communication of information
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 Communication of Information
1/11
CHAPTER 4:
COMMUNICATION OF INFORMATION
GROUP MEMBERS: STUDENT ID:
ENGKU NOR AINI BINTI ENGKU HASSAN 2012390287
NUR ATIQAH BINTI MOHD ISMAIL 2012706111
NUR RIFAH SYAHIRAH BINTI SHARUM 2012472268NURUL SYUHADAH BINTI MOHAMED AZLI 2012709637
-
7/28/2019 Communication of Information
2/11
GENERAL
COMMUNICATION
MODEL
SenderEncodes messageChooses amedium (channel)Sends themessage
Receiver
Receives messageDecodes messageMay sendfeedback forclarification
Noisecaninterfereat anypoint
-
7/28/2019 Communication of Information
3/11
Sender
The person who initiates the communication process by encoding
and sending the message.
Encoding
The conversion of a message into some symbolic form.
Channel
The medium / means by which a message travels.
Example : E-mail, website, memo, face-to-face, phone.
Message The tangible form of the information.
A purpose to be conveyed.
Example: write writing, speak speech, paint - picture.
-
7/28/2019 Communication of Information
4/11
Decoding
A receivers translations of a senders message.
Receiver
The intended recipient of the information.Noise
Any disturbances that interfere with transmission receipt or
feedback of a message.
Feedback The degree to which carrying out the work activities require
by a job results in the individuals obtaining direct and clear
information about the effectiveness of his / her performance.
-
7/28/2019 Communication of Information
5/11
Face to face or telephone
conversation
Fortify the formal channels of
communication
Continuous interaction ispossible.
Fast
Disadvantages It can direct to misconceptions
It can lead to mistake in
spelling
Impossible to fix the
responsibility for its origin
Contains facts, deceptions,
rumors and unclear data
Advantages
A transactional process in which the sender and the
receiver of information have different personal realities
formed by their experiences, perceptions and ideas.
HUMAN
NETWORKING
MODEL
-
7/28/2019 Communication of Information
6/11
INVISIBLE
COLLEGE
The term invisible college was first used in 17th century
Europe when the Royal Society of London was
founded. Members of this early Royal Society of
Scientist did not belong to a formal institution, but
referred to themselves as an invisible college due totheir geographic closeness and regular meeting based
on shared scientific interests.
Invisible colleges become more visible when scientists
are grouped together within a defined boundary,regularly procure financial support, engage in a formal
selection process and shared research vision, and
participate in mandatory group meeting.
-
7/28/2019 Communication of Information
7/11
The strength of
invisible college
Some historically inaccessible information now made
available by the internet.
Often available sooner than conventional literature.
May allow the reader/user to listen in on active debateof current issues.
-
7/28/2019 Communication of Information
8/11
Considerations
Quality varies.
Can be hard to identify, search for, and access.
May require validation of data, especially with
internet sources.
Assumes a fairly high level of familiarity with an
issues or topic usually not good for gathering
background information.
Target Audience: Any group sharing a common
interest- You may need to look up some terms.
-
7/28/2019 Communication of Information
9/11
GATEKEEPER
MODEL
According to Pamela Shoemaker and Tim Vos,
gatekeeping is the process of culling and crafting
countless bits of information into the limited number of
messages that reach people everyday, and it is thecenter of the medias role in modern public life. [] This
process determines not only which information is
selected, but also what the content and nature of the
messages, such as news, will be.
Gatekeeper is referring to individuals who decide
whether a given message will be distributed by a mass
medium.
-
7/28/2019 Communication of Information
10/11
Figure 1 shows David Manning Whites vision of Gatekeeper model
-
7/28/2019 Communication of Information
11/11
REFERENCES
Alberts, J. K., Nakayama, T. K., & Martin, J. N. (2007).
Human communication in society. New Jersey: Pearson
Education Inc.
Dang Merdu Wati Hj Hashim. (2009). Foundation of
information management. Shah Alam: Institut
Perkembangan Pendidikan.
Hajah Sobariah Awang Mukhtar. (2010). Principles and
practice of management. UiTM Puncak Perdana.
http://communicationtheory.org/gatekeeping-theory/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeper
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeping_(communication)
http://communicationtheory.org/gatekeeping-theory/http://communicationtheory.org/gatekeeping-theory/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeperhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeping_(communication)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeping_(communication)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeping_(communication)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeping_(communication)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeping_(communication)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeping_(communication)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeping_(communication)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeping_(communication)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeperhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeperhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeperhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeperhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeperhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeperhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeperhttp://communicationtheory.org/gatekeeping-theory/http://communicationtheory.org/gatekeeping-theory/http://communicationtheory.org/gatekeeping-theory/http://communicationtheory.org/gatekeeping-theory/http://communicationtheory.org/gatekeeping-theory/http://communicationtheory.org/gatekeeping-theory/http://communicationtheory.org/gatekeeping-theory/http://communicationtheory.org/gatekeeping-theory/