another section yy of base plate at the centre of column as shown in
fig.
Calculate Hogging B.M= 𝑤𝑙2
2 and sagging B.M=
𝑤𝑑2
8
Net B.M at the center of base plate
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 270
Myy =𝑤𝑑2
8−
𝑤𝑙2
2
Calculate the moment of resistance per mm width at section yy
M𝑟𝑦 = 𝑧.𝜎𝑏𝑐 =1
6x𝑡2x1𝜎𝑏𝑐
Equating max. B.M. (Myy), find‘t’. Providing thickness‘t’ whichever is
maximum (considering Mxx and Myy).
6. Calculate the thickness of concrete block and size of block as in case of slab
base.
7. Design the fastners.
17.3 CALCULATION:
Column section IM 350 𝑋 225 𝑋 12
Properties of column:
𝐴𝑥 = 124 𝑐𝑚2 ; 𝐷 = 368 𝑚𝑚 ; 𝐵𝑓 = 140 𝑚𝑚
𝑇𝑓 = 14 𝑚𝑚 ; 𝑇𝑤 = 8𝑚𝑚 ; 𝐼𝑧 = 29902 𝑋 104 𝑚𝑚4
Axial load = 1340 𝐾𝑁
Bearing strength of concrete = 4 𝑁 𝑚𝑚2
Bending stress for steel base plate 𝜎𝑏𝑠 = 185 𝑁 𝑚𝑚2
Safe bearing capacity of the soil = 200 𝐾𝑁 𝑚𝑚2
Area of the base plate required = 1340 𝑋 103
4
Let 12 𝑚𝑚 thick gusset plate and ISA 90 𝑋 90 𝑋 12
Minimum width of the base plate = 368 + 2 𝑋 12 + 2 𝑋 90
= 572 ≅ 575 𝑚𝑚
Length of the base plate = 335 𝑋 103
575
= 585 mm
Provide 575 𝑋 585 base plate
Actual bearing pressure intensity on the base plate = 1340 𝑋 103
575 𝑋 585
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 271
= 3.983 𝑁 𝑚𝑚2
Cantilever projection = 90 − 12 = 78 𝑚𝑚
Consider a cantilever strip of the base plate of 1mm wide and 78 mm long
Maximum cantilever moment = 30983 𝑋 782
2
= 12107.16 𝑁 𝑚
Equating the moment of resistance to cantilever moment = 1
6𝜎𝑏𝑠𝑏𝑡
2
1
6 𝑋 185 𝑋 1 𝑋 𝑡2 = 12107.16
𝑡 = 12107.16 𝑋 6
185
𝑡 = 19.81 𝑚𝑚 ≅ 20 𝑚𝑚
Bending moment at critical section XX = 368 + 2 𝑋 12
= 392 𝑚𝑚
= 3.98 𝑋 3922
8− 3.98 𝑋
902
2
= 60374.3 𝑁 𝑚𝑚
Equating the moment of resistance to the bending moment
= 1
6 𝑋 185 𝑋 1 𝑋 𝑡2 = 60374.3
𝑡 = 60374.3 𝑋 6
185
𝑡 = 44.25 ≅ 45 𝑚𝑚
Hence provide = 575 𝑋 585 𝑋 45 𝑚𝑚
Design of concrete block:
Axial load = 1340𝐾𝑁
Self-weight of the foundation 10 % = 134 𝑘𝑁
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 272
Total load on soil = 1474 𝐾𝑁
Area of concrete block = 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑
𝑠𝑎𝑓𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑖𝑙
= 1474
200= 7.37 𝑚𝑚2
Side length of the bed block = 7.37
= 2.71 𝑚
∴ Adopt 2.75 m X 2.75 m square concrete block
Assuming 450 load dispersion
Depth of concrete block = 0.5 2750 − 5851
= 1082.5 ≅ 1090 𝑚𝑚
= 1.09 𝑚
∴ Provide the size of concrete pedestal as 2.75 X 2.75 X 1.09 m
Connections:
Outstand on each side = 585−360
2
= 108.5 𝑚𝑚
Load on end connection =108.5 𝑋 585 𝑋 3.983
1000
= 252.81 𝐾𝑁
Single shear strength = 2 𝐾𝑁
No. of bolts = 252.81
29
= 8.71 ≅ 10
∴ Adopt 10 bolts connecting gusset angles with gusset plates and same number of
anchor bolts to connect the gusset plate with column.
COMPARTIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 273
18. DESIGN OF STAIR CASE
Floor to floor height (H) = 3.2 m
Width of stair case = 1.0 m
No of flights in a stair case = 2
Assuming width of landing = 0.80 m
Live load on stairs = 3 kN/m2
Assuming Riser (R) = 160 mm
Tread = 250 mm
Angle of inclination = 2502 + 1602
secϕ = 1.187
No of riser = 3200/160
= 20 no's
Risers in each flight = 10
Treads in each flight = 10-1
= 9
Going = 250x 9=2250 mm
Using Indian standard channel section as a stair(step)
From structural steel tables
Try ISMC 250
D = 250 mm bf = 80 mm wt = 0.351 kN/m
Wt of cement concrete in the channel = 24 x 0.25 x 0.16 = 0.96 kN/m
Live load on stairs /meter length = 3.0 kN/m
Total load = 3.96 kN/m
Factored load = 1.5 x 3.96 = 5.96 kN/m
Bending Moment (M) = 𝑤𝑙 2
8 =
5.96 𝑥 12
8 = 0.74 kN-m
Permissible bending stress in steel (𝜎𝑏𝑐 )= 0.66 fy
COMPARTIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 274
= 0.66x 250 = 165 N/mm2
Section modulus about y direction Zyy = 𝑀
𝜎𝑏𝑐
Zyy = 4500 mm3
Allowable section modulus is 38.4 x103 mm
3
Allowable section modulus is greater than required section modulus
Reaction of loads on stringer beam
Self weight of ISMC 250 = 0.298 kN/m
Load on stairs = 5.96 kN/m
Shear force on stringer beam = ( 0.298 + 5.96 x 1 )/2
= 3.129 kN = 3.2 kN
No of treads in each flight = 10 x
Uniformly distributed load on stringer beam
= (10 x3.2)/2.76
= 11.59 = 11.6 kN/m
Length of stringer beam = 𝐺𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑔2 + (𝐻/2)2
= 2.252 + (1.6/2)2
= 2.76 m
Bending Moment of stringer = 𝑤𝑙 2
8
= 11.6 x2.762
8 = 11.04 kN-m
Section modulus about x is Zxx = 𝑀
𝜎𝑏𝑐 = 66909.09 mm
3
From steel tables try ISLC 300
Allowable section modulus about x is Zxx = 403.2 x 103
Hence safe
MODULE III
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 276
20. ESTIMATING AND COSTING
20.1ESTIMATING:
Before undertaking a construction of a project it is necessary to know it’s
probable cost which is worked out by estimating, an estimate is computation or
calculation of the quantities required and expenditure likely to be incurred in the
construction of the work. Estimation can be done by various methods but accurate
estimate is prepared by detailed estimate method.
There are two methods of estimation:
Detailed estimate
Actual cost.
DETAILED ESTIMATE AND ACTUAL COST:
Detailed of the measurements form.
Abstract of the estimate cost
20.2 Main items of the work:
1. EARTHWORK
2. CONCRETE IN FOUNDATION
3. SOILING
4. DAMP PROOF COURSE
5. MASONARY
6. ARCH MASONARY WORK
7. LINTELS OVER OPENINGS
8. R.C.C AND R.B WORKS
9. FLOORING AND ROOFING
10. PLASTERING AND POINTING
11. CORNICE
12. PILLARS
13. DOORS AND WINDOWS
14. WOOD WORK
15. IRON WORK
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 277
20.2.1 EARTHWORK
It is usually taken out in earthwork excavation and earth work filling
separately upon different items.
Earthwork in excavation in foundation is calculated by taking the
dimension of each trench(𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒈𝒕𝒉 ∗ 𝒃𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒕𝒉 ∗ 𝒅𝒆𝒑𝒕𝒉).
Earthwork in plinth filling is calculated by taking the internal dimensions
in between plinth wall which is usually less than internal dimension of
room.
Its units are cu-m.
20.2.2 CONCRETE IN FOUNDATION
The concrete is take out in cu-m by length*breadth*thickness.
The thickness of the concrete varies from 20 cm to 45 cm. But usually it
taken as 30 cm.
The proportion of the cement concrete in foundation may be 1:4:8 or
1:5:10.
20.2.3 SOILING
When the soil is soft or bad on layer of dry thick or stone soiling is
applied below foundation concrete
The soil layer is computed in sq-mts.
20.2.4 DAMP PROOF COURSE
D.P.C is usually of 2.5 cm thick rich cement concrete 𝟏 ∶ 𝟏 ½ ∶ 𝟑.
Plinth levels are computed in sq-mts.
20.2.5 MASONARY
Masonry is measured in (𝑳𝒆𝒏𝒈𝒕𝒉 ∗ 𝒃𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒕𝒉 ∗ 𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕)
In taking out the quantities the walls are measured solid and deduction are
made for openings as doors and windows etc.
Masonry is computed in cu-m.
20.2.6 ARCH MASONARY WORK
By product of the mean length of the arch by thickness of the arch and
width of the wall
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 278
Quantity of arch masonry = lm * t * thickness of the wall
Masonry work in arches is calculated in cu-m
20.2.7 LINTELS OVER OPENINGS
Lintels are either R.C.C or R.B. work
Length of lintel = clear span + two bearings.
If dimension the bearing is not given the bearing may be taken as
thickness of lintel with the minimum of 12 cm.
L = s + 2t
Quantity of lintel = ( 𝒍𝒎 ∗ 𝒕 ∗ 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒄𝒌𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒘𝒂𝒍𝒍 ).
It is measured in cu-m.
20.2.8 R.C.C AND R.B WORKS
R.C.C and R.B work may be in roof or floor slab, in beams, lintels,
columns, foundations, etc.
Bearings are added with clear span to get the dimension.
It is measured in cu-m
R.C.C and R.B work may be estimated exclusively of steel, centering and
and shuttering for complete work.
Centering and shuttering are mainly used in R.B and R.C.C.
20.2.9 FLOORING AND ROOFING
1. Ground floor :
The base line concrete and floor finishing of C.C or stone or marble or
mosaic are usually taken as one item.
It is calculated by multiplication of length and breadth
It is measured in sq-m.
2. FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR:
As R.C.C or R.B. and floor finishing is separately taken in sq-m as
2.5cms Supporting structure is taken separately in cu-m
3. ROOF
Supporting structure is taken in cu-m and line concrete terracing is computed in
sq-m with thickness specified. The compacted thickness of the lime concrete terracing is
7.5 – 12 cms.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 279
20.2.10 PLASTERING AND POINTING
Plastering usually 12 mm thick
Its calculated in sq-mts
For walls Measurement are taken for the whole of the wall or both sides as a solid
and deductions for the openings are in following manner
No deduction is made for Beams, rafters and posts
For small openings up to 0.5 sq-mts no deduction is made
For openings more than 0.5 sq-mts deductions are made
For openings more than 3 deductions are made both sides of the faces.
20.2.11 CORNICE
Ornamental or large cornice is measured in running meters for the complete work
which includes masonry, plastering, mouldings, etc. are paid in running meter.
Similarly, string course, drip course, cor-belling, coping, etc. are measured and
paid in running meter for the complete work.
20.2.12 PILLARS
Pillars are taken separately in cu-m for their net volume and quantities are calculated by
correct geometrical measurements.
Quantity = (𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 ∗ 𝑒𝑖𝑔𝑡 ) = (𝜋𝑑2
4) ∗ 𝑒𝑖𝑔𝑡 𝑐𝑢 − 𝑚 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑 𝑝𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑠,
d is dia.
= ( 𝑎2 ∗ 𝑒𝑖𝑔𝑡 𝑐𝑢 − 𝑚 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑝𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑠 ),
a is the side.
Plastering in pillars are calculated in sq.m multiplying the circumference of perimeter by
the height.
20.2.13 DOORS AND WINDOWS
a. Chowkhat or frame – It is measured in cu-m. Vertical members should be
inserted into the floor about (2.5 to 4 )cm. Length is obtained by adding the length
of all members of the frame, top and two verticals. Also by adding bottom and
this length is multiplied by the two dimensions of the cross-section of the
member.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 280
b. Door or Window Leaves or shutters – It is measured in sq-m. It can be
calculated by multiplying the (breadth * height) of the structures
20.2.14 WOOD WORK
Wooden beams, burgahs, posts, wooden roof trusses come under this item.
It is measured in cu-m.
20.2.15 IRON WORK
This is measured in kilo grams. The quantities are calculated out correctly
by multiplying the weights per running meter by the length. For steel joint the length
is equal to clear span plus two bearings. The bearings may be taken as ¼ thickness of
the wall.
20.3 DEGREE OF ACCURACY IN ESTIMATING
Accuracy to be observed in preparing an estimate depends upon the rate of item
and the unit of payment. The rate the greater should be accuracy with which
quantities are calculated.
PRINCIPLE OF UNITS FOR VARIOUS ITEMS OF WORKS:
Units of different works depend upon their nature, size and shape
Mass, voluminous and thick works shall be taken in cubic unit or volume.
The measurements of length, breadth, and height or depth shall be taken to
compute the volume.
Shallow, thin and surface works shall be taken in square unit. This can be
measured by length and breadth or height shall be taken to compute area.
Long and thin work shall be taken in linear
Piece work, job work etc.
Area of 6 mm bar = 2.827 x 10-5
m2 = 28.27 mm
2
Area of 8 mm bar = 5.026 x 10-5
m2 = 50.26 mm
2
Area of 10 mm bar = 7.853 x 10-5
m2 = 78.53 mm
2
Area of 12 mm bar = 1.130 x 10-4
m2 = 113.08 mm
2
Area of 16 mm bar = 2.010 x 10-4
m2 = 201.0 mm
2
Area of 18 mm bar = 2.544 x 10-4
m2 = 254.4 mm
2
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 281
20.4 ESTIMATATION OF QUANTITY OF CONCRETE
Item
no
Particular and
items of work No
Len
gth
m
Bre
ad
th
m
Dep
th
m Quantity
m3
Remarks
I SLABS
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
10
10
12
10
10
10
10
3.8
3.65
3.65
3.65
4.3
4.15
4.15
3.15
3.85
3.7
10.25
3.15
3.85
3.7
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.14
0.12
0.12
0.12
14.364
16.863.
19.4472
52.3775
16.254
19.173
18.426
3.65+0.15=3.8
3+3.15=3.15
3.7+3.15=3.85
3.55+0.15=3.7
3.5+0.15=3.65
4.15+0.15=4.30
3.00+0.15=3.15
3.7 +0.15=3.85
3.55 +0.15=3.7
156.904 M3
II PLINTH
BEAMS
1001, 1007, 1009,
1014,1015, 1020,
1021, 1026.
