community, civil society, public and private partnerships ... · • mcd provides the building,...
TRANSCRIPT
Community, Civil Society, Public and Private Partnerships for
Health
Community, Civil Society, Public and Private Partnerships for
Health
Workshop on
“Community NGO Public Private Partnership: Designing the New Development Paradigm”
February 15, 2007 Jaipur
Dr. Siddharth AgarwalUrban Health Resource Centre (UHRC)
[formerly EHP India]
Presentation Outline Presentation Outline
• Need to partner with CSO, private, public sector and community
• Partnership with Civil Society Organizations and Public Sector and Community
• Partnership with Private and Public Sector and Community
• Multi-stakeholder partnership
• Challenges
• The way forward
• Lessons learnt
Need to partner with private, public sector
and community
Need to partner with private, public sector
and community
Maternal and Child Mortality in IndiaMaternal and Child Mortality in India
25%0.13 millionMaternal deathsProportion of globalEstimated NumbersAnnual Mortality
22%2.4 millionChild deaths
24%1.7 millionInfant deaths
30%1.2 millionNeonatal deaths
Reduction in MMR from 407/1 lakh live births (1998) to 100/1 lakh live births by 2015 (MDG)
Reduction in U-5 MR from 87/1000 live births (2003) to 41/1000 live births by 2015 (MDG)
0
20
40
60
80
100
020406080
100120140160
Under 5 Mortality * Infant Mortality * Neonatal Mortality *
Health conditions of urban poor are similar to or worse than rural population and far worse than urban averages
[Re-analysis of NFHS 2 (1998-99) by Standard of Living Index, EHP: 2003]
103.7
46.7
Rural Average
103.7
63.147
73.3
31.7
49.638.4
Urban Average Urban Poor
101.3
66
39.1
56.0
Nutritional Status
* Mortality per 1000 live births
Child Health and Survival in Rural and Urban AreasChild Health and Survival in Rural and Urban Areas
Source :USAID-EHP 2003.Standard of Living Index based reanalysis of NFHS-2 1998-1999.
* Mortality per 1000 live births
Mortality among Urban Poor Children in Rajasthan
Mortality among Urban Poor Children in Rajasthan
162.3
98.2
65.5
93.368.9
45.6
133.2
93.1
56.3
020406080
100120140160180
Under 5 Mortality * Infant Mortality * Neonatal Mortality *
Urban Poor Urban Average Rural Average
Source : USAID-EHP .2003.Standard of Living Index based reanalysis of NFHS2. 1998-1999.
Nutritional Status of Urban Poor Children in Rajasthan (under 3 years)
Nutritional Status of Urban Poor Children in Rajasthan (under 3 years)
62.5
27.1
46
15.1
51.9
22.3
010203040506070
Under weight for age Undernourished(Stunted) for age
Urban Poor Urban Average Rural Average
Perc
enta
ge
Poor Access to Health Services (Rajasthan)Poor Access to Health Services (Rajasthan)
23.6
43.8
17.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
1
Urbal Poor Urban Average Rural Average
Births whose mothers had minimum of 3 ante-natal visits
Perc
enta
ge
Source : USAID-EHP 2003.Standard of Living Index based reanalysis of NFHS 2. 1998-1999.
