compact tilecell for the atlas esd (status) ( continued from 29/09/04 tilecal software meeting ) ...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Compact TileCell for the ATLAS ESD (status) ( Continued from 29/09/04 TileCal Software meeting ) The compactification option implemented for TILE use:](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072013/56649e4a5503460f94b3eedc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Compact TileCell for the ATLAS ESD (status) ( Continued from 29/09/04 TileCal Software meeting )
The compactification option implemented for TILE use:
16 bit for energy/gain/quality for each PMT:
13 bit |E|, 1 bit E sign,
1 bit LOWGAINPMT, HIGHGAINPMT,
1 bit GOOD BAD quality flag
cubic root for the energy compactification.
further 15 bit for |time| +1 bit for sign only when it is really needed
Logarithmic compactification.
Implemented in CaloTools-00-01-26
Several Bug fixes (thanks to Sasha, Sven)
some preliminary control plots …
![Page 2: Compact TileCell for the ATLAS ESD (status) ( Continued from 29/09/04 TileCal Software meeting ) The compactification option implemented for TILE use:](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072013/56649e4a5503460f94b3eedc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Some plots on performances
Hardhare gain is always preserved in compactification/decompactification
Gain after pack and unpack
Gai
n
Test performed using a small di-jet sample at Qt=180GeV
![Page 3: Compact TileCell for the ATLAS ESD (status) ( Continued from 29/09/04 TileCal Software meeting ) The compactification option implemented for TILE use:](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072013/56649e4a5503460f94b3eedc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Some plots on performances Test performed using a small di-jet sample at Qt=180GeV
Cells Energy after packing and unpackingCells Energy
![Page 4: Compact TileCell for the ATLAS ESD (status) ( Continued from 29/09/04 TileCal Software meeting ) The compactification option implemented for TILE use:](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072013/56649e4a5503460f94b3eedc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Some plots on performances Test performed using a small di-jet sample at Qt=180GeV
pmt1 after packing and unpackingpmt2 after packing and unpacking
PM
T2
PM
T1
![Page 5: Compact TileCell for the ATLAS ESD (status) ( Continued from 29/09/04 TileCal Software meeting ) The compactification option implemented for TILE use:](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072013/56649e4a5503460f94b3eedc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Some plots on performances Test performed using a small di-jet sample at Qt=180GeV
Cells Energy
E /E
![Page 6: Compact TileCell for the ATLAS ESD (status) ( Continued from 29/09/04 TileCal Software meeting ) The compactification option implemented for TILE use:](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072013/56649e4a5503460f94b3eedc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Plans
i) Test the scheme with a larger sample,
I have some problems running Reconstruction, in the last releases (with the algorithm writen ad hoc to test packing/unpacking) The simplest thing to me was to use release 8.7.0 and co all the packages. Now it works, and I can test it with more statistic
Maybe Should be better to test al the scheme using the ATLAS Reconstruction Chain: Write ESD/AOD and read back ?
I have no familiarity with this, but first or later, we have to try !!
Any other Idea?