1002,1006, 1010,
1013, 1016, 1017,
1022, 1025
1003, 1011, 1012,
1017, 1018, 1023,
1024
1004, 1030, 1034
8
8
7
3
3.00
3.70
3.55
1.65
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
2.88
3.552
2.982
0.594
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 282
1005,1008
1027, 1028,
1031, 1035, 1036
1044, 1045, 1046,
1047, 1048, 1049,
1050
1029, 1032, 1051
2
5
7
3
1.9
3.65
4.15
2.00
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.456
2.19
3.486
0.72
16.86 m
3
III
TYPICAL
BEAMS
2001, 2007, 2009,
2014, 2015, 2022,
2023, 2030, 3001,
3007, 3009, 3014,
3015, 3022, 3023,
3030, 4001, 4007,
4009, 4014, 4015,
4022, 4023, 4030,
5001 5007, 5009,
5014, 5015, 5022,
5023, 5030
2002, 2006, 2010,
2013, 3002, 3006,
3010, 3013, 4002,
4006, 4010, 4012,
5002, 5006, 5010,
5013
2003, 2011, 2012,
2018, 2019, 2026,
2027, 3003, 3011,
3012, 3018, 3019,
3026, 3027, 4003,
4011, 4012, 4018,
4019, 4026, 4027,
5003, 5011, 5012,
32
16
28
3.00
3.70
3.55
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
11.52
7.104
11.92
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 283
5018, 5019, 5026,
5027
2004, 2034,
2038,3004, 3034,
3038,4004, 4034,
4038, 5004, 5034,
5038
2005, 2008, 3005,
3008, 4005, 4008,
5005, 5008
2016, 2021, 2024,
2029, 3016, 3021,
3024, 3029, 4016,
4021, 4024, 4029,
5016, 5021, 5024,
5029
2017, 2020, 2025,
2028, 3017, 3020,
3025, 3028, 4017,
4020, 4025, 4028,
5017, 5020, 5025,
5028
2031, 2032, 2035,
2039, 2040, 3031,
3032, 3035, 3039,
3040, 4031, 4032,
4035, 4039, 4040,
5031, 5032, 5035,
5039, 5040
2033, 2036, 2037,
2051, 3033, 3036,
3037, 3051, 4033,
4036, 4037, 4051,
5033, 5036, 5037,
5051
2041, 2042, 2043,
12
8
16
16
20
16
1.65
1.90
0.85
2.85
3.65
2.00
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
2.376
1.824
1.632
5.472
8.76
3.84
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 284
IV
3041, 3042, 3043,
4041. 4042, 4043,
5041, 5042, 5043
2044,2045, 2046,
2047, 2048, 2049,
2050,3044, 3045,
3046, 3047, 3048,
3049, 3050, 4044,
4045, 4046, 4046,
4047, 4048, 4049,
4050, 5044, 5045,
5046, 5047, 5048,
5049, 5050
ROOF BEAMS
6001, 6007, 6009,
6014, 6015, 6023,
6030
6002, 6006, 6010,
6013
6003, 6011, 6012,
6018, 6019, 6026,
6027, 7001, 7005,
7006
6004, 6034, 6038,
7002, 7011
6005, 6008, 7003,
7004
6016, 6021, 6024,
6029
6017, 6020, 6025,
6028
6031, 6032, 6035,
6039, 6040
12
29
7
4
10
5
4
4
4
5
3.50
4.15
3.00
3.70
3.55
1.65
1.9
0.85
2.85
3.65
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
5.04
14.442
73.93 m3
2.52
1.776
4.26
0.99
0.912
0.408
1.368
2.19
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 285
6033, 6036, 6037,
7009, 7010
6041, 6042, 6043
6044, 6045, 6046,
6047, 6048, 6049,
6050
5
3
7
2.00
3.5
4.15
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
1.2
1.26
3.486
20.36 m3
V
COLUMNS
GROUP
1A
1B
2A
2B
3
10
3
14
1
4
17.5
17.5
17.5
17.5
17.5
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.5
26.25
6.21
36.75
2.1
10.5
81.81 m3
VI
STAIR CASE
No of stair
cases= 6
24
3.56
1.0
0.15
12.81 m3
12.81 m3
VII FOOTING
GROUP
I
II
III
IV
4
14
10
4
1.80
2.30
2.50
1.80
1.60
2.10
2.30
1.70
0.4
0.52
0.52
0.41
4.608
35.162
29.90
5.018
74.688 m3
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 286
20.5 ESTIMATION OF QUANTITY OF STEEL
SLABS
Slab
panel
(1)
No. of
slabs
(2)
Dia
mm
(3)
No. of
bars
(4)
Length of
bar
m
(5)
Total
length of
bars
m
(6)=4 x 5
Quantity
m3
(7) =
Area of (3) x
(6)
Total
quantity
m3
(8) = (2)x(7)
S1 10
8 15 3.184 47.76 2.40x10-3
0.024
8 19
3.834 72.846 3.67x10-3
0.0367
S2 10
8 19 3.884 73.796 3.708 x10-3
0.03708
8 15 3.834 57.51 2.89 x10-3
0.0289
S3 12 8 15 3.734 56.01 2.81 x10
-3 0.03372
8 19 3.834 72.846 3.67 x10-3
0.04404
S4 10 8 74 10.434 772.116 0.0388 0.388
8 13 3.604 46.852 2.36 x10-3
0.0236
S5 10 8 20 4.034 80.68 4.06 x10
-3 0.0406
8 21 4.334 91.014 4.58 x10-3
0.0458
S6 10 8 12 3.034 36.408 1.83 x10
-3 0.0183
