comparative assessment of hybrid vehicle power split

96
January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 1 Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions John M. Miller, P.E., PhD J-N-J Miller, P.L.C. Design Services

Upload: others

Post on 24-May-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 1

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

John M. Miller, P.E., PhDJ-N-J Miller, P.L.C.

Design Services

Page 2: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 2

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Outline of TopicsSlide #

3 21 64 75 8593

• Session 1: Historical developments…….• Session 2: Toyota, THS-I and THS-II…..• Session 3: Ford-Volvo-Aisin, FHS………• Session 4: GM-Allison, AHS-2………….• Session 5 Renault, IVT………………….• Conclusion and wrap up………………….

• Presentation time: ½ day

Page 3: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 3

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Historical Developments: Hydrostatic

• Hydrostatic power split– Maintains direct mechanical power path– Input power splits (k/(k+1)) mechanical + (1/(k+1)) hydraulic– Controllable speed summer (differential) maintains desired

output

ICE Gearbox

VarDispPump

Fixed DispMotor

Hydraulic lines

Geardiff.

Output

Mechanical Power Path

Hydrastatic Power SplitTransmission

Page 4: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 4

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Historical Developments: ElectroMechanical

• The classic electro-mechanical power split transmission developed by TRW and published in a 1971 SAE paper is the basis of today’s electric power split systems. G.H. Gelb, N. A. Richardson, T.C. Wang, B. Berman, “An Electromechanical Transmission for Hybrid Vehicle Powertrains,” SAE paper no. 710235, Jan. 1971

• One electric machine provided the function of “speeder” • A second electric machine provided the function of a

“torquer”• In the original TRW system there are no clutches and no

step ratio gear shifts – the essentials of power split.

Page 5: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 5

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Historical Developments: ElectroMechanical

• TRW Electromechanical Transmission – EMT– ICE drives the planetary SUN gear– The “speeder” (generator) M/G connects to the carrier– The “torquer” (motor) M/G is connected to the ring gear via an

additional gear ratio.– Ring gear output shaft transmits summation power to the vehicle

driveline.

Page 6: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 6

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Historical Developments: ElectroMechanical

• Electromechanical Transmission– Has 5 operating modes– Relies on single planetary gear– Requires 2 electric M/G’s

R

C

SICE

Speeder M/G

FD

TorquerM/G

ωe

ωs

ωΤ

BatteryPack

Page 7: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 7

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Historical Developments: ElectroMechanical

• EMT Operating Modes• Mode 1: low acceleration events when ICE power

exceeds the road load– Excess engine power is used to charge the battery by using

M/G1 and M/G2 in their generating mode– When engine power matches road load but has insufficient

torque, the “torquer” M/G acts as a motor to deliver additional power to the wheels by discharging the battery.

• Mode 2: low speed, launch and light cruise– The “speeder” M/G remains in generator mode and delivers

engine power to the “torquer” via the electric path.– Excess electric power may be delivered to the battery

Page 8: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 8

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Historical Developments: ElectroMechanical

• EMT – operating regimesR

C

SICE

Speeder M/G

FD

TorquerM/G

ωe

ωs

ωΤ

BatteryPack

Veh

icle

Acc

el (m

/s2)

Vehicle Speed (mph)

Mode 1

Mode 2

Mode 3

Mode 4

Mode 5

Page 9: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 9

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Historical Developments: ElectroMechanical

• Mode 3: High load condition– Road load torque and power exceed the available engine torque

and power.– The battery (ESS) contributes additional boost power to both the

motor “torquer” and generator “speeder”.

• Mode 4: High cruising speeds– “Speeder” is locked up and the engine is throttled up– “Torquer” is operated in motoring or generating mode as needed

• Mode 5: Deceleration– Both M/G’s operate in generating mode to recuperate vehicle

kinetic energy to battery (ESS).

Page 10: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 10

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Historical Developments: ElectroMechanical

• EMT operating regimes

Veh

icle

Acc

el (m

/s2)

Vehicle Speed (mph)

Mode 1

Mode 2

Mode 3

Mode 4

Mode 5

R

C

SICE

Speeder M/G

FD

TorquerM/G

ωe

ωs

ωΤ

BatteryPack

Page 11: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 11

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Historical Developments: Flywheel Hybrids

• During 1970’s to early 1980’s U.S. DOE sponsored programs investigated ICE-Flywheel hybrid concepts– FES is the primary energy storage system– Some used mechanical CVT’s as matching elements

FD

ICE CVT

C1 C2

C3

ChainDriveAssembly

Flywheel

HypoidGear

Page 12: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 12

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Historical Developments: Flywheel Hybrids

• Some systems used a planetary gear matching element between the driveline and the flywheel, FES– City bus applications were common development platforms

CIDI

MTFW + GearReduction

SpeedSummer

FD

FW

4:1Epicyclic

Clutch

Input

DOE ProgramFW Brake EnergyRecovery16 T City Bus100 kW CIDI750 Wh FW

Page 13: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 13

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Historical Developments:Battery + Flywheel

• A novel combination relied on Lead-acid battery energy storage and a flywheel for dynamic storage– Battery for continuous and low dynamic events– FES for high dynamic events and for power boosting

FWBattFDXMM/G

90 Wh18 kWh

Battery -FW combination EV

mv = 910 kg

mbatt = 500 kg

mpass = 273 kg

mGVW = 1683 kg

ηFW = 52%

Battery only EV range ~ 57 mi

Battery + FW EV range = 80 mi

Page 14: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 14

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Historical Developments:Battery + Flywheel

• Battery + FES system was an early attempt at combination energy storage systems for continuous and dynamic loading events– FES recharges during deceleration events AND– FES can be recharged from the battery – at slow and efficient rates

Battery PowerFWPower

FW PowerBatterychargesFW

Accel Cruise Coast Brake IdleP

t

Page 15: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 15

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Historical Developments: Early Hybrids• 1905 H. Piper files U.S. patent for a petrol-electric hybrid vehicle.

Goal was to use the electric motor to assist the ICE so that higher speeds (25 mph) could be achieved.– Unfortunately, within a couple years the ICE was improved to the

point that such speeds became commonplace.• 1921 Owen Magnetic Model 60 Touring vehicle

– Uses gasoline engine to run a generatorThat supplies electric power to motorsMounted in each of the rear wheels.

