combining covaris 96 afa-tube tpx plate with swift ... · figure 1 100 ng 96 afa-tube tpx plates no...
TRANSCRIPT
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
1
IntroductionAs Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) moves into the clinical applications space requiring higher throughput and sensitivity existing
processes need to be improved to ensure accurate precise data outputs Mechanical DNA shearing using Covarisreg Adaptive Focused
Acousticsreg (AFAreg) technology is recognized as the gold-standard for DNA fragmentation in NGS library preparation AFA hydrodynamic
shear force-based DNA fragmentation is strictly mechanical and isothermal and thus guarantees a highly controlled process while yielding
random unbiased DNA fragment distributions
The Covaris 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate is optimized for low DNA input and allows single tube DNA shearing and NGS library preparation This
new engineered polymer vessel incorporates features that effectively control acoustic cavitation to enable reproducible and precisely tuned
hydrodynamic shear forces Its low binding surface guarantees high DNA recovery as well as ease of volume handling down to 10 μl and
picogram DNA inputs Additionally this vessel is fully compatible with magnetic separation procedures thermal cyclers and liquid handling
platforms The AFA-TUBE design is adaptable for scaled-up SBS formats such as 96 384 and higher well densities
In this case study DNA shearing in the AFA-TUBEtrade was paired with Swift Biosciencestrade Accel-NGS 2Sreg Kit for NGS library construction
The 2S kit preserves complexity from low input samples due to enhanced end repair chemistry for highly efficient adapter ligation in a
single tube workflow This combination enables for the first time DNA shearing end repair and adapter ligation in the same vessel thereby
eliminating cumbersome sample transfers We present sequencing data from libraries constructed with this workflow and compare them to
libraries constructed according to standard ldquowith transferrdquo protocol in microTUBE
Combining Covaris 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate with Swift Biosciences Accel-NGS 2S Kit for an Optimized Single Tube Workflow for Robust Low Input NGS Library Preparation
Figure 1 Specifications comparison 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate vs 96 microTUBE-50 AFA Fiber Plate
96 AFA-TUBE PX Plate 96 microTUBE-50 AFA Plate
NGS Library Construction All steps occur in AFA-TUBE Transfer required for library preparation
Automation Capabilities New plate format allows for use as typical labware Plate holders available for liquid handling platforms
Format Engineered polymer AFA-TUBE Glass-based microTUBE
Sealing Adhesive foil or Cap Map Aluminum adhesive foil
DNA Shearing Volume 10 ndash 50 microl 55 microl
Total Volume Capacity 200 microl 55 microl
Sample Concentration Range Up to 100 ngmicrol Up to 100 ngmicrol
Authors Guillaume Durin1 Elizabeth Weiss1 Jeremy Terry1 Julie Donaldson1 Ulrich Thomann1 Eugenio Daviso1 Jayne Simon1 Gianna Garza1 Justin Lenhart2 Sukhinder Sandhu2 Laurie Kurihara2 and Jim Laugharn1
Affiliation 1 Covaris Inc Woburn MA USA and 2 Swift Biosciences Ann Arbor MI USA
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
2
Mechanical DNA Shearing PerformancesReproducible DNA Shearing - 48 DNA replicates were treated in the first 6 rows of a 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate (1 to 6) for a targeted
size of 150 bp or 350 bp 50 ng human genomic DNA (Promega PN G3041) was sheared on a Covaris LE220-plus with the following
settings
Figure 2 Coupling Accel-NGSreg 2S Plus Library Kit with 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate Simplified workflow without transfer step to generate PCR-free NGS libraries
Targeted Size 350 bp 150 bp
PIP (W) 250 250
DF () 20 20
CPB 50 50
Time (s) 52 360
Repair IIEnd Repair amp Polishing
Ligation I3rsquo Ligation of
P7
Ligation II5rsquo Ligation of
P5
DNA Shearing with AFA
Library
Repair IDephosphorylation
Optional PCR varies
27 min
32 min
27 min
22 min
PP
Dephosphorylation at 5rsquo termini prevents chimera formation removal of phosphate at 3rsquo termini improves ligation efficiency
Sequential ligation prevents adapter dimer formation and allows optimized ligation to each strand
Equivalent efficiency at all inputs No adapter titration needed
During Ligation I the P7 adapter is attached to the repaired 3rsquo termini
During Ligation II the P5 adapter is attached to the repaired 5rsquo termini
Optional PCRPCR-free inputs down to 10 ngWith PCR inputs down to 10 pg
1 min96
one
TUBE
-10
Plat
eN
o tr
ansf
er st
eps
Figure 1
100 ng
96 A
FA-T
UBE
TPX
Pla
tes
No
tran
sfer
ste
ps
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
3
Mechanical DNA Shearing Performances
Figure 4 ndash Reproducible DNA Shearing 48 DNA replicates were treated in the first 6 rows of a 96 oneTUBE-10 AFA Plate (1 to 6) for a targeted size of 150 bp or 350 bp 50 ng human genomic DNA (Promega PN G3041) was sheared on a Covaris LE220-plus with the following settings
Targeted size 350 bp 150 bp
PIP (W) 250 250
DF () 20 20
CPB 50 50
Time (s) 52 360
DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (High Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit) and the Boxplot graph of the DNA electropherograms was generate by a home-written MATLAB R2016b script
A Overlay of the 48 technical replicates after amplitude normalization 150 bp (Blue) or 350 bp (Red) B Box plot of the 48 replicates for each targeted size (350 bp left 140 bp right) organized by row (1 to 6) and
then position (A to H) Red line is the median blue dot the mean and green diamond the mode Each box represents 25th to 75th region
A
A
B
B
(Figure 3) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (High Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit) and the Boxplot graph of the DNA
electropherograms was generated by a custom MATLAB R2016b script
A Overlay of the 48 technical replicates after amplitude normalization 150 bp (Blue) or 350 bp (Red)
B Box plot of the 48 replicates for each targeted size (350 bp left 150 bp right) organized by row (1 to 6) and then position (A to H)
Red line is the median blue dot the mean and green diamond the mode Each box represents 25th to 75th region
----------------- AFA-TUBE 350 bp----------------- AFA-TUBE 150 bp
Reproducible DNA Shearing
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
4
C
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
100 50 25 10 5 5 25 1 05 025 01
Aver
age
Mod
e (b
p)
DNA input ngmicroL
Reproducible DNA Shearing
Size (bp)
Figure 5 ndash Dynamic DNA input range Comparison of DNA fragment size distributions at different DNA inputs for a range of 1 ng up to 1 ug Human genomic DNA (Promega PN G3041) was sheared in 96 oneTUBE-10 AFA Plate on a Covaris LE220-plus to a 300bp target size
- A Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (1 ng up to 50 ng) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (High Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit)
- B Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (100 ng up to 1 ug) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (Standard Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit)
- C Analysis of average mode size for 8 replicates (entire row) per DNA input across the whole DNA titration range
A
B
C
B
6000
3000
2000
1500
1200
100090
0
800
700
600
500
Size (bp)
400
300
307
305
302
300
200
1001
(1)H1 10 ngmicrol(1)G5 25 ngmicrol(1)F1 50 ngmicrol(1)E2 100 ngmicrol
RFU
2570
2400
2200
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
-24
Figure 5 ndash Dynamic DNA input range Comparison of DNA fragment size distributions at different DNA inputs for a range of 1 ng up to 1 ug Human genomic DNA (Promega PN G3041) was sheared in 96 oneTUBE-10 AFA Plate on a Covaris LE220-plus to a 300bp target size
- A Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (1 ng up to 50 ng) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (High Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit)
- B Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (100 ng up to 1 ug) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (Standard Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit)
- C Analysis of average mode size for 8 replicates (entire row) per DNA input across the whole DNA titration range