8 17 4.334 73.678 3.703 x10-3
0.03703
S7 10 8 15 3.734 56.01 2.815 x10
-3 0.0281
8 17 4.334 73.678 3.703 x10-3
0.03703
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 287
BEAMS
Main Reinforcement in Plinth Beams B
eam
Ty
pe
No
of
Bea
ms
Len
gth
Bea
m
(m)
Dia
Mm
No. of
bars
Length of bar
m
To
tal
len
gth
of
ba
rs
m Quantity
m3
Total quantity
m3
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)=5x6 (8) =
Area of (4) x (7) (9) = (2)x(8)
Pli
nth
Bea
ms
8 3.00 12 5 3.56 17.8 2.01 x 10-3 16.08 x 10-3
1+1=2 1.314+0.9=2.214 4.428 5.00 x 10-4 4 x 10-3
8 3.70 12 5 3.70 18.5 2.09 x 10-3 16.73 x 10-3
1+1=2 1.075+1.075=2.15 4.3 4.85 x 10-4 3.88 x 10-3
7 3.55 12 5 3.55 17.75 2.00 x 10-3 14 x 10-3
1+1=2 1.04+1.04=2.08 4.16 4.70 x 10-4 3.29 x 10-3
3 1.65 12 5 1.65 8.25 9.32 x 10-4 2.79 x 10-3
1+1=2 0.42+0.42=0.84 1.68 1.89 x 10-4 5.6 x 10-4
2 1.90 12 5 1.95 9.75 1.10 x 10-3 2.2 x 10-3
1+1=2 0.63+0.63=1.26 2.52 2.84 x 10-4 5.68 x 10-4
5 3.65 12 5 3.65 18.25 2.06 x 10-3 10.3 x 10-3
1+1=2 1.48+1.063=2.55 5.1 5.76 x 10-4 2.88 x 10-3
7 4.15 12 5 4.71 23.55 2.66 x 10-3 18.62 x 10-3
5+4=9 1.60+1.18=2.78 25.02 2.82 x 10-3 19.74 x 10-3
3 2.00 12
5 3.56 17.8 2.01 x 10-3 6.03 x 10-3
2+2=4 1.06+0.65=1.71 6.84 7.72 x 10-4 2.31 x 10-3
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 288
Main Reinforcement in Typical Floor Beams
Bea
m
Ty
pe
No
of
Bea
ms
Len
gth
Bea
m
(m)
Dia
Mm
No
. o
f
ba
rs
Length of bar
m
Total
length
of bars
m
Quantity
m3
Total quantity
m3
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) =
(5) x (6)
(8) =
Area of (4) x (7) (9) = (2)x(8)
Typ
ical
Flo
or
Bea
ms
32 3.00
12 3 3.56 10.68 1.20 x 10-3 38.4 x 10-3
16 1+1=2 1.50+0.9=2.4 4.8 9.64 x 10-4 30.84 x 10-3
16 2 3.75 7.5 1.50 x 10-3 48 x 10-3
12 3.70
12 3 3.70 11.1 1.25 x 10-3 15 x 10-3
16 1+1=2 1.075+1.075=2.15 4.3 8.64 x 10-4 10.36 x 10-3
16 2 3.70 7.4 1.48 x 10-3 17.76 x 10-3
28 3.55
12 3 3.55 10.65 1.20 x 10-3 33.6 x 10-3
16 2+2=4 1.04+1.04=2.08 8.32 1.67 x 10-3 46.76 x 10-3
16 2 3.55 7.1 1.42 x 10-3 39.76 x 10-3
12 1.65
12 4 1.65 6.6 7.45 x 10-4 86.94 x 10-3
16 1+1=2 0.42+0.42=0.84 1.68 3.37 x 10-4 4.04 x 10-3
16 2 1.65 3.3 6.63 x 10-4 7.95 x 10-3
8 1.90 12
3 1.90 5.7 6.44 x 10-4 5.15 x 10-3
2+2=4 0.63+0.63=1.26 5.04 5.69 x 10-4 4.55 x 10-3
2 1.90 3.8 4.29 x 10-4 3.43 x 10-3
12 0.85
12 3 0.85 2.55 2.88 x 10-4 3.45 x 10-3
16 2+2=4 0.37+0.37=0.74 2.96 5.94 x 10-4 7.12 x 10-3
16 2 0.85 1.7 3.41 x 10-4 4.09 x 10-3
12 2.85
12 3 2.85 8.55 9.66 x 10-4 11.59 x 10-3
16 1+1=2 0.87+0.87=1.74 3.48 6.99 x 10-4 8.38 x 10-3
16 2 2.85 5.7 1.14 x 10-3 13.68 x 10-3
12 3.65
12 3 4.40 13.2 1.49 x 10-3 17.88 x 10-3
16 2+1=3 1.7+1.06=2.76 8.28 1.66 x 10-3 19.92 x 10-3
16 2 4.40 8.8 1.76 x 10-3 21.12 x 10-3
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 289
12
3.50
12 3 3.50 10.5 11.86 x 10-3 142.32 x 10-3
16 2+1=3 1.03+1.03=2.06 6.18 1.242 x 10-3 14.90 x 10-3
16 2 3.50 7 1.40 x 10-3 `16.8 x 10-3
28 4.15 16 5 4.90 24.5 4.92 x 10-3 137.76 x 10-3
2+1=3 1.79+1.19=2.98 8.94 1.79 x 10-3 50.12 x 10-3
16 2.00 12 5 2.75 13.75 1.55 x 10-3 24.8 x 10-3
2+2=4 1.064+0.65=1.71 6.84 7.72 x 10-4 11.55 x 10-4
Main Reinforcement in Roof Beams
Bea
m
Ty
pe
No
of
Bea
ms
Len
gth
of
Bea
m
( m
)
Dia
mm
No. of
bars
Length of bar
m
Total
length
of bars
m
Quantity
m3
Total quantity
m3
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)=5x6 (8) =
Area of (4) x (7) (9) = (2)x(8)
Roof
Bea
ms
7 3.00 12 5 3.56 17.8 2.01 x 10-3 14.07 x 10-3
1+1=2 1.314+0.9=2.21 4.42 4.99 x 10-4 3.49 x 10-3
4 3.70 12 5 3.70 18.5 2.09 x 10-3 8.36 x 10-3
1+1=2 1.075+1.075=2.15 4.3 4.85 x 10-4 1.94 x 10-3
10 3.55 12 5 3.55 17.75 2.0 x 10-3 20 x 10-3
1+1=2 1.04+1.04=2.08 4.16 4.7 x 10-4 4.7 x 10-3
5 1.65 12 5 1.65 8.25 9.32 x 10-4 4.66 x 10-3
1+1=2 0.42+0.42=0.84 1.68 1.89 x 10-4 9.45 x 10-4
4 1.90 12 5 1.95 9.75 1.10 x 10-3 4.4 x 10-3
