community ecology
DESCRIPTION
Community Ecology. Definitions: A community is a group of species populations that occur together in the same place and the same time. Community ecology studies the patterns of species distributions and abundance, rules of species assembly, dynamics and stability. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Community Ecology
Definitions:
A community is a group of species populations that occur together in the same place and the same time.
Community ecology studies the patterns of species distributions and abundance, rules of species assembly, dynamics and stability.
![Page 4: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The Topics of Community Ecology
Succession: how does open habitat become populated by first few than many species?
Assemblage: Are there any rules that determine which species live together?
Coexistence: how do many species requiring essentially the same habitats and resources coexist?
Food webs: what are the feeding relationships between many members of a community?
![Page 5: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Food chains and webs- the pathway of food and energy transfer through the organisms of a community -
![Page 6: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Simplified food web for the Northwest Atlantic
![Page 7: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Southern California kelp forest
![Page 8: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Definition: Trophic Level
Organisms can be categorized by how many levels they are removed from eating primary producers- plants. An organism’s trophic level is its “distance” from the primary producers at level 1.
1st : primary producers 2nd : primary consumers (vegetarians)3rd : secondary consumers (carnivores I)4th : tertiary consumers (carnivores II)
![Page 9: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
mussels
barnacles
algae
gulls oystercatchers
Lottia peltaLottia strigatellaLottia digitalis
Wootton 1992. (Tatoosh Island, Washington)
![Page 10: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
(Townsend, Begon and Harper 2003)
birds present birds excluded
![Page 11: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
(Townsend, Begon and Harper 2003)
![Page 12: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
mussels
barnacles Lottia peltaLottia strigatellaLottia digitalis
Wootton 1992. (Tatoosh Island, Washington)
increase in safer habitat
decrease in safer habitat
+
-
-
Effect of bird removal:
+
release from predation
increased competition
increased competition
-
+ release from
predation
+ increased competition
![Page 13: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Complex food webs contain complex indirect interactions:
• Enemies of your friends are your enemies (reduced predation of a mutualist can lead to increases in abundance).
• Enemies of your enemies are your friends (reduced predation of a competitor can lead to decreases in abundance).
Sometimes, indirect effects are stronger than direct effects.
Sometimes, indirect and direct effects cancel one another.
The presence or absence of top predators often fundamentally changes community structure.
![Page 14: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
What controls the herbivores in food webs?
Bottom-up control:
Primary production sets a limit on herbivore density.(in low-productivity environments)
To-down control:
Carnivores control herbivore density which in turn control the density of primary producers.(in high-productivity environments)
![Page 15: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Keystone species:
a species whose removal would have significant effects on community structure and/or diversity.
In the construction of arches, the keystone holds all other stones in place.
Some recognized keystone species:
Black-tailed prairie dogs to the prairie communitySalmon to Canada’s coastal rainforestsSea otters to Pacific coastal waters
![Page 16: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Sea otters maintain a healthy kelp forest:
![Page 17: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Salmon maintain Canada’s coastal rainforests:
![Page 19: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Food chains and trophic structure
![Page 20: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Most food chains have 4 trophic levels or less.
Schoener 1989
![Page 21: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Schoenly 1989
![Page 22: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Why are so many food chains short?
• Food chains run out of energy to support viable population sizes at higher trophic levels.
• Long food chains are unstable (Pimm and Lawton 1977).
• There could be longer food chains, but area in each of earth’s ecosystems is too small to support another trophic level.
![Page 23: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Productivity pyramid:
On average, a consecutive trophic level has only 10-20% of the biomass growth (often quantified as biomass-C) of the previous level.
Primary producers (plants)
Primary consumers
Secondary consumers
Tertiary consumers
![Page 24: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Productivity
Species(excluding plants and parasites)
Biomass
(Terrestrial Ecosystems) (Aquatic Ecosystems)
![Page 25: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Mean net primary productivity: 1200 g m-2 yr-1
Mean net primary productivity: 5-100 g m-2 yr-1
More productive ecosystems do not have longer food chains!
![Page 26: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Mean net primary productivity: 10 - 400 g m-2 yr-1
But, some low productivity biomes do have shorter food chains.
![Page 27: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Why are so many food chains short?
Some low productivity food chains run out of energy to support higher trophic levels, but high productivity food chains that could support more trophic levels do not.
![Page 28: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Pimm and Lawton compared the stability of a large number of hypothetical food chains, all including four
species, but differently arranged:
Increasing tendency to return to equilibrium after perturbation
![Page 29: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
With omnivory and competition:
Increasing tendency to return to equilibrium after perturbation
However, each omnivorous trophic web was much less stable than its non-omnivorous counterpart
![Page 30: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Why are so many food chains short?
Some low productivity food chains run out of energy to support higher trophic levels, but high productivity food chains that could support more trophic levels do not.
Long food chains are more unstable (Pimm and Lawton 1977).
- perhaps, but the model is really too simple.
![Page 31: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
The limited area hypothesis:
If we have more area at the bottom, we get more total primary production over a whole region and perhaps enough fuel to sustain one
more trophic level at the top.
Primary producers (plants)
Primary consumers
Secondary consumers
Tertiary consumers
![Page 32: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Larger areas contain more species.
(Unpublished data from Jake Vander Zanden for lakes in Canada)
![Page 33: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Schoenly et al. 1991
Species diversity usually declines with increasing trophic levels.
![Page 34: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Why are so many food chains short?
Some low productivity food chains run out of energy to support higher trophic levels, but high productivity food chains that could support more trophic levels do not.
Long food chains are more unstable (Pimm and Lawton 1977).
- perhaps, but the model is really too simple.
Long food chains (> 4 trophic levels) do seem to require a larger ecosystem (larger area for terrestrial, greater volume for aquatic).
- whether larger areas would allow longer trophic chains isuntestable on this earth.
![Page 35: Community Ecology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062802/56814605550346895db3144f/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Summary
Food chains and webs are generally very complex, such that many species are weakly interacting either directly (through a feeding relationship) or indirectly (through feeding relationships once or twice removed).
This implies that the removal of one species can have many trickle-down effects in the food web.
Some species are more important than others: top predators and other key stone species. Their removal can lead to the loss of an entire community.
There appear to be strong limits on trophic chain length but we don’t know why.
In theory food chains could be longer but in practice they seldom are. Do higher trophic levels run out of energy or do they become too unstable?