A
B
C
A(1)B10 01 ngmicrol(1)D1 025 ngmicrol(1)C5 05 ngmicrol(1)B5 1 ngmicrol(1)A6 25 ngmicrol(1)D11 5 ngmicrol
6000
3000
2000
1500
1200
100090
0
800
700
600
500
400
300
302
297
301
292 294301
200
1001
-72
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
RFU
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200
2436
(Figure 4) Comparison of DNA fragment size distributions at different DNA inputs for a range of 1 ng up to 1 μg Human genomic DNA
(Promega PNG3041) was sheared in a 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate on a Covaris LE220-plus to a 300 bp target size
A Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (1 ng up to 50 ng) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (High Sensitivity NGS
Fragment Analysis Kit)
B Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (100 ng up to 1 μg) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (Standard Sensitivity
NGS Fragment Analysis Kit)
C Analysis of average mode size for 6 replicates (entire row) per DNA input across the whole DNA titration range
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
5
Table 1 Evaluation of sample input and base composition bias
Input Application DNA Covaris Vessel
Mean Fragment
Size (target)Number of Replicates
Mean Fold Coverage
Percent 0X
Coverage
Percent ge30X
Coverage
Percent ge20X
Coverage
100 ng PCR-free
Microbial Mix96 AFA-TUBE
TPX Plate350 bp
4 47x 011 972 986
Microbial Mix microTUBE 4 47x 065 972 986
1 ng9 PCR Cycles
Microbial Mix96 AFA-TUBE
TPX Plate350 bp
4 35x 069 977 988
Microbial Mix microTUBE - - - - -
Figure 5 Picard plots of whole genome sequencing of 100 and 1 ng bacterial DNA mix libraries
100 ng
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
96 oneTUBE-10 AFA Plate microTUBE
100 ng
1 ng
Figure 6
microTUBE
96 oneTUBE-10 AFA Plate microTUBE
100 ng
1 ng
Figure 6
Artificial Microbial Community (AMC) SequencingWe constructed an Artificial Microbial Community (AMC) to study library complexity coverage and bias The AMC is composed of 3 unique
microbial genomes that contain a unique baseline GC composition Each genomic DNA species was pooled with equivalent genome copy
number The AMC genome has a 16565915 bp genome territory
- Escherichia coli (ATCC 10798D-5) 51 GC
- Streptomyces avermitilis (ATCC 31267D-5) 71 GC
- Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923D-5) 33 GC
Libraries were constructed as described in Figure 3 PCR-free libraries from 100 ng and amplified libraries from 1ng of the AMC Low pass
sequencing was carried out on an Illumina MiSeq For each condition two libraries were constructed one in the 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
and one with microTUBE for DNA Shearing and subsequent transfer to PCR plate for library construction (control library)
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
6
Whole Genome Sequencing on HiSeq X TenPCR-free WGS libraries were constructed as described in Figure 3 using 200 ng Coriell NA12878 genomic DNA For each condition two
libraries were constructed one entirely in the 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate and one with microTUBE for DNA Shearing and subsequent transfer
to PCR plate for library construction (control library) Sequencing was carried out by Novogene on the Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform Post
sequencing following exclusion filters were applied before analysis ( exclusion for AFA-TUBE and microTUBE libraries respectively)
- Low mapping quality reads 47 and 47
- Duplicate exclusion 83 and 79
- Low base quality 45 and 42
- Second observation from an insert with overlapping reads 2 and 41
Table 2 WGS PCR-free Libraries
Input Amplification DNA Covaris Vessel Mean Fragment size (target) Number of replicates
200 ng PCR-free NA1287896 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
350 bp 4microTUBE
Alignment Summary Table
WGS Coverage Table
Table 3 WGS coverage and alignment tables
Mean Coverage
MedianCoverage PCT_5X PCT_10X PCT_15X PCT_20X PCT_25X
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
341 34 981 978 974 965 918
microTUBE 326 33 980 977 973 960 892
Total Reads PF_READS_ALIGNED
PCT_PF_READS _ALIGNED
PF_HQ_ALIGNED _BASES
PF_HQ_ALIGNED _Q20_BASES
PCT_READS_ALIGNED _IN_PAIRS
PCT_ADAPTER_ Dimer
96 AFA-TUBETPX Plate
855785748 854357548 9983 60306787476 58766369045 9886 001
microTUBE 833328788 831857134 9982 58623160032 57180420381 9903 001
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
7
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
microTUBE
microTUBE
Figure 6 Picard plots of 200 ng PCR-free WGS libraries
0 20 40 60 80 100
00
05
10
15
20
All Reads Level All Reads GC Bias Plot
GC of 100 base windows
Frac
tion
of n
orm
aliz
ed c
over
age
010
2030
40
Mea
n ba
se q
ualit
y
minus
Normalized CoverageWindows at GCBase Quality at GC
0 20 40 60 80 100
00
05
10
15
20
All Reads Level All Reads GC Bias Plot
GC of 100 base windows
Frac
tion
of n
orm
aliz
ed c
over
age
010
2030
40
Mea
n ba
se q
ualit
y
minus
Normalized CoverageWindows at GCBase Quality at GC
Figure 7 Cumulative Probability Distributions of Avg Depth of Coverage of the Bad Promoters
Figure 8 Relative ldquoBad Promotersrdquo coverageCharacterizing and measuring bias in sequence data Ross et al Genome Biology 2013 14R51
0102030405060708090
100
Dept
h of
Seq
uenc
ing
Cove
rage
Bad Promoters
Average Coverage oneTUBE Average Coverage microTUBE
Figure 9
AFA-TUBE
Figure 8Bad Promoters List Analysis for WGS DataldquoCharacterizing and measuring bias in sequence datardquo from Ross et al describes a set of 1000 promoters with the lowest relative coverage
(based on an Illumina data set) and called this list the lsquobad promotersrsquo list These ldquoBad Promoters (BP)rdquo are GC-rich (averaging 79 GC
composition)
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
8
USA Covaris Inc | Tel +1 7819323959 | Fax +1 7819328705 | Email customerservicecovariscomEurope Covaris Ltd | Tel +44 (0)845 872 0100 | Fax +44 (0)845 384 9160 | Email emeacustomerservicecovariscomWeb wwwcovariscom | Applications applicationsupportcovariscom | Service and Support techsupportcovariscomM020072_RevB_Apr2019 | Information subject to change without notice | For research only | Not for use in diagnostic procedures | 2019copy Covaris Inc
Stay Connected
ConclusionCombination of DNA shearing in the AFA-TUBE with Swift Biosciences Accel-NGS 2S Kit enables for the first time DNA shearing end repair
and adapter ligation in the same vessel thereby eliminating cumbersome sample transfers and enabling a streamlined workflow Sequencing
performance metrics in AFA-TUBE are matching or exceeding current benchmark consisting of shearing in microTUBE and then transferring into a
PCR plate for library construction
DNA Shearing with the 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate demonstrates robust performances For both conditions analyzed 150 and 350 bp the 48
technical replicates display highly reproducible and tight DNA fragment size distributions Testing performances with different DNA mass also
highlight that as expected with mechanical DNA shearing the protocols are robust across a wide input range
Artificial Microbial Community (AMC) Sequencing data show no adverse biases in coverage uniformity with PCR-free and PCR libraries at inputs
ranging from 1 ng to 100 ng and DNA from species with varying GC
Whole Genome Sequencing on HiSeq X Ten shows an even coverage across the human genome and similar insert size distribution between
AFA-TUBE and microTUBE libraries ldquoBad Promotersrdquo list in depth analysis shows an equivalent coverage between microTUBE and AFA-TUBE
Visit wwwcovariscom and wwwswiftbioscicom for more information
- Button 24
- Button 25
- Button 26
- Button 27
- Button 28
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
2
Mechanical DNA Shearing PerformancesReproducible DNA Shearing - 48 DNA replicates were treated in the first 6 rows of a 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate (1 to 6) for a targeted
size of 150 bp or 350 bp 50 ng human genomic DNA (Promega PN G3041) was sheared on a Covaris LE220-plus with the following
settings
Figure 2 Coupling Accel-NGSreg 2S Plus Library Kit with 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate Simplified workflow without transfer step to generate PCR-free NGS libraries
Targeted Size 350 bp 150 bp
PIP (W) 250 250
DF () 20 20