1+1=2 0.63+0.63=1.26 2.52 2.84 x 10-4 1.13 x 10-3
4 0.85 12 5 0.85 4.25 4.80 x 10-4 1.92 x 10-3
1+1=2 0.36+0.36=0.72 1.44 1.62 x 10-4 6.48 x 10-4
4 2.85 12 5 2.85 14.25 1.61 x 10-3 6.44 x 10-3
1+1=2 0.86+0.86=1.72 3.44 3.88 x 10-4 1.55 x 10-3
5 3.65 12 5 3.65 18.25 2.06 x 10-3 10.3 x 10-3
1+1=2 1.48+1.063=2.55 5.1 5.76 x 10-4 2.88 x 10-3
3 3.50 12 5 3.5 17.5 1.97 x 10-3 5.91 x 10-3
1+1=2 1.025+1.025=2.05 4.1 4.63 x 10-4 1.38 x 10-3
7 4.15 12 5 4.71 23.55 2.66 x 10-3 18.62 x 10-3
1+1=2 1.60+1.18=2.78 5.56 6.28 x 10-4 4.39 x 10-3
5 2.00 12 5 3.56 17.8 2.01 x 10-4 1.0 x 10-3
1+1=2 1.06+0.65=1.71 3.42 3.86 x 10-4 1.9 x 10-3
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 290
Shear Reinforcement in Beams (stirrups)
S.NO
(1) TYPE (2)
Dia
mm
(3)
No. of
stirrups
(4)
Length of
stirrups
m
(5)
Total
length of
stirrups
m
(6)=4 x 5
Quantity
m3
(7) =
Area of (3) x (6)
1 Plinth
Beams 6 107 1.328 142.096 4.013x 10
-3
2
Typical
Floor
Beam
6 127 1.328 168.656 4.767x 10-3
3 Roof
Beams 6 107 1.328 142.096 4.013x 10
-3
COLUMNS
Longitudinal Reinforcement of column
Group
(1)
No of
columns
(2)
Dia
mm
(3)
No. of
bars
(4)
Length of
bar
m
(5)
Total
length of
bars
m
(6)=4 x 5
Quantity
m3
(7) =
Area of (3) x (6)
Total
quantity
m3
(8) = (2)x(7)
1. 10 16 10 19.00 190.00 0.038 0.38
3 12 10 19.00 190.00 0.021 0.063
2. 14 16 8 19.00 152.00 0.030 0.42
1 12 8 19.00 152.00 0.017 0.017
3 4 16 8 19.00 152.00 0.030 0.122
Transverse Reinforcement (Lateral Ties)
Group
(1)
No of
columns
(2)
Dia
mm
(3)
No. of
stirrups
(4)
Length of
stirrups
m
(5)
Total
length of
stirrups
m
(6)=4 x 5
Quantity
m3
(7) =
Area of (3) x (6)
Total quantity
m3
(8) = (2)x(7)
1. 10 6 70 1.338 93.66 2.648 x 10
-3 0.0264
3 6 70 1.188 83.16 2.35 x 10-3
7.05 x 10-3
2. 14 6 70 1.338 93.66 2.648 x 10
-3 0.0370
1 6 70 1.188 83.16 2.35 x 10-3
2.35 x 10-3
3 4 6 70 1.338 93.66 2.648 x 10-3
0.0105
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 291
FOOTINGS
Group
(1)
No of
footings
(2)
Dia
mm
(3)
No. of
bars
(4)
Length of
bar
m
(5)
Total
length of
bars
m
(6)=4 x 5
Quantity
m3
(7) =
Area of (3) x (6)
Total quantity
m3
(8) = (2)x(7)
1. 4
12 9 1.892 17.028 1.925 x 10-3
7.7 x 10-3
12 10
1.692 16.92 1.913 x 10-3
7.65 x 10-3
2. 14
12 12 2.392 28.704 3.246 x 10-3
0.0454
12 13 2.192 28.496 3.222 x10-3
0.0451
3 10 16 13 2.592 33.696 6.774 x 10
-3 0.0677
16 14 2.392 33.488 6.733 x10-3
0.0673
4 4 12 9 1.892 17.028 1.925 x 10
-3 7.7 x 10
-3
12 10 1.792 17.92 2.026 x 10-3
8.107 x 10-3
STAIR CASE
Type
(1)
No of
flights
(2)
Dia
mm
(3)
No. of
bars
(4)
Length
of bar
m
(5)
Total
length of
bars
m
(6)=4 x 5
Quantity
m3
(7) =
Area of (3) x
(6)
Total
quantity
m3
(8) = (2)x(7)
Main
Rein 12
10 6 3.75 22.5 1.76 x 10-3
0.0212
10 6
1.74 10.44 8.198 x 10-4
9.838 x 10-3
Dist
Rein 12 8 13 0.95 12.35 6.207 x 10
-4 7.449 x 10
-3
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 292
SUMMARY OF REINFORCEMENT S
.no
Dia
of
bar Quantity
Total
quantity
(cu-m)
Density
(kg/m3)
Weight
kgs S
lab
Bea
m
Colu
mn
Footi
ng
Sta
ir
case
1 6 -------- 12.8x
10-3
0.084
-------
- ------ 0.0968 7850 759.88
2 8 0.8229
5 ------- ------- ------ 7.449 x 10
-3 0.8304 7850 6518.64
3 10 -------- ------- ------- ------ 0.031038 0.031038
7850 243.65
4 12 ------- 0.622 0.08 0.130
3 ------ 0.8323 7850 6533.55
5 16 ------- 0.500 0.922 0.135 ----- 1.557 7850 12222.45
Schedule of Rate (As per APSSR 2011-2012)
s.no Description of item unit Rate
1 R.C.C M20 design mix using 20 mm graded HBG metal
from approved quarry including cost of conveyance of all
materials to the site(including labour charges, batching
machinery, vibrators, centering and water )
Foundations
Plinth beams
Beams
Columns
Slabs
1 cu.m
1 cu.m
1 cu.m
1 cu.m
1 cu.m
6086.74
7550.84
8103.56
6601.02
8236.21
2 TMT Bars (HYSD Fe 415)
Supplying, fitting and placing TMT bars reinforcement as
per drawings and technical specifications for Bars below