• 2004 Ford Hybrid Escape– Launches in electric mode 0 25 mph

Page 16: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 16

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Hybrid Functions

• Hybrid functionality improves dramatically as M/G power increases to 50% of targeted peak power – synergy with ICE

<4035301073%FE Benefit

ZEV

Launch assist

Energy Mg’mt

Regen

Idle Stop

Functions:

NiMH, 60kgNiMH, 40kgNiMH, 20 kgVRLA, 30kgVRLA, 30kgFlooded Pb-Acid, 25 kg

Battery

ElectricElectricElectric ElectricConventionalConventionalAncillaries

Offset ISG >300V

Crank-ISG 150V

Crank-ISG 42V

Belt ISG 42V

Belt ISG 42V

Belt ISG 14V

Elect. M/G

DownsizedDownsizedDownsizedConventionalConventionalConventionalPowerTrain

<4035301073%FE Benefit

ZEV

Launch assist

Energy Mg’mt

Regen

Idle Stop

Functions:

NiMH, 60kgNiMH, 40kgNiMH, 20 kgVRLA, 30kgVRLA, 30kgFlooded Pb-Acid, 25 kg

Battery

ElectricElectricElectric ElectricConventionalConventionalAncillaries

Offset ISG >300V

Crank-ISG 150V

Crank-ISG 42V

Belt ISG 42V

Belt ISG 42V

Belt ISG 14V

Elect. M/G

DownsizedDownsizedDownsizedConventionalConventionalConventionalPowerTrain

Page 17: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 17

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

ICE versus Electric: Achieving a balance

• What do we mean by synergy with ICE?• Toyota: Hybrid Passenger Vehicle Industry leader

– Prius hybrid: THS-I generation of hybrid functionality– New Prius hybrid: THS-II generation based on hybrid synergy drive– Toyota Prius-II has electric power steering, electronic controlled brakes

and electric drive air conditioning.

PICE PM/G

100 kW

0 50 100 Electric Fraction, Ef

CV

THS-IIHSD Batt

EV

THS-I

Toyota Motor Co has managed toRaise the battery warranty from 8 yearsOn PRIUS-I to 150,000 miles (10 yr)On PRIUS-II

How?By more intelligent operation and byImproving the battery terminations forLower ESR (higher efficiency)

Page 18: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 18

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Vehicle Performance Targets

• Hybrid vehicles today must deliver the performance customers expect. The new HSD Prius-II was released for sale October 2003 in North America. Prius-I sales for 2003 were some 38,000 in NA and customers are now lining up to purchase the new Prius-II. CY2004 sales target in N.A. is 70,000

Launch Accel0.45g

tz6011s

tz8521s

MaximumGrade 30%

Gradeability 90 kphfor 20 min. 6%

WOT speed0% grade180 kph

ZEV Range:

Towing Capacity

Hybrids typically do not have towing capability– until the new Ford hybrid Escape

introduced Oct. 2004 that has a tow capability of 1500# (non-hybrid Escape is rated 3500# towing). Full size pickups are rated 6500# towing.

Acceleration benchmarks:Prius I, 0 60 mph time = 12.5sPrius II, 0 60 mph time = 10.5sHybrid Escape, 0 60 mph time = 11.2s

Page 19: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 19

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Vehicle Performance Targets

• Applying the vehicle performance targets

Vehicle Speed, V

Axl

e To

rque

Total Power

Road Load at 0-grade

Vmax atWOT & 0-grade

mmax, tire adhesionlimited

P max, T

ransm

ission rolling, aero, grade

limited speed

Road load at 6% grade

sustain 90 kph, 20 min

V6%

Torque for 30% grade

Page 20: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 20

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Vehicle Performance Targets

• So how do recent hybrid vehicle products now offered “stack-up” in terms of performance?– Historically, performance targets have dictated a peak specific power

(combined in case of a hybrid) of 10 kW/125 kg power plant

10.34750/10571295HSD8.84565/28802053Escape8.63833/10531254Prius7.351410631242Civic

(kW/125 kg)(%)(kW)(kW)(kg)

Peak specific power

Electric Fraction

M/G Power

Engine Power

Curb massVehicle

Hybrid Synergy Drive, HSD, goal is to match V6 performance with anI4 through “electric supercharging”

Page 21: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 21

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Session 2

• Toyota Hybrid System: – THS-I and THS-II– Tire dynamics– Hybrid modes– Power Split operation during cruise

Page 22: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 22

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Comparison of Toyota Hybrid Technology: THS-I & THS-II Power Train & Vehicle

• Example to illustrate Prius-II vehicle specifications in comparison to Prius-I

P185/65R15P175/65R14Tires

2.29 m22.23 m2Frontal area *

0.260.29Drag coefficient, Cd

1313 kg1257 kgVehicle curb weight

Electronic CVTElectronic CVTTransmission

60/51/55 mpg city/hwy/combined52/45/48 mpg city/hwy/combinedFuel Economy

Advanced Tech. PZEVSULEVEmissions

111 Nm at 4,200 rpm111 Nm at 4,200 rpmEngine Torque

57 kW at 5,000 rpm52 kW at 4,500 rpmEngine Power

4V/cylinder, VVT-i4V/cylinder, VVT-iValve system

13:1 Atkinson Cycle13:1 Atkinson CycleCompression ratio

1.5 liter, DOHC, I41.5 liter, DOHC, I4Engine displacement

Prius IIPrius I

Page 23: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 23

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Comparison of Toyota Hybrid Technology: THS-I & THS-II Power Train & Vehicle

• To understand vehicle propulsion we start at the wheels– Code: P175/65R14 = <veh type> <W, tread width> <H in %W> <Drim>

Tire code: P=passenger, 123mm tread width/sidewall height as xx% Wtread, R, rim diameter (inch)

V (mph)

WH

Drimrw

2)%(298.0 treadrim

wxWHDr +

= = 0.292m Prius-I and 0.3045m Prius-II from which the final drive ratio comes out to Gr=3.95:1 in Prius-I and 4.0:1 in Prius-II

Page 24: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 24

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Comparison of Toyota Hybrid Technology: THS-I & THS-II Power Train & Vehicle

• Finding the driveline final drive ratio, gfd– Must know Vmax and Nm-max

– Need tire dynamic rolling radius, rw

V (mph)

rw

Motor, Ωmax

axleωa, ma

gfd

drivelineωdl, mdl

Vmax

mphvVgVg

rVg

fd

fd

wfd

97|95.3/383)447.0/()292.0(3.586

)/(

maxmax

max

maxmax

====

Ω=

Page 25: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 25

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Comparison of Toyota Hybrid Technology: THS-I & THS-II Power Train & Vehicle

• Comparison of Prius-I and Prius-II continued

201.6 V, 168 cells273.6V, 228 cellsBattery voltage

21 kW improved internal resistance

21 kW (25 kW max)Battery PowerSealed NiMHSealed NiMHBattery type

500V max274VSystem Voltage400 Nm, 0 to 1,200 rpm350 Nm 0 to 400 rpmM/G Torque

50 kW, 1,200 to 1,540 rpm33 kW 1,040 to 5,600 rpmM/G Power

Permanent Reluctance Machine, PRM

Interior Permanent Magnet, IPM

Motor/GeneratorPrius-IIPrius-I

Page 26: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 26

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

THS-II System

• THS-II achieves higher voltage local dc bus using a conventional half bridge converter (i.e., one additional phase leg of power electronics).

