common pitfalls in grants management

54
Common Pitfalls in Grants Management May 18, 2021

Upload: others

Post on 28-May-2022

15 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Common Pitfalls in Grants ManagementMay 18, 2021

Page 2: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

› Individuals• Participate in entire webinar• Answer polls when they are provided

› Groups• Group leader is the person who registered & logged on to the webinar• Answer polls when they are provided• Complete group attendance form • Group leader sign bottom of form• Submit group attendance form to [email protected] within 24 hours of webinar

› If all eligibility requirements are met, each participant will be emailed their CPE certificate within 15 business days of webinar. Due to the large volume of certificates of completion issued, requests to reissue lost or misplaced certificates will be honored up to 60 days following the webinar

To Receive CPE Credit

Page 3: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Neely Duncan, CPA, CFE, [email protected]

Today’s Presenters

Julie Murdock, CPA, [email protected]

Kelsey [email protected]

Shauna Woody-Coussens, CFEManaging [email protected]

Teresa Seymour, CPASenior [email protected]

Danny Martinez, CPA, CGFM®

Managing [email protected]

Page 4: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

AgendaOverview – Compliance Resources

Overview – Internal Control Over

Compliance

Common Pitfalls Identified During

COVID-Related Grants Management3

Page 5: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Overview –Compliance Resources

Page 6: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management
Page 7: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

COVID-19 Funding Subject to Single AuditYES› Provider Relief Fund, Health and Human

Services (HHS) – 93.498*

› Coronavirus Relief Fund, Treasury – 21.019

› Education Stabilization Fund, Education –84.425

› Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program, Justice – 16.034

› Disaster Assistance Loans, SBA – 59.008

› COVID-19 Telehealth Program, Federal Communications Commission – 32.006

NO› Paycheck Protection Program, Small Business

Administration (SBA) – 59.073

› Coronavirus Food Assistance Program (CFAP), Agriculture – 10.130

› Coronavirus Relief – Pandemic Relief for Aviation Workers, Treasury – 21.018

*As of February 16, 2021

*For-profit subject to compliance audit

Page 8: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

COVID-19 Funding Subject to Single AuditYES› COVID-19 Testing for the Uninsured, HHS –

93.461

› Grants for New and Expanded Services under the Health Center Program, HHS – 93.527

› Emergency Grants to Address Mental and Substance Use Disorders During COVID-19, HHS – 93.665

› COVID-19 Testing for Rural Health Clinics, HHS – 93.697

› Disaster Assistance Loans (Economic Injury Disaster Loans) – 59.008

NO› Economic Injury Disaster Loan Emergency

Advance, SBA – 59.072

› OED Resource Partners Training Portal (RPTP), SBA – 59.074

*As of February 16, 2021

Page 9: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Multiple Layers of Complex Regulations

Federal requirements (Uniform Guidance)

Departmental requirements (HHS, DOL, DOJ)

Grant requirements (Notice of award)

Page 11: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management
Page 12: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

SAM.govResource

Page 13: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

OMB Compliance Supplement

• Issued August 2020

2020 Compliance Supplement

• Intended to cover new COVID-19 federal programs• Issued December 22, 2020

2020 Compliance Supplement Addendum

Page 14: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management
Page 15: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Uniform Guidance Update

• Published August 13, 2020• Effective as of November 12, 2020• Except for 200.216 & 200.340, effective August 13, 2020

Uniform Guidance final revisions

Page 16: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Overview – Internal Control Over Compliance

Page 17: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Compliance Requirements› Activities Allowed or Unallowed (A)› Allowable Costs/Cost Principles (B)› Cash Management (C)› Eligibility (E)› Equipment & Real Property Management (F)› Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking (G)› Period of Performance (H)› Procurement & Suspension & Debarment (I)› Program Income (J)› Reporting (L)› Subrecipient Monitoring (M)› Special Tests & Provisions (N)

Compliance Supplement dictates which requirements auditors test, but auditee must comply with all, as applicable

Complete testing requirements for all COVID-19 funding has not yet been published

Page 18: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Internal Control

Best practice per UG is for internal controls to be compliant with guidance in either

• “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (the Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States

• “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)

Page 19: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Internal Control

Part 6 of Compliance Supplement

• Summary of the requirements for internal control for both nonfederal entities receiving federal awards & auditors performing Single Audits

• Background discussion on important internal control concepts• Appendices that include illustrations of entitywide internal controls

over federal awards & internal controls specific to each type of compliance requirement

Page 20: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Compliance Supplement:

Part 6 Control

Activities Example

Page 21: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Example Internal Controls – Cost Principles

Control environment – Personnel are

properly trained on their responsibilities

Risk assessment –Management identifies key compliance

objectives for compliance

requirements

Control activities –Supervisors review &

approve invoices, cost allocations,

efforts of personnel, fringe benefits &

indirect charges, for allowability,

adherence to cost principles, accuracy,

& completeness

Page 22: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Information & communication – Financial & programmatic systems

accurately capture, process, & timely report

pertinent information

Monitoring activities –Qualified & competent

personnel monitor control activities

Example Internal Controls – Cost Principles

Page 23: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

› Consider consistency of processes & controls over differing grant funding sources

• Federal• State, county, city• Corporate• Foundation

Different Funding Mechanisms

Page 24: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Common PitfallsIdentified DuringCOVID-RelatedGrants Management

Page 25: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

› Importance of a comprehensive needs assessment• Collaborate with your community

› Get the biggest bang for your buck through collaboration & cooperation

• Look at both your organization entity’s need & community needs› Consult stakeholders when determining your funding plan

• Prioritize fiscal stability & returning to work

#1 – Lack of an Organization/Community Needs Assessment

Page 26: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

#2 – Not Understanding Procurement Requirements› Understanding procurement requirements

• Current thresholds• Noncompetitive proposal

› Policies & procedures • Not updated for Uniform Guidance requirements • Only partially address the requirements• Include small & minority business & women-owned business enterprises

provisions

Page 27: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

#2 – Not Understanding Procurement Requirements› Documentation of grace period adoption› Lack of sufficient documentation

• Procurement method used• Vendor/contractor selection rationale• Agreements with the vendor/contractor do not address the contract

provision requirements of Uniform Guidance• Lack of documentation for cost price analysis

Page 28: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

#2 – Not Understanding Procurement Requirements

› Lack of communication & coordination with other departments

• Decentralized• Varying policies by department • Staff knowledge & training • Monitoring

› Suspension & debarment checks• https://www.sam.gov/SAM

Page 29: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Procurement – Allowable MethodsMicropurchases – Aggregate dollar amount doesn’t exceed the micropurchase threshold

• Price must be considered reasonable

Small purchase – Purchases above the micropurchase threshold but below the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT) as defined by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

• Price or rate quotes must be obtained from more than one qualified source

Sealed bids – Purchases greater than the SAT

• Bids publicly solicited & fixed-price contract is awarded to bidder with lowest price

Page 30: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Procurement – Allowable Methods

Competitive proposals – When sealed bids aren’t appropriate

• Requests for proposal (RFP) must be publicized (solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources) & identify all evaluation factors & relative importance

• Entity must have written method for evaluating & selecting recipients

Noncompetitive proposals – When item is available only from one source, in a public emergency, or competition is deemed inadequate

Page 31: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

#3 – Struggle Following Various Reporting Requirements

› Understanding various reporting requirements

› Timeliness › Method to track deadlines› Accuracy of financial & performance

reports› FFATA› Data collection form filing› Closeout

Page 32: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

#4 – Unfamiliarity with Eligibility Requirements & Documentation› Complexity

› Supporting documentation

› Incorporating certifications in the application process

› Anticipation of outcomes/performance reporting metrics

› Who is responsible?

Page 33: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

› Subrecipient: A nonfederal entity that receives a subaward for the purpose of carrying out part of a federal award. The subaward creates a federal assistance relationship with the subrecipient (See 2 CFR 200.93 & .330 (a) of the Uniform Guidance)

› Contractor: A nonfederal entity that receives a contract for the purpose of providing goods & services for the awarding nonfederal entity’s own use. The contract creates a procurement relationship with the contractor. The Uniform Guidance replaced the term “Vendor” with “Contractor” (See 2 CFR 200.22 & .330 (b) of the Uniform Guidance)

#5 – Not Knowing if You Have a Subrecipient or Contractor Relationship

Page 34: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

› Decision-making authority

› Nature of award

› Award risk

› Criteria for selection

› Entity’s business environment

Subrecipient Versus Contractor Determination

Page 35: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

#6 – Understanding Responsibility when Passing Money to Subrecipients› Assessment of subrecipients’ ability to administer prior to

entering into arrangement› Risk assessment

• Not performed• Incomplete• Inadequate

› Contract requirements excluded from contracts with subrecipients

Page 36: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

#6 – Understanding Responsibility when Passing Money to Subrecipients› Appropriateness of monitoring procedures performed