CPB 50 50
Time (s) 52 360
Repair IIEnd Repair amp Polishing
Ligation I3rsquo Ligation of
P7
Ligation II5rsquo Ligation of
P5
DNA Shearing with AFA
Library
Repair IDephosphorylation
Optional PCR varies
27 min
32 min
27 min
22 min
PP
Dephosphorylation at 5rsquo termini prevents chimera formation removal of phosphate at 3rsquo termini improves ligation efficiency
Sequential ligation prevents adapter dimer formation and allows optimized ligation to each strand
Equivalent efficiency at all inputs No adapter titration needed
During Ligation I the P7 adapter is attached to the repaired 3rsquo termini
During Ligation II the P5 adapter is attached to the repaired 5rsquo termini
Optional PCRPCR-free inputs down to 10 ngWith PCR inputs down to 10 pg
1 min96
one
TUBE
-10
Plat
eN
o tr
ansf
er st
eps
Figure 1
100 ng
96 A
FA-T
UBE
TPX
Pla
tes
No
tran
sfer
ste
ps
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
3
Mechanical DNA Shearing Performances
Figure 4 ndash Reproducible DNA Shearing 48 DNA replicates were treated in the first 6 rows of a 96 oneTUBE-10 AFA Plate (1 to 6) for a targeted size of 150 bp or 350 bp 50 ng human genomic DNA (Promega PN G3041) was sheared on a Covaris LE220-plus with the following settings
Targeted size 350 bp 150 bp
PIP (W) 250 250
DF () 20 20
CPB 50 50
Time (s) 52 360
DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (High Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit) and the Boxplot graph of the DNA electropherograms was generate by a home-written MATLAB R2016b script
A Overlay of the 48 technical replicates after amplitude normalization 150 bp (Blue) or 350 bp (Red) B Box plot of the 48 replicates for each targeted size (350 bp left 140 bp right) organized by row (1 to 6) and
then position (A to H) Red line is the median blue dot the mean and green diamond the mode Each box represents 25th to 75th region
A
A
B
B
(Figure 3) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (High Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit) and the Boxplot graph of the DNA
electropherograms was generated by a custom MATLAB R2016b script
A Overlay of the 48 technical replicates after amplitude normalization 150 bp (Blue) or 350 bp (Red)
B Box plot of the 48 replicates for each targeted size (350 bp left 150 bp right) organized by row (1 to 6) and then position (A to H)
Red line is the median blue dot the mean and green diamond the mode Each box represents 25th to 75th region
----------------- AFA-TUBE 350 bp----------------- AFA-TUBE 150 bp
Reproducible DNA Shearing
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
4
C
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
100 50 25 10 5 5 25 1 05 025 01
Aver
age
Mod
e (b
p)
DNA input ngmicroL
Reproducible DNA Shearing
Size (bp)
Figure 5 ndash Dynamic DNA input range Comparison of DNA fragment size distributions at different DNA inputs for a range of 1 ng up to 1 ug Human genomic DNA (Promega PN G3041) was sheared in 96 oneTUBE-10 AFA Plate on a Covaris LE220-plus to a 300bp target size
- A Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (1 ng up to 50 ng) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (High Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit)
- B Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (100 ng up to 1 ug) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (Standard Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit)
- C Analysis of average mode size for 8 replicates (entire row) per DNA input across the whole DNA titration range
A
B
C
B
6000
3000
2000
1500
1200
100090
0
800
700
600
500
Size (bp)
400
300
307
305
302
300
200
1001
(1)H1 10 ngmicrol(1)G5 25 ngmicrol(1)F1 50 ngmicrol(1)E2 100 ngmicrol
RFU
2570
2400
2200
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
-24
Figure 5 ndash Dynamic DNA input range Comparison of DNA fragment size distributions at different DNA inputs for a range of 1 ng up to 1 ug Human genomic DNA (Promega PN G3041) was sheared in 96 oneTUBE-10 AFA Plate on a Covaris LE220-plus to a 300bp target size
- A Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (1 ng up to 50 ng) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (High Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit)
- B Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (100 ng up to 1 ug) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (Standard Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit)
- C Analysis of average mode size for 8 replicates (entire row) per DNA input across the whole DNA titration range
A
B
C
A(1)B10 01 ngmicrol(1)D1 025 ngmicrol(1)C5 05 ngmicrol(1)B5 1 ngmicrol(1)A6 25 ngmicrol(1)D11 5 ngmicrol
6000
3000
2000
1500
1200
100090
0
800
700
600
500
400
300
302
297
301
292 294301
200
1001
-72
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
RFU
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200
2436
(Figure 4) Comparison of DNA fragment size distributions at different DNA inputs for a range of 1 ng up to 1 μg Human genomic DNA
(Promega PNG3041) was sheared in a 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate on a Covaris LE220-plus to a 300 bp target size
A Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (1 ng up to 50 ng) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (High Sensitivity NGS
Fragment Analysis Kit)
B Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (100 ng up to 1 μg) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (Standard Sensitivity
NGS Fragment Analysis Kit)
C Analysis of average mode size for 6 replicates (entire row) per DNA input across the whole DNA titration range
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
5
Table 1 Evaluation of sample input and base composition bias
Input Application DNA Covaris Vessel
Mean Fragment
Size (target)Number of Replicates
Mean Fold Coverage
Percent 0X
Coverage
Percent ge30X
Coverage
Percent ge20X
Coverage
100 ng PCR-free
Microbial Mix96 AFA-TUBE
TPX Plate350 bp
4 47x 011 972 986
Microbial Mix microTUBE 4 47x 065 972 986
1 ng9 PCR Cycles
Microbial Mix96 AFA-TUBE
TPX Plate350 bp
4 35x 069 977 988
Microbial Mix microTUBE - - - - -
Figure 5 Picard plots of whole genome sequencing of 100 and 1 ng bacterial DNA mix libraries
100 ng
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
96 oneTUBE-10 AFA Plate microTUBE
100 ng
1 ng
Figure 6
microTUBE
96 oneTUBE-10 AFA Plate microTUBE
100 ng
1 ng
Figure 6
Artificial Microbial Community (AMC) SequencingWe constructed an Artificial Microbial Community (AMC) to study library complexity coverage and bias The AMC is composed of 3 unique
microbial genomes that contain a unique baseline GC composition Each genomic DNA species was pooled with equivalent genome copy
number The AMC genome has a 16565915 bp genome territory
- Escherichia coli (ATCC 10798D-5) 51 GC
- Streptomyces avermitilis (ATCC 31267D-5) 71 GC
- Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923D-5) 33 GC
Libraries were constructed as described in Figure 3 PCR-free libraries from 100 ng and amplified libraries from 1ng of the AMC Low pass
sequencing was carried out on an Illumina MiSeq For each condition two libraries were constructed one in the 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
and one with microTUBE for DNA Shearing and subsequent transfer to PCR plate for library construction (control library)
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
6
Whole Genome Sequencing on HiSeq X TenPCR-free WGS libraries were constructed as described in Figure 3 using 200 ng Coriell NA12878 genomic DNA For each condition two
libraries were constructed one entirely in the 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate and one with microTUBE for DNA Shearing and subsequent transfer
to PCR plate for library construction (control library) Sequencing was carried out by Novogene on the Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform Post
sequencing following exclusion filters were applied before analysis ( exclusion for AFA-TUBE and microTUBE libraries respectively)
- Low mapping quality reads 47 and 47
- Duplicate exclusion 83 and 79
- Low base quality 45 and 42
- Second observation from an insert with overlapping reads 2 and 41
Table 2 WGS PCR-free Libraries
Input Amplification DNA Covaris Vessel Mean Fragment size (target) Number of replicates
200 ng PCR-free NA1287896 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
350 bp 4microTUBE
Alignment Summary Table