• Present cost of hybridization for THS-I and THS-II systems are $66/kW to $93/kW while cost of an SI powertrain is ~$30/kW

S/A M/GNiMH6 Ah201.7 V233 Apk1400 W/kg

Half-bridgeboostconverter

Boost Ind250A, 10 kHz

1500 uF600V

10 kW 50 kW

500V (2.5x boost)

30 kW, 8-pole IPM50 kW, 8-pole IPM

500V Power Elect.

1500 uF, 600V, PPS-polyphenylene sulfide dc link bus capacitor

S/A M/GNiMH6 Ah201.7 V233 Apk1400 W/kg

Half-bridgeboostconverter

Boost Ind250A, 10 kHz

1500 uF600V

10 kW 50 kW

500V (2.5x boost)

30 kW, 8-pole IPM50 kW, 8-pole IPM

500V Power Elect.

1500 uF, 600V, PPS-polyphenylene sulfide dc link bus capacitor

Page 27: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 27

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

THS-II System• NiMH battery with double welded terminations for 30% reduced ESR &

more compact package.

S/A M/GNiMH6 Ah201.7 V233 Apk1400 W/kg

Half-bridgeboostconverter

Boost Ind250A, 10 kHz

1500 uF600V

10 kW 50 kW

500V (2.5x boost)

Expanded view of power electronics package. NiMH battery cable connector:

Link Ind~100mmcube

Page 28: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 28

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

THS-II System• Mechanical & Electrical Architecture• Motor/Generators are under full electronic control

R

C

S

M/G2

ICE FD

wheels

Power Split, E-CVT

M/G1

Battery

Integrated Power& Control Electronics

Page 29: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 29

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

THS: Power Split Device

• Mechanical and Electrical Architecture– Depend fundamentally on the dynamics of a planetary gear set– Epicyclic gears provide speed summation– Torque splits according to port loading (power balance)

Uc

ωr

ωc

ωprp

vsωs

rs

rr

rc

SunPlanet

Ring (inside and/or outside gear)

Fundamental equation of the planetaryGear set: ratio of the difference inAngular speeds between an inner epicyclicGear and a common gear and a secondInner gear and the common gear equalsA constant – the basic ratio.

0)1()()(

=+−+−−=−

−=−=−−

crs

crcs

s

r

cr

cs

kkk

kNN

ωωωωωωω

ωωωω

Page 30: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 30

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

THS: Power Split Device• Planetery gear set

– The basic ratio is negative for inside gears and positive for an outside epicyclic gear.

• Dynamics of the planetary gear set (ω is angular speed and m is torque, MKS units)

R

S

C

ωs ωrωc

011

0110)1(

_

=+

−−+

+

=+−−

=+−+

==

rrccrrcc

rrssrrss

crs

s

r

JkkJM

kkM

Jk

JMk

M

kk

ratiobasicRRk

ωωηη

ωωηη

ωωω

&&

&&

Prius I & II: Nr = 78, Np=24, Ns=30 from which k=78/30 = 2.6

Page 31: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 31

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

THS: Power Split Dynamics

• THS power split dynamics

R

C

S

M/G2

ICE FD

wheels

M/G1

Batteryrw

V

Ga2r

Gr2s

Ge2s

ωama,Ja

ωfd,mfd,Jfd

ωr,mr,Jr

ωg,mg,Jg

ωe,me,Je

ωm,mm,Jm

Pe

Pb

SOCCbUoc

Page 32: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 32

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

THS: Power Split Dynamics

• Expressions for M/G2 (motor) and M/G1 (gen) torque can be derived by inspection of the THS architecture– System inertias are lumped parameter– Generator effects (couple) are reflected to engine and motor ports

( )

emdlss

mgceeese

g

mmqgcse

sregceq

se

sre

se

srmdl

mkkmm

JJmg

m

JJggJJ

ggm

ggmm

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

++=

−−=

−+

−+−=

ωω

ωω

&&

&&

Steady state driveline torque expression showingTorque contribution of motor and engine mechanicalPath split

Page 33: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 33

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

THS: Propulsion System Strategy

• Engine and electric system matching are essential to realize geographical preferences in the market– The power split device & the electric machine CPSR – constant

power speed ratio are key elements in this strategy

R

C

S

M/G

ICE

S/A

Gearbox FD

wheelsFE(mpg)

Gsrc

4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7

ATGear shift ratio coverage = 5 5.5 6.5

Japan 10-151900 kg sedan

Europe EC1900 kg sedan

US combined2900 kg SUV

Note: most input coupled transmissions have the ICE at the planet carrier port

Page 34: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 34

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

THS: Propulsion System Strategy

• To further develop the propulsion system strategy we first define the power split operating modes

• Then, an efficiency optimizing strategy is defined for highway cruise that aims to hold the ICE in or near the high plateau’s of BSFC – brake specific fuel consumption (g/kWh)

Batt

R

C

S

M/G2

ICE FD

wheels

Power Split, e-CVTUn-Buffered ESS

M/G1

Epicyclic274 V Inverter

Ultra-cap

Page 35: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 35

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

THS: Propulsion System Strategy

• Operating modes – In this study five modes will be

defined• Batt-EV & Regen mode• Normal driving mode• Battery charge mode• Power boost mode• Negative split mode

• Some power split systems enter negative split as a means to further lug the engine (lower its speed at given torque)

Page 36: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 36

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

THS: Propulsion System Strategy

• Positive split is primarily used (which is most of the time) when ESS state of charge, SOC, is low, vehicle speed is relatively low and the engine delivers power to the ESS –battery.

• Negative split is used when the ESS, SOC is high, vehicle is under cruise condition with engine ON.– ESS discharges into generator (runs in motoring quadrant(s))– Generator in motoring mode drives engine speed lower to further

optimize fuel efficiency

• Series mode is used when parked, during idle and for reverse (Batt-EV mode).

Page 37: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 37

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

THS: Propulsion System Modes• Batt-EV (electric drive and regeneration mode)

– Engine OFF and generator not used.– Also called series mode

Batt-EV and Regeneration Mode

ICE

GEN

ESSBattery

MOT

FD

Inverter

Note: series modeFor reverse – speedConstrained in S/WBy rev limiter.

Page 38: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 38

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

THS: Propulsion System Modes• Normal driving, cruise mode

– Engine ON, power splits from engine to wheels mechanically and via generator electrically.