36 mm dia including binding wire, over laps and wastage,
where they are not welded.
1 kg
65.042
3 Mild steel bars
Supplying, fitting and placing mild steel bars
reinforcement as per drawings and technical
specifications including binding wire, over laps and
wastage, where they are not welded.
6 mm diameter
1 kg 52.080
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 293
Abstract of Estimate
Item
no Particulars
Quantit
y Unit Rate Per Cost
1 slabs 156.904 Cu.m 8236.21 Cu.m 1292294.29
2 Roof beams 20.36 Cu.m 8103.56 Cu.m 164988.48
3 Typical floor beams 73.93 Cu.m 8103.56 Cu.m 599096.19
4 Plinth beams 16.86 Cu.m 7550.84 Cu.m 127307.16
5 Columns 81.81 Cu.m 6601.02 Cu.m 540029.44
6 Footings 74.688 Cu.m 6086.74 Cu.m 454606.43
7 Stair case 12.81 Cu.m 8103.56 Cu.m 103806.60
8 TMT 8mm dia 6518.64 Kg 65.042 Kg 423985.38
9 TMT 10 mm dia 243.65 Kg 65.042 Kg 15847.48
10 TMT 12 mm dia 6533.55 Kg 65.042 Kg 424955.15
11 TMT 16 mm dia 12222.45 Kg 65.042 Kg 794972.59
12 Mild steel 6mm dia 759.88 Kg 52.080 Kg 39574.55
Lump sum cost = Rs 49,81,463.74
Add 5% extra = Rs 2,49,073.18
Total cost Rs 52,30,537.00
Approximately Rs 52,30,537.00 is required to construct the G+4 residential and
commercial RCC building.
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 294
21. ESTIMATION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL MEMBERS
Structural steel members may be of single I section or double I sections,
channel sections, angles, tee sections, flat plates and other fastening accessories. The
cost estimates for steel structures are significantly different from calculation of the
estimated cost of RCC structures, as they need special designs. The most important
part of the design and construction of steel structure are the connections. It is well
known that connections costs are about 12% of major structural elements such as
stanchions (columns), beams in a building.
The connections , either through the use of welds or high-stress bolts, have the
largest share in the process of preparing detailed drawings, where the most important
and most critical phase is the accuracy of the details of the connection.
21.1 STEEL TAKE-OFF FROM STAAD PRO OUT PUT
PROFILE LENGTH(M) WEIGHT( kN)
ST ISWB600A 588.80 836.327
ST ISHB200 508.10 185.402
ST ISHB400 66.75 50.610
ST ISHB250 351.00 175.264
ST ISHB300 33.20 19.077
TOTAL = 1266.680 kN
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 295
21.2 Estimation of Quantity of structural steel members
S.
no Particulars No
Length
m
Breadth
m
Qty
Wt.
per
unit
Total
weight
(kN)
I Rolled steel
I sections
ISWB600A
ISHB200
ISHB400
ISHB250
ISHB300
1
1
1
1
1
588.80
508.10
66.75
351.00
33.20
-----
----
-----
-----
-----
------
----
-----
-----
-----
1.42
kN/m
0.364
0.758
0.499
0.574
836.33
185.41
50.61
175.30
19.1
II Mild steel plates
@ column bases
575 x 585 x 45 mm
thick base plate
Wt of 45 mm thick
plate =
0.045x7850=3.46
kN/m2
32
0.575
0.585
10.76 m2
3.46kn/
m2
37.23
III Connections (cleat
angles, stiffeners,
gusset plates anchor
bolts, welds)
Beam to columns,
Beam to Beam and
column to columns are
approximately 12 %
of the total weight of
beams and columns
12 x (836.33 +185.41+ 50.61+
175.30+ 19.1)/100
= 152. 01 kN
152. 01
IV Kirby Deck slab
Thickness of sheet 0.7
mm
Wt = 0.069 kN/m2
Total area = 5xarea of
each slab-5xarea of
staircase- 5 x area of
lift + cap slab
5 x 231-5 x 7.1-5 x 3.8 + 25.914 =
1126.414 m2
0.069
kN/m2
77.73
V Steel Stair case
Stairs
ISMC250@
0.298kN/m
12 flights & 10 treads
120
1.0
-----
-----
0.298
35.76
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
NIZAM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 296
in each flight
Stringer beams
ISLC 300 @
0.324 kN/m
2 stringer beams per
flight
Length of stringer
beam + width of
landing (2.76+0.8)
Connections
12% of total steel
quantity of stair case.
