combination antihypertensive therapy lowers stroke risk

1
Inpharma 1308 - 6 Oct 2001 Wang say that the target should be normal BP (< Combination antihypertensive 130/85mm Hg) and note that combination therapy will therapy lowers stroke risk be required in most patients to achieve this level of BP control. Combination therapy with perindopril and As increasing numbers of patients will be eligible for indapamide lowers the risk of stroke in patients with a BP-lowering therapy on the basis of the findings of history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), PROGRESS, Drs Staessen and Wang say that further reports the multinational PROGRESS * Collaborative research should be conducted to clarify whether drug Group. 1 classes that are more expensive than diuretics (such as PROGRESS involved 6105 patients with a history of ACE inhibitors) should be used as initial BP-lowering stroke or TIA during the previous 5 years who were therapy for secondary stroke prevention. considered to have no definite indication for, or contraindication to, ACE inhibitor therapy. ** Patients * Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study were randomised to receive active therapy based on ** The study was supported in part by Servier. perindopril 4 mg/day (n = 3051) or placebo. Of the 1. PROGRESS Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of a perindopril-based patients who were judged to have no specific indication blood-pressure-lowering regimen among 6105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Lancet 358: 1033-1041, 29 Sep 2001. for, or contraindication to, diuretic treatment, those in 2. Staessen JA, et al. Blood-pressure lowering for the secondary prevention of the active therapy group received additional indapamide stroke. Lancet 358: 1026-1027, 29 Sep 2001. 2 or 2.5 mg/day and those in the placebo group received 800840842 a second placebo (1770 and 1774 patients, » Editorial comment: Results from this study were presented respectively). The mean duration of follow-up was 3.9 at the 17th World Congress of Neurology, held in London, UK, years. in June 2001 [see Inpharma 1297: 14, 21 Jul 2001; 800840675]. Risk reduction for different stroke subtypes During follow-up, stroke occurred in 10 and 14% of patients in the active therapy and placebo groups, respectively (relative risk reduction 28%; 95% CI 17–38%). The benefit of active therapy was seen for fatal or disabling strokes and for less severe strokes, and for ischaemic stroke or cerebral haemorrhage. Active therapy, compared with placebo, was also associated with a reduction in the risk of major vascular events (relative risk reduction 26%; 95% CI 16–34%). Recipients of perindopril plus indapamide, compared with double placebo, had a significantly lower stroke risk (relative risk reduction 43%; 95% CI 30–54%) and risk of any major vascular event (40%; 29–49%); such significant differences were not seen when recipients of perindopril alone were compared with patients given single placebo. The researchers note that there was significant heterogeneity in the magnitude of these treatment effects. Reductions in the risks of stroke and major vascular events were similar among patients with or without hypertension; in both of these patient subgroups, perindopril plus indapamide seemed to provide similar advantages over perindopril alone. Therapeutic implications The researchers conclude that their findings ‘should have implications for the care of a large proportion of all patients who survive stroke or transient ischaemic attack’. They suggest that for patients presenting with acute stroke or TIA, starting treatment at hospital discharge or at a post-discharge follow-up visit should be considered. The researchers also believe that general practitioners should consider starting treatment at the next visit in patients who have previously experienced a stroke or TIA. They say that while treatment may start with monotherapy, ‘the objective should be to move patients onto combination therapy as soon as possible’. Discussing the translation of these study results into clinical practice, Drs Jan Staessen and Jiguang Wang from the University of Leuven, Belgium, say that until expert committees have reached a consensus, it would be reasonable to start or intensify BP-lowering therapy in patients who are middle aged or older, have experienced a cerebrovascular event during the period from 2 weeks to 5 years prior, are clinically stable and who have no contraindications to such therapy. 2 Drs Staessen and 1 Inpharma 6 Oct 2001 No. 1308 1173-8324/10/1308-0001/$14.95 Adis © 2010 Springer International Publishing AG. All rights reserved

Post on 13-Dec-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Combination antihypertensive therapy lowers stroke risk