– ESS has nominal SOC, electrical power circulates from engine viagenerator to the motor where it sums mechanically with engine mechanical path power Normal Driving Mode

ICE

GEN

ESSBattery

MOT

FD

Inverter

Page 39: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 39

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

THS: Propulsion System Modes

• Battery charge mode – Vehicle parked or during idle

Battery Charging Mode

ICE

GEN

ESSBattery

MOT

FD

Inverter

Page 40: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 40

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

THS: Propulsion System Modes

• Power boost mode– Engine torque augmentation– Similar to EMT mode 3, engine has insufficient torque/power to meet

road load demandPower Boost Mode

ICE

GEN

ESSBattery

MOT

FD

Inverter

Page 41: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 41

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

THS: Propulsion System Modes• Negative split mode

– Forced engine lugging to optimize fuel economy– Engine control strategies also come into play in the form of advanced or

retarded VVT when SOC is low• Advanced VVT lowers speed, but higher torque op point• Retarded VVT increases speed, lowers torque op point

Negative Split Mode

ICE

GEN

ESSBattery

MOT

FD

Inverter

Page 42: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 42

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

THS: Propulsion System Strategy

• Overall strategy is to operate the engine at high torque, low speed, most efficient operating points– Atkinson cycle provides inherent ~10% higher thermodynamic

combustion efficiency– Improves highway FE

ICE

GEN

ESSBattery

MOT

FD

Inverter

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000Engine speed (rpm)

210215

220230

250

270

300

400

700BSFC

Bra

ke m

ean

effe

ctiv

e pr

essu

re x

100

(kN

/m2 ) Te

Peng

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

Engi

ne p

ower

(kW

)200

150

100

50

0

Torq

ue (N

m)

(me-ωe) constrainedmapping points

Torque reservefor driveability

Page 43: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 43

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

THS: Propulsion System Strategy• Efficiency optimizing strategy for cruise mode

– Define using N/V plot– Piecewise linear approximation of the engine control strategy– Generator speed responds to these discontinuties – artifact of the method

0 20 40 60 80 1005000

0

5000

1 .104

Speed, mph

Ang

ular

spee

d, ra

d/s

5.544 103×

3.712− 103×

N m i( )

N e i( )

N g i( )

0

1000 V i( )

Note that the generator speed is restricted to 3rd quadrant operation. LoweringGenerator speed increases engine speed and vice versa regardless of Motor speed (i.e., vehicle speed)

Page 44: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 44

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

THS: Propulsion System Strategy• Lever “stick” diagrams are

sometimes used to illustrate the interplay of engine and electric M/G’s in the power split system.

RCS

Vehicle launch

Cruise

Engine Cranking

AccelerationVehSpeed

EngineSpeed

S/ASpeed

292.004136

167.170167

10 V i( ).

ω r i( )

ω c i( )

ω s i( )

100 t i( )0 2 4 6 8 10

200

0

200

400

Time (s)

Com

pone

nt S

peed

s (m

/s, r

ad/s

)

R

C

S

M/G2

ICE FD

wheels

Power Split, E-CVT

M/G1

BatteryVehicle Speed

M/G2 rpm

Engine rpm

M/G1 rpm

Page 45: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 45

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Power Split Propulsion System Strategy

• The strategy to be employed can be described in look up table format (and applied to the THS-I system)

+430-19374620280080

-1110-26044043220070

-860-28883465170060

+430-10272890180050

+670-6082310150040

-3,290-45041733OFF30

000OFF0

Battery PowerPb (W)

Generator SpeedNg (rpm)

Motor SpeedNm (rpm)

Engine SpeedNe (rpm)

Vehicle SpeedV (mph)

Page 46: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 46

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

PS Propulsion System in Cruise Mode

• Observations on the selected Power Split strategy– Batt-EV mode 0 30mph then– Batt-charge mode at 40 and 50 mph– Power boost mode at 60 and 70 mph– ICE to near WOT torque at 80 mph

• At max vehicle speed the PS motor will be at max speed – As will the planetary gear set

• Engine operation at WOT torque (Ne~ 4000 rpm) will occur during high load conditions, grade, etc.

Page 47: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 47

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

PS Propulsion System in Cruise Mode

• The maximum Batt-EV mode speed is limited by the generator max speed– Ne = 0 engine is OFF– Ng = 6500 rpm maximum

mphV

smV

kgr

V

ci

ci

fd

wgmci

3.43447.035.19

/35.19)95.3(6.2

)292.0(6.680

==

==

Ω=

ICE

GEN

ESSBattery

MOT

FD

Inverter

Max engine cut-in speed can be approachedBy very gradual acceleration in Batt-EV mode

Page 48: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 48

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

PS Propulsion System in Cruise Mode

• First step is to calculate the road load during cruise

• Froll = 98.33N and Faero = 0.4103V2

2

3

3

0

20

31.29.0

)(Pr29.0@/225.1

0/902.9

1254008.0

sin5.0cos

mWHA

iusCSTPmkg

gradesmg

kgmR

gmVACgmRF

f

d

air

v

vfdairvt

==

==

−==

==

++=

ρ

α

αρα

Page 49: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 49

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

PS Propulsion System in Cruise Mode

• Steps used in the evaluation of power split operation• 1st: Calculate the road load for the stated condition• 2nd: Reflect the road load to the driveline – speed and

torque• 3rd: Assign the engine speed per the strategy• 4th: Use the planetary gear speed equation to determine

the generator speed,• 5th: Calculate the engine mechanical path torque per the

planetary gear torque expression (see power split device slides)

• 6th: Calculate all power flows and insure balance to match the stated battery loading condition.

Page 50: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 50

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

PS Propulsion System in Cruise Mode

ICE

GEN

ESSBattery

MOT

FD

Inverter

VehicleV = 30 mphFt = 172 NPt = 2.31 kW

DrivelinePdl = 2.81 kWωdl =181.4 r/smdl=15.5 Nm

Motor/Ring GearPm = 2.81 kWωm = 181.4 r/smm = 15.5 Nm

EnginePem = 0ωe = 0mem = 0me = 0Pe = 0

GeneratorPg = 0ωg = -471.6 r/smg = 0

Pb =-3.9 kW PM/G = 0

gfd = 3.95ηfd = 0.82

Electric power path:ηmi = ηm*ηi = 0.91*0.94 = 0.855• V=30 mph

Page 51: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 51

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

PS Propulsion System in Cruise Mode

• Engine and M/G maps for 30 mph

115

90

65

35

0

Torq

ue (N

m)

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Engine Speed (rpm)

200

210

220

230

240

250

270

290

Consumptiong/kWh

20 kW

15 kW10 kW 8 kW

35 kW

55 kW

T(Nm)

80

60

40

20

0

Speed (krpm)0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Generator map

93

88

82

73

Atkinson Engine Map

Page 52: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 52

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

PS Propulsion System in Cruise Mode

ICE

GEN

ESSBattery

MOT

FD

Inverter

VehicleV =40 mphFt = 229.5 NPt = 4.1 kW

DrivelinePdl =5 kWPdlm = 4.5 kWPdle = 0.5 kWωdl =241.9 r/smdl=20.67 Nm

Motor/Ring GearPm =0.5 kWωm = 241.9 r/smm = 2.07 Nm

EnginePem = 4.5 kWωe = 157 r/smem = 28.62me = 41.2Pe = 6.47 kW

GeneratorPg =1.47 kW ωg = -63.74 r/smg = 6.74 Nm

Pb = +670WPM/G = 585W

Electric power path:ηmi = ηm*ηi = 0.91*0.94 = 0.855

gfd = 3.95ηfd = 0.82

• V=40 mph

Page 53: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 53

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

PS Propulsion System in Cruise Mode

• Engine and M/G maps for 40 mph

115

90

65

35

0

Torq

ue (N

m)