(12 x
(35.76+27.68))/100
24
-----
3.56
-----
------
------
-----
-----
0.324
-----
27.68
7.612
Total weight 1604.77
19.3 ABSTRACT OF ESTIMATE
From Standard schedule of rates 2011-2012 the cost of M.S
I section, Angles, channels etc., = Rs 48.00 per kg.
Fabrication charges = Rs 14.00 per kg
Erection charges = Rs 12.00 per kg
Total = Rs 74.00 per kg
Total weight of steel members = 1604.77 kN = 163585.11 kgs
Cost of the steel structural members = 163585.11 x48
= Rs 78,52,085.28
Add 5% for contingencies and
Work charged establishment = Rs 3,92,604.264
Total cost of steel structure = Rs 82,44,689.54
= Rs 82,44,690.00
Approximately Rs 82,44,690.00 is required to construct the G+4 residential and
commercial STEEL Building
COMPARITIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
297
22. CONCLUSION
S.
NO PARTICULARS R.C.C BUILDING STEEL BUILDING
1 Grade/ Materials
M20
Fe250 & Fe415
Mild steel
2 Max sizes of
sections
Beams
Columns
Min sizes of
sections
Beams
Columns
Secondary beams
300 x 400 mm
300 x 500 mm
300 x 400 mm
300 x 500 mm
------------
ISHB 300
ISWB600A
ISHB 200
ISWB 600 A
ISJB 200
3 Reactions
Maximum
Gravity
Wind
Seismic
1637.006 kN (Node 15)
92.625 kN (Node 3)
152.811 kN (Node 3)
776.237 kN (Node 15)
104.611 kN (Node 3)
72.905 kN (Node 3)
4
Max Bending
moments
Gravity loads
Wind loads
Seismic loads
42.816 kN-m (Beam 5021)
19.87 kN-m (Beam 1051)
26.559 kN-m (Beam 105)
56.277 kN-m (Beam 3029)
37.618 kN-m (Beam 2048)
14.951 kN-m (Beam 1046)
5
Max shear force
130.305 kN (Beam 5021)
124.553 kN (Beam 4016)
6
Max deflection
Gravity loads
About X
About Y
About Z
0.416 mm (Node 259)
2.866 mm (Node 262)
0.757 mm (Node 263)
0.678 mm (Node 258)
2.006 mm (Node 243)
0.395 mm (Node 95)
COMPARITIVE STUDY ON MULTI-STOREY R.C.C AND STEEL BUILDING
298
Wind loads
About X
About Y
About Z
Seismic loads
About X
About Y
About Z
2.134 mm (Node 261)
0.179 mm (Node 217)
5.195 mm (Node 258)
7.342 mm (Node 263)
0.360 mm (Node 255)
9.552 mm (Node 258)
5.065 mm (Node265)
0.246 mm (Node255)
16.478 mm (Node 258)
5.651mm (Node 259)
0.198mm (Node 138)
9.967mm(Node 243)
Envelope load
case
Max BM
Max shear force
Max Reactions
97.419 kN-m(Beam 3047 )
1.5(DL+EQ ZP)
130.305 kN (Beam 5021)
1.5(DL+LL)
1637.006 kN (Node3)
1.5(DL+EQ XN)
99.318 kN-m (Beam 3029)
1.5(DL+LL)
124.553 kN (Beam 4016)
1.5(DL+LL)
1361.171 kN (Node 22)
1.5(DL+LL)
7
Quantity of
material
Concrete = 437.362 cu.m
Steel = 26,178.17 kgs
Structural Steel = 1604.77kN
8
Approximate cost
( only structure )
Rs 52,30,537.00
Rs 82,44,690.00
BIBLOGRAPHY
Reinforced concrete design by S.Unnikrishna pillai and Devdas menon.
Limit state design by B.C.Punmia, Ashok.K.Jain and Arun.K.Jain.
Illustrated design of reinforced concrete buildings by Dr. V.L.Shah and
Dr.S.R.Karve
Standard method of detailing structural concrete by B.H.G.Cresswell
Riol.
Limit state design of R.C.C structures by Ramachandra.
Design for RCC slabs by K.C Jain.
Building Design and Construction by Fredrick S.Merritt and Jonathan
T.Ricketts
Design of R.C.C Structural Elements by S.S.Bhavikatti
Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures by M.R.Dheerendra Babu
Structural Design and Drawing Reinforced Concrete and Steel by
N.Krishna Raju.
Steel Structures by K.Naga Sreenivasa Rao.
Design of Steel Structures by S.Ramamrutham and R.Narayanan.
Design of Steel Structures by Ram Chandra