commercializing discoveries: disclosing your intellectual property by ryan n. fiorini, ph.d., mba,...

28
Commercializing Discoveries: Disclosing your Intellectual Property By Ryan N. Fiorini, Ph.D., MBA, MHA Licensing and Commercialization Manager MUSC Foundation for Research Development

Upload: kiersten-relf

Post on 15-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Commercializing Discoveries: Disclosing your Intellectual

Property

ByRyan N. Fiorini, Ph.D., MBA, MHA

Licensing and Commercialization ManagerMUSC Foundation for Research Development

Goal of Presentation

• How do I Commercialize my Technology?• What does the Foundation for Research

Development (FRD) do?• Where can I get more information?

• Why is it important to learn about technology transfer?

MUSC Foundation for Research Development909 Haborview Tower

876-1900http://frd.musc.edu

Who Works at FRD?

Chip Hood, J.D.Executive Director

Lisa BensonPatent Administrator

Karen Hallenbeck, J.D.Legal Council

Ryan Fiorini, Ph.D., MBATechnology and Marketing Manager

What does FRD do?

Manage Technology Transfer for MUSC

Bench BedsideIndustry

What does FRD do?

Manage Technology Transfer for MUSC

Where is the Information?

• FRD Website

http://frd.musc.edu

– Forms– Policies– Procedures– Links

Evaluation

Patent

Licensee

Release

ROI

Retain

Technology TransferIn

vent

orF

ound

atio

n fo

r R

esea

rch

Dev

elop

men

tO

utsi

de M

US

C

Licensee

Invention Protection: Step 1

Document that you are the first one to come up with this ideaA. Write the idea down in your notebookB. Gather data to support your idea

A. Protocols and ExperimentsB. Data and Analysis

C. Keep accurate recordsA. If in doubt, write it down

Dateand

Witness

Eureka! You have an ideaEureka! You have an idea

At any time: Call us! 876-1900We’ll help do an early assessment of the

commercial potential of your invention

Why Date and Witness?

NASDAQ: MEND

Evaluation

Patent

Licensee

Release

ROI

Retain

Technology TransferIn

vent

orF

ound

atio

n fo

r R

esea

rch

Dev

elop

men

tO

utsi

de M

US

C

Licensee

The disclosure

What to Report? Anything that is new (or improved) and may be useful:

e.g.• new use of known compounds• new chemical structures• devices• reagents• cell lines• software• diagnostic markers• copyright• etc.

When in doubt, CALL US! 876-1900

You CAN’T Patent

• Genes, Peptide, RNA, Long Protein, Novel Bacteria found on ground

• Can’t patent a natural occurring product

You CAN Patent

• Can patent its use or method to extract• Product by Process• Biomarker, Probe, Gene Modulator, Novel

Therapeutic, Probiotic

Why should I file an invention disclosure?

• High Publicity of Your Research

• Further Progress of Your Science– Sponsored Research

• Licensing of Technology– Royalties

Make it Big

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 5, 243-247 (March 2004)

taxol

Evaluation

Patent

Licensee

Release

ROI

Retain

Technology TransferIn

vent

orF

ound

atio

n fo

r R

esea

rch

Dev

elop

men

tO

utsi

de M

US

C

Licensee

Evaluation

What are we looking for? • What is the commercial potential? • Likelihood of obtaining Intellectual Property

= What is a company looking for?

Evaluation

• What is the commercial potential?– Is it better, cheaper, quicker?– How much development needed before

commercialization?– What is the Market size?– Potential for making a profit?– Is a company interested already?

Case Studies and Issues

**Further information available on website and at all departmental seminars

Most Common Mistakes

• Public Disclosure Prior to Protection

• Signing Rights– MTA

• Inadvertent COI

• Sponsored Research

Source: Council on Governmental Relations

The Disclosure

When to Report? Before public disclosure!

Including: – Publication of the paper– Poster in hallway– Student presentation– Departmental seminar– Discussion with colleague from other institution– Material Transfer Agreement (MTA)– Grants

If you think it might be a disclosure,

calll us! Confidentiality Agreement

876-1900 or http://frd.musc.edu

Cohen-Boyer

• Recombinant DNA– Stanford, UCSF

• Paper – November 1973

• Applied for Patent 1974

• Patent Issued December 2, 1980

The Outcome

• Still widely successful– Total loss of foreign rights

• Patent Expired in 1997– Licensing Revenue $255 million– From $35 billion in worldwide sales

Point: Send in your disclosures

Blockbuster Drugs from Patent

• Epogen (Amgen) -1989

• Procrit (Amgen)

• Humulin (Lilly)

• Novolin (Noro-Nordisk)

• In vitro HIV (Abbott)

• Recombinate (Genetic Institute-Baxter)

• Proleukin (Chiron)

• Intron A (Schering) - 1996

MTA

• Signatory Authority

• Loss of Rights

• Future Inventions

• Definition of Material

• Conflicts with Existing IP

• MUSC Example

Consider the Following…

• Post Doc develops 3 new novel targets in a pathway

• Pathway not patentable

• Info kept from IP office

• Unauthorized signed by Post-doc

• 4 years later targets and novel therapeutics sent to IP office

• ALL PATENT RIGHTS LOST

Conclusion

• Importance of technology transfer

• Role of Intellectual Property

• Be aware of public disclosure

• Call FRD with any questions 876-1900

• New Website

http://frd.musc.edu

Contact InformationW. Chip Hood, [email protected]

Ryan Fiorini, Ph.D. [email protected]

?

? ??

?

?

Questions

http://frd.musc.edu