79
51.5
84.5
0102030405060708090
1
Urban Poor Urban Average Rural Average
ANC Services Deliveries at Home
Inadequate Public Sector Primary Level Urban Health InfrastructureInadequate Public Sector Primary Level Urban Health Infrastructure
• 61 UFWCs and 90 Health Posts, many run from hospitals, not proximal to slums
• In urban Rajasthan (13.2 million) there is one UFWC/HP for about 87,417 population
• PP Centres: 135 (many closed owing to discontinuation of Central funding)
• (Source: Annual Report on Special Schemes, Dept of Family Welfare, MOHFW, 1999-2000)
Community, CSOs,Public and Private Sectors Complement Each OtherCommunity, CSOs,Public and Private Sectors Complement Each Other
High physical and social access to the poor esp. of non qualified providers;
no mechanism to monitor quality
Poor quality of services at most Primary Care
centres and low social access
CSOs can effectively act as link between
community and service providers and improve
service utilisation
Low utilisation of public health care services
Limited willingness to serve the low profit
sections; weak emphasis on preventive care. High commitment to the poor among non-profit sector
Provision of subsidized and free health care for
the poor, equal focus on preventive measures
NGOs can effectively provide primary level
health services
Low community awareness about primary level healthcare services
Availability of modern technology –flexibility and
openness in approach
Weak planning and management systems –
rigidity
NGOs are close to community and have
better capacity of social mobilization for improved
utilization of services
Low satisfaction of Community with the
existing efforts
Many types of providers –85% medical
professionals private, non qualified providers widely
accessed
Constitutional mandate, Policy backup & wide
network
CSOs are concerned with health of the poor
Community desire for improved health
Private SectorPublic SectorCivil SocietyCommunity
NRHM lays strong emphasis on community, civil society, private and public partnershipsNRHM lays strong emphasis on community, civil society, private and public partnerships
• CSO-Private-Public sectors partnership to meet national public-health goals is one of the key strategies of NRHM
• Forms of partnership mentioned in NRHM relevant for increasing access to health services for the urban poor include:
– Contracting the management of UHCs to Civil society Organisations
– Contracting in private practitioners / specialists to public sector facilities / provide out reach services
– Contracting delivery of health services to unserved areas to Civil Society Organisations
– Social franchising / marketing
– Partnership with corporate sector
– Partnership with Community based organizations
– Enhancing capacity of community for better service utilisation
– Strengthening linkages between community and service providers through link workers (ASHA)
Civil Society, Community and Public Sector PartnershipsCivil Society, Community and Public Sector Partnerships
Outreach
10,000
Referral to Identified FRUs/Charitable Hospital
e.g., Arpana Trust manages a MCD health center in Molarbund, Delhi; Sumangli Seva Ashram, Shri Sharan Seva Samaja, Lions Club Trust and others (Bangalore), several NGOs in Chennai
Outreach
10,000
Outreach
10,000
Outreach
10,000
Outreach
10,000
Urban Health Centre
Government
1.Building2.Recurring costs3.Vaccines4.Other supplies5.Coordination
NGO Manages Govt./Municipal Urban Health Centre
CSO-Community and Govt. Partnership Approach # 1 CSOs Managing Health Centre from Govt. Premises
CSO-Community and Govt. Partnership Approach # 1 CSOs Managing Health Centre from Govt. Premises
Example Approach # 1.. Contd. Partnership between MCD, Arpana Trust and Community
Example Approach # 1.. Contd. Partnership between MCD, Arpana Trust and Community
• Arpana Trust runs a urban health center of MCD in an urban poor community in Delhi since July 2003.
• MCD, as part of IPP-VIII had constructed a health centre which was dysfunctional because of lack of staff and equipment
• Arpana Trust offered to run this health center and an MoU was signed for 5 years
• MCD provides the building, medicines and vaccines; Aprana Trust is in-charge of staff salaries, running expenses and community volunteers.
• Arpana Trust also mobilizes additional resources from corporate,individual and other donations.
• Arpana Trust has improved quality of services by– Providing diagnostic services at affordable prices– Providing services of part-time / visiting specialist consultants– Providing outreach services through mobile health vans
Outreach
10,000
e.g., Govt. of Assam’s partnership with Marwari Maternity Hospital (Guwahati), Govt. of Tamil Nadu’s & Chennai Corporation’s partnership with Voluntary Health Services
Outreach
10,000
Outreach
10,000
Outreach
10,000
Outreach
10,000
Government
1. Equipment costs2. Vaccine3. Other supplies4. Coordination
Referral for 2nd tier
services
CSO-Community and Govt. Partnership Approach # 2 NGOs Providing Health Services from Own Hospital
CSO-Community and Govt. Partnership Approach # 2 NGOs Providing Health Services from Own Hospital
Govt. contracts hospital toprovide outreach, OPD and
Referral services
Example Approach # 2.. ContdPartnership between Govt. of Assam and MarwariMaternity Hospital (MMH)
Example Approach # 2.. ContdPartnership between Govt. of Assam and MarwariMaternity Hospital (MMH)
• Govt. of Assam contracted MMH (a charitable hosptial) to provide outreach and referral health services in eight slums of Guwahati.