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Engine Speed (rpm)

200

210

220

230

240

250

270

290

Consumptiong/kWh

20 kW

15 kW10 kW 8 kW

35 kW

55 kW

T(Nm)

80

60

40

20

0

Speed (krpm)0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Generator map

93

88

82

73

Atkinson Engine Map

Page 54: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 54

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

PS Propulsion System in Cruise Mode

ICE

GEN

ESSBattery

MOT

FD

Inverter

VehicleV =50 mphFt = 303 NPt = 6.78 kW

Motor/Ring GearPm =1.12 kWωm = 302mm = 3.71 Nm

EnginePem = 7.14 kWωe = 188.5 r/smem = 37.9 Nmme = 48.7 NmPe = 9.175 kW

GeneratorPg = 2.035 kWωg = -107.5 r/smg = 18.93 Nm

Pb = +430 WPM/G =1.31 kW

Electric power path:ηmi = ηm*ηi = 0.91*0.94 = 0.855

gfd = 3.95ηfd = 0.82

DrivelinePdl =8.27 kWPdlm = 7.14 kWPdle = 1.12 kWωdl =302.3 r/smdl= 27.35

• V=50 mph

Page 55: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 55

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

PS Propulsion System in Cruise Mode

• Engine and M/G maps for 50 mph

115

90

65

35

0

Torq

ue (N

m)

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Engine Speed (rpm)

200

210

220

230

240

250

270

290

Consumptiong/kWh

20 kW

15 kW10 kW 8 kW

35 kW

55 kW

T(Nm)

80

60

40

20

0

Speed (krpm)0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Generator map

93

88

82

73

Atkinson Engine Map

Page 56: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 56

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

PS Propulsion System in Cruise Mode

ICE

GEN

ESSBattery

MOT

FD

Inverter

VehicleV =60 mphFt = 393.5 NPt = 10.6 kW

Motor/Ring GearPm =4.125 kWωm = 362.8 r./smm = 11.4 Nm

EnginePem = 8.745 kWωe = 178 r/smem = 49.1 Nmme = 75.2 NmPe = 13.385 kW

GeneratorPg =4.64 kW ωg = -302.5r/smg = 15.33 Nm

Pb = -860 WPM/G = 4.824 kW

Electric power path:ηmi = ηm*ηi = 0.91*0.94 = 0.855

gfd = 3.95ηfd = 0.82

DrivelinePdl =12.87 kWPdlm = 8.745 kWPdle = 4.125 kWωdl =362.8 r/smdl=35.47 Nm

• V=60 mph

Page 57: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 57

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

PS Propulsion System in Cruise Mode

• Engine and M/G maps for 60 mph

115

90

65

35

0

Torq

ue (N

m)

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Engine Speed (rpm)

200

210

220

230

240

250

270

290

Consumptiong/kWh

20 kW

15 kW10 kW 8 kW

35 kW

55 kW

T(Nm)

80

60

40

20

0

Speed (krpm)0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Generator map

93

88

82

73

Atkinson Engine Map

Page 58: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 58

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

PS Propulsion System in Cruise Mode

ICE

GEN

ESSBattery

MOT

FD

Inverter

VehicleV =70 mphFt = 500 NPt = 15.65 kW

Motor/Ring GearPm =4.73 kWωm = 423.3 r/smm = 11.17 Nm

EnginePem = 14.37 kWωe = 230 r/smem = 62.5 Nmme = 85 NmPe = 19.55 kW

GeneratorPg = 5.18 kWωg = -272.6 r/smg = 19 Nm

Pb = -1.1 kWPM/G = 5.532 kW

Electric power path:ηmi = ηm*ηi = 0.91*0.94 = 0.855

gfd = 3.95ηfd = 0.82

DrivelinePdl =19.1 kWPdlm = 14.37 kWPdle = 4.73 kWωdl =423.3 r/smdl=45.12 Nm

• V= 70 mph

Page 59: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 59

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

PS Propulsion System in Cruise Mode

• Engine and M/G maps for 70 mph

115

90

65

35

0

Torq

ue (N

m)

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Engine Speed (rpm)

200

210

220

230

240

250

270

290

Consumptiong/kWh

20 kW

15 kW10 kW 8 kW

35 kW

55 kW

T(Nm)

80

60

40

20

0

Speed (krpm)0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Generator map

93

88

82

73

Atkinson Engine Map

Page 60: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 60

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

PS Propulsion System in Cruise Mode

ICE

GEN

ESSBattery

MOT

FD

Inverter

VehicleV =80 mphFt = 623 NPt = 22.3 kW

Motor/Ring GearPm =4.374 kWωm = 483.7 r/smm = 9.04 Nm

EnginePem = 22.786 kWωe = 293 r/smem = 77.8 Nmme = 100 NmPe = 29.27kW

GeneratorPg = 6.486 kWωg = -202.8mg = 21.6 Nm

Pb = +430WPM/G =5.116 kW

Electric power path:ηmi = ηm*ηi = 0.91*0.94 = 0.855

gfd = 3.95ηfd = 0.82

DrivelinePdl =27.16 kWPdlm = 22.786 kWPdle = 4.374 kWωdl =483.7 r/smdl=56.15 Nm

• V=80 mph

Page 61: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 61

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

PS Propulsion System in Cruise Mode

• Engine and M/G maps for 80 mph

115

90

65

35

0

Torq

ue (N

m)

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Engine Speed (rpm)

200

210

220

230

240

250

270

290

Consumptiong/kWh

20 kW

15 kW10 kW 8 kW

35 kW

55 kW

T(Nm)

80

60

40

20

0

Speed (krpm)0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Generator map

93

88

82

73

Atkinson Engine Map

Page 62: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 62

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

PS Propulsion System in Cruise Mode

• Composite engine and M/G maps

115

90

65

35

0

Torq

ue (N

m)

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Engine Speed (rpm)

200

210

220

230

240

250

270

290

Consumptiong/kWh

20 kW

15 kW10 kW 8 kW

35 kW

55 kW

T(Nm)

80

60

40

20

0

Speed (krpm)0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Generator map

93

88

82

73

Atkinson Engine Map

T(Nm)

300

240

200

120

80

0

Speed (krpm)0 1 2 3 4 5 6

93

88

82

73

Motor map

(me-ωe) constrainedmapping points

Torque reservefor driveability

Electric subsystemtorque reserve forpower boosting

Page 63: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 63

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

PS System Summary

• Conclusions– Cruise mode control strategy must optimize both engine and

generator efficiency– Hybrid strategy pushes engine operation high on T-N map

resulting in reduced engine torque for transients– Motor operates at relatively low power levels during cruise– But, the motor maintains sufficient reserve to augment the

engine torque during transient maneuvers, passing, negotiating grades, braking, etc

– Battery SOC is maintained via the generator by additional loading on the engine

– During boosting the battery augments generator power

Page 64: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 64

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Session 3

• Ford-Volvo-Aisin, FHS System– Very similar to the THS system, with the addition of output

gearing– Still an input coupled power split– Motor is now offset geared from planetary ring gear– Power and control electronics are now integral to the e-CVT

transmission.