• Request supporting documentation• Timeliness of invoicing• Agreed-upon procedures

› Timely addressing known issues• Staff turnover• Audit findings

› Varying requirements between nonprofits, universities, & states

Page 37: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Subrecipient Monitoring: Pass-Through Entity Requirements

Determine if subrecipient or

contractor

Clearly identify subawards to subrecipients

Consider results of subrecipient audits

Provide certain subaward

information at time of subaward

Evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance

Consider imposing specific subaward

conditionsMonitor activities of subrecipients

Verify subrecipient audited

Consider taking enforcement action for noncompliant

subrecipients

Page 38: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

› Unallowable direct costs• Insufficient support for direct costs• Improper period of performance• Food & meals charged to grant when not allowable

› Misallocation of costs• Between direct & indirect costs• Between grants

› Not using latest guidance or FAQ

#7 – Evolving Guidance Causing Confusion Around Allowable Costs

Page 39: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Cost Principles – Basic Considerations› Necessary & reasonable for the performance of the federal award› Allocable under the principles in 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E*› In accordance with policies & procedures (for both federally funded & other)› Treated consistently as other costs incurred for the same purpose in like

circumstances › In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)› Not included as a cost or used to meet cost-sharing or matching requirements

of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period**› Adequately documented

*Each agency has slightly differing requirements**Consider PPP Loans

Page 40: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Payroll Costs› Manual nature of time & effort tracking› Payroll reported based on actual effort

• Understanding time versus effort

› 100% of effort tracked & included in calculation› Evaluate how your organization performs time & effort

calculations

Page 41: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Payroll Costs› Time sheet

• Timely submissions

• Accurate submissions

• Proper approvals

› Calculation errors• Human error

• PTO considerations

• Application of benefits

• Salary cap limitations

• Proper cutoff (period of availability)

Page 42: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

› Understanding difference between an external audit & a desk review or other monitoring/site visit

› Financial statement deficiencies & material weakness may result in Single Audit findings

› Not using or understanding compliance supplement› Schedule of expenditures of federal awards

• Inaccurate • Incomplete• What is not there? • Management’s responsibility

#8 – Preparing for an External Audit vs. a Desk Review

Page 43: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

› Understanding complexity of identifying the source of funding (federal, state, local)

› Avoid double dipping

#9 – Waterfall/Cascade

Page 44: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

#10 – Not Knowing What or How to Reconcile Information

Reconciling Items • Timing differences• Subrecipients paid versus

subrecipient expense• Program income• Matching• Rejected costs• Variances between accrual

estimates & actual

When to Reconcile• Cumulative & by period at

month, quarter, & annual for › Grant reporting year-end› Your year-end› Calendar year-end› Total grant project-end

Page 45: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Bonus Material

Page 46: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Best Practices for Compliance› Focus on internal control systems

• Checklists

• Review requirements

• Use of technology & systems

› Policies & procedures› Staff training & education› Understanding by staff of roles &

responsibilities› Adequate resources

Page 47: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Tips for AuditeesGather & summarize grant information

• Grant award documentation, including terms & conditions• CFDA number for each federal award

Review written policies & procedures

• Allowability of costs• Cash management• Procurement• Subrecipient monitoring

Page 48: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Tips for AuditeesGather records

• Expenditure justification, including identification of contractors (procurement records) & capital purchases

• Financial & performance reports

Re-review compliance requirements for common issues• Avoid double dipping; reclassification of costs between programs looks

suspicious• Net applicable credits (purchase discounts, rebates & refunds, contract

settlements, etc.) against expenditures

Page 50: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management
Page 51: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

For more information, please visit BKD's COVID-19 Resource Center atbkd.com/covid-19-resource-center

Page 52: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

Continuing Professional Education (CPE) Credit

BKD, LLP is registered with the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA) as a sponsor of continuing professional education on the National Registry of CPE Sponsors. State boards of accountancy have final authority on the acceptance of individual courses for CPE credit. Complaints regarding registered sponsors may be submitted to the National Registry of CPE Sponsors through its website: www.nasbaregistry.org

Page 53: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

› CPE credit may be awarded upon verification of participant attendance

› For questions, concerns, or comments regarding CPE credit, please email the BKD Learning & Development Department at [email protected]

CPE Credit

Page 54: Common Pitfalls in Grants Management

bkd.com | @BKDLLP

The information contained in these slides is presented by professionals for your information only & is not to be considered as legal advice. Applying specific information to your situation requires careful consideration of facts & circumstances. Consult your BKD advisor or legal counsel before acting on any matters covered