comparative studies
DESCRIPTION
A guest lecture on conducting comparative studies. Delivered in Rebecca Moore Howard's CCR 720 seminar on 10/20/09.TRANSCRIPT
The Nitty Grittyon Comparative Studies
Step 1: Find some stuff
selection of artifacts
Spring 2005
Spring 2006
1728 & 1738
Step 2: Make sure the stuff is comparable.
Textual relationship
Step 3: Figure out what you’re
going to do with all that.
Articulate a method.
textual analysis
Wikipedia’s 5 Pillars
Fine. But not enough.
sampled texts
How, oh how will I select articles?
Look for precedents
Emigh & Herring 2005
random article selection
Problem: then is not now
Conics? Catoptrics? Nah.
MineralsTrigonometryFortificationFalconryGarden
Make it do-able.
Trigonometry: 2,500+ edits
First and last 100 edits
Step 4: Execute. Adjust.
How do I create a comparable comparison?
comparator
Convert files.
Easy access to digital versions
Typical Problems:
18c British English and OCR
PDF to .txt
Stupid problems:
1728 ed. = beautiful
1738 ed.= bad archiving practices
4 foot wide pages
bad scans
missing sections
Solution: hand-correcting
Solution: talking to librarians
Eventually: prevail.
Clean .txt files of 18c texts
1400 edits total
Coded for 65 edit types
Chambers 1738
High edit incidence
Title1728length
1738length
Total EditsTypographic
Changes
Falconry 168 166 35 33
Fortification 2134 2039 419 365
Garden 970 970 205 200
Mineral 800 802 144 137
Trigonometry 1636 1607 365 352
Germanic capitalizationLong s shift
1668
distributed agency
Terminal
stubs
Article Creation DateCreation Length
Current Length
Falconry 1/16/03 21 6,075
Fortification 3/31/03 32 3,486
Garden 2/27/02 1 1,393
Minerals 12/12/01 236 2,698
Trigonometry 9/8/01 157 (69) 2,240
Communal and participatory
Effected through form
Open ended