WGS Coverage Table
Table 3 WGS coverage and alignment tables
Mean Coverage
MedianCoverage PCT_5X PCT_10X PCT_15X PCT_20X PCT_25X
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
341 34 981 978 974 965 918
microTUBE 326 33 980 977 973 960 892
Total Reads PF_READS_ALIGNED
PCT_PF_READS _ALIGNED
PF_HQ_ALIGNED _BASES
PF_HQ_ALIGNED _Q20_BASES
PCT_READS_ALIGNED _IN_PAIRS
PCT_ADAPTER_ Dimer
96 AFA-TUBETPX Plate
855785748 854357548 9983 60306787476 58766369045 9886 001
microTUBE 833328788 831857134 9982 58623160032 57180420381 9903 001
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
7
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
microTUBE
microTUBE
Figure 6 Picard plots of 200 ng PCR-free WGS libraries
0 20 40 60 80 100
00
05
10
15
20
All Reads Level All Reads GC Bias Plot
GC of 100 base windows
Frac
tion
of n
orm
aliz
ed c
over
age
010
2030
40
Mea
n ba
se q
ualit
y
minus
Normalized CoverageWindows at GCBase Quality at GC
0 20 40 60 80 100
00
05
10
15
20
All Reads Level All Reads GC Bias Plot
GC of 100 base windows
Frac
tion
of n
orm
aliz
ed c
over
age
010
2030
40
Mea
n ba
se q
ualit
y
minus
Normalized CoverageWindows at GCBase Quality at GC
Figure 7 Cumulative Probability Distributions of Avg Depth of Coverage of the Bad Promoters
Figure 8 Relative ldquoBad Promotersrdquo coverageCharacterizing and measuring bias in sequence data Ross et al Genome Biology 2013 14R51
0102030405060708090
100
Dept
h of
Seq
uenc
ing
Cove
rage
Bad Promoters
Average Coverage oneTUBE Average Coverage microTUBE
Figure 9
AFA-TUBE
Figure 8Bad Promoters List Analysis for WGS DataldquoCharacterizing and measuring bias in sequence datardquo from Ross et al describes a set of 1000 promoters with the lowest relative coverage
(based on an Illumina data set) and called this list the lsquobad promotersrsquo list These ldquoBad Promoters (BP)rdquo are GC-rich (averaging 79 GC
composition)
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
8
USA Covaris Inc | Tel +1 7819323959 | Fax +1 7819328705 | Email customerservicecovariscomEurope Covaris Ltd | Tel +44 (0)845 872 0100 | Fax +44 (0)845 384 9160 | Email emeacustomerservicecovariscomWeb wwwcovariscom | Applications applicationsupportcovariscom | Service and Support techsupportcovariscomM020072_RevB_Apr2019 | Information subject to change without notice | For research only | Not for use in diagnostic procedures | 2019copy Covaris Inc
Stay Connected
ConclusionCombination of DNA shearing in the AFA-TUBE with Swift Biosciences Accel-NGS 2S Kit enables for the first time DNA shearing end repair
and adapter ligation in the same vessel thereby eliminating cumbersome sample transfers and enabling a streamlined workflow Sequencing
performance metrics in AFA-TUBE are matching or exceeding current benchmark consisting of shearing in microTUBE and then transferring into a
PCR plate for library construction
DNA Shearing with the 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate demonstrates robust performances For both conditions analyzed 150 and 350 bp the 48
technical replicates display highly reproducible and tight DNA fragment size distributions Testing performances with different DNA mass also
highlight that as expected with mechanical DNA shearing the protocols are robust across a wide input range
Artificial Microbial Community (AMC) Sequencing data show no adverse biases in coverage uniformity with PCR-free and PCR libraries at inputs
ranging from 1 ng to 100 ng and DNA from species with varying GC
Whole Genome Sequencing on HiSeq X Ten shows an even coverage across the human genome and similar insert size distribution between
AFA-TUBE and microTUBE libraries ldquoBad Promotersrdquo list in depth analysis shows an equivalent coverage between microTUBE and AFA-TUBE
Visit wwwcovariscom and wwwswiftbioscicom for more information
- Button 24
- Button 25
- Button 26
- Button 27
- Button 28
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
3
Mechanical DNA Shearing Performances
Figure 4 ndash Reproducible DNA Shearing 48 DNA replicates were treated in the first 6 rows of a 96 oneTUBE-10 AFA Plate (1 to 6) for a targeted size of 150 bp or 350 bp 50 ng human genomic DNA (Promega PN G3041) was sheared on a Covaris LE220-plus with the following settings
Targeted size 350 bp 150 bp
PIP (W) 250 250
DF () 20 20
CPB 50 50
Time (s) 52 360
DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (High Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit) and the Boxplot graph of the DNA electropherograms was generate by a home-written MATLAB R2016b script
A Overlay of the 48 technical replicates after amplitude normalization 150 bp (Blue) or 350 bp (Red) B Box plot of the 48 replicates for each targeted size (350 bp left 140 bp right) organized by row (1 to 6) and
then position (A to H) Red line is the median blue dot the mean and green diamond the mode Each box represents 25th to 75th region
A
A
B
B
(Figure 3) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (High Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit) and the Boxplot graph of the DNA
electropherograms was generated by a custom MATLAB R2016b script
A Overlay of the 48 technical replicates after amplitude normalization 150 bp (Blue) or 350 bp (Red)
B Box plot of the 48 replicates for each targeted size (350 bp left 150 bp right) organized by row (1 to 6) and then position (A to H)
Red line is the median blue dot the mean and green diamond the mode Each box represents 25th to 75th region
----------------- AFA-TUBE 350 bp----------------- AFA-TUBE 150 bp
Reproducible DNA Shearing
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
4
C
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
100 50 25 10 5 5 25 1 05 025 01
Aver
age
Mod
e (b
p)
DNA input ngmicroL
Reproducible DNA Shearing
Size (bp)
Figure 5 ndash Dynamic DNA input range Comparison of DNA fragment size distributions at different DNA inputs for a range of 1 ng up to 1 ug Human genomic DNA (Promega PN G3041) was sheared in 96 oneTUBE-10 AFA Plate on a Covaris LE220-plus to a 300bp target size
- A Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (1 ng up to 50 ng) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (High Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit)
- B Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (100 ng up to 1 ug) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (Standard Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit)
- C Analysis of average mode size for 8 replicates (entire row) per DNA input across the whole DNA titration range
A
B
C
B
6000
3000
2000
1500
1200
100090
0
800
700
600
500
Size (bp)
400
300
307
305
302
300
200
1001
(1)H1 10 ngmicrol(1)G5 25 ngmicrol(1)F1 50 ngmicrol(1)E2 100 ngmicrol
RFU
2570
2400
2200
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
-24
Figure 5 ndash Dynamic DNA input range Comparison of DNA fragment size distributions at different DNA inputs for a range of 1 ng up to 1 ug Human genomic DNA (Promega PN G3041) was sheared in 96 oneTUBE-10 AFA Plate on a Covaris LE220-plus to a 300bp target size
- A Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (1 ng up to 50 ng) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (High Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit)
- B Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (100 ng up to 1 ug) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (Standard Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit)
- C Analysis of average mode size for 8 replicates (entire row) per DNA input across the whole DNA titration range
A
B
C
A(1)B10 01 ngmicrol(1)D1 025 ngmicrol(1)C5 05 ngmicrol(1)B5 1 ngmicrol(1)A6 25 ngmicrol(1)D11 5 ngmicrol
6000
3000
2000
1500
1200
100090
0
800
700
600
500
400
300
302
297
301
292 294301
200
1001
-72
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
RFU
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200
2436
(Figure 4) Comparison of DNA fragment size distributions at different DNA inputs for a range of 1 ng up to 1 μg Human genomic DNA
(Promega PNG3041) was sheared in a 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate on a Covaris LE220-plus to a 300 bp target size
A Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (1 ng up to 50 ng) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (High Sensitivity NGS
Fragment Analysis Kit)
B Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (100 ng up to 1 μg) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (Standard Sensitivity