• Govt. pays for referral and outreach services and also provides vaccines and contraceptives
• Initial contract was for one year (2002-03) and was subsequently renewed.
• This model requires little infrastructure, cheap and has potential to rapidly expand services to the unreached.
• This initiative has improved access to services (especially the floating population and migrants) and health outcomes in identified slums.
Partnerships with Private, Public Sectors and PeoplePartnerships with Private, Public Sectors and People
Nodal Govt./Municipal Dispensary
1.Vaccines2.Other supplies3.Coordination
2nd tier Govt./Private Centre
Slum2
3000 popln
Slum 3
3000 popln
Slum 4
3000 popln
Week 2
Week 4
Slum1
3000 poplnWeek 1
PPP: Approach # 3 Partnership with Public sector Private Doctors and Community
PPP: Approach # 3 Partnership with Public sector Private Doctors and Community
Week 3
Under the govt. immunization scheme there is provision of Rs. 1400 for 4 camps to be held in a slum per month
Referral from slums to Govt. Dispensaries or 2nd tier Govt/Private centre
Socially Committed Private Doctor[receives honorarium from Govt]
(about 3-4 hrs every Sunday)
District Urban RCH Unit Coordinates with private doctors, NGOs, nodal Dispensary,Coordinates periodic review
Social Mobilization by NGO• Identifies and trains link workers• Supports community mobilization• Supports outreach services• Builds linkage between community,
health providers
E.g. IPP VIII and CUDP 3 in 40 cities of West BengalEstimated cost per month: Rs. 25000; Cost per person : Rs. 2 per month
PPP: Approach #3 contdOther forms of Partnership with Private DoctorsPPP: Approach #3 contdOther forms of Partnership with Private Doctors
• Private doctors can provide health services in government healthfacilities on fee sharing/part time basis. Specialists can volunteer for few hours each month. [IPP VIII Kolkata and Delhi (Arpana)]
• Govt. referred cases (neonates, obstetric, childhood illnesses) are treated at Private facility which can be then reimbursed. [e.g. TN]
• Govt. can give “child health vouchers” to parents of newborns for series of services they can avail at private doctor’s facility [Kolkata, Udaipur]
• Once-a-week-OPD subsidy: Private Pediatricians (and others) can provide substantially subsidized services for the poor once a week for a specified time at their clinics [Meerut, Haridwar, many cities]
Government
1.Vaccines2.Other supplies3.Coordination
Referral to Identified FRUs/Charitable Hospital
Slum cluster 1
10,000 popln.
Slum Cluster 2
10, 000 popln.
Slum Cluster 3
10,000 popln.
PPP Approach # 4 .. ContdExample of Corporate supported Urban Health Efforts:
PPP Approach # 4 .. ContdExample of Corporate supported Urban Health Efforts:
Services provided : OPD, immunization, ANC, IUD insertions, health education, counseling, Referral and lab tests
Ranbaxy Mobile Health ClinicSocial mobilization and RCH Service Team
Estimated cost: Capital cost – 7.5 lac, annual recurring cost – 10 lac
• Supplement Health Investments and services needed to address urban health challenge
• Sharing of expertise pertaining to demand generation, marketing and management
• Advocacy for enhanced attention to health of urban poor population
PPP Approach # 4Partnership with
the Corporate-Public Sector and Community
PPP Approach # 4Partnership with
the Corporate-Public Sector and Community
CSR is not just charity; it is an integral part of doing business-View expressed by several leading Corporate leaders
Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships and ConvergenceMulti-Stakeholder Partnerships and Convergence
Ward levelCore Group
Ward levelCore Group
Total Coverage: 70, 000 slum population in 2 wards in Indore
Multi-stakeholder Coordination for Optimizing Resourcesto Improve Immunization (UHP Indore)
Multi-stakeholder Coordination for Optimizing Resourcesto Improve Immunization (UHP Indore)
NGOs & CBOs
Charitable organizations
Elected Representatives
Municipal Corporation(Zonal office)
DUDA [UIT]Local Resources
(Local Clubs, Schools)
Health dept
ICDS
Improves utilization of available services and enhances reach to vulnerable slums
• UHRC, facilitate coordination of the efforts of the municipal corporation, health department, ICDS, DUDA, local leaders, NGOs and a community based organization to provide immunization services in 24 slums of Indore.