• Hybrid Escape introduced in Oct. 2004 as MY2005 hybSUV

Page 65: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 65

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Hybrid Escape e-CVT

• Ford Hybrid System

2.3L ICE

e-CVT

HV Battery

2.3L Atkinson

Cycle Engine

Planetary

GearOutputGear

To Wheels

TractionGenerato

r

TractionMotor

AC-DCInverters

TractionHV Battery

Mechanical PathElectrical Path

Page 66: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 66

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Hybrid Escape e-CVT

• Model development

R1

C1

S1 M/G1

ICEFD

wheels

M/G2

EpicyclicInput

300 V

BattUltra-cap Inverter

OWCB1

N1

N2

N2

OutputGears

Fixed link, PowerSplit with Gear

An ultracapacitor and battery combination isShown to illustrate that ESS system upgrades are possible and also recommended for increased ESS longevity

Page 67: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 67

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Hybrid e-CVT: Sidebar on ESS

• It is small wonder then, with this discussion of hybrid vehicles and energy storage systems that energy storage may indeed represent a >$10B market by 2010.

Potential: 1000 Wh/kg

Nissan AltraEVSONY, SAFTlaboratory400 to 1200300100 to 150Lithium-Ion

Potential: 2200 cycle

life

WWU Viking 23SAFT110300 to 600mature10 to 20-60 to +60-40 to +601000 to

200050 to 20035 to 57Nickel-Cadmium

Potential: 120 Wh/kg, and 2200 cycle life

Toyota RAV4-EV,

Toyota Prius,

Chrysler Epic

minivan, Honda EV, Chevy S-10

Panasonic, Ovonic, SAFT

115 to 300525 to 540prototype600 to 1500150 to 25050 to 80Nickel-Metal

Hydride

Potential: 55 Wh/kg, 450 W/kg, and 2000 cycle

life

Audi Duo, GM EV1 (VLRA), Solectria

Force

Delphi, Horizon,

Electrosourceproduction500 to 800240 to 41235 to 42Advanced

Lead Acid

CARTA bus,

SolectriaE10

(sealed)

Trojan, Hawker, Exide,

Interstate

75100 to 125production2 to 3ambient-18 to +70200 to 40075 to 13025 to 35Lead-Acid

Other Notes

Vehicles Used_In

Principal Manuf.

Future Cost

$/kWh]

Current Cost

[$/kWh]Maturity

Self Discharge Rate[% per month]

Storage Temp.

[C]

Operating Temp.

[C]

Cycle Life

Power Density [W/kg]

Energy Density [Wh/kg]

Battery Type

Page 68: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 68

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Hybrid e-CVT: Sidebar on ESS

• Ultracapacitors are becoming a viable ESS technology

Above, 2700F BoostCAP & New D-Cell BoostCAP.Below, D-Cell 15V 58 F module

Page 69: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 69

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Power Split: Electrical System Modeling

• Motor-generator and power electronics are modeled conventionally: – M/G as torque source or sink dependent on angular speed with

load dependent loss– Inverter as switching elements with load dependent losses

• Control strategy is modeled as state transition map based on hybrid dynamical systems theory – Each operating mode must be modeled:– (1) standstill, (2) Creep, (3) Power split, (4) Parallel, (5) Regen

brake• Electrical Energy Storage System model for state-of-

charge variation with load demand

Page 70: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 70

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Power Split: Electrical System Modeling

• State transition map

q1

q2

q3

q4

q5

Standstill

Creep

PowerSplit

Parallel

regeneration

Enter

State Transition Map, ex

e1

e2

e3

e4

e5

e6 e7 e8

e9

e10e11In state q4 we have that (ρ=1/k):

fme

ee

r

g

re

mmmJ

J −++

=+

+

=+

=

ρω

ρ

ω

ωρ

ω

1)1(

01

1

2&

Brake B1=ON

Page 71: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 71

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Power Split: Electrical System Modeling

• Model must account for ESS SOC variation

dtCSdCI

IVPdtSOCdCV

dtdW

PRIVIIVP

brb

bocstoredbrocc

availibocbbdbat

)0(

)()(

=∴

===

=−==

VocVd

Battery Ri

Pbat

Ib

Substitute for Ib in equation for PbatThen solve the resulting quadratic to obtain:

( )bri

ocibatoc

briocbrbat

CRVRPV

dtSOCd

thatFinddtSOCdCRV

dtSOCdCP

24)(

:_

)()(

2 −−+

−=

−=

Define Cbr = battery rated capacity, AhNoting that: RiCbr = τbat

Page 72: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 72

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Power Split: Electrical System Modeling

• Mechanical System Modeling

++++=

=Ω=

dttdUMgMUtUACgMR

Gr

tm

rtUG

Gt

vvofdvofd

wf

w

fdafdf

)()sin())((21)(

)()(

2 αρ

ω

ωe, me

ωr, mr

ωg, mg

ωf, mfR1

C1

S1 M/G1

ICEFD

wheels

M/G2

EpicyclicInput

300 V

BattUltra-cap Inverter

OWCB1

N1

N2

N2

OutputGears

Fixed link, PowerSplit with Gear

Countershaft

ωm, mm

fmr

reeregr

rgergrg

mmmthatnoting

mkkmJ

kkJJ

kk

mk

mJkJk

J

kDefine

==

++=

+

−++

−=+−

+

=

:_

111

1)1(1

1:

2

2

2

ωω

ωω

ρ

&&

&&

For each operating state reflectRoad load conditions to power splitM/G’s and engine

Page 73: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 73

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Power Split: e-CVT Dynamics

• FHS system dynamics

R

C

S

M/G2

ICEFD

wheels

M/G1

Battery

rw

V

ga2f

gr2s

ge2s

ωamaJa

ωr,mr,Jr

ωg,mg,Jg

ωe,me,Je

ωm,mm,Jm

PePb

SOCCbUoc

N1

N2

N3

Pe

ωfd,mfd,Jfd

gm2r

gm2f

gf2r

Input split with fixed output gearing

Counter shaft

Page 74: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 74

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

FHS: e-CVT Power Split Dynamics

• Expressions for M/G2 (motor) and M/G1 (gen) torque can be derived by inspection of the THS architecture– System inertias are lumped parameter– Generator effects (couple) are reflected to engine and motor ports