NGS Fragment Analysis Kit)
C Analysis of average mode size for 6 replicates (entire row) per DNA input across the whole DNA titration range
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
5
Table 1 Evaluation of sample input and base composition bias
Input Application DNA Covaris Vessel
Mean Fragment
Size (target)Number of Replicates
Mean Fold Coverage
Percent 0X
Coverage
Percent ge30X
Coverage
Percent ge20X
Coverage
100 ng PCR-free
Microbial Mix96 AFA-TUBE
TPX Plate350 bp
4 47x 011 972 986
Microbial Mix microTUBE 4 47x 065 972 986
1 ng9 PCR Cycles
Microbial Mix96 AFA-TUBE
TPX Plate350 bp
4 35x 069 977 988
Microbial Mix microTUBE - - - - -
Figure 5 Picard plots of whole genome sequencing of 100 and 1 ng bacterial DNA mix libraries
100 ng
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
96 oneTUBE-10 AFA Plate microTUBE
100 ng
1 ng
Figure 6
microTUBE
96 oneTUBE-10 AFA Plate microTUBE
100 ng
1 ng
Figure 6
Artificial Microbial Community (AMC) SequencingWe constructed an Artificial Microbial Community (AMC) to study library complexity coverage and bias The AMC is composed of 3 unique
microbial genomes that contain a unique baseline GC composition Each genomic DNA species was pooled with equivalent genome copy
number The AMC genome has a 16565915 bp genome territory
- Escherichia coli (ATCC 10798D-5) 51 GC
- Streptomyces avermitilis (ATCC 31267D-5) 71 GC
- Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923D-5) 33 GC
Libraries were constructed as described in Figure 3 PCR-free libraries from 100 ng and amplified libraries from 1ng of the AMC Low pass
sequencing was carried out on an Illumina MiSeq For each condition two libraries were constructed one in the 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
and one with microTUBE for DNA Shearing and subsequent transfer to PCR plate for library construction (control library)
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
6
Whole Genome Sequencing on HiSeq X TenPCR-free WGS libraries were constructed as described in Figure 3 using 200 ng Coriell NA12878 genomic DNA For each condition two
libraries were constructed one entirely in the 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate and one with microTUBE for DNA Shearing and subsequent transfer
to PCR plate for library construction (control library) Sequencing was carried out by Novogene on the Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform Post
sequencing following exclusion filters were applied before analysis ( exclusion for AFA-TUBE and microTUBE libraries respectively)
- Low mapping quality reads 47 and 47
- Duplicate exclusion 83 and 79
- Low base quality 45 and 42
- Second observation from an insert with overlapping reads 2 and 41
Table 2 WGS PCR-free Libraries
Input Amplification DNA Covaris Vessel Mean Fragment size (target) Number of replicates
200 ng PCR-free NA1287896 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
350 bp 4microTUBE
Alignment Summary Table
WGS Coverage Table
Table 3 WGS coverage and alignment tables
Mean Coverage
MedianCoverage PCT_5X PCT_10X PCT_15X PCT_20X PCT_25X
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
341 34 981 978 974 965 918
microTUBE 326 33 980 977 973 960 892
Total Reads PF_READS_ALIGNED
PCT_PF_READS _ALIGNED
PF_HQ_ALIGNED _BASES
PF_HQ_ALIGNED _Q20_BASES
PCT_READS_ALIGNED _IN_PAIRS
PCT_ADAPTER_ Dimer
96 AFA-TUBETPX Plate
855785748 854357548 9983 60306787476 58766369045 9886 001
microTUBE 833328788 831857134 9982 58623160032 57180420381 9903 001
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
7
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
microTUBE
microTUBE
Figure 6 Picard plots of 200 ng PCR-free WGS libraries
0 20 40 60 80 100
00
05
10
15
20
All Reads Level All Reads GC Bias Plot
GC of 100 base windows
Frac
tion
of n
orm
aliz
ed c
over
age
010
2030
40
Mea
n ba
se q
ualit
y
minus
Normalized CoverageWindows at GCBase Quality at GC
0 20 40 60 80 100
00
05
10
15
20
All Reads Level All Reads GC Bias Plot
GC of 100 base windows
Frac
tion
of n
orm
aliz
ed c
over
age
010
2030
40
Mea
n ba
se q
ualit
y
minus
Normalized CoverageWindows at GCBase Quality at GC
Figure 7 Cumulative Probability Distributions of Avg Depth of Coverage of the Bad Promoters
Figure 8 Relative ldquoBad Promotersrdquo coverageCharacterizing and measuring bias in sequence data Ross et al Genome Biology 2013 14R51
0102030405060708090
100
Dept
h of
Seq
uenc
ing
Cove
rage
Bad Promoters
Average Coverage oneTUBE Average Coverage microTUBE
Figure 9
AFA-TUBE
Figure 8Bad Promoters List Analysis for WGS DataldquoCharacterizing and measuring bias in sequence datardquo from Ross et al describes a set of 1000 promoters with the lowest relative coverage
(based on an Illumina data set) and called this list the lsquobad promotersrsquo list These ldquoBad Promoters (BP)rdquo are GC-rich (averaging 79 GC
composition)
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
8
USA Covaris Inc | Tel +1 7819323959 | Fax +1 7819328705 | Email customerservicecovariscomEurope Covaris Ltd | Tel +44 (0)845 872 0100 | Fax +44 (0)845 384 9160 | Email emeacustomerservicecovariscomWeb wwwcovariscom | Applications applicationsupportcovariscom | Service and Support techsupportcovariscomM020072_RevB_Apr2019 | Information subject to change without notice | For research only | Not for use in diagnostic procedures | 2019copy Covaris Inc
Stay Connected
ConclusionCombination of DNA shearing in the AFA-TUBE with Swift Biosciences Accel-NGS 2S Kit enables for the first time DNA shearing end repair
and adapter ligation in the same vessel thereby eliminating cumbersome sample transfers and enabling a streamlined workflow Sequencing
performance metrics in AFA-TUBE are matching or exceeding current benchmark consisting of shearing in microTUBE and then transferring into a
PCR plate for library construction
DNA Shearing with the 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate demonstrates robust performances For both conditions analyzed 150 and 350 bp the 48
technical replicates display highly reproducible and tight DNA fragment size distributions Testing performances with different DNA mass also
highlight that as expected with mechanical DNA shearing the protocols are robust across a wide input range
Artificial Microbial Community (AMC) Sequencing data show no adverse biases in coverage uniformity with PCR-free and PCR libraries at inputs
ranging from 1 ng to 100 ng and DNA from species with varying GC
Whole Genome Sequencing on HiSeq X Ten shows an even coverage across the human genome and similar insert size distribution between
AFA-TUBE and microTUBE libraries ldquoBad Promotersrdquo list in depth analysis shows an equivalent coverage between microTUBE and AFA-TUBE
Visit wwwcovariscom and wwwswiftbioscicom for more information
- Button 24
- Button 25
- Button 26
- Button 27
- Button 28
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
4
C
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
100 50 25 10 5 5 25 1 05 025 01
Aver
age
Mod
e (b
p)
DNA input ngmicroL
Reproducible DNA Shearing
Size (bp)
Figure 5 ndash Dynamic DNA input range Comparison of DNA fragment size distributions at different DNA inputs for a range of 1 ng up to 1 ug Human genomic DNA (Promega PN G3041) was sheared in 96 oneTUBE-10 AFA Plate on a Covaris LE220-plus to a 300bp target size
- A Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (1 ng up to 50 ng) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (High Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit)
- B Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (100 ng up to 1 ug) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (Standard Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit)
- C Analysis of average mode size for 8 replicates (entire row) per DNA input across the whole DNA titration range
A
B
C
B
6000
3000
2000
1500
1200
100090
0
800
700
600
500
Size (bp)
400
300
307
305
302
300
200
1001
(1)H1 10 ngmicrol(1)G5 25 ngmicrol(1)F1 50 ngmicrol(1)E2 100 ngmicrol
RFU
2570
2400
2200
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
-24
Figure 5 ndash Dynamic DNA input range Comparison of DNA fragment size distributions at different DNA inputs for a range of 1 ng up to 1 ug Human genomic DNA (Promega PN G3041) was sheared in 96 oneTUBE-10 AFA Plate on a Covaris LE220-plus to a 300bp target size