• Regular meetings of these stakeholders are organized to discuss health related issues and provide services to all needy people.
• Bringing coordination among different stakeholders it aims to improve facility based immunization, outreach services and linkages of community with public and private sector providers for improving reach of healthcare services
• The overall purpose is to develop a replicable model and learn from this experience to apply in other wards and cities
Multi-stakeholder Partnership and Convergence Approach (UHP Indore)Multi-stakeholder Partnership and Convergence Approach (UHP Indore)
Challenges and OptionsChallenges and Options
IssueSkepticism among govt. officials in involving Private Partners including NGOs in health service delivery –
requires advocacy
OptionMutual trust between two sectors can be enhanced through
interaction/visits of Govt. officials to Private partner and NGO areas; and to places where PPP is functional.
Challenge 1Limited acceptance of PPP approach among
public and private counterparts
Challenge 1Limited acceptance of PPP approach among
public and private counterparts
Issue
Not many NGOs have the capacity to deliver health services independently
OptionThere is need to strengthen governments’ capacity to select
private partners and develop and monitor contractsCapacity building of NGOs to deliver health services is
essential
Challenge 2Effective mechanism for identification of appropriate NGO required
Challenge 2Effective mechanism for identification of appropriate NGO required
IssueBureaucratic constraints and lack of coordination across
government departments leads to delays in starting PPPPayment delays owing to long drawn procedures
affects operations of NGOsOption
Service or performance based payment rather than focus on processes; as well as maintaining private partners’
managerial autonomy improves outcomes.
Challenge 3Govt. and partner need to evolve the mode of functioning to streamline partnership
Challenge 3Govt. and partner need to evolve the mode of functioning to streamline partnership
Issue
PPP managed RCH services have often not lasted beyond project life (Andhra Pradesh, Bangalore)
Options
Approaches to sustain PPP beyond project funding need to be explored at the inception e.g. alternative funding, user fees, corpus
Partnership with NGOs helped sustain services after funding stopped
(Sumangali Sewa Ashram, Bangalore).
Challenge 4Sustainability of such partnerships beyond project funding is achallenge
Challenge 4Sustainability of such partnerships beyond project funding is achallenge
Lessons LearntLessons Learnt
Gentle Dialogue, Perseverant Efforts and Proper DocumentationGentle Dialogue, Perseverant Efforts and Proper Documentation
• Gentle and genuine dialogue, assessment of critical needs, joint development of plan to respond to needs, builds trust which is critical to success.
• Formal documentation within Govt. system– by way of letters of request, minutes of meetings, etc.
• Perseverant efforts to play catalytic/facilitator role: – Appreciate and begin with what Govt. stakeholders have – Involve decision makers at critical junctures– Identify and encourage champions within the govt.
system– Remain open to ideas/feedback, be flexible and
responsive• It is vital to initiate sustainability efforts early to
complement Govt/donor resources and sustain health improvements
HealthImprovements
PUBLIC SECTOR
SERVICES
PRIVATE/NON-GOVT AGENCIES
PEOPLE (SLUM COMMUNITIES/INSTITUTIONS)
The slum communities are essential partners in this effort to achieve optimal behaviors, penetration to most- vulnerable pockets, sustain health improvements
Include the “people” as key partners Include the “people” as key partners
Complement resources, strengths
Strengthening Comm
unity Capacity and
Linkages with Providers
Improved Supply andQuality of Services
Impr
oved
B
ehav
iour
san
d D
eman
d
Link
ed fo
r bet
ter a
cces
s
Let us work in
partnership to
build a healthy
and productive
tomorrow for
these children
Let us work in
partnership to
build a healthy
and productive
tomorrow for
these children