( )

emfdss

sefm

srrmcs

mgceeqese

g

mmqfa

gccsegcfa

eqcsecsmfm

fd

mNN

kkm

NNm

ggggg

JJmg

m

Jg

JgJg

Jgmgmg

m

++

=

=

−−=

−+

−+−=

3

2

1

2

22

22

2

222

1

1

111

ωω

ωω

&&

&&

Steady state driveline torque expression showingTorque contribution of motor and engine mechanicalPath split

Page 75: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 75

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Session 4

• GM-Allision Advanced Hybrid System, 2-mode– Introduces clutches into basic power split– Dual planetary e-CVT with both input and output coupling– Input split and compound split performance– Synchronous shift from low range to high range

• Compound split promotes induction machine use

Page 76: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 76

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

GM-Allision Advanced Hybrid System, 2-mode

• AHS-2 system– Mechanical and electrical architecture

R

C

S

M/G

ICE FD

wheelsBattery

R

C

S

M/G

Compound Split, e-CVT

The AHS-2 system appears suited to heavyVehicles such as city buses, trucks and fullSize SUV’s.

Page 77: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 77

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

GM-Allison, AHS-2• Compound split E-VT exhibits 2-modes: high and low range without need

for gear shifts.– Two “mechanical” points of power split at input plus two “mechanical” points of output split.– M/G electrical power versus vehicle speed exhibits the mechanical points:

M/G1M/G2

Pe

mechanical points

Pe

Uv, veh spd

Mode switching requires clutch activations synchronously withM/G speed = zero points

Page 78: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 78

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

AHS-2 System

• AHS-2 model development• Mode 1 = Input Split

– Low range & reverse– E1 = differential– E2 = torque mult– C1=1, C2=0, C3=1– M/G1=gen, M/G2=mtr

• Mode 2 = Compound Split– High range, highway– Towing, grades– E1=E2=differential– C1=1, C2=1, C3=0

• Neutral mode: C2=C3=0

R1

C1

S1 M/G1

ICE

FD

wheels

R2

C2

S2M/G2

Compound Split, EVTUn-Buffered ESS

CL1

CL2

CL3EpicyclicInput

EpicyclicOutput

300 V

BattUltra-cap Inverter

Page 79: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 79

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

AHS-2 System

• AH2 model development– Compound split mode: input power splits into 2 paths which

recombine at the output differential, E2– Benefit of compound split is reduced M/G speed range made

possible by introduction of clutches and synch shift– M/G1 and M/G2 can be induction machines

• M/G operating modes versus vehicle speed– V<0 reverse, engine at idle, M/G2 = motoring in (-) dir and M/G1

spins faster in (-) direction– V>0 forward, engine speed ramps up, M/G2=motoring in (+) dir

and M/G1 spins in (-) direction but slowing down.– At a particular vehicle speed, Vshift, M/G1 speed =0

Page 80: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 80

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

AHS-2 System Modes & Dynamics

• Input split (mode 1)

R1

C1

S1 M/G1

ICE

FD

wheels

R2

C2

S2M/G2

EVT in Mode 1CL1=1, CL2=0, CL3=1

CL1

CL2

CL3

BatterySOCCbUoc

Pb

Pe

ωe,me,Je

ωg,mg,Jg

rw

V

ωa

ma,Ja

ga2f

ωfd,mfd,Jfd

ωr2,mr2,Jr2

ωg,mg,Jg

Counter shaft

gi2g

ge2g

Intermediate shaft

gm2i

gf2m

gr2m

ωi,mi,Ji

ωr1,mr1,Jr1

E1-Differential E2- TorqueMultiplier

Page 81: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 81

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

AHS-2 System Modes & Dynamics

• Compound split (mode 2)

R1

C1

S1 M/G1

ICE

FD

wheels

R2

C2

S2M/G2

EVT in Mode 2CL1=1, CL2=1, CL3=0

CL1

CL2

CL3

BatterySOCCbUoc

Pb

Pe

ωe,me,Je

ωg,mg,Jg

rw

V

ωama,Ja

ga2f

ωfd,mfd,Jfd

ωr2,mr2,Jr2

ωg,mg,Jg

Counter shaft

gi2g

ge2g

Intermediate shaft

gm2i

gf2m

gr2m

ωi,mi,Ji

ωr1,mr1,Jr1

Page 82: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 82

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

AHS-2 System

0 20 40 60 80 1001000

0

1000

2000Input split mode below sync shift

Vehicle Speed, mph

Ang

ular

spee

ds, r

pm

1.8 103×

392.197−

n 0 i( )

n e i( )

0

10015− V i( )

0.447

Engine ramps to steady state, Nss, at V=30 mph

• M/G operating modes versus vehicle speed– Synchronous shift when

V=Vshift, M/G1 speed = 0 (1st

mech pt)– Vshift<V< Vs3, both M/G1 and

M/G2 motoring in (+) dir– At Vs3, M/G2 speed =0 (2nd

mechanical point)– Vs3<V<Vs4 have M/G2

motoring in (-) dir to add torque to M/G1 and to the engine

– V>Vs4 have M/G1 = gen.

0 20 40 60 80 1005000

0

5000

1 .104 Input split mode, below sync shift

Vehicle speed, mph

Ang

ular

spee

d, rp

m

5.648 103×

4.012− 103×

n m1 i( )

n m2 i( )

0

10010− V i( )

0.447

At synchronous shift point, Vshift = 33 mph, the Output shaft speed, No=1294 rpm and Nm1=4659 rpm

Page 83: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 83

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

AHS-2 System

0 20 40 60 80 1001000

2000

3000

4000Compound split mode above sync shift

Vehicle speed, mph

Ang

ular

spee

d, rp

m

3.804 103×

1.294 103×

n 0 i( )

n e i( )

10015− V i( )

0.447

0 20 40 60 80 1001 .104

0

1 .104 Compound split mode above sync shift

Vehicle speed, mph

Ang

ular

spee

d, rp

m

9.016 103×

9.745− 103×

n m1 i( )

n m2 i( )

0

10010− V i( )

0.447

Engine remains at Nss, No continues to climb inDirect relation to vehicle speed, V

At 1st mech point, Vs1 Nm2=0 while V=53.3 mphNm1=2940 rpm. At 97 mph, Nm1=9 krpm, Nm2=-9750

• M/G operating points versus vehicle speed

• Input split mode:

• Compound split mode02

01

0

)1()1(

1047.0

nknknnkn

rVg

n

m

em

w

fd

+=−+=

=

kkk

nkknkn

knnknNn

EEem

em

sse

==

+−−=

−+===

210

22

01

)1)(1(

)1(1800

Page 84: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 84

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

AHS-2 System• AHS-2 summary

– For modest values of the epicyclic basic ratio the M/G speed regimes are indeed reasonable.