- A Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (1 ng up to 50 ng) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (High Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit)
- B Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (100 ng up to 1 ug) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (Standard Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit)
- C Analysis of average mode size for 8 replicates (entire row) per DNA input across the whole DNA titration range
A
B
C
A(1)B10 01 ngmicrol(1)D1 025 ngmicrol(1)C5 05 ngmicrol(1)B5 1 ngmicrol(1)A6 25 ngmicrol(1)D11 5 ngmicrol
6000
3000
2000
1500
1200
100090
0
800
700
600
500
400
300
302
297
301
292 294301
200
1001
-72
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
RFU
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200
2436
(Figure 4) Comparison of DNA fragment size distributions at different DNA inputs for a range of 1 ng up to 1 μg Human genomic DNA
(Promega PNG3041) was sheared in a 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate on a Covaris LE220-plus to a 300 bp target size
A Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (1 ng up to 50 ng) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (High Sensitivity NGS
Fragment Analysis Kit)
B Overlay of 1 replicates per DNA input (100 ng up to 1 μg) DNA was analyzed with a Fragment Analyzer (Standard Sensitivity
NGS Fragment Analysis Kit)
C Analysis of average mode size for 6 replicates (entire row) per DNA input across the whole DNA titration range
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
5
Table 1 Evaluation of sample input and base composition bias
Input Application DNA Covaris Vessel
Mean Fragment
Size (target)Number of Replicates
Mean Fold Coverage
Percent 0X
Coverage
Percent ge30X
Coverage
Percent ge20X
Coverage
100 ng PCR-free
Microbial Mix96 AFA-TUBE
TPX Plate350 bp
4 47x 011 972 986
Microbial Mix microTUBE 4 47x 065 972 986
1 ng9 PCR Cycles
Microbial Mix96 AFA-TUBE
TPX Plate350 bp
4 35x 069 977 988
Microbial Mix microTUBE - - - - -
Figure 5 Picard plots of whole genome sequencing of 100 and 1 ng bacterial DNA mix libraries
100 ng
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
96 oneTUBE-10 AFA Plate microTUBE
100 ng
1 ng
Figure 6
microTUBE
96 oneTUBE-10 AFA Plate microTUBE
100 ng
1 ng
Figure 6
Artificial Microbial Community (AMC) SequencingWe constructed an Artificial Microbial Community (AMC) to study library complexity coverage and bias The AMC is composed of 3 unique
microbial genomes that contain a unique baseline GC composition Each genomic DNA species was pooled with equivalent genome copy
number The AMC genome has a 16565915 bp genome territory
- Escherichia coli (ATCC 10798D-5) 51 GC
- Streptomyces avermitilis (ATCC 31267D-5) 71 GC
- Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923D-5) 33 GC
Libraries were constructed as described in Figure 3 PCR-free libraries from 100 ng and amplified libraries from 1ng of the AMC Low pass
sequencing was carried out on an Illumina MiSeq For each condition two libraries were constructed one in the 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
and one with microTUBE for DNA Shearing and subsequent transfer to PCR plate for library construction (control library)
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
6
Whole Genome Sequencing on HiSeq X TenPCR-free WGS libraries were constructed as described in Figure 3 using 200 ng Coriell NA12878 genomic DNA For each condition two
libraries were constructed one entirely in the 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate and one with microTUBE for DNA Shearing and subsequent transfer
to PCR plate for library construction (control library) Sequencing was carried out by Novogene on the Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform Post
sequencing following exclusion filters were applied before analysis ( exclusion for AFA-TUBE and microTUBE libraries respectively)
- Low mapping quality reads 47 and 47
- Duplicate exclusion 83 and 79
- Low base quality 45 and 42
- Second observation from an insert with overlapping reads 2 and 41
Table 2 WGS PCR-free Libraries
Input Amplification DNA Covaris Vessel Mean Fragment size (target) Number of replicates
200 ng PCR-free NA1287896 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
350 bp 4microTUBE
Alignment Summary Table
WGS Coverage Table
Table 3 WGS coverage and alignment tables
Mean Coverage
MedianCoverage PCT_5X PCT_10X PCT_15X PCT_20X PCT_25X
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
341 34 981 978 974 965 918
microTUBE 326 33 980 977 973 960 892
Total Reads PF_READS_ALIGNED
PCT_PF_READS _ALIGNED
PF_HQ_ALIGNED _BASES
PF_HQ_ALIGNED _Q20_BASES
PCT_READS_ALIGNED _IN_PAIRS
PCT_ADAPTER_ Dimer
96 AFA-TUBETPX Plate
855785748 854357548 9983 60306787476 58766369045 9886 001
microTUBE 833328788 831857134 9982 58623160032 57180420381 9903 001
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
7
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
microTUBE
microTUBE
Figure 6 Picard plots of 200 ng PCR-free WGS libraries
0 20 40 60 80 100
00
05
10
15
20
All Reads Level All Reads GC Bias Plot
GC of 100 base windows
Frac
tion
of n
orm
aliz
ed c
over
age
010
2030
40
Mea
n ba
se q
ualit
y
minus
Normalized CoverageWindows at GCBase Quality at GC
0 20 40 60 80 100
00
05
10
15
20
All Reads Level All Reads GC Bias Plot
GC of 100 base windows
Frac
tion
of n
orm
aliz
ed c
over
age
010
2030
40
Mea
n ba
se q
ualit
y
minus
Normalized CoverageWindows at GCBase Quality at GC
Figure 7 Cumulative Probability Distributions of Avg Depth of Coverage of the Bad Promoters
Figure 8 Relative ldquoBad Promotersrdquo coverageCharacterizing and measuring bias in sequence data Ross et al Genome Biology 2013 14R51
0102030405060708090
100
Dept
h of
Seq
uenc
ing
Cove
rage
Bad Promoters
Average Coverage oneTUBE Average Coverage microTUBE
Figure 9
AFA-TUBE
Figure 8Bad Promoters List Analysis for WGS DataldquoCharacterizing and measuring bias in sequence datardquo from Ross et al describes a set of 1000 promoters with the lowest relative coverage
(based on an Illumina data set) and called this list the lsquobad promotersrsquo list These ldquoBad Promoters (BP)rdquo are GC-rich (averaging 79 GC
composition)
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
8
USA Covaris Inc | Tel +1 7819323959 | Fax +1 7819328705 | Email customerservicecovariscomEurope Covaris Ltd | Tel +44 (0)845 872 0100 | Fax +44 (0)845 384 9160 | Email emeacustomerservicecovariscomWeb wwwcovariscom | Applications applicationsupportcovariscom | Service and Support techsupportcovariscomM020072_RevB_Apr2019 | Information subject to change without notice | For research only | Not for use in diagnostic procedures | 2019copy Covaris Inc
Stay Connected
ConclusionCombination of DNA shearing in the AFA-TUBE with Swift Biosciences Accel-NGS 2S Kit enables for the first time DNA shearing end repair
and adapter ligation in the same vessel thereby eliminating cumbersome sample transfers and enabling a streamlined workflow Sequencing
performance metrics in AFA-TUBE are matching or exceeding current benchmark consisting of shearing in microTUBE and then transferring into a
PCR plate for library construction
DNA Shearing with the 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate demonstrates robust performances For both conditions analyzed 150 and 350 bp the 48
technical replicates display highly reproducible and tight DNA fragment size distributions Testing performances with different DNA mass also
highlight that as expected with mechanical DNA shearing the protocols are robust across a wide input range
Artificial Microbial Community (AMC) Sequencing data show no adverse biases in coverage uniformity with PCR-free and PCR libraries at inputs
ranging from 1 ng to 100 ng and DNA from species with varying GC
Whole Genome Sequencing on HiSeq X Ten shows an even coverage across the human genome and similar insert size distribution between
AFA-TUBE and microTUBE libraries ldquoBad Promotersrdquo list in depth analysis shows an equivalent coverage between microTUBE and AFA-TUBE
Visit wwwcovariscom and wwwswiftbioscicom for more information
- Button 24
- Button 25
- Button 26
- Button 27
- Button 28
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
5
Table 1 Evaluation of sample input and base composition bias
Input Application DNA Covaris Vessel
Mean Fragment