Inpharma 1308 - 6 Oct 2001

Wang say that the target should be normal BP (<Combination antihypertensive130/85mm Hg) and note that combination therapy willtherapy lowers stroke risk be required in most patients to achieve this level of BPcontrol.Combination therapy with perindopril and

As increasing numbers of patients will be eligible forindapamide lowers the risk of stroke in patients with aBP-lowering therapy on the basis of the findings ofhistory of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA),PROGRESS, Drs Staessen and Wang say that furtherreports the multinational PROGRESS* Collaborativeresearch should be conducted to clarify whether drugGroup.1classes that are more expensive than diuretics (such asPROGRESS involved 6105 patients with a history ofACE inhibitors) should be used as initial BP-loweringstroke or TIA during the previous 5 years who weretherapy for secondary stroke prevention.considered to have no definite indication for, or

contraindication to, ACE inhibitor therapy.** Patients * Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Studywere randomised to receive active therapy based on ** The study was supported in part by Servier.perindopril 4 mg/day (n = 3051) or placebo. Of the

1. PROGRESS Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of a perindopril-basedpatients who were judged to have no specific indication blood-pressure-lowering regimen among 6105 individuals with previous stroke

or transient ischaemic attack. Lancet 358: 1033-1041, 29 Sep 2001.for, or contraindication to, diuretic treatment, those in2. Staessen JA, et al. Blood-pressure lowering for the secondary prevention ofthe active therapy group received additional indapamide stroke. Lancet 358: 1026-1027, 29 Sep 2001.

2 or 2.5 mg/day and those in the placebo group received 800840842

a second placebo (1770 and 1774 patients, » Editorial comment: Results from this study were presentedrespectively). The mean duration of follow-up was 3.9at the 17th World Congress of Neurology, held in London, UK,years. in June 2001 [see Inpharma 1297: 14, 21 Jul 2001; 800840675].

Risk reduction for different stroke subtypesDuring follow-up, stroke occurred in 10 and 14% of

patients in the active therapy and placebo groups,respectively (relative risk reduction 28%; 95% CI17–38%). The benefit of active therapy was seen for fatalor disabling strokes and for less severe strokes, and forischaemic stroke or cerebral haemorrhage. Activetherapy, compared with placebo, was also associatedwith a reduction in the risk of major vascular events(relative risk reduction 26%; 95% CI 16–34%).

Recipients of perindopril plus indapamide, comparedwith double placebo, had a significantly lower strokerisk (relative risk reduction 43%; 95% CI 30–54%) andrisk of any major vascular event (40%; 29–49%); suchsignificant differences were not seen when recipients ofperindopril alone were compared with patients givensingle placebo. The researchers note that there wassignificant heterogeneity in the magnitude of thesetreatment effects. Reductions in the risks of stroke andmajor vascular events were similar among patients withor without hypertension; in both of these patientsubgroups, perindopril plus indapamide seemed toprovide similar advantages over perindopril alone.

Therapeutic implicationsThe researchers conclude that their findings ‘should

have implications for the care of a large proportion of allpatients who survive stroke or transient ischaemicattack’. They suggest that for patients presenting withacute stroke or TIA, starting treatment at hospitaldischarge or at a post-discharge follow-up visit shouldbe considered. The researchers also believe that generalpractitioners should consider starting treatment at thenext visit in patients who have previously experienced astroke or TIA. They say that while treatment may startwith monotherapy, ‘the objective should be to movepatients onto combination therapy as soon as possible’.

Discussing the translation of these study results intoclinical practice, Drs Jan Staessen and Jiguang Wangfrom the University of Leuven, Belgium, say that untilexpert committees have reached a consensus, it wouldbe reasonable to start or intensify BP-lowering therapy inpatients who are middle aged or older, have experienceda cerebrovascular event during the period from 2 weeksto 5 years prior, are clinically stable and who have nocontraindications to such therapy.2 Drs Staessen and

1

Inpharma 6 Oct 2001 No. 13081173-8324/10/1308-0001/$14.95 Adis © 2010 Springer International Publishing AG. All rights reserved