– For k>3 the speeds tend to become excessive– K=2.6 was assumed here

• Composite M/G, Vehicle and Engine speeds

-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100V, mph

N(krpm) 10

8

6

4

2

0

-2

-4

-6

-8

-10

Vs1 Vshift Vs2 Vs3 Vs4Rev Forward

Nm2

Ne

Nout

Nm1AHS-2 EVT

Page 85: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 85

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Session 5

• Renault Infinitely Variable Transmission, IVT– Appears derived from GM-Allision AHS-2 concept– Emphasis on bulk of power transmission via mechanical path– Variator path is electrical– Variator controls the overall transmission ratio

• Compound split (electric variator) promotes induction machine use

Page 86: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 86

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Renault IVT System• Compound split without synchronous shift

– Renault sought out the most flexible and most efficient variator topology– An electric variator was selected

• The IVT transmission concept

M/G2 M/G1

R1

R1

C1

C1

S1S2

C2

C2

R2

R2

ICE

FD

gf2d

gfd

PM/G

ωvoωvi ωi

ωo

Page 87: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 87

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Renault IVT System

• IVT model development

E1

E2

S1

C1

R1

M/G1

M/G2S2

C2

R2

ICE

ωvi

ωvo

ωiωi

ωo

ωo

PM/G

M/G2 M/G1

R1

R1

C1

C1

S1S2

C2

C2

R2

R2

ICE

FD

gf2d

gfd

PM/G

ωvoωvi ωi

ωo

Page 88: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 88

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Renault IVT System

• IVT model development

E1

E2

S1

C1

R1

M/G1

M/G2S2

C2

R2

ICE

ωvi

ωvo

ωiωi

ωo

ωo

PM/G

M/G2 M/G1

R1

R1

C1

C1

S1S2

C2

C2

R2

R2

ICE

FD

gf2d

gfd

PM/G

ωvoωvi ωi

ωo

E1

E2

S1

C1

R1

M/G1

M/G2 S2

C2

R2

ICEPM/G

Vb

Pb

ωvi

ωvo

ωo ωo

ωiωi

Compound Splitmechanical path

Electric Variator

Page 89: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 89

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Renault IVT System• IVT model development

– Planetary gear sets E1 & E2 may have different basic ratios– Define the planetary gear element speeds at each carrier – This will result in expressions for ωi and ωo.

E1

E2

S1

C1

R1

M/G1

M/G2 S2

C2

R2

ICEPM/G

Vb

Pb

ωvi

ωvo

ωo ωo

ωiωi

Compound Splitmechanical path

Electric Variator

22

2

222

11

1

111

111

111

rE

E

sEc

rE

E

sEc

kk

k

kk

k

ωωω

ωωω

+

+

+=

+

+

+=

Page 90: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 90

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Renault IVT System

• IVT model development

22

2

222

11

1

111

111

111

rE

E

sEc

rE

E

sEc

kk

k

kk

k

ωωω

ωωω

+

+

+=

+

+

+=

E1

E2

S1

C1

R1

M/G1

M/G2 S2

C2

R2

ICEPM/G

Vb

Pb

ωvi

ωvo

ωo ωo

ωiωi

Compound Splitmechanical path

Electric Variator

oE

E

voEi

iE

E

viEo

kk

k

kk

k

ωωω

ωωω

+

+

+=

+

+

+=

2

2

2

1

1

1

111

111

Page 91: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 91

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Renault IVT System

• IVT model development– Some definitions, then solve the preceding sets of equations for

E1 and E2 speeds as:

2

2

2

22

1

1

1

11

1

11

1

11

E

E

E

E

E

E

kkk

kkk

+=

+=

+=

+=

β

α

β

α

−−

−−=

vo

vi

o

i

ωω

ββαβ

ββα

ββα

βββα

ωω

21

21

21

1

21

2

21

21

11

11

Page 92: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 92

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Renault IVT System

• IVT model development– Electric variator system– ESS capacity = 0 system is “AT-like”– ESS capacity = low, system is “mild” hybrid w/ stop/start, regen, boost– ESS capacity = high, system is “full” hybrid w/ “mild” + ZEV range

S1

C1R1

S2

C2 R2

E1

E2

ωvi

ωvo

ωi ωo

mi

mvo

mvi

mo

IVT - quadripole elementE1

E2

S1

C1

R1

M/G1

M/G2 S2

C2

R2

ICEPM/G

Vb

Pb

ωvi

ωvo

ωo ωo

ωiωi

Compound Splitmechanical path

Electric Variator

Page 93: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 93

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Conclusions and Wrap-up

• Historical developments during the early 20th century explored combining ICE’s with electric machines – hybrid

• Globally, automotive OEM’s have converged to the power split hybrid transmission– Decouples engine from wheels so long as output power is met– Provides all hybrid transmission features plus emissions

reduction– Transmits bulk of engine power mechanically to wheels whereas

variator – electric path, determines its overall ratio

• Power split transmissions rely on 2 electric machines

Page 94: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 94

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Conclusions and Wrap-up

• Power split transmissions, or, electronic CVT’s, have emerged along two distinct development paths– Single planetary gear, input coupled, power split preferred by

Toyota and Ford– Dual planetary gear, input/compound split, preferred by GM and

Renault (and others)

• Efficiency of the variator, as in mechanical CVT’s, remains the main development area:– Need for high power density & efficient electric machines– Need for compact and highly efficient power electronics– Need for high energy throughput electric energy storage system

Page 95: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 95

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Conclusions and Wrap-up• Economics of hybrids:• CO2 reduction = Fuel consumption reduction = Fuel economy benefit

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

$1400 +$1400 +$2800 +$3200 +$5600Base cost ------> technology increment

CO2Reduction (%) 70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

$18/%FE

$125/%FE

SI-Base

GDI

DownsizedLean BurnGDI

4V HSDIDiesel

Lean BoostedDownsized GDIMild Hybrid

Honda CivicIMA

Ricardo IMOGENMild Hybrid Diesel$900 in 2006

Prius THS-I$3500 in 2006

Prius THS-I$5300 in 2003

50% FC Reduction= 100% FE Improvement

Source: Ricardo & UC Davis ITS

benefit

lincrementametric FE

Value%$

=

−=

benefit

benefitbenefit FC

FCFE

%100%

100%

Page 96: Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split

January 12, 2005 4’th VI Winter Workshop Series Slide 96

Comparative Assessment of Hybrid Vehicle Power Split Transmissions

Conclusions and Wrap-up

• Current market prices for hybrid electric cars– Hybrid vehicle market expected to reach 4.5 M units/yr (6%) in 2013– Drivers: higher energy costs and more stringent emissions regulations

Ford Escape Hybrid MSRP Range: $26,780- $28,405 »Buy Now »More Info

Honda Insight

MSRP Range: $19,180- $21,380 »Buy Now »More Info

Honda Civic

MSRP Range: $19,650- $20,950 »Buy Now »More Info

Toyota Prius

MSRP: $20,295 »Buy Now »More Info