Size (target)Number of Replicates
Mean Fold Coverage
Percent 0X
Coverage
Percent ge30X
Coverage
Percent ge20X
Coverage
100 ng PCR-free
Microbial Mix96 AFA-TUBE
TPX Plate350 bp
4 47x 011 972 986
Microbial Mix microTUBE 4 47x 065 972 986
1 ng9 PCR Cycles
Microbial Mix96 AFA-TUBE
TPX Plate350 bp
4 35x 069 977 988
Microbial Mix microTUBE - - - - -
Figure 5 Picard plots of whole genome sequencing of 100 and 1 ng bacterial DNA mix libraries
100 ng
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
96 oneTUBE-10 AFA Plate microTUBE
100 ng
1 ng
Figure 6
microTUBE
96 oneTUBE-10 AFA Plate microTUBE
100 ng
1 ng
Figure 6
Artificial Microbial Community (AMC) SequencingWe constructed an Artificial Microbial Community (AMC) to study library complexity coverage and bias The AMC is composed of 3 unique
microbial genomes that contain a unique baseline GC composition Each genomic DNA species was pooled with equivalent genome copy
number The AMC genome has a 16565915 bp genome territory
- Escherichia coli (ATCC 10798D-5) 51 GC
- Streptomyces avermitilis (ATCC 31267D-5) 71 GC
- Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923D-5) 33 GC
Libraries were constructed as described in Figure 3 PCR-free libraries from 100 ng and amplified libraries from 1ng of the AMC Low pass
sequencing was carried out on an Illumina MiSeq For each condition two libraries were constructed one in the 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
and one with microTUBE for DNA Shearing and subsequent transfer to PCR plate for library construction (control library)
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
6
Whole Genome Sequencing on HiSeq X TenPCR-free WGS libraries were constructed as described in Figure 3 using 200 ng Coriell NA12878 genomic DNA For each condition two
libraries were constructed one entirely in the 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate and one with microTUBE for DNA Shearing and subsequent transfer
to PCR plate for library construction (control library) Sequencing was carried out by Novogene on the Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform Post
sequencing following exclusion filters were applied before analysis ( exclusion for AFA-TUBE and microTUBE libraries respectively)
- Low mapping quality reads 47 and 47
- Duplicate exclusion 83 and 79
- Low base quality 45 and 42
- Second observation from an insert with overlapping reads 2 and 41
Table 2 WGS PCR-free Libraries
Input Amplification DNA Covaris Vessel Mean Fragment size (target) Number of replicates
200 ng PCR-free NA1287896 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
350 bp 4microTUBE
Alignment Summary Table
WGS Coverage Table
Table 3 WGS coverage and alignment tables
Mean Coverage
MedianCoverage PCT_5X PCT_10X PCT_15X PCT_20X PCT_25X
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
341 34 981 978 974 965 918
microTUBE 326 33 980 977 973 960 892
Total Reads PF_READS_ALIGNED
PCT_PF_READS _ALIGNED
PF_HQ_ALIGNED _BASES
PF_HQ_ALIGNED _Q20_BASES
PCT_READS_ALIGNED _IN_PAIRS
PCT_ADAPTER_ Dimer
96 AFA-TUBETPX Plate
855785748 854357548 9983 60306787476 58766369045 9886 001
microTUBE 833328788 831857134 9982 58623160032 57180420381 9903 001
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
7
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
microTUBE
microTUBE
Figure 6 Picard plots of 200 ng PCR-free WGS libraries
0 20 40 60 80 100
00
05
10
15
20
All Reads Level All Reads GC Bias Plot
GC of 100 base windows
Frac
tion
of n
orm
aliz
ed c
over
age
010
2030
40
Mea
n ba
se q
ualit
y
minus
Normalized CoverageWindows at GCBase Quality at GC
0 20 40 60 80 100
00
05
10
15
20
All Reads Level All Reads GC Bias Plot
GC of 100 base windows
Frac
tion
of n
orm
aliz
ed c
over
age
010
2030
40
Mea
n ba
se q
ualit
y
minus
Normalized CoverageWindows at GCBase Quality at GC
Figure 7 Cumulative Probability Distributions of Avg Depth of Coverage of the Bad Promoters
Figure 8 Relative ldquoBad Promotersrdquo coverageCharacterizing and measuring bias in sequence data Ross et al Genome Biology 2013 14R51
0102030405060708090
100
Dept
h of
Seq
uenc
ing
Cove
rage
Bad Promoters
Average Coverage oneTUBE Average Coverage microTUBE
Figure 9
AFA-TUBE
Figure 8Bad Promoters List Analysis for WGS DataldquoCharacterizing and measuring bias in sequence datardquo from Ross et al describes a set of 1000 promoters with the lowest relative coverage
(based on an Illumina data set) and called this list the lsquobad promotersrsquo list These ldquoBad Promoters (BP)rdquo are GC-rich (averaging 79 GC
composition)
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
8
USA Covaris Inc | Tel +1 7819323959 | Fax +1 7819328705 | Email customerservicecovariscomEurope Covaris Ltd | Tel +44 (0)845 872 0100 | Fax +44 (0)845 384 9160 | Email emeacustomerservicecovariscomWeb wwwcovariscom | Applications applicationsupportcovariscom | Service and Support techsupportcovariscomM020072_RevB_Apr2019 | Information subject to change without notice | For research only | Not for use in diagnostic procedures | 2019copy Covaris Inc
Stay Connected
ConclusionCombination of DNA shearing in the AFA-TUBE with Swift Biosciences Accel-NGS 2S Kit enables for the first time DNA shearing end repair
and adapter ligation in the same vessel thereby eliminating cumbersome sample transfers and enabling a streamlined workflow Sequencing
performance metrics in AFA-TUBE are matching or exceeding current benchmark consisting of shearing in microTUBE and then transferring into a
PCR plate for library construction
DNA Shearing with the 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate demonstrates robust performances For both conditions analyzed 150 and 350 bp the 48
technical replicates display highly reproducible and tight DNA fragment size distributions Testing performances with different DNA mass also
highlight that as expected with mechanical DNA shearing the protocols are robust across a wide input range
Artificial Microbial Community (AMC) Sequencing data show no adverse biases in coverage uniformity with PCR-free and PCR libraries at inputs
ranging from 1 ng to 100 ng and DNA from species with varying GC
Whole Genome Sequencing on HiSeq X Ten shows an even coverage across the human genome and similar insert size distribution between
AFA-TUBE and microTUBE libraries ldquoBad Promotersrdquo list in depth analysis shows an equivalent coverage between microTUBE and AFA-TUBE
Visit wwwcovariscom and wwwswiftbioscicom for more information
- Button 24
- Button 25
- Button 26
- Button 27
- Button 28
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
6
Whole Genome Sequencing on HiSeq X TenPCR-free WGS libraries were constructed as described in Figure 3 using 200 ng Coriell NA12878 genomic DNA For each condition two
libraries were constructed one entirely in the 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate and one with microTUBE for DNA Shearing and subsequent transfer
to PCR plate for library construction (control library) Sequencing was carried out by Novogene on the Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform Post
sequencing following exclusion filters were applied before analysis ( exclusion for AFA-TUBE and microTUBE libraries respectively)
- Low mapping quality reads 47 and 47
- Duplicate exclusion 83 and 79
- Low base quality 45 and 42
- Second observation from an insert with overlapping reads 2 and 41
Table 2 WGS PCR-free Libraries
Input Amplification DNA Covaris Vessel Mean Fragment size (target) Number of replicates
200 ng PCR-free NA1287896 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
350 bp 4microTUBE
Alignment Summary Table
WGS Coverage Table
Table 3 WGS coverage and alignment tables
Mean Coverage
MedianCoverage PCT_5X PCT_10X PCT_15X PCT_20X PCT_25X
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
341 34 981 978 974 965 918
microTUBE 326 33 980 977 973 960 892
Total Reads PF_READS_ALIGNED
PCT_PF_READS _ALIGNED
PF_HQ_ALIGNED _BASES
PF_HQ_ALIGNED _Q20_BASES
PCT_READS_ALIGNED _IN_PAIRS
PCT_ADAPTER_ Dimer
96 AFA-TUBETPX Plate
855785748 854357548 9983 60306787476 58766369045 9886 001
microTUBE 833328788 831857134 9982 58623160032 57180420381 9903 001
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
7
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
microTUBE
microTUBE
Figure 6 Picard plots of 200 ng PCR-free WGS libraries
0 20 40 60 80 100
00
05
10
15
20
All Reads Level All Reads GC Bias Plot
GC of 100 base windows
Frac
tion
of n
orm
aliz
ed c
over
age
010
2030
40
Mea
n ba
se q
ualit
y
minus
Normalized CoverageWindows at GCBase Quality at GC
0 20 40 60 80 100
00
05
10
15
20
All Reads Level All Reads GC Bias Plot
GC of 100 base windows
Frac
tion
of n
orm
aliz
ed c
over
age
010
2030
40
Mea
n ba
se q
ualit
y
minus
Normalized CoverageWindows at GCBase Quality at GC
Figure 7 Cumulative Probability Distributions of Avg Depth of Coverage of the Bad Promoters
Figure 8 Relative ldquoBad Promotersrdquo coverageCharacterizing and measuring bias in sequence data Ross et al Genome Biology 2013 14R51
0102030405060708090
100
Dept
h of
Seq
uenc
ing
Cove
rage
Bad Promoters
Average Coverage oneTUBE Average Coverage microTUBE
Figure 9
AFA-TUBE
Figure 8Bad Promoters List Analysis for WGS DataldquoCharacterizing and measuring bias in sequence datardquo from Ross et al describes a set of 1000 promoters with the lowest relative coverage
(based on an Illumina data set) and called this list the lsquobad promotersrsquo list These ldquoBad Promoters (BP)rdquo are GC-rich (averaging 79 GC
composition)
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
8
USA Covaris Inc | Tel +1 7819323959 | Fax +1 7819328705 | Email customerservicecovariscomEurope Covaris Ltd | Tel +44 (0)845 872 0100 | Fax +44 (0)845 384 9160 | Email emeacustomerservicecovariscomWeb wwwcovariscom | Applications applicationsupportcovariscom | Service and Support techsupportcovariscomM020072_RevB_Apr2019 | Information subject to change without notice | For research only | Not for use in diagnostic procedures | 2019copy Covaris Inc
Stay Connected
ConclusionCombination of DNA shearing in the AFA-TUBE with Swift Biosciences Accel-NGS 2S Kit enables for the first time DNA shearing end repair
and adapter ligation in the same vessel thereby eliminating cumbersome sample transfers and enabling a streamlined workflow Sequencing
performance metrics in AFA-TUBE are matching or exceeding current benchmark consisting of shearing in microTUBE and then transferring into a
PCR plate for library construction
DNA Shearing with the 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate demonstrates robust performances For both conditions analyzed 150 and 350 bp the 48
technical replicates display highly reproducible and tight DNA fragment size distributions Testing performances with different DNA mass also
highlight that as expected with mechanical DNA shearing the protocols are robust across a wide input range
Artificial Microbial Community (AMC) Sequencing data show no adverse biases in coverage uniformity with PCR-free and PCR libraries at inputs
ranging from 1 ng to 100 ng and DNA from species with varying GC
Whole Genome Sequencing on HiSeq X Ten shows an even coverage across the human genome and similar insert size distribution between
AFA-TUBE and microTUBE libraries ldquoBad Promotersrdquo list in depth analysis shows an equivalent coverage between microTUBE and AFA-TUBE
Visit wwwcovariscom and wwwswiftbioscicom for more information
- Button 24
- Button 25
- Button 26
- Button 27
- Button 28
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
7
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate
microTUBE
microTUBE
Figure 6 Picard plots of 200 ng PCR-free WGS libraries
0 20 40 60 80 100
00
05
10
15
20
All Reads Level All Reads GC Bias Plot
GC of 100 base windows
Frac
tion
of n
orm
aliz
ed c
over
age
010
2030
40
Mea
n ba
se q
ualit
y
minus
Normalized CoverageWindows at GCBase Quality at GC
0 20 40 60 80 100
00
05
10
15
20
All Reads Level All Reads GC Bias Plot
GC of 100 base windows
Frac
tion
of n
orm
aliz
ed c
over
age
010
2030
40
Mea
n ba
se q
ualit
y
minus
Normalized CoverageWindows at GCBase Quality at GC
Figure 7 Cumulative Probability Distributions of Avg Depth of Coverage of the Bad Promoters
Figure 8 Relative ldquoBad Promotersrdquo coverageCharacterizing and measuring bias in sequence data Ross et al Genome Biology 2013 14R51
0102030405060708090
100
Dept
h of
Seq
uenc
ing
Cove
rage
Bad Promoters
Average Coverage oneTUBE Average Coverage microTUBE
Figure 9
AFA-TUBE
Figure 8Bad Promoters List Analysis for WGS DataldquoCharacterizing and measuring bias in sequence datardquo from Ross et al describes a set of 1000 promoters with the lowest relative coverage
(based on an Illumina data set) and called this list the lsquobad promotersrsquo list These ldquoBad Promoters (BP)rdquo are GC-rich (averaging 79 GC
composition)
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
8
USA Covaris Inc | Tel +1 7819323959 | Fax +1 7819328705 | Email customerservicecovariscomEurope Covaris Ltd | Tel +44 (0)845 872 0100 | Fax +44 (0)845 384 9160 | Email emeacustomerservicecovariscomWeb wwwcovariscom | Applications applicationsupportcovariscom | Service and Support techsupportcovariscomM020072_RevB_Apr2019 | Information subject to change without notice | For research only | Not for use in diagnostic procedures | 2019copy Covaris Inc
Stay Connected
ConclusionCombination of DNA shearing in the AFA-TUBE with Swift Biosciences Accel-NGS 2S Kit enables for the first time DNA shearing end repair
and adapter ligation in the same vessel thereby eliminating cumbersome sample transfers and enabling a streamlined workflow Sequencing
performance metrics in AFA-TUBE are matching or exceeding current benchmark consisting of shearing in microTUBE and then transferring into a
PCR plate for library construction
DNA Shearing with the 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate demonstrates robust performances For both conditions analyzed 150 and 350 bp the 48
technical replicates display highly reproducible and tight DNA fragment size distributions Testing performances with different DNA mass also
highlight that as expected with mechanical DNA shearing the protocols are robust across a wide input range
Artificial Microbial Community (AMC) Sequencing data show no adverse biases in coverage uniformity with PCR-free and PCR libraries at inputs
ranging from 1 ng to 100 ng and DNA from species with varying GC
Whole Genome Sequencing on HiSeq X Ten shows an even coverage across the human genome and similar insert size distribution between
AFA-TUBE and microTUBE libraries ldquoBad Promotersrdquo list in depth analysis shows an equivalent coverage between microTUBE and AFA-TUBE
Visit wwwcovariscom and wwwswiftbioscicom for more information
- Button 24
- Button 25
- Button 26
- Button 27
- Button 28
Covaris Application Note | wwwcovariscom
8
USA Covaris Inc | Tel +1 7819323959 | Fax +1 7819328705 | Email customerservicecovariscomEurope Covaris Ltd | Tel +44 (0)845 872 0100 | Fax +44 (0)845 384 9160 | Email emeacustomerservicecovariscomWeb wwwcovariscom | Applications applicationsupportcovariscom | Service and Support techsupportcovariscomM020072_RevB_Apr2019 | Information subject to change without notice | For research only | Not for use in diagnostic procedures | 2019copy Covaris Inc
Stay Connected
ConclusionCombination of DNA shearing in the AFA-TUBE with Swift Biosciences Accel-NGS 2S Kit enables for the first time DNA shearing end repair
and adapter ligation in the same vessel thereby eliminating cumbersome sample transfers and enabling a streamlined workflow Sequencing
performance metrics in AFA-TUBE are matching or exceeding current benchmark consisting of shearing in microTUBE and then transferring into a
PCR plate for library construction
DNA Shearing with the 96 AFA-TUBE TPX Plate demonstrates robust performances For both conditions analyzed 150 and 350 bp the 48
technical replicates display highly reproducible and tight DNA fragment size distributions Testing performances with different DNA mass also
highlight that as expected with mechanical DNA shearing the protocols are robust across a wide input range
Artificial Microbial Community (AMC) Sequencing data show no adverse biases in coverage uniformity with PCR-free and PCR libraries at inputs
ranging from 1 ng to 100 ng and DNA from species with varying GC
Whole Genome Sequencing on HiSeq X Ten shows an even coverage across the human genome and similar insert size distribution between
AFA-TUBE and microTUBE libraries ldquoBad Promotersrdquo list in depth analysis shows an equivalent coverage between microTUBE and AFA-TUBE
Visit wwwcovariscom and wwwswiftbioscicom for more information
- Button 24
- Button 25
- Button 26
- Button 